Talk:Lean 6 Sigma in project management - Revision history

Gusru at 17:22, 28 September 2015

2015-09-28T17:22:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:22, 28 September 2015
Line 70:		Line 70:
	**Remember to refer to the figures in the text. '''Answer''':Figure reference done.		**Remember to refer to the figures in the text. '''Answer''':Figure reference done.
	**Some figures are unnecessary big (e.g. Pareto boundaries), some are very small and hard to read (e.g. Simplified Value Mapping Tool. [7]) '''Answer''': Size adjusted.		**Some figures are unnecessary big (e.g. Pareto boundaries), some are very small and hard to read (e.g. Simplified Value Mapping Tool. [7]) '''Answer''': Size adjusted.
	**As well I believe you have copied the figures from some textbooks of websites, remember the reference and make sure you are allowed to use it (no copyright) '''Answer''': No copyrigth ~~changed~~ figures and made on my own the ones that had copyrigth.		**As well I believe you have copied the figures from some textbooks of websites, remember the reference and make sure you are allowed to use it (no copyright) '''Answer''': No copyrigth. Changed figures and made on my own the ones that had copyrigth.

	*References:		*References:
	**Remember we are supposed to make an annotated biography, meaning a reference list with a short description. '''Answer''': Annotated bibliography added.		**Remember we are supposed to make an annotated biography, meaning a reference list with a short description. '''Answer''': Annotated bibliography added.

Gusru at 16:23, 28 September 2015

2015-09-28T16:23:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:23, 28 September 2015
Line 6:		Line 6:

	*Clear introduction. You highlighted the poit —>waste reduction and high quality control <— '''Answer''': Good		*Clear introduction. You highlighted the poit —>waste reduction and high quality control <— '''Answer''': Good
	*Background gives a perfect idea of how the topic is correlated with nowadays firms. Answer: Good		*Background gives a perfect idea of how the topic is correlated with nowadays firms. '''Answer''': Good
	*Great connection with Toyata (JIT philosophy). Answer: Good		*Great connection with Toyata (JIT philosophy). '''Answer''': Good
	*A paragraph regarding WIND INDUSTRY EXAMPLE could be done. Answer: New paragraph of the Wind Industry example done.		*A paragraph regarding WIND INDUSTRY EXAMPLE could be done. '''Answer''': New paragraph of the Wind Industry example done.
	*Detailed explanation of the tool but lack of illustrations (from my point of view imagines of the tools could help a straight forward understanding). Answer: Two more figures shown.		*Detailed explanation of the tool but lack of illustrations (from my point of view imagines of the tools could help a straight forward understanding). '''Answer''': Two more figures shown.
	*The Chapter (Example: The multi-objective case) suits perfectly for the description of big scale (portfolio). Answer: Good.		*The Chapter (Example: The multi-objective case) suits perfectly for the description of big scale (portfolio). '''Answer''': Good.
	*Conclusions are a bit confused and don’t really conclude the article. Maybe a more detailed discussion is needed to increase the score of the article. Answer: Conclusion changed.		*Conclusions are a bit confused and don’t really conclude the article. Maybe a more detailed discussion is needed to increase the score of the article. '''Answer''': Conclusion changed.
	*Overall the article is well implemented and the topic is totally interesting. Answer: Good		*Overall the article is well implemented and the topic is totally interesting. '''Answer''': Good

	FORMAL ASPECTS		FORMAL ASPECTS
	*Overall the article follows the case method structure. Answer: Good		*Overall the article follows the case method structure. '''Answer''': Good
	*Grammar wise is correct. Answer: Good		*Grammar wise is correct. '''Answer''': Good
	*Lack of figures and visual illustrations for the tool part. Answer: Two more figures shown.		*Lack of figures and visual illustrations for the tool part. '''Answer''': Two more figures shown.
	*Formatted Properly. Answer: Good		*Formatted Properly. '''Answer''': Good

	CONTENT ASPECTS		CONTENT ASPECTS
	*The article is totally interesting. Answer: Good		*The article is totally interesting. '''Answer''': Good
	*It does relate to PPPM. Answer: Good		*It does relate to PPPM. '''Answer''': Good
	*Appropriate length. Answer: Good		*Appropriate length. '''Answer''': Good
	*Flow is great. Answer: Good		*Flow is great. '''Answer''': Good
	*Reference materials are great but absence of annotated bibliography. Answer: Annotated bibliography added		*Reference materials are great but absence of annotated bibliography. '''Answer''': Annotated bibliography added.
	*It seems well elaborated and it’s definitely not a copy paste. Answer: Good		*It seems well elaborated and it’s definitely not a copy paste. '''Answer''': Good


