Mieanker: /* Feedback 2 | Reviewer name: ... */

2019-02-25T19:46:16Z

Feedback 2 | Reviewer name: ...

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:46, 25 February 2019
Line 103:		Line 103:
	''Fair amount of sources, maybe more in the application part. I like that you include a Bibliography''		''Fair amount of sources, maybe more in the application part. I like that you include a Bibliography''

	==Feedback 2 \| Reviewer name: ''~~...~~''==		==Feedback 2 \| Reviewer name: ''Mie Anker''==
	===Question 1 · TEXT===		===Question 1 · TEXT===
	'''Quality of the summary:'''		'''Quality of the summary:'''
Line 112:		Line 112:

	===Answer 1===		===Answer 1===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''Good''

	===Question 2 · TEXT===		===Question 2 · TEXT===
Line 128:		Line 128:

	===Answer 2===		===Answer 2===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''Great. The first part "SMART goals” is defiantly he weakest. I will admit that you lost me a bit and I was not sure where you were going. ''

	===Question 3 · TEXT===		===Question 3 · TEXT===
Line 140:		Line 140:

	===Answer 3===		===Answer 3===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''Some grammar errors spread all over the article and the word order – or sentences being a bit cramped, for example “SMART goals are applicable without the use of specialist tools or years of education to everything from your life goals to the creation of a new opera house.”. But all over a good article, nice to read and with well-formed sentences. ''

	===Question 4 · TEXT===		===Question 4 · TEXT===
Line 152:		Line 152:

	===Answer 4===		===Answer 4===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''No figures were used, but I did not miss any illustrations. ''

	===Question 5 · TEXT===		===Question 5 · TEXT===
Line 164:		Line 164:

	===Answer 5===		===Answer 5===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''It is very clear that it is relevant. Maybe use a specific example from a project that used SMART goals? Or didn't and something went wrong''

	===Question 6 · TEXT===		===Question 6 · TEXT===
Line 176:		Line 176:

	===Answer 6===		===Answer 6===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''The article does not make a significant contribution beyond a cursory web search, but the Limitation part sounds like it has the potential of doing so. If the program and portfolio managers are included I don’t know about the title of the article? ''

	===Question 7 · TEXT===		===Question 7 · TEXT===
Line 190:		Line 190:

	===Answer 7===		===Answer 7===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''Good and briefly explains each reference. A bit too subjective with the words “good” and “great”''

MoritzGutheil at 18:52, 25 February 2019

2019-02-25T18:52:43Z

Show changes

Raquel Valente: Created page with "==Feedback on Abstract:== {| |'''Text clarity & language'''|| Good |- |'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Good |- |'''Article purpose explanation'''|| Could be el..."

2019-02-19T10:11:26Z

Created page with "==Feedback on Abstract:== {| |'''Text clarity & language'''|| Good |- |'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Good |- |'''Article purpose explanation'''|| Could be el..."

New page

==Feedback on Abstract:==

{|
|'''Text clarity & language'''|| Good
|-
|'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Good
|-
|'''Article purpose explanation'''|| Could be elaborated
|-
|'''Relevance to curriculum '''|| Relevant. Make sure you clearly relate it to project management and its relevance
|-
|'''References'''|| Don't forget to add the bibliography. Here are some guidelines from DTU Library: https://www.bibliotek.dtu.dk/english/servicemenu/find/reference_management/references

|}

Talk:SMART goals - A Project Manager Tool - Revision history

Mieanker: /* Feedback 2 | Reviewer name: ... */

MoritzGutheil at 18:52, 25 February 2019

Raquel Valente: Created page with "==Feedback on Abstract:== {| |'''Text clarity & language'''|| Good |- |'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Good |- |'''Article purpose explanation'''|| Could be el..."