Talk:Theory of Constraints - Revision history

Faker: /* Reviewer 2: s141586 */

2015-09-29T15:50:25Z

Reviewer 2: s141586

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:50, 29 September 2015
Line 32:		Line 32:
	• The article is well formatted, but it is still in progress. <br>		• The article is well formatted, but it is still in progress. <br>
	• Missing references. <br>		• Missing references. <br>

	<code>'''I added a few semi-relevant figures, as well as some references.'''</code>		<code>'''I added a few semi-relevant figures, as well as some references.'''</code>

2015-09-29T15:50:14Z

Reviewer 2: s141586

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:50, 29 September 2015
Line 31:		Line 31:
	• It lacks figures. Some figures would help to make it more comprehensive. <br>		• It lacks figures. Some figures would help to make it more comprehensive. <br>
	• The article is well formatted, but it is still in progress. <br>		• The article is well formatted, but it is still in progress. <br>
	• Missing references. ~~<br>~~<br>		• Missing references. <br>
	<code>'''I added a few semi-relevant figures, as well as some references.'''</code>		<code>'''I added a few semi-relevant figures, as well as some references.'''</code>

2015-09-29T15:50:03Z

Reviewer 2: s141586

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:50, 29 September 2015
Line 32:		Line 32:
	• The article is well formatted, but it is still in progress. <br>		• The article is well formatted, but it is still in progress. <br>
	• Missing references. <br><br>		• Missing references. <br><br>

	<code>'''I added a few semi-relevant figures, as well as some references.'''</code>		<code>'''I added a few semi-relevant figures, as well as some references.'''</code>

2015-09-29T15:49:51Z

Reviewer 3, s121408

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:49, 29 September 2015
Line 54:		Line 54:
	*No proper refernce given in the text.		*No proper refernce given in the text.
	*No images shown. Images can improve the content of the article so I would suggest to add some.		*No images shown. Images can improve the content of the article so I would suggest to add some.

			<code>'''Chapters filled, and images and references added.'''</code>

	Content:		Content:
	*There is a good flow of the arguments		*There is a good flow of the arguments
Line 60:		Line 63:
	* As there is no clear connection with management portfolio I do not really see relevant for a practitioner.		* As there is no clear connection with management portfolio I do not really see relevant for a practitioner.
	*It is not well seem the author contribution to the topic. It seems just a description of a tool without any perspective or analysis.		*It is not well seem the author contribution to the topic. It seems just a description of a tool without any perspective or analysis.

			<code>'''I hope the relevance for both the course and a practitioner is more clear, now the article is finished. Also, I hope that "Applications" and "Limitations" has given some depth and perspective to the article.'''</code>

2015-09-29T15:47:30Z

Reviewer 2: s141586

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:47, 29 September 2015
Line 45:		Line 45:
	• There is not a subjective statement from the author; maybe a “discussion” section would be interesting. <br>		• There is not a subjective statement from the author; maybe a “discussion” section would be interesting. <br>

	<code>'''I hope the applications chapter gave more meaning to the topic. I also threw in some relevant cites. I hope the "Limitations" chapter ~~can~~ suffice for the lack of a discussion :)'''</code>		<code>'''I hope the applications chapter gave more meaning to the topic. I also threw in some relevant cites. I hope the "Limitations" chapter will suffice for the lack of a discussion :)'''</code>

	==Reviewer 3, s121408==		==Reviewer 3, s121408==

2015-09-29T15:47:13Z

Reviewer 2: s141586

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:47, 29 September 2015
Line 32:		Line 32:
	• The article is well formatted, but it is still in progress. <br>		• The article is well formatted, but it is still in progress. <br>
	• Missing references. <br><br>		• Missing references. <br><br>

			<code>'''I added a few semi-relevant figures, as well as some references.'''</code>

	Content: <br>		Content: <br>
Line 42:		Line 44:
	• It is not linked to other APPPM articles. <br>		• It is not linked to other APPPM articles. <br>
	• There is not a subjective statement from the author; maybe a “discussion” section would be interesting. <br>		• There is not a subjective statement from the author; maybe a “discussion” section would be interesting. <br>

			<code>'''I hope the applications chapter gave more meaning to the topic. I also threw in some relevant cites. I hope the "Limitations" chapter can suffice for the lack of a discussion :)'''</code>

	==Reviewer 3, s121408==		==Reviewer 3, s121408==
	Formal:		Formal:

2015-09-29T15:43:09Z

Review given by StephSalling, review1

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:43, 29 September 2015
Line 18:		Line 18:
	* It looks like you have attempted to put in references but not succeeded (yet), which makes it hard to judge the sources and objectivity of the article (although it seems very objective).		* It looks like you have attempted to put in references but not succeeded (yet), which makes it hard to judge the sources and objectivity of the article (although it seems very objective).
	* It could maybe be beneficial to link the article to other pages in the APPPM wiki (such as pages with the topic of LEAN?)		* It could maybe be beneficial to link the article to other pages in the APPPM wiki (such as pages with the topic of LEAN?)

			<code>'''I think I managed to get some proper references and cites :)'''</code>

	== Reviewer 2: s141586 ==		== Reviewer 2: s141586 ==

2015-09-29T15:41:47Z

Formal aspects

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:41, 29 September 2015
Line 9:		Line 9:
	* The use of different bullet point styles is good. It could be a good idea to link to some other wiki-pages.		* The use of different bullet point styles is good. It could be a good idea to link to some other wiki-pages.

	<code>''The last parts have been added along with a couple of illustrations. I have also added links to relevant wiki-pages.''</code>		<code>'''The last parts have been added along with a couple of illustrations. I have also added links to relevant wiki-pages.'''</code>

	==== Content aspects ====		==== Content aspects ====

2015-09-29T15:41:10Z

Formal aspects

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:41, 29 September 2015
Line 9:		Line 9:
	* The use of different bullet point styles is good. It could be a good idea to link to some other wiki-pages.		* The use of different bullet point styles is good. It could be a good idea to link to some other wiki-pages.

	''The last parts have been added along with a couple of illustrations. I have also added links to relevant wiki-pages.''		<code>''The last parts have been added along with a couple of illustrations. I have also added links to relevant wiki-pages.''</code>

	==== Content aspects ====		==== Content aspects ====

2015-09-29T15:40:53Z

Review given by StephSalling, review1

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:40, 29 September 2015
Line 9:		Line 9:
	* The use of different bullet point styles is good. It could be a good idea to link to some other wiki-pages.		* The use of different bullet point styles is good. It could be a good idea to link to some other wiki-pages.

	The last parts have been added along with a couple of illustrations. I have also added links to relevant wiki-pages.		''The last parts have been added along with a couple of illustrations. I have also added links to relevant wiki-pages.''

	==== Content aspects ====		==== Content aspects ====