Talk:Constructive Controversy - Revision history

Different at 12:19, 1 December 2014

2014-12-01T12:19:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:19, 1 December 2014
Line 50:		Line 50:
	** Probably, but I think it fits neatly in here to be honest.		** Probably, but I think it fits neatly in here to be honest.
	*Other than that it is a very good discussion - a bit long, but very nice indeed		*Other than that it is a very good discussion - a bit long, but very nice indeed
	**~~thanks~~		**Thanks
	<u>References</u>		<u>References</u>
	*The references should be changed to make it more clear who it the author, what is the name of the article, what is the publisher, the year, etc. … Make it look more like reference number 8.		*The references should be changed to make it more clear who it the author, what is the name of the article, what is the publisher, the year, etc. … Make it look more like reference number 8.
	** Done for the scientific articles. I will keep the reference to ~~google~~ books, since it redirects the user to the exact page for reference.		** Done for the scientific articles. I will keep the reference to Google books, since it redirects the user to the exact page for reference.
	<u>General comments</u>		<u>General comments</u>
	*Consider writing more about the use in risk management		*Consider writing more about the use in risk management
			**More about the use in Risk Management added.
	*It's a nice article and the flow is pretty good		*It's a nice article and the flow is pretty good
	** Thanks		** Thanks

Different at 14:21, 30 November 2014

2014-11-30T14:21:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:21, 30 November 2014
Line 72:		Line 72:
	*Add a category to the article; e.g. Project management, Risk management, Decision-making		*Add a category to the article; e.g. Project management, Risk management, Decision-making
	** Done		** Done
	* Very nice with an example! It clearly shows the positive effects of the use. However it can perhaps be more clear if it was presented step-by-step. A step-by-step presentation gives the reader an easier overview how it can and should be used in reality.		* Very nice with an example! It clearly shows the positive effects of the use. However it can perhaps be more clear if it was presented step-by-step. A step-by-step presentation gives the reader an easier overview how it can and should be used in reality.
			**Steps added. I hope it's a bit more clear now.

	===Formal aspects===		===Formal aspects===

Different at 14:17, 30 November 2014

2014-11-30T14:17:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:17, 30 November 2014
Line 80:		Line 80:
	** You're right. Corrected.		** You're right. Corrected.
	*Overall a good use of appropriate words. However, you should consider a quick spell check. Use Word or other software that also including grammar check.		*Overall a good use of appropriate words. However, you should consider a quick spell check. Use Word or other software that also including grammar check.
	** Ran it through ~~word~~, and I found a couple of grammatical errors. Has been Corrected now		** Ran it through MS Word, and I found a couple of grammatical errors. Has been Corrected now.
	* Describe the first table,, how does it connect with the steps?		* Describe the first table,, how does it connect with the steps?
	** Has been corrected as well.		** Has been corrected as well.
	*Overall a good use of references, however, they have a tendency to disappear in the end		*Overall a good use of references, however, they have a tendency to disappear in the end
	**Thanks. I've added a couple more where I felt it was appropriate.		**Thanks. I've added a couple more where I felt it was appropriate.

Different at 10:41, 28 November 2014

2014-11-28T10:41:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:41, 28 November 2014
Line 71:		Line 71:
	** You're right. Corrected.		** You're right. Corrected.
	*Add a category to the article; e.g. Project management, Risk management, Decision-making		*Add a category to the article; e.g. Project management, Risk management, Decision-making
			** Done
	* Very nice with an example! It clearly shows the positive effects of the use. However it can perhaps be more clear if it was presented step-by-step. A step-by-step presentation gives the reader an easier overview how it can and should be used in reality.		* Very nice with an example! It clearly shows the positive effects of the use. However it can perhaps be more clear if it was presented step-by-step. A step-by-step presentation gives the reader an easier overview how it can and should be used in reality.

