Talk:SAFe - Revision history

Thanosfotis at 21:29, 25 February 2019

2019-02-25T21:29:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:29, 25 February 2019
Line 93:		Line 93:


	==Feedback 2 \| Reviewer name: ''~~Name~~''==		==Feedback 2 \| Reviewer name: ''Athanasios Fotis''==
	===Question 1 · TEXT===		===Question 1 · TEXT===
	'''Quality of the summary:'''		'''Quality of the summary:'''
Line 102:		Line 102:

	===Answer 1===		===Answer 1===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''Yes. The summary is very well structured and written and it is very clear to the reviewer about the topic which will be further analyzed.''

	===Question 2 · TEXT===		===Question 2 · TEXT===
Line 118:		Line 118:

	===Answer 2===		===Answer 2===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''There is a good logical flow to the article. It is very good that you end with the limitations while you have already described the principles and the actual implementation.
			You are using a lot of arguments in order to explain the topic and the structure you have chosen is very good and clear.''

	===Question 3 · TEXT===		===Question 3 · TEXT===
Line 130:		Line 131:

	===Answer 3===		===Answer 3===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''The are not grammar and spelling errors. Generally the text is well writen''

	===Question 4 · TEXT===		===Question 4 · TEXT===
Line 142:		Line 143:

	===Answer 4===		===Answer 4===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''I like very much the picture you have used because it is very clear and to the point. However, I would like to see more pictures because it doesn't seem consistent regarding the format of the article.''

	===Question 5 · TEXT===		===Question 5 · TEXT===
Line 154:		Line 155:

	===Answer 5===		===Answer 5===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''The topic is really interesting and in my opinion relevant too.''

	===Question 6 · TEXT===		===Question 6 · TEXT===
Line 166:		Line 167:

	===Answer 6===		===Answer 6===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''Regarding the clear methodology I think that it is more interesting for a practitioner. ''

	===Question 7 · TEXT===		===Question 7 · TEXT===
Line 180:		Line 181:

	===Answer 7===		===Answer 7===
	''~~Answer here~~''		'' The citation is good, although I would add and some more references such as PMBOK and ISO. In general it is a great job! You can definitely improve it, but it is clear that this is not the final version.''

Anne at 16:55, 25 February 2019

2019-02-25T16:55:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:55, 25 February 2019
Line 25:		Line 25:
	===Answer 2===		===Answer 2===
	''There is a good logical flow - it is good how you start with the concept and goes into the implementation and finishes with the limitations.		''There is a good logical flow - it is good how you start with the concept and goes into the implementation and finishes with the limitations.
	The argumentation and the explaination of the concept is clear and it is easy to read. It is really nice ~~to break~~ up the text ~~with~~ some bulletpoints and bold text as indication of important things/points. ''		The argumentation and the explaination of the concept is clear and it is easy to read. It is really nice that you have split up the text in some bulletpoints and bold text as indication of important things/points. ''

	===Question 3 · TEXT===		===Question 3 · TEXT===
Line 37:		Line 37:

	===Answer 3===		===Answer 3===
	''Overall good spelling and grammar.''		''Overall good spelling and grammar. It is easy to understand.''

Anne at 16:53, 25 February 2019

2019-02-25T16:53:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:53, 25 February 2019
Line 8:		Line 8:

	===Answer 1===		===Answer 1===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''Yes. The summary is well written and has a clear focus, it sums up really nicely what is intended to do in the article - very interesting topic''

	===Question 2 · TEXT===		===Question 2 · TEXT===
Line 24:		Line 24:

	===Answer 2===		===Answer 2===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''There is a good logical flow - it is good how you start with the concept and goes into the implementation and finishes with the limitations.
			The argumentation and the explaination of the concept is clear and it is easy to read. It is really nice to break up the text with some bulletpoints and bold text as indication of important things/points. ''

	===Question 3 · TEXT===		===Question 3 · TEXT===
Line 36:		Line 37:

	===Answer 3===		===Answer 3===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''Overall good spelling and grammar.''


	===Question 4 · TEXT===		===Question 4 · TEXT===
Line 48:		Line 50:

	===Answer 4===		===Answer 4===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''There is only one figure and it shows the implementation of SAFe very nice. It should perhaps be scaled a bit down in the final article, it is quite large. Since there is only one figure, I would suggest having one or two in the concept section (when the article is finalized) as well to support your text and point.''

	===Question 5 · TEXT===		===Question 5 · TEXT===
Line 60:		Line 62:

	===Answer 5===		===Answer 5===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''The topic is very interesting and relevant. I see the article both as practical and academic of relevance because it is about a methodology - how it works and how it can be implemented''

	===Question 6 · TEXT===		===Question 6 · TEXT===
Line 72:		Line 74:

	===Answer 6===		===Answer 6===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''I would say the article is most interesting for a practitioner, because it describes the methodology step by step without being to heavy in the theory and history. The article is a good starting point for a practitioner. Furthermore, the article is critical to the methodology and provides limitations of it. ''

	===Question 7 · TEXT===		===Question 7 · TEXT===
Line 86:		Line 88:

	===Answer 7===		===Answer 7===
	''~~Answer here''~~		''Good work with the citation and referencing throughout the article. The choice of references seems proper, but I would hesitate a bit when using a blog article. Remember to include the standards as well. No annotated bibliography has been made yet.

			Good job! It is a very interesting topic and highly relevant - will be looking forward to read the finished article.''

Anne at 07:45, 25 February 2019

2019-02-25T07:45:42Z

Show changes

Raquel Valente: Created page with "==Feedback on Abstract:== {| |'''Text clarity & language'''|| Good |- |'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Good |- |'''Article purpose explanation'''|| Good |- |''..."

2019-02-19T09:41:43Z

Created page with "==Feedback on Abstract:== {| |'''Text clarity & language'''|| Good |- |'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Good |- |'''Article purpose explanation'''|| Good |- |''..."

New page

==Feedback on Abstract:==

{|
|'''Text clarity & language'''|| Good
|-
|'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Good
|-
|'''Article purpose explanation'''|| Good
|-
|'''Relevance to curriculum '''|| Relevant. Make sure you keep it within the focus
|-
|'''References'''|| Missing references. Here are some guidelines from DTU Library: https://www.bibliotek.dtu.dk/english/servicemenu/find/reference_management/references
|}