Talk:Project sponsor - Revision history

S172365: /* Answer 7 */

2018-02-18T21:33:11Z

Answer 7

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:33, 18 February 2018
Line 213:		Line 213:
	===Answer 7===		===Answer 7===

	~~Answer here~~		I did not find any misleading sources. All of them give valid information. Therefore, there is no need to change

2018-02-18T21:31:54Z

Answer 6

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:31, 18 February 2018
Line 197:		Line 197:
	===Answer 6===		===Answer 6===

	~~Answer here~~		It would be perfect for a web research to receive an overview. Still, it would be nice to some more about the current state of art or how sponsoring was changing over the years.

	===Question 7===		===Question 7===

2018-02-18T21:30:17Z

Answer 5

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:30, 18 February 2018
Line 183:		Line 183:
	What would you suggest to improve?		What would you suggest to improve?
	===Answer 5===		===Answer 5===
	The article gives a good overview of the project sponsoring.		The article gives a good overview of the project sponsoring and also why it is important within a project. In my opinion it is designed more academic because after reading you can not really say how to implement a better sponsoring into your company. In my opinion it would be interesting, especially on this topic, how a wrong sponsorship is happening within a real-life example.

	===Question 6===		===Question 6===

2018-02-18T21:25:26Z

Answer 5

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:25, 18 February 2018
Line 183:		Line 183:
	What would you suggest to improve?		What would you suggest to improve?
	===Answer 5===		===Answer 5===
			The article gives a good overview of the project sponsoring.

	~~Answer here~~
	===Question 6===		===Question 6===

2018-02-18T21:18:45Z

Answer 4

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:18, 18 February 2018
Line 171:		Line 171:
	===Answer 4===		===Answer 4===

	~~Answer here~~		I like the figures which are used. As I mentioned above I would maybe add one more to explain the organizational involvement of the Project Sponsor.

	===Question 5===		===Question 5===

2018-02-18T21:17:41Z

Answer 3

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:17, 18 February 2018
Line 158:		Line 158:
	===Answer 3===		===Answer 3===

	~~Answer here~~		Overall the text is well written and easy understanable. Sometimes there are little mistakes in the structure of the sentences.

	===Question 4===		===Question 4===

2018-02-18T21:16:25Z

Answer 2

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:16, 18 February 2018
Line 145:		Line 145:

	Answer here		Answer here
			The article is really interesting to read. I like how you structured started with the general definition into more detailed knowledge. The structure is easy to follow and points out the main topics of sponsorship. The pictures are underlining the topic and give more additional information. You also mentioned the relationship between the project sponsor and project manager as well as the problem that it could happen that the differentiation between both roles is not easy to define. I would like to have a clearer overview of how the project sponsor can influence the on-going project and who has to escalate to whom. Does the Project manager escalate to the project sponsor or to the top management? Who has the last decision within a project (except top management)? Maybe you can try to constitute those relations - maybe with a picture?

	===Question 3===		===Question 3===

2018-02-18T20:57:30Z

Answer 1

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:57, 18 February 2018
Line 126:		Line 126:
	===Answer 1===		===Answer 1===

	~~Answer here~~		Does the summary make the key focus, insights and/or contribution of the article clear?
			The summary has tuned out well. I as a reader of the article know now what I need to expect from the following chapters. Especially mentioning the current problems of Project sponsoring catches my attention. The only which is not clear, maybe because the article is not finalized yet, is the list of relevant sources. Also, I would put the quote a few sentences earlier where you are talking about the misunderstanding of project sponsorship.

	===Question 2===		===Question 2===

2018-02-18T20:55:40Z

Question 1

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:55, 18 February 2018
Line 120:		Line 120:

	Quality of the summary:		Quality of the summary:

	~~Does the summary make the key focus, insights and/or contribution of the article clear?~~
	The summary has tuned out well. I as a reader of the article know now what I need to expect from the following chapters. Especially mentioning the current problems of Project sponsoring catches my attention. Also, the distinction between

	What would you suggest to improve?		What would you suggest to improve?

2018-02-18T20:54:15Z

Question 1

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:54, 18 February 2018
Line 122:		Line 122:

	Does the summary make the key focus, insights and/or contribution of the article clear?		Does the summary make the key focus, insights and/or contribution of the article clear?
			The summary has tuned out well. I as a reader of the article know now what I need to expect from the following chapters. Especially mentioning the current problems of Project sponsoring catches my attention. Also, the distinction between

	What would you suggest to improve?		What would you suggest to improve?