Line 77:		Line 78:
	** I see. Done.		** I see. Done.
	*First two sentences seems a bit contradictory. Can an uncommon method be commonly used?		*First two sentences seems a bit contradictory. Can an uncommon method be commonly used?
	* You're right. Corrected.		** You're right. Corrected.
	*Overall a good use of appropriate words. However, you should consider a quick spell check. Use Word or other software that also including grammar check.		*Overall a good use of appropriate words. However, you should consider a quick spell check. Use Word or other software that also including grammar check.
	** Ran it through word, and I found a couple of grammatical errors. Has been Corrected now		** Ran it through word, and I found a couple of grammatical errors. Has been Corrected now

Different at 09:37, 28 November 2014

2014-11-28T09:37:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:37, 28 November 2014
Line 63:		Line 63:
	==Review by Bdmn==		==Review by Bdmn==
	*Overall an interesting wiki-article		*Overall an interesting wiki-article
			** Thanks

	===Content aspects===		===Content aspects===
	* Good with the connection to how it can be used in project management.		* Good with the connection to how it can be used in project management.
			** Thanks
	* The first introduction section is written as the rest "will be written". Try to tell what the article will present instead.		* The first introduction section is written as the rest "will be written". Try to tell what the article will present instead.
			** You're right. Corrected.
	*Add a category to the article; e.g. Project management, Risk management, Decision-making		*Add a category to the article; e.g. Project management, Risk management, Decision-making
	* Very nice with an example! It clearly shows the positive effects of the use. However it can perhaps be more clear if it was presented step-by-step. A step-by-step presentation gives the reader an easier overview how it can and should be used in reality.		* Very nice with an example! It clearly shows the positive effects of the use. However it can perhaps be more clear if it was presented step-by-step. A step-by-step presentation gives the reader an easier overview how it can and should be used in reality.
Line 72:		Line 75:
	===Formal aspects===		===Formal aspects===
	* It can be a bit confusing what parts relating to each other when headings are dividing the text with lines. Try not to use the first heading since it's used as the overall heading and use "second heading ==" instead		* It can be a bit confusing what parts relating to each other when headings are dividing the text with lines. Try not to use the first heading since it's used as the overall heading and use "second heading ==" instead
			** I see. Done.
	*First two sentences seems a bit contradictory. Can an uncommon method be commonly used?		*First two sentences seems a bit contradictory. Can an uncommon method be commonly used?
			* You're right. Corrected.
	*Overall a good use of appropriate words. However, you should consider a quick spell check. Use Word or other software that also including grammar check.		*Overall a good use of appropriate words. However, you should consider a quick spell check. Use Word or other software that also including grammar check.
			** Ran it through word, and I found a couple of grammatical errors. Has been Corrected now
	* Describe the first table,, how does it connect with the steps?		* Describe the first table,, how does it connect with the steps?
	Overall a good use of references, however, they have a tendency to disappear in the end		** Has been corrected as well.
			*Overall a good use of references, however, they have a tendency to disappear in the end
			**Thanks. I've added a couple more where I felt it was appropriate.

Different at 16:00, 27 November 2014

2014-11-27T16:00:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:00, 27 November 2014
Line 30:		Line 30:
	**Corrected		**Corrected
	*Maybe include a couple of sentences about what the dangers are of not using these rules.		*Maybe include a couple of sentences about what the dangers are of not using these rules.
			**Done
	<u>Example of Constructive Controversy being used in Project Management</u>		<u>Example of Constructive Controversy being used in Project Management</u>
	*Very good idea to give a concrete example		*Very good idea to give a concrete example
Line 49:		Line 50:
	** Probably, but I think it fits neatly in here to be honest.		** Probably, but I think it fits neatly in here to be honest.
	*Other than that it is a very good discussion - a bit long, but very nice indeed		*Other than that it is a very good discussion - a bit long, but very nice indeed
			**thanks
	<u>References</u>		<u>References</u>
	*The references should be changed to make it more clear who it the author, what is the name of the article, what is the publisher, the year, etc. … Make it look more like reference number 8.		*The references should be changed to make it more clear who it the author, what is the name of the article, what is the publisher, the year, etc. … Make it look more like reference number 8.

Different at 15:39, 27 November 2014

2014-11-27T15:39:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:39, 27 November 2014
Line 51:		Line 51:
	<u>References</u>		<u>References</u>
	*The references should be changed to make it more clear who it the author, what is the name of the article, what is the publisher, the year, etc. … Make it look more like reference number 8.		*The references should be changed to make it more clear who it the author, what is the name of the article, what is the publisher, the year, etc. … Make it look more like reference number 8.
			** Done for the scientific articles. I will keep the reference to google books, since it redirects the user to the exact page for reference.
	<u>General comments</u>		<u>General comments</u>
	*Consider writing more about the use in risk management		*Consider writing more about the use in risk management
	*It's a nice article and the flow is pretty good		*It's a nice article and the flow is pretty good
			** Thanks
	*Consider using synonyms for ‘however’ and remember commas before and after.		*Consider using synonyms for ‘however’ and remember commas before and after.
			** The word was only in the text a combined 4 times. I've changed two of them now, and placed the commas. Thanks.

