<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-GB">
	<id>http://13.50.150.85/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=S154073</id>
	<title>DTU ProjectLab - User contributions [en-gb]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://13.50.150.85/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=S154073"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php/Special:Contributions/S154073"/>
	<updated>2026-07-14T14:08:53Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.3</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:A_Guide_to_Risk_Management_in_Construction_Projects&amp;diff=66968</id>
		<title>Talk:A Guide to Risk Management in Construction Projects</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:A_Guide_to_Risk_Management_in_Construction_Projects&amp;diff=66968"/>
		<updated>2019-02-25T20:46:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S154073: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Feedback 1 | Reviewer name: &#039;&#039;Johannes Oschinsky&#039;&#039;==&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 1 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
Review of the article: A Guide to Risk Management in Construction Projects&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Quality of the summary:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does the summary make the key focus, insights and/or contribution of the article clear? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 1===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;The Abstracts contains information that rises interest to read further. Hence, it states  the goal of the thus the reader knows what the article is about and why its created.  I do like it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 2 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Structure and logic of the article:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the argument clear? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is there a logical flow to the article? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does one part build upon the other? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the article consistent in its argument and free of contradictions? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 2===&lt;br /&gt;
The article is structured in a good way. One can follow the information order is aligned to the PMBOK Guide. The author takes time to explain how the article will be assembled. The information is build upon and one the order is logical. Going from an general view of the construction industry deeper into the methodology.&lt;br /&gt;
One suggestion of improvement is to put “:” behind the bold market words in section “Key Concepts” to keep the same structure.  Hence, in this part does not stand where the information is coming from.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 3 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Grammar and style:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the writing free of grammatical and spelling errors? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the language precise without unnecessary fill words? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 3===&lt;br /&gt;
The Grammar and writing style are good. It is well written, and one can understand everything you say. Hence, it not a roman and you mention just the most important information. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 4 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Figures and tables:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are figures and tables clear? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do they summarize the key points of the article in a meaningful way? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 4===&lt;br /&gt;
The pictures support the content of the article in a good way. The article is about risk management in construction processes and not about for example “Perform Qualitative Risk Analysis”. It’s good that you put the picture in in case the reader wants to see more about that topic.  For the article itself it is important to mention it but not describe in detail. As you did. Good work with labelling all pictures and put them in place. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 5 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Interest and relevance:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the article of high practical and / or academic relevance? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it made clear in the article why / how it is relevant? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 5===&lt;br /&gt;
The article points out the relevance for example in the section “Abstract” and the article refers to in.   It provides a guideline for managers to define and evaluated risk which it does in my point of view. For the first hand in it is a good work. But think about provide also the “Annotated Bibliography “. Hence think about pros and cons of the approach you suggest.&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 6 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Depth of treatment:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the article interesting for a practitioner or academic to read? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does it make a significant contribution beyond a cursory web search? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 6===&lt;br /&gt;
It provides a general overview of risk management in relation to the construction industry. I think it makes a good contribution to understand the methodology intertwining with the construction sector.  As previously mentioned I would like to see pro’s and cons of the guide. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 7 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Annotated bibliography:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does the article properly cite and acknowledge previous work? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does it briefly summarize the key references at the end of the article? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it based on empirical data instead of opinion? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 7===&lt;br /&gt;
Not implemented yet. A suggestion is to take at least the book” A guide to the project management body of knowledge.”   And add it to the bibliography.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anyways, I think you are on good way and the article seems pretty good. It is well written and kept me interested.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Feedback 2 | Reviewer name: Johan Hilsøe==&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 1 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Quality of the summary:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does the summary make the key focus, insights and/or contribution of the article clear? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 1===&lt;br /&gt;
Good introduction, but consider explaining what the article will describe rather than the background of the construction industry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 2 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Structure and logic of the article:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the argument clear? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is there a logical flow to the article? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does one part build upon the other? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the article consistent in its argument and free of contradictions? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 2===&lt;br /&gt;
The flow makes perfect sense. Missing the limitations section.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 3 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Grammar and style:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the writing free of grammatical and spelling errors? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the language precise without unnecessary fill words? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 3===&lt;br /&gt;
Well-written, might need a final review.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 4 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Figures and tables:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are figures and tables clear? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do they summarize the key points of the article in a meaningful way? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 4===&lt;br /&gt;
Good figures to support the article, but they could be described more - explain what figure 2-9 contain instead of just referring maybe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 5 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Interest and relevance:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the article of high practical and / or academic relevance? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it made clear in the article why / how it is relevant? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 5===&lt;br /&gt;
The relation to project management is clear. No comments :).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 6 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Depth of treatment:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the article interesting for a practitioner or academic to read? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does it make a significant contribution beyond a cursory web search? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 6===&lt;br /&gt;
Good with an overview and then going more in depth. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 7 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Annotated bibliography:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does the article properly cite and acknowledge previous work? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does it briefly summarize the key references at the end of the article? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it based on empirical data instead of opinion? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 7===&lt;br /&gt;
Needs to be made :)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S154073</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:The_Project_Charter&amp;diff=66947</id>
		<title>Talk:The Project Charter</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:The_Project_Charter&amp;diff=66947"/>
		<updated>2019-02-25T20:15:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S154073: Created page with &amp;quot;==Feedback 1 | Reviewer name: Johan Hilsøe== ===Question 1 · TEXT=== &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Quality of the summary:&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;  Does the summary make the key focus, insights and/or contribution of the ...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Feedback 1 | Reviewer name: Johan Hilsøe==&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 1 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Quality of the summary:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does the summary make the key focus, insights and/or contribution of the article clear? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 1===&lt;br /&gt;
The summary provides a good overview of what to expect of the article. Especially the last section is a nice overview of the article. Maybe consider describing what a project charter is in a single sentence or two, before explaining the limitations, pros and cons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 2 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Structure and logic of the article:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the argument clear? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is there a logical flow to the article? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does one part build upon the other? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the article consistent in its argument and free of contradictions? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 2===&lt;br /&gt;
It makes sense to explain why one would make a project charter and then explain exactly what it contains. The example links it all together, but the picture could be larger. Also, I think that it shouldn&#039;t contain confidential information blanked out - rather make a new one with made up contents.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 3 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Grammar and style:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the writing free of grammatical and spelling errors? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the language precise without unnecessary fill words? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 3===&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the article is in perfect english. The abstract needs a fine-tuning though :). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 4 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Figures and tables:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are figures and tables clear? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do they summarize the key points of the article in a meaningful way? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 4===&lt;br /&gt;
The text links to the pictures well. No comments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 5 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Interest and relevance:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the article of high practical and / or academic relevance? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it made clear in the article why / how it is relevant? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 5===&lt;br /&gt;
Very relevant, especially linked to the process of a project. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 6 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Depth of treatment:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the article interesting for a practitioner or academic to read? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does it make a significant contribution beyond a cursory web search? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 6===&lt;br /&gt;
The article provides rather good information on the project charter, but the subject can easily be Googled. If possible, dig deeper in to the pros and cons and how to use it. Use the example :).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 7 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Annotated bibliography:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does the article properly cite and acknowledge previous work? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does it briefly summarize the key references at the end of the article? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it based on empirical data instead of opinion? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 7===&lt;br /&gt;
Perfect, provides why the references are used. Maybe one more reference would be good.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Feedback 2 | Reviewer name: &#039;&#039;NAME&#039;&#039;==&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 1 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Quality of the summary:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does the summary make the key focus, insights and/or contribution of the article clear? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 1===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Answer here&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 2 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Structure and logic of the article:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the argument clear? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is there a logical flow to the article? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does one part build upon the other? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the article consistent in its argument and free of contradictions? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 2===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Answer here&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 3 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Grammar and style:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the writing free of grammatical and spelling errors? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the language precise without unnecessary fill words? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 3===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Answer here&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 4 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Figures and tables:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are figures and tables clear? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do they summarize the key points of the article in a meaningful way? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 4===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Answer here&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 5 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Interest and relevance:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the article of high practical and / or academic relevance? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it made clear in the article why / how it is relevant? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 5===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Answer here&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 6 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Depth of treatment:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the article interesting for a practitioner or academic to read? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does it make a significant contribution beyond a cursory web search? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 6===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Answer here&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 7 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Annotated bibliography:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does the article properly cite and acknowledge previous work? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does it briefly summarize the key references at the end of the article? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it based on empirical data instead of opinion? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 7===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Answer here&#039;&#039;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S154073</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64431</id>
		<title>Unidentified Risks</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64431"/>
		<updated>2019-02-22T13:42:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S154073: /* Risk classification */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any project there will be some risks that should be carefully managed, but there will also be uncertainty, which involves variability and ambiguity &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/civil-and-environmental-engineering/1-040-project-management-spring-2009/lecture-notes/MIT1_040s09_lec24.pdf free to share and adapt under Creative Commons terms: Attribution, noncommercial, share alike (https://ocw.mit.edu/terms/) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode). Slides by Fred Moavenzadeh from MIT &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. This article outlines four different types of uncertainty with the main focus on the unidentified risks (or the “unknown unknowns”). Unidentified risks are the risks that seem impossible to find. However, studies have found that they in fact are not unidentifiable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To describe uncertainty management in detail, this article will first explain what variability and ambiguity in projects consists of and then dig deeper into the different types of uncertainty. Finally, some tools to manage the unidentified risks are presented as well as a reflection on the usage of the tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the type of uncertainty that is generated due to lack of knowledge or unexpected events and changes in the project &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Slides from Project Management course (42429 F18)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Before a project is started, it is important to reflect on the possible factors that can influence the project. Part of this is to reflect on the types of uncertainty, namely the known knowns (change control), known unknowns (risk management), unknown knowns (planning &amp;amp; communication errors) and the unknown unknowns (unexpected events and changes). A model to describe these four types of uncertainty is the Cynefin Framework which is divided in to the following: Order, unorder and disorder. Unorder is furthermore divided in to the complex domain and the complicated domain, while order is divided in to the chaotic domain and the simple domain. The Cynefin Framework will be used as a model to describe the types of uncertainty throughout this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
To understand the theory of uncertainty management and thereby the importance of managing the unidentified risks, this section will first describe what uncertainty really is as well as link it to risk management. Furthermore, the different types of uncertainty will be outlined.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The British Standard (Axelos) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/lib/dtudk/reader.action?docID=4863041&amp;amp;ppg=30 Project Management: &amp;quot;Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2&amp;quot;, Axelos &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; distinguishes project work from “business as usual” by the following characteristics: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change, temporary, cross-functional, unique and uncertainty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Change implies that a project introduces a change from one state to another.&lt;br /&gt;
*Temporary is part of the definition of a project and means that business as usual returns after the project is finished. &lt;br /&gt;
*Cross-functional means that a project involves people from different backgrounds working together towards a common goal.&lt;br /&gt;
*Unique implies that no projects are identical &lt;br /&gt;
*Uncertainty covers the threats (and opportunities) that the other characteristics bring to the project work. These threats and opportunities are often bigger and more important than those in everyday work, meaning that projects are subject to more risk. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article focuses describes the uncertainty of projects. The term “uncertainty” is defined by Chapman and Ward (2002) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Chapman, Chris &amp;amp; Ward, Stephen. (2002). Managing Project Risk and Uncertainty : A Constructively Simple Approach to Decision Making / C. Chapman, S. Ward. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31747699_Managing_Project_Risk_and_Uncertainty_A_Constructively_Simple_Approach_to_Decision_Making_C_Chapman_S_Ward &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as “lack of certainty, involving variability and ambiguity”, where variability is “uncertainty about the size of parameters which may result from lack of data, lack of detail, lack of definition, lack of experience and so on, which may be quantified if this is useful” and ambiguity is “the aspects of uncertainty not addressed in terms of variability”. Uncertainty can thereby be defined as the aspects of a project that may influence it either positively or negatively which is why uncertainty management is divided into opportunity management (which controls the positive influences) and risk management (which controls the negative influences) (MIT). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Classification of uncertainty===&lt;br /&gt;
In 2002 the former U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Henry Rumsfeld mentioned “unknown unknowns” in a Department of Defense news briefing &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiPe1OiKQuk Donald Rumsfeld DoD briefing &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.This made people try to understand the different types of uncertainty by classifying the knowledge. David Cleden (2009)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.amazon.co.uk/Managing-Project-Uncertainty-Advances-Management/dp/B00SLUXH2E Managing Project Uncertainty (Advances in Project Management): Written by David Cleden, 2009 Edition, (1st Edition) Publisher: Gower&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; uses the typical classification of risks, which is based on the knowledge of an event’s occurrence and impact, to list four possibilities: &lt;br /&gt;
*Known–knowns (knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–knowns (untapped knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Known–unknowns (risks)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–unknowns (unfathomable uncertainty)&lt;br /&gt;
The following will describe, and provide examples of, the different elements. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The known knowns are the knowledge used in the planning phase of a project. This means that even before the project has started, the people involved in the project are aware of basic knowledge or theory behind the project. A very simple example could be that, in a building project, all participants are aware that a lot of money will be spent on materials, salaries and so on. It could also be to identify the obvious stakeholders of the project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Since a project consists of people from different backgrounds with different skillsets, and there is limited space or resources to hire experts on every single aspect of the project, there will be unknown knowns in a project. These consist of knowledge that is not apparent within the project group but can be gathered from experts on the areas. In the example of a building project, this could be knowledge of an external consultant providing additional details to the planning process of the project.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Known unknowns are risks that the project group is aware of the existence of and want to manage carefully. In this sense, the risks are negative impacts on the project that the project has to minimize. These can be risks of material shortage or negative stakeholder involvement in a building project. The risk of negative stakeholder involvement could be due to poor communication to the important stakeholders which leads to them intervening in the project and possibly setting it back to an earlier state. Therefore, the known unknowns are part of risk management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the known unknowns that are yet to be identified. As it is located in the cross-section of the uncertain and unidentified, these risks are by far the most difficult to manage. An unknown unknown is an event or impact on a project that is considered unfathomable or even unimaginable which is why they are so difficult to consider in the planning process of a project. It is furthermore difficult to provide an example of an unknown unknown as these are risks that seem unidentifiable, although this article will provide some tools to convert the unknown unknowns into known unknowns which make them easier to manage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To summarize, the different elements can be shortly described &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://marketbusinessnews.com/financial-glossary/financial-glossary-u/unknown-unknowns/ Market Business News: &amp;quot;What Are Unknown Unknowns? Definition And Examples&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*The known knowns are the things we are aware of and understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown knowns are the things understand but aren’t aware of.&lt;br /&gt;
*The known unknowns are the things we are aware of but don’t understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown unknowns are the things we are neither aware of nor understand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Models of uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces models to understand and manage uncertainty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Risk classification===&lt;br /&gt;
To simplify the classification mentioned in the previous section, the knowledge of an event’s occurrence is labeled “identification” and the knowledge of an event’s impact is labeled “certainty”. In the matrix below, the four different types of (un)certainty are portrayed  &amp;lt;ref name=uuarticle&amp;gt; Kim, S. D. (2012). Characterizing unknown unknowns. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The matrix is divided in to certainty and identification. The idea is that “identification” is defined as either “knowledge” or “risk”, i.e. positive or negative and that “certainty” is whether or not we know that a certain event, that can influence the project, exists. This implies that the factors or events that we know exist and have knowledge about are relatively easy to identify and manage whereas the unknown unknowns are much harder to identify and therefore manage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:table_of_uncertainty_1.jpg|center|frame|Risk classification&amp;lt;ref name=uuarticle /&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Cynefin Framework===&lt;br /&gt;
The Cynefin Framework is a tool developed by David J. Snowden and other contributors&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://pmiswohio.org/images/downloads/Summit18/hatter_cynefin_framework_summit18_03202018.pdf Cynefin Framewok (PMI SW Ohio)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to determine contexts enabling leaders to make appropriate choices. The framework consists of five domains: Simple, complicated, complex, chaotic and disorder. The first two are placed in to the “ordered universe” where facts are applicable. Complex and chaotic are placed in the “un-ordered universe” where the relationship between cause and effect is not immediately apparent. Below, the different domains are shortly explained and linked to the above model &amp;lt;ref name=hbr&amp;gt; https://hbr.org/2007/11/a-leaders-framework-for-decision-making (Cynefin Framework). A Leader’s Framework for Decision Making, Snowden, D. J. et al. 2007 in Harvard Business Review &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*The simple domain are the known knowns where it is possible to categorize the situation based on facts on the area.&lt;br /&gt;
*The complicated domain are the known unknowns where the situation isn’t immediately apparent, but it is possible to analyze the situation. &lt;br /&gt;
*The complex domain are the unknown unknowns where the outcome cannot be immediately determined but experiments will lead towards the correct direction.&lt;br /&gt;
*The chaotic domain are the unknowable unknowns where nothing makes sense and we search for ways to move more towards the complex domain.&lt;br /&gt;
*Disorder is a mix of the above domains and the situation has to be broken down in to parts to assign to the other domains. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Cynefin_Framework_(HBR).gif|center|frame|The Cynefin Framework&amp;lt;ref name=hbr /&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much like the model described in the above section, this framework suggests that the easiest situation is the simple domain, where the known knowns are found. Furthermore, the framework provides tools for leaders to manage their way out of the above situations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Tools==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces some tools to minimize the known unknown risks or identify the unknown unknown risks. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the limitations will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S154073</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64430</id>
		<title>Unidentified Risks</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64430"/>
		<updated>2019-02-22T13:42:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S154073: /* The Cynefin Framework */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any project there will be some risks that should be carefully managed, but there will also be uncertainty, which involves variability and ambiguity &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/civil-and-environmental-engineering/1-040-project-management-spring-2009/lecture-notes/MIT1_040s09_lec24.pdf free to share and adapt under Creative Commons terms: Attribution, noncommercial, share alike (https://ocw.mit.edu/terms/) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode). Slides by Fred Moavenzadeh from MIT &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. This article outlines four different types of uncertainty with the main focus on the unidentified risks (or the “unknown unknowns”). Unidentified risks are the risks that seem impossible to find. However, studies have found that they in fact are not unidentifiable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To describe uncertainty management in detail, this article will first explain what variability and ambiguity in projects consists of and then dig deeper into the different types of uncertainty. Finally, some tools to manage the unidentified risks are presented as well as a reflection on the usage of the tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the type of uncertainty that is generated due to lack of knowledge or unexpected events and changes in the project &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Slides from Project Management course (42429 F18)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Before a project is started, it is important to reflect on the possible factors that can influence the project. Part of this is to reflect on the types of uncertainty, namely the known knowns (change control), known unknowns (risk management), unknown knowns (planning &amp;amp; communication errors) and the unknown unknowns (unexpected events and changes). A model to describe these four types of uncertainty is the Cynefin Framework which is divided in to the following: Order, unorder and disorder. Unorder is furthermore divided in to the complex domain and the complicated domain, while order is divided in to the chaotic domain and the simple domain. The Cynefin Framework will be used as a model to describe the types of uncertainty throughout this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
To understand the theory of uncertainty management and thereby the importance of managing the unidentified risks, this section will first describe what uncertainty really is as well as link it to risk management. Furthermore, the different types of uncertainty will be outlined.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The British Standard (Axelos) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/lib/dtudk/reader.action?docID=4863041&amp;amp;ppg=30 Project Management: &amp;quot;Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2&amp;quot;, Axelos &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; distinguishes project work from “business as usual” by the following characteristics: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change, temporary, cross-functional, unique and uncertainty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Change implies that a project introduces a change from one state to another.&lt;br /&gt;
*Temporary is part of the definition of a project and means that business as usual returns after the project is finished. &lt;br /&gt;
*Cross-functional means that a project involves people from different backgrounds working together towards a common goal.&lt;br /&gt;
*Unique implies that no projects are identical &lt;br /&gt;
*Uncertainty covers the threats (and opportunities) that the other characteristics bring to the project work. These threats and opportunities are often bigger and more important than those in everyday work, meaning that projects are subject to more risk. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article focuses describes the uncertainty of projects. The term “uncertainty” is defined by Chapman and Ward (2002) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Chapman, Chris &amp;amp; Ward, Stephen. (2002). Managing Project Risk and Uncertainty : A Constructively Simple Approach to Decision Making / C. Chapman, S. Ward. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31747699_Managing_Project_Risk_and_Uncertainty_A_Constructively_Simple_Approach_to_Decision_Making_C_Chapman_S_Ward &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as “lack of certainty, involving variability and ambiguity”, where variability is “uncertainty about the size of parameters which may result from lack of data, lack of detail, lack of definition, lack of experience and so on, which may be quantified if this is useful” and ambiguity is “the aspects of uncertainty not addressed in terms of variability”. Uncertainty can thereby be defined as the aspects of a project that may influence it either positively or negatively which is why uncertainty management is divided into opportunity management (which controls the positive influences) and risk management (which controls the negative influences) (MIT). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Classification of uncertainty===&lt;br /&gt;
In 2002 the former U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Henry Rumsfeld mentioned “unknown unknowns” in a Department of Defense news briefing &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiPe1OiKQuk Donald Rumsfeld DoD briefing &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.This made people try to understand the different types of uncertainty by classifying the knowledge. David Cleden (2009)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.amazon.co.uk/Managing-Project-Uncertainty-Advances-Management/dp/B00SLUXH2E Managing Project Uncertainty (Advances in Project Management): Written by David Cleden, 2009 Edition, (1st Edition) Publisher: Gower&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; uses the typical classification of risks, which is based on the knowledge of an event’s occurrence and impact, to list four possibilities: &lt;br /&gt;
*Known–knowns (knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–knowns (untapped knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Known–unknowns (risks)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–unknowns (unfathomable uncertainty)&lt;br /&gt;
The following will describe, and provide examples of, the different elements. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The known knowns are the knowledge used in the planning phase of a project. This means that even before the project has started, the people involved in the project are aware of basic knowledge or theory behind the project. A very simple example could be that, in a building project, all participants are aware that a lot of money will be spent on materials, salaries and so on. It could also be to identify the obvious stakeholders of the project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Since a project consists of people from different backgrounds with different skillsets, and there is limited space or resources to hire experts on every single aspect of the project, there will be unknown knowns in a project. These consist of knowledge that is not apparent within the project group but can be gathered from experts on the areas. In the example of a building project, this could be knowledge of an external consultant providing additional details to the planning process of the project.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Known unknowns are risks that the project group is aware of the existence of and want to manage carefully. In this sense, the risks are negative impacts on the project that the project has to minimize. These can be risks of material shortage or negative stakeholder involvement in a building project. The risk of negative stakeholder involvement could be due to poor communication to the important stakeholders which leads to them intervening in the project and possibly setting it back to an earlier state. Therefore, the known unknowns are part of risk management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the known unknowns that are yet to be identified. As it is located in the cross-section of the uncertain and unidentified, these risks are by far the most difficult to manage. An unknown unknown is an event or impact on a project that is considered unfathomable or even unimaginable which is why they are so difficult to consider in the planning process of a project. It is furthermore difficult to provide an example of an unknown unknown as these are risks that seem unidentifiable, although this article will provide some tools to convert the unknown unknowns into known unknowns which make them easier to manage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To summarize, the different elements can be shortly described &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://marketbusinessnews.com/financial-glossary/financial-glossary-u/unknown-unknowns/ Market Business News: &amp;quot;What Are Unknown Unknowns? Definition And Examples&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*The known knowns are the things we are aware of and understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown knowns are the things understand but aren’t aware of.&lt;br /&gt;
*The known unknowns are the things we are aware of but don’t understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown unknowns are the things we are neither aware of nor understand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Models of uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces models to understand and manage uncertainty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Risk classification===&lt;br /&gt;
To simplify the classification mentioned in the previous section, the knowledge of an event’s occurrence is labeled “identification” and the knowledge of an event’s impact is labeled “certainty”. In the matrix below, the four different types of (un)certainty are portrayed  &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;uuarticle&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; Kim, S. D. (2012). Characterizing unknown unknowns. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The matrix is divided in to certainty and identification. The idea is that “identification” is defined as either “knowledge” or “risk”, i.e. positive or negative and that “certainty” is whether or not we know that a certain event, that can influence the project, exists. This implies that the factors or events that we know exist and have knowledge about are relatively easy to identify and manage whereas the unknown unknowns are much harder to identify and therefore manage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:table_of_uncertainty_1.jpg|center|frame|Risk classification&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;uuarticle&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Cynefin Framework===&lt;br /&gt;
The Cynefin Framework is a tool developed by David J. Snowden and other contributors&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://pmiswohio.org/images/downloads/Summit18/hatter_cynefin_framework_summit18_03202018.pdf Cynefin Framewok (PMI SW Ohio)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to determine contexts enabling leaders to make appropriate choices. The framework consists of five domains: Simple, complicated, complex, chaotic and disorder. The first two are placed in to the “ordered universe” where facts are applicable. Complex and chaotic are placed in the “un-ordered universe” where the relationship between cause and effect is not immediately apparent. Below, the different domains are shortly explained and linked to the above model &amp;lt;ref name=hbr&amp;gt; https://hbr.org/2007/11/a-leaders-framework-for-decision-making (Cynefin Framework). A Leader’s Framework for Decision Making, Snowden, D. J. et al. 2007 in Harvard Business Review &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*The simple domain are the known knowns where it is possible to categorize the situation based on facts on the area.&lt;br /&gt;
*The complicated domain are the known unknowns where the situation isn’t immediately apparent, but it is possible to analyze the situation. &lt;br /&gt;
*The complex domain are the unknown unknowns where the outcome cannot be immediately determined but experiments will lead towards the correct direction.&lt;br /&gt;
*The chaotic domain are the unknowable unknowns where nothing makes sense and we search for ways to move more towards the complex domain.&lt;br /&gt;
*Disorder is a mix of the above domains and the situation has to be broken down in to parts to assign to the other domains. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Cynefin_Framework_(HBR).gif|center|frame|The Cynefin Framework&amp;lt;ref name=hbr /&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much like the model described in the above section, this framework suggests that the easiest situation is the simple domain, where the known knowns are found. Furthermore, the framework provides tools for leaders to manage their way out of the above situations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Tools==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces some tools to minimize the known unknown risks or identify the unknown unknown risks. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the limitations will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S154073</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64425</id>
		<title>Unidentified Risks</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64425"/>
		<updated>2019-02-22T13:41:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S154073: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any project there will be some risks that should be carefully managed, but there will also be uncertainty, which involves variability and ambiguity &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/civil-and-environmental-engineering/1-040-project-management-spring-2009/lecture-notes/MIT1_040s09_lec24.pdf free to share and adapt under Creative Commons terms: Attribution, noncommercial, share alike (https://ocw.mit.edu/terms/) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode). Slides by Fred Moavenzadeh from MIT &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. This article outlines four different types of uncertainty with the main focus on the unidentified risks (or the “unknown unknowns”). Unidentified risks are the risks that seem impossible to find. However, studies have found that they in fact are not unidentifiable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To describe uncertainty management in detail, this article will first explain what variability and ambiguity in projects consists of and then dig deeper into the different types of uncertainty. Finally, some tools to manage the unidentified risks are presented as well as a reflection on the usage of the tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the type of uncertainty that is generated due to lack of knowledge or unexpected events and changes in the project &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Slides from Project Management course (42429 F18)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Before a project is started, it is important to reflect on the possible factors that can influence the project. Part of this is to reflect on the types of uncertainty, namely the known knowns (change control), known unknowns (risk management), unknown knowns (planning &amp;amp; communication errors) and the unknown unknowns (unexpected events and changes). A model to describe these four types of uncertainty is the Cynefin Framework which is divided in to the following: Order, unorder and disorder. Unorder is furthermore divided in to the complex domain and the complicated domain, while order is divided in to the chaotic domain and the simple domain. The Cynefin Framework will be used as a model to describe the types of uncertainty throughout this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
To understand the theory of uncertainty management and thereby the importance of managing the unidentified risks, this section will first describe what uncertainty really is as well as link it to risk management. Furthermore, the different types of uncertainty will be outlined.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The British Standard (Axelos) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/lib/dtudk/reader.action?docID=4863041&amp;amp;ppg=30 Project Management: &amp;quot;Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2&amp;quot;, Axelos &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; distinguishes project work from “business as usual” by the following characteristics: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change, temporary, cross-functional, unique and uncertainty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Change implies that a project introduces a change from one state to another.&lt;br /&gt;
*Temporary is part of the definition of a project and means that business as usual returns after the project is finished. &lt;br /&gt;
*Cross-functional means that a project involves people from different backgrounds working together towards a common goal.&lt;br /&gt;
*Unique implies that no projects are identical &lt;br /&gt;
*Uncertainty covers the threats (and opportunities) that the other characteristics bring to the project work. These threats and opportunities are often bigger and more important than those in everyday work, meaning that projects are subject to more risk. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article focuses describes the uncertainty of projects. The term “uncertainty” is defined by Chapman and Ward (2002) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Chapman, Chris &amp;amp; Ward, Stephen. (2002). Managing Project Risk and Uncertainty : A Constructively Simple Approach to Decision Making / C. Chapman, S. Ward. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31747699_Managing_Project_Risk_and_Uncertainty_A_Constructively_Simple_Approach_to_Decision_Making_C_Chapman_S_Ward &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as “lack of certainty, involving variability and ambiguity”, where variability is “uncertainty about the size of parameters which may result from lack of data, lack of detail, lack of definition, lack of experience and so on, which may be quantified if this is useful” and ambiguity is “the aspects of uncertainty not addressed in terms of variability”. Uncertainty can thereby be defined as the aspects of a project that may influence it either positively or negatively which is why uncertainty management is divided into opportunity management (which controls the positive influences) and risk management (which controls the negative influences) (MIT). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Classification of uncertainty===&lt;br /&gt;
In 2002 the former U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Henry Rumsfeld mentioned “unknown unknowns” in a Department of Defense news briefing &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiPe1OiKQuk Donald Rumsfeld DoD briefing &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.This made people try to understand the different types of uncertainty by classifying the knowledge. David Cleden (2009)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.amazon.co.uk/Managing-Project-Uncertainty-Advances-Management/dp/B00SLUXH2E Managing Project Uncertainty (Advances in Project Management): Written by David Cleden, 2009 Edition, (1st Edition) Publisher: Gower&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; uses the typical classification of risks, which is based on the knowledge of an event’s occurrence and impact, to list four possibilities: &lt;br /&gt;
*Known–knowns (knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–knowns (untapped knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Known–unknowns (risks)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–unknowns (unfathomable uncertainty)&lt;br /&gt;
The following will describe, and provide examples of, the different elements. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The known knowns are the knowledge used in the planning phase of a project. This means that even before the project has started, the people involved in the project are aware of basic knowledge or theory behind the project. A very simple example could be that, in a building project, all participants are aware that a lot of money will be spent on materials, salaries and so on. It could also be to identify the obvious stakeholders of the project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Since a project consists of people from different backgrounds with different skillsets, and there is limited space or resources to hire experts on every single aspect of the project, there will be unknown knowns in a project. These consist of knowledge that is not apparent within the project group but can be gathered from experts on the areas. In the example of a building project, this could be knowledge of an external consultant providing additional details to the planning process of the project.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Known unknowns are risks that the project group is aware of the existence of and want to manage carefully. In this sense, the risks are negative impacts on the project that the project has to minimize. These can be risks of material shortage or negative stakeholder involvement in a building project. The risk of negative stakeholder involvement could be due to poor communication to the important stakeholders which leads to them intervening in the project and possibly setting it back to an earlier state. Therefore, the known unknowns are part of risk management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the known unknowns that are yet to be identified. As it is located in the cross-section of the uncertain and unidentified, these risks are by far the most difficult to manage. An unknown unknown is an event or impact on a project that is considered unfathomable or even unimaginable which is why they are so difficult to consider in the planning process of a project. It is furthermore difficult to provide an example of an unknown unknown as these are risks that seem unidentifiable, although this article will provide some tools to convert the unknown unknowns into known unknowns which make them easier to manage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To summarize, the different elements can be shortly described &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://marketbusinessnews.com/financial-glossary/financial-glossary-u/unknown-unknowns/ Market Business News: &amp;quot;What Are Unknown Unknowns? Definition And Examples&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*The known knowns are the things we are aware of and understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown knowns are the things understand but aren’t aware of.&lt;br /&gt;
*The known unknowns are the things we are aware of but don’t understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown unknowns are the things we are neither aware of nor understand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Models of uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces models to understand and manage uncertainty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Risk classification===&lt;br /&gt;
To simplify the classification mentioned in the previous section, the knowledge of an event’s occurrence is labeled “identification” and the knowledge of an event’s impact is labeled “certainty”. In the matrix below, the four different types of (un)certainty are portrayed  &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;uuarticle&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; Kim, S. D. (2012). Characterizing unknown unknowns. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The matrix is divided in to certainty and identification. The idea is that “identification” is defined as either “knowledge” or “risk”, i.e. positive or negative and that “certainty” is whether or not we know that a certain event, that can influence the project, exists. This implies that the factors or events that we know exist and have knowledge about are relatively easy to identify and manage whereas the unknown unknowns are much harder to identify and therefore manage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:table_of_uncertainty_1.jpg|center|frame|Risk classification&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;uuarticle&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Cynefin Framework===&lt;br /&gt;
The Cynefin Framework is a tool developed by David J. Snowden and other contributors&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://pmiswohio.org/images/downloads/Summit18/hatter_cynefin_framework_summit18_03202018.pdf Cynefin Framewok (PMI SW Ohio)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to determine contexts enabling leaders to make appropriate choices. The framework consists of five domains: Simple, complicated, complex, chaotic and disorder. The first two are placed in to the “ordered universe” where facts are applicable. Complex and chaotic are placed in the “un-ordered universe” where the relationship between cause and effect is not immediately apparent. Below, the different domains are shortly explained and linked to the above model &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;hbr&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; https://hbr.org/2007/11/a-leaders-framework-for-decision-making (Cynefin Framework). A Leader’s Framework for Decision Making, Snowden, D. J. et al. 2007 in Harvard Business Review &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*The simple domain are the known knowns where it is possible to categorize the situation based on facts on the area.&lt;br /&gt;
*The complicated domain are the known unknowns where the situation isn’t immediately apparent, but it is possible to analyze the situation. &lt;br /&gt;
*The complex domain are the unknown unknowns where the outcome cannot be immediately determined but experiments will lead towards the correct direction.&lt;br /&gt;
*The chaotic domain are the unknowable unknowns where nothing makes sense and we search for ways to move more towards the complex domain.&lt;br /&gt;
*Disorder is a mix of the above domains and the situation has to be broken down in to parts to assign to the other domains. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Cynefin_Framework_(HBR).gif|center|frame|The Cynefin Framework&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;hbr&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much like the model described in the above section, this framework suggests that the easiest situation is the simple domain, where the known knowns are found. Furthermore, the framework provides tools for leaders to manage their way out of the above situations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Tools==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces some tools to minimize the known unknown risks or identify the unknown unknown risks. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the limitations will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S154073</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64421</id>
		<title>Unidentified Risks</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64421"/>
		<updated>2019-02-22T13:41:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S154073: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any project there will be some risks that should be carefully managed, but there will also be uncertainty, which involves variability and ambiguity &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/civil-and-environmental-engineering/1-040-project-management-spring-2009/lecture-notes/MIT1_040s09_lec24.pdf free to share and adapt under Creative Commons terms: Attribution, noncommercial, share alike (https://ocw.mit.edu/terms/) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode). Slides by Fred Moavenzadeh from MIT &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. This article outlines four different types of uncertainty with the main focus on the unidentified risks (or the “unknown unknowns”). Unidentified risks are the risks that seem impossible to find. However, studies have found that they in fact are not unidentifiable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To describe uncertainty management in detail, this article will first explain what variability and ambiguity in projects consists of and then dig deeper into the different types of uncertainty. Finally, some tools to manage the unidentified risks are presented as well as a reflection on the usage of the tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the type of uncertainty that is generated due to lack of knowledge or unexpected events and changes in the project &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Slides from Project Management course (42429 F18)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Before a project is started, it is important to reflect on the possible factors that can influence the project. Part of this is to reflect on the types of uncertainty, namely the known knowns (change control), known unknowns (risk management), unknown knowns (planning &amp;amp; communication errors) and the unknown unknowns (unexpected events and changes). A model to describe these four types of uncertainty is the Cynefin Framework which is divided in to the following: Order, unorder and disorder. Unorder is furthermore divided in to the complex domain and the complicated domain, while order is divided in to the chaotic domain and the simple domain. The Cynefin Framework will be used as a model to describe the types of uncertainty throughout this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
To understand the theory of uncertainty management and thereby the importance of managing the unidentified risks, this section will first describe what uncertainty really is as well as link it to risk management. Furthermore, the different types of uncertainty will be outlined.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The British Standard (Axelos) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/lib/dtudk/reader.action?docID=4863041&amp;amp;ppg=30 Project Management: &amp;quot;Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2&amp;quot;, Axelos &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; distinguishes project work from “business as usual” by the following characteristics: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change, temporary, cross-functional, unique and uncertainty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Change implies that a project introduces a change from one state to another.&lt;br /&gt;
*Temporary is part of the definition of a project and means that business as usual returns after the project is finished. &lt;br /&gt;
*Cross-functional means that a project involves people from different backgrounds working together towards a common goal.&lt;br /&gt;
*Unique implies that no projects are identical &lt;br /&gt;
*Uncertainty covers the threats (and opportunities) that the other characteristics bring to the project work. These threats and opportunities are often bigger and more important than those in everyday work, meaning that projects are subject to more risk. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article focuses describes the uncertainty of projects. The term “uncertainty” is defined by Chapman and Ward (2002) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Chapman, Chris &amp;amp; Ward, Stephen. (2002). Managing Project Risk and Uncertainty : A Constructively Simple Approach to Decision Making / C. Chapman, S. Ward. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31747699_Managing_Project_Risk_and_Uncertainty_A_Constructively_Simple_Approach_to_Decision_Making_C_Chapman_S_Ward &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as “lack of certainty, involving variability and ambiguity”, where variability is “uncertainty about the size of parameters which may result from lack of data, lack of detail, lack of definition, lack of experience and so on, which may be quantified if this is useful” and ambiguity is “the aspects of uncertainty not addressed in terms of variability”. Uncertainty can thereby be defined as the aspects of a project that may influence it either positively or negatively which is why uncertainty management is divided into opportunity management (which controls the positive influences) and risk management (which controls the negative influences) (MIT). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Classification of uncertainty===&lt;br /&gt;
In 2002 the former U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Henry Rumsfeld mentioned “unknown unknowns” in a Department of Defense news briefing &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiPe1OiKQuk Donald Rumsfeld DoD briefing &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.This made people try to understand the different types of uncertainty by classifying the knowledge. David Cleden (2009)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.amazon.co.uk/Managing-Project-Uncertainty-Advances-Management/dp/B00SLUXH2E Managing Project Uncertainty (Advances in Project Management): Written by David Cleden, 2009 Edition, (1st Edition) Publisher: Gower&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; uses the typical classification of risks, which is based on the knowledge of an event’s occurrence and impact, to list four possibilities: &lt;br /&gt;
*Known–knowns (knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–knowns (untapped knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Known–unknowns (risks)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–unknowns (unfathomable uncertainty)&lt;br /&gt;
The following will describe, and provide examples of, the different elements. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The known knowns are the knowledge used in the planning phase of a project. This means that even before the project has started, the people involved in the project are aware of basic knowledge or theory behind the project. A very simple example could be that, in a building project, all participants are aware that a lot of money will be spent on materials, salaries and so on. It could also be to identify the obvious stakeholders of the project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Since a project consists of people from different backgrounds with different skillsets, and there is limited space or resources to hire experts on every single aspect of the project, there will be unknown knowns in a project. These consist of knowledge that is not apparent within the project group but can be gathered from experts on the areas. In the example of a building project, this could be knowledge of an external consultant providing additional details to the planning process of the project.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Known unknowns are risks that the project group is aware of the existence of and want to manage carefully. In this sense, the risks are negative impacts on the project that the project has to minimize. These can be risks of material shortage or negative stakeholder involvement in a building project. The risk of negative stakeholder involvement could be due to poor communication to the important stakeholders which leads to them intervening in the project and possibly setting it back to an earlier state. Therefore, the known unknowns are part of risk management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the known unknowns that are yet to be identified. As it is located in the cross-section of the uncertain and unidentified, these risks are by far the most difficult to manage. An unknown unknown is an event or impact on a project that is considered unfathomable or even unimaginable which is why they are so difficult to consider in the planning process of a project. It is furthermore difficult to provide an example of an unknown unknown as these are risks that seem unidentifiable, although this article will provide some tools to convert the unknown unknowns into known unknowns which make them easier to manage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To summarize, the different elements can be shortly described &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://marketbusinessnews.com/financial-glossary/financial-glossary-u/unknown-unknowns/ Market Business News: &amp;quot;What Are Unknown Unknowns? Definition And Examples&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*The known knowns are the things we are aware of and understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown knowns are the things understand but aren’t aware of.&lt;br /&gt;
*The known unknowns are the things we are aware of but don’t understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown unknowns are the things we are neither aware of nor understand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Models of uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces models to understand and manage uncertainty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Risk classification===&lt;br /&gt;
To simplify the classification mentioned in the previous section, the knowledge of an event’s occurrence is labeled “identification” and the knowledge of an event’s impact is labeled “certainty”. In the matrix below, the four different types of (un)certainty are portrayed  &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;uuarticle&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; Kim, S. D. (2012). Characterizing unknown unknowns. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The matrix is divided in to certainty and identification. The idea is that “identification” is defined as either “knowledge” or “risk”, i.e. positive or negative and that “certainty” is whether or not we know that a certain event, that can influence the project, exists. This implies that the factors or events that we know exist and have knowledge about are relatively easy to identify and manage whereas the unknown unknowns are much harder to identify and therefore manage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:table_of_uncertainty_1.jpg|center|frame|Risk classification&amp;lt;ref name=uuarticle /&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Cynefin Framework===&lt;br /&gt;
The Cynefin Framework is a tool developed by David J. Snowden and other contributors&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://pmiswohio.org/images/downloads/Summit18/hatter_cynefin_framework_summit18_03202018.pdf Cynefin Framewok (PMI SW Ohio)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to determine contexts enabling leaders to make appropriate choices. The framework consists of five domains: Simple, complicated, complex, chaotic and disorder. The first two are placed in to the “ordered universe” where facts are applicable. Complex and chaotic are placed in the “un-ordered universe” where the relationship between cause and effect is not immediately apparent. Below, the different domains are shortly explained and linked to the above model &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;hbr&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; https://hbr.org/2007/11/a-leaders-framework-for-decision-making (Cynefin Framework). A Leader’s Framework for Decision Making, Snowden, D. J. et al. 2007 in Harvard Business Review &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*The simple domain are the known knowns where it is possible to categorize the situation based on facts on the area.&lt;br /&gt;
