<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-GB">
	<id>http://13.50.150.85/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=S152093</id>
	<title>DTU ProjectLab - User contributions [en-gb]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://13.50.150.85/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=S152093"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php/Special:Contributions/S152093"/>
	<updated>2026-07-14T17:55:36Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.3</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:Project_Management_Competency_Framework&amp;diff=17923</id>
		<title>Talk:Project Management Competency Framework</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:Project_Management_Competency_Framework&amp;diff=17923"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T23:39:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S152093: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Anna: Hi I like the idea, however, I&#039;m afraid that it doesn&#039;t really fit into either one of the two article types. This is not really a method, but you could easily choose a method within the topic of leadership.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Review of S141926, Reviewer 1 ==&lt;br /&gt;
==== General formal aspects ====&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Thank you for great feedback!! I appreciate the time you took to read my article. As you may have guessed, the article was by no means done when you read it (which I apologize for). I hope that you find the article both more interesting and enjoyable this time! :-) Below I have responded to your feedback.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Overall the writing is clear and precise with the use of appropriate technical words. However, I found some words mistranslated from Danish and minor grammatical issues.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Noted and corrected&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* In my opinion, I think it would make the article easier to be read if you added more full stops and you split the, under my point of view, too long paragraphs. I liked the paragraph where you make questions and answer them. However, I think that this part would be clearer in bullet points (under my point of view).&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Noted. I have tried to make more paragraphs and put in more sections.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* As I mention in the following section, the limitations/solutions part could be nicely shown in a format table to make the article more readable as well as adding some graphics to illustrate the methodology. &lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Unfortunately I couldn&#039;t find a lot of graphics that showed my points. I like the idea with the tables, although I couldn&#039;t find a place where it made sense (after I finished the article.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* I suggest you to review the Wikipedia formatting, I can see some references and links not well defined or linked.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Done&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====  Review of the content ====&lt;br /&gt;
* Regarding the Introduction part I think that gives a too general conclusion and does not focus enough to the main topic of the article, which is Leadership styles. Under my point of view, it is too focused on Standards and Managers competences and I am missing some more specific information about leadership in general. &lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;You are absolutely right. As my article wasn&#039;t done, I hadn&#039;t had time to change the headline of the article. I hope it makes more sense now.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* I think it would also improve your article to get more into detail on the different skills required for a project manager under different scenarios. &lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Done&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Apart from the fact that as I said I think there is some information missing that would make the article more understandable, I think that you would also had to add some more writing in order to fulfil the requirements regarding length.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Done&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* I would advise to review the requirements of the article type and adding a method regarding leadership and define the uses/limitations of this particular method.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Done&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* I liked the limitations and problems pointed out when saying that a manager does not have to possess technical skills in the project he/she manages and all problems that come up due to this matter. I found the information given interesting but it might be a good idea to type those problems/solutions in a tabular format or in separated paragraphs.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;I like the idea, but I couldn&#039;t picture it for me when I got further in the process of writing the article.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* I think it would be a good idea to add some more conclusions. However, I found the ones you mentioned relevant and a good summary of the above explained.  &lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Done&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Remember also to add the references part, I am afraid it is compulsory :) And maybe a Table of contents at the beginning.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Done, and once again thanks for great feedback :-)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Review given by StephSalling, review3 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Wow, one more great review. Thank you very much!! I appreciate the time you took to read my article. As you mentioned yourself, the article was by no means done when you read it (which I apologize for). I hope that you find the article both more interesting and enjoyable this time! :-) Below I have responded to your feedback.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
As far as I can tell, this article is not done yet, so I will possibly point out some things you were already planning to change or add.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Formal aspects ====&lt;br /&gt;
* The different parts in this “method” study are a bit hard to tell apart. The “big idea” is combined with the “application”, but none of them are really adequately described. From my point of view, the “limitations” part in the article is the best part, but it should be substantiated with some literature.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;I agree, and this is hopefully changed now.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* The grammar, spelling and punctuation in the “introduction” and “conclusion” are generally good: There are only a few singular/plural mistakes. It seems that the “limitations” part has not been proofread as thoroughly as the other sections.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;You are right, this is hopefully changed now.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Even though there are not many fill words in the sentences (which is very good), some of the sentences are a bit long and hard to follow. Maybe some bullet points illustrating the content of the different standards would help make it easier to read. - Or simply dividing the text into more paragraphs.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Done&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Some illustrations of the content of the different standards could be helpful.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;I like your idea, but unfortunately I couldn&#039;t find any good ones :-(&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* With the many different standards mentioned and technical terms used it would be easy to add some references within the wiki-system.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Done&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Content aspects ==== &lt;br /&gt;
* The subject of leadership styles and the different focus areas of a leader is very interesting, but I think the article would be more interesting for a practitioner if it elaborated the content of the standards and made a more clear comparison between them or just focused on one standard.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;I agree, and this has hopefully changed now.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* The relation to a specific project, program or portfolio management topic is a bit hard to see, since the article contains more of an overview than it deals with a specific problem/method. &lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;I agree, and this has hopefully changed now.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* The article is very short. The remaining 2000 words could be put into good use focusing on a specific leadership style or comparing the content of the different standards as mentioned earlier. &lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;This was really good inspiration!&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* The flow through the article so far is logical.&lt;br /&gt;
* References should be given to the sources used.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Done&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* It is hard to judge the quality of the sources used for the article as they are not directly given. From the different standards mentioned in the text, it seems that the sources are trustworthy and of high quality.&lt;br /&gt;
* The article does not contain an annotated bibliography of any source. &lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Now done&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* The article does not link to other relevant pages in the APPPM wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;And it still doesn&#039;t. Unfortunately I couldn&#039;t find any relevant for my article :-(&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* The “introduction” is very objective and does not leave the reader in doubt of that statements are substantiated by literature and not “own opinion”. The “limitations” part however seems more like “own opinion” statements, but this is not given anywhere.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;I hope that this is more clear now.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* The article seems to be free of “copy &amp;amp; paste” plagiarism since the sources of the different statements are mentioned in the text, but as there are no actual references (I can see that an attempt to use citation has been made but not completed) I cannot be sure.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;I hope that this is more clearer now, and once again, great feedback!&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Reviewer: Faker, review2==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;I have been really lucky with three times really good feedback!! I appreciate the time you took to read my article. As you may have guessed, the article was by no means done when you read it (which I apologize for). I hope that you find the article both more interesting and enjoyable this time! :-) Below I have responded to your feedback.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
;Clarity of writing. Is the writing free of grammatical and spelling errors? Is the language precise without unnecessary fill words?&lt;br /&gt;
: There are some spelling error and a few inconsistant grammatical errors, but it is not disrupting for understanding the article.&lt;br /&gt;
:The language seems very lenghty and is most possibly emphasized by the lack of chapters, paragraphs, line breaks, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;I agree, and hopefully this is changed now.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Clarity of the argument. Is there a logical flow to the article? Does one part build upon the other? Is the article consistent in its argument and free of contradictions?&lt;br /&gt;
: With the lack of headlines and description of chapters, the article seems very disorganized. &lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;I agree, and hopefully this is changed now.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
: The word &amp;quot;leadership&amp;quot; is first introduced in the last fifth of the article, which seems very strange to me. Being in the title of the article, I would assume it to be mentioned more often.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;I absolutely agree with you! As my article wasn&#039;t done, I hadn&#039;t had time to change the headline of the article. I hope it makes more sense now.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
: Thinking I was going to read an article about &amp;quot;Leadership styles&amp;quot;, the first half of the article seemed to be very much out of context.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Agree! Hopefully not any longer :-)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Is the article of high practical and / or academic relevance?&lt;br /&gt;
:It might just be me, but I could not see the relevance of the first half of the article. &lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Noted. I hope I have managed to put it more in context now.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The second to last chapter (&amp;quot;This naturally raises ...&amp;quot;) seemed like a rather complete text and a good mixture of &amp;quot;Big idea&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Application&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Does the article properly cite and acknowledge previous work? Is it based on empirical data instead of opinion?&lt;br /&gt;
: As the cites have not been fully implemented yet, it is tough to determined exactly how well it is cited, but there seems to be a lot of references. This also makes it hard to determine the degree of emperical data to opinion, but the article definitely comes across as academic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Is the article properly linked within the Wiki to other relevant articles and category summaries?&lt;br /&gt;
: There are seemingly no links to other articles within the Wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;And it still doesn&#039;t. Unfortunately I couldn&#039;t find any relevant for my article :-( Once again, thanks for great feedback :-)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S152093</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:Project_Management_Competency_Framework&amp;diff=17920</id>
		<title>Talk:Project Management Competency Framework</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:Project_Management_Competency_Framework&amp;diff=17920"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T23:39:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S152093: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Anna: Hi I like the idea, however, I&#039;m afraid that it doesn&#039;t really fit into either one of the two article types. This is not really a method, but you could easily choose a method within the topic of leadership.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Review of S141926, Reviewer 1 ==&lt;br /&gt;
==== General formal aspects ====&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Thank you for great feedback!! I appreciate the time you took to read through my article. As you may have guessed, the article was by no means done when you read it (which I apologize for). I hope that you find the article both more interesting and enjoyable this time! :-) Below I have responded to your feedback.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Overall the writing is clear and precise with the use of appropriate technical words. However, I found some words mistranslated from Danish and minor grammatical issues.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Noted and corrected&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* In my opinion, I think it would make the article easier to be read if you added more full stops and you split the, under my point of view, too long paragraphs. I liked the paragraph where you make questions and answer them. However, I think that this part would be clearer in bullet points (under my point of view).&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Noted. I have tried to make more paragraphs and put in more sections.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* As I mention in the following section, the limitations/solutions part could be nicely shown in a format table to make the article more readable as well as adding some graphics to illustrate the methodology. &lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Unfortunately I couldn&#039;t find a lot of graphics that showed my points. I like the idea with the tables, although I couldn&#039;t find a place where it made sense (after I finished the article.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* I suggest you to review the Wikipedia formatting, I can see some references and links not well defined or linked.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Done&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====  Review of the content ====&lt;br /&gt;
* Regarding the Introduction part I think that gives a too general conclusion and does not focus enough to the main topic of the article, which is Leadership styles. Under my point of view, it is too focused on Standards and Managers competences and I am missing some more specific information about leadership in general. &lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;You are absolutely right. As my article wasn&#039;t done, I hadn&#039;t had time to change the headline of the article. I hope it makes more sense now.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* I think it would also improve your article to get more into detail on the different skills required for a project manager under different scenarios. &lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Done&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Apart from the fact that as I said I think there is some information missing that would make the article more understandable, I think that you would also had to add some more writing in order to fulfil the requirements regarding length.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Done&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* I would advise to review the requirements of the article type and adding a method regarding leadership and define the uses/limitations of this particular method.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Done&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* I liked the limitations and problems pointed out when saying that a manager does not have to possess technical skills in the project he/she manages and all problems that come up due to this matter. I found the information given interesting but it might be a good idea to type those problems/solutions in a tabular format or in separated paragraphs.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;I like the idea, but I couldn&#039;t picture it for me when I got further in the process of writing the article.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* I think it would be a good idea to add some more conclusions. However, I found the ones you mentioned relevant and a good summary of the above explained.  &lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Done&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Remember also to add the references part, I am afraid it is compulsory :) And maybe a Table of contents at the beginning.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Done, and once again thanks for great feedback :-)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Review given by StephSalling, review3 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Wow, one more great review. Thank you very much!! I appreciate the time you took to read through my article. As you mentioned yourself, the article was by no means done when you read it (which I apologize for). I hope that you find the article both more interesting and enjoyable this time! :-) Below I have responded to your feedback.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
As far as I can tell, this article is not done yet, so I will possibly point out some things you were already planning to change or add.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Formal aspects ====&lt;br /&gt;
* The different parts in this “method” study are a bit hard to tell apart. The “big idea” is combined with the “application”, but none of them are really adequately described. From my point of view, the “limitations” part in the article is the best part, but it should be substantiated with some literature.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;I agree, and this is hopefully changed now.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* The grammar, spelling and punctuation in the “introduction” and “conclusion” are generally good: There are only a few singular/plural mistakes. It seems that the “limitations” part has not been proofread as thoroughly as the other sections.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;You are right, this is hopefully changed now.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Even though there are not many fill words in the sentences (which is very good), some of the sentences are a bit long and hard to follow. Maybe some bullet points illustrating the content of the different standards would help make it easier to read. - Or simply dividing the text into more paragraphs.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Done&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Some illustrations of the content of the different standards could be helpful.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;I like your idea, but unfortunately I couldn&#039;t find any good ones :-(&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* With the many different standards mentioned and technical terms used it would be easy to add some references within the wiki-system.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Done&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Content aspects ==== &lt;br /&gt;
* The subject of leadership styles and the different focus areas of a leader is very interesting, but I think the article would be more interesting for a practitioner if it elaborated the content of the standards and made a more clear comparison between them or just focused on one standard.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;I agree, and this has hopefully changed now.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* The relation to a specific project, program or portfolio management topic is a bit hard to see, since the article contains more of an overview than it deals with a specific problem/method. &lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;I agree, and this has hopefully changed now.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* The article is very short. The remaining 2000 words could be put into good use focusing on a specific leadership style or comparing the content of the different standards as mentioned earlier. &lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;This was really good inspiration!&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* The flow through the article so far is logical.&lt;br /&gt;
* References should be given to the sources used.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Done&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* It is hard to judge the quality of the sources used for the article as they are not directly given. From the different standards mentioned in the text, it seems that the sources are trustworthy and of high quality.&lt;br /&gt;
* The article does not contain an annotated bibliography of any source. &lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Now done&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* The article does not link to other relevant pages in the APPPM wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;And it still doesn&#039;t. Unfortunately I couldn&#039;t find any relevant for my article :-(&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* The “introduction” is very objective and does not leave the reader in doubt of that statements are substantiated by literature and not “own opinion”. The “limitations” part however seems more like “own opinion” statements, but this is not given anywhere.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;I hope that this is more clear now.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* The article seems to be free of “copy &amp;amp; paste” plagiarism since the sources of the different statements are mentioned in the text, but as there are no actual references (I can see that an attempt to use citation has been made but not completed) I cannot be sure.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;I hope that this is more clearer now, and once again, great feedback!&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Reviewer: Faker, review2==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;I have been really lucky with three times really good feedback!! I appreciate the time you took to read through my article. As you may have guessed, the article was by no means done when you read it (which I apologize for). I hope that you find the article both more interesting and enjoyable this time! :-) Below I have responded to your feedback.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
;Clarity of writing. Is the writing free of grammatical and spelling errors? Is the language precise without unnecessary fill words?&lt;br /&gt;
: There are some spelling error and a few inconsistant grammatical errors, but it is not disrupting for understanding the article.&lt;br /&gt;
:The language seems very lenghty and is most possibly emphasized by the lack of chapters, paragraphs, line breaks, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;I agree, and hopefully this is changed now.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Clarity of the argument. Is there a logical flow to the article? Does one part build upon the other? Is the article consistent in its argument and free of contradictions?&lt;br /&gt;
: With the lack of headlines and description of chapters, the article seems very disorganized. &lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;I agree, and hopefully this is changed now.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
: The word &amp;quot;leadership&amp;quot; is first introduced in the last fifth of the article, which seems very strange to me. Being in the title of the article, I would assume it to be mentioned more often.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;I absolutely agree with you! As my article wasn&#039;t done, I hadn&#039;t had time to change the headline of the article. I hope it makes more sense now.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
: Thinking I was going to read an article about &amp;quot;Leadership styles&amp;quot;, the first half of the article seemed to be very much out of context.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Agree! Hopefully not any longer :-)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Is the article of high practical and / or academic relevance?&lt;br /&gt;
:It might just be me, but I could not see the relevance of the first half of the article. &lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Noted. I hope I have managed to put it more in context now.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The second to last chapter (&amp;quot;This naturally raises ...&amp;quot;) seemed like a rather complete text and a good mixture of &amp;quot;Big idea&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Application&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Does the article properly cite and acknowledge previous work? Is it based on empirical data instead of opinion?&lt;br /&gt;
: As the cites have not been fully implemented yet, it is tough to determined exactly how well it is cited, but there seems to be a lot of references. This also makes it hard to determine the degree of emperical data to opinion, but the article definitely comes across as academic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Is the article properly linked within the Wiki to other relevant articles and category summaries?&lt;br /&gt;
: There are seemingly no links to other articles within the Wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;And it still doesn&#039;t. Unfortunately I couldn&#039;t find any relevant for my article :-( Once again, thanks for great feedback :-)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S152093</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:Project_Management_Competency_Framework&amp;diff=17897</id>
		<title>Talk:Project Management Competency Framework</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:Project_Management_Competency_Framework&amp;diff=17897"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T23:26:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S152093: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Anna: Hi I like the idea, however, I&#039;m afraid that it doesn&#039;t really fit into either one of the two article types. This is not really a method, but you could easily choose a method within the topic of leadership.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Review of S141926, Reviewer 1 ==&lt;br /&gt;
==== General formal aspects ====&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Thank you for great feedback!! I appreciate the time you took to read through my article. As you may have guessed, the article was by no means done when you read it (which I apologize for). I hope that you find the article both more interesting and enjoyable this time! :-) Below I have responded to your feedback.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Overall the writing is clear and precise with the use of appropriate technical words. However, I found some words mistranslated from Danish and minor grammatical issues.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Noted and corrected&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* In my opinion, I think it would make the article easier to be read if you added more full stops and you split the, under my point of view, too long paragraphs. I liked the paragraph where you make questions and answer them. However, I think that this part would be clearer in bullet points (under my point of view).&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Noted. I have tried to make more paragraphs and put in more sections.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* As I mention in the following section, the limitations/solutions part could be nicely shown in a format table to make the article more readable as well as adding some graphics to illustrate the methodology. &lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Unfortunately I couldn&#039;t find a lot of graphics that showed my points. I like the idea with the tables, although I couldn&#039;t find a place where it made sense (after I finished the article.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* I suggest you to review the Wikipedia formatting, I can see some references and links not well defined or linked.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Done&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====  Review of the content ====&lt;br /&gt;
* Regarding the Introduction part I think that gives a too general conclusion and does not focus enough to the main topic of the article, which is Leadership styles. Under my point of view, it is too focused on Standards and Managers competences and I am missing some more specific information about leadership in general. &lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;You are absolutely right. As my article wasn&#039;t done, I hadn&#039;t had time to change the headline of the article. I hope it makes more sense now.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* I think it would also improve your article to get more into detail on the different skills required for a project manager under different scenarios. &lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Done&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Apart from the fact that as I said I think there is some information missing that would make the article more understandable, I think that you would also had to add some more writing in order to fulfil the requirements regarding length.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Done&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* I would advise to review the requirements of the article type and adding a method regarding leadership and define the uses/limitations of this particular method.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Done&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* I liked the limitations and problems pointed out when saying that a manager does not have to possess technical skills in the project he/she manages and all problems that come up due to this matter. I found the information given interesting but it might be a good idea to type those problems/solutions in a tabular format or in separated paragraphs.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;I like the idea, but I couldn&#039;t picture it for me when I got further in the process of writing the article.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* I think it would be a good idea to add some more conclusions. However, I found the ones you mentioned relevant and a good summary of the above explained.  &lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Done&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Remember also to add the references part, I am afraid it is compulsory :) And maybe a Table of contents at the beginning.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Done, and once again thanks for great feedback :-)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Review given by StephSalling, review3 ==&lt;br /&gt;
As far as I can tell, this article is not done yet, so I will possibly point out some things you were already planning to change or add.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Formal aspects ====&lt;br /&gt;
* The different parts in this “method” study are a bit hard to tell apart. The “big idea” is combined with the “application”, but none of them are really adequately described. From my point of view, the “limitations” part in the article is the best part, but it should be substantiated with some literature.&lt;br /&gt;
* The grammar, spelling and punctuation in the “introduction” and “conclusion” are generally good: There are only a few singular/plural mistakes. It seems that the “limitations” part has not been proofread as thoroughly as the other sections.&lt;br /&gt;
* Even though there are not many fill words in the sentences (which is very good), some of the sentences are a bit long and hard to follow. Maybe some bullet points illustrating the content of the different standards would help make it easier to read. - Or simply dividing the text into more paragraphs.&lt;br /&gt;
* Some illustrations of the content of the different standards could be helpful.&lt;br /&gt;
* With the many different standards mentioned and technical terms used it would be easy to add some references within the wiki-system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Content aspects ==== &lt;br /&gt;
* The subject of leadership styles and the different focus areas of a leader is very interesting, but I think the article would be more interesting for a practitioner if it elaborated the content of the standards and made a more clear comparison between them or just focused on one standard.&lt;br /&gt;
* The relation to a specific project, program or portfolio management topic is a bit hard to see, since the article contains more of an overview than it deals with a specific problem/method. &lt;br /&gt;
* The article is very short. The remaining 2000 words could be put into good use focusing on a specific leadership style or comparing the content of the different standards as mentioned earlier. &lt;br /&gt;
* The flow through the article so far is logical.&lt;br /&gt;
* References should be given to the sources used.&lt;br /&gt;
* It is hard to judge the quality of the sources used for the article as they are not directly given. From the different standards mentioned in the text, it seems that the sources are trustworthy and of high quality.&lt;br /&gt;
* The article does not contain an annotated bibliography of any source. &lt;br /&gt;
* The article does not link to other relevant pages in the APPPM wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
* The “introduction” is very objective and does not leave the reader in doubt of that statements are substantiated by literature and not “own opinion”. The “limitations” part however seems more like “own opinion” statements, but this is not given anywhere.&lt;br /&gt;
* The article seems to be free of “copy &amp;amp; paste” plagiarism since the sources of the different statements are mentioned in the text, but as there are no actual references (I can see that an attempt to use citation has been made but not completed) I cannot be sure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Reviewer: Faker, review2==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Clarity of writing. Is the writing free of grammatical and spelling errors? Is the language precise without unnecessary fill words?&lt;br /&gt;
: There are some spelling error and a few inconsistant grammatical errors, but it is not disrupting for understanding the article.&lt;br /&gt;
:The language seems very lenghty and is most possibly emphasized by the lack of chapters, paragraphs, line breaks, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Clarity of the argument. Is there a logical flow to the article? Does one part build upon the other? Is the article consistent in its argument and free of contradictions?&lt;br /&gt;
: With the lack of headlines and description of chapters, the article seems very disorganized. &lt;br /&gt;
: The word &amp;quot;leadership&amp;quot; is first introduced in the last fifth of the article, which seems very strange to me. Being in the title of the article, I would assume it to be mentioned more often.&lt;br /&gt;
: Thinking I was going to read an article about &amp;quot;Leadership styles&amp;quot;, the first half of the article seemed to be very much out of context.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Is the article of high practical and / or academic relevance?&lt;br /&gt;
:It might just be me, but I could not see the relevance of the first half of the article. &lt;br /&gt;
:The second to last chapter (&amp;quot;This naturally raises ...&amp;quot;) seemed like a rather complete text and a good mixture of &amp;quot;Big idea&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Application&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Does the article properly cite and acknowledge previous work? Is it based on empirical data instead of opinion?&lt;br /&gt;
: As the cites have not been fully implemented yet, it is tough to determined exactly how well it is cited, but there seems to be a lot of references. This also makes it hard to determine the degree of emperical data to opinion, but the article definitely comes across as academic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Is the article properly linked within the Wiki to other relevant articles and category summaries?&lt;br /&gt;
: There are seemingly no links to other articles within the Wiki.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S152093</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:Project_Management_Competency_Framework&amp;diff=17883</id>
		<title>Talk:Project Management Competency Framework</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:Project_Management_Competency_Framework&amp;diff=17883"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T23:19:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S152093: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Anna: Hi I like the idea, however, I&#039;m afraid that it doesn&#039;t really fit into either one of the two article types. This is not really a method, but you could easily choose a method within the topic of leadership.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Review of S141926, Reviewer 1 ==&lt;br /&gt;
==== General formal aspects ====&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Thank you for great feedback!! I appreciate the time you took to read through my article. As you may have guessed, the article was by no means done when you read it (which I apologize for). Below I have responded to your feedback.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Overall the writing is clear and precise with the use of appropriate technical words. However, I found some words mistranslated from Danish and minor grammatical issues.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Hi&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* In my opinion, I think it would make the article easier to be read if you added more full stops and you split the, under my point of view, too long paragraphs. I liked the paragraph where you make questions and answer them. However, I think that this part would be clearer in bullet points (under my point of view).&lt;br /&gt;
* As I mention in the following section, the limitations/solutions part could be nicely shown in a format table to make the article more readable as well as adding some graphics to illustrate the methodology. &lt;br /&gt;
* I suggest you to review the Wikipedia formatting, I can see some references and links not well defined or linked.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====  Review of the content ====&lt;br /&gt;
* Regarding the Introduction part I think that gives a too general conclusion and does not focus enough to the main topic of the article, which is Leadership styles. Under my point of view, it is too focused on Standards and Managers competences and I am missing some more specific information about leadership in general. &lt;br /&gt;
* I think it would also improve your article to get more into detail on the different skills required for a project manager under different scenarios. &lt;br /&gt;
* Apart from the fact that as I said I think there is some information missing that would make the article more understandable, I think that you would also had to add some more writing in order to fulfil the requirements regarding length.&lt;br /&gt;
* I would advise to review the requirements of the article type and adding a method regarding leadership and define the uses/limitations of this particular method.&lt;br /&gt;
* I liked the limitations and problems pointed out when saying that a manager does not have to possess technical skills in the project he/she manages and all problems that come up due to this matter. I found the information given interesting but it might be a good idea to type those problems/solutions in a tabular format or in separated paragraphs.&lt;br /&gt;
* I think it would be a good idea to add some more conclusions. However, I found the ones you mentioned relevant and a good summary of the above explained.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Remember also to add the references part, I am afraid it is compulsory :) And maybe a Table of contents at the beginning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Review given by StephSalling, review3 ==&lt;br /&gt;
As far as I can tell, this article is not done yet, so I will possibly point out some things you were already planning to change or add.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Formal aspects ====&lt;br /&gt;
* The different parts in this “method” study are a bit hard to tell apart. The “big idea” is combined with the “application”, but none of them are really adequately described. From my point of view, the “limitations” part in the article is the best part, but it should be substantiated with some literature.&lt;br /&gt;
* The grammar, spelling and punctuation in the “introduction” and “conclusion” are generally good: There are only a few singular/plural mistakes. It seems that the “limitations” part has not been proofread as thoroughly as the other sections.&lt;br /&gt;
* Even though there are not many fill words in the sentences (which is very good), some of the sentences are a bit long and hard to follow. Maybe some bullet points illustrating the content of the different standards would help make it easier to read. - Or simply dividing the text into more paragraphs.&lt;br /&gt;
* Some illustrations of the content of the different standards could be helpful.&lt;br /&gt;
* With the many different standards mentioned and technical terms used it would be easy to add some references within the wiki-system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Content aspects ==== &lt;br /&gt;
* The subject of leadership styles and the different focus areas of a leader is very interesting, but I think the article would be more interesting for a practitioner if it elaborated the content of the standards and made a more clear comparison between them or just focused on one standard.&lt;br /&gt;
* The relation to a specific project, program or portfolio management topic is a bit hard to see, since the article contains more of an overview than it deals with a specific problem/method. &lt;br /&gt;
* The article is very short. The remaining 2000 words could be put into good use focusing on a specific leadership style or comparing the content of the different standards as mentioned earlier. &lt;br /&gt;
* The flow through the article so far is logical.&lt;br /&gt;
* References should be given to the sources used.&lt;br /&gt;
* It is hard to judge the quality of the sources used for the article as they are not directly given. From the different standards mentioned in the text, it seems that the sources are trustworthy and of high quality.&lt;br /&gt;
* The article does not contain an annotated bibliography of any source. &lt;br /&gt;
* The article does not link to other relevant pages in the APPPM wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
* The “introduction” is very objective and does not leave the reader in doubt of that statements are substantiated by literature and not “own opinion”. The “limitations” part however seems more like “own opinion” statements, but this is not given anywhere.&lt;br /&gt;
* The article seems to be free of “copy &amp;amp; paste” plagiarism since the sources of the different statements are mentioned in the text, but as there are no actual references (I can see that an attempt to use citation has been made but not completed) I cannot be sure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Reviewer: Faker, review2==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Clarity of writing. Is the writing free of grammatical and spelling errors? Is the language precise without unnecessary fill words?&lt;br /&gt;
: There are some spelling error and a few inconsistant grammatical errors, but it is not disrupting for understanding the article.&lt;br /&gt;
:The language seems very lenghty and is most possibly emphasized by the lack of chapters, paragraphs, line breaks, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Clarity of the argument. Is there a logical flow to the article? Does one part build upon the other? Is the article consistent in its argument and free of contradictions?&lt;br /&gt;
: With the lack of headlines and description of chapters, the article seems very disorganized. &lt;br /&gt;
: The word &amp;quot;leadership&amp;quot; is first introduced in the last fifth of the article, which seems very strange to me. Being in the title of the article, I would assume it to be mentioned more often.&lt;br /&gt;
: Thinking I was going to read an article about &amp;quot;Leadership styles&amp;quot;, the first half of the article seemed to be very much out of context.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Is the article of high practical and / or academic relevance?&lt;br /&gt;
:It might just be me, but I could not see the relevance of the first half of the article. &lt;br /&gt;
:The second to last chapter (&amp;quot;This naturally raises ...&amp;quot;) seemed like a rather complete text and a good mixture of &amp;quot;Big idea&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Application&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Does the article properly cite and acknowledge previous work? Is it based on empirical data instead of opinion?&lt;br /&gt;
: As the cites have not been fully implemented yet, it is tough to determined exactly how well it is cited, but there seems to be a lot of references. This also makes it hard to determine the degree of emperical data to opinion, but the article definitely comes across as academic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Is the article properly linked within the Wiki to other relevant articles and category summaries?&lt;br /&gt;
: There are seemingly no links to other articles within the Wiki.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S152093</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Project_Management_Competency_Framework&amp;diff=17872</id>
		<title>Project Management Competency Framework</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Project_Management_Competency_Framework&amp;diff=17872"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T23:15:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S152093: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Summary==&lt;br /&gt;
In literature, many things have been written about project management and the best practice hereof. Various standards exist with the aim of describing the field, and a long list of terms and processes are defined and described. All the standards aim to prepare a project manager to give him the highest chances of achieving success with his projects. It seems that even though each standard differ from the others, they tend to have a similar perspective on the best practice of the subject.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this article is going to look at three standards, the PMI, ISO, and IPMA standard. The focus will be on what they suggest as good project management qualifications, but in particular what the standards suggest as necessary as area-specific knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on what the standards suggest as good project management methods, the two typical approaches to become a project manager is discussed. One approach is by having studied project management, and for example becoming certified project manager. The other way is by achieving a broad knowledge within a field, and then work the way into a position as a project manager. During this discussion, it will be look at whether or not there, typically, will be a gap in knowledge of project managers. The dual leadership model is briefly being introduced, in order to see if this model could cover the gap in a project manager&#039;s knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But before we get started, the difference between a manager and a leader is introduced as suggested by Capowski.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Capow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Capowski, G., &#039;&#039;Anatomy of a Leader: Where Are the Leaders of Tomorrow?&#039;&#039;, (1994)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; These are two terms that are being used a lot within this article, although the main focus will be on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Manager:&#039;&#039;&#039; A manager has a degree of power from the position that he is in. He is structured, analytical, and rational, and he creates stability within a project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Leader:&#039;&#039;&#039; A leader, on the other hand, has power because people let him have power. He is courageous, innovative, and visionary, and initiates changes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
For project management, there exist many standards. These standards aim to describe project management across different types of projects and across fields. They for example describe the best practice of the initiation, planning, implementation, controlling and closing of a project, and introduce a long list of tools in order to have the best chances of achieving success within a project. These standards also have a view of the best version of a project manager and the abilities that he should possess.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the following, three standards are being introduced. In particular, their view on the best version of a project manager is at interest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;PMBOK:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the PMI standard (PMBOK),&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Project Management Institute, &#039;&#039;A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge&#039;&#039;, Fifth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA, (2013) - &#039;&#039;&#039;Annotation:&#039;&#039;&#039; PMBOK is an American best practice standard on project management. It is highly influential, and among the most important project management standards in the world.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; it is mentioned that in addition to area-specific skills, project managers possess a set of characteristics, being within the area of knowledge, performance and personal.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; These characteristics covers the project manager&#039;s knowledge, hes ability to perform and then personal relations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;ISO Standard:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the ISO Standard, &amp;quot;Competencies of project personnel&amp;quot; describes the competencies a project manager should have and the competencies that the project team as a unit should have.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;iso&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dansk Standard, &#039;&#039;ISO 21500, Guidance on Project Management&#039;&#039;, First Edition, Dansk Standard, Copenhagen, Denmark, (2012) - &#039;&#039;&#039;Annotation:&#039;&#039;&#039; ISO Standard is an international standard on project management. Because of the broadness of the standard, it is very brief in nature.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Here it is stated that the project team should have a certain skill set, and that any gap between the required and available competencies could be a risk, and should be addressed. On the other hand there are listed three categories of competencies that a project manager should possess, that being technical competencies, behavioral competencies, and contextual competencies.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;iso&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;technical competencies&#039;&#039; describe processes, terminology and concepts, all within project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;behavioral competencies&#039;&#039; describe personal relationships.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;contextual competencies&#039;&#039; describe the context of the project, i.e., the project within the organization and environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;IPMA:&#039;&#039;&#039; The International Project Management Association (IPMA) divides project management skills in the same three categories as the ISO standard in their &amp;quot;Competence baseline&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ipma&amp;quot;&amp;gt;International Project Management Association, &#039;&#039;ICB - IPMA Competence Baseline&#039;&#039;, Third Edition, International Project Management Association, Nijkerk, The Netherlands, (2006) - &#039;&#039;&#039;Annotation:&#039;&#039;&#039; The IPMA Competence Baseline is the European version of PMBOK on project management. Although not as influential as PMBOK, it is still highly used in industries.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; IPMA focuses on competence elements, whereof the majority of them are in the technical category. The two other categories, behavioral and contextual competencies, are also described in this standard though.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are all well-known standards that are used across various fields and industries. They guide project managers to follow the best practice of management in a given project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They all describe processes, techniques, and concepts, although the level of details within each standard varies a lot. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Discussion==&lt;br /&gt;
In the brief overview of what skills a project manager must possess, it might, at first glance, seem surprising that there is a lack of requirement of the field specific technical knowledge. There is a long list of requirement to the technical knowledge, in the sense of project management techniques, but the demand of area specific technical knowledge is limited.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is noted that the organizations behind the standards all have an interest of being as broad as possible, so that as many project managers and leaders can use and apply their standards.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the PMBOK there is a slight opening of a discussion about area specific skills, but the majority of the concept is treated in an appendix in the 4th edition,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok4&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Project Management Institute, &#039;&#039;A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge&#039;&#039;, Fourth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA, (2008)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and is referred to as &amp;quot;Application Area Extensions&amp;quot;. Noticeably this section has been removed in the 5th edition.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; This though is only an introduction to the extension material that PMI offers within each project type, e.g. software projects, construction projects, etc., and treats for example area specific practices.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmboksoftware&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Caupin, G., et al., &#039;&#039;Software Extension to the PMBOK® Guide Fifth Edition, review&#039;&#039;, Fifth Edition, http://marketplace.pmi.org/Pages/ProductDetail.aspx?GMProduct=00101457501 [visited 25/09 - 2015] - &#039;&#039;&#039;Annotation:&#039;&#039;&#039; The review on the Software extension to PMBOK is used as an example of extensions of the general PMBOK.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does not treat the subject at all, while the IPMA is the standard that goes the most in depth with the subject. The section on Contextual Competencies describes the link between the project and the organization. In the element description &amp;quot;Permanent Organization&amp;quot;, it is mentioned that &amp;quot;If the project manager is experienced in the respective sector and industry, he will be in a better position to understand these factors. [The planning and management principles of the operations of the permanent organization, red.]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally raises the question: does a project manager need area specific knowledge of the projects that he manages? Does a manager need technical skills within an area to lead a team to meet predefined goals and objectives?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking into the mentioned standards, the answer seems to be no. According to appendix D in PMBOK, there can be some area specific processes that would be ideal to follow,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; but there is not explicit requirements for concrete technical knowledge related to the working area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does only describe to subject by noting that gaps in knowledge about a project can be a risk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IPMA Competence Baseline describes area specific knowledge as being an advantage in managing the permanent organization, but doesn&#039;t describe the subject in relation to projects in the temporary sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thinking of having a manager with very limited area-specific skills, one encounters problems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Being a successful project manager means being successful at delegating work to other people, in order to meet a set of predefined goals and objectives. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally means that the project manager needs to have some kind of respect about his person, so what he lacks in area-specific skills, he must make up for in other areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Estimating the time needed for specific sub-tasks becomes more difficult, but also a task as setting up a project team that covers a wide set of skills becomes more of a challenge. The project team is an important stakeholders. The team needs to be dynamical and have a good relation to each other, but the definition of the required skill set within the project team is of huge importance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what is the alternative then? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An obvious suggestion would be to have people working their way to a position as project managers. This is the concept of having academics that have been working a long time, and then being rewarded with responsibility. That could for example be for good work, loyalty, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One does encounter various problems with this method of employing project managers in a company. First of all, the specialized knowledge and experience gained over a long time is taken away from a project team. Second of all, there are often organizational politics involved in the decision of hiring an employee in a new position within the organization. What should have been a decision based on qualifications can then easily become a political decision. Thirdly there could be a tendency of people working in the same field within the same company for years after years to be more narrow-minded. This will result in project managers to be less likely to think out of the box and to have a very set way of doing things.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Judging from Richardson et al.,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stillaccidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Richardson, T. M. et al., &#039;&#039;Is Project Management Still an Accidental Profession? A Qualitative Study of Career Trajectory&#039;&#039;, http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/5/1/2158244015572098 (1995) - &#039;&#039;&#039;Annotation:&#039;&#039;&#039; This article is a follow up article on the highly influential article &amp;quot;Lessons for an Accidental Profession&amp;quot;. It looks into the career paths on project managers, and concludes that project management still is an &amp;quot;accidental profession&amp;quot; to a high degree.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; it seems that academics working their way up the ranks, is actually the career path that many project managers have taken.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As suggested in literature, the profession of being a project manager is often called the accidental profession (see for example Pinto et al.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;accidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Pinto, J. K., Kharbanda, O. P., &#039;&#039;Lessons for an Accidental Profession&#039;&#039;, (1995) - &#039;&#039;&#039;Annotation:&#039;&#039;&#039; This article has been a highly influential article for 15 years. It describes project management as an accidental profession, and introduces tools to become a better project manager.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;) This covers the fact that there is a clear tendency of project managers being employed on behalf of their academic qualifications or the expectations for their future success as a project manager, rather than their experience as project managers.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stillaccidentalprof&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pmimember.PNG|right|thumb|350px|Figure 1: The evolution in number of members of PMI worldwide, from 1969 to 2008]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But as discussed by Ranf,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;thenandnow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ranf, D. E., &#039;&#039;Project management: Then and now&#039;&#039;, Annales Universitatis Apulensis: Series Oeconomica, 13, 596-603 (2011) - &#039;&#039;&#039;Annotation:&#039;&#039;&#039; Article discussing the change in project management from a technological specialization to a strategic business specialization.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; time is changing. Figure 1&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;figur&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Lecture slides MEP 1.2 from the course 42429 Projektledelse Aug 15, DTU - &#039;&#039;&#039;Annotation:&#039;&#039;&#039; Slide with figure from pmi.org.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; shows the evolution of number of members of PMI worldwide, and as seen on the curve the number of memberships is increasing almost exponentially. Although it refers to the number of members of PMI (and not all other project management organizations), it can be seen as a clear sign of the significance of projects, but in particular the increasing significance as project management as a profession.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally, project managers were valued for their technological knowledge that they could apply within a certain project. Having business knowledge was an advantage, but not a requirement. Now, on the other hand, project managers are valued for the business knowledge, and technological knowledge is an advantage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This has to be seen in relation to the change of the working market. Projects are incorporated in work settings in a completely new way, and as discussed, the demand of project managers is increasing. Now the project manager&#039;s primarily job isn&#039;t necessarily to contribute with technological knowledge. According to Ranf,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;thenandnow&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; the business aspect has an increasing importance, in order for the project manager to contribute to business decisions etc. Another aspect of the project management is political abilities. As the number of projects increases, the political environment increases, and the project manager has to move within a more complex organizational structure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So it seems that the project manager very easily can be in a situation where there is a knowledge gap. Is it too much to require from a person that he is both a highly competent manager but also a very skilled worker? And can everybody become a project manager?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Say a person has been working his way up in the company, and finally is offered a management position. He will undergo up-qualifications of his management skills, and be certified project manager within one of the numerous project management standards. Not long ago many people didn&#039;t believe in this approach. The born leader is a term that most people have encountered, but it is also a term that was highly used not long ago.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bornleader&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Lecture slides MEP 5.1 from the course 42429 Projektledelse Aug 15, DTU - &#039;&#039;&#039;Annotation:&#039;&#039;&#039; Slide built on research made by Daft et al. (2008)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Today most people acknowledge that being a leader (and in particular manager) requires a set of skills that most people can learn. This being in line with all other types of knowledge that we can acquire, if there is a need and a desire hereof.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A solution used in some bigger companies, is the dual leadership model. Duos of leaders are composed, in hopes of the duo to compliment each other. If the duo is working efficiently, a wider set of leadership skills is covered within a field. That can e.g. be technological knowledge on one hand, and more management oriented abilities on the other.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Among the companies that have tried this method, are Goldman Sachs, Unilever, and Motorola.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;jointleader&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Palmer, M., &#039;&#039;Two chiefs not necessarily better than one&#039;&#039;, Financial Times, http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/3d509590-45d8-11e1-acc9-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3myDawPXD [visited 27/09 - 2015] - &#039;&#039;&#039;Annotation:&#039;&#039;&#039; Article published in Financial Times (which has more than 3.8 million followers on Google+). The view on Dual Leadership is here used as inspiration.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This model brings challenges with it. There has to be a clear definition of roles, for the duo to work dynamically. There also has to be a very clear communication strategy, for information to flow efficiently within an organization. The duo needs to have a good chemistry and be able to challenge each other, but it is also suggested that a constellation like this can slow down the response to changes within an organization or project.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;jointleader&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But these examples are less dominant compared to the cost of a setup like this. One successful and money-making project after the other could very easily make the setup worth it, but it puts a very natural limitation of the types of companies and projects that could have use of this model. It simply has to be of a certain size in order to make sense, and have the acquired budget.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
All in all it is difficult to give one single answer to what type of leader a project or company needs. In all situations it is necessary to take a look at the project surroundings. The qualifications need to be prioritized, in order to find the most suitable project manager within the framework of the company. In generally it does not seem like the dual leadership model is a solution to this problem. Both in terms of the limitations in the model itself, but also in the cost of a model like this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A clear tendency is that more and more business knowledge is required, which tends to cut down on the required area-specific technological knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If one were to judge only on behalf of what the different standards on project management mention as necessary qualifications, then area-specific knowledge does not play an important role. But by taking this as a fact, one has to bear in mind that these standards have an agenda. At the end of the day, they make money the more people get certified within their framework. Thereby there is a natural interest in being as broad as possible, in order to approach as many future project managers as possible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lack of defined area-specific knowledge in the standards can either be seen as a part of the definition of the project manager&#039;s competencies. But it can also be seen as a limitation to the standards in general. It depends on what view one has on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Throughout the whole article, there has not been made any distinctions on how close or far the project manager is to hes project team. A discussion on how the distance to the project team would affect the manager&#039;s ideal competencies would have been useful, although outside of the scope of this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It does seems inevitable though, to be prepared to spend time on further education of a project manager&#039;s qualifications. That can either be the project management skills or the area-specific skills, depending on what road that has been taken to get into the present position.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No matter what perspective one must have, it seems that it is a field within which there is room for more research to be done. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated Bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S152093</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Project_Management_Competency_Framework&amp;diff=17860</id>
		<title>Project Management Competency Framework</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Project_Management_Competency_Framework&amp;diff=17860"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T23:07:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S152093: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Summary==&lt;br /&gt;
In literature, many things have been written about project management and the best practice hereof. Various standards exist with the aim of describing the field, and a long list of terms and processes are defined and described. All the standards aim to prepare a project manager to give him the highest chances of achieving success with his projects. It seems that even though each standard differ from the others, they tend to have a similar perspective on the best practice of the subject.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this article is going to look at three standards, the PMI, ISO, and IPMA standard. The focus will be on what they suggest as good project management qualifications, but in particular what the standards suggest as necessary as area-specific knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on what the standards suggest as good project management methods, the two typical approaches to become a project manager is discussed. One approach is by having studied project management, and for example becoming certified project manager. The other way is by achieving a broad knowledge within a field, and then work the way into a position as a project manager. During this discussion, it will be look at whether or not there, typically, will be a gap in knowledge of project managers. The dual leadership model is briefly being introduced, in order to see if this model could cover the gap in a project manager&#039;s knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But before we get started, the difference between a manager and a leader is introduced as suggested by Capowski.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Capow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Capowski, G., &#039;&#039;Anatomy of a Leader: Where Are the Leaders of Tomorrow?&#039;&#039;, (1994)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; These are two terms that are being used a lot within this article, although the main focus will be on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Manager:&#039;&#039;&#039; A manager has a degree of power from the position that he is in. He is structured, analytical, and rational, and he creates stability within a project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Leader:&#039;&#039;&#039; A leader, on the other hand, has power because people let him have power. He is courageous, innovative, and visionary, and initiates changes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
For project management, there exist many standards. These standards aim to describe project management across different types of projects and across fields. They for example describe the best practice of the initiation, planning, implementation, controlling and closing of a project, and introduce a long list of tools in order to have the best chances of achieving success within a project. These standards also have a view of the best version of a project manager and the abilities that he should possess.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the following, three standards are being introduced. In particular, their view on the best version of a project manager is at interest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;PMBOK:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the PMI standard (PMBOK),&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Project Management Institute, &#039;&#039;A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge&#039;&#039;, Fifth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA, (2013) - &#039;&#039;&#039;Annotation:&#039;&#039;&#039; PMBOK is an American best practice standard on project management. It is highly influential, and among the most important project management standards in the world.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; it is mentioned that in addition to area-specific skills, project managers possess a set of characteristics, being within the area of knowledge, performance and personal.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; These characteristics covers the project manager&#039;s knowledge, hes ability to perform and then personal relations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;ISO Standard:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the ISO Standard, &amp;quot;Competencies of project personnel&amp;quot; describes the competencies a project manager should have and the competencies that the project team as a unit should have.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;iso&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dansk Standard, &#039;&#039;ISO 21500, Guidance on Project Management&#039;&#039;, First Edition, Dansk Standard, Copenhagen, Denmark, (2012) - &#039;&#039;&#039;Annotation:&#039;&#039;&#039; ISO Standard is an international standard on project management. Because of the broadness of the standard, it is very brief in nature.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Here it is stated that the project team should have a certain skill set, and that any gap between the required and available competencies could be a risk, and should be addressed. On the other hand there are listed three categories of competencies that a project manager should possess, that being technical competencies, behavioral competencies, and contextual competencies.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;iso&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;technical competencies&#039;&#039; describe processes, terminology and concepts, all within project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;behavioral competencies&#039;&#039; describe personal relationships.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;contextual competencies&#039;&#039; describe the context of the project, i.e., the project within the organization and environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;IPMA:&#039;&#039;&#039; The International Project Management Association (IPMA) divides project management skills in the same three categories as the ISO standard in their &amp;quot;Competence baseline&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ipma&amp;quot;&amp;gt;International Project Management Association, &#039;&#039;ICB - IPMA Competence Baseline&#039;&#039;, Third Edition, International Project Management Association, Nijkerk, The Netherlands, (2006) - &#039;&#039;&#039;Annotation:&#039;&#039;&#039; The IPMA Competence Baseline is the European version of PMBOK on project management. Although not as influential as PMBOK, it is still highly used in industries.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; IPMA focuses on competence elements, whereof the majority of them are in the technical category. The two other categories, behavioral and contextual competencies, are also described in this standard though.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are all well-known standards that are used across various fields and industries. They guide project managers to follow the best practice of management in a given project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They all describe processes, techniques, and concepts, although the level of details within each standard varies a lot. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Discussion==&lt;br /&gt;
