Talk:Lean Project Management tools - Revision history

Rikke at 16:13, 19 February 2018

2018-02-19T16:13:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:13, 19 February 2018
Line 26:		Line 26:

	===Answer 1===		===Answer 1===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''Reading the summary I expect to get basic knowledge (short introduction to) Lean principles, Muda, how to decide/measure Value for customer, Diming cycle, Agile project management inkl. Scrum, how Diming is similar to Agile (and where it is not?) and how some deepening knowledge of Lean Project Management and how and where in the process the different tools are used helpful?''

	Reading the summary I expect to get basic knowledge (short introduction to) Lean principles, Muda, how to decide/measure Value for customer, Diming cycle, Agile project management inkl. Scrum, how Diming is similar to Agile (and where it is not?) and how some deepening knowledge of Lean Project Management and how and where in the process the different tools are used helpful?		''Hov - kan jo bare skrive dansk.
			Helt overordnet ide - kunne det være interessant at skrive artiklen med Lean principles for øje? Fx. Value for customer (mig som læser) - og hvem forventer du at jeg er (Hvad er værdi for mig - praktisk viden/akademisk viden) - Value stream (map all the processes that is necessary), Eliminate Waste (hvad er ikke anvendeligt - eller hvad i de foreslåede værktøjer er ikke anvendeligt, mens andet i værktøjet måske er).''
	Hov - kan jo bare skrive dansk.
	Helt overordnet ide - kunne det være interessant at skrive artiklen med Lean principles for øje? Fx. Value for customer (mig som læser) - og hvem forventer du at jeg er (Hvad er værdi for mig - praktisk viden/akademisk viden) - Value stream (map all the processes that is necessary), Eliminate Waste (hvad er ikke anvendeligt - eller hvad i de foreslåede værktøjer er ikke anvendeligt, mens andet i værktøjet måske er).

	===Question 2 · TEXT===		===Question 2 · TEXT===
Line 47:		Line 45:

	===Answer 2===		===Answer 2===
	''~~Answer here''~~		''Du er tydeligvis igang med at skrive og skabe en struktur i teksten, så der mangler naturligt nok fortsat en rød tråd og naturligt flow for mig som læser.''

	Du er tydeligvis igang med at skrive og skabe en struktur i teksten, så der mangler naturligt nok fortsat en rød tråd og naturligt flow for mig som læser.

	Hvorfor fx Six Sigma - summary skriver intet om hvorfor denne introduceres eller hvilken (naturlig eller eksperimenterende) sammenhæng den har med Lean Project Management. Hvad er den naturlige sammenhæng mellem Lean og Six Sigma? (lidt for teknisk beskrevet ift. hvordan de øvrige redskaber er beskrevet).

			''Hvorfor fx Six Sigma - summary skriver intet om hvorfor denne introduceres eller hvilken (naturlig eller eksperimenterende) sammenhæng den har med Lean Project Management. Hvad er den naturlige sammenhæng mellem Lean og Six Sigma? (lidt for teknisk beskrevet ift. hvordan de øvrige redskaber er beskrevet).
			''
	===Question 3 · TEXT===		===Question 3 · TEXT===
	'''Grammar and style:'''		'''Grammar and style:'''
Line 63:		Line 59:

	===Answer 3===		===Answer 3===
	''~~Answer here''~~		''Fint og forståeligt sprog. Der er en detalje i indledningen hvor du sammenligner Agile og Lean og skriver respectively uses Kanban and Scrum. Dette betyder at Agile benytter Kanban og Lean bruger Scrum. Mener det er omvendt.''
	Fint og forståeligt sprog. Der er en detalje i indledningen hvor du sammenligner Agile og Lean og skriver respectively uses Kanban and Scrum. Dette betyder at Agile benytter Kanban og Lean bruger Scrum. Mener det er omvendt.

	===Question 4 · TEXT===		===Question 4 · TEXT===
Line 76:		Line 71:

	===Answer 4===		===Answer 4===
	''~~Answer here''~~		''Ingen figurer og/eller tabeller endnu. At vise Kanban synes relevant. Ligeledes kan Diming vises grafisk og vil give lidt liv i teksten.''

	Ingen figurer og/eller tabeller endnu. At vise Kanban synes relevant. Ligeledes kan Diming vises grafisk og vil give lidt liv i teksten.