*The complicated domain are the known unknowns where the situation isn’t immediately apparent, but it is possible to analyze the situation. &lt;br /&gt;
*The complex domain are the unknown unknowns where the outcome cannot be immediately determined but experiments will lead towards the correct direction.&lt;br /&gt;
*The chaotic domain are the unknowable unknowns where nothing makes sense and we search for ways to move more towards the complex domain.&lt;br /&gt;
*Disorder is a mix of the above domains and the situation has to be broken down in to parts to assign to the other domains. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Cynefin_Framework_(HBR).gif|center|frame|The Cynefin Framework&amp;lt;ref name=hbr /&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much like the model described in the above section, this framework suggests that the easiest situation is the simple domain, where the known knowns are found. Furthermore, the framework provides tools for leaders to manage their way out of the above situations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Tools==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces some tools to minimize the known unknown risks or identify the unknown unknown risks. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the limitations will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S154073</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64413</id>
		<title>Unidentified Risks</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64413"/>
		<updated>2019-02-22T13:38:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S154073: /* Risk classification */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any project there will be some risks that should be carefully managed, but there will also be uncertainty, which involves variability and ambiguity &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/civil-and-environmental-engineering/1-040-project-management-spring-2009/lecture-notes/MIT1_040s09_lec24.pdf free to share and adapt under Creative Commons terms: Attribution, noncommercial, share alike (https://ocw.mit.edu/terms/) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode). Slides by Fred Moavenzadeh from MIT &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. This article outlines four different types of uncertainty with the main focus on the unidentified risks (or the “unknown unknowns”). Unidentified risks are the risks that seem impossible to find. However, studies have found that they in fact are not unidentifiable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To describe uncertainty management in detail, this article will first explain what variability and ambiguity in projects consists of and then dig deeper into the different types of uncertainty. Finally, some tools to manage the unidentified risks are presented as well as a reflection on the usage of the tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the type of uncertainty that is generated due to lack of knowledge or unexpected events and changes in the project &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Slides from Project Management course (42429 F18)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Before a project is started, it is important to reflect on the possible factors that can influence the project. Part of this is to reflect on the types of uncertainty, namely the known knowns (change control), known unknowns (risk management), unknown knowns (planning &amp;amp; communication errors) and the unknown unknowns (unexpected events and changes). A model to describe these four types of uncertainty is the Cynefin Framework which is divided in to the following: Order, unorder and disorder. Unorder is furthermore divided in to the complex domain and the complicated domain, while order is divided in to the chaotic domain and the simple domain. The Cynefin Framework will be used as a model to describe the types of uncertainty throughout this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
To understand the theory of uncertainty management and thereby the importance of managing the unidentified risks, this section will first describe what uncertainty really is as well as link it to risk management. Furthermore, the different types of uncertainty will be outlined.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The British Standard (Axelos) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/lib/dtudk/reader.action?docID=4863041&amp;amp;ppg=30 Project Management: &amp;quot;Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2&amp;quot;, Axelos &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; distinguishes project work from “business as usual” by the following characteristics: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change, temporary, cross-functional, unique and uncertainty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Change implies that a project introduces a change from one state to another.&lt;br /&gt;
*Temporary is part of the definition of a project and means that business as usual returns after the project is finished. &lt;br /&gt;
*Cross-functional means that a project involves people from different backgrounds working together towards a common goal.&lt;br /&gt;
*Unique implies that no projects are identical &lt;br /&gt;
*Uncertainty covers the threats (and opportunities) that the other characteristics bring to the project work. These threats and opportunities are often bigger and more important than those in everyday work, meaning that projects are subject to more risk. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article focuses describes the uncertainty of projects. The term “uncertainty” is defined by Chapman and Ward (2002) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Chapman, Chris &amp;amp; Ward, Stephen. (2002). Managing Project Risk and Uncertainty : A Constructively Simple Approach to Decision Making / C. Chapman, S. Ward. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31747699_Managing_Project_Risk_and_Uncertainty_A_Constructively_Simple_Approach_to_Decision_Making_C_Chapman_S_Ward &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as “lack of certainty, involving variability and ambiguity”, where variability is “uncertainty about the size of parameters which may result from lack of data, lack of detail, lack of definition, lack of experience and so on, which may be quantified if this is useful” and ambiguity is “the aspects of uncertainty not addressed in terms of variability”. Uncertainty can thereby be defined as the aspects of a project that may influence it either positively or negatively which is why uncertainty management is divided into opportunity management (which controls the positive influences) and risk management (which controls the negative influences) (MIT). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Classification of uncertainty===&lt;br /&gt;
In 2002 the former U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Henry Rumsfeld mentioned “unknown unknowns” in a Department of Defense news briefing &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiPe1OiKQuk Donald Rumsfeld DoD briefing &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.This made people try to understand the different types of uncertainty by classifying the knowledge. David Cleden (2009)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.amazon.co.uk/Managing-Project-Uncertainty-Advances-Management/dp/B00SLUXH2E Managing Project Uncertainty (Advances in Project Management): Written by David Cleden, 2009 Edition, (1st Edition) Publisher: Gower&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; uses the typical classification of risks, which is based on the knowledge of an event’s occurrence and impact, to list four possibilities: &lt;br /&gt;
*Known–knowns (knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–knowns (untapped knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Known–unknowns (risks)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–unknowns (unfathomable uncertainty)&lt;br /&gt;
The following will describe, and provide examples of, the different elements. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The known knowns are the knowledge used in the planning phase of a project. This means that even before the project has started, the people involved in the project are aware of basic knowledge or theory behind the project. A very simple example could be that, in a building project, all participants are aware that a lot of money will be spent on materials, salaries and so on. It could also be to identify the obvious stakeholders of the project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Since a project consists of people from different backgrounds with different skillsets, and there is limited space or resources to hire experts on every single aspect of the project, there will be unknown knowns in a project. These consist of knowledge that is not apparent within the project group but can be gathered from experts on the areas. In the example of a building project, this could be knowledge of an external consultant providing additional details to the planning process of the project.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Known unknowns are risks that the project group is aware of the existence of and want to manage carefully. In this sense, the risks are negative impacts on the project that the project has to minimize. These can be risks of material shortage or negative stakeholder involvement in a building project. The risk of negative stakeholder involvement could be due to poor communication to the important stakeholders which leads to them intervening in the project and possibly setting it back to an earlier state. Therefore, the known unknowns are part of risk management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the known unknowns that are yet to be identified. As it is located in the cross-section of the uncertain and unidentified, these risks are by far the most difficult to manage. An unknown unknown is an event or impact on a project that is considered unfathomable or even unimaginable which is why they are so difficult to consider in the planning process of a project. It is furthermore difficult to provide an example of an unknown unknown as these are risks that seem unidentifiable, although this article will provide some tools to convert the unknown unknowns into known unknowns which make them easier to manage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To summarize, the different elements can be shortly described &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://marketbusinessnews.com/financial-glossary/financial-glossary-u/unknown-unknowns/ Market Business News: &amp;quot;What Are Unknown Unknowns? Definition And Examples&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*The known knowns are the things we are aware of and understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown knowns are the things understand but aren’t aware of.&lt;br /&gt;
*The known unknowns are the things we are aware of but don’t understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown unknowns are the things we are neither aware of nor understand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Models of uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces models to understand and manage uncertainty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Risk classification===&lt;br /&gt;
To simplify the classification mentioned in the previous section, the knowledge of an event’s occurrence is labeled “identification” and the knowledge of an event’s impact is labeled “certainty”. In the matrix below, the four different types of (un)certainty are portrayed  &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;uuarticle&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; Kim, S. D. (2012). Characterizing unknown unknowns. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The matrix is divided in to certainty and identification. The idea is that “identification” is defined as either “knowledge” or “risk”, i.e. positive or negative and that “certainty” is whether or not we know that a certain event, that can influence the project, exists. This implies that the factors or events that we know exist and have knowledge about are relatively easy to identify and manage whereas the unknown unknowns are much harder to identify and therefore manage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:table_of_uncertainty_1.jpg|center|frame|Risk classification&amp;lt;ref name=uuarticle &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Cynefin Framework===&lt;br /&gt;
The Cynefin Framework is a tool developed by David J. Snowden and other contributors&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://pmiswohio.org/images/downloads/Summit18/hatter_cynefin_framework_summit18_03202018.pdf Cynefin Framewok (PMI SW Ohio)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to determine contexts enabling leaders to make appropriate choices. The framework consists of five domains: Simple, complicated, complex, chaotic and disorder. The first two are placed in to the “ordered universe” where facts are applicable. Complex and chaotic are placed in the “un-ordered universe” where the relationship between cause and effect is not immediately apparent. Below, the different domains are shortly explained and linked to the above model&amp;lt;ref name=hbr&amp;gt; https://hbr.org/2007/11/a-leaders-framework-for-decision-making (Cynefin Framework). A Leader’s Framework for Decision Making, Snowden, D. J. et al. 2007 in Harvard Business Review&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*The simple domain are the known knowns where it is possible to categorize the situation based on facts on the area.&lt;br /&gt;
*The complicated domain are the known unknowns where the situation isn’t immediately apparent, but it is possible to analyze the situation. &lt;br /&gt;
*The complex domain are the unknown unknowns where the outcome cannot be immediately determined but experiments will lead towards the correct direction.&lt;br /&gt;
*The chaotic domain are the unknowable unknowns where nothing makes sense and we search for ways to move more towards the complex domain.&lt;br /&gt;
*Disorder is a mix of the above domains and the situation has to be broken down in to parts to assign to the other domains. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Cynefin_Framework_(HBR).gif|center|frame|The Cynefin Framework&amp;lt;ref name=hbr &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much like the model described in the above section, this framework suggests that the easiest situation is the simple domain, where the known knowns are found. Furthermore, the framework provides tools for leaders to manage their way out of the above situations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Tools==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces some tools to minimize the known unknown risks or identify the unknown unknown risks. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the limitations will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S154073</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64407</id>
		<title>Unidentified Risks</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64407"/>
		<updated>2019-02-22T13:36:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S154073: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any project there will be some risks that should be carefully managed, but there will also be uncertainty, which involves variability and ambiguity &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/civil-and-environmental-engineering/1-040-project-management-spring-2009/lecture-notes/MIT1_040s09_lec24.pdf free to share and adapt under Creative Commons terms: Attribution, noncommercial, share alike (https://ocw.mit.edu/terms/) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode). Slides by Fred Moavenzadeh from MIT &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. This article outlines four different types of uncertainty with the main focus on the unidentified risks (or the “unknown unknowns”). Unidentified risks are the risks that seem impossible to find. However, studies have found that they in fact are not unidentifiable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To describe uncertainty management in detail, this article will first explain what variability and ambiguity in projects consists of and then dig deeper into the different types of uncertainty. Finally, some tools to manage the unidentified risks are presented as well as a reflection on the usage of the tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the type of uncertainty that is generated due to lack of knowledge or unexpected events and changes in the project &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Slides from Project Management course (42429 F18)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Before a project is started, it is important to reflect on the possible factors that can influence the project. Part of this is to reflect on the types of uncertainty, namely the known knowns (change control), known unknowns (risk management), unknown knowns (planning &amp;amp; communication errors) and the unknown unknowns (unexpected events and changes). A model to describe these four types of uncertainty is the Cynefin Framework which is divided in to the following: Order, unorder and disorder. Unorder is furthermore divided in to the complex domain and the complicated domain, while order is divided in to the chaotic domain and the simple domain. The Cynefin Framework will be used as a model to describe the types of uncertainty throughout this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
To understand the theory of uncertainty management and thereby the importance of managing the unidentified risks, this section will first describe what uncertainty really is as well as link it to risk management. Furthermore, the different types of uncertainty will be outlined.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The British Standard (Axelos) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/lib/dtudk/reader.action?docID=4863041&amp;amp;ppg=30 Project Management: &amp;quot;Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2&amp;quot;, Axelos &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; distinguishes project work from “business as usual” by the following characteristics: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change, temporary, cross-functional, unique and uncertainty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Change implies that a project introduces a change from one state to another.&lt;br /&gt;
*Temporary is part of the definition of a project and means that business as usual returns after the project is finished. &lt;br /&gt;
*Cross-functional means that a project involves people from different backgrounds working together towards a common goal.&lt;br /&gt;
*Unique implies that no projects are identical &lt;br /&gt;
*Uncertainty covers the threats (and opportunities) that the other characteristics bring to the project work. These threats and opportunities are often bigger and more important than those in everyday work, meaning that projects are subject to more risk. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article focuses describes the uncertainty of projects. The term “uncertainty” is defined by Chapman and Ward (2002) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Chapman, Chris &amp;amp; Ward, Stephen. (2002). Managing Project Risk and Uncertainty : A Constructively Simple Approach to Decision Making / C. Chapman, S. Ward. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31747699_Managing_Project_Risk_and_Uncertainty_A_Constructively_Simple_Approach_to_Decision_Making_C_Chapman_S_Ward &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as “lack of certainty, involving variability and ambiguity”, where variability is “uncertainty about the size of parameters which may result from lack of data, lack of detail, lack of definition, lack of experience and so on, which may be quantified if this is useful” and ambiguity is “the aspects of uncertainty not addressed in terms of variability”. Uncertainty can thereby be defined as the aspects of a project that may influence it either positively or negatively which is why uncertainty management is divided into opportunity management (which controls the positive influences) and risk management (which controls the negative influences) (MIT). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Classification of uncertainty===&lt;br /&gt;
In 2002 the former U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Henry Rumsfeld mentioned “unknown unknowns” in a Department of Defense news briefing &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiPe1OiKQuk Donald Rumsfeld DoD briefing &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.This made people try to understand the different types of uncertainty by classifying the knowledge. David Cleden (2009)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.amazon.co.uk/Managing-Project-Uncertainty-Advances-Management/dp/B00SLUXH2E Managing Project Uncertainty (Advances in Project Management): Written by David Cleden, 2009 Edition, (1st Edition) Publisher: Gower&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; uses the typical classification of risks, which is based on the knowledge of an event’s occurrence and impact, to list four possibilities: &lt;br /&gt;
*Known–knowns (knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–knowns (untapped knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Known–unknowns (risks)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–unknowns (unfathomable uncertainty)&lt;br /&gt;
The following will describe, and provide examples of, the different elements. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The known knowns are the knowledge used in the planning phase of a project. This means that even before the project has started, the people involved in the project are aware of basic knowledge or theory behind the project. A very simple example could be that, in a building project, all participants are aware that a lot of money will be spent on materials, salaries and so on. It could also be to identify the obvious stakeholders of the project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Since a project consists of people from different backgrounds with different skillsets, and there is limited space or resources to hire experts on every single aspect of the project, there will be unknown knowns in a project. These consist of knowledge that is not apparent within the project group but can be gathered from experts on the areas. In the example of a building project, this could be knowledge of an external consultant providing additional details to the planning process of the project.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Known unknowns are risks that the project group is aware of the existence of and want to manage carefully. In this sense, the risks are negative impacts on the project that the project has to minimize. These can be risks of material shortage or negative stakeholder involvement in a building project. The risk of negative stakeholder involvement could be due to poor communication to the important stakeholders which leads to them intervening in the project and possibly setting it back to an earlier state. Therefore, the known unknowns are part of risk management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the known unknowns that are yet to be identified. As it is located in the cross-section of the uncertain and unidentified, these risks are by far the most difficult to manage. An unknown unknown is an event or impact on a project that is considered unfathomable or even unimaginable which is why they are so difficult to consider in the planning process of a project. It is furthermore difficult to provide an example of an unknown unknown as these are risks that seem unidentifiable, although this article will provide some tools to convert the unknown unknowns into known unknowns which make them easier to manage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To summarize, the different elements can be shortly described &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://marketbusinessnews.com/financial-glossary/financial-glossary-u/unknown-unknowns/ Market Business News: &amp;quot;What Are Unknown Unknowns? Definition And Examples&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*The known knowns are the things we are aware of and understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown knowns are the things understand but aren’t aware of.&lt;br /&gt;
*The known unknowns are the things we are aware of but don’t understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown unknowns are the things we are neither aware of nor understand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Models of uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces models to understand and manage uncertainty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Risk classification===&lt;br /&gt;
To simplify the classification mentioned in the previous section, the knowledge of an event’s occurrence is labeled “identification” and the knowledge of an event’s impact is labeled “certainty”. In the matrix below, the four different types of (un)certainty are portrayed  &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;uuarticle&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; Kim, S. D. (2012). Characterizing unknown unknowns. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The matrix is divided in to certainty and identification. The idea is that “identification” is defined as either “knowledge” or “risk”, i.e. positive or negative and that “certainty” is whether or not we know that a certain event, that can influence the project, exists. This implies that the factors or events that we know exist and have knowledge about are relatively easy to identify and manage whereas the unknown unknowns are much harder to identify and therefore manage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:table_of_uncertainty_1.jpg|center|frame|Risk classification&amp;lt;ref name=uuarticle &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Cynefin Framework===&lt;br /&gt;
The Cynefin Framework is a tool developed by David J. Snowden and other contributors&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://pmiswohio.org/images/downloads/Summit18/hatter_cynefin_framework_summit18_03202018.pdf Cynefin Framewok (PMI SW Ohio)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to determine contexts enabling leaders to make appropriate choices. The framework consists of five domains: Simple, complicated, complex, chaotic and disorder. The first two are placed in to the “ordered universe” where facts are applicable. Complex and chaotic are placed in the “un-ordered universe” where the relationship between cause and effect is not immediately apparent. Below, the different domains are shortly explained and linked to the above model&amp;lt;ref name=hbr&amp;gt; https://hbr.org/2007/11/a-leaders-framework-for-decision-making (Cynefin Framework). A Leader’s Framework for Decision Making, Snowden, D. J. et al. 2007 in Harvard Business Review&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*The simple domain are the known knowns where it is possible to categorize the situation based on facts on the area.&lt;br /&gt;
*The complicated domain are the known unknowns where the situation isn’t immediately apparent, but it is possible to analyze the situation. &lt;br /&gt;
*The complex domain are the unknown unknowns where the outcome cannot be immediately determined but experiments will lead towards the correct direction.&lt;br /&gt;
*The chaotic domain are the unknowable unknowns where nothing makes sense and we search for ways to move more towards the complex domain.&lt;br /&gt;
*Disorder is a mix of the above domains and the situation has to be broken down in to parts to assign to the other domains. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Cynefin_Framework_(HBR).gif|center|frame|The Cynefin Framework&amp;lt;ref name=hbr /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much like the model described in the above section, this framework suggests that the easiest situation is the simple domain, where the known knowns are found. Furthermore, the framework provides tools for leaders to manage their way out of the above situations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Tools==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces some tools to minimize the known unknown risks or identify the unknown unknown risks. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the limitations will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S154073</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64403</id>
		<title>Unidentified Risks</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64403"/>
		<updated>2019-02-22T13:35:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S154073: /* Risk classification */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any project there will be some risks that should be carefully managed, but there will also be uncertainty, which involves variability and ambiguity &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/civil-and-environmental-engineering/1-040-project-management-spring-2009/lecture-notes/MIT1_040s09_lec24.pdf free to share and adapt under Creative Commons terms: Attribution, noncommercial, share alike (https://ocw.mit.edu/terms/) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode). Slides by Fred Moavenzadeh from MIT &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. This article outlines four different types of uncertainty with the main focus on the unidentified risks (or the “unknown unknowns”). Unidentified risks are the risks that seem impossible to find. However, studies have found that they in fact are not unidentifiable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To describe uncertainty management in detail, this article will first explain what variability and ambiguity in projects consists of and then dig deeper into the different types of uncertainty. Finally, some tools to manage the unidentified risks are presented as well as a reflection on the usage of the tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the type of uncertainty that is generated due to lack of knowledge or unexpected events and changes in the project &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Slides from Project Management course (42429 F18)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Before a project is started, it is important to reflect on the possible factors that can influence the project. Part of this is to reflect on the types of uncertainty, namely the known knowns (change control), known unknowns (risk management), unknown knowns (planning &amp;amp; communication errors) and the unknown unknowns (unexpected events and changes). A model to describe these four types of uncertainty is the Cynefin Framework which is divided in to the following: Order, unorder and disorder. Unorder is furthermore divided in to the complex domain and the complicated domain, while order is divided in to the chaotic domain and the simple domain. The Cynefin Framework will be used as a model to describe the types of uncertainty throughout this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
To understand the theory of uncertainty management and thereby the importance of managing the unidentified risks, this section will first describe what uncertainty really is as well as link it to risk management. Furthermore, the different types of uncertainty will be outlined.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The British Standard (Axelos) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/lib/dtudk/reader.action?docID=4863041&amp;amp;ppg=30 Project Management: &amp;quot;Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2&amp;quot;, Axelos &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; distinguishes project work from “business as usual” by the following characteristics: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change, temporary, cross-functional, unique and uncertainty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Change implies that a project introduces a change from one state to another.&lt;br /&gt;
*Temporary is part of the definition of a project and means that business as usual returns after the project is finished. &lt;br /&gt;
*Cross-functional means that a project involves people from different backgrounds working together towards a common goal.&lt;br /&gt;
*Unique implies that no projects are identical &lt;br /&gt;
*Uncertainty covers the threats (and opportunities) that the other characteristics bring to the project work. These threats and opportunities are often bigger and more important than those in everyday work, meaning that projects are subject to more risk. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article focuses describes the uncertainty of projects. The term “uncertainty” is defined by Chapman and Ward (2002) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Chapman, Chris &amp;amp; Ward, Stephen. (2002). Managing Project Risk and Uncertainty : A Constructively Simple Approach to Decision Making / C. Chapman, S. Ward. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31747699_Managing_Project_Risk_and_Uncertainty_A_Constructively_Simple_Approach_to_Decision_Making_C_Chapman_S_Ward &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as “lack of certainty, involving variability and ambiguity”, where variability is “uncertainty about the size of parameters which may result from lack of data, lack of detail, lack of definition, lack of experience and so on, which may be quantified if this is useful” and ambiguity is “the aspects of uncertainty not addressed in terms of variability”. Uncertainty can thereby be defined as the aspects of a project that may influence it either positively or negatively which is why uncertainty management is divided into opportunity management (which controls the positive influences) and risk management (which controls the negative influences) (MIT). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Classification of uncertainty===&lt;br /&gt;
In 2002 the former U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Henry Rumsfeld mentioned “unknown unknowns” in a Department of Defense news briefing &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiPe1OiKQuk Donald Rumsfeld DoD briefing &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.This made people try to understand the different types of uncertainty by classifying the knowledge. David Cleden (2009)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.amazon.co.uk/Managing-Project-Uncertainty-Advances-Management/dp/B00SLUXH2E Managing Project Uncertainty (Advances in Project Management): Written by David Cleden, 2009 Edition, (1st Edition) Publisher: Gower&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; uses the typical classification of risks, which is based on the knowledge of an event’s occurrence and impact, to list four possibilities: &lt;br /&gt;
*Known–knowns (knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–knowns (untapped knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Known–unknowns (risks)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–unknowns (unfathomable uncertainty)&lt;br /&gt;
The following will describe, and provide examples of, the different elements. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The known knowns are the knowledge used in the planning phase of a project. This means that even before the project has started, the people involved in the project are aware of basic knowledge or theory behind the project. A very simple example could be that, in a building project, all participants are aware that a lot of money will be spent on materials, salaries and so on. It could also be to identify the obvious stakeholders of the project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Since a project consists of people from different backgrounds with different skillsets, and there is limited space or resources to hire experts on every single aspect of the project, there will be unknown knowns in a project. These consist of knowledge that is not apparent within the project group but can be gathered from experts on the areas. In the example of a building project, this could be knowledge of an external consultant providing additional details to the planning process of the project.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Known unknowns are risks that the project group is aware of the existence of and want to manage carefully. In this sense, the risks are negative impacts on the project that the project has to minimize. These can be risks of material shortage or negative stakeholder involvement in a building project. The risk of negative stakeholder involvement could be due to poor communication to the important stakeholders which leads to them intervening in the project and possibly setting it back to an earlier state. Therefore, the known unknowns are part of risk management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the known unknowns that are yet to be identified. As it is located in the cross-section of the uncertain and unidentified, these risks are by far the most difficult to manage. An unknown unknown is an event or impact on a project that is considered unfathomable or even unimaginable which is why they are so difficult to consider in the planning process of a project. It is furthermore difficult to provide an example of an unknown unknown as these are risks that seem unidentifiable, although this article will provide some tools to convert the unknown unknowns into known unknowns which make them easier to manage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To summarize, the different elements can be shortly described &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://marketbusinessnews.com/financial-glossary/financial-glossary-u/unknown-unknowns/ Market Business News: &amp;quot;What Are Unknown Unknowns? Definition And Examples&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*The known knowns are the things we are aware of and understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown knowns are the things understand but aren’t aware of.&lt;br /&gt;
*The known unknowns are the things we are aware of but don’t understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown unknowns are the things we are neither aware of nor understand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Models of uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces models to understand and manage uncertainty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Risk classification===&lt;br /&gt;
To simplify the classification mentioned in the previous section, the knowledge of an event’s occurrence is labeled “identification” and the knowledge of an event’s impact is labeled “certainty”. In the matrix below, the four different types of (un)certainty are portrayed  &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;uuarticle&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; Kim, S. D. (2012). Characterizing unknown unknowns. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The matrix is divided in to certainty and identification. The idea is that “identification” is defined as either “knowledge” or “risk”, i.e. positive or negative and that “certainty” is whether or not we know that a certain event, that can influence the project, exists. This implies that the factors or events that we know exist and have knowledge about are relatively easy to identify and manage whereas the unknown unknowns are much harder to identify and therefore manage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:table_of_uncertainty_1.jpg|center|frame|Risk classification&amp;lt;ref name=uuarticle &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Cynefin Framework===&lt;br /&gt;
The Cynefin Framework is a tool developed by David J. Snowden and other contributors&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://pmiswohio.org/images/downloads/Summit18/hatter_cynefin_framework_summit18_03202018.pdf Cynefin Framewok (PMI SW Ohio)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to determine contexts enabling leaders to make appropriate choices. The framework consists of five domains: Simple, complicated, complex, chaotic and disorder. The first two are placed in to the “ordered universe” where facts are applicable. Complex and chaotic are placed in the “un-ordered universe” where the relationship between cause and effect is not immediately apparent. Below, the different domains are shortly explained and linked to the above model&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://hbr.org/2007/11/a-leaders-framework-for-decision-making (Cynefin Framework). A Leader’s Framework for Decision Making, Snowden, D. J. et al. 2007 in Harvard Business Review&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*The simple domain are the known knowns where it is possible to categorize the situation based on facts on the area.&lt;br /&gt;
*The complicated domain are the known unknowns where the situation isn’t immediately apparent, but it is possible to analyze the situation. &lt;br /&gt;
*The complex domain are the unknown unknowns where the outcome cannot be immediately determined but experiments will lead towards the correct direction.&lt;br /&gt;
*The chaotic domain are the unknowable unknowns where nothing makes sense and we search for ways to move more towards the complex domain.&lt;br /&gt;
*Disorder is a mix of the above domains and the situation has to be broken down in to parts to assign to the other domains. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Cynefin_Framework_(HBR).gif|center|frame|The Cynefin Framework&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://hbr.org/2007/11/a-leaders-framework-for-decision-making (Cynefin Framework). A Leader’s Framework for Decision Making, Snowden, D. J. et al. 2007 in Harvard Business Review&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much like the model described in the above section, this framework suggests that the easiest situation is the simple domain, where the known knowns are found. Furthermore, the framework provides tools for leaders to manage their way out of the above situations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Tools==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces some tools to minimize the known unknown risks or identify the unknown unknown risks. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the limitations will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S154073</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64401</id>
		<title>Unidentified Risks</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64401"/>
		<updated>2019-02-22T13:35:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S154073: /* Risk classification */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any project there will be some risks that should be carefully managed, but there will also be uncertainty, which involves variability and ambiguity &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/civil-and-environmental-engineering/1-040-project-management-spring-2009/lecture-notes/MIT1_040s09_lec24.pdf free to share and adapt under Creative Commons terms: Attribution, noncommercial, share alike (https://ocw.mit.edu/terms/) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode). Slides by Fred Moavenzadeh from MIT &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. This article outlines four different types of uncertainty with the main focus on the unidentified risks (or the “unknown unknowns”). Unidentified risks are the risks that seem impossible to find. However, studies have found that they in fact are not unidentifiable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To describe uncertainty management in detail, this article will first explain what variability and ambiguity in projects consists of and then dig deeper into the different types of uncertainty. Finally, some tools to manage the unidentified risks are presented as well as a reflection on the usage of the tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the type of uncertainty that is generated due to lack of knowledge or unexpected events and changes in the project &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Slides from Project Management course (42429 F18)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Before a project is started, it is important to reflect on the possible factors that can influence the project. Part of this is to reflect on the types of uncertainty, namely the known knowns (change control), known unknowns (risk management), unknown knowns (planning &amp;amp; communication errors) and the unknown unknowns (unexpected events and changes). A model to describe these four types of uncertainty is the Cynefin Framework which is divided in to the following: Order, unorder and disorder. Unorder is furthermore divided in to the complex domain and the complicated domain, while order is divided in to the chaotic domain and the simple domain. The Cynefin Framework will be used as a model to describe the types of uncertainty throughout this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
To understand the theory of uncertainty management and thereby the importance of managing the unidentified risks, this section will first describe what uncertainty really is as well as link it to risk management. Furthermore, the different types of uncertainty will be outlined.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The British Standard (Axelos) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/lib/dtudk/reader.action?docID=4863041&amp;amp;ppg=30 Project Management: &amp;quot;Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2&amp;quot;, Axelos &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; distinguishes project work from “business as usual” by the following characteristics: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change, temporary, cross-functional, unique and uncertainty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Change implies that a project introduces a change from one state to another.&lt;br /&gt;
*Temporary is part of the definition of a project and means that business as usual returns after the project is finished. &lt;br /&gt;
*Cross-functional means that a project involves people from different backgrounds working together towards a common goal.&lt;br /&gt;
*Unique implies that no projects are identical &lt;br /&gt;
*Uncertainty covers the threats (and opportunities) that the other characteristics bring to the project work. These threats and opportunities are often bigger and more important than those in everyday work, meaning that projects are subject to more risk. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article focuses describes the uncertainty of projects. The term “uncertainty” is defined by Chapman and Ward (2002) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Chapman, Chris &amp;amp; Ward, Stephen. (2002). Managing Project Risk and Uncertainty : A Constructively Simple Approach to Decision Making / C. Chapman, S. Ward. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31747699_Managing_Project_Risk_and_Uncertainty_A_Constructively_Simple_Approach_to_Decision_Making_C_Chapman_S_Ward &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as “lack of certainty, involving variability and ambiguity”, where variability is “uncertainty about the size of parameters which may result from lack of data, lack of detail, lack of definition, lack of experience and so on, which may be quantified if this is useful” and ambiguity is “the aspects of uncertainty not addressed in terms of variability”. Uncertainty can thereby be defined as the aspects of a project that may influence it either positively or negatively which is why uncertainty management is divided into opportunity management (which controls the positive influences) and risk management (which controls the negative influences) (MIT). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Classification of uncertainty===&lt;br /&gt;
In 2002 the former U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Henry Rumsfeld mentioned “unknown unknowns” in a Department of Defense news briefing &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiPe1OiKQuk Donald Rumsfeld DoD briefing &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.This made people try to understand the different types of uncertainty by classifying the knowledge. David Cleden (2009)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.amazon.co.uk/Managing-Project-Uncertainty-Advances-Management/dp/B00SLUXH2E Managing Project Uncertainty (Advances in Project Management): Written by David Cleden, 2009 Edition, (1st Edition) Publisher: Gower&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; uses the typical classification of risks, which is based on the knowledge of an event’s occurrence and impact, to list four possibilities: &lt;br /&gt;
*Known–knowns (knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–knowns (untapped knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Known–unknowns (risks)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–unknowns (unfathomable uncertainty)&lt;br /&gt;
The following will describe, and provide examples of, the different elements. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The known knowns are the knowledge used in the planning phase of a project. This means that even before the project has started, the people involved in the project are aware of basic knowledge or theory behind the project. A very simple example could be that, in a building project, all participants are aware that a lot of money will be spent on materials, salaries and so on. It could also be to identify the obvious stakeholders of the project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Since a project consists of people from different backgrounds with different skillsets, and there is limited space or resources to hire experts on every single aspect of the project, there will be unknown knowns in a project. These consist of knowledge that is not apparent within the project group but can be gathered from experts on the areas. In the example of a building project, this could be knowledge of an external consultant providing additional details to the planning process of the project.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Known unknowns are risks that the project group is aware of the existence of and want to manage carefully. In this sense, the risks are negative impacts on the project that the project has to minimize. These can be risks of material shortage or negative stakeholder involvement in a building project. The risk of negative stakeholder involvement could be due to poor communication to the important stakeholders which leads to them intervening in the project and possibly setting it back to an earlier state. Therefore, the known unknowns are part of risk management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the known unknowns that are yet to be identified. As it is located in the cross-section of the uncertain and unidentified, these risks are by far the most difficult to manage. An unknown unknown is an event or impact on a project that is considered unfathomable or even unimaginable which is why they are so difficult to consider in the planning process of a project. It is furthermore difficult to provide an example of an unknown unknown as these are risks that seem unidentifiable, although this article will provide some tools to convert the unknown unknowns into known unknowns which make them easier to manage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To summarize, the different elements can be shortly described &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://marketbusinessnews.com/financial-glossary/financial-glossary-u/unknown-unknowns/ Market Business News: &amp;quot;What Are Unknown Unknowns? Definition And Examples&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*The known knowns are the things we are aware of and understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown knowns are the things understand but aren’t aware of.&lt;br /&gt;
*The known unknowns are the things we are aware of but don’t understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown unknowns are the things we are neither aware of nor understand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Models of uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces models to understand and manage uncertainty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Risk classification===&lt;br /&gt;
To simplify the classification mentioned in the previous section, the knowledge of an event’s occurrence is labeled “identification” and the knowledge of an event’s impact is labeled “certainty”. In the matrix below, the four different types of (un)certainty are portrayed  &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;uuarticle&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; Kim, S. D. (2012). Characterizing unknown unknowns. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The matrix is divided in to certainty and identification. The idea is that “identification” is defined as either “knowledge” or “risk”, i.e. positive or negative and that “certainty” is whether or not we know that a certain event, that can influence the project, exists. This implies that the factors or events that we know exist and have knowledge about are relatively easy to identify and manage whereas the unknown unknowns are much harder to identify and therefore manage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:table_of_uncertainty_1.jpg|center|frame|Risk classification&amp;lt;ref name=uuarticle &amp;lt;ref/&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Cynefin Framework===&lt;br /&gt;
The Cynefin Framework is a tool developed by David J. Snowden and other contributors&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://pmiswohio.org/images/downloads/Summit18/hatter_cynefin_framework_summit18_03202018.pdf Cynefin Framewok (PMI SW Ohio)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to determine contexts enabling leaders to make appropriate choices. The framework consists of five domains: Simple, complicated, complex, chaotic and disorder. The first two are placed in to the “ordered universe” where facts are applicable. Complex and chaotic are placed in the “un-ordered universe” where the relationship between cause and effect is not immediately apparent. Below, the different domains are shortly explained and linked to the above model&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://hbr.org/2007/11/a-leaders-framework-for-decision-making (Cynefin Framework). A Leader’s Framework for Decision Making, Snowden, D. J. et al. 2007 in Harvard Business Review&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*The simple domain are the known knowns where it is possible to categorize the situation based on facts on the area.&lt;br /&gt;
*The complicated domain are the known unknowns where the situation isn’t immediately apparent, but it is possible to analyze the situation. &lt;br /&gt;
*The complex domain are the unknown unknowns where the outcome cannot be immediately determined but experiments will lead towards the correct direction.&lt;br /&gt;
*The chaotic domain are the unknowable unknowns where nothing makes sense and we search for ways to move more towards the complex domain.&lt;br /&gt;
*Disorder is a mix of the above domains and the situation has to be broken down in to parts to assign to the other domains. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Cynefin_Framework_(HBR).gif|center|frame|The Cynefin Framework&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://hbr.org/2007/11/a-leaders-framework-for-decision-making (Cynefin Framework). A Leader’s Framework for Decision Making, Snowden, D. J. et al. 2007 in Harvard Business Review&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much like the model described in the above section, this framework suggests that the easiest situation is the simple domain, where the known knowns are found. Furthermore, the framework provides tools for leaders to manage their way out of the above situations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Tools==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces some tools to minimize the known unknown risks or identify the unknown unknown risks. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the limitations will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S154073</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64399</id>
		<title>Unidentified Risks</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64399"/>
		<updated>2019-02-22T13:35:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S154073: /* Risk classification */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any project there will be some risks that should be carefully managed, but there will also be uncertainty, which involves variability and ambiguity &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/civil-and-environmental-engineering/1-040-project-management-spring-2009/lecture-notes/MIT1_040s09_lec24.pdf free to share and adapt under Creative Commons terms: Attribution, noncommercial, share alike (https://ocw.mit.edu/terms/) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode). Slides by Fred Moavenzadeh from MIT &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. This article outlines four different types of uncertainty with the main focus on the unidentified risks (or the “unknown unknowns”). Unidentified risks are the risks that seem impossible to find. However, studies have found that they in fact are not unidentifiable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To describe uncertainty management in detail, this article will first explain what variability and ambiguity in projects consists of and then dig deeper into the different types of uncertainty. Finally, some tools to manage the unidentified risks are presented as well as a reflection on the usage of the tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the type of uncertainty that is generated due to lack of knowledge or unexpected events and changes in the project &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Slides from Project Management course (42429 F18)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Before a project is started, it is important to reflect on the possible factors that can influence the project. Part of this is to reflect on the types of uncertainty, namely the known knowns (change control), known unknowns (risk management), unknown knowns (planning &amp;amp; communication errors) and the unknown unknowns (unexpected events and changes). A model to describe these four types of uncertainty is the Cynefin Framework which is divided in to the following: Order, unorder and disorder. Unorder is furthermore divided in to the complex domain and the complicated domain, while order is divided in to the chaotic domain and the simple domain. The Cynefin Framework will be used as a model to describe the types of uncertainty throughout this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
To understand the theory of uncertainty management and thereby the importance of managing the unidentified risks, this section will first describe what uncertainty really is as well as link it to risk management. Furthermore, the different types of uncertainty will be outlined.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The British Standard (Axelos) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/lib/dtudk/reader.action?docID=4863041&amp;amp;ppg=30 Project Management: &amp;quot;Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2&amp;quot;, Axelos &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; distinguishes project work from “business as usual” by the following characteristics: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change, temporary, cross-functional, unique and uncertainty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Change implies that a project introduces a change from one state to another.&lt;br /&gt;
*Temporary is part of the definition of a project and means that business as usual returns after the project is finished. &lt;br /&gt;
*Cross-functional means that a project involves people from different backgrounds working together towards a common goal.&lt;br /&gt;
*Unique implies that no projects are identical &lt;br /&gt;
*Uncertainty covers the threats (and opportunities) that the other characteristics bring to the project work. These threats and opportunities are often bigger and more important than those in everyday work, meaning that projects are subject to more risk. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article focuses describes the uncertainty of projects. The term “uncertainty” is defined by Chapman and Ward (2002) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Chapman, Chris &amp;amp; Ward, Stephen. (2002). Managing Project Risk and Uncertainty : A Constructively Simple Approach to Decision Making / C. Chapman, S. Ward. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31747699_Managing_Project_Risk_and_Uncertainty_A_Constructively_Simple_Approach_to_Decision_Making_C_Chapman_S_Ward &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as “lack of certainty, involving variability and ambiguity”, where variability is “uncertainty about the size of parameters which may result from lack of data, lack of detail, lack of definition, lack of experience and so on, which may be quantified if this is useful” and ambiguity is “the aspects of uncertainty not addressed in terms of variability”. Uncertainty can thereby be defined as the aspects of a project that may influence it either positively or negatively which is why uncertainty management is divided into opportunity management (which controls the positive influences) and risk management (which controls the negative influences) (MIT). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Classification of uncertainty===&lt;br /&gt;
In 2002 the former U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Henry Rumsfeld mentioned “unknown unknowns” in a Department of Defense news briefing &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiPe1OiKQuk Donald Rumsfeld DoD briefing &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.This made people try to understand the different types of uncertainty by classifying the knowledge. David Cleden (2009)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.amazon.co.uk/Managing-Project-Uncertainty-Advances-Management/dp/B00SLUXH2E Managing Project Uncertainty (Advances in Project Management): Written by David Cleden, 2009 Edition, (1st Edition) Publisher: Gower&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; uses the typical classification of risks, which is based on the knowledge of an event’s occurrence and impact, to list four possibilities: &lt;br /&gt;
*Known–knowns (knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–knowns (untapped knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Known–unknowns (risks)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–unknowns (unfathomable uncertainty)&lt;br /&gt;
The following will describe, and provide examples of, the different elements. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The known knowns are the knowledge used in the planning phase of a project. This means that even before the project has started, the people involved in the project are aware of basic knowledge or theory behind the project. A very simple example could be that, in a building project, all participants are aware that a lot of money will be spent on materials, salaries and so on. It could also be to identify the obvious stakeholders of the project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Since a project consists of people from different backgrounds with different skillsets, and there is limited space or resources to hire experts on every single aspect of the project, there will be unknown knowns in a project. These consist of knowledge that is not apparent within the project group but can be gathered from experts on the areas. In the example of a building project, this could be knowledge of an external consultant providing additional details to the planning process of the project.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Known unknowns are risks that the project group is aware of the existence of and want to manage carefully. In this sense, the risks are negative impacts on the project that the project has to minimize. These can be risks of material shortage or negative stakeholder involvement in a building project. The risk of negative stakeholder involvement could be due to poor communication to the important stakeholders which leads to them intervening in the project and possibly setting it back to an earlier state. Therefore, the known unknowns are part of risk management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the known unknowns that are yet to be identified. As it is located in the cross-section of the uncertain and unidentified, these risks are by far the most difficult to manage. An unknown unknown is an event or impact on a project that is considered unfathomable or even unimaginable which is why they are so difficult to consider in the planning process of a project. It is furthermore difficult to provide an example of an unknown unknown as these are risks that seem unidentifiable, although this article will provide some tools to convert the unknown unknowns into known unknowns which make them easier to manage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To summarize, the different elements can be shortly described &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://marketbusinessnews.com/financial-glossary/financial-glossary-u/unknown-unknowns/ Market Business News: &amp;quot;What Are Unknown Unknowns? Definition And Examples&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*The known knowns are the things we are aware of and understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown knowns are the things understand but aren’t aware of.&lt;br /&gt;
*The known unknowns are the things we are aware of but don’t understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown unknowns are the things we are neither aware of nor understand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Models of uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces models to understand and manage uncertainty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Risk classification===&lt;br /&gt;
To simplify the classification mentioned in the previous section, the knowledge of an event’s occurrence is labeled “identification” and the knowledge of an event’s impact is labeled “certainty”. In the matrix below, the four different types of (un)certainty are portrayed  &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;uuarticle&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; Kim, S. D. (2012). Characterizing unknown unknowns. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The matrix is divided in to certainty and identification. The idea is that “identification” is defined as either “knowledge” or “risk”, i.e. positive or negative and that “certainty” is whether or not we know that a certain event, that can influence the project, exists. This implies that the factors or events that we know exist and have knowledge about are relatively easy to identify and manage whereas the unknown unknowns are much harder to identify and therefore manage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:table_of_uncertainty_1.jpg|center|frame|Risk classification&amp;lt;ref name=uuarticle /&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Cynefin Framework===&lt;br /&gt;
The Cynefin Framework is a tool developed by David J. Snowden and other contributors&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://pmiswohio.org/images/downloads/Summit18/hatter_cynefin_framework_summit18_03202018.pdf Cynefin Framewok (PMI SW Ohio)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to determine contexts enabling leaders to make appropriate choices. The framework consists of five domains: Simple, complicated, complex, chaotic and disorder. The first two are placed in to the “ordered universe” where facts are applicable. Complex and chaotic are placed in the “un-ordered universe” where the relationship between cause and effect is not immediately apparent. Below, the different domains are shortly explained and linked to the above model&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://hbr.org/2007/11/a-leaders-framework-for-decision-making (Cynefin Framework). A Leader’s Framework for Decision Making, Snowden, D. J. et al. 2007 in Harvard Business Review&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*The simple domain are the known knowns where it is possible to categorize the situation based on facts on the area.&lt;br /&gt;
*The complicated domain are the known unknowns where the situation isn’t immediately apparent, but it is possible to analyze the situation. &lt;br /&gt;
*The complex domain are the unknown unknowns where the outcome cannot be immediately determined but experiments will lead towards the correct direction.&lt;br /&gt;
*The chaotic domain are the unknowable unknowns where nothing makes sense and we search for ways to move more towards the complex domain.&lt;br /&gt;
*Disorder is a mix of the above domains and the situation has to be broken down in to parts to assign to the other domains. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Cynefin_Framework_(HBR).gif|center|frame|The Cynefin Framework&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://hbr.org/2007/11/a-leaders-framework-for-decision-making (Cynefin Framework). A Leader’s Framework for Decision Making, Snowden, D. J. et al. 2007 in Harvard Business Review&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much like the model described in the above section, this framework suggests that the easiest situation is the simple domain, where the known knowns are found. Furthermore, the framework provides tools for leaders to manage their way out of the above situations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Tools==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces some tools to minimize the known unknown risks or identify the unknown unknown risks. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the limitations will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S154073</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64397</id>
		<title>Unidentified Risks</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64397"/>
		<updated>2019-02-22T13:34:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S154073: /* Risk classification */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any project there will be some risks that should be carefully managed, but there will also be uncertainty, which involves variability and ambiguity &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/civil-and-environmental-engineering/1-040-project-management-spring-2009/lecture-notes/MIT1_040s09_lec24.pdf free to share and adapt under Creative Commons terms: Attribution, noncommercial, share alike (https://ocw.mit.edu/terms/) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode). Slides by Fred Moavenzadeh from MIT &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. This article outlines four different types of uncertainty with the main focus on the unidentified risks (or the “unknown unknowns”). Unidentified risks are the risks that seem impossible to find. However, studies have found that they in fact are not unidentifiable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To describe uncertainty management in detail, this article will first explain what variability and ambiguity in projects consists of and then dig deeper into the different types of uncertainty. Finally, some tools to manage the unidentified risks are presented as well as a reflection on the usage of the tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the type of uncertainty that is generated due to lack of knowledge or unexpected events and changes in the project &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Slides from Project Management course (42429 F18)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Before a project is started, it is important to reflect on the possible factors that can influence the project. Part of this is to reflect on the types of uncertainty, namely the known knowns (change control), known unknowns (risk management), unknown knowns (planning &amp;amp; communication errors) and the unknown unknowns (unexpected events and changes). A model to describe these four types of uncertainty is the Cynefin Framework which is divided in to the following: Order, unorder and disorder. Unorder is furthermore divided in to the complex domain and the complicated domain, while order is divided in to the chaotic domain and the simple domain. The Cynefin Framework will be used as a model to describe the types of uncertainty throughout this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