	==Review by Bdmn==		==Review by Bdmn==

Different at 13:37, 27 November 2014

2014-11-27T13:37:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:37, 27 November 2014
Line 5:		Line 5:
	<u>Intro</u>		<u>Intro</u>
	*Good introduction, however, a short example of use to reach consensus about a controversial topic might be a good idea to explain the method a bit further, maybe just like explain how to make people take sides or give an example of a topix where this could be beneficial.		*Good introduction, however, a short example of use to reach consensus about a controversial topic might be a good idea to explain the method a bit further, maybe just like explain how to make people take sides or give an example of a topix where this could be beneficial.
			** Added a better explanation.
	<u>History and origin</u>		<u>History and origin</u>
	*The history and origin part is quite interesting, but the last part about the release of other books and articles should maybe be moves to a “further reading” part at the end of this article.		*The history and origin part is quite interesting, but the last part about the release of other books and articles should maybe be moves to a “further reading” part at the end of this article.
			** Will keep it here. I think it's relevant. However I will add a Further reading chapter to the end of the article.
	<u>Explanation of Concept</u>		<u>Explanation of Concept</u>
	*''Spelling'': The cognitive biases can be ''set'' aside (instead of ''sat'')		*''Spelling'': The cognitive biases can be ''set'' aside (instead of ''sat'')
			** Corrected
	*Maybe write a bit more about how constructive controversy can be used when inevitable unplanned events happen, and when these create problems in the original project plan		*Maybe write a bit more about how constructive controversy can be used when inevitable unplanned events happen, and when these create problems in the original project plan
	<u>Step-by-Step Guide (consider using hyphens) </u>		** Few sentences added to clear it up. The way to use it here, is the exact same way. :)
			<u>Step-by-Step Guide (consider using hyphens) (Changed!)</u>
	*Make a reference to D.W. Johnson’s 6 steps		*Make a reference to D.W. Johnson’s 6 steps
			**Done
	*Maybe make some sort of a concluding comment on the steps and what steps are different/omitted in other theories		*Maybe make some sort of a concluding comment on the steps and what steps are different/omitted in other theories
			**I feel like I have already done this when i write: "Some say 4, others 5 or 6. While it is the exact same process, different theorists have chosen to split it up differently."?
	<u>The Roles of the different participants when using constructive controversy</u>		<u>The Roles of the different participants when using constructive controversy</u>
	*Reference to the Constructive controversy article		*Reference to the Constructive controversy article
			**Done
	*Who has fitted the table? Did you do it or have your found the fitted one in another article?		*Who has fitted the table? Did you do it or have your found the fitted one in another article?
			** Yes, I have. I'll write that if you think it's necessary
	*I think there is a need for providing more explanation of how this table should/could be used.		*I think there is a need for providing more explanation of how this table should/could be used.
			**Will explain how the six steps relate to the Recitation, Group Discussion and Controversy Phase.
	<u>Rules for using Constructive Controversy</u>		<u>Rules for using Constructive Controversy</u>
	*The first sentence should be re-written in order to make more sense. Maybe something along the lines of: “In order to use Constructive Controversy, a certain set of rules or guidelines will now be presented to help things along”		*The first sentence should be re-written in order to make more sense. Maybe something along the lines of: “In order to use Constructive Controversy, a certain set of rules or guidelines will now be presented to help things along”
			**Corrected
	*Maybe include a couple of sentences about what the dangers are of not using these rules.		*Maybe include a couple of sentences about what the dangers are of not using these rules.
	<u>Example of Constructive Controversy being used in Project Management</u>		<u>Example of Constructive Controversy being used in Project Management</u>
	*Very good idea to give a concrete example		*Very good idea to give a concrete example
			**thanks
	*Just a minor detail – if you write “for” in italic you should maybe also write “against” in italic		*Just a minor detail – if you write “for” in italic you should maybe also write “against” in italic
			** Corrected
	*Grammar: Jean-Luc and Agnes ''are'' placed – instead of ''is''		*Grammar: Jean-Luc and Agnes ''are'' placed – instead of ''is''
			** Corrected
	*Grammar: The two team ''discuss'' – instead of ''discusses''		*Grammar: The two team ''discuss'' – instead of ''discusses''
			** Corrected
	*Grammar: Both Jean-Luc and Andrei ''have'' become… and ''decide'' – instead of ''has'' and ''decides''.		*Grammar: Both Jean-Luc and Andrei ''have'' become… and ''decide'' – instead of ''has'' and ''decides''.
			** Corrected.
	*Where does this example come from? Have you read about it or has this been made up for the purpose of the article? Write a bit about this maybe		*Where does this example come from? Have you read about it or has this been made up for the purpose of the article? Write a bit about this maybe
			** Yes I made it up for this article. I've add a sentence or two about it.
	<u>Discussion</u>		<u>Discussion</u>
	*Maybe the educational use should be mentioned more in the article itself, before being discussed more thoroughly in this part		*Maybe the educational use should be mentioned more in the article itself, before being discussed more thoroughly in this part
	*The “Johnson and Johnson” part could potentially be written as its own paragraph and then only summarised/referred to in the discussion		**It's already mentioned in the introduction, but I'll mention it a couple of other places as well to me more thorough.
			*The “Johnson and Johnson” part could potentially be written as its own paragraph and then only summarised/referred to in the discussion
			** Probably, but I think it fits neatly in here to be honest.
	*Other than that it is a very good discussion - a bit long, but very nice indeed		*Other than that it is a very good discussion - a bit long, but very nice indeed
	<u>References</u>		<u>References</u>

