Fishbone diagram analysis - Revision history

Maria: /* Annonated Bibliography */

2021-02-27T20:33:34Z

Annonated Bibliography

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:33, 27 February 2021
Line 125:		Line 125:
	Leadership and commitment management can be implemented in the brainstorming process. In order to improve it, there could be a coordinator of the session who makes sure every group member is heard and respected and sets a time limit to it.		Leadership and commitment management can be implemented in the brainstorming process. In order to improve it, there could be a coordinator of the session who makes sure every group member is heard and respected and sets a time limit to it.

	== ~~Annonated~~ Bibliography ==		== Annotated Bibliography ==

	'''Lock, Dennis ; Project management (2007) p. 100.'''		'''Lock, Dennis ; Project management (2007) p. 100.'''

Maria: /* Building the diagram */

2021-02-26T16:26:34Z

Building the diagram

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:26, 26 February 2021
Line 27:		Line 27:
	'''Step 2''': Each member should agree on the major categories of causes that lead to the problem. Though it is up to the team to select the causes’ categories, usually depending on the nature of the project, . in a simplified version of the diagram, the categories could be the 4Ms: Machines, Materials, Methods, Manpower.		'''Step 2''': Each member should agree on the major categories of causes that lead to the problem. Though it is up to the team to select the causes’ categories, usually depending on the nature of the project, . in a simplified version of the diagram, the categories could be the 4Ms: Machines, Materials, Methods, Manpower.

	[[File:4Ms.JPG\|\|option\|frameless\|upright=3\|link=\|alt=]] ( based on <ref ~~name="foo"~~ > " A new model of Ishikawa diagram for quality assessment" </ref>)		[[File:4Ms.JPG\|\|option\|frameless\|upright=3\|link=\|alt=]] ( based on <ref > " A new model of Ishikawa diagram for quality assessment" </ref>)

	:		:

Maria: /* Building the diagram */

2021-02-26T16:26:10Z

Building the diagram

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:26, 26 February 2021
Line 27:		Line 27:
	'''Step 2''': Each member should agree on the major categories of causes that lead to the problem. Though it is up to the team to select the causes’ categories, usually depending on the nature of the project, . in a simplified version of the diagram, the categories could be the 4Ms: Machines, Materials, Methods, Manpower.		'''Step 2''': Each member should agree on the major categories of causes that lead to the problem. Though it is up to the team to select the causes’ categories, usually depending on the nature of the project, . in a simplified version of the diagram, the categories could be the 4Ms: Machines, Materials, Methods, Manpower.

	[[File:4Ms.JPG\|\|option\|frameless\|upright=3\|link=\|alt=]] ( based on <ref name="foo" > "~~The application~~ of ~~cause and effect~~ diagram ~~in the oil~~		[[File:4Ms.JPG\|\|option\|frameless\|upright=3\|link=\|alt=]] ( based on <ref name="foo" > " A new model of Ishikawa diagram for quality assessment" </ref>)
	~~industry in Iran: The case of four liter oil canning process of Sepahan Oil Company~~ " </ref>)

	:		:

Maria: /* Building the diagram */

2021-02-26T16:24:06Z

Building the diagram

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:24, 26 February 2021
Line 27:		Line 27:
	'''Step 2''': Each member should agree on the major categories of causes that lead to the problem. Though it is up to the team to select the causes’ categories, usually depending on the nature of the project, . in a simplified version of the diagram, the categories could be the 4Ms: Machines, Materials, Methods, Manpower.		'''Step 2''': Each member should agree on the major categories of causes that lead to the problem. Though it is up to the team to select the causes’ categories, usually depending on the nature of the project, . in a simplified version of the diagram, the categories could be the 4Ms: Machines, Materials, Methods, Manpower.

	[[File:4Ms.JPG\|\|option\|frameless\|upright=3\|link=\|alt=]]		[[File:4Ms.JPG\|\|option\|frameless\|upright=3\|link=\|alt=]] ( based on <ref name="foo" > "The application of cause and effect diagram in the oil
	( based on <ref name="foo" > "The application of cause and effect diagram in the oil		industry in Iran: The case of four liter oil canning process of Sepahan Oil Company " </ref>)
	industry in Iran: The case of four liter oil canning process of Sepahan Oil Company " </ref>):
			:


Line 46:		Line 47:


	[[File:fishbone.JPG\|\|option\|frameless\|upright=3\|link=\|alt=]]		[[File:fishbone.JPG\|\|option\|frameless\|upright=3\|link=\|alt=]] ( based on <ref name="foo" > "The application of cause and effect diagram in the oil
			industry in Iran: The case of four liter oil canning process of Sepahan Oil Company " </ref>)

Maria: /* References */

2021-02-26T16:22:33Z

References

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:22, 26 February 2021
Line 152:		Line 152:

	Branch, Ardestan ; The application of cause and effect diagram in the oil industry in Iran: The case of four liter oil canning process of Sepahan Oil Company (2011)		Branch, Ardestan ; The application of cause and effect diagram in the oil industry in Iran: The case of four liter oil canning process of Sepahan Oil Company (2011)

	url: http://www.academicjournals.org/app/webroot/article/article1380537568_Hekmatpanah.pdf		url: http://www.academicjournals.org/app/webroot/article/article1380537568_Hekmatpanah.pdf

Line 159:		Line 160:

	Luca, Liliana ; A new model of Ishikawa diagram for quality assessment (2016)		Luca, Liliana ; A new model of Ishikawa diagram for quality assessment (2016)

			url: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1757-899X/161/1/012099/pdf