Line 33:		Line 33:
	*General suggestions		*General suggestions

	**Very interesting topic. Answer: Good		**Very interesting topic. '''Answer''': Good
	**Interesting use of “Background” to position the reader. Answer: Good		**Interesting use of “Background” to position the reader. '''Answer''': Good
	**Long paragraphs, could be more concise. Answer: Shorter paragraphs with new revision.		**Long paragraphs, could be more concise. '''Answer''': Shorter paragraphs with new revision.
	**Could use more figures. Answer: Two more figures shown.		**Could use more figures. '''Answer''': Two more figures shown.
	**Conclusion could be better explained. Answer: Conclusion changed.		**Conclusion could be better explained. '''Answer''': Conclusion changed.


	*Formal aspects:		*Formal aspects:

	**It follows the methods structure		**It follows the methods structure '''Answer''':Good
	**The article could have a better formatting with titles and subtitles		**The article could have a better formatting with titles and subtitles '''Answer''':Formatting changed. Now with subtitles as well.
	**Figures used are useful, but some explanations could have illustrations as well		**Figures used are useful, but some explanations could have illustrations as well '''Answer''': Incrementation on explanation about figures.


	*Content aspects:		*Content aspects:

	**The article is interesting and related to the course topic		**The article is interesting and related to the course topic. '''Answer''':Good
	**The length is appropriate		**The length is appropriate. '''Answer''':Good
	**The sources have titles but lack summaries		**The sources have titles but lack summaries. '''Answer''': Summaries added
	**Not copy paste		**Not copy paste. '''Answer''':Good


Line 58:		Line 58:

	==Reviewer 3, DI2009==		==Reviewer 3, DI2009==
	*Summary; I like the beginning of your article however I see it more as an introduction than a summary of the article. A summary should give the reader an overview and make it easy for the reader to know what he should expect when reading the article		*Summary; I like the beginning of your article however I see it more as an introduction than a summary of the article. A summary should give the reader an overview and make it easy for the reader to know what he should expect when reading the article. '''Answer''':Summary changed.

	*Formatted: I think the text get a bit “heavy” maybe with a better use of the Wiki-features such as sub-headings, proper bullet-point will help giving a better overview.		*Formatted: I think the text get a bit “heavy” maybe with a better use of the Wiki-features such as sub-headings, proper bullet-point will help giving a better overview. '''Answer''':Format changed. Now bullet and subtitles.

	*Structure:		*Structure:
	**I like the structure and I think it is nice to wrap up the article with a discussion of the drawbacks/”cons”.		**I like the structure and I think it is nice to wrap up the article with a discussion of the drawbacks/”cons”. '''Answer''':Good
	**As well I think you introduce every section well (very short and precise)		**As well I think you introduce every section well (very short and precise) '''Answer''': Good

	*Figures:		*Figures:
	**Nice with many relevant figures that match the content of the text.		**Nice with many relevant figures that match the content of the text. '''Answer''':Good
	**Remember to refer to the figures in the text		**Remember to refer to the figures in the text. '''Answer''':Figure reference done.
	**Some figures are unnecessary big (e.g. Pareto boundaries), some are very small and hard to read (e.g. Simplified Value Mapping Tool. [7])		**Some figures are unnecessary big (e.g. Pareto boundaries), some are very small and hard to read (e.g. Simplified Value Mapping Tool. [7]) '''Answer''': Size adjusted.
	**As well I believe you have copied the figures from some textbooks of websites, remember the reference and make sure you are allowed to use it (no copyright)		**As well I believe you have copied the figures from some textbooks of websites, remember the reference and make sure you are allowed to use it (no copyright) '''Answer''': No copyrigth changed figures and made on my own the ones that had copyrigth.

	*References:		*References:
	**Remember we are supposed to make an annotated biography, meaning a reference list with a short description.		**Remember we are supposed to make an annotated biography, meaning a reference list with a short description. '''Answer''': Annotated bibliography added.

Gusru at 16:18, 28 September 2015

2015-09-28T16:18:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:18, 28 September 2015
Line 5:		Line 5:
	==Jejenji - REVIEW 1==		==Jejenji - REVIEW 1==