In the brief overview of what skills a project manager must possess, it might, at first glance, seem surprising that there is a lack of requirement of the field specific technical knowledge. There is a long list of requirement to the technical knowledge, in the sense of project management techniques, but the demand of area specific technical knowledge is limited.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is noted that the organizations behind the standards all have an interest of being as broad as possible, so that as many project managers and leaders can use and apply their standards.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the PMBOK there is a slight opening of a discussion about area specific skills, but the majority of the concept is treated in an appendix in the 4th edition,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok4&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Project Management Institute, &#039;&#039;A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge&#039;&#039;, Fourth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA, (2008)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and is referred to as &amp;quot;Application Area Extensions&amp;quot;. Noticeably this section has been removed in the 5th edition.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; This though is only an introduction to the extension material that PMI offers within each project type, e.g. software projects, construction projects, etc., and treats for example area specific practices.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmboksoftware&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Caupin, G., et al., &#039;&#039;Software Extension to the PMBOK® Guide Fifth Edition, review&#039;&#039;, Fifth Edition, http://marketplace.pmi.org/Pages/ProductDetail.aspx?GMProduct=00101457501 [visited 25/09 - 2015] - &#039;&#039;&#039;Annotation:&#039;&#039;&#039; The review on the Software extension to PMBOK is used as an example of extensions of the general PMBOK.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does not treat the subject at all, while the IPMA is the standard that goes the most in depth with the subject. The section on Contextual Competencies describes the link between the project and the organization. In the element description &amp;quot;Permanent Organization&amp;quot;, it is mentioned that &amp;quot;If the project manager is experienced in the respective sector and industry, he will be in a better position to understand these factors. [The planning and management principles of the operations of the permanent organization, red.]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally raises the question: does a project manager need area specific knowledge of the projects that he manages? Does a manager need technical skills within an area to lead a team to meet predefined goals and objectives?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking into the mentioned standards, the answer seems to be no. According to appendix D in PMBOK, there can be some area specific processes that would be ideal to follow,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; but there is not explicit requirements for concrete technical knowledge related to the working area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does only describe to subject by noting that gaps in knowledge about a project can be a risk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IPMA Competence Baseline describes area specific knowledge as being an advantage in managing the permanent organization, but doesn&#039;t describe the subject in relation to projects in the temporary sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thinking of having a manager with very limited area-specific skills, one encounters problems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Being a successful project manager means being successful at delegating work to other people, in order to meet a set of predefined goals and objectives. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally means that the project manager needs to have some kind of respect about his person, so what he lacks in area-specific skills, he must make up for in other areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Estimating the time needed for specific sub-tasks becomes more difficult, but also a task as setting up a project team that covers a wide set of skills becomes more of a challenge. The project team is an important stakeholders. The team needs to be dynamical and have a good relation to each other, but the definition of the required skill set within the project team is of huge importance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what is the alternative then? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An obvious suggestion would be to have people working their way to a position as project managers. This is the concept of having academics that have been working a long time, and then being rewarded with responsibility. That could for example be for good work, loyalty, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One does encounter various problems with this method of employing project managers in a company. First of all, the specialized knowledge and experience gained over a long time is taken away from a project team. Second of all, there are often organizational politics involved in the decision of hiring an employee in a new position within the organization. What should have been a decision based on qualifications can then easily become a political decision. Thirdly there could be a tendency of people working in the same field within the same company for years after years to be more narrow-minded. This will result in project managers to be less likely to think out of the box and to have a very set way of doing things.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Judging from Richardson et al.,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stillaccidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Richardson, T. M. et al., &#039;&#039;Is Project Management Still an Accidental Profession? A Qualitative Study of Career Trajectory&#039;&#039;, http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/5/1/2158244015572098 (1995) - &#039;&#039;&#039;Annotation:&#039;&#039;&#039; This article is a follow up article on the highly influential article &amp;quot;Lessons for an Accidental Profession&amp;quot;. It looks into the career paths on project managers, and concludes that project management still is an &amp;quot;accidental profession&amp;quot; to a high degree.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; it seems that academics working their way up the ranks, is actually the career path that many project managers have taken.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As suggested in literature, the profession of being a project manager is often called the accidental profession (see for example Pinto et al.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;accidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Pinto, J. K., Kharbanda, O. P., &#039;&#039;Lessons for an Accidental Profession&#039;&#039;, (1995) - &#039;&#039;&#039;Annotation:&#039;&#039;&#039; This article has been a highly influential article for 15 years. It describes project management as an accidental profession, and introduces tools to become a better project manager.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;) This covers the fact that there is a clear tendency of project managers being employed on behalf of their academic qualifications or the expectations for their future success as a project manager, rather than their experience as project managers.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stillaccidentalprof&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pmimember.PNG|right|thumb|350px|Figure 1: The evolution in number of members of PMI worldwide, from 1969 to 2008]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But as discussed by Ranf,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;thenandnow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ranf, D. E., &#039;&#039;Project management: Then and now&#039;&#039;, Annales Universitatis Apulensis: Series Oeconomica, 13, 596-603 (2011) - &#039;&#039;&#039;Annotation:&#039;&#039;&#039; Article discussing the change in project management from a technological specialization to a strategic business specialization.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; time is changing. Figure 1&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;figur&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Lecture slides MEP 1.2 from the course 42429 Projektledelse Aug 15, DTU - &#039;&#039;&#039;Annotation:&#039;&#039;&#039; Slide with figure from pmi.org.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; shows the evolution of number of members of PMI worldwide, and as seen on the curve the number of memberships is increasing almost exponentially. Although it refers to the number of members of PMI (and not all other project management organizations), it can be seen as a clear sign of the significance of projects, but in particular the increasing significance as project management as a profession.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally, project managers were valued for their technological knowledge that they could apply within a certain project. Having business knowledge was an advantage, but not a requirement. Now, on the other hand, project managers are valued for the business knowledge, and technological knowledge is an advantage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This has to be seen in relation to the change of the working market. Projects are incorporated in work settings in a completely new way, and as discussed, the demand of project managers is increasing. Now the project manager&#039;s primarily job isn&#039;t necessarily to contribute with technological knowledge. According to Ranf,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;thenandnow&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; the business aspect has an increasing importance, in order for the project manager to contribute to business decisions etc. Another aspect of the project management is political abilities. As the number of projects increases, the political environment increases, and the project manager has to move within a more complex organizational structure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So it seems that the project manager very easily can be in a situation where there is a knowledge gap. Is it too much to require from a person that he is both a highly competent manager but also a very skilled worker? And can everybody become a project manager?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Say a person has been working his way up in the company, and finally is offered a management position. He will undergo up-qualifications of his management skills, and be certified project manager within one of the numerous project management standards. Not long ago many people didn&#039;t believe in this approach. The born leader is a term that most people have encountered, but it is also a term that was highly used not long ago.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bornleader&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Lecture slides MEP 5.1 from the course 42429 Projektledelse Aug 15, DTU - &#039;&#039;&#039;Annotation:&#039;&#039;&#039; Slide built on research made by Daft et al. (2008)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Today most people acknowledge that being a leader (and in particular manager) requires a set of skills that most people can learn. This being in line with all other types of knowledge that we can acquire, if there is a need and a desire hereof.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A solution used in some bigger companies, is the dual leadership model. Duos of leaders are composed, in hopes of the duo to compliment each other. If the duo is working efficiently, a wider set of leadership skills is covered within a field. That can e.g. be technological knowledge on one hand, and more management oriented abilities on the other.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Among the companies that have tried this method, are Goldman Sachs, Unilever, and Motorola.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;jointleader&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Palmer, M., &#039;&#039;Two chiefs not necessarily better than one&#039;&#039;, Financial Times, http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/3d509590-45d8-11e1-acc9-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3myDawPXD [visited 27/09 - 2015] - &#039;&#039;&#039;Annotation:&#039;&#039;&#039; Article published in Financial Times (which has more than 3.8 million followers on Google+). The view on Dual Leadership is here used as inspiration.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This model brings challenges with it. There has to be a clear definition of roles, for the duo to work dynamically. There also has to be a very clear communication strategy, for information to flow efficiently within an organization. The duo needs to have a good chemistry and be able to challenge each other, but it is also suggested that a constellation like this can slow down the response to changes within an organization or project.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;jointleader&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But these examples are less dominant compared to the cost of a setup like this. One successful and money-making project after the other could very easily make the setup worth it, but it puts a very natural limitation of the types of companies and projects that could have use of this model. It simply has to be of a certain size in order to make sense, and have the acquired budget.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
All in all it is difficult to give one single answer to what type of leader a project or company needs. In all situations it is necessary to take a look at the project surroundings. The qualifications need to be prioritized, in order to find the most suitable project manager within the framework of the company. In generally it does not seem like the dual leadership model is a solution to this problem. Both in terms of the limitations in the model itself, but also in the cost of a model like this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A clear tendency is that more and more business knowledge is required, which tends to cut down on the required area-specific technological knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If one were to judge only on behalf of what the different standards mention as necessary qualifications, then area-specific knowledge does not play an important role. But by taking this as a fact, one has to bear in mind that these standards have an agenda. At the end of the day, they make money the more people get certified within their framework. Thereby there is a natural interest in being as broad as possible, in order to approach as many future project managers as possible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lack of this can either be seen as a part of the definition of the project manager&#039;s competencies. But it can also be seen as a limitation to the standards in general. It depends on what view one has on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Throughout the whole article, there has not been made any distinctions on how close or far the project manager is to hes project team. A discussion on how the distance to the project team would affect the manager&#039;s ideal competencies would have been useful, although outside of the scope of this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It does seems inevitable though, to be prepared to spend time on further education of a project manager&#039;s qualifications. That can either be the project management skills or the area-specific skills, depending on what road that has been taken to get into the present position.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No matter what perspective one must have, it seems that it is a field within which there is room for more research to be done. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated Bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S152093</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Project_Management_Competency_Framework&amp;diff=17850</id>
		<title>Project Management Competency Framework</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Project_Management_Competency_Framework&amp;diff=17850"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T23:04:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S152093: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Summary==&lt;br /&gt;
In literature, many things have been written about project management and the best practice hereof. Various standards exist with the aim of describing the field, and a long list of terms and processes are defined and described. All the standards aim to prepare a project manager to give him the highest chances of achieving success with his projects. It seems that even though each standard differ from the others, they tend to have a similar perspective on the best practice of the subject.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this article is going to look at three standards, the PMI, ISO, and IPMA standard. The focus will be on what they suggest as good project management qualifications, but in particular what the standards suggest as necessary as area-specific knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on what the standards suggest as good project management methods, the two typical approaches to become a project manager is discussed. One approach is by having studied project management, and for example becoming certified project manager. The other way is by achieving a broad knowledge within a field, and then work the way into a position as a project manager. During this discussion, it will be look at whether or not there, typically, will be a gap in knowledge of project managers. The dual leadership model is briefly being introduced, in order to see if this model could cover the gap in a project manager&#039;s knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But before we get started, the difference between a manager and a leader is introduced as suggested by Capowski.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Capow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Capowski, G., &#039;&#039;Anatomy of a Leader: Where Are the Leaders of Tomorrow?&#039;&#039;, (1994)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; These are two terms that are being used a lot within this article, although the main focus will be on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Manager:&#039;&#039;&#039; A manager has a degree of power from the position that he is in. He is structured, analytical, and rational, and he creates stability within a project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Leader:&#039;&#039;&#039; A leader, on the other hand, has power because people let him have power. He is courageous, innovative, and visionary, and initiates changes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
For project management, there exist many standards. These standards aim to describe project management across different types of projects and across fields. They for example describe the best practice of the initiation, planning, implementation, controlling and closing of a project, and introduce a long list of tools in order to have the best chances of achieving success within a project. These standards also have a view of the best version of a project manager and the abilities that he should possess.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the following, three standards are being introduced. In particular, their view on the best version of a project manager is at interest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;PMBOK:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the PMI standard (PMBOK),&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Project Management Institute, &#039;&#039;A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge&#039;&#039;, Fifth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA, (2013) - &#039;&#039;&#039;Annotation:&#039;&#039;&#039; PMBOK is an American best practice standard on project management. It is highly influential, and among the most important project management standards in the world.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; it is mentioned that in addition to area-specific skills, project managers possess a set of characteristics, being within the area of knowledge, performance and personal.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; These characteristics covers the project manager&#039;s knowledge, hes ability to perform and then personal relations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;ISO Standard:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the ISO Standard, &amp;quot;Competencies of project personnel&amp;quot; describes the competencies a project manager should have and the competencies that the project team as a unit should have.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;iso&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dansk Standard, &#039;&#039;ISO 21500, Guidance on Project Management&#039;&#039;, First Edition, Dansk Standard, Copenhagen, Denmark, (2012) - &#039;&#039;&#039;Annotation:&#039;&#039;&#039; ISO Standard is an international standard on project management. Because of the broadness of the standard, it is very brief in nature.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Here it is stated that the project team should have a certain skill set, and that any gap between the required and available competencies could be a risk, and should be addressed. On the other hand there are listed three categories of competencies that a project manager should possess, that being technical competencies, behavioral competencies, and contextual competencies.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;iso&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;technical competencies&#039;&#039; describe processes, terminology and concepts, all within project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;behavioral competencies&#039;&#039; describe personal relationships.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;contextual competencies&#039;&#039; describe the context of the project, i.e., the project within the organization and environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;IPMA:&#039;&#039;&#039; The International Project Management Association (IPMA) divides project management skills in the same three categories as the ISO standard in their &amp;quot;Competence baseline&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ipma&amp;quot;&amp;gt;International Project Management Association, &#039;&#039;ICB - IPMA Competence Baseline&#039;&#039;, Third Edition, International Project Management Association, Nijkerk, The Netherlands, (2006) - &#039;&#039;&#039;Annotation:&#039;&#039;&#039; The IPMA Competence Baseline is the European version of PMBOK on project management. Although not as influential as PMBOK, it is still highly used in industries.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; IPMA focuses on competence elements, whereof the majority of them are in the technical category. The two other categories, behavioral and contextual competencies, are also described in this standard though.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are all well-known standards that are used across various fields and industries. They guide project managers to follow the best practice of management in a given project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They all describe processes, techniques, and concepts, although the level of details within each standard varies a lot. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Discussion==&lt;br /&gt;
In the brief overview of what skills a project manager must possess, it might, at first glance, seem surprising that there is a lack of requirement of the field specific technical knowledge. There is a long list of requirement to the technical knowledge, in the sense of project management techniques, but the demand of area specific technical knowledge is limited.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is noted that the organizations behind the standards all have an interest of being as broad as possible, so that as many project managers and leaders can use and apply their standards.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the PMBOK there is a slight opening of a discussion about area specific skills, but the majority of the concept is treated in an appendix in the 4th edition,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok4&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Project Management Institute, &#039;&#039;A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge&#039;&#039;, Fourth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA, (2008)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and is referred to as &amp;quot;Application Area Extensions&amp;quot;. Noticeably this section has been removed in the 5th edition.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; This though is only an introduction to the extension material that PMI offers within each project type, e.g. software projects, construction projects, etc., and treats for example area specific practices.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmboksoftware&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Caupin, G., et al., &#039;&#039;Software Extension to the PMBOK® Guide Fifth Edition, review&#039;&#039;, Fifth Edition, http://marketplace.pmi.org/Pages/ProductDetail.aspx?GMProduct=00101457501 [visited 25/09 - 2015] - &#039;&#039;&#039;Annotation:&#039;&#039;&#039; The review on the Software extension to PMBOK is used as an example of extensions of the general PMBOK.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does not treat the subject at all, while the IPMA is the standard that goes the most in depth with the subject. The section on Contextual Competencies describes the link between the project and the organization. In the element description &amp;quot;Permanent Organization&amp;quot;, it is mentioned that &amp;quot;If the project manager is experienced in the respective sector and industry, he will be in a better position to understand these factors. [The planning and management principles of the operations of the permanent organization, red.]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally raises the question: does a project manager need area specific knowledge of the projects that he manages? Does a manager need technical skills within an area to lead a team to meet predefined goals and objectives?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking into the mentioned standards, the answer seems to be no. According to appendix D in PMBOK, there can be some area specific processes that would be ideal to follow,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; but there is not explicit requirements for concrete technical knowledge related to the working area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does only describe to subject by noting that gaps in knowledge about a project can be a risk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IPMA Competence Baseline describes area specific knowledge as being an advantage in managing the permanent organization, but doesn&#039;t describe the subject in relation to projects in the temporary sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thinking of having a manager with very limited area-specific skills, one encounters problems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Being a successful project manager means being successful at delegating work to other people, in order to meet a set of predefined goals and objectives. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally means that the project manager needs to have some kind of respect about his person, so what he lacks in area-specific skills, he must make up for in other areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Estimating the time needed for specific sub-tasks becomes more difficult, but also a task as setting up a project team that covers a wide set of skills becomes more of a challenge. The project team is an important stakeholders. The team needs to be dynamical and have a good relation to each other, but the definition of the required skill set within the project team is of huge importance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what is the alternative then? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An obvious suggestion would be to have people working their way to a position as project managers. This is the concept of having academics that have been working a long time, and then being rewarded with responsibility. That could for example be for good work, loyalty, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One does encounter various problems with this method of employing project managers in a company. First of all, the specialized knowledge and experience gained over a long time is taken away from a project team. Second of all, there are often organizational politics involved in the decision of hiring an employee in a new position within the organization. What should have been a decision based on qualifications can then easily become a political decision. Thirdly there could be a tendency of people working in the same field within the same company for years after years to be more narrow-minded. This will result in project managers to be less likely to think out of the box and to have a very set way of doing things.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Judging from Richardson et al.,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stillaccidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Richardson, T. M. et al., &#039;&#039;Is Project Management Still an Accidental Profession? A Qualitative Study of Career Trajectory&#039;&#039;, http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/5/1/2158244015572098 (1995) - &#039;&#039;&#039;Annotation:&#039;&#039;&#039; This article is a follow up article on the highly influential article &amp;quot;Lessons for an Accidental Profession&amp;quot;. It looks into the career paths on project managers, and concludes that project management still is an &amp;quot;accidental profession&amp;quot; to a high degree.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; it seems that academics working their way up the ranks, is actually the career path that many project managers have taken.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As suggested in literature, the profession of being a project manager is often called the accidental profession (see for example Pinto et al.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;accidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Pinto, J. K., Kharbanda, O. P., &#039;&#039;Lessons for an Accidental Profession&#039;&#039;, (1995) - &#039;&#039;&#039;Annotation:&#039;&#039;&#039; This article has been a highly influential article for 15 years. It describes project management as an accidental profession, and introduces tools to become a better project manager.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;) This covers the fact that there is a clear tendency of project managers being employed on behalf of their academic qualifications or the expectations for their future success as a project manager, rather than their experience as project managers.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stillaccidentalprof&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pmimember.PNG|right|thumb|350px|Figure 1: The evolution in number of members of PMI worldwide, from 1969 to 2008]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But as discussed by Ranf,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;thenandnow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ranf, D. E., &#039;&#039;Project management: Then and now&#039;&#039;, Annales Universitatis Apulensis: Series Oeconomica, 13, 596-603 (2011) - &#039;&#039;&#039;Annotation:&#039;&#039;&#039; Article discussion the change in project management from a technological specialization to a strategic business specialization.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; time is changing. Figure 1&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;figur&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Lecture slides MEP 1.2 from the course 42429 Projektledelse Aug 15, DTU&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; shows the evolution of number of members of PMI worldwide, and as seen on the curve the number of memberships is increasing almost exponentially. Although it refers to the number of members of PMI (and not all other project management organizations), it can be seen as a clear sign of the significance of projects, but in particular the increasing significance as project management as a profession.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally, project managers were valued for their technological knowledge that they could apply within a certain project. Having business knowledge was an advantage, but not a requirement. Now, on the other hand, project managers are valued for the business knowledge, and technological knowledge is an advantage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This has to be seen in relation to the change of the working market. Projects are incorporated in work settings in a completely new way, and as discussed, the demand of project managers is increasing. Now the project manager&#039;s primarily job isn&#039;t necessarily to contribute with technological knowledge. According to Ranf,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;thenandnow&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; the business aspect has an increasing importance, in order for the project manager to contribute to business decisions etc. Another aspect of the project management is political abilities. As the number of projects increases, the political environment increases, and the project manager has to move within a more complex organizational structure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So it seems that the project manager very easily can be in a situation where there is a knowledge gap. Is it too much to require from a person that he is both a highly competent manager but also a very skilled worker? And can everybody become a project manager?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Say a person has been working his way up in the company, and finally is offered a management position. He will undergo up-qualifications of his management skills, and be certified project manager within one of the numerous project management standards. Not long ago many people didn&#039;t believe in this approach. The born leader is a term that most people have encountered, but it is also a term that was highly used not long ago.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bornleader&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Lecture slides MEP 5.1 from the course 42429 Projektledelse Aug 15, DTU - &#039;&#039;&#039;Annotation:&#039;&#039;&#039; Slides built on research made by Daft et al. (2008)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Today most people acknowledge that being a leader (and in particular manager) requires a set of skills that most people can learn. This being in line with all other types of knowledge that we can acquire, if there is a need and a desire hereof.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A solution used in some bigger companies, is the dual leadership model. Duos of leaders are composed, in hopes of the duo to compliment each other. If the duo is working efficiently, a wider set of leadership skills is covered within a field. That can e.g. be technological knowledge on one hand, and more management oriented abilities on the other.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Among the companies that have tried this method, are Goldman Sachs, Unilever, and Motorola.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;jointleader&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Palmer, M., &#039;&#039;Two chiefs not necessarily better than one&#039;&#039;, Financial Times, http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/3d509590-45d8-11e1-acc9-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3myDawPXD [visited 27/09 - 2015] - &#039;&#039;&#039;Annotation:&#039;&#039;&#039; Article published in Financial Times (which has more than 3.8 million followers on Google+). The view on Dual Leadership is here used as inspiration.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This model brings challenges with it. There has to be a clear definition of roles, for the duo to work dynamically. There also has to be a very clear communication strategy, for information to flow efficiently within an organization. The duo needs to have a good chemistry and be able to challenge each other, but it is also suggested that a constellation like this can slow down the response to changes within an organization or project.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;jointleader&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But these examples are less dominant compared to the cost of a setup like this. One successful and money-making project after the other could very easily make the setup worth it, but it puts a very natural limitation of the types of companies and projects that could have use of this model. It simply has to be of a certain size in order to make sense, and have the acquired budget.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
All in all it is difficult to give one single answer to what type of leader a project or company needs. In all situations it is necessary to take a look at the project surroundings. The qualifications need to be prioritized, in order to find the most suitable project manager within the framework of the company. In generally it does not seem like the dual leadership model is a solution to this problem. Both in terms of the limitations in the model itself, but also in the cost of a model like this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A clear tendency is that more and more business knowledge is required, which tends to cut down on the required area-specific technological knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If one were to judge only on behalf of what the different standards mention as necessary qualifications, then area-specific knowledge does not play an important role. But by taking this as a fact, one has to bear in mind that these standards have an agenda. At the end of the day, they make money the more people get certified within their framework. Thereby there is a natural interest in being as broad as possible, in order to approach as many future project managers as possible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lack of this can either be seen as a part of the definition of the project manager&#039;s competencies. But it can also be seen as a limitation to the standards in general. It depends on what view one has on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Throughout the whole article, there has not been made any distinctions on how close or far the project manager is to hes project team. A discussion on how the distance to the project team would affect the manager&#039;s ideal competencies would have been useful, although outside of the scope of this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It does seems inevitable though, to be prepared to spend time on further education of a project manager&#039;s qualifications. That can either be the project management skills or the area-specific skills, depending on what road that has been taken to get into the present position.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No matter what perspective one must have, it seems that it is a field within which there is room for more research to be done. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated Bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S152093</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Project_Management_Competency_Framework&amp;diff=17814</id>
		<title>Project Management Competency Framework</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Project_Management_Competency_Framework&amp;diff=17814"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T22:54:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S152093: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Summary==&lt;br /&gt;
In literature, many things have been written about project management and the best practice hereof. Various standards exist with the aim of describing the field, and a long list of terms and processes are defined and described. All the standards aim to prepare a project manager to give him the highest chances of achieving success with his projects. It seems that even though each standard differ from the others, they tend to have a similar perspective on the best practice of the subject.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this article is going to look at three standards, the PMI, ISO, and IPMA standard. The focus will be on what they suggest as good project management qualifications, but in particular what the standards suggest as necessary as area-specific knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on what the standards suggest as good project management methods, the two typical approaches to become a project manager is discussed. One approach is by having studied project management, and for example becoming certified project manager. The other way is by achieving a broad knowledge within a field, and then work the way into a position as a project manager. During this discussion, it will be look at whether or not there, typically, will be a gap in knowledge of project managers. The dual leadership model is briefly being introduced, in order to see if this model could cover the gap in a project manager&#039;s knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But before we get started, the difference between a manager and a leader is introduced as suggested by Capowski.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Capow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Capowski, G., &#039;&#039;Anatomy of a Leader: Where Are the Leaders of Tomorrow?&#039;&#039;, (1994)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; These are two terms that are being used a lot within this article, although the main focus will be on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Manager:&#039;&#039;&#039; A manager has a degree of power from the position that he is in. He is structured, analytical, and rational, and he creates stability within a project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Leader:&#039;&#039;&#039; A leader, on the other hand, has power because people let him have power. He is courageous, innovative, and visionary, and initiates changes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
For project management, there exist many standards. These standards aim to describe project management across different types of projects and across fields. They for example describe the best practice of the initiation, planning, implementation, controlling and closing of a project, and introduce a long list of tools in order to have the best chances of achieving success within a project. These standards also have a view of the best version of a project manager and the abilities that he should possess.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the following, three standards are being introduced. In particular, their view on the best version of a project manager is at interest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;PMBOK:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the PMI standard (PMBOK),&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Project Management Institute, &#039;&#039;A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge&#039;&#039;, Fifth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA, (2013) - &#039;&#039;&#039;Annotation:&#039;&#039;&#039; PMBOK is an American best practice standard on project management. It is highly influential, and among the most important project management standards in the world.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; it is mentioned that in addition to area-specific skills, project managers possess a set of characteristics, being within the area of knowledge, performance and personal.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; These characteristics covers the project manager&#039;s knowledge, hes ability to perform and then personal relations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;ISO Standard:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the ISO Standard, &amp;quot;Competencies of project personnel&amp;quot; describes the competencies a project manager should have and the competencies that the project team as a unit should have.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;iso&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dansk Standard, &#039;&#039;ISO 21500, Guidance on Project Management&#039;&#039;, First Edition, Dansk Standard, Copenhagen, Denmark, (2012) - &#039;&#039;&#039;Annotation:&#039;&#039;&#039; ISO Standard is an international standard on project management. Because of the broadness of the standard, it is very brief in nature.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Here it is stated that the project team should have a certain skill set, and that any gap between the required and available competencies could be a risk, and should be addressed. On the other hand there are listed three categories of competencies that a project manager should possess, that being technical competencies, behavioral competencies, and contextual competencies.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;iso&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;technical competencies&#039;&#039; describe processes, terminology and concepts, all within project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;behavioral competencies&#039;&#039; describe personal relationships.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;contextual competencies&#039;&#039; describe the context of the project, i.e., the project within the organization and environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;IPMA:&#039;&#039;&#039; The International Project Management Association (IPMA) divides project management skills in the same three categories as the ISO standard in their &amp;quot;Competence baseline&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ipma&amp;quot;&amp;gt;International Project Management Association, &#039;&#039;ICB - IPMA Competence Baseline&#039;&#039;, Third Edition, International Project Management Association, Nijkerk, The Netherlands, (2006) - &#039;&#039;&#039;Annotation:&#039;&#039;&#039; The IPMA Competence Baseline is the European version of PMBOK on project management. Although not as influential as PMBOK, it is still highly used in industries.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; IPMA focuses on competence elements, whereof the majority of them are in the technical category. The two other categories, behavioral and contextual competencies, are also described in this standard though.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are all well-known standards that are used across various fields and industries. They guide project managers to follow the best practice of management in a given project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They all describe processes, techniques, and concepts, although the level of details within each standard varies a lot. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Discussion==&lt;br /&gt;
In the brief overview of what skills a project manager must possess, it might, at first glance, seem surprising that there is a lack of requirement of the field specific technical knowledge. There is a long list of requirement to the technical knowledge, in the sense of project management techniques, but the demand of area specific technical knowledge is limited.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is noted that the organizations behind the standards all have an interest of being as broad as possible, so that as many project managers and leaders can use and apply their standards.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the PMBOK there is a slight opening of a discussion about area specific skills, but the majority of the concept is treated in an appendix in the 4th edition,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok4&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Project Management Institute, &#039;&#039;A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge&#039;&#039;, Fourth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA, (2008)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and is referred to as &amp;quot;Application Area Extensions&amp;quot;. Noticeably this section has been removed in the 5th edition.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; This though is only an introduction to the extension material that PMI offers within each project type, e.g. software projects, construction projects, etc., and treats for example area specific practices.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmboksoftware&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Caupin, G., et al., &#039;&#039;Software Extension to the PMBOK® Guide Fifth Edition, review&#039;&#039;, Fifth Edition, http://marketplace.pmi.org/Pages/ProductDetail.aspx?GMProduct=00101457501 [visited 25/09 - 2015] - &#039;&#039;&#039;Annotation:&#039;&#039;&#039; The review on the Software extension to PMBOK is used as an example of extensions of the general PMBOK.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does not treat the subject at all, while the IPMA is the standard that goes the most in depth with the subject. The section on Contextual Competencies describes the link between the project and the organization. In the element description &amp;quot;Permanent Organization&amp;quot;, it is mentioned that &amp;quot;If the project manager is experienced in the respective sector and industry, he will be in a better position to understand these factors. [The planning and management principles of the operations of the permanent organization, red.]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally raises the question: does a project manager need area specific knowledge of the projects that he manages? Does a manager need technical skills within an area to lead a team to meet predefined goals and objectives?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking into the mentioned standards, the answer seems to be no. According to appendix D in PMBOK, there can be some area specific processes that would be ideal to follow,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; but there is not explicit requirements for concrete technical knowledge related to the working area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does only describe to subject by noting that gaps in knowledge about a project can be a risk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IPMA Competence Baseline describes area specific knowledge as being an advantage in managing the permanent organization, but doesn&#039;t describe the subject in relation to projects in the temporary sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thinking of having a manager with very limited area-specific skills, one encounters problems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Being a successful project manager means being successful at delegating work to other people, in order to meet a set of predefined goals and objectives. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally means that the project manager needs to have some kind of respect about his person, so what he lacks in area-specific skills, he must make up for in other areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Estimating the time needed for specific sub-tasks becomes more difficult, but also a task as setting up a project team that covers a wide set of skills becomes more of a challenge. The project team is an important stakeholders. The team needs to be dynamical and have a good relation to each other, but the definition of the required skill set within the project team is of huge importance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what is the alternative then? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An obvious suggestion would be to have people working their way to a position as project managers. This is the concept of having academics that have been working a long time, and then being rewarded with responsibility. That could for example be for good work, loyalty, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One does encounter various problems with this method of employing project managers in a company. First of all, the specialized knowledge and experience gained over a long time is taken away from a project team. Second of all, there are often organizational politics involved in the decision of hiring an employee in a new position within the organization. What should have been a decision based on qualifications can then easily become a political decision. Thirdly there could be a tendency of people working in the same field within the same company for years after years to be more narrow-minded. This will result in project managers to be less likely to think out of the box and to have a very set way of doing things.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Judging from Richardson et al.,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stillaccidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Richardson, T. M. et al., &#039;&#039;Is Project Management Still an Accidental Profession? A Qualitative Study of Career Trajectory&#039;&#039;, http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/5/1/2158244015572098 (1995) - &#039;&#039;&#039;Annotation:&#039;&#039;&#039; This article is a follow up article on the highly influential article &amp;quot;Lessons for an Accidental Profession&amp;quot;. It looks into the career paths on project managers, and concludes that project management still is an &amp;quot;accidental profession&amp;quot; to a high degree.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; it seems that academics working their way up the ranks, is actually the career path that many project managers have taken.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As suggested in literature, the profession of being a project manager is often called the accidental profession (see for example Pinto et al.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;accidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Pinto, J. K., Kharbanda, O. P., &#039;&#039;Lessons for an Accidental Profession&#039;&#039;, (1995) - &#039;&#039;&#039;Annotation:&#039;&#039;&#039; This article has been a highly influential article for 15 years. It describes project management as an accidental profession, and introduces tools to become a better project manager.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;) This covers the fact that there is a clear tendency of project managers being employed on behalf of their academic qualifications or the expectations for their future success as a project manager, rather than their experience as project managers.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stillaccidentalprof&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pmimember.PNG|right|thumb|350px|Figure 1: The evolution in number of members of PMI worldwide, from 1969 to 2008]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But as discussed by Ranf,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;thenandnow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ranf, D. E., &#039;&#039;Project management: Then and now&#039;&#039;, Annales Universitatis Apulensis: Series Oeconomica, 13, 596-603 (2011)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; time is changing. Figure 1&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;figur&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Lecture slides MEP 1.2 from the course 42429 Projektledelse Aug 15, DTU&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; shows the evolution of number of members of PMI worldwide, and as seen on the curve the number of memberships is increasing almost exponentially. Although it refers to the number of members of PMI (and not all other project management organizations), it can be seen as a clear sign of the significance of projects, but in particular the increasing significance as project management as a profession.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally, project managers were valued for their technological knowledge that they could apply within a certain project. Having business knowledge was an advantage, but not a requirement. Now, on the other hand, project managers are valued for the business knowledge, and technological knowledge is an advantage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This has to be seen in relation to the change of the working market. Projects are incorporated in work settings in a completely new way, and as discussed, the demand of project managers is increasing. Now the project manager&#039;s primarily job isn&#039;t necessarily to contribute with technological knowledge. According to Ranf,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;thenandnow&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; the business aspect has an increasing importance, in order for the project manager to contribute to business decisions etc. Another aspect of the project management is political abilities. As the number of projects increases, the political environment increases, and the project manager has to move within a more complex organizational structure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So it seems that the project manager very easily can be in a situation where there is a knowledge gap. Is it too much to require from a person that he is both a highly competent manager but also a very skilled worker? And can everybody become a project manager?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Say a person has been working his way up in the company, and finally is offered a management position. He will undergo up-qualifications of his management skills, and be certified project manager within one of the numerous project management standards. Not long ago many people didn&#039;t believe in this approach. The born leader is a term that most people have encountered, but it is also a term that was highly used not long ago.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bornleader&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Lecture slides MEP 5.1 from the course 42429 Projektledelse Aug 15, DTU&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Today most people acknowledge that being a leader (and in particular manager) requires a set of skills that most people can learn. This being in line with all other types of knowledge that we can acquire, if there is a need and a desire hereof.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A solution used in some bigger companies, is the dual leadership model. Duos of leaders are composed, in hopes of the duo to compliment each other. If the duo is working efficiently, a wider set of leadership skills is covered within a field. That can e.g. be technological knowledge on one hand, and more management oriented abilities on the other.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Among the companies that have tried this method, are Goldman Sachs, Unilever, and Motorola.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;jointleader&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Palmer, M., &#039;&#039;Two chiefs not necessarily better than one&#039;&#039;, Financial Times, http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/3d509590-45d8-11e1-acc9-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3myDawPXD [visited 27/09 - 2015]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This model brings challenges with it. There has to be a clear definition of roles, for the duo to work dynamically. There also has to be a very clear communication strategy, for information to flow efficiently within an organization. The duo needs to have a good chemistry and be able to challenge each other, but it is also suggested that a constellation like this can slow down the response to changes within an organization or project.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;jointleader&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But these examples are less dominant compared to the cost of a setup like this. One successful and money-making project after the other could very easily make the setup worth it, but it puts a very natural limitation of the types of companies and projects that could have use of this model. It simply has to be of a certain size in order to make sense, and have the acquired budget.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
All in all it is difficult to give one single answer to what type of leader a project or company needs. In all situations it is necessary to take a look at the project surroundings. The qualifications need to be prioritized, in order to find the most suitable project manager within the framework of the company. In generally it does not seem like the dual leadership model is a solution to this problem. Both in terms of the limitations in the model itself, but also in the cost of a model like this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A clear tendency is that more and more business knowledge is required, which tends to cut down on the required area-specific technological knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If one were to judge only on behalf of what the different standards mention as necessary qualifications, then area-specific knowledge does not play an important role. But by taking this as a fact, one has to bear in mind that these standards have an agenda. At the end of the day, they make money the more people get certified within their framework. Thereby there is a natural interest in being as broad as possible, in order to approach as many future project managers as possible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lack of this can either be seen as a part of the definition of the project manager&#039;s competencies. But it can also be seen as a limitation to the standards in general. It depends on what view one has on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Throughout the whole article, there has not been made any distinctions on how close or far the project manager is to hes project team. A discussion on how the distance to the project team would affect the manager&#039;s ideal competencies would have been useful, although outside of the scope of this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It does seems inevitable though, to be prepared to spend time on further education of a project manager&#039;s qualifications. That can either be the project management skills or the area-specific skills, depending on what road that has been taken to get into the present position.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No matter what perspective one must have, it seems that it is a field within which there is room for more research to be done. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated Bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S152093</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Project_Management_Competency_Framework&amp;diff=17789</id>
		<title>Project Management Competency Framework</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Project_Management_Competency_Framework&amp;diff=17789"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T22:46:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S152093: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Summary==&lt;br /&gt;
In literature, many things have been written about project management and the best practice hereof. Various standards exist with the aim of describing the field, and a long list of terms and processes are defined and described. All the standards aim to prepare a project manager to give him the highest chances of achieving success with his projects. It seems that even though each standard differ from the others, they tend to have a similar perspective on the best practice of the subject.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this article is going to look at three standards, the PMI, ISO, and IPMA standard. The focus will be on what they suggest as good project management qualifications, but in particular what the standards suggest as necessary as area-specific knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on what the standards suggest as good project management methods, the two typical approaches to become a project manager is discussed. One approach is by having studied project management, and for example becoming certified project manager. The other way is by achieving a broad knowledge within a field, and then work the way into a position as a project manager. During this discussion, it will be look at whether or not there, typically, will be a gap in knowledge of project managers. The dual leadership model is briefly being introduced, in order to see if this model could cover the gap in a project manager&#039;s knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But before we get started, the difference between a manager and a leader is introduced as suggested by Capowski.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Capow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Capowski, G., &#039;&#039;Anatomy of a Leader: Where Are the Leaders of Tomorrow?&#039;&#039;, (1994)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; These are two terms that are being used a lot within this article, although the main focus will be on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Manager:&#039;&#039;&#039; A manager has a degree of power from the position that he is in. He is structured, analytical, and rational, and he creates stability within a project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Leader:&#039;&#039;&#039; A leader, on the other hand, has power because people let him have power. He is courageous, innovative, and visionary, and initiates changes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
For project management, there exist many standards. These standards aim to describe project management across different types of projects and across fields. They for example describe the best practice of the initiation, planning, implementation, controlling and closing of a project, and introduce a long list of tools in order to have the best chances of achieving success within a project. These standards also have a view of the best version of a project manager and the abilities that he should possess.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the following, three standards are being introduced. In particular, their view on the best version of a project manager is at interest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;PMBOK:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the PMI standard (PMBOK),&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Project Management Institute, &#039;&#039;A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge&#039;&#039;, Fifth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA, (2013) - &#039;&#039;&#039;Annotation:&#039;&#039;&#039; PMBOK is an American best practice standard. It is highly influential, and among the most important project management standards in the world.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; it is mentioned that in addition to area-specific skills, project managers possess a set of characteristics, being within the area of knowledge, performance and personal.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; These characteristics covers the project manager&#039;s knowledge, hes ability to perform and then personal relations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;ISO Standard:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the ISO Standard, &amp;quot;Competencies of project personnel&amp;quot; describes the competencies a project manager should have and the competencies that the project team as a unit should have.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;iso&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dansk Standard, &#039;&#039;ISO 21500, Guidance on Project Management&#039;&#039;, First Edition, Dansk Standard, Copenhagen, Denmark, (2012) - &#039;&#039;&#039;Annotation:&#039;&#039;&#039; ISO Standard is an international standard on project management. Because of the broadness of the standard, it is very brief in nature.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Here it is stated that the project team should have a certain skill set, and that any gap between the required and available competencies could be a risk, and should be addressed. On the other hand there are listed three categories of competencies that a project manager should possess, that being technical competencies, behavioral competencies, and contextual competencies.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;iso&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;technical competencies&#039;&#039; describe processes, terminology and concepts, all within project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;behavioral competencies&#039;&#039; describe personal relationships.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;contextual competencies&#039;&#039; describe the context of the project, i.e., the project within the organization and environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;IPMA:&#039;&#039;&#039; The International Project Management Association (IPMA) divides project management skills in the same three categories as the ISO standard in their &amp;quot;Competence baseline&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ipma&amp;quot;&amp;gt;International Project Management Association, &#039;&#039;ICB - IPMA Competence Baseline&#039;&#039;, Third Edition, International Project Management Association, Nijkerk, The Netherlands, (2006) - &#039;&#039;&#039;Annotation:&#039;&#039;&#039; The IPMA Standard is the European version of PMBOK. Although not as influential as PMBOK, it is still highly used in industries.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; IPMA focuses on competence elements, whereof the majority of them are in the technical category. The two other categories, behavioral and contextual competencies, are also described in this standard though.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are all well-known standards that are used across various fields and industries. They guide project managers to follow the best practice of management in a given project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They all describe processes, techniques, and concepts, although the level of details within each standard varies a lot. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Discussion==&lt;br /&gt;
In the brief overview of what skills a project manager must possess, it might, at first glance, seem surprising that there is a lack of requirement of the field specific technical knowledge. There is a long list of requirement to the technical knowledge, in the sense of project management techniques, but the demand of area specific technical knowledge is limited.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is noted that the organizations behind the standards all have an interest of being as broad as possible, so that as many project managers and leaders can use and apply their standards.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the PMBOK there is a slight opening of a discussion about area specific skills, but the majority of the concept is treated in an appendix in the 4th edition,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok4&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Project Management Institute, &#039;&#039;A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge&#039;&#039;, Fourth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA, (2008)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and is referred to as &amp;quot;Application Area Extensions&amp;quot;. Noticeably this section has been removed in the 5th edition.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; This though is only an introduction to the extension material that PMI offers within each project type, e.g. software projects, construction projects, etc., and treats for example area specific practices.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmboksoftware&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Caupin, G., et al., &#039;&#039;Software Extension to the PMBOK® Guide Fifth Edition, review&#039;&#039;, Fifth Edition, http://marketplace.pmi.org/Pages/ProductDetail.aspx?GMProduct=00101457501 [visited 25/09 - 2015] - &#039;&#039;&#039;Annotation:&#039;&#039;&#039; The review on the Software extension to PMBOK is used as an example of extensions of the general PMBOK.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does not treat the subject at all, while the IPMA is the standard that goes the most in depth with the subject. The section on Contextual Competencies describes the link between the project and the organization. In the element description &amp;quot;Permanent Organization&amp;quot;, it is mentioned that &amp;quot;If the project manager is experienced in the respective sector and industry, he will be in a better position to understand these factors. [The planning and management principles of the operations of the permanent organization, red.]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally raises the question: does a project manager need area specific knowledge of the projects that he manages? Does a manager need technical skills within an area to lead a team to meet predefined goals and objectives?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking into the mentioned standards, the answer seems to be no. According to appendix D in PMBOK, there can be some area specific processes that would be ideal to follow,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; but there is not explicit requirements for concrete technical knowledge related to the working area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does only describe to subject by noting that gaps in knowledge about a project can be a risk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IPMA Competence Baseline describes area specific knowledge as being an advantage in managing the permanent organization, but doesn&#039;t describe the subject in relation to projects in the temporary sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thinking of having a manager with very limited area-specific skills, one encounters problems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Being a successful project manager means being successful at delegating work to other people, in order to meet a set of predefined goals and objectives. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally means that the project manager needs to have some kind of respect about his person, so what he lacks in area-specific skills, he must make up for in other areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Estimating the time needed for specific sub-tasks becomes more difficult, but also a task as setting up a project team that covers a wide set of skills becomes more of a challenge. The project team is an important stakeholders. The team needs to be dynamical and have a good relation to each other, but the definition of the required skill set within the project team is of huge importance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what is the alternative then? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An obvious suggestion would be to have people working their way to a position as project managers. This is the concept of having academics that have been working a long time, and then being rewarded with responsibility. That could for example be for good work, loyalty, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One does encounter various problems with this method of employing project managers in a company. First of all, the specialized knowledge and experience gained over a long time is taken away from a project team. Second of all, there are often organizational politics involved in the decision of hiring an employee in a new position within the organization. What should have been a decision based on qualifications can then easily become a political decision. Thirdly there could be a tendency of people working in the same field within the same company for years after years to be more narrow-minded. This will result in project managers to be less likely to think out of the box and to have a very set way of doing things.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Judging from Richardson et al.,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stillaccidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Richardson, T. M. et al., &#039;&#039;Is Project Management Still an Accidental Profession? A Qualitative Study of Career Trajectory&#039;&#039;, http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/5/1/2158244015572098 (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; it seems that academics working their way up the ranks, is actually the career path that many project managers have taken.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As suggested in literature, the profession of being a project manager is often called the accidental profession (see for example Pinto et al.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;accidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Pinto, J. K., Kharbanda, O. P., &#039;&#039;Lessons for an Accidental Profession&#039;&#039;, (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;) This covers the fact that there is a clear tendency of project managers being employed on behalf of their academic qualifications or the expectations for their future success as a project manager, rather than their experience as project managers.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stillaccidentalprof&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pmimember.PNG|right|thumb|350px|Figure 1: The evolution in number of members of PMI worldwide, from 1969 to 2008]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But as discussed by Ranf,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;thenandnow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ranf, D. E., &#039;&#039;Project management: Then and now&#039;&#039;, Annales Universitatis Apulensis: Series Oeconomica, 13, 596-603 (2011)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; time is changing. Figure 1&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;figur&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Lecture slides MEP 1.2 from the course 42429 Projektledelse Aug 15, DTU&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; shows the evolution of number of members of PMI worldwide, and as seen on the curve the number of memberships is increasing almost exponentially. Although it refers to the number of members of PMI (and not all other project management organizations), it can be seen as a clear sign of the significance of projects, but in particular the increasing significance as project management as a profession.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally, project managers were valued for their technological knowledge that they could apply within a certain project. Having business knowledge was an advantage, but not a requirement. Now, on the other hand, project managers are valued for the business knowledge, and technological knowledge is an advantage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This has to be seen in relation to the change of the working market. Projects are incorporated in work settings in a completely new way, and as discussed, the demand of project managers is increasing. Now the project manager&#039;s primarily job isn&#039;t necessarily to contribute with technological knowledge. According to Ranf,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;thenandnow&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; the business aspect has an increasing importance, in order for the project manager to contribute to business decisions etc. Another aspect of the project management is political abilities. As the number of projects increases, the political environment increases, and the project manager has to move within a more complex organizational structure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So it seems that the project manager very easily can be in a situation where there is a knowledge gap. Is it too much to require from a person that he is both a highly competent manager but also a very skilled worker? And can everybody become a project manager?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Say a person has been working his way up in the company, and finally is offered a management position. He will undergo up-qualifications of his management skills, and be certified project manager within one of the numerous project management standards. Not long ago many people didn&#039;t believe in this approach. The born leader is a term that most people have encountered, but it is also a term that was highly used not long ago.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bornleader&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Lecture slides MEP 5.1 from the course 42429 Projektledelse Aug 15, DTU&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Today most people acknowledge that being a leader (and in particular manager) requires a set of skills that most people can learn. This being in line with all other types of knowledge that we can acquire, if there is a need and a desire hereof.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A solution used in some bigger companies, is the dual leadership model. Duos of leaders are composed, in hopes of the duo to compliment each other. If the duo is working efficiently, a wider set of leadership skills is covered within a field. That can e.g. be technological knowledge on one hand, and more management oriented abilities on the other.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Among the companies that have tried this method, are Goldman Sachs, Unilever, and Motorola.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;jointleader&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Palmer, M., &#039;&#039;Two chiefs not necessarily better than one&#039;&#039;, Financial Times, http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/3d509590-45d8-11e1-acc9-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3myDawPXD [visited 27/09 - 2015]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This model brings challenges with it. There has to be a clear definition of roles, for the duo to work dynamically. There also has to be a very clear communication strategy, for information to flow efficiently within an organization. The duo needs to have a good chemistry and be able to challenge each other, but it is also suggested that a constellation like this can slow down the response to changes within an organization or project.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;jointleader&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But these examples are less dominant compared to the cost of a setup like this. One successful and money-making project after the other could very easily make the setup worth it, but it puts a very natural limitation of the types of companies and projects that could have use of this model. It simply has to be of a certain size in order to make sense, and have the acquired budget.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
All in all it is difficult to give one single answer to what type of leader a project or company needs. In all situations it is necessary to take a look at the project surroundings. The qualifications need to be prioritized, in order to find the most suitable project manager within the framework of the company. In generally it does not seem like the dual leadership model is a solution to this problem. Both in terms of the limitations in the model itself, but also in the cost of a model like this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A clear tendency is that more and more business knowledge is required, which tends to cut down on the required area-specific technological knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If one were to judge only on behalf of what the different standards mention as necessary qualifications, then area-specific knowledge does not play an important role. But by taking this as a fact, one has to bear in mind that these standards have an agenda. At the end of the day, they make money the more people get certified within their framework. Thereby there is a natural interest in being as broad as possible, in order to approach as many future project managers as possible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lack of this can either be seen as a part of the definition of the project manager&#039;s competencies. But it can also be seen as a limitation to the standards in general. It depends on what view one has on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Throughout the whole article, there has not been made any distinctions on how close or far the project manager is to hes project team. A discussion on how the distance to the project team would affect the manager&#039;s ideal competencies would have been useful, although outside of the scope of this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It does seems inevitable though, to be prepared to spend time on further education of a project manager&#039;s qualifications. That can either be the project management skills or the area-specific skills, depending on what road that has been taken to get into the present position.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No matter what perspective one must have, it seems that it is a field within which there is room for more research to be done. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated Bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S152093</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Project_Management_Competency_Framework&amp;diff=17745</id>
		<title>Project Management Competency Framework</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Project_Management_Competency_Framework&amp;diff=17745"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T22:30:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S152093: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Summary==&lt;br /&gt;
In literature, many things have been written about project management and the best practice hereof. Various standards exist with the aim of describing the field, and a long list of terms and processes are defined and described. All the standards aim to prepare a project manager to give him the highest chances of achieving success with his projects. It seems that even though each standard differ from the others, they tend to have a similar perspective on the best practice of the subject.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this article is going to look at three standards, the PMI, ISO, and IPMA standard. The focus will be on what they suggest as good project management qualifications, but in particular what the standards suggest as necessary as area-specific knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on what the standards suggest as good project management methods, the two typical approaches to become a project manager is discussed. One approach is by having studied project management, and for example becoming certified project manager. The other way is by achieving a broad knowledge within a field, and then work the way into a position as a project manager. During this discussion, it will be look at whether or not there, typically, will be a gap in knowledge of project managers. The dual leadership model is briefly being introduced, in order to see if this model could cover the gap in a project manager&#039;s knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But before we get started, the difference between a manager and a leader is introduced as suggested by Capowski.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Capow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Capowski, G., &#039;&#039;Anatomy of a Leader: Where Are the Leaders of Tomorrow?&#039;&#039;, (1994)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; These are two terms that are being used a lot within this article, although the main focus will be on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Manager:&#039;&#039;&#039; A manager has a degree of power from the position that he is in. He is structured, analytical, and rational, and he creates stability within a project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Leader:&#039;&#039;&#039; A leader, on the other hand, has power because people let him have power. He is courageous, innovative, and visionary, and initiates changes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
For project management, there exist many standards. These standards aim to describe project management across different types of projects and across fields. They for example describe the best practice of the initiation, planning, implementation, controlling and closing of a project, and introduce a long list of tools in order to have the best chances of achieving success within a project. These standards also have a view of the best version of a project manager and the abilities that he should possess.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the following, three standards are being introduced. In particular, their view on the best version of a project manager is at interest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;PMBOK:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the PMI standard (PMBOK),&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Project Management Institute, &#039;&#039;A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge&#039;&#039;, Fifth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA, (2013)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; it is mentioned that in addition to area-specific skills, project managers possess a set of characteristics, being within the area of knowledge, performance and personal.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; These characteristics covers the project manager&#039;s knowledge, hes ability to perform and then personal relations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;ISO standard:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the ISO standard, &amp;quot;Competencies of project personnel&amp;quot; describes the competencies a project manager should have and the competencies that the project team as a unit should have.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;iso&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dansk Standard, &#039;&#039;ISO 21500, Guidance on Project Management&#039;&#039;, First Edition, Dansk Standard, Copenhagen, Denmark, (2012)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Here it is stated that the project team should have a certain skill set, and that any gap between the required and available competencies could be a risk, and should be addressed. On the other hand there are listed three categories of competencies that a project manager should possess, that being technical competencies, behavioral competencies, and contextual competencies.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;iso&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;technical competencies&#039;&#039; describe processes, terminology and concepts, all within project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;behavioral competencies&#039;&#039; describe personal relationships.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;contextual competencies&#039;&#039; describe the context of the project, i.e., the project within the organization and environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;IPMA:&#039;&#039;&#039; The International Project Management Association (IPMA) divides project management skills in the same three categories as the ISO standard in their &amp;quot;Competence baseline&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ipma&amp;quot;&amp;gt;International Project Management Association, &#039;&#039;ICB - IPMA Competence Baseline&#039;&#039;, Third Edition, International Project Management Association, Nijkerk, The Netherlands, (2006)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; IPMA focuses on competence elements, whereof the majority of them are in the technical category. The two other categories, behavioral and contextual competencies, are also described in this standard though.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are all well-known standards that are used across various fields and industries. They guide project managers to follow the best practice of management in a given project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They all describe processes, techniques, and concepts, although the level of details within each standard varies a lot. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Discussion==&lt;br /&gt;
