Talk:V-Model: Difference between revisions

From DTU ProjectLab
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page with "Anna: Very nice topic and method you have chosen. I don't have a lot of comments as it seems that you are well within the requirements for the article and that you have alread..."
 
S150905 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Anna: Very nice topic and method you have chosen. I don't have a lot of comments as it seems that you are well within the requirements for the article and that you have already created a great structure including the application and limitations.
Anna: Very nice topic and method you have chosen. I don't have a lot of comments as it seems that you are well within the requirements for the article and that you have already created a great structure including the application and limitations.
s150905, Review 1:
Hi, the illustration of the method is really engaging and interesting for the subject
Formal aspects
* The article follow the right method’s structure.
* The few images used are very focused and understandable.
* There is a lack in blank spaces and paragraphs’ division in the section, which might help the reader.
Content
* The introduction is very clear and illustrative.
* The topic clearly developed, underling the essential aspects in a precise way.
* The method description maybe seems sometimes a little much specific and the reader could find difficulties in following the parts depicted; but here the example you have made could act as a helper.
* Not all the references appear to be of high quality

Revision as of 16:00, 22 September 2015

Anna: Very nice topic and method you have chosen. I don't have a lot of comments as it seems that you are well within the requirements for the article and that you have already created a great structure including the application and limitations.

s150905, Review 1: Hi, the illustration of the method is really engaging and interesting for the subject Formal aspects

  • The article follow the right method’s structure.
  • The few images used are very focused and understandable.
  • There is a lack in blank spaces and paragraphs’ division in the section, which might help the reader.

Content

  • The introduction is very clear and illustrative.
  • The topic clearly developed, underling the essential aspects in a precise way.
  • The method description maybe seems sometimes a little much specific and the reader could find difficulties in following the parts depicted; but here the example you have made could act as a helper.
  • Not all the references appear to be of high quality