To understand the theory of uncertainty management and thereby the importance of managing the unidentified risks, this section will first describe what uncertainty really is as well as link it to risk management. Furthermore, the different types of uncertainty will be outlined.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The British Standard (Axelos) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/lib/dtudk/reader.action?docID=4863041&amp;amp;ppg=30 Project Management: &amp;quot;Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2&amp;quot;, Axelos &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; distinguishes project work from “business as usual” by the following characteristics: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change, temporary, cross-functional, unique and uncertainty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Change implies that a project introduces a change from one state to another.&lt;br /&gt;
*Temporary is part of the definition of a project and means that business as usual returns after the project is finished. &lt;br /&gt;
*Cross-functional means that a project involves people from different backgrounds working together towards a common goal.&lt;br /&gt;
*Unique implies that no projects are identical &lt;br /&gt;
*Uncertainty covers the threats (and opportunities) that the other characteristics bring to the project work. These threats and opportunities are often bigger and more important than those in everyday work, meaning that projects are subject to more risk. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article focuses describes the uncertainty of projects. The term “uncertainty” is defined by Chapman and Ward (2002) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Chapman, Chris &amp;amp; Ward, Stephen. (2002). Managing Project Risk and Uncertainty : A Constructively Simple Approach to Decision Making / C. Chapman, S. Ward. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31747699_Managing_Project_Risk_and_Uncertainty_A_Constructively_Simple_Approach_to_Decision_Making_C_Chapman_S_Ward &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as “lack of certainty, involving variability and ambiguity”, where variability is “uncertainty about the size of parameters which may result from lack of data, lack of detail, lack of definition, lack of experience and so on, which may be quantified if this is useful” and ambiguity is “the aspects of uncertainty not addressed in terms of variability”. Uncertainty can thereby be defined as the aspects of a project that may influence it either positively or negatively which is why uncertainty management is divided into opportunity management (which controls the positive influences) and risk management (which controls the negative influences) (MIT). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Classification of uncertainty===&lt;br /&gt;
In 2002 the former U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Henry Rumsfeld mentioned “unknown unknowns” in a Department of Defense news briefing &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiPe1OiKQuk Donald Rumsfeld DoD briefing &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.This made people try to understand the different types of uncertainty by classifying the knowledge. David Cleden (2009)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.amazon.co.uk/Managing-Project-Uncertainty-Advances-Management/dp/B00SLUXH2E Managing Project Uncertainty (Advances in Project Management): Written by David Cleden, 2009 Edition, (1st Edition) Publisher: Gower&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; uses the typical classification of risks, which is based on the knowledge of an event’s occurrence and impact, to list four possibilities: &lt;br /&gt;
*Known–knowns (knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–knowns (untapped knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Known–unknowns (risks)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–unknowns (unfathomable uncertainty)&lt;br /&gt;
The following will describe, and provide examples of, the different elements. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The known knowns are the knowledge used in the planning phase of a project. This means that even before the project has started, the people involved in the project are aware of basic knowledge or theory behind the project. A very simple example could be that, in a building project, all participants are aware that a lot of money will be spent on materials, salaries and so on. It could also be to identify the obvious stakeholders of the project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Since a project consists of people from different backgrounds with different skillsets, and there is limited space or resources to hire experts on every single aspect of the project, there will be unknown knowns in a project. These consist of knowledge that is not apparent within the project group but can be gathered from experts on the areas. In the example of a building project, this could be knowledge of an external consultant providing additional details to the planning process of the project.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Known unknowns are risks that the project group is aware of the existence of and want to manage carefully. In this sense, the risks are negative impacts on the project that the project has to minimize. These can be risks of material shortage or negative stakeholder involvement in a building project. The risk of negative stakeholder involvement could be due to poor communication to the important stakeholders which leads to them intervening in the project and possibly setting it back to an earlier state. Therefore, the known unknowns are part of risk management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the known unknowns that are yet to be identified. As it is located in the cross-section of the uncertain and unidentified, these risks are by far the most difficult to manage. An unknown unknown is an event or impact on a project that is considered unfathomable or even unimaginable which is why they are so difficult to consider in the planning process of a project. It is furthermore difficult to provide an example of an unknown unknown as these are risks that seem unidentifiable, although this article will provide some tools to convert the unknown unknowns into known unknowns which make them easier to manage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To summarize, the different elements can be shortly described &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://marketbusinessnews.com/financial-glossary/financial-glossary-u/unknown-unknowns/ Market Business News: &amp;quot;What Are Unknown Unknowns? Definition And Examples&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*The known knowns are the things we are aware of and understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown knowns are the things understand but aren’t aware of.&lt;br /&gt;
*The known unknowns are the things we are aware of but don’t understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown unknowns are the things we are neither aware of nor understand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Models of uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces models to understand and manage uncertainty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Risk classification===&lt;br /&gt;
To simplify the classification mentioned in the previous section, the knowledge of an event’s occurrence is labeled “identification” and the knowledge of an event’s impact is labeled “certainty”. In the matrix below, the four different types of (un)certainty are portrayed  &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;uuarticle&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; Kim, S. D. (2012). Characterizing unknown unknowns. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The matrix is divided in to certainty and identification. The idea is that “identification” is defined as either “knowledge” or “risk”, i.e. positive or negative and that “certainty” is whether or not we know that a certain event, that can influence the project, exists. This implies that the factors or events that we know exist and have knowledge about are relatively easy to identify and manage whereas the unknown unknowns are much harder to identify and therefore manage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:table_of_uncertainty_1.jpg|center|frame|Risk classification&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kim, S. D. (2012). Characterizing unknown unknowns. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Cynefin Framework===&lt;br /&gt;
The Cynefin Framework is a tool developed by David J. Snowden and other contributors&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://pmiswohio.org/images/downloads/Summit18/hatter_cynefin_framework_summit18_03202018.pdf Cynefin Framewok (PMI SW Ohio)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to determine contexts enabling leaders to make appropriate choices. The framework consists of five domains: Simple, complicated, complex, chaotic and disorder. The first two are placed in to the “ordered universe” where facts are applicable. Complex and chaotic are placed in the “un-ordered universe” where the relationship between cause and effect is not immediately apparent. Below, the different domains are shortly explained and linked to the above model&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://hbr.org/2007/11/a-leaders-framework-for-decision-making (Cynefin Framework). A Leader’s Framework for Decision Making, Snowden, D. J. et al. 2007 in Harvard Business Review&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*The simple domain are the known knowns where it is possible to categorize the situation based on facts on the area.&lt;br /&gt;
*The complicated domain are the known unknowns where the situation isn’t immediately apparent, but it is possible to analyze the situation. &lt;br /&gt;
*The complex domain are the unknown unknowns where the outcome cannot be immediately determined but experiments will lead towards the correct direction.&lt;br /&gt;
*The chaotic domain are the unknowable unknowns where nothing makes sense and we search for ways to move more towards the complex domain.&lt;br /&gt;
*Disorder is a mix of the above domains and the situation has to be broken down in to parts to assign to the other domains. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Cynefin_Framework_(HBR).gif|center|frame|The Cynefin Framework&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://hbr.org/2007/11/a-leaders-framework-for-decision-making (Cynefin Framework). A Leader’s Framework for Decision Making, Snowden, D. J. et al. 2007 in Harvard Business Review&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much like the model described in the above section, this framework suggests that the easiest situation is the simple domain, where the known knowns are found. Furthermore, the framework provides tools for leaders to manage their way out of the above situations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Tools==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces some tools to minimize the known unknown risks or identify the unknown unknown risks. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the limitations will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S154073</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64394</id>
		<title>Unidentified Risks</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64394"/>
		<updated>2019-02-22T13:34:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S154073: /* Risk classification */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any project there will be some risks that should be carefully managed, but there will also be uncertainty, which involves variability and ambiguity &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/civil-and-environmental-engineering/1-040-project-management-spring-2009/lecture-notes/MIT1_040s09_lec24.pdf free to share and adapt under Creative Commons terms: Attribution, noncommercial, share alike (https://ocw.mit.edu/terms/) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode). Slides by Fred Moavenzadeh from MIT &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. This article outlines four different types of uncertainty with the main focus on the unidentified risks (or the “unknown unknowns”). Unidentified risks are the risks that seem impossible to find. However, studies have found that they in fact are not unidentifiable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To describe uncertainty management in detail, this article will first explain what variability and ambiguity in projects consists of and then dig deeper into the different types of uncertainty. Finally, some tools to manage the unidentified risks are presented as well as a reflection on the usage of the tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the type of uncertainty that is generated due to lack of knowledge or unexpected events and changes in the project &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Slides from Project Management course (42429 F18)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Before a project is started, it is important to reflect on the possible factors that can influence the project. Part of this is to reflect on the types of uncertainty, namely the known knowns (change control), known unknowns (risk management), unknown knowns (planning &amp;amp; communication errors) and the unknown unknowns (unexpected events and changes). A model to describe these four types of uncertainty is the Cynefin Framework which is divided in to the following: Order, unorder and disorder. Unorder is furthermore divided in to the complex domain and the complicated domain, while order is divided in to the chaotic domain and the simple domain. The Cynefin Framework will be used as a model to describe the types of uncertainty throughout this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
To understand the theory of uncertainty management and thereby the importance of managing the unidentified risks, this section will first describe what uncertainty really is as well as link it to risk management. Furthermore, the different types of uncertainty will be outlined.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The British Standard (Axelos) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/lib/dtudk/reader.action?docID=4863041&amp;amp;ppg=30 Project Management: &amp;quot;Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2&amp;quot;, Axelos &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; distinguishes project work from “business as usual” by the following characteristics: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change, temporary, cross-functional, unique and uncertainty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Change implies that a project introduces a change from one state to another.&lt;br /&gt;
*Temporary is part of the definition of a project and means that business as usual returns after the project is finished. &lt;br /&gt;
*Cross-functional means that a project involves people from different backgrounds working together towards a common goal.&lt;br /&gt;
*Unique implies that no projects are identical &lt;br /&gt;
*Uncertainty covers the threats (and opportunities) that the other characteristics bring to the project work. These threats and opportunities are often bigger and more important than those in everyday work, meaning that projects are subject to more risk. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article focuses describes the uncertainty of projects. The term “uncertainty” is defined by Chapman and Ward (2002) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Chapman, Chris &amp;amp; Ward, Stephen. (2002). Managing Project Risk and Uncertainty : A Constructively Simple Approach to Decision Making / C. Chapman, S. Ward. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31747699_Managing_Project_Risk_and_Uncertainty_A_Constructively_Simple_Approach_to_Decision_Making_C_Chapman_S_Ward &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as “lack of certainty, involving variability and ambiguity”, where variability is “uncertainty about the size of parameters which may result from lack of data, lack of detail, lack of definition, lack of experience and so on, which may be quantified if this is useful” and ambiguity is “the aspects of uncertainty not addressed in terms of variability”. Uncertainty can thereby be defined as the aspects of a project that may influence it either positively or negatively which is why uncertainty management is divided into opportunity management (which controls the positive influences) and risk management (which controls the negative influences) (MIT). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Classification of uncertainty===&lt;br /&gt;
In 2002 the former U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Henry Rumsfeld mentioned “unknown unknowns” in a Department of Defense news briefing &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiPe1OiKQuk Donald Rumsfeld DoD briefing &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.This made people try to understand the different types of uncertainty by classifying the knowledge. David Cleden (2009)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.amazon.co.uk/Managing-Project-Uncertainty-Advances-Management/dp/B00SLUXH2E Managing Project Uncertainty (Advances in Project Management): Written by David Cleden, 2009 Edition, (1st Edition) Publisher: Gower&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; uses the typical classification of risks, which is based on the knowledge of an event’s occurrence and impact, to list four possibilities: &lt;br /&gt;
*Known–knowns (knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–knowns (untapped knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Known–unknowns (risks)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–unknowns (unfathomable uncertainty)&lt;br /&gt;
The following will describe, and provide examples of, the different elements. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The known knowns are the knowledge used in the planning phase of a project. This means that even before the project has started, the people involved in the project are aware of basic knowledge or theory behind the project. A very simple example could be that, in a building project, all participants are aware that a lot of money will be spent on materials, salaries and so on. It could also be to identify the obvious stakeholders of the project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Since a project consists of people from different backgrounds with different skillsets, and there is limited space or resources to hire experts on every single aspect of the project, there will be unknown knowns in a project. These consist of knowledge that is not apparent within the project group but can be gathered from experts on the areas. In the example of a building project, this could be knowledge of an external consultant providing additional details to the planning process of the project.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Known unknowns are risks that the project group is aware of the existence of and want to manage carefully. In this sense, the risks are negative impacts on the project that the project has to minimize. These can be risks of material shortage or negative stakeholder involvement in a building project. The risk of negative stakeholder involvement could be due to poor communication to the important stakeholders which leads to them intervening in the project and possibly setting it back to an earlier state. Therefore, the known unknowns are part of risk management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the known unknowns that are yet to be identified. As it is located in the cross-section of the uncertain and unidentified, these risks are by far the most difficult to manage. An unknown unknown is an event or impact on a project that is considered unfathomable or even unimaginable which is why they are so difficult to consider in the planning process of a project. It is furthermore difficult to provide an example of an unknown unknown as these are risks that seem unidentifiable, although this article will provide some tools to convert the unknown unknowns into known unknowns which make them easier to manage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To summarize, the different elements can be shortly described &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://marketbusinessnews.com/financial-glossary/financial-glossary-u/unknown-unknowns/ Market Business News: &amp;quot;What Are Unknown Unknowns? Definition And Examples&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*The known knowns are the things we are aware of and understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown knowns are the things understand but aren’t aware of.&lt;br /&gt;
*The known unknowns are the things we are aware of but don’t understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown unknowns are the things we are neither aware of nor understand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Models of uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces models to understand and manage uncertainty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Risk classification===&lt;br /&gt;
To simplify the classification mentioned in the previous section, the knowledge of an event’s occurrence is labeled “identification” and the knowledge of an event’s impact is labeled “certainty”. In the matrix below, the four different types of (un)certainty are portrayed  &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;uuarticle&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;link/title&#039;&#039; Kim, S. D. (2012). Characterizing unknown unknowns. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The matrix is divided in to certainty and identification. The idea is that “identification” is defined as either “knowledge” or “risk”, i.e. positive or negative and that “certainty” is whether or not we know that a certain event, that can influence the project, exists. This implies that the factors or events that we know exist and have knowledge about are relatively easy to identify and manage whereas the unknown unknowns are much harder to identify and therefore manage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:table_of_uncertainty_1.jpg|center|frame|Risk classification&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kim, S. D. (2012). Characterizing unknown unknowns. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Cynefin Framework===&lt;br /&gt;
The Cynefin Framework is a tool developed by David J. Snowden and other contributors&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://pmiswohio.org/images/downloads/Summit18/hatter_cynefin_framework_summit18_03202018.pdf Cynefin Framewok (PMI SW Ohio)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to determine contexts enabling leaders to make appropriate choices. The framework consists of five domains: Simple, complicated, complex, chaotic and disorder. The first two are placed in to the “ordered universe” where facts are applicable. Complex and chaotic are placed in the “un-ordered universe” where the relationship between cause and effect is not immediately apparent. Below, the different domains are shortly explained and linked to the above model&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://hbr.org/2007/11/a-leaders-framework-for-decision-making (Cynefin Framework). A Leader’s Framework for Decision Making, Snowden, D. J. et al. 2007 in Harvard Business Review&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*The simple domain are the known knowns where it is possible to categorize the situation based on facts on the area.&lt;br /&gt;
*The complicated domain are the known unknowns where the situation isn’t immediately apparent, but it is possible to analyze the situation. &lt;br /&gt;
*The complex domain are the unknown unknowns where the outcome cannot be immediately determined but experiments will lead towards the correct direction.&lt;br /&gt;
*The chaotic domain are the unknowable unknowns where nothing makes sense and we search for ways to move more towards the complex domain.&lt;br /&gt;
*Disorder is a mix of the above domains and the situation has to be broken down in to parts to assign to the other domains. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Cynefin_Framework_(HBR).gif|center|frame|The Cynefin Framework&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://hbr.org/2007/11/a-leaders-framework-for-decision-making (Cynefin Framework). A Leader’s Framework for Decision Making, Snowden, D. J. et al. 2007 in Harvard Business Review&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much like the model described in the above section, this framework suggests that the easiest situation is the simple domain, where the known knowns are found. Furthermore, the framework provides tools for leaders to manage their way out of the above situations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Tools==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces some tools to minimize the known unknown risks or identify the unknown unknown risks. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the limitations will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S154073</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64383</id>
		<title>Unidentified Risks</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64383"/>
		<updated>2019-02-22T13:32:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S154073: /* Risk classification */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any project there will be some risks that should be carefully managed, but there will also be uncertainty, which involves variability and ambiguity &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/civil-and-environmental-engineering/1-040-project-management-spring-2009/lecture-notes/MIT1_040s09_lec24.pdf free to share and adapt under Creative Commons terms: Attribution, noncommercial, share alike (https://ocw.mit.edu/terms/) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode). Slides by Fred Moavenzadeh from MIT &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. This article outlines four different types of uncertainty with the main focus on the unidentified risks (or the “unknown unknowns”). Unidentified risks are the risks that seem impossible to find. However, studies have found that they in fact are not unidentifiable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To describe uncertainty management in detail, this article will first explain what variability and ambiguity in projects consists of and then dig deeper into the different types of uncertainty. Finally, some tools to manage the unidentified risks are presented as well as a reflection on the usage of the tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the type of uncertainty that is generated due to lack of knowledge or unexpected events and changes in the project &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Slides from Project Management course (42429 F18)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Before a project is started, it is important to reflect on the possible factors that can influence the project. Part of this is to reflect on the types of uncertainty, namely the known knowns (change control), known unknowns (risk management), unknown knowns (planning &amp;amp; communication errors) and the unknown unknowns (unexpected events and changes). A model to describe these four types of uncertainty is the Cynefin Framework which is divided in to the following: Order, unorder and disorder. Unorder is furthermore divided in to the complex domain and the complicated domain, while order is divided in to the chaotic domain and the simple domain. The Cynefin Framework will be used as a model to describe the types of uncertainty throughout this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
To understand the theory of uncertainty management and thereby the importance of managing the unidentified risks, this section will first describe what uncertainty really is as well as link it to risk management. Furthermore, the different types of uncertainty will be outlined.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The British Standard (Axelos) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/lib/dtudk/reader.action?docID=4863041&amp;amp;ppg=30 Project Management: &amp;quot;Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2&amp;quot;, Axelos &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; distinguishes project work from “business as usual” by the following characteristics: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change, temporary, cross-functional, unique and uncertainty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Change implies that a project introduces a change from one state to another.&lt;br /&gt;
*Temporary is part of the definition of a project and means that business as usual returns after the project is finished. &lt;br /&gt;
*Cross-functional means that a project involves people from different backgrounds working together towards a common goal.&lt;br /&gt;
*Unique implies that no projects are identical &lt;br /&gt;
*Uncertainty covers the threats (and opportunities) that the other characteristics bring to the project work. These threats and opportunities are often bigger and more important than those in everyday work, meaning that projects are subject to more risk. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article focuses describes the uncertainty of projects. The term “uncertainty” is defined by Chapman and Ward (2002) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Chapman, Chris &amp;amp; Ward, Stephen. (2002). Managing Project Risk and Uncertainty : A Constructively Simple Approach to Decision Making / C. Chapman, S. Ward. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31747699_Managing_Project_Risk_and_Uncertainty_A_Constructively_Simple_Approach_to_Decision_Making_C_Chapman_S_Ward &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as “lack of certainty, involving variability and ambiguity”, where variability is “uncertainty about the size of parameters which may result from lack of data, lack of detail, lack of definition, lack of experience and so on, which may be quantified if this is useful” and ambiguity is “the aspects of uncertainty not addressed in terms of variability”. Uncertainty can thereby be defined as the aspects of a project that may influence it either positively or negatively which is why uncertainty management is divided into opportunity management (which controls the positive influences) and risk management (which controls the negative influences) (MIT). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Classification of uncertainty===&lt;br /&gt;
In 2002 the former U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Henry Rumsfeld mentioned “unknown unknowns” in a Department of Defense news briefing &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiPe1OiKQuk Donald Rumsfeld DoD briefing &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.This made people try to understand the different types of uncertainty by classifying the knowledge. David Cleden (2009)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.amazon.co.uk/Managing-Project-Uncertainty-Advances-Management/dp/B00SLUXH2E Managing Project Uncertainty (Advances in Project Management): Written by David Cleden, 2009 Edition, (1st Edition) Publisher: Gower&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; uses the typical classification of risks, which is based on the knowledge of an event’s occurrence and impact, to list four possibilities: &lt;br /&gt;
*Known–knowns (knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–knowns (untapped knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Known–unknowns (risks)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–unknowns (unfathomable uncertainty)&lt;br /&gt;
The following will describe, and provide examples of, the different elements. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The known knowns are the knowledge used in the planning phase of a project. This means that even before the project has started, the people involved in the project are aware of basic knowledge or theory behind the project. A very simple example could be that, in a building project, all participants are aware that a lot of money will be spent on materials, salaries and so on. It could also be to identify the obvious stakeholders of the project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Since a project consists of people from different backgrounds with different skillsets, and there is limited space or resources to hire experts on every single aspect of the project, there will be unknown knowns in a project. These consist of knowledge that is not apparent within the project group but can be gathered from experts on the areas. In the example of a building project, this could be knowledge of an external consultant providing additional details to the planning process of the project.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Known unknowns are risks that the project group is aware of the existence of and want to manage carefully. In this sense, the risks are negative impacts on the project that the project has to minimize. These can be risks of material shortage or negative stakeholder involvement in a building project. The risk of negative stakeholder involvement could be due to poor communication to the important stakeholders which leads to them intervening in the project and possibly setting it back to an earlier state. Therefore, the known unknowns are part of risk management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the known unknowns that are yet to be identified. As it is located in the cross-section of the uncertain and unidentified, these risks are by far the most difficult to manage. An unknown unknown is an event or impact on a project that is considered unfathomable or even unimaginable which is why they are so difficult to consider in the planning process of a project. It is furthermore difficult to provide an example of an unknown unknown as these are risks that seem unidentifiable, although this article will provide some tools to convert the unknown unknowns into known unknowns which make them easier to manage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To summarize, the different elements can be shortly described &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://marketbusinessnews.com/financial-glossary/financial-glossary-u/unknown-unknowns/ Market Business News: &amp;quot;What Are Unknown Unknowns? Definition And Examples&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*The known knowns are the things we are aware of and understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown knowns are the things understand but aren’t aware of.&lt;br /&gt;
*The known unknowns are the things we are aware of but don’t understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown unknowns are the things we are neither aware of nor understand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Models of uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces models to understand and manage uncertainty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Risk classification===&lt;br /&gt;
To simplify the classification mentioned in the previous section, the knowledge of an event’s occurrence is labeled “identification” and the knowledge of an event’s impact is labeled “certainty”. In the matrix below, the four different types of (un)certainty are portrayed &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Kim, S. D. (2012). Characterizing unknown unknowns. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The matrix is divided in to certainty and identification. The idea is that “identification” is defined as either “knowledge” or “risk”, i.e. positive or negative and that “certainty” is whether or not we know that a certain event, that can influence the project, exists. This implies that the factors or events that we know exist and have knowledge about are relatively easy to identify and manage whereas the unknown unknowns are much harder to identify and therefore manage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:table_of_uncertainty_1.jpg|center|frame|Risk classification&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kim, S. D. (2012). Characterizing unknown unknowns. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Cynefin Framework===&lt;br /&gt;
The Cynefin Framework is a tool developed by David J. Snowden and other contributors&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://pmiswohio.org/images/downloads/Summit18/hatter_cynefin_framework_summit18_03202018.pdf Cynefin Framewok (PMI SW Ohio)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to determine contexts enabling leaders to make appropriate choices. The framework consists of five domains: Simple, complicated, complex, chaotic and disorder. The first two are placed in to the “ordered universe” where facts are applicable. Complex and chaotic are placed in the “un-ordered universe” where the relationship between cause and effect is not immediately apparent. Below, the different domains are shortly explained and linked to the above model&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://hbr.org/2007/11/a-leaders-framework-for-decision-making (Cynefin Framework). A Leader’s Framework for Decision Making, Snowden, D. J. et al. 2007 in Harvard Business Review&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*The simple domain are the known knowns where it is possible to categorize the situation based on facts on the area.&lt;br /&gt;
*The complicated domain are the known unknowns where the situation isn’t immediately apparent, but it is possible to analyze the situation. &lt;br /&gt;
*The complex domain are the unknown unknowns where the outcome cannot be immediately determined but experiments will lead towards the correct direction.&lt;br /&gt;
*The chaotic domain are the unknowable unknowns where nothing makes sense and we search for ways to move more towards the complex domain.&lt;br /&gt;
*Disorder is a mix of the above domains and the situation has to be broken down in to parts to assign to the other domains. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Cynefin_Framework_(HBR).gif|center|frame|The Cynefin Framework&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://hbr.org/2007/11/a-leaders-framework-for-decision-making (Cynefin Framework). A Leader’s Framework for Decision Making, Snowden, D. J. et al. 2007 in Harvard Business Review&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much like the model described in the above section, this framework suggests that the easiest situation is the simple domain, where the known knowns are found. Furthermore, the framework provides tools for leaders to manage their way out of the above situations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Tools==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces some tools to minimize the known unknown risks or identify the unknown unknown risks. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the limitations will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S154073</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64376</id>
		<title>Unidentified Risks</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64376"/>
		<updated>2019-02-22T13:30:59Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S154073: /* The Cynefin Framework */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any project there will be some risks that should be carefully managed, but there will also be uncertainty, which involves variability and ambiguity &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/civil-and-environmental-engineering/1-040-project-management-spring-2009/lecture-notes/MIT1_040s09_lec24.pdf free to share and adapt under Creative Commons terms: Attribution, noncommercial, share alike (https://ocw.mit.edu/terms/) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode). Slides by Fred Moavenzadeh from MIT &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. This article outlines four different types of uncertainty with the main focus on the unidentified risks (or the “unknown unknowns”). Unidentified risks are the risks that seem impossible to find. However, studies have found that they in fact are not unidentifiable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To describe uncertainty management in detail, this article will first explain what variability and ambiguity in projects consists of and then dig deeper into the different types of uncertainty. Finally, some tools to manage the unidentified risks are presented as well as a reflection on the usage of the tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the type of uncertainty that is generated due to lack of knowledge or unexpected events and changes in the project &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Slides from Project Management course (42429 F18)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Before a project is started, it is important to reflect on the possible factors that can influence the project. Part of this is to reflect on the types of uncertainty, namely the known knowns (change control), known unknowns (risk management), unknown knowns (planning &amp;amp; communication errors) and the unknown unknowns (unexpected events and changes). A model to describe these four types of uncertainty is the Cynefin Framework which is divided in to the following: Order, unorder and disorder. Unorder is furthermore divided in to the complex domain and the complicated domain, while order is divided in to the chaotic domain and the simple domain. The Cynefin Framework will be used as a model to describe the types of uncertainty throughout this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
To understand the theory of uncertainty management and thereby the importance of managing the unidentified risks, this section will first describe what uncertainty really is as well as link it to risk management. Furthermore, the different types of uncertainty will be outlined.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The British Standard (Axelos) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/lib/dtudk/reader.action?docID=4863041&amp;amp;ppg=30 Project Management: &amp;quot;Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2&amp;quot;, Axelos &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; distinguishes project work from “business as usual” by the following characteristics: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change, temporary, cross-functional, unique and uncertainty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Change implies that a project introduces a change from one state to another.&lt;br /&gt;
*Temporary is part of the definition of a project and means that business as usual returns after the project is finished. &lt;br /&gt;
*Cross-functional means that a project involves people from different backgrounds working together towards a common goal.&lt;br /&gt;
*Unique implies that no projects are identical &lt;br /&gt;
*Uncertainty covers the threats (and opportunities) that the other characteristics bring to the project work. These threats and opportunities are often bigger and more important than those in everyday work, meaning that projects are subject to more risk. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article focuses describes the uncertainty of projects. The term “uncertainty” is defined by Chapman and Ward (2002) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Chapman, Chris &amp;amp; Ward, Stephen. (2002). Managing Project Risk and Uncertainty : A Constructively Simple Approach to Decision Making / C. Chapman, S. Ward. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31747699_Managing_Project_Risk_and_Uncertainty_A_Constructively_Simple_Approach_to_Decision_Making_C_Chapman_S_Ward &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as “lack of certainty, involving variability and ambiguity”, where variability is “uncertainty about the size of parameters which may result from lack of data, lack of detail, lack of definition, lack of experience and so on, which may be quantified if this is useful” and ambiguity is “the aspects of uncertainty not addressed in terms of variability”. Uncertainty can thereby be defined as the aspects of a project that may influence it either positively or negatively which is why uncertainty management is divided into opportunity management (which controls the positive influences) and risk management (which controls the negative influences) (MIT). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Classification of uncertainty===&lt;br /&gt;
In 2002 the former U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Henry Rumsfeld mentioned “unknown unknowns” in a Department of Defense news briefing &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiPe1OiKQuk Donald Rumsfeld DoD briefing &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.This made people try to understand the different types of uncertainty by classifying the knowledge. David Cleden (2009)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.amazon.co.uk/Managing-Project-Uncertainty-Advances-Management/dp/B00SLUXH2E Managing Project Uncertainty (Advances in Project Management): Written by David Cleden, 2009 Edition, (1st Edition) Publisher: Gower&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; uses the typical classification of risks, which is based on the knowledge of an event’s occurrence and impact, to list four possibilities: &lt;br /&gt;
*Known–knowns (knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–knowns (untapped knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Known–unknowns (risks)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–unknowns (unfathomable uncertainty)&lt;br /&gt;
The following will describe, and provide examples of, the different elements. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The known knowns are the knowledge used in the planning phase of a project. This means that even before the project has started, the people involved in the project are aware of basic knowledge or theory behind the project. A very simple example could be that, in a building project, all participants are aware that a lot of money will be spent on materials, salaries and so on. It could also be to identify the obvious stakeholders of the project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Since a project consists of people from different backgrounds with different skillsets, and there is limited space or resources to hire experts on every single aspect of the project, there will be unknown knowns in a project. These consist of knowledge that is not apparent within the project group but can be gathered from experts on the areas. In the example of a building project, this could be knowledge of an external consultant providing additional details to the planning process of the project.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Known unknowns are risks that the project group is aware of the existence of and want to manage carefully. In this sense, the risks are negative impacts on the project that the project has to minimize. These can be risks of material shortage or negative stakeholder involvement in a building project. The risk of negative stakeholder involvement could be due to poor communication to the important stakeholders which leads to them intervening in the project and possibly setting it back to an earlier state. Therefore, the known unknowns are part of risk management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the known unknowns that are yet to be identified. As it is located in the cross-section of the uncertain and unidentified, these risks are by far the most difficult to manage. An unknown unknown is an event or impact on a project that is considered unfathomable or even unimaginable which is why they are so difficult to consider in the planning process of a project. It is furthermore difficult to provide an example of an unknown unknown as these are risks that seem unidentifiable, although this article will provide some tools to convert the unknown unknowns into known unknowns which make them easier to manage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To summarize, the different elements can be shortly described &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://marketbusinessnews.com/financial-glossary/financial-glossary-u/unknown-unknowns/ Market Business News: &amp;quot;What Are Unknown Unknowns? Definition And Examples&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*The known knowns are the things we are aware of and understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown knowns are the things understand but aren’t aware of.&lt;br /&gt;
*The known unknowns are the things we are aware of but don’t understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown unknowns are the things we are neither aware of nor understand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Models of uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces models to understand and manage uncertainty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Risk classification===&lt;br /&gt;
To simplify the classification mentioned in the previous section, the knowledge of an event’s occurrence is labeled “identification” and the knowledge of an event’s impact is labeled “certainty”. In the matrix below, the four different types of (un)certainty are portrayed &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Kim, S. D. (2012). Characterizing unknown unknowns. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The matrix is divided in to certainty and identification. The idea is that “identification” is defined as either “knowledge” or “risk”, i.e. positive or negative and that “certainty” is whether or not we know that a certain event, that can influence the project, exists. This implies that the factors or events that we know exist and have knowledge about are relatively easy to identify and manage whereas the unknown unknowns are much harder to identify and therefore manage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:table_of_uncertainty_1.jpg|center|frame|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Cynefin Framework===&lt;br /&gt;
The Cynefin Framework is a tool developed by David J. Snowden and other contributors&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://pmiswohio.org/images/downloads/Summit18/hatter_cynefin_framework_summit18_03202018.pdf Cynefin Framewok (PMI SW Ohio)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to determine contexts enabling leaders to make appropriate choices. The framework consists of five domains: Simple, complicated, complex, chaotic and disorder. The first two are placed in to the “ordered universe” where facts are applicable. Complex and chaotic are placed in the “un-ordered universe” where the relationship between cause and effect is not immediately apparent. Below, the different domains are shortly explained and linked to the above model&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://hbr.org/2007/11/a-leaders-framework-for-decision-making (Cynefin Framework). A Leader’s Framework for Decision Making, Snowden, D. J. et al. 2007 in Harvard Business Review&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*The simple domain are the known knowns where it is possible to categorize the situation based on facts on the area.&lt;br /&gt;
*The complicated domain are the known unknowns where the situation isn’t immediately apparent, but it is possible to analyze the situation. &lt;br /&gt;
*The complex domain are the unknown unknowns where the outcome cannot be immediately determined but experiments will lead towards the correct direction.&lt;br /&gt;
*The chaotic domain are the unknowable unknowns where nothing makes sense and we search for ways to move more towards the complex domain.&lt;br /&gt;
*Disorder is a mix of the above domains and the situation has to be broken down in to parts to assign to the other domains. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Cynefin_Framework_(HBR).gif|center|frame|The Cynefin Framework&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://hbr.org/2007/11/a-leaders-framework-for-decision-making (Cynefin Framework). A Leader’s Framework for Decision Making, Snowden, D. J. et al. 2007 in Harvard Business Review&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much like the model described in the above section, this framework suggests that the easiest situation is the simple domain, where the known knowns are found. Furthermore, the framework provides tools for leaders to manage their way out of the above situations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Tools==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces some tools to minimize the known unknown risks or identify the unknown unknown risks. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the limitations will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S154073</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64373</id>
		<title>Unidentified Risks</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64373"/>
		<updated>2019-02-22T13:30:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S154073: /* The Cynefin Framework */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any project there will be some risks that should be carefully managed, but there will also be uncertainty, which involves variability and ambiguity &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/civil-and-environmental-engineering/1-040-project-management-spring-2009/lecture-notes/MIT1_040s09_lec24.pdf free to share and adapt under Creative Commons terms: Attribution, noncommercial, share alike (https://ocw.mit.edu/terms/) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode). Slides by Fred Moavenzadeh from MIT &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. This article outlines four different types of uncertainty with the main focus on the unidentified risks (or the “unknown unknowns”). Unidentified risks are the risks that seem impossible to find. However, studies have found that they in fact are not unidentifiable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To describe uncertainty management in detail, this article will first explain what variability and ambiguity in projects consists of and then dig deeper into the different types of uncertainty. Finally, some tools to manage the unidentified risks are presented as well as a reflection on the usage of the tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the type of uncertainty that is generated due to lack of knowledge or unexpected events and changes in the project &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Slides from Project Management course (42429 F18)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Before a project is started, it is important to reflect on the possible factors that can influence the project. Part of this is to reflect on the types of uncertainty, namely the known knowns (change control), known unknowns (risk management), unknown knowns (planning &amp;amp; communication errors) and the unknown unknowns (unexpected events and changes). A model to describe these four types of uncertainty is the Cynefin Framework which is divided in to the following: Order, unorder and disorder. Unorder is furthermore divided in to the complex domain and the complicated domain, while order is divided in to the chaotic domain and the simple domain. The Cynefin Framework will be used as a model to describe the types of uncertainty throughout this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
To understand the theory of uncertainty management and thereby the importance of managing the unidentified risks, this section will first describe what uncertainty really is as well as link it to risk management. Furthermore, the different types of uncertainty will be outlined.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The British Standard (Axelos) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/lib/dtudk/reader.action?docID=4863041&amp;amp;ppg=30 Project Management: &amp;quot;Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2&amp;quot;, Axelos &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; distinguishes project work from “business as usual” by the following characteristics: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change, temporary, cross-functional, unique and uncertainty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Change implies that a project introduces a change from one state to another.&lt;br /&gt;
*Temporary is part of the definition of a project and means that business as usual returns after the project is finished. &lt;br /&gt;
*Cross-functional means that a project involves people from different backgrounds working together towards a common goal.&lt;br /&gt;
*Unique implies that no projects are identical &lt;br /&gt;
*Uncertainty covers the threats (and opportunities) that the other characteristics bring to the project work. These threats and opportunities are often bigger and more important than those in everyday work, meaning that projects are subject to more risk. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article focuses describes the uncertainty of projects. The term “uncertainty” is defined by Chapman and Ward (2002) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Chapman, Chris &amp;amp; Ward, Stephen. (2002). Managing Project Risk and Uncertainty : A Constructively Simple Approach to Decision Making / C. Chapman, S. Ward. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31747699_Managing_Project_Risk_and_Uncertainty_A_Constructively_Simple_Approach_to_Decision_Making_C_Chapman_S_Ward &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as “lack of certainty, involving variability and ambiguity”, where variability is “uncertainty about the size of parameters which may result from lack of data, lack of detail, lack of definition, lack of experience and so on, which may be quantified if this is useful” and ambiguity is “the aspects of uncertainty not addressed in terms of variability”. Uncertainty can thereby be defined as the aspects of a project that may influence it either positively or negatively which is why uncertainty management is divided into opportunity management (which controls the positive influences) and risk management (which controls the negative influences) (MIT). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Classification of uncertainty===&lt;br /&gt;
In 2002 the former U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Henry Rumsfeld mentioned “unknown unknowns” in a Department of Defense news briefing &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiPe1OiKQuk Donald Rumsfeld DoD briefing &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.This made people try to understand the different types of uncertainty by classifying the knowledge. David Cleden (2009)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.amazon.co.uk/Managing-Project-Uncertainty-Advances-Management/dp/B00SLUXH2E Managing Project Uncertainty (Advances in Project Management): Written by David Cleden, 2009 Edition, (1st Edition) Publisher: Gower&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; uses the typical classification of risks, which is based on the knowledge of an event’s occurrence and impact, to list four possibilities: &lt;br /&gt;
*Known–knowns (knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–knowns (untapped knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Known–unknowns (risks)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–unknowns (unfathomable uncertainty)&lt;br /&gt;
The following will describe, and provide examples of, the different elements. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The known knowns are the knowledge used in the planning phase of a project. This means that even before the project has started, the people involved in the project are aware of basic knowledge or theory behind the project. A very simple example could be that, in a building project, all participants are aware that a lot of money will be spent on materials, salaries and so on. It could also be to identify the obvious stakeholders of the project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Since a project consists of people from different backgrounds with different skillsets, and there is limited space or resources to hire experts on every single aspect of the project, there will be unknown knowns in a project. These consist of knowledge that is not apparent within the project group but can be gathered from experts on the areas. In the example of a building project, this could be knowledge of an external consultant providing additional details to the planning process of the project.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Known unknowns are risks that the project group is aware of the existence of and want to manage carefully. In this sense, the risks are negative impacts on the project that the project has to minimize. These can be risks of material shortage or negative stakeholder involvement in a building project. The risk of negative stakeholder involvement could be due to poor communication to the important stakeholders which leads to them intervening in the project and possibly setting it back to an earlier state. Therefore, the known unknowns are part of risk management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the known unknowns that are yet to be identified. As it is located in the cross-section of the uncertain and unidentified, these risks are by far the most difficult to manage. An unknown unknown is an event or impact on a project that is considered unfathomable or even unimaginable which is why they are so difficult to consider in the planning process of a project. It is furthermore difficult to provide an example of an unknown unknown as these are risks that seem unidentifiable, although this article will provide some tools to convert the unknown unknowns into known unknowns which make them easier to manage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To summarize, the different elements can be shortly described &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://marketbusinessnews.com/financial-glossary/financial-glossary-u/unknown-unknowns/ Market Business News: &amp;quot;What Are Unknown Unknowns? Definition And Examples&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*The known knowns are the things we are aware of and understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown knowns are the things understand but aren’t aware of.&lt;br /&gt;
*The known unknowns are the things we are aware of but don’t understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown unknowns are the things we are neither aware of nor understand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Models of uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces models to understand and manage uncertainty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Risk classification===&lt;br /&gt;
To simplify the classification mentioned in the previous section, the knowledge of an event’s occurrence is labeled “identification” and the knowledge of an event’s impact is labeled “certainty”. In the matrix below, the four different types of (un)certainty are portrayed &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Kim, S. D. (2012). Characterizing unknown unknowns. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The matrix is divided in to certainty and identification. The idea is that “identification” is defined as either “knowledge” or “risk”, i.e. positive or negative and that “certainty” is whether or not we know that a certain event, that can influence the project, exists. This implies that the factors or events that we know exist and have knowledge about are relatively easy to identify and manage whereas the unknown unknowns are much harder to identify and therefore manage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:table_of_uncertainty_1.jpg|center|frame|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Cynefin Framework===&lt;br /&gt;
The Cynefin Framework is a tool developed by David J. Snowden and other contributors&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://pmiswohio.org/images/downloads/Summit18/hatter_cynefin_framework_summit18_03202018.pdf Cynefin Framewok (PMI SW Ohio)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to determine contexts enabling leaders to make appropriate choices. The framework consists of five domains: Simple, complicated, complex, chaotic and disorder. The first two are placed in to the “ordered universe” where facts are applicable. Complex and chaotic are placed in the “un-ordered universe” where the relationship between cause and effect is not immediately apparent. Below, the different domains are shortly explained and linked to the above model&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://hbr.org/2007/11/a-leaders-framework-for-decision-making (Cynefin Framework). A Leader’s Framework for Decision Making, Snowden, D. J. et al. 2007 in Harvard Business Review&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*The simple domain are the known knowns where it is possible to categorize the situation based on facts on the area.&lt;br /&gt;
*The complicated domain are the known unknowns where the situation isn’t immediately apparent, but it is possible to analyze the situation. &lt;br /&gt;
*The complex domain are the unknown unknowns where the outcome cannot be immediately determined but experiments will lead towards the correct direction.&lt;br /&gt;
*The chaotic domain are the unknowable unknowns where nothing makes sense and we search for ways to move more towards the complex domain.&lt;br /&gt;
*Disorder is a mix of the above domains and the situation has to be broken down in to parts to assign to the other domains. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Cynefin_Framework_(HBR).gif|center|frame|&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://hbr.org/2007/11/a-leaders-framework-for-decision-making (Cynefin Framework). A Leader’s Framework for Decision Making, Snowden, D. J. et al. 2007 in Harvard Business Review&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much like the model described in the above section, this framework suggests that the easiest situation is the simple domain, where the known knowns are found. Furthermore, the framework provides tools for leaders to manage their way out of the above situations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Tools==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces some tools to minimize the known unknown risks or identify the unknown unknown risks. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the limitations will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S154073</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64371</id>
		<title>Unidentified Risks</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64371"/>
		<updated>2019-02-22T13:30:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S154073: /* Models of uncertainty */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any project there will be some risks that should be carefully managed, but there will also be uncertainty, which involves variability and ambiguity &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/civil-and-environmental-engineering/1-040-project-management-spring-2009/lecture-notes/MIT1_040s09_lec24.pdf free to share and adapt under Creative Commons terms: Attribution, noncommercial, share alike (https://ocw.mit.edu/terms/) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode). Slides by Fred Moavenzadeh from MIT &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. This article outlines four different types of uncertainty with the main focus on the unidentified risks (or the “unknown unknowns”). Unidentified risks are the risks that seem impossible to find. However, studies have found that they in fact are not unidentifiable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To describe uncertainty management in detail, this article will first explain what variability and ambiguity in projects consists of and then dig deeper into the different types of uncertainty. Finally, some tools to manage the unidentified risks are presented as well as a reflection on the usage of the tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the type of uncertainty that is generated due to lack of knowledge or unexpected events and changes in the project &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Slides from Project Management course (42429 F18)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Before a project is started, it is important to reflect on the possible factors that can influence the project. Part of this is to reflect on the types of uncertainty, namely the known knowns (change control), known unknowns (risk management), unknown knowns (planning &amp;amp; communication errors) and the unknown unknowns (unexpected events and changes). A model to describe these four types of uncertainty is the Cynefin Framework which is divided in to the following: Order, unorder and disorder. Unorder is furthermore divided in to the complex domain and the complicated domain, while order is divided in to the chaotic domain and the simple domain. The Cynefin Framework will be used as a model to describe the types of uncertainty throughout this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
To understand the theory of uncertainty management and thereby the importance of managing the unidentified risks, this section will first describe what uncertainty really is as well as link it to risk management. Furthermore, the different types of uncertainty will be outlined.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The British Standard (Axelos) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/lib/dtudk/reader.action?docID=4863041&amp;amp;ppg=30 Project Management: &amp;quot;Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2&amp;quot;, Axelos &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; distinguishes project work from “business as usual” by the following characteristics: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change, temporary, cross-functional, unique and uncertainty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Change implies that a project introduces a change from one state to another.&lt;br /&gt;
*Temporary is part of the definition of a project and means that business as usual returns after the project is finished. &lt;br /&gt;
*Cross-functional means that a project involves people from different backgrounds working together towards a common goal.&lt;br /&gt;
*Unique implies that no projects are identical &lt;br /&gt;
