Talk:Cash flow & payment milestones - Revision history

Alice Allouche: /* Feedback 2 | Reviewer name: Alice Allouche */

2018-02-19T21:28:21Z

Feedback 2 | Reviewer name: Alice Allouche

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:28, 19 February 2018
Line 114:		Line 114:


	==Feedback 2 \| Reviewer name: ''Alice Allouche''==		==Feedback 2 \| Reviewer name: ''Alice Allouche (Reviewed 19/02)''==
	===Question 1===		===Question 1===
	'''Quality of the summary:'''		'''Quality of the summary:'''

Alice Allouche at 21:27, 19 February 2018

2018-02-19T21:27:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:27, 19 February 2018
Line 115:		Line 115:

	==Feedback 2 \| Reviewer name: ''Alice Allouche''==		==Feedback 2 \| Reviewer name: ''Alice Allouche''==
	===Question 1 ~~· TEXT~~===		===Question 1===
	'''Quality of the summary:'''		'''Quality of the summary:'''

Line 123:		Line 123:

	===Answer 1===		===Answer 1===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''The abstract is well written and concise, but maybe you should develop a bit more on the concepts of cash flow and payment milestones. I know there is a definition paragraph just below, but maybe add how it contributes to project management, or the precise goal of those 2 concepts.''

	===Question 2 · TEXT===		===Question 2 · TEXT===
Line 139:		Line 139:

	===Answer 2===		===Answer 2===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''The argument is clear. The tools are well described, and the structure announced in the abstract is folllowed. I think you could go into more depth regarding the definitions and usefulness of the methods: how they are implemented, if there are any challenges, what is the current use of these methods, etc. It is the same for the Gantt and Pert examples, maybe you should explain a bit more in detail how they are used concretely, and how they help project management. On the whole, maybe you should be a bit critical of the tools you are talking about. But your article is not finished yet, so maybe you planned on developing all that! ''

	===Question 3 · TEXT===		===Question 3 · TEXT===
Line 151:		Line 151:

	===Answer 3===		===Answer 3===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''Sentences are precise and well written, and little to no writing mistakes.''

	===Question 4 · TEXT===		===Question 4 · TEXT===
Line 163:		Line 163:

	===Answer 4===		===Answer 4===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''The figures are nicely integrated and relevant. As Marianne said, maybe you should re-draw them yourself (or not?)''

	===Question 5 · TEXT===		===Question 5 · TEXT===
Line 175:		Line 175:

	===Answer 5===		===Answer 5===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''The subject is relevant to project management, but maybe you could emphasize that link (maybe find some data about how many people use it, or the amount of money such planning can save, etc). Also, what about program and portfolio management?''

	===Question 6 · TEXT===		===Question 6 · TEXT===
Line 187:		Line 187:

	===Answer 6===		===Answer 6===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''The article presents usefool tools that are difficult to use, so it good to explain the clearly, which is the case. Some analysis and criticism of it could add some added value''

	===Question 7 · TEXT===		===Question 7 · TEXT===
Line 201:		Line 201:

	===Answer 7===		===Answer 7===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''Many varied references, good! Don't forget the annotated bibliography where you have to describe your sources.''

Marianne at 14:52, 18 February 2018

2018-02-18T14:52:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:52, 18 February 2018
Line 20:		Line 20:

	==Feedback 1 \| Reviewer name: ''Marianne Delp (reviewed 18/02)''==		==Feedback 1 \| Reviewer name: ''Marianne Delp (reviewed 18/02)''==
	===Question 1 ~~· TEXT~~===		===Question 1 ===
	'''Quality of the summary:'''		'''Quality of the summary:'''

Line 30:		Line 30:
	''Article is not finished and only includes a abstract and short introduction. Therefore, it is difficult to conclude if the abstract is good or not and to make suggestion on improvements.''		''Article is not finished and only includes a abstract and short introduction. Therefore, it is difficult to conclude if the abstract is good or not and to make suggestion on improvements.''

	===Question 2 ~~· TEXT~~===		===Question 2 ===
	'''Structure and logic of the article:'''		'''Structure and logic of the article:'''

Line 46:		Line 46:
	'Same answer as question 1. In addition, the introduction is well written with good contents in regard to the article's focus.''		'Same answer as question 1. In addition, the introduction is well written with good contents in regard to the article's focus.''

	===Question 3 ~~· TEXT~~===		===Question 3 ===
	'''Grammar and style:'''		'''Grammar and style:'''

Line 58:		Line 58:
	''Good and precise written, with no significant errors.''		''Good and precise written, with no significant errors.''

	===Question 4 ~~· TEXT~~===		===Question 4 ===
	'''Figures and tables:'''		'''Figures and tables:'''

Line 70:		Line 70:
	''The two figures are very good where they are easy to understand and are relevant to the text. Remember that the professor said you can't copy-paste figures from a webpage etc., but that we had to make our own based on the figures. ''		''The two figures are very good where they are easy to understand and are relevant to the text. Remember that the professor said you can't copy-paste figures from a webpage etc., but that we had to make our own based on the figures. ''

	===Question 5 ~~· TEXT~~===		===Question 5 ===
	'''Interest and relevance:'''		'''Interest and relevance:'''

Line 82:		Line 82:
	''This article is of relevance more towards a practical relevance. One improvement could maybe be to specify directly how this article relate to project, program and/or portfolio management in one sentence.''		''This article is of relevance more towards a practical relevance. One improvement could maybe be to specify directly how this article relate to project, program and/or portfolio management in one sentence.''