Maria: /* Building the diagram */

2021-02-26T16:21:15Z

Building the diagram

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:21, 26 February 2021
Line 28:		Line 28:

	[[File:4Ms.JPG\|\|option\|frameless\|upright=3\|link=\|alt=]]		[[File:4Ms.JPG\|\|option\|frameless\|upright=3\|link=\|alt=]]
	(~~own figure~~ based on <ref name="foo" > "The application of cause and effect diagram in the oil		( based on <ref name="foo" > "The application of cause and effect diagram in the oil
	industry in Iran: The case of four liter oil canning process of Sepahan Oil Company " </ref>:		industry in Iran: The case of four liter oil canning process of Sepahan Oil Company " </ref>):

Maria: /* Limitations */

2021-02-26T16:19:39Z

Limitations

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:19, 26 February 2021
Line 94:		Line 94:
	The Ishikawa fishbone diagram might also fail to capture the interrelationships of multiple factors that contribute to the problem statement. Some categories of the diagram can be connected: for instance, the materials could be connected to the people category in the suppliers’ sector.		The Ishikawa fishbone diagram might also fail to capture the interrelationships of multiple factors that contribute to the problem statement. Some categories of the diagram can be connected: for instance, the materials could be connected to the people category in the suppliers’ sector.

	Finally, in the case of a complex problem statement, the diagram is prone to becoming very complex.		Finally, in the case of a complex problem statement, the diagram is prone to becoming very complex and thus difficult to interpret.

	== Recommendations ==		== Recommendations ==

Maria: /* Annonated Bibliography */

2021-02-26T16:19:04Z

Annonated Bibliography

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:19, 26 February 2021
Line 140:		Line 140:

	The writer of the paper utilizes the fishbone diagram which, as mentioned in the article, is not used for quantitive analysis rather than qualitative. He also uses the six sigmas tool that is suitable for data-driven methodology for identifying the root cause of a problem. By combining these two tools, the writer performs a thorough analysis of the problem of the production line problem of Sepahan Oil Company.		The writer of the paper utilizes the fishbone diagram which, as mentioned in the article, is not used for quantitive analysis rather than qualitative. He also uses the six sigmas tool that is suitable for data-driven methodology for identifying the root cause of a problem. By combining these two tools, the writer performs a thorough analysis of the problem of the production line problem of Sepahan Oil Company.
	The paper gives detailed instructions on how to build the fishbone diagram ~~(page 2)~~ and a brief historical overview. It is an appropriate source since it refers to other quality management tools as well, such as the Pareto chart, giving an overview of how quality management relates to the risk identification stage of a project.		The paper gives detailed instructions on how to build the fishbone diagram and a brief historical overview. It is an appropriate source since it refers to other quality management tools as well, such as the Pareto chart, giving an overview of how quality management relates to the risk identification stage of a project.

	== References ==		== References ==

Maria: /* The fishbone diagram implemented on the Apollo 13 incident */

2021-02-26T16:18:36Z

The fishbone diagram implemented on the Apollo 13 incident

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:18, 26 February 2021
Line 73:		Line 73:
	The root cause as identified by the experts is that during the maintenance procedures related to Apollo 10, the second oxygen tank was accidentally dropped, damaging the fill connection inside the tank. Thus, the root cause was indeed under the Man category of the fishbone diagram.		The root cause as identified by the experts is that during the maintenance procedures related to Apollo 10, the second oxygen tank was accidentally dropped, damaging the fill connection inside the tank. Thus, the root cause was indeed under the Man category of the fishbone diagram.

	Looking back on the Apollo 13 incident after identifying the root causes raises the question: was the project a success? Project and project management success are two concepts that should not be confused. Considering that the mission's initial goal was lunar landing the project cannot be characterized as successful. Although, even if the mission far exceeded its budget, the resilience and improvisation of both the astronauts and the mission control room crew were impressive, and thus the project management was successful. Overall, the Apollo 13 stayed in history as a "successful failure" <ref > "Wiki, Apollo 13" </ref>.		Looking back on the Apollo 13 incident after identifying the root causes raises the question: was the project a success? Project and project management success are two concepts that should not be confused. Considering that the mission's initial goal was lunar landing the project cannot be characterized as successful. Although, even if the mission far exceeded its budget, the resilience and improvisation of both the astronauts and the mission control room crew were impressive, and thus the project management was successful. Overall, the Apollo 13 stayed in history as a "successful failure" <ref name="foo" > "Wiki, Apollo 13" </ref>.

	=== Benefits ===		=== Benefits ===

Maria: /* Building the diagram */

2021-02-26T16:17:31Z

Building the diagram

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:17, 26 February 2021
Line 28:		Line 28:

	[[File:4Ms.JPG\|\|option\|frameless\|upright=3\|link=\|alt=]]		[[File:4Ms.JPG\|\|option\|frameless\|upright=3\|link=\|alt=]]
	(own figure based on <ref > "The application of cause and effect diagram in the oil		(own figure based on <ref name="foo" > "The application of cause and effect diagram in the oil
	industry in Iran: The case of four liter oil canning process of Sepahan Oil Company " </ref> )		industry in Iran: The case of four liter oil canning process of Sepahan Oil Company " </ref>:


	The causes under each category must be related to<ref > "A new model of Ishikawa diagram for quality assessment" </ref> :		The causes under each category must be related to<ref > "A new model of Ishikawa diagram for quality assessment" </ref> :