Nhpp at 14:33, 25 February 2019

2019-02-25T14:33:55Z

@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 |}
-==Feedback 1 | Reviewer name: ''Sarantis Pavlidis''==
+==Feedback 1 | Reviewer name: ''Nikolaj Haagen Patzig Petersen''==
 ===Question 1 · TEXT===
 '''Quality of the summary:'''
@@ Line 28: / Line 28: @@
 ===Answer 1===
-''Answer here''
+''Good summery/Abstract, gives a good overview of what is going to presented ''
 ===Question 2 · TEXT===
@@ Line 44: / Line 44: @@
 ===Answer 2===
-''Answer here''
+''I guess a lot of material is still missing so a bit hard to determine the consistancy and the flow.
 ===Question 3 · TEXT===
@@ Line 56: / Line 57: @@
 ===Answer 3===
-''Answer here''
+''Very good so far''
 ===Question 4 · TEXT===
@@ Line 68: / Line 69: @@
 ===Answer 4===
-''Answer here''
+''Really nice table, and i like the way you use bullet points as well, malet it nice and easy to read''
 ===Question 5 · TEXT===
@@ Line 80: / Line 81: @@
 ===Answer 5===
-''Answer here''
+''Very relevant in relation to PM, i really like the critical evaluation part, that narrow in and describe suitable conditions''
 ===Question 6 · TEXT===
@@ Line 92: / Line 93: @@
 ===Answer 6===
-''Answer here''
+''Not enough material to determiner yet''
 ===Question 7 · TEXT===
@@ Line 106: / Line 107: @@
 ===Answer 7===
-''Answer here''
+''Not yet''

Nhpp at 09:20, 25 February 2019

2019-02-25T09:20:49Z

Show changes

Ebkh: Created page with "==Feedback on Abstract:== {| |'''Text clarity'''|| Good |- |'''Language'''|| Good |- |'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Good but the abstract is a bit short so y..."

2019-02-19T12:43:05Z

Created page with "==Feedback on Abstract:== {| |'''Text clarity'''|| Good |- |'''Language'''|| Good |- |'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Good but the abstract is a bit short so y..."

New page

==Feedback on Abstract:==

{|
|'''Text clarity'''|| Good
|-
|'''Language'''|| Good
|-
|'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Good but the abstract is a bit short so you have space to explain further
|-
|'''Purpose explanation'''|| Good
|-
|'''Title of the Wiki'''|| Good
|-
|'''Relevance to curriculum'''|| Relevant
|-
|'''References'''|| Remember to make correct references. Here are some guidelines from DTU Library: https://www.bibliotek.dtu.dk/english/servicemenu/find/reference_management/references
|-
|'''Other'''|| Abstract is a bit short
|}

Talk:Prince2 - Revision history

Nhpp at 14:33, 25 February 2019

Nhpp at 09:20, 25 February 2019

Ebkh: Created page with "==Feedback on Abstract:== {| |'''Text clarity'''|| Good |- |'''Language'''|| Good |- |'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Good but the abstract is a bit short so y..."