http://13.50.150.85/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Talk%3AStakeholder_analysis 2026-07-16T15:15:04Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.43.3 http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:Stakeholder_analysis&diff=66826&oldid=prev 2019-02-25T16:44:14Z

<p>Created page with &quot;Reviewer : Marie Bukkholm Question 1 · TEXT Quality of the summary: Does the summary make the key focus, insights and/or contribution of the article clear? Yes. What would ...&quot;</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>Reviewer : Marie Bukkholm<br /> Question 1 · TEXT<br /> Quality of the summary:<br /> <br /> Does the summary make the key focus, insights and/or contribution of the article clear? Yes.<br /> <br /> What would you suggest to improve? - <br /> <br /> <br /> Question 2 · TEXT<br /> Structure and logic of the article:<br /> <br /> Is the argument clear? It is hard to say very much about this, as the article is still quite short. <br /> <br /> Is there a logical flow to the article? Yes<br /> <br /> Does one part build upon the other? Not yet. <br /> <br /> Is the article consistent in its argument and free of contradictions? -<br /> <br /> What would you suggest to improve? - <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Question 3 · TEXT<br /> Grammar and style:<br /> <br /> Is the writing free of grammatical and spelling errors? Yes<br /> <br /> Is the language precise without unnecessary fill words? Yes<br /> <br /> What would you suggest to improve? -<br /> <br /> <br /> Question 4 · TEXT<br /> Figures and tables:<br /> <br /> Are figures and tables clear? No figures yet.<br /> <br /> Do they summarize the key points of the article in a meaningful way? -<br /> <br /> What would you suggest to improve? - <br /> <br /> <br /> Question 5 · TEXT<br /> Interest and relevance:<br /> <br /> Is the article of high practical and / or academic relevance? Yes<br /> <br /> Is it made clear in the article why / how it is relevant? Yes, it is logical after reading the text.<br /> <br /> What would you suggest to improve? Could be an idea to write about the influence of stakeholders in a project and what they mean for a project. Maybe some examples?<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Question 6 · TEXT<br /> Depth of treatment:<br /> <br /> Is the article interesting for a practitioner or academic to read? Yes<br /> <br /> Does it make a significant contribution beyond a cursory web search? Not yet<br /> <br /> What would you suggest to improve? Hard to say, as the article is not finished.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Question 7 · TEXT<br /> Annotated bibliography:<br /> <br /> Does the article properly cite and acknowledge previous work? No<br /> <br /> Does it briefly summarize the key references at the end of the article? No<br /> <br /> Is it based on empirical data instead of opinion? Yes<br /> <br /> What would you suggest to improve? More references.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Feedback 2 | Reviewer name: Sandro Pina<br /> Question 1 · TEXT<br /> Quality of the summary:<br /> <br /> Does the summary make the key focus, insights and/or contribution of the article clear?<br /> <br /> What would you suggest to improve?<br /> <br /> Answer 1<br /> Answer here<br /> <br /> Question 2 · TEXT<br /> Structure and logic of the article:<br /> <br /> Is the argument clear?<br /> <br /> Is there a logical flow to the article?<br /> <br /> Does one part build upon the other?<br /> <br /> Is the article consistent in its argument and free of contradictions?<br /> <br /> What would you suggest to improve?<br /> <br /> Answer 2<br /> Answer here<br /> <br /> Question 3 · TEXT<br /> Grammar and style:<br /> <br /> Is the writing free of grammatical and spelling errors?<br /> <br /> Is the language precise without unnecessary fill words?<br /> <br /> What would you suggest to improve?<br /> <br /> Answer 3<br /> Answer here<br /> <br /> Question 4 · TEXT<br /> Figures and tables:<br /> <br /> Are figures and tables clear?<br /> <br /> Do they summarize the key points of the article in a meaningful way?<br /> <br /> What would you suggest to improve?<br /> <br /> Answer 4<br /> Answer here<br /> <br /> Question 5 · TEXT<br /> Interest and relevance:<br /> <br /> Is the article of high practical and / or academic relevance?<br /> <br /> Is it made clear in the article why / how it is relevant?<br /> <br /> What would you suggest to improve?<br /> <br /> Answer 5<br /> Answer here<br /> <br /> Question 6 · TEXT<br /> Depth of treatment:<br /> <br /> Is the article interesting for a practitioner or academic to read?<br /> <br /> Does it make a significant contribution beyond a cursory web search?<br /> <br /> What would you suggest to improve?<br /> <br /> Answer 6<br /> Answer here<br /> <br /> Question 7 · TEXT<br /> Annotated bibliography:<br /> <br /> Does the article properly cite and acknowledge previous work?<br /> <br /> Does it briefly summarize the key references at the end of the article?<br /> <br /> Is it based on empirical data instead of opinion?<br /> <br /> What would you suggest to improve?<br /> <br /> Answer 7<br /> Answer here</div>

S182741