In the brief overview of what skills a project manager must possess, it might, at first glance, seem surprising that there is a lack of requirement of the field specific technical knowledge. There is a long list of requirement to the technical knowledge, in the sense of project management techniques, but the demand of area specific technical knowledge is limited.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is noted that the organizations behind the standards all have an interest of being as broad as possible, so that as many project managers and leaders can use and apply their standards.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the PMBOK there is a slight opening of a discussion about area specific skills, but the majority of the concept is treated in an appendix in the 4th edition,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok4&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Project Management Institute, &#039;&#039;A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge&#039;&#039;, Fourth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA, (2008)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and is referred to as &amp;quot;Application Area Extensions&amp;quot;. Noticeably this section has been removed in the 5th edition.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; This though is only an introduction to the extension material that PMI offers within each project type, e.g. software projects, construction projects, etc., and treats for example area specific practices.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmboksoftware&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Caupin, G., et al., &#039;&#039;Software Extension to the PMBOK® Guide Fifth Edition, review&#039;&#039;, Fifth Edition, http://marketplace.pmi.org/Pages/ProductDetail.aspx?GMProduct=00101457501 [visited 25/09 - 2015]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does not treat the subject at all, while the IPMA is the standard that goes the most in depth with the subject. The section on Contextual Competencies describes the link between the project and the organization. In the element description &amp;quot;Permanent Organization&amp;quot;, it is mentioned that &amp;quot;If the project manager is experienced in the respective sector and industry, he will be in a better position to understand these factors. [The planning and management principles of the operations of the permanent organization, red.]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally raises the question: does a project manager need area specific knowledge of the projects that he manages? Does a manager need technical skills within an area to lead a team to meet predefined goals and objectives?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking into the mentioned standards, the answer seems to be no. According to appendix D in PMBOK, there can be some area specific processes that would be ideal to follow,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; but there is not explicit requirements for concrete technical knowledge related to the working area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does only describe to subject by noting that gaps in knowledge about a project can be a risk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IPMA Competence Baseline describes area specific knowledge as being an advantage in managing the permanent organization, but doesn&#039;t describe the subject in relation to projects in the temporary sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thinking of having a manager with very limited area-specific skills, one encounters problems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Being a successful project manager means being successful at delegating work to other people, in order to meet a set of predefined goals and objectives. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally means that the project manager needs to have some kind of respect about his person, so what he lacks in area-specific skills, he must make up for in other areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Estimating the time needed for specific sub-tasks becomes more difficult, but also a task as setting up a project team that covers a wide set of skills becomes more of a challenge. The project team is an important stakeholders. The team needs to be dynamical and have a good relation to each other, but the definition of the required skill set within the project team is of huge importance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what is the alternative then? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An obvious suggestion would be to have people working their way to a position as project managers. This is the concept of having academics that have been working a long time, and then being rewarded with responsibility. That could for example be for good work, loyalty, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One does encounter various problems with this method of employing project managers in a company. First of all, the specialized knowledge and experience gained over a long time is taken away from a project team. Second of all, there are often organizational politics involved in the decision of hiring an employee in a new position within the organization. What should have been a decision based on qualifications can then easily become a political decision. Thirdly there could be a tendency of people working in the same field within the same company for years after years to be more narrow-minded. This will result in project managers to be less likely to think out of the box and to have a very set way of doing things.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Judging from Richardson et al.,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stillaccidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Richardson, T. M. et al., &#039;&#039;Is Project Management Still an Accidental Profession? A Qualitative Study of Career Trajectory&#039;&#039;, http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/5/1/2158244015572098 (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; it seems that academics working their way up the ranks, is actually the career path that many project managers have taken.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As suggested in literature, the profession of being a project manager is often called the accidental profession (see for example Pinto et al.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;accidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Pinto, J. K., Kharbanda, O. P., &#039;&#039;Lessons for an Accidental Profession&#039;&#039;, (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;) This covers the fact that there is a clear tendency of project managers being employed on behalf of their academic qualifications or the expectations for their future success as a project manager, rather than their experience as project managers.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stillaccidentalprof&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pmimember.PNG|right|thumb|350px|Figure 1: The evolution in number of members of PMI worldwide, from 1969 to 2008]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But as discussed by Ranf,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;thenandnow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ranf, D. E., &#039;&#039;Project management: Then and now&#039;&#039;, Annales Universitatis Apulensis: Series Oeconomica, 13, 596-603 (2011)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; time is changing. Figure 1&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;figur&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Lecture slides MEP 1.2 from the course 42429 Projektledelse Aug 15, DTU&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; shows the evolution of number of members of PMI worldwide, and as seen on the curve the number of memberships is increasing almost exponentially. Although it refers to the number of members of PMI (and not all other project management organizations), it can be seen as a clear sign of the significance of projects, but in particular the increasing significance as project management as a profession.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally, project managers were valued for their technological knowledge that they could apply within a certain project. Having business knowledge was an advantage, but not a requirement. Now, on the other hand, project managers are valued for the business knowledge, and technological knowledge is an advantage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This has to be seen in relation to the change of the working market. Projects are incorporated in work settings in a completely new way, and as discussed, the demand of project managers is increasing. Now the project manager&#039;s primarily job isn&#039;t necessarily to contribute with technological knowledge. According to Ranf,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;thenandnow&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; the business aspect has an increasing importance, in order for the project manager to contribute to business decisions etc. Another aspect of the project management is political abilities. As the number of projects increases, the political environment increases, and the project manager has to move within a more complex organizational structure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So it seems that the project manager very easily can be in a situation where there is a knowledge gap. Is it too much to require from a person that he is both a highly competent manager but also a very skilled worker? And can everybody become a project manager?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Say a person has been working his way up in the company, and finally is offered a management position. He will undergo up-qualifications of his management skills, and be certified project manager within one of the numerous project management standards. Not long ago many people didn&#039;t believe in this approach. The born leader is a term that most people have encountered, but it is also a term that was highly used not long ago.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bornleader&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Lecture slides MEP 5.1 from the course 42429 Projektledelse Aug 15, DTU&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Today most people acknowledge that being a leader (and in particular manager) requires a set of skills that most people can learn. This being in line with all other types of knowledge that we can acquire, if there is a need and a desire hereof.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A solution used in some bigger companies, is the dual leadership model. Duos of leaders are composed, in hopes of the duo to compliment each other. If the duo is working efficiently, a wider set of leadership skills is covered within a field. That can e.g. be technological knowledge on one hand, and more management oriented abilities on the other.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Among the companies that have tried this method, are Goldman Sachs, Unilever, and Motorola.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;jointleader&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Palmer, M., &#039;&#039;Two chiefs not necessarily better than one&#039;&#039;, Financial Times, http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/3d509590-45d8-11e1-acc9-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3myDawPXD [visited 27/09 - 2015]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This model brings challenges with it. There has to be a clear definition of roles, for the duo to work dynamically. There also has to be a very clear communication strategy, for information to flow efficiently within an organization. The duo needs to have a good chemistry and be able to challenge each other, but it is also suggested that a constellation like this can slow down the response to changes within an organization or project.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;jointleader&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But these examples are less dominant compared to the cost of a setup like this. One successful and money-making project after the other could very easily make the setup worth it, but it puts a very natural limitation of the types of companies and projects that could have use of this model. It simply has to be of a certain size in order to make sense, and have the acquired budget.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
All in all it is difficult to give one single answer to what type of leader a project or company needs. In all situations it is necessary to take a look at the project surroundings. The qualifications need to be prioritized, in order to find the most suitable project manager within the framework of the company. In generally it does not seem like the dual leadership model is a solution to this problem. Both in terms of the limitations in the model itself, but also in the cost of a model like this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A clear tendency is that more and more business knowledge is required, which tends to cut down on the required area-specific technological knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If one were to judge only on behalf of what the different standards mention as necessary qualifications, then area-specific knowledge does not play an important role. But by taking this as a fact, one has to bear in mind that these standards have an agenda. At the end of the day, they make money the more people get certified within their framework. Thereby there is a natural interest in being as broad as possible, in order to approach as many future project managers as possible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lack of this can either be seen as a part of the definition of the project manager&#039;s competencies. But it can also be seen as a limitation to the standards in general. It depends on what view one has on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Throughout the whole article, there has not been made any distinctions on how close or far the project manager is to hes project team. A discussion on how the distance to the project team would affect the manager&#039;s ideal competencies would have been useful, although outside of the scope of this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It does seems inevitable though, to be prepared to spend time on further education of a project manager&#039;s qualifications. That can either be the project management skills or the area-specific skills, depending on what road that has been taken to get into the present position.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No matter what perspective one must have, it seems that it is a field within which there is room for more research to be done. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated Bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S152093</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Project_Management_Competency_Framework&amp;diff=17739</id>
		<title>Project Management Competency Framework</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Project_Management_Competency_Framework&amp;diff=17739"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T22:29:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S152093: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Summary==&lt;br /&gt;
In literature, many things have been written about project management and the best practice hereof. Various standards exist with the aim of describing the field, and a long list of terms and processes are defined and described. All the standards aim to prepare a project manager to give him the highest chances of achieving success with his projects. It seems that even though each standard differ from the others, they tend to have a similar perspective on the best practice of the subject.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this article is going to look at three standards, the PMI, ISO, and IPMA standard. The focus will be on what they suggest as good project management qualifications, but in particular what the standards suggest as necessary as area-specific knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on what the standards suggest as good project management methods, the two typical approaches to become a project manager is discussed. One approach is by having studied project management, and for example becoming certified project manager. The other way is by achieving a broad knowledge within a field, and then work the way into a position as a project manager. During this discussion, it will be look at whether or not there, typically, will be a gap in knowledge of project managers. The dual leadership model is briefly being introduced, in order to see if this model could cover the gap in a project manager&#039;s knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But before we get started, the difference between a manager and a leader is introduced as suggested by Capowski.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Capow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Capowski, G., &#039;&#039;Anatomy of a Leader: Where Are the Leaders of Tomorrow?&#039;&#039;, (1994)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; These are two terms that are being used a lot within this article, although the main focus will be on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Manager:&#039;&#039;&#039; A manager has a degree of power from the position that he is in. He is structured, analytical, and rational, and he creates stability within a project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Leader:&#039;&#039;&#039; A leader, on the other hand, has power because people let him have power. He is courageous, innovative, and visionary, and initiates changes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
For project management, there exist many standards. These standards aim to describe project management across different types of projects and across fields. They for example describe the best practice of the initiation, planning, implementation, controlling and closing of a project, and introduce a long list of tools in order to have the best chances of achieving success within a project. These standards also have a view of the best version of a project manager and the abilities that he should possess.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the following, three standards are being introduced. In particular, their view on the best version of a project manager is at interest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;PMBOK:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the PMI standard (PMBOK),&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Project Management Institute, &#039;&#039;A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge&#039;&#039;, Fifth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA, (2013)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; it is mentioned that in addition to area-specific skills, project managers possess a set of characteristics, being within the area of knowledge, performance and personal.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; These characteristics covers the project manager&#039;s knowledge, hes ability to perform and then personal relations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;ISO standard:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the ISO standard, &amp;quot;Competencies of project personnel&amp;quot; describes the competencies a project manager should have and the competencies that the project team as a unit should have.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;iso&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dansk Standard, &#039;&#039;ISO 21500, Guidance on Project Management&#039;&#039;, First Edition, Dansk Standard, Copenhagen, Denmark, (2012)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Here it is stated that the project team should have a certain skill set, and that any gap between the required and available competencies could be a risk, and should be addressed. On the other hand there are listed three categories of competencies that a project manager should possess, that being technical competencies, behavioral competencies, and contextual competencies.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;iso&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;technical competencies&#039;&#039; describe processes, terminology and concepts, all within project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;behavioral competencies&#039;&#039; describe personal relationships.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;contextual competencies&#039;&#039; describe the context of the project, i.e., the project within the organization and environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;IPMA:&#039;&#039;&#039; The International Project Management Association (IPMA) divides project management skills in the same three categories as the ISO standard in their &amp;quot;Competence baseline&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ipma&amp;quot;&amp;gt;International Project Management Association, &#039;&#039;ICB - IPMA Competence Baseline&#039;&#039;, Third Edition, International Project Management Association, Nijkerk, The Netherlands, (2006)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; IPMA focuses on competence elements, whereof the majority of them are in the technical category. The two other categories, behavioral and contextual competencies, are also described in this standard though.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are all well-known standards that are used across various fields and industries. They guide project managers to follow the best practice of management in a given project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They all describe processes, techniques, and concepts, although the level of details within each standard varies a lot. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Discussion==&lt;br /&gt;
In the brief overview of what skills a project manager must possess, it might, at first glance, seem surprising that there is a lack of requirement of the field specific technical knowledge. There is a long list of requirement to the technical knowledge, in the sense of project management techniques, but the demand of area specific technical knowledge is limited.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is noted that the organizations behind the standards all have an interest of being as broad as possible, so that as many project managers and leaders can use and apply their standards.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the PMBOK there is a slight opening of a discussion about area specific skills, but the majority of the concept is treated in an appendix in the 4th edition,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok4&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Project Management Institute, &#039;&#039;A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge&#039;&#039;, Fourth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA, (2008)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and is referred to as &amp;quot;Application Area Extensions&amp;quot;. Noticeably this section has been removed in the 5th edition.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; This though is only an introduction to the extension material that PMI offers within each project type, e.g. software projects, construction projects, etc., and treats for example area specific practices.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmboksoftware&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Caupin, G., et al., &#039;&#039;Software Extension to the PMBOK® Guide Fifth Edition, review&#039;&#039;, Fifth Edition, http://marketplace.pmi.org/Pages/ProductDetail.aspx?GMProduct=00101457501 [visited 25/09 - 2015]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does not treat the subject at all, while the IPMA is the standard that goes the most in depth with the subject. The section on Contextual Competencies describes the link between the project and the organization. In the element description &amp;quot;Permanent Organization&amp;quot;, it is mentioned that &amp;quot;If the project manager is experienced in the respective sector and industry, he will be in a better position to understand these factors. [The planning and management principles of the operations of the permanent organization, red.]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally raises the question: does a project manager need area specific knowledge of the projects that he manages? Does a manager need technical skills within an area to lead a team to meet predefined goals and objectives?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking into the mentioned standards, the answer seems to be no. According to appendix D in PMBOK, there can be some area specific processes that would be ideal to follow,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; but there is not explicit requirements for concrete technical knowledge related to the working area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does only describe to subject by noting that gaps in knowledge about a project can be a risk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IPMA Competence Baseline describes area specific knowledge as being an advantage in managing the permanent organization, but doesn&#039;t describe the subject in relation to projects in the temporary sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thinking of having a manager with very limited area-specific skills, one encounters problems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Being a successful project manager means being successful at delegating work to other people, in order to meet a set of predefined goals and objectives. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally means that the project manager needs to have some kind of respect about his person, so what he lacks in area-specific skills, he must make up for in other areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Estimating the time needed for specific sub-tasks becomes more difficult, but also a task as setting up a project team that covers a wide set of skills becomes more of a challenge. The project team is an important stakeholders. The team needs to be dynamical and have a good relation to each other, but the definition of the required skill set within the project team is of huge importance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what is the alternative then? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An obvious suggestion would be to have people working their way to a position as project managers. This is the concept of having academics that have been working a long time, and then being rewarded with responsibility. That could for example be for good work, loyalty, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One does encounter various problems with this method of employing project managers in a company. First of all, the specialized knowledge and experience gained over a long time is taken away from a project team. Second of all, there are often organizational politics involved in the decision of hiring an employee in a new position within the organization. What should have been a decision based on qualifications can then easily become a political decision. Thirdly there could be a tendency of people working in the same field within the same company for years after years to be more narrow-minded. This will result in project managers to be less likely to think out of the box and to have a very set way of doing things.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Judging from Richardson et al.,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stillaccidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Richardson, T. M. et al., &#039;&#039;Is Project Management Still an Accidental Profession? A Qualitative Study of Career Trajectory&#039;&#039;, http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/5/1/2158244015572098 (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; it seems that academics working their way up the ranks, is actually the career path that many project managers have taken.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As suggested in literature, the profession of being a project manager is often called the accidental profession (see for example Pinto et al.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;accidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Pinto, J. K., Kharbanda, O. P., &#039;&#039;Lessons for an Accidental Profession&#039;&#039;, (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;) This covers the fact that there is a clear tendency of project managers being employed on behalf of their academic qualifications or the expectations for their future success as a project manager, rather than their experience as project managers.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stillaccidentalprof&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pmimember.PNG|right|thumb|350px|Figure 1: The evolution in number of members of PMI worldwide, from 1969 to 2008]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But as discussed by Ranf,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;thenandnow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ranf, D. E., &#039;&#039;Project management: Then and now&#039;&#039;, Annales Universitatis Apulensis: Series Oeconomica, 13, 596-603 (2011)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; time is changing. Figure 1&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;figur&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Lecture slides MEP 1.2 from the course 42429 Projektledelse Aug 15, DTU&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; shows the evolution of number of members of PMI worldwide, and as seen on the curve the number of memberships is increasing almost exponentially. Although it refers to the number of members of PMI (and not all other project management organizations), it can be seen as a clear sign of the significance of projects, but in particular the increasing significance as project management as a profession.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally, project managers were valued for their technological knowledge that they could apply within a certain project. Having business knowledge was an advantage, but not a requirement. Now, on the other hand, project managers are valued for the business knowledge, and technological knowledge is an advantage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This has to be seen in relation to the change of the working market. Projects are incorporated in work settings in a completely new way, and as discussed, the demand of project managers is increasing. Now the project manager&#039;s primarily job isn&#039;t necessarily to contribute with technological knowledge. According to Ranf,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;thenandnow&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; the business aspect has an increasing importance, in order for the project manager to contribute to business decisions etc. Another aspect of the project management is political abilities. As the number of projects increases, the political environment increases, and the project manager has to move within a more complex organizational structure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So it seems that the project manager very easily can be in a situation where there is a knowledge gap. Is it too much to require from a person that he is both a highly competent manager but also a very skilled worker? And can everybody become a project manager?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Say a person has been working his way up in the company, and finally is offered a management position. He will undergo up-qualifications of his management skills, and be certified project manager within one of the numerous project management standards. Not long ago many people didn&#039;t believe in this approach. The born leader is a term that most people have encountered, but it is also a term that was highly used not long ago.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bornleader&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Lecture slides MEP 5.1 from the course 42429 Projektledelse Aug 15, DTU&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Today most people acknowledge that being a leader (and in particular manager) requires a set of skills that most people can learn. This being in line with all other types of knowledge that we can acquire, if there is a need and a desire hereof.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A solution used in some bigger companies, is the dual leadership model. Duos of leaders are composed, in hopes of the duo to compliment each other. If the duo is working efficiently, a wider set of leadership skills is covered within a field. That can e.g. be technological knowledge on one hand, and more management oriented abilities on the other.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Among the companies that have tried this method, are Goldman Sachs, Unilever, and Motorola.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;jointleader&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Palmer, M., &#039;&#039;Two chiefs not necessarily better than one&#039;&#039;, Financial Times, http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/3d509590-45d8-11e1-acc9-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3myDawPXD [visited 27/09 - 2015]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This model brings challenges with it. There has to be a clear definition of roles, for the duo to work dynamically. There also has to be a very clear communication strategy, for information to flow efficiently within an organization. The duo needs to have a good chemistry and be able to challenge each other, but it is also suggested that a constellation like this can slow down the response to changes within an organization or project.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;jointleader&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But these examples are less dominant compared to the cost of a setup like this. One successful and money-making project after the other could very easily make the setup worth it, but it puts a very natural limitation of the types of companies and projects that could have use of this model. It simply has to be of a certain size in order to make sense, and have the acquired budget.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
All in all it is difficult to give one single answer to what type of leader a project or company needs. In all situations it is necessary to take a look at the project surroundings. The qualifications need to be prioritized, in order to find the most suitable project manager within the framework of the company. In generally it does not seem like the dual leadership model is a solution to this problem. Both in terms of the limitations in the model itself, but also in the cost of a model like this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A clear tendency is that more and more business knowledge is required, which tends to cut down on the required area-specific technological knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If one were to judge only on behalf of what the different standards mention as necessary qualifications, then area-specific knowledge does not play an important role. But by taking this as a fact, one has to bear in mind that these standards have an agenda. At the end of the day, they make money the more people get certified within their framework. Thereby there is a natural interest in being as broad as possible, in order to approach as many future project managers as possible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lack of this can either be seen as a part of the definition of the project manager&#039;s competencies. But it can also be seen as a limitation to the standards in general. It depends on what view one has on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Throughout the whole article, there has not been made any distinctions on how close or far the project manager is to hes project team. A discussion on how the distance to the project team would affect the manager&#039;s ideal competencies would have been useful, although outside of the scope of this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It does seems inevitable though, to be prepared to spend time on further education of a project manager&#039;s qualifications. That can either be the project management skills or the area-specific skills, depending on what road that has been taken to get into the present position.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No matter what perspective one must have, it seems that it is a field within which there is room for more research to be done. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S152093</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Project_Management_Competency_Framework&amp;diff=17737</id>
		<title>Project Management Competency Framework</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Project_Management_Competency_Framework&amp;diff=17737"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T22:28:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S152093: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Summary==&lt;br /&gt;
In literature, many things have been written about project management and the best practice hereof. Various standards exist with the aim of describing the field, and a long list of terms and processes are defined and described. All the standards aim to prepare a project manager to give him the highest chances of achieving success with his projects. It seems that even though each standard differ from the others, they tend to have a similar perspective on the best practice of the subject.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this article is going to look at three standards, the PMI, ISO, and IPMA standard. The focus will be on what they suggest as good project management qualifications, but in particular what the standards suggest as necessary as area-specific knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on what the standards suggest as good project management methods, the two typical approaches to become a project manager is discussed. One approach is by having studied project management, and for example becoming certified project manager. The other way is by achieving a broad knowledge within a field, and then work the way into a position as a project manager. During this discussion, it will be look at whether or not there, typically, will be a gap in knowledge of project managers. The dual leadership model is briefly being introduced, in order to see if this model could cover the gap in a project manager&#039;s knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But before we get started, the difference between a manager and a leader is introduced as suggested by Capowski.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Capow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Capowski, G., &#039;&#039;Anatomy of a Leader: Where Are the Leaders of Tomorrow?&#039;&#039;, (1994)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; These are two terms that are being used a lot within this article, although the main focus will be on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Manager:&#039;&#039;&#039; A manager has a degree of power from the position that he is in. He is structured, analytical, and rational, and he creates stability within a project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Leader:&#039;&#039;&#039; A leader, on the other hand, has power because people let him have power. He is courageous, innovative, and visionary, and initiates changes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
For project management, there exist many standards. These standards aim to describe project management across different types of projects and across fields. They for example describe the best practice of the initiation, planning, implementation, controlling and closing of a project, and introduce a long list of tools in order to have the best chances of achieving success within a project. These standards also have a view of the best version of a project manager and the abilities that he should possess.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the following, three standards are being introduced. In particular, their view on the best version of a project manager is at interest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;PMBOK:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the PMI standard (PMBOK),&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Project Management Institute, &#039;&#039;A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge&#039;&#039;, Fifth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA, (2013)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; it is mentioned that in addition to area-specific skills, project managers possess a set of characteristics, being within the area of knowledge, performance and personal.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; These characteristics covers the project manager&#039;s knowledge, hes ability to perform and then personal relations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;ISO standard:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the ISO standard, &amp;quot;Competencies of project personnel&amp;quot; describes the competencies a project manager should have and the competencies that the project team as a unit should have.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;iso&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dansk Standard, &#039;&#039;ISO 21500, Guidance on Project Management&#039;&#039;, First Edition, Dansk Standard, Copenhagen, Denmark, (2012)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Here it is stated that the project team should have a certain skill set, and that any gap between the required and available competencies could be a risk, and should be addressed. On the other hand there are listed three categories of competencies that a project manager should possess, that being technical competencies, behavioral competencies, and contextual competencies.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;iso&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;technical competencies&#039;&#039; describe processes, terminology and concepts, all within project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;behavioral competencies&#039;&#039; describe personal relationships.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;contextual competencies&#039;&#039; describe the context of the project, i.e., the project within the organization and environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;IPMA:&#039;&#039;&#039; The International Project Management Association (IPMA) divides project management skills in the same three categories as the ISO standard in their &amp;quot;Competence baseline&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ipma&amp;quot;&amp;gt;International Project Management Association, &#039;&#039;ICB - IPMA Competence Baseline&#039;&#039;, Third Edition, International Project Management Association, Nijkerk, The Netherlands, (2006)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; IPMA focuses on competence elements, whereof the majority of them are in the technical category. The two other categories, behavioral and contextual competencies, are also described in this standard though.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are all well-known standards that are used across various fields and industries. They guide project managers to follow the best practice of management in a given project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They all describe processes, techniques, and concepts, although the level of details within each standard varies a lot. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Discussion==&lt;br /&gt;
In the brief overview of what skills a project manager must possess, it might, at first glance, seem surprising that there is a lack of requirement of the field specific technical knowledge. There is a long list of requirement to the technical knowledge, in the sense of project management techniques, but the demand of area specific technical knowledge is limited.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is noted that the organizations behind the standards all have an interest of being as broad as possible, so that as many project managers and leaders can use and apply their standards.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the PMBOK there is a slight opening of a discussion about area specific skills, but the majority of the concept is treated in an appendix in the 4th edition,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok4&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Project Management Institute, &#039;&#039;A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge&#039;&#039;, Fourth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA, (2008)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and is referred to as &amp;quot;Application Area Extensions&amp;quot;. Noticeably this section has been removed in the 5th edition.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; This though is only an introduction to the extension material that PMI offers within each project type, e.g. software projects, construction projects, etc., and treats for example area specific practices.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmboksoftware&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Caupin, G., et al., &#039;&#039;Software Extension to the PMBOK® Guide Fifth Edition, review&#039;&#039;, Fifth Edition, http://marketplace.pmi.org/Pages/ProductDetail.aspx?GMProduct=00101457501 [visited 25/09 - 2015]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does not treat the subject at all, while the IPMA is the standard that goes the most in depth with the subject. The section on Contextual Competencies describes the link between the project and the organization. In the element description &amp;quot;Permanent Organization&amp;quot;, it is mentioned that &amp;quot;If the project manager is experienced in the respective sector and industry, he will be in a better position to understand these factors. [The planning and management principles of the operations of the permanent organization, red.]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally raises the question: does a project manager need area specific knowledge of the projects that he manages? Does a manager need technical skills within an area to lead a team to meet predefined goals and objectives?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking into the mentioned standards, the answer seems to be no. According to appendix D in PMBOK, there can be some area specific processes that would be ideal to follow,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; but there is not explicit requirements for concrete technical knowledge related to the working area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does only describe to subject by noting that gaps in knowledge about a project can be a risk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IPMA Competence Baseline describes area specific knowledge as being an advantage in managing the permanent organization, but doesn&#039;t describe the subject in relation to projects in the temporary sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thinking of having a manager with very limited area-specific skills, one encounters problems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Being a successful project manager means being successful at delegating work to other people, in order to meet a set of predefined goals and objectives. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally means that the project manager needs to have some kind of respect about his person, so what he lacks in area-specific skills, he must make up for in other areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Estimating the time needed for specific sub-tasks becomes more difficult, but also a task as setting up a project team that covers a wide set of skills becomes more of a challenge. The project team is an important stakeholders. The team needs to be dynamical and have a good relation to each other, but the definition of the required skill set within the project team is of huge importance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what is the alternative then? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An obvious suggestion would be to have people working their way to a position as project managers. This is the concept of having academics that have been working a long time, and then being rewarded with responsibility. That could for example be for good work, loyalty, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One does encounter various problems with this method of employing project managers in a company. First of all, the specialized knowledge and experience gained over a long time is taken away from a project team. Second of all, there are often organizational politics involved in the decision of hiring an employee in a new position within the organization. What should have been a decision based on qualifications can then easily become a political decision. Thirdly there could be a tendency of people working in the same field within the same company for years after years to be more narrow-minded. This will result in project managers to be less likely to think out of the box and to have a very set way of doing things.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Judging from Richardson et al.,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stillaccidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Richardson, T. M. et al., &#039;&#039;Is Project Management Still an Accidental Profession? A Qualitative Study of Career Trajectory&#039;&#039;, http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/5/1/2158244015572098 (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; it seems that academics working their way up the ranks, is actually the career path that many project managers have taken.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As suggested in literature, the profession of being a project manager is often called the accidental profession (see for example Pinto et al.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;accidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Pinto, J. K., Kharbanda, O. P., &#039;&#039;Lessons for an Accidental Profession&#039;&#039;, (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;) This covers the fact that there is a clear tendency of project managers being employed on behalf of their academic qualifications or the expectations for their future success as a project manager, rather than their experience as project managers.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stillaccidentalprof&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pmimember.PNG|right|thumb|350px|Figure 1: The evolution in number of members of PMI worldwide, from 1969 to 2008]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But as discussed by Ranf,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;thenandnow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ranf, D. E., &#039;&#039;Project management: Then and now&#039;&#039;, Annales Universitatis Apulensis: Series Oeconomica, 13, 596-603 (2011)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; time is changing. Figure 1&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;figur&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Lecture slides MEP 1.2 from the course 42429 Projektledelse Aug 15, DTU&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; shows the evolution of number of members of PMI worldwide, and as seen on the curve the number of memberships is increasing almost exponentially. Although it refers to the number of members of PMI (and not all other project management organizations), it can be seen as a clear sign of the significance of projects, but in particular the increasing significance as project management as a profession.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally, project managers were valued for their technological knowledge that they could apply within a certain project. Having business knowledge was an advantage, but not a requirement. Now, on the other hand, project managers are valued for the business knowledge, and technological knowledge is an advantage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This has to be seen in relation to the change of the working market. Projects are incorporated in work settings in a completely new way, and as discussed, the demand of project managers is increasing. Now the project manager&#039;s primarily job isn&#039;t necessarily to contribute with technological knowledge. According to Ranf,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;thenandnow&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; the business aspect has an increasing importance, in order for the project manager to contribute to business decisions etc. Another aspect of the project management is political abilities. As the number of projects increases, the political environment increases, and the project manager has to move within a more complex organizational structure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So it seems that the project manager very easily can be in a situation where there is a knowledge gap. Is it too much to require from a person that he is both a highly competent manager but also a very skilled worker? And can everybody become a project manager?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Say a person has been working his way up in the company, and finally is offered a management position. He will undergo up-qualifications of his management skills, and be certified project manager within one of the numerous project management standards. Not long ago many people didn&#039;t believe in this approach. The born leader is a term that most people have encountered, but it is also a term that was highly used not long ago.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bornleader&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Lecture slides MEP 5.1 from the course 42429 Projektledelse Aug 15, DTU&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Today most people acknowledge that being a leader (and in particular manager) requires a set of skills that most people can learn. This being in line with all other types of knowledge that we can acquire, if there is a need and a desire hereof.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A solution used in some bigger companies, is the dual leadership model. Duos of leaders are composed, in hopes of the duo to compliment each other. If the duo is working efficiently, a wider set of leadership skills is covered within a field. That can e.g. be technological knowledge on one hand, and more management oriented abilities on the other.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Among the companies that have tried this method, are Goldman Sachs, Unilever, and Motorola.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;jointleader&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Palmer, M., &#039;&#039;Two chiefs not necessarily better than one&#039;&#039;, Financial Times, http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/3d509590-45d8-11e1-acc9-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3myDawPXD [visited 27/09 - 2015]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This model brings challenges with it. There has to be a clear definition of roles, for the duo to work dynamically. There also has to be a very clear communication strategy, for information to flow efficiently within an organization. The duo needs to have a good chemistry and be able to challenge each other, but it is also suggested that a constellation like this can slow down the response to changes within an organization or project.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;jointleader&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But these examples are less dominant compared to the cost of a setup like this. One successful and money-making project after the other could very easily make the setup worth it, but it puts a very natural limitation of the types of companies and projects that could have use of this model. It simply has to be of a certain size in order to make sense, and have the acquired budget.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
All in all it is difficult to give one single answer to what type of leader a project or company needs. In all situations it is necessary to take a look at the project surroundings. The qualifications need to be prioritized, in order to find the most suitable project manager within the framework of the company. In generally it does not seem like the dual leadership model is a solution to this problem. Both in terms of the limitations in the model itself, but also in the cost of a model like this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A clear tendency is that more and more business knowledge is required, which tends to cut down on the required area-specific technological knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If one were to judge only on behalf of what the different standards mention as necessary qualifications, then area-specific knowledge does not play an important role. But by taking this as a fact, one has to bear in mind that these standards have an agenda. At the end of the day, they make money the more people get certified within their framework. Thereby there is a natural interest in being as broad as possible, in order to approach as many future project managers as possible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lack of this can either be seen as a part of the definition of the project manager&#039;s competencies. But it can also be seen as a limitation to the standards in general. It depends on what view one has on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It does seems inevitable though, to be prepared to spend time on further education of a project manager&#039;s qualifications. That can either be the project management skills or the area-specific skills, depending on what road that has been taken to get into the present position.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Throughout the whole article, there has not been made any distinctions on how close or far the project manager is to hes project team. A discussion on how the distance to the project team would affect the manager&#039;s ideal competencies would have been useful, although outside of the scope of this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No matter what perspective one must have, it seems that it is a field within which there is room for more research to be done. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S152093</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Project_Management_Competency_Framework&amp;diff=17722</id>
		<title>Project Management Competency Framework</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Project_Management_Competency_Framework&amp;diff=17722"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T22:23:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S152093: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Summary==&lt;br /&gt;
In literature, many things have been written about project management and the best practice hereof. Various standards exist with the aim of describing the field, and a long list of terms and processes are defined and described. All the standards aim to prepare a project manager to give him the highest chances of achieving success with his projects. It seems that even though each standard differ from the others, they tend to have a similar perspective on the best practice of the subject.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this article is going to look at three standards, the PMI, ISO, and IPMA standard. The focus will be on what they suggest as good project management qualifications, but in particular what the standards suggest as necessary as area-specific knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on what the standards suggest as good project management methods, the two typical approaches to become a project manager is discussed. One approach is by having studied project management, and for example becoming certified project manager. The other way is by achieving a broad knowledge within a field, and then work the way into a position as a project manager. During this discussion, it will be look at whether or not there, typically, will be a gap in knowledge of project managers. The dual leadership model is briefly being introduced, in order to see if this model could cover the gap in a project manager&#039;s knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But before we get started, the difference between a manager and a leader is introduced as suggested by Capowski.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Capow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Capowski, G., &#039;&#039;Anatomy of a Leader: Where Are the Leaders of Tomorrow?&#039;&#039;, (1994)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; These are two terms that are being used a lot within this article, although the main focus will be on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Manager:&#039;&#039;&#039; A manager has a degree of power from the position that he is in. He is structured, analytical, and rational, and he creates stability within a project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Leader:&#039;&#039;&#039; A leader, on the other hand, has power because people let him have power. He is courageous, innovative, and visionary, and initiates changes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
For project management, there exist many standards. These standards aim to describe project management across different types of projects and across fields. They for example describe the best practice of the initiation, planning, implementation, controlling and closing of a project, and introduce a long list of tools in order to have the best chances of achieving success within a project. These standards also have a view of the best version of a project manager and the abilities that he should possess.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the following, three standards are being introduced. In particular, their view on the best version of a project manager is at interest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;PMBOK:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the PMI standard (PMBOK),&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Project Management Institute, &#039;&#039;A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge&#039;&#039;, Fifth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA, (2013)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; it is mentioned that in addition to area-specific skills, project managers possess a set of characteristics, being within the area of knowledge, performance and personal.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; These characteristics covers the project manager&#039;s knowledge, hes ability to perform and then personal relations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;ISO standard:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the ISO standard, &amp;quot;Competencies of project personnel&amp;quot; describes the competencies a project manager should have and the competencies that the project team as a unit should have.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;iso&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dansk Standard, &#039;&#039;ISO 21500, Guidance on Project Management&#039;&#039;, First Edition, Dansk Standard, Copenhagen, Denmark, (2012)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Here it is stated that the project team should have a certain skill set, and that any gap between the required and available competencies could be a risk, and should be addressed. On the other hand there are listed three categories of competencies that a project manager should possess, that being technical competencies, behavioral competencies, and contextual competencies.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;iso&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;technical competencies&#039;&#039; describe processes, terminology and concepts, all within project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;behavioral competencies&#039;&#039; describe personal relationships.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;contextual competencies&#039;&#039; describe the context of the project, i.e., the project within the organization and environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;IPMA:&#039;&#039;&#039; The International Project Management Association (IPMA) divides project management skills in the same three categories as the ISO standard in their &amp;quot;Competence baseline&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ipma&amp;quot;&amp;gt;International Project Management Association, &#039;&#039;ICB - IPMA Competence Baseline&#039;&#039;, Third Edition, International Project Management Association, Nijkerk, The Netherlands, (2006)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; IPMA focuses on competence elements, whereof the majority of them are in the technical category. The two other categories, behavioral and contextual competencies, are also described in this standard though.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are all well-known standards that are used across various fields and industries. They guide project managers to follow the best practice of management in a given project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They all describe processes, techniques, and concepts, although the level of details within each standard varies a lot. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Discussion==&lt;br /&gt;
In the brief overview of what skills a project manager must possess, it might, at first glance, seem surprising that there is a lack of requirement of the field specific technical knowledge. There is a long list of requirement to the technical knowledge, in the sense of project management techniques, but the demand of area specific technical knowledge is limited.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is noted that the organizations behind the standards all have an interest of being as broad as possible, so that as many project managers and leaders can use and apply their standards.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the PMBOK there is a slight opening of a discussion about area specific skills, but the majority of the concept is treated in an appendix in the 4th edition,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok4&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Project Management Institute, &#039;&#039;A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge&#039;&#039;, Fourth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA, (2008)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and is referred to as &amp;quot;Application Area Extensions&amp;quot;. Noticeably this section has been removed in the 5th edition.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; This though is only an introduction to the extension material that PMI offers within each project type, e.g. software projects, construction projects, etc., and treats for example area specific practices.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmboksoftware&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Caupin, G., et al., &#039;&#039;Software Extension to the PMBOK® Guide Fifth Edition, review&#039;&#039;, Fifth Edition, http://marketplace.pmi.org/Pages/ProductDetail.aspx?GMProduct=00101457501 [visited 25/09 - 2015]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does not treat the subject at all, while the IPMA is the standard that goes the most in depth with the subject. The section on Contextual Competencies describes the link between the project and the organization. In the element description &amp;quot;Permanent Organization&amp;quot;, it is mentioned that &amp;quot;If the project manager is experienced in the respective sector and industry, he will be in a better position to understand these factors. [The planning and management principles of the operations of the permanent organization, red.]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally raises the question: does a project manager need area specific knowledge of the projects that he manages? Does a manager need technical skills within an area to lead a team to meet predefined goals and objectives?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking into the mentioned standards, the answer seems to be no. According to appendix D in PMBOK, there can be some area specific processes that would be ideal to follow,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; but there is not explicit requirements for concrete technical knowledge related to the working area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does only describe to subject by noting that gaps in knowledge about a project can be a risk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IPMA Competence Baseline describes area specific knowledge as being an advantage in managing the permanent organization, but doesn&#039;t describe the subject in relation to projects in the temporary sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thinking of having a manager with very limited area-specific skills, one encounters problems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Being a successful project manager means being successful at delegating work to other people, in order to meet a set of predefined goals and objectives. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally means that the project manager needs to have some kind of respect about his person, so what he lacks in area-specific skills, he must make up for in other areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Estimating the time needed for specific sub-tasks becomes more difficult, but also a task as setting up a project team that covers a wide set of skills becomes more of a challenge. The project team is an important stakeholders. The team needs to be dynamical and have a good relation to each other, but the definition of the required skill set within the project team is of huge importance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what is the alternative then? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An obvious suggestion would be to have people working their way to a position as project managers. This is the concept of having academics that have been working a long time, and then being rewarded with responsibility. That could for example be for good work, loyalty, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One does encounter various problems with this method of employing project managers in a company. First of all, the specialized knowledge and experience gained over a long time is taken away from a project team. Second of all, there are often organizational politics involved in the decision of hiring an employee in a new position within the organization. What should have been a decision based on qualifications can then easily become a political decision. Thirdly there could be a tendency of people working in the same field within the same company for years after years to be more narrow-minded. This will result in project managers to be less likely to think out of the box and to have a very set way of doing things.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Judging from Richardson et al.,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stillaccidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Richardson, T. M. et al., &#039;&#039;Is Project Management Still an Accidental Profession? A Qualitative Study of Career Trajectory&#039;&#039;, http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/5/1/2158244015572098 (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; it seems that academics working their way up the ranks, is actually the career path that many project managers have taken.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As suggested in literature, the profession of being a project manager is often called the accidental profession (see for example Pinto et al.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;accidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Pinto, J. K., Kharbanda, O. P., &#039;&#039;Lessons for an Accidental Profession&#039;&#039;, (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;) This covers the fact that there is a clear tendency of project managers being employed on behalf of their academic qualifications or the expectations for their future success as a project manager, rather than their experience as project managers.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stillaccidentalprof&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pmimember.PNG|right|thumb|350px|Figure 1: The evolution in number of members of PMI worldwide, from 1969 to 2008]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But as discussed by Ranf,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;thenandnow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ranf, D. E., &#039;&#039;Project management: Then and now&#039;&#039;, Annales Universitatis Apulensis: Series Oeconomica, 13, 596-603 (2011)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; time is changing. Figure 1&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;figur&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Lecture slides MEP 1.2 from the course 42429 Projektledelse Aug 15, DTU&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; shows the evolution of number of members of PMI worldwide, and as seen on the curve the number of memberships is increasing almost exponentially. Although it refers to the number of members of PMI (and not all other project management organizations), it can be seen as a clear sign of the significance of projects, but in particular the increasing significance as project management as a profession.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally, project managers were valued for their technological knowledge that they could apply within a certain project. Having business knowledge was an advantage, but not a requirement. Now, on the other hand, project managers are valued for the business knowledge, and technological knowledge is an advantage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This has to be seen in relation to the change of the working market. Projects are incorporated in work settings in a completely new way, and as discussed, the demand of project managers is increasing. Now the project manager&#039;s primarily job isn&#039;t necessarily to contribute with technological knowledge. According to Ranf,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;thenandnow&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; the business aspect has an increasing importance, in order for the project manager to contribute to business decisions etc. Another aspect of the project management is political abilities. As the number of projects increases, the political environment increases, and the project manager has to move within a more complex organizational structure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So it seems that the project manager very easily can be in a situation where there is a knowledge gap. Is it too much to require from a person that he is both a highly competent manager but also a very skilled worker? And can everybody become a project manager?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Say a person has been working his way up in the company, and finally is offered a management position. He will undergo up-qualifications of his management skills, and be certified project manager within one of the numerous project management standards. Not long ago many people didn&#039;t believe in this approach. The born leader is a term that most people have encountered, but it is also a term that was highly used not long ago.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bornleader&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Lecture slides MEP 5.1 from the course 42429 Projektledelse Aug 15, DTU&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Today most people acknowledge that being a leader (and in particular manager) requires a set of skills that most people can learn. This being in line with all other types of knowledge that we can acquire, if there is a need and a desire hereof.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A solution used in some bigger companies, is the dual leadership model. Duos of leaders are composed, in hopes of the duo to compliment each other. If the duo is working efficiently, a wider set of leadership skills is covered within a field. That can e.g. be technological knowledge on one hand, and more management oriented abilities on the other.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Among the companies that have tried this method, are Goldman Sachs, Unilever, and Motorola.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;jointleader&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Palmer, M., &#039;&#039;Two chiefs not necessarily better than one&#039;&#039;, Financial Times, http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/3d509590-45d8-11e1-acc9-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3myDawPXD [visited 27/09 - 2015]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This model brings challenges with it. There has to be a clear definition of roles, for the duo to work dynamically. There also has to be a very clear communication strategy, for information to flow efficiently within an organization. The duo needs to have a good chemistry and be able to challenge each other, but it is also suggested that a constellation like this can slow down the response to changes within an organization or project.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;jointleader&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But these examples are less dominant compared to the cost of a setup like this. One successful and money-making project after the other could very easily make the setup worth it, but it puts a very natural limitation of the types of companies and projects that could have use of this model. It simply has to be of a certain size in order to make sense, and have the acquired budget.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
All in all it is difficult to give one single answer to what type of leader a project or company needs. In all situations it is necessary to take a look at the project surroundings. The qualifications need to be prioritized, in order to find the most suitable project manager within the framework of the company. In generally it does not seem like the dual leadership model is a solution to this problem. Both in terms of the limitations in the model itself, but also in the cost of a model like this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A clear tendency is that more and more business knowledge is required, which tends to cut down on the required area-specific technological knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If one were to judge only on behalf of what the different standards mention as necessary qualifications, then area-specific knowledge does not play an important role. But by taking this as a fact, one has to bear in mind that these standards have an agenda. At the end of the day, they make money the more people get certified within their framework. Thereby there is a natural interest in being as broad as possible, in order to approach as many future project managers as possible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lack of this can either be seen as a part of the definition of the project manager&#039;s competencies. But it can also be seen as a limitation to the standards in general. It depends on what view one has on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It does seems inevitable though, to be prepared to spend time on further education of a project manager&#039;s qualifications. That can either be the project management skills or the area-specific skills, depending on what road that has been taken to get into the present position.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No matter what perspective one must have, it seems like it is a field within which there is room for more research to be done. And until then, the conclusion must be: when in doubt, bring in an expert.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S152093</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Project_Management_Competency_Framework&amp;diff=17710</id>
		<title>Project Management Competency Framework</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Project_Management_Competency_Framework&amp;diff=17710"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T22:18:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S152093: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Summary==&lt;br /&gt;
In literature, many things have been written about project management and the best practice hereof. Various standards exist with the aim of describing the field, and a long list of terms and processes are defined and described. All the standards aim to prepare a project manager to give him the highest chances of achieving success with his projects. It seems that even though each standard differ from the others, they tend to have a similar perspective on the best practice of the subject.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this article is going to look at three standards, the PMI, ISO, and IPMA standard. The focus will be on what they suggest as good project management qualifications, but in particular what the standards suggest as necessary as area-specific knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on what the standards suggest as good project management methods, the two typical approaches to become a project manager is discussed. One approach is by having studied project management, and for example becoming certified project manager. The other way is by achieving a broad knowledge within a field, and then work the way into a position as a project manager. During this discussion, it will be look at whether or not there, typically, will be a gap in knowledge of project managers. The dual leadership model is briefly being introduced, in order to see if this model could cover the gap in a project manager&#039;s knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But before we get started, the difference between a manager and a leader is introduced as suggested by Capowski.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Capow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Capowski, G., &#039;&#039;Anatomy of a Leader: Where Are the Leaders of Tomorrow?&#039;&#039;, (1994)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; These are two terms that are being used a lot within this article, although the main focus will be on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Manager:&#039;&#039;&#039; A manager has a degree of power from the position that he is in. He is structured, analytical, and rational, and he creates stability within a project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Leader:&#039;&#039;&#039; A leader, on the other hand, has power because people let him have power. He is courageous, innovative, and visionary, and initiates changes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
