Talk:Negotiation techniques - Revision history

S171379 at 18:33, 20 February 2018

2018-02-20T18:33:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:33, 20 February 2018
Line 121:		Line 121:
	You state multiple times that "research suggests that....", but you don't name or link the research. I guess you just did not include it yet, as I can see you have references but haven't included them in the text yet :).		You state multiple times that "research suggests that....", but you don't name or link the research. I guess you just did not include it yet, as I can see you have references but haven't included them in the text yet :).

	==Feedback 2 \| Reviewer name: ''~~Place your name here~~''==		==Feedback 2 \| Reviewer name: ''Marie Totland''==
	===Question 1 · TEXT===		===Question 1 · TEXT===
	'''Quality of the summary:'''		'''Quality of the summary:'''

	Does the summary make the key focus, insights and/or contribution of the article clear?		Does the summary make the key focus, insights and/or contribution of the article clear?

Line 130:		Line 129:

	===Answer 1===		===Answer 1===
	~~''Answer here''~~
			All in all, it captures the essence of the article.

	===Question 2 · TEXT===		===Question 2 · TEXT===
Line 146:		Line 146:

	===Answer 2===		===Answer 2===
	~~''Answer here''~~		I assume this will also come more as you progress, it is a bit all over the place at the moment, but nothing critical


			Like Kasper said, explain BATNA
	===Question 3 · TEXT===		===Question 3 · TEXT===
	'''Grammar and style:'''		'''Grammar and style:'''
Line 158:		Line 160:

	===Answer 3===		===Answer 3===
	'~~'Answer here''~~		The language is overall good, but could need a bit more flow. In some cases the sentences are too long and a bit heavy to read, and could use with some connections and also wouldn't suffer from a bit shorter sentences.
			The language is a bit informal, maybe try to use "you" a bit less.
	===Question 4 · TEXT===		===Question 4 · TEXT===
	'''Figures and tables:'''		'''Figures and tables:'''
Line 170:		Line 172:

	===Answer 4===		===Answer 4===
	'~~'Answer here''~~		Maybe see if you can find some figures to break up the text a bit, but not sure if it's necessary

	===Question 5 · TEXT===		===Question 5 · TEXT===
Line 183:		Line 185:
	===Answer 5===		===Answer 5===
	''Answer here''		''Answer here''

			Absolutely relevant! Maybe it is possible to make a bullet point list or some sort of "how to" -guide? Don't know if it is difficult, but could make it even more useful.

	===Question 6 · TEXT===		===Question 6 · TEXT===
Line 194:		Line 198:

	===Answer 6===		===Answer 6===
	~~''Answer here''~~		Definitely interesting!


	===Question 7 · TEXT===		===Question 7 · TEXT===
Line 208:		Line 213:

	===Answer 7===		===Answer 7===
	'~~'Answer here''~~		I'm guessing this comes later!

Kasperloewe: /* Feedback 1 | Reviewer name: Kasper Løwe Olsen */

2018-02-19T20:14:53Z

Feedback 1 | Reviewer name: Kasper Løwe Olsen

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:14, 19 February 2018
Line 33:		Line 33:

	===Answer 1===		===Answer 1===
	~~''Answer here''~~
			Short, clear and interesting, makes me want to read the article.

	===Question 2 · TEXT===		===Question 2 · TEXT===
Line 49:		Line 50:

	===Answer 2===		===Answer 2===
	~~''Answer here''~~
			Already in the abstract you mention the term "BATNA" which I was wondering about all the way down to where it was explained.
			Other than that, the structure is fine :)

	===Question 3 · TEXT===		===Question 3 · TEXT===
Line 61:		Line 64:

	===Answer 3===		===Answer 3===
	~~''Answer here''~~
			Great English skills. However, some of the sentences are very long. E.g.: "Every negotiator want to get as much of the goods being discussed as they can but a successful project manager is aware of the fact that there is a broader spectrum of things that matter such as the stability and durability of the agreement and the ability to repeat a similar deal with the stakeholder at a later point in time".

	===Question 4 · TEXT===		===Question 4 · TEXT===
Line 73:		Line 77:

	===Answer 4===		===Answer 4===
	'~~'Answer here''~~
			No tables or figures included. I don't think they would make much sense anyway.

	===Question 5 · TEXT===		===Question 5 · TEXT===
Line 85:		Line 90:

	===Answer 5===		===Answer 5===
	~~''Answer here''~~
			The article is useful in a personal sense and gives thoughts to how one negotiates himself. So great and useful.

	===Question 6 · TEXT===		===Question 6 · TEXT===
Line 97:		Line 103:

	===Answer 6===		===Answer 6===
	~~''Answer here''~~
			Interesting for everyone, as everyone negotiate every now and then, both at work or at home.

	===Question 7 · TEXT===		===Question 7 · TEXT===
Line 111:		Line 118:

	===Answer 7===		===Answer 7===
	''~~Answer here''~~
			You state multiple times that "research suggests that....", but you don't name or link the research. I guess you just did not include it yet, as I can see you have references but haven't included them in the text yet :).

