Talk:Agile One Page Project Management: Difference between revisions

From DTU ProjectLab
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older editNewer edit →
Line 2: Line 2:


{|
{|
|'''Text clarity & language'''|| The text is good, but there's quite a few grammatical mistakes.
|'''Text clarity & language'''|| The text is very coherent.
|-
|-
|'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Good, but a short description of Agile One Page Project Management can be added. Also, do you have permission to include LEO Pharma A/S? It's best practice to just mention "a healthcare company."
|'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Very good.
|-
|-
|'''Article purpose explanation'''|| Good
|'''Article purpose explanation'''|| Missing. Keep up the good work and make sure to include an explanation of the article purpose.
|-
|-
|'''Relevance to curriculum '''|| Relevant
|'''Relevance to curriculum '''|| Relevant
|-
|-
|'''References'''|| Good references
|'''References'''|| Add some references in your abstract, if needed.
|}
|}

Revision as of 21:53, 18 February 2019

Feedback on Abstract:

Text clarity & language The text is very coherent.
Description of the tool/theory/concept Very good.
Article purpose explanation Missing. Keep up the good work and make sure to include an explanation of the article purpose.
Relevance to curriculum Relevant
References Add some references in your abstract, if needed.
Retrieved from "http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:Agile_One_Page_Project_Management&oldid=61986"