	===Question 5 · TEXT===		===Question 5 · TEXT===
Line 90:		Line 83:

	===Answer 5===		===Answer 5===
	''~~Answer here''~~		''Svært at sige om du sigter mod praktisk anvendelig eller akademisk artikel. Men nok vigtigt at vælge enten/eller og gøre det klart i introduktionen, eller sikre begge dele - bagvedliggende teori og how to apply in practice.''
			''Endvidere kunne det for mig som læser være interessant at vide om (og i hvilken grad) Lean Project Management og de foreslåede værktøjer anvendes i dag i denne kontekst - evt. i hvilke brancher - eller om artiklen har til formål at inspirere mig til noget nyt.''
	Svært at sige om du sigter mod praktisk anvendelig eller akademisk artikel. Men nok vigtigt at vælge enten/eller og gøre det klart i introduktionen, eller sikre begge dele - bagvedliggende teori og how to apply in practice.
	Endvidere kunne det for mig som læser være interessant at vide om (og i hvilken grad) Lean Project Management og de foreslåede værktøjer anvendes i dag i denne kontekst - evt. i hvilke brancher - eller om artiklen har til formål at inspirere mig til noget nyt.

	===Question 6 · TEXT===		===Question 6 · TEXT===
Line 105:		Line 96:

	===Answer 6===		===Answer 6===
	''~~Answer here''~~		''Savner lidt at se sammenhængene imellem de værktøjer du vælger at præsentere - relevansen ift. Lean men også ift. hinanden. Kan man sige noget om det/illustrere det?''

	Savner lidt at se sammenhængene imellem de værktøjer du vælger at præsentere - relevansen ift. Lean men også ift. hinanden. Kan man sige noget om det/illustrere det?

	===Question 7 · TEXT===		===Question 7 · TEXT===
Line 121:		Line 110:

	===Answer 7===		===Answer 7===
	~~''Answer here''~~

	Ikke endnu.		''Ikke endnu. Se Scopus og Google Scholar og måske er der andre APPPM-wikis der er relevante at linke til/snitflade/uddybende ift. områder af din wiki''

	==Feedback 2 \| Reviewer name: ''Nina''==		==Feedback 2 \| Reviewer name: ''Nina''==

Rikke at 15:09, 19 February 2018

2018-02-19T15:09:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:09, 19 February 2018
Line 31:		Line 31:

	Hov - kan jo bare skrive dansk.		Hov - kan jo bare skrive dansk.
	Helt overordnet - kunne det være interessant at skrive artiklen med Lean principles for øje? Fx. Value for customer (mig som læser) - og hvem forventer du at jeg er (Hvad er værdi for mig - praktisk viden/akademisk viden) -		Helt overordnet ide - kunne det være interessant at skrive artiklen med Lean principles for øje? Fx. Value for customer (mig som læser) - og hvem forventer du at jeg er (Hvad er værdi for mig - praktisk viden/akademisk viden) - Value stream (map all the processes that is necessary), Eliminate Waste (hvad er ikke anvendeligt - eller hvad i de foreslåede værktøjer er ikke anvendeligt, mens andet i værktøjet måske er).

	===Question 2 · TEXT===		===Question 2 · TEXT===
	'''Structure and logic of the article:'''		'''Structure and logic of the article:'''
Line 121:		Line 122:
	===Answer 7===		===Answer 7===
	''Answer here''		''Answer here''

			Ikke endnu.

	==Feedback 2 \| Reviewer name: ''Nina''==		==Feedback 2 \| Reviewer name: ''Nina''==

Rikke at 15:06, 19 February 2018

2018-02-19T15:06:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:06, 19 February 2018
Line 31:		Line 31:

	Hov - kan jo bare skrive dansk.		Hov - kan jo bare skrive dansk.
	Helt overordnet - kunne det være interessant at skrive artiklen ~~efter~~ Lean principles?		Helt overordnet - kunne det være interessant at skrive artiklen med Lean principles for øje? Fx. Value for customer (mig som læser) - og hvem forventer du at jeg er (Hvad er værdi for mig - praktisk viden/akademisk viden) -
	===Question 2 · TEXT===		===Question 2 · TEXT===
	'''Structure and logic of the article:'''		'''Structure and logic of the article:'''

Rikke at 15:04, 19 February 2018

2018-02-19T15:04:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:04, 19 February 2018
Line 27:		Line 27:
	===Answer 1===		===Answer 1===
	''Answer here''		''Answer here''

	Reading the summary I expect to get basic knowledge (short introduction to) Lean principles, Muda, how to decide/measure Value for customer, Diming cycle, Agile project management inkl. Scrum, how Diming is similar to Agile (and where it is not?) and how some deepening knowledge of Lean Project Management and how and where in the process the different tools are used helpful?		Reading the summary I expect to get basic knowledge (short introduction to) Lean principles, Muda, how to decide/measure Value for customer, Diming cycle, Agile project management inkl. Scrum, how Diming is similar to Agile (and where it is not?) and how some deepening knowledge of Lean Project Management and how and where in the process the different tools are used helpful?

