Talk:Agile One Page Project Management: Difference between revisions

From DTU ProjectLab
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older editNewer edit →
Line 2: Line 2:


{|
{|
|'''Text clarity & language'''|| The text is very coherent.
|'''Text clarity & language'''|| The text is okay, however there's a few grammatical errors.
|-
|-
|'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Very good.
|'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Good. However, a short description of "Agile One Page Project Management" would be beneficial.
|-
|-
|'''Article purpose explanation'''|| Missing. Keep up the good work and make sure to include an explanation of the article purpose.
|'''Article purpose explanation'''|| Well elaborated. However, do you have permission to mention "LEO Pharma A/S" in your article? Best practice is just to mention "based on a pharmaceutical company/pharmaceutical industry."
|-
|-
|'''Relevance to curriculum '''|| Relevant
|'''Relevance to curriculum '''|| Relevant
|-
|-
|'''References'''|| Add some references in your abstract, if needed.
|'''References'''|| Good references.
|}
|}

Revision as of 22:02, 18 February 2019

Feedback on Abstract:

Text clarity & language The text is okay, however there's a few grammatical errors.
Description of the tool/theory/concept Good. However, a short description of "Agile One Page Project Management" would be beneficial.
Article purpose explanation Well elaborated. However, do you have permission to mention "LEO Pharma A/S" in your article? Best practice is just to mention "based on a pharmaceutical company/pharmaceutical industry."
Relevance to curriculum Relevant
References Good references.
Retrieved from "http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:Agile_One_Page_Project_Management&oldid=61989"