Talk:Stakeholder Analysis Process - Revision history

Char: /* fra johnjohn */

2014-11-28T13:13:25Z

fra johnjohn

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:13, 28 November 2014
Line 32:		Line 32:
	** Could you make any general recommendations from that?		** Could you make any general recommendations from that?
	* ”3. Profile statement”		* ”3. Profile statement”
	** I would really like a visualization example of how the stakeholder profiles could be structured?"Char= Jep, good idea"		** I would really like a visualization example of how the stakeholder profiles could be structured? ''Char= Jep, good idea''
	*4. Strategy for managing stakeholders		*4. Strategy for managing stakeholders
	** I think what you describe is relevant and interesting. I however miss bullet points for the most important elements, or and illustration, or maybe just highlight of the two communication strategies in bold.		** I think what you describe is relevant and interesting. I however miss bullet points for the most important elements, or and illustration, or maybe just highlight of the two communication strategies in bold.

Char: /* fra johnjohn */

2014-11-28T13:12:55Z

fra johnjohn

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:12, 28 November 2014
Line 8:		Line 8:
	* Very few grammatical errors		* Very few grammatical errors
	* References are substantial and of relevance.		* References are substantial and of relevance.
	* Wiki references are ok, I am however a little confused about the fx reference 1 & 2 is the same? Are you aware of that you can use the same reference several times during the article? "Char: perfect, I have correct it"		* Wiki references are ok, I am however a little confused about the fx reference 1 & 2 is the same? Are you aware of that you can use the same reference several times during the article? ''Char: perfect, I have correct it''

	=== Commenst for each section ===		=== Commenst for each section ===
Line 41:		Line 41:


	"Your feedback has been very constructive and good. I have taken many of your suggestions into account."		''Your feedback has been very constructive and good. I have taken many of your suggestions into account.''

Char: /* fra johnjohn */

2014-11-28T13:12:20Z

fra johnjohn

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:12, 28 November 2014
Line 8:		Line 8:
	* Very few grammatical errors		* Very few grammatical errors
	* References are substantial and of relevance.		* References are substantial and of relevance.
	* Wiki references are ok, I am however a little confused about the fx reference 1 & 2 is the same? Are you aware of that you can use the same reference several times during the article?		* Wiki references are ok, I am however a little confused about the fx reference 1 & 2 is the same? Are you aware of that you can use the same reference several times during the article? "Char: perfect, I have correct it"

	=== Commenst for each section ===		=== Commenst for each section ===

Char: /* fra johnjohn */

2014-11-28T12:37:59Z

fra johnjohn

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:37, 28 November 2014
Line 39:		Line 39:
	*What you describe in you discussion that an understanding of the system is important. Maybe you should refer to how stakeholders are identified?		*What you describe in you discussion that an understanding of the system is important. Maybe you should refer to how stakeholders are identified?
	* I like the subjects you discuss they are of high relevance, you mention some interesting perspectives. Maybe you could highlight those and give links and suggestion to further reading in a ”perspectives” section.		* I like the subjects you discuss they are of high relevance, you mention some interesting perspectives. Maybe you could highlight those and give links and suggestion to further reading in a ”perspectives” section.


			"Your feedback has been very constructive and good. I have taken many of your suggestions into account."

Char: /* fra johnjohn */

2014-11-28T12:19:29Z

fra johnjohn

Johnjohn: /* fra johnjohn */ new section

2014-11-25T16:18:17Z

fra johnjohn: new section

New page

== fra johnjohn ==

=== General ===
Overall I really like the structure and content of the article. It is really informative and the content is relevant and concise. I however lack some illustrations. Maybe some illustrative examples supporting some of you main points?

Format:
* Nice and fluent language. Easy understandable.
* Very few grammatical errors
* References are substantial and of relevance.
* Wiki references are ok, I am however a little confused about the fx reference 1 & 2 is the same? Are you aware of that you can use the same reference several times during the article?

