Talk:Project management within volunteering organisations - Revision history

S131063 at 09:05, 28 November 2014

2014-11-28T09:05:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:05, 28 November 2014
Line 42:		Line 42:


	= ''' PEER REVIEW ''' =		= ''' PEER REVIEW by s131063''' =

S131063: /* PEER REVIEW 2 */

2014-11-28T09:04:57Z

PEER REVIEW 2

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:04, 28 November 2014
Line 42:		Line 42:


	= PEER REVIEW 2 =		= ''' PEER REVIEW ''' =

S131063: /* PEER REVIEW 2 */

2014-11-28T09:04:20Z

PEER REVIEW 2

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:04, 28 November 2014
Line 49:		Line 49:


	'''FORMAL ASPECTS'''		=='''FORMAL ASPECTS'''==

	*I would suggest another structure of the article. I am not sure about if the article is finished or not. If it is not finish is fine but if it is finished, instead of using only one main point, maybe you could use the current subpoints (from 1.1 to 1.6) as main points.		*I would suggest another structure of the article. I am not sure about if the article is finished or not. If it is not finish is fine but if it is finished, instead of using only one main point, maybe you could use the current subpoints (from 1.1 to 1.6) as main points.
	* The article has some grammatical errors that need to be reviewed (principally related to singular/plural forms) e.g.: a study were done, though the study were done, specifically on group pitfalls of management within in volunteering project groups is... and also some small spelling mistakes. I suggest to copy/paste it in word in order to correct them easier.		* The article has some grammatical errors that need to be reviewed (principally related to singular/plural forms) e.g.: a study were done, though the study were done, specifically on group pitfalls of management within in volunteering project groups is... and also some small spelling mistakes. I suggest to copy/paste it in word in order to correct them easier.
	*I think that the style of the article is good, nevertheless sometimes I find short sentences alone thoughtout the text. It would be better if you elaborate a bit on them or just include them in a paragraph.		*I think that the style of the article is good, nevertheless sometimes I find short sentences alone thoughtout the text. It would be better if you elaborate a bit on them or just include them in a paragraph (see point 1.1, especially 1.1.2 and 1.1.3.
	*There are not formal errors in the pictures or figures. Also it seems that the author does not need the copyright to use them because he/she makes them.		*There are not formal errors in the pictures or figures. Also it seems that the author does not need the copyright to use them because he/she makes them. However, I suggest to put numbers on the pictures and do references to them throughout the text.
	I miss some Wiki-features such as external links, points, etc...		I miss some Wiki-features such as external links, points, etc...
	*Sometimes ~~you write in~~ the second person, I think it is better to use always the ~~third person~~ in a wiki-article (section 1.4).		*Sometimes the second person is used, I think it is better to use always the impersonal in a wiki-article or in your case also the third person when your refer to the "Det Danske Spejderkorps" (see section 1.4).


	'''CONTENT ASPECTS'''		=='''CONTENT ASPECTS'''==

	*I would add a paragraph at the beginning (before the content of the article) as an abstract (explaining how is going to be the article, what is expected...)		*I would add a paragraph at the beginning (before the content of the article) as an abstract (explaining how is going to be the article, what is expected...).
	* Sometimes I can not see the relation between the article and project management. Maybe it would be a good idea to clarify ~~more~~ how project management is used within volunteering organization. ~~It would be great~~ to find some specific tools or techniques of project management that could be apply to volunteering organisations.		*More elaboration on the introduction is needed.
			* Sometimes I can not see the relation between the article and project management. Maybe it would be a good idea to clarify better how project management is used within volunteering organization. My suggestion is to find some specific tools or techniques of project management that could be apply to volunteering organisations, it would be great ;)
	* I think the article is a bit short (but maybe it is not finished).		* I think the article is a bit short (but maybe it is not finished).
	* The article is coherent and the logical flow throughout the article is great.		* The article is coherent and the logical flow throughout the article is great.
	* The article seems to be free of "copy & paste" plagiarism ~~but~~ I am missing more academic references (e.g.: papers, publications or project management books)		* The article seems to be free of "copy & paste" plagiarism
			*I am missing more academic references (e.g.: papers, publications or project management books)
	* Some parts of the article seem more an opinion but it would be good if you base your feelings in some references. Another option could be to include a discussion at the end in which you state your own opinion or the pros and cons of the topic. E.g.: last paragraph of 1.2.		* Some parts of the article seem more an opinion but it would be good if you base your feelings in some references. Another option could be to include a discussion at the end in which you state your own opinion or the pros and cons of the topic. E.g.: last paragraph of 1.2.
	* I really like the way you relate volunteering organisations project management with typical companies. However I think you should elaborate more on this part.		* I really like the way you relate volunteering organisations project management with typical companies. However I think you should elaborate more on this part.

