Talk:Goal hierarchy or Goal Breakdown Structure - Revision history

S180230 at 16:54, 25 February 2019

2019-02-25T16:54:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:54, 25 February 2019
Line 11:		Line 11:
	What do you like?		What do you like?
	LBH:		LBH:
	- Good and relevant subject ~~and good use of examples~~.		- Good and relevant subject.
	- What should be improved, and how? Insure that all the sections are connected and supports the one purpose of the article.
			- What should be improved, and how?
			LBH:
			- Te article is not quite finished, but the structure seams good. So just fill out the sections created. Insure that all the sections are connected and supports the one purpose of the article.

	Content: Is the article convincing?		Content: Is the article convincing?
	LBH:		LBH:
	- ~~Semi. More clarity of the purpose is needed, but if~~ this ~~is defined it will be~~.		- It needs to closer to being finished to elaborate upon this.

	Is it complete? Is it relevant an “deep” enough?		Is it complete? Is it relevant an “deep” enough?
	LBH:		LBH: Not complet. Needs more depth, but is indead relevant.
	~~More detain of the topic would favour the article~~.

	What parts do you like?		What parts do you like?
	LBH:		LBH:
	- The section ~~with exampels~~ and ~~limitation~~ is good.		- The section "Goal herierchy in program" and "Limitation"is good.

	What parts need to be improve		What parts need to be improve
	LBH:		LBH:
	- More clarity of the purpose of the article in the abstract and throughout the article.		- More clarity of the purpose of the article in the abstract and throughout the article.

S180230 at 16:47, 25 February 2019

2019-02-25T16:47:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:47, 25 February 2019
Line 5:		Line 5:
	Structure and logical flow: Is every part of the article informative and necessary to communicate the core message?		Structure and logical flow: Is every part of the article informative and necessary to communicate the core message?
	LBH:		LBH:
	- The Introduction/Abstract is more an introduction than an abstract. I would suggest to change it more into an abstract, which is the demand from the teaches.		- The Introduction/Abstract is more an introduction than an abstract. I would suggest to change it more into an abstract, which is the demand from the teaches. The section "Goal herierchy in program" Could almost just be put in front of the Introduction/Abstract and used as the abstract.
	- Be more explicit in the abstract of what it is you want investigate.		- Be more explicit in the abstract of what it is you want investigate.

S180230 at 16:45, 25 February 2019

2019-02-25T16:45:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:45, 25 February 2019
Line 5:		Line 5:
	Structure and logical flow: Is every part of the article informative and necessary to communicate the core message?		Structure and logical flow: Is every part of the article informative and necessary to communicate the core message?
	LBH:		LBH:
	- Be more explicit in the abstract of what it is you want investigate. ~~More than just the examples.~~		- The Introduction/Abstract is more an introduction than an abstract. I would suggest to change it more into an abstract, which is the demand from the teaches.
	~~- Second sections headline, is it really called "the big idea"?~~		- Be more explicit in the abstract of what it is you want investigate.
	~~- Section "Create a vison", edit the bullet setup. It is a little confusing as it is now.~~

	What do you like?		What do you like?

S180230: Created page with "Grammar and spelling: Is the text readable and free of formal errors? LBH: - The gramme is en general fine. Structure and logical flow: Is every part of the article inform..."

2019-02-25T16:42:03Z

Created page with "Grammar and spelling: Is the text readable and free of formal errors? LBH: - The gramme is en general fine. Structure and logical flow: Is every part of the article inform..."

New page

Grammar and spelling: Is the text readable and free of formal errors?
LBH:
- The gramme is en general fine.

Structure and logical flow: Is every part of the article informative and necessary to communicate the core message?
LBH:
- Be more explicit in the abstract of what it is you want investigate. More than just the examples.
- Second sections headline, is it really called "the big idea"?
- Section "Create a vison", edit the bullet setup. It is a little confusing as it is now.

What do you like?
LBH:
- Good and relevant subject and good use of examples.
- What should be improved, and how? Insure that all the sections are connected and supports the one purpose of the article.

Content: Is the article convincing?
LBH:
- Semi. More clarity of the purpose is needed, but if this is defined it will be.

Is it complete? Is it relevant an “deep” enough?
LBH:
More detain of the topic would favour the article.

What parts do you like?
LBH:
- The section with exampels and limitation is good.

What parts need to be improve
LBH:
- More clarity of the purpose of the article in the abstract and throughout the article.