Talk:Meetings Management - Revision history

S172569: /* Feedback 2 | Reviewer name: Lukasz Marczuk */

2018-02-24T17:43:22Z

Feedback 2 | Reviewer name: Lukasz Marczuk

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:43, 24 February 2018
Line 122:		Line 122:

	===Answer 1===		===Answer 1===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''The summary is conducted well, it is difficult to verify how it contributes to the entire article, since it is not finished.''

	===Question 2 · TEXT===		===Question 2 · TEXT===
Line 138:		Line 138:

	===Answer 2===		===Answer 2===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''The introduced structure seems logical and well planed, unfortunately it is not possible to verify further, due to lack of content.''

	===Question 3 · TEXT===		===Question 3 · TEXT===
Line 150:		Line 150:

	===Answer 3===		===Answer 3===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''Since article is not finished, it is not possible to verify it. For the exiting part, no errors were detected.''

	===Question 4 · TEXT===		===Question 4 · TEXT===
Line 162:		Line 162:

	===Answer 4===		===Answer 4===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''There are no figures nor tables present in the article.''

	===Question 5 · TEXT===		===Question 5 · TEXT===
Line 174:		Line 174:

	===Answer 5===		===Answer 5===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''Article not finished.''

	===Question 6 · TEXT===		===Question 6 · TEXT===
Line 186:		Line 186:

	===Answer 6===		===Answer 6===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''Article not finished.''

	===Question 7 · TEXT===		===Question 7 · TEXT===
Line 200:		Line 200:

	===Answer 7===		===Answer 7===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''Article not finished.''

Marianne at 14:54, 18 February 2018

2018-02-18T14:54:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:54, 18 February 2018
Line 20:		Line 20:

	==Feedback 1 \| Reviewer name: ''Marianne Delp (reviewed 18/02)''==		==Feedback 1 \| Reviewer name: ''Marianne Delp (reviewed 18/02)''==
	===Question 1 ~~· TEXT~~===		===Question 1 ===
	'''Quality of the summary:'''		'''Quality of the summary:'''

Line 30:		Line 30:
	''Difficult to answer and come with improvements since the wiki-article only contains abstract and a couple of sentences about the meeting roles and The 3 Stages of Meetings. But one question here could be that you mention 'Meeting Management' can be used in project management, but can it also be implemented in project and program management? Why/Why not? Or conclude that your article focuses is only on Project Management.''		''Difficult to answer and come with improvements since the wiki-article only contains abstract and a couple of sentences about the meeting roles and The 3 Stages of Meetings. But one question here could be that you mention 'Meeting Management' can be used in project management, but can it also be implemented in project and program management? Why/Why not? Or conclude that your article focuses is only on Project Management.''

	===Question 2 ~~· TEXT~~===		===Question 2 ===
	'''Structure and logic of the article:'''		'''Structure and logic of the article:'''

Line 46:		Line 46:
	''Difficult to answer and come with improvements since the wiki-article only contains abstract and a couple of sentences about the meeting roles and The 3 Stages of Meetings''		''Difficult to answer and come with improvements since the wiki-article only contains abstract and a couple of sentences about the meeting roles and The 3 Stages of Meetings''

	===Question 3 ~~· TEXT~~===		===Question 3 ===
	'''Grammar and style:'''		'''Grammar and style:'''

Line 58:		Line 58:
	''Grammar is good, and good length of sentences. Presise language. No improvement suggestions here.''		''Grammar is good, and good length of sentences. Presise language. No improvement suggestions here.''

	===Question 4 ~~· TEXT~~===		===Question 4 ===
	'''Figures and tables:'''		'''Figures and tables:'''

Line 70:		Line 70:
	''No figures in the article''		''No figures in the article''

	===Question 5 ~~· TEXT~~===		===Question 5 ===
	'''Interest and relevance:'''		'''Interest and relevance:'''

Line 82:		Line 82:
	''This is well explained in the abstract. Good! '		''This is well explained in the abstract. Good! '

	===Question 6 ~~· TEXT~~===		===Question 6 ===
	'''Depth of treatment:'''		'''Depth of treatment:'''

Line 94:		Line 94:
	''Relevant for practitioner to read! Improvements are to add more sources, that you'll probably do when the article is finished'		''Relevant for practitioner to read! Improvements are to add more sources, that you'll probably do when the article is finished'

	===Question 7 ~~· TEXT~~===		===Question 7 ===
	'''Annotated bibliography:'''		'''Annotated bibliography:'''

