Talk:Requirements management using SysML - Revision history

Ripo: /* Answer 3 */

2019-02-25T11:33:27Z

Answer 3

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:33, 25 February 2019
Line 146:		Line 146:

	===Answer 3===		===Answer 3===
	''I found a few spelling ~~erroes~~. Try to run the article in Grammarly...this will also check the grammar.''		''I found a few spelling errors. Try to run the article in Grammarly...this will also check the grammar.''

	===Question 4 · TEXT===		===Question 4 · TEXT===

Ripo at 11:32, 25 February 2019

2019-02-25T11:32:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:32, 25 February 2019
Line 107:		Line 107:
	''No Annotated bibliography. No references throughout the whole article. One single reference (without source, author, date etc) Remember to use Vancouver citation style''		''No Annotated bibliography. No references throughout the whole article. One single reference (without source, author, date etc) Remember to use Vancouver citation style''

	==Feedback 2 \| Reviewer name: ''~~Place your name here~~''==
			==Feedback 2 \| Reviewer name: ''Andreas Riposati''==
			Article draft seems to be incomplete. Therefore it's sometimes hard to give an in-depth feedback
	===Question 1 · TEXT===		===Question 1 · TEXT===
	'''Quality of the summary:'''		'''Quality of the summary:'''
Line 116:		Line 118:

	===Answer 1===		===Answer 1===
	''~~Answer here'~~'		''The summary is quite good and gives a clear and brief explanation of the article's relevance. It needs to be finished".

	===Question 2 · TEXT===		===Question 2 · TEXT===
Line 132:		Line 134:

	===Answer 2===		===Answer 2===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''A chapter about the subject's limitations could be interesting to have (and I'm pretty sure you have to include it). Overall, the structure seems okay."

	===Question 3 · TEXT===		===Question 3 · TEXT===
Line 144:		Line 146:

	===Answer 3===		===Answer 3===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''I found a few spelling erroes. Try to run the article in Grammarly...this will also check the grammar.''

	===Question 4 · TEXT===		===Question 4 · TEXT===
Line 156:		Line 158:

	===Answer 4===		===Answer 4===
	''~~Answer here''~~		''No figures and/or tables yet."

	===Question 5 · TEXT===		===Question 5 · TEXT===
Line 168:		Line 170:

	===Answer 5===		===Answer 5===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''It seems really relevant, but it is hard to tell to what extent, as a lot of text is still missing and the subject has therefore not be fully analysed yet.''

	===Question 6 · TEXT===		===Question 6 · TEXT===
Line 180:		Line 182:

	===Answer 6===		===Answer 6===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''Same answer as above.''

	===Question 7 · TEXT===		===Question 7 · TEXT===
Line 194:		Line 196:

	===Answer 7===		===Answer 7===
	''~~Answer here''~~		''No Annotated bibliography and only a single references in the article".

S182655: /* Answer 4 */

2019-02-23T14:53:54Z

Answer 4

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:53, 23 February 2019
Line 66:		Line 66:

	===Answer 4===		===Answer 4===
	''for now, there are no tables/figures  try to use figures in the description of each approach ''		''for now, there are no tables/figures --> try to use figures in the description of each approach ''

	===Question 5 · TEXT===		===Question 5 · TEXT===

S182655: /* Feedback 1 | Reviewer name: Andrea Könnecke */

2019-02-23T14:53:37Z

Feedback 1 | Reviewer name: Andrea Könnecke

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:53, 23 February 2019
Line 17:		Line 17:

	==Feedback 1 \| Reviewer name: ''Andrea Könnecke''==		==Feedback 1 \| Reviewer name: ''Andrea Könnecke''==
	Article draft seems to be incomplete.		Article draft seems to be incomplete. Therefore it's sometimes hard to give an in-depth feedback
	===Question 1 · TEXT===		===Question 1 · TEXT===
	'''Quality of the summary:'''		'''Quality of the summary:'''

S182655: /* Feedback on Abstract: */

2019-02-23T14:52:39Z

Feedback on Abstract:

Show changes

Hani Mike Rae Selim: Created page with "==Feedback on Abstract:== The abstract seems incomplete. However, please find my immediate feedback below (19-Feb-2019) {| |'''Text clarity & language'''|| The text is okay,..."

2019-02-19T08:53:55Z

Created page with "==Feedback on Abstract:== The abstract seems incomplete. However, please find my immediate feedback below (19-Feb-2019) {| |'''Text clarity & language'''|| The text is okay,..."

New page

==Feedback on Abstract:==

The abstract seems incomplete. However, please find my immediate feedback below (19-Feb-2019)

{|
|'''Text clarity & language'''|| The text is okay, however there's a lack of flow/consistency (too many dotted lines).
|-
|'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Good.
|-
|'''Article purpose explanation'''|| Good. Ensure to emphasize how the tool is relevant and its project/program/portfolio management without getting into too much technical detail about the modelling language itself.
|-
|'''Relevance to curriculum '''|| Relevant
|-
|'''References'''|| Good references.
|}