Talk:Value Proposition Canvas - Revision history

Walther Emil Eriksen: /* Feedback 1 | Reviewer name: Julianna Apli */

2018-02-20T08:32:25Z

Feedback 1 | Reviewer name: Julianna Apli

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:32, 20 February 2018
Line 73:		Line 73:

	===Answer 6===		===Answer 6===
	''The article has a nice description about the tool and the relevance of it, however the how-to-use part is a bit unclear. In the abstract it has been mentioned how is it relevant for the project manager, but later in the article it is not elaborated further on. The application chapter is more about what it is and when it is used. Elaborate on these points, and the article will be a lot better for it.''		''The article has a nice description about the tool and the relevance of it, however the how-to-use part is a bit unclear. In the abstract it has been mentioned how is it relevant for the project manager, but later in the article it is not elaborated further on. The application chapter is more about what it is and when it is used, describe the create value canvas point more thoroughly. Elaborate on these points, and the article will be a lot better for it.''

	===Question 7 · TEXT===		===Question 7 · TEXT===

2018-02-19T22:43:06Z

Feedback 2 | Reviewer name: Christopher Emil Søndergaard

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:43, 19 February 2018
Line 150:		Line 150:

	===Answer 5===		===Answer 5===
	''''		''It is well-based why the tool is important to have in mind as a project manager. I would like you to follow more up on the case study.''

	===Question 6===		===Question 6===
Line 162:		Line 162:

	===Answer 6===		===Answer 6===
	''''		''I agree with Juliana that you need to explain more concrete how to use the tool so it will be more manageable. This will make the article even more interesting.''

	===Question 7===		===Question 7===

2018-02-19T22:35:07Z

Answer 7

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:35, 19 February 2018
Line 176:		Line 176:

	===Answer 7===		===Answer 7===
	''There is a good use of references. Be aware of that the references aren't set up in the same way.''		''There is a good use of references. Be aware of that the references aren't set up in different ways. It has to be in the same way.''

	==Abstract Feedback==		==Abstract Feedback==

2018-02-19T22:34:41Z

Answer 7

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:34, 19 February 2018
Line 176:		Line 176:

	===Answer 7===		===Answer 7===
	''There is a good use of references. Be aware that the references aren't set up in the same way.''		''There is a good use of references. Be aware of that the references aren't set up in the same way.''

	==Abstract Feedback==		==Abstract Feedback==

2018-02-19T22:34:16Z

Answer 7

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:34, 19 February 2018
Line 176:		Line 176:

	===Answer 7===		===Answer 7===
	''''		''There is a good use of references. Be aware that the references aren't set up in the same way.''

	==Abstract Feedback==		==Abstract Feedback==

2018-02-19T22:32:32Z

Answer 1

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:32, 19 February 2018
Line 98:		Line 98:

	===Answer 1===		===Answer 1===
	''The summary makes it clear why this is important. You should make it more clear what the article ~~is about~~ by briefly ~~summerising~~ it.''		''The summary makes it clear why this is important. You should make it more clear what sections the article consist of by briefly summerizing it.''

	===Question 2===		===Question 2===

2018-02-19T22:30:32Z

Feedback 2 | Reviewer name: Christopher Emil Søndergaard

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:30, 19 February 2018
Line 98:		Line 98:

	===Answer 1===		===Answer 1===
	''''		''The summary makes it clear why this is important. You should make it more clear what the article is about by briefly summerising it.''

	===Question 2===		===Question 2===

2018-02-19T22:27:14Z

Feedback 2 | Reviewer name: Christopher Emil Søndergaard

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:27, 19 February 2018
Line 114:		Line 114:

	===Answer 2===		===Answer 2===
	''''		''I like the way the article is built up. The section "Application" isn't readable since there are a lot of subtitles. You should make a list og use fonts and space in a better way.''

	===Question 3===		===Question 3===
Line 126:		Line 126:

	===Answer 3===		===Answer 3===
	''''		''Overall the article is well-written even though there are som minor grammatical and spelling errors.''

	===Question 4===		===Question 4===

2018-02-19T22:04:58Z

Feedback 2 | Reviewer name: Christopher Emil Søndergaard

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:04, 19 February 2018
Line 138:		Line 138:

	===Answer 4===		===Answer 4===
	''''		''The figures look good and support your messages in a meaningful way. You should reconsider how they are set up by centre them and add some descriptive text.''

	===Question 5===		===Question 5===

2018-02-19T21:37:12Z

@@ Line 88: / Line 88: @@
 ===Answer 7===
 ''Throughout the article the references are correct and regularly used. Maybe it would be nice to add a few more and a few citations to confirm the article. The annotated bibliography is incomplete, two of the references have a short summary, but it is a bit too short. I would recommend to write a bit longer descriptions about the key references.''
 ==Abstract Feedback==