For project management, there exist many standards. These standards aim to describe project management across different types of projects and across fields. They for example describe the best practice of the initiation, planning, implementation, controlling and closing of a project, and introduce a long list of tools in order to have the best chances of achieving success within a project. These standards also have a view of the best version of a project manager and the abilities that he should possess.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the following, three standards are being introduced. In particular, their view on the best version of a project manager is at interest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;PMBOK:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the PMI standard (PMBOK),&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Project Management Institute, &#039;&#039;A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge&#039;&#039;, Fifth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA, (2013)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; it is mentioned that in addition to area-specific skills, project managers possess a set of characteristics, being within the area of knowledge, performance and personal.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; These characteristics covers the project manager&#039;s knowledge, hes ability to perform and then personal relations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;ISO standard:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the ISO standard, &amp;quot;Competencies of project personnel&amp;quot; describes the competencies a project manager should have and the competencies that the project team as a unit should have.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;iso&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dansk Standard, &#039;&#039;ISO 21500, Guidance on Project Management&#039;&#039;, First Edition, Dansk Standard, Copenhagen, Denmark, (2012)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Here it is stated that the project team should have a certain skill set, and that any gap between the required and available competencies could be a risk, and should be addressed. On the other hand there are listed three categories of competencies that a project manager should possess, that being technical competencies, behavioral competencies, and contextual competencies.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;iso&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;technical competencies&#039;&#039; describe processes, terminology and concepts, all within project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;behavioral competencies&#039;&#039; describe personal relationships.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;contextual competencies&#039;&#039; describe the context of the project, i.e., the project within the organization and environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;IPMA:&#039;&#039;&#039; The International Project Management Association (IPMA) divides project management skills in the same three categories as the ISO standard in their &amp;quot;Competence baseline&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ipma&amp;quot;&amp;gt;International Project Management Association, &#039;&#039;ICB - IPMA Competence Baseline&#039;&#039;, Third Edition, International Project Management Association, Nijkerk, The Netherlands, (2006)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; IPMA focuses on competence elements, whereof the majority of them are in the technical category. The two other categories, behavioral and contextual competencies, are also described in this standard though.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are all well-known standards that are used across various fields and industries. They guide project managers to follow the best practice of management in a given project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They all describe processes, techniques, and concepts, although the level of details within each standard varies a lot. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the brief overview of what skills a project manager must possess, it might, at first glance, seem surprising that there is a lack of requirement of the field specific technical knowledge. There is a long list of requirement to the technical knowledge, in the sense of project management techniques, but the demand of area specific technical knowledge is limited.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is noted that the organizations behind the standards all have an interest of being as broad as possible, so that as many project managers and leaders can use and apply their standards.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the PMBOK there is a slight opening of a discussion about area specific skills, but the majority of the concept is treated in an appendix in the 4th edition,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok4&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Project Management Institute, &#039;&#039;A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge&#039;&#039;, Fourth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA, (2008)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and is referred to as &amp;quot;Application Area Extensions&amp;quot;. Noticeably this section has been removed in the 5th edition.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; This though is only an introduction to the extension material that PMI offers within each project type, e.g. software projects, construction projects, etc., and treats for example area specific practices.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmboksoftware&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Caupin, G., et al., &#039;&#039;Software Extension to the PMBOK® Guide Fifth Edition, review&#039;&#039;, Fifth Edition, http://marketplace.pmi.org/Pages/ProductDetail.aspx?GMProduct=00101457501 [visited 25/09 - 2015]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does not treat the subject at all, while the IPMA is the standard that goes the most in depth with the subject. The section on Contextual Competencies describes the link between the project and the organization. In the element description &amp;quot;Permanent Organization&amp;quot;, it is mentioned that &amp;quot;If the project manager is experienced in the respective sector and industry, he will be in a better position to understand these factors. [The planning and management principles of the operations of the permanent organization, red.]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally raises the question: does a project manager need area specific knowledge of the projects that he manages? Does a manager need technical skills within an area to lead a team to meet predefined goals and objectives?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking into the mentioned standards, the answer seems to be no. According to appendix D in PMBOK, there can be some area specific processes that would be ideal to follow,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; but there is not explicit requirements for concrete technical knowledge related to the working area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does only describe to subject by noting that gaps in knowledge about a project can be a risk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IPMA Competence Baseline describes area specific knowledge as being an advantage in managing the permanent organization, but doesn&#039;t describe the subject in relation to projects in the temporary sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thinking of having a manager with very limited area-specific skills, one encounters problems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Being a successful project manager means being successful at delegating work to other people, in order to meet a set of predefined goals and objectives. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally means that the project manager needs to have some kind of respect about his person, so what he lacks in area-specific skills, he must make up for in other areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Estimating the time needed for specific sub-tasks becomes more difficult, but also a task as setting up a project team that covers a wide set of skills becomes more of a challenge. The project team is an important stakeholders. The team needs to be dynamical and have a good relation to each other, but the definition of the required skill set within the project team is of huge importance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what is the alternative then? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An obvious suggestion would be to have people working their way to a position as project managers. This is the concept of having academics that have been working a long time, and then being rewarded with responsibility. That could for example be for good work, loyalty, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One does encounter various problems with this method of employing project managers in a company. First of all, the specialized knowledge and experience gained over a long time is taken away from a project team. Second of all, there are often organizational politics involved in the decision of hiring an employee in a new position within the organization. What should have been a decision based on qualifications can then easily become a political decision. Thirdly there could be a tendency of people working in the same field within the same company for years after years to be more narrow-minded. This will result in project managers to be less likely to think out of the box and to have a very set way of doing things.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Judging from Richardson et al.,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stillaccidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Richardson, T. M. et al., &#039;&#039;Is Project Management Still an Accidental Profession? A Qualitative Study of Career Trajectory&#039;&#039;, http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/5/1/2158244015572098 (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; it seems that academics working their way up the ranks, is actually the career path that many project managers have taken.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As suggested in literature, the profession of being a project manager is often called the accidental profession (see for example Pinto et al.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;accidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Pinto, J. K., Kharbanda, O. P., &#039;&#039;Lessons for an Accidental Profession&#039;&#039;, (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;) This covers the fact that there is a clear tendency of project managers being employed on behalf of their academic qualifications or the expectations for their future success as a project manager, rather than their experience as project managers.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stillaccidentalprof&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pmimember.PNG|right|thumb|350px|Figure 1: The evolution in number of members of PMI worldwide, from 1969 to 2008]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But as discussed by Ranf,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;thenandnow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ranf, D. E., &#039;&#039;Project management: Then and now&#039;&#039;, Annales Universitatis Apulensis: Series Oeconomica, 13, 596-603 (2011)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; time is changing. Figure 1&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;figur&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Lecture slides MEP 1.2 from the course 42429 Projektledelse Aug 15, DTU&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; shows the evolution of number of members of PMI worldwide, and as seen on the curve the number of memberships is increasing almost exponentially. Although it refers to the number of members of PMI (and not all other project management organizations), it can be seen as a clear sign of the significance of projects, but in particular the increasing significance as project management as a profession.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally, project managers were valued for their technological knowledge that they could apply within a certain project. Having business knowledge was an advantage, but not a requirement. Now, on the other hand, project managers are valued for the business knowledge, and technological knowledge is an advantage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This has to be seen in relation to the change of the working market. Projects are incorporated in work settings in a completely new way, and as discussed, the demand of project managers is increasing. Now the project manager&#039;s primarily job isn&#039;t necessarily to contribute with technological knowledge. According to Ranf,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;thenandnow&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; the business aspect has an increasing importance, in order for the project manager to contribute to business decisions etc. Another aspect of the project management is political abilities. As the number of projects increases, the political environment increases, and the project manager has to move within a more complex organizational structure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So it seems that the project manager very easily can be in a situation where there is a knowledge gap. Is it too much to require from a person that he is both a highly competent manager but also a very skilled worker? And can everybody become a project manager?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Say a person has been working his way up in the company, and finally is offered a management position. He will undergo up-qualifications of his management skills, and be certified project manager within one of the numerous project management standards. Not long ago many people didn&#039;t believe in this approach. The born leader is a term that most people have encountered, but it is also a term that was highly used not long ago.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bornleader&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Lecture slides MEP 5.1 from the course 42429 Projektledelse Aug 15, DTU&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Today most people acknowledge that being a leader (and in particular manager) requires a set of skills that most people can learn. This being in line with all other types of knowledge that we can acquire, if there is a need and a desire hereof.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A solution used in some bigger companies, is the dual leadership model. Duos of leaders are composed, in hopes of the duo to compliment each other. If the duo is working efficiently, a wider set of leadership skills is covered within a field. That can e.g. be technological knowledge on one hand, and more management oriented abilities on the other.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Among the companies that have tried this method, are Goldman Sachs, Unilever, and Motorola.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;jointleader&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Palmer, M., &#039;&#039;Two chiefs not necessarily better than one&#039;&#039;, Financial Times, http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/3d509590-45d8-11e1-acc9-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3myDawPXD [visited 27/09 - 2015]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This model brings challenges with it. There has to be a clear definition of roles, for the duo to work dynamically. There also has to be a very clear communication strategy, for information to flow efficiently within an organization. The duo needs to have a good chemistry and be able to challenge each other, but it is also suggested that a constellation like this can slow down the response to changes within an organization or project.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;jointleader&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But these examples are less dominant compared to the cost of a setup like this. One successful and money-making project after the other could very easily make the setup worth it, but it puts a very natural limitation of the types of companies and projects that could have use of this model. It simply has to be of a certain size in order to make sense, and have the acquired budget.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
All in all it is difficult to give one single answer to what type of leader a project or company needs. In all situations it is necessary to take a look at the project surroundings. The qualifications need to be prioritized, in order to find the most suitable project manager within the framework of the company. In generally it does not seem like the dual leadership model is a solution to this problem. Both in terms of the limitations in the model itself, but also in the cost of a model like this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A clear tendency is that more and more business knowledge is required, which tends to cut down on the required area-specific technological knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If one were to judge only on behalf of what the different standards mention as necessary qualifications, then area-specific knowledge does not play an important role. But by taking this as a fact, one has to bear in mind that these standards have an agenda. At the end of the day, they make money the more people get certified within their framework. Thereby there is a natural interest in being as broad as possible, in order to approach as many future project managers as possible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lack of this can either be seen as a part of the definition of the project manager&#039;s competencies. But it can also be seen as a limitation to the standards in general. It depends on what view one has on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It does seems inevitable though, to be prepared to spend time on further education of a project manager&#039;s qualifications. That can either be the project management skills or the area-specific skills, depending on what road that has been taken to get into the present position.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No matter what perspective one must have, it seems like it is a field within which there is room for more research to be done. And until then, the conclusion must be: when in doubt, bring in an expert.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S152093</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Project_Management_Competency_Framework&amp;diff=17691</id>
		<title>Project Management Competency Framework</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Project_Management_Competency_Framework&amp;diff=17691"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T22:09:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S152093: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Summary==&lt;br /&gt;
In literature, many things have been written about project management and the best practice hereof. Various standards exist with the aim of describing the field, and a long list of terms and processes are defined and described. All the standards aim to prepare a project manager to give him the highest chances of achieving success with his projects. It seems that even though each standard differ from the others, they tend to have a similar perspective on the best practice of the subject.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this article is going to look at three standards, the PMI, ISO, and IPMA standard. The focus will be on what they suggest as good project management qualifications, but in particular what the standards suggest as necessary as area-specific knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on what the standards suggest as good project management methods, the two typical approaches to become a project manager is discussed. One approach is by having studied project management, and for example becoming certified project manager. The other way is by achieving a broad knowledge within a field, and then work the way into a position as a project manager. During this discussion, it will be look at whether or not there, typically, will be a gap in knowledge of project managers. The dual leadership model is briefly being introduced, in order to see if this model could cover the gap in a project manager&#039;s knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But before we get started, the difference between a manager and a leader is introduced as suggested by Capowski.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Capow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Capowski, G., &#039;&#039;Anatomy of a Leader: Where Are the Leaders of Tomorrow?&#039;&#039;, (1994)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; These are two terms that are being used a lot within this article, although the main focus will be on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Manager:&#039;&#039;&#039; A manager has a degree of power from the position that he is in. He is structured, analytical, and rational, and he creates stability within a project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Leader:&#039;&#039;&#039; A leader, on the other hand, has power because people let him have power. He is courageous, innovative, and visionary, and initiates changes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
For project management, there exist many standards. These standards aim to describe project management across different types of projects and across fields. They for example describe the best practice of the initiation, planning, implementation, controlling and closing of a project, and introduce a long list of tools in order to have the best chances of achieving success within a project. These standards also have a view of the best version of a project manager and the abilities that he should possess.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the following, three standards are being introduced. In particular, their view on the best version of a project manager is at interest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;PMBOK:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the PMI standard (PMBOK),&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Project Management Institute, &#039;&#039;A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge&#039;&#039;, Fifth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA, (2013)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; it is mentioned that in addition to area-specific skills, project managers possess a set of characteristics, being within the area of knowledge, performance and personal.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; These characteristics covers the project manager&#039;s knowledge, hes ability to perform and then personal relations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;ISO standard:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the ISO standard, &amp;quot;Competencies of project personnel&amp;quot; describes the competencies a project manager should have and the competencies that the project team as a unit should have.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;iso&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dansk Standard, &#039;&#039;ISO 21500, Guidance on Project Management&#039;&#039;, First Edition, Dansk Standard, Copenhagen, Denmark, (2012)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Here it is stated that the project team should have a certain skill set, and that any gap between the required and available competencies could be a risk, and should be addressed. On the other hand there are listed three categories of competencies that a project manager should possess, that being technical competencies, behavioral competencies, and contextual competencies.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;iso&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dansk Standard, &#039;&#039;ISO 21500, Guidance on Project Management&#039;&#039;, First Edition, Dansk Standard, Copenhagen, Denmark, (2012)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;technical competencies&#039;&#039; describe processes, terminology and concepts, all within project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;behavioral competencies&#039;&#039; describe personal relationships.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;contextual competencies&#039;&#039; describe the context of the project, i.e., the project within the organization and environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;IPMA:&#039;&#039;&#039; The International Project Management Association (IPMA) divides project management skills in the same three categories as the ISO standard in their &amp;quot;Competence baseline&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ipma&amp;quot;&amp;gt;International Project Management Association, &#039;&#039;ICB - IPMA Competence Baseline&#039;&#039;, Third Edition, International Project Management Association, Nijkerk, The Netherlands, (2006)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; IPMA focuses on competence elements, whereof the majority of them are in the technical category. The two other categories, behavioral and contextual competencies, are also described in this standard though.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are all well-known standards that are used across various fields and industries. They guide project managers to follow the best practice of management in a given project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They all describe processes, techniques, and concepts, although the level of details within each standard varies a lot. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the brief overview of what skills a project manager must possess, it might, at first glance, seem surprising that there is a lack of requirement of the field specific technical knowledge. There is a long list of requirement to the technical knowledge, in the sense of project management techniques, but the demand of area specific technical knowledge is limited.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is noted that the organizations behind the standards all have an interest of being as broad as possible, so that as many project managers and leaders can use and apply their standards.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the PMBOK there is a slight opening of a discussion about area specific skills, but the majority of the concept is treated in an appendix in the 4th edition,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok4&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Project Management Institute, &#039;&#039;A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge&#039;&#039;, Fourth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA, (2008)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and is referred to as &amp;quot;Application Area Extensions&amp;quot;. Noticeably this section has been removed in the 5th edition.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; This though is only an introduction to the extension material that PMI offers within each project type, e.g. software projects, construction projects, etc., and treats for example area specific practices.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmboksoftware&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Caupin, G., et al., &#039;&#039;Software Extension to the PMBOK® Guide Fifth Edition, review&#039;&#039;, Fifth Edition, http://marketplace.pmi.org/Pages/ProductDetail.aspx?GMProduct=00101457501 [visited 25/09 - 2015]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does not treat the subject at all, while the IPMA is the standard that goes the most in depth with the subject. The section on Contextual Competencies describes the link between the project and the organization. In the element description &amp;quot;Permanent Organization&amp;quot;, it is mentioned that &amp;quot;If the project manager is experienced in the respective sector and industry, he will be in a better position to understand these factors. [The planning and management principles of the operations of the permanent organization, red.]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally raises the question: does a project manager need area specific knowledge of the projects that he manages? Does a manager need technical skills within an area to lead a team to meet predefined goals and objectives?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking into the mentioned standards, the answer seems to be no. According to appendix D in PMBOK, there can be some area specific processes that would be ideal to follow,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; but there is not explicit requirements for concrete technical knowledge related to the working area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does only describe to subject by noting that gaps in knowledge about a project can be a risk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IPMA Competence Baseline describes area specific knowledge as being an advantage in managing the permanent organization, but doesn&#039;t describe the subject in relation to projects in the temporary sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thinking of having a manager with very limited area-specific skills, one encounters problems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Being a successful project manager means being successful at delegating work to other people, in order to meet a set of predefined goals and objectives. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally means that the project manager needs to have some kind of respect about his person, so what he lacks in area-specific skills, he must make up for in other areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Estimating the time needed for specific sub-tasks becomes more difficult, but also a task as setting up a project team that covers a wide set of skills becomes more of a challenge. The project team is an important stakeholders. The team needs to be dynamical and have a good relation to each other, but the definition of the required skill set within the project team is of huge importance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what is the alternative then? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An obvious suggestion would be to have people working their way to a position as project managers. This is the concept of having academics that have been working a long time, and then being rewarded with responsibility. That could for example be for good work, loyalty, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One does encounter various problems with this method of employing project managers in a company. First of all, the specialized knowledge and experience gained over a long time is taken away from a project team. Second of all, there are often organizational politics involved in the decision of hiring an employee in a new position within the organization. What should have been a decision based on qualifications can then easily become a political decision. Thirdly there could be a tendency of people working in the same field within the same company for years after years to be more narrow-minded. This will result in project managers to be less likely to think out of the box and to have a very set way of doing things.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Judging from Richardson et al.,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stillaccidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Richardson, T. M. et al., &#039;&#039;Is Project Management Still an Accidental Profession? A Qualitative Study of Career Trajectory&#039;&#039;, http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/5/1/2158244015572098 (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; it seems that academics working their way up the ranks, is actually the career path that many project managers have taken.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As suggested in literature, the profession of being a project manager is often called the accidental profession (see for example Pinto et al.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;accidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Pinto, J. K., Kharbanda, O. P., &#039;&#039;Lessons for an Accidental Profession&#039;&#039;, (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;) This covers the fact that there is a clear tendency of project managers being employed on behalf of their academic qualifications or the expectations for their future success as a project manager, rather than their experience as project managers.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stillaccidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Richardson, T. M. et al., &#039;&#039;Is Project Management Still an Accidental Profession? A Qualitative Study of Career Trajectory&#039;&#039;, http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/5/1/2158244015572098 (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pmimember.PNG|right|thumb|350px|Figure 1: The evolution in number of members of PMI worldwide, from 1969 to 2008]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But as discussed by Ranf,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;thenandnow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ranf, D. E., &#039;&#039;Project management: Then and now&#039;&#039;, Annales Universitatis Apulensis: Series Oeconomica, 13, 596-603 (2011)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; time is changing. Figure 1&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;figur&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Lecture slides MEP 1.2 from the course 42429 Projektledelse Aug 15, DTU&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; shows the evolution of number of members of PMI worldwide, and as seen on the curve the number of memberships is increasing almost exponentially. Although it refers to the number of members of PMI (and not all other project management organizations), it can be seen as a clear sign of the significance of projects, but in particular the increasing significance as project management as a profession.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally, project managers were valued for their technological knowledge that they could apply within a certain project. Having business knowledge was an advantage, but not a requirement. Now, on the other hand, project managers are valued for the business knowledge, and technological knowledge is an advantage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This has to be seen in relation to the change of the working market. Projects are incorporated in work settings in a completely new way, and as discussed, the demand of project managers is increasing. Now the project manager&#039;s primarily job isn&#039;t necessarily to contribute with technological knowledge. According to Ranf,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;thenandnow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ranf, D. E., &#039;&#039;Project management: Then and now&#039;&#039;, Annales Universitatis Apulensis: Series Oeconomica, 13, 596-603 (2011)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the business aspect has an increasing importance, in order for the project manager to contribute to business decisions etc. Another aspect of the project management is political abilities. As the number of projects increases, the political environment increases, and the project manager has to move within a more complex organizational structure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So it seems that the project manager very easily can be in a situation where there is a knowledge gap. Is it too much to require from a person that he is both a highly competent manager but also a very skilled worker? And can everybody become a project manager?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Say a person has been working his way up in the company, and finally is offered a management position. He will undergo up-qualifications of his management skills, and be certified project manager within one of the numerous project management standards. Not long ago many people didn&#039;t believe in this approach. The born leader is a term that most people have encountered, but it is also a term that was highly used not long ago.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bornleader&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Lecture slides MEP 5.1 from the course 42429 Projektledelse Aug 15, DTU&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Today most people acknowledge that being a leader (and in particular manager) requires a set of skills that most people can learn. This being in line with all other types of knowledge that we can acquire, if there is a need and a desire hereof.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A solution used in some bigger companies, is the dual leadership model. Duos of leaders are composed, in hopes of the duo to compliment each other. If the duo is working efficiently, a wider set of leadership skills is covered within a field. That can e.g. be technological knowledge on one hand, and more management oriented abilities on the other.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Among the companies that have tried this method, are Goldman Sachs, Unilever, and Motorola.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;jointleader&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Palmer, M., &#039;&#039;Two chiefs not necessarily better than one&#039;&#039;, Financial Times, http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/3d509590-45d8-11e1-acc9-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3myDawPXD [visited 27/09 - 2015]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This model brings challenges with it. There has to be a clear definition of roles, for the duo to work dynamically. There also has to be a very clear communication strategy, for information to flow efficiently within an organization. The duo needs to have a good chemistry and be able to challenge each other, but it is also suggested that a constellation like this can slow down the response to changes within an organization or project.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;jointleader&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But these examples are less dominant compared to the cost of a setup like this. One successful and money-making project after the other could very easily make the setup worth it, but it puts a very natural limitation of the types of companies and projects that could have use of this model. It simply has to be of a certain size in order to make sense, and have the acquired budget.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
All in all it is difficult to give one single answer to what type of leader a project or company needs. In all situations it is necessary to take a look at the project surroundings. The qualifications need to be prioritized, in order to find the most suitable project manager within the framework of the company. In generally it does not seem like the dual leadership model is a solution to this problem. Both in terms of the limitations in the model itself, but also in the cost of a model like this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A clear tendency is that more and more business knowledge is required, which tends to cut down on the required area-specific technological knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If one were to judge only on behalf of what the different standards mention as necessary qualifications, then area-specific knowledge does not play an important role. But by taking this as a fact, one has to bear in mind that these standards have an agenda. At the end of the day, they make money the more people get certified within their framework. Thereby there is a natural interest in being as broad as possible, in order to approach as many future project managers as possible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lack of this can either be seen as a part of the definition of the project manager&#039;s competencies. But it can also be seen as a limitation to the standards in general. It depends on what view one has on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It does seems inevitable though, to be prepared to spend time on further education of a project manager&#039;s qualifications. That can either be the project management skills or the area-specific skills, depending on what road that has been taken to get into the present position.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No matter what perspective one must have, it seems like it is a field within which there is room for more research to be done. And until then, the conclusion must be: when in doubt, bring in an expert.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S152093</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Project_Management_Competency_Framework&amp;diff=17687</id>
		<title>Project Management Competency Framework</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Project_Management_Competency_Framework&amp;diff=17687"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T22:07:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S152093: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Summary==&lt;br /&gt;
In literature, many things have been written about project management and the best practice hereof. Various standards exist with the aim of describing the field, and a long list of terms and processes are defined and described. All the standards aim to prepare a project manager to give him the highest chances of achieving success with his projects. It seems that even though each standard differ from the others, they tend to have a similar perspective on the best practice of the subject.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this article is going to look at three standards, the PMI, ISO, and IPMA standard. The focus will be on what they suggest as good project management qualifications, but in particular what the standards suggest as necessary as area-specific knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on what the standards suggest as good project management methods, the two typical approaches to become a project manager is discussed. One approach is by having studied project management, and for example becoming certified project manager. The other way is by achieving a broad knowledge within a field, and then work the way into a position as a project manager. During this discussion, it will be look at whether or not there, typically, will be a gap in knowledge of project managers. The dual leadership model is briefly being introduced, in order to see if this model could cover the gap in a project manager&#039;s knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But before we get started, the difference between a manager and a leader is introduced as suggested by Capowski.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Capow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Capowski, G., &#039;&#039;Anatomy of a Leader: Where Are the Leaders of Tomorrow?&#039;&#039;, (1994)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; These are two terms that are being used a lot within this article, although the main focus will be on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Manager:&#039;&#039;&#039; A manager has a degree of power from the position that he is in. He is structured, analytical, and rational, and he creates stability within a project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Leader:&#039;&#039;&#039; A leader, on the other hand, has power because people let him have power. He is courageous, innovative, and visionary, and initiates changes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
For project management, there exist many standards. These standards aim to describe project management across different types of projects and across fields. They for example describe the best practice of the initiation, planning, implementation, controlling and closing of a project, and introduce a long list of tools in order to have the best chances of achieving success within a project. These standards also have a view of the best version of a project manager and the abilities that he should possess.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the following, three standards are being introduced. In particular, their view on the best version of a project manager is at interest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;PMBOK:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the PMI standard (PMBOK),&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Project Management Institute, &#039;&#039;A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge&#039;&#039;, Fifth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA, (2013)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; it is mentioned that in addition to area-specific skills, project managers possess a set of characteristics, being within the area of knowledge, performance and personal.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; These characteristics covers the project manager&#039;s knowledge, hes ability to perform and then personal relations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;ISO standard:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the ISO standard, &amp;quot;Competencies of project personnel&amp;quot; describes the competencies a project manager should have and the competencies that the project team as a unit should have.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;iso&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dansk Standard, &#039;&#039;ISO 21500, Guidance on Project Management&#039;&#039;, First Edition, Dansk Standard, Copenhagen, Denmark, (2012)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Here it is stated that the project team should have a certain skill set, and that any gap between the required and available competencies could be a risk, and should be addressed. On the other hand there are listed three categories of competencies that a project manager should possess, that being technical competencies, behavioral competencies, and contextual competencies.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;iso&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dansk Standard, &#039;&#039;ISO 21500, Guidance on Project Management&#039;&#039;, First Edition, Dansk Standard, Copenhagen, Denmark, (2012)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;technical competencies&#039;&#039; describe processes, terminology and concepts, all within project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;behavioral competencies&#039;&#039; describe personal relationships.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;contextual competencies&#039;&#039; describe the context of the project, i.e., the project within the organization and environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;IPMA:&#039;&#039;&#039; The International Project Management Association (IPMA) divides project management skills in the same three categories as the ISO standard in their &amp;quot;Competence baseline&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ipma&amp;quot;&amp;gt;International Project Management Association, &#039;&#039;ICB - IPMA Competence Baseline&#039;&#039;, Third Edition, International Project Management Association, Nijkerk, The Netherlands, (2006)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; IPMA focuses on competence elements, whereof the majority of them are in the technical category. The two other categories, behavioral and contextual competencies, are also described in this standard though.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are all well-known standards that are used across various fields and industries. They guide project managers to follow the best practice of management in a given project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They all describe processes, techniques, and concepts, although the level of details within each standard varies a lot. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the brief overview of what skills a project manager must possess, it might, at first glance, seem surprising that there is a lack of requirement of the field specific technical knowledge. There is a long list of requirement to the technical knowledge, in the sense of project management techniques, but the demand of area specific technical knowledge is limited.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is noted that the organizations behind the standards all have an interest of being as broad as possible, so that as many project managers and leaders can use and apply their standards.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the PMBOK there is a slight opening of a discussion about area specific skills, but the majority of the concept is treated in an appendix in the 4th edition,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok4&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Project Management Institute, &#039;&#039;A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge&#039;&#039;, Fourth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA, (2008)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and is referred to as &amp;quot;Application Area Extensions&amp;quot;. Noticeably this section has been removed in the 5th edition.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; This though is only an introduction to the extension material that PMI offers within each project type, e.g. software projects, construction projects, etc., and treats for example area specific practices.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmboksoftware&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Caupin, G., et al., &#039;&#039;Software Extension to the PMBOK® Guide Fifth Edition, review&#039;&#039;, Fifth Edition, http://marketplace.pmi.org/Pages/ProductDetail.aspx?GMProduct=00101457501 [visited 25/09 - 2015]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does not treat the subject at all, while the IPMA is the standard that goes the most in depth with the subject. The section on Contextual Competencies describes the link between the project and the organization. In the element description &amp;quot;Permanent Organization&amp;quot;, it is mentioned that &amp;quot;If the project manager is experienced in the respective sector and industry, he will be in a better position to understand these factors. [The planning and management principles of the operations of the permanent organization, red.]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally raises the question: does a project manager need area specific knowledge of the projects that he manages? Does a manager need technical skills within an area to lead a team to meet predefined goals and objectives?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking into the mentioned standards, the answer seems to be no. According to appendix D in PMBOK, there can be some area specific processes that would be ideal to follow,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; but there is not explicit requirements for concrete technical knowledge related to the working area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does only describe to subject by noting that gaps in knowledge about a project can be a risk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IPMA Competence Baseline describes area specific knowledge as being an advantage in managing the permanent organization, but doesn&#039;t describe the subject in relation to projects in the temporary sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thinking of having a manager with very limited area-specific skills, one encounters problems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Being a successful project manager means being successful at delegating work to other people, in order to meet a set of predefined goals and objectives. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally means that the project manager needs to have some kind of respect about his person, so what he lacks in area-specific skills, he must make up for in other areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Estimating the time needed for specific sub-tasks becomes more difficult, but also a task as setting up a project team that covers a wide set of skills becomes more of a challenge. The project team is an important stakeholders. The team needs to be dynamical and have a good relation to each other, but the definition of the required skill set within the project team is of huge importance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what is the alternative then? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An obvious suggestion would be to have people working their way to a position as project managers. This is the concept of having academics that have been working a long time, and then being rewarded with responsibility. That could for example be for good work, loyalty, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One does encounter various problems with this method of employing project managers in a company. First of all, the specialized knowledge and experience gained over a long time is taken away from a project team. Second of all, there are often organizational politics involved in the decision of hiring an employee in a new position within the organization. What should have been a decision based on qualifications can then easily become a political decision. Thirdly there could be a tendency of people working in the same field within the same company for years after years to be more narrow-minded. This will result in project managers to be less likely to think out of the box and to have a very set way of doing things.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Judging from Richardson et al.,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stillaccidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Richardson, T. M. et al., &#039;&#039;Is Project Management Still an Accidental Profession? A Qualitative Study of Career Trajectory&#039;&#039;, http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/5/1/2158244015572098 (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; it seems that academics working their way up the ranks, is actually the career path that many project managers have taken.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As suggested in literature, the profession of being a project manager is often called the accidental profession (see for example Pinto et al.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;accidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Pinto, J. K., Kharbanda, O. P., &#039;&#039;Lessons for an Accidental Profession&#039;&#039;, (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;) This covers the fact that there is a clear tendency of project managers being employed on behalf of their academic qualifications or the expectations for their future success as a project manager, rather than their experience as project managers.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stillaccidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Richardson, T. M. et al., &#039;&#039;Is Project Management Still an Accidental Profession? A Qualitative Study of Career Trajectory&#039;&#039;, http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/5/1/2158244015572098 (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pmimember.PNG|right|thumb|350px|Figure 1: The evolution in number of members of PMI worldwide, from 1969 to 2008]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But as discussed by Ranf,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;thenandnow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ranf, D. E., &#039;&#039;Project management: Then and now&#039;&#039;, Annales Universitatis Apulensis: Series Oeconomica, 13, 596-603 (2011)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; time is changing. Figure 1&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;figur&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Lecture slides MEP 1.2 from the course 42429 Projektledelse Aug 15&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; shows the evolution of number of members of PMI worldwide, and as seen on the curve the number of memberships is increasing almost exponentially. Although it refers to the number of members of PMI (and not all other project management organizations), it can be seen as a clear sign of the significance of projects, but in particular the increasing significance as project management as a profession.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally, project managers were valued for their technological knowledge that they could apply within a certain project. Having business knowledge was an advantage, but not a requirement. Now, on the other hand, project managers are valued for the business knowledge, and technological knowledge is an advantage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This has to be seen in relation to the change of the working market. Projects are incorporated in work settings in a completely new way, and as discussed, the demand of project managers is increasing. Now the project manager&#039;s primarily job isn&#039;t necessarily to contribute with technological knowledge. According to Ranf,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;thenandnow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ranf, D. E., &#039;&#039;Project management: Then and now&#039;&#039;, Annales Universitatis Apulensis: Series Oeconomica, 13, 596-603 (2011)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the business aspect has an increasing importance, in order for the project manager to contribute to business decisions etc. Another aspect of the project management is political abilities. As the number of projects increases, the political environment increases, and the project manager has to move within a more complex organizational structure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So it seems that the project manager very easily can be in a situation where there is a knowledge gap. Is it too much to require from a person that he is both a highly competent manager but also a very skilled worker? And can everybody become a project manager?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Say a person has been working his way up in the company, and finally is offered a management position. He will undergo up-qualifications of his management skills, and be certified project manager within one of the numerous project management standards. Not long ago many people didn&#039;t believe in this approach. The born leader is a term that most people have encountered, but it is also a term that was highly used not long ago.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bornleader&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Lecture slides MEP 5.1 from the course 42429 Projektledelse Aug 15&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Today most people acknowledge that being a leader (and in particular manager) requires a set of skills that most people can learn. This being in line with all other types of knowledge that we can acquire, if there is a need and a desire hereof.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A solution used in some bigger companies, is the dual leadership model. Duos of leaders are composed, in hopes of the duo to compliment each other. If the duo is working efficiently, a wider set of leadership skills is covered within a field. That can e.g. be technological knowledge on one hand, and more management oriented abilities on the other.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Among the companies that have tried this method, are Goldman Sachs, Unilever, and Motorola.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;jointleader&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Palmer, M., &#039;&#039;Two chiefs not necessarily better than one&#039;&#039;, Financial Times, http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/3d509590-45d8-11e1-acc9-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3myDawPXD [visited 27/09 - 2015]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This model brings challenges with it. There has to be a clear definition of roles, for the duo to work dynamically. There also has to be a very clear communication strategy, for information to flow efficiently within an organization. The duo needs to have a good chemistry and be able to challenge each other, but it is also suggested that a constellation like this can slow down the response to changes within an organization or project.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;jointleader&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But these examples are less dominant compared to the cost of a setup like this. One successful and money-making project after the other could very easily make the setup worth it, but it puts a very natural limitation of the types of companies and projects that could have use of this model. It simply has to be of a certain size in order to make sense, and have the acquired budget.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
All in all it is difficult to give one single answer to what type of leader a project or company needs. In all situations it is necessary to take a look at the project surroundings. The qualifications need to be prioritized, in order to find the most suitable project manager within the framework of the company. In generally it does not seem like the dual leadership model is a solution to this problem. Both in terms of the limitations in the model itself, but also in the cost of a model like this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A clear tendency is that more and more business knowledge is required, which tends to cut down on the required area-specific technological knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If one were to judge only on behalf of what the different standards mention as necessary qualifications, then area-specific knowledge does not play an important role. But by taking this as a fact, one has to bear in mind that these standards have an agenda. At the end of the day, they make money the more people get certified within their framework. Thereby there is a natural interest in being as broad as possible, in order to approach as many future project managers as possible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lack of this can either be seen as a part of the definition of the project manager&#039;s competencies. But it can also be seen as a limitation to the standards in general. It depends on what view one has on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It does seems inevitable though, to be prepared to spend time on further education of a project manager&#039;s qualifications. That can either be the project management skills or the area-specific skills, depending on what road that has been taken to get into the present position.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No matter what perspective one must have, it seems like it is a field within which there is room for more research to be done. And until then, the conclusion must be: when in doubt, bring in an expert.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S152093</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Project_Management_Competency_Framework&amp;diff=17683</id>
		<title>Project Management Competency Framework</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Project_Management_Competency_Framework&amp;diff=17683"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T22:06:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S152093: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Summary==&lt;br /&gt;
In literature, many things have been written about project management and the best practice hereof. Various standards exist with the aim of describing the field, and a long list of terms and processes are defined and described. All the standards aim to prepare a project manager to give him the highest chances of achieving success with his projects. It seems that even though each standard differ from the others, they tend to have a similar perspective on the best practice of the subject.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this article is going to look at three standards, the PMI, ISO, and IPMA standard. The focus will be on what they suggest as good project management qualifications, but in particular what the standards suggest as necessary as area-specific knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on what the standards suggest as good project management methods, the two typical approaches to become a project manager is discussed. One approach is by having studied project management, and for example becoming certified project manager. The other way is by achieving a broad knowledge within a field, and then work the way into a position as a project manager. During this discussion, it will be look at whether or not there, typically, will be a gap in knowledge of project managers. The dual leadership model is briefly being introduced, in order to see if this model could cover the gap in a project manager&#039;s knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But before we get started, the difference between a manager and a leader is introduced as suggested by Capowski.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Capow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Capowski, G., &#039;&#039;Anatomy of a Leader: Where Are the Leaders of Tomorrow?&#039;&#039;, (1994)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; These are two terms that are being used a lot within this article, although the main focus will be on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Manager:&#039;&#039;&#039; A manager has a degree of power from the position that he is in. He is structured, analytical, and rational, and he creates stability within a project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Leader:&#039;&#039;&#039; A leader, on the other hand, has power because people let him have power. He is courageous, innovative, and visionary, and initiates changes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
For project management, there exist many standards. These standards aim to describe project management across different types of projects and across fields. They for example describe the best practice of the initiation, planning, implementation, controlling and closing of a project, and introduce a long list of tools in order to have the best chances of achieving success within a project. These standards also have a view of the best version of a project manager and the abilities that he should possess.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the following, three standards are being introduced. In particular, their view on the best version of a project manager is at interest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;PMBOK:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the PMI standard (PMBOK),&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Project Management Institute, &#039;&#039;A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge&#039;&#039;, Fifth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA, (2013)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; it is mentioned that in addition to area-specific skills, project managers possess a set of characteristics, being within the area of knowledge, performance and personal.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; These characteristics covers the project manager&#039;s knowledge, hes ability to perform and then personal relations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;ISO standard:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the ISO standard, &amp;quot;Competencies of project personnel&amp;quot; describes the competencies a project manager should have and the competencies that the project team as a unit should have.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;iso&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dansk Standard, &#039;&#039;ISO 21500, Guidance on Project Management&#039;&#039;, First Edition, Dansk Standard, Copenhagen, Denmark, (2012)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Here it is stated that the project team should have a certain skill set, and that any gap between the required and available competencies could be a risk, and should be addressed. On the other hand there are listed three categories of competencies that a project manager should possess, that being technical competencies, behavioral competencies, and contextual competencies.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;iso&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dansk Standard, &#039;&#039;ISO 21500, Guidance on Project Management&#039;&#039;, First Edition, Dansk Standard, Copenhagen, Denmark, (2012)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;technical competencies&#039;&#039; describe processes, terminology and concepts, all within project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;behavioral competencies&#039;&#039; describe personal relationships.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;contextual competencies&#039;&#039; describe the context of the project, i.e., the project within the organization and environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;IPMA:&#039;&#039;&#039; The International Project Management Association (IPMA) divides project management skills in the same three categories as the ISO standard in their &amp;quot;Competence baseline&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ipma&amp;quot;&amp;gt;International Project Management Association, &#039;&#039;ICB - IPMA Competence Baseline&#039;&#039;, Third Edition, International Project Management Association, Nijkerk, The Netherlands, (2006)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; IPMA focuses on competence elements, whereof the majority of them are in the technical category. The two other categories, behavioral and contextual competencies, are also described in this standard though.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are all well-known standards that are used across various fields and industries. They guide project managers to follow the best practice of management in a given project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They all describe processes, techniques, and concepts, although the level of details within each standard varies a lot. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the brief overview of what skills a project manager must possess, it might, at first glance, seem surprising that there is a lack of requirement of the field specific technical knowledge. There is a long list of requirement to the technical knowledge, in the sense of project management techniques, but the demand of area specific technical knowledge is limited.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is noted that the organizations behind the standards all have an interest of being as broad as possible, so that as many project managers and leaders can use and apply their standards.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the PMBOK there is a slight opening of a discussion about area specific skills, but the majority of the concept is treated in an appendix in the 4th edition,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok4&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Project Management Institute, &#039;&#039;A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge&#039;&#039;, Fourth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA, (2008)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and is referred to as &amp;quot;Application Area Extensions&amp;quot;. Noticeably this section has been removed in the 5th edition.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; This though is only an introduction to the extension material that PMI offers within each project type, e.g. software projects, construction projects, etc., and treats for example area specific practices.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmboksoftware&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Caupin, G., et al., &#039;&#039;Software Extension to the PMBOK® Guide Fifth Edition, review&#039;&#039;, Fifth Edition, http://marketplace.pmi.org/Pages/ProductDetail.aspx?GMProduct=00101457501 [visited 25/09 - 2015]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does not treat the subject at all, while the IPMA is the standard that goes the most in depth with the subject. The section on Contextual Competencies describes the link between the project and the organization. In the element description &amp;quot;Permanent Organization&amp;quot;, it is mentioned that &amp;quot;If the project manager is experienced in the respective sector and industry, he will be in a better position to understand these factors. [The planning and management principles of the operations of the permanent organization, red.]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally raises the question: does a project manager need area specific knowledge of the projects that he manages? Does a manager need technical skills within an area to lead a team to meet predefined goals and objectives?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking into the mentioned standards, the answer seems to be no. According to appendix D in PMBOK, there can be some area specific processes that would be ideal to follow,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; but there is not explicit requirements for concrete technical knowledge related to the working area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does only describe to subject by noting that gaps in knowledge about a project can be a risk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IPMA Competence Baseline describes area specific knowledge as being an advantage in managing the permanent organization, but doesn&#039;t describe the subject in relation to projects in the temporary sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thinking of having a manager with very limited area-specific skills, one encounters problems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Being a successful project manager means being successful at delegating work to other people, in order to meet a set of predefined goals and objectives. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally means that the project manager needs to have some kind of respect about his person, so what he lacks in area-specific skills, he must make up for in other areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Estimating the time needed for specific sub-tasks becomes more difficult, but also a task as setting up a project team that covers a wide set of skills becomes more of a challenge. The project team is an important stakeholders. The team needs to be dynamical and have a good relation to each other, but the definition of the required skill set within the project team is of huge importance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what is the alternative then? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An obvious suggestion would be to have people working their way to a position as project managers. This is the concept of having academics that have been working a long time, and then being rewarded with responsibility. That could for example be for good work, loyalty, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One does encounter various problems with this method of employing project managers in a company. First of all, the specialized knowledge and experience gained over a long time is taken away from a project team. Second of all, there are often organizational politics involved in the decision of hiring an employee in a new position within the organization. What should have been a decision based on qualifications can then easily become a political decision. Thirdly there could be a tendency of people working in the same field within the same company for years after years to be more narrow-minded. This will result in project managers to be less likely to think out of the box and to have a very set way of doing things.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Judging from Richardson et al.,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stillaccidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Richardson, T. M. et al., &#039;&#039;Is Project Management Still an Accidental Profession? A Qualitative Study of Career Trajectory&#039;&#039;, http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/5/1/2158244015572098 (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; it seems that academics working their way up the ranks, is actually the career path that many project managers have taken.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As suggested in literature, the profession of being a project manager is often called the accidental profession (see for example Pinto et al.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;accidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Pinto, J. K., Kharbanda, O. P., &#039;&#039;Lessons for an Accidental Profession&#039;&#039;, (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;) This covers the fact that there is a clear tendency of project managers being employed on behalf of their academic qualifications or the expectations for their future success as a project manager, rather than their experience as project managers.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stillaccidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Richardson, T. M. et al., &#039;&#039;Is Project Management Still an Accidental Profession? A Qualitative Study of Career Trajectory&#039;&#039;, http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/5/1/2158244015572098 (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pmimember.PNG|right|thumb|350px|Figure 1: The evolution in numbers of members of PMI worldwide, from 1969 to 2008]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But as discussed by Ranf,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;thenandnow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ranf, D. E., &#039;&#039;Project management: Then and now&#039;&#039;, Annales Universitatis Apulensis: Series Oeconomica, 13, 596-603 (2011)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; time is changing. Figure 1&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;figur&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Lecture slides MEP 1.2 from the course 42429 Projektledelse Aug 15&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; shows the evolution of numbers of members of PMI worldwide, and as seen on the curve the number of memberships is increasing almost exponentially. Although it refers to the number of members of PMI (and not all other project management organizations), it can be seen as a clear sign of the significance of projects, but in particular the increasing significance as project management as a profession.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally, project managers were valued for their technological knowledge that they could apply within a certain project. Having business knowledge was an advantage, but not a requirement. Now, on the other hand, project managers are valued for the business knowledge, and technological knowledge is an advantage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This has to be seen in relation to the change of the working market. Projects are incorporated in work settings in a completely new way, and as discussed, the demand of project managers is increasing. Now the project manager&#039;s primarily job isn&#039;t necessarily to contribute with technological knowledge. According to Ranf,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;thenandnow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ranf, D. E., &#039;&#039;Project management: Then and now&#039;&#039;, Annales Universitatis Apulensis: Series Oeconomica, 13, 596-603 (2011)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the business aspect has an increasing importance, in order for the project manager to contribute to business decisions etc. Another aspect of the project management is political abilities. As the number of projects increases, the political environment increases, and the project manager has to move within a more complex organizational structure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So it seems that the project manager very easily can be in a situation where there is a knowledge gap. Is it too much to require from a person that he is both a highly competent manager but also a very skilled worker? And can everybody become a project manager?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Say a person has been working his way up in the company, and finally is offered a management position. He will undergo up-qualifications of his management skills, and be certified project manager within one of the numerous project management standards. Not long ago many people didn&#039;t believe in this approach. The born leader is a term that most people have encountered, but it is also a term that was highly used not long ago.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bornleader&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Lecture slides MEP 5.1 from the course 42429 Projektledelse Aug 15&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Today most people acknowledge that being a leader (and in particular manager) requires a set of skills that most people can learn. This being in line with all other types of knowledge that we can acquire, if there is a need and a desire hereof.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A solution used in some bigger companies, is the dual leadership model. Duos of leaders are composed, in hopes of the duo to compliment each other. If the duo is working efficiently, a wider set of leadership skills is covered within a field. That can e.g. be technological knowledge on one hand, and more management oriented abilities on the other.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Among the companies that have tried this method, are Goldman Sachs, Unilever, and Motorola.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;jointleader&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Palmer, M., &#039;&#039;Two chiefs not necessarily better than one&#039;&#039;, Financial Times, http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/3d509590-45d8-11e1-acc9-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3myDawPXD [visited 27/09 - 2015]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This model brings challenges with it. There has to be a clear definition of roles, for the duo to work dynamically. There also has to be a very clear communication strategy, for information to flow efficiently within an organization. The duo needs to have a good chemistry and be able to challenge each other, but it is also suggested that a constellation like this can slow down the response to changes within an organization or project.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;jointleader&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But these examples are less dominant compared to the cost of a setup like this. One successful and money-making project after the other could very easily make the setup worth it, but it puts a very natural limitation of the types of companies and projects that could have use of this model. It simply has to be of a certain size in order to make sense, and have the acquired budget.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
All in all it is difficult to give one single answer to what type of leader a project or company needs. In all situations it is necessary to take a look at the project surroundings. The qualifications need to be prioritized, in order to find the most suitable project manager within the framework of the company. In generally it does not seem like the dual leadership model is a solution to this problem. Both in terms of the limitations in the model itself, but also in the cost of a model like this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A clear tendency is that more and more business knowledge is required, which tends to cut down on the required area-specific technological knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If one were to judge only on behalf of what the different standards mention as necessary qualifications, then area-specific knowledge does not play an important role. But by taking this as a fact, one has to bear in mind that these standards have an agenda. At the end of the day, they make money the more people get certified within their framework. Thereby there is a natural interest in being as broad as possible, in order to approach as many future project managers as possible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lack of this can either be seen as a part of the definition of the project manager&#039;s competencies. But it can also be seen as a limitation to the standards in general. It depends on what view one has on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It does seems inevitable though, to be prepared to spend time on further education of a project manager&#039;s qualifications. That can either be the project management skills or the area-specific skills, depending on what road that has been taken to get into the present position.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No matter what perspective one must have, it seems like it is a field within which there is room for more research to be done. And until then, the conclusion must be: when in doubt, bring in an expert.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S152093</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Project_Management_Competency_Framework&amp;diff=17628</id>
		<title>Project Management Competency Framework</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Project_Management_Competency_Framework&amp;diff=17628"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T21:51:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S152093: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Summary==&lt;br /&gt;
In literature, many things have been written about project management and the best practice hereof. Various standards exist with the aim of describing the field, and a long list of terms and processes are defined and described. All the standards aim to prepare a project manager to give him the highest chances of achieving success with his projects. It seems that even though each standard differ from the others, they tend to have a similar perspective on the best practice of the subject.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this article is going to look at three standards, the PMI, ISO, and IPMA standard. The focus will be on what they suggest as good project management qualifications, but in particular what the standards suggest as necessary as area-specific knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on what the standards suggest as good project management methods, the two typical approaches to become a project manager is discussed. One approach is by having studied project management, and for example becoming certified project manager. The other way is by achieving a broad knowledge within a field, and then work the way into a position as a project manager. During this discussion, it will be look at whether or not there, typically, will be a gap in knowledge of project managers. The dual leadership model is briefly being introduced, in order to see if this model could cover the gap in a project manager&#039;s knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But before we get started, the difference between a manager and a leader is introduced as suggested by Capowski.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Capow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Capowski, G., &#039;&#039;Anatomy of a Leader: Where Are the Leaders of Tomorrow?&#039;&#039;, (1994)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; These are two terms that are being used a lot within this article, although the main focus will be on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Manager:&#039;&#039;&#039; A manager has a degree of power from the position that he is in. He is structured, analytical, and rational, and he creates stability within a project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Leader:&#039;&#039;&#039; A leader, on the other hand, has power because people let him have power. He is courageous, innovative, and visionary, and initiates changes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
