Talk:Managing Uncertainty and Risk on the Project - Revision history

DanielKrogh at 14:08, 29 September 2015

2015-09-29T14:08:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:08, 29 September 2015
Line 25:		Line 25:
	*Expected to see pros/cons		*Expected to see pros/cons
	*Implementations would narrow the whole subject and make it more interesting		*Implementations would narrow the whole subject and make it more interesting
	Generally speaking a more wiki style text, with hyperlinks,more bibliography and see also section would be more appropriate to this great text.		Generally speaking a more wiki style text, with hyperlinks,more bibliography and see also section would be more appropriate to this great text.

			'''Author feedback: I tried to narrow the article so that I have focus on project management and the tool. I deleted that part with the comparing the different definitions. I have made the relevant inter-wiki links that fitted in this article. I have answered how to use the the tool. I have used more references, so the credibility is higher. Limitations and strengths has been added as well. '''

	== Reviewer 3 - s141938 ==		== Reviewer 3 - s141938 ==

DanielKrogh: /* Reviewer 3 - s141938 */

2015-09-29T13:51:16Z

Reviewer 3 - s141938

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:51, 29 September 2015
Line 45:		Line 45:

	Conclusion: Great article and properly written, but needs to be restructured a bit for quicker scanning of the article and to fit the method article type.		Conclusion: Great article and properly written, but needs to be restructured a bit for quicker scanning of the article and to fit the method article type.
	'''
	Author feedback: I deleted a part of the definition section so that it made more sense. I scoped the article so that I focused on project management part only. I added limitation/strengths part. I also added more references (I was just not finished with the article at that point) :) I fitted the article to the type 1 article, so that I have the right structure.'''		'''Author feedback: I deleted a part of the definition section so that it made more sense. I scoped the article so that I focused on project management part only. I added limitation/strengths part. I also added more references (I was just not finished with the article at that point) :) I fitted the article to the type 1 article, so that I have the right structure.'''

DanielKrogh: /* Reviewer 3 - s141938 */

2015-09-29T13:50:52Z

Reviewer 3 - s141938

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:50, 29 September 2015
Line 45:		Line 45:

	Conclusion: Great article and properly written, but needs to be restructured a bit for quicker scanning of the article and to fit the method article type.		Conclusion: Great article and properly written, but needs to be restructured a bit for quicker scanning of the article and to fit the method article type.
			'''
	Author feedback: I deleted a part of the definition section so that it made more sense. I scoped the article so that I focused on project management part only. I added limitation/strengths part. I also added more references (I was just not finished with the article at that point) :) I fitted the article to the type 1 article, so that I have the right structure.		Author feedback: I deleted a part of the definition section so that it made more sense. I scoped the article so that I focused on project management part only. I added limitation/strengths part. I also added more references (I was just not finished with the article at that point) :) I fitted the article to the type 1 article, so that I have the right structure.'''

DanielKrogh: /* Reviewer 3 - s141938 */

2015-09-29T13:50:34Z

Reviewer 3 - s141938

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:50, 29 September 2015
Line 45:		Line 45:

	Conclusion: Great article and properly written, but needs to be restructured a bit for quicker scanning of the article and to fit the method article type.		Conclusion: Great article and properly written, but needs to be restructured a bit for quicker scanning of the article and to fit the method article type.

			Author feedback: I deleted a part of the definition section so that it made more sense. I scoped the article so that I focused on project management part only. I added limitation/strengths part. I also added more references (I was just not finished with the article at that point) :) I fitted the article to the type 1 article, so that I have the right structure.

DanielKrogh at 13:47, 29 September 2015

2015-09-29T13:47:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:47, 29 September 2015
Line 11:		Line 11:
	* Good that there are references on every figure		* Good that there are references on every figure

			'''Author feedback: I have changed to scope, so that I have a clearer scope on project management and excluded the portfolio part. I deleted a part of the definition section, so that it made more sense. Also I changed the "body" of the article to fit it to Article type 1. I made the full name before the acronym and made it as hyperlink.
			'''

	Reviewer 2:Andkamp		Reviewer 2:Andkamp

Buurbuur at 22:09, 22 September 2015

2015-09-22T22:09:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:09, 22 September 2015
Line 4:		Line 4:
	* I found the topic very interesting and very relevant for this course.		* I found the topic very interesting and very relevant for this course.
	* Good that many point are illustrated with an appropriate figure.		* Good that many point are illustrated with an appropriate figure.
			* However i think you scope maybe is too big, maybe just focus on managing uncertainty and risk in either project or portfolio
	* In the ''definition'' section i find it difficult to understand and navigate between all the different definitions, maybe it could make it more easy and understandable if you make a grid to show the difference. Or list them up on bulletspoints		* In the ''definition'' section i find it difficult to understand and navigate between all the different definitions, maybe it could make it more easy and understandable if you make a grid to show the difference. Or list them up on bulletspoints
	* Secure that the article fit to one of the two article types i relation to the required topics		* Secure that the article fit to one of the two article types i relation to the required topics

