Talk:Organisational resilience with mindfulness - Revision history

S140046 at 20:22, 28 September 2015

2015-09-28T20:22:26Z

S140046 at 20:19, 28 September 2015

2015-09-28T20:19:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:19, 28 September 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Josef: Hello, thank you for an interesting proposal. I really like the idea. Please make sure to go back to the original literature (e.g. Weick, see our whitepaper), and also follow the "Method" structure we propose. Also please make sure that you do not end up writing about "organizational resilience" in general, but making projects more resilient.		Josef: Hello, thank you for an interesting proposal. I really like the idea. Please make sure to go back to the original literature (e.g. Weick, see our whitepaper), and also follow the "Method" structure we propose. Also please make sure that you do not end up writing about "organizational resilience" in general, but making projects more resilient.

			Comments from the author is written in ''Italic''
	Review 1, s150621		Review 1, s150621

	• Interesting topic		• Interesting topic
			''Thank you. It turned out to be quite a tricky topic. I hope you like the result''

	• Nice that you give a description of the content of the article in the abstract		• Nice that you give a description of the content of the article in the abstract
			''The abstract is deleted in the final article''

	• The table with the 5 principles is clear and straight forward, good with examples for each principle		• The table with the 5 principles is clear and straight forward, good with examples for each principle
			''More examples have been implemented in general for better understanding of the topic. Not only in this table but throughout the article''

	• The abstract should be before the contents		• The abstract should be before the contents
			''The abstract is deleted in the final article''

	• Some of the sentences could be written easier, or described better, as for example this sentence: “Thorough management is crucial in resilient organisations (check ref, Geraldi et al, 2009) and mindfulness encompass the risk of the human mind.”		• Some of the sentences could be written easier, or described better, as for example this sentence: “Thorough management is crucial in resilient organisations (check ref, Geraldi et al, 2009) and mindfulness encompass the risk of the human mind.”

	• In the article you refer to many books, which is very good. The reference should consistently be done in wiki style, with footnotes. One example is the sentence; “Weick and Sutcliffe(2001) describe mindfulness as “a rich awareness of discrimatory detail”.”, where you don´t use the footnote reference style		• In the article you refer to many books, which is very good. The reference should consistently be done in wiki style, with footnotes. One example is the sentence; “Weick and Sutcliffe(2001) describe mindfulness as “a rich awareness of discrimatory detail”.”, where you don´t use the footnote reference style
			''Good point - All references have been made in wiki-style with footnotes.''

	• It is nice that the article includes figures, but remember text for describing the figures, and to add the source of the figure		• It is nice that the article includes figures, but remember text for describing the figures, and to add the source of the figure
			''Figure text have been added and sources added where possible''

	• The application paragraph ends with a question, which I suggest rather to put into the discussion. Some alternatives for the answer of the question would also be nice to add to the discussion.		• The application paragraph ends with a question, which I suggest rather to put into the discussion. Some alternatives for the answer of the question would also be nice to add to the discussion.
			''I agree - That sentence had to be rephrased. Which have been done.''


	• Can see that you are not finished yet, but so far it looks interesting, and I look forward to read the rest when you are finished		• Can see that you are not finished yet, but so far it looks interesting, and I look forward to read the rest when you are finished
			''Thank you - Now it is done''

	==Review of Sorth90 (Rasmus Sorth-Olsen s117422), Reviewer 2==		==Review of Sorth90 (Rasmus Sorth-Olsen s117422), Reviewer 2==
	* The feedback was given on Tuesday 22-09-2015 at 5 PM.		* The feedback was given on Tuesday 22-09-2015 at 5 PM.
	* The article is not finalized.		* The article is not finalized.
			''True. I apolagize for the incomplete article You had for review.''
	* Several sections are not written.		* Several sections are not written.
			''True''
	* It would have been an advantage if the article had described what “Organisational resilience with mindfulness” is and how the tools are applied and why. It would have made it easier for the reader to get an overview and at the same time find the information the reader is looking for.		* It would have been an advantage if the article had described what “Organisational resilience with mindfulness” is and how the tools are applied and why. It would have made it easier for the reader to get an overview and at the same time find the information the reader is looking for.
			''I hope the article give you these answers now. Unfortunately there is not any tools in mindfulness because it is a management theory or a mind-set. To keep it somehow practical I have given some processes which can be followed by project managers to implement mindfulness. It should be noted that all processes must be fitted to the project to work sucessfully.''