	Hov - kan jo bare skrive dansk.		Hov - kan jo bare skrive dansk.
			Helt overordnet - kunne det være interessant at skrive artiklen efter Lean principles?
	===Question 2 · TEXT===		===Question 2 · TEXT===
	'''Structure and logic of the article:'''		'''Structure and logic of the article:'''
Line 45:		Line 47:
	===Answer 2===		===Answer 2===
	''Answer here''		''Answer here''

	Du er tydeligvis igang med at skrive og skabe en struktur i teksten, så der mangler naturligt nok fortsat en rød tråd og naturligt flow for mig som læser.		Du er tydeligvis igang med at skrive og skabe en struktur i teksten, så der mangler naturligt nok fortsat en rød tråd og naturligt flow for mig som læser.

Line 73:		Line 76:
	===Answer 4===		===Answer 4===
	''Answer here''		''Answer here''

			Ingen figurer og/eller tabeller endnu. At vise Kanban synes relevant. Ligeledes kan Diming vises grafisk og vil give lidt liv i teksten.

	===Question 5 · TEXT===		===Question 5 · TEXT===
Line 86:		Line 91:
	''Answer here''		''Answer here''

			Svært at sige om du sigter mod praktisk anvendelig eller akademisk artikel. Men nok vigtigt at vælge enten/eller og gøre det klart i introduktionen, eller sikre begge dele - bagvedliggende teori og how to apply in practice.
			Endvidere kunne det for mig som læser være interessant at vide om (og i hvilken grad) Lean Project Management og de foreslåede værktøjer anvendes i dag i denne kontekst - evt. i hvilke brancher - eller om artiklen har til formål at inspirere mig til noget nyt.

	===Question 6 · TEXT===		===Question 6 · TEXT===
	'''Depth of treatment:'''		'''Depth of treatment:'''
Line 97:		Line 105:
	===Answer 6===		===Answer 6===
	''Answer here''		''Answer here''

			Savner lidt at se sammenhængene imellem de værktøjer du vælger at præsentere - relevansen ift. Lean men også ift. hinanden. Kan man sige noget om det/illustrere det?

	===Question 7 · TEXT===		===Question 7 · TEXT===

Nina: /* Answer 2 */

2018-02-19T15:01:07Z

Answer 2

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:01, 19 February 2018
Line 141:		Line 141:
	It is not quite clear why there is a section only dedicated to define a project. I would suggest that the first parts (2+3+4) gets a "Introduction" or "Definitions" or "Background" - framing. This way the reader knows what to expect of the chapters.		It is not quite clear why there is a section only dedicated to define a project. I would suggest that the first parts (2+3+4) gets a "Introduction" or "Definitions" or "Background" - framing. This way the reader knows what to expect of the chapters.

	In the Muda-section, did you plan on describing the waste-types?		In the Muda-section, did you plan on describing the waste-types?''
	''

	===Question 3 · TEXT===		===Question 3 · TEXT===

Nina at 15:00, 19 February 2018

2018-02-19T15:00:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:00, 19 February 2018
Line 112:		Line 112:
	''Answer here''		''Answer here''

	==Feedback 2 \| Reviewer name: ''~~Place your name here~~''==		==Feedback 2 \| Reviewer name: ''Nina''==
	===Question 1 · TEXT===		===Question 1 · TEXT===
	'''Quality of the summary:'''		'''Quality of the summary:'''
Line 121:		Line 121:

	===Answer 1===		===Answer 1===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''The abstract gives a good insight to the article and I think it is nice to read that there will be a "discussion" regarding if Agile and Lean are conflicting concepts.''

	===Question 2 · TEXT===		===Question 2 · TEXT===
Line 137:		Line 137:

	===Answer 2===		===Answer 2===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''The argument is clear and within each chapter there is a good explanation to why it is divided as it is.

			It is not quite clear why there is a section only dedicated to define a project. I would suggest that the first parts (2+3+4) gets a "Introduction" or "Definitions" or "Background" - framing. This way the reader knows what to expect of the chapters.

			In the Muda-section, did you plan on describing the waste-types?
			''

	===Question 3 · TEXT===		===Question 3 · TEXT===
Line 149:		Line 154:

	===Answer 3===		===Answer 3===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''Very nicely written. Good language. Only a few spelling mistakes in the sections that are not done yet''

	===Question 4 · TEXT===		===Question 4 · TEXT===
Line 161:		Line 166:

	===Answer 4===		===Answer 4===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''Going to be good :)''

	===Question 5 · TEXT===		===Question 5 · TEXT===
Line 173:		Line 178:

	===Answer 5===		===Answer 5===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''It is theoretical and explains which practical tools are used. The "why/how" could be more clear from a Project Manager's view.''

