Talk:Communication in Project Management - Revision history

Ebureika at 17:19, 25 September 2015

2015-09-25T17:19:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:19, 25 September 2015
Line 6:		Line 6:
	* Good with a lot of references to relevant sources.		* Good with a lot of references to relevant sources.
	* Nice with the figures, they were good and understandable. Would be nice if figure 1 was referred to in the text. ''-Author: Done.''		* Nice with the figures, they were good and understandable. Would be nice if figure 1 was referred to in the text. ''-Author: Done.''
	* Maybe some of the limitations could be evaluated.		* Maybe some of the limitations could be evaluated. ''-Author: Done.''
	* The bibliography is missing.		* The bibliography is missing. ''-Author: Done.''
	* I am not sure about what to comment on the length of it, since I’m not sure you are completely finished yet. But everything there is written now seems relevant from my point of view.		* I am not sure about what to comment on the length of it, since I’m not sure you are completely finished yet. But everything there is written now seems relevant from my point of view.

Line 18:		Line 18:
	* Interesting topic, and very important!		* Interesting topic, and very important!
	* advantages and disadvantages? ''-Author: The importance of making a communication better is described in the introduction. It can only bring advantages.''		* advantages and disadvantages? ''-Author: The importance of making a communication better is described in the introduction. It can only bring advantages.''
	* Add a discussion/conclusion		* Add a discussion/conclusion ''-Author: Done.''
	* And a bibliography		* And a bibliography ''-Author: Done.''


Line 41:		Line 41:
	'''*Links, connections and comprehension.'''		'''*Links, connections and comprehension.'''

	The article describes the subject in a logical way. It is a method description so the structure choice makes perfect sense to me. Maybe you can describe farther the communication plan with the picture to ensure people who will read your article that it is really important.		The article describes the subject in a logical way. It is a method description so the structure choice makes perfect sense to me. Maybe you can describe farther the communication plan with the picture to ensure people who will read your article that it is really important. ''-Author: Done.''

	'''* Bibliography'''		'''* Bibliography'''
Line 56:		Line 56:
	* WHY ARE WE YELLING? All jokes aside; you should probably change your titles to not be in all caps, as it is very dramatic and distracting to look at! ;) ''-Autor: Fixed.''		* WHY ARE WE YELLING? All jokes aside; you should probably change your titles to not be in all caps, as it is very dramatic and distracting to look at! ;) ''-Autor: Fixed.''
	* Good abstract! It works as it should, explaining what the article should be around.		* Good abstract! It works as it should, explaining what the article should be around.
	* Remember to make the references correctly. You can find a guide on how to do it on the front page, or – if you want – feel free to just copy the structure used in my article ☺ -Autor: Fixed.		* Remember to make the references correctly. You can find a guide on how to do it on the front page, or – if you want – feel free to just copy the structure used in my article ☺ ''-Autor: Fixed.''
	* The pictures are good, and it’s great that you’ve made them big enough for us to see what is going on. Maybe figure 2 can/should be re-made, so that there aren’t search-highlights on “communic” ;) ''- Author: Haha, thanks, fixed!''		* The pictures are good, and it’s great that you’ve made them big enough for us to see what is going on. Maybe figure 2 can/should be re-made, so that there aren’t search-highlights on “communic” ;) ''- Author: Haha, thanks, fixed!''
	* So far the article seems very well written and interesting. I’m not sure if it is finished, but I would suggest bringing in a section for discussion – talk about which methods and tool are used most often, why/why not certain tools are used more than others, etc.. Maybe you could also add a nice conclusion to wrap up the article in the end? Just a suggestion. Overall a good article! ☺		* So far the article seems very well written and interesting. I’m not sure if it is finished, but I would suggest bringing in a section for discussion – talk about which methods and tool are used most often, why/why not certain tools are used more than others, etc.. Maybe you could also add a nice conclusion to wrap up the article in the end? Just a suggestion. Overall a good article! ☺ ''-Author: Done.''

