Talk:SWOT analysis - Revision history

Dunseiz at 23:54, 1 December 2014

2014-12-01T23:54:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:54, 1 December 2014
Line 13:		Line 13:
	===History===		===History===
	*Boring but okay :)		*Boring but okay :)
			'''''

	===SWOT matrix===		===SWOT matrix===

Dunseiz at 14:06, 1 December 2014

2014-12-01T14:06:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:06, 1 December 2014
Line 9:		Line 9:

	*I like the idea of "...to present the reader with a guide on how to perform a conventional SWOT..." - This should however in my opinion be in the abstract and not in the introduction. Actually i think that you should "slow down" and give a good and deep step by step guide in how to perform a SWOT		*I like the idea of "...to present the reader with a guide on how to perform a conventional SWOT..." - This should however in my opinion be in the abstract and not in the introduction. Actually i think that you should "slow down" and give a good and deep step by step guide in how to perform a SWOT
	'''''Thank you for this comment. I think you are right, the aim of the article should come in the beginning. And the step-by-step guide of the SWOT analysis will stay more or less the same but with an emphasis on the inherent implications ("paramount issues") before the actual guide.		'''''Thank you for this comment. I think you are right, the aim of the article should come in the beginning. And the step-by-step guide of the SWOT analysis will stay more or less the same but with an emphasis on the inherent implications ("paramount issues") before the actual guide, making the reader aware of the "pitfalls".

	===History===		===History===

Dunseiz at 14:04, 1 December 2014

2014-12-01T14:04:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:04, 1 December 2014
Line 9:		Line 9:

	*I like the idea of "...to present the reader with a guide on how to perform a conventional SWOT..." - This should however in my opinion be in the abstract and not in the introduction. Actually i think that you should "slow down" and give a good and deep step by step guide in how to perform a SWOT		*I like the idea of "...to present the reader with a guide on how to perform a conventional SWOT..." - This should however in my opinion be in the abstract and not in the introduction. Actually i think that you should "slow down" and give a good and deep step by step guide in how to perform a SWOT
	'''''Thank you for this comment. I think you are right		'''''Thank you for this comment. I think you are right, the aim of the article should come in the beginning. And the step-by-step guide of the SWOT analysis will stay more or less the same but with an emphasis on the inherent implications ("paramount issues") before the actual guide.

	===History===		===History===

Dunseiz at 13:48, 1 December 2014

2014-12-01T13:48:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:48, 1 December 2014
Line 6:		Line 6:

	*optimisingly treated - I don't like that phrasing :)		*optimisingly treated - I don't like that phrasing :)
	'''''~~neither~~ did I - it is gone'''''		'''''Neither did I - it is gone'''''

	*I like the idea of "...to present the reader with a guide on how to perform a conventional SWOT..." - This should however in my opinion be in the abstract and not in the introduction. Actually i think that you should "slow down" and give a good and deep step by step guide in how to perform a SWOT		*I like the idea of "...to present the reader with a guide on how to perform a conventional SWOT..." - This should however in my opinion be in the abstract and not in the introduction. Actually i think that you should "slow down" and give a good and deep step by step guide in how to perform a SWOT
	'''''~~thank~~ you for this comment. I think you are right		'''''Thank you for this comment. I think you are right

	===History===		===History===

Dunseiz at 11:55, 1 December 2014

2014-12-01T11:55:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:55, 1 December 2014
Line 9:		Line 9:

	*I like the idea of "...to present the reader with a guide on how to perform a conventional SWOT..." - This should however in my opinion be in the abstract and not in the introduction. Actually i think that you should "slow down" and give a good and deep step by step guide in how to perform a SWOT		*I like the idea of "...to present the reader with a guide on how to perform a conventional SWOT..." - This should however in my opinion be in the abstract and not in the introduction. Actually i think that you should "slow down" and give a good and deep step by step guide in how to perform a SWOT
	'''''thank you for this comment		'''''thank you for this comment. I think you are right

	===History===		===History===

Dunseiz at 11:00, 1 December 2014

2014-12-01T11:00:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:00, 1 December 2014
Line 3:		Line 3:
	===Introduction===		===Introduction===
	*..on the contrary many papers, books and articles.. - You must have a bunch of articles ready for reference when writing a statement like this		*..on the contrary many papers, books and articles.. - You must have a bunch of articles ready for reference when writing a statement like this
			'''''That I have ;)'''''