For project management, there exist many standards. These standards aim to describe project management across different types of projects and across fields. They for example describe the best practice of the initiation, planning, implementation, controlling and closing of a project, and introduce a long list of tools in order to have the best chances of achieving success within a project. These standards also have a view of the best version of a project manager and the abilities that he should possess.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the following, three standards are being introduced. In particular, their view on the best version of a project manager is at interest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;PMBOK:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the PMI standard (PMBOK),&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Project Management Institute, &#039;&#039;A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge&#039;&#039;, Fifth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA, (2013)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; it is mentioned that in addition to area-specific skills, project managers possess a set of characteristics, being within the area of knowledge, performance and personal.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; These characteristics covers the project manager&#039;s knowledge, hes ability to perform and then personal relations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;ISO standard:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the ISO standard, &amp;quot;Competencies of project personnel&amp;quot; describes the competencies a project manager should have and the competencies that the project team as a unit should have.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;iso&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dansk Standard, &#039;&#039;ISO 21500, Guidance on Project Management&#039;&#039;, First Edition, Dansk Standard, Copenhagen, Denmark, (2012)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Here it is stated that the project team should have a certain skill set, and that any gap between the required and available competencies could be a risk, and should be addressed. On the other hand there are listed three categories of competencies that a project manager should possess, that being technical competencies, behavioral competencies, and contextual competencies.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;iso&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dansk Standard, &#039;&#039;ISO 21500, Guidance on Project Management&#039;&#039;, First Edition, Dansk Standard, Copenhagen, Denmark, (2012)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;technical competencies&#039;&#039; describe processes, terminology and concepts, all within project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;behavioral competencies&#039;&#039; describe personal relationships.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;contextual competencies&#039;&#039; describe the context of the project, i.e., the project within the organization and environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;IPMA:&#039;&#039;&#039; The International Project Management Association (IPMA) divides project management skills in the same three categories as the ISO standard in their &amp;quot;Competence baseline&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ipma&amp;quot;&amp;gt;International Project Management Association, &#039;&#039;ICB - IPMA Competence Baseline&#039;&#039;, Third Edition, International Project Management Association, Nijkerk, The Netherlands, (2006)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; IPMA focuses on competence elements, whereof the majority of them are in the technical category. The two other categories, behavioral and contextual competencies, are also described in this standard though.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are all well-known standards that are used across various fields and industries. They guide project managers to follow the best practice of management in a given project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They all describe processes, techniques, and concepts, although the level of details within each standard varies a lot. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the brief overview of what skills a project manager must possess, it might, at first glance, seem surprising that there is a lack of requirement of the field specific technical knowledge. There is a long list of requirement to the technical knowledge, in the sense of project management techniques, but the demand of area specific technical knowledge is limited.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is noted that the organizations behind the standards all have an interest of being as broad as possible, so that as many project managers and leaders can use and apply their standards.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the PMBOK there is a slight opening of a discussion about area specific skills, but the majority of the concept is treated in an appendix in the 4th edition,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok4&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Project Management Institute, &#039;&#039;A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge&#039;&#039;, Fourth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA, (2008)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and is referred to as &amp;quot;Application Area Extensions&amp;quot;. Noticeably this section has been removed in the 5th edition.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; This though is only an introduction to the extension material that PMI offers within each project type, e.g. software projects, construction projects, etc., and treats for example area specific practices.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmboksoftware&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Caupin, G., et al., &#039;&#039;Software Extension to the PMBOK® Guide Fifth Edition, review&#039;&#039;, Fifth Edition, http://marketplace.pmi.org/Pages/ProductDetail.aspx?GMProduct=00101457501 [visited 25/09 - 2015]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does not treat the subject at all, while the IPMA is the standard that goes the most in depth with the subject. The section on Contextual Competencies describes the link between the project and the organization. In the element description &amp;quot;Permanent Organization&amp;quot;, it is mentioned that &amp;quot;If the project manager is experienced in the respective sector and industry, he will be in a better position to understand these factors. [The planning and management principles of the operations of the permanent organization, red.]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally raises the question: does a project manager need area specific knowledge of the projects that he manages? Does a manager need technical skills within an area to lead a team to meet predefined goals and objectives?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking into the mentioned standards, the answer seems to be no. According to appendix D in PMBOK, there can be some area specific processes that would be ideal to follow,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; but there is not explicit requirements for concrete technical knowledge related to the working area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does only describe to subject by noting that gaps in knowledge about a project can be a risk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IPMA Competence Baseline describes area specific knowledge as being an advantage in managing the permanent organization, but doesn&#039;t describe the subject in relation to projects in the temporary sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thinking of having a manager with very limited area-specific skills, one encounters problems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Being a successful project manager means being successful at delegating work to other people, in order to meet a set of predefined goals and objectives. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally means that the project manager needs to have some kind of respect about his person, so what he lacks in area-specific skills, he must make up for in other areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Estimating the time needed for specific sub-tasks becomes more difficult, but also a task as setting up a project team that covers a wide set of skills becomes more of a challenge. The project team is an important stakeholders. The team needs to be dynamical and have a good relation to each other, but the definition of the required skill set within the project team is of huge importance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what is the alternative then? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An obvious suggestion would be to have people working their way to a position as project managers. This is the concept of having academics that have been working a long time, and then being rewarded with responsibility. That could for example be for good work, loyalty, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One does encounter various problems with this method of employing project managers in a company. First of all, the specialized knowledge and experience gained over a long time is taken away from a project team. Second of all, there are often organizational politics involved in the decision of hiring an employee in a new position within the organization. What should have been a decision based on qualifications can then easily become a political decision. Thirdly there could be a tendency of people working in the same field within the same company for years after years to be more narrow-minded. This will result in project managers to be less likely to think out of the box and to have a very set way of doing things.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Judging from Richardson et al.,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stillaccidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Richardson, T. M. et al., &#039;&#039;Is Project Management Still an Accidental Profession? A Qualitative Study of Career Trajectory&#039;&#039;, http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/5/1/2158244015572098 (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; it seems that academics working their way up the ranks, is actually the career path that many project managers have taken.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As suggested in literature, the profession of being a project manager is often called the accidental profession (see for example Pinto et al.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;accidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Pinto, J. K., Kharbanda, O. P., &#039;&#039;Lessons for an Accidental Profession&#039;&#039;, (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;) This covers the fact that there is a clear tendency of project managers being employed on behalf of their academic qualifications or the expectations for their future success as a project manager, rather than their experience as project managers.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stillaccidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Richardson, T. M. et al., &#039;&#039;Is Project Management Still an Accidental Profession? A Qualitative Study of Career Trajectory&#039;&#039;, http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/5/1/2158244015572098 (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pmimember.PNG|right|300px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But as discussed by Ranf,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;thenandnow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ranf, D. E., &#039;&#039;Project management: Then and now&#039;&#039;, Annales Universitatis Apulensis: Series Oeconomica, 13, 596-603 (2011)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; time is changing. Figure (SOMETHING) shows the evolution of numbers of members of PMI worldwide, and as seen on the curve the number of memberships is increasing almost exponentially. Although it refers to the number of members of PMI (and not all other project management organizations), it can be seen as a clear sign of the significance of projects, but in particular the increasing significance as project management as a profession.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally, project managers were valued for their technological knowledge that they could apply within a certain project. Having business knowledge was an advantage, but not a requirement. Now, on the other hand, project managers are valued for the business knowledge, and technological knowledge is an advantage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This has to be seen in relation to the change of the working market. Projects are incorporated in work settings in a completely new way, and as discussed, the demand of project managers is increasing. Now the project manager&#039;s primarily job isn&#039;t necessarily to contribute with technological knowledge. According to Ranf,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;thenandnow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ranf, D. E., &#039;&#039;Project management: Then and now&#039;&#039;, Annales Universitatis Apulensis: Series Oeconomica, 13, 596-603 (2011)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the business aspect has an increasing importance, in order for the project manager to contribute to business decisions etc. Another aspect of the project management is political abilities. As the number of projects increases, the political environment increases, and the project manager has to move within a more complex organizational structure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So it seems that the project manager very easily can be in a situation where there is a knowledge gap. Is it too much to require from a person that he is both a highly competent manager but also a very skilled worker? And can everybody become a project manager?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Say a person has been working his way up in the company, and finally is offered a management position. He will undergo up-qualifications of his management skills, and be certified project manager within one of the numerous project management standards. Not long ago many people didn&#039;t believe in this approach. The born leader is a term that most people have encountered, but it is also a term that was highly used not long ago.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bornleader&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Lecture slides MEP 5.1 from the course 42429 Projektledelse Aug 15&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Today most people acknowledge that being a leader (and in particular manager) requires a set of skills that most people can learn. This being in line with all other types of knowledge that we can acquire, if there is a need and a desire hereof.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A solution used in some bigger companies, is the dual leadership model. Duos of leaders are composed, in hopes of the duo to compliment each other. If the duo is working efficiently, a wider set of leadership skills is covered within a field. That can e.g. be technological knowledge on one hand, and more management oriented abilities on the other.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Among the companies that have tried this method, are Goldman Sachs, Unilever, and Motorola.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;jointleader&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Palmer, M., &#039;&#039;Two chiefs not necessarily better than one&#039;&#039;, Financial Times, http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/3d509590-45d8-11e1-acc9-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3myDawPXD [visited 27/09 - 2015]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This model brings challenges with it. There has to be a clear definition of roles, for the duo to work dynamically. There also has to be a very clear communication strategy, for information to flow efficiently within an organization. The duo needs to have a good chemistry and be able to challenge each other, but it is also suggested that a constellation like this can slow down the response to changes within an organization or project.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;jointleader&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But these examples are less dominant compared to the cost of a setup like this. One successful and money-making project after the other could very easily make the setup worth it, but it puts a very natural limitation of the types of companies and projects that could have use of this model. It simply has to be of a certain size in order to make sense, and have the acquired budget.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
All in all it is difficult to give one single answer to what type of leader a project or company needs. In all situations it is necessary to take a look at the project surroundings. The qualifications need to be prioritized, in order to find the most suitable project manager within the framework of the company. In generally it does not seem like the dual leadership model is a solution to this problem. Both in terms of the limitations in the model itself, but also in the cost of a model like this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A clear tendency is that more and more business knowledge is required, which tends to cut down on the required area-specific technological knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If one were to judge only on behalf of what the different standards mention as necessary qualifications, then area-specific knowledge does not play an important role. But by taking this as a fact, one has to bear in mind that these standards have an agenda. At the end of the day, they make money the more people get certified within their framework. Thereby there is a natural interest in being as broad as possible, in order to approach as many future project managers as possible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lack of this can either be seen as a part of the definition of the project manager&#039;s competencies. But it can also be seen as a limitation to the standards in general. It depends on what view one has on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It does seems inevitable though, to be prepared to spend time on further education of a project manager&#039;s qualifications. That can either be the project management skills or the area-specific skills, depending on what road that has been taken to get into the present position.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No matter what perspective one must have, it seems like it is a field within which there is room for more research to be done. And until then, the conclusion must be: when in doubt, bring in an expert.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S152093</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Project_Management_Competency_Framework&amp;diff=17622</id>
		<title>Project Management Competency Framework</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Project_Management_Competency_Framework&amp;diff=17622"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T21:50:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S152093: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Summary==&lt;br /&gt;
In literature, many things have been written about project management and the best practice hereof. Various standards exist with the aim of describing the field, and a long list of terms and processes are defined and described. All the standards aim to prepare a project manager to give him the highest chances of achieving success with his projects. It seems that even though each standard differ from the others, they tend to have a similar perspective on the best practice of the subject.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this article is going to look at three standards, the PMI, ISO, and IPMA standard. The focus will be on what they suggest as good project management qualifications, but in particular what the standards suggest as necessary as area-specific knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on what the standards suggest as good project management methods, the two typical approaches to become a project manager is discussed. One approach is by having studied project management, and for example becoming certified project manager. The other way is by achieving a broad knowledge within a field, and then work the way into a position as a project manager. During this discussion, it will be look at whether or not there, typically, will be a gap in knowledge of project managers. The dual leadership model is briefly being introduced, in order to see if this model could cover the gap in a project manager&#039;s knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But before we get started, the difference between a manager and a leader is introduced as suggested by Capowski.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Capow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Capowski, G., &#039;&#039;Anatomy of a Leader: Where Are the Leaders of Tomorrow?&#039;&#039;, (1994)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; These are two terms that are being used a lot within this article, although the main focus will be on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Manager:&#039;&#039;&#039; A manager has a degree of power from the position that he is in. He is structured, analytical, and rational, and he creates stability within a project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Leader:&#039;&#039;&#039; A leader, on the other hand, has power because people let him have power. He is courageous, innovative, and visionary, and initiates changes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
For project management, there exist many standards. These standards aim to describe project management across different types of projects and across fields. They for example describe the best practice of the initiation, planning, implementation, controlling and closing of a project, and introduce a long list of tools in order to have the best chances of achieving success within a project. These standards also have a view of the best version of a project manager and the abilities that he should possess.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the following, three standards are being introduced. In particular, their view on the best version of a project manager is at interest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;PMBOK:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the PMI standard (PMBOK),&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Project Management Institute, &#039;&#039;A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge&#039;&#039;, Fifth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA, (2013)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; it is mentioned that in addition to area-specific skills, project managers possess a set of characteristics, being within the area of knowledge, performance and personal.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; These characteristics covers the project manager&#039;s knowledge, hes ability to perform and then personal relations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;ISO standard:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the ISO standard, &amp;quot;Competencies of project personnel&amp;quot; describes the competencies a project manager should have and the competencies that the project team as a unit should have.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;iso&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dansk Standard, &#039;&#039;ISO 21500, Guidance on Project Management&#039;&#039;, First Edition, Dansk Standard, Copenhagen, Denmark, (2012)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Here it is stated that the project team should have a certain skill set, and that any gap between the required and available competencies could be a risk, and should be addressed. On the other hand there are listed three categories of competencies that a project manager should possess, that being technical competencies, behavioral competencies, and contextual competencies.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;iso&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dansk Standard, &#039;&#039;ISO 21500, Guidance on Project Management&#039;&#039;, First Edition, Dansk Standard, Copenhagen, Denmark, (2012)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;technical competencies&#039;&#039; describe processes, terminology and concepts, all within project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;behavioral competencies&#039;&#039; describe personal relationships.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;contextual competencies&#039;&#039; describe the context of the project, i.e., the project within the organization and environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;IPMA:&#039;&#039;&#039; The International Project Management Association (IPMA) divides project management skills in the same three categories as the ISO standard in their &amp;quot;Competence baseline&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ipma&amp;quot;&amp;gt;International Project Management Association, &#039;&#039;ICB - IPMA Competence Baseline&#039;&#039;, Third Edition, International Project Management Association, Nijkerk, The Netherlands, (2006)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; IPMA focuses on competence elements, whereof the majority of them are in the technical category. The two other categories, behavioral and contextual competencies, are also described in this standard though.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are all well-known standards that are used across various fields and industries. They guide project managers to follow the best practice of management in a given project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They all describe processes, techniques, and concepts, although the level of details within each standard varies a lot. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the brief overview of what skills a project manager must possess, it might, at first glance, seem surprising that there is a lack of requirement of the field specific technical knowledge. There is a long list of requirement to the technical knowledge, in the sense of project management techniques, but the demand of area specific technical knowledge is limited.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is noted that the organizations behind the standards all have an interest of being as broad as possible, so that as many project managers and leaders can use and apply their standards.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the PMBOK there is a slight opening of a discussion about area specific skills, but the majority of the concept is treated in an appendix in the 4th edition,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok4&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Project Management Institute, &#039;&#039;A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge&#039;&#039;, Fourth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA, (2008)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and is referred to as &amp;quot;Application Area Extensions&amp;quot;. Noticeably this section has been removed in the 5th edition.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; This though is only an introduction to the extension material that PMI offers within each project type, e.g. software projects, construction projects, etc., and treats for example area specific practices.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmboksoftware&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Caupin, G., et al., &#039;&#039;Software Extension to the PMBOK® Guide Fifth Edition, review&#039;&#039;, Fifth Edition, http://marketplace.pmi.org/Pages/ProductDetail.aspx?GMProduct=00101457501 [visited 25/09 - 2015]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does not treat the subject at all, while the IPMA is the standard that goes the most in depth with the subject. The section on Contextual Competencies describes the link between the project and the organization. In the element description &amp;quot;Permanent Organization&amp;quot;, it is mentioned that &amp;quot;If the project manager is experienced in the respective sector and industry, he will be in a better position to understand these factors. [The planning and management principles of the operations of the permanent organization, red.]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally raises the question: does a project manager need area specific knowledge of the projects that he manages? Does a manager need technical skills within an area to lead a team to meet predefined goals and objectives?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking into the mentioned standards, the answer seems to be no. According to appendix D in PMBOK, there can be some area specific processes that would be ideal to follow,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; but there is not explicit requirements for concrete technical knowledge related to the working area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does only describe to subject by noting that gaps in knowledge about a project can be a risk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IPMA Competence Baseline describes area specific knowledge as being an advantage in managing the permanent organization, but doesn&#039;t describe the subject in relation to projects in the temporary sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thinking of having a manager with very limited area-specific skills, one encounters problems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Being a successful project manager means being successful at delegating work to other people, in order to meet a set of predefined goals and objectives. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally means that the project manager needs to have some kind of respect about his person, so what he lacks in area-specific skills, he must make up for in other areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Estimating the time needed for specific sub-tasks becomes more difficult, but also a task as setting up a project team that covers a wide set of skills becomes more of a challenge. The project team is an important stakeholders. The team needs to be dynamical and have a good relation to each other, but the definition of the required skill set within the project team is of huge importance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what is the alternative then? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An obvious suggestion would be to have people working their way to a position as project managers. This is the concept of having academics that have been working a long time, and then being rewarded with responsibility. That could for example be for good work, loyalty, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One does encounter various problems with this method of employing project managers in a company. First of all, the specialized knowledge and experience gained over a long time is taken away from a project team. Second of all, there are often organizational politics involved in the decision of hiring an employee in a new position within the organization. What should have been a decision based on qualifications can then easily become a political decision. Thirdly there could be a tendency of people working in the same field within the same company for years after years to be more narrow-minded. This will result in project managers to be less likely to think out of the box and to have a very set way of doing things.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Judging from Richardson et al.,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stillaccidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Richardson, T. M. et al., &#039;&#039;Is Project Management Still an Accidental Profession? A Qualitative Study of Career Trajectory&#039;&#039;, http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/5/1/2158244015572098 (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; it seems that academics working their way up the ranks, is actually the career path that many project managers have taken.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As suggested in literature, the profession of being a project manager is often called the accidental profession (see for example Pinto et al.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;accidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Pinto, J. K., Kharbanda, O. P., &#039;&#039;Lessons for an Accidental Profession&#039;&#039;, (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;) This covers the fact that there is a clear tendency of project managers being employed on behalf of their academic qualifications or the expectations for their future success as a project manager, rather than their experience as project managers.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stillaccidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Richardson, T. M. et al., &#039;&#039;Is Project Management Still an Accidental Profession? A Qualitative Study of Career Trajectory&#039;&#039;, http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/5/1/2158244015572098 (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pmimember.PNG|right|50px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But as discussed by Ranf,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;thenandnow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ranf, D. E., &#039;&#039;Project management: Then and now&#039;&#039;, Annales Universitatis Apulensis: Series Oeconomica, 13, 596-603 (2011)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; time is changing. Figure (SOMETHING) shows the evolution of numbers of members of PMI worldwide, and as seen on the curve the number of memberships is increasing almost exponentially. Although it refers to the number of members of PMI (and not all other project management organizations), it can be seen as a clear sign of the significance of projects, but in particular the increasing significance as project management as a profession.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally, project managers were valued for their technological knowledge that they could apply within a certain project. Having business knowledge was an advantage, but not a requirement. Now, on the other hand, project managers are valued for the business knowledge, and technological knowledge is an advantage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This has to be seen in relation to the change of the working market. Projects are incorporated in work settings in a completely new way, and as discussed, the demand of project managers is increasing. Now the project manager&#039;s primarily job isn&#039;t necessarily to contribute with technological knowledge. According to Ranf,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;thenandnow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ranf, D. E., &#039;&#039;Project management: Then and now&#039;&#039;, Annales Universitatis Apulensis: Series Oeconomica, 13, 596-603 (2011)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the business aspect has an increasing importance, in order for the project manager to contribute to business decisions etc. Another aspect of the project management is political abilities. As the number of projects increases, the political environment increases, and the project manager has to move within a more complex organizational structure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So it seems that the project manager very easily can be in a situation where there is a knowledge gap. Is it too much to require from a person that he is both a highly competent manager but also a very skilled worker? And can everybody become a project manager?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Say a person has been working his way up in the company, and finally is offered a management position. He will undergo up-qualifications of his management skills, and be certified project manager within one of the numerous project management standards. Not long ago many people didn&#039;t believe in this approach. The born leader is a term that most people have encountered, but it is also a term that was highly used not long ago.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bornleader&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Lecture slides MEP 5.1 from the course 42429 Projektledelse Aug 15&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Today most people acknowledge that being a leader (and in particular manager) requires a set of skills that most people can learn. This being in line with all other types of knowledge that we can acquire, if there is a need and a desire hereof.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A solution used in some bigger companies, is the dual leadership model. Duos of leaders are composed, in hopes of the duo to compliment each other. If the duo is working efficiently, a wider set of leadership skills is covered within a field. That can e.g. be technological knowledge on one hand, and more management oriented abilities on the other.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Among the companies that have tried this method, are Goldman Sachs, Unilever, and Motorola.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;jointleader&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Palmer, M., &#039;&#039;Two chiefs not necessarily better than one&#039;&#039;, Financial Times, http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/3d509590-45d8-11e1-acc9-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3myDawPXD [visited 27/09 - 2015]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This model brings challenges with it. There has to be a clear definition of roles, for the duo to work dynamically. There also has to be a very clear communication strategy, for information to flow efficiently within an organization. The duo needs to have a good chemistry and be able to challenge each other, but it is also suggested that a constellation like this can slow down the response to changes within an organization or project.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;jointleader&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But these examples are less dominant compared to the cost of a setup like this. One successful and money-making project after the other could very easily make the setup worth it, but it puts a very natural limitation of the types of companies and projects that could have use of this model. It simply has to be of a certain size in order to make sense, and have the acquired budget.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
All in all it is difficult to give one single answer to what type of leader a project or company needs. In all situations it is necessary to take a look at the project surroundings. The qualifications need to be prioritized, in order to find the most suitable project manager within the framework of the company. In generally it does not seem like the dual leadership model is a solution to this problem. Both in terms of the limitations in the model itself, but also in the cost of a model like this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A clear tendency is that more and more business knowledge is required, which tends to cut down on the required area-specific technological knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If one were to judge only on behalf of what the different standards mention as necessary qualifications, then area-specific knowledge does not play an important role. But by taking this as a fact, one has to bear in mind that these standards have an agenda. At the end of the day, they make money the more people get certified within their framework. Thereby there is a natural interest in being as broad as possible, in order to approach as many future project managers as possible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lack of this can either be seen as a part of the definition of the project manager&#039;s competencies. But it can also be seen as a limitation to the standards in general. It depends on what view one has on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It does seems inevitable though, to be prepared to spend time on further education of a project manager&#039;s qualifications. That can either be the project management skills or the area-specific skills, depending on what road that has been taken to get into the present position.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No matter what perspective one must have, it seems like it is a field within which there is room for more research to be done. And until then, the conclusion must be: when in doubt, bring in an expert.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S152093</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Project_Management_Competency_Framework&amp;diff=17607</id>
		<title>Project Management Competency Framework</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Project_Management_Competency_Framework&amp;diff=17607"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T21:47:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S152093: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Summary==&lt;br /&gt;
In literature, many things have been written about project management and the best practice hereof. Various standards exist with the aim of describing the field, and a long list of terms and processes are defined and described. All the standards aim to prepare a project manager to give him the highest chances of achieving success with his projects. It seems that even though each standard differ from the others, they tend to have a similar perspective on the best practice of the subject.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this article is going to look at three standards, the PMI, ISO, and IPMA standard. The focus will be on what they suggest as good project management qualifications, but in particular what the standards suggest as necessary as area-specific knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on what the standards suggest as good project management methods, the two typical approaches to become a project manager is discussed. One approach is by having studied project management, and for example becoming certified project manager. The other way is by achieving a broad knowledge within a field, and then work the way into a position as a project manager. During this discussion, it will be look at whether or not there, typically, will be a gap in knowledge of project managers. The dual leadership model is briefly being introduced, in order to see if this model could cover the gap in a project manager&#039;s knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But before we get started, the difference between a manager and a leader is introduced as suggested by Capowski.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Capow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Capowski, G., &#039;&#039;Anatomy of a Leader: Where Are the Leaders of Tomorrow?&#039;&#039;, (1994)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; These are two terms that are being used a lot within this article, although the main focus will be on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Manager:&#039;&#039;&#039; A manager has a degree of power from the position that he is in. He is structured, analytical, and rational, and he creates stability within a project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Leader:&#039;&#039;&#039; A leader, on the other hand, has power because people let him have power. He is courageous, innovative, and visionary, and initiates changes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
For project management, there exist many standards. These standards aim to describe project management across different types of projects and across fields. They for example describe the best practice of the initiation, planning, implementation, controlling and closing of a project, and introduce a long list of tools in order to have the best chances of achieving success within a project. These standards also have a view of the best version of a project manager and the abilities that he should possess.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the following, three standards are being introduced. In particular, their view on the best version of a project manager is at interest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;PMBOK:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the PMI standard (PMBOK),&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Project Management Institute, &#039;&#039;A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge&#039;&#039;, Fifth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA, (2013)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; it is mentioned that in addition to area-specific skills, project managers possess a set of characteristics, being within the area of knowledge, performance and personal.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; These characteristics covers the project manager&#039;s knowledge, hes ability to perform and then personal relations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;ISO standard:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the ISO standard, &amp;quot;Competencies of project personnel&amp;quot; describes the competencies a project manager should have and the competencies that the project team as a unit should have.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;iso&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dansk Standard, &#039;&#039;ISO 21500, Guidance on Project Management&#039;&#039;, First Edition, Dansk Standard, Copenhagen, Denmark, (2012)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Here it is stated that the project team should have a certain skill set, and that any gap between the required and available competencies could be a risk, and should be addressed. On the other hand there are listed three categories of competencies that a project manager should possess, that being technical competencies, behavioral competencies, and contextual competencies.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;iso&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dansk Standard, &#039;&#039;ISO 21500, Guidance on Project Management&#039;&#039;, First Edition, Dansk Standard, Copenhagen, Denmark, (2012)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;technical competencies&#039;&#039; describe processes, terminology and concepts, all within project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;behavioral competencies&#039;&#039; describe personal relationships.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;contextual competencies&#039;&#039; describe the context of the project, i.e., the project within the organization and environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;IPMA:&#039;&#039;&#039; The International Project Management Association (IPMA) divides project management skills in the same three categories as the ISO standard in their &amp;quot;Competence baseline&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ipma&amp;quot;&amp;gt;International Project Management Association, &#039;&#039;ICB - IPMA Competence Baseline&#039;&#039;, Third Edition, International Project Management Association, Nijkerk, The Netherlands, (2006)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; IPMA focuses on competence elements, whereof the majority of them are in the technical category. The two other categories, behavioral and contextual competencies, are also described in this standard though.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are all well-known standards that are used across various fields and industries. They guide project managers to follow the best practice of management in a given project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They all describe processes, techniques, and concepts, although the level of details within each standard varies a lot. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the brief overview of what skills a project manager must possess, it might, at first glance, seem surprising that there is a lack of requirement of the field specific technical knowledge. There is a long list of requirement to the technical knowledge, in the sense of project management techniques, but the demand of area specific technical knowledge is limited.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is noted that the organizations behind the standards all have an interest of being as broad as possible, so that as many project managers and leaders can use and apply their standards.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the PMBOK there is a slight opening of a discussion about area specific skills, but the majority of the concept is treated in an appendix in the 4th edition,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok4&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Project Management Institute, &#039;&#039;A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge&#039;&#039;, Fourth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA, (2008)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and is referred to as &amp;quot;Application Area Extensions&amp;quot;. Noticeably this section has been removed in the 5th edition.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; This though is only an introduction to the extension material that PMI offers within each project type, e.g. software projects, construction projects, etc., and treats for example area specific practices.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmboksoftware&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Caupin, G., et al., &#039;&#039;Software Extension to the PMBOK® Guide Fifth Edition, review&#039;&#039;, Fifth Edition, http://marketplace.pmi.org/Pages/ProductDetail.aspx?GMProduct=00101457501 [visited 25/09 - 2015]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does not treat the subject at all, while the IPMA is the standard that goes the most in depth with the subject. The section on Contextual Competencies describes the link between the project and the organization. In the element description &amp;quot;Permanent Organization&amp;quot;, it is mentioned that &amp;quot;If the project manager is experienced in the respective sector and industry, he will be in a better position to understand these factors. [The planning and management principles of the operations of the permanent organization, red.]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally raises the question: does a project manager need area specific knowledge of the projects that he manages? Does a manager need technical skills within an area to lead a team to meet predefined goals and objectives?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking into the mentioned standards, the answer seems to be no. According to appendix D in PMBOK, there can be some area specific processes that would be ideal to follow,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; but there is not explicit requirements for concrete technical knowledge related to the working area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does only describe to subject by noting that gaps in knowledge about a project can be a risk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IPMA Competence Baseline describes area specific knowledge as being an advantage in managing the permanent organization, but doesn&#039;t describe the subject in relation to projects in the temporary sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thinking of having a manager with very limited area-specific skills, one encounters problems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Being a successful project manager means being successful at delegating work to other people, in order to meet a set of predefined goals and objectives. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally means that the project manager needs to have some kind of respect about his person, so what he lacks in area-specific skills, he must make up for in other areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Estimating the time needed for specific sub-tasks becomes more difficult, but also a task as setting up a project team that covers a wide set of skills becomes more of a challenge. The project team is an important stakeholders. The team needs to be dynamical and have a good relation to each other, but the definition of the required skill set within the project team is of huge importance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what is the alternative then? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An obvious suggestion would be to have people working their way to a position as project managers. This is the concept of having academics that have been working a long time, and then being rewarded with responsibility. That could for example be for good work, loyalty, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One does encounter various problems with this method of employing project managers in a company. First of all, the specialized knowledge and experience gained over a long time is taken away from a project team. Second of all, there are often organizational politics involved in the decision of hiring an employee in a new position within the organization. What should have been a decision based on qualifications can then easily become a political decision. Thirdly there could be a tendency of people working in the same field within the same company for years after years to be more narrow-minded. This will result in project managers to be less likely to think out of the box and to have a very set way of doing things.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Judging from Richardson et al.,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stillaccidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Richardson, T. M. et al., &#039;&#039;Is Project Management Still an Accidental Profession? A Qualitative Study of Career Trajectory&#039;&#039;, http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/5/1/2158244015572098 (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; it seems that academics working their way up the ranks, is actually the career path that many project managers have taken.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As suggested in literature, the profession of being a project manager is often called the accidental profession (see for example Pinto et al.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;accidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Pinto, J. K., Kharbanda, O. P., &#039;&#039;Lessons for an Accidental Profession&#039;&#039;, (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;) This covers the fact that there is a clear tendency of project managers being employed on behalf of their academic qualifications or the expectations for their future success as a project manager, rather than their experience as project managers.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stillaccidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Richardson, T. M. et al., &#039;&#039;Is Project Management Still an Accidental Profession? A Qualitative Study of Career Trajectory&#039;&#039;, http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/5/1/2158244015572098 (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pmimember.PNG|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But as discussed by Ranf,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;thenandnow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ranf, D. E., &#039;&#039;Project management: Then and now&#039;&#039;, Annales Universitatis Apulensis: Series Oeconomica, 13, 596-603 (2011)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; time is changing. Figure (SOMETHING) shows the evolution of numbers of members of PMI worldwide, and as seen on the curve the number of memberships is increasing almost exponentially. Although it refers to the number of members of PMI (and not all other project management organizations), it can be seen as a clear sign of the significance of projects, but in particular the increasing significance as project management as a profession.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally, project managers were valued for their technological knowledge that they could apply within a certain project. Having business knowledge was an advantage, but not a requirement. Now, on the other hand, project managers are valued for the business knowledge, and technological knowledge is an advantage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This has to be seen in relation to the change of the working market. Projects are incorporated in work settings in a completely new way, and as discussed, the demand of project managers is increasing. Now the project manager&#039;s primarily job isn&#039;t necessarily to contribute with technological knowledge. According to Ranf,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;thenandnow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ranf, D. E., &#039;&#039;Project management: Then and now&#039;&#039;, Annales Universitatis Apulensis: Series Oeconomica, 13, 596-603 (2011)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the business aspect has an increasing importance, in order for the project manager to contribute to business decisions etc. Another aspect of the project management is political abilities. As the number of projects increases, the political environment increases, and the project manager has to move within a more complex organizational structure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So it seems that the project manager very easily can be in a situation where there is a knowledge gap. Is it too much to require from a person that he is both a highly competent manager but also a very skilled worker? And can everybody become a project manager?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Say a person has been working his way up in the company, and finally is offered a management position. He will undergo up-qualifications of his management skills, and be certified project manager within one of the numerous project management standards. Not long ago many people didn&#039;t believe in this approach. The born leader is a term that most people have encountered, but it is also a term that was highly used not long ago.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bornleader&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Lecture slides MEP 5.1 from the course 42429 Projektledelse Aug 15&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Today most people acknowledge that being a leader (and in particular manager) requires a set of skills that most people can learn. This being in line with all other types of knowledge that we can acquire, if there is a need and a desire hereof.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A solution used in some bigger companies, is the dual leadership model. Duos of leaders are composed, in hopes of the duo to compliment each other. If the duo is working efficiently, a wider set of leadership skills is covered within a field. That can e.g. be technological knowledge on one hand, and more management oriented abilities on the other.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Among the companies that have tried this method, are Goldman Sachs, Unilever, and Motorola.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;jointleader&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Palmer, M., &#039;&#039;Two chiefs not necessarily better than one&#039;&#039;, Financial Times, http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/3d509590-45d8-11e1-acc9-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3myDawPXD [visited 27/09 - 2015]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This model brings challenges with it. There has to be a clear definition of roles, for the duo to work dynamically. There also has to be a very clear communication strategy, for information to flow efficiently within an organization. The duo needs to have a good chemistry and be able to challenge each other, but it is also suggested that a constellation like this can slow down the response to changes within an organization or project.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;jointleader&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But these examples are less dominant compared to the cost of a setup like this. One successful and money-making project after the other could very easily make the setup worth it, but it puts a very natural limitation of the types of companies and projects that could have use of this model. It simply has to be of a certain size in order to make sense, and have the acquired budget.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
All in all it is difficult to give one single answer to what type of leader a project or company needs. In all situations it is necessary to take a look at the project surroundings. The qualifications need to be prioritized, in order to find the most suitable project manager within the framework of the company. In generally it does not seem like the dual leadership model is a solution to this problem. Both in terms of the limitations in the model itself, but also in the cost of a model like this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A clear tendency is that more and more business knowledge is required, which tends to cut down on the required area-specific technological knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If one were to judge only on behalf of what the different standards mention as necessary qualifications, then area-specific knowledge does not play an important role. But by taking this as a fact, one has to bear in mind that these standards have an agenda. At the end of the day, they make money the more people get certified within their framework. Thereby there is a natural interest in being as broad as possible, in order to approach as many future project managers as possible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lack of this can either be seen as a part of the definition of the project manager&#039;s competencies. But it can also be seen as a limitation to the standards in general. It depends on what view one has on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It does seems inevitable though, to be prepared to spend time on further education of a project manager&#039;s qualifications. That can either be the project management skills or the area-specific skills, depending on what road that has been taken to get into the present position.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No matter what perspective one must have, it seems like it is a field within which there is room for more research to be done. And until then, the conclusion must be: when in doubt, bring in an expert.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S152093</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Project_Management_Competency_Framework&amp;diff=17598</id>
		<title>Project Management Competency Framework</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Project_Management_Competency_Framework&amp;diff=17598"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T21:45:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S152093: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Summary==&lt;br /&gt;
In literature, many things have been written about project management and the best practice hereof. Various standards exist with the aim of describing the field, and a long list of terms and processes are defined and described. All the standards aim to prepare a project manager to give him the highest chances of achieving success with his projects. It seems that even though each standard differ from the others, they tend to have a similar perspective on the best practice of the subject.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this article is going to look at three standards, the PMI, ISO, and IPMA standard. The focus will be on what they suggest as good project management qualifications, but in particular what the standards suggest as necessary as area-specific knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on what the standards suggest as good project management methods, the two typical approaches to become a project manager is discussed. One approach is by having studied project management, and for example becoming certified project manager. The other way is by achieving a broad knowledge within a field, and then work the way into a position as a project manager. During this discussion, it will be look at whether or not there, typically, will be a gap in knowledge of project managers. The dual leadership model is briefly being introduced, in order to see if this model could cover the gap in a project manager&#039;s knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But before we get started, the difference between a manager and a leader is introduced as suggested by Capowski.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Capow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Capowski, G., &#039;&#039;Anatomy of a Leader: Where Are the Leaders of Tomorrow?&#039;&#039;, (1994)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; These are two terms that are being used a lot within this article, although the main focus will be on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Manager:&#039;&#039;&#039; A manager has a degree of power from the position that he is in. He is structured, analytical, and rational, and he creates stability within a project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Leader:&#039;&#039;&#039; A leader, on the other hand, has power because people let him have power. He is courageous, innovative, and visionary, and initiates changes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
For project management, there exist many standards. These standards aim to describe project management across different types of projects and across fields. They for example describe the best practice of the initiation, planning, implementation, controlling and closing of a project, and introduce a long list of tools in order to have the best chances of achieving success within a project. These standards also have a view of the best version of a project manager and the abilities that he should possess.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the following, three standards are being introduced. In particular, their view on the best version of a project manager is at interest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;PMBOK:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the PMI standard (PMBOK),&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Project Management Institute, &#039;&#039;A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge&#039;&#039;, Fifth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA, (2013)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; it is mentioned that in addition to area-specific skills, project managers possess a set of characteristics, being within the area of knowledge, performance and personal.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; These characteristics covers the project manager&#039;s knowledge, hes ability to perform and then personal relations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;ISO standard:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the ISO standard, &amp;quot;Competencies of project personnel&amp;quot; describes the competencies a project manager should have and the competencies that the project team as a unit should have.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;iso&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dansk Standard, &#039;&#039;ISO 21500, Guidance on Project Management&#039;&#039;, First Edition, Dansk Standard, Copenhagen, Denmark, (2012)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Here it is stated that the project team should have a certain skill set, and that any gap between the required and available competencies could be a risk, and should be addressed. On the other hand there are listed three categories of competencies that a project manager should possess, that being technical competencies, behavioral competencies, and contextual competencies.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;iso&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dansk Standard, &#039;&#039;ISO 21500, Guidance on Project Management&#039;&#039;, First Edition, Dansk Standard, Copenhagen, Denmark, (2012)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;technical competencies&#039;&#039; describe processes, terminology and concepts, all within project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;behavioral competencies&#039;&#039; describe personal relationships.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;contextual competencies&#039;&#039; describe the context of the project, i.e., the project within the organization and environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;IPMA:&#039;&#039;&#039; The International Project Management Association (IPMA) divides project management skills in the same three categories as the ISO standard in their &amp;quot;Competence baseline&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ipma&amp;quot;&amp;gt;International Project Management Association, &#039;&#039;ICB - IPMA Competence Baseline&#039;&#039;, Third Edition, International Project Management Association, Nijkerk, The Netherlands, (2006)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; IPMA focuses on competence elements, whereof the majority of them are in the technical category. The two other categories, behavioral and contextual competencies, are also described in this standard though.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are all well-known standards that are used across various fields and industries. They guide project managers to follow the best practice of management in a given project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They all describe processes, techniques, and concepts, although the level of details within each standard varies a lot. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the brief overview of what skills a project manager must possess, it might, at first glance, seem surprising that there is a lack of requirement of the field specific technical knowledge. There is a long list of requirement to the technical knowledge, in the sense of project management techniques, but the demand of area specific technical knowledge is limited.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is noted that the organizations behind the standards all have an interest of being as broad as possible, so that as many project managers and leaders can use and apply their standards.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the PMBOK there is a slight opening of a discussion about area specific skills, but the majority of the concept is treated in an appendix in the 4th edition,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok4&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Project Management Institute, &#039;&#039;A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge&#039;&#039;, Fourth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA, (2008)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and is referred to as &amp;quot;Application Area Extensions&amp;quot;. Noticeably this section has been removed in the 5th edition.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; This though is only an introduction to the extension material that PMI offers within each project type, e.g. software projects, construction projects, etc., and treats for example area specific practices.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmboksoftware&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Caupin, G., et al., &#039;&#039;Software Extension to the PMBOK® Guide Fifth Edition, review&#039;&#039;, Fifth Edition, http://marketplace.pmi.org/Pages/ProductDetail.aspx?GMProduct=00101457501 [visited 25/09 - 2015]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does not treat the subject at all, while the IPMA is the standard that goes the most in depth with the subject. The section on Contextual Competencies describes the link between the project and the organization. In the element description &amp;quot;Permanent Organization&amp;quot;, it is mentioned that &amp;quot;If the project manager is experienced in the respective sector and industry, he will be in a better position to understand these factors. [The planning and management principles of the operations of the permanent organization, red.]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally raises the question: does a project manager need area specific knowledge of the projects that he manages? Does a manager need technical skills within an area to lead a team to meet predefined goals and objectives?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking into the mentioned standards, the answer seems to be no. According to appendix D in PMBOK, there can be some area specific processes that would be ideal to follow,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; but there is not explicit requirements for concrete technical knowledge related to the working area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does only describe to subject by noting that gaps in knowledge about a project can be a risk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IPMA Competence Baseline describes area specific knowledge as being an advantage in managing the permanent organization, but doesn&#039;t describe the subject in relation to projects in the temporary sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thinking of having a manager with very limited area-specific skills, one encounters problems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Being a successful project manager means being successful at delegating work to other people, in order to meet a set of predefined goals and objectives. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally means that the project manager needs to have some kind of respect about his person, so what he lacks in area-specific skills, he must make up for in other areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Estimating the time needed for specific sub-tasks becomes more difficult, but also a task as setting up a project team that covers a wide set of skills becomes more of a challenge. The project team is an important stakeholders. The team needs to be dynamical and have a good relation to each other, but the definition of the required skill set within the project team is of huge importance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what is the alternative then? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An obvious suggestion would be to have people working their way to a position as project managers. This is the concept of having academics that have been working a long time, and then being rewarded with responsibility. That could for example be for good work, loyalty, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One does encounter various problems with this method of employing project managers in a company. First of all, the specialized knowledge and experience gained over a long time is taken away from a project team. Second of all, there are often organizational politics involved in the decision of hiring an employee in a new position within the organization. What should have been a decision based on qualifications can then easily become a political decision. Thirdly there could be a tendency of people working in the same field within the same company for years after years to be more narrow-minded. This will result in project managers to be less likely to think out of the box and to have a very set way of doing things.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Judging from Richardson et al.,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stillaccidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Richardson, T. M. et al., &#039;&#039;Is Project Management Still an Accidental Profession? A Qualitative Study of Career Trajectory&#039;&#039;, http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/5/1/2158244015572098 (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; it seems that academics working their way up the ranks, is actually the career path that many project managers have taken.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As suggested in literature, the profession of being a project manager is often called the accidental profession (see for example Pinto et al.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;accidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Pinto, J. K., Kharbanda, O. P., &#039;&#039;Lessons for an Accidental Profession&#039;&#039;, (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;) This covers the fact that there is a clear tendency of project managers being employed on behalf of their academic qualifications or the expectations for their future success as a project manager, rather than their experience as project managers.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stillaccidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Richardson, T. M. et al., &#039;&#039;Is Project Management Still an Accidental Profession? A Qualitative Study of Career Trajectory&#039;&#039;, http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/5/1/2158244015572098 (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pmimember.PNG|thumb|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But as discussed by Ranf,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;thenandnow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ranf, D. E., &#039;&#039;Project management: Then and now&#039;&#039;, Annales Universitatis Apulensis: Series Oeconomica, 13, 596-603 (2011)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; time is changing. Figure (SOMETHING) shows the evolution of numbers of members of PMI worldwide, and as seen on the curve the number of memberships is increasing almost exponentially. Although it refers to the number of members of PMI (and not all other project management organizations), it can be seen as a clear sign of the significance of projects, but in particular the increasing significance as project management as a profession.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally, project managers were valued for their technological knowledge that they could apply within a certain project. Having business knowledge was an advantage, but not a requirement. Now, on the other hand, project managers are valued for the business knowledge, and technological knowledge is an advantage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This has to be seen in relation to the change of the working market. Projects are incorporated in work settings in a completely new way, and as discussed, the demand of project managers is increasing. Now the project manager&#039;s primarily job isn&#039;t necessarily to contribute with technological knowledge. According to Ranf,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;thenandnow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ranf, D. E., &#039;&#039;Project management: Then and now&#039;&#039;, Annales Universitatis Apulensis: Series Oeconomica, 13, 596-603 (2011)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the business aspect has an increasing importance, in order for the project manager to contribute to business decisions etc. Another aspect of the project management is political abilities. As the number of projects increases, the political environment increases, and the project manager has to move within a more complex organizational structure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So it seems that the project manager very easily can be in a situation where there is a knowledge gap. Is it too much to require from a person that he is both a highly competent manager but also a very skilled worker? And can everybody become a project manager?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Say a person has been working his way up in the company, and finally is offered a management position. He will undergo up-qualifications of his management skills, and be certified project manager within one of the numerous project management standards. Not long ago many people didn&#039;t believe in this approach. The born leader is a term that most people have encountered, but it is also a term that was highly used not long ago.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bornleader&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Lecture slides MEP 5.1 from the course 42429 Projektledelse Aug 15&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Today most people acknowledge that being a leader (and in particular manager) requires a set of skills that most people can learn. This being in line with all other types of knowledge that we can acquire, if there is a need and a desire hereof.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A solution used in some bigger companies, is the dual leadership model. Duos of leaders are composed, in hopes of the duo to compliment each other. If the duo is working efficiently, a wider set of leadership skills is covered within a field. That can e.g. be technological knowledge on one hand, and more management oriented abilities on the other.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Among the companies that have tried this method, are Goldman Sachs, Unilever, and Motorola.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;jointleader&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Palmer, M., &#039;&#039;Two chiefs not necessarily better than one&#039;&#039;, Financial Times, http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/3d509590-45d8-11e1-acc9-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3myDawPXD [visited 27/09 - 2015]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This model brings challenges with it. There has to be a clear definition of roles, for the duo to work dynamically. There also has to be a very clear communication strategy, for information to flow efficiently within an organization. The duo needs to have a good chemistry and be able to challenge each other, but it is also suggested that a constellation like this can slow down the response to changes within an organization or project.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;jointleader&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But these examples are less dominant compared to the cost of a setup like this. One successful and money-making project after the other could very easily make the setup worth it, but it puts a very natural limitation of the types of companies and projects that could have use of this model. It simply has to be of a certain size in order to make sense, and have the acquired budget.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
All in all it is difficult to give one single answer to what type of leader a project or company needs. In all situations it is necessary to take a look at the project surroundings. The qualifications need to be prioritized, in order to find the most suitable project manager within the framework of the company. In generally it does not seem like the dual leadership model is a solution to this problem. Both in terms of the limitations in the model itself, but also in the cost of a model like this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A clear tendency is that more and more business knowledge is required, which tends to cut down on the required area-specific technological knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If one were to judge only on behalf of what the different standards mention as necessary qualifications, then area-specific knowledge does not play an important role. But by taking this as a fact, one has to bear in mind that these standards have an agenda. At the end of the day, they make money the more people get certified within their framework. Thereby there is a natural interest in being as broad as possible, in order to approach as many future project managers as possible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lack of this can either be seen as a part of the definition of the project manager&#039;s competencies. But it can also be seen as a limitation to the standards in general. It depends on what view one has on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It does seems inevitable though, to be prepared to spend time on further education of a project manager&#039;s qualifications. That can either be the project management skills or the area-specific skills, depending on what road that has been taken to get into the present position.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No matter what perspective one must have, it seems like it is a field within which there is room for more research to be done. And until then, the conclusion must be: when in doubt, bring in an expert.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S152093</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Project_Management_Competency_Framework&amp;diff=17512</id>
		<title>Project Management Competency Framework</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Project_Management_Competency_Framework&amp;diff=17512"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T21:17:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S152093: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Summary==&lt;br /&gt;
In literature, many things have been written about project management and the best practice hereof. Various standards exist with the aim of describing the field, and a long list of terms and processes are defined and described. All the standards aim to prepare a project manager to give him the highest chances of achieving success with his projects. It seems that even though each standard differ from the others, they tend to have a similar perspective on the best practice of the subject.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this article is going to look at three standards, the PMI, ISO, and IPMA standard. The focus will be on what they suggest as good project management qualifications, but in particular what the standards suggest as necessary as area-specific knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on what the standards suggest as good project management methods, the two typical approaches to become a project manager is discussed. One approach is by having studied project management, and for example becoming certified project manager. The other way is by achieving a broad knowledge within a field, and then work the way into a position as a project manager. During this discussion, it will be look at whether or not there, typically, will be a gap in knowledge of project managers. The dual leadership model is briefly being introduced, in order to see if this model could cover the gap in a project manager&#039;s knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But before we get started, the difference between a manager and a leader is introduced as suggested by Capowski.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Capow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Capowski, G., &#039;&#039;Anatomy of a Leader: Where Are the Leaders of Tomorrow?&#039;&#039;, (1994)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; These are two terms that are being used a lot within this article, although the main focus will be on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Manager:&#039;&#039;&#039; A manager has a degree of power from the position that he is in. He is structured, analytical, and rational, and he creates stability within a project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Leader:&#039;&#039;&#039; A leader, on the other hand, has power because people let him have power. He is courageous, innovative, and visionary, and initiates changes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