Ebureika at 17:16, 25 September 2015

2015-09-25T17:16:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:16, 25 September 2015
Line 5:		Line 5:
	* The abstract gives a good insight in the topic.		* The abstract gives a good insight in the topic.
	* Good with a lot of references to relevant sources.		* Good with a lot of references to relevant sources.
	* Nice with the figures, they were good and understandable. Would be nice if figure 1 was referred to in the text. -Author: Done.		* Nice with the figures, they were good and understandable. Would be nice if figure 1 was referred to in the text. ''-Author: Done.''
	* Maybe some of the limitations could be evaluated.		* Maybe some of the limitations could be evaluated.
	* The bibliography is missing.		* The bibliography is missing.
Line 12:		Line 12:

	* Figures are easy to understand		* Figures are easy to understand
	* Make figure 2 smaller -Author: Done.		* Make figure 2 smaller ''-Author: Done.''
	* Great with references		* Great with references
	* Why capital letters for your headlines? -Author: Fixed.		* Why capital letters for your headlines? ''-Author: Fixed.''
	* More structed layout. -Author: Fixed.		* More structed layout. ''-Author: Fixed.''
	* Interesting topic, and very important!		* Interesting topic, and very important!
	* advantages and disadvantages? -Author: The importance of making a communication better is described in the introduction. It can only bring advantages.		* advantages and disadvantages? ''-Author: The importance of making a communication better is described in the introduction. It can only bring advantages.''
	* Add a discussion/conclusion		* Add a discussion/conclusion
	* And a bibliography		* And a bibliography
Line 37:		Line 37:
	'''* Schemas and photos'''		'''* Schemas and photos'''

	They are used in harmony within the text but we do not see the reference to the pictures in your development. The last picture is maybe too technical and a farther description of it can be a good idea. -Author: Done.		They are used in harmony within the text but we do not see the reference to the pictures in your development. The last picture is maybe too technical and a farther description of it can be a good idea. ''-Author: Done.''

	'''*Links, connections and comprehension.'''		'''*Links, connections and comprehension.'''
Line 45:		Line 45:
	'''* Bibliography'''		'''* Bibliography'''

	The references seem to be very serious one. The explanations for each reference may be more developed. And you have to fix the links inside your text. -Author: Done.		The references seem to be very serious one. The explanations for each reference may be more developed. And you have to fix the links inside your text. ''-Author: Done.''

	'''* Conclusion and advices:'''		'''* Conclusion and advices:'''
Line 54:		Line 54:

	113129, reviewer 3:		113129, reviewer 3:
	* WHY ARE WE YELLING? All jokes aside; you should probably change your titles to not be in all caps, as it is very dramatic and distracting to look at! ;) -Autor: Fixed.		* WHY ARE WE YELLING? All jokes aside; you should probably change your titles to not be in all caps, as it is very dramatic and distracting to look at! ;) ''-Autor: Fixed.''
	* Good abstract! It works as it should, explaining what the article should be around.		* Good abstract! It works as it should, explaining what the article should be around.
	* Remember to make the references correctly. You can find a guide on how to do it on the front page, or – if you want – feel free to just copy the structure used in my article ☺ -Autor: Fixed.		* Remember to make the references correctly. You can find a guide on how to do it on the front page, or – if you want – feel free to just copy the structure used in my article ☺ -Autor: Fixed.
	* The pictures are good, and it’s great that you’ve made them big enough for us to see what is going on. Maybe figure 2 can/should be re-made, so that there aren’t search-highlights on “communic” ;) - Author: Haha, thanks, fixed!		* The pictures are good, and it’s great that you’ve made them big enough for us to see what is going on. Maybe figure 2 can/should be re-made, so that there aren’t search-highlights on “communic” ;) ''- Author: Haha, thanks, fixed!''
	* So far the article seems very well written and interesting. I’m not sure if it is finished, but I would suggest bringing in a section for discussion – talk about which methods and tool are used most often, why/why not certain tools are used more than others, etc.. Maybe you could also add a nice conclusion to wrap up the article in the end? Just a suggestion. Overall a good article! ☺		* So far the article seems very well written and interesting. I’m not sure if it is finished, but I would suggest bringing in a section for discussion – talk about which methods and tool are used most often, why/why not certain tools are used more than others, etc.. Maybe you could also add a nice conclusion to wrap up the article in the end? Just a suggestion. Overall a good article! ☺

Ebureika at 09:40, 25 September 2015

2015-09-25T09:40:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:40, 25 September 2015
Line 5:		Line 5:
	* The abstract gives a good insight in the topic.		* The abstract gives a good insight in the topic.
	* Good with a lot of references to relevant sources.		* Good with a lot of references to relevant sources.
	* Nice with the figures, they were good and understandable. Would be nice if figure 1 was referred to in the text.		* Nice with the figures, they were good and understandable. Would be nice if figure 1 was referred to in the text. -Author: Done.
	* Maybe some of the limitations could be evaluated.		* Maybe some of the limitations could be evaluated.
	* The bibliography is missing.		* The bibliography is missing.
Line 12:		Line 12:

	* Figures are easy to understand		* Figures are easy to understand
	* Make figure 2 smaller		* Make figure 2 smaller -Author: Done.
	* Great with references		* Great with references
	* Why capital letters for your headlines?		* Why capital letters for your headlines? -Author: Fixed.
	* More structed layout.		* More structed layout. -Author: Fixed.
	* Interesting topic, and very important!		* Interesting topic, and very important!
	* advantages and disadvantages?		* advantages and disadvantages? -Author: The importance of making a communication better is described in the introduction. It can only bring advantages.
	* Add a discussion/conclusion		* Add a discussion/conclusion
	* And a bibliography		* And a bibliography
Line 37:		Line 37:
	'''* Schemas and photos'''		'''* Schemas and photos'''

	They are used in harmony within the text but we do not see the reference to the pictures in your development. The last picture is maybe too technical and a farther description of it can be a good idea.		They are used in harmony within the text but we do not see the reference to the pictures in your development. The last picture is maybe too technical and a farther description of it can be a good idea. -Author: Done.

	'''*Links, connections and comprehension.'''		'''*Links, connections and comprehension.'''
Line 45:		Line 45:
	'''* Bibliography'''		'''* Bibliography'''

	The references seem to be very serious one. The explanations for each reference may be more developed. And you have to fix the links inside your text.		The references seem to be very serious one. The explanations for each reference may be more developed. And you have to fix the links inside your text. -Author: Done.

	'''* Conclusion and advices:'''		'''* Conclusion and advices:'''
Line 54:		Line 54:

	113129, reviewer 3:		113129, reviewer 3:
	* WHY ARE WE YELLING? All jokes aside; you should probably change your titles to not be in all caps, as it is very dramatic and distracting to look at! ;)		* WHY ARE WE YELLING? All jokes aside; you should probably change your titles to not be in all caps, as it is very dramatic and distracting to look at! ;) -Autor: Fixed.
	* Good abstract! It works as it should, explaining what the article should be around.		* Good abstract! It works as it should, explaining what the article should be around.
	* Remember to make the references correctly. You can find a guide on how to do it on the front page, or – if you want – feel free to just copy the structure used in my article ☺		* Remember to make the references correctly. You can find a guide on how to do it on the front page, or – if you want – feel free to just copy the structure used in my article ☺ -Autor: Fixed.
	* The pictures are good, and it’s great that you’ve made them big enough for us to see what is going on. Maybe figure 2 can/should be re-made, so that there aren’t search-highlights on “communic” ;)		* The pictures are good, and it’s great that you’ve made them big enough for us to see what is going on. Maybe figure 2 can/should be re-made, so that there aren’t search-highlights on “communic” ;) - Author: Haha, thanks, fixed!
	* So far the article seems very well written and interesting. I’m not sure if it is finished, but I would suggest bringing in a section for discussion – talk about which methods and tool are used most often, why/why not certain tools are used more than others, etc.. Maybe you could also add a nice conclusion to wrap up the article in the end? Just a suggestion. Overall a good article! ☺		* So far the article seems very well written and interesting. I’m not sure if it is finished, but I would suggest bringing in a section for discussion – talk about which methods and tool are used most often, why/why not certain tools are used more than others, etc.. Maybe you could also add a nice conclusion to wrap up the article in the end? Just a suggestion. Overall a good article! ☺

Fabien at 19:51, 22 September 2015

2015-09-22T19:51:01Z

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 * I am not sure about what to comment on the length of it, since I’m not sure you are completely finished yet. But everything there is written now seems relevant from my point of view.
 * Figures are easy to understand
@@ Line 22: / Line 20: @@
 * Add a discussion/conclusion
 * And a bibliography