*Uncertainty covers the threats (and opportunities) that the other characteristics bring to the project work. These threats and opportunities are often bigger and more important than those in everyday work, meaning that projects are subject to more risk. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article focuses describes the uncertainty of projects. The term “uncertainty” is defined by Chapman and Ward (2002) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Chapman, Chris &amp;amp; Ward, Stephen. (2002). Managing Project Risk and Uncertainty : A Constructively Simple Approach to Decision Making / C. Chapman, S. Ward. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31747699_Managing_Project_Risk_and_Uncertainty_A_Constructively_Simple_Approach_to_Decision_Making_C_Chapman_S_Ward &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as “lack of certainty, involving variability and ambiguity”, where variability is “uncertainty about the size of parameters which may result from lack of data, lack of detail, lack of definition, lack of experience and so on, which may be quantified if this is useful” and ambiguity is “the aspects of uncertainty not addressed in terms of variability”. Uncertainty can thereby be defined as the aspects of a project that may influence it either positively or negatively which is why uncertainty management is divided into opportunity management (which controls the positive influences) and risk management (which controls the negative influences) (MIT). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Classification of uncertainty===&lt;br /&gt;
In 2002 the former U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Henry Rumsfeld mentioned “unknown unknowns” in a Department of Defense news briefing &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiPe1OiKQuk Donald Rumsfeld DoD briefing &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.This made people try to understand the different types of uncertainty by classifying the knowledge. David Cleden (2009)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.amazon.co.uk/Managing-Project-Uncertainty-Advances-Management/dp/B00SLUXH2E Managing Project Uncertainty (Advances in Project Management): Written by David Cleden, 2009 Edition, (1st Edition) Publisher: Gower&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; uses the typical classification of risks, which is based on the knowledge of an event’s occurrence and impact, to list four possibilities: &lt;br /&gt;
*Known–knowns (knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–knowns (untapped knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Known–unknowns (risks)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–unknowns (unfathomable uncertainty)&lt;br /&gt;
The following will describe, and provide examples of, the different elements. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The known knowns are the knowledge used in the planning phase of a project. This means that even before the project has started, the people involved in the project are aware of basic knowledge or theory behind the project. A very simple example could be that, in a building project, all participants are aware that a lot of money will be spent on materials, salaries and so on. It could also be to identify the obvious stakeholders of the project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Since a project consists of people from different backgrounds with different skillsets, and there is limited space or resources to hire experts on every single aspect of the project, there will be unknown knowns in a project. These consist of knowledge that is not apparent within the project group but can be gathered from experts on the areas. In the example of a building project, this could be knowledge of an external consultant providing additional details to the planning process of the project.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Known unknowns are risks that the project group is aware of the existence of and want to manage carefully. In this sense, the risks are negative impacts on the project that the project has to minimize. These can be risks of material shortage or negative stakeholder involvement in a building project. The risk of negative stakeholder involvement could be due to poor communication to the important stakeholders which leads to them intervening in the project and possibly setting it back to an earlier state. Therefore, the known unknowns are part of risk management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the known unknowns that are yet to be identified. As it is located in the cross-section of the uncertain and unidentified, these risks are by far the most difficult to manage. An unknown unknown is an event or impact on a project that is considered unfathomable or even unimaginable which is why they are so difficult to consider in the planning process of a project. It is furthermore difficult to provide an example of an unknown unknown as these are risks that seem unidentifiable, although this article will provide some tools to convert the unknown unknowns into known unknowns which make them easier to manage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To summarize, the different elements can be shortly described &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://marketbusinessnews.com/financial-glossary/financial-glossary-u/unknown-unknowns/ Market Business News: &amp;quot;What Are Unknown Unknowns? Definition And Examples&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*The known knowns are the things we are aware of and understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown knowns are the things understand but aren’t aware of.&lt;br /&gt;
*The known unknowns are the things we are aware of but don’t understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown unknowns are the things we are neither aware of nor understand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Models of uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces models to understand and manage uncertainty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Risk classification===&lt;br /&gt;
To simplify the classification mentioned in the previous section, the knowledge of an event’s occurrence is labeled “identification” and the knowledge of an event’s impact is labeled “certainty”. In the matrix below, the four different types of (un)certainty are portrayed &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Kim, S. D. (2012). Characterizing unknown unknowns. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The matrix is divided in to certainty and identification. The idea is that “identification” is defined as either “knowledge” or “risk”, i.e. positive or negative and that “certainty” is whether or not we know that a certain event, that can influence the project, exists. This implies that the factors or events that we know exist and have knowledge about are relatively easy to identify and manage whereas the unknown unknowns are much harder to identify and therefore manage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:table_of_uncertainty_1.jpg|center|frame|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Cynefin Framework===&lt;br /&gt;
The Cynefin Framework is a tool developed by David J. Snowden and other contributors&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://pmiswohio.org/images/downloads/Summit18/hatter_cynefin_framework_summit18_03202018.pdf Cynefin Framewok (PMI SW Ohio)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to determine contexts enabling leaders to make appropriate choices. The framework consists of five domains: Simple, complicated, complex, chaotic and disorder. The first two are placed in to the “ordered universe” where facts are applicable. Complex and chaotic are placed in the “un-ordered universe” where the relationship between cause and effect is not immediately apparent. Below, the different domains are shortly explained and linked to the above model&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://hbr.org/2007/11/a-leaders-framework-for-decision-making (Cynefin Framework). A Leader’s Framework for Decision Making, Snowden, D. J. et al. 2007 in Harvard Business Review&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*The simple domain are the known knowns where it is possible to categorize the situation based on facts on the area.&lt;br /&gt;
*The complicated domain are the known unknowns where the situation isn’t immediately apparent, but it is possible to analyze the situation. &lt;br /&gt;
*The complex domain are the unknown unknowns where the outcome cannot be immediately determined but experiments will lead towards the correct direction.&lt;br /&gt;
*The chaotic domain are the unknowable unknowns where nothing makes sense and we search for ways to move more towards the complex domain.&lt;br /&gt;
*Disorder is a mix of the above domains and the situation has to be broken down in to parts to assign to the other domains. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Cynefin_Framework_(HBR).gif|center|frame|&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://hbr.org/2007/11/a-leaders-framework-for-decision-making&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much like the model described in the above section, this framework suggests that the easiest situation is the simple domain, where the known knowns are found. Furthermore, the framework provides tools for leaders to manage their way out of the above situations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Tools==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces some tools to minimize the known unknown risks or identify the unknown unknown risks. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the limitations will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S154073</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64363</id>
		<title>Unidentified Risks</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64363"/>
		<updated>2019-02-22T13:28:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S154073: /* Risk classification */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any project there will be some risks that should be carefully managed, but there will also be uncertainty, which involves variability and ambiguity &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/civil-and-environmental-engineering/1-040-project-management-spring-2009/lecture-notes/MIT1_040s09_lec24.pdf free to share and adapt under Creative Commons terms: Attribution, noncommercial, share alike (https://ocw.mit.edu/terms/) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode). Slides by Fred Moavenzadeh from MIT &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. This article outlines four different types of uncertainty with the main focus on the unidentified risks (or the “unknown unknowns”). Unidentified risks are the risks that seem impossible to find. However, studies have found that they in fact are not unidentifiable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To describe uncertainty management in detail, this article will first explain what variability and ambiguity in projects consists of and then dig deeper into the different types of uncertainty. Finally, some tools to manage the unidentified risks are presented as well as a reflection on the usage of the tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the type of uncertainty that is generated due to lack of knowledge or unexpected events and changes in the project &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Slides from Project Management course (42429 F18)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Before a project is started, it is important to reflect on the possible factors that can influence the project. Part of this is to reflect on the types of uncertainty, namely the known knowns (change control), known unknowns (risk management), unknown knowns (planning &amp;amp; communication errors) and the unknown unknowns (unexpected events and changes). A model to describe these four types of uncertainty is the Cynefin Framework which is divided in to the following: Order, unorder and disorder. Unorder is furthermore divided in to the complex domain and the complicated domain, while order is divided in to the chaotic domain and the simple domain. The Cynefin Framework will be used as a model to describe the types of uncertainty throughout this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
To understand the theory of uncertainty management and thereby the importance of managing the unidentified risks, this section will first describe what uncertainty really is as well as link it to risk management. Furthermore, the different types of uncertainty will be outlined.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The British Standard (Axelos) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/lib/dtudk/reader.action?docID=4863041&amp;amp;ppg=30 Project Management: &amp;quot;Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2&amp;quot;, Axelos &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; distinguishes project work from “business as usual” by the following characteristics: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change, temporary, cross-functional, unique and uncertainty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Change implies that a project introduces a change from one state to another.&lt;br /&gt;
*Temporary is part of the definition of a project and means that business as usual returns after the project is finished. &lt;br /&gt;
*Cross-functional means that a project involves people from different backgrounds working together towards a common goal.&lt;br /&gt;
*Unique implies that no projects are identical &lt;br /&gt;
*Uncertainty covers the threats (and opportunities) that the other characteristics bring to the project work. These threats and opportunities are often bigger and more important than those in everyday work, meaning that projects are subject to more risk. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article focuses describes the uncertainty of projects. The term “uncertainty” is defined by Chapman and Ward (2002) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Chapman, Chris &amp;amp; Ward, Stephen. (2002). Managing Project Risk and Uncertainty : A Constructively Simple Approach to Decision Making / C. Chapman, S. Ward. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31747699_Managing_Project_Risk_and_Uncertainty_A_Constructively_Simple_Approach_to_Decision_Making_C_Chapman_S_Ward &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as “lack of certainty, involving variability and ambiguity”, where variability is “uncertainty about the size of parameters which may result from lack of data, lack of detail, lack of definition, lack of experience and so on, which may be quantified if this is useful” and ambiguity is “the aspects of uncertainty not addressed in terms of variability”. Uncertainty can thereby be defined as the aspects of a project that may influence it either positively or negatively which is why uncertainty management is divided into opportunity management (which controls the positive influences) and risk management (which controls the negative influences) (MIT). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Classification of uncertainty===&lt;br /&gt;
In 2002 the former U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Henry Rumsfeld mentioned “unknown unknowns” in a Department of Defense news briefing &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiPe1OiKQuk Donald Rumsfeld DoD briefing &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.This made people try to understand the different types of uncertainty by classifying the knowledge. David Cleden (2009)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.amazon.co.uk/Managing-Project-Uncertainty-Advances-Management/dp/B00SLUXH2E Managing Project Uncertainty (Advances in Project Management): Written by David Cleden, 2009 Edition, (1st Edition) Publisher: Gower&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; uses the typical classification of risks, which is based on the knowledge of an event’s occurrence and impact, to list four possibilities: &lt;br /&gt;
*Known–knowns (knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–knowns (untapped knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Known–unknowns (risks)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–unknowns (unfathomable uncertainty)&lt;br /&gt;
The following will describe, and provide examples of, the different elements. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The known knowns are the knowledge used in the planning phase of a project. This means that even before the project has started, the people involved in the project are aware of basic knowledge or theory behind the project. A very simple example could be that, in a building project, all participants are aware that a lot of money will be spent on materials, salaries and so on. It could also be to identify the obvious stakeholders of the project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Since a project consists of people from different backgrounds with different skillsets, and there is limited space or resources to hire experts on every single aspect of the project, there will be unknown knowns in a project. These consist of knowledge that is not apparent within the project group but can be gathered from experts on the areas. In the example of a building project, this could be knowledge of an external consultant providing additional details to the planning process of the project.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Known unknowns are risks that the project group is aware of the existence of and want to manage carefully. In this sense, the risks are negative impacts on the project that the project has to minimize. These can be risks of material shortage or negative stakeholder involvement in a building project. The risk of negative stakeholder involvement could be due to poor communication to the important stakeholders which leads to them intervening in the project and possibly setting it back to an earlier state. Therefore, the known unknowns are part of risk management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the known unknowns that are yet to be identified. As it is located in the cross-section of the uncertain and unidentified, these risks are by far the most difficult to manage. An unknown unknown is an event or impact on a project that is considered unfathomable or even unimaginable which is why they are so difficult to consider in the planning process of a project. It is furthermore difficult to provide an example of an unknown unknown as these are risks that seem unidentifiable, although this article will provide some tools to convert the unknown unknowns into known unknowns which make them easier to manage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To summarize, the different elements can be shortly described &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://marketbusinessnews.com/financial-glossary/financial-glossary-u/unknown-unknowns/ Market Business News: &amp;quot;What Are Unknown Unknowns? Definition And Examples&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*The known knowns are the things we are aware of and understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown knowns are the things understand but aren’t aware of.&lt;br /&gt;
*The known unknowns are the things we are aware of but don’t understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown unknowns are the things we are neither aware of nor understand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Models of uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces models to understand and manage uncertainty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Risk classification===&lt;br /&gt;
To simplify the classification mentioned in the previous section, the knowledge of an event’s occurrence is labeled “identification” and the knowledge of an event’s impact is labeled “certainty”. In the matrix below, the four different types of (un)certainty are portrayed &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Kim, S. D. (2012). Characterizing unknown unknowns. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The matrix is divided in to certainty and identification. The idea is that “identification” is defined as either “knowledge” or “risk”, i.e. positive or negative and that “certainty” is whether or not we know that a certain event, that can influence the project, exists. This implies that the factors or events that we know exist and have knowledge about are relatively easy to identify and manage whereas the unknown unknowns are much harder to identify and therefore manage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:table_of_uncertainty_1.jpg|center|frame|&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://hbr.org/2007/11/a-leaders-framework-for-decision-making&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Cynefin Framework===&lt;br /&gt;
The Cynefin Framework is a tool developed by David J. Snowden and other contributors&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://pmiswohio.org/images/downloads/Summit18/hatter_cynefin_framework_summit18_03202018.pdf Cynefin Framewok (PMI SW Ohio)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to determine contexts enabling leaders to make appropriate choices. The framework consists of five domains: Simple, complicated, complex, chaotic and disorder. The first two are placed in to the “ordered universe” where facts are applicable. Complex and chaotic are placed in the “un-ordered universe” where the relationship between cause and effect is not immediately apparent. Below, the different domains are shortly explained and linked to the above model&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://hbr.org/2007/11/a-leaders-framework-for-decision-making (Cynefin Framework). A Leader’s Framework for Decision Making, Snowden, D. J. et al. 2007 in Harvard Business Review&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*The simple domain are the known knowns where it is possible to categorize the situation based on facts on the area.&lt;br /&gt;
*The complicated domain are the known unknowns where the situation isn’t immediately apparent, but it is possible to analyze the situation. &lt;br /&gt;
*The complex domain are the unknown unknowns where the outcome cannot be immediately determined but experiments will lead towards the correct direction.&lt;br /&gt;
*The chaotic domain are the unknowable unknowns where nothing makes sense and we search for ways to move more towards the complex domain.&lt;br /&gt;
*Disorder is a mix of the above domains and the situation has to be broken down in to parts to assign to the other domains. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Cynefin_Framework_(HBR).gif|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much like the model described in the above section, this framework suggests that the easiest situation is the simple domain, where the known knowns are found. Furthermore, the framework provides tools for leaders to manage their way out of the above situations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Tools==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces some tools to minimize the known unknown risks or identify the unknown unknown risks. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the limitations will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S154073</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64356</id>
		<title>Unidentified Risks</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64356"/>
		<updated>2019-02-22T13:27:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S154073: /* Risk classification */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any project there will be some risks that should be carefully managed, but there will also be uncertainty, which involves variability and ambiguity &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/civil-and-environmental-engineering/1-040-project-management-spring-2009/lecture-notes/MIT1_040s09_lec24.pdf free to share and adapt under Creative Commons terms: Attribution, noncommercial, share alike (https://ocw.mit.edu/terms/) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode). Slides by Fred Moavenzadeh from MIT &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. This article outlines four different types of uncertainty with the main focus on the unidentified risks (or the “unknown unknowns”). Unidentified risks are the risks that seem impossible to find. However, studies have found that they in fact are not unidentifiable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To describe uncertainty management in detail, this article will first explain what variability and ambiguity in projects consists of and then dig deeper into the different types of uncertainty. Finally, some tools to manage the unidentified risks are presented as well as a reflection on the usage of the tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the type of uncertainty that is generated due to lack of knowledge or unexpected events and changes in the project &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Slides from Project Management course (42429 F18)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Before a project is started, it is important to reflect on the possible factors that can influence the project. Part of this is to reflect on the types of uncertainty, namely the known knowns (change control), known unknowns (risk management), unknown knowns (planning &amp;amp; communication errors) and the unknown unknowns (unexpected events and changes). A model to describe these four types of uncertainty is the Cynefin Framework which is divided in to the following: Order, unorder and disorder. Unorder is furthermore divided in to the complex domain and the complicated domain, while order is divided in to the chaotic domain and the simple domain. The Cynefin Framework will be used as a model to describe the types of uncertainty throughout this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
To understand the theory of uncertainty management and thereby the importance of managing the unidentified risks, this section will first describe what uncertainty really is as well as link it to risk management. Furthermore, the different types of uncertainty will be outlined.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The British Standard (Axelos) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/lib/dtudk/reader.action?docID=4863041&amp;amp;ppg=30 Project Management: &amp;quot;Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2&amp;quot;, Axelos &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; distinguishes project work from “business as usual” by the following characteristics: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change, temporary, cross-functional, unique and uncertainty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Change implies that a project introduces a change from one state to another.&lt;br /&gt;
*Temporary is part of the definition of a project and means that business as usual returns after the project is finished. &lt;br /&gt;
*Cross-functional means that a project involves people from different backgrounds working together towards a common goal.&lt;br /&gt;
*Unique implies that no projects are identical &lt;br /&gt;
*Uncertainty covers the threats (and opportunities) that the other characteristics bring to the project work. These threats and opportunities are often bigger and more important than those in everyday work, meaning that projects are subject to more risk. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article focuses describes the uncertainty of projects. The term “uncertainty” is defined by Chapman and Ward (2002) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Chapman, Chris &amp;amp; Ward, Stephen. (2002). Managing Project Risk and Uncertainty : A Constructively Simple Approach to Decision Making / C. Chapman, S. Ward. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31747699_Managing_Project_Risk_and_Uncertainty_A_Constructively_Simple_Approach_to_Decision_Making_C_Chapman_S_Ward &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as “lack of certainty, involving variability and ambiguity”, where variability is “uncertainty about the size of parameters which may result from lack of data, lack of detail, lack of definition, lack of experience and so on, which may be quantified if this is useful” and ambiguity is “the aspects of uncertainty not addressed in terms of variability”. Uncertainty can thereby be defined as the aspects of a project that may influence it either positively or negatively which is why uncertainty management is divided into opportunity management (which controls the positive influences) and risk management (which controls the negative influences) (MIT). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Classification of uncertainty===&lt;br /&gt;
In 2002 the former U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Henry Rumsfeld mentioned “unknown unknowns” in a Department of Defense news briefing &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiPe1OiKQuk Donald Rumsfeld DoD briefing &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.This made people try to understand the different types of uncertainty by classifying the knowledge. David Cleden (2009)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.amazon.co.uk/Managing-Project-Uncertainty-Advances-Management/dp/B00SLUXH2E Managing Project Uncertainty (Advances in Project Management): Written by David Cleden, 2009 Edition, (1st Edition) Publisher: Gower&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; uses the typical classification of risks, which is based on the knowledge of an event’s occurrence and impact, to list four possibilities: &lt;br /&gt;
*Known–knowns (knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–knowns (untapped knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Known–unknowns (risks)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–unknowns (unfathomable uncertainty)&lt;br /&gt;
The following will describe, and provide examples of, the different elements. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The known knowns are the knowledge used in the planning phase of a project. This means that even before the project has started, the people involved in the project are aware of basic knowledge or theory behind the project. A very simple example could be that, in a building project, all participants are aware that a lot of money will be spent on materials, salaries and so on. It could also be to identify the obvious stakeholders of the project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Since a project consists of people from different backgrounds with different skillsets, and there is limited space or resources to hire experts on every single aspect of the project, there will be unknown knowns in a project. These consist of knowledge that is not apparent within the project group but can be gathered from experts on the areas. In the example of a building project, this could be knowledge of an external consultant providing additional details to the planning process of the project.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Known unknowns are risks that the project group is aware of the existence of and want to manage carefully. In this sense, the risks are negative impacts on the project that the project has to minimize. These can be risks of material shortage or negative stakeholder involvement in a building project. The risk of negative stakeholder involvement could be due to poor communication to the important stakeholders which leads to them intervening in the project and possibly setting it back to an earlier state. Therefore, the known unknowns are part of risk management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the known unknowns that are yet to be identified. As it is located in the cross-section of the uncertain and unidentified, these risks are by far the most difficult to manage. An unknown unknown is an event or impact on a project that is considered unfathomable or even unimaginable which is why they are so difficult to consider in the planning process of a project. It is furthermore difficult to provide an example of an unknown unknown as these are risks that seem unidentifiable, although this article will provide some tools to convert the unknown unknowns into known unknowns which make them easier to manage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To summarize, the different elements can be shortly described &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://marketbusinessnews.com/financial-glossary/financial-glossary-u/unknown-unknowns/ Market Business News: &amp;quot;What Are Unknown Unknowns? Definition And Examples&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*The known knowns are the things we are aware of and understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown knowns are the things understand but aren’t aware of.&lt;br /&gt;
*The known unknowns are the things we are aware of but don’t understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown unknowns are the things we are neither aware of nor understand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Models of uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces models to understand and manage uncertainty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Risk classification===&lt;br /&gt;
To simplify the classification mentioned in the previous section, the knowledge of an event’s occurrence is labeled “identification” and the knowledge of an event’s impact is labeled “certainty”. In the matrix below, the four different types of (un)certainty are portrayed &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Kim, S. D. (2012). Characterizing unknown unknowns. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The matrix is divided in to certainty and identification. The idea is that “identification” is defined as either “knowledge” or “risk”, i.e. positive or negative and that “certainty” is whether or not we know that a certain event, that can influence the project, exists. This implies that the factors or events that we know exist and have knowledge about are relatively easy to identify and manage whereas the unknown unknowns are much harder to identify and therefore manage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:table_of_uncertainty_1.jpg|center|frame|caption]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Cynefin Framework===&lt;br /&gt;
The Cynefin Framework is a tool developed by David J. Snowden and other contributors&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://pmiswohio.org/images/downloads/Summit18/hatter_cynefin_framework_summit18_03202018.pdf Cynefin Framewok (PMI SW Ohio)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to determine contexts enabling leaders to make appropriate choices. The framework consists of five domains: Simple, complicated, complex, chaotic and disorder. The first two are placed in to the “ordered universe” where facts are applicable. Complex and chaotic are placed in the “un-ordered universe” where the relationship between cause and effect is not immediately apparent. Below, the different domains are shortly explained and linked to the above model&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://hbr.org/2007/11/a-leaders-framework-for-decision-making (Cynefin Framework). A Leader’s Framework for Decision Making, Snowden, D. J. et al. 2007 in Harvard Business Review&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*The simple domain are the known knowns where it is possible to categorize the situation based on facts on the area.&lt;br /&gt;
*The complicated domain are the known unknowns where the situation isn’t immediately apparent, but it is possible to analyze the situation. &lt;br /&gt;
*The complex domain are the unknown unknowns where the outcome cannot be immediately determined but experiments will lead towards the correct direction.&lt;br /&gt;
*The chaotic domain are the unknowable unknowns where nothing makes sense and we search for ways to move more towards the complex domain.&lt;br /&gt;
*Disorder is a mix of the above domains and the situation has to be broken down in to parts to assign to the other domains. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Cynefin_Framework_(HBR).gif|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much like the model described in the above section, this framework suggests that the easiest situation is the simple domain, where the known knowns are found. Furthermore, the framework provides tools for leaders to manage their way out of the above situations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Tools==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces some tools to minimize the known unknown risks or identify the unknown unknown risks. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the limitations will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S154073</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64341</id>
		<title>Unidentified Risks</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64341"/>
		<updated>2019-02-22T13:24:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S154073: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any project there will be some risks that should be carefully managed, but there will also be uncertainty, which involves variability and ambiguity &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/civil-and-environmental-engineering/1-040-project-management-spring-2009/lecture-notes/MIT1_040s09_lec24.pdf free to share and adapt under Creative Commons terms: Attribution, noncommercial, share alike (https://ocw.mit.edu/terms/) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode). Slides by Fred Moavenzadeh from MIT &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. This article outlines four different types of uncertainty with the main focus on the unidentified risks (or the “unknown unknowns”). Unidentified risks are the risks that seem impossible to find. However, studies have found that they in fact are not unidentifiable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To describe uncertainty management in detail, this article will first explain what variability and ambiguity in projects consists of and then dig deeper into the different types of uncertainty. Finally, some tools to manage the unidentified risks are presented as well as a reflection on the usage of the tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the type of uncertainty that is generated due to lack of knowledge or unexpected events and changes in the project &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Slides from Project Management course (42429 F18)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Before a project is started, it is important to reflect on the possible factors that can influence the project. Part of this is to reflect on the types of uncertainty, namely the known knowns (change control), known unknowns (risk management), unknown knowns (planning &amp;amp; communication errors) and the unknown unknowns (unexpected events and changes). A model to describe these four types of uncertainty is the Cynefin Framework which is divided in to the following: Order, unorder and disorder. Unorder is furthermore divided in to the complex domain and the complicated domain, while order is divided in to the chaotic domain and the simple domain. The Cynefin Framework will be used as a model to describe the types of uncertainty throughout this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
To understand the theory of uncertainty management and thereby the importance of managing the unidentified risks, this section will first describe what uncertainty really is as well as link it to risk management. Furthermore, the different types of uncertainty will be outlined.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The British Standard (Axelos) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/lib/dtudk/reader.action?docID=4863041&amp;amp;ppg=30 Project Management: &amp;quot;Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2&amp;quot;, Axelos &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; distinguishes project work from “business as usual” by the following characteristics: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change, temporary, cross-functional, unique and uncertainty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Change implies that a project introduces a change from one state to another.&lt;br /&gt;
*Temporary is part of the definition of a project and means that business as usual returns after the project is finished. &lt;br /&gt;
*Cross-functional means that a project involves people from different backgrounds working together towards a common goal.&lt;br /&gt;
*Unique implies that no projects are identical &lt;br /&gt;
*Uncertainty covers the threats (and opportunities) that the other characteristics bring to the project work. These threats and opportunities are often bigger and more important than those in everyday work, meaning that projects are subject to more risk. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article focuses describes the uncertainty of projects. The term “uncertainty” is defined by Chapman and Ward (2002) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Chapman, Chris &amp;amp; Ward, Stephen. (2002). Managing Project Risk and Uncertainty : A Constructively Simple Approach to Decision Making / C. Chapman, S. Ward. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31747699_Managing_Project_Risk_and_Uncertainty_A_Constructively_Simple_Approach_to_Decision_Making_C_Chapman_S_Ward &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as “lack of certainty, involving variability and ambiguity”, where variability is “uncertainty about the size of parameters which may result from lack of data, lack of detail, lack of definition, lack of experience and so on, which may be quantified if this is useful” and ambiguity is “the aspects of uncertainty not addressed in terms of variability”. Uncertainty can thereby be defined as the aspects of a project that may influence it either positively or negatively which is why uncertainty management is divided into opportunity management (which controls the positive influences) and risk management (which controls the negative influences) (MIT). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Classification of uncertainty===&lt;br /&gt;
In 2002 the former U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Henry Rumsfeld mentioned “unknown unknowns” in a Department of Defense news briefing &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiPe1OiKQuk Donald Rumsfeld DoD briefing &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.This made people try to understand the different types of uncertainty by classifying the knowledge. David Cleden (2009)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.amazon.co.uk/Managing-Project-Uncertainty-Advances-Management/dp/B00SLUXH2E Managing Project Uncertainty (Advances in Project Management): Written by David Cleden, 2009 Edition, (1st Edition) Publisher: Gower&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; uses the typical classification of risks, which is based on the knowledge of an event’s occurrence and impact, to list four possibilities: &lt;br /&gt;
*Known–knowns (knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–knowns (untapped knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Known–unknowns (risks)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–unknowns (unfathomable uncertainty)&lt;br /&gt;
The following will describe, and provide examples of, the different elements. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The known knowns are the knowledge used in the planning phase of a project. This means that even before the project has started, the people involved in the project are aware of basic knowledge or theory behind the project. A very simple example could be that, in a building project, all participants are aware that a lot of money will be spent on materials, salaries and so on. It could also be to identify the obvious stakeholders of the project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Since a project consists of people from different backgrounds with different skillsets, and there is limited space or resources to hire experts on every single aspect of the project, there will be unknown knowns in a project. These consist of knowledge that is not apparent within the project group but can be gathered from experts on the areas. In the example of a building project, this could be knowledge of an external consultant providing additional details to the planning process of the project.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Known unknowns are risks that the project group is aware of the existence of and want to manage carefully. In this sense, the risks are negative impacts on the project that the project has to minimize. These can be risks of material shortage or negative stakeholder involvement in a building project. The risk of negative stakeholder involvement could be due to poor communication to the important stakeholders which leads to them intervening in the project and possibly setting it back to an earlier state. Therefore, the known unknowns are part of risk management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the known unknowns that are yet to be identified. As it is located in the cross-section of the uncertain and unidentified, these risks are by far the most difficult to manage. An unknown unknown is an event or impact on a project that is considered unfathomable or even unimaginable which is why they are so difficult to consider in the planning process of a project. It is furthermore difficult to provide an example of an unknown unknown as these are risks that seem unidentifiable, although this article will provide some tools to convert the unknown unknowns into known unknowns which make them easier to manage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To summarize, the different elements can be shortly described &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://marketbusinessnews.com/financial-glossary/financial-glossary-u/unknown-unknowns/ Market Business News: &amp;quot;What Are Unknown Unknowns? Definition And Examples&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*The known knowns are the things we are aware of and understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown knowns are the things understand but aren’t aware of.&lt;br /&gt;
*The known unknowns are the things we are aware of but don’t understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown unknowns are the things we are neither aware of nor understand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Models of uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces models to understand and manage uncertainty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Risk classification===&lt;br /&gt;
To simplify the classification mentioned in the previous section, the knowledge of an event’s occurrence is labeled “identification” and the knowledge of an event’s impact is labeled “certainty”. In the matrix below, the four different types of (un)certainty are portrayed &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Kim, S. D. (2012). Characterizing unknown unknowns. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The matrix is divided in to certainty and identification. The idea is that “identification” is defined as either “knowledge” or “risk”, i.e. positive or negative and that “certainty” is whether or not we know that a certain event, that can influence the project, exists. This implies that the factors or events that we know exist and have knowledge about are relatively easy to identify and manage whereas the unknown unknowns are much harder to identify and therefore manage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:table_of_uncertainty_1.jpg|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Cynefin Framework===&lt;br /&gt;
The Cynefin Framework is a tool developed by David J. Snowden and other contributors&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://pmiswohio.org/images/downloads/Summit18/hatter_cynefin_framework_summit18_03202018.pdf Cynefin Framewok (PMI SW Ohio)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to determine contexts enabling leaders to make appropriate choices. The framework consists of five domains: Simple, complicated, complex, chaotic and disorder. The first two are placed in to the “ordered universe” where facts are applicable. Complex and chaotic are placed in the “un-ordered universe” where the relationship between cause and effect is not immediately apparent. Below, the different domains are shortly explained and linked to the above model&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://hbr.org/2007/11/a-leaders-framework-for-decision-making (Cynefin Framework). A Leader’s Framework for Decision Making, Snowden, D. J. et al. 2007 in Harvard Business Review&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*The simple domain are the known knowns where it is possible to categorize the situation based on facts on the area.&lt;br /&gt;
*The complicated domain are the known unknowns where the situation isn’t immediately apparent, but it is possible to analyze the situation. &lt;br /&gt;
*The complex domain are the unknown unknowns where the outcome cannot be immediately determined but experiments will lead towards the correct direction.&lt;br /&gt;
*The chaotic domain are the unknowable unknowns where nothing makes sense and we search for ways to move more towards the complex domain.&lt;br /&gt;
*Disorder is a mix of the above domains and the situation has to be broken down in to parts to assign to the other domains. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Cynefin_Framework_(HBR).gif|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much like the model described in the above section, this framework suggests that the easiest situation is the simple domain, where the known knowns are found. Furthermore, the framework provides tools for leaders to manage their way out of the above situations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Tools==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces some tools to minimize the known unknown risks or identify the unknown unknown risks. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the limitations will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S154073</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64337</id>
		<title>Unidentified Risks</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64337"/>
		<updated>2019-02-22T13:21:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S154073: /* Annotated bibliography */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any project there will be some risks that should be carefully managed, but there will also be uncertainty, which involves variability and ambiguity &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/civil-and-environmental-engineering/1-040-project-management-spring-2009/lecture-notes/MIT1_040s09_lec24.pdf free to share and adapt under Creative Commons terms: Attribution, noncommercial, share alike (https://ocw.mit.edu/terms/) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode). Slides by Fred Moavenzadeh from MIT &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. This article outlines four different types of uncertainty with the main focus on the unidentified risks (or the “unknown unknowns”). Unidentified risks are the risks that seem impossible to find. However, studies have found that they in fact are not unidentifiable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To describe uncertainty management in detail, this article will first explain what variability and ambiguity in projects consists of and then dig deeper into the different types of uncertainty. Finally, some tools to manage the unidentified risks are presented as well as a reflection on the usage of the tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the type of uncertainty that is generated due to lack of knowledge or unexpected events and changes in the project &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Slides from Project Management course (42429 F18)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Before a project is started, it is important to reflect on the possible factors that can influence the project. Part of this is to reflect on the types of uncertainty, namely the known knowns (change control), known unknowns (risk management), unknown knowns (planning &amp;amp; communication errors) and the unknown unknowns (unexpected events and changes). A model to describe these four types of uncertainty is the Cynefin Framework which is divided in to the following: Order, unorder and disorder. Unorder is furthermore divided in to the complex domain and the complicated domain, while order is divided in to the chaotic domain and the simple domain. The Cynefin Framework will be used as a model to describe the types of uncertainty throughout this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
To understand the theory of uncertainty management and thereby the importance of managing the unidentified risks, this section will first describe what uncertainty really is as well as link it to risk management. Furthermore, the different types of uncertainty will be outlined.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The British Standard (Axelos) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/lib/dtudk/reader.action?docID=4863041&amp;amp;ppg=30 Project Management: &amp;quot;Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2&amp;quot;, Axelos &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; distinguishes project work from “business as usual” by the following characteristics: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change, temporary, cross-functional, unique and uncertainty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Change implies that a project introduces a change from one state to another.&lt;br /&gt;
*Temporary is part of the definition of a project and means that business as usual returns after the project is finished. &lt;br /&gt;
*Cross-functional means that a project involves people from different backgrounds working together towards a common goal.&lt;br /&gt;
*Unique implies that no projects are identical &lt;br /&gt;
*Uncertainty covers the threats (and opportunities) that the other characteristics bring to the project work. These threats and opportunities are often bigger and more important than those in everyday work, meaning that projects are subject to more risk. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article focuses describes the uncertainty of projects. The term “uncertainty” is defined by Chapman and Ward (2002) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Chapman, Chris &amp;amp; Ward, Stephen. (2002). Managing Project Risk and Uncertainty : A Constructively Simple Approach to Decision Making / C. Chapman, S. Ward. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31747699_Managing_Project_Risk_and_Uncertainty_A_Constructively_Simple_Approach_to_Decision_Making_C_Chapman_S_Ward &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as “lack of certainty, involving variability and ambiguity”, where variability is “uncertainty about the size of parameters which may result from lack of data, lack of detail, lack of definition, lack of experience and so on, which may be quantified if this is useful” and ambiguity is “the aspects of uncertainty not addressed in terms of variability”. Uncertainty can thereby be defined as the aspects of a project that may influence it either positively or negatively which is why uncertainty management is divided into opportunity management (which controls the positive influences) and risk management (which controls the negative influences) (MIT). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Classification of uncertainty===&lt;br /&gt;
In 2002 the former U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Henry Rumsfeld mentioned “unknown unknowns” in a Department of Defense news briefing &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiPe1OiKQuk Donald Rumsfeld DoD briefing &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.This made people try to understand the different types of uncertainty by classifying the knowledge. David Cleden (2009)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.amazon.co.uk/Managing-Project-Uncertainty-Advances-Management/dp/B00SLUXH2E Managing Project Uncertainty (Advances in Project Management): Written by David Cleden, 2009 Edition, (1st Edition) Publisher: Gower&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; uses the typical classification of risks, which is based on the knowledge of an event’s occurrence and impact, to list four possibilities: &lt;br /&gt;
*Known–knowns (knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–knowns (untapped knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Known–unknowns (risks)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–unknowns (unfathomable uncertainty)&lt;br /&gt;
The following will describe, and provide examples of, the different elements. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The known knowns are the knowledge used in the planning phase of a project. This means that even before the project has started, the people involved in the project are aware of basic knowledge or theory behind the project. A very simple example could be that, in a building project, all participants are aware that a lot of money will be spent on materials, salaries and so on. It could also be to identify the obvious stakeholders of the project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Since a project consists of people from different backgrounds with different skillsets, and there is limited space or resources to hire experts on every single aspect of the project, there will be unknown knowns in a project. These consist of knowledge that is not apparent within the project group but can be gathered from experts on the areas. In the example of a building project, this could be knowledge of an external consultant providing additional details to the planning process of the project.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Known unknowns are risks that the project group is aware of the existence of and want to manage carefully. In this sense, the risks are negative impacts on the project that the project has to minimize. These can be risks of material shortage or negative stakeholder involvement in a building project. The risk of negative stakeholder involvement could be due to poor communication to the important stakeholders which leads to them intervening in the project and possibly setting it back to an earlier state. Therefore, the known unknowns are part of risk management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the known unknowns that are yet to be identified. As it is located in the cross-section of the uncertain and unidentified, these risks are by far the most difficult to manage. An unknown unknown is an event or impact on a project that is considered unfathomable or even unimaginable which is why they are so difficult to consider in the planning process of a project. It is furthermore difficult to provide an example of an unknown unknown as these are risks that seem unidentifiable, although this article will provide some tools to convert the unknown unknowns into known unknowns which make them easier to manage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To summarize, the different elements can be shortly described &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://marketbusinessnews.com/financial-glossary/financial-glossary-u/unknown-unknowns/ Market Business News: &amp;quot;What Are Unknown Unknowns? Definition And Examples&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*The known knowns are the things we are aware of and understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown knowns are the things understand but aren’t aware of.&lt;br /&gt;
*The known unknowns are the things we are aware of but don’t understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown unknowns are the things we are neither aware of nor understand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Models of uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces models to understand and manage uncertainty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Risk classification===&lt;br /&gt;
To simplify the classification mentioned in the previous section, the knowledge of an event’s occurrence is labeled “identification” and the knowledge of an event’s impact is labeled “certainty”. In the matrix below, the four different types of (un)certainty are portrayed &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Kim, S. D. (2012). Characterizing unknown unknowns. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The matrix is divided in to certainty and identification. The idea is that “identification” is defined as either “knowledge” or “risk”, i.e. positive or negative and that “certainty” is whether or not we know that a certain event, that can influence the project, exists. This implies that the factors or events that we know exist and have knowledge about are relatively easy to identify and manage whereas the unknown unknowns are much harder to identify and therefore manage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:table_of_uncertainty_1.jpg|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Cynefin Framework===&lt;br /&gt;
The Cynefin Framework is a tool developed by David J. Snowden and other contributors&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://pmiswohio.org/images/downloads/Summit18/hatter_cynefin_framework_summit18_03202018.pdf Cynefin Framewok (PMI SW Ohio)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to determine contexts enabling leaders to make appropriate choices. The framework consists of five domains: Simple, complicated, complex, chaotic and disorder. The first two are placed in to the “ordered universe” where facts are applicable. Complex and chaotic are placed in the “un-ordered universe” where the relationship between cause and effect is not immediately apparent. Below, the different domains are shortly explained and linked to the above model&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://hbr.org/2007/11/a-leaders-framework-for-decision-making (Cynefin Framework). A Leader’s Framework for Decision Making, Snowden, D. J. et al. 2007 in Harvard Business Review&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*The simple domain are the known knowns where it is possible to categorize the situation based on facts on the area.&lt;br /&gt;
*The complicated domain are the known unknowns where the situation isn’t immediately apparent, but it is possible to analyze the situation. &lt;br /&gt;
*The complex domain are the unknown unknowns where the outcome cannot be immediately determined but experiments will lead towards the correct direction.&lt;br /&gt;
*The chaotic domain are the unknowable unknowns where nothing makes sense and we search for ways to move more towards the complex domain.&lt;br /&gt;
*Disorder is a mix of the above domains and the situation has to be broken down in to parts to assign to the other domains. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Cynefin_Framework_(HBR).gif|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much like the model described in the above section, this framework suggests that the easiest situation is the simple domain, where the known knowns are found. Furthermore, the framework provides tools for leaders to manage their way out of the above situations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Tools==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces some tools to minimize the known unknown risks or identify the unknown unknown risks. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Application==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the application will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the limitations will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S154073</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64336</id>
		<title>Unidentified Risks</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64336"/>
		<updated>2019-02-22T13:20:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S154073: /* The Cynefin Framework */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any project there will be some risks that should be carefully managed, but there will also be uncertainty, which involves variability and ambiguity &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/civil-and-environmental-engineering/1-040-project-management-spring-2009/lecture-notes/MIT1_040s09_lec24.pdf free to share and adapt under Creative Commons terms: Attribution, noncommercial, share alike (https://ocw.mit.edu/terms/) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode). Slides by Fred Moavenzadeh from MIT &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. This article outlines four different types of uncertainty with the main focus on the unidentified risks (or the “unknown unknowns”). Unidentified risks are the risks that seem impossible to find. However, studies have found that they in fact are not unidentifiable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To describe uncertainty management in detail, this article will first explain what variability and ambiguity in projects consists of and then dig deeper into the different types of uncertainty. Finally, some tools to manage the unidentified risks are presented as well as a reflection on the usage of the tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the type of uncertainty that is generated due to lack of knowledge or unexpected events and changes in the project &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Slides from Project Management course (42429 F18)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Before a project is started, it is important to reflect on the possible factors that can influence the project. Part of this is to reflect on the types of uncertainty, namely the known knowns (change control), known unknowns (risk management), unknown knowns (planning &amp;amp; communication errors) and the unknown unknowns (unexpected events and changes). A model to describe these four types of uncertainty is the Cynefin Framework which is divided in to the following: Order, unorder and disorder. Unorder is furthermore divided in to the complex domain and the complicated domain, while order is divided in to the chaotic domain and the simple domain. The Cynefin Framework will be used as a model to describe the types of uncertainty throughout this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
To understand the theory of uncertainty management and thereby the importance of managing the unidentified risks, this section will first describe what uncertainty really is as well as link it to risk management. Furthermore, the different types of uncertainty will be outlined.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The British Standard (Axelos) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/lib/dtudk/reader.action?docID=4863041&amp;amp;ppg=30 Project Management: &amp;quot;Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2&amp;quot;, Axelos &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; distinguishes project work from “business as usual” by the following characteristics: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change, temporary, cross-functional, unique and uncertainty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Change implies that a project introduces a change from one state to another.&lt;br /&gt;
*Temporary is part of the definition of a project and means that business as usual returns after the project is finished. &lt;br /&gt;
*Cross-functional means that a project involves people from different backgrounds working together towards a common goal.&lt;br /&gt;
*Unique implies that no projects are identical &lt;br /&gt;
*Uncertainty covers the threats (and opportunities) that the other characteristics bring to the project work. These threats and opportunities are often bigger and more important than those in everyday work, meaning that projects are subject to more risk. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article focuses describes the uncertainty of projects. The term “uncertainty” is defined by Chapman and Ward (2002) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Chapman, Chris &amp;amp; Ward, Stephen. (2002). Managing Project Risk and Uncertainty : A Constructively Simple Approach to Decision Making / C. Chapman, S. Ward. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31747699_Managing_Project_Risk_and_Uncertainty_A_Constructively_Simple_Approach_to_Decision_Making_C_Chapman_S_Ward &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as “lack of certainty, involving variability and ambiguity”, where variability is “uncertainty about the size of parameters which may result from lack of data, lack of detail, lack of definition, lack of experience and so on, which may be quantified if this is useful” and ambiguity is “the aspects of uncertainty not addressed in terms of variability”. Uncertainty can thereby be defined as the aspects of a project that may influence it either positively or negatively which is why uncertainty management is divided into opportunity management (which controls the positive influences) and risk management (which controls the negative influences) (MIT). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Classification of uncertainty===&lt;br /&gt;
In 2002 the former U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Henry Rumsfeld mentioned “unknown unknowns” in a Department of Defense news briefing &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiPe1OiKQuk Donald Rumsfeld DoD briefing &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.This made people try to understand the different types of uncertainty by classifying the knowledge. David Cleden (2009)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.amazon.co.uk/Managing-Project-Uncertainty-Advances-Management/dp/B00SLUXH2E Managing Project Uncertainty (Advances in Project Management): Written by David Cleden, 2009 Edition, (1st Edition) Publisher: Gower&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; uses the typical classification of risks, which is based on the knowledge of an event’s occurrence and impact, to list four possibilities: &lt;br /&gt;
*Known–knowns (knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–knowns (untapped knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Known–unknowns (risks)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–unknowns (unfathomable uncertainty)&lt;br /&gt;
The following will describe, and provide examples of, the different elements. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The known knowns are the knowledge used in the planning phase of a project. This means that even before the project has started, the people involved in the project are aware of basic knowledge or theory behind the project. A very simple example could be that, in a building project, all participants are aware that a lot of money will be spent on materials, salaries and so on. It could also be to identify the obvious stakeholders of the project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Since a project consists of people from different backgrounds with different skillsets, and there is limited space or resources to hire experts on every single aspect of the project, there will be unknown knowns in a project. These consist of knowledge that is not apparent within the project group but can be gathered from experts on the areas. In the example of a building project, this could be knowledge of an external consultant providing additional details to the planning process of the project.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Known unknowns are risks that the project group is aware of the existence of and want to manage carefully. In this sense, the risks are negative impacts on the project that the project has to minimize. These can be risks of material shortage or negative stakeholder involvement in a building project. The risk of negative stakeholder involvement could be due to poor communication to the important stakeholders which leads to them intervening in the project and possibly setting it back to an earlier state. Therefore, the known unknowns are part of risk management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the known unknowns that are yet to be identified. As it is located in the cross-section of the uncertain and unidentified, these risks are by far the most difficult to manage. An unknown unknown is an event or impact on a project that is considered unfathomable or even unimaginable which is why they are so difficult to consider in the planning process of a project. It is furthermore difficult to provide an example of an unknown unknown as these are risks that seem unidentifiable, although this article will provide some tools to convert the unknown unknowns into known unknowns which make them easier to manage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To summarize, the different elements can be shortly described &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://marketbusinessnews.com/financial-glossary/financial-glossary-u/unknown-unknowns/ Market Business News: &amp;quot;What Are Unknown Unknowns? Definition And Examples&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*The known knowns are the things we are aware of and understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown knowns are the things understand but aren’t aware of.&lt;br /&gt;
