Talk:Lean Project Management - Revision history

S131063: /* Answer to the feedback on "Lean Project Management" by DBDHL */

2014-11-30T23:42:19Z

Answer to the feedback on "Lean Project Management" by DBDHL

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:42, 30 November 2014
Line 29:		Line 29:

	== Answer to the feedback on "Lean Project Management" by DBDHL ==		== Answer to the feedback on "Lean Project Management" by DBDHL ==
	First of all, thank you for your feedback. I will go throughout your points and I will answer your recommendations point by point (I do not answer when the feedbak is good and there is nothing to be checked). I answered in bold letters:		'''First of all, thank you for your feedback. I will go throughout your points and I will answer your recommendations point by point (I do not answer when the feedbak is good and there is nothing to be checked). I answered in bold letters:'''

	=== Formal aspects ===		=== Formal aspects ===

S131063: /* Answer to the feedback on "Lean Project Management" by Linus R.V */

2014-11-30T23:41:55Z

Answer to the feedback on "Lean Project Management" by Linus R.V

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:41, 30 November 2014
Line 112:		Line 112:

	== Answer to the feedback on "Lean Project Management" by Linus R.V==		== Answer to the feedback on "Lean Project Management" by Linus R.V==
	First of all, thank you for your feedback. I will go throughout your points and I will answer your recommendations point by point (I do not answer when the feedbak is good and there is nothing to be checked):		'''First of all, thank you for your feedback. I will go throughout your points and I will answer your recommendations point by point (I do not answer when the feedbak is good and there is nothing to be checked),I answered in bold letters''':

	===Formal aspects===		===Formal aspects===

S131063: /* Answer to the feedback on "Lean Project Management" by DBDHL */

2014-11-30T23:41:32Z

Answer to the feedback on "Lean Project Management" by DBDHL

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:41, 30 November 2014
Line 29:		Line 29:

	== Answer to the feedback on "Lean Project Management" by DBDHL ==		== Answer to the feedback on "Lean Project Management" by DBDHL ==
	First of all, thank you for your feedback. I will go throughout your points and I will answer your recommendations point by point (I do not answer when the feedbak is good and there is nothing to be checked):		First of all, thank you for your feedback. I will go throughout your points and I will answer your recommendations point by point (I do not answer when the feedbak is good and there is nothing to be checked). I answered in bold letters:

	=== Formal aspects ===		=== Formal aspects ===

S131063: /* Content aspects */

2014-11-30T23:40:56Z

Content aspects

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:40, 30 November 2014
Line 63:		Line 63:
	'''I think now is fine, this is a conclusion from all the analysis done throughout the article but I think that it was not clear enough in the text, I reformulated now this part in a better way. Hope now is understandable ;) '''		'''I think now is fine, this is a conclusion from all the analysis done throughout the article but I think that it was not clear enough in the text, I reformulated now this part in a better way. Hope now is understandable ;) '''
	*The article doesn’t seem to have “copy/paste” plagiarism.		*The article doesn’t seem to have “copy/paste” plagiarism.

			'''Thank you very much for your feedback, it has been very usefull and it helps me a lot to improve my article :) '''

	== Feedback on "Lean Project Management" by Linus R.V==		== Feedback on "Lean Project Management" by Linus R.V==

S131063: /* Answer to the feedback on "Lean Project Management" by Linus R.V */

2014-11-30T23:40:35Z

Answer to the feedback on "Lean Project Management" by Linus R.V

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:40, 30 November 2014
Line 157:		Line 157:
	'''As it is a wiki-article, adressing an accademic topic, I tried to do the article in an objective way: based on scientific literature and avoiding my own opinion.'''		'''As it is a wiki-article, adressing an accademic topic, I tried to do the article in an objective way: based on scientific literature and avoiding my own opinion.'''
	* In general the article seems to be free for copy and paste plagiarism, anyway should the author put attention to review sources and destinations to be absolut sure, that copy paste and plagiarism is avoided.		* In general the article seems to be free for copy and paste plagiarism, anyway should the author put attention to review sources and destinations to be absolut sure, that copy paste and plagiarism is avoided.
	Done ;)		'''Done ;)'''

			'''Thank you very much for your feedback, it has been very usefull and it helps me a lot to improve my article :) '''

S131063: /* Content aspects */

2014-11-30T23:39:20Z

Content aspects

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:39, 30 November 2014
Line 150:		Line 150:

	*The resources look a like high to good quality reference material, thus it is hard to define what the article mainly relies on. The links are not taken into consideration.		*The resources look a like high to good quality reference material, thus it is hard to define what the article mainly relies on. The links are not taken into consideration.
			'''What do you mean with "The links are not taken into consideration? If you refer to the references I used them throughout the article... Sorry, I do not understand your point...'''
	*The article is not linked to another APPPM wiki.		*The article is not linked to another APPPM wiki.
	'''The article is clearly linked with other APPPM wiki articles, I did even an especial section in which I included the links to the articles related (Point 5: See also), maybe you did not realised about it...'''		'''The article is clearly linked with other APPPM wiki articles, I did even an especial section in which I included the links to the articles related (Point 5: See also), maybe you did not realised about it...'''