	Abstract:		Abstract:
	* From the abstract, the article seems interesting.		* From the abstract, the article seems interesting.
			''Thank you''
	* Who is seeking sociotechnical?		* Who is seeking sociotechnical?
			''I do not understand the question''

	Big idea:		Big idea:
Line 38:		Line 50:
	* Good use of sources.		* Good use of sources.
	* What section tell the reader?		* What section tell the reader?
			''The big idea have been converted to the section "Overview" which I found as a more genuine wikipedia section title''

	5 Principles:		5 Principles:
	* References.		* References.
			''References is given as (Weick & Sutcliffe, 2001)''
	* Lacking a description of the figure.		* Lacking a description of the figure.
			''Description is added for all figures''
	* Good shape. The figure is not complete.		* Good shape. The figure is not complete.
			''The figure has been remodeled in PowerPoint to get a crisp graphic which fit to the other figures in the article.''

	Application:		Application:
	* Using an example. Thus the reader understand better the section.		* Using an example. Thus the reader understand better the section.
			''Examples are included throughout the article. A seperate wikipage have been created with a continous example of how the five principles fit into the processes of a US Navy carrier.''
	* More in-depth description of Butler & Gray.		* More in-depth description of Butler & Gray.
			''Butler & Gray have been kept on a minimal level to maintain focus on Weick & Sutcliffe.''
	* Do you have a reference for the figure?		* Do you have a reference for the figure?
			''Yes, the reference have been added.''


	* The rest of the article is missing, to be written.		* The rest of the article is missing, to be written.
			''True''

	==Reviewed by s152093, review 3==		==Reviewed by s152093, review 3==
	* I know that the article isn’t done, but here are a few comments.		* I know that the article isn’t done, but here are a few comments.
			''Thank you for taking your time even though it's not even close to be finish.''

	* Since you talk a lot about cognitive biases and resilience I think it would make sense to introduce the terms.		* Since you talk a lot about cognitive biases and resilience I think it would make sense to introduce the terms.
			''The terms are now linked to wikipedia pages with the topics. I recon this is the way people do it on this platform.''

	* The language is clear and there is a natural flow.		* The language is clear and there is a natural flow.
			''Thanks''

	* It would be nice to see examples of fields where mindfulness would be very useful, and fields where it wouldn’t make sense to apply the techniques.		* It would be nice to see examples of fields where mindfulness would be very useful, and fields where it wouldn’t make sense to apply the techniques.
			''I argue that mindfulness is useful in all fields, also fields where failures doesn't result in severe casualties. I can follow your point that there must be some fields where it cannot make any difference, but in some version I think it is relevant everywhere. All sectors/fields experience unexpected events and have to react to these.''

	* Don’t forget to make the annotated bibliography where you write about each reference.		* Don’t forget to make the annotated bibliography where you write about each reference.
			''Thanks - Its done''

	* The table gives a quick and clear overview.		* The table gives a quick and clear overview.
	* The picture is nice, but don’t forget to include it in the text.		''Great - That is exactly my intention. I hope I have kept the clear overview even though I have added extra examples.''

			* The picture is nice, but don’t forget to include it in the text.
			''All pictures are included in text by direct reference.''

	* In general a really good idea. I’m looking forward to read the final version of the article :-)		* In general a really good idea. I’m looking forward to read the final version of the article :-)
			''Thank you. I hope you like the result. :-)''

S152093 at 20:00, 22 September 2015

2015-09-22T20:00:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:00, 22 September 2015
Line 51:		Line 51:

	* The rest of the article is missing, to be written.		* The rest of the article is missing, to be written.