	==Feedback 2 \| Reviewer name: ''Place your name here''==		==Feedback 2 \| Reviewer name: ''Place your name here''==

Kasperloewe: /* Feedback 1 | Reviewer name: Place your name here */

2018-02-19T20:04:52Z

Feedback 1 | Reviewer name: Place your name here

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:04, 19 February 2018
Line 24:		Line 24:


	==Feedback 1 \| Reviewer name: ''~~Place your name here~~''==		==Feedback 1 \| Reviewer name: ''Kasper Løwe Olsen''==
	===Question 1 · TEXT===		===Question 1 · TEXT===
	'''Quality of the summary:'''		'''Quality of the summary:'''
Line 112:		Line 112:
	===Answer 7===		===Answer 7===
	''Answer here''		''Answer here''


	==Feedback 2 \| Reviewer name: ''Place your name here''==		==Feedback 2 \| Reviewer name: ''Place your name here''==

Kasperloewe: /* Feedback 1 | Reviewer name: Place your name here */

2018-02-19T19:49:15Z

Feedback 1 | Reviewer name: Place your name here

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:49, 19 February 2018
Line 114:		Line 114:


	==Feedback 1 \| Reviewer name: ''Place your name here''==		==Feedback 2 \| Reviewer name: ''Place your name here''==
	===Question 1 · TEXT===		===Question 1 · TEXT===
	'''Quality of the summary:'''		'''Quality of the summary:'''

Kasperloewe: /* Abstract Feedback */

2018-02-19T19:48:39Z

Abstract Feedback

Show changes

Hani Mike Rae Selim: /* Abstract Feedback */

2018-02-18T09:31:40Z

Abstract Feedback

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:31, 18 February 2018
Line 7:		Line 7:
	'''Description of the tool/theory/concept''' Well explained		'''Description of the tool/theory/concept''' Well explained

	'''Purpose explanation''' Well addressed, but consider to briefly outline the structure of the article to set the reader's expectations (see "Article in general" for info on article structure		'''Purpose explanation''' Well addressed, but consider to briefly outline the structure of the article to set the reader's expectations (see "Article in general" for info on article structure)

	'''References''' Missing references to list of mandatory references/standards		'''References''' Missing references to list of mandatory references/standards

Hani Mike Rae Selim: /* Abstract Feedback */

2018-02-18T09:31:10Z

Abstract Feedback

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:31, 18 February 2018
Line 7:		Line 7:
	'''Description of the tool/theory/concept''' Well explained		'''Description of the tool/theory/concept''' Well explained

	'''Purpose explanation''' Well addressed, but consider to briefly outline the structure of the article to set the reader's expectations (see "Article in ~~General~~" for info on article structure.		'''Purpose explanation''' Well addressed, but consider to briefly outline the structure of the article to set the reader's expectations (see "Article in general" for info on article structure

	'''References''' Missing references to list of mandatory references/standards		'''References''' Missing references to list of mandatory references/standards

Hani Mike Rae Selim: /* Abstract Feedback */

2018-02-18T09:30:44Z

Abstract Feedback

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:30, 18 February 2018
Line 7:		Line 7:
	'''Description of the tool/theory/concept''' Well explained		'''Description of the tool/theory/concept''' Well explained

	'''Purpose explanation''' Well addressed, but consider to briefly outline the structure of article to set the reader's expectations (see "Article in General" for info on article structure.		'''Purpose explanation''' Well addressed, but consider to briefly outline the structure of the article to set the reader's expectations (see "Article in General" for info on article structure.

	'''References''' Missing references to list of mandatory references/standards		'''References''' Missing references to list of mandatory references/standards

Hani Mike Rae Selim: Created page with "==Abstract Feedback== '''Text clarity''' Good '''Language''' Good with minor spelling mistakes: e.g. write "her" instead of "hers" and write "role" instead of "rolle..."

2018-02-18T09:30:21Z

Created page with "==Abstract Feedback== '''Text clarity''' Good '''Language''' Good with minor spelling mistakes: e.g. write "her" instead of "hers" and write "role" instead of "rolle..."

New page

==Abstract Feedback==

'''Text clarity''' Good

'''Language''' Good with minor spelling mistakes: e.g. write "her" instead of "hers" and write "role" instead of "rolle"

'''Description of the tool/theory/concept''' Well explained

'''Purpose explanation''' Well addressed, but consider to briefly outline the structure of article to set the reader's expectations (see "Article in General" for info on article structure.

'''References''' Missing references to list of mandatory references/standards

'''Relevance of article''' Relevant

'''Article in general''' Good topic, but consider the structure of your article. The following structure is recommended

<ol>
<li> Summary/abstract
<li> Big idea/theory
<li> Application
<li> Limitations
<li> Annotated bibliography
</ol>