*The known unknowns are the things we are aware of but don’t understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown unknowns are the things we are neither aware of nor understand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Models of uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces models to understand and manage uncertainty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Risk classification===&lt;br /&gt;
To simplify the classification mentioned in the previous section, the knowledge of an event’s occurrence is labeled “identification” and the knowledge of an event’s impact is labeled “certainty”. In the matrix below, the four different types of (un)certainty are portrayed &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Kim, S. D. (2012). Characterizing unknown unknowns. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The matrix is divided in to certainty and identification. The idea is that “identification” is defined as either “knowledge” or “risk”, i.e. positive or negative and that “certainty” is whether or not we know that a certain event, that can influence the project, exists. This implies that the factors or events that we know exist and have knowledge about are relatively easy to identify and manage whereas the unknown unknowns are much harder to identify and therefore manage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:table_of_uncertainty_1.jpg|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Cynefin Framework===&lt;br /&gt;
The Cynefin Framework is a tool developed by David J. Snowden and other contributors&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://pmiswohio.org/images/downloads/Summit18/hatter_cynefin_framework_summit18_03202018.pdf Cynefin Framewok (PMI SW Ohio)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to determine contexts enabling leaders to make appropriate choices. The framework consists of five domains: Simple, complicated, complex, chaotic and disorder. The first two are placed in to the “ordered universe” where facts are applicable. Complex and chaotic are placed in the “un-ordered universe” where the relationship between cause and effect is not immediately apparent. Below, the different domains are shortly explained and linked to the above model&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://hbr.org/2007/11/a-leaders-framework-for-decision-making (Cynefin Framework). A Leader’s Framework for Decision Making, Snowden, D. J. et al. 2007 in Harvard Business Review&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*The simple domain are the known knowns where it is possible to categorize the situation based on facts on the area.&lt;br /&gt;
*The complicated domain are the known unknowns where the situation isn’t immediately apparent, but it is possible to analyze the situation. &lt;br /&gt;
*The complex domain are the unknown unknowns where the outcome cannot be immediately determined but experiments will lead towards the correct direction.&lt;br /&gt;
*The chaotic domain are the unknowable unknowns where nothing makes sense and we search for ways to move more towards the complex domain.&lt;br /&gt;
*Disorder is a mix of the above domains and the situation has to be broken down in to parts to assign to the other domains. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Cynefin_Framework_(HBR).gif|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much like the model described in the above section, this framework suggests that the easiest situation is the simple domain, where the known knowns are found. Furthermore, the framework provides tools for leaders to manage their way out of the above situations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Tools==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces some tools to minimize the known unknown risks or identify the unknown unknown risks. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Application==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the application will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the limitations will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Here the bibliography will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kim, S. D. (2012). Characterizing unknown unknowns. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/civil-and-environmental-engineering/1-040-project-management-spring-2009/lecture-notes/MIT1_040s09_lec24.pdf free to share and adapt under Creative Commons terms: Attribution, noncommercial, share alike (https://ocw.mit.edu/terms/) &lt;br /&gt;
Slides by Fred Moavenzadeh from MIT&lt;br /&gt;
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chapman, Chris &amp;amp; Ward, Stephen. (2002). Managing Project Risk and Uncertainty : A Constructively Simple Approach to Decision Making / C. Chapman, S. Ward.&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31747699_Managing_Project_Risk_and_Uncertainty_A_Constructively_Simple_Approach_to_Decision_Making_C_Chapman_S_Ward &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiPe1OiKQuk Donald Rumsfeld DoD briefing. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Managing-Project-Uncertainty-Advances-Management/dp/B00SLUXH2E Managing Project Uncertainty (Advances in Project Management): Written by David Cleden, 2009 Edition, (1st Edition) Publisher: Gower &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://marketbusinessnews.com/financial-glossary/financial-glossary-u/unknown-unknowns/ Market Business News: &amp;quot;What Are Unknown Unknowns? Definition And Examples&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://pmiswohio.org/images/downloads/Summit18/hatter_cynefin_framework_summit18_03202018.pdf Cynefin Framewok (PMI SW Ohio)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://hbr.org/2007/11/a-leaders-framework-for-decision-making &lt;br /&gt;
(Cynefin Framework). A Leader’s Framework for Decision Making, Snowden, D. J. et al. 2007 in Harvard Business Review&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S154073</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64334</id>
		<title>Unidentified Risks</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64334"/>
		<updated>2019-02-22T13:20:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S154073: /* The Cynefin Framework */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any project there will be some risks that should be carefully managed, but there will also be uncertainty, which involves variability and ambiguity &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/civil-and-environmental-engineering/1-040-project-management-spring-2009/lecture-notes/MIT1_040s09_lec24.pdf free to share and adapt under Creative Commons terms: Attribution, noncommercial, share alike (https://ocw.mit.edu/terms/) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode). Slides by Fred Moavenzadeh from MIT &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. This article outlines four different types of uncertainty with the main focus on the unidentified risks (or the “unknown unknowns”). Unidentified risks are the risks that seem impossible to find. However, studies have found that they in fact are not unidentifiable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To describe uncertainty management in detail, this article will first explain what variability and ambiguity in projects consists of and then dig deeper into the different types of uncertainty. Finally, some tools to manage the unidentified risks are presented as well as a reflection on the usage of the tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the type of uncertainty that is generated due to lack of knowledge or unexpected events and changes in the project &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Slides from Project Management course (42429 F18)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Before a project is started, it is important to reflect on the possible factors that can influence the project. Part of this is to reflect on the types of uncertainty, namely the known knowns (change control), known unknowns (risk management), unknown knowns (planning &amp;amp; communication errors) and the unknown unknowns (unexpected events and changes). A model to describe these four types of uncertainty is the Cynefin Framework which is divided in to the following: Order, unorder and disorder. Unorder is furthermore divided in to the complex domain and the complicated domain, while order is divided in to the chaotic domain and the simple domain. The Cynefin Framework will be used as a model to describe the types of uncertainty throughout this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
To understand the theory of uncertainty management and thereby the importance of managing the unidentified risks, this section will first describe what uncertainty really is as well as link it to risk management. Furthermore, the different types of uncertainty will be outlined.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The British Standard (Axelos) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/lib/dtudk/reader.action?docID=4863041&amp;amp;ppg=30 Project Management: &amp;quot;Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2&amp;quot;, Axelos &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; distinguishes project work from “business as usual” by the following characteristics: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change, temporary, cross-functional, unique and uncertainty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Change implies that a project introduces a change from one state to another.&lt;br /&gt;
*Temporary is part of the definition of a project and means that business as usual returns after the project is finished. &lt;br /&gt;
*Cross-functional means that a project involves people from different backgrounds working together towards a common goal.&lt;br /&gt;
*Unique implies that no projects are identical &lt;br /&gt;
*Uncertainty covers the threats (and opportunities) that the other characteristics bring to the project work. These threats and opportunities are often bigger and more important than those in everyday work, meaning that projects are subject to more risk. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article focuses describes the uncertainty of projects. The term “uncertainty” is defined by Chapman and Ward (2002) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Chapman, Chris &amp;amp; Ward, Stephen. (2002). Managing Project Risk and Uncertainty : A Constructively Simple Approach to Decision Making / C. Chapman, S. Ward. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31747699_Managing_Project_Risk_and_Uncertainty_A_Constructively_Simple_Approach_to_Decision_Making_C_Chapman_S_Ward &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as “lack of certainty, involving variability and ambiguity”, where variability is “uncertainty about the size of parameters which may result from lack of data, lack of detail, lack of definition, lack of experience and so on, which may be quantified if this is useful” and ambiguity is “the aspects of uncertainty not addressed in terms of variability”. Uncertainty can thereby be defined as the aspects of a project that may influence it either positively or negatively which is why uncertainty management is divided into opportunity management (which controls the positive influences) and risk management (which controls the negative influences) (MIT). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Classification of uncertainty===&lt;br /&gt;
In 2002 the former U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Henry Rumsfeld mentioned “unknown unknowns” in a Department of Defense news briefing &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiPe1OiKQuk Donald Rumsfeld DoD briefing &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.This made people try to understand the different types of uncertainty by classifying the knowledge. David Cleden (2009)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.amazon.co.uk/Managing-Project-Uncertainty-Advances-Management/dp/B00SLUXH2E Managing Project Uncertainty (Advances in Project Management): Written by David Cleden, 2009 Edition, (1st Edition) Publisher: Gower&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; uses the typical classification of risks, which is based on the knowledge of an event’s occurrence and impact, to list four possibilities: &lt;br /&gt;
*Known–knowns (knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–knowns (untapped knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Known–unknowns (risks)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–unknowns (unfathomable uncertainty)&lt;br /&gt;
The following will describe, and provide examples of, the different elements. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The known knowns are the knowledge used in the planning phase of a project. This means that even before the project has started, the people involved in the project are aware of basic knowledge or theory behind the project. A very simple example could be that, in a building project, all participants are aware that a lot of money will be spent on materials, salaries and so on. It could also be to identify the obvious stakeholders of the project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Since a project consists of people from different backgrounds with different skillsets, and there is limited space or resources to hire experts on every single aspect of the project, there will be unknown knowns in a project. These consist of knowledge that is not apparent within the project group but can be gathered from experts on the areas. In the example of a building project, this could be knowledge of an external consultant providing additional details to the planning process of the project.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Known unknowns are risks that the project group is aware of the existence of and want to manage carefully. In this sense, the risks are negative impacts on the project that the project has to minimize. These can be risks of material shortage or negative stakeholder involvement in a building project. The risk of negative stakeholder involvement could be due to poor communication to the important stakeholders which leads to them intervening in the project and possibly setting it back to an earlier state. Therefore, the known unknowns are part of risk management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the known unknowns that are yet to be identified. As it is located in the cross-section of the uncertain and unidentified, these risks are by far the most difficult to manage. An unknown unknown is an event or impact on a project that is considered unfathomable or even unimaginable which is why they are so difficult to consider in the planning process of a project. It is furthermore difficult to provide an example of an unknown unknown as these are risks that seem unidentifiable, although this article will provide some tools to convert the unknown unknowns into known unknowns which make them easier to manage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To summarize, the different elements can be shortly described &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://marketbusinessnews.com/financial-glossary/financial-glossary-u/unknown-unknowns/ Market Business News: &amp;quot;What Are Unknown Unknowns? Definition And Examples&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*The known knowns are the things we are aware of and understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown knowns are the things understand but aren’t aware of.&lt;br /&gt;
*The known unknowns are the things we are aware of but don’t understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown unknowns are the things we are neither aware of nor understand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Models of uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces models to understand and manage uncertainty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Risk classification===&lt;br /&gt;
To simplify the classification mentioned in the previous section, the knowledge of an event’s occurrence is labeled “identification” and the knowledge of an event’s impact is labeled “certainty”. In the matrix below, the four different types of (un)certainty are portrayed &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Kim, S. D. (2012). Characterizing unknown unknowns. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The matrix is divided in to certainty and identification. The idea is that “identification” is defined as either “knowledge” or “risk”, i.e. positive or negative and that “certainty” is whether or not we know that a certain event, that can influence the project, exists. This implies that the factors or events that we know exist and have knowledge about are relatively easy to identify and manage whereas the unknown unknowns are much harder to identify and therefore manage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:table_of_uncertainty_1.jpg|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Cynefin Framework===&lt;br /&gt;
The Cynefin Framework is a tool developed by David J. Snowden and other contributors&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://pmiswohio.org/images/downloads/Summit18/hatter_cynefin_framework_summit18_03202018.pdf Cynefin Framewok (PMI SW Ohio)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to determine contexts enabling leaders to make appropriate choices. The framework consists of five domains: Simple, complicated, complex, chaotic and disorder. The first two are placed in to the “ordered universe” where facts are applicable. Complex and chaotic are placed in the “un-ordered universe” where the relationship between cause and effect is not immediately apparent. Below, the different domains are shortly explained and linked to the above model:&lt;br /&gt;
*The simple domain are the known knowns where it is possible to categorize the situation based on facts on the area.&lt;br /&gt;
*The complicated domain are the known unknowns where the situation isn’t immediately apparent, but it is possible to analyze the situation. &lt;br /&gt;
*The complex domain are the unknown unknowns where the outcome cannot be immediately determined but experiments will lead towards the correct direction.&lt;br /&gt;
*The chaotic domain are the unknowable unknowns where nothing makes sense and we search for ways to move more towards the complex domain.&lt;br /&gt;
*Disorder is a mix of the above domains and the situation has to be broken down in to parts to assign to the other domains. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Cynefin_Framework_(HBR).gif|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much like the model described in the above section, this framework suggests that the easiest situation is the simple domain, where the known knowns are found. Furthermore, the framework provides tools for leaders to manage their way out of the above situations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Tools==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces some tools to minimize the known unknown risks or identify the unknown unknown risks. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Application==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the application will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the limitations will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Here the bibliography will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kim, S. D. (2012). Characterizing unknown unknowns. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/civil-and-environmental-engineering/1-040-project-management-spring-2009/lecture-notes/MIT1_040s09_lec24.pdf free to share and adapt under Creative Commons terms: Attribution, noncommercial, share alike (https://ocw.mit.edu/terms/) &lt;br /&gt;
Slides by Fred Moavenzadeh from MIT&lt;br /&gt;
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chapman, Chris &amp;amp; Ward, Stephen. (2002). Managing Project Risk and Uncertainty : A Constructively Simple Approach to Decision Making / C. Chapman, S. Ward.&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31747699_Managing_Project_Risk_and_Uncertainty_A_Constructively_Simple_Approach_to_Decision_Making_C_Chapman_S_Ward &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiPe1OiKQuk Donald Rumsfeld DoD briefing. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Managing-Project-Uncertainty-Advances-Management/dp/B00SLUXH2E Managing Project Uncertainty (Advances in Project Management): Written by David Cleden, 2009 Edition, (1st Edition) Publisher: Gower &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://marketbusinessnews.com/financial-glossary/financial-glossary-u/unknown-unknowns/ Market Business News: &amp;quot;What Are Unknown Unknowns? Definition And Examples&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://pmiswohio.org/images/downloads/Summit18/hatter_cynefin_framework_summit18_03202018.pdf Cynefin Framewok (PMI SW Ohio)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://hbr.org/2007/11/a-leaders-framework-for-decision-making &lt;br /&gt;
(Cynefin Framework). A Leader’s Framework for Decision Making, Snowden, D. J. et al. 2007 in Harvard Business Review&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S154073</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64329</id>
		<title>Unidentified Risks</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64329"/>
		<updated>2019-02-22T13:19:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S154073: /* Unknown unknowns */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any project there will be some risks that should be carefully managed, but there will also be uncertainty, which involves variability and ambiguity &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/civil-and-environmental-engineering/1-040-project-management-spring-2009/lecture-notes/MIT1_040s09_lec24.pdf free to share and adapt under Creative Commons terms: Attribution, noncommercial, share alike (https://ocw.mit.edu/terms/) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode). Slides by Fred Moavenzadeh from MIT &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. This article outlines four different types of uncertainty with the main focus on the unidentified risks (or the “unknown unknowns”). Unidentified risks are the risks that seem impossible to find. However, studies have found that they in fact are not unidentifiable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To describe uncertainty management in detail, this article will first explain what variability and ambiguity in projects consists of and then dig deeper into the different types of uncertainty. Finally, some tools to manage the unidentified risks are presented as well as a reflection on the usage of the tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the type of uncertainty that is generated due to lack of knowledge or unexpected events and changes in the project &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Slides from Project Management course (42429 F18)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Before a project is started, it is important to reflect on the possible factors that can influence the project. Part of this is to reflect on the types of uncertainty, namely the known knowns (change control), known unknowns (risk management), unknown knowns (planning &amp;amp; communication errors) and the unknown unknowns (unexpected events and changes). A model to describe these four types of uncertainty is the Cynefin Framework which is divided in to the following: Order, unorder and disorder. Unorder is furthermore divided in to the complex domain and the complicated domain, while order is divided in to the chaotic domain and the simple domain. The Cynefin Framework will be used as a model to describe the types of uncertainty throughout this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
To understand the theory of uncertainty management and thereby the importance of managing the unidentified risks, this section will first describe what uncertainty really is as well as link it to risk management. Furthermore, the different types of uncertainty will be outlined.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The British Standard (Axelos) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/lib/dtudk/reader.action?docID=4863041&amp;amp;ppg=30 Project Management: &amp;quot;Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2&amp;quot;, Axelos &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; distinguishes project work from “business as usual” by the following characteristics: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change, temporary, cross-functional, unique and uncertainty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Change implies that a project introduces a change from one state to another.&lt;br /&gt;
*Temporary is part of the definition of a project and means that business as usual returns after the project is finished. &lt;br /&gt;
*Cross-functional means that a project involves people from different backgrounds working together towards a common goal.&lt;br /&gt;
*Unique implies that no projects are identical &lt;br /&gt;
*Uncertainty covers the threats (and opportunities) that the other characteristics bring to the project work. These threats and opportunities are often bigger and more important than those in everyday work, meaning that projects are subject to more risk. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article focuses describes the uncertainty of projects. The term “uncertainty” is defined by Chapman and Ward (2002) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Chapman, Chris &amp;amp; Ward, Stephen. (2002). Managing Project Risk and Uncertainty : A Constructively Simple Approach to Decision Making / C. Chapman, S. Ward. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31747699_Managing_Project_Risk_and_Uncertainty_A_Constructively_Simple_Approach_to_Decision_Making_C_Chapman_S_Ward &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as “lack of certainty, involving variability and ambiguity”, where variability is “uncertainty about the size of parameters which may result from lack of data, lack of detail, lack of definition, lack of experience and so on, which may be quantified if this is useful” and ambiguity is “the aspects of uncertainty not addressed in terms of variability”. Uncertainty can thereby be defined as the aspects of a project that may influence it either positively or negatively which is why uncertainty management is divided into opportunity management (which controls the positive influences) and risk management (which controls the negative influences) (MIT). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Classification of uncertainty===&lt;br /&gt;
In 2002 the former U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Henry Rumsfeld mentioned “unknown unknowns” in a Department of Defense news briefing &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiPe1OiKQuk Donald Rumsfeld DoD briefing &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.This made people try to understand the different types of uncertainty by classifying the knowledge. David Cleden (2009)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.amazon.co.uk/Managing-Project-Uncertainty-Advances-Management/dp/B00SLUXH2E Managing Project Uncertainty (Advances in Project Management): Written by David Cleden, 2009 Edition, (1st Edition) Publisher: Gower&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; uses the typical classification of risks, which is based on the knowledge of an event’s occurrence and impact, to list four possibilities: &lt;br /&gt;
*Known–knowns (knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–knowns (untapped knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Known–unknowns (risks)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–unknowns (unfathomable uncertainty)&lt;br /&gt;
The following will describe, and provide examples of, the different elements. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The known knowns are the knowledge used in the planning phase of a project. This means that even before the project has started, the people involved in the project are aware of basic knowledge or theory behind the project. A very simple example could be that, in a building project, all participants are aware that a lot of money will be spent on materials, salaries and so on. It could also be to identify the obvious stakeholders of the project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Since a project consists of people from different backgrounds with different skillsets, and there is limited space or resources to hire experts on every single aspect of the project, there will be unknown knowns in a project. These consist of knowledge that is not apparent within the project group but can be gathered from experts on the areas. In the example of a building project, this could be knowledge of an external consultant providing additional details to the planning process of the project.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Known unknowns are risks that the project group is aware of the existence of and want to manage carefully. In this sense, the risks are negative impacts on the project that the project has to minimize. These can be risks of material shortage or negative stakeholder involvement in a building project. The risk of negative stakeholder involvement could be due to poor communication to the important stakeholders which leads to them intervening in the project and possibly setting it back to an earlier state. Therefore, the known unknowns are part of risk management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the known unknowns that are yet to be identified. As it is located in the cross-section of the uncertain and unidentified, these risks are by far the most difficult to manage. An unknown unknown is an event or impact on a project that is considered unfathomable or even unimaginable which is why they are so difficult to consider in the planning process of a project. It is furthermore difficult to provide an example of an unknown unknown as these are risks that seem unidentifiable, although this article will provide some tools to convert the unknown unknowns into known unknowns which make them easier to manage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To summarize, the different elements can be shortly described &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://marketbusinessnews.com/financial-glossary/financial-glossary-u/unknown-unknowns/ Market Business News: &amp;quot;What Are Unknown Unknowns? Definition And Examples&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*The known knowns are the things we are aware of and understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown knowns are the things understand but aren’t aware of.&lt;br /&gt;
*The known unknowns are the things we are aware of but don’t understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown unknowns are the things we are neither aware of nor understand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Models of uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces models to understand and manage uncertainty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Risk classification===&lt;br /&gt;
To simplify the classification mentioned in the previous section, the knowledge of an event’s occurrence is labeled “identification” and the knowledge of an event’s impact is labeled “certainty”. In the matrix below, the four different types of (un)certainty are portrayed &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Kim, S. D. (2012). Characterizing unknown unknowns. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The matrix is divided in to certainty and identification. The idea is that “identification” is defined as either “knowledge” or “risk”, i.e. positive or negative and that “certainty” is whether or not we know that a certain event, that can influence the project, exists. This implies that the factors or events that we know exist and have knowledge about are relatively easy to identify and manage whereas the unknown unknowns are much harder to identify and therefore manage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:table_of_uncertainty_1.jpg|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Cynefin Framework===&lt;br /&gt;
The Cynefin Framework is a tool developed by David J. Snowden and other contributors (HBR ref.) to determine contexts enabling leaders to make appropriate choices. The framework consists of five domains: Simple, complicated, complex, chaotic and disorder. The first two are placed in to the “ordered universe” where facts are applicable. Complex and chaotic are placed in the “un-ordered universe” where the relationship between cause and effect is not immediately apparent. Below, the different domains are shortly explained and linked to the above model:&lt;br /&gt;
*The simple domain are the known knowns where it is possible to categorize the situation based on facts on the area.&lt;br /&gt;
*The complicated domain are the known unknowns where the situation isn’t immediately apparent, but it is possible to analyze the situation. &lt;br /&gt;
*The complex domain are the unknown unknowns where the outcome cannot be immediately determined but experiments will lead towards the correct direction.&lt;br /&gt;
*The chaotic domain are the unknowable unknowns where nothing makes sense and we search for ways to move more towards the complex domain.&lt;br /&gt;
*Disorder is a mix of the above domains and the situation has to be broken down in to parts to assign to the other domains. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Cynefin_Framework_(HBR).gif|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much like the model described in the above section, this framework suggests that the easiest situation is the simple domain, where the known knowns are found. Furthermore, the framework provides tools for leaders to manage their way out of the above situations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Tools==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces some tools to minimize the known unknown risks or identify the unknown unknown risks. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Application==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the application will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the limitations will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Here the bibliography will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kim, S. D. (2012). Characterizing unknown unknowns. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/civil-and-environmental-engineering/1-040-project-management-spring-2009/lecture-notes/MIT1_040s09_lec24.pdf free to share and adapt under Creative Commons terms: Attribution, noncommercial, share alike (https://ocw.mit.edu/terms/) &lt;br /&gt;
Slides by Fred Moavenzadeh from MIT&lt;br /&gt;
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chapman, Chris &amp;amp; Ward, Stephen. (2002). Managing Project Risk and Uncertainty : A Constructively Simple Approach to Decision Making / C. Chapman, S. Ward.&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31747699_Managing_Project_Risk_and_Uncertainty_A_Constructively_Simple_Approach_to_Decision_Making_C_Chapman_S_Ward &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiPe1OiKQuk Donald Rumsfeld DoD briefing. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Managing-Project-Uncertainty-Advances-Management/dp/B00SLUXH2E Managing Project Uncertainty (Advances in Project Management): Written by David Cleden, 2009 Edition, (1st Edition) Publisher: Gower &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://marketbusinessnews.com/financial-glossary/financial-glossary-u/unknown-unknowns/ Market Business News: &amp;quot;What Are Unknown Unknowns? Definition And Examples&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://pmiswohio.org/images/downloads/Summit18/hatter_cynefin_framework_summit18_03202018.pdf Cynefin Framewok (PMI SW Ohio)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://hbr.org/2007/11/a-leaders-framework-for-decision-making &lt;br /&gt;
(Cynefin Framework). A Leader’s Framework for Decision Making, Snowden, D. J. et al. 2007 in Harvard Business Review&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S154073</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64327</id>
		<title>Unidentified Risks</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64327"/>
		<updated>2019-02-22T13:18:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S154073: /* Annotated bibliography */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any project there will be some risks that should be carefully managed, but there will also be uncertainty, which involves variability and ambiguity &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/civil-and-environmental-engineering/1-040-project-management-spring-2009/lecture-notes/MIT1_040s09_lec24.pdf free to share and adapt under Creative Commons terms: Attribution, noncommercial, share alike (https://ocw.mit.edu/terms/) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode). Slides by Fred Moavenzadeh from MIT &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. This article outlines four different types of uncertainty with the main focus on the unidentified risks (or the “unknown unknowns”). Unidentified risks are the risks that seem impossible to find. However, studies have found that they in fact are not unidentifiable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To describe uncertainty management in detail, this article will first explain what variability and ambiguity in projects consists of and then dig deeper into the different types of uncertainty. Finally, some tools to manage the unidentified risks are presented as well as a reflection on the usage of the tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the type of uncertainty that is generated due to lack of knowledge or unexpected events and changes in the project &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Slides from Project Management course (42429 F18)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Before a project is started, it is important to reflect on the possible factors that can influence the project. Part of this is to reflect on the types of uncertainty, namely the known knowns (change control), known unknowns (risk management), unknown knowns (planning &amp;amp; communication errors) and the unknown unknowns (unexpected events and changes). A model to describe these four types of uncertainty is the Cynefin Framework which is divided in to the following: Order, unorder and disorder. Unorder is furthermore divided in to the complex domain and the complicated domain, while order is divided in to the chaotic domain and the simple domain. The Cynefin Framework will be used as a model to describe the types of uncertainty throughout this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
To understand the theory of uncertainty management and thereby the importance of managing the unidentified risks, this section will first describe what uncertainty really is as well as link it to risk management. Furthermore, the different types of uncertainty will be outlined.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The British Standard (Axelos) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/lib/dtudk/reader.action?docID=4863041&amp;amp;ppg=30 Project Management: &amp;quot;Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2&amp;quot;, Axelos &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; distinguishes project work from “business as usual” by the following characteristics: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change, temporary, cross-functional, unique and uncertainty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Change implies that a project introduces a change from one state to another.&lt;br /&gt;
*Temporary is part of the definition of a project and means that business as usual returns after the project is finished. &lt;br /&gt;
*Cross-functional means that a project involves people from different backgrounds working together towards a common goal.&lt;br /&gt;
*Unique implies that no projects are identical &lt;br /&gt;
*Uncertainty covers the threats (and opportunities) that the other characteristics bring to the project work. These threats and opportunities are often bigger and more important than those in everyday work, meaning that projects are subject to more risk. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article focuses describes the uncertainty of projects. The term “uncertainty” is defined by Chapman and Ward (2002) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Chapman, Chris &amp;amp; Ward, Stephen. (2002). Managing Project Risk and Uncertainty : A Constructively Simple Approach to Decision Making / C. Chapman, S. Ward. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31747699_Managing_Project_Risk_and_Uncertainty_A_Constructively_Simple_Approach_to_Decision_Making_C_Chapman_S_Ward &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as “lack of certainty, involving variability and ambiguity”, where variability is “uncertainty about the size of parameters which may result from lack of data, lack of detail, lack of definition, lack of experience and so on, which may be quantified if this is useful” and ambiguity is “the aspects of uncertainty not addressed in terms of variability”. Uncertainty can thereby be defined as the aspects of a project that may influence it either positively or negatively which is why uncertainty management is divided into opportunity management (which controls the positive influences) and risk management (which controls the negative influences) (MIT). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Classification of uncertainty===&lt;br /&gt;
In 2002 the former U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Henry Rumsfeld mentioned “unknown unknowns” in a Department of Defense news briefing &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiPe1OiKQuk Donald Rumsfeld DoD briefing &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.This made people try to understand the different types of uncertainty by classifying the knowledge. David Cleden (2009)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.amazon.co.uk/Managing-Project-Uncertainty-Advances-Management/dp/B00SLUXH2E Managing Project Uncertainty (Advances in Project Management): Written by David Cleden, 2009 Edition, (1st Edition) Publisher: Gower&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; uses the typical classification of risks, which is based on the knowledge of an event’s occurrence and impact, to list four possibilities: &lt;br /&gt;
*Known–knowns (knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–knowns (untapped knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Known–unknowns (risks)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–unknowns (unfathomable uncertainty)&lt;br /&gt;
The following will describe, and provide examples of, the different elements. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The known knowns are the knowledge used in the planning phase of a project. This means that even before the project has started, the people involved in the project are aware of basic knowledge or theory behind the project. A very simple example could be that, in a building project, all participants are aware that a lot of money will be spent on materials, salaries and so on. It could also be to identify the obvious stakeholders of the project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Since a project consists of people from different backgrounds with different skillsets, and there is limited space or resources to hire experts on every single aspect of the project, there will be unknown knowns in a project. These consist of knowledge that is not apparent within the project group but can be gathered from experts on the areas. In the example of a building project, this could be knowledge of an external consultant providing additional details to the planning process of the project.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Known unknowns are risks that the project group is aware of the existence of and want to manage carefully. In this sense, the risks are negative impacts on the project that the project has to minimize. These can be risks of material shortage or negative stakeholder involvement in a building project. The risk of negative stakeholder involvement could be due to poor communication to the important stakeholders which leads to them intervening in the project and possibly setting it back to an earlier state. Therefore, the known unknowns are part of risk management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the known unknowns that are yet to be identified. As it is located in the cross-section of the uncertain and unidentified, these risks are by far the most difficult to manage. An unknown unknown is an event or impact on a project that is considered unfathomable or even unimaginable which is why they are so difficult to consider in the planning process of a project. It is furthermore difficult to provide an example of an unknown unknown as these are risks that seem unidentifiable, although this article will provide some tools to convert the unknown unknowns into known unknowns which make them easier to manage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To summarize, the different elements can be shortly described (Market Business News):&lt;br /&gt;
*The known knowns are the things we are aware of and understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown knowns are the things understand but aren’t aware of.&lt;br /&gt;
*The known unknowns are the things we are aware of but don’t understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown unknowns are the things we are neither aware of nor understand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Models of uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces models to understand and manage uncertainty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Risk classification===&lt;br /&gt;
To simplify the classification mentioned in the previous section, the knowledge of an event’s occurrence is labeled “identification” and the knowledge of an event’s impact is labeled “certainty”. In the matrix below, the four different types of (un)certainty are portrayed &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Kim, S. D. (2012). Characterizing unknown unknowns. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The matrix is divided in to certainty and identification. The idea is that “identification” is defined as either “knowledge” or “risk”, i.e. positive or negative and that “certainty” is whether or not we know that a certain event, that can influence the project, exists. This implies that the factors or events that we know exist and have knowledge about are relatively easy to identify and manage whereas the unknown unknowns are much harder to identify and therefore manage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:table_of_uncertainty_1.jpg|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Cynefin Framework===&lt;br /&gt;
The Cynefin Framework is a tool developed by David J. Snowden and other contributors (HBR ref.) to determine contexts enabling leaders to make appropriate choices. The framework consists of five domains: Simple, complicated, complex, chaotic and disorder. The first two are placed in to the “ordered universe” where facts are applicable. Complex and chaotic are placed in the “un-ordered universe” where the relationship between cause and effect is not immediately apparent. Below, the different domains are shortly explained and linked to the above model:&lt;br /&gt;
*The simple domain are the known knowns where it is possible to categorize the situation based on facts on the area.&lt;br /&gt;
*The complicated domain are the known unknowns where the situation isn’t immediately apparent, but it is possible to analyze the situation. &lt;br /&gt;
*The complex domain are the unknown unknowns where the outcome cannot be immediately determined but experiments will lead towards the correct direction.&lt;br /&gt;
*The chaotic domain are the unknowable unknowns where nothing makes sense and we search for ways to move more towards the complex domain.&lt;br /&gt;
*Disorder is a mix of the above domains and the situation has to be broken down in to parts to assign to the other domains. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Cynefin_Framework_(HBR).gif|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much like the model described in the above section, this framework suggests that the easiest situation is the simple domain, where the known knowns are found. Furthermore, the framework provides tools for leaders to manage their way out of the above situations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Tools==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces some tools to minimize the known unknown risks or identify the unknown unknown risks. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Application==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the application will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the limitations will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Here the bibliography will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kim, S. D. (2012). Characterizing unknown unknowns. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/civil-and-environmental-engineering/1-040-project-management-spring-2009/lecture-notes/MIT1_040s09_lec24.pdf free to share and adapt under Creative Commons terms: Attribution, noncommercial, share alike (https://ocw.mit.edu/terms/) &lt;br /&gt;
Slides by Fred Moavenzadeh from MIT&lt;br /&gt;
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chapman, Chris &amp;amp; Ward, Stephen. (2002). Managing Project Risk and Uncertainty : A Constructively Simple Approach to Decision Making / C. Chapman, S. Ward.&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31747699_Managing_Project_Risk_and_Uncertainty_A_Constructively_Simple_Approach_to_Decision_Making_C_Chapman_S_Ward &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiPe1OiKQuk Donald Rumsfeld DoD briefing. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Managing-Project-Uncertainty-Advances-Management/dp/B00SLUXH2E Managing Project Uncertainty (Advances in Project Management): Written by David Cleden, 2009 Edition, (1st Edition) Publisher: Gower &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://marketbusinessnews.com/financial-glossary/financial-glossary-u/unknown-unknowns/ Market Business News: &amp;quot;What Are Unknown Unknowns? Definition And Examples&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://pmiswohio.org/images/downloads/Summit18/hatter_cynefin_framework_summit18_03202018.pdf Cynefin Framewok (PMI SW Ohio)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://hbr.org/2007/11/a-leaders-framework-for-decision-making &lt;br /&gt;
(Cynefin Framework). A Leader’s Framework for Decision Making, Snowden, D. J. et al. 2007 in Harvard Business Review&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S154073</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64323</id>
		<title>Unidentified Risks</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64323"/>
		<updated>2019-02-22T13:18:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S154073: /* Classification of uncertainty */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any project there will be some risks that should be carefully managed, but there will also be uncertainty, which involves variability and ambiguity &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/civil-and-environmental-engineering/1-040-project-management-spring-2009/lecture-notes/MIT1_040s09_lec24.pdf free to share and adapt under Creative Commons terms: Attribution, noncommercial, share alike (https://ocw.mit.edu/terms/) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode). Slides by Fred Moavenzadeh from MIT &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. This article outlines four different types of uncertainty with the main focus on the unidentified risks (or the “unknown unknowns”). Unidentified risks are the risks that seem impossible to find. However, studies have found that they in fact are not unidentifiable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To describe uncertainty management in detail, this article will first explain what variability and ambiguity in projects consists of and then dig deeper into the different types of uncertainty. Finally, some tools to manage the unidentified risks are presented as well as a reflection on the usage of the tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the type of uncertainty that is generated due to lack of knowledge or unexpected events and changes in the project &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Slides from Project Management course (42429 F18)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Before a project is started, it is important to reflect on the possible factors that can influence the project. Part of this is to reflect on the types of uncertainty, namely the known knowns (change control), known unknowns (risk management), unknown knowns (planning &amp;amp; communication errors) and the unknown unknowns (unexpected events and changes). A model to describe these four types of uncertainty is the Cynefin Framework which is divided in to the following: Order, unorder and disorder. Unorder is furthermore divided in to the complex domain and the complicated domain, while order is divided in to the chaotic domain and the simple domain. The Cynefin Framework will be used as a model to describe the types of uncertainty throughout this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
To understand the theory of uncertainty management and thereby the importance of managing the unidentified risks, this section will first describe what uncertainty really is as well as link it to risk management. Furthermore, the different types of uncertainty will be outlined.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The British Standard (Axelos) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/lib/dtudk/reader.action?docID=4863041&amp;amp;ppg=30 Project Management: &amp;quot;Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2&amp;quot;, Axelos &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; distinguishes project work from “business as usual” by the following characteristics: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change, temporary, cross-functional, unique and uncertainty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Change implies that a project introduces a change from one state to another.&lt;br /&gt;
*Temporary is part of the definition of a project and means that business as usual returns after the project is finished. &lt;br /&gt;
*Cross-functional means that a project involves people from different backgrounds working together towards a common goal.&lt;br /&gt;
*Unique implies that no projects are identical &lt;br /&gt;
*Uncertainty covers the threats (and opportunities) that the other characteristics bring to the project work. These threats and opportunities are often bigger and more important than those in everyday work, meaning that projects are subject to more risk. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article focuses describes the uncertainty of projects. The term “uncertainty” is defined by Chapman and Ward (2002) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Chapman, Chris &amp;amp; Ward, Stephen. (2002). Managing Project Risk and Uncertainty : A Constructively Simple Approach to Decision Making / C. Chapman, S. Ward. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31747699_Managing_Project_Risk_and_Uncertainty_A_Constructively_Simple_Approach_to_Decision_Making_C_Chapman_S_Ward &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as “lack of certainty, involving variability and ambiguity”, where variability is “uncertainty about the size of parameters which may result from lack of data, lack of detail, lack of definition, lack of experience and so on, which may be quantified if this is useful” and ambiguity is “the aspects of uncertainty not addressed in terms of variability”. Uncertainty can thereby be defined as the aspects of a project that may influence it either positively or negatively which is why uncertainty management is divided into opportunity management (which controls the positive influences) and risk management (which controls the negative influences) (MIT). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Classification of uncertainty===&lt;br /&gt;
In 2002 the former U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Henry Rumsfeld mentioned “unknown unknowns” in a Department of Defense news briefing &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiPe1OiKQuk Donald Rumsfeld DoD briefing &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.This made people try to understand the different types of uncertainty by classifying the knowledge. David Cleden (2009)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.amazon.co.uk/Managing-Project-Uncertainty-Advances-Management/dp/B00SLUXH2E Managing Project Uncertainty (Advances in Project Management): Written by David Cleden, 2009 Edition, (1st Edition) Publisher: Gower&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; uses the typical classification of risks, which is based on the knowledge of an event’s occurrence and impact, to list four possibilities: &lt;br /&gt;
*Known–knowns (knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–knowns (untapped knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Known–unknowns (risks)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–unknowns (unfathomable uncertainty)&lt;br /&gt;
The following will describe, and provide examples of, the different elements. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The known knowns are the knowledge used in the planning phase of a project. This means that even before the project has started, the people involved in the project are aware of basic knowledge or theory behind the project. A very simple example could be that, in a building project, all participants are aware that a lot of money will be spent on materials, salaries and so on. It could also be to identify the obvious stakeholders of the project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Since a project consists of people from different backgrounds with different skillsets, and there is limited space or resources to hire experts on every single aspect of the project, there will be unknown knowns in a project. These consist of knowledge that is not apparent within the project group but can be gathered from experts on the areas. In the example of a building project, this could be knowledge of an external consultant providing additional details to the planning process of the project.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Known unknowns are risks that the project group is aware of the existence of and want to manage carefully. In this sense, the risks are negative impacts on the project that the project has to minimize. These can be risks of material shortage or negative stakeholder involvement in a building project. The risk of negative stakeholder involvement could be due to poor communication to the important stakeholders which leads to them intervening in the project and possibly setting it back to an earlier state. Therefore, the known unknowns are part of risk management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the known unknowns that are yet to be identified. As it is located in the cross-section of the uncertain and unidentified, these risks are by far the most difficult to manage. An unknown unknown is an event or impact on a project that is considered unfathomable or even unimaginable which is why they are so difficult to consider in the planning process of a project. It is furthermore difficult to provide an example of an unknown unknown as these are risks that seem unidentifiable, although this article will provide some tools to convert the unknown unknowns into known unknowns which make them easier to manage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To summarize, the different elements can be shortly described (Market Business News):&lt;br /&gt;
*The known knowns are the things we are aware of and understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown knowns are the things understand but aren’t aware of.&lt;br /&gt;
*The known unknowns are the things we are aware of but don’t understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown unknowns are the things we are neither aware of nor understand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Models of uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces models to understand and manage uncertainty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Risk classification===&lt;br /&gt;
To simplify the classification mentioned in the previous section, the knowledge of an event’s occurrence is labeled “identification” and the knowledge of an event’s impact is labeled “certainty”. In the matrix below, the four different types of (un)certainty are portrayed &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Kim, S. D. (2012). Characterizing unknown unknowns. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The matrix is divided in to certainty and identification. The idea is that “identification” is defined as either “knowledge” or “risk”, i.e. positive or negative and that “certainty” is whether or not we know that a certain event, that can influence the project, exists. This implies that the factors or events that we know exist and have knowledge about are relatively easy to identify and manage whereas the unknown unknowns are much harder to identify and therefore manage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:table_of_uncertainty_1.jpg|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Cynefin Framework===&lt;br /&gt;
The Cynefin Framework is a tool developed by David J. Snowden and other contributors (HBR ref.) to determine contexts enabling leaders to make appropriate choices. The framework consists of five domains: Simple, complicated, complex, chaotic and disorder. The first two are placed in to the “ordered universe” where facts are applicable. Complex and chaotic are placed in the “un-ordered universe” where the relationship between cause and effect is not immediately apparent. Below, the different domains are shortly explained and linked to the above model:&lt;br /&gt;
*The simple domain are the known knowns where it is possible to categorize the situation based on facts on the area.&lt;br /&gt;
*The complicated domain are the known unknowns where the situation isn’t immediately apparent, but it is possible to analyze the situation. &lt;br /&gt;
*The complex domain are the unknown unknowns where the outcome cannot be immediately determined but experiments will lead towards the correct direction.&lt;br /&gt;
*The chaotic domain are the unknowable unknowns where nothing makes sense and we search for ways to move more towards the complex domain.&lt;br /&gt;
*Disorder is a mix of the above domains and the situation has to be broken down in to parts to assign to the other domains. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Cynefin_Framework_(HBR).gif|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much like the model described in the above section, this framework suggests that the easiest situation is the simple domain, where the known knowns are found. Furthermore, the framework provides tools for leaders to manage their way out of the above situations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Tools==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces some tools to minimize the known unknown risks or identify the unknown unknown risks. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Application==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the application will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the limitations will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Here the bibliography will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kim, S. D. (2012). Characterizing unknown unknowns. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/civil-and-environmental-engineering/1-040-project-management-spring-2009/lecture-notes/MIT1_040s09_lec24.pdf free to share and adapt under Creative Commons terms: Attribution, noncommercial, share alike (https://ocw.mit.edu/terms/) &lt;br /&gt;
Slides by Fred Moavenzadeh from MIT&lt;br /&gt;
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chapman, Chris &amp;amp; Ward, Stephen. (2002). Managing Project Risk and Uncertainty : A Constructively Simple Approach to Decision Making / C. Chapman, S. Ward.&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31747699_Managing_Project_Risk_and_Uncertainty_A_Constructively_Simple_Approach_to_Decision_Making_C_Chapman_S_Ward &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiPe1OiKQuk Donald Rumsfeld DoD briefing. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Managing-Project-Uncertainty-Advances-Management/dp/B00SLUXH2E Managing Project Uncertainty (Advances in Project Management): Written by David Cleden, 2009 Edition, (1st Edition) Publisher: Gower &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://marketbusinessnews.com/financial-glossary/financial-glossary-u/unknown-unknowns/ summary of knowns.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://pmiswohio.org/images/downloads/Summit18/hatter_cynefin_framework_summit18_03202018.pdf Cynefin Framewok (PMI SW Ohio)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://hbr.org/2007/11/a-leaders-framework-for-decision-making &lt;br /&gt;
(Cynefin Framework). A Leader’s Framework for Decision Making, Snowden, D. J. et al. 2007 in Harvard Business Review&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S154073</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64319</id>
		<title>Unidentified Risks</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64319"/>
		<updated>2019-02-22T13:16:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S154073: /* Annotated bibliography */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any project there will be some risks that should be carefully managed, but there will also be uncertainty, which involves variability and ambiguity &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/civil-and-environmental-engineering/1-040-project-management-spring-2009/lecture-notes/MIT1_040s09_lec24.pdf free to share and adapt under Creative Commons terms: Attribution, noncommercial, share alike (https://ocw.mit.edu/terms/) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode). Slides by Fred Moavenzadeh from MIT &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. This article outlines four different types of uncertainty with the main focus on the unidentified risks (or the “unknown unknowns”). Unidentified risks are the risks that seem impossible to find. However, studies have found that they in fact are not unidentifiable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To describe uncertainty management in detail, this article will first explain what variability and ambiguity in projects consists of and then dig deeper into the different types of uncertainty. Finally, some tools to manage the unidentified risks are presented as well as a reflection on the usage of the tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the type of uncertainty that is generated due to lack of knowledge or unexpected events and changes in the project &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Slides from Project Management course (42429 F18)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Before a project is started, it is important to reflect on the possible factors that can influence the project. Part of this is to reflect on the types of uncertainty, namely the known knowns (change control), known unknowns (risk management), unknown knowns (planning &amp;amp; communication errors) and the unknown unknowns (unexpected events and changes). A model to describe these four types of uncertainty is the Cynefin Framework which is divided in to the following: Order, unorder and disorder. Unorder is furthermore divided in to the complex domain and the complicated domain, while order is divided in to the chaotic domain and the simple domain. The Cynefin Framework will be used as a model to describe the types of uncertainty throughout this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
To understand the theory of uncertainty management and thereby the importance of managing the unidentified risks, this section will first describe what uncertainty really is as well as link it to risk management. Furthermore, the different types of uncertainty will be outlined.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The British Standard (Axelos) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/lib/dtudk/reader.action?docID=4863041&amp;amp;ppg=30 Project Management: &amp;quot;Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2&amp;quot;, Axelos &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; distinguishes project work from “business as usual” by the following characteristics: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change, temporary, cross-functional, unique and uncertainty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Change implies that a project introduces a change from one state to another.&lt;br /&gt;
*Temporary is part of the definition of a project and means that business as usual returns after the project is finished. &lt;br /&gt;
*Cross-functional means that a project involves people from different backgrounds working together towards a common goal.&lt;br /&gt;
*Unique implies that no projects are identical &lt;br /&gt;
*Uncertainty covers the threats (and opportunities) that the other characteristics bring to the project work. These threats and opportunities are often bigger and more important than those in everyday work, meaning that projects are subject to more risk. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article focuses describes the uncertainty of projects. The term “uncertainty” is defined by Chapman and Ward (2002) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Chapman, Chris &amp;amp; Ward, Stephen. (2002). Managing Project Risk and Uncertainty : A Constructively Simple Approach to Decision Making / C. Chapman, S. Ward. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31747699_Managing_Project_Risk_and_Uncertainty_A_Constructively_Simple_Approach_to_Decision_Making_C_Chapman_S_Ward &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as “lack of certainty, involving variability and ambiguity”, where variability is “uncertainty about the size of parameters which may result from lack of data, lack of detail, lack of definition, lack of experience and so on, which may be quantified if this is useful” and ambiguity is “the aspects of uncertainty not addressed in terms of variability”. Uncertainty can thereby be defined as the aspects of a project that may influence it either positively or negatively which is why uncertainty management is divided into opportunity management (which controls the positive influences) and risk management (which controls the negative influences) (MIT). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Classification of uncertainty===&lt;br /&gt;
