Talk:Leadership vs. management - Revision history

Helenegravdal: /* Feedback 2 | Reviewer name: Helene Gravdal */

2019-02-25T16:47:17Z

Feedback 2 | Reviewer name: Helene Gravdal

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:47, 25 February 2019
Line 142:		Line 142:

	===Answer 3===		===Answer 3===
	''The article is easy to read, and the ~~grammar~~ is ~~clear~~.''		''The article is easy to read, and the vocabulary is diverse.''

	===Question 4 · TEXT===		===Question 4 · TEXT===
Line 166:		Line 166:

	===Answer 5===		===Answer 5===
	''~~It is~~ a ~~very intere~~''		''The article highlights and evaluates relevant and important topics, it has a great starting point it will be interesting to see how it will evolve. ''

	===Question 6 · TEXT===		===Question 6 · TEXT===
Line 178:		Line 178:

	===Answer 6===		===Answer 6===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''Currently, since the article is still under progress, the depth has not evolved to the desired level yet. However, more thorough will hand to a developed and deep article that will give a deeper insight to the topic. ''

	===Question 7 · TEXT===		===Question 7 · TEXT===

Hedinp: /* Feedback 1 | Reviewer name: Heðin Gunnarsstein Poulsen */

2019-02-25T15:57:37Z

Feedback 1 | Reviewer name: Heðin Gunnarsstein Poulsen

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:57, 25 February 2019
Line 25:		Line 25:

	===Answer 1===		===Answer 1===
	~~'''More feedback will be provided later on'''.~~''The summary is really good with an introduction to different perspectives. I still miss the part where you say that you are going for example to discuss about managent vs leadership in project, program or portfolio management. Could maybe be too broad if you begin discussing about all of the three. They certainly have different perspectives on this topic. But I guess you have chosen Project management as you ~~begin~~ writing about it further down~~. But I would suggest~~ to mention ~~it in the summary~~ as well''		''The summary is really good with an introduction to different perspectives. I still miss the part where you say that you are going for example to discuss about managent vs leadership in project, program or portfolio management. Could maybe be too broad if you begin discussing about all of the three. They certainly have different perspectives on this topic. But I guess you have chosen Project management as you are writing about it further down, but don't forget to mention this like a introduction as well''

	===Question 2 · TEXT===		===Question 2 · TEXT===
Line 41:		Line 41:

	===Answer 2===		===Answer 2===
	''I think overall it looks good. I think you are telling a lot of theory which is good, but I just think that you should mention some tools and how these can improve or define leadership styles etc. And also it would help to have some figures to support the understanding sometimes. ~~The last comment is maybe kinda Also for a prettier layout~~''		''I think overall it looks good. I think you are telling a lot of theory which is good, but I just think that you should mention some tools and how these can improve or define leadership styles etc. And also it would help to have some figures to support the understanding sometimes, if this can be done. This will also make the wiki article more interesting and pretty''

	===Question 3 · TEXT===		===Question 3 · TEXT===
Line 53:		Line 53:

	===Answer 3===		===Answer 3===
	''The language is really good. I ~~should learn something from it as I have a lot of misspellings :)~~ ''		''The language is really good and I don't see any major misspelling or type errors, nice writing and good job! ''

	===Question 4 · TEXT===		===Question 4 · TEXT===
Line 77:		Line 77:

	===Answer 5===		===Answer 5===
	''Definitely something of high practical and academic relevance. Again I would suggest using/showing some tools. But I guess the article is not finished yet and this will come?''		''Definitely something of high practical and academic relevance. Again I would suggest using/showing some tools. But I guess the article is not finished yet and this will come.''

