Ebkh: /* Feedback on Abstract: */

2019-02-19T14:50:18Z

Feedback on Abstract:

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:50, 19 February 2019
Line 2:		Line 2:

	{\|		{\|
	\|'''Text clarity'''\|\| -		\|'''Text clarity'''\|\| Yes it's coherent
	\|-		\|-
	\|'''Language'''\|\| -		\|'''Language'''\|\| Good but a few misspellings
	\|-		\|-
	\|'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''\|\| -		\|'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''\|\| What is it exactly the article will focus on? Looking at the processes you mention in the end, be careful not to make the wiki too broad. As an example "managing teams" has its own wiki so trying to fit that and all the other can be too much. Consider choosing one Project Ressource Management Tool
	\|-		\|-
	\|'''Purpose explanation'''\|\| -		\|'''Purpose explanation'''\|\| Good
	\|-		\|-
	\|'''Title of the Wiki'''\|\| Ok but could be more specific as Resources in Project Management		\|'''Title of the Wiki'''\|\| Ok but could be more specific as Resources in Project Management if that is your focus
	\|-		\|-
	\|'''Relevance to curriculum'''\|\| ~~Yes~~		\|'''Relevance to curriculum'''\|\| Relevant
	\|-		\|-
	\|'''References'''\|\| Remember to make correct references. Here are some guidelines from DTU Library: https://www.bibliotek.dtu.dk/english/servicemenu/find/reference_management/references		\|'''References'''\|\| Remember to make correct references. Here are some guidelines from DTU Library: https://www.bibliotek.dtu.dk/english/servicemenu/find/reference_management/references
	\|-		\|-
	\|'''Other'''\|\| Abstract is ~~missing~~ so ~~I cannot evaluate it. The wiki could be too broad when looking at~~ the ~~structure~~.		\|'''Other'''\|\| The Abstract is too long so consider deleting the questions.
	\|}		\|}

Ebkh: Created page with "==Feedback on Abstract:== {| |'''Text clarity'''|| - |- |'''Language'''|| - |- |'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| - |- |'''Purpose explanation'''|| - |- |'''Titl..."

2019-02-18T22:19:16Z

Created page with "==Feedback on Abstract:== {| |'''Text clarity'''|| - |- |'''Language'''|| - |- |'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| - |- |'''Purpose explanation'''|| - |- |'''Titl..."

New page

==Feedback on Abstract:==

{|
|'''Text clarity'''|| -
|-
|'''Language'''|| -
|-
|'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| -
|-
|'''Purpose explanation'''|| -
|-
|'''Title of the Wiki'''|| Ok but could be more specific as Resources in Project Management
|-
|'''Relevance to curriculum'''|| Yes
|-
|'''References'''|| Remember to make correct references. Here are some guidelines from DTU Library: https://www.bibliotek.dtu.dk/english/servicemenu/find/reference_management/references
|-
|'''Other'''|| Abstract is missing so I cannot evaluate it. The wiki could be too broad when looking at the structure.
|}

Talk:Resources - Revision history

Ebkh: /* Feedback on Abstract: */

Ebkh: Created page with "==Feedback on Abstract:== {| |'''Text clarity'''|| - |- |'''Language'''|| - |- |'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| - |- |'''Purpose explanation'''|| - |- |'''Titl..."