	*optimisingly treated - I don't like that phrasing :)		*optimisingly treated - I don't like that phrasing :)
			'''''neither did I - it is gone'''''

	*I like the idea of "...to present the reader with a guide on how to perform a conventional SWOT..." - This should however in my opinion be in the abstract and not in the introduction. Actually i think that you should "slow down" and give a good and deep step by step guide in how to perform a SWOT		*I like the idea of "...to present the reader with a guide on how to perform a conventional SWOT..." - This should however in my opinion be in the abstract and not in the introduction. Actually i think that you should "slow down" and give a good and deep step by step guide in how to perform a SWOT
			'''''thank you for this comment

	===History===		===History===

User: /* Headlines */

2014-11-26T00:04:06Z

Headlines

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:04, 26 November 2014
Line 61:		Line 61:
	# Introduction		# Introduction
	# History of SWOT Analysis		# History of SWOT Analysis
	# Applications of SWOT Analysises (incl. everything you don’t need for PPPM application)		# Applications/Types of SWOT Analysises (incl. everything you don’t need for PPPM application, but still want to mention)
	# Application of SWOT Analysis in PPPM (maybe sub-sections for int., ext. factors, updating, etc…)		# Application of SWOT Analysis in PPPM (maybe sub-sections for int., ext. factors, updating, etc…)
	# Examples/Best Practice (optional)		# Examples/Best Practice (optional)

User: /* Review by User */

2014-11-26T00:03:13Z

Review by User

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:03, 26 November 2014
Line 20:		Line 20:
	*Remember the conclusion - and write the take home messages very simple		*Remember the conclusion - and write the take home messages very simple

	== Review by User ==		== Review by "User" ==

	Hej APPPM mate!		Hej APPPM mate!
Line 59:		Line 59:
	As you asked for advice regarding your headlines, I will come up with a rough proposal. How about:		As you asked for advice regarding your headlines, I will come up with a rough proposal. How about:

	1. Introduction		# Introduction
	2. History of SWOT Analysis		# History of SWOT Analysis
	3. Applications of SWOT Analysises (incl. everything you don’t need for PPPM application)		# Applications of SWOT Analysises (incl. everything you don’t need for PPPM application)
	4. Application of SWOT Analysis in PPPM (maybe sub-sections for int., ext. factors, updating, etc…)		# Application of SWOT Analysis in PPPM (maybe sub-sections for int., ext. factors, updating, etc…)
	5. Examples/Best Practice (optional)		# Examples/Best Practice (optional)
	6. Reflections		# Reflections
	7. References		# References

	Anyway, I hope my review will be useful for your efforts. All the best!		Anyway, I hope my review will be useful for your efforts. All the best!

	Yours “User”		Yours “User”

User: /* Headlines */

2014-11-26T00:01:49Z

Headlines

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:01, 26 November 2014
Line 56:		Line 56:
	*I really like how you relate the external factors to Porter’s Five Forces etc.. That helps the reader to bring the reader into a line with other models. More of this!!		*I really like how you relate the external factors to Porter’s Five Forces etc.. That helps the reader to bring the reader into a line with other models. More of this!!

	== Headlines ==		=== Headlines ===
	As you asked for advice regarding your headlines, I will come up with a rough proposal. How about:		As you asked for advice regarding your headlines, I will come up with a rough proposal. How about:

User: /* Review by User */

2014-11-26T00:01:37Z

Review by User

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:01, 26 November 2014
Line 24:		Line 24:
	Hej APPPM mate!		Hej APPPM mate!

	Before starting with the feedback I would like to say that I noticed of course, that you are not done with the article, and for me it is okay. Nevertheless am I going to give you some reasonable feedback, with which I might sometimes address some very obvious lacks. So in ~~that~~ case, please don’t feel offended. Let’s go now…		Before starting with the feedback I would like to say that I noticed of course, that you are not done with the article, and for me it is okay. Nevertheless am I going to give you some reasonable feedback, with which I might sometimes address some very obvious lacks. So just in case, please don’t feel offended or annoyed. Let’s go now…

	=== In General ===		=== In General ===