	*Clear introduction. You highlighted the poit —>waste reduction and high quality control <— Answer: Good		*Clear introduction. You highlighted the poit —>waste reduction and high quality control <— '''Answer''': Good
	*Background gives a perfect idea of how the topic is correlated with nowadays firms. Answer: Good		*Background gives a perfect idea of how the topic is correlated with nowadays firms. Answer: Good
	*Great connection with Toyata (JIT philosophy) Answer: Good		*Great connection with Toyata (JIT philosophy). Answer: Good
	*A paragraph regarding WIND INDUSTRY EXAMPLE could be done Answer: New paragraph of the Wind Industry example done.		*A paragraph regarding WIND INDUSTRY EXAMPLE could be done. Answer: New paragraph of the Wind Industry example done.
	*Detailed explanation of the tool but lack of illustrations (from my point of view imagines of the tools could help a straight forward understanding).Answer: Two more figures shown.		*Detailed explanation of the tool but lack of illustrations (from my point of view imagines of the tools could help a straight forward understanding). Answer: Two more figures shown.
	*The Chapter (Example: The multi-objective case) suits perfectly for the description of big scale (portfolio). Answer: Good.		*The Chapter (Example: The multi-objective case) suits perfectly for the description of big scale (portfolio). Answer: Good.
	*Conclusions are a bit confused and don’t really conclude the article. Maybe a more detailed discussion is needed to increase the score of the article. Answer: Conclusion changed.		*Conclusions are a bit confused and don’t really conclude the article. Maybe a more detailed discussion is needed to increase the score of the article. Answer: Conclusion changed.

Gusru at 16:17, 28 September 2015

2015-09-28T16:17:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:17, 28 September 2015
Line 5:		Line 5:
	==Jejenji - REVIEW 1==		==Jejenji - REVIEW 1==

	*Clear introduction. You highlighted the poit —>waste reduction and high quality control <—		*Clear introduction. You highlighted the poit —>waste reduction and high quality control <— Answer: Good
	*Background gives a perfect idea of how the topic is correlated with nowadays firms.		*Background gives a perfect idea of how the topic is correlated with nowadays firms. Answer: Good
	*Great connection with Toyata (JIT philosophy)		*Great connection with Toyata (JIT philosophy) Answer: Good
	*A paragraph regarding WIND INDUSTRY EXAMPLE could be done		*A paragraph regarding WIND INDUSTRY EXAMPLE could be done Answer: New paragraph of the Wind Industry example done.
	*Detailed explanation of the tool but lack of illustrations (from my point of view imagines of the tools could help a straight forward understanding)		*Detailed explanation of the tool but lack of illustrations (from my point of view imagines of the tools could help a straight forward understanding).Answer: Two more figures shown.
	*The Chapter (Example: The multi-objective case) suits perfectly for the description of big scale (portfolio).		*The Chapter (Example: The multi-objective case) suits perfectly for the description of big scale (portfolio). Answer: Good.
	*Conclusions are a bit confused and don’t really conclude the article. Maybe a more detailed discussion is needed to increase the score of the article.		*Conclusions are a bit confused and don’t really conclude the article. Maybe a more detailed discussion is needed to increase the score of the article. Answer: Conclusion changed.
	*Overall the article is well implemented and the topic is totally interesting.		*Overall the article is well implemented and the topic is totally interesting. Answer: Good

	FORMAL ASPECTS		FORMAL ASPECTS
	*Overall the article follows the case method structure		*Overall the article follows the case method structure. Answer: Good
	*Grammar wise is correct		*Grammar wise is correct. Answer: Good
	*Lack of figures and visual illustrations for the tool part		*Lack of figures and visual illustrations for the tool part. Answer: Two more figures shown.
	*Formatted Properly		*Formatted Properly. Answer: Good

	CONTENT ASPECTS		CONTENT ASPECTS
	*The article is totally interesting		*The article is totally interesting. Answer: Good
	*It does relate to PPPM		*It does relate to PPPM. Answer: Good
	*Appropriate length		*Appropriate length. Answer: Good
	*Flow is great		*Flow is great. Answer: Good
	*Reference materials are great but absence of annotated bibliography		*Reference materials are great but absence of annotated bibliography. Answer: Annotated bibliography added
	*It seems well elaborated and it’s definitely not a copy paste		*It seems well elaborated and it’s definitely not a copy paste. Answer: Good


Line 33:		Line 33:
	*General suggestions		*General suggestions

	**Very interesting topic		**Very interesting topic. Answer: Good
	**Interesting use of “Background” to position the reader		**Interesting use of “Background” to position the reader. Answer: Good
	**Long paragraphs, could be more concise		**Long paragraphs, could be more concise. Answer: Shorter paragraphs with new revision.
	**Could use more figures		**Could use more figures. Answer: Two more figures shown.
	**Conclusion could be better explained		**Conclusion could be better explained. Answer: Conclusion changed.

