Talk:DMAIC

Feedback on Abstract:

I'm unsure whether or not your abstract at this point is complete, however find my feedback below.

Text clarity & language	Good, however there's a few mistakes (e.g. "it is almost impossible to measure and improve, if you do now know where to start." - you probably meant "if you do not know where to start.")
Description of the tool/theory/concept	Good.
Article purpose explanation	Well elaborated.
Relevance to curriculum	Relevant
References	Make sure to add references wherever needed.

Mads Mohr Madsen Question 1 Quality of the summary: Does the summary make the key focus, insights and/or contribution of the article clear?

• A: Yes.

What would you suggest to improve?

• A:

Question 2 Structure and logic of the article: Is the argument clear?

• A: yes

Is there a logical flow to the article?

• A: yes

Does one part build upon the other?

• A: yes

Is the article consistent in its argument and free of contradictions?

• A: yes

What would you suggest to improve?

• A: stucture is fine

Question 3 Grammar and style: Is the writing free of grammatical and spelling errors?

• A: yes

Is the language precise without unnecessary fill words?

• A: yes

Question 4 Figures and tables: Are figures and tables clear?

• A: its quite big. However, are you sure you are allowed to use it? Maybe check this with the TA's.

Do they summarize the key points of the article in a meaningful way?

• A: yes

What would you suggest to improve?

• A: talk more about the figure, rather than just "check the figure if you need to see when to use this tool"

Question 5 Interest and relevance: Is the article of high practical and / or academic relevance?

• A: medium

Is it made clear in the article why / how it is relevant?

• A: no. There could have been more about when to use this method and when not to, pros and cons stuff like that.

Question 6 Depth of treatment: Is the article interesting for a practitioner or academic to read?

• A: no

Does it make a significant contribution beyond a cursory web search?

• A: no

Question 7 Annotated bibliography: Does the article properly cite and acknowledge previous work?

• A: yes

Does it briefly summarize the key references at the end of the article?

• A: no and there is mainly websites, where as in this course they have said quite clearly that they prefer books.

Is it based on empirical data instead of opinion?

• A: Yes

General comment: I think it is a fine article, however I think it is introducing a lot of tools very briefly. I think a discussion on when to use these or a deeper presentation of some of the tools would make it a lot stronger.