Talk:Line Balancing - Yamazumi Chart Method - Revision history

S171379 at 12:44, 21 February 2018

2018-02-21T12:44:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:44, 21 February 2018
Line 91:		Line 91:


	==Feedback 2 \| Reviewer name: ~~Cathrine Aasenden~~ ==		==Feedback 2 \| Reviewer name: ==

	===Question 1===		===Question 1===

C.Fay at 20:24, 19 February 2018

2018-02-19T20:24:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:24, 19 February 2018
Line 91:		Line 91:


	==Feedback 1 \| Reviewer name: Cathrine Aasenden ==		==Feedback 2 \| Reviewer name: Cathrine Aasenden ==

	===Question 1===		===Question 1===

C.Fay at 20:23, 19 February 2018

2018-02-19T20:23:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:23, 19 February 2018
Line 86:		Line 86:

	=====Answer 7=====		=====Answer 7=====





			==Feedback 1 \| Reviewer name: Cathrine Aasenden ==

			===Question 1===
			====Quality of the summary:====

			Does the summary make the key focus, insights and/or contribution of the article clear?

			What would you suggest to improve?

			=====Answer 1=====
			Great overview of the topic.

			===Question 2===
			====Structure and logic of the article:====

			Is the argument clear?

			Is there a logical flow to the article?

			Does one part build upon the other?

			Is the article consistent in its argument and free of contradictions?

			What would you suggest to improve?

			=====Answer 2=====
			The argumentation is clear and the structure is logical. Would recommend you to also look into some restrictions with the method.

			===Question 3 ===
			====Grammar and style:====

			Is the writing free of grammatical and spelling errors?

			Is the language precise without unnecessary fill words?

			What would you suggest to improve?

			=====Answer 3=====
			Some grammatical errors and some fill sentences.

			===Question 4===
			====Figures and tables:====

			Are figures and tables clear?

			Do they summarize the key points of the article in a meaningful way?

			What would you suggest to improve?

			=====Answer 4=====
			Very good use of tables.


			===Question 5===
			====Interest and relevance:====

			Is the article of high practical and / or academic relevance?

			Is it made clear in the article why / how it is relevant?

			What would you suggest to improve?

			=====Answer 5=====
			The step-by-step procedure provides the user with an clear guide on how to apply the method. The topic is of academic relevance.

			===Question 6===
			====Depth of treatment:====

			Is the article interesting for a practitioner or academic to read?

			Does it make a significant contribution beyond a cursory web search?

			What would you suggest to improve?

			=====Answer 6=====
			There are several articles covering this topic online, however, none quite as thorough as this article will be when finished.


			===Question 7 ===
			====Annotated bibliography:====

			Does the article properly cite and acknowledge previous work?

			Does it briefly summarize the key references at the end of the article?

			Is it based on empirical data instead of opinion?

			What would you suggest to improve?

			=====Answer 7=====






	==Abstract Feedback==		==Abstract Feedback==

S172048: /* Annotated bibliography: */

2018-02-19T19:38:39Z

Annotated bibliography:

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:38, 19 February 2018
Line 85:		Line 85:
	What would you suggest to improve?		What would you suggest to improve?

	Answer 7		=====Answer 7=====


	==Abstract Feedback==		==Abstract Feedback==

S172048: /* Depth of treatment: */

2018-02-19T19:38:30Z

Depth of treatment:

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:38, 19 February 2018
Line 72:		Line 72:
	What would you suggest to improve?		What would you suggest to improve?

	Answer 6		=====Answer 6=====


	===Question 7 ===		===Question 7 ===

S172048: /* Interest and relevance: */

2018-02-19T19:38:22Z

Interest and relevance:

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:38, 19 February 2018
Line 60:		Line 60:
	What would you suggest to improve?		What would you suggest to improve?

	Answer 5		=====Answer 5=====
	''I guess you will include some more about this''		''I guess you will include some more about this''


	===Question 6===		===Question 6===

S172048: /* Figures and tables: */

2018-02-19T19:38:14Z

Figures and tables:

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:38, 19 February 2018
Line 48:		Line 48:
	What would you suggest to improve?		What would you suggest to improve?

	Answer 4		=====Answer 4=====
	''Figures and tables are good, and they make it easy to understand what is explained in the text.''		''Figures and tables are good, and they make it easy to understand what is explained in the text.''

S172048: /* Grammar and style: */

2018-02-19T19:38:06Z

Grammar and style:

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:38, 19 February 2018
Line 36:		Line 36:
	What would you suggest to improve?		What would you suggest to improve?

	Answer 3		=====Answer 3=====
	''Some spelling errors, but as this is a draft, I will skip this question.''		''Some spelling errors, but as this is a draft, I will skip this question.''

S172048: /* Answer 2 */

2018-02-19T19:37:53Z

Answer 2

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:37, 19 February 2018
Line 24:		Line 24:
	What would you suggest to improve?		What would you suggest to improve?

	===Answer 2===		=====Answer 2=====
	''I will review the article when it's finished. But the current structure looks good, and for the "methodology" part it is easy to understand the concept (well explained through tables and examples). Add more to "benefits"''		''I will review the article when it's finished. But the current structure looks good, and for the "methodology" part it is easy to understand the concept (well explained through tables and examples). Add more to "benefits"''



	===Question 3 ===		===Question 3 ===

S172048: /* Answer 1 */

2018-02-19T19:37:37Z

Answer 1

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:37, 19 February 2018
Line 8:		Line 8:
	What would you suggest to improve?		What would you suggest to improve?

	===Answer 1===		=====Answer 1=====
	''The objective of the article is clear from the summary, and the text is coherent.''		''The objective of the article is clear from the summary, and the text is coherent.''


	===Question 2===		===Question 2===