	===Question 6 ~~· TEXT~~===		===Question 6 ===
	'''Depth of treatment:'''		'''Depth of treatment:'''

Line 94:		Line 94:
	''I belive this article are interesting for practitioner and academic to read. ''		''I belive this article are interesting for practitioner and academic to read. ''

	===Question 7 ~~· TEXT~~===		===Question 7 ===
	'''Annotated bibliography:'''		'''Annotated bibliography:'''

Marianne at 14:51, 18 February 2018

2018-02-18T14:51:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:51, 18 February 2018
Line 19:		Line 19:
	</ol>		</ol>

	==Feedback 1 \| Reviewer name: ''Marianne Delp''==		==Feedback 1 \| Reviewer name: ''Marianne Delp (reviewed 18/02)''==
	===Question 1 · TEXT===		===Question 1 · TEXT===
	'''Quality of the summary:'''		'''Quality of the summary:'''
Line 28:		Line 28:

	===Answer 1===		===Answer 1===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''Article is not finished and only includes a abstract and short introduction. Therefore, it is difficult to conclude if the abstract is good or not and to make suggestion on improvements.''

	===Question 2 · TEXT===		===Question 2 · TEXT===
Line 44:		Line 44:

	===Answer 2===		===Answer 2===
	''~~Answer here~~''		'Same answer as question 1. In addition, the introduction is well written with good contents in regard to the article's focus.''

	===Question 3 · TEXT===		===Question 3 · TEXT===
Line 56:		Line 56:

	===Answer 3===		===Answer 3===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''Good and precise written, with no significant errors.''

	===Question 4 · TEXT===		===Question 4 · TEXT===
Line 68:		Line 68:

	===Answer 4===		===Answer 4===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''The two figures are very good where they are easy to understand and are relevant to the text. Remember that the professor said you can't copy-paste figures from a webpage etc., but that we had to make our own based on the figures. ''

	===Question 5 · TEXT===		===Question 5 · TEXT===
Line 80:		Line 80:

	===Answer 5===		===Answer 5===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''This article is of relevance more towards a practical relevance. One improvement could maybe be to specify directly how this article relate to project, program and/or portfolio management in one sentence.''

	===Question 6 · TEXT===		===Question 6 · TEXT===
Line 92:		Line 92:

	===Answer 6===		===Answer 6===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''I belive this article are interesting for practitioner and academic to read. ''

	===Question 7 · TEXT===		===Question 7 · TEXT===
Line 106:		Line 106:

	===Answer 7===		===Answer 7===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''The sources seems reliable. One of the sources refers to empirical data from Wal-Mart Stores Inc.'s in 2015. Note: One of the sources are not correctly cited in text as the others. ''

Marianne at 11:12, 17 February 2018

2018-02-17T11:12:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:12, 17 February 2018
Line 114:		Line 114:


	==Feedback 2 \| Reviewer name: ''~~Place your name here~~''==		==Feedback 2 \| Reviewer name: ''Alice Allouche''==
	===Question 1 · TEXT===		===Question 1 · TEXT===
	'''Quality of the summary:'''		'''Quality of the summary:'''

Marianne at 11:10, 17 February 2018

2018-02-17T11:10:38Z

Show changes

Hani Mike Rae Selim at 21:58, 13 February 2018

2018-02-13T21:58:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:58, 13 February 2018
Line 14:		Line 14:

	<ol>		<ol>
	<li> Explain the link between cash flow and payment milestones to Project Cost Management?		<li> Explain the link between cash flow and payment milestones to Project Cost Management
	<li> Who is the reader? Project Manager or Sponsor etc?		<li> Who is the reader? Project Manager or Sponsor etc?
	<li> Ensure depth of the article so it contributes to the project management community more than a normal web search		<li> Ensure depth of the article so it contributes to the project management community more than a normal web search
	</ol>		</ol>

Hani Mike Rae Selim at 21:58, 13 February 2018

2018-02-13T21:58:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:58, 13 February 2018
Line 14:		Line 14:

	<ol>		<ol>
	<li> ~~Which aspect of~~ Project Cost Management ~~is being considered~~?		<li> Explain the link between cash flow and payment milestones to Project Cost Management?
	<li> Who is the reader? Project Manager or Sponsor etc?		<li> Who is the reader? Project Manager or Sponsor etc?
	<li> Ensure depth of the article so it contributes to the project management community more than a normal web search		<li> Ensure depth of the article so it contributes to the project management community more than a normal web search
	</ol>		</ol>

Hani Mike Rae Selim: Created page with "==Abstract Feedback== '''Text clarity''' Text is coherent, although this can be improved '''Language''' Some spelling mistakes e.g. "technics" where it is meant "tec..."

2018-02-13T21:56:14Z

Created page with "==Abstract Feedback== '''Text clarity''' Text is coherent, although this can be improved '''Language''' Some spelling mistakes e.g. "technics" where it is meant "tec..."

New page

==Abstract Feedback==

'''Text clarity''' Text is coherent, although this can be improved

'''Language''' Some spelling mistakes e.g. "technics" where it is meant "techniques"

'''Description of the tool/theory/concept''' Can be elaborated - e.g. what is a payment milestone?

'''Purpose explanation''' The abstract needs further elaboration - it is on the short side in terms of content

'''References''' Missing appropriate references to mandatory list of references

'''Relevance of article''' Consider the following:

<ol>
<li> Which aspect of Project Cost Management is being considered?
<li> Who is the reader? Project Manager or Sponsor etc?
<li> Ensure depth of the article so it contributes to the project management community more than a normal web search
</ol>