Talk:Project Vision Statement: Difference between revisions
Created page with "Grammar and spelling: Is the text readable and free of formal errors? The gramme is en general fine. Structure and logical flow: Is every part of the article informative and..." |
No edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Grammar and spelling: Is the text readable and free of formal errors? The gramme is en general fine. | Grammar and spelling: Is the text readable and free of formal errors? | ||
LBH: | |||
- The gramme is en general fine. | |||
Structure and logical flow: Is every part of the article informative and necessary to communicate the core message? | Structure and logical flow: Is every part of the article informative and necessary to communicate the core message? | ||
LBH: | |||
- Be more explicit in the abstract of what it is you want investigate. More than just the examples. | |||
- Second sections headline, is it really called "the big idea"? | |||
- Section "Create a vison", edit the bullet setup. It is a little confusing as it is now. | |||
Content: Is the article convincing? Is it complete? Is it relevant an “deep” enough? What parts do you like? What parts need to be improve | What do you like? | ||
LBH: | |||
- Good and relevant subject and good use of examples. | |||
- What should be improved, and how? Insure that all the sections are connected and supports the one purpose of the article. | |||
Content: Is the article convincing? | |||
LBH: | |||
- Semi. More clarity of the purpose is needed, but if this is defined it will be. | |||
Is it complete? Is it relevant an “deep” enough? | |||
LBH: | |||
More detain of the topic would favour the article. | |||
What parts do you like? | |||
LBH: | |||
- The section with exampels and limitation is good. | |||
What parts need to be improve | |||
LBH: | |||
- More clarity of the purpose of the article in the abstract and throughout the article. | |||
Latest revision as of 16:38, 25 February 2019
Grammar and spelling: Is the text readable and free of formal errors? LBH: - The gramme is en general fine.
Structure and logical flow: Is every part of the article informative and necessary to communicate the core message? LBH: - Be more explicit in the abstract of what it is you want investigate. More than just the examples. - Second sections headline, is it really called "the big idea"? - Section "Create a vison", edit the bullet setup. It is a little confusing as it is now.
What do you like? LBH: - Good and relevant subject and good use of examples. - What should be improved, and how? Insure that all the sections are connected and supports the one purpose of the article.
Content: Is the article convincing? LBH: - Semi. More clarity of the purpose is needed, but if this is defined it will be.
Is it complete? Is it relevant an “deep” enough? LBH: More detain of the topic would favour the article.
What parts do you like? LBH: - The section with exampels and limitation is good.
What parts need to be improve LBH: - More clarity of the purpose of the article in the abstract and throughout the article.