	===Question 6 · TEXT===		===Question 6 · TEXT===
Line 103:		Line 103:

	===Answer 7===		===Answer 7===
	''It is stated that we need to use ~~atleast~~ 3 references in the annotated bibliography, so far I can only see one''		''It is stated that we need to use at least 3 references in the annotated bibliography, so far I can only see one''

	==Feedback 2 \| Reviewer name: ''Helene Gravdal''==		==Feedback 2 \| Reviewer name: ''Helene Gravdal''==

Helenegravdal at 20:05, 24 February 2019

2019-02-24T20:05:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:05, 24 February 2019
Line 114:		Line 114:

	===Answer 1===		===Answer 1===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''The summary is clear, but I feel like some of the parts should be included in the background information instead? Moreover, I would like to get a better overview of how what to expect in the article. ''

	===Question 2 · TEXT===		===Question 2 · TEXT===
Line 130:		Line 130:

	===Answer 2===		===Answer 2===
	''~~Answer~~ here''		''The structure provided so far is the article is ok. I would like to have more background information, apart from the structure and definitions. Maybe write a few sentences about why you wrote about the different definitions in the background information, a type of introduction would be useful here. The logic of the report is good. ''

	===Question 3 · TEXT===		===Question 3 · TEXT===
Line 142:		Line 142:

	===Answer 3===		===Answer 3===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''The article is easy to read, and the grammar is clear.''

	===Question 4 · TEXT===		===Question 4 · TEXT===
Line 154:		Line 154:

	===Answer 4===		===Answer 4===
	''~~Answer here~~''		'' Would be nice to see some figures and tables. ''

	===Question 5 · TEXT===		===Question 5 · TEXT===
Line 166:		Line 166:

	===Answer 5===		===Answer 5===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''It is a very intere''

	===Question 6 · TEXT===		===Question 6 · TEXT===
Line 192:		Line 192:

	===Answer 7===		===Answer 7===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''The annotated bibliography provided so far is ok! ''

Hedinp: /* Answer 7 */

2019-02-24T18:04:53Z

Answer 7

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:04, 24 February 2019
Line 103:		Line 103:

	===Answer 7===		===Answer 7===
	''It is stated that we need to use atleast 3 references in the ~~annotaed~~ bibliography, so far I can only see one''		''It is stated that we need to use atleast 3 references in the annotated bibliography, so far I can only see one''

	==Feedback 2 \| Reviewer name: ''Helene Gravdal''==		==Feedback 2 \| Reviewer name: ''Helene Gravdal''==

Hedinp at 18:04, 24 February 2019

2019-02-24T18:04:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:04, 24 February 2019
Line 41:		Line 41:

	===Answer 2===		===Answer 2===
	''I think overall it looks good. I ~~just~~ think ~~that~~ you ~~mention some tools and~~ I think ~~definetly~~ you should ~~show~~ some tools and how these can improve or define leadership styles etc. And also it would help to have some figures to support the understanding sometimes.''		''I think overall it looks good. I think you are telling a lot of theory which is good, but I just think that you should mention some tools and how these can improve or define leadership styles etc. And also it would help to have some figures to support the understanding sometimes. The last comment is maybe kinda Also for a prettier layout''

	===Question 3 · TEXT===		===Question 3 · TEXT===
Line 77:		Line 77:

	===Answer 5===		===Answer 5===
	''Definitely something of high practical and academic relevance. Again I would suggest using/showing some tools. But I guess the article is not finished yet and this will come''		''Definitely something of high practical and academic relevance. Again I would suggest using/showing some tools. But I guess the article is not finished yet and this will come?''

	===Question 6 · TEXT===		===Question 6 · TEXT===
Line 89:		Line 89:

	===Answer 6===		===Answer 6===
	''I think it is interesting to read, but ''		''I think this article is interesting and is easy to read, but without a finished article it is kinda hard to say where you are going with this. But so far it is very good. '

	===Question 7 · TEXT===		===Question 7 · TEXT===
Line 103:		Line 103:

	===Answer 7===		===Answer 7===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''It is stated that we need to use atleast 3 references in the annotaed bibliography, so far I can only see one''

	==Feedback 2 \| Reviewer name: ''Helene Gravdal''==		==Feedback 2 \| Reviewer name: ''Helene Gravdal''==

Hedinp at 17:43, 24 February 2019

2019-02-24T17:43:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:43, 24 February 2019
Line 25:		Line 25:

