Talk:Future Workshop - Revision history

Hani Mike Rae Selim: /* Abstract Feedback */

2018-02-13T19:40:25Z

Abstract Feedback

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:40, 13 February 2018
Line 5:		Line 5:
	'''Language''' Good		'''Language''' Good

	'''Description of the tool/theory/concept''' Good and easy to follow, but how does this relate to project ~~magement~~ rather than just organizational management or day-to-day problem solving at work? This should be emphasized and clarified in the abstract		'''Description of the tool/theory/concept''' Good and easy to follow, but how does this relate to project management rather than just organizational management or day-to-day problem solving at work? This should be emphasized and clarified in the abstract

	'''Purpose explanation''' Good, but can be improved once the article scope is narrowed down to a project management knowledge area or areas. Consider briefly explaining the structure of the article and the points to be discussed to set the reader's expectations from the beginning		'''Purpose explanation''' Good, but can be improved once the article scope is narrowed down to a project management knowledge area or areas. Consider briefly explaining the structure of the article and the points to be discussed to set the reader's expectations from the beginning
Line 14:		Line 14:

	<ol>		<ol>
	<li> Who is the reader? Project Manager or Sponsor ~~ect~~?		<li> Who is the reader? Project Manager or Sponsor etc?
	<li> What kind of issues can be tackled using future workshop?		<li> What kind of issues can be tackled using future workshop?
	<li> Ensure depth of the article so it contributes to the project management community ~~more~~ than a normal web search		<li> Ensure depth of the article so it contributes to the project management community rather than a normal web search
	</ol>		</ol>

Hani Mike Rae Selim: /* Abstract Feedback */

2018-02-13T19:34:39Z

Abstract Feedback

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:34, 13 February 2018
Line 7:		Line 7:
	'''Description of the tool/theory/concept''' Good and easy to follow, but how does this relate to project magement rather than just organizational management or day-to-day problem solving at work? This should be emphasized and clarified in the abstract		'''Description of the tool/theory/concept''' Good and easy to follow, but how does this relate to project magement rather than just organizational management or day-to-day problem solving at work? This should be emphasized and clarified in the abstract

	'''Purpose explanation''' Good, but can improved once the article scope is narrowed down to a project management knowledge area or areas. Consider briefly explaining the structure of the article and the points to be discussed to set the reader's expectations		'''Purpose explanation''' Good, but can be improved once the article scope is narrowed down to a project management knowledge area or areas. Consider briefly explaining the structure of the article and the points to be discussed to set the reader's expectations from the beginning

	'''References''' Missing appropriate references to mandatory list of references		'''References''' Missing appropriate references to mandatory list of references

Hani Mike Rae Selim: Created page with "==Abstract Feedback== '''Text clarity''' Text is coherent '''Language''' Good '''Description of the tool/theory/concept''' Good and easy to follow, but how does thi..."

2018-02-13T19:33:53Z

Created page with "==Abstract Feedback== '''Text clarity''' Text is coherent '''Language''' Good '''Description of the tool/theory/concept''' Good and easy to follow, but how does thi..."

New page

==Abstract Feedback==

'''Text clarity''' Text is coherent

'''Language''' Good

'''Description of the tool/theory/concept''' Good and easy to follow, but how does this relate to project magement rather than just organizational management or day-to-day problem solving at work? This should be emphasized and clarified in the abstract

'''Purpose explanation''' Good, but can improved once the article scope is narrowed down to a project management knowledge area or areas. Consider briefly explaining the structure of the article and the points to be discussed to set the reader's expectations

'''References''' Missing appropriate references to mandatory list of references

'''Relevance of article''' Consider the following:

<ol>
<li> Who is the reader? Project Manager or Sponsor ect?
<li> What kind of issues can be tackled using future workshop?
<li> Ensure depth of the article so it contributes to the project management community more than a normal web search
</ol>