In 2002 the former U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Henry Rumsfeld mentioned “unknown unknowns” in a Department of Defense news briefing &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiPe1OiKQuk Donald Rumsfeld DoD briefing &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.This made people try to understand the different types of uncertainty by classifying the knowledge. David Cleden (2009) uses the typical classification of risks, which is based on the knowledge of an event’s occurrence and impact, to list four possibilities: &lt;br /&gt;
*Known–knowns (knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–knowns (untapped knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Known–unknowns (risks)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–unknowns (unfathomable uncertainty)&lt;br /&gt;
The following will describe, and provide examples of, the different elements. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The known knowns are the knowledge used in the planning phase of a project. This means that even before the project has started, the people involved in the project are aware of basic knowledge or theory behind the project. A very simple example could be that, in a building project, all participants are aware that a lot of money will be spent on materials, salaries and so on. It could also be to identify the obvious stakeholders of the project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Since a project consists of people from different backgrounds with different skillsets, and there is limited space or resources to hire experts on every single aspect of the project, there will be unknown knowns in a project. These consist of knowledge that is not apparent within the project group but can be gathered from experts on the areas. In the example of a building project, this could be knowledge of an external consultant providing additional details to the planning process of the project.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Known unknowns are risks that the project group is aware of the existence of and want to manage carefully. In this sense, the risks are negative impacts on the project that the project has to minimize. These can be risks of material shortage or negative stakeholder involvement in a building project. The risk of negative stakeholder involvement could be due to poor communication to the important stakeholders which leads to them intervening in the project and possibly setting it back to an earlier state. Therefore, the known unknowns are part of risk management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the known unknowns that are yet to be identified. As it is located in the cross-section of the uncertain and unidentified, these risks are by far the most difficult to manage. An unknown unknown is an event or impact on a project that is considered unfathomable or even unimaginable which is why they are so difficult to consider in the planning process of a project. It is furthermore difficult to provide an example of an unknown unknown as these are risks that seem unidentifiable, although this article will provide some tools to convert the unknown unknowns into known unknowns which make them easier to manage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To summarize, the different elements can be shortly described (Market Business News):&lt;br /&gt;
*The known knowns are the things we are aware of and understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown knowns are the things understand but aren’t aware of.&lt;br /&gt;
*The known unknowns are the things we are aware of but don’t understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown unknowns are the things we are neither aware of nor understand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Models of uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces models to understand and manage uncertainty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Risk classification===&lt;br /&gt;
To simplify the classification mentioned in the previous section, the knowledge of an event’s occurrence is labeled “identification” and the knowledge of an event’s impact is labeled “certainty”. In the matrix below, the four different types of (un)certainty are portrayed &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Kim, S. D. (2012). Characterizing unknown unknowns. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The matrix is divided in to certainty and identification. The idea is that “identification” is defined as either “knowledge” or “risk”, i.e. positive or negative and that “certainty” is whether or not we know that a certain event, that can influence the project, exists. This implies that the factors or events that we know exist and have knowledge about are relatively easy to identify and manage whereas the unknown unknowns are much harder to identify and therefore manage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:table_of_uncertainty_1.jpg|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Cynefin Framework===&lt;br /&gt;
The Cynefin Framework is a tool developed by David J. Snowden and other contributors (HBR ref.) to determine contexts enabling leaders to make appropriate choices. The framework consists of five domains: Simple, complicated, complex, chaotic and disorder. The first two are placed in to the “ordered universe” where facts are applicable. Complex and chaotic are placed in the “un-ordered universe” where the relationship between cause and effect is not immediately apparent. Below, the different domains are shortly explained and linked to the above model:&lt;br /&gt;
*The simple domain are the known knowns where it is possible to categorize the situation based on facts on the area.&lt;br /&gt;
*The complicated domain are the known unknowns where the situation isn’t immediately apparent, but it is possible to analyze the situation. &lt;br /&gt;
*The complex domain are the unknown unknowns where the outcome cannot be immediately determined but experiments will lead towards the correct direction.&lt;br /&gt;
*The chaotic domain are the unknowable unknowns where nothing makes sense and we search for ways to move more towards the complex domain.&lt;br /&gt;
*Disorder is a mix of the above domains and the situation has to be broken down in to parts to assign to the other domains. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Cynefin_Framework_(HBR).gif|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much like the model described in the above section, this framework suggests that the easiest situation is the simple domain, where the known knowns are found. Furthermore, the framework provides tools for leaders to manage their way out of the above situations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Tools==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces some tools to minimize the known unknown risks or identify the unknown unknown risks. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Application==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the application will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the limitations will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Here the bibliography will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kim, S. D. (2012). Characterizing unknown unknowns. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/civil-and-environmental-engineering/1-040-project-management-spring-2009/lecture-notes/MIT1_040s09_lec24.pdf free to share and adapt under Creative Commons terms: Attribution, noncommercial, share alike (https://ocw.mit.edu/terms/) &lt;br /&gt;
Slides by Fred Moavenzadeh from MIT&lt;br /&gt;
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chapman, Chris &amp;amp; Ward, Stephen. (2002). Managing Project Risk and Uncertainty : A Constructively Simple Approach to Decision Making / C. Chapman, S. Ward.&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31747699_Managing_Project_Risk_and_Uncertainty_A_Constructively_Simple_Approach_to_Decision_Making_C_Chapman_S_Ward &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiPe1OiKQuk Donald Rumsfeld DoD briefing. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Managing-Project-Uncertainty-Advances-Management/dp/B00SLUXH2E Managing Project Uncertainty (Advances in Project Management): Written by David Cleden, 2009 Edition, (1st Edition) Publisher: Gower &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://marketbusinessnews.com/financial-glossary/financial-glossary-u/unknown-unknowns/ summary of knowns.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://pmiswohio.org/images/downloads/Summit18/hatter_cynefin_framework_summit18_03202018.pdf Cynefin Framewok (PMI SW Ohio)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://hbr.org/2007/11/a-leaders-framework-for-decision-making &lt;br /&gt;
(Cynefin Framework). A Leader’s Framework for Decision Making, Snowden, D. J. et al. 2007 in Harvard Business Review&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S154073</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64313</id>
		<title>Unidentified Risks</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64313"/>
		<updated>2019-02-22T13:15:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S154073: /* Classification of uncertainty */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any project there will be some risks that should be carefully managed, but there will also be uncertainty, which involves variability and ambiguity &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/civil-and-environmental-engineering/1-040-project-management-spring-2009/lecture-notes/MIT1_040s09_lec24.pdf free to share and adapt under Creative Commons terms: Attribution, noncommercial, share alike (https://ocw.mit.edu/terms/) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode). Slides by Fred Moavenzadeh from MIT &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. This article outlines four different types of uncertainty with the main focus on the unidentified risks (or the “unknown unknowns”). Unidentified risks are the risks that seem impossible to find. However, studies have found that they in fact are not unidentifiable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To describe uncertainty management in detail, this article will first explain what variability and ambiguity in projects consists of and then dig deeper into the different types of uncertainty. Finally, some tools to manage the unidentified risks are presented as well as a reflection on the usage of the tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the type of uncertainty that is generated due to lack of knowledge or unexpected events and changes in the project &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Slides from Project Management course (42429 F18)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Before a project is started, it is important to reflect on the possible factors that can influence the project. Part of this is to reflect on the types of uncertainty, namely the known knowns (change control), known unknowns (risk management), unknown knowns (planning &amp;amp; communication errors) and the unknown unknowns (unexpected events and changes). A model to describe these four types of uncertainty is the Cynefin Framework which is divided in to the following: Order, unorder and disorder. Unorder is furthermore divided in to the complex domain and the complicated domain, while order is divided in to the chaotic domain and the simple domain. The Cynefin Framework will be used as a model to describe the types of uncertainty throughout this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
To understand the theory of uncertainty management and thereby the importance of managing the unidentified risks, this section will first describe what uncertainty really is as well as link it to risk management. Furthermore, the different types of uncertainty will be outlined.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The British Standard (Axelos) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/lib/dtudk/reader.action?docID=4863041&amp;amp;ppg=30 Project Management: &amp;quot;Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2&amp;quot;, Axelos &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; distinguishes project work from “business as usual” by the following characteristics: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change, temporary, cross-functional, unique and uncertainty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Change implies that a project introduces a change from one state to another.&lt;br /&gt;
*Temporary is part of the definition of a project and means that business as usual returns after the project is finished. &lt;br /&gt;
*Cross-functional means that a project involves people from different backgrounds working together towards a common goal.&lt;br /&gt;
*Unique implies that no projects are identical &lt;br /&gt;
*Uncertainty covers the threats (and opportunities) that the other characteristics bring to the project work. These threats and opportunities are often bigger and more important than those in everyday work, meaning that projects are subject to more risk. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article focuses describes the uncertainty of projects. The term “uncertainty” is defined by Chapman and Ward (2002) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Chapman, Chris &amp;amp; Ward, Stephen. (2002). Managing Project Risk and Uncertainty : A Constructively Simple Approach to Decision Making / C. Chapman, S. Ward. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31747699_Managing_Project_Risk_and_Uncertainty_A_Constructively_Simple_Approach_to_Decision_Making_C_Chapman_S_Ward &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as “lack of certainty, involving variability and ambiguity”, where variability is “uncertainty about the size of parameters which may result from lack of data, lack of detail, lack of definition, lack of experience and so on, which may be quantified if this is useful” and ambiguity is “the aspects of uncertainty not addressed in terms of variability”. Uncertainty can thereby be defined as the aspects of a project that may influence it either positively or negatively which is why uncertainty management is divided into opportunity management (which controls the positive influences) and risk management (which controls the negative influences) (MIT). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Classification of uncertainty===&lt;br /&gt;
In 2002 the former U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Henry Rumsfeld mentioned “unknown unknowns” in a Department of Defense news briefing &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiPe1OiKQuk Donald Rumsfeld DoD briefing &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.This made people try to understand the different types of uncertainty by classifying the knowledge. David Cleden (2009) uses the typical classification of risks, which is based on the knowledge of an event’s occurrence and impact, to list four possibilities: &lt;br /&gt;
*Known–knowns (knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–knowns (untapped knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Known–unknowns (risks)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–unknowns (unfathomable uncertainty)&lt;br /&gt;
The following will describe, and provide examples of, the different elements. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The known knowns are the knowledge used in the planning phase of a project. This means that even before the project has started, the people involved in the project are aware of basic knowledge or theory behind the project. A very simple example could be that, in a building project, all participants are aware that a lot of money will be spent on materials, salaries and so on. It could also be to identify the obvious stakeholders of the project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Since a project consists of people from different backgrounds with different skillsets, and there is limited space or resources to hire experts on every single aspect of the project, there will be unknown knowns in a project. These consist of knowledge that is not apparent within the project group but can be gathered from experts on the areas. In the example of a building project, this could be knowledge of an external consultant providing additional details to the planning process of the project.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Known unknowns are risks that the project group is aware of the existence of and want to manage carefully. In this sense, the risks are negative impacts on the project that the project has to minimize. These can be risks of material shortage or negative stakeholder involvement in a building project. The risk of negative stakeholder involvement could be due to poor communication to the important stakeholders which leads to them intervening in the project and possibly setting it back to an earlier state. Therefore, the known unknowns are part of risk management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the known unknowns that are yet to be identified. As it is located in the cross-section of the uncertain and unidentified, these risks are by far the most difficult to manage. An unknown unknown is an event or impact on a project that is considered unfathomable or even unimaginable which is why they are so difficult to consider in the planning process of a project. It is furthermore difficult to provide an example of an unknown unknown as these are risks that seem unidentifiable, although this article will provide some tools to convert the unknown unknowns into known unknowns which make them easier to manage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To summarize, the different elements can be shortly described (Market Business News):&lt;br /&gt;
*The known knowns are the things we are aware of and understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown knowns are the things understand but aren’t aware of.&lt;br /&gt;
*The known unknowns are the things we are aware of but don’t understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown unknowns are the things we are neither aware of nor understand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Models of uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces models to understand and manage uncertainty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Risk classification===&lt;br /&gt;
To simplify the classification mentioned in the previous section, the knowledge of an event’s occurrence is labeled “identification” and the knowledge of an event’s impact is labeled “certainty”. In the matrix below, the four different types of (un)certainty are portrayed &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Kim, S. D. (2012). Characterizing unknown unknowns. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The matrix is divided in to certainty and identification. The idea is that “identification” is defined as either “knowledge” or “risk”, i.e. positive or negative and that “certainty” is whether or not we know that a certain event, that can influence the project, exists. This implies that the factors or events that we know exist and have knowledge about are relatively easy to identify and manage whereas the unknown unknowns are much harder to identify and therefore manage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:table_of_uncertainty_1.jpg|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Cynefin Framework===&lt;br /&gt;
The Cynefin Framework is a tool developed by David J. Snowden and other contributors (HBR ref.) to determine contexts enabling leaders to make appropriate choices. The framework consists of five domains: Simple, complicated, complex, chaotic and disorder. The first two are placed in to the “ordered universe” where facts are applicable. Complex and chaotic are placed in the “un-ordered universe” where the relationship between cause and effect is not immediately apparent. Below, the different domains are shortly explained and linked to the above model:&lt;br /&gt;
*The simple domain are the known knowns where it is possible to categorize the situation based on facts on the area.&lt;br /&gt;
*The complicated domain are the known unknowns where the situation isn’t immediately apparent, but it is possible to analyze the situation. &lt;br /&gt;
*The complex domain are the unknown unknowns where the outcome cannot be immediately determined but experiments will lead towards the correct direction.&lt;br /&gt;
*The chaotic domain are the unknowable unknowns where nothing makes sense and we search for ways to move more towards the complex domain.&lt;br /&gt;
*Disorder is a mix of the above domains and the situation has to be broken down in to parts to assign to the other domains. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Cynefin_Framework_(HBR).gif|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much like the model described in the above section, this framework suggests that the easiest situation is the simple domain, where the known knowns are found. Furthermore, the framework provides tools for leaders to manage their way out of the above situations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Tools==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces some tools to minimize the known unknown risks or identify the unknown unknown risks. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Application==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the application will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the limitations will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Here the bibliography will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kim, S. D. (2012). Characterizing unknown unknowns. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/civil-and-environmental-engineering/1-040-project-management-spring-2009/lecture-notes/MIT1_040s09_lec24.pdf free to share and adapt under Creative Commons terms: Attribution, noncommercial, share alike (https://ocw.mit.edu/terms/) &lt;br /&gt;
Slides by Fred Moavenzadeh from MIT&lt;br /&gt;
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chapman, Chris &amp;amp; Ward, Stephen. (2002). Managing Project Risk and Uncertainty : A Constructively Simple Approach to Decision Making / C. Chapman, S. Ward.&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31747699_Managing_Project_Risk_and_Uncertainty_A_Constructively_Simple_Approach_to_Decision_Making_C_Chapman_S_Ward &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiPe1OiKQuk Donald Rumsfeld DoD briefing. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Managing-Project-Uncertainty-Advances-Management/dp/B00SLUXH2E Cleden, D. (2009) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://marketbusinessnews.com/financial-glossary/financial-glossary-u/unknown-unknowns/ summary of knowns.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://pmiswohio.org/images/downloads/Summit18/hatter_cynefin_framework_summit18_03202018.pdf Cynefin Framewok (PMI SW Ohio)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://hbr.org/2007/11/a-leaders-framework-for-decision-making &lt;br /&gt;
(Cynefin Framework). A Leader’s Framework for Decision Making, Snowden, D. J. et al. 2007 in Harvard Business Review&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S154073</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64308</id>
		<title>Unidentified Risks</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64308"/>
		<updated>2019-02-22T13:14:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S154073: /* Uncertainty */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any project there will be some risks that should be carefully managed, but there will also be uncertainty, which involves variability and ambiguity &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/civil-and-environmental-engineering/1-040-project-management-spring-2009/lecture-notes/MIT1_040s09_lec24.pdf free to share and adapt under Creative Commons terms: Attribution, noncommercial, share alike (https://ocw.mit.edu/terms/) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode). Slides by Fred Moavenzadeh from MIT &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. This article outlines four different types of uncertainty with the main focus on the unidentified risks (or the “unknown unknowns”). Unidentified risks are the risks that seem impossible to find. However, studies have found that they in fact are not unidentifiable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To describe uncertainty management in detail, this article will first explain what variability and ambiguity in projects consists of and then dig deeper into the different types of uncertainty. Finally, some tools to manage the unidentified risks are presented as well as a reflection on the usage of the tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the type of uncertainty that is generated due to lack of knowledge or unexpected events and changes in the project &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Slides from Project Management course (42429 F18)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Before a project is started, it is important to reflect on the possible factors that can influence the project. Part of this is to reflect on the types of uncertainty, namely the known knowns (change control), known unknowns (risk management), unknown knowns (planning &amp;amp; communication errors) and the unknown unknowns (unexpected events and changes). A model to describe these four types of uncertainty is the Cynefin Framework which is divided in to the following: Order, unorder and disorder. Unorder is furthermore divided in to the complex domain and the complicated domain, while order is divided in to the chaotic domain and the simple domain. The Cynefin Framework will be used as a model to describe the types of uncertainty throughout this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
To understand the theory of uncertainty management and thereby the importance of managing the unidentified risks, this section will first describe what uncertainty really is as well as link it to risk management. Furthermore, the different types of uncertainty will be outlined.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The British Standard (Axelos) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/lib/dtudk/reader.action?docID=4863041&amp;amp;ppg=30 Project Management: &amp;quot;Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2&amp;quot;, Axelos &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; distinguishes project work from “business as usual” by the following characteristics: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change, temporary, cross-functional, unique and uncertainty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Change implies that a project introduces a change from one state to another.&lt;br /&gt;
*Temporary is part of the definition of a project and means that business as usual returns after the project is finished. &lt;br /&gt;
*Cross-functional means that a project involves people from different backgrounds working together towards a common goal.&lt;br /&gt;
*Unique implies that no projects are identical &lt;br /&gt;
*Uncertainty covers the threats (and opportunities) that the other characteristics bring to the project work. These threats and opportunities are often bigger and more important than those in everyday work, meaning that projects are subject to more risk. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article focuses describes the uncertainty of projects. The term “uncertainty” is defined by Chapman and Ward (2002) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Chapman, Chris &amp;amp; Ward, Stephen. (2002). Managing Project Risk and Uncertainty : A Constructively Simple Approach to Decision Making / C. Chapman, S. Ward. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31747699_Managing_Project_Risk_and_Uncertainty_A_Constructively_Simple_Approach_to_Decision_Making_C_Chapman_S_Ward &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as “lack of certainty, involving variability and ambiguity”, where variability is “uncertainty about the size of parameters which may result from lack of data, lack of detail, lack of definition, lack of experience and so on, which may be quantified if this is useful” and ambiguity is “the aspects of uncertainty not addressed in terms of variability”. Uncertainty can thereby be defined as the aspects of a project that may influence it either positively or negatively which is why uncertainty management is divided into opportunity management (which controls the positive influences) and risk management (which controls the negative influences) (MIT). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Classification of uncertainty===&lt;br /&gt;
In 2002 the former U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Henry Rumsfeld mentioned “unknown unknowns” in a Department of Defense news briefing (YT). This made people try to understand the different types of uncertainty by classifying the knowledge. David Cleden (2009) uses the typical classification of risks, which is based on the knowledge of an event’s occurrence and impact, to list four possibilities: &lt;br /&gt;
*Known–knowns (knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–knowns (untapped knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Known–unknowns (risks)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–unknowns (unfathomable uncertainty)&lt;br /&gt;
The following will describe, and provide examples of, the different elements. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The known knowns are the knowledge used in the planning phase of a project. This means that even before the project has started, the people involved in the project are aware of basic knowledge or theory behind the project. A very simple example could be that, in a building project, all participants are aware that a lot of money will be spent on materials, salaries and so on. It could also be to identify the obvious stakeholders of the project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Since a project consists of people from different backgrounds with different skillsets, and there is limited space or resources to hire experts on every single aspect of the project, there will be unknown knowns in a project. These consist of knowledge that is not apparent within the project group but can be gathered from experts on the areas. In the example of a building project, this could be knowledge of an external consultant providing additional details to the planning process of the project.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Known unknowns are risks that the project group is aware of the existence of and want to manage carefully. In this sense, the risks are negative impacts on the project that the project has to minimize. These can be risks of material shortage or negative stakeholder involvement in a building project. The risk of negative stakeholder involvement could be due to poor communication to the important stakeholders which leads to them intervening in the project and possibly setting it back to an earlier state. Therefore, the known unknowns are part of risk management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the known unknowns that are yet to be identified. As it is located in the cross-section of the uncertain and unidentified, these risks are by far the most difficult to manage. An unknown unknown is an event or impact on a project that is considered unfathomable or even unimaginable which is why they are so difficult to consider in the planning process of a project. It is furthermore difficult to provide an example of an unknown unknown as these are risks that seem unidentifiable, although this article will provide some tools to convert the unknown unknowns into known unknowns which make them easier to manage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To summarize, the different elements can be shortly described (Market Business News):&lt;br /&gt;
*The known knowns are the things we are aware of and understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown knowns are the things understand but aren’t aware of.&lt;br /&gt;
*The known unknowns are the things we are aware of but don’t understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown unknowns are the things we are neither aware of nor understand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Models of uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces models to understand and manage uncertainty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Risk classification===&lt;br /&gt;
To simplify the classification mentioned in the previous section, the knowledge of an event’s occurrence is labeled “identification” and the knowledge of an event’s impact is labeled “certainty”. In the matrix below, the four different types of (un)certainty are portrayed &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Kim, S. D. (2012). Characterizing unknown unknowns. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The matrix is divided in to certainty and identification. The idea is that “identification” is defined as either “knowledge” or “risk”, i.e. positive or negative and that “certainty” is whether or not we know that a certain event, that can influence the project, exists. This implies that the factors or events that we know exist and have knowledge about are relatively easy to identify and manage whereas the unknown unknowns are much harder to identify and therefore manage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:table_of_uncertainty_1.jpg|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Cynefin Framework===&lt;br /&gt;
The Cynefin Framework is a tool developed by David J. Snowden and other contributors (HBR ref.) to determine contexts enabling leaders to make appropriate choices. The framework consists of five domains: Simple, complicated, complex, chaotic and disorder. The first two are placed in to the “ordered universe” where facts are applicable. Complex and chaotic are placed in the “un-ordered universe” where the relationship between cause and effect is not immediately apparent. Below, the different domains are shortly explained and linked to the above model:&lt;br /&gt;
*The simple domain are the known knowns where it is possible to categorize the situation based on facts on the area.&lt;br /&gt;
*The complicated domain are the known unknowns where the situation isn’t immediately apparent, but it is possible to analyze the situation. &lt;br /&gt;
*The complex domain are the unknown unknowns where the outcome cannot be immediately determined but experiments will lead towards the correct direction.&lt;br /&gt;
*The chaotic domain are the unknowable unknowns where nothing makes sense and we search for ways to move more towards the complex domain.&lt;br /&gt;
*Disorder is a mix of the above domains and the situation has to be broken down in to parts to assign to the other domains. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Cynefin_Framework_(HBR).gif|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much like the model described in the above section, this framework suggests that the easiest situation is the simple domain, where the known knowns are found. Furthermore, the framework provides tools for leaders to manage their way out of the above situations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Tools==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces some tools to minimize the known unknown risks or identify the unknown unknown risks. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Application==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the application will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the limitations will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Here the bibliography will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kim, S. D. (2012). Characterizing unknown unknowns. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/civil-and-environmental-engineering/1-040-project-management-spring-2009/lecture-notes/MIT1_040s09_lec24.pdf free to share and adapt under Creative Commons terms: Attribution, noncommercial, share alike (https://ocw.mit.edu/terms/) &lt;br /&gt;
Slides by Fred Moavenzadeh from MIT&lt;br /&gt;
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chapman, Chris &amp;amp; Ward, Stephen. (2002). Managing Project Risk and Uncertainty : A Constructively Simple Approach to Decision Making / C. Chapman, S. Ward.&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31747699_Managing_Project_Risk_and_Uncertainty_A_Constructively_Simple_Approach_to_Decision_Making_C_Chapman_S_Ward &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiPe1OiKQuk Donald Rumsfeld DoD briefing. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Managing-Project-Uncertainty-Advances-Management/dp/B00SLUXH2E Cleden, D. (2009) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://marketbusinessnews.com/financial-glossary/financial-glossary-u/unknown-unknowns/ summary of knowns.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://pmiswohio.org/images/downloads/Summit18/hatter_cynefin_framework_summit18_03202018.pdf Cynefin Framewok (PMI SW Ohio)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://hbr.org/2007/11/a-leaders-framework-for-decision-making &lt;br /&gt;
(Cynefin Framework). A Leader’s Framework for Decision Making, Snowden, D. J. et al. 2007 in Harvard Business Review&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S154073</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64303</id>
		<title>Unidentified Risks</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64303"/>
		<updated>2019-02-22T13:14:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S154073: /* Uncertainty */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any project there will be some risks that should be carefully managed, but there will also be uncertainty, which involves variability and ambiguity &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/civil-and-environmental-engineering/1-040-project-management-spring-2009/lecture-notes/MIT1_040s09_lec24.pdf free to share and adapt under Creative Commons terms: Attribution, noncommercial, share alike (https://ocw.mit.edu/terms/) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode). Slides by Fred Moavenzadeh from MIT &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. This article outlines four different types of uncertainty with the main focus on the unidentified risks (or the “unknown unknowns”). Unidentified risks are the risks that seem impossible to find. However, studies have found that they in fact are not unidentifiable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To describe uncertainty management in detail, this article will first explain what variability and ambiguity in projects consists of and then dig deeper into the different types of uncertainty. Finally, some tools to manage the unidentified risks are presented as well as a reflection on the usage of the tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the type of uncertainty that is generated due to lack of knowledge or unexpected events and changes in the project &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Slides from Project Management course (42429 F18)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Before a project is started, it is important to reflect on the possible factors that can influence the project. Part of this is to reflect on the types of uncertainty, namely the known knowns (change control), known unknowns (risk management), unknown knowns (planning &amp;amp; communication errors) and the unknown unknowns (unexpected events and changes). A model to describe these four types of uncertainty is the Cynefin Framework which is divided in to the following: Order, unorder and disorder. Unorder is furthermore divided in to the complex domain and the complicated domain, while order is divided in to the chaotic domain and the simple domain. The Cynefin Framework will be used as a model to describe the types of uncertainty throughout this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
To understand the theory of uncertainty management and thereby the importance of managing the unidentified risks, this section will first describe what uncertainty really is as well as link it to risk management. Furthermore, the different types of uncertainty will be outlined.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The British Standard (Axelos) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/lib/dtudk/reader.action?docID=4863041&amp;amp;ppg=30 Project Management: &amp;quot;Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2&amp;quot;, Axelos &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; distinguishes project work from “business as usual” by the following characteristics: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change, temporary, cross-functional, unique and uncertainty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Change implies that a project introduces a change from one state to another.&lt;br /&gt;
*Temporary is part of the definition of a project and means that business as usual returns after the project is finished. &lt;br /&gt;
*Cross-functional means that a project involves people from different backgrounds working together towards a common goal.&lt;br /&gt;
*Unique implies that no projects are identical &lt;br /&gt;
*Uncertainty covers the threats (and opportunities) that the other characteristics bring to the project work. These threats and opportunities are often bigger and more important than those in everyday work, meaning that projects are subject to more risk. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article focuses describes the uncertainty of projects. The term “uncertainty” is defined by Chapman and Ward (2002) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Kim, S. D. (2012). Characterizing unknown unknowns. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as “lack of certainty, involving variability and ambiguity”, where variability is “uncertainty about the size of parameters which may result from lack of data, lack of detail, lack of definition, lack of experience and so on, which may be quantified if this is useful” and ambiguity is “the aspects of uncertainty not addressed in terms of variability”. Uncertainty can thereby be defined as the aspects of a project that may influence it either positively or negatively which is why uncertainty management is divided into opportunity management (which controls the positive influences) and risk management (which controls the negative influences) (MIT). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Classification of uncertainty===&lt;br /&gt;
In 2002 the former U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Henry Rumsfeld mentioned “unknown unknowns” in a Department of Defense news briefing (YT). This made people try to understand the different types of uncertainty by classifying the knowledge. David Cleden (2009) uses the typical classification of risks, which is based on the knowledge of an event’s occurrence and impact, to list four possibilities: &lt;br /&gt;
*Known–knowns (knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–knowns (untapped knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Known–unknowns (risks)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–unknowns (unfathomable uncertainty)&lt;br /&gt;
The following will describe, and provide examples of, the different elements. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The known knowns are the knowledge used in the planning phase of a project. This means that even before the project has started, the people involved in the project are aware of basic knowledge or theory behind the project. A very simple example could be that, in a building project, all participants are aware that a lot of money will be spent on materials, salaries and so on. It could also be to identify the obvious stakeholders of the project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Since a project consists of people from different backgrounds with different skillsets, and there is limited space or resources to hire experts on every single aspect of the project, there will be unknown knowns in a project. These consist of knowledge that is not apparent within the project group but can be gathered from experts on the areas. In the example of a building project, this could be knowledge of an external consultant providing additional details to the planning process of the project.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Known unknowns are risks that the project group is aware of the existence of and want to manage carefully. In this sense, the risks are negative impacts on the project that the project has to minimize. These can be risks of material shortage or negative stakeholder involvement in a building project. The risk of negative stakeholder involvement could be due to poor communication to the important stakeholders which leads to them intervening in the project and possibly setting it back to an earlier state. Therefore, the known unknowns are part of risk management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the known unknowns that are yet to be identified. As it is located in the cross-section of the uncertain and unidentified, these risks are by far the most difficult to manage. An unknown unknown is an event or impact on a project that is considered unfathomable or even unimaginable which is why they are so difficult to consider in the planning process of a project. It is furthermore difficult to provide an example of an unknown unknown as these are risks that seem unidentifiable, although this article will provide some tools to convert the unknown unknowns into known unknowns which make them easier to manage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To summarize, the different elements can be shortly described (Market Business News):&lt;br /&gt;
*The known knowns are the things we are aware of and understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown knowns are the things understand but aren’t aware of.&lt;br /&gt;
*The known unknowns are the things we are aware of but don’t understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown unknowns are the things we are neither aware of nor understand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Models of uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces models to understand and manage uncertainty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Risk classification===&lt;br /&gt;
To simplify the classification mentioned in the previous section, the knowledge of an event’s occurrence is labeled “identification” and the knowledge of an event’s impact is labeled “certainty”. In the matrix below, the four different types of (un)certainty are portrayed &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Kim, S. D. (2012). Characterizing unknown unknowns. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The matrix is divided in to certainty and identification. The idea is that “identification” is defined as either “knowledge” or “risk”, i.e. positive or negative and that “certainty” is whether or not we know that a certain event, that can influence the project, exists. This implies that the factors or events that we know exist and have knowledge about are relatively easy to identify and manage whereas the unknown unknowns are much harder to identify and therefore manage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:table_of_uncertainty_1.jpg|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Cynefin Framework===&lt;br /&gt;
The Cynefin Framework is a tool developed by David J. Snowden and other contributors (HBR ref.) to determine contexts enabling leaders to make appropriate choices. The framework consists of five domains: Simple, complicated, complex, chaotic and disorder. The first two are placed in to the “ordered universe” where facts are applicable. Complex and chaotic are placed in the “un-ordered universe” where the relationship between cause and effect is not immediately apparent. Below, the different domains are shortly explained and linked to the above model:&lt;br /&gt;
*The simple domain are the known knowns where it is possible to categorize the situation based on facts on the area.&lt;br /&gt;
*The complicated domain are the known unknowns where the situation isn’t immediately apparent, but it is possible to analyze the situation. &lt;br /&gt;
*The complex domain are the unknown unknowns where the outcome cannot be immediately determined but experiments will lead towards the correct direction.&lt;br /&gt;
*The chaotic domain are the unknowable unknowns where nothing makes sense and we search for ways to move more towards the complex domain.&lt;br /&gt;
*Disorder is a mix of the above domains and the situation has to be broken down in to parts to assign to the other domains. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Cynefin_Framework_(HBR).gif|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much like the model described in the above section, this framework suggests that the easiest situation is the simple domain, where the known knowns are found. Furthermore, the framework provides tools for leaders to manage their way out of the above situations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Tools==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces some tools to minimize the known unknown risks or identify the unknown unknown risks. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Application==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the application will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the limitations will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Here the bibliography will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kim, S. D. (2012). Characterizing unknown unknowns. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/civil-and-environmental-engineering/1-040-project-management-spring-2009/lecture-notes/MIT1_040s09_lec24.pdf free to share and adapt under Creative Commons terms: Attribution, noncommercial, share alike (https://ocw.mit.edu/terms/) &lt;br /&gt;
Slides by Fred Moavenzadeh from MIT&lt;br /&gt;
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chapman, Chris &amp;amp; Ward, Stephen. (2002). Managing Project Risk and Uncertainty : A Constructively Simple Approach to Decision Making / C. Chapman, S. Ward.&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31747699_Managing_Project_Risk_and_Uncertainty_A_Constructively_Simple_Approach_to_Decision_Making_C_Chapman_S_Ward &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiPe1OiKQuk Donald Rumsfeld DoD briefing. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Managing-Project-Uncertainty-Advances-Management/dp/B00SLUXH2E Cleden, D. (2009) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://marketbusinessnews.com/financial-glossary/financial-glossary-u/unknown-unknowns/ summary of knowns.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://pmiswohio.org/images/downloads/Summit18/hatter_cynefin_framework_summit18_03202018.pdf Cynefin Framewok (PMI SW Ohio)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://hbr.org/2007/11/a-leaders-framework-for-decision-making &lt;br /&gt;
(Cynefin Framework). A Leader’s Framework for Decision Making, Snowden, D. J. et al. 2007 in Harvard Business Review&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S154073</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64299</id>
		<title>Unidentified Risks</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64299"/>
		<updated>2019-02-22T13:12:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S154073: /* Risk classification */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any project there will be some risks that should be carefully managed, but there will also be uncertainty, which involves variability and ambiguity &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/civil-and-environmental-engineering/1-040-project-management-spring-2009/lecture-notes/MIT1_040s09_lec24.pdf free to share and adapt under Creative Commons terms: Attribution, noncommercial, share alike (https://ocw.mit.edu/terms/) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode). Slides by Fred Moavenzadeh from MIT &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. This article outlines four different types of uncertainty with the main focus on the unidentified risks (or the “unknown unknowns”). Unidentified risks are the risks that seem impossible to find. However, studies have found that they in fact are not unidentifiable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To describe uncertainty management in detail, this article will first explain what variability and ambiguity in projects consists of and then dig deeper into the different types of uncertainty. Finally, some tools to manage the unidentified risks are presented as well as a reflection on the usage of the tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the type of uncertainty that is generated due to lack of knowledge or unexpected events and changes in the project &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Slides from Project Management course (42429 F18)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Before a project is started, it is important to reflect on the possible factors that can influence the project. Part of this is to reflect on the types of uncertainty, namely the known knowns (change control), known unknowns (risk management), unknown knowns (planning &amp;amp; communication errors) and the unknown unknowns (unexpected events and changes). A model to describe these four types of uncertainty is the Cynefin Framework which is divided in to the following: Order, unorder and disorder. Unorder is furthermore divided in to the complex domain and the complicated domain, while order is divided in to the chaotic domain and the simple domain. The Cynefin Framework will be used as a model to describe the types of uncertainty throughout this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
To understand the theory of uncertainty management and thereby the importance of managing the unidentified risks, this section will first describe what uncertainty really is as well as link it to risk management. Furthermore, the different types of uncertainty will be outlined.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The British Standard (Axelos) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/lib/dtudk/reader.action?docID=4863041&amp;amp;ppg=30 Project Management: &amp;quot;Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2&amp;quot;, Axelos &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; distinguishes project work from “business as usual” by the following characteristics: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change, temporary, cross-functional, unique and uncertainty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Change implies that a project introduces a change from one state to another.&lt;br /&gt;
*Temporary is part of the definition of a project and means that business as usual returns after the project is finished. &lt;br /&gt;
*Cross-functional means that a project involves people from different backgrounds working together towards a common goal.&lt;br /&gt;
*Unique implies that no projects are identical &lt;br /&gt;
*Uncertainty covers the threats (and opportunities) that the other characteristics bring to the project work. These threats and opportunities are often bigger and more important than those in everyday work, meaning that projects are subject to more risk. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article focuses describes the uncertainty of projects. The term “uncertainty” is defined by Chapman and Ward (2002) as “lack of certainty, involving variability and ambiguity”, where variability is “uncertainty about the size of parameters which may result from lack of data, lack of detail, lack of definition, lack of experience and so on, which may be quantified if this is useful” and ambiguity is “the aspects of uncertainty not addressed in terms of variability”. Uncertainty can thereby be defined as the aspects of a project that may influence it either positively or negatively which is why uncertainty management is divided into opportunity management (which controls the positive influences) and risk management (which controls the negative influences) (MIT). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Classification of uncertainty===&lt;br /&gt;
In 2002 the former U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Henry Rumsfeld mentioned “unknown unknowns” in a Department of Defense news briefing (YT). This made people try to understand the different types of uncertainty by classifying the knowledge. David Cleden (2009) uses the typical classification of risks, which is based on the knowledge of an event’s occurrence and impact, to list four possibilities: &lt;br /&gt;
*Known–knowns (knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–knowns (untapped knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Known–unknowns (risks)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–unknowns (unfathomable uncertainty)&lt;br /&gt;
The following will describe, and provide examples of, the different elements. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The known knowns are the knowledge used in the planning phase of a project. This means that even before the project has started, the people involved in the project are aware of basic knowledge or theory behind the project. A very simple example could be that, in a building project, all participants are aware that a lot of money will be spent on materials, salaries and so on. It could also be to identify the obvious stakeholders of the project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Since a project consists of people from different backgrounds with different skillsets, and there is limited space or resources to hire experts on every single aspect of the project, there will be unknown knowns in a project. These consist of knowledge that is not apparent within the project group but can be gathered from experts on the areas. In the example of a building project, this could be knowledge of an external consultant providing additional details to the planning process of the project.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Known unknowns are risks that the project group is aware of the existence of and want to manage carefully. In this sense, the risks are negative impacts on the project that the project has to minimize. These can be risks of material shortage or negative stakeholder involvement in a building project. The risk of negative stakeholder involvement could be due to poor communication to the important stakeholders which leads to them intervening in the project and possibly setting it back to an earlier state. Therefore, the known unknowns are part of risk management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the known unknowns that are yet to be identified. As it is located in the cross-section of the uncertain and unidentified, these risks are by far the most difficult to manage. An unknown unknown is an event or impact on a project that is considered unfathomable or even unimaginable which is why they are so difficult to consider in the planning process of a project. It is furthermore difficult to provide an example of an unknown unknown as these are risks that seem unidentifiable, although this article will provide some tools to convert the unknown unknowns into known unknowns which make them easier to manage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To summarize, the different elements can be shortly described (Market Business News):&lt;br /&gt;
*The known knowns are the things we are aware of and understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown knowns are the things understand but aren’t aware of.&lt;br /&gt;
*The known unknowns are the things we are aware of but don’t understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown unknowns are the things we are neither aware of nor understand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Models of uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces models to understand and manage uncertainty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Risk classification===&lt;br /&gt;
To simplify the classification mentioned in the previous section, the knowledge of an event’s occurrence is labeled “identification” and the knowledge of an event’s impact is labeled “certainty”. In the matrix below, the four different types of (un)certainty are portrayed &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Kim, S. D. (2012). Characterizing unknown unknowns. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The matrix is divided in to certainty and identification. The idea is that “identification” is defined as either “knowledge” or “risk”, i.e. positive or negative and that “certainty” is whether or not we know that a certain event, that can influence the project, exists. This implies that the factors or events that we know exist and have knowledge about are relatively easy to identify and manage whereas the unknown unknowns are much harder to identify and therefore manage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:table_of_uncertainty_1.jpg|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Cynefin Framework===&lt;br /&gt;
The Cynefin Framework is a tool developed by David J. Snowden and other contributors (HBR ref.) to determine contexts enabling leaders to make appropriate choices. The framework consists of five domains: Simple, complicated, complex, chaotic and disorder. The first two are placed in to the “ordered universe” where facts are applicable. Complex and chaotic are placed in the “un-ordered universe” where the relationship between cause and effect is not immediately apparent. Below, the different domains are shortly explained and linked to the above model:&lt;br /&gt;
*The simple domain are the known knowns where it is possible to categorize the situation based on facts on the area.&lt;br /&gt;
*The complicated domain are the known unknowns where the situation isn’t immediately apparent, but it is possible to analyze the situation. &lt;br /&gt;
*The complex domain are the unknown unknowns where the outcome cannot be immediately determined but experiments will lead towards the correct direction.&lt;br /&gt;
*The chaotic domain are the unknowable unknowns where nothing makes sense and we search for ways to move more towards the complex domain.&lt;br /&gt;
*Disorder is a mix of the above domains and the situation has to be broken down in to parts to assign to the other domains. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Cynefin_Framework_(HBR).gif|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much like the model described in the above section, this framework suggests that the easiest situation is the simple domain, where the known knowns are found. Furthermore, the framework provides tools for leaders to manage their way out of the above situations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Tools==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces some tools to minimize the known unknown risks or identify the unknown unknown risks. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Application==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the application will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the limitations will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Here the bibliography will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kim, S. D. (2012). Characterizing unknown unknowns. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/civil-and-environmental-engineering/1-040-project-management-spring-2009/lecture-notes/MIT1_040s09_lec24.pdf free to share and adapt under Creative Commons terms: Attribution, noncommercial, share alike (https://ocw.mit.edu/terms/) &lt;br /&gt;
Slides by Fred Moavenzadeh from MIT&lt;br /&gt;
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chapman, Chris &amp;amp; Ward, Stephen. (2002). Managing Project Risk and Uncertainty : A Constructively Simple Approach to Decision Making / C. Chapman, S. Ward.&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31747699_Managing_Project_Risk_and_Uncertainty_A_Constructively_Simple_Approach_to_Decision_Making_C_Chapman_S_Ward &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiPe1OiKQuk Donald Rumsfeld DoD briefing. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Managing-Project-Uncertainty-Advances-Management/dp/B00SLUXH2E Cleden, D. (2009) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://marketbusinessnews.com/financial-glossary/financial-glossary-u/unknown-unknowns/ summary of knowns.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://pmiswohio.org/images/downloads/Summit18/hatter_cynefin_framework_summit18_03202018.pdf Cynefin Framewok (PMI SW Ohio)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://hbr.org/2007/11/a-leaders-framework-for-decision-making &lt;br /&gt;
(Cynefin Framework). A Leader’s Framework for Decision Making, Snowden, D. J. et al. 2007 in Harvard Business Review&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S154073</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64261</id>
		<title>Unidentified Risks</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64261"/>
		<updated>2019-02-22T13:01:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S154073: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any project there will be some risks that should be carefully managed, but there will also be uncertainty, which involves variability and ambiguity &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/civil-and-environmental-engineering/1-040-project-management-spring-2009/lecture-notes/MIT1_040s09_lec24.pdf free to share and adapt under Creative Commons terms: Attribution, noncommercial, share alike (https://ocw.mit.edu/terms/) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode). Slides by Fred Moavenzadeh from MIT &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. This article outlines four different types of uncertainty with the main focus on the unidentified risks (or the “unknown unknowns”). Unidentified risks are the risks that seem impossible to find. However, studies have found that they in fact are not unidentifiable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To describe uncertainty management in detail, this article will first explain what variability and ambiguity in projects consists of and then dig deeper into the different types of uncertainty. Finally, some tools to manage the unidentified risks are presented as well as a reflection on the usage of the tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the type of uncertainty that is generated due to lack of knowledge or unexpected events and changes in the project &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Slides from Project Management course (42429 F18)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Before a project is started, it is important to reflect on the possible factors that can influence the project. Part of this is to reflect on the types of uncertainty, namely the known knowns (change control), known unknowns (risk management), unknown knowns (planning &amp;amp; communication errors) and the unknown unknowns (unexpected events and changes). A model to describe these four types of uncertainty is the Cynefin Framework which is divided in to the following: Order, unorder and disorder. Unorder is furthermore divided in to the complex domain and the complicated domain, while order is divided in to the chaotic domain and the simple domain. The Cynefin Framework will be used as a model to describe the types of uncertainty throughout this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
To understand the theory of uncertainty management and thereby the importance of managing the unidentified risks, this section will first describe what uncertainty really is as well as link it to risk management. Furthermore, the different types of uncertainty will be outlined.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The British Standard (Axelos) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/lib/dtudk/reader.action?docID=4863041&amp;amp;ppg=30 Project Management: &amp;quot;Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2&amp;quot;, Axelos &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; distinguishes project work from “business as usual” by the following characteristics: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change, temporary, cross-functional, unique and uncertainty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Change implies that a project introduces a change from one state to another.&lt;br /&gt;
*Temporary is part of the definition of a project and means that business as usual returns after the project is finished. &lt;br /&gt;
*Cross-functional means that a project involves people from different backgrounds working together towards a common goal.&lt;br /&gt;
*Unique implies that no projects are identical &lt;br /&gt;
*Uncertainty covers the threats (and opportunities) that the other characteristics bring to the project work. These threats and opportunities are often bigger and more important than those in everyday work, meaning that projects are subject to more risk. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article focuses describes the uncertainty of projects. The term “uncertainty” is defined by Chapman and Ward (2002) as “lack of certainty, involving variability and ambiguity”, where variability is “uncertainty about the size of parameters which may result from lack of data, lack of detail, lack of definition, lack of experience and so on, which may be quantified if this is useful” and ambiguity is “the aspects of uncertainty not addressed in terms of variability”. Uncertainty can thereby be defined as the aspects of a project that may influence it either positively or negatively which is why uncertainty management is divided into opportunity management (which controls the positive influences) and risk management (which controls the negative influences) (MIT). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Classification of uncertainty===&lt;br /&gt;
In 2002 the former U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Henry Rumsfeld mentioned “unknown unknowns” in a Department of Defense news briefing (YT). This made people try to understand the different types of uncertainty by classifying the knowledge. David Cleden (2009) uses the typical classification of risks, which is based on the knowledge of an event’s occurrence and impact, to list four possibilities: &lt;br /&gt;
*Known–knowns (knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–knowns (untapped knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Known–unknowns (risks)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–unknowns (unfathomable uncertainty)&lt;br /&gt;