S131063 at 08:50, 28 November 2014

2014-11-28T08:50:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:50, 28 November 2014
Line 40:		Line 40:
	* Maybe include your elaboration on how this fits into APPPM		* Maybe include your elaboration on how this fits into APPPM
	* How could practioneers benefit from this method? What is to be learned?		* How could practioneers benefit from this method? What is to be learned?


			= PEER REVIEW 2 =

	~~== PEER REVIEW 2 ==~~

S131063: /* PEER REVIEW 2 */

2014-11-26T00:25:04Z

PEER REVIEW 2

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:25, 26 November 2014
Line 59:		Line 59:
	'''CONTENT ASPECTS'''		'''CONTENT ASPECTS'''

			*I would add a paragraph at the beginning (before the content of the article) as an abstract (explaining how is going to be the article, what is expected...)
	* Sometimes I can not see the relation between the article and project management. Maybe it would be a good idea to clarify more how project management is used within volunteering organization. It would be great to find some specific tools or techniques of project management that could be apply to volunteering organisations.		* Sometimes I can not see the relation between the article and project management. Maybe it would be a good idea to clarify more how project management is used within volunteering organization. It would be great to find some specific tools or techniques of project management that could be apply to volunteering organisations.
	* I think the article is a bit short (but maybe it is not finished).		* I think the article is a bit short (but maybe it is not finished).

S131063: /* PEER REVIEW 2 */ new section

2014-11-26T00:12:50Z

PEER REVIEW 2: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:12, 26 November 2014
Line 40:		Line 40:
	* Maybe include your elaboration on how this fits into APPPM		* Maybe include your elaboration on how this fits into APPPM
	* How could practioneers benefit from this method? What is to be learned?		* How could practioneers benefit from this method? What is to be learned?

			== PEER REVIEW 2 ==


			First of all I find the idea and the topic of the article very interesting.


			'''FORMAL ASPECTS'''

			*I would suggest another structure of the article. I am not sure about if the article is finished or not. If it is not finish is fine but if it is finished, instead of using only one main point, maybe you could use the current subpoints (from 1.1 to 1.6) as main points.
			* The article has some grammatical errors that need to be reviewed (principally related to singular/plural forms) e.g.: a study were done, though the study were done, specifically on group pitfalls of management within in volunteering project groups is... and also some small spelling mistakes. I suggest to copy/paste it in word in order to correct them easier.
			*I think that the style of the article is good, nevertheless sometimes I find short sentences alone thoughtout the text. It would be better if you elaborate a bit on them or just include them in a paragraph.
			*There are not formal errors in the pictures or figures. Also it seems that the author does not need the copyright to use them because he/she makes them.
			I miss some Wiki-features such as external links, points, etc...
			*Sometimes you write in the second person, I think it is better to use always the third person in a wiki-article (section 1.4).


