Talk:The Gantt Chart: Difference between revisions

From DTU ProjectLab
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page with "Anna: I like your topic idea and that it focuses on a single project management tool. It also seem that you have read and understood the structure requirements."
 
Nannats (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Anna: I like your topic idea and that it focuses on a single project management tool. It also seem that you have read and understood the structure requirements.
Anna: I like your topic idea and that it focuses on a single project management tool. It also seem that you have read and understood the structure requirements.
'''Review 1, Nannats'''
* Generally, the whole article is easy to understand, which is nice. But be aware of the language do not become too much ’spoken’ language, and too long sentences.
* I like the example with the light – also easy to understand :-)
* I think it is good that you suggest real tools for creating Gantt Charts.
* You mention The Critical Path Method, which is nice! You could consider to link to the Wiki article about the Critical path method. The same as for the WBS.
* There are some spelling errors - watch out for these :-)
* You should consider the layout of the sentence under figure 1 (''"to the Gantt Chart by using arrows as shown in Figure 3.”''), to make it easier for the reader to read.
* The figure 2 is taking up a lot of space. Maybe you could remove some of the white frame in the figure.
* I was a little confused about figure 3, so it might be an idea to explain what a predecessor activity and a successor activity is.
* I think the video is god, but as your article is a bit short, you could consider writing the guide on how to create a Gantt Chart yourself.

Revision as of 18:36, 22 September 2015

Anna: I like your topic idea and that it focuses on a single project management tool. It also seem that you have read and understood the structure requirements.

Review 1, Nannats

  • Generally, the whole article is easy to understand, which is nice. But be aware of the language do not become too much ’spoken’ language, and too long sentences.
  • I like the example with the light – also easy to understand :-)
  • I think it is good that you suggest real tools for creating Gantt Charts.
  • You mention The Critical Path Method, which is nice! You could consider to link to the Wiki article about the Critical path method. The same as for the WBS.
  • There are some spelling errors - watch out for these :-)
  • You should consider the layout of the sentence under figure 1 ("to the Gantt Chart by using arrows as shown in Figure 3.”), to make it easier for the reader to read.
  • The figure 2 is taking up a lot of space. Maybe you could remove some of the white frame in the figure.
  • I was a little confused about figure 3, so it might be an idea to explain what a predecessor activity and a successor activity is.
  • I think the video is god, but as your article is a bit short, you could consider writing the guide on how to create a Gantt Chart yourself.