Talk:Product family master plan - Revision history

Danarut at 20:11, 25 February 2019

2019-02-25T20:11:57Z

@@ Line 106: / Line 106: @@
 ===Answer 7===
 ''All the previous literature are mentioned in the article, and they clearly explain the topic. The references at the end of the article are schematized in a comprehensible way. All information is traceable, but I suggest inserting some other resource, especially for the general explanation of the topic.
 ''

2019-02-25T10:05:39Z

Answer 7

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:05, 25 February 2019
Line 105:		Line 105:

	===Answer 7===		===Answer 7===
	All the previous literature are mentioned in the article, and they clearly explain the topic. The references at the end of the article are schematized in a comprehensible way. All information is traceable, but I suggest inserting some other resource, especially for the general explanation of the topic.		''All the previous literature are mentioned in the article, and they clearly explain the topic. The references at the end of the article are schematized in a comprehensible way. All information is traceable, but I suggest inserting some other resource, especially for the general explanation of the topic.
			''

2019-02-25T10:05:31Z

Answer 6

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:05, 25 February 2019
Line 91:		Line 91:

	===Answer 6===		===Answer 6===
	The article was written in such a way as to provide all the information necessary for readers. Arguments are explained clearly and the main focus is supported with academic information. It can be a good contribution in cursory web research. I believe that could be useful to add more general information about the article, so that any type of reader can understand the topic.		''The article was written in such a way as to provide all the information necessary for readers. Arguments are explained clearly and the main focus is supported with academic information. It can be a good contribution in cursory web research. I believe that could be useful to add more general information about the article, so that any type of reader can understand the topic.''

	===Question 7 · TEXT===		===Question 7 · TEXT===

2019-02-25T10:05:23Z

Answer 5

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:05, 25 February 2019
Line 78:		Line 78:

	===Answer 5===		===Answer 5===
	The article clearly explains the contents with academic relevance. The information are well articulated and in the most specific parts, all references are integrated correctly. The main purpose of the whole article was summarized in the first part, and then the rest of the article is implemented with practical examples. In my opinion the article does not need further improvements.		''The article clearly explains the contents with academic relevance. The information are well articulated and in the most specific parts, all references are integrated correctly. The main purpose of the whole article was summarized in the first part, and then the rest of the article is implemented with practical examples. In my opinion the article does not need further improvements.
			''

	===Question 6 · TEXT===		===Question 6 · TEXT===

2019-02-25T10:05:05Z

Answer 3

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:05, 25 February 2019
Line 53:		Line 53:

	===Answer 3===		===Answer 3===
	The grammar used in the article is correct and perfectly appropriate, it is possible to see that there are many specific words concerning the topic described. In the entire article there is the presence of some fill words, but reading separately the individual paragraphs, they don't notice an excessive presence of them. I don't think that grammar and style need improvements.		''The grammar used in the article is correct and perfectly appropriate, it is possible to see that there are many specific words concerning the topic described. In the entire article there is the presence of some fill words, but reading separately the individual paragraphs, they don't notice an excessive presence of them. I don't think that grammar and style need improvements.
			''

	===Question 4 · TEXT===		===Question 4 · TEXT===

2019-02-25T10:04:57Z

Answer 2

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:04, 25 February 2019
Line 40:		Line 40:

	===Answer 2===		===Answer 2===
	All the argument are clear and the article is written with a good logical flow, especially because the format has been set following a precise list. The parts are well divided, is possible to understand all the keywords thanks to a perfect use of bold and bullet point are used properly. I haven't found any contradiction, but I suggest to put more pictures in order to have a better comprehension of the all article.		''All the argument are clear and the article is written with a good logical flow, especially because the format has been set following a precise list. The parts are well divided, is possible to understand all the keywords thanks to a perfect use of bold and bullet point are used properly. I haven't found any contradiction, but I suggest to put more pictures in order to have a better comprehension of the all article.
			''

	===Question 3 · TEXT===		===Question 3 · TEXT===

2019-02-25T10:04:50Z

Answer 1

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:04, 25 February 2019
Line 23:		Line 23:

	===Answer 1===		===Answer 1===
	The summary is really clear because it shows with few words the main purpose of the article. After reading the summary is possible to understand quickly all the contents that are explained in the article.		''The summary is really clear because it shows with few words the main purpose of the article. After reading the summary is possible to understand quickly all the contents that are explained in the article. I suggest to show more references and to include pictures as well.
			''
	I suggest to show more references and to include pictures as well.

	===Question 2 · TEXT===		===Question 2 · TEXT===

2019-02-25T10:02:03Z

Answer 7

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:02, 25 February 2019
Line 103:		Line 103:

	===Answer 7===		===Answer 7===
	~~''Answer here''~~		All the previous literature are mentioned in the article, and they clearly explain the topic. The references at the end of the article are schematized in a comprehensible way. All information is traceable, but I suggest inserting some other resource, especially for the general explanation of the topic.

2019-02-25T09:57:04Z

Answer 6

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:57, 25 February 2019
Line 89:		Line 89:

	===Answer 6===		===Answer 6===
	~~''Answer here''~~		The article was written in such a way as to provide all the information necessary for readers. Arguments are explained clearly and the main focus is supported with academic information. It can be a good contribution in cursory web research. I believe that could be useful to add more general information about the article, so that any type of reader can understand the topic.

	===Question 7 · TEXT===		===Question 7 · TEXT===

2019-02-25T09:49:27Z

Answer 5

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:49, 25 February 2019
Line 77:		Line 77:

	===Answer 5===		===Answer 5===
	~~''Answer here''~~		The article clearly explains the contents with academic relevance. The information are well articulated and in the most specific parts, all references are integrated correctly. The main purpose of the whole article was summarized in the first part, and then the rest of the article is implemented with practical examples. In my opinion the article does not need further improvements.

	===Question 6 · TEXT===		===Question 6 · TEXT===