The following will describe, and provide examples of, the different elements. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The known knowns are the knowledge used in the planning phase of a project. This means that even before the project has started, the people involved in the project are aware of basic knowledge or theory behind the project. A very simple example could be that, in a building project, all participants are aware that a lot of money will be spent on materials, salaries and so on. It could also be to identify the obvious stakeholders of the project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Since a project consists of people from different backgrounds with different skillsets, and there is limited space or resources to hire experts on every single aspect of the project, there will be unknown knowns in a project. These consist of knowledge that is not apparent within the project group but can be gathered from experts on the areas. In the example of a building project, this could be knowledge of an external consultant providing additional details to the planning process of the project.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Known unknowns are risks that the project group is aware of the existence of and want to manage carefully. In this sense, the risks are negative impacts on the project that the project has to minimize. These can be risks of material shortage or negative stakeholder involvement in a building project. The risk of negative stakeholder involvement could be due to poor communication to the important stakeholders which leads to them intervening in the project and possibly setting it back to an earlier state. Therefore, the known unknowns are part of risk management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the known unknowns that are yet to be identified. As it is located in the cross-section of the uncertain and unidentified, these risks are by far the most difficult to manage. An unknown unknown is an event or impact on a project that is considered unfathomable or even unimaginable which is why they are so difficult to consider in the planning process of a project. It is furthermore difficult to provide an example of an unknown unknown as these are risks that seem unidentifiable, although this article will provide some tools to convert the unknown unknowns into known unknowns which make them easier to manage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To summarize, the different elements can be shortly described (Market Business News):&lt;br /&gt;
*The known knowns are the things we are aware of and understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown knowns are the things understand but aren’t aware of.&lt;br /&gt;
*The known unknowns are the things we are aware of but don’t understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown unknowns are the things we are neither aware of nor understand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Models of uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces models to understand and manage uncertainty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Risk classification===&lt;br /&gt;
To simplify the classification mentioned in the previous section, the knowledge of an event’s occurrence is labeled “identification” and the knowledge of an event’s impact is labeled “certainty”. In the matrix below, the four different types of (un)certainty are portrayed. The matrix is divided in to certainty and identification. The idea is that “identification” is defined as either “knowledge” or “risk”, i.e. positive or negative and that “certainty” is whether or not we know that a certain event, that can influence the project, exists. This implies that the factors or events that we know exist and have knowledge about are relatively easy to identify and manage whereas the unknown unknowns are much harder to identify and therefore manage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:table_of_uncertainty_1.jpg|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Cynefin Framework===&lt;br /&gt;
The Cynefin Framework is a tool developed by David J. Snowden and other contributors (HBR ref.) to determine contexts enabling leaders to make appropriate choices. The framework consists of five domains: Simple, complicated, complex, chaotic and disorder. The first two are placed in to the “ordered universe” where facts are applicable. Complex and chaotic are placed in the “un-ordered universe” where the relationship between cause and effect is not immediately apparent. Below, the different domains are shortly explained and linked to the above model:&lt;br /&gt;
*The simple domain are the known knowns where it is possible to categorize the situation based on facts on the area.&lt;br /&gt;
*The complicated domain are the known unknowns where the situation isn’t immediately apparent, but it is possible to analyze the situation. &lt;br /&gt;
*The complex domain are the unknown unknowns where the outcome cannot be immediately determined but experiments will lead towards the correct direction.&lt;br /&gt;
*The chaotic domain are the unknowable unknowns where nothing makes sense and we search for ways to move more towards the complex domain.&lt;br /&gt;
*Disorder is a mix of the above domains and the situation has to be broken down in to parts to assign to the other domains. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Cynefin_Framework_(HBR).gif|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much like the model described in the above section, this framework suggests that the easiest situation is the simple domain, where the known knowns are found. Furthermore, the framework provides tools for leaders to manage their way out of the above situations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Tools==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces some tools to minimize the known unknown risks or identify the unknown unknown risks. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Application==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the application will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the limitations will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Here the bibliography will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kim, S. D. (2012). Characterizing unknown unknowns. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/civil-and-environmental-engineering/1-040-project-management-spring-2009/lecture-notes/MIT1_040s09_lec24.pdf free to share and adapt under Creative Commons terms: Attribution, noncommercial, share alike (https://ocw.mit.edu/terms/) &lt;br /&gt;
Slides by Fred Moavenzadeh from MIT&lt;br /&gt;
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chapman, Chris &amp;amp; Ward, Stephen. (2002). Managing Project Risk and Uncertainty : A Constructively Simple Approach to Decision Making / C. Chapman, S. Ward.&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31747699_Managing_Project_Risk_and_Uncertainty_A_Constructively_Simple_Approach_to_Decision_Making_C_Chapman_S_Ward &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiPe1OiKQuk Donald Rumsfeld DoD briefing. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Managing-Project-Uncertainty-Advances-Management/dp/B00SLUXH2E Cleden, D. (2009) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://marketbusinessnews.com/financial-glossary/financial-glossary-u/unknown-unknowns/ summary of knowns.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://pmiswohio.org/images/downloads/Summit18/hatter_cynefin_framework_summit18_03202018.pdf Cynefin Framewok (PMI SW Ohio)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://hbr.org/2007/11/a-leaders-framework-for-decision-making &lt;br /&gt;
(Cynefin Framework). A Leader’s Framework for Decision Making, Snowden, D. J. et al. 2007 in Harvard Business Review&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S154073</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64251</id>
		<title>Unidentified Risks</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64251"/>
		<updated>2019-02-22T12:56:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S154073: /* The Cynefin Framework */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any project there will be some risks that should be carefully managed, but there will also be uncertainty, which involves variability and ambiguity &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/civil-and-environmental-engineering/1-040-project-management-spring-2009/lecture-notes/MIT1_040s09_lec24.pdf free to share and adapt under Creative Commons terms: Attribution, noncommercial, share alike (https://ocw.mit.edu/terms/) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode). Slides by Fred Moavenzadeh from MIT &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. This article outlines four different types of uncertainty with the main focus on the unidentified risks (or the “unknown unknowns”). Unidentified risks are the risks that seem impossible to find. However, studies have found that they in fact are not unidentifiable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To describe uncertainty management in detail, this article will first explain what variability and ambiguity in projects consists of and then dig deeper into the different types of uncertainty. Finally, some tools to manage the unidentified risks are presented as well as a reflection on the usage of the tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the type of uncertainty that is generated due to lack of knowledge or unexpected events and changes in the project &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Slides from Project Management course (42429 F18)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Before a project is started, it is important to reflect on the possible factors that can influence the project. Part of this is to reflect on the types of uncertainty, namely the known knowns (change control), known unknowns (risk management), unknown knowns (planning &amp;amp; communication errors) and the unknown unknowns (unexpected events and changes). A model to describe these four types of uncertainty is the Cynefin Framework which is divided in to the following: Order, unorder and disorder. Unorder is furthermore divided in to the complex domain and the complicated domain, while order is divided in to the chaotic domain and the simple domain. The Cynefin Framework will be used as a model to describe the types of uncertainty throughout this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
To understand the theory of uncertainty management and thereby the importance of managing the unidentified risks, this section will first describe what uncertainty really is as well as link it to risk management. Furthermore, the different types of uncertainty will be outlined.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The British Standard (Axelos) (REF: Project Management: &amp;quot;Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2&amp;quot;) distinguishes project work from “business as usual” by the following characteristics: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change, temporary, cross-functional, unique and uncertainty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Change implies that a project introduces a change from one state to another.&lt;br /&gt;
*Temporary is part of the definition of a project and means that business as usual returns after the project is finished. &lt;br /&gt;
*Cross-functional means that a project involves people from different backgrounds working together towards a common goal.&lt;br /&gt;
*Unique implies that no projects are identical &lt;br /&gt;
*Uncertainty covers the threats (and opportunities) that the other characteristics bring to the project work. These threats and opportunities are often bigger and more important than those in everyday work, meaning that projects are subject to more risk. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article focuses describes the uncertainty of projects. The term “uncertainty” is defined by Chapman and Ward (2002) as “lack of certainty, involving variability and ambiguity”, where variability is “uncertainty about the size of parameters which may result from lack of data, lack of detail, lack of definition, lack of experience and so on, which may be quantified if this is useful” and ambiguity is “the aspects of uncertainty not addressed in terms of variability”. Uncertainty can thereby be defined as the aspects of a project that may influence it either positively or negatively which is why uncertainty management is divided into opportunity management (which controls the positive influences) and risk management (which controls the negative influences) (MIT). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Classification of uncertainty===&lt;br /&gt;
In 2002 the former U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Henry Rumsfeld mentioned “unknown unknowns” in a Department of Defense news briefing (YT). This made people try to understand the different types of uncertainty by classifying the knowledge. David Cleden (2009) uses the typical classification of risks, which is based on the knowledge of an event’s occurrence and impact, to list four possibilities: &lt;br /&gt;
*Known–knowns (knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–knowns (untapped knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Known–unknowns (risks)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–unknowns (unfathomable uncertainty)&lt;br /&gt;
The following will describe, and provide examples of, the different elements. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The known knowns are the knowledge used in the planning phase of a project. This means that even before the project has started, the people involved in the project are aware of basic knowledge or theory behind the project. A very simple example could be that, in a building project, all participants are aware that a lot of money will be spent on materials, salaries and so on. It could also be to identify the obvious stakeholders of the project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Since a project consists of people from different backgrounds with different skillsets, and there is limited space or resources to hire experts on every single aspect of the project, there will be unknown knowns in a project. These consist of knowledge that is not apparent within the project group but can be gathered from experts on the areas. In the example of a building project, this could be knowledge of an external consultant providing additional details to the planning process of the project.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Known unknowns are risks that the project group is aware of the existence of and want to manage carefully. In this sense, the risks are negative impacts on the project that the project has to minimize. These can be risks of material shortage or negative stakeholder involvement in a building project. The risk of negative stakeholder involvement could be due to poor communication to the important stakeholders which leads to them intervening in the project and possibly setting it back to an earlier state. Therefore, the known unknowns are part of risk management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the known unknowns that are yet to be identified. As it is located in the cross-section of the uncertain and unidentified, these risks are by far the most difficult to manage. An unknown unknown is an event or impact on a project that is considered unfathomable or even unimaginable which is why they are so difficult to consider in the planning process of a project. It is furthermore difficult to provide an example of an unknown unknown as these are risks that seem unidentifiable, although this article will provide some tools to convert the unknown unknowns into known unknowns which make them easier to manage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To summarize, the different elements can be shortly described (Market Business News):&lt;br /&gt;
*The known knowns are the things we are aware of and understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown knowns are the things understand but aren’t aware of.&lt;br /&gt;
*The known unknowns are the things we are aware of but don’t understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown unknowns are the things we are neither aware of nor understand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Models of uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces models to understand and manage uncertainty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Risk classification===&lt;br /&gt;
To simplify the classification mentioned in the previous section, the knowledge of an event’s occurrence is labeled “identification” and the knowledge of an event’s impact is labeled “certainty”. In the matrix below, the four different types of (un)certainty are portrayed. The matrix is divided in to certainty and identification. The idea is that “identification” is defined as either “knowledge” or “risk”, i.e. positive or negative and that “certainty” is whether or not we know that a certain event, that can influence the project, exists. This implies that the factors or events that we know exist and have knowledge about are relatively easy to identify and manage whereas the unknown unknowns are much harder to identify and therefore manage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:table_of_uncertainty_1.jpg|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Cynefin Framework===&lt;br /&gt;
The Cynefin Framework is a tool developed by David J. Snowden and other contributors (HBR ref.) to determine contexts enabling leaders to make appropriate choices. The framework consists of five domains: Simple, complicated, complex, chaotic and disorder. The first two are placed in to the “ordered universe” where facts are applicable. Complex and chaotic are placed in the “un-ordered universe” where the relationship between cause and effect is not immediately apparent. Below, the different domains are shortly explained and linked to the above model:&lt;br /&gt;
*The simple domain are the known knowns where it is possible to categorize the situation based on facts on the area.&lt;br /&gt;
*The complicated domain are the known unknowns where the situation isn’t immediately apparent, but it is possible to analyze the situation. &lt;br /&gt;
*The complex domain are the unknown unknowns where the outcome cannot be immediately determined but experiments will lead towards the correct direction.&lt;br /&gt;
*The chaotic domain are the unknowable unknowns where nothing makes sense and we search for ways to move more towards the complex domain.&lt;br /&gt;
*Disorder is a mix of the above domains and the situation has to be broken down in to parts to assign to the other domains. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Cynefin_Framework_(HBR).gif|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much like the model described in the above section, this framework suggests that the easiest situation is the simple domain, where the known knowns are found. Furthermore, the framework provides tools for leaders to manage their way out of the above situations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Tools==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces some tools to minimize the known unknown risks or identify the unknown unknown risks. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Application==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the application will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the limitations will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Here the bibliography will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kim, S. D. (2012). Characterizing unknown unknowns. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/civil-and-environmental-engineering/1-040-project-management-spring-2009/lecture-notes/MIT1_040s09_lec24.pdf free to share and adapt under Creative Commons terms: Attribution, noncommercial, share alike (https://ocw.mit.edu/terms/) &lt;br /&gt;
Slides by Fred Moavenzadeh from MIT&lt;br /&gt;
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chapman, Chris &amp;amp; Ward, Stephen. (2002). Managing Project Risk and Uncertainty : A Constructively Simple Approach to Decision Making / C. Chapman, S. Ward.&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31747699_Managing_Project_Risk_and_Uncertainty_A_Constructively_Simple_Approach_to_Decision_Making_C_Chapman_S_Ward &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiPe1OiKQuk Donald Rumsfeld DoD briefing. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Managing-Project-Uncertainty-Advances-Management/dp/B00SLUXH2E Cleden, D. (2009) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://marketbusinessnews.com/financial-glossary/financial-glossary-u/unknown-unknowns/ summary of knowns.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://pmiswohio.org/images/downloads/Summit18/hatter_cynefin_framework_summit18_03202018.pdf Cynefin Framewok (PMI SW Ohio)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://hbr.org/2007/11/a-leaders-framework-for-decision-making &lt;br /&gt;
(Cynefin Framework). A Leader’s Framework for Decision Making, Snowden, D. J. et al. 2007 in Harvard Business Review&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S154073</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=File:Cynefin_Framework_(HBR).gif&amp;diff=64249</id>
		<title>File:Cynefin Framework (HBR).gif</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=File:Cynefin_Framework_(HBR).gif&amp;diff=64249"/>
		<updated>2019-02-22T12:56:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S154073: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S154073</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64248</id>
		<title>Unidentified Risks</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64248"/>
		<updated>2019-02-22T12:54:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S154073: /* Risk classification */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any project there will be some risks that should be carefully managed, but there will also be uncertainty, which involves variability and ambiguity &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/civil-and-environmental-engineering/1-040-project-management-spring-2009/lecture-notes/MIT1_040s09_lec24.pdf free to share and adapt under Creative Commons terms: Attribution, noncommercial, share alike (https://ocw.mit.edu/terms/) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode). Slides by Fred Moavenzadeh from MIT &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. This article outlines four different types of uncertainty with the main focus on the unidentified risks (or the “unknown unknowns”). Unidentified risks are the risks that seem impossible to find. However, studies have found that they in fact are not unidentifiable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To describe uncertainty management in detail, this article will first explain what variability and ambiguity in projects consists of and then dig deeper into the different types of uncertainty. Finally, some tools to manage the unidentified risks are presented as well as a reflection on the usage of the tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the type of uncertainty that is generated due to lack of knowledge or unexpected events and changes in the project &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Slides from Project Management course (42429 F18)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Before a project is started, it is important to reflect on the possible factors that can influence the project. Part of this is to reflect on the types of uncertainty, namely the known knowns (change control), known unknowns (risk management), unknown knowns (planning &amp;amp; communication errors) and the unknown unknowns (unexpected events and changes). A model to describe these four types of uncertainty is the Cynefin Framework which is divided in to the following: Order, unorder and disorder. Unorder is furthermore divided in to the complex domain and the complicated domain, while order is divided in to the chaotic domain and the simple domain. The Cynefin Framework will be used as a model to describe the types of uncertainty throughout this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
To understand the theory of uncertainty management and thereby the importance of managing the unidentified risks, this section will first describe what uncertainty really is as well as link it to risk management. Furthermore, the different types of uncertainty will be outlined.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The British Standard (Axelos) (REF: Project Management: &amp;quot;Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2&amp;quot;) distinguishes project work from “business as usual” by the following characteristics: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change, temporary, cross-functional, unique and uncertainty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Change implies that a project introduces a change from one state to another.&lt;br /&gt;
*Temporary is part of the definition of a project and means that business as usual returns after the project is finished. &lt;br /&gt;
*Cross-functional means that a project involves people from different backgrounds working together towards a common goal.&lt;br /&gt;
*Unique implies that no projects are identical &lt;br /&gt;
*Uncertainty covers the threats (and opportunities) that the other characteristics bring to the project work. These threats and opportunities are often bigger and more important than those in everyday work, meaning that projects are subject to more risk. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article focuses describes the uncertainty of projects. The term “uncertainty” is defined by Chapman and Ward (2002) as “lack of certainty, involving variability and ambiguity”, where variability is “uncertainty about the size of parameters which may result from lack of data, lack of detail, lack of definition, lack of experience and so on, which may be quantified if this is useful” and ambiguity is “the aspects of uncertainty not addressed in terms of variability”. Uncertainty can thereby be defined as the aspects of a project that may influence it either positively or negatively which is why uncertainty management is divided into opportunity management (which controls the positive influences) and risk management (which controls the negative influences) (MIT). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Classification of uncertainty===&lt;br /&gt;
In 2002 the former U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Henry Rumsfeld mentioned “unknown unknowns” in a Department of Defense news briefing (YT). This made people try to understand the different types of uncertainty by classifying the knowledge. David Cleden (2009) uses the typical classification of risks, which is based on the knowledge of an event’s occurrence and impact, to list four possibilities: &lt;br /&gt;
*Known–knowns (knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–knowns (untapped knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Known–unknowns (risks)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–unknowns (unfathomable uncertainty)&lt;br /&gt;
The following will describe, and provide examples of, the different elements. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The known knowns are the knowledge used in the planning phase of a project. This means that even before the project has started, the people involved in the project are aware of basic knowledge or theory behind the project. A very simple example could be that, in a building project, all participants are aware that a lot of money will be spent on materials, salaries and so on. It could also be to identify the obvious stakeholders of the project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Since a project consists of people from different backgrounds with different skillsets, and there is limited space or resources to hire experts on every single aspect of the project, there will be unknown knowns in a project. These consist of knowledge that is not apparent within the project group but can be gathered from experts on the areas. In the example of a building project, this could be knowledge of an external consultant providing additional details to the planning process of the project.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Known unknowns are risks that the project group is aware of the existence of and want to manage carefully. In this sense, the risks are negative impacts on the project that the project has to minimize. These can be risks of material shortage or negative stakeholder involvement in a building project. The risk of negative stakeholder involvement could be due to poor communication to the important stakeholders which leads to them intervening in the project and possibly setting it back to an earlier state. Therefore, the known unknowns are part of risk management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the known unknowns that are yet to be identified. As it is located in the cross-section of the uncertain and unidentified, these risks are by far the most difficult to manage. An unknown unknown is an event or impact on a project that is considered unfathomable or even unimaginable which is why they are so difficult to consider in the planning process of a project. It is furthermore difficult to provide an example of an unknown unknown as these are risks that seem unidentifiable, although this article will provide some tools to convert the unknown unknowns into known unknowns which make them easier to manage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To summarize, the different elements can be shortly described (Market Business News):&lt;br /&gt;
*The known knowns are the things we are aware of and understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown knowns are the things understand but aren’t aware of.&lt;br /&gt;
*The known unknowns are the things we are aware of but don’t understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown unknowns are the things we are neither aware of nor understand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Models of uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces models to understand and manage uncertainty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Risk classification===&lt;br /&gt;
To simplify the classification mentioned in the previous section, the knowledge of an event’s occurrence is labeled “identification” and the knowledge of an event’s impact is labeled “certainty”. In the matrix below, the four different types of (un)certainty are portrayed. The matrix is divided in to certainty and identification. The idea is that “identification” is defined as either “knowledge” or “risk”, i.e. positive or negative and that “certainty” is whether or not we know that a certain event, that can influence the project, exists. This implies that the factors or events that we know exist and have knowledge about are relatively easy to identify and manage whereas the unknown unknowns are much harder to identify and therefore manage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:table_of_uncertainty_1.jpg|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Cynefin Framework===&lt;br /&gt;
The Cynefin Framework is a tool developed by David J. Snowden and other contributors (HBR ref.) to determine contexts enabling leaders to make appropriate choices. The framework consists of five domains: Simple, complicated, complex, chaotic and disorder. The first two are placed in to the “ordered universe” where facts are applicable. Complex and chaotic are placed in the “un-ordered universe” where the relationship between cause and effect is not immediately apparent. Below, the different domains are shortly explained and linked to the above model:&lt;br /&gt;
*The simple domain are the known knowns where it is possible to categorize the situation based on facts on the area.&lt;br /&gt;
*The complicated domain are the known unknowns where the situation isn’t immediately apparent, but it is possible to analyze the situation. &lt;br /&gt;
*The complex domain are the unknown unknowns where the outcome cannot be immediately determined but experiments will lead towards the correct direction.&lt;br /&gt;
*The chaotic domain are the unknowable unknowns where nothing makes sense and we search for ways to move more towards the complex domain.&lt;br /&gt;
*Disorder is a mix of the above domains and the situation has to be broken down in to parts to assign to the other domains. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much like the model described in the above section, this framework suggests that the easiest situation is the simple domain, where the known knowns are found. Furthermore, the framework provides tools for leaders to manage their way out of the above situations.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Tools==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces some tools to minimize the known unknown risks or identify the unknown unknown risks. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Application==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the application will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the limitations will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Here the bibliography will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kim, S. D. (2012). Characterizing unknown unknowns. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/civil-and-environmental-engineering/1-040-project-management-spring-2009/lecture-notes/MIT1_040s09_lec24.pdf free to share and adapt under Creative Commons terms: Attribution, noncommercial, share alike (https://ocw.mit.edu/terms/) &lt;br /&gt;
Slides by Fred Moavenzadeh from MIT&lt;br /&gt;
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chapman, Chris &amp;amp; Ward, Stephen. (2002). Managing Project Risk and Uncertainty : A Constructively Simple Approach to Decision Making / C. Chapman, S. Ward.&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31747699_Managing_Project_Risk_and_Uncertainty_A_Constructively_Simple_Approach_to_Decision_Making_C_Chapman_S_Ward &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiPe1OiKQuk Donald Rumsfeld DoD briefing. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Managing-Project-Uncertainty-Advances-Management/dp/B00SLUXH2E Cleden, D. (2009) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://marketbusinessnews.com/financial-glossary/financial-glossary-u/unknown-unknowns/ summary of knowns.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://pmiswohio.org/images/downloads/Summit18/hatter_cynefin_framework_summit18_03202018.pdf Cynefin Framewok (PMI SW Ohio)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://hbr.org/2007/11/a-leaders-framework-for-decision-making &lt;br /&gt;
(Cynefin Framework). A Leader’s Framework for Decision Making, Snowden, D. J. et al. 2007 in Harvard Business Review&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S154073</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64245</id>
		<title>Unidentified Risks</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64245"/>
		<updated>2019-02-22T12:53:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S154073: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any project there will be some risks that should be carefully managed, but there will also be uncertainty, which involves variability and ambiguity &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/civil-and-environmental-engineering/1-040-project-management-spring-2009/lecture-notes/MIT1_040s09_lec24.pdf free to share and adapt under Creative Commons terms: Attribution, noncommercial, share alike (https://ocw.mit.edu/terms/) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode). Slides by Fred Moavenzadeh from MIT &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. This article outlines four different types of uncertainty with the main focus on the unidentified risks (or the “unknown unknowns”). Unidentified risks are the risks that seem impossible to find. However, studies have found that they in fact are not unidentifiable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To describe uncertainty management in detail, this article will first explain what variability and ambiguity in projects consists of and then dig deeper into the different types of uncertainty. Finally, some tools to manage the unidentified risks are presented as well as a reflection on the usage of the tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the type of uncertainty that is generated due to lack of knowledge or unexpected events and changes in the project &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Slides from Project Management course (42429 F18)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Before a project is started, it is important to reflect on the possible factors that can influence the project. Part of this is to reflect on the types of uncertainty, namely the known knowns (change control), known unknowns (risk management), unknown knowns (planning &amp;amp; communication errors) and the unknown unknowns (unexpected events and changes). A model to describe these four types of uncertainty is the Cynefin Framework which is divided in to the following: Order, unorder and disorder. Unorder is furthermore divided in to the complex domain and the complicated domain, while order is divided in to the chaotic domain and the simple domain. The Cynefin Framework will be used as a model to describe the types of uncertainty throughout this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
To understand the theory of uncertainty management and thereby the importance of managing the unidentified risks, this section will first describe what uncertainty really is as well as link it to risk management. Furthermore, the different types of uncertainty will be outlined.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The British Standard (Axelos) (REF: Project Management: &amp;quot;Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2&amp;quot;) distinguishes project work from “business as usual” by the following characteristics: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change, temporary, cross-functional, unique and uncertainty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Change implies that a project introduces a change from one state to another.&lt;br /&gt;
*Temporary is part of the definition of a project and means that business as usual returns after the project is finished. &lt;br /&gt;
*Cross-functional means that a project involves people from different backgrounds working together towards a common goal.&lt;br /&gt;
*Unique implies that no projects are identical &lt;br /&gt;
*Uncertainty covers the threats (and opportunities) that the other characteristics bring to the project work. These threats and opportunities are often bigger and more important than those in everyday work, meaning that projects are subject to more risk. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article focuses describes the uncertainty of projects. The term “uncertainty” is defined by Chapman and Ward (2002) as “lack of certainty, involving variability and ambiguity”, where variability is “uncertainty about the size of parameters which may result from lack of data, lack of detail, lack of definition, lack of experience and so on, which may be quantified if this is useful” and ambiguity is “the aspects of uncertainty not addressed in terms of variability”. Uncertainty can thereby be defined as the aspects of a project that may influence it either positively or negatively which is why uncertainty management is divided into opportunity management (which controls the positive influences) and risk management (which controls the negative influences) (MIT). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Classification of uncertainty===&lt;br /&gt;
In 2002 the former U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Henry Rumsfeld mentioned “unknown unknowns” in a Department of Defense news briefing (YT). This made people try to understand the different types of uncertainty by classifying the knowledge. David Cleden (2009) uses the typical classification of risks, which is based on the knowledge of an event’s occurrence and impact, to list four possibilities: &lt;br /&gt;
*Known–knowns (knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–knowns (untapped knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Known–unknowns (risks)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–unknowns (unfathomable uncertainty)&lt;br /&gt;
The following will describe, and provide examples of, the different elements. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The known knowns are the knowledge used in the planning phase of a project. This means that even before the project has started, the people involved in the project are aware of basic knowledge or theory behind the project. A very simple example could be that, in a building project, all participants are aware that a lot of money will be spent on materials, salaries and so on. It could also be to identify the obvious stakeholders of the project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Since a project consists of people from different backgrounds with different skillsets, and there is limited space or resources to hire experts on every single aspect of the project, there will be unknown knowns in a project. These consist of knowledge that is not apparent within the project group but can be gathered from experts on the areas. In the example of a building project, this could be knowledge of an external consultant providing additional details to the planning process of the project.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Known unknowns are risks that the project group is aware of the existence of and want to manage carefully. In this sense, the risks are negative impacts on the project that the project has to minimize. These can be risks of material shortage or negative stakeholder involvement in a building project. The risk of negative stakeholder involvement could be due to poor communication to the important stakeholders which leads to them intervening in the project and possibly setting it back to an earlier state. Therefore, the known unknowns are part of risk management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the known unknowns that are yet to be identified. As it is located in the cross-section of the uncertain and unidentified, these risks are by far the most difficult to manage. An unknown unknown is an event or impact on a project that is considered unfathomable or even unimaginable which is why they are so difficult to consider in the planning process of a project. It is furthermore difficult to provide an example of an unknown unknown as these are risks that seem unidentifiable, although this article will provide some tools to convert the unknown unknowns into known unknowns which make them easier to manage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To summarize, the different elements can be shortly described (Market Business News):&lt;br /&gt;
*The known knowns are the things we are aware of and understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown knowns are the things understand but aren’t aware of.&lt;br /&gt;
*The known unknowns are the things we are aware of but don’t understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown unknowns are the things we are neither aware of nor understand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Models of uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces models to understand and manage uncertainty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Risk classification===&lt;br /&gt;
To simplify the classification mentioned in the previous section, the knowledge of an event’s occurrence is labeled “identification” and the knowledge of an event’s impact is labeled “certainty”. In the matrix below, the four different types of (un)certainty are portrayed. The matrix is divided in to certainty and identification. The idea is that “identification” is defined as either “knowledge” or “risk”, i.e. positive or negative and that “certainty” is whether or not we know that a certain event, that can influence the project, exists. This implies that the factors or events that we know exist and have knowledge about are relatively easy to identify and manage whereas the unknown unknowns are much harder to identify and therefore manage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:table_of_uncertainty_1.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Cynefin Framework===&lt;br /&gt;
The Cynefin Framework is a tool developed by David J. Snowden and other contributors (HBR ref.) to determine contexts enabling leaders to make appropriate choices. The framework consists of five domains: Simple, complicated, complex, chaotic and disorder. The first two are placed in to the “ordered universe” where facts are applicable. Complex and chaotic are placed in the “un-ordered universe” where the relationship between cause and effect is not immediately apparent. Below, the different domains are shortly explained and linked to the above model:&lt;br /&gt;
*The simple domain are the known knowns where it is possible to categorize the situation based on facts on the area.&lt;br /&gt;
*The complicated domain are the known unknowns where the situation isn’t immediately apparent, but it is possible to analyze the situation. &lt;br /&gt;
*The complex domain are the unknown unknowns where the outcome cannot be immediately determined but experiments will lead towards the correct direction.&lt;br /&gt;
*The chaotic domain are the unknowable unknowns where nothing makes sense and we search for ways to move more towards the complex domain.&lt;br /&gt;
*Disorder is a mix of the above domains and the situation has to be broken down in to parts to assign to the other domains. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much like the model described in the above section, this framework suggests that the easiest situation is the simple domain, where the known knowns are found. Furthermore, the framework provides tools for leaders to manage their way out of the above situations.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Tools==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces some tools to minimize the known unknown risks or identify the unknown unknown risks. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Application==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the application will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the limitations will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Here the bibliography will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kim, S. D. (2012). Characterizing unknown unknowns. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/civil-and-environmental-engineering/1-040-project-management-spring-2009/lecture-notes/MIT1_040s09_lec24.pdf free to share and adapt under Creative Commons terms: Attribution, noncommercial, share alike (https://ocw.mit.edu/terms/) &lt;br /&gt;
Slides by Fred Moavenzadeh from MIT&lt;br /&gt;
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chapman, Chris &amp;amp; Ward, Stephen. (2002). Managing Project Risk and Uncertainty : A Constructively Simple Approach to Decision Making / C. Chapman, S. Ward.&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31747699_Managing_Project_Risk_and_Uncertainty_A_Constructively_Simple_Approach_to_Decision_Making_C_Chapman_S_Ward &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiPe1OiKQuk Donald Rumsfeld DoD briefing. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Managing-Project-Uncertainty-Advances-Management/dp/B00SLUXH2E Cleden, D. (2009) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://marketbusinessnews.com/financial-glossary/financial-glossary-u/unknown-unknowns/ summary of knowns.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://pmiswohio.org/images/downloads/Summit18/hatter_cynefin_framework_summit18_03202018.pdf Cynefin Framewok (PMI SW Ohio)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://hbr.org/2007/11/a-leaders-framework-for-decision-making &lt;br /&gt;
(Cynefin Framework). A Leader’s Framework for Decision Making, Snowden, D. J. et al. 2007 in Harvard Business Review&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S154073</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=File:Table_of_uncertainty_1.jpg&amp;diff=64244</id>
		<title>File:Table of uncertainty 1.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=File:Table_of_uncertainty_1.jpg&amp;diff=64244"/>
		<updated>2019-02-22T12:53:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S154073: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S154073</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64208</id>
		<title>Unidentified Risks</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64208"/>
		<updated>2019-02-22T12:43:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S154073: /* Abstract */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any project there will be some risks that should be carefully managed, but there will also be uncertainty, which involves variability and ambiguity &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/civil-and-environmental-engineering/1-040-project-management-spring-2009/lecture-notes/MIT1_040s09_lec24.pdf free to share and adapt under Creative Commons terms: Attribution, noncommercial, share alike (https://ocw.mit.edu/terms/) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode). Slides by Fred Moavenzadeh from MIT &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. This article outlines four different types of uncertainty with the main focus on the unidentified risks (or the “unknown unknowns”). Unidentified risks are the risks that seem impossible to find. However, studies have found that they in fact are not unidentifiable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To describe uncertainty management in detail, this article will first explain what variability and ambiguity in projects consists of and then dig deeper into the different types of uncertainty. Finally, some tools to manage the unidentified risks are presented as well as a reflection on the usage of the tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the type of uncertainty that is generated due to lack of knowledge or unexpected events and changes in the project &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Slides from Project Management course (42429 F18)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Before a project is started, it is important to reflect on the possible factors that can influence the project. Part of this is to reflect on the types of uncertainty, namely the known knowns (change control), known unknowns (risk management), unknown knowns (planning &amp;amp; communication errors) and the unknown unknowns (unexpected events and changes). A model to describe these four types of uncertainty is the Cynefin Framework which is divided in to the following: Order, unorder and disorder. Unorder is furthermore divided in to the complex domain and the complicated domain, while order is divided in to the chaotic domain and the simple domain. The Cynefin Framework will be used as a model to describe the types of uncertainty throughout this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
To understand the theory of uncertainty management and thereby the importance of managing the unidentified risks, this section will first describe what uncertainty really is as well as link it to risk management. Furthermore, the different types of uncertainty will be outlined.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The British Standard (Axelos) (REF: Project Management: &amp;quot;Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2&amp;quot;) distinguishes project work from “business as usual” by the following characteristics: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change, temporary, cross-functional, unique and uncertainty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Change implies that a project introduces a change from one state to another.&lt;br /&gt;
*Temporary is part of the definition of a project and means that business as usual returns after the project is finished. &lt;br /&gt;
*Cross-functional means that a project involves people from different backgrounds working together towards a common goal.&lt;br /&gt;
*Unique implies that no projects are identical &lt;br /&gt;
*Uncertainty covers the threats (and opportunities) that the other characteristics bring to the project work. These threats and opportunities are often bigger and more important than those in everyday work, meaning that projects are subject to more risk. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article focuses describes the uncertainty of projects. The term “uncertainty” is defined by Chapman and Ward (2002) as “lack of certainty, involving variability and ambiguity”, where variability is “uncertainty about the size of parameters which may result from lack of data, lack of detail, lack of definition, lack of experience and so on, which may be quantified if this is useful” and ambiguity is “the aspects of uncertainty not addressed in terms of variability”. Uncertainty can thereby be defined as the aspects of a project that may influence it either positively or negatively which is why uncertainty management is divided into opportunity management (which controls the positive influences) and risk management (which controls the negative influences) (MIT). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Classification of uncertainty===&lt;br /&gt;
In 2002 the former U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Henry Rumsfeld mentioned “unknown unknowns” in a Department of Defense news briefing (YT). This made people try to understand the different types of uncertainty by classifying the knowledge. David Cleden (2009) uses the typical classification of risks, which is based on the knowledge of an event’s occurrence and impact, to list four possibilities: &lt;br /&gt;
*Known–knowns (knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–knowns (untapped knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Known–unknowns (risks)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–unknowns (unfathomable uncertainty)&lt;br /&gt;
The following will describe, and provide examples of, the different elements. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The known knowns are the knowledge used in the planning phase of a project. This means that even before the project has started, the people involved in the project are aware of basic knowledge or theory behind the project. A very simple example could be that, in a building project, all participants are aware that a lot of money will be spent on materials, salaries and so on. It could also be to identify the obvious stakeholders of the project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Since a project consists of people from different backgrounds with different skillsets, and there is limited space or resources to hire experts on every single aspect of the project, there will be unknown knowns in a project. These consist of knowledge that is not apparent within the project group but can be gathered from experts on the areas. In the example of a building project, this could be knowledge of an external consultant providing additional details to the planning process of the project.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Known unknowns are risks that the project group is aware of the existence of and want to manage carefully. In this sense, the risks are negative impacts on the project that the project has to minimize. These can be risks of material shortage or negative stakeholder involvement in a building project. The risk of negative stakeholder involvement could be due to poor communication to the important stakeholders which leads to them intervening in the project and possibly setting it back to an earlier state. Therefore, the known unknowns are part of risk management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the known unknowns that are yet to be identified. As it is located in the cross-section of the uncertain and unidentified, these risks are by far the most difficult to manage. An unknown unknown is an event or impact on a project that is considered unfathomable or even unimaginable which is why they are so difficult to consider in the planning process of a project. It is furthermore difficult to provide an example of an unknown unknown as these are risks that seem unidentifiable, although this article will provide some tools to convert the unknown unknowns into known unknowns which make them easier to manage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To summarize, the different elements can be shortly described (Market Business News):&lt;br /&gt;
*The known knowns are the things we are aware of and understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown knowns are the things understand but aren’t aware of.&lt;br /&gt;
*The known unknowns are the things we are aware of but don’t understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown unknowns are the things we are neither aware of nor understand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Models of uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces models to understand and manage uncertainty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Risk classification===&lt;br /&gt;
To simplify the classification mentioned in the previous section, the knowledge of an event’s occurrence is labeled “identification” and the knowledge of an event’s impact is labeled “certainty”. In the matrix below, the four different types of (un)certainty are portrayed. The matrix is divided in to certainty and identification. The idea is that “identification” is defined as either “knowledge” or “risk”, i.e. positive or negative and that “certainty” is whether or not we know that a certain event, that can influence the project, exists. This implies that the factors or events that we know exist and have knowledge about are relatively easy to identify and manage whereas the unknown unknowns are much harder to identify and therefore manage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Cynefin Framework===&lt;br /&gt;
The Cynefin Framework is a tool developed by David J. Snowden and other contributors (HBR ref.) to determine contexts enabling leaders to make appropriate choices. The framework consists of five domains: Simple, complicated, complex, chaotic and disorder. The first two are placed in to the “ordered universe” where facts are applicable. Complex and chaotic are placed in the “un-ordered universe” where the relationship between cause and effect is not immediately apparent. Below, the different domains are shortly explained and linked to the above model:&lt;br /&gt;
*The simple domain are the known knowns where it is possible to categorize the situation based on facts on the area.&lt;br /&gt;
*The complicated domain are the known unknowns where the situation isn’t immediately apparent, but it is possible to analyze the situation. &lt;br /&gt;
*The complex domain are the unknown unknowns where the outcome cannot be immediately determined but experiments will lead towards the correct direction.&lt;br /&gt;
*The chaotic domain are the unknowable unknowns where nothing makes sense and we search for ways to move more towards the complex domain.&lt;br /&gt;
*Disorder is a mix of the above domains and the situation has to be broken down in to parts to assign to the other domains. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much like the model described in the above section, this framework suggests that the easiest situation is the simple domain, where the known knowns are found. Furthermore, the framework provides tools for leaders to manage their way out of the above situations.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Tools==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces some tools to minimize the known unknown risks or identify the unknown unknown risks. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Application==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the application will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the limitations will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Here the bibliography will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kim, S. D. (2012). Characterizing unknown unknowns. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/civil-and-environmental-engineering/1-040-project-management-spring-2009/lecture-notes/MIT1_040s09_lec24.pdf free to share and adapt under Creative Commons terms: Attribution, noncommercial, share alike (https://ocw.mit.edu/terms/) &lt;br /&gt;
Slides by Fred Moavenzadeh from MIT&lt;br /&gt;
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chapman, Chris &amp;amp; Ward, Stephen. (2002). Managing Project Risk and Uncertainty : A Constructively Simple Approach to Decision Making / C. Chapman, S. Ward.&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31747699_Managing_Project_Risk_and_Uncertainty_A_Constructively_Simple_Approach_to_Decision_Making_C_Chapman_S_Ward &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiPe1OiKQuk Donald Rumsfeld DoD briefing. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Managing-Project-Uncertainty-Advances-Management/dp/B00SLUXH2E Cleden, D. (2009) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://marketbusinessnews.com/financial-glossary/financial-glossary-u/unknown-unknowns/ summary of knowns.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://pmiswohio.org/images/downloads/Summit18/hatter_cynefin_framework_summit18_03202018.pdf Cynefin Framewok (PMI SW Ohio)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://hbr.org/2007/11/a-leaders-framework-for-decision-making &lt;br /&gt;
(Cynefin Framework). A Leader’s Framework for Decision Making, Snowden, D. J. et al. 2007 in Harvard Business Review&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S154073</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64204</id>
		<title>Unidentified Risks</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64204"/>
		<updated>2019-02-22T12:42:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S154073: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any project there will be some risks that should be carefully managed, but there will also be uncertainty, which involves variability and ambiguity (MIT reference). This article outlines four different types of uncertainty with the main focus on the unidentified risks (or the “unknown unknowns”). Unidentified risks are the risks that seem impossible to find. However, studies have found that they in fact are not unidentifiable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To describe uncertainty management in detail, this article will first explain what variability and ambiguity in projects consists of and then dig deeper into the different types of uncertainty. Finally, some tools to manage the unidentified risks are presented as well as a reflection on the usage of the tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the type of uncertainty that is generated due to lack of knowledge or unexpected events and changes in the project &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;(Slides from Project Management course (42429 F18))&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Before a project is started, it is important to reflect on the possible factors that can influence the project. Part of this is to reflect on the types of uncertainty, namely the known knowns (change control), known unknowns (risk management), unknown knowns (planning &amp;amp; communication errors) and the unknown unknowns (unexpected events and changes). A model to describe these four types of uncertainty is the Cynefin Framework which is divided in to the following: Order, unorder and disorder. Unorder is furthermore divided in to the complex domain and the complicated domain, while order is divided in to the chaotic domain and the simple domain. The Cynefin Framework will be used as a model to describe the types of uncertainty throughout this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
To understand the theory of uncertainty management and thereby the importance of managing the unidentified risks, this section will first describe what uncertainty really is as well as link it to risk management. Furthermore, the different types of uncertainty will be outlined.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The British Standard (Axelos) (REF: Project Management: &amp;quot;Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2&amp;quot;) distinguishes project work from “business as usual” by the following characteristics: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change, temporary, cross-functional, unique and uncertainty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Change implies that a project introduces a change from one state to another.&lt;br /&gt;
*Temporary is part of the definition of a project and means that business as usual returns after the project is finished. &lt;br /&gt;
*Cross-functional means that a project involves people from different backgrounds working together towards a common goal.&lt;br /&gt;
*Unique implies that no projects are identical &lt;br /&gt;
*Uncertainty covers the threats (and opportunities) that the other characteristics bring to the project work. These threats and opportunities are often bigger and more important than those in everyday work, meaning that projects are subject to more risk. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article focuses describes the uncertainty of projects. The term “uncertainty” is defined by Chapman and Ward (2002) as “lack of certainty, involving variability and ambiguity”, where variability is “uncertainty about the size of parameters which may result from lack of data, lack of detail, lack of definition, lack of experience and so on, which may be quantified if this is useful” and ambiguity is “the aspects of uncertainty not addressed in terms of variability”. Uncertainty can thereby be defined as the aspects of a project that may influence it either positively or negatively which is why uncertainty management is divided into opportunity management (which controls the positive influences) and risk management (which controls the negative influences) (MIT). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Classification of uncertainty===&lt;br /&gt;
In 2002 the former U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Henry Rumsfeld mentioned “unknown unknowns” in a Department of Defense news briefing (YT). This made people try to understand the different types of uncertainty by classifying the knowledge. David Cleden (2009) uses the typical classification of risks, which is based on the knowledge of an event’s occurrence and impact, to list four possibilities: &lt;br /&gt;
*Known–knowns (knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–knowns (untapped knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Known–unknowns (risks)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–unknowns (unfathomable uncertainty)&lt;br /&gt;
The following will describe, and provide examples of, the different elements. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The known knowns are the knowledge used in the planning phase of a project. This means that even before the project has started, the people involved in the project are aware of basic knowledge or theory behind the project. A very simple example could be that, in a building project, all participants are aware that a lot of money will be spent on materials, salaries and so on. It could also be to identify the obvious stakeholders of the project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Since a project consists of people from different backgrounds with different skillsets, and there is limited space or resources to hire experts on every single aspect of the project, there will be unknown knowns in a project. These consist of knowledge that is not apparent within the project group but can be gathered from experts on the areas. In the example of a building project, this could be knowledge of an external consultant providing additional details to the planning process of the project.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Known unknowns are risks that the project group is aware of the existence of and want to manage carefully. In this sense, the risks are negative impacts on the project that the project has to minimize. These can be risks of material shortage or negative stakeholder involvement in a building project. The risk of negative stakeholder involvement could be due to poor communication to the important stakeholders which leads to them intervening in the project and possibly setting it back to an earlier state. Therefore, the known unknowns are part of risk management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the known unknowns that are yet to be identified. As it is located in the cross-section of the uncertain and unidentified, these risks are by far the most difficult to manage. An unknown unknown is an event or impact on a project that is considered unfathomable or even unimaginable which is why they are so difficult to consider in the planning process of a project. It is furthermore difficult to provide an example of an unknown unknown as these are risks that seem unidentifiable, although this article will provide some tools to convert the unknown unknowns into known unknowns which make them easier to manage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To summarize, the different elements can be shortly described (Market Business News):&lt;br /&gt;
*The known knowns are the things we are aware of and understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown knowns are the things understand but aren’t aware of.&lt;br /&gt;
*The known unknowns are the things we are aware of but don’t understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown unknowns are the things we are neither aware of nor understand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Models of uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces models to understand and manage uncertainty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Risk classification===&lt;br /&gt;
To simplify the classification mentioned in the previous section, the knowledge of an event’s occurrence is labeled “identification” and the knowledge of an event’s impact is labeled “certainty”. In the matrix below, the four different types of (un)certainty are portrayed. The matrix is divided in to certainty and identification. The idea is that “identification” is defined as either “knowledge” or “risk”, i.e. positive or negative and that “certainty” is whether or not we know that a certain event, that can influence the project, exists. This implies that the factors or events that we know exist and have knowledge about are relatively easy to identify and manage whereas the unknown unknowns are much harder to identify and therefore manage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Cynefin Framework===&lt;br /&gt;
The Cynefin Framework is a tool developed by David J. Snowden and other contributors (HBR ref.) to determine contexts enabling leaders to make appropriate choices. The framework consists of five domains: Simple, complicated, complex, chaotic and disorder. The first two are placed in to the “ordered universe” where facts are applicable. Complex and chaotic are placed in the “un-ordered universe” where the relationship between cause and effect is not immediately apparent. Below, the different domains are shortly explained and linked to the above model:&lt;br /&gt;
*The simple domain are the known knowns where it is possible to categorize the situation based on facts on the area.&lt;br /&gt;
*The complicated domain are the known unknowns where the situation isn’t immediately apparent, but it is possible to analyze the situation. &lt;br /&gt;
*The complex domain are the unknown unknowns where the outcome cannot be immediately determined but experiments will lead towards the correct direction.&lt;br /&gt;
*The chaotic domain are the unknowable unknowns where nothing makes sense and we search for ways to move more towards the complex domain.&lt;br /&gt;