	*Overall the article seems to be quite objective, since the topic by nature doesn't leave much room for interpretation. It is hard to determine if the author avoided, other crucial relevant information and thereby has ben non objective,		*Overall the article seems to be quite objective, since the topic by nature doesn't leave much room for interpretation. It is hard to determine if the author avoided, other crucial relevant information and thereby has ben non objective,
			'''As it is a wiki-article, adressing an accademic topic, I tried to do the article in an objective way: based on scientific literature and avoiding my own opinion.'''
	* In general the article seems to be free for copy and paste plagiarism, anyway should the author put attention to review sources and destinations to be absolut sure, that copy paste and plagiarism is avoided.		* In general the article seems to be free for copy and paste plagiarism, anyway should the author put attention to review sources and destinations to be absolut sure, that copy paste and plagiarism is avoided.
	Done ;)		Done ;)

S131063: /* Content aspects */

2014-11-30T23:35:45Z

Content aspects

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:35, 30 November 2014
Line 152:		Line 152:

	*The article is not linked to another APPPM wiki.		*The article is not linked to another APPPM wiki.
	'''The article is clearly linked with other APPPM wiki articles, I did even an especial section in which I included the links to the articles related (~~see~~ also)		'''The article is clearly linked with other APPPM wiki articles, I did even an especial section in which I included the links to the articles related (Point 5: See also), maybe you did not realised about it...'''

	*Overall the article seems to be quite objective, since the topic by nature doesn't leave much room for interpretation. It is hard to determine if the author avoided, other crucial relevant information and thereby has ben non objective,		*Overall the article seems to be quite objective, since the topic by nature doesn't leave much room for interpretation. It is hard to determine if the author avoided, other crucial relevant information and thereby has ben non objective,

	* In general the article seems to be free for copy and paste plagiarism, anyway should the author put attention to review sources and destinations to be absolut sure, that copy paste and plagiarism is avoided.		* In general the article seems to be free for copy and paste plagiarism, anyway should the author put attention to review sources and destinations to be absolut sure, that copy paste and plagiarism is avoided.
			Done ;)

S131063: /* Content aspects */

2014-11-30T23:33:55Z

Content aspects

S131063: /* Content aspects */

2014-11-30T23:17:58Z

Content aspects

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:17, 30 November 2014
Line 137:		Line 137:

	*The article describes Lean and How to manage projects in a Lean way into debt, with propper phase descriptions and the evaluation of tools. Thereby the article highly relates to a project management topic. When that is said, the direct link or interaction with general project, programme and portfolio management methods is minor or not existing and may put LPM in the light of a stand alone approach.		*The article describes Lean and How to manage projects in a Lean way into debt, with propper phase descriptions and the evaluation of tools. Thereby the article highly relates to a project management topic. When that is said, the direct link or interaction with general project, programme and portfolio management methods is minor or not existing and may put LPM in the light of a stand alone approach.
	'''I relate to project management throughout all the article, also I have the category end of text.'''		'''I relate to project management many times throughout all the article, also I have the category end of text. In my opinion, the relation to Project Management is quite clear since I related to this a lot of times.'''
	*It is quite clear, that the article is related to one of the proposed content categories.		*It is quite clear, that the article is related to one of the proposed content categories.

S131063: /* Content aspects */

2014-11-30T23:13:26Z

Content aspects

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:13, 30 November 2014
Line 137:		Line 137:

	*The article describes Lean and How to manage projects in a Lean way into debt, with propper phase descriptions and the evaluation of tools. Thereby the article highly relates to a project management topic. When that is said, the direct link or interaction with general project, programme and portfolio management methods is minor or not existing and may put LPM in the light of a stand alone approach.		*The article describes Lean and How to manage projects in a Lean way into debt, with propper phase descriptions and the evaluation of tools. Thereby the article highly relates to a project management topic. When that is said, the direct link or interaction with general project, programme and portfolio management methods is minor or not existing and may put LPM in the light of a stand alone approach.
			'''I relate to project management throughout all the article, also I have the category end of text.'''
	*It is quite clear, that the article is related to one of the proposed content categories.		*It is quite clear, that the article is related to one of the proposed content categories.