For project management, there exist many standards. These standards aim to describe project management across different types of projects and across fields. They for example describe the best practice of the initiation, planning, implementation, controlling and closing of a project, and introduce a long list of tools in order to have the best chances of achieving success within a project. These standards also have a view of the best version of a project manager and the abilities that he should possess.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the following, three standards are being introduced. In particular, their view on the best version of a project manager is at interest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;PMBOK:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the PMI standard (PMBOK),&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Project Management Institute, &#039;&#039;A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge&#039;&#039;, Fifth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA, (2013)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; it is mentioned that in addition to area-specific skills, project managers possess a set of characteristics, being within the area of knowledge, performance and personal.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; These characteristics covers the project manager&#039;s knowledge, hes ability to perform and then personal relations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;ISO standard:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the ISO standard, &amp;quot;Competencies of project personnel&amp;quot; describes the competencies a project manager should have and the competencies that the project team as a unit should have.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;iso&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dansk Standard, &#039;&#039;ISO 21500, Guidance on Project Management&#039;&#039;, First Edition, Dansk Standard, Copenhagen, Denmark, (2012)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Here it is stated that the project team should have a certain skill set, and that any gap between the required and available competencies could be a risk, and should be addressed. On the other hand there are listed three categories of competencies that a project manager should possess, that being technical competencies, behavioral competencies, and contextual competencies.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;iso&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dansk Standard, &#039;&#039;ISO 21500, Guidance on Project Management&#039;&#039;, First Edition, Dansk Standard, Copenhagen, Denmark, (2012)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;technical competencies&#039;&#039; describe processes, terminology and concepts, all within project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;behavioral competencies&#039;&#039; describe personal relationships.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;contextual competencies&#039;&#039; describe the context of the project, i.e., the project within the organization and environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;IPMA:&#039;&#039;&#039; The International Project Management Association (IPMA) divides project management skills in the same three categories as the ISO standard in their &amp;quot;Competence baseline&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ipma&amp;quot;&amp;gt;International Project Management Association, &#039;&#039;ICB - IPMA Competence Baseline&#039;&#039;, Third Edition, International Project Management Association, Nijkerk, The Netherlands, (2006)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; IPMA focuses on competence elements, whereof the majority of them are in the technical category. The two other categories, behavioral and contextual competencies, are also described in this standard though.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are all well-known standards that are used across various fields and industries. They guide project managers to follow the best practice of management in a given project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They all describe processes, techniques, and concepts, although the level of details within each standard varies a lot. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the brief overview of what skills a project manager must possess, it might, at first glance, seem surprising that there is a lack of requirement of the field specific technical knowledge. There is a long list of requirement to the technical knowledge, in the sense of project management techniques, but the demand of area specific technical knowledge is limited.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is noted that the organizations behind the standards all have an interest of being as broad as possible, so that as many project managers and leaders can use and apply their standards.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the PMBOK there is a slight opening of a discussion about area specific skills, but the majority of the concept is treated in an appendix in the 4th edition,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok4&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Project Management Institute, &#039;&#039;A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge&#039;&#039;, Fourth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA, (2008)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and is referred to as &amp;quot;Application Area Extensions&amp;quot;. Noticeably this section has been removed in the 5th edition.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; This though is only an introduction to the extension material that PMI offers within each project type, e.g. software projects, construction projects, etc., and treats for example area specific practices.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmboksoftware&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Caupin, G., et al, &#039;&#039;Software Extension to the PMBOK® Guide Fifth Edition, review&#039;&#039;, Fifth Edition, http://marketplace.pmi.org/Pages/ProductDetail.aspx?GMProduct=00101457501 [visited 25/09 - 2015]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does not treat the subject at all, while the IPMA is the standard that goes the most in depth with the subject. The section on Contextual Competencies describes the link between the project and the organization. In the element description &amp;quot;Permanent Organization&amp;quot;, it is mentioned that &amp;quot;If the project manager is experienced in the respective sector and industry, he will be in a better position to understand these factors. [The planning and management principles of the operations of the permanent organization, red.]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally raises the question: does a project manager need area specific knowledge of the projects that he manages? Does a manager need technical skills within an area to lead a team to meet predefined goals and objectives?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking into the mentioned standards, the answer seems to be no. According to appendix D in PMBOK, there can be some area specific processes that would be ideal to follow,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; but there is not explicit requirements for concrete technical knowledge related to the working area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does only describe to subject by noting that gaps in knowledge about a project can be a risk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IPMA Competence Baseline describes area specific knowledge as being an advantage in managing the permanent organization, but doesn&#039;t describe the subject in relation to projects in the temporary sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thinking of having a manager with very limited area-specific skills, one encounters problems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Being a successful project manager means being successful at delegating work to other people, in order to meet a set of predefined goals and objectives. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally means that the project manager needs to have some kind of respect about his person, so what he lacks in area-specific skills, he must make up for in other areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Estimating the time needed for specific sub-tasks becomes more difficult, but also a task as setting up a project team that covers a wide set of skills becomes more of a challenge. The project team as a hole is one of the key stakeholders (REFERENCE). The team needs to be dynamical and have a good relation to each other, but the definition of the required skill set within the project team is of huge importance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what is the alternative then? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An obvious suggestion would be to have people working their way to a position as project managers. This is the concept of having academics that have been working a long time, and then being rewarded with responsibility. That could for example be for good work, loyalty, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One does encounter various problems with this method of employing project managers in a company. First of all, the specialized knowledge and experience gained over a long time is taken away from a project team (REFERENCE). Second of all, there are often organizational politics involved in the decision of hiring an employee in a new position within the organization. What should have been a decision based on qualifications can then easily become a political decision. (REFERENCE). Thirdly there could be a tendency of people working in the same field within the same company for years after years to be more narrow-minded. This will result in project managers to be less likely to think out of the box and to have a very set way of doing things.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Judging from Richardson et al,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stillaccidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Richardson, T. M. et al, &#039;&#039;Is Project Management Still an Accidental Profession? A Qualitative Study of Career Trajectory&#039;&#039;, http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/5/1/2158244015572098 (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; it seems that academics working their way up the ranks, is actually the career path that many project managers have taken.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As suggested in literature, the profession of being a project manager is often called the accidental profession (see for example Pinto et al.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;accidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Pinto, J. K., Kharbanda, O. P., &#039;&#039;Lessons for an Accidental Profession&#039;&#039;, (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;) This covers the fact that there is a clear tendency of project managers being employed on behalf of their academic qualifications or the expectations for their future success as a project manager, rather than their experience as project managers.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stillaccidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Richardson, T. M. et al, &#039;&#039;Is Project Management Still an Accidental Profession? A Qualitative Study of Career Trajectory&#039;&#039;, http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/5/1/2158244015572098 (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pmimember.PNG|thumb|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But as discussed by Ranf,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;thenandnow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ranf, D. E., &#039;&#039;Project management: Then and now&#039;&#039;, Annales Universitatis Apulensis: Series Oeconomica, 13, 596-603 (2011)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; time is changing. Figure (SOMETHING) shows the evolution of numbers of members of PMI worldwide, and as seen on the curve the number of memberships is increasing almost exponentially. Although it refers to the number of members of PMI (and not all other project management organizations), it can be seen as a clear sign of the significance of projects, but in particular the increasing significance as project management as a profession.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally, project managers were valued for their technological knowledge that they could apply within a certain project. Having business knowledge was an advantage, but not a requirement. Now, on the other hand, project managers are valued for the business knowledge, and technological knowledge is an advantage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This has to be seen in relation to the change of the working market. Projects are incorporated in work settings in a completely new way, and as discussed, the demand of project managers is increasing. Now the project manager&#039;s primarily job isn&#039;t necessarily to contribute with technological knowledge. According to Ranf,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;thenandnow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ranf, D. E., &#039;&#039;Project management: Then and now&#039;&#039;, Annales Universitatis Apulensis: Series Oeconomica, 13, 596-603 (2011)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the business aspect has an increasing importance, in order for the project manager to contribute to business decisions etc. Another aspect of the project management is political abilities. As the number of projects increases, the political environment increases, and the project manager has to move within a more complex organizational structure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So it seems that the project manager very easily can be in a situation where there is a knowledge gap. Is it too much to require from a person that he is both a highly competent manager but also a very skilled worker? And can everybody become a project manager?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Say a person has been working his way up in the company, and finally is offered a management position. He will undergo up-qualifications of his management skills, and be certified project manager within one of the numerous project management standards. Not long ago many people didn&#039;t believe in this approach. The born leader is a term that most people have encountered, but it is also a term that was highly used not long ago (REFERENCE). Today most people acknowledge that being a leader (and in particular manager) requires a set of skills that most people can learn. This being in line with all other types of knowledge that we can acquire, if there is a need and a desire hereof.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A solution used in some bigger companies, is the dual leadership model. Duos of leaders are composed, in hopes of the duo to compliment each other. If the duo is working efficiently, a wider set of leadership skills is covered within a field. That can e.g. be technological knowledge on one hand, and more management oriented abilities on the other.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Among the companies that have tried this method, are Goldman Sachs, Unilever, and Motorola.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;jointleader&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Palmer, M., &#039;&#039;Two chiefs not necessarily better than one&#039;&#039;, Financial Times, http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/3d509590-45d8-11e1-acc9-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3myDawPXD [visited 27/09 - 2015]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This model brings challenges with it. There has to be a clear definition of roles, for the duo to work dynamically. There also has to be a very clear communication strategy, for information to flow efficiently within an organization. The duo needs to have a good chemistry and be able to challenge each other, but it is also suggested that a constellation like this can slow down the response to changes within an organization or project.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;jointleader&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But these examples are less dominant compared to the cost of a setup like this. One successful and money-making project after the other could very easily make the setup worth it, but it puts a very natural limitation of the types of companies and projects that could have use of this model. It simply has to be of a certain size in order to make sense, and have the acquired budget.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
All in all it is difficult to give one single answer to what type of leader a project or company needs. In all situations it is necessary to take a look at the project surroundings. The qualifications need to be prioritized, in order to find the most suitable project manager within the framework of the company. In generally it does not seem like the dual leadership model is a solution to this problem. Both in terms of the limitations in the model itself, but also in the cost of a model like this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A clear tendency is that more and more business knowledge is required, which tends to cut down on the required area-specific technological knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If one were to judge only on behalf of what the different standards mention as necessary qualifications, then area-specific knowledge does not play an important role. But by taking this as a fact, one has to bear in mind that these standards have an agenda. At the end of the day, they make money the more people get certified within their framework. Thereby there is a natural interest in being as broad as possible, in order to approach as many future project managers as possible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lack of this can either be seen as a part of the definition of the project manager&#039;s competencies. But it can also be seen as a limitation to the standards in general. It depends on what view one has on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It does seems inevitable though, to be prepared to spend time on further education of a project manager&#039;s qualifications. That can either be the project management skills or the area-specific skills, depending on what road that has been taken to get into the present position.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No matter what perspective one must have, it seems like it is a field within which there is room for more research to be done. And until then, the conclusion must be: when in doubt, bring in an expert.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S152093</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Project_Management_Competency_Framework&amp;diff=17497</id>
		<title>Project Management Competency Framework</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Project_Management_Competency_Framework&amp;diff=17497"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T21:12:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S152093: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Summary==&lt;br /&gt;
In literature, many things have been written about project management and the best practice hereof. Various standards exist with the aim of describing the field, and a long list of terms and processes are defined and described. All the standards aim to prepare a project manager to give him the highest chances of achieving success with his projects. It seems that even though each standard differ from the others, they tend to have a similar perspective on the best practice of the subject.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this article is going to look at three standards, the PMI, ISO, and IPMA standard. The focus will be on what they suggest as good project management qualifications, but in particular what the standards suggest as necessary as area-specific knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on what the standards suggest as good project management methods, the two typical approaches to become a project manager is discussed. One approach is by having studied project management, and for example becoming certified project manager. The other way is by achieving a broad knowledge within a field, and then work the way into a position as a project manager. During this discussion, it will be look at whether or not there, typically, will be a gap in knowledge of project managers. The dual leadership model is briefly being introduced, in order to see if this model could cover the gap in a project manager&#039;s knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But before we get started, the difference between a manager and a leader is introduced as suggested by Capowski&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Capow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Capowski, G., &#039;&#039;Anatomy of a Leader: Where Are the Leaders of Tomorrow?&#039;&#039;, (1994)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. These are two terms that are being used a lot within this article, although the main focus will be on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Manager:&#039;&#039;&#039; A manager has a degree of power from the position that he is in. He is structured, analytical, and rational, and he creates stability within a project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Leader:&#039;&#039;&#039; A leader, on the other hand, has power because people let him have power. He is courageous, innovative, and visionary, and initiates changes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
For project management, there exist many standards. These standards aim to describe project management across different types of projects and across fields. They for example describe the best practice of the initiation, planning, implementation, controlling and closing of a project, and introduce a long list of tools in order to have the best chances of achieving success within a project. These standards also have a view of the best version of a project manager and the abilities that he should possess.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the following, three standards are being introduced. In particular, their view on the best version of a project manager is at interest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;PMBOK:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the PMI standard (PMBOK)&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Project Management Institute, &#039;&#039;A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge&#039;&#039;, Fifth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA, (2013)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, it is mentioned that in addition to area-specific skills, project managers possess a set of characteristics, being within the area of knowledge, performance and personal&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. These characteristics covers the project manager&#039;s knowledge, hes ability to perform and then personal relations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;ISO standard:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the ISO standard, &amp;quot;Competencies of project personnel&amp;quot; describes the competencies a project manager should have and the competencies that the project team as a unit should have&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;iso&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dansk Standard, &#039;&#039;ISO 21500, Guidance on Project Management&#039;&#039;, First Edition, Dansk Standard, Copenhagen, Denmark, (2012)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Here it is stated that the project team should have a certain skill set, and that any gap between the required and available competencies could be a risk, and should be addressed. On the other hand there are listed three categories of competencies that a project manager should possess, that being technical competencies, behavioral competencies, and contextual competencies&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;iso&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dansk Standard, &#039;&#039;ISO 21500, Guidance on Project Management&#039;&#039;, First Edition, Dansk Standard, Copenhagen, Denmark, (2012)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;technical competencies&#039;&#039; describe processes, terminology and concepts, all within project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;behavioral competencies&#039;&#039; describe personal relationships.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;contextual competencies&#039;&#039; describe the context of the project, i.e., the project within the organization and environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;IPMA:&#039;&#039;&#039; The International Project Management Association (IPMA) divides project management skills in the same three categories as the ISO standard in their &amp;quot;Competence baseline&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ipma&amp;quot;&amp;gt;International Project Management Association, &#039;&#039;ICB - IPMA Competence Baseline&#039;&#039;, Third Edition, International Project Management Association, Nijkerk, The Netherlands, (2006)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. IPMA focuses on competence elements, whereof the majority of them are in the technical category. The two other categories, behavioral and contextual competencies, are also described in this standard though.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are all well-known standards that are used across various fields and industries. They guide project managers to follow the best practice of management in a given project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They all describe processes, techniques, and concepts, although the level of details within each standard varies a lot. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the brief overview of what skills a project manager must possess, it might, at first glance, seem surprising that there is a lack of requirement of the field specific technical knowledge. There is a long list of requirement to the technical knowledge, in the sense of project management techniques, but the demand of area specific technical knowledge is limited.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is noted that the organizations behind the standards all have an interest of being as broad as possible, so that as many project managers and leaders can use and apply their standards.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the PMBOK there is a slight opening of a discussion about area specific skills, but the majority of the concept is treated in an appendix in the 4th edition&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok4&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Project Management Institute, &#039;&#039;A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge&#039;&#039;, Fourth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA, (2008)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and is referred to as &amp;quot;Application Area Extensions&amp;quot;. Noticeably this section has been removed in the 5th edition&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. This though is only an introduction to the extension material that PMI offers within each project type, e.g. software projects, construction projects, etc., and treats for example area specific practices&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmboksoftware&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Caupin, G., et al, &#039;&#039;Software Extension to the PMBOK® Guide Fifth Edition, review&#039;&#039;, Fifth Edition, http://marketplace.pmi.org/Pages/ProductDetail.aspx?GMProduct=00101457501 [visited 25/09 - 2015]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does not treat the subject at all, while the IPMA is the standard that goes the most in depth with the subject. The section on Contextual Competencies describes the link between the project and the organization. In the element description &amp;quot;Permanent Organization&amp;quot;, it is mentioned that &amp;quot;If the project manager is experienced in the respective sector and industry, he will be in a better position to understand these factors. [The planning and management principles of the operations of the permanent organization, red.]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally raises the question: does a project manager need area specific knowledge of the projects that he manages? Does a manager need technical skills within an area to lead a team to meet predefined goals and objectives?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking into the mentioned standards, the answer seems to be no. According to appendix D in PMBOK, there can be some area specific processes that would be ideal to follow&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, but there is not explicit requirements for concrete technical knowledge related to the working area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does only describe to subject by noting that gaps in knowledge about a project can be a risk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IPMA Competence Baseline describes area specific knowledge as being an advantage in managing the permanent organization, but doesn&#039;t describe the subject in relation to projects in the temporary sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thinking of having a manager with very limited area-specific skills, one encounters problems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Being a successful project manager means being successful at delegating work to other people, in order to meet a set of predefined goals and objectives. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally means that the project manager needs to have some kind of respect about his person, so what he lacks in area-specific skills, he must make up for in other areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Estimating the time needed for specific sub-tasks becomes more difficult, but also a task as setting up a project team that covers a wide set of skills becomes more of a challenge. The project team as a hole is one of the key stakeholders (REFERENCE). The team needs to be dynamical and have a good relation to each other, but the definition of the required skill set within the project team is of huge importance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what is the alternative then? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An obvious suggestion would be to have people working their way to a position as project managers. This is the concept of having academics that have been working a long time, and then being rewarded with responsibility. That could for example be for good work, loyalty, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One does encounter various problems with this method of employing project managers in a company. First of all, the specialized knowledge and experience gained over a long time is taken away from a project team (REFERENCE). Second of all, there are often organizational politics involved in the decision of hiring an employee in a new position within the organization. What should have been a decision based on qualifications can then easily become a political decision. (REFERENCE). Thirdly there could be a tendency of people working in the same field within the same company for years after years to be more narrow-minded. This will result in project managers to be less likely to think out of the box and to have a very set way of doing things.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Judging from Richardson et al&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stillaccidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Richardson, T. M. et al, &#039;&#039;Is Project Management Still an Accidental Profession? A Qualitative Study of Career Trajectory&#039;&#039;, http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/5/1/2158244015572098 (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, it seems that academics working their way up the ranks, is actually the career path that many project managers have taken.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As suggested in literature, the profession of being a project manager is often called the accidental profession (see for example &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;accidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Pinto, J. K., Kharbanda, O. P., &#039;&#039;Lessons for an Accidental Profession&#039;&#039;, (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). This covers the fact that there is a clear tendency of project managers being employed on behalf of their academic qualifications or the expectations for their future success as a project manager, rather than their experience as project managers&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stillaccidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Richardson, T. M. et al, &#039;&#039;Is Project Management Still an Accidental Profession? A Qualitative Study of Career Trajectory&#039;&#039;, http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/5/1/2158244015572098 (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pmimember.PNG|thumb|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But as discussed in&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;thenandnow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ranf, D. E., &#039;&#039;Project management: Then and now&#039;&#039;, Annales Universitatis Apulensis: Series Oeconomica, 13, 596-603 (2011)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, time is changing. Figure (SOMETHING) shows the evolution of numbers of members of PMI worldwide, and as seen on the curve the number of memberships is increasing almost exponentially. Although it refers to the number of members of PMI (and not all other project management organizations), it can be seen as a clear sign of the significance of projects, but in particular the increasing significance as project management as a profession.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally, project managers were valued for their technological knowledge that they could apply within a certain project. Having business knowledge was an advantage, but not a requirement. Now, on the other hand, project managers are valued for the business knowledge, and technological knowledge is an advantage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This has to be seen in relation to the change of the working market. Projects are incorporated in work settings in a completely new way, and as discussed, the demand of project managers is increasing. Now the project manager&#039;s primarily job isn&#039;t necessarily to contribute with technological knowledge. According to Ranf&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;thenandnow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ranf, D. E., &#039;&#039;Project management: Then and now&#039;&#039;, Annales Universitatis Apulensis: Series Oeconomica, 13, 596-603 (2011)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the business aspect has an increasing importance, in order for the project manager to contribute to business decisions etc. Another aspect of the project management is political abilities. As the number of projects increases, the political environment increases, and the project manager has to move within a more complex organizational structure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So it seems that the project manager very easily can be in a situation where there is a knowledge gap. Is it too much to require from a person that he is both a highly competent manager but also a very skilled worker? And can everybody become a project manager?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Say a person has been working his way up in the company, and finally is offered a management position. He will undergo up-qualifications of his management skills, and be certified project manager within one of the numerous project management standards. Not long ago many people didn&#039;t believe in this approach. The born leader is a term that most people have encountered, but it is also a term that was highly used not long ago (REFERENCE). Today most people acknowledge that being a leader (and in particular manager) requires a set of skills that most people can learn. This being in line with all other types of knowledge that we can acquire, if there is a need and a desire hereof.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A solution used in some bigger companies, is the dual leadership model. Duos of leaders are composed, in hopes of the duo to compliment each other. If the duo is working efficiently, a wider set of leadership skills is covered within a field. That can e.g. be technological knowledge on one hand, and more management oriented abilities on the other.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Among the companies that have tried this method, are Goldman Sachs, Unilever, and Motorola.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;jointleader&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Palmer, M., &#039;&#039;Two chiefs not necessarily better than one&#039;&#039;, Financial Times, http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/3d509590-45d8-11e1-acc9-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3myDawPXD [visited 27/09 - 2015]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This model brings challenges with it. There has to be a clear definition of roles, for the duo to work dynamically. There also has to be a very clear communication strategy, for information to flow efficiently within an organization. The duo needs to have a good chemistry and be able to challenge each other, but it is also suggested that a constellation like this can slow down the response to changes within an organization or project.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;jointleader&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But these examples are less dominant compared to the cost of a setup like this. One successful and money-making project after the other could very easily make the setup worth it, but it puts a very natural limitation of the types of companies and projects that could have use of this model. It simply has to be of a certain size in order to make sense, and have the acquired budget.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
All in all it is difficult to give one single answer to what type of leader a project or company needs. In all situations it is necessary to take a look at the project surroundings. The qualifications need to be prioritized, in order to find the most suitable project manager within the framework of the company. In generally it does not seem like the dual leadership model is a solution to this problem. Both in terms of the limitations in the model itself, but also in the cost of a model like this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A clear tendency is that more and more business knowledge is required, which tends to cut down on the required area-specific technological knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If one were to judge only on behalf of what the different standards mention as necessary qualifications, then area-specific knowledge does not play an important role. But by taking this as a fact, one has to bear in mind that these standards have an agenda. At the end of the day, they make money the more people get certified within their framework. Thereby there is a natural interest in being as broad as possible, in order to approach as many future project managers as possible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lack of this can either be seen as a part of the definition of the project manager&#039;s competencies. But it can also be seen as a limitation to the standards in general. It depends on what view one has on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It does seems inevitable though, to be prepared to spend time on further education of a project manager&#039;s qualifications. That can either be the project management skills or the area-specific skills, depending on what road that has been taken to get into the present position.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No matter what perspective one must have, it seems like it is a field within which there is room for more research to be done. And until then, the conclusion must be: when in doubt, bring in an expert.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S152093</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Project_Management_Competency_Framework&amp;diff=17440</id>
		<title>Project Management Competency Framework</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Project_Management_Competency_Framework&amp;diff=17440"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T20:47:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S152093: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Summary==&lt;br /&gt;
In literature, many things have been written about project management and the best practice hereof. Various standards exist with the aim of describing the field, and a long list of terms and processes are defined and described. All the standards aim to prepare a project manager to give him the highest chances of achieving success with his projects. It seems that even though each standard differ from the others, they tend to have a similar perspective on the best practice of the subject.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this article I am going to look at three standards, the PMI, ISO, and IPMA standard. I am going to look into what they suggest as good project management qualifications, but in particular what the standards suggest as necessary as area-specific knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on what the standards suggest as good project management methods, I am going to discuss two typical approaches to become a project manager. One approach is by having studied project management, and for example becoming certified project manager. The other way is by achieving a broad knowledge within a field, and then work the way into a position as a project manager. During this discussion, I will look at whether or not there typically will be a gap in knowledge of project managers. The dual leadership model is briefly being introduced, in order to see if this model could cover the gap in a project manager&#039;s knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But before we get started, let me introduce the difference between a manager and a leader. These are two terms that are being used a lot within this article, although the main focus will be on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Manager:&#039;&#039;&#039; A manager has a degree of power from the position that he is in. He is structured, analytical, and rational, and he creates stability within a project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Leader:&#039;&#039;&#039; A leader, on the other hand, has power because people let him have power. He is courageous, innovative, and visionary, and initiates changes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
For project management, there exist many standards. These standards aim to describe project management across different types of projects and across fields. They for example describe the best practise of the initiation, planning, implementation, controlling and closing of a project, and introduce a long list of tools in order to have the best chances of achieving success within a project. These standards also have a view of the best version of a project manager and the abilities that he should possess.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the following, three standards are being introduced. In particular, their view on the best version of a project manager is at interest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;PMBOK:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the PMI standard (PMBOK)&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Project Management Institute, &#039;&#039;A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge&#039;&#039;, Fifth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA,&lt;br /&gt;
2013)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, it is mentioned that in addition to area-specific skills, project managers possess a set of characteristics, being within the area of knowledge, performance and personal&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. These characteristics covers the project manager&#039;s knowledge, hes ability to perform and then personal relations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;ISO standard:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the ISO standard, &amp;quot;Competencies of project personnel&amp;quot; describes the competencies a project manager should have and the competencies that the project team as a unit should have&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;iso&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dansk Standard, &#039;&#039;ISO 21500, Guidance on Project Management&#039;&#039;, First Edition, Dansk Standard, Copenhagen, Denmark, (2012)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Here it is stated that the project team should have a certain skill set, and that any gap between the required and available competencies could be a risk, and should be addressed. On the other hand there are listed three categories of competencies that a project manager should possess, that being technical competencies, behavioural competencies, and contextual competencies&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;iso&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dansk Standard, &#039;&#039;ISO 21500, Guidance on Project Management&#039;&#039;, First Edition, Dansk Standard, Copenhagen, Denmark, (2012)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;technical competencies&#039;&#039; describes processes, terminology and concepts, all within project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;behavioural competencies&#039;&#039; describes personal relationships.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;contextual competencies&#039;&#039; describes the context of the project, i.e., the project within the organization and environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;IPMA:&#039;&#039;&#039; The International Project Management Association (IPMA) divides project management skills in the same three categories as the ISO standard in their &amp;quot;Competence baseline&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ipma&amp;quot;&amp;gt;International Project Management Association, &#039;&#039;ICB - IPMA Competence Baseline&#039;&#039;, Third Edition, International Project Management Association, Nijkerk, The Netherlands, (2006)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. IPMA focuses on competence elements, whereof the majority of them are in the technical category. The two other categories, behavioral and contextual competencies, are also described in this standard though.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are all well known standards that are used across various fields and industries. They guide project managers to follow the best practice of management in a given project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They all describe processes, techniques, and concepts, although the level of details within each standard varies a lot. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the brief overview of what skills a project manager must possess, it might at first glance seem surprising that there is a lack of requirement of the field specific technical knowledge. There is a long list of requirement to the technical knowledge in the sense of project management techniques, but the demand of area specific technical knowledge is limited.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is noted that the organisations behind the standards all have an interest of being as broad as possible, so that as many project managers and leaders can use and apply their standards.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the PMBOK there is a slight opening of a discussion about area specific skills, but the majority of the concept is treated in an appendix in the 4th edition&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok4&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Project Management Institute, &#039;&#039;A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge&#039;&#039;, Fourth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA, (2008)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and is referred to as &amp;quot;Application Area Extensions&amp;quot;. Noticeably this section has been removed in the 5th edition \cite{pmbok5}. This though is only an introduction to the extension material that PMI offers within each project type, e.g. software projects, construction projects, etc., and treats for example area specific practices&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmboksoftware&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Caupin, G., et al, &#039;&#039;Software Extension to the PMBOK® Guide Fifth Edition, review&#039;&#039;, Fifth Edition, http://marketplace.pmi.org/Pages/ProductDetail.aspx?GMProduct=00101457501 [visited 25/09 - 2015]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does not treat the subject at all, while the IPMA is the standard that goes the most in depth with the subject. The section on Contextual Competencies describe the link between the project and the organisation. In the element description &amp;quot;Permanent Organisation&amp;quot;, it is mentioned that &amp;quot;If the project manager is experienced in the respective sector and industry, he will be in a better position to understand these factors. [The planning and management principles of the operations of the permanent organisation, red.]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally raises the question: does a project manager need area specific knowledge of the projects that he manages? Does a manager need technical skills within an area to lead a team to meet predefined goals and objectives?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking into the mentioned standards, the answer seems to be no. According to PMBOK, there can be some area specific processes that would be ideal to follow \cite[appendix D]{pmbok5}, but there is not explicit requirements for concrete technical knowledge related to the working area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does only describe to subject by noting that gaps in knowledge about a project can be a risk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IPMA Competence Baseline describes area specific knowledge as being an advantage in managing the permanent organisation, but doesn&#039;t describe the subject in relation to projects in the temporary sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thinking of having a manager with very limited area-specific skills, one encounters problems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Being a successful project manager means being successful at delegating work to other people, in order to meet a set of predefined goals and objectives. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally means that the project manager needs to have some kind of respect about his person, so what he lacks in area-specific skills, he must make up for in other areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Estimating the time needed for specific sub-tasks becomes more difficult, but also a task as setting up a project team that covers a wide set of skills becomes more of a challenge. The project team as a hole is one of the key stakeholders (REFERENCE). The team need to be dynamical and have a good relation to each other, but the definition of the required skill set within the project team is of huge importance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what is the alternative then? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An obvious suggestion would be to have people working their way to a position as project managers. This is the concept of having academics that have been working a long time, and then being rewarded with responsibility. That could for example be for good work, loyalty, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One does encounter various problems with this method of employing project managers in a company. First of all, the specialized knowledge and experience gained over a long time is taken away from a project team (REFERENCE). Second of all, there are often organizational politics involved in the decision of hiring an employee in a new position within the organization. What should have been a decision based on qualifications can then easily become a political decision. (REFERENCE). Thirdly there could be a tendency of people working in the same field within the same company for years after years to be more narrow minded. This will result in project managers to be less likely to think out of the box and to have a very set way of doing things.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Judging from Richardson et al&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stillaccidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Richardson, T. M. et al, &#039;&#039;Is Project Management Still an Accidental Profession? A Qualitative Study of Career Trajectory&#039;&#039;, http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/5/1/2158244015572098 (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, it seems that academics working their way up the ranks, is actually the career path that many project managers have taken.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As suggested in literature, the profession of being a project manager is often called the accidental profession (see for example &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;accidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Pinto, J. K., Kharbanda, O. P., &#039;&#039;Lessons for an Accidental Profession&#039;&#039;, (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). This covers the fact that there is a clear tendency of project managers being employed on behalf of their academic qualifications or the expectations for their future success as a project manager, rather than their experience as project managers&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stillaccidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Richardson, T. M. et al, &#039;&#039;Is Project Management Still an Accidental Profession? A Qualitative Study of Career Trajectory&#039;&#039;, http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/5/1/2158244015572098 (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pmimember.PNG|thumb|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But as discussed in&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;thenandnow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ranf, D. E., &#039;&#039;Project management: Then and now&#039;&#039;, Annales Universitatis Apulensis: Series Oeconomica, 13, 596-603 (2011)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, time is changing. Figure (SOMETHING) shows the evolution of numbers of members of PMI worldwide, and as seen on the curve the number of memberships is increasing almost exponentially. Although it refers to the number of members of PMI (and not all other project management organisations), it can be seen as a clear sign of the significance of projects, but in particular the increasing significance as project management as a profession.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally, project managers were valued for their technological knowledge that they could apply within a certain project. Having business knowledge was an advantage, but not a requirement. Now, on the other hand, project managers are valued for the business knowledge, and technological knowledge is an advantage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This has to be seen in relation to the change of the working market. Projects are incorporated in work settings in a completely new way, and as discussed, the demand of project managers is increasing. Now the project manager&#039;s primarily job isn&#039;t necessarily to contribute with technological knowledge. According to Ranf&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;thenandnow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ranf, D. E., &#039;&#039;Project management: Then and now&#039;&#039;, Annales Universitatis Apulensis: Series Oeconomica, 13, 596-603 (2011)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the business aspect has an increasing importance, in order for the project manager to contribute to business decisions etc. Another aspect of the project management, is political abilities. As the number of projects increases, the political environment increases, and the project manager has to move within a more complex organizational structure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So it seems that the project manager very easily can be in a situation were there is a knowledge gap. Is it too much to require from a person that he is both a highly competent manager but also a very skilled worker? And can everybody become a project manager?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Say a person has been working his way up in the company, and finally is offered a management position. He will undergo up-qualifications of his management skills, and be certified project manager within one of the numerous project management standards. Not long ago many people didn&#039;t believe in this approach. The born leader is a term that most people have encountered, but it is also a term that was highly used not long ago (REFERENCE). Today most people acknowledge that being a leader (and in particular manager), requires a set of skills that most people can learn. This being in line with all other types of knowledge that we can acquire, if there is a need and a desire hereof.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A solution used in some bigger companies, is the dual leadership model. Duos of leaders are composed, in hopes of the duo to compliment each other. If the duo is working efficiently, a wider set of leadership skills is covered within a field. That can e.g. be technological knowledge on one hand, and more management oriented abilities on the other.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Among the companies that have tried this method, is Goldman Sachs, Unilever, and Motorola&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;jointleader&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Palmer, M., &#039;&#039;Two chiefs not necessarily better than one&#039;&#039;, Financial Times, http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/3d509590-45d8-11e1-acc9-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3myDawPXD [visited 27/09 - 2015]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This model brings challenges with it. There has to be a clear definition of roles, for the duo to work dynamically. There also has to be a very clear communication strategy, for information to flow efficiently within an organization. The duo needs to have a good chemistry and be able to challenge each other, but it is also suggested that a constellation like this can slow down the response to changes withing an organization or project&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;jointleader&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But these examples are less dominant compared to the cost of a setup like this. One successful and money-making project after the other could very easily make the setup worth it, but it puts a very natural limitation of the types of companies and projects that could have use of this model. It simply has to be of a certain size in order to make sense, and have the acquired budget.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
All in all it is difficult to give one single answer to what type of leader a project or company needs. In all situations it is necessary to take a look at the project surroundings. The qualifications needed needs to be prioritize, in order to find the most suitable project manager within the framework of the company. In generally it does not seem like the dual leadership model is a solution to this problem. Both in terms of the limitations in the model itself, but also in the cost of a model like this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A clear tendency is that more and more business knowledge is required, which tends to cut down on the required area-specific technological knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If one were to judge only on behalf of what the different standards mention as necessary qualifications, then area-specific knowledge does not play an important role. But by taking this as a fact, one has to bear in mind that these standards have an agenda. At the end of the day, they make money the more people get certified within their framework. Thereby there is a natural interest in being as broad as possible, in order to approach as many future project managers as possible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lack of this can either be seen as a part of the definition of the project manager&#039;s competencies. But it can also be seen as a limitation to the standards in general. It depends on what view one has on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It does seems inevitable though, to be prepared to spend time on further education of a project manager&#039;s qualifications. That can either be the project management skills or the area-specific skills, depending on what road that has been taken to get into the present position.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No matter what perspective one must have, it seems like it is a field within which there is room for more research to be done. And until then, the conclusion must be: when in doubt, bring in an expert.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S152093</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:Project_Management_Competency_Framework&amp;diff=17124</id>
		<title>Talk:Project Management Competency Framework</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:Project_Management_Competency_Framework&amp;diff=17124"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T19:10:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S152093: Created page with &amp;quot;Anna: Hi I like the idea, however, I&amp;#039;m afraid that it doesn&amp;#039;t really fit into either one of the two article types. This is not really a method, but you could easily choose a m...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Anna: Hi I like the idea, however, I&#039;m afraid that it doesn&#039;t really fit into either one of the two article types. This is not really a method, but you could easily choose a method within the topic of leadership.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Review of S141926, Reviewer 1 ==&lt;br /&gt;
==== General formal aspects ====&lt;br /&gt;
* Overall the writing is clear and precise with the use of appropriate technical words. However, I found some words mistranslated from Danish and minor grammatical issues.&lt;br /&gt;
* In my opinion, I think it would make the article easier to be read if you added more full stops and you split the, under my point of view, too long paragraphs. I liked the paragraph where you make questions and answer them. However, I think that this part would be clearer in bullet points (under my point of view).&lt;br /&gt;
* As I mention in the following section, the limitations/solutions part could be nicely shown in a format table to make the article more readable as well as adding some graphics to illustrate the methodology. &lt;br /&gt;
* I suggest you to review the Wikipedia formatting, I can see some references and links not well defined or linked.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====  Review of the content ====&lt;br /&gt;
* Regarding the Introduction part I think that gives a too general conclusion and does not focus enough to the main topic of the article, which is Leadership styles. Under my point of view, it is too focused on Standards and Managers competences and I am missing some more specific information about leadership in general. &lt;br /&gt;
* I think it would also improve your article to get more into detail on the different skills required for a project manager under different scenarios. &lt;br /&gt;
* Apart from the fact that as I said I think there is some information missing that would make the article more understandable, I think that you would also had to add some more writing in order to fulfil the requirements regarding length.&lt;br /&gt;
* I would advise to review the requirements of the article type and adding a method regarding leadership and define the uses/limitations of this particular method.&lt;br /&gt;
* I liked the limitations and problems pointed out when saying that a manager does not have to possess technical skills in the project he/she manages and all problems that come up due to this matter. I found the information given interesting but it might be a good idea to type those problems/solutions in a tabular format or in separated paragraphs.&lt;br /&gt;
* I think it would be a good idea to add some more conclusions. However, I found the ones you mentioned relevant and a good summary of the above explained.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Remember also to add the references part, I am afraid it is compulsory :) And maybe a Table of contents at the beginning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Review given by StephSalling, review3 ==&lt;br /&gt;
As far as I can tell, this article is not done yet, so I will possibly point out some things you were already planning to change or add.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Formal aspects ====&lt;br /&gt;
* The different parts in this “method” study are a bit hard to tell apart. The “big idea” is combined with the “application”, but none of them are really adequately described. From my point of view, the “limitations” part in the article is the best part, but it should be substantiated with some literature.&lt;br /&gt;
* The grammar, spelling and punctuation in the “introduction” and “conclusion” are generally good: There are only a few singular/plural mistakes. It seems that the “limitations” part has not been proofread as thoroughly as the other sections.&lt;br /&gt;
* Even though there are not many fill words in the sentences (which is very good), some of the sentences are a bit long and hard to follow. Maybe some bullet points illustrating the content of the different standards would help make it easier to read. - Or simply dividing the text into more paragraphs.&lt;br /&gt;
* Some illustrations of the content of the different standards could be helpful.&lt;br /&gt;
* With the many different standards mentioned and technical terms used it would be easy to add some references within the wiki-system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Content aspects ==== &lt;br /&gt;
* The subject of leadership styles and the different focus areas of a leader is very interesting, but I think the article would be more interesting for a practitioner if it elaborated the content of the standards and made a more clear comparison between them or just focused on one standard.&lt;br /&gt;
* The relation to a specific project, program or portfolio management topic is a bit hard to see, since the article contains more of an overview than it deals with a specific problem/method. &lt;br /&gt;
* The article is very short. The remaining 2000 words could be put into good use focusing on a specific leadership style or comparing the content of the different standards as mentioned earlier. &lt;br /&gt;
* The flow through the article so far is logical.&lt;br /&gt;
* References should be given to the sources used.&lt;br /&gt;
* It is hard to judge the quality of the sources used for the article as they are not directly given. From the different standards mentioned in the text, it seems that the sources are trustworthy and of high quality.&lt;br /&gt;
* The article does not contain an annotated bibliography of any source. &lt;br /&gt;
* The article does not link to other relevant pages in the APPPM wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
* The “introduction” is very objective and does not leave the reader in doubt of that statements are substantiated by literature and not “own opinion”. The “limitations” part however seems more like “own opinion” statements, but this is not given anywhere.&lt;br /&gt;
* The article seems to be free of “copy &amp;amp; paste” plagiarism since the sources of the different statements are mentioned in the text, but as there are no actual references (I can see that an attempt to use citation has been made but not completed) I cannot be sure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Reviewer: Faker, review2==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Clarity of writing. Is the writing free of grammatical and spelling errors? Is the language precise without unnecessary fill words?&lt;br /&gt;
: There are some spelling error and a few inconsistant grammatical errors, but it is not disrupting for understanding the article.&lt;br /&gt;
:The language seems very lenghty and is most possibly emphasized by the lack of chapters, paragraphs, line breaks, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Clarity of the argument. Is there a logical flow to the article? Does one part build upon the other? Is the article consistent in its argument and free of contradictions?&lt;br /&gt;
: With the lack of headlines and description of chapters, the article seems very disorganized. &lt;br /&gt;
: The word &amp;quot;leadership&amp;quot; is first introduced in the last fifth of the article, which seems very strange to me. Being in the title of the article, I would assume it to be mentioned more often.&lt;br /&gt;
: Thinking I was going to read an article about &amp;quot;Leadership styles&amp;quot;, the first half of the article seemed to be very much out of context.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Is the article of high practical and / or academic relevance?&lt;br /&gt;
:It might just be me, but I could not see the relevance of the first half of the article. &lt;br /&gt;
:The second to last chapter (&amp;quot;This naturally raises ...&amp;quot;) seemed like a rather complete text and a good mixture of &amp;quot;Big idea&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Application&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Does the article properly cite and acknowledge previous work? Is it based on empirical data instead of opinion?&lt;br /&gt;
: As the cites have not been fully implemented yet, it is tough to determined exactly how well it is cited, but there seems to be a lot of references. This also makes it hard to determine the degree of emperical data to opinion, but the article definitely comes across as academic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Is the article properly linked within the Wiki to other relevant articles and category summaries?&lt;br /&gt;
: There are seemingly no links to other articles within the Wiki.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S152093</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Project_Management_Competency_Framework&amp;diff=17122</id>
		<title>Project Management Competency Framework</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Project_Management_Competency_Framework&amp;diff=17122"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T19:09:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S152093: Created page with &amp;quot;In literature, many things have been written about project management and the best practice hereof. Various standards exist with the aim of describing the field, and a long li...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;In literature, many things have been written about project management and the best practice hereof. Various standards exist with the aim of describing the field, and a long list of terms and processes are defined and described. All the standards aim to prepare a project manager to give him the highest chances of achieving success with his projects. It seems that even though each standard differ from the others, they tend to have a similar perspective on the best practice of the subject.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this article I am going to look at three standards, the PMI, ISO, and IPMA standard. I am going to look into what they suggest as good project management qualifications, but in particular what the standards suggest as necessary as area-specific knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on what the standards suggest as good project management methods, I am going to discuss two typical approaches to become a project manager. One approach is by having studied project management, and for example becoming certified project manager. The other way is by achieving a broad knowledge within a field, and then work the way into a position as a project manager. During this discussion, I will look at whether or not there typically will be a gap in knowledge of project managers. The dual leadership model is briefly being introduced, in order to see if this model could cover the gap in a project manager&#039;s knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But before we get started, let me introduce the difference between a manager and a leader. These are two terms that are being used a lot within this article, although the main focus will be on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Manager:&#039;&#039;&#039; A manager has a degree of power from the position that he is in. He is structured, analytical, and rational, and he creates stability within a project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Leader:&#039;&#039;&#039; A leader, on the other hand, has power because people let him have power. He is courageous, innovative, and visionary, and initiates changes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
For project management, there exist many standards. These standards aim to describe project management across different types of projects and across fields. They for example describe the best practise of the initiation, planning, implementation, controlling and closing of a project, and introduce a long list of tools in order to have the best chances of achieving success within a project. These standards also have a view of the best version of a project manager and the abilities that he should possess.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the following, three standards are being introduced. In particular, their view on the best version of a project manager is at interest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;PMBOK:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the PMI standard (PMBOK)&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Project Management Institute, &#039;&#039;A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge&#039;&#039;, Fifth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA,&lt;br /&gt;
2013)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, it is mentioned that in addition to area-specific skills, project managers possess a set of characteristics, being within the area of knowledge, performance and personal&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. These characteristics covers the project manager&#039;s knowledge, hes ability to perform and then personal relations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;ISO standard:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the ISO standard, &amp;quot;Competencies of project personnel&amp;quot; describes the competencies a project manager should have and the competencies that the project team as a unit should have&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;iso&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dansk Standard, &#039;&#039;ISO 21500, Guidance on Project Management&#039;&#039;, First Edition, Dansk Standard, Copenhagen, Denmark, (2012)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Here it is stated that the project team should have a certain skill set, and that any gap between the required and available competencies could be a risk, and should be addressed. On the other hand there are listed three categories of competencies that a project manager should possess, that being technical competencies, behavioural competencies, and contextual competencies&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;iso&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dansk Standard, &#039;&#039;ISO 21500, Guidance on Project Management&#039;&#039;, First Edition, Dansk Standard, Copenhagen, Denmark, (2012)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;technical competencies&#039;&#039; describes processes, terminology and concepts, all within project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;behavioural competencies&#039;&#039; describes personal relationships.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;contextual competencies&#039;&#039; describes the context of the project, i.e., the project within the organization and environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;IPMA:&#039;&#039;&#039; The International Project Management Association (IPMA) divides project management skills in the same three categories as the ISO standard in their &amp;quot;Competence baseline&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ipma&amp;quot;&amp;gt;International Project Management Association, &#039;&#039;ICB - IPMA Competence Baseline&#039;&#039;, Third Edition, International Project Management Association, Nijkerk, The Netherlands, (2006)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. IPMA focuses on competence elements, whereof the majority of them are in the technical category. The two other categories, behavioral and contextual competencies, are also described in this standard though.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are all well known standards that are used across various fields and industries. They guide project managers to follow the best practice of management in a given project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They all describe processes, techniques, and concepts, although the level of details within each standard varies a lot. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the brief overview of what skills a project manager must possess, it might at first glance seem surprising that there is a lack of requirement of the field specific technical knowledge. There is a long list of requirement to the technical knowledge in the sense of project management techniques, but the demand of area specific technical knowledge is limited.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is noted that the organisations behind the standards all have an interest of being as broad as possible, so that as many project managers and leaders can use and apply their standards.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the PMBOK there is a slight opening of a discussion about area specific skills, but the majority of the concept is treated in an appendix in the 4th edition&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok4&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Project Management Institute, &#039;&#039;A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge&#039;&#039;, Fourth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA, (2008)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and is referred to as &amp;quot;Application Area Extensions&amp;quot;. Noticeably this section has been removed in the 5th edition \cite{pmbok5}. This though is only an introduction to the extension material that PMI offers within each project type, e.g. software projects, construction projects, etc., and treats for example area specific practices&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmboksoftware&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Caupin, G., et al, &#039;&#039;Software Extension to the PMBOK® Guide Fifth Edition, review&#039;&#039;, Fifth Edition, http://marketplace.pmi.org/Pages/ProductDetail.aspx?GMProduct=00101457501 [visited 25/09 - 2015]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does not treat the subject at all, while the IPMA is the standard that goes the most in depth with the subject. The section on Contextual Competencies describe the link between the project and the organisation. In the element description &amp;quot;Permanent Organisation&amp;quot;, it is mentioned that &amp;quot;If the project manager is experienced in the respective sector and industry, he will be in a better position to understand these factors. [The planning and management principles of the operations of the permanent organisation, red.]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally raises the question: does a project manager need area specific knowledge of the projects that he manages? Does a manager need technical skills within an area to lead a team to meet predefined goals and objectives?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking into the mentioned standards, the answer seems to be no. According to PMBOK, there can be some area specific processes that would be ideal to follow \cite[appendix D]{pmbok5}, but there is not explicit requirements for concrete technical knowledge related to the working area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does only describe to subject by noting that gaps in knowledge about a project can be a risk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IPMA Competence Baseline describes area specific knowledge as being an advantage in managing the permanent organisation, but doesn&#039;t describe the subject in relation to projects in the temporary sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thinking of having a manager with very limited area-specific skills, one encounters problems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Being a successful project manager means being successful at delegating work to other people, in order to meet a set of predefined goals and objectives. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally means that the project manager needs to have some kind of respect about his person, so what he lacks in area-specific skills, he must make up for in other areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Estimating the time needed for specific sub-tasks becomes more difficult, but also a task as setting up a project team that covers a wide set of skills becomes more of a challenge. The project team as a hole is one of the key stakeholders (REFERENCE). The team need to be dynamical and have a good relation to each other, but the definition of the required skill set within the project team is of huge importance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what is the alternative then? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An obvious suggestion would be to have people working their way to a position as project managers. This is the concept of having academics that have been working a long time, and then being rewarded with responsibility. That could for example be for good work, loyalty, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One does encounter various problems with this method of employing project managers in a company. First of all, the specialized knowledge and experience gained over a long time is taken away from a project team (REFERENCE). Second of all, there are often organizational politics involved in the decision of hiring an employee in a new position within the organization. What should have been a decision based on qualifications can then easily become a political decision. (REFERENCE). Thirdly there could be a tendency of people working in the same field within the same company for years after years to be more narrow minded. This will result in project managers to be less likely to think out of the box and to have a very set way of doing things.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Judging from Richardson et al&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stillaccidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Richardson, T. M. et al, &#039;&#039;Is Project Management Still an Accidental Profession? A Qualitative Study of Career Trajectory&#039;&#039;, http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/5/1/2158244015572098 (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, it seems that academics working their way up the ranks, is actually the career path that many project managers have taken.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As suggested in literature, the profession of being a project manager is often called the accidental profession (see for example &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;accidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Pinto, J. K., Kharbanda, O. P., &#039;&#039;Lessons for an Accidental Profession&#039;&#039;, (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). This covers the fact that there is a clear tendency of project managers being employed on behalf of their academic qualifications or the expectations for their future success as a project manager, rather than their experience as project managers&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stillaccidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Richardson, T. M. et al, &#039;&#039;Is Project Management Still an Accidental Profession? A Qualitative Study of Career Trajectory&#039;&#039;, http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/5/1/2158244015572098 (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pmimember.PNG|thumb|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But as discussed in&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;thenandnow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ranf, D. E., &#039;&#039;Project management: Then and now&#039;&#039;, Annales Universitatis Apulensis: Series Oeconomica, 13, 596-603 (2011)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, time is changing. Figure (SOMETHING) shows the evolution of numbers of members of PMI worldwide, and as seen on the curve the number of memberships is increasing almost exponentially. Although it refers to the number of members of PMI (and not all other project management organisations), it can be seen as a clear sign of the significance of projects, but in particular the increasing significance as project management as a profession.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally, project managers were valued for their technological knowledge that they could apply within a certain project. Having business knowledge was an advantage, but not a requirement. Now, on the other hand, project managers are valued for the business knowledge, and technological knowledge is an advantage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This has to be seen in relation to the change of the working market. Projects are incorporated in work settings in a completely new way, and as discussed, the demand of project managers is increasing. Now the project manager&#039;s primarily job isn&#039;t necessarily to contribute with technological knowledge. According to Ranf&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;thenandnow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ranf, D. E., &#039;&#039;Project management: Then and now&#039;&#039;, Annales Universitatis Apulensis: Series Oeconomica, 13, 596-603 (2011)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the business aspect has an increasing importance, in order for the project manager to contribute to business decisions etc. Another aspect of the project management, is political abilities. As the number of projects increases, the political environment increases, and the project manager has to move within a more complex organizational structure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So it seems that the project manager very easily can be in a situation were there is a knowledge gap. Is it too much to require from a person that he is both a highly competent manager but also a very skilled worker? And can everybody become a project manager?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Say a person has been working his way up in the company, and finally is offered a management position. He will undergo up-qualifications of his management skills, and be certified project manager within one of the numerous project management standards. Not long ago many people didn&#039;t believe in this approach. The born leader is a term that most people have encountered, but it is also a term that was highly used not long ago (REFERENCE). Today most people acknowledge that being a leader (and in particular manager), requires a set of skills that most people can learn. This being in line with all other types of knowledge that we can acquire, if there is a need and a desire hereof.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A solution used in some bigger companies, is the dual leadership model. Duos of leaders are composed, in hopes of the duo to compliment each other. If the duo is working efficiently, a wider set of leadership skills is covered within a field. That can e.g. be technological knowledge on one hand, and more management oriented abilities on the other.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Among the companies that have tried this method, is Goldman Sachs, Unilever, and Motorola&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;jointleader&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Palmer, M., &#039;&#039;Two chiefs not necessarily better than one&#039;&#039;, Financial Times, http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/3d509590-45d8-11e1-acc9-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3myDawPXD [visited 27/09 - 2015]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This model brings challenges with it. There has to be a clear definition of roles, for the duo to work dynamically. There also has to be a very clear communication strategy, for information to flow efficiently within an organization. The duo needs to have a good chemistry and be able to challenge each other, but it is also suggested that a constellation like this can slow down the response to changes withing an organization or project&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;jointleader&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But these examples are less dominant compared to the cost of a setup like this. One successful and money-making project after the other could very easily make the setup worth it, but it puts a very natural limitation of the types of companies and projects that could have use of this model. It simply has to be of a certain size in order to make sense, and have the acquired budget.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
All in all it is difficult to give one single answer to what type of leader a project or company needs. In all situations it is necessary to take a look at the project surroundings. The qualifications needed needs to be prioritize, in order to find the most suitable project manager within the framework of the company. In generally it does not seem like the dual leadership model is a solution to this problem. Both in terms of the limitations in the model itself, but also in the cost of a model like this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A clear tendency is that more and more business knowledge is required, which tends to cut down on the required area-specific technological knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If one were to judge only on behalf of what the different standards mention as necessary qualifications, then area-specific knowledge does not play an important role. But by taking this as a fact, one has to bear in mind that these standards have an agenda. At the end of the day, they make money the more people get certified within their framework. Thereby there is a natural interest in being as broad as possible, in order to approach as many future project managers as possible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lack of this can either be seen as a part of the definition of the project manager&#039;s competencies. But it can also be seen as a limitation to the standards in general. It depends on what view one has on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It does seems inevitable though, to be prepared to spend time on further education of a project manager&#039;s qualifications. That can either be the project management skills or the area-specific skills, depending on what road that has been taken to get into the present position.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No matter what perspective one must have, it seems like it is a field within which there is room for more research to be done. And until then, the conclusion must be: when in doubt, bring in an expert.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S152093</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Articles_Fall_Term_2015&amp;diff=17102</id>