Marianne at 14:34, 18 February 2018

2018-02-18T14:34:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:34, 18 February 2018
Line 19:		Line 19:
	</ol>		</ol>

	==Feedback 1 \| Reviewer name: ''Marianne Delp''==		==Feedback 1 \| Reviewer name: ''Marianne Delp (reviewed 18/02)''==
	===Question 1 · TEXT===		===Question 1 · TEXT===
	'''Quality of the summary:'''		'''Quality of the summary:'''
Line 28:		Line 28:

	===Answer 1===		===Answer 1===
	''~~Answer~~ here''		''Difficult to answer and come with improvements since the wiki-article only contains abstract and a couple of sentences about the meeting roles and The 3 Stages of Meetings. But one question here could be that you mention 'Meeting Management' can be used in project management, but can it also be implemented in project and program management? Why/Why not? Or conclude that your article focuses is only on Project Management.''

	===Question 2 · TEXT===		===Question 2 · TEXT===
Line 44:		Line 44:

	===Answer 2===		===Answer 2===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''Difficult to answer and come with improvements since the wiki-article only contains abstract and a couple of sentences about the meeting roles and The 3 Stages of Meetings''

	===Question 3 · TEXT===		===Question 3 · TEXT===
Line 56:		Line 56:

	===Answer 3===		===Answer 3===
	''~~Answer~~ here''		''Grammar is good, and good length of sentences. Presise language. No improvement suggestions here.''

	===Question 4 · TEXT===		===Question 4 · TEXT===
Line 68:		Line 68:

	===Answer 4===		===Answer 4===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''No figures in the article''

	===Question 5 · TEXT===		===Question 5 · TEXT===
Line 80:		Line 80:

	===Answer 5===		===Answer 5===
	''~~Answer here'~~'		''This is well explained in the abstract. Good! '

	===Question 6 · TEXT===		===Question 6 · TEXT===
Line 92:		Line 92:

	===Answer 6===		===Answer 6===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''Relevant for practitioner to read! Improvements are to add more sources, that you'll probably do when the article is finished'

	===Question 7 · TEXT===		===Question 7 · TEXT===
Line 106:		Line 106:

	===Answer 7===		===Answer 7===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''The two sources referred to in the article seems legit and reliable. One of the sources is referring to American empirical data regarding the subject - good!''

Marianne at 11:12, 17 February 2018

2018-02-17T11:12:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:12, 17 February 2018
Line 113:		Line 113:


	==Feedback 2 \| Reviewer name: ''~~Place your name here~~''==		==Feedback 2 \| Reviewer name: ''Lukasz Marczuk''==
	===Question 1 · TEXT===		===Question 1 · TEXT===
	'''Quality of the summary:'''		'''Quality of the summary:'''

Marianne at 11:09, 17 February 2018

2018-02-17T11:09:42Z

Show changes

Hani Mike Rae Selim: /* Abstract Feedback */

2018-02-13T21:26:44Z

Abstract Feedback

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:26, 13 February 2018
Line 7:		Line 7:
	'''Description of the tool/theory/concept''' Easy to follow		'''Description of the tool/theory/concept''' Easy to follow

	'''Purpose explanation''' Elaborate on the purpose of the article - what will the reader get out of this/learn?		'''Purpose explanation''' Elaborate on the purpose of the article - what will the reader get out of this/learn? Briefly explain the structure of the article in the abstract to set reader expectations

	'''References''' Missing appropriate references to mandatory list of references		'''References''' Missing appropriate references to mandatory list of references

Hani Mike Rae Selim: Created page with "==Abstract Feedback== '''Text clarity''' Text is coherent '''Language''' Good, but try to write shorter and more concise scentences '''Description of the tool/theor..."

2018-02-13T21:25:57Z

Created page with "==Abstract Feedback== '''Text clarity''' Text is coherent '''Language''' Good, but try to write shorter and more concise scentences '''Description of the tool/theor..."

New page

==Abstract Feedback==

'''Text clarity''' Text is coherent

'''Language''' Good, but try to write shorter and more concise scentences

'''Description of the tool/theory/concept''' Easy to follow

'''Purpose explanation''' Elaborate on the purpose of the article - what will the reader get out of this/learn?

'''References''' Missing appropriate references to mandatory list of references

'''Relevance of article''' Consider the following:

<ol>
<li> Who is the reader? Project Manager or Sponsor etc?
<li> Add more context around project management e.g. meetings the Project Manager organizes and leads with the project steering group
<li> Ensure depth of the article so it contributes to the project management community more than a normal web search
</ol>