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:33, 30 November 2014
Line 137:		Line 137:

	*The article describes Lean and How to manage projects in a Lean way into debt, with propper phase descriptions and the evaluation of tools. Thereby the article highly relates to a project management topic. When that is said, the direct link or interaction with general project, programme and portfolio management methods is minor or not existing and may put LPM in the light of a stand alone approach.		*The article describes Lean and How to manage projects in a Lean way into debt, with propper phase descriptions and the evaluation of tools. Thereby the article highly relates to a project management topic. When that is said, the direct link or interaction with general project, programme and portfolio management methods is minor or not existing and may put LPM in the light of a stand alone approach.
	'''I relate to project management many times throughout all the article, also I have the category end of text. In my opinion, the relation to Project Management is quite clear since I related to this a lot of times.'''		'''Do you mean "in depth" instead of "into debt"? I relate to project management many times throughout all the article, also I have the category end of text. In my opinion, the relation to Project Management is quite clear since I related to this a lot of times.'''
	*It is quite clear, that the article is related to one of the proposed content categories.		*It is quite clear, that the article is related to one of the proposed content categories.

	*The length of the article seems nice for the in debt description of a whole PM method, including phases. One could question if the in debt description is aligned with the idea of a wiki. Wikipedia, for instance, has a labyrinthine set of policies and guidelines summed up in its five pillars: '''Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia''; Wikipedia has a neutral point of view; Wikipedia is free content; Wikipedians should interact in a respectful and civil manner; and Wikipedia does not have firm rules. Encyclopaedia again is defined as: An encyclopedia or encyclopaedia (also spelled encyclopædia, see spelling differences)[1] is a type of reference work or compendium holding a comprehensive summary of information from either all branches of knowledge or a particular branch of knowledge.[2].		*The length of the article seems nice for the in debt description of a whole PM method, including phases. One could question if the in debt description is aligned with the idea of a wiki. Wikipedia, for instance, has a labyrinthine set of policies and guidelines summed up in its five pillars: '''Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia''; Wikipedia has a neutral point of view; Wikipedia is free content; Wikipedians should interact in a respectful and civil manner; and Wikipedia does not have firm rules. Encyclopaedia again is defined as: An encyclopedia or encyclopaedia (also spelled encyclopædia, see spelling differences)[1] is a type of reference work or compendium holding a comprehensive summary of information from either all branches of knowledge or a particular branch of knowledge.[2].
			'''As I understood, a topic for the wiki-article is fine if it is related to the APPPM course and follows the especifications provided by the teachers during the lectures and fulfill the requirenments expected by them. In this sense, the APPPM is a bit different than the "normal wiki".'''

	*The overall flow seems logical and natural. Hence no suggestions are proposed.		*The overall flow seems logical and natural. Hence no suggestions are proposed.

	*The starting article seem to have a nice size and contains the relevant introduction topic, however some people may see "Many companies" as somewhat unclear opening statement. The view on that surely differs and thereby it is meant as discussion point, for general consideration.		*The starting article seem to have a nice size and contains the relevant introduction topic, however some people may see "Many companies" as somewhat unclear opening statement. The view on that surely differs and thereby it is meant as discussion point, for general consideration.
			'''Yes, you are right. I think that this point depends more on a personal opinion of the reader. From my point of view I like the statement as an introductory sentence to the topic of the article. For this reason I decided to keep it.'''
	*The article provides sufficient sources and reference material, even though a crosslink and a link for further reading.		*The article provides sufficient sources and reference material, even though a crosslink and a link for further reading.

Line 151:		Line 152:

	*The article is not linked to another APPPM wiki.		*The article is not linked to another APPPM wiki.
			'''The article is clearly linked with other APPPM wiki articles, I did even an especial section in which I included the links to the articles related (see also)

	*Overall the article seems to be quite objective, since the topic by nature doesn't leave much room for interpretation. It is hard to determine if the author avoided, other crucial relevant information and thereby has ben non objective,		*Overall the article seems to be quite objective, since the topic by nature doesn't leave much room for interpretation. It is hard to determine if the author avoided, other crucial relevant information and thereby has ben non objective,

	* In general the article seems to be free for copy and paste plagiarism, anyway should the author put attention to review sources and destinations to be absolut sure, that copy paste and plagiarism is avoided.		* In general the article seems to be free for copy and paste plagiarism, anyway should the author put attention to review sources and destinations to be absolut sure, that copy paste and plagiarism is avoided.