113129 at 18:09, 22 September 2015

2015-09-22T18:09:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:09, 22 September 2015
Line 29:		Line 29:
	* Remember to make the references correctly. You can find a guide on how to do it on the front page, or – if you want – feel free to just copy the structure used in my article ☺		* Remember to make the references correctly. You can find a guide on how to do it on the front page, or – if you want – feel free to just copy the structure used in my article ☺
	* The pictures are good, and it’s great that you’ve made them big enough for us to see what is going on. Maybe figure 2 can/should be re-made, so that there aren’t search-highlights on “communic” ;)		* The pictures are good, and it’s great that you’ve made them big enough for us to see what is going on. Maybe figure 2 can/should be re-made, so that there aren’t search-highlights on “communic” ;)
	* So far the article seems very well written and interesting. I’m not sure if it is finished, but I would suggest bringing in a section for discussion – talk about which methods and tool are used most often, why (not), etc.. Maybe you could also add a nice conclusion to wrap up the article in the end? Just a suggestion. Overall a good article! ☺		* So far the article seems very well written and interesting. I’m not sure if it is finished, but I would suggest bringing in a section for discussion – talk about which methods and tool are used most often, why/why not certain tools are used more than others, etc.. Maybe you could also add a nice conclusion to wrap up the article in the end? Just a suggestion. Overall a good article! ☺

113129 at 18:09, 22 September 2015

2015-09-22T18:09:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:09, 22 September 2015
Line 22:		Line 22:
	* Add a discussion/conclusion		* Add a discussion/conclusion
	* And a bibliography		* And a bibliography


	113129, reviewer 3:		113129, reviewer 3:
	* WHY ARE WE YELLING? All jokes aside; you should probably change your titles to not be in all caps, as it is very dramatic and distracting to look at! ;)		* WHY ARE WE YELLING? All jokes aside; you should probably change your titles to not be in all caps, as it is very dramatic and distracting to look at! ;)

113129 at 18:08, 22 September 2015

2015-09-22T18:08:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:08, 22 September 2015
Line 22:		Line 22:
	* Add a discussion/conclusion		* Add a discussion/conclusion
	* And a bibliography		* And a bibliography

			113129, reviewer 3:
			* WHY ARE WE YELLING? All jokes aside; you should probably change your titles to not be in all caps, as it is very dramatic and distracting to look at! ;)
			* Good abstract! It works as it should, explaining what the article should be around.
			* Remember to make the references correctly. You can find a guide on how to do it on the front page, or – if you want – feel free to just copy the structure used in my article ☺
			* The pictures are good, and it’s great that you’ve made them big enough for us to see what is going on. Maybe figure 2 can/should be re-made, so that there aren’t search-highlights on “communic” ;)
			* So far the article seems very well written and interesting. I’m not sure if it is finished, but I would suggest bringing in a section for discussion – talk about which methods and tool are used most often, why (not), etc.. Maybe you could also add a nice conclusion to wrap up the article in the end? Just a suggestion. Overall a good article! ☺

S117318 at 16:25, 22 September 2015

2015-09-22T16:25:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:25, 22 September 2015
Line 18:		Line 18:
	* Why capital letters for your headlines?		* Why capital letters for your headlines?
	* More structed layout.		* More structed layout.
	* Interesting topic,		* Interesting topic, and very important!
	* advantages and disadvantages?		* advantages and disadvantages?
	* Add a discussion/conclusion		* Add a discussion/conclusion
	* And a bibliography		* And a bibliography

S117318 at 16:25, 22 September 2015

2015-09-22T16:25:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:25, 22 September 2015
Line 9:		Line 9:
	* The bibliography is missing.		* The bibliography is missing.
	* I am not sure about what to comment on the length of it, since I’m not sure you are completely finished yet. But everything there is written now seems relevant from my point of view.		* I am not sure about what to comment on the length of it, since I’m not sure you are completely finished yet. But everything there is written now seems relevant from my point of view.


			Wiki feedback from s117318

			* Figures are easy to understand
			* Make figure 2 smaller
			* Great with references
			* Why capital letters for your headlines?
			* More structed layout.
			* Interesting topic,
			* advantages and disadvantages?
			* Add a discussion/conclusion
			* And a bibliography

KB1991 at 13:51, 22 September 2015

2015-09-22T13:51:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:51, 22 September 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Discussion		Discussion

			KB1991, reviewer 1:
			* The article is in general very well written both with regards to the grammar/spelling and the content. It is interesting to read.
			* The abstract gives a good insight in the topic.
			* Good with a lot of references to relevant sources.
			* Nice with the figures, they were good and understandable. Would be nice if figure 1 was referred to in the text.
			* Maybe some of the limitations could be evaluated.
			* The bibliography is missing.
			* I am not sure about what to comment on the length of it, since I’m not sure you are completely finished yet. But everything there is written now seems relevant from my point of view.