=== Commenst for each section ===

Summary:
* Good summary stating the importance of stakeholder analysis relative to management.
* I felt intrigued to read more.
History:
* I like this because it is precise, and give a brief overview.
* Maybe you could briefly state who the people you mention were? Their titles?
* Have you thought of including the different theories from Donaldson and Preston: Instrumental stakeholder theory,Descriptive stakeholder, Normative stakeholder theory ...?

Stakeholder analysis:
* I like the language in this section and how it gives a brief overview.
* Maybe you could include the importance of limiting and framing your stakeholder analysis? Who to include/exclude? What about including the theory of demarcation of the system in order to scope the stakeholder analysis? You could just briefly introduce it and link to other sources?

Stakeholder analysis approach:
* I like that you in bullets state the brief overview and then go into detail.

* Under 1. Identify stakeholders I am wondering how you should handle the identification of these stakeholders? Could you enter them in a map or matrix? Or you a table where you compare them? Like we did in the course? I could also wish for an illustration.

* Under ”2. prioritize stakeholders” I like that you include a figure.
** Could you make any general recommendations from that?
* ”3. Profile statement”
** I would really like a visualization example of how the stakeholder profiles could be structured?
*4. Strategy for managing stakeholders
** I think what you describe is relevant and interesting. I however miss bullet points for the most important elements, or and illustration, or maybe just highlight of the two communication strategies in bold.

Discussion
*What you describe in you discussion that an understanding of the system is important. Maybe you should refer to how stakeholders are identified?
* I like the subjects you discuss they are of high relevance, you mention some interesting perspectives. Maybe you could highlight those and give links and suggestion to further reading in a ”perspectives” section.

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:19, 28 November 2014
Line 17:		Line 17:
	History:		History:
	* I like this because it is precise, and give a brief overview.		* I like this because it is precise, and give a brief overview.
	* Maybe you could briefly state who the people you mention were? Their titles?		* Maybe you could briefly state who the people you mention were? Their titles? ''Char: Good idea, I will do that!''
	* Have you thought of including the different theories from Donaldson and Preston: Instrumental stakeholder theory,Descriptive stakeholder, Normative stakeholder theory ...?		* Have you thought of including the different theories from Donaldson and Preston: Instrumental stakeholder theory,Descriptive stakeholder, Normative stakeholder theory ...? ''Char: Yes I have and I will short mention them. Not so much the different theories, but more that they say that the stakeholder theory consist of different theories.''

	Stakeholder analysis:		Stakeholder analysis:
Line 27:		Line 27:
	* I like that you in bullets state the brief overview and then go into detail.		* I like that you in bullets state the brief overview and then go into detail.

	* Under 1. Identify stakeholders I am wondering how you should handle the identification of these stakeholders? Could you enter them in a map or matrix? Or you a table where you compare them? Like we did in the course? I could also wish for an illustration.		* Under 1. Identify stakeholders I am wondering how you should handle the identification of these stakeholders? Could you enter them in a map or matrix? Or you a table where you compare them? Like we did in the course? I could also wish for an illustration. ''Char: I will make illustration to all the steps- good point. The stakeholders are mapped in step 2, but the stakeholder could be placed in a table in step 1- I will do that''

	* Under ”2. prioritize stakeholders” I like that you include a figure.		* Under ”2. prioritize stakeholders” I like that you include a figure.
	** Could you make any general recommendations from that?		** Could you make any general recommendations from that?
	* ”3. Profile statement”		* ”3. Profile statement”
	** I would really like a visualization example of how the stakeholder profiles could be structured?		** I would really like a visualization example of how the stakeholder profiles could be structured?"Char= Jep, good idea"
	*4. Strategy for managing stakeholders		*4. Strategy for managing stakeholders
	** I think what you describe is relevant and interesting. I however miss bullet points for the most important elements, or and illustration, or maybe just highlight of the two communication strategies in bold.		** I think what you describe is relevant and interesting. I however miss bullet points for the most important elements, or and illustration, or maybe just highlight of the two communication strategies in bold.