	===Answer 1===		===Answer 1===
	''The summary is really good with an introduction to different perspectives. I still miss the part where you say that you are going for example to discuss about managent vs leadership in project, program or portfolio management. Could maybe be too broad if you begin discussing about all of the three. They certainly have different perspectives on this topic. But I guess you have chosen Project management as you begin writing about it further down. But I would suggest to ~~say~~ it in the summary as well''		'''More feedback will be provided later on'''.''The summary is really good with an introduction to different perspectives. I still miss the part where you say that you are going for example to discuss about managent vs leadership in project, program or portfolio management. Could maybe be too broad if you begin discussing about all of the three. They certainly have different perspectives on this topic. But I guess you have chosen Project management as you begin writing about it further down. But I would suggest to mention it in the summary as well''

	===Question 2 · TEXT===		===Question 2 · TEXT===
Line 41:		Line 41:

	===Answer 2===		===Answer 2===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''I think overall it looks good. I just think that you mention some tools and I think definetly you should show some tools and how these can improve or define leadership styles etc. And also it would help to have some figures to support the understanding sometimes.''

	===Question 3 · TEXT===		===Question 3 · TEXT===
Line 53:		Line 53:

	===Answer 3===		===Answer 3===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''The language is really good. I should learn something from it as I have a lot of misspellings :) ''

	===Question 4 · TEXT===		===Question 4 · TEXT===
Line 65:		Line 65:

	===Answer 4===		===Answer 4===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''There are no figures or tables so far, so I can't evaluate them. ''

	===Question 5 · TEXT===		===Question 5 · TEXT===
Line 77:		Line 77:

	===Answer 5===		===Answer 5===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''Definitely something of high practical and academic relevance. Again I would suggest using/showing some tools. But I guess the article is not finished yet and this will come''

	===Question 6 · TEXT===		===Question 6 · TEXT===
Line 89:		Line 89:

	===Answer 6===		===Answer 6===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''I think it is interesting to read, but ''

	===Question 7 · TEXT===		===Question 7 · TEXT===

Helenegravdal: /* Feedback 2 | Reviewer name: Place your name here */

2019-02-24T17:35:31Z

Feedback 2 | Reviewer name: Place your name here

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:35, 24 February 2019
Line 105:		Line 105:
	''Answer here''		''Answer here''

	==Feedback 2 \| Reviewer name: ''~~Place your name here~~''==		==Feedback 2 \| Reviewer name: ''Helene Gravdal''==
	===Question 1 · TEXT===		===Question 1 · TEXT===
	'''Quality of the summary:'''		'''Quality of the summary:'''

Hedinp at 17:28, 24 February 2019

2019-02-24T17:28:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:28, 24 February 2019
Line 25:		Line 25:

	===Answer 1===		===Answer 1===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''The summary is really good with an introduction to different perspectives. I still miss the part where you say that you are going for example to discuss about managent vs leadership in project, program or portfolio management. Could maybe be too broad if you begin discussing about all of the three. They certainly have different perspectives on this topic. But I guess you have chosen Project management as you begin writing about it further down. But I would suggest to say it in the summary as well''

	===Question 2 · TEXT===		===Question 2 · TEXT===

Hedinp at 17:19, 24 February 2019

2019-02-24T17:19:20Z

Show changes

Raquel Valente: Created page with "==Feedback on Abstract:== {| |'''Text clarity & language'''|| Good. The text is coherent |- |'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| The distinction between leadership..."

2019-02-19T13:06:01Z

Created page with "==Feedback on Abstract:== {| |'''Text clarity & language'''|| Good. The text is coherent |- |'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| The distinction between leadership..."

New page

==Feedback on Abstract:==

{|
|'''Text clarity & language'''|| Good. The text is coherent
|-
|'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| The distinction between leadership and management is well described but no tool/theory/concept is described at the moment
|-
|'''Article purpose explanation'''|| Needs to elaborated
|-
|'''Relevance to curriculum '''|| At the moment the subject is not related to project, program or portfolio management and make sure you clearly define the scope of the article
|-
|'''References'''|| Some references missing. Check the guidelines for references from DTU Library: https://www.bibliotek.dtu.dk/english/servicemenu/find/reference_management/references
|-

|}