Bdmn: /* Feedback from ProjectGoat */

2014-11-25T17:09:42Z

Feedback from ProjectGoat

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:09, 25 November 2014
Line 37:		Line 37:
	*It's a nice article and the flow is pretty good		*It's a nice article and the flow is pretty good
	*Consider using synonyms for ‘however’ and remember commas before and after.		*Consider using synonyms for ‘however’ and remember commas before and after.

			==Review by Bdmn==
			*Overall an interesting wiki-article

			===Content aspects===
			* Good with the connection to how it can be used in project management.
			* The first introduction section is written as the rest "will be written". Try to tell what the article will present instead.
			*Add a category to the article; e.g. Project management, Risk management, Decision-making
			* Very nice with an example! It clearly shows the positive effects of the use. However it can perhaps be more clear if it was presented step-by-step. A step-by-step presentation gives the reader an easier overview how it can and should be used in reality.

			===Formal aspects===
			* It can be a bit confusing what parts relating to each other when headings are dividing the text with lines. Try not to use the first heading since it's used as the overall heading and use "second heading ==" instead
			*First two sentences seems a bit contradictory. Can an uncommon method be commonly used?
			*Overall a good use of appropriate words. However, you should consider a quick spell check. Use Word or other software that also including grammar check.
			* Describe the first table,, how does it connect with the steps?
			Overall a good use of references, however, they have a tendency to disappear in the end

AnnaGreve at 15:46, 25 November 2014

2014-11-25T15:46:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:46, 25 November 2014
Line 9:		Line 9:
	<u>Explanation of Concept</u>		<u>Explanation of Concept</u>
	*''Spelling'': The cognitive biases can be ''set'' aside (instead of ''sat'')		*''Spelling'': The cognitive biases can be ''set'' aside (instead of ''sat'')
	*Consider using synonyms for ‘however’ and remember commas before and after.
	*Maybe write a bit more about how constructive controversy can be used when inevitable unplanned events happen, and when these create problems in the original project plan		*Maybe write a bit more about how constructive controversy can be used when inevitable unplanned events happen, and when these create problems in the original project plan
	<u>Step-by-Step Guide (consider using hyphens) </u>		<u>Step-by-Step Guide (consider using hyphens) </u>
Line 37:		Line 36:
	*Consider writing more about the use in risk management		*Consider writing more about the use in risk management
	*It's a nice article and the flow is pretty good		*It's a nice article and the flow is pretty good
			*Consider using synonyms for ‘however’ and remember commas before and after.