			==Reviewed by s152093, review 3==
			* I know that the article isn’t done, but here are a few comments.
			* Since you talk a lot about cognitive biases and resilience I think it would make sense to introduce the terms.
			* The language is clear and there is a natural flow.
			* It would be nice to see examples of fields where mindfulness would be very useful, and fields where it wouldn’t make sense to apply the techniques.
			* Don’t forget to make the annotated bibliography where you write about each reference.
			* The table gives a quick and clear overview.
			* The picture is nice, but don’t forget to include it in the text.
			* In general a really good idea. I’m looking forward to read the final version of the article :-)

Sorth90 at 19:32, 22 September 2015

2015-09-22T19:32:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:32, 22 September 2015
Line 23:		Line 23:

	• Can see that you are not finished yet, but so far it looks interesting, and I look forward to read the rest when you are finished		• Can see that you are not finished yet, but so far it looks interesting, and I look forward to read the rest when you are finished

			==Review of Sorth90 (Rasmus Sorth-Olsen s117422), Reviewer 2==
			* The feedback was given on Tuesday 22-09-2015 at 5 PM.
			* The article is not finalized.
			* Several sections are not written.
			* It would have been an advantage if the article had described what “Organisational resilience with mindfulness” is and how the tools are applied and why. It would have made it easier for the reader to get an overview and at the same time find the information the reader is looking for.

			Abstract:
			* From the abstract, the article seems interesting.
			* Who is seeking sociotechnical?

			Big idea:
			* Good language.
			* Good use of sources.
			* What section tell the reader?

			5 Principles:
			* References.
			* Lacking a description of the figure.
			* Good shape. The figure is not complete.

			Application:
			* Using an example. Thus the reader understand better the section.
			* More in-depth description of Butler & Gray.
			* Do you have a reference for the figure?


			* The rest of the article is missing, to be written.

Mathilso at 17:50, 22 September 2015

2015-09-22T17:50:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:50, 22 September 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Josef: Hello, thank you for an interesting proposal. I really like the idea. Please make sure to go back to the original literature (e.g. Weick, see our whitepaper), and also follow the "Method" structure we propose. Also please make sure that you do not end up writing about "organizational resilience" in general, but making projects more resilient.		Josef: Hello, thank you for an interesting proposal. I really like the idea. Please make sure to go back to the original literature (e.g. Weick, see our whitepaper), and also follow the "Method" structure we propose. Also please make sure that you do not end up writing about "organizational resilience" in general, but making projects more resilient.


			Review 1, s150621

			• Interesting topic

			• Nice that you give a description of the content of the article in the abstract

			• The table with the 5 principles is clear and straight forward, good with examples for each principle


			• The abstract should be before the contents

			• Some of the sentences could be written easier, or described better, as for example this sentence: “Thorough management is crucial in resilient organisations (check ref, Geraldi et al, 2009) and mindfulness encompass the risk of the human mind.”

			• In the article you refer to many books, which is very good. The reference should consistently be done in wiki style, with footnotes. One example is the sentence; “Weick and Sutcliffe(2001) describe mindfulness as “a rich awareness of discrimatory detail”.”, where you don´t use the footnote reference style

			• It is nice that the article includes figures, but remember text for describing the figures, and to add the source of the figure

			• The application paragraph ends with a question, which I suggest rather to put into the discussion. Some alternatives for the answer of the question would also be nice to add to the discussion.