		<title>Articles Fall Term 2015</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Articles_Fall_Term_2015&amp;diff=17102"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T19:06:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S152093: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Please complete this table with your name, user name and the title of your article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To create more lines in the table click &#039;&#039;&#039;Edit&#039;&#039;&#039; and use the following code to create more lines in the table and replace the example text with your own information:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre style=&amp;quot;white-space: pre-wrap; &lt;br /&gt;
white-space: -moz-pre-wrap; &lt;br /&gt;
white-space: -pre-wrap; &lt;br /&gt;
white-space: -o-pre-wrap; &lt;br /&gt;
word-wrap: break-word;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Group Number&lt;br /&gt;
|Last Name&lt;br /&gt;
|First Name&lt;br /&gt;
|Username&lt;br /&gt;
|Link to Article&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Create a direct link by making square brackets around the title [[Title]] (Case sensitive)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The straight lines ( | ) create columns and the straight line with a dash ( |- ) creates a new row in the table.&lt;br /&gt;
( |} ) is only used at the very end to finish the coding for the table.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Overview of 2015 Wiki Articles=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+Fall 2015 Wiki Articles&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Group Number&lt;br /&gt;
!Last Name&lt;br /&gt;
!First Name&lt;br /&gt;
!User Name&lt;br /&gt;
!Link to article&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 1&lt;br /&gt;
|Nguyen&lt;br /&gt;
|Michael&lt;br /&gt;
|Michaelnguyendtu&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Leading an offshore team]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 12&lt;br /&gt;
|Gkatzalas&lt;br /&gt;
|Nikolaos&lt;br /&gt;
|s141569&lt;br /&gt;
|[[The Gantt chart and the usage nowadays]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 6&lt;br /&gt;
|Lymperis&lt;br /&gt;
|Konstantinos&lt;br /&gt;
|s142330&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Risk Management in Oil and Gas Industry]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 3&lt;br /&gt;
|Filis&lt;br /&gt;
|Charalampos&lt;br /&gt;
|Ch.filis&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Project Risk Management and Project Risk Management Processes]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 11&lt;br /&gt;
|Larsen&lt;br /&gt;
|Leonora&lt;br /&gt;
|s112910&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Gantt Charts as a Tool for Project Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 10&lt;br /&gt;
|Sala Vilar&lt;br /&gt;
|Lluís Ròmul&lt;br /&gt;
|s141586&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Portfolio Management in a Startup]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 14&lt;br /&gt;
|Pitsavas&lt;br /&gt;
|Konstantinos&lt;br /&gt;
|Konspits&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Modularisation: A modern process for project management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 2&lt;br /&gt;
|Kampianakis&lt;br /&gt;
|Andreas&lt;br /&gt;
|s150912&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Financial Portfolio Optimization Methods]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 13&lt;br /&gt;
|Penzes&lt;br /&gt;
|Balint&lt;br /&gt;
|s141943&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Product development and portfolio management processes at LEGO]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 6&lt;br /&gt;
|Hozmache&lt;br /&gt;
|Mihaela&lt;br /&gt;
|s146898&lt;br /&gt;
|[[PRINCE2 - For successful Project Management]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 14&lt;br /&gt;
|Le Corre&lt;br /&gt;
|Damien&lt;br /&gt;
|Damien&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Game theory in project management]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 14&lt;br /&gt;
|Bertrand&lt;br /&gt;
|Fabien&lt;br /&gt;
|150477&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Multi project management]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 9&lt;br /&gt;
|Cassel&lt;br /&gt;
|Sara&lt;br /&gt;
|Sarac&lt;br /&gt;
|[[The benefits of systems engineering]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 13&lt;br /&gt;
|Sergi&lt;br /&gt;
|Gibaja Musachs&lt;br /&gt;
|S141926&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Manage Extreme Projects with Rapid Methodology]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 14&lt;br /&gt;
|Poza&lt;br /&gt;
|María&lt;br /&gt;
|s150793&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Integrated Cost and Schedule Control]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 6&lt;br /&gt;
|Kulikova&lt;br /&gt;
|Nataliia&lt;br /&gt;
|s140767&lt;br /&gt;
|[[SCRUM Method]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 4&lt;br /&gt;
|Pekala&lt;br /&gt;
|Adam&lt;br /&gt;
|Adam.pekala&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Critical Path Method in Construction Industry]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 10&lt;br /&gt;
|Garnotel&lt;br /&gt;
|Gaëtan&lt;br /&gt;
|gaetangarnotel&lt;br /&gt;
|[[V-Model]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 4&lt;br /&gt;
|Ghanizada&lt;br /&gt;
|Naweed&lt;br /&gt;
|S103745&lt;br /&gt;
|[[PRINCE2, A Project Management Methodology]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 1&lt;br /&gt;
|Jacobsen&lt;br /&gt;
|Martin&lt;br /&gt;
|MistaJacob&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Mindfulness and Cognitive Biases in Project Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 6&lt;br /&gt;
|Ferraresi&lt;br /&gt;
|Fabrizio&lt;br /&gt;
|S150905&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Projects in Controlled Environments, a process-based approach for project management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 5&lt;br /&gt;
|Tanghus&lt;br /&gt;
|Bjarke&lt;br /&gt;
|S113815&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Location Based Scheduling]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 9&lt;br /&gt;
|Højgaard Hindhede&lt;br /&gt;
|Daniel &lt;br /&gt;
|S143352 &lt;br /&gt;
|[[Construction modularization from a lean perspective]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 10&lt;br /&gt;
|Gayot&lt;br /&gt;
|Charles-Henri&lt;br /&gt;
|s141074&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Responsibility Assignment Matrix (RACI Matrix)]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 12&lt;br /&gt;
|Thorp Sørensen&lt;br /&gt;
|Anders&lt;br /&gt;
|s103183&lt;br /&gt;
|[[The Gantt Chart]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 3&lt;br /&gt;
|Makris&lt;br /&gt;
|Dimitrios&lt;br /&gt;
|Dimak&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Benchmarking in Project Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 7&lt;br /&gt;
|Greiling&lt;br /&gt;
|Lea&lt;br /&gt;
|Lea&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Lean in Project Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 8&lt;br /&gt;
|Latorre Duque&lt;br /&gt;
|Ana&lt;br /&gt;
|Ana&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Modularity and Black-Boxing]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 7&lt;br /&gt;
|Almanzi&lt;br /&gt;
|Stefano&lt;br /&gt;
|S141530&lt;br /&gt;
|[[ Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 12&lt;br /&gt;
|Montagner&lt;br /&gt;
|Giacomo&lt;br /&gt;
|S150821&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Scrum Methodology in Agile Software Development]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 14&lt;br /&gt;
|Ruiz Muñoz&lt;br /&gt;
|Gustavo Adolfo&lt;br /&gt;
|S121408&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Lean 6 Sigma in project management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 3&lt;br /&gt;
|Kalmus&lt;br /&gt;
|Thomas&lt;br /&gt;
|S141938&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Program evaluation and review technique (PERT) ]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 12&lt;br /&gt;
|Gudmundsson&lt;br /&gt;
|Arnar Gauti&lt;br /&gt;
|S141543&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Management of risk]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 5&lt;br /&gt;
|Jacobsen&lt;br /&gt;
|Ian Thobias&lt;br /&gt;
|S113735&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Story Points Estimation]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 11&lt;br /&gt;
|Boesgaard&lt;br /&gt;
|Katrine&lt;br /&gt;
|KB1991&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Gantt Chart]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 5&lt;br /&gt;
|Sorth-Olsen&lt;br /&gt;
|Rasmus&lt;br /&gt;
|Sorth90&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Lean as a project management tool]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 13&lt;br /&gt;
|Salling&lt;br /&gt;
|Stephanie&lt;br /&gt;
|StephSalling&lt;br /&gt;
|[[E. Pihl &amp;amp; Søn A/S from a management perspective]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 6&lt;br /&gt;
|Ruina&lt;br /&gt;
|Jessica Linda&lt;br /&gt;
|Jejenji &lt;br /&gt;
|[[Scheduling techniques in Project Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 4&lt;br /&gt;
|Gjerstrup&lt;br /&gt;
|Jacob&lt;br /&gt;
|s113440&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Fault tree analysis]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 11&lt;br /&gt;
|Lynge&lt;br /&gt;
|Jane&lt;br /&gt;
|s997303&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Theory of Constraint]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 8&lt;br /&gt;
|Palmerini&lt;br /&gt;
|Alessandro&lt;br /&gt;
|alex161&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Effective Communication in Project Management]] &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 2&lt;br /&gt;
|Tvedt&lt;br /&gt;
|Ida Marie&lt;br /&gt;
|IMT&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Risk Profile in Turnkey Projects]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 2&lt;br /&gt;
|Søndenaa&lt;br /&gt;
|Mathilde Hanssen&lt;br /&gt;
|s150621&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Critical chain project management (CCPM)]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 9&lt;br /&gt;
|Helassalo&lt;br /&gt;
|Antti&lt;br /&gt;
|s141506&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Development phase of idea to project]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 9&lt;br /&gt;
|Thorning-Schmidt&lt;br /&gt;
|Nanna&lt;br /&gt;
|Nannats&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Earned Value Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 10&lt;br /&gt;
|Bureika&lt;br /&gt;
|Edvinas&lt;br /&gt;
|s141931&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Communication in Project Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 1&lt;br /&gt;
|Rasmussen&lt;br /&gt;
|Marie-Louise&lt;br /&gt;
|DI2009&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Managing a Virtual Cross-Cultural Team in Global Project Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group &lt;br /&gt;
|Lara Hoces&lt;br /&gt;
|Fernando&lt;br /&gt;
|s131882&lt;br /&gt;
|[[The Oticon Case: the Spaghetti organisation]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 13&lt;br /&gt;
|Christos&lt;br /&gt;
|Stamatis&lt;br /&gt;
|S145170&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Olympic Games London 2012: When the client strives for innovation (The London model)]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 5&lt;br /&gt;
|Moe&lt;br /&gt;
|Elizabeth Lindhard&lt;br /&gt;
|113129&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Stakeholder Management as a Contractor]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 3&lt;br /&gt;
|Lessis&lt;br /&gt;
|Vasileios&lt;br /&gt;
|lessisv&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Rational Unified Process (RUP)]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 8&lt;br /&gt;
|Klibo Buur&lt;br /&gt;
|Christian&lt;br /&gt;
|Buurbuur&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Project Execution Model (PEM)]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 8&lt;br /&gt;
|Bachmann&lt;br /&gt;
|Thomas&lt;br /&gt;
|s117318&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Lean Tools in Project Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 11&lt;br /&gt;
|Vilar Bustos&lt;br /&gt;
|Alberto&lt;br /&gt;
|s142581&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Minimizing Risk and Uncertainties in Construction Projects]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 1&lt;br /&gt;
|Trap Wiegandt&lt;br /&gt;
|Sissel&lt;br /&gt;
|s112195&lt;br /&gt;
|[[The Critical Path Method (CPM)]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 2&lt;br /&gt;
|Christensen&lt;br /&gt;
|Britt Marie Lekven&lt;br /&gt;
|brittmch&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Lean in building and construction industry]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 5&lt;br /&gt;
|Vestergaard Andersen&lt;br /&gt;
|Andreas&lt;br /&gt;
|AndreasAndersen&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Management of Project Change ]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 7&lt;br /&gt;
|Ann-Elise&lt;br /&gt;
|Gustavsen&lt;br /&gt;
|Alise&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Stakeholder Analysis and Matrices ]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 2&lt;br /&gt;
|Krogh&lt;br /&gt;
|Daniel&lt;br /&gt;
|DanielKrogh&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Managing Uncertainty and Risk on the Project]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 7&lt;br /&gt;
|Fabio&lt;br /&gt;
|Labrini&lt;br /&gt;
|s142911&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Critical Chain Project Management to cope with uncertainty]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 1&lt;br /&gt;
|Viig&lt;br /&gt;
|Oliver Johannes&lt;br /&gt;
|s102935&lt;br /&gt;
|[[BIM as a project management tool on construction projects]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 8&lt;br /&gt;
|Federico&lt;br /&gt;
|Sbernini&lt;br /&gt;
|s141573&lt;br /&gt;
|[[The Failure Mode and effects analysis (FMEA) in product development projects]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 12&lt;br /&gt;
|Augustin&lt;br /&gt;
|Bouet&lt;br /&gt;
|s142823&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Metra Potential Method]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 7&lt;br /&gt;
|Eva Schultz&lt;br /&gt;
|Hansen&lt;br /&gt;
|s112960&lt;br /&gt;
|[[A method to analyze visualizations in project management as boundary objects]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 13&lt;br /&gt;
|Otiv&lt;br /&gt;
|Peter&lt;br /&gt;
|s145166&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Private Finance Initiative]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 4&lt;br /&gt;
|Juhasz&lt;br /&gt;
|Bianka Zsuzsanna&lt;br /&gt;
|Biankajuh&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Changing conversations based on the Stacey matrix]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 3&lt;br /&gt;
|Rodrigues&lt;br /&gt;
|Rafael&lt;br /&gt;
|s150931&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Six Sigma and PMBOK]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 9&lt;br /&gt;
|Søren  &lt;br /&gt;
|Thomsen&lt;br /&gt;
|s140046&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Organisational resilience with mindfulness]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 8&lt;br /&gt;
|Schrøder  &lt;br /&gt;
|Niklas&lt;br /&gt;
|Faker&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Theory of Constraints]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 11&lt;br /&gt;
|Herreros&lt;br /&gt;
|Maria&lt;br /&gt;
|s142597&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Early warning signals in project management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 3&lt;br /&gt;
|Larsen&lt;br /&gt;
|Martin T&lt;br /&gt;
|s103128&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Risk Identification]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 9&lt;br /&gt;
|Hoier&lt;br /&gt;
|Lasse Rasmus&lt;br /&gt;
|Lassehoier87&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Application of Antifragility in Project Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 4&lt;br /&gt;
|Shapel  &lt;br /&gt;
|Sarah Groot&lt;br /&gt;
|s152093&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Project Management Competency Framework]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 4&lt;br /&gt;
|Hammer  &lt;br /&gt;
|Jonas&lt;br /&gt;
|s113665&lt;br /&gt;
|[[The best milestone plan is simple but with depths!]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 2&lt;br /&gt;
|Flataukan &lt;br /&gt;
|Camilla&lt;br /&gt;
|s150801&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Risk Profile in General Contracting]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 10&lt;br /&gt;
|Marazaki&lt;br /&gt;
|Ilektra&lt;br /&gt;
|s142899&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Portfolio Management and complexity in organizations]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S152093</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Leadership_styles&amp;diff=17098</id>
		<title>Leadership styles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Leadership_styles&amp;diff=17098"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T19:05:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S152093: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;In literature, many things have been written about project management and the best practice hereof. Various standards exist with the aim of describing the field, and a long list of terms and processes are defined and described. All the standards aim to prepare a project manager to give him the highest chances of achieving success with his projects. It seems that even though each standard differ from the others, they tend to have a similar perspective on the best practice of the subject.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this article I am going to look at three standards, the PMI, ISO, and IPMA standard. I am going to look into what they suggest as good project management qualifications, but in particular what the standards suggest as necessary as area-specific knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on what the standards suggest as good project management methods, I am going to discuss two typical approaches to become a project manager. One approach is by having studied project management, and for example becoming certified project manager. The other way is by achieving a broad knowledge within a field, and then work the way into a position as a project manager. During this discussion, I will look at whether or not there typically will be a gap in knowledge of project managers. The dual leadership model is briefly being introduced, in order to see if this model could cover the gap in a project manager&#039;s knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But before we get started, let me introduce the difference between a manager and a leader. These are two terms that are being used a lot within this article, although the main focus will be on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Manager:&#039;&#039;&#039; A manager has a degree of power from the position that he is in. He is structured, analytical, and rational, and he creates stability within a project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Leader:&#039;&#039;&#039; A leader, on the other hand, has power because people let him have power. He is courageous, innovative, and visionary, and initiates changes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
For project management, there exist many standards. These standards aim to describe project management across different types of projects and across fields. They for example describe the best practise of the initiation, planning, implementation, controlling and closing of a project, and introduce a long list of tools in order to have the best chances of achieving success within a project. These standards also have a view of the best version of a project manager and the abilities that he should possess.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the following, three standards are being introduced. In particular, their view on the best version of a project manager is at interest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;PMBOK:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the PMI standard (PMBOK)&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Project Management Institute, &#039;&#039;A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge&#039;&#039;, Fifth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA,&lt;br /&gt;
2013)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, it is mentioned that in addition to area-specific skills, project managers possess a set of characteristics, being within the area of knowledge, performance and personal&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. These characteristics covers the project manager&#039;s knowledge, hes ability to perform and then personal relations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;ISO standard:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the ISO standard, &amp;quot;Competencies of project personnel&amp;quot; describes the competencies a project manager should have and the competencies that the project team as a unit should have&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;iso&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dansk Standard, &#039;&#039;ISO 21500, Guidance on Project Management&#039;&#039;, First Edition, Dansk Standard, Copenhagen, Denmark, (2012)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Here it is stated that the project team should have a certain skill set, and that any gap between the required and available competencies could be a risk, and should be addressed. On the other hand there are listed three categories of competencies that a project manager should possess, that being technical competencies, behavioural competencies, and contextual competencies&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;iso&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dansk Standard, &#039;&#039;ISO 21500, Guidance on Project Management&#039;&#039;, First Edition, Dansk Standard, Copenhagen, Denmark, (2012)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;technical competencies&#039;&#039; describes processes, terminology and concepts, all within project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;behavioural competencies&#039;&#039; describes personal relationships.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;contextual competencies&#039;&#039; describes the context of the project, i.e., the project within the organization and environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;IPMA:&#039;&#039;&#039; The International Project Management Association (IPMA) divides project management skills in the same three categories as the ISO standard in their &amp;quot;Competence baseline&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ipma&amp;quot;&amp;gt;International Project Management Association, &#039;&#039;ICB - IPMA Competence Baseline&#039;&#039;, Third Edition, International Project Management Association, Nijkerk, The Netherlands, (2006)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. IPMA focuses on competence elements, whereof the majority of them are in the technical category. The two other categories, behavioral and contextual competencies, are also described in this standard though.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are all well known standards that are used across various fields and industries. They guide project managers to follow the best practice of management in a given project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They all describe processes, techniques, and concepts, although the level of details within each standard varies a lot. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the brief overview of what skills a project manager must possess, it might at first glance seem surprising that there is a lack of requirement of the field specific technical knowledge. There is a long list of requirement to the technical knowledge in the sense of project management techniques, but the demand of area specific technical knowledge is limited.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is noted that the organisations behind the standards all have an interest of being as broad as possible, so that as many project managers and leaders can use and apply their standards.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the PMBOK there is a slight opening of a discussion about area specific skills, but the majority of the concept is treated in an appendix in the 4th edition&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok4&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Project Management Institute, &#039;&#039;A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge&#039;&#039;, Fourth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA, (2008)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and is referred to as &amp;quot;Application Area Extensions&amp;quot;. Noticeably this section has been removed in the 5th edition \cite{pmbok5}. This though is only an introduction to the extension material that PMI offers within each project type, e.g. software projects, construction projects, etc., and treats for example area specific practices&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmboksoftware&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Caupin, G., et al, &#039;&#039;Software Extension to the PMBOK® Guide Fifth Edition, review&#039;&#039;, Fifth Edition, http://marketplace.pmi.org/Pages/ProductDetail.aspx?GMProduct=00101457501 [visited 25/09 - 2015]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does not treat the subject at all, while the IPMA is the standard that goes the most in depth with the subject. The section on Contextual Competencies describe the link between the project and the organisation. In the element description &amp;quot;Permanent Organisation&amp;quot;, it is mentioned that &amp;quot;If the project manager is experienced in the respective sector and industry, he will be in a better position to understand these factors. [The planning and management principles of the operations of the permanent organisation, red.]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally raises the question: does a project manager need area specific knowledge of the projects that he manages? Does a manager need technical skills within an area to lead a team to meet predefined goals and objectives?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking into the mentioned standards, the answer seems to be no. According to PMBOK, there can be some area specific processes that would be ideal to follow \cite[appendix D]{pmbok5}, but there is not explicit requirements for concrete technical knowledge related to the working area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does only describe to subject by noting that gaps in knowledge about a project can be a risk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IPMA Competence Baseline describes area specific knowledge as being an advantage in managing the permanent organisation, but doesn&#039;t describe the subject in relation to projects in the temporary sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thinking of having a manager with very limited area-specific skills, one encounters problems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Being a successful project manager means being successful at delegating work to other people, in order to meet a set of predefined goals and objectives. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally means that the project manager needs to have some kind of respect about his person, so what he lacks in area-specific skills, he must make up for in other areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Estimating the time needed for specific sub-tasks becomes more difficult, but also a task as setting up a project team that covers a wide set of skills becomes more of a challenge. The project team as a hole is one of the key stakeholders (REFERENCE). The team need to be dynamical and have a good relation to each other, but the definition of the required skill set within the project team is of huge importance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what is the alternative then? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An obvious suggestion would be to have people working their way to a position as project managers. This is the concept of having academics that have been working a long time, and then being rewarded with responsibility. That could for example be for good work, loyalty, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One does encounter various problems with this method of employing project managers in a company. First of all, the specialized knowledge and experience gained over a long time is taken away from a project team (REFERENCE). Second of all, there are often organizational politics involved in the decision of hiring an employee in a new position within the organization. What should have been a decision based on qualifications can then easily become a political decision. (REFERENCE). Thirdly there could be a tendency of people working in the same field within the same company for years after years to be more narrow minded. This will result in project managers to be less likely to think out of the box and to have a very set way of doing things.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Judging from Richardson et al&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stillaccidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Richardson, T. M. et al, &#039;&#039;Is Project Management Still an Accidental Profession? A Qualitative Study of Career Trajectory&#039;&#039;, http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/5/1/2158244015572098 (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, it seems that academics working their way up the ranks, is actually the career path that many project managers have taken.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As suggested in literature, the profession of being a project manager is often called the accidental profession (see for example &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;accidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Pinto, J. K., Kharbanda, O. P., &#039;&#039;Lessons for an Accidental Profession&#039;&#039;, (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). This covers the fact that there is a clear tendency of project managers being employed on behalf of their academic qualifications or the expectations for their future success as a project manager, rather than their experience as project managers&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stillaccidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Richardson, T. M. et al, &#039;&#039;Is Project Management Still an Accidental Profession? A Qualitative Study of Career Trajectory&#039;&#039;, http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/5/1/2158244015572098 (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pmimember.PNG|thumb|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But as discussed in&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;thenandnow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ranf, D. E., &#039;&#039;Project management: Then and now&#039;&#039;, Annales Universitatis Apulensis: Series Oeconomica, 13, 596-603 (2011)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, time is changing. Figure (SOMETHING) shows the evolution of numbers of members of PMI worldwide, and as seen on the curve the number of memberships is increasing almost exponentially. Although it refers to the number of members of PMI (and not all other project management organisations), it can be seen as a clear sign of the significance of projects, but in particular the increasing significance as project management as a profession.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally, project managers were valued for their technological knowledge that they could apply within a certain project. Having business knowledge was an advantage, but not a requirement. Now, on the other hand, project managers are valued for the business knowledge, and technological knowledge is an advantage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This has to be seen in relation to the change of the working market. Projects are incorporated in work settings in a completely new way, and as discussed, the demand of project managers is increasing. Now the project manager&#039;s primarily job isn&#039;t necessarily to contribute with technological knowledge. According to Ranf&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;thenandnow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ranf, D. E., &#039;&#039;Project management: Then and now&#039;&#039;, Annales Universitatis Apulensis: Series Oeconomica, 13, 596-603 (2011)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the business aspect has an increasing importance, in order for the project manager to contribute to business decisions etc. Another aspect of the project management, is political abilities. As the number of projects increases, the political environment increases, and the project manager has to move within a more complex organizational structure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So it seems that the project manager very easily can be in a situation were there is a knowledge gap. Is it too much to require from a person that he is both a highly competent manager but also a very skilled worker? And can everybody become a project manager?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Say a person has been working his way up in the company, and finally is offered a management position. He will undergo up-qualifications of his management skills, and be certified project manager within one of the numerous project management standards. Not long ago many people didn&#039;t believe in this approach. The born leader is a term that most people have encountered, but it is also a term that was highly used not long ago (REFERENCE). Today most people acknowledge that being a leader (and in particular manager), requires a set of skills that most people can learn. This being in line with all other types of knowledge that we can acquire, if there is a need and a desire hereof.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A solution used in some bigger companies, is the dual leadership model. Duos of leaders are composed, in hopes of the duo to compliment each other. If the duo is working efficiently, a wider set of leadership skills is covered within a field. That can e.g. be technological knowledge on one hand, and more management oriented abilities on the other.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Among the companies that have tried this method, is Goldman Sachs, Unilever, and Motorola&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;jointleader&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Palmer, M., &#039;&#039;Two chiefs not necessarily better than one&#039;&#039;, Financial Times, http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/3d509590-45d8-11e1-acc9-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3myDawPXD [visited 27/09 - 2015]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This model brings challenges with it. There has to be a clear definition of roles, for the duo to work dynamically. There also has to be a very clear communication strategy, for information to flow efficiently within an organization. The duo needs to have a good chemistry and be able to challenge each other, but it is also suggested that a constellation like this can slow down the response to changes withing an organization or project&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;jointleader&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But these examples are less dominant compared to the cost of a setup like this. One successful and money-making project after the other could very easily make the setup worth it, but it puts a very natural limitation of the types of companies and projects that could have use of this model. It simply has to be of a certain size in order to make sense, and have the acquired budget.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
All in all it is difficult to give one single answer to what type of leader a project or company needs. In all situations it is necessary to take a look at the project surroundings. The qualifications needed needs to be prioritize, in order to find the most suitable project manager within the framework of the company. In generally it does not seem like the dual leadership model is a solution to this problem. Both in terms of the limitations in the model itself, but also in the cost of a model like this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A clear tendency is that more and more business knowledge is required, which tends to cut down on the required area-specific technological knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If one were to judge only on behalf of what the different standards mention as necessary qualifications, then area-specific knowledge does not play an important role. But by taking this as a fact, one has to bear in mind that these standards have an agenda. At the end of the day, they make money the more people get certified within their framework. Thereby there is a natural interest in being as broad as possible, in order to approach as many future project managers as possible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lack of this can either be seen as a part of the definition of the project manager&#039;s competencies. But it can also be seen as a limitation to the standards in general. It depends on what view one has on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It does seems inevitable though, to be prepared to spend time on further education of a project manager&#039;s qualifications. That can either be the project management skills or the area-specific skills, depending on what road that has been taken to get into the present position.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No matter what perspective one must have, it seems like it is a field within which there is room for more research to be done. And until then, the conclusion must be: when in doubt, bring in an expert.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S152093</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Leadership_styles&amp;diff=17070</id>
		<title>Leadership styles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Leadership_styles&amp;diff=17070"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T19:00:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S152093: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;In literature, many things have been written about project management and the best practice hereof. Various standards exist with the aim of describing the field, and a long list of terms and processes are defined and described. All the standards aim to prepare a project manager to give him the highest chances of achieving success with his projects. It seems that even though each standard differ from the others, they tend to have a similar perspective on the best practice of the subject.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this article I am going to look at three standards, the PMI, ISO, and IPMA standard. I am going to look into what they suggest as good project management qualifications, but in particular what the standards suggest as necessary as area-specific knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on what the standards suggest as good project management methods, I am going to discuss two typical approaches to become a project manager. One approach is by having studied project management, and for example becoming certified project manager. The other way is by achieving a broad knowledge within a field, and then work the way into a position as a project manager. During this discussion, I will look at whether or not there typically will be a gap in knowledge of project managers. The dual leadership model is briefly being introduced, in order to see if this model could cover the gap in a project manager&#039;s knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But before we get started, let me introduce the difference between a manager and a leader. These are two terms that are being used a lot within this article, although the main focus will be on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Manager:&#039;&#039;&#039; A manager has a degree of power from the position that he is in. He is structured, analytical, and rational, and he creates stability within a project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Leader:&#039;&#039;&#039; A leader, on the other hand, has power because people let him have power. He is courageous, innovative, and visionary, and initiates changes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
For project management, there exist many standards. These standards aim to describe project management across different types of projects and across fields. They for example describe the best practise of the initiation, planning, implementation, controlling and closing of a project, and introduce a long list of tools in order to have the best chances of achieving success within a project. These standards also have a view of the best version of a project manager and the abilities that he should possess.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the following, three standards are being introduced. In particular, their view on the best version of a project manager is at interest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;PMBOK:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the PMI standard (PMBOK)&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Project Management Institute, &#039;&#039;A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge&#039;&#039;, Fifth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA,&lt;br /&gt;
2013)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, it is mentioned that in addition to area-specific skills, project managers possess a set of characteristics, being within the area of knowledge, performance and personal&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. These characteristics covers the project manager&#039;s knowledge, hes ability to perform and then personal relations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;ISO standard:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the ISO standard, &amp;quot;Competencies of project personnel&amp;quot; describes the competencies a project manager should have and the competencies that the project team as a unit should have&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;iso&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dansk Standard, &#039;&#039;ISO 21500, Guidance on Project Management&#039;&#039;, First Edition, Dansk Standard, Copenhagen, Denmark, (2012)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Here it is stated that the project team should have a certain skill set, and that any gap between the required and available competencies could be a risk, and should be addressed. On the other hand there are listed three categories of competencies that a project manager should possess, that being technical competencies, behavioural competencies, and contextual competencies&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;iso&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dansk Standard, &#039;&#039;ISO 21500, Guidance on Project Management&#039;&#039;, First Edition, Dansk Standard, Copenhagen, Denmark, (2012)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;technical competencies&#039;&#039; describes processes, terminology and concepts, all within project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;behavioural competencies&#039;&#039; describes personal relationships.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;contextual competencies&#039;&#039; describes the context of the project, i.e., the project within the organization and environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;IPMA:&#039;&#039;&#039; The International Project Management Association (IPMA) divides project management skills in the same three categories as the ISO standard in their &amp;quot;Competence baseline&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ipma&amp;quot;&amp;gt;International Project Management Association, &#039;&#039;ICB - IPMA Competence Baseline&#039;&#039;, Third Edition, International Project Management Association, Nijkerk, The Netherlands, (2006)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. IPMA focuses on competence elements, whereof the majority of them are in the technical category. The two other categories, behavioral and contextual competencies, are also described in this standard though.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are all well known standards that are used across various fields and industries. They guide project managers to follow the best practice of management in a given project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They all describe processes, techniques, and concepts, although the level of details within each standard varies a lot. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the brief overview of what skills a project manager must possess, it might at first glance seem surprising that there is a lack of requirement of the field specific technical knowledge. There is a long list of requirement to the technical knowledge in the sense of project management techniques, but the demand of area specific technical knowledge is limited.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is noted that the organisations behind the standards all have an interest of being as broad as possible, so that as many project managers and leaders can use and apply their standards.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the PMBOK there is a slight opening of a discussion about area specific skills, but the majority of the concept is treated in an appendix in the 4th edition&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok4&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Project Management Institute, &#039;&#039;A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge&#039;&#039;, Fourth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA, (2008)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and is referred to as &amp;quot;Application Area Extensions&amp;quot;. Noticeably this section has been removed in the 5th edition \cite{pmbok5}. This though is only an introduction to the extension material that PMI offers within each project type, e.g. software projects, construction projects, etc., and treats for example area specific practices&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmboksoftware&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Caupin, G., et al, &#039;&#039;Software Extension to the PMBOK® Guide Fifth Edition, review&#039;&#039;, Fifth Edition, http://marketplace.pmi.org/Pages/ProductDetail.aspx?GMProduct=00101457501 [visited 25/09 - 2015]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does not treat the subject at all, while the IPMA is the standard that goes the most in depth with the subject. The section on Contextual Competencies describe the link between the project and the organisation. In the element description &amp;quot;Permanent Organisation&amp;quot;, it is mentioned that &amp;quot;If the project manager is experienced in the respective sector and industry, he will be in a better position to understand these factors. [The planning and management principles of the operations of the permanent organisation, red.]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally raises the question: does a project manager need area specific knowledge of the projects that he manages? Does a manager need technical skills within an area to lead a team to meet predefined goals and objectives?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking into the mentioned standards, the answer seems to be no. According to PMBOK, there can be some area specific processes that would be ideal to follow \cite[appendix D]{pmbok5}, but there is not explicit requirements for concrete technical knowledge related to the working area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does only describe to subject by noting that gaps in knowledge about a project can be a risk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IPMA Competence Baseline describes area specific knowledge as being an advantage in managing the permanent organisation, but doesn&#039;t describe the subject in relation to projects in the temporary sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thinking of having a manager with very limited area-specific skills, one encounters problems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Being a successful project manager means being successful at delegating work to other people, in order to meet a set of predefined goals and objectives. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally means that the project manager needs to have some kind of respect about his person, so what he lacks in area-specific skills, he must make up for in other areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Estimating the time needed for specific sub-tasks becomes more difficult, but also a task as setting up a project team that covers a wide set of skills becomes more of a challenge. The project team as a hole is one of the key stakeholders (REFERENCE). The team need to be dynamical and have a good relation to each other, but the definition of the required skill set within the project team is of huge importance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what is the alternative then? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An obvious suggestion would be to have people working their way to a position as project managers. This is the concept of having academics that have been working a long time, and then being rewarded with responsibility. That could for example be for good work, loyalty, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One does encounter various problems with this method of employing project managers in a company. First of all, the specialized knowledge and experience gained over a long time is taken away from a project team (REFERENCE). Second of all, there are often organizational politics involved in the decision of hiring an employee in a new position within the organization. What should have been a decision based on qualifications can then easily become a political decision. (REFERENCE). Thirdly there could be a tendency of people working in the same field within the same company for years after years to be more narrow minded. This will result in project managers to be less likely to think out of the box and to have a very set way of doing things.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Judging from Richardson et al&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stillaccidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Richardson, T. M. et al, &#039;&#039;Is Project Management Still an Accidental Profession? A Qualitative Study of Career Trajectory&#039;&#039;, http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/5/1/2158244015572098 (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, it seems that academics working their way up the ranks, is actually the career path that many project managers have taken.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As suggested in literature, the profession of being a project manager is often called the accidental profession (see for example &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;accidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Pinto, J. K., Kharbanda, O. P., &#039;&#039;Lessons for an Accidental Profession&#039;&#039;, (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). This covers the fact that there is a clear tendency of project managers being employed on behalf of their academic qualifications or the expectations for their future success as a project manager, rather than their experience as project managers&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stillaccidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Richardson, T. M. et al, &#039;&#039;Is Project Management Still an Accidental Profession? A Qualitative Study of Career Trajectory&#039;&#039;, http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/5/1/2158244015572098 (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pmimember.png|thumb|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But as discussed in&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;thenandnow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ranf, D. E., &#039;&#039;Project management: Then and now&#039;&#039;, Annales Universitatis Apulensis: Series Oeconomica, 13, 596-603 (2011)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, time is changing. Figure (SOMETHING) shows the evolution of numbers of members of PMI worldwide, and as seen on the curve the number of memberships is increasing almost exponentially. Although it refers to the number of members of PMI (and not all other project management organisations), it can be seen as a clear sign of the significance of projects, but in particular the increasing significance as project management as a profession.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally, project managers were valued for their technological knowledge that they could apply within a certain project. Having business knowledge was an advantage, but not a requirement. Now, on the other hand, project managers are valued for the business knowledge, and technological knowledge is an advantage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This has to be seen in relation to the change of the working market. Projects are incorporated in work settings in a completely new way, and as discussed, the demand of project managers is increasing. Now the project manager&#039;s primarily job isn&#039;t necessarily to contribute with technological knowledge. According to Ranf&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;thenandnow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ranf, D. E., &#039;&#039;Project management: Then and now&#039;&#039;, Annales Universitatis Apulensis: Series Oeconomica, 13, 596-603 (2011)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the business aspect has an increasing importance, in order for the project manager to contribute to business decisions etc. Another aspect of the project management, is political abilities. As the number of projects increases, the political environment increases, and the project manager has to move within a more complex organizational structure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So it seems that the project manager very easily can be in a situation were there is a knowledge gap. Is it too much to require from a person that he is both a highly competent manager but also a very skilled worker? And can everybody become a project manager?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Say a person has been working his way up in the company, and finally is offered a management position. He will undergo up-qualifications of his management skills, and be certified project manager within one of the numerous project management standards. Not long ago many people didn&#039;t believe in this approach. The born leader is a term that most people have encountered, but it is also a term that was highly used not long ago (REFERENCE). Today most people acknowledge that being a leader (and in particular manager), requires a set of skills that most people can learn. This being in line with all other types of knowledge that we can acquire, if there is a need and a desire hereof.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A solution used in some bigger companies, is the dual leadership model. Duos of leaders are composed, in hopes of the duo to compliment each other. If the duo is working efficiently, a wider set of leadership skills is covered within a field. That can e.g. be technological knowledge on one hand, and more management oriented abilities on the other.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Among the companies that have tried this method, is Goldman Sachs, Unilever, and Motorola&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;jointleader&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Palmer, M., &#039;&#039;Two chiefs not necessarily better than one&#039;&#039;, Financial Times, http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/3d509590-45d8-11e1-acc9-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3myDawPXD [visited 27/09 - 2015]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This model brings challenges with it. There has to be a clear definition of roles, for the duo to work dynamically. There also has to be a very clear communication strategy, for information to flow efficiently within an organization. The duo needs to have a good chemistry and be able to challenge each other, but it is also suggested that a constellation like this can slow down the response to changes withing an organization or project&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;jointleader&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But these examples are less dominant compared to the cost of a setup like this. One successful and money-making project after the other could very easily make the setup worth it, but it puts a very natural limitation of the types of companies and projects that could have use of this model. It simply has to be of a certain size in order to make sense, and have the acquired budget.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
All in all it is difficult to give one single answer to what type of leader a project or company needs. In all situations it is necessary to take a look at the project surroundings. The qualifications needed needs to be prioritize, in order to find the most suitable project manager within the framework of the company. In generally it does not seem like the dual leadership model is a solution to this problem. Both in terms of the limitations in the model itself, but also in the cost of a model like this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A clear tendency is that more and more business knowledge is required, which tends to cut down on the required area-specific technological knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If one were to judge only on behalf of what the different standards mention as necessary qualifications, then area-specific knowledge does not play an important role. But by taking this as a fact, one has to bear in mind that these standards have an agenda. At the end of the day, they make money the more people get certified within their framework. Thereby there is a natural interest in being as broad as possible, in order to approach as many future project managers as possible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lack of this can either be seen as a part of the definition of the project manager&#039;s competencies. But it can also be seen as a limitation to the standards in general. It depends on what view one has on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It does seems inevitable though, to be prepared to spend time on further education of a project manager&#039;s qualifications. That can either be the project management skills or the area-specific skills, depending on what road that has been taken to get into the present position.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No matter what perspective one must have, it seems like it is a field within which there is room for more research to be done. And until then, the conclusion must be: when in doubt, bring in an expert.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S152093</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=File:Pmimember.PNG&amp;diff=17047</id>
		<title>File:Pmimember.PNG</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=File:Pmimember.PNG&amp;diff=17047"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T18:55:18Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S152093: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S152093</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Leadership_styles&amp;diff=17014</id>
		<title>Leadership styles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Leadership_styles&amp;diff=17014"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T18:48:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S152093: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;In literature, many things have been written about project management and the best practice hereof. Various standards exist with the aim of describing the field, and a long list of terms and processes are defined and described. All the standards aim to prepare a project manager to give him the highest chances of achieving success with his projects. It seems that even though each standard differ from the others, they tend to have a similar perspective on the best practice of the subject.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this article I am going to look at three standards, the PMI, ISO, and IPMA standard. I am going to look into what they suggest as good project management qualifications, but in particular what the standards suggest as necessary as area-specific knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on what the standards suggest as good project management methods, I am going to discuss two typical approaches to become a project manager. One approach is by having studied project management, and for example becoming certified project manager. The other way is by achieving a broad knowledge within a field, and then work the way into a position as a project manager. During this discussion, I will look at whether or not there typically will be a gap in knowledge of project managers. The dual leadership model is briefly being introduced, in order to see if this model could cover the gap in a project manager&#039;s knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But before we get started, let me introduce the difference between a manager and a leader. These are two terms that are being used a lot within this article, although the main focus will be on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Manager:&#039;&#039;&#039; A manager has a degree of power from the position that he is in. He is structured, analytical, and rational, and he creates stability within a project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Leader:&#039;&#039;&#039; A leader, on the other hand, has power because people let him have power. He is courageous, innovative, and visionary, and initiates changes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
For project management, there exist many standards. These standards aim to describe project management across different types of projects and across fields. They for example describe the best practise of the initiation, planning, implementation, controlling and closing of a project, and introduce a long list of tools in order to have the best chances of achieving success within a project. These standards also have a view of the best version of a project manager and the abilities that he should possess.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the following, three standards are being introduced. In particular, their view on the best version of a project manager is at interest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;PMBOK:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the PMI standard (PMBOK)&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Project Management Institute, &#039;&#039;A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge&#039;&#039;, Fifth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA,&lt;br /&gt;
2013)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, it is mentioned that in addition to area-specific skills, project managers possess a set of characteristics, being within the area of knowledge, performance and personal&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. These characteristics covers the project manager&#039;s knowledge, hes ability to perform and then personal relations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;ISO standard:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the ISO standard, &amp;quot;Competencies of project personnel&amp;quot; describes the competencies a project manager should have and the competencies that the project team as a unit should have&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;iso&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dansk Standard, &#039;&#039;ISO 21500, Guidance on Project Management&#039;&#039;, First Edition, Dansk Standard, Copenhagen, Denmark, (2012)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Here it is stated that the project team should have a certain skill set, and that any gap between the required and available competencies could be a risk, and should be addressed. On the other hand there are listed three categories of competencies that a project manager should possess, that being technical competencies, behavioural competencies, and contextual competencies&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;iso&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dansk Standard, &#039;&#039;ISO 21500, Guidance on Project Management&#039;&#039;, First Edition, Dansk Standard, Copenhagen, Denmark, (2012)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;technical competencies&#039;&#039; describes processes, terminology and concepts, all within project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;behavioural competencies&#039;&#039; describes personal relationships.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;contextual competencies&#039;&#039; describes the context of the project, i.e., the project within the organization and environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;IPMA:&#039;&#039;&#039; The International Project Management Association (IPMA) divides project management skills in the same three categories as the ISO standard in their &amp;quot;Competence baseline&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ipma&amp;quot;&amp;gt;International Project Management Association, &#039;&#039;ICB - IPMA Competence Baseline&#039;&#039;, Third Edition, International Project Management Association, Nijkerk, The Netherlands, (2006)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. IPMA focuses on competence elements, whereof the majority of them are in the technical category. The two other categories, behavioral and contextual competencies, are also described in this standard though.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are all well known standards that are used across various fields and industries. They guide project managers to follow the best practice of management in a given project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They all describe processes, techniques, and concepts, although the level of details within each standard varies a lot. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the brief overview of what skills a project manager must possess, it might at first glance seem surprising that there is a lack of requirement of the field specific technical knowledge. There is a long list of requirement to the technical knowledge in the sense of project management techniques, but the demand of area specific technical knowledge is limited.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is noted that the organisations behind the standards all have an interest of being as broad as possible, so that as many project managers and leaders can use and apply their standards.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the PMBOK there is a slight opening of a discussion about area specific skills, but the majority of the concept is treated in an appendix in the 4th edition&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok4&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Project Management Institute, &#039;&#039;A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge&#039;&#039;, Fourth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA, (2008)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and is referred to as &amp;quot;Application Area Extensions&amp;quot;. Noticeably this section has been removed in the 5th edition \cite{pmbok5}. This though is only an introduction to the extension material that PMI offers within each project type, e.g. software projects, construction projects, etc., and treats for example area specific practices&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmboksoftware&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Caupin, G., et al, &#039;&#039;Software Extension to the PMBOK® Guide Fifth Edition, review&#039;&#039;, Fifth Edition, http://marketplace.pmi.org/Pages/ProductDetail.aspx?GMProduct=00101457501 [visited 25/09 - 2015]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does not treat the subject at all, while the IPMA is the standard that goes the most in depth with the subject. The section on Contextual Competencies describe the link between the project and the organisation. In the element description &amp;quot;Permanent Organisation&amp;quot;, it is mentioned that &amp;quot;If the project manager is experienced in the respective sector and industry, he will be in a better position to understand these factors. [The planning and management principles of the operations of the permanent organisation, red.]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally raises the question: does a project manager need area specific knowledge of the projects that he manages? Does a manager need technical skills within an area to lead a team to meet predefined goals and objectives?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking into the mentioned standards, the answer seems to be no. According to PMBOK, there can be some area specific processes that would be ideal to follow \cite[appendix D]{pmbok5}, but there is not explicit requirements for concrete technical knowledge related to the working area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does only describe to subject by noting that gaps in knowledge about a project can be a risk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IPMA Competence Baseline describes area specific knowledge as being an advantage in managing the permanent organisation, but doesn&#039;t describe the subject in relation to projects in the temporary sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thinking of having a manager with very limited area-specific skills, one encounters problems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Being a successful project manager means being successful at delegating work to other people, in order to meet a set of predefined goals and objectives. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally means that the project manager needs to have some kind of respect about his person, so what he lacks in area-specific skills, he must make up for in other areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Estimating the time needed for specific sub-tasks becomes more difficult, but also a task as setting up a project team that covers a wide set of skills becomes more of a challenge. The project team as a hole is one of the key stakeholders (REFERENCE). The team need to be dynamical and have a good relation to each other, but the definition of the required skill set within the project team is of huge importance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what is the alternative then? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An obvious suggestion would be to have people working their way to a position as project managers. This is the concept of having academics that have been working a long time, and then being rewarded with responsibility. That could for example be for good work, loyalty, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One does encounter various problems with this method of employing project managers in a company. First of all, the specialized knowledge and experience gained over a long time is taken away from a project team (REFERENCE). Second of all, there are often organizational politics involved in the decision of hiring an employee in a new position within the organization. What should have been a decision based on qualifications can then easily become a political decision. (REFERENCE). Thirdly there could be a tendency of people working in the same field within the same company for years after years to be more narrow minded. This will result in project managers to be less likely to think out of the box and to have a very set way of doing things.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Judging from Richardson et al&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stillaccidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Richardson, T. M. et al, &#039;&#039;Is Project Management Still an Accidental Profession? A Qualitative Study of Career Trajectory&#039;&#039;, http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/5/1/2158244015572098 (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, it seems that academics working their way up the ranks, is actually the career path that many project managers have taken.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As suggested in literature, the profession of being a project manager is often called the accidental profession (see for example &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;accidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Pinto, J. K., Kharbanda, O. P., &#039;&#039;Lessons for an Accidental Profession&#039;&#039;, (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). This covers the fact that there is a clear tendency of project managers being employed on behalf of their academic qualifications or the expectations for their future success as a project manager, rather than their experience as project managers&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stillaccidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Richardson, T. M. et al, &#039;&#039;Is Project Management Still an Accidental Profession? A Qualitative Study of Career Trajectory&#039;&#039;, http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/5/1/2158244015572098 (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But as discussed in&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;thenandnow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ranf, D. E., &#039;&#039;Project management: Then and now&#039;&#039;, Annales Universitatis Apulensis: Series Oeconomica, 13, 596-603 (2011)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, time is changing. Figure (SOMETHING) shows the evolution of numbers of members of PMI worldwide, and as seen on the curve the number of memberships is increasing almost exponentially. Although it refers to the number of members of PMI (and not all other project management organisations), it can be seen as a clear sign of the significance of projects, but in particular the increasing significance as project management as a profession.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally, project managers were valued for their technological knowledge that they could apply within a certain project. Having business knowledge was an advantage, but not a requirement. Now, on the other hand, project managers are valued for the business knowledge, and technological knowledge is an advantage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This has to be seen in relation to the change of the working market. Projects are incorporated in work settings in a completely new way, and as discussed, the demand of project managers is increasing. Now the project manager&#039;s primarily job isn&#039;t necessarily to contribute with technological knowledge. According to Ranf&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;thenandnow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ranf, D. E., &#039;&#039;Project management: Then and now&#039;&#039;, Annales Universitatis Apulensis: Series Oeconomica, 13, 596-603 (2011)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the business aspect has an increasing importance, in order for the project manager to contribute to business decisions etc. Another aspect of the project management, is political abilities. As the number of projects increases, the political environment increases, and the project manager has to move within a more complex organizational structure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So it seems that the project manager very easily can be in a situation were there is a knowledge gap. Is it too much to require from a person that he is both a highly competent manager but also a very skilled worker? And can everybody become a project manager?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Say a person has been working his way up in the company, and finally is offered a management position. He will undergo up-qualifications of his management skills, and be certified project manager within one of the numerous project management standards. Not long ago many people didn&#039;t believe in this approach. The born leader is a term that most people have encountered, but it is also a term that was highly used not long ago (REFERENCE). Today most people acknowledge that being a leader (and in particular manager), requires a set of skills that most people can learn. This being in line with all other types of knowledge that we can acquire, if there is a need and a desire hereof.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A solution used in some bigger companies, is the dual leadership model. Duos of leaders are composed, in hopes of the duo to compliment each other. If the duo is working efficiently, a wider set of leadership skills is covered within a field. That can e.g. be technological knowledge on one hand, and more management oriented abilities on the other.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Among the companies that have tried this method, is Goldman Sachs, Unilever, and Motorola&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;jointleader&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Palmer, M., &#039;&#039;Two chiefs not necessarily better than one&#039;&#039;, Financial Times, http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/3d509590-45d8-11e1-acc9-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3myDawPXD [visited 27/09 - 2015]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This model brings challenges with it. There has to be a clear definition of roles, for the duo to work dynamically. There also has to be a very clear communication strategy, for information to flow efficiently within an organization. The duo needs to have a good chemistry and be able to challenge each other, but it is also suggested that a constellation like this can slow down the response to changes withing an organization or project&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;jointleader&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But these examples are less dominant compared to the cost of a setup like this. One successful and money-making project after the other could very easily make the setup worth it, but it puts a very natural limitation of the types of companies and projects that could have use of this model. It simply has to be of a certain size in order to make sense, and have the acquired budget.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
All in all it is difficult to give one single answer to what type of leader a project or company needs. In all situations it is necessary to take a look at the project surroundings. The qualifications needed needs to be prioritize, in order to find the most suitable project manager within the framework of the company. In generally it does not seem like the dual leadership model is a solution to this problem. Both in terms of the limitations in the model itself, but also in the cost of a model like this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A clear tendency is that more and more business knowledge is required, which tends to cut down on the required area-specific technological knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If one were to judge only on behalf of what the different standards mention as necessary qualifications, then area-specific knowledge does not play an important role. But by taking this as a fact, one has to bear in mind that these standards have an agenda. At the end of the day, they make money the more people get certified within their framework. Thereby there is a natural interest in being as broad as possible, in order to approach as many future project managers as possible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lack of this can either be seen as a part of the definition of the project manager&#039;s competencies. But it can also be seen as a limitation to the standards in general. It depends on what view one has on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It does seems inevitable though, to be prepared to spend time on further education of a project manager&#039;s qualifications. That can either be the project management skills or the area-specific skills, depending on what road that has been taken to get into the present position.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No matter what perspective one must have, it seems like it is a field within which there is room for more research to be done. And until then, the conclusion must be: when in doubt, bring in an expert.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S152093</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Leadership_styles&amp;diff=17004</id>
		<title>Leadership styles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Leadership_styles&amp;diff=17004"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T18:47:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S152093: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;In literature, many things have been written about project management and the best practice hereof. Various standards exist with the aim of describing the field, and a long list of terms and processes are defined and described. All the standards aim to prepare a project manager to give him the highest chances of achieving success with his projects. It seems that even though each standard differ from the others, they tend to have a similar perspective on the best practice of the subject.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this article I am going to look at three standards, the PMI, ISO, and IPMA standard. I am going to look into what they suggest as good project management qualifications, but in particular what the standards suggest as necessary as area-specific knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on what the standards suggest as good project management methods, I am going to discuss two typical approaches to become a project manager. One approach is by having studied project management, and for example becoming certified project manager. The other way is by achieving a broad knowledge within a field, and then work the way into a position as a project manager. During this discussion, I will look at whether or not there typically will be a gap in knowledge of project managers. The dual leadership model is briefly being introduced, in order to see if this model could cover the gap in a project manager&#039;s knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But before we get started, let me introduce the difference between a manager and a leader. These are two terms that are being used a lot within this article, although the main focus will be on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Manager:&#039;&#039;&#039; A manager has a degree of power from the position that he is in. He is structured, analytical, and rational, and he creates stability within a project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Leader:&#039;&#039;&#039; A leader, on the other hand, has power because people let him have power. He is courageous, innovative, and visionary, and initiates changes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
For project management, there exist many standards. These standards aim to describe project management across different types of projects and across fields. They for example describe the best practise of the initiation, planning, implementation, controlling and closing of a project, and introduce a long list of tools in order to have the best chances of achieving success within a project. These standards also have a view of the best version of a project manager and the abilities that he should possess.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the following, three standards are being introduced. In particular, their view on the best version of a project manager is at interest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;PMBOK:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the PMI standard (PMBOK)&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Project Management Institute, &#039;&#039;A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge&#039;&#039;, Fifth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA,&lt;br /&gt;