			'''CONTENT ASPECTS'''

			* Sometimes I can not see the relation between the article and project management. Maybe it would be a good idea to clarify more how project management is used within volunteering organization. It would be great to find some specific tools or techniques of project management that could be apply to volunteering organisations.
			* I think the article is a bit short (but maybe it is not finished).
			* The article is coherent and the logical flow throughout the article is great.
			* The article seems to be free of "copy & paste" plagiarism but I am missing more academic references (e.g.: papers, publications or project management books)
			* Some parts of the article seem more an opinion but it would be good if you base your feelings in some references. Another option could be to include a discussion at the end in which you state your own opinion or the pros and cons of the topic. E.g.: last paragraph of 1.2.
			* I really like the way you relate volunteering organisations project management with typical companies. However I think you should elaborate more on this part.

S131063: /* 1.5 How is this useful to companies */

2014-11-26T00:12:27Z

1.5 How is this useful to companies

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:12, 26 November 2014
Line 40:		Line 40:
	* Maybe include your elaboration on how this fits into APPPM		* Maybe include your elaboration on how this fits into APPPM
	* How could practioneers benefit from this method? What is to be learned?		* How could practioneers benefit from this method? What is to be learned?

	~~'''== Peer Review =='''~~

	~~First of all I find the idea and the topic of the article very interesting.~~


	~~'''FORMAL ASPECTS'''~~

	*I would suggest another structure of the article. I am not sure about if the article is finished or not. If it is not finish is fine but if it is finished, instead of using only one main point, maybe you could use the current subpoints (from 1.1 to 1.6) as main points.
	* The article has some grammatical errors that need to be reviewed (principally related to singular/plural forms) e.g.: a study were done, though the study were done, specifically on group pitfalls of management within in volunteering project groups is... and also some small spelling mistakes. I suggest to copy/paste it in word in order to correct them easier.
	*I think that the style of the article is good, nevertheless sometimes I find short sentences alone thoughtout the text. It would be better if you elaborate a bit on them or just include them in a paragraph.
	*There are not formal errors in the pictures or figures. Also it seems that the author does not need the copyright to use them because he/she makes them.
	I miss some Wiki-features such as external links, points, etc...
	*Sometimes you write in the second person, I think it is better to use always the third person in a wiki-article (section 1.4).


	~~'''CONTENT ASPECTS'''~~

	* Sometimes I can not see the relation between the article and project management. Maybe it would be a good idea to clarify more how project management is used within volunteering organization. It would be great to find some specific tools or techniques of project management that could be apply to volunteering organisations.
	* I think the article is a bit short (but maybe it is not finished).
	* The article is coherent and the logical flow throughout the article is great.
	* The article seems to be free of "copy & paste" plagiarism but I am missing more academic references (e.g.: papers, publications or project management books)
	* Some parts of the article seem more an opinion but it would be good if you base your feelings in some references. Another option could be to include a discussion at the end in which you state your own opinion or the pros and cons of the topic. E.g.: last paragraph of 1.2.
	* I really like the way you relate volunteering organisations project management with typical companies. However I think you should elaborate more on this part.

S131063: /* 1.5 How is this useful to companies */

2014-11-26T00:12:02Z

1.5 How is this useful to companies

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:12, 26 November 2014
Line 41:		Line 41:
	* How could practioneers benefit from this method? What is to be learned?		* How could practioneers benefit from this method? What is to be learned?

	[['''== Peer Review ==''']]		'''== Peer Review =='''

	First of all I find the idea and the topic of the article very interesting.		First of all I find the idea and the topic of the article very interesting.

S131063: /* Peer Review */

2014-11-26T00:11:45Z

Peer Review

@@ Line 41: / Line 41: @@
 * How could practioneers benefit from this method? What is to be learned?
-== Peer Review ==
+[['''== Peer Review ==''']]
-jaskñ
+First of all I find the idea and the topic of the article very interesting.

S131063: /* Peer Review */ new section

2014-11-26T00:09:28Z

Peer Review: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:09, 26 November 2014
Line 40:		Line 40:
	* Maybe include your elaboration on how this fits into APPPM		* Maybe include your elaboration on how this fits into APPPM
	* How could practioneers benefit from this method? What is to be learned?		* How could practioneers benefit from this method? What is to be learned?

			== Peer Review ==

			jaskñ