Buurbuur at 22:06, 22 September 2015

2015-09-22T22:06:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:06, 22 September 2015
Line 4:		Line 4:
	* I found the topic very interesting and very relevant for this course.		* I found the topic very interesting and very relevant for this course.
	* Good that many point are illustrated with an appropriate figure.		* Good that many point are illustrated with an appropriate figure.
	* However I find the scope very broad, maybe choose only to focus on project or portofolio management.
	* In the ''definition'' section i find it difficult to understand and navigate between all the different definitions, maybe it could make it more easy and understandable if you make a grid to show the difference. Or list them up on bulletspoints		* In the ''definition'' section i find it difficult to understand and navigate between all the different definitions, maybe it could make it more easy and understandable if you make a grid to show the difference. Or list them up on bulletspoints
	* Secure that the article fit to one of the two article types i relation to the required topics		* Secure that the article fit to one of the two article types i relation to the required topics

Buurbuur at 22:05, 22 September 2015

2015-09-22T22:05:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:05, 22 September 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Review1, Buurbuur:		tool that can be applied for managing uncertainty and risk in a project. Remember that your article has to fit one of the two article types and the required structure -)
	- I found the topic very interesting and very relevant for this course.
	- Good that many point are illustrated with an appropriate figure.		Review1, Buurbuur:
	- However I find the scope very broad, maybe choose only to focus on project or portofolio management.		* I found the topic very interesting and very relevant for this course.
	- In the ''definition'' section i find it difficult to understand and navigate between all the different definitions, maybe it could make it more easy and understandable if you make a grid to show the difference. Or list them up on bulletspoints		* Good that many point are illustrated with an appropriate figure.
	- Secure that the article fit to one of the two article types i relation to the required topics		* However I find the scope very broad, maybe choose only to focus on project or portofolio management.
	- However I find the figures clear and understandable		* In the ''definition'' section i find it difficult to understand and navigate between all the different definitions, maybe it could make it more easy and understandable if you make a grid to show the difference. Or list them up on bulletspoints
	- Good that there are references on every figure		* Secure that the article fit to one of the two article types i relation to the required topics
			* Write the full wording before abbreviation in this case i refer to the use of FMEA
			* However I find the figures clear and understandable
			* Good that there are references on every figure



	Anna: It is an interesting and very relevant topic, however, I would suggest that you try to narrow down the scope and focus your article on one method/tool that can be applied for managing uncertainty and risk in a project. Remember that your article has to fit one of the two article types and the required structure :)

	Reviewer 2:Andkamp		Reviewer 2:Andkamp

S141938 at 20:23, 22 September 2015

2015-09-22T20:23:06Z

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 Anna: It is an interesting and very relevant topic, however, I would suggest that you try to narrow down the scope and focus your article on one method/tool that can be applied for managing uncertainty and risk in a project. Remember that your article has to fit one of the two article types and the required structure :)
-Reviewer 3:Andkamp
+Reviewer 2:Andkamp
 *Great use of English and nice sentences structure
 *Great subject but, very broad, needs to be narrowed a little bit
@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 *Implementations would narrow the whole subject and make it more interesting
 Generally speaking a more wiki style text, with hyperlinks,more bibliography and see also section would be more appropriate to this great text.

Andkamp at 17:12, 22 September 2015

2015-09-22T17:12:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:12, 22 September 2015
Line 11:		Line 11:

	Anna: It is an interesting and very relevant topic, however, I would suggest that you try to narrow down the scope and focus your article on one method/tool that can be applied for managing uncertainty and risk in a project. Remember that your article has to fit one of the two article types and the required structure :)		Anna: It is an interesting and very relevant topic, however, I would suggest that you try to narrow down the scope and focus your article on one method/tool that can be applied for managing uncertainty and risk in a project. Remember that your article has to fit one of the two article types and the required structure :)

			Reviewer 3:Andkamp
			*Great use of English and nice sentences structure
			*Great subject but, very broad, needs to be narrowed a little bit
			*Nice figures, but the matrix with the papers is something I expected to be illustrated in matrix and not a Figure, in order to maintain the wiki style of the article.
			*Nice Referencing of the figures, although it hadn't any inter-wiki links or in text links.
			*The interest of a practitioner could be greater if there was more focusing in aspects of this subject.
			*Profound relation with project management
			*The good structure assures logical flow
			*Extremely poor reference material for such extended article, that could lead someone with bad intensions to think that there's some amount of plagiarism
			*Expected to see pros/cons
			*Implementations would narrow the whole subject and make it more interesting
			Generally speaking a more wiki style text, with hyperlinks,more bibliography and see also section would be more appropriate to this great text.