Talk:V-Model - Revision history

Gaetangarnotel: /* Review 1: s150905 */

2015-09-28T21:20:56Z

Review 1: s150905

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:20, 28 September 2015
Line 29:		Line 29:
	*Understandable description of the model’s limitations and advantages as well		*Understandable description of the model’s limitations and advantages as well
	*Quite few references for so extensive analysis but probably the author’s experience can cover parts of the subject		*Quite few references for so extensive analysis but probably the author’s experience can cover parts of the subject

			==Thanks & answers==
			Dear all,

			Thank you for your comments, they have been important to improve the article. And to answer the second comment, I actually based much of the article on my own experience, which explains why you don't have 10 references but only 5 :)

S150905 at 09:06, 24 September 2015

2015-09-24T09:06:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:06, 24 September 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Anna: Very nice topic and method you have chosen. I don't have a lot of comments as it seems that you are well within the requirements for the article and that you have already created a great structure including the application and limitations.		Anna: Very nice topic and method you have chosen. I don't have a lot of comments as it seems that you are well within the requirements for the article and that you have already created a great structure including the application and limitations.

	~~s150905,~~ Review 1:		==Review 1: s150905==
	Hi, the illustration of the method is really engaging and interesting for the subject		Hi, the illustration of the method is really engaging and interesting for the subject

Ch.filis at 17:52, 22 September 2015

2015-09-22T17:52:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:52, 22 September 2015
Line 14:		Line 14:
	* The method description maybe seems sometimes a little much specific and the reader could find difficulties in following the parts depicted; but here the example you have made could act as a helper.		* The method description maybe seems sometimes a little much specific and the reader could find difficulties in following the parts depicted; but here the example you have made could act as a helper.
	* Not all the references appear to be of high quality		* Not all the references appear to be of high quality


			Ch.filis, Review 2: Hello, and straight to the point. Really analytical explanation and description of the method. I had the opportunity while reading it, to understand how the methods works.

			'''Formal Aspects:'''
			*The article has a logical flow and every part is “built” on another
			*I could not notice any obvious grammar mistakes
			*The images illustrate your writings in a clear and understandable way

			'''Content Aspects:'''
			*The introduction describes the model in a clear way
			*Analysis in depth for all the phases required in order to formulate the model
			*Not so clear how the model was used in the industry
			*Understandable description of the model’s limitations and advantages as well
			*Quite few references for so extensive analysis but probably the author’s experience can cover parts of the subject

S150905 at 16:00, 22 September 2015

2015-09-22T16:00:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:00, 22 September 2015
Line 3:		Line 3:
	s150905, Review 1:		s150905, Review 1:
	Hi, the illustration of the method is really engaging and interesting for the subject		Hi, the illustration of the method is really engaging and interesting for the subject

	Formal aspects		Formal aspects
	* The article follow the right method’s structure.		* The article follow the right method’s structure.

S150905 at 16:00, 22 September 2015

2015-09-22T16:00:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:00, 22 September 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Anna: Very nice topic and method you have chosen. I don't have a lot of comments as it seems that you are well within the requirements for the article and that you have already created a great structure including the application and limitations.		Anna: Very nice topic and method you have chosen. I don't have a lot of comments as it seems that you are well within the requirements for the article and that you have already created a great structure including the application and limitations.

			s150905, Review 1:
			Hi, the illustration of the method is really engaging and interesting for the subject
			Formal aspects
			* The article follow the right method’s structure.
			* The few images used are very focused and understandable.
			* There is a lack in blank spaces and paragraphs’ division in the section, which might help the reader.

			Content
			* The introduction is very clear and illustrative.
			* The topic clearly developed, underling the essential aspects in a precise way.
			* The method description maybe seems sometimes a little much specific and the reader could find difficulties in following the parts depicted; but here the example you have made could act as a helper.
			* Not all the references appear to be of high quality

AnnaGreve: Created page with "Anna: Very nice topic and method you have chosen. I don't have a lot of comments as it seems that you are well within the requirements for the article and that you have alread..."

2015-09-16T14:02:32Z

Created page with "Anna: Very nice topic and method you have chosen. I don't have a lot of comments as it seems that you are well within the requirements for the article and that you have alread..."

New page

Anna: Very nice topic and method you have chosen. I don't have a lot of comments as it seems that you are well within the requirements for the article and that you have already created a great structure including the application and limitations.