Talk:Crisis Management in Construction Projects - Revision history

Veronikabanko: /* Feedback 4 - Veronika Bankó */

2019-02-26T19:27:52Z

Feedback 4 - Veronika Bankó

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:27, 26 February 2019
Line 95:		Line 95:
	==Feedback 4 - Veronika Bankó==		==Feedback 4 - Veronika Bankó==
	(Sorry for not structuring the information, instead I will just write every tought one by one)		(Sorry for not structuring the information, instead I will just write every tought one by one)
	The abstract is good. ~~About the whole article:~~
	- I didn't get the point why this article is just about construction projects. What are the differences between them and other project?		* The abstract is good.
	- Try to be more specific. I do agree with the others, that you might wanted to cover too much but at the end you ended up with too much information. This might be why you have so much bullet-points --with out being bullet-points (it is hard to read them in this state)-- and so much headlines. I feel like there are a lot of information listed one by one but with just little specific examination on each elements and also, I can't really see the connection between the different headlines. So maybe if you don't want to narrow down the concept, maybe try to align them together so that the reader can understand the connections as well.		* I didn't get the point why this article is just about construction projects. What are the differences between them and other project?
	- I know you are going to put some examples and pictures in, just one good place could be at the certain social structures ”which ensure a smoother transition of information than others”.		* Try to be more specific. I do agree with the others, that you might wanted to cover too much but at the end you ended up with too much information. This might be why you have so much bullet-points --with out being bullet-points (it is hard to read them in this state)-- and so much headlines. I feel like there are a lot of information listed one by one but with just little specific examination on each elements and also, I can't really see the connection between the different headlines. So maybe if you don't want to narrow down the concept, maybe try to align them together so that the reader can understand the connections as well.
	- And also I liked your car example but since we are talking about construction,		* I know you are going to put some examples and pictures in, just one good place could be at the certain social structures ”which ensure a smoother transition of information than others”.
	- Probably you are going to fix the references, but just in case: You need to use the wiki reference structure (numbers with [] brackets)		* And also I liked your car example but since we are talking about construction,
			* Probably you are going to fix the references, but just in case: You need to use the wiki reference structure (numbers with [] brackets)

Veronikabanko at 19:27, 26 February 2019

2019-02-26T19:27:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:27, 26 February 2019
Line 92:		Line 92:

	the theory part looks somewhat fragmented. It should be ok, if you were planning on expanding the individual sections, otherwise I would recomend changing the layout. Also, the different header sizes look rather random and don't really help the structure as I think you intended - maybe use normal text in bold and italics instead of headers for the under points?		the theory part looks somewhat fragmented. It should be ok, if you were planning on expanding the individual sections, otherwise I would recomend changing the layout. Also, the different header sizes look rather random and don't really help the structure as I think you intended - maybe use normal text in bold and italics instead of headers for the under points?

			==Feedback 4 - Veronika Bankó==
			(Sorry for not structuring the information, instead I will just write every tought one by one)
			The abstract is good. About the whole article:
			- I didn't get the point why this article is just about construction projects. What are the differences between them and other project?
			- Try to be more specific. I do agree with the others, that you might wanted to cover too much but at the end you ended up with too much information. This might be why you have so much bullet-points --with out being bullet-points (it is hard to read them in this state)-- and so much headlines. I feel like there are a lot of information listed one by one but with just little specific examination on each elements and also, I can't really see the connection between the different headlines. So maybe if you don't want to narrow down the concept, maybe try to align them together so that the reader can understand the connections as well.
			- I know you are going to put some examples and pictures in, just one good place could be at the certain social structures ”which ensure a smoother transition of information than others”.
			- And also I liked your car example but since we are talking about construction,
			- Probably you are going to fix the references, but just in case: You need to use the wiki reference structure (numbers with [] brackets)

Mercedes Hachmann at 22:02, 25 February 2019

2019-02-25T22:02:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:02, 25 February 2019
Line 87:		Line 87:
	===Answer 7===		===Answer 7===
	''Citation is good''		''Citation is good''


			==feedback 3 - mercedes hachmann==

			the theory part looks somewhat fragmented. It should be ok, if you were planning on expanding the individual sections, otherwise I would recomend changing the layout. Also, the different header sizes look rather random and don't really help the structure as I think you intended - maybe use normal text in bold and italics instead of headers for the under points?

Yulisa: /* Answer 7 */

2019-02-25T13:42:05Z

Answer 7

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:42, 25 February 2019
Line 86:		Line 86:

	===Answer 7===		===Answer 7===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''Citation is good''

Yulisa: /* Answer 6 */

2019-02-25T13:41:54Z

Answer 6

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:41, 25 February 2019
Line 72:		Line 72:

	===Answer 6===		===Answer 6===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''Ive covered these questions above''

	===Question 7 · TEXT===		===Question 7 · TEXT===

Yulisa: /* Answer 5 */

2019-02-25T13:41:34Z

Answer 5

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:41, 25 February 2019
Line 60:		Line 60:

	===Answer 5===		===Answer 5===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''I feel like it was just a lot of information but not a lot of "tying together" to represent a full argument or idea. ''

	===Question 6 · TEXT===		===Question 6 · TEXT===

Yulisa: /* Answer 4 */

2019-02-25T13:40:40Z

Answer 4

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:40, 25 February 2019
Line 48:		Line 48:

	===Answer 4===		===Answer 4===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''No figures put up, but dont worry, I did the same haha. I dont know how to upload the pictures or figures onto the wiki article yet''

	===Question 5 · TEXT===		===Question 5 · TEXT===

Yulisa: /* Answer 3 */

2019-02-25T13:39:56Z

Answer 3

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:39, 25 February 2019
Line 36:		Line 36:

	===Answer 3===		===Answer 3===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''There are many small grammar mistakes such as miss-spelling, erroneously using "there, their, theyre, or there are". In the Theory section you forgot a period. Small things. Nothing too crazy.''

	===Question 4 · TEXT===		===Question 4 · TEXT===

Yulisa: /* Answer 2 */

2019-02-25T13:37:56Z

Answer 2

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:37, 25 February 2019
Line 24:		Line 24:

	===Answer 2===		===Answer 2===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''The structure is a little confusing due to the fact that it is not clearly shown what is a subcategory of what. Also, I feel like instead of just listing information, try to explain WHY its important to know that information, and how that info could alter or enhance the situation. Just a small tip''

	===Question 3 · TEXT===		===Question 3 · TEXT===

Yulisa: /* Answer 1 */

2019-02-25T13:36:17Z

Answer 1

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:36, 25 February 2019
Line 8:		Line 8:

	===Answer 1===		===Answer 1===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''You could expand in depth a little more on your abstract. Also, the last sentence throws off the flow of your abstract. Maybe try saying something like "Aside from offering a brief background on crisis management, the main goal of this article is to cover the various tools project managers have to prevent crises in relations to cost overrun in construction projects, and the available tools to mitigate cost after crises.'"'

	===Question 2 · TEXT===		===Question 2 · TEXT===