File:Systemfmea.png

Size of this preview: 800 × 335 pixels. Other resolution: 1,024 × 429 pixels.

Original file (1,024 × 429 pixels, file size: 79 KB, MIME type: image/png)

M. Shafiee ,F. Dinmohammadi, 2014, "An FMEA-Based Risk Assessment Approach for Wind Turbine Systems: A Comparative Study of Onshore and Offshore", Energies

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

	Date/Time	Thumbnail	Dimensions	User	Comment
current	12:54, 25 September 2015		1,024 × 429 (79 KB)	S141573 (talk \| contribs)	SOURCE: M. Shafiee ,F. Dinmohammadi, 2014, "An FMEA-Based Risk Assessment Approach for Wind Turbine Systems: A Comparative Study of Onshore and Offshore", Energies
	12:54, 25 September 2015		1,024 × 429 (79 KB)	S141573 (talk \| contribs)	M. Shafiee ,F. Dinmohammadi, 2014, "An FMEA-Based Risk Assessment Approach for Wind Turbine Systems: A Comparative Study of Onshore and Offshore", Energies

You cannot overwrite this file.

File usage

The following page uses this file:

The Failure Mode and effects analysis (FMEA) in product development projects

Metadata

This file contains additional information, probably added from the digital camera or scanner used to create or digitise it.

If the file has been modified from its original state, some details may not fully reflect the modified file.

PNG file comment	Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) has been extensively used by wind turbine assembly manufacturers for analyzing, evaluating and prioritizing potential/known failure modes. However, several limitations are associated with its practical implementation in wind farms. First, the Risk-Priority-Number (RPN) of a wind turbine system is not informative enough for wind farm managers from the perspective of criticality; second, there are variety of wind turbines with different structures and hence, it is not correct to compare the RPN values of different wind turbines with each other for prioritization purposes; and lastly, some important economical aspects such as power production losses, and the costs of logistics and transportation are not taken into account in the RPN value. In order to overcome these drawbacks, we develop a mathematical tool for risk and failure mode analysis of wind turbine systems (both onshore and offshore) by integrating the aspects of traditional FMEA and some economic considerations. Then, a quantitative comparative study is carried out using the traditional and the proposed FMEA methodologies on two same type of onshore and offshore wind turbine systems. The results show that the both systems face many of the same risks, however there are some main differences worth considering.
Horizontal resolution	354.33 dpc
Vertical resolution	354.33 dpc

File:Systemfmea.png

File history

File usage

Metadata

Navigation menu

Search