S150931 at 21:28, 22 September 2015

2015-09-22T21:28:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:28, 22 September 2015
Line 27:		Line 27:
	*Reference materials are great but absence of annotated bibliography		*Reference materials are great but absence of annotated bibliography
	*It seems well elaborated and it’s definitely not a copy paste		*It seems well elaborated and it’s definitely not a copy paste


			==Reviewer 2, S150931==

			*General suggestions

			**Very interesting topic
			**Interesting use of “Background” to position the reader
			**Long paragraphs, could be more concise
			**Could use more figures
			**Conclusion could be better explained


			*Formal aspects:

			**It follows the methods structure
			**The article could have a better formatting with titles and subtitles
			**Figures used are useful, but some explanations could have illustrations as well


			*Content aspects:

			**The article is interesting and related to the course topic
			**The length is appropriate
			**The sources have titles but lack summaries
			**Not copy paste

DI2009 at 19:33, 22 September 2015

2015-09-22T19:33:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:33, 22 September 2015
Line 32:		Line 32:

	==Reviewer 3, DI2009==		==Reviewer 3, DI2009==
	*Summary; I the beginning of your article however I see it more as an introduction than a summary of the article. A summary should give the reader an overview and make it easy for the reader to know what he should expect when reading the article		*Summary; I like the beginning of your article however I see it more as an introduction than a summary of the article. A summary should give the reader an overview and make it easy for the reader to know what he should expect when reading the article

	*Formatted: I think the text get a bit “heavy” maybe with a better use of the Wiki-features such as sub-headings, proper bullet-point will help giving a better overview.		*Formatted: I think the text get a bit “heavy” maybe with a better use of the Wiki-features such as sub-headings, proper bullet-point will help giving a better overview.

Jejenji: /* Feedback */

2015-09-22T15:26:59Z

Feedback

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:26, 22 September 2015
Line 2:		Line 2:

	=Feedback=		=Feedback=

			==Jejenji - REVIEW 1==

			*Clear introduction. You highlighted the poit —>waste reduction and high quality control <—
			*Background gives a perfect idea of how the topic is correlated with nowadays firms.
			*Great connection with Toyata (JIT philosophy)
			*A paragraph regarding WIND INDUSTRY EXAMPLE could be done
			*Detailed explanation of the tool but lack of illustrations (from my point of view imagines of the tools could help a straight forward understanding)
			*The Chapter (Example: The multi-objective case) suits perfectly for the description of big scale (portfolio).
			*Conclusions are a bit confused and don’t really conclude the article. Maybe a more detailed discussion is needed to increase the score of the article.
			*Overall the article is well implemented and the topic is totally interesting.

			FORMAL ASPECTS
			*Overall the article follows the case method structure
			*Grammar wise is correct
			*Lack of figures and visual illustrations for the tool part
			*Formatted Properly

			CONTENT ASPECTS
			*The article is totally interesting
			*It does relate to PPPM
			*Appropriate length
			*Flow is great
			*Reference materials are great but absence of annotated bibliography
			*It seems well elaborated and it’s definitely not a copy paste

DI2009 at 14:50, 22 September 2015

2015-09-22T14:50:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:50, 22 September 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Anna: I like your topic and the direction it is headed with the focus on the tool within program management. Remember to follow to requirements for the structure once you continue with your article.		Anna: I like your topic and the direction it is headed with the focus on the tool within program management. Remember to follow to requirements for the structure once you continue with your article.

			=Feedback=




			==Reviewer 3, DI2009==
			*Summary; I the beginning of your article however I see it more as an introduction than a summary of the article. A summary should give the reader an overview and make it easy for the reader to know what he should expect when reading the article

			*Formatted: I think the text get a bit “heavy” maybe with a better use of the Wiki-features such as sub-headings, proper bullet-point will help giving a better overview.

			*Structure:
			**I like the structure and I think it is nice to wrap up the article with a discussion of the drawbacks/”cons”.
			**As well I think you introduce every section well (very short and precise)

			*Figures:
			**Nice with many relevant figures that match the content of the text.
			**Remember to refer to the figures in the text
			**Some figures are unnecessary big (e.g. Pareto boundaries), some are very small and hard to read (e.g. Simplified Value Mapping Tool. [7])
			**As well I believe you have copied the figures from some textbooks of websites, remember the reference and make sure you are allowed to use it (no copyright)

			*References:
			**Remember we are supposed to make an annotated biography, meaning a reference list with a short description.

AnnaGreve: Created page with "Anna: I like your topic and the direction it is headed with the focus on the tool within program management. Remember to follow to requirements for the structure once you cont..."

2015-09-16T14:14:07Z

Created page with "Anna: I like your topic and the direction it is headed with the focus on the tool within program management. Remember to follow to requirements for the structure once you cont..."

New page

Anna: I like your topic and the direction it is headed with the focus on the tool within program management. Remember to follow to requirements for the structure once you continue with your article.