	===Question 6 · TEXT===		===Question 6 · TEXT===
Line 185:		Line 190:

	===Answer 6===		===Answer 6===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''The tools are explained to depth but as stated in answer 5, the why/how could be addressed a little further.''

	===Question 7 · TEXT===		===Question 7 · TEXT===
Line 199:		Line 204:

	===Answer 7===		===Answer 7===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''Still under construction''

Rikke at 14:53, 19 February 2018

2018-02-19T14:53:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:53, 19 February 2018
Line 27:		Line 27:
	===Answer 1===		===Answer 1===
	''Answer here''		''Answer here''
			Reading the summary I expect to get basic knowledge (short introduction to) Lean principles, Muda, how to decide/measure Value for customer, Diming cycle, Agile project management inkl. Scrum, how Diming is similar to Agile (and where it is not?) and how some deepening knowledge of Lean Project Management and how and where in the process the different tools are used helpful?

			Hov - kan jo bare skrive dansk.
	===Question 2 · TEXT===		===Question 2 · TEXT===
	'''Structure and logic of the article:'''		'''Structure and logic of the article:'''
Line 43:		Line 45:
	===Answer 2===		===Answer 2===
	''Answer here''		''Answer here''
			Du er tydeligvis igang med at skrive og skabe en struktur i teksten, så der mangler naturligt nok fortsat en rød tråd og naturligt flow for mig som læser.

			Hvorfor fx Six Sigma - summary skriver intet om hvorfor denne introduceres eller hvilken (naturlig eller eksperimenterende) sammenhæng den har med Lean Project Management. Hvad er den naturlige sammenhæng mellem Lean og Six Sigma? (lidt for teknisk beskrevet ift. hvordan de øvrige redskaber er beskrevet).

	===Question 3 · TEXT===		===Question 3 · TEXT===
Line 55:		Line 60:
	===Answer 3===		===Answer 3===
	''Answer here''		''Answer here''
			Fint og forståeligt sprog. Der er en detalje i indledningen hvor du sammenligner Agile og Lean og skriver respectively uses Kanban and Scrum. Dette betyder at Agile benytter Kanban og Lean bruger Scrum. Mener det er omvendt.

	===Question 4 · TEXT===		===Question 4 · TEXT===

Rikke: /* Feedback 1 | Reviewer name: Rikke */

2018-02-19T09:02:30Z

Feedback 1 | Reviewer name: Rikke

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:02, 19 February 2018
Line 16:		Line 16:
	Since Lean approaches are related with different management styles from the recommended literature, please find more relevant literature.		Since Lean approaches are related with different management styles from the recommended literature, please find more relevant literature.

	==Feedback 1 \| Reviewer name: ''Rikke''==		==Feedback 1 \| Reviewer name: ''Rikke - giver feedback i eftermiddag mellem 16:00-17:45 eller 22:30-23:59''==
	Giver feedback i eftermiddag mellem 16:00 - 17:45		Giver feedback i eftermiddag mellem 16:00 - 17:45
	===Question 1 · TEXT===		===Question 1 · TEXT===

Rikke at 09:01, 19 February 2018

2018-02-19T09:01:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:01, 19 February 2018
Line 16:		Line 16:
	Since Lean approaches are related with different management styles from the recommended literature, please find more relevant literature.		Since Lean approaches are related with different management styles from the recommended literature, please find more relevant literature.

	==Feedback 1 \| Reviewer name: ''~~Place your name here~~''==		==Feedback 1 \| Reviewer name: ''Rikke''==
			Giver feedback i eftermiddag mellem 16:00 - 17:45
	===Question 1 · TEXT===		===Question 1 · TEXT===
	'''Quality of the summary:'''		'''Quality of the summary:'''

S122906: /* Abstract Feedback */

2018-02-16T20:34:51Z

Abstract Feedback

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:34, 16 February 2018
Line 12:		Line 12:
	You have a typo with the word "Murda" is MUDA, do not forget to add the definition of Muda and the importance of this word in the article.		You have a typo with the word "Murda" is MUDA, do not forget to add the definition of Muda and the importance of this word in the article.

	Six sigma is an statistical tool/technique developed by motorola for manufacturing processes focused to reduce defects, why is considered a lean tool?, find a reference .		Six sigma is an statistical tool/technique developed by motorola for manufacturing processes focused to reduce defects, why is considered a lean tool?, try find a reference that support this.

	Since Lean approaches are related with different management styles from the recommended literature, please find more relevant literature.		Since Lean approaches are related with different management styles from the recommended literature, please find more relevant literature.