*Disorder is a mix of the above domains and the situation has to be broken down in to parts to assign to the other domains. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much like the model described in the above section, this framework suggests that the easiest situation is the simple domain, where the known knowns are found. Furthermore, the framework provides tools for leaders to manage their way out of the above situations.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Tools==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces some tools to minimize the known unknown risks or identify the unknown unknown risks. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Application==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the application will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the limitations will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Here the bibliography will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kim, S. D. (2012). Characterizing unknown unknowns. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/civil-and-environmental-engineering/1-040-project-management-spring-2009/lecture-notes/MIT1_040s09_lec24.pdf free to share and adapt under Creative Commons terms: Attribution, noncommercial, share alike (https://ocw.mit.edu/terms/) &lt;br /&gt;
Slides by Fred Moavenzadeh from MIT&lt;br /&gt;
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chapman, Chris &amp;amp; Ward, Stephen. (2002). Managing Project Risk and Uncertainty : A Constructively Simple Approach to Decision Making / C. Chapman, S. Ward.&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31747699_Managing_Project_Risk_and_Uncertainty_A_Constructively_Simple_Approach_to_Decision_Making_C_Chapman_S_Ward &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiPe1OiKQuk Donald Rumsfeld DoD briefing. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Managing-Project-Uncertainty-Advances-Management/dp/B00SLUXH2E Cleden, D. (2009) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://marketbusinessnews.com/financial-glossary/financial-glossary-u/unknown-unknowns/ summary of knowns.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://pmiswohio.org/images/downloads/Summit18/hatter_cynefin_framework_summit18_03202018.pdf Cynefin Framewok (PMI SW Ohio)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://hbr.org/2007/11/a-leaders-framework-for-decision-making &lt;br /&gt;
(Cynefin Framework). A Leader’s Framework for Decision Making, Snowden, D. J. et al. 2007 in Harvard Business Review&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S154073</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64199</id>
		<title>Unidentified Risks</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64199"/>
		<updated>2019-02-22T12:41:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S154073: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any project there will be some risks that should be carefully managed, but there will also be uncertainty, which involves variability and ambiguity (MIT reference). This article outlines four different types of uncertainty with the main focus on the unidentified risks (or the “unknown unknowns”). Unidentified risks are the risks that seem impossible to find. However, studies have found that they in fact are not unidentifiable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To describe uncertainty management in detail, this article will first explain what variability and ambiguity in projects consists of and then dig deeper into the different types of uncertainty. Finally, some tools to manage the unidentified risks are presented as well as a reflection on the usage of the tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the type of uncertainty that is generated due to lack of knowledge or unexpected events and changes in the project &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;(Slides from Project Management course (42429 F18))&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Before a project is started, it is important to reflect on the possible factors that can influence the project. Part of this is to reflect on the types of uncertainty, namely the known knowns (change control), known unknowns (risk management), unknown knowns (planning &amp;amp; communication errors) and the unknown unknowns (unexpected events and changes). A model to describe these four types of uncertainty is the Cynefin Framework which is divided in to the following: Order, unorder and disorder. Unorder is furthermore divided in to the complex domain and the complicated domain, while order is divided in to the chaotic domain and the simple domain. The Cynefin Framework will be used as a model to describe the types of uncertainty throughout this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
To understand the theory of uncertainty management and thereby the importance of managing the unidentified risks, this section will first describe what uncertainty really is as well as link it to risk management. Furthermore, the different types of uncertainty will be outlined.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The British Standard (Axelos) (REF: Project Management: &amp;quot;Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2&amp;quot;) distinguishes project work from “business as usual” by the following characteristics: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change, temporary, cross-functional, unique and uncertainty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Change implies that a project introduces a change from one state to another.&lt;br /&gt;
*Temporary is part of the definition of a project and means that business as usual returns after the project is finished. &lt;br /&gt;
*Cross-functional means that a project involves people from different backgrounds working together towards a common goal.&lt;br /&gt;
*Unique implies that no projects are identical &lt;br /&gt;
*Uncertainty covers the threats (and opportunities) that the other characteristics bring to the project work. These threats and opportunities are often bigger and more important than those in everyday work, meaning that projects are subject to more risk. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article focuses describes the uncertainty of projects. The term “uncertainty” is defined by Chapman and Ward (2002) as “lack of certainty, involving variability and ambiguity”, where variability is “uncertainty about the size of parameters which may result from lack of data, lack of detail, lack of definition, lack of experience and so on, which may be quantified if this is useful” and ambiguity is “the aspects of uncertainty not addressed in terms of variability”. Uncertainty can thereby be defined as the aspects of a project that may influence it either positively or negatively which is why uncertainty management is divided into opportunity management (which controls the positive influences) and risk management (which controls the negative influences) (MIT). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Classification of uncertainty===&lt;br /&gt;
In 2002 the former U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Henry Rumsfeld mentioned “unknown unknowns” in a Department of Defense news briefing (YT). This made people try to understand the different types of uncertainty by classifying the knowledge. David Cleden (2009) uses the typical classification of risks, which is based on the knowledge of an event’s occurrence and impact, to list four possibilities: &lt;br /&gt;
*Known–knowns (knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–knowns (untapped knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Known–unknowns (risks)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–unknowns (unfathomable uncertainty)&lt;br /&gt;
The following will describe, and provide examples of, the different elements. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The known knowns are the knowledge used in the planning phase of a project. This means that even before the project has started, the people involved in the project are aware of basic knowledge or theory behind the project. A very simple example could be that, in a building project, all participants are aware that a lot of money will be spent on materials, salaries and so on. It could also be to identify the obvious stakeholders of the project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Since a project consists of people from different backgrounds with different skillsets, and there is limited space or resources to hire experts on every single aspect of the project, there will be unknown knowns in a project. These consist of knowledge that is not apparent within the project group but can be gathered from experts on the areas. In the example of a building project, this could be knowledge of an external consultant providing additional details to the planning process of the project.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Known unknowns are risks that the project group is aware of the existence of and want to manage carefully. In this sense, the risks are negative impacts on the project that the project has to minimize. These can be risks of material shortage or negative stakeholder involvement in a building project. The risk of negative stakeholder involvement could be due to poor communication to the important stakeholders which leads to them intervening in the project and possibly setting it back to an earlier state. Therefore, the known unknowns are part of risk management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the known unknowns that are yet to be identified. As it is located in the cross-section of the uncertain and unidentified, these risks are by far the most difficult to manage. An unknown unknown is an event or impact on a project that is considered unfathomable or even unimaginable which is why they are so difficult to consider in the planning process of a project. It is furthermore difficult to provide an example of an unknown unknown as these are risks that seem unidentifiable, although this article will provide some tools to convert the unknown unknowns into known unknowns which make them easier to manage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To summarize, the different elements can be shortly described (Market Business News):&lt;br /&gt;
*The known knowns are the things we are aware of and understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown knowns are the things understand but aren’t aware of.&lt;br /&gt;
*The known unknowns are the things we are aware of but don’t understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown unknowns are the things we are neither aware of nor understand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Models of uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces models to understand and manage uncertainty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Risk classification===&lt;br /&gt;
To simplify the classification mentioned in the previous section, the knowledge of an event’s occurrence is labeled “identification” and the knowledge of an event’s impact is labeled “certainty”. In the matrix below, the four different types of (un)certainty are portrayed. The matrix is divided in to certainty and identification. The idea is that “identification” is defined as either “knowledge” or “risk”, i.e. positive or negative and that “certainty” is whether or not we know that a certain event, that can influence the project, exists. This implies that the factors or events that we know exist and have knowledge about are relatively easy to identify and manage whereas the unknown unknowns are much harder to identify and therefore manage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Cynefin Framework===&lt;br /&gt;
The Cynefin Framework is a tool developed by David J. Snowden and other contributors (HBR ref.) to determine contexts enabling leaders to make appropriate choices. The framework consists of five domains: Simple, complicated, complex, chaotic and disorder. The first two are placed in to the “ordered universe” where facts are applicable. Complex and chaotic are placed in the “un-ordered universe” where the relationship between cause and effect is not immediately apparent. Below, the different domains are shortly explained and linked to the above model:&lt;br /&gt;
*The simple domain are the known knowns where it is possible to categorize the situation based on facts on the area.&lt;br /&gt;
*The complicated domain are the known unknowns where the situation isn’t immediately apparent, but it is possible to analyze the situation. &lt;br /&gt;
*The complex domain are the unknown unknowns where the outcome cannot be immediately determined but experiments will lead towards the correct direction.&lt;br /&gt;
*The chaotic domain are the unknowable unknowns where nothing makes sense and we search for ways to move more towards the complex domain.&lt;br /&gt;
*Disorder is a mix of the above domains and the situation has to be broken down in to parts to assign to the other domains. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much like the model described in the above section, this framework suggests that the easiest situation is the simple domain, where the known knowns are found. Furthermore, the framework provides tools for leaders to manage their way out of the above situations.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Tools==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces some tools to minimize the known unknown risks or identify the unknown unknown risks. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Application==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the application will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the limitations will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the bibliography will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kim, S. D. (2012). Characterizing unknown unknowns. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/civil-and-environmental-engineering/1-040-project-management-spring-2009/lecture-notes/MIT1_040s09_lec24.pdf free to share and adapt under Creative Commons terms: Attribution, noncommercial, share alike (https://ocw.mit.edu/terms/) &lt;br /&gt;
Slides by Fred Moavenzadeh from MIT&lt;br /&gt;
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chapman, Chris &amp;amp; Ward, Stephen. (2002). Managing Project Risk and Uncertainty : A Constructively Simple Approach to Decision Making / C. Chapman, S. Ward.&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31747699_Managing_Project_Risk_and_Uncertainty_A_Constructively_Simple_Approach_to_Decision_Making_C_Chapman_S_Ward &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiPe1OiKQuk Donald Rumsfeld DoD briefing. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Managing-Project-Uncertainty-Advances-Management/dp/B00SLUXH2E Cleden, D. (2009) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://marketbusinessnews.com/financial-glossary/financial-glossary-u/unknown-unknowns/ summary of knowns.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://pmiswohio.org/images/downloads/Summit18/hatter_cynefin_framework_summit18_03202018.pdf Cynefin Framewok (PMI SW Ohio)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://hbr.org/2007/11/a-leaders-framework-for-decision-making &lt;br /&gt;
(Cynefin Framework). A Leader’s Framework for Decision Making, Snowden, D. J. et al. 2007 in Harvard Business Review&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S154073</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64114</id>
		<title>Unidentified Risks</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64114"/>
		<updated>2019-02-22T12:13:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S154073: /* Annotated bibliography */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any project there will be some risks that should be carefully managed, but there will also be uncertainty, which involves variability and ambiguity (MIT reference). This article outlines four different types of uncertainty with the main focus on the unidentified risks (or the “unknown unknowns”). Unidentified risks are the risks that seem impossible to find. However, studies have found that they in fact are not unidentifiable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To describe uncertainty management in detail, this article will first explain what variability and ambiguity in projects consists of and then dig deeper into the different types of uncertainty. Finally, some tools to manage the unidentified risks are presented as well as a reflection on the usage of the tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the type of uncertainty that is generated due to lack of knowledge or unexpected events and changes in the project (Project Management course (42429)). Before a project is started, it is important to reflect on the possible factors that can influence the project. Part of this is to reflect on the types of uncertainty, namely the known knowns (change control), known unknowns (risk management), unknown knowns (planning &amp;amp; communication errors) and the unknown unknowns (unexpected events and changes). A model to describe these four types of uncertainty is the Cynefin Framework which is divided in to the following: Order, unorder and disorder. Unorder is furthermore divided in to the complex domain and the complicated domain, while order is divided in to the chaotic domain and the simple domain. The Cynefin Framework will be used as a model to describe the types of uncertainty throughout this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
To understand the theory of uncertainty management and thereby the importance of managing the unidentified risks, this section will first describe what uncertainty really is as well as link it to risk management. Furthermore, the different types of uncertainty will be outlined.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The British Standard (Axelos) (REF: Project Management: &amp;quot;Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2&amp;quot;) distinguishes project work from “business as usual” by the following characteristics: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change, temporary, cross-functional, unique and uncertainty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Change implies that a project introduces a change from one state to another.&lt;br /&gt;
*Temporary is part of the definition of a project and means that business as usual returns after the project is finished. &lt;br /&gt;
*Cross-functional means that a project involves people from different backgrounds working together towards a common goal.&lt;br /&gt;
*Unique implies that no projects are identical &lt;br /&gt;
*Uncertainty covers the threats (and opportunities) that the other characteristics bring to the project work. These threats and opportunities are often bigger and more important than those in everyday work, meaning that projects are subject to more risk. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article focuses describes the uncertainty of projects. The term “uncertainty” is defined by Chapman and Ward (2002) as “lack of certainty, involving variability and ambiguity”, where variability is “uncertainty about the size of parameters which may result from lack of data, lack of detail, lack of definition, lack of experience and so on, which may be quantified if this is useful” and ambiguity is “the aspects of uncertainty not addressed in terms of variability”. Uncertainty can thereby be defined as the aspects of a project that may influence it either positively or negatively which is why uncertainty management is divided into opportunity management (which controls the positive influences) and risk management (which controls the negative influences) (MIT). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Classification of uncertainty===&lt;br /&gt;
In 2002 the former U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Henry Rumsfeld mentioned “unknown unknowns” in a Department of Defense news briefing (YT). This made people try to understand the different types of uncertainty by classifying the knowledge. David Cleden (2009) uses the typical classification of risks, which is based on the knowledge of an event’s occurrence and impact, to list four possibilities: &lt;br /&gt;
*Known–knowns (knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–knowns (untapped knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Known–unknowns (risks)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–unknowns (unfathomable uncertainty)&lt;br /&gt;
The following will describe, and provide examples of, the different elements. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The known knowns are the knowledge used in the planning phase of a project. This means that even before the project has started, the people involved in the project are aware of basic knowledge or theory behind the project. A very simple example could be that, in a building project, all participants are aware that a lot of money will be spent on materials, salaries and so on. It could also be to identify the obvious stakeholders of the project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Since a project consists of people from different backgrounds with different skillsets, and there is limited space or resources to hire experts on every single aspect of the project, there will be unknown knowns in a project. These consist of knowledge that is not apparent within the project group but can be gathered from experts on the areas. In the example of a building project, this could be knowledge of an external consultant providing additional details to the planning process of the project.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Known unknowns are risks that the project group is aware of the existence of and want to manage carefully. In this sense, the risks are negative impacts on the project that the project has to minimize. These can be risks of material shortage or negative stakeholder involvement in a building project. The risk of negative stakeholder involvement could be due to poor communication to the important stakeholders which leads to them intervening in the project and possibly setting it back to an earlier state. Therefore, the known unknowns are part of risk management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the known unknowns that are yet to be identified. As it is located in the cross-section of the uncertain and unidentified, these risks are by far the most difficult to manage. An unknown unknown is an event or impact on a project that is considered unfathomable or even unimaginable which is why they are so difficult to consider in the planning process of a project. It is furthermore difficult to provide an example of an unknown unknown as these are risks that seem unidentifiable, although this article will provide some tools to convert the unknown unknowns into known unknowns which make them easier to manage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To summarize, the different elements can be shortly described (Market Business News):&lt;br /&gt;
*The known knowns are the things we are aware of and understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown knowns are the things understand but aren’t aware of.&lt;br /&gt;
*The known unknowns are the things we are aware of but don’t understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown unknowns are the things we are neither aware of nor understand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Models of uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces models to understand and manage uncertainty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Risk classification===&lt;br /&gt;
To simplify the classification mentioned in the previous section, the knowledge of an event’s occurrence is labeled “identification” and the knowledge of an event’s impact is labeled “certainty”. In the matrix below, the four different types of (un)certainty are portrayed. The matrix is divided in to certainty and identification. The idea is that “identification” is defined as either “knowledge” or “risk”, i.e. positive or negative and that “certainty” is whether or not we know that a certain event, that can influence the project, exists. This implies that the factors or events that we know exist and have knowledge about are relatively easy to identify and manage whereas the unknown unknowns are much harder to identify and therefore manage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Cynefin Framework===&lt;br /&gt;
The Cynefin Framework is a tool developed by David J. Snowden and other contributors (HBR ref.) to determine contexts enabling leaders to make appropriate choices. The framework consists of five domains: Simple, complicated, complex, chaotic and disorder. The first two are placed in to the “ordered universe” where facts are applicable. Complex and chaotic are placed in the “un-ordered universe” where the relationship between cause and effect is not immediately apparent. Below, the different domains are shortly explained and linked to the above model:&lt;br /&gt;
*The simple domain are the known knowns where it is possible to categorize the situation based on facts on the area.&lt;br /&gt;
*The complicated domain are the known unknowns where the situation isn’t immediately apparent, but it is possible to analyze the situation. &lt;br /&gt;
*The complex domain are the unknown unknowns where the outcome cannot be immediately determined but experiments will lead towards the correct direction.&lt;br /&gt;
*The chaotic domain are the unknowable unknowns where nothing makes sense and we search for ways to move more towards the complex domain.&lt;br /&gt;
*Disorder is a mix of the above domains and the situation has to be broken down in to parts to assign to the other domains. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much like the model described in the above section, this framework suggests that the easiest situation is the simple domain, where the known knowns are found. Furthermore, the framework provides tools for leaders to manage their way out of the above situations.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Tools==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces some tools to minimize the known unknown risks or identify the unknown unknown risks. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Application==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the application will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the limitations will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the bibliography will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kim, S. D. (2012). Characterizing unknown unknowns. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/civil-and-environmental-engineering/1-040-project-management-spring-2009/lecture-notes/MIT1_040s09_lec24.pdf free to share and adapt under Creative Commons terms: Attribution, noncommercial, share alike (https://ocw.mit.edu/terms/) &lt;br /&gt;
Slides by Fred Moavenzadeh from MIT&lt;br /&gt;
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chapman, Chris &amp;amp; Ward, Stephen. (2002). Managing Project Risk and Uncertainty : A Constructively Simple Approach to Decision Making / C. Chapman, S. Ward.&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31747699_Managing_Project_Risk_and_Uncertainty_A_Constructively_Simple_Approach_to_Decision_Making_C_Chapman_S_Ward &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiPe1OiKQuk Donald Rumsfeld DoD briefing. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Managing-Project-Uncertainty-Advances-Management/dp/B00SLUXH2E Cleden, D. (2009) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://marketbusinessnews.com/financial-glossary/financial-glossary-u/unknown-unknowns/ summary of knowns.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://pmiswohio.org/images/downloads/Summit18/hatter_cynefin_framework_summit18_03202018.pdf Cynefin Framewok (PMI SW Ohio)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://hbr.org/2007/11/a-leaders-framework-for-decision-making &lt;br /&gt;
(Cynefin Framework). A Leader’s Framework for Decision Making, Snowden, D. J. et al. 2007 in Harvard Business Review&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S154073</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64112</id>
		<title>Unidentified Risks</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64112"/>
		<updated>2019-02-22T12:13:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S154073: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any project there will be some risks that should be carefully managed, but there will also be uncertainty, which involves variability and ambiguity (MIT reference). This article outlines four different types of uncertainty with the main focus on the unidentified risks (or the “unknown unknowns”). Unidentified risks are the risks that seem impossible to find. However, studies have found that they in fact are not unidentifiable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To describe uncertainty management in detail, this article will first explain what variability and ambiguity in projects consists of and then dig deeper into the different types of uncertainty. Finally, some tools to manage the unidentified risks are presented as well as a reflection on the usage of the tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the type of uncertainty that is generated due to lack of knowledge or unexpected events and changes in the project (Project Management course (42429)). Before a project is started, it is important to reflect on the possible factors that can influence the project. Part of this is to reflect on the types of uncertainty, namely the known knowns (change control), known unknowns (risk management), unknown knowns (planning &amp;amp; communication errors) and the unknown unknowns (unexpected events and changes). A model to describe these four types of uncertainty is the Cynefin Framework which is divided in to the following: Order, unorder and disorder. Unorder is furthermore divided in to the complex domain and the complicated domain, while order is divided in to the chaotic domain and the simple domain. The Cynefin Framework will be used as a model to describe the types of uncertainty throughout this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
To understand the theory of uncertainty management and thereby the importance of managing the unidentified risks, this section will first describe what uncertainty really is as well as link it to risk management. Furthermore, the different types of uncertainty will be outlined.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The British Standard (Axelos) (REF: Project Management: &amp;quot;Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2&amp;quot;) distinguishes project work from “business as usual” by the following characteristics: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change, temporary, cross-functional, unique and uncertainty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Change implies that a project introduces a change from one state to another.&lt;br /&gt;
*Temporary is part of the definition of a project and means that business as usual returns after the project is finished. &lt;br /&gt;
*Cross-functional means that a project involves people from different backgrounds working together towards a common goal.&lt;br /&gt;
*Unique implies that no projects are identical &lt;br /&gt;
*Uncertainty covers the threats (and opportunities) that the other characteristics bring to the project work. These threats and opportunities are often bigger and more important than those in everyday work, meaning that projects are subject to more risk. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article focuses describes the uncertainty of projects. The term “uncertainty” is defined by Chapman and Ward (2002) as “lack of certainty, involving variability and ambiguity”, where variability is “uncertainty about the size of parameters which may result from lack of data, lack of detail, lack of definition, lack of experience and so on, which may be quantified if this is useful” and ambiguity is “the aspects of uncertainty not addressed in terms of variability”. Uncertainty can thereby be defined as the aspects of a project that may influence it either positively or negatively which is why uncertainty management is divided into opportunity management (which controls the positive influences) and risk management (which controls the negative influences) (MIT). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Classification of uncertainty===&lt;br /&gt;
In 2002 the former U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Henry Rumsfeld mentioned “unknown unknowns” in a Department of Defense news briefing (YT). This made people try to understand the different types of uncertainty by classifying the knowledge. David Cleden (2009) uses the typical classification of risks, which is based on the knowledge of an event’s occurrence and impact, to list four possibilities: &lt;br /&gt;
*Known–knowns (knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–knowns (untapped knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Known–unknowns (risks)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–unknowns (unfathomable uncertainty)&lt;br /&gt;
The following will describe, and provide examples of, the different elements. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The known knowns are the knowledge used in the planning phase of a project. This means that even before the project has started, the people involved in the project are aware of basic knowledge or theory behind the project. A very simple example could be that, in a building project, all participants are aware that a lot of money will be spent on materials, salaries and so on. It could also be to identify the obvious stakeholders of the project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Since a project consists of people from different backgrounds with different skillsets, and there is limited space or resources to hire experts on every single aspect of the project, there will be unknown knowns in a project. These consist of knowledge that is not apparent within the project group but can be gathered from experts on the areas. In the example of a building project, this could be knowledge of an external consultant providing additional details to the planning process of the project.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Known unknowns are risks that the project group is aware of the existence of and want to manage carefully. In this sense, the risks are negative impacts on the project that the project has to minimize. These can be risks of material shortage or negative stakeholder involvement in a building project. The risk of negative stakeholder involvement could be due to poor communication to the important stakeholders which leads to them intervening in the project and possibly setting it back to an earlier state. Therefore, the known unknowns are part of risk management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the known unknowns that are yet to be identified. As it is located in the cross-section of the uncertain and unidentified, these risks are by far the most difficult to manage. An unknown unknown is an event or impact on a project that is considered unfathomable or even unimaginable which is why they are so difficult to consider in the planning process of a project. It is furthermore difficult to provide an example of an unknown unknown as these are risks that seem unidentifiable, although this article will provide some tools to convert the unknown unknowns into known unknowns which make them easier to manage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To summarize, the different elements can be shortly described (Market Business News):&lt;br /&gt;
*The known knowns are the things we are aware of and understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown knowns are the things understand but aren’t aware of.&lt;br /&gt;
*The known unknowns are the things we are aware of but don’t understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown unknowns are the things we are neither aware of nor understand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Models of uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces models to understand and manage uncertainty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Risk classification===&lt;br /&gt;
To simplify the classification mentioned in the previous section, the knowledge of an event’s occurrence is labeled “identification” and the knowledge of an event’s impact is labeled “certainty”. In the matrix below, the four different types of (un)certainty are portrayed. The matrix is divided in to certainty and identification. The idea is that “identification” is defined as either “knowledge” or “risk”, i.e. positive or negative and that “certainty” is whether or not we know that a certain event, that can influence the project, exists. This implies that the factors or events that we know exist and have knowledge about are relatively easy to identify and manage whereas the unknown unknowns are much harder to identify and therefore manage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Cynefin Framework===&lt;br /&gt;
The Cynefin Framework is a tool developed by David J. Snowden and other contributors (HBR ref.) to determine contexts enabling leaders to make appropriate choices. The framework consists of five domains: Simple, complicated, complex, chaotic and disorder. The first two are placed in to the “ordered universe” where facts are applicable. Complex and chaotic are placed in the “un-ordered universe” where the relationship between cause and effect is not immediately apparent. Below, the different domains are shortly explained and linked to the above model:&lt;br /&gt;
*The simple domain are the known knowns where it is possible to categorize the situation based on facts on the area.&lt;br /&gt;
*The complicated domain are the known unknowns where the situation isn’t immediately apparent, but it is possible to analyze the situation. &lt;br /&gt;
*The complex domain are the unknown unknowns where the outcome cannot be immediately determined but experiments will lead towards the correct direction.&lt;br /&gt;
*The chaotic domain are the unknowable unknowns where nothing makes sense and we search for ways to move more towards the complex domain.&lt;br /&gt;
*Disorder is a mix of the above domains and the situation has to be broken down in to parts to assign to the other domains. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much like the model described in the above section, this framework suggests that the easiest situation is the simple domain, where the known knowns are found. Furthermore, the framework provides tools for leaders to manage their way out of the above situations.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Tools==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces some tools to minimize the known unknown risks or identify the unknown unknown risks. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Application==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the application will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the limitations will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the bibliography will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kim, S. D. (2012). Characterizing unknown unknowns. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S154073</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64106</id>
		<title>Unidentified Risks</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=64106"/>
		<updated>2019-02-22T12:11:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S154073: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any project there will be some risks that should be carefully managed, but there will also be uncertainty, which involves variability and ambiguity (MIT reference). This article outlines four different types of uncertainty with the main focus on the unidentified risks (or the “unknown unknowns”). Unidentified risks are the risks that seem impossible to find. However, studies have found that they in fact are not unidentifiable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To describe uncertainty management in detail, this article will first explain what variability and ambiguity in projects consists of and then dig deeper into the different types of uncertainty. Finally, some tools to manage the unidentified risks are presented as well as a reflection on the usage of the tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the type of uncertainty that is generated due to lack of knowledge or unexpected events and changes in the project (Project Management course (42429)). Before a project is started, it is important to reflect on the possible factors that can influence the project. Part of this is to reflect on the types of uncertainty, namely the known knowns (change control), known unknowns (risk management), unknown knowns (planning &amp;amp; communication errors) and the unknown unknowns (unexpected events and changes). A model to describe these four types of uncertainty is the Cynefin Framework which is divided in to the following: Order, unorder and disorder. Unorder is furthermore divided in to the complex domain and the complicated domain, while order is divided in to the chaotic domain and the simple domain. The Cynefin Framework will be used as a model to describe the types of uncertainty throughout this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Big idea==&lt;br /&gt;
To understand the theory of uncertainty management and thereby the importance of managing the unidentified risks, this section will first describe what uncertainty really is as well as link it to risk management. Furthermore, the different types of uncertainty will be outlined. &lt;br /&gt;
===Uncertainty===&lt;br /&gt;
The British Standard (Axelos) (REF: Project Management: &amp;quot;Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2&amp;quot;) distinguishes project work from “business as usual” by the following characteristics: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change, temporary, cross-functional, unique and uncertainty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Change implies that a project introduces a change from one state to another.&lt;br /&gt;
*Temporary is part of the definition of a project and means that business as usual returns after the project is finished. &lt;br /&gt;
*Cross-functional means that a project involves people from different backgrounds working together towards a common goal.&lt;br /&gt;
*Unique implies that no projects are identical &lt;br /&gt;
*Uncertainty covers the threats (and opportunities) that the other characteristics bring to the project work. These threats and opportunities are often bigger and more important than those in everyday work, meaning that projects are subject to more risk. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article focuses describes the uncertainty of projects. The term “uncertainty” is defined by Chapman and Ward (2002) as “lack of certainty, involving variability and ambiguity”, where variability is “uncertainty about the size of parameters which may result from lack of data, lack of detail, lack of definition, lack of experience and so on, which may be quantified if this is useful” and ambiguity is “the aspects of uncertainty not addressed in terms of variability”. Uncertainty can thereby be defined as the aspects of a project that may influence it either positively or negatively which is why uncertainty management is divided into opportunity management (which controls the positive influences) and risk management (which controls the negative influences) (MIT). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Classification of uncertainty===&lt;br /&gt;
In 2002 the former U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Henry Rumsfeld mentioned “unknown unknowns” in a Department of Defense news briefing (YT). This made people try to understand the different types of uncertainty by classifying the knowledge. David Cleden (2009) uses the typical classification of risks, which is based on the knowledge of an event’s occurrence and impact, to list four possibilities: &lt;br /&gt;
*Known–knowns (knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–knowns (untapped knowledge)&lt;br /&gt;
*Known–unknowns (risks)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown–unknowns (unfathomable uncertainty)&lt;br /&gt;
The following will describe, and provide examples of, the different elements. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known knowns===&lt;br /&gt;
The known knowns are the knowledge used in the planning phase of a project. This means that even before the project has started, the people involved in the project are aware of basic knowledge or theory behind the project. A very simple example could be that, in a building project, all participants are aware that a lot of money will be spent on materials, salaries and so on. It could also be to identify the obvious stakeholders of the project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown knowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Since a project consists of people from different backgrounds with different skillsets, and there is limited space or resources to hire experts on every single aspect of the project, there will be unknown knowns in a project. These consist of knowledge that is not apparent within the project group but can be gathered from experts on the areas. In the example of a building project, this could be knowledge of an external consultant providing additional details to the planning process of the project.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Known unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
Known unknowns are risks that the project group is aware of the existence of and want to manage carefully. In this sense, the risks are negative impacts on the project that the project has to minimize. These can be risks of material shortage or negative stakeholder involvement in a building project. The risk of negative stakeholder involvement could be due to poor communication to the important stakeholders which leads to them intervening in the project and possibly setting it back to an earlier state. Therefore, the known unknowns are part of risk management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unknown unknowns====&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the known unknowns that are yet to be identified. As it is located in the cross-section of the uncertain and unidentified, these risks are by far the most difficult to manage. An unknown unknown is an event or impact on a project that is considered unfathomable or even unimaginable which is why they are so difficult to consider in the planning process of a project. It is furthermore difficult to provide an example of an unknown unknown as these are risks that seem unidentifiable, although this article will provide some tools to convert the unknown unknowns into known unknowns which make them easier to manage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To summarize, the different elements can be shortly described (Market Business News):&lt;br /&gt;
*The known knowns are the things we are aware of and understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown knowns are the things understand but aren’t aware of.&lt;br /&gt;
*The known unknowns are the things we are aware of but don’t understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*The unknown unknowns are the things we are neither aware of nor understand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Models of uncertainty==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces models to understand and manage uncertainty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Risk classification===&lt;br /&gt;
To simplify the classification mentioned in the previous section, the knowledge of an event’s occurrence is labeled “identification” and the knowledge of an event’s impact is labeled “certainty”. In the matrix below, the four different types of (un)certainty are portrayed. The matrix is divided in to certainty and identification. The idea is that “identification” is defined as either “knowledge” or “risk”, i.e. positive or negative and that “certainty” is whether or not we know that a certain event, that can influence the project, exists. This implies that the factors or events that we know exist and have knowledge about are relatively easy to identify and manage whereas the unknown unknowns are much harder to identify and therefore manage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Cynefin Framework===&lt;br /&gt;
The Cynefin Framework is a tool developed by David J. Snowden and other contributors (HBR ref.) to determine contexts enabling leaders to make appropriate choices. The framework consists of five domains: Simple, complicated, complex, chaotic and disorder. The first two are placed in to the “ordered universe” where facts are applicable. Complex and chaotic are placed in the “un-ordered universe” where the relationship between cause and effect is not immediately apparent. Below, the different domains are shortly explained and linked to the above model:&lt;br /&gt;
*The simple domain are the known knowns where it is possible to categorize the situation based on facts on the area.&lt;br /&gt;
*The complicated domain are the known unknowns where the situation isn’t immediately apparent, but it is possible to analyze the situation. &lt;br /&gt;
*The complex domain are the unknown unknowns where the outcome cannot be immediately determined but experiments will lead towards the correct direction.&lt;br /&gt;
*The chaotic domain are the unknowable unknowns where nothing makes sense and we search for ways to move more towards the complex domain.&lt;br /&gt;
*Disorder is a mix of the above domains and the situation has to be broken down in to parts to assign to the other domains. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much like the model described in the above section, this framework suggests that the easiest situation is the simple domain, where the known knowns are found. Furthermore, the framework provides tools for leaders to manage their way out of the above situations.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Tools==&lt;br /&gt;
This section introduces some tools to minimize the known unknown risks or identify the unknown unknown risks. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Application==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the application will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the limitations will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the bibliography will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kim, S. D. (2012). Characterizing unknown unknowns. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S154073</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=62384</id>
		<title>Unidentified Risks</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=62384"/>
		<updated>2019-02-19T17:22:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S154073: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;In any project there will be some risks that should be carefully managed, but there will also be uncertainty, which involves variability and ambiguity (MIT reference). This article outlines four different types of uncertainty with the main focus on the unidentified risks (or the “unknown unknowns”). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unidentified risks (or &amp;quot;Unknown unknowns&amp;quot;) are the risks that seem impossible to find. However, studies have found that they in fact are not unidentifiable. The unknown unknowns are the type of uncertainty that is generated due to lack of knowledge or unexpected events and changes in the project. Before a project is started, it is important to reflect on the possible factors that can influence the project. Part of this is to reflect on the types of uncertainty, namely the known knowns (change control), known unknowns (risk management), unknown knowns (planning &amp;amp; communication errors) and the unknown unknowns (unexpected events and changes). A model to describe these four types of uncertainty is the Cynefin Framework which is divided in to the following: Order, unorder and disorder. Unorder is furthermore divided in to the complex domain and the complicated domain, while order is divided in to the chaotic domain and the simple domain. The Cynefin Framework will be used as a model to describe the types of uncertainty throughout this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To describe uncertainty management in detail, this article will first explain what variability and ambiguity in projects consists of and then dig deeper into the different types of uncertainty. Finally, some tools to manage the unidentified risks are presented as well as a reflection on the usage of the tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Big idea==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the big idea will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Application==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the application will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the limitations will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the bibliography will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kim, S. D. (2012). Characterizing unknown unknowns. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S154073</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=62379</id>
		<title>Unidentified Risks</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=62379"/>
		<updated>2019-02-19T17:16:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S154073: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;In any project there will be some risks that should be carefully managed, but there will also be uncertainty, which involves variability and ambiguity (MIT reference). This article outlines four different types of uncertainty with the main focus on the unidentified risks (or the “unknown unknowns”). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To describe uncertainty management in detail, this article will first explain what variability and ambiguity in projects consists of and then dig deeper into the different types of uncertainty. Finally, some tools to manage the unidentified risks are presented as well as a reflection on the usage of the tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unidentified risks (or &amp;quot;Unknown unknowns&amp;quot;) are the risks that seem impossible to find. However, studies have found that they in fact are not unidentifiable. The unknown unknowns are the type of uncertainty that is generated due to lack of knowledge or unexpected events and changes in the project. Before a project is started, it is important to reflect on the possible factors that can influence the project. Part of this is to reflect on the types of uncertainty, namely the known knowns (change control), known unknowns (risk management), unknown knowns (planning &amp;amp; communication errors) and the unknown unknowns (unexpected events and changes). A model to describe these four types of uncertainty is the Cynefin Framework which is divided in to the following: Order, unorder and disorder. Unorder is furthermore divided in to the complex domain and the complicated domain, while order is divided in to the chaotic domain and the simple domain. The Cynefin Framework will be used as a model to describe the types of uncertainty throughout this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Big idea==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the big idea will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Application==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the application will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the limitations will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the bibliography will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kim, S. D. (2012). Characterizing unknown unknowns. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S154073</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=62378</id>
		<title>Unidentified Risks</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=62378"/>
		<updated>2019-02-19T17:15:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S154073: /* Abstract */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Unidentified risks (or &amp;quot;Unknown unknowns&amp;quot;) are the risks that seem impossible to find. However, studies have found that they in fact are not unidentifiable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any project there will be some risks that should be carefully managed, but there will also be uncertainty, which involves variability and ambiguity (MIT reference). This article outlines four different types of uncertainty with the main focus on the unidentified risks (or the “unknown unknowns”). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To describe uncertainty management in detail, this article will first explain what variability and ambiguity in projects consists of and then dig deeper into the different types of uncertainty. Finally, some tools to manage the unidentified risks are presented as well as a reflection on the usage of the tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the type of uncertainty that is generated due to lack of knowledge or unexpected events and changes in the project. Before a project is started, it is important to reflect on the possible factors that can influence the project. Part of this is to reflect on the types of uncertainty, namely the known knowns (change control), known unknowns (risk management), unknown knowns (planning &amp;amp; communication errors) and the unknown unknowns (unexpected events and changes). A model to describe these four types of uncertainty is the Cynefin Framework which is divided in to the following: Order, unorder and disorder. Unorder is furthermore divided in to the complex domain and the complicated domain, while order is divided in to the chaotic domain and the simple domain. The Cynefin Framework will be used as a model to describe the types of uncertainty throughout this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Big idea==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the big idea will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Application==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the application will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the limitations will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the bibliography will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kim, S. D. (2012). Characterizing unknown unknowns. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S154073</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=61478</id>
		<title>Unidentified Risks</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=61478"/>
		<updated>2019-02-17T17:39:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S154073: /* Abstract */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Unidentified risks (or &amp;quot;Unknown unknowns&amp;quot;) are the risks that seem impossible to find. However, studies have found that they in fact are not unidentifiable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any project there will be some risks that should be carefully managed, but there will also be uncertainty, which involves variability and ambiguity (MIT reference). This article outlines four different types of uncertainty with the main focus on the unidentified risks (or the “unknown unknowns”). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To describe uncertainty management in detail, this article will first explain what variability and ambiguity in projects consists of and then dig deeper into the different types of uncertainty. Finally, some tools to manage the unidentified risks are presented as well as a reflection on the usage of the tools. Below are the sections of the article outlined:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Big idea&lt;br /&gt;
** Uncertainty&lt;br /&gt;
*** Variability&lt;br /&gt;
*** Ambiguity&lt;br /&gt;
** Types of uncertainty&lt;br /&gt;
*** Known knowns&lt;br /&gt;
*** Known unknowns&lt;br /&gt;
*** Unknown knowns&lt;br /&gt;
*** Unknown unknowns&lt;br /&gt;
* Applications&lt;br /&gt;
** Tools for uncertainty management&lt;br /&gt;
* Limitations&lt;br /&gt;
** Reflections on the tools&lt;br /&gt;
* Annotated bibliography&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the type of uncertainty that is generated due to lack of knowledge or unexpected events and changes in the project. Before a project is started, it is important to reflect on the possible factors that can influence the project. Part of this is to reflect on the types of uncertainty, namely the known knowns (change control), known unknowns (risk management), unknown knowns (planning &amp;amp; communication errors) and the unknown unknowns (unexpected events and changes). A model to describe these four types of uncertainty is the Cynefin Framework which is divided in to the following: Order, unorder and disorder. Unorder is furthermore divided in to the complex domain and the complicated domain, while order is divided in to the chaotic domain and the simple domain. The Cynefin Framework will be used as a model to describe the types of uncertainty throughout this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Big idea==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the big idea will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Application==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the application will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the limitations will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the bibliography will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kim, S. D. (2012). Characterizing unknown unknowns. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S154073</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=61477</id>
		<title>Unidentified Risks</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=61477"/>
		<updated>2019-02-17T17:37:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S154073: /* Abstract */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Unidentified risks (or &amp;quot;Unknown unknowns&amp;quot;) are the risks that seem impossible to find. However, studies have found that they in fact are not unidentifiable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any project there will be some risks that should be carefully managed, but there will also be uncertainty, which involves variability and ambiguity (MIT reference). This article outlines four different types of uncertainty with the main focus on the unidentified risks (or the “unknown unknowns”). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To describe uncertainty management in detail, this article will first explain what variability and ambiguity in projects consists of and then dig deeper into the different types of uncertainty. Finally, some tools to manage the unidentified risks are presented as well as a reflection on the usage of the tools. Below are the sections of the article outlined:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Big idea&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
** Uncertainty&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*** Variability&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*** Ambiguity&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
** Types of uncertainty&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*** Known knowns&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*** Known unknowns&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*** Unknown knowns&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*** Unknown unknowns&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Applications&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
** Tools for uncertainty management&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Limitations&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
** Reflections on the tools&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Annotated bibliography&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the type of uncertainty that is generated due to lack of knowledge or unexpected events and changes in the project. Before a project is started, it is important to reflect on the possible factors that can influence the project. Part of this is to reflect on the types of uncertainty, namely the known knowns (change control), known unknowns (risk management), unknown knowns (planning &amp;amp; communication errors) and the unknown unknowns (unexpected events and changes). A model to describe these four types of uncertainty is the Cynefin Framework which is divided in to the following: Order, unorder and disorder. Unorder is furthermore divided in to the complex domain and the complicated domain, while order is divided in to the chaotic domain and the simple domain. The Cynefin Framework will be used as a model to describe the types of uncertainty throughout this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Big idea==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the big idea will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Application==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the application will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the limitations will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the bibliography will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kim, S. D. (2012). Characterizing unknown unknowns. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S154073</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=61476</id>
		<title>Unidentified Risks</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=61476"/>
		<updated>2019-02-17T17:34:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S154073: /* Abstract */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Unidentified risks (or &amp;quot;Unknown unknowns&amp;quot;) are the risks that seem impossible to find. However, studies have found that they in fact are not unidentifiable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any project there will be some risks that should be carefully managed, but there will also be uncertainty, which involves variability and ambiguity (MIT reference). This article outlines four different types of uncertainty with the main focus on the unidentified risks (or the “unknown unknowns”). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To describe uncertainty management in detail, this article will first explain what variability and ambiguity in projects consists of and then dig deeper into the different types of uncertainty. Finally, some tools to manage the unidentified risks are presented as well as a reflection on the usage of the tools. Below are the sections of the article outlined:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-	Big idea&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	o	Uncertainty&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
			Variability&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
			Ambiguity&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	o	Types of uncertainty&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
			Known knowns&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
			Known unknowns&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
			Unknown knowns&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
			Unknown unknowns&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-	Applications&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	o	Tools for uncertainty management&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-	Limitations&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	o	Reflections on the tools&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-	Annotated bibliography&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the type of uncertainty that is generated due to lack of knowledge or unexpected events and changes in the project. Before a project is started, it is important to reflect on the possible factors that can influence the project. Part of this is to reflect on the types of uncertainty, namely the known knowns (change control), known unknowns (risk management), unknown knowns (planning &amp;amp; communication errors) and the unknown unknowns (unexpected events and changes). A model to describe these four types of uncertainty is the Cynefin Framework which is divided in to the following: Order, unorder and disorder. Unorder is furthermore divided in to the complex domain and the complicated domain, while order is divided in to the chaotic domain and the simple domain. The Cynefin Framework will be used as a model to describe the types of uncertainty throughout this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Big idea==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the big idea will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Application==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the application will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the limitations will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the bibliography will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kim, S. D. (2012). Characterizing unknown unknowns. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S154073</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=61475</id>
		<title>Unidentified Risks</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Unidentified_Risks&amp;diff=61475"/>
		<updated>2019-02-17T17:34:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S154073: /* Abstract */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Unidentified risks (or &amp;quot;Unknown unknowns&amp;quot;) are the risks that seem impossible to find. However, studies have found that they in fact are not unidentifiable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any project there will be some risks that should be carefully managed, but there will also be uncertainty, which involves variability and ambiguity (MIT reference). This article outlines four different types of uncertainty with the main focus on the unidentified risks (or the “unknown unknowns”). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To describe uncertainty management in detail, this article will first explain what variability and ambiguity in projects consists of and then dig deeper into the different types of uncertainty. Finally, some tools to manage the unidentified risks are presented as well as a reflection on the usage of the tools. Below are the sections of the article outlined:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-	Big idea&lt;br /&gt;
	o	Uncertainty&lt;br /&gt;
			Variability&lt;br /&gt;
			Ambiguity&lt;br /&gt;
	o	Types of uncertainty&lt;br /&gt;
			Known knowns&lt;br /&gt;
			Known unknowns&lt;br /&gt;
			Unknown knowns&lt;br /&gt;
			Unknown unknowns&lt;br /&gt;
-	Applications&lt;br /&gt;
	o	Tools for uncertainty management&lt;br /&gt;
-	Limitations&lt;br /&gt;
	o	Reflections on the tools&lt;br /&gt;
-	Annotated bibliography&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown unknowns are the type of uncertainty that is generated due to lack of knowledge or unexpected events and changes in the project. Before a project is started, it is important to reflect on the possible factors that can influence the project. Part of this is to reflect on the types of uncertainty, namely the known knowns (change control), known unknowns (risk management), unknown knowns (planning &amp;amp; communication errors) and the unknown unknowns (unexpected events and changes). A model to describe these four types of uncertainty is the Cynefin Framework which is divided in to the following: Order, unorder and disorder. Unorder is furthermore divided in to the complex domain and the complicated domain, while order is divided in to the chaotic domain and the simple domain. The Cynefin Framework will be used as a model to describe the types of uncertainty throughout this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Big idea==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the big idea will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Application==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the application will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the limitations will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
Here the bibliography will be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kim, S. D. (2012). Characterizing unknown unknowns. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S154073</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>