			• Can see that you are not finished yet, but so far it looks interesting, and I look forward to read the rest when you are finished

Jooehm at 10:04, 17 September 2015

2015-09-17T10:04:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:04, 17 September 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Josef: Hello, thank you for an interesting proposal. I really like the idea. Please make sure to go back to the original literature (e.g. Weick, see our whitepaper), and also follow the "Method" structure we propose.		Josef: Hello, thank you for an interesting proposal. I really like the idea. Please make sure to go back to the original literature (e.g. Weick, see our whitepaper), and also follow the "Method" structure we propose. Also please make sure that you do not end up writing about "organizational resilience" in general, but making projects more resilient.

Jooehm: Created page with "Josef: Hello, thank you for an interesting proposal. I really like the idea. Please make sure to go back to the original literature (e.g. Weick, see our whitepaper), and also ..."

2015-09-17T10:03:27Z

Created page with "Josef: Hello, thank you for an interesting proposal. I really like the idea. Please make sure to go back to the original literature (e.g. Weick, see our whitepaper), and also ..."

New page

Josef: Hello, thank you for an interesting proposal. I really like the idea. Please make sure to go back to the original literature (e.g. Weick, see our whitepaper), and also follow the "Method" structure we propose.

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:22, 28 September 2015
Line 35:		Line 35:
	* The article is not finalized.		* The article is not finalized.
	''True. I apolagize for the incomplete article You had for review.''		''True. I apolagize for the incomplete article You had for review.''

	* Several sections are not written.		* Several sections are not written.
	''True''		''True''

	* It would have been an advantage if the article had described what “Organisational resilience with mindfulness” is and how the tools are applied and why. It would have made it easier for the reader to get an overview and at the same time find the information the reader is looking for.		* It would have been an advantage if the article had described what “Organisational resilience with mindfulness” is and how the tools are applied and why. It would have made it easier for the reader to get an overview and at the same time find the information the reader is looking for.
	''I hope the article give you these answers now. Unfortunately there is not any tools in mindfulness because it is a management theory or a mind-set. To keep it somehow practical I have given some processes which can be followed by project managers to implement mindfulness. It should be noted that all processes must be fitted to the project to work sucessfully.''		''I hope the article give you these answers now. Unfortunately there is not any tools in mindfulness because it is a management theory or a mind-set. To keep it somehow practical I have given some processes which can be followed by project managers to implement mindfulness. It should be noted that all processes must be fitted to the project to work sucessfully.''
Line 43:		Line 45:
	* From the abstract, the article seems interesting.		* From the abstract, the article seems interesting.
	''Thank you''		''Thank you''

	* Who is seeking sociotechnical?		* Who is seeking sociotechnical?
	''I do not understand the question''		''I do not understand the question''
Line 55:		Line 58:
	* References.		* References.
	''References is given as (Weick & Sutcliffe, 2001)''		''References is given as (Weick & Sutcliffe, 2001)''

	* Lacking a description of the figure.		* Lacking a description of the figure.
	''Description is added for all figures''		''Description is added for all figures''

	* Good shape. The figure is not complete.		* Good shape. The figure is not complete.
	''The figure has been remodeled in PowerPoint to get a crisp graphic which fit to the other figures in the article.''		''The figure has been remodeled in PowerPoint to get a crisp graphic which fit to the other figures in the article.''
Line 63:		Line 68:
	* Using an example. Thus the reader understand better the section.		* Using an example. Thus the reader understand better the section.
	''Examples are included throughout the article. A seperate wikipage have been created with a continous example of how the five principles fit into the processes of a US Navy carrier.''		''Examples are included throughout the article. A seperate wikipage have been created with a continous example of how the five principles fit into the processes of a US Navy carrier.''

	* More in-depth description of Butler & Gray.		* More in-depth description of Butler & Gray.
	''Butler & Gray have been kept on a minimal level to maintain focus on Weick & Sutcliffe.''		''Butler & Gray have been kept on a minimal level to maintain focus on Weick & Sutcliffe.''

	* Do you have a reference for the figure?		* Do you have a reference for the figure?
	''Yes, the reference have been added.''		''Yes, the reference have been added.''


	* The rest of the article is missing, to be written.		* The rest of the article is missing, to be written.