2013)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, it is mentioned that in addition to area-specific skills, project managers possess a set of characteristics, being within the area of knowledge, performance and personal&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. These characteristics covers the project manager&#039;s knowledge, hes ability to perform and then personal relations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;ISO standard:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the ISO standard, &amp;quot;Competencies of project personnel&amp;quot; describes the competencies a project manager should have and the competencies that the project team as a unit should have&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;iso&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dansk Standard, &#039;&#039;ISO 21500, Guidance on Project Management&#039;&#039;, First Edition, Dansk Standard, Copenhagen, Denmark, (2012)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Here it is stated that the project team should have a certain skill set, and that any gap between the required and available competencies could be a risk, and should be addressed. On the other hand there are listed three categories of competencies that a project manager should possess, that being technical competencies, behavioural competencies, and contextual competencies&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;iso&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dansk Standard, &#039;&#039;ISO 21500, Guidance on Project Management&#039;&#039;, First Edition, Dansk Standard, Copenhagen, Denmark, (2012)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;technical competencies&#039;&#039; describes processes, terminology and concepts, all within project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;behavioural competencies&#039;&#039; describes personal relationships.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;contextual competencies&#039;&#039; describes the context of the project, i.e., the project within the organization and environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;IPMA:&#039;&#039;&#039; The International Project Management Association (IPMA) divides project management skills in the same three categories as the ISO standard in their &amp;quot;Competence baseline&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ipma&amp;quot;&amp;gt;International Project Management Association, &#039;&#039;ICB - IPMA Competence Baseline&#039;&#039;, Third Edition, International Project Management Association, Nijkerk, The Netherlands, (2006)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. IPMA focuses on competence elements, whereof the majority of them are in the technical category. The two other categories, behavioral and contextual competencies, are also described in this standard though.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are all well known standards that are used across various fields and industries. They guide project managers to follow the best practice of management in a given project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They all describe processes, techniques, and concepts, although the level of details within each standard varies a lot. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the brief overview of what skills a project manager must possess, it might at first glance seem surprising that there is a lack of requirement of the field specific technical knowledge. There is a long list of requirement to the technical knowledge in the sense of project management techniques, but the demand of area specific technical knowledge is limited.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is noted that the organisations behind the standards all have an interest of being as broad as possible, so that as many project managers and leaders can use and apply their standards.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the PMBOK there is a slight opening of a discussion about area specific skills, but the majority of the concept is treated in an appendix in the 4th edition&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok4&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Project Management Institute, &#039;&#039;A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge&#039;&#039;, Fourth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA, (2008)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and is referred to as &amp;quot;Application Area Extensions&amp;quot;. Noticeably this section has been removed in the 5th edition \cite{pmbok5}. This though is only an introduction to the extension material that PMI offers within each project type, e.g. software projects, construction projects, etc., and treats for example area specific practices&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmboksoftware&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Caupin, G., et al, &#039;&#039;Software Extension to the PMBOK® Guide Fifth Edition, review&#039;&#039;, Fifth Edition, http://marketplace.pmi.org/Pages/ProductDetail.aspx?GMProduct=00101457501 [visited 25/09 - 2015]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does not treat the subject at all, while the IPMA is the standard that goes the most in depth with the subject. The section on Contextual Competencies describe the link between the project and the organisation. In the element description &amp;quot;Permanent Organisation&amp;quot;, it is mentioned that &amp;quot;If the project manager is experienced in the respective sector and industry, he will be in a better position to understand these factors. [The planning and management principles of the operations of the permanent organisation, red.]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally raises the question: does a project manager need area specific knowledge of the projects that he manages? Does a manager need technical skills within an area to lead a team to meet predefined goals and objectives?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking into the mentioned standards, the answer seems to be no. According to PMBOK, there can be some area specific processes that would be ideal to follow \cite[appendix D]{pmbok5}, but there is not explicit requirements for concrete technical knowledge related to the working area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does only describe to subject by noting that gaps in knowledge about a project can be a risk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IPMA Competence Baseline describes area specific knowledge as being an advantage in managing the permanent organisation, but doesn&#039;t describe the subject in relation to projects in the temporary sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thinking of having a manager with very limited area-specific skills, one encounters problems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Being a successful project manager means being successful at delegating work to other people, in order to meet a set of predefined goals and objectives. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally means that the project manager needs to have some kind of respect about his person, so what he lacks in area-specific skills, he must make up for in other areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Estimating the time needed for specific sub-tasks becomes more difficult, but also a task as setting up a project team that covers a wide set of skills becomes more of a challenge. The project team as a hole is one of the key stakeholders (REFERENCE). The team need to be dynamical and have a good relation to each other, but the definition of the required skill set within the project team is of huge importance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what is the alternative then? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An obvious suggestion would be to have people working their way to a position as project managers. This is the concept of having academics that have been working a long time, and then being rewarded with responsibility. That could for example be for good work, loyalty, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One does encounter various problems with this method of employing project managers in a company. First of all, the specialized knowledge and experience gained over a long time is taken away from a project team (REFERENCE). Second of all, there are often organizational politics involved in the decision of hiring an employee in a new position within the organization. What should have been a decision based on qualifications can then easily become a political decision. (REFERENCE). Thirdly there could be a tendency of people working in the same field within the same company for years after years to be more narrow minded. This will result in project managers to be less likely to think out of the box and to have a very set way of doing things.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Judging from Richardson et al&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stillaccidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Richardson, T. M. et al, &#039;&#039;Is Project Management Still an Accidental Profession? A Qualitative Study of Career Trajectory&#039;&#039;, http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/5/1/2158244015572098 (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, it seems that academics working their way up the ranks, is actually the career path that many project managers have taken.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As suggested in literature, the profession of being a project manager is often called the accidental profession (see for example &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;accidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Pinto, J. K., Kharbanda, O. P., &#039;&#039;Lessons for an Accidental Profession&#039;&#039;, (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). This covers the fact that there is a clear tendency of project managers being employed on behalf of their academic qualifications or the expectations for their future success as a project manager, rather than their experience as project managers&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stillaccidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Richardson, T. M. et al, &#039;&#039;Is Project Management Still an Accidental Profession? A Qualitative Study of Career Trajectory&#039;&#039;, http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/5/1/2158244015572098 (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But as discussed in&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;thenandnow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ranf, D. E., &#039;&#039;Project management: Then and now&#039;&#039;, Annales Universitatis Apulensis: Series Oeconomica, 13, 596-603 (2011)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, time is changing. Figure (SOMETHING) shows the evolution of numbers of members of PMI worldwide, and as seen on the curve the number of memberships is increasing almost exponentially. Although it refers to the number of members of PMI (and not all other project management organisations), it can be seen as a clear sign of the significance of projects, but in particular the increasing significance as project management as a profession.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally, project managers were valued for their technological knowledge that they could apply within a certain project. Having business knowledge was an advantage, but not a requirement. Now, on the other hand, project managers are valued for the business knowledge, and technological knowledge is an advantage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This has to be seen in relation to the change of the working market. Projects are incorporated in work settings in a completely new way, and as discussed, the demand of project managers is increasing. Now the project manager&#039;s primarily job isn&#039;t necessarily to contribute with technological knowledge. According to Ranf&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;thenandnow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ranf, D. E., &#039;&#039;Project management: Then and now&#039;&#039;, Annales Universitatis Apulensis: Series Oeconomica, 13, 596-603 (2011)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the business aspect has an increasing importance, in order for the project manager to contribute to business decisions etc. Another aspect of the project management, is political abilities. As the number of projects increases, the political environment increases, and the project manager has to move within a more complex organizational structure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So it seems that the project manager very easily can be in a situation were there is a knowledge gap. Is it too much to require from a person that he is both a highly competent manager but also a very skilled worker? And can everybody become a project manager?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Say a person has been working his way up in the company, and finally is offered a management position. He will undergo up-qualifications of his management skills, and be certified project manager within one of the numerous project management standards. Not long ago many people didn&#039;t believe in this approach. The born leader is a term that most people have encountered, but it is also a term that was highly used not long ago (REFERENCE). Today most people acknowledge that being a leader (and in particular manager), requires a set of skills that most people can learn. This being in line with all other types of knowledge that we can acquire, if there is a need and a desire hereof.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A solution used in some bigger companies, is the dual leadership model. Duos of leaders are composed, in hopes of the duo to compliment each other. If the duo is working efficiently, a wider set of leadership skills is covered within a field. That can e.g. be technological knowledge on one hand, and more management oriented abilities on the other.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Among the companies that have tried this method, is Goldman Sachs, Unilever, and Motorola&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;jointleader&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Palmer, M., &#039;&#039;Two chiefs not necessarily better than one&#039;&#039;, Financial Times, http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/3d509590-45d8-11e1-acc9-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3myDawPXD [visited 27/09 - 2015]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This model brings challenges with it. There has to be a clear definition of roles, for the duo to work dynamically. There also has to be a very clear communication strategy, for information to flow efficiently within an organization. The duo needs to have a good chemistry and be able to challenge each other, but it is also suggested that a constellation like this can slow down the response to changes withing an organization or project&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;jointleader&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But these examples are less dominant compared to the cost of a setup like this. One successful and money-making project after the other could very easily make the setup worth it, but it puts a very natural limitation of the types of companies and projects that could have use of this model. It simply has to be of a certain size in order to make sense, and have the acquired budget.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
All in all it is difficult to give one single answer to what type of leader a project or company needs. In all situations it is necessary to take a look at the project surroundings. The qualifications needed needs to be prioritize, in order to find the most suitable project manager within the framework of the company. In generally it does not seem like the dual leadership model is a solution to this problem. Both in terms of the limitations in the model itself, but also in the cost of a model like this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A clear tendency is that more and more business knowledge is required, which tends to cut down on the required area-specific technological knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If one were to judge only on behalf of what the different standards mention as necessary qualifications, then area-specific knowledge does not play an important role. But by taking this as a fact, one has to bear in mind that these standards have an agenda. At the end of the day, they make money the more people get certified within their framework. Thereby there is a natural interest in being as broad as possible, in order to approach as many future project managers as possible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lack of this can either be seen as a part of the definition of the project manager&#039;s competencies. But it can also be seen as a limitation to the standards in general. It depends on what view one has on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It does seems inevitable though, to be prepared to spend time on further education of a project manager&#039;s qualifications. That can either be the project management skills or the area-specific skills, depending on what road that has been taken to get into the present position.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No matter what perspective one must have, it seems like it is a field within which there is room for more research to be done. And until then, the conclusion must be: when in doubt, bring in an expert.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok4&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Project Management Institute, &#039;&#039;A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge&#039;&#039;, Fourth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA, (2008)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;iso&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dansk Standard, &#039;&#039;ISO 21500, Guidance on Project Management&#039;&#039;, First Edition, Dansk Standard, Copenhagen, Denmark, (2012)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ipma&amp;quot;&amp;gt;International Project Management Association, &#039;&#039;ICB - IPMA Competence Baseline&#039;&#039;, Third Edition, International Project Management Association, Nijkerk, The Netherlands, (2006)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmboksoftware&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Caupin, G., et al, &#039;&#039;Software Extension to the PMBOK® Guide Fifth Edition, review&#039;&#039;, Fifth Edition, http://marketplace.pmi.org/Pages/ProductDetail.aspx?GMProduct=00101457501 [visited 25/09 - 2015]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;accidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Pinto, J. K., Kharbanda, O. P., &#039;&#039;Lessons for an Accidental Profession&#039;&#039;, (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stillaccidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Richardson, T. M. et al, &#039;&#039;Is Project Management Still an Accidental Profession? A Qualitative Study of Career Trajectory&#039;&#039;, http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/5/1/2158244015572098 (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;thenandnow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ranf, D. E., &#039;&#039;Project management: Then and now&#039;&#039;, Annales Universitatis Apulensis: Series Oeconomica, 13, 596-603 (2011)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;jointleader&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Palmer, M., &#039;&#039;Two chiefs not necessarily better than one&#039;&#039;, Financial Times, http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/3d509590-45d8-11e1-acc9-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3myDawPXD [visited 27/09 - 2015]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S152093</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Leadership_styles&amp;diff=16999</id>
		<title>Leadership styles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Leadership_styles&amp;diff=16999"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T18:46:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S152093: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;In literature, many things have been written about project management and the best practice hereof. Various standards exist with the aim of describing the field, and a long list of terms and processes are defined and described. All the standards aim to prepare a project manager to give him the highest chances of achieving success with his projects. It seems that even though each standard differ from the others, they tend to have a similar perspective on the best practice of the subject.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this article I am going to look at three standards, the PMI, ISO, and IPMA standard. I am going to look into what they suggest as good project management qualifications, but in particular what the standards suggest as necessary as area-specific knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on what the standards suggest as good project management methods, I am going to discuss two typical approaches to become a project manager. One approach is by having studied project management, and for example becoming certified project manager. The other way is by achieving a broad knowledge within a field, and then work the way into a position as a project manager. During this discussion, I will look at whether or not there typically will be a gap in knowledge of project managers. The dual leadership model is briefly being introduced, in order to see if this model could cover the gap in a project manager&#039;s knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But before we get started, let me introduce the difference between a manager and a leader. These are two terms that are being used a lot within this article, although the main focus will be on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Manager:&#039;&#039;&#039; A manager has a degree of power from the position that he is in. He is structured, analytical, and rational, and he creates stability within a project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Leader:&#039;&#039;&#039; A leader, on the other hand, has power because people let him have power. He is courageous, innovative, and visionary, and initiates changes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
For project management, there exist many standards. These standards aim to describe project management across different types of projects and across fields. They for example describe the best practise of the initiation, planning, implementation, controlling and closing of a project, and introduce a long list of tools in order to have the best chances of achieving success within a project. These standards also have a view of the best version of a project manager and the abilities that he should possess.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the following, three standards are being introduced. In particular, their view on the best version of a project manager is at interest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;PMBOK:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the PMI standard (PMBOK)&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Project Management Institute, &#039;&#039;A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge&#039;&#039;, Fifth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA,&lt;br /&gt;
2013)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, it is mentioned that in addition to area-specific skills, project managers possess a set of characteristics, being within the area of knowledge, performance and personal&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. These characteristics covers the project manager&#039;s knowledge, hes ability to perform and then personal relations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;ISO standard:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the ISO standard, &amp;quot;Competencies of project personnel&amp;quot; describes the competencies a project manager should have and the competencies that the project team as a unit should have&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;iso&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dansk Standard, &#039;&#039;ISO 21500, Guidance on Project Management&#039;&#039;, First Edition, Dansk Standard, Copenhagen, Denmark, (2012)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Here it is stated that the project team should have a certain skill set, and that any gap between the required and available competencies could be a risk, and should be addressed. On the other hand there are listed three categories of competencies that a project manager should possess, that being technical competencies, behavioural competencies, and contextual competencies&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;iso&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dansk Standard, &#039;&#039;ISO 21500, Guidance on Project Management&#039;&#039;, First Edition, Dansk Standard, Copenhagen, Denmark, (2012)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;technical competencies&#039;&#039; describes processes, terminology and concepts, all within project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;behavioural competencies&#039;&#039; describes personal relationships.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;contextual competencies&#039;&#039; describes the context of the project, i.e., the project within the organization and environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;IPMA:&#039;&#039;&#039; The International Project Management Association (IPMA) divides project management skills in the same three categories as the ISO standard in their &amp;quot;Competence baseline&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ipma&amp;quot;&amp;gt;International Project Management Association, &#039;&#039;ICB - IPMA Competence Baseline&#039;&#039;, Third Edition, International Project Management Association, Nijkerk, The Netherlands, (2006)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. IPMA focuses on competence elements, whereof the majority of them are in the technical category. The two other categories, behavioral and contextual competencies, are also described in this standard though.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are all well known standards that are used across various fields and industries. They guide project managers to follow the best practice of management in a given project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They all describe processes, techniques, and concepts, although the level of details within each standard varies a lot. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the brief overview of what skills a project manager must possess, it might at first glance seem surprising that there is a lack of requirement of the field specific technical knowledge. There is a long list of requirement to the technical knowledge in the sense of project management techniques, but the demand of area specific technical knowledge is limited.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is noted that the organisations behind the standards all have an interest of being as broad as possible, so that as many project managers and leaders can use and apply their standards.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the PMBOK there is a slight opening of a discussion about area specific skills, but the majority of the concept is treated in an appendix in the 4th edition&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok4&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Project Management Institute, &#039;&#039;A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge&#039;&#039;, Fourth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA, (2008)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and is referred to as &amp;quot;Application Area Extensions&amp;quot;. Noticeably this section has been removed in the 5th edition \cite{pmbok5}. This though is only an introduction to the extension material that PMI offers within each project type, e.g. software projects, construction projects, etc., and treats for example area specific practices&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmboksoftware&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Caupin, G., et al, &#039;&#039;Software Extension to the PMBOK® Guide Fifth Edition, review&#039;&#039;, Fifth Edition, http://marketplace.pmi.org/Pages/ProductDetail.aspx?GMProduct=00101457501 [visited 25/09 - 2015]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does not treat the subject at all, while the IPMA is the standard that goes the most in depth with the subject. The section on Contextual Competencies describe the link between the project and the organisation. In the element description &amp;quot;Permanent Organisation&amp;quot;, it is mentioned that &amp;quot;If the project manager is experienced in the respective sector and industry, he will be in a better position to understand these factors. [The planning and management principles of the operations of the permanent organisation, red.]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally raises the question: does a project manager need area specific knowledge of the projects that he manages? Does a manager need technical skills within an area to lead a team to meet predefined goals and objectives?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking into the mentioned standards, the answer seems to be no. According to PMBOK, there can be some area specific processes that would be ideal to follow \cite[appendix D]{pmbok5}, but there is not explicit requirements for concrete technical knowledge related to the working area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does only describe to subject by noting that gaps in knowledge about a project can be a risk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IPMA Competence Baseline describes area specific knowledge as being an advantage in managing the permanent organisation, but doesn&#039;t describe the subject in relation to projects in the temporary sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thinking of having a manager with very limited area-specific skills, one encounters problems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Being a successful project manager means being successful at delegating work to other people, in order to meet a set of predefined goals and objectives. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally means that the project manager needs to have some kind of respect about his person, so what he lacks in area-specific skills, he must make up for in other areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Estimating the time needed for specific sub-tasks becomes more difficult, but also a task as setting up a project team that covers a wide set of skills becomes more of a challenge. The project team as a hole is one of the key stakeholders (REFERENCE). The team need to be dynamical and have a good relation to each other, but the definition of the required skill set within the project team is of huge importance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what is the alternative then? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An obvious suggestion would be to have people working their way to a position as project managers. This is the concept of having academics that have been working a long time, and then being rewarded with responsibility. That could for example be for good work, loyalty, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One does encounter various problems with this method of employing project managers in a company. First of all, the specialized knowledge and experience gained over a long time is taken away from a project team (REFERENCE). Second of all, there are often organizational politics involved in the decision of hiring an employee in a new position within the organization. What should have been a decision based on qualifications can then easily become a political decision. (REFERENCE). Thirdly there could be a tendency of people working in the same field within the same company for years after years to be more narrow minded. This will result in project managers to be less likely to think out of the box and to have a very set way of doing things.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Judging from Richardson et al&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stillaccidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Richardson, T. M. et al, &#039;&#039;Is Project Management Still an Accidental Profession? A Qualitative Study of Career Trajectory&#039;&#039;, http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/5/1/2158244015572098 (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, it seems that academics working their way up the ranks, is actually the career path that many project managers have taken.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As suggested in literature, the profession of being a project manager is often called the accidental profession (see for example &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;accidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Pinto, J. K., Kharbanda, O. P., &#039;&#039;Lessons for an Accidental Profession&#039;&#039;, (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). This covers the fact that there is a clear tendency of project managers being employed on behalf of their academic qualifications or the expectations for their future success as a project manager, rather than their experience as project managers&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stillaccidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Richardson, T. M. et al, &#039;&#039;Is Project Management Still an Accidental Profession? A Qualitative Study of Career Trajectory&#039;&#039;, http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/5/1/2158244015572098 (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But as discussed in&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;thenandnow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ranf, D. E., &#039;&#039;Project management: Then and now&#039;&#039;, Annales Universitatis Apulensis: Series Oeconomica, 13, 596-603 (2011)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, time is changing. Figure (SOMETHING) shows the evolution of numbers of members of PMI worldwide, and as seen on the curve the number of memberships is increasing almost exponentially. Although it refers to the number of members of PMI (and not all other project management organisations), it can be seen as a clear sign of the significance of projects, but in particular the increasing significance as project management as a profession.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally, project managers were valued for their technological knowledge that they could apply within a certain project. Having business knowledge was an advantage, but not a requirement. Now, on the other hand, project managers are valued for the business knowledge, and technological knowledge is an advantage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This has to be seen in relation to the change of the working market. Projects are incorporated in work settings in a completely new way, and as discussed, the demand of project managers is increasing. Now the project manager&#039;s primarily job isn&#039;t necessarily to contribute with technological knowledge. According to Ranf&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;thenandnow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ranf, D. E., &#039;&#039;Project management: Then and now&#039;&#039;, Annales Universitatis Apulensis: Series Oeconomica, 13, 596-603 (2011)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the business aspect has an increasing importance, in order for the project manager to contribute to business decisions etc. Another aspect of the project management, is political abilities. As the number of projects increases, the political environment increases, and the project manager has to move within a more complex organizational structure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So it seems that the project manager very easily can be in a situation were there is a knowledge gap. Is it too much to require from a person that he is both a highly competent manager but also a very skilled worker? And can everybody become a project manager?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Say a person has been working his way up in the company, and finally is offered a management position. He will undergo up-qualifications of his management skills, and be certified project manager within one of the numerous project management standards. Not long ago many people didn&#039;t believe in this approach. The born leader is a term that most people have encountered, but it is also a term that was highly used not long ago (REFERENCE). Today most people acknowledge that being a leader (and in particular manager), requires a set of skills that most people can learn. This being in line with all other types of knowledge that we can acquire, if there is a need and a desire hereof.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A solution used in some bigger companies, is the dual leadership model. Duos of leaders are composed, in hopes of the duo to compliment each other. If the duo is working efficiently, a wider set of leadership skills is covered within a field. That can e.g. be technological knowledge on one hand, and more management oriented abilities on the other.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Among the companies that have tried this method, is Goldman Sachs, Unilever, and Motorola&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;jointleader&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Palmer, M., &#039;&#039;Two chiefs not necessarily better than one&#039;&#039;, Financial Times, http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/3d509590-45d8-11e1-acc9-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3myDawPXD [visited 27/09 - 2015]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This model brings challenges with it. There has to be a clear definition of roles, for the duo to work dynamically. There also has to be a very clear communication strategy, for information to flow efficiently within an organization. The duo needs to have a good chemistry and be able to challenge each other, but it is also suggested that a constellation like this can slow down the response to changes withing an organization or project&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;jointleader&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But these examples are less dominant compared to the cost of a setup like this. One successful and money-making project after the other could very easily make the setup worth it, but it puts a very natural limitation of the types of companies and projects that could have use of this model. It simply has to be of a certain size in order to make sense, and have the acquired budget.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
All in all it is difficult to give one single answer to what type of leader a project or company needs. In all situations it is necessary to take a look at the project surroundings. The qualifications needed needs to be prioritize, in order to find the most suitable project manager within the framework of the company. In generally it does not seem like the dual leadership model is a solution to this problem. Both in terms of the limitations in the model itself, but also in the cost of a model like this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A clear tendency is that more and more business knowledge is required, which tends to cut down on the required area-specific technological knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If one were to judge only on behalf of what the different standards mention as necessary qualifications, then area-specific knowledge does not play an important role. But by taking this as a fact, one has to bear in mind that these standards have an agenda. At the end of the day, they make money the more people get certified within their framework. Thereby there is a natural interest in being as broad as possible, in order to approach as many future project managers as possible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lack of this can either be seen as a part of the definition of the project manager&#039;s competencies. But it can also be seen as a limitation to the standards in general. It depends on what view one has on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It does seems inevitable though, to be prepared to spend time on further education of a project manager&#039;s qualifications. That can either be the project management skills or the area-specific skills, depending on what road that has been taken to get into the present position.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No matter what perspective one must have, it seems like it is a field within which there is room for more research to be done. And until then, the conclusion must be: when in doubt, bring in an expert.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok4&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Project Management Institute, &#039;&#039;A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge&#039;&#039;, Fourth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA, (2008)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;iso&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dansk Standard, &#039;&#039;ISO 21500, Guidance on Project Management&#039;&#039;, First Edition, Dansk Standard, Copenhagen, Denmark, (2012)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ipma&amp;quot;&amp;gt;International Project Management Association, &#039;&#039;ICB - IPMA Competence Baseline&#039;&#039;, Third Edition, International Project Management Association, Nijkerk, The Netherlands, (2006)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmboksoftware&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Caupin, G., et al, &#039;&#039;Software Extension to the PMBOK® Guide Fifth Edition, review&#039;&#039;, Fifth Edition, http://marketplace.pmi.org/Pages/ProductDetail.aspx?GMProduct=00101457501 [visited 25/09 - 2015]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;accidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Pinto, J. K., Kharbanda, O. P., &#039;&#039;Lessons for an Accidental Profession&#039;&#039;, (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stillaccidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Richardson, T. M. et al, &#039;&#039;Is Project Management Still an Accidental Profession? A Qualitative Study of Career Trajectory&#039;&#039;, http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/5/1/2158244015572098 (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;thenandnow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ranf, D. E., &#039;&#039;Project management: Then and now&#039;&#039;, Annales Universitatis Apulensis: Series Oeconomica, 13, 596-603 (2011)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;jointleader&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Palmer, M., &#039;&#039;Two chiefs not necessarily better than one&#039;&#039;, Financial Times, http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/3d509590-45d8-11e1-acc9-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3myDawPXD [visited 27/09 - 2015]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S152093</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Leadership_styles&amp;diff=16966</id>
		<title>Leadership styles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Leadership_styles&amp;diff=16966"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T18:38:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S152093: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;In literature, many things have been written about project management and the best practice hereof. Various standards exist with the aim of describing the field, and a long list of terms and processes are defined and described. All the standards aim to prepare a project manager to give him the highest chances of achieving success with his projects. It seems that even though each standard differ from the others, they tend to have a similar perspective on the best practice of the subject.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this article I am going to look at three standards, the PMI, ISO, and IPMA standard. I am going to look into what they suggest as good project management qualifications, but in particular what the standards suggest as necessary as area-specific knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on what the standards suggest as good project management methods, I am going to discuss two typical approaches to become a project manager. One approach is by having studied project management, and for example becoming certified project manager. The other way is by achieving a broad knowledge within a field, and then work the way into a position as a project manager. During this discussion, I will look at whether or not there typically will be a gap in knowledge of project managers. The dual leadership model is briefly being introduced, in order to see if this model could cover the gap in a project manager&#039;s knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But before we get started, let me introduce the difference between a manager and a leader. These are two terms that are being used a lot within this article, although the main focus will be on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Manager:&#039;&#039;&#039; A manager has a degree of power from the position that he is in. He is structured, analytical, and rational, and he creates stability within a project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Leader:&#039;&#039;&#039; A leader, on the other hand, has power because people let him have power. He is courageous, innovative, and visionary, and initiates changes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
For project management, there exist many standards. These standards aim to describe project management across different types of projects and across fields. They for example describe the best practise of the initiation, planning, implementation, controlling and closing of a project, and introduce a long list of tools in order to have the best chances of achieving success within a project. These standards also have a view of the best version of a project manager and the abilities that he should possess.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the following, three standards are being introduced. In particular, their view on the best version of a project manager is at interest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;PMBOK:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the PMI standard (PMBOK) &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Project Management Institute, &#039;&#039;A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge&#039;&#039;, Fifth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA,&lt;br /&gt;
2013)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, it is mentioned that in addition to area-specific skills, project managers possess a set of characteristics, being within the area of knowledge, performance and personal \cite[page 13]{pmbok5}. These characteristics covers the project manager&#039;s knowledge, hes ability to perform and then personal relations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;ISO standard:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the ISO standard, &amp;quot;Competencies of project personnel&amp;quot; describes the competencies a project manager should have and the competencies that the project team as a unit should have \cite{iso}. Here it is stated that the project team should have a certain skill set, and that any gap between the required and available competencies could be a risk, and should be addressed. On the other hand there are listed three categories of competencies that a project manager should possess, that being technical competencies, behavioural competencies, and contextual competencies \cite[page 7]{iso}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;technical competencies&#039;&#039; describes processes, terminology and concepts, all within project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;behavioural competencies&#039;&#039; describes personal relationships.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;contextual competencies&#039;&#039; describes the context of the project, i.e., the project within the organization and environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;IPMA:&#039;&#039;&#039; The International Project Management Association (IPMA) divides project management skills in the same three categories as the ISO standard in their &amp;quot;Competence baseline&amp;quot; \cite{ipma}. IPMA focuses on competence elements, whereof the majority of them are in the technical category. The two other categories, behavioral and contextual competencies, are also described in this standard though.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are all well known standards that are used across various fields and industries. They guide project managers to follow the best practice of management in a given project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They all describe processes, techniques, and concepts, although the level of details within each standard varies a lot. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the brief overview of what skills a project manager must possess, it might at first glance seem surprising that there is a lack of requirement of the field specific technical knowledge. There is a long list of requirement to the technical knowledge in the sense of project management techniques, but the demand of area specific technical knowledge is limited.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is noted that the organisations behind the standards all have an interest of being as broad as possible, so that as many project managers and leaders can use and apply their standards.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the PMBOK there is a slight opening of a discussion about area specific skills, but the majority of the concept is treated in an appendix in the 4th edition \cite{pmbok4}, and is referred to as &amp;quot;Application Area Extensions&amp;quot;. Noticeably this section has been removed in the 5th edition \cite{pmbok5}. This though is only an introduction to the extension material that PMI offers within each project type, e.g. software projects, construction projects, etc., and treats for example area specific practices \cite{pmboksoftware}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does not treat the subject at all, while the IPMA is the standard that goes the most in depth with the subject. The section on Contextual Competencies describe the link between the project and the organisation. In the element description &amp;quot;Permanent Organisation&amp;quot;, it is mentioned that &amp;quot;If the project manager is experienced in the respective sector and industry, he will be in a better position to understand these factors. [The planning and management principles of the operations of the permanent organisation, red.]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally raises the question: does a project manager need area specific knowledge of the projects that he manages? Does a manager need technical skills within an area to lead a team to meet predefined goals and objectives?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking into the mentioned standards, the answer seems to be no. According to PMBOK, there can be some area specific processes that would be ideal to follow \cite[appendix D]{pmbok5}, but there is not explicit requirements for concrete technical knowledge related to the working area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does only describe to subject by noting that gaps in knowledge about a project can be a risk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IPMA Competence Baseline describes area specific knowledge as being an advantage in managing the permanent organisation, but doesn&#039;t describe the subject in relation to projects in the temporary sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thinking of having a manager with very limited area-specific skills, one encounters problems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Being a successful project manager means being successful at delegating work to other people, in order to meet a set of predefined goals and objectives. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally means that the project manager needs to have some kind of respect about his person, so what he lacks in area-specific skills, he must make up for in other areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Estimating the time needed for specific sub-tasks becomes more difficult, but also a task as setting up a project team that covers a wide set of skills becomes more of a challenge. The project team as a hole is one of the key stakeholders (REFERENCE). The team need to be dynamical and have a good relation to each other, but the definition of the required skill set within the project team is of huge importance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what is the alternative then? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An obvious suggestion would be to have people working their way to a position as project managers. This is the concept of having academics that have been working a long time, and then being rewarded with responsibility. That could for example be for good work, loyalty, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One does encounter various problems with this method of employing project managers in a company. First of all, the specialized knowledge and experience gained over a long time is taken away from a project team (REFERENCE). Second of all, there are often organizational politics involved in the decision of hiring an employee in a new position within the organization. What should have been a decision based on qualifications can then easily become a political decision. (REFERENCE). Thirdly there could be a tendency of people working in the same field within the same company for years after years to be more narrow minded. This will result in project managers to be less likely to think out of the box and to have a very set way of doing things.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Judging from Richardson et al \cite{stillaccidentalprof}, it seems that academics working their way up the ranks, is actually the career path that many project managers have taken.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As suggested in literature, the profession of being a project manager is often called the accidental profession (see for example \cite{accidentalprof}). This covers the fact that there is a clear tendency of project managers being employed on behalf of their academic qualifications or the expectations for their future success as a project manager, rather than their experience as project managers \cite{stillaccidentalprof}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But as discussed in \cite{thenandnow}, time is changing. Figure (SOMETHING) shows the evolution of numbers of members of PMI worldwide, and as seen on the curve the number of memberships is increasing almost exponentially. Although it refers to the number of members of PMI (and not all other project management organisations), it can be seen as a clear sign of the significance of projects, but in particular the increasing significance as project management as a profession.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally, project managers were valued for their technological knowledge that they could apply within a certain project. Having business knowledge was an advantage, but not a requirement. Now, on the other hand, project managers are valued for the business knowledge, and technological knowledge is an advantage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This has to be seen in relation to the change of the working market. Projects are incorporated in work settings in a completely new way, and as discussed, the demand of project managers is increasing. Now the project manager&#039;s primarily job isn&#039;t necessarily to contribute with technological knowledge. According to Ranf \cite{thenandnow}, the business aspect has an increasing importance, in order for the project manager to contribute to business decisions etc. Another aspect of the project management, is political abilities. As the number of projects increases, the political environment increases, and the project manager has to move within a more complex organizational structure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So it seems that the project manager very easily can be in a situation were there is a knowledge gap. Is it too much to require from a person that he is both a highly competent manager but also a very skilled worker? And can everybody become a project manager?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Say a person has been working his way up in the company, and finally is offered a management position. He will undergo up-qualifications of his management skills, and be certified project manager within one of the numerous project management standards. Not long ago many people didn&#039;t believe in this approach. The born leader is a term that most people have encountered, but it is also a term that was highly used not long ago (REFERENCE). Today most people acknowledge that being a leader (and in particular manager), requires a set of skills that most people can learn. This being in line with all other types of knowledge that we can acquire, if there is a need and a desire hereof.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A solution used in some bigger companies, is the dual leadership model. Duos of leaders are composed, in hopes of the duo to compliment each other. If the duo is working efficiently, a wider set of leadership skills is covered within a field. That can e.g. be technological knowledge on one hand, and more management oriented abilities on the other.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Among the companies that have tried this method, is Goldman Sachs, Unilever, and Motorola \cite{jointleader}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This model brings challenges with it. There has to be a clear definition of roles, for the duo to work dynamically. There also has to be a very clear communication strategy, for information to flow efficiently within an organization. The duo needs to have a good chemistry and be able to challenge each other, but it is also suggested that a constellation like this can slow down the response to changes withing an organization or project \cite{jointleader}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But these examples are less dominant compared to the cost of a setup like this. One successful and money-making project after the other could very easily make the setup worth it, but it puts a very natural limitation of the types of companies and projects that could have use of this model. It simply has to be of a certain size in order to make sense, and have the acquired budget.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
All in all it is difficult to give one single answer to what type of leader a project or company needs. In all situations it is necessary to take a look at the project surroundings. The qualifications needed needs to be prioritize, in order to find the most suitable project manager within the framework of the company. In generally it does not seem like the dual leadership model is a solution to this problem. Both in terms of the limitations in the model itself, but also in the cost of a model like this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A clear tendency is that more and more business knowledge is required, which tends to cut down on the required area-specific technological knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If one were to judge only on behalf of what the different standards mention as necessary qualifications, then area-specific knowledge does not play an important role. But by taking this as a fact, one has to bear in mind that these standards have an agenda. At the end of the day, they make money the more people get certified within their framework. Thereby there is a natural interest in being as broad as possible, in order to approach as many future project managers as possible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lack of this can either be seen as a part of the definition of the project manager&#039;s competencies. But it can also be seen as a limitation to the standards in general. It depends on what view one has on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It does seems inevitable though, to be prepared to spend time on further education of a project manager&#039;s qualifications. That can either be the project management skills or the area-specific skills, depending on what road that has been taken to get into the present position.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No matter what perspective one must have, it seems like it is a field within which there is room for more research to be done. And until then, the conclusion must be: when in doubt, bring in an expert.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok4&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Project Management Institute, &#039;&#039;A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge&#039;&#039;, Fourth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA, (2008)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;iso&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dansk Standard, &#039;&#039;ISO 21500, Guidance on Project Management&#039;&#039;, First Edition, Dansk Standard, Copenhagen, Denmark, (2012)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ipma&amp;quot;&amp;gt;International Project Management Association, &#039;&#039;ICB - IPMA Competence Baseline&#039;&#039;, Third Edition, International Project Management Association, Nijkerk, The Netherlands, (2006)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmboksoftware&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Caupin, G., et al, &#039;&#039;Software Extension to the PMBOK® Guide Fifth Edition, review&#039;&#039;, Fifth Edition, http://marketplace.pmi.org/Pages/ProductDetail.aspx?GMProduct=00101457501 [visited 25/09 - 2015]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;accidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Pinto, J. K., Kharbanda, O. P., &#039;&#039;Lessons for an Accidental Profession&#039;&#039;, (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;stillaccidentalprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Richardson, T. M. et al, &#039;&#039;Is Project Management Still an Accidental Profession? A Qualitative Study of Career Trajectory&#039;&#039;, http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/5/1/2158244015572098 (1995)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;thenandnow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ranf, D. E., &#039;&#039;Project management: Then and now&#039;&#039;, Annales Universitatis Apulensis: Series Oeconomica, 13, 596-603 (2011)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;jointleader&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Palmer, M., &#039;&#039;Two chiefs not necessarily better than one&#039;&#039;, Financial Times, http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/3d509590-45d8-11e1-acc9-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3myDawPXD [visited 27/09 - 2015]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S152093</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Leadership_styles&amp;diff=16934</id>
		<title>Leadership styles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Leadership_styles&amp;diff=16934"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T18:21:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S152093: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;In literature, many things have been written about project management and the best practice hereof. Various standards exist with the aim of describing the field, and a long list of terms and processes are defined and described. All the standards aim to prepare a project manager to give him the highest chances of achieving success with his projects. It seems that even though each standard differ from the others, they tend to have a similar perspective on the best practice of the subject.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this article I am going to look at three standards, the PMI, ISO, and IPMA standard. I am going to look into what they suggest as good project management qualifications, but in particular what the standards suggest as necessary as area-specific knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on what the standards suggest as good project management methods, I am going to discuss two typical approaches to become a project manager. One approach is by having studied project management, and for example becoming certified project manager. The other way is by achieving a broad knowledge within a field, and then work the way into a position as a project manager. During this discussion, I will look at whether or not there typically will be a gap in knowledge of project managers. The dual leadership model is briefly being introduced, in order to see if this model could cover the gap in a project manager&#039;s knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But before we get started, let me introduce the difference between a manager and a leader. These are two terms that are being used a lot within this article, although the main focus will be on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\textbf{Manager:} A manager has a degree of power from the position that he is in. He is structured, analytical, and rational, and he creates stability within a project.&lt;br /&gt;
\textbf{Leader:} A leader, on the other hand, has power because people let him have power. He is courageous, innovative, and visionary, and initiates changes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
For project management, there exist many standards. These standards aim to describe project management across different types of projects and across fields. They for example describe the best practise of the initiation, planning, implementation, controlling and closing of a project, and introduce a long list of tools in order to have the best chances of achieving success within a project. These standards also have a view of the best version of a project manager and the abilities that he should possess.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the following, three standards are being introduced. In particular, their view on the best version of a project manager is at interest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;PMBOK:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the PMI standard (PMBOK) &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok5&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Project Management Institute, &#039;&#039;A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge&#039;&#039;, Fifth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA,&lt;br /&gt;
2013)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, it is mentioned that in addition to area-specific skills, project managers possess a set of characteristics, being within the area of knowledge, performance and personal \cite[page 13]{pmbok5}. These characteristics covers the project manager&#039;s knowledge, hes ability to perform and then personal relations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;ISO standard:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the ISO standard, &amp;quot;Competencies of project personnel&amp;quot; describes the competencies a project manager should have and the competencies that the project team as a unit should have \cite{iso}. Here it is stated that the project team should have a certain skill set, and that any gap between the required and available competencies could be a risk, and should be addressed. On the other hand there are listed three categories of competencies that a project manager should possess, that being technical competencies, behavioural competencies, and contextual competencies \cite[page 7]{iso}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;technical competencies&#039;&#039; describes processes, terminology and concepts, all within project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;behavioural competencies&#039;&#039; describes personal relationships.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;contextual competencies&#039;&#039; describes the context of the project, i.e., the project within the organization and environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;IPMA:&#039;&#039;&#039; The International Project Management Association (IPMA) divides project management skills in the same three categories as the ISO standard in their &amp;quot;Competence baseline&amp;quot; \cite{ipma}. IPMA focuses on competence elements, whereof the majority of them are in the technical category. The two other categories, behavioral and contextual competencies, are also described in this standard though.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are all well known standards that are used across various fields and industries. They guide project managers to follow the best practice of management in a given project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They all describe processes, techniques, and concepts, although the level of details within each standard varies a lot. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the brief overview of what skills a project manager must possess, it might at first glance seem surprising that there is a lack of requirement of the field specific technical knowledge. There is a long list of requirement to the technical knowledge in the sense of project management techniques, but the demand of area specific technical knowledge is limited.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is noted that the organisations behind the standards all have an interest of being as broad as possible, so that as many project managers and leaders can use and apply their standards.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the PMBOK there is a slight opening of a discussion about area specific skills, but the majority of the concept is treated in an appendix in the 4th edition \cite{pmbok4}, and is referred to as &amp;quot;Application Area Extensions&amp;quot;. Noticeably this section has been removed in the 5th edition \cite{pmbok5}. This though is only an introduction to the extension material that PMI offers within each project type, e.g. software projects, construction projects, etc., and treats for example area specific practices \cite{pmboksoftware}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does not treat the subject at all, while the IPMA is the standard that goes the most in depth with the subject. The section on Contextual Competencies describe the link between the project and the organisation. In the element description &amp;quot;Permanent Organisation&amp;quot;, it is mentioned that &amp;quot;If the project manager is experienced in the respective sector and industry, he will be in a better position to understand these factors. [The planning and management principles of the operations of the permanent organisation, red.]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally raises the question: does a project manager need area specific knowledge of the projects that he manages? Does a manager need technical skills within an area to lead a team to meet predefined goals and objectives?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking into the mentioned standards, the answer seems to be no. According to PMBOK, there can be some area specific processes that would be ideal to follow \cite[appendix D]{pmbok5}, but there is not explicit requirements for concrete technical knowledge related to the working area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does only describe to subject by noting that gaps in knowledge about a project can be a risk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IPMA Competence Baseline describes area specific knowledge as being an advantage in managing the permanent organisation, but doesn&#039;t describe the subject in relation to projects in the temporary sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thinking of having a manager with very limited area-specific skills, one encounters problems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Being a successful project manager means being successful at delegating work to other people, in order to meet a set of predefined goals and objectives. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally means that the project manager needs to have some kind of respect about his person, so what he lacks in area-specific skills, he must make up for in other areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Estimating the time needed for specific sub-tasks becomes more difficult, but also a task as setting up a project team that covers a wide set of skills becomes more of a challenge. The project team as a hole is one of the key stakeholders (REFERENCE). The team need to be dynamical and have a good relation to each other, but the definition of the required skill set within the project team is of huge importance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what is the alternative then? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An obvious suggestion would be to have people working their way to a position as project managers. This is the concept of having academics that have been working a long time, and then being rewarded with responsibility. That could for example be for good work, loyalty, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One does encounter various problems with this method of employing project managers in a company. First of all, the specialized knowledge and experience gained over a long time is taken away from a project team (REFERENCE). Second of all, there are often organizational politics involved in the decision of hiring an employee in a new position within the organization. What should have been a decision based on qualifications can then easily become a political decision. (REFERENCE). Thirdly there could be a tendency of people working in the same field within the same company for years after years to be more narrow minded. This will result in project managers to be less likely to think out of the box and to have a very set way of doing things.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Judging from Richardson et al \cite{stillaccidentalprof}, it seems that academics working their way up the ranks, is actually the career path that many project managers have taken.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As suggested in literature, the profession of being a project manager is often called the accidental profession (see for example \cite{accidentalprof}). This covers the fact that there is a clear tendency of project managers being employed on behalf of their academic qualifications or the expectations for their future success as a project manager, rather than their experience as project managers \cite{stillaccidentalprof}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But as discussed in \cite{thenandnow}, time is changing. Figure (SOMETHING) shows the evolution of numbers of members of PMI worldwide, and as seen on the curve the number of memberships is increasing almost exponentially. Although it refers to the number of members of PMI (and not all other project management organisations), it can be seen as a clear sign of the significance of projects, but in particular the increasing significance as project management as a profession.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally, project managers were valued for their technological knowledge that they could apply within a certain project. Having business knowledge was an advantage, but not a requirement. Now, on the other hand, project managers are valued for the business knowledge, and technological knowledge is an advantage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This has to be seen in relation to the change of the working market. Projects are incorporated in work settings in a completely new way, and as discussed, the demand of project managers is increasing. Now the project manager&#039;s primarily job isn&#039;t necessarily to contribute with technological knowledge. According to Ranf \cite{thenandnow}, the business aspect has an increasing importance, in order for the project manager to contribute to business decisions etc. Another aspect of the project management, is political abilities. As the number of projects increases, the political environment increases, and the project manager has to move within a more complex organizational structure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So it seems that the project manager very easily can be in a situation were there is a knowledge gap. Is it too much to require from a person that he is both a highly competent manager but also a very skilled worker? And can everybody become a project manager?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Say a person has been working his way up in the company, and finally is offered a management position. He will undergo up-qualifications of his management skills, and be certified project manager within one of the numerous project management standards. Not long ago many people didn&#039;t believe in this approach. The born leader is a term that most people have encountered, but it is also a term that was highly used not long ago (REFERENCE). Today most people acknowledge that being a leader (and in particular manager), requires a set of skills that most people can learn. This being in line with all other types of knowledge that we can acquire, if there is a need and a desire hereof.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A solution used in some bigger companies, is the dual leadership model. Duos of leaders are composed, in hopes of the duo to compliment each other. If the duo is working efficiently, a wider set of leadership skills is covered within a field. That can e.g. be technological knowledge on one hand, and more management oriented abilities on the other.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Among the companies that have tried this method, is Goldman Sachs, Unilever, and Motorola \cite{jointleader}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This model brings challenges with it. There has to be a clear definition of roles, for the duo to work dynamically. There also has to be a very clear communication strategy, for information to flow efficiently within an organization. The duo needs to have a good chemistry and be able to challenge each other, but it is also suggested that a constellation like this can slow down the response to changes withing an organization or project \cite{jointleader}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But these examples are less dominant compared to the cost of a setup like this. One successful and money-making project after the other could very easily make the setup worth it, but it puts a very natural limitation of the types of companies and projects that could have use of this model. It simply has to be of a certain size in order to make sense, and have the acquired budget.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
All in all it is difficult to give one single answer to what type of leader a project or company needs. In all situations it is necessary to take a look at the project surroundings. The qualifications needed needs to be prioritize, in order to find the most suitable project manager within the framework of the company. In generally it does not seem like the dual leadership model is a solution to this problem. Both in terms of the limitations in the model itself, but also in the cost of a model like this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A clear tendency is that more and more business knowledge is required, which tends to cut down on the required area-specific technological knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If one were to judge only on behalf of what the different standards mention as necessary qualifications, then area-specific knowledge does not play an important role. But by taking this as a fact, one has to bear in mind that these standards have an agenda. At the end of the day, they make money the more people get certified within their framework. Thereby there is a natural interest in being as broad as possible, in order to approach as many future project managers as possible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lack of this can either be seen as a part of the definition of the project manager&#039;s competencies. But it can also be seen as a limitation to the standards in general. It depends on what view one has on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It does seems inevitable though, to be prepared to spend time on further education of a project manager&#039;s qualifications. That can either be the project management skills or the area-specific skills, depending on what road that has been taken to get into the present position.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No matter what perspective one must have, it seems like it is a field within which there is room for more research to be done. And until then, the conclusion must be: when in doubt, bring in an expert.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pmbok4&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Project Management Institute, &#039;&#039;A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge&#039;&#039;, Fourth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA, (2008)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\bibitem{iso}&lt;br /&gt;
Dansk Standard, &lt;br /&gt;
\emph{ISO 21500, Guidance on Project Management}, &lt;br /&gt;
First Edition,&lt;br /&gt;
Dansk Standard,&lt;br /&gt;
Copenhagen, Denmark,&lt;br /&gt;
(2012)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\bibitem{ipma}&lt;br /&gt;
International Project Management Association, &lt;br /&gt;
\emph{ICB - IPMA Competence Baseline}, &lt;br /&gt;
Third Edition,&lt;br /&gt;
International Project Management Association,&lt;br /&gt;
Nijkerk, The Netherlands,&lt;br /&gt;
(2006)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\bibitem{pmboksoftware}&lt;br /&gt;
Caupin, G., et al, &lt;br /&gt;
\emph{Software Extension to the PMBOK® Guide Fifth Edition, review}, &lt;br /&gt;
Fifth Edition,&lt;br /&gt;
http://marketplace.pmi.org/Pages/ProductDetail.aspx?GMProduct=00101457501 [visited 25/09 - 2015]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\bibitem{accidentalprof}&lt;br /&gt;
Pinto, J. K., Kharbanda, O. P., &lt;br /&gt;
\emph{Lessons for an Accidental Profession}, &lt;br /&gt;
(1995)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\bibitem{stillaccidentalprof}&lt;br /&gt;
Richardson, T. M. et al,&lt;br /&gt;
\emph{Is Project Management Still an Accidental Profession? A Qualitative Study of Career Trajectory}, &lt;br /&gt;
http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/5/1/2158244015572098&lt;br /&gt;
(1995)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\bibitem{thenandnow}&lt;br /&gt;
Ranf, D. E.,&lt;br /&gt;
\emph{Project management: Then and now},&lt;br /&gt;
Annales Universitatis Apulensis: Series Oeconomica, 13, 596-603&lt;br /&gt;
(2011)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\bibitem{jointleader}&lt;br /&gt;
Palmer, M., &lt;br /&gt;
\emph{Two chiefs not necessarily better than one}, &lt;br /&gt;
Financial Times,&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/3d509590-45d8-11e1-acc9-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3myDawPXD [visited 27/09 - 2015]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S152093</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Leadership_styles&amp;diff=16900</id>
		<title>Leadership styles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Leadership_styles&amp;diff=16900"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T18:05:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S152093: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;In literature, many things have been written about project management and the best practice hereof. Various standards exist with the aim of describing the field, and a long list of terms and processes are defined and described. All the standards aim to prepare a project manager to give him the highest chances of achieving success with his projects. It seems that even though each standard differ from the others, they tend to have a similar perspective on the best practice of the subject.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this article I am going to look at three standards, the PMI, ISO, and IPMA standard. I am going to look into what they suggest as good project management qualifications, but in particular what the standards suggest as necessary as area-specific knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on what the standards suggest as good project management methods, I am going to discuss two typical approaches to become a project manager. One approach is by having studied project management, and for example becoming certified project manager. The other way is by achieving a broad knowledge within a field, and then work the way into a position as a project manager. During this discussion, I will look at whether or not there typically will be a gap in knowledge of project managers. The dual leadership model is briefly being introduced, in order to see if this model could cover the gap in a project manager&#039;s knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But before we get started, let me introduce the difference between a manager and a leader. These are two terms that are being used a lot within this article, although the main focus will be on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\textbf{Manager:} A manager has a degree of power from the position that he is in. He is structured, analytical, and rational, and he creates stability within a project.&lt;br /&gt;
\textbf{Leader:} A leader, on the other hand, has power because people let him have power. He is courageous, innovative, and visionary, and initiates changes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
For project management, there exist many standards. These standards aim to describe project management across different types of projects and across fields. They for example describe the best practise of the initiation, planning, implementation, controlling and closing of a project, and introduce a long list of tools in order to have the best chances of achieving success within a project. These standards also have a view of the best version of a project manager and the abilities that he should possess.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the following, three standards are being introduced. In particular, their view on the best version of a project manager is at interest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;PMBOK:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the PMI standard (PMBOK) \cite{pmbok5}, it is mentioned that in addition to area-specific skills, project managers possess a set of characteristics, being within the area of knowledge, performance and personal \cite[page 13]{pmbok5}. These characteristics covers the project manager&#039;s knowledge, hes ability to perform and then personal relations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;ISO standard:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the ISO standard, &amp;quot;Competencies of project personnel&amp;quot; describes the competencies a project manager should have and the competencies that the project team as a unit should have \cite{iso}. Here it is stated that the project team should have a certain skill set, and that any gap between the required and available competencies could be a risk, and should be addressed. On the other hand there are listed three categories of competencies that a project manager should possess, that being technical competencies, behavioural competencies, and contextual competencies \cite[page 7]{iso}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;technical competencies&#039;&#039; describes processes, terminology and concepts, all within project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;behavioural competencies&#039;&#039; describes personal relationships.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;contextual competencies&#039;&#039; describes the context of the project, i.e., the project within the organization and environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;IPMA:&#039;&#039;&#039; The International Project Management Association (IPMA) divides project management skills in the same three categories as the ISO standard in their &amp;quot;Competence baseline&amp;quot; \cite{ipma}. IPMA focuses on competence elements, whereof the majority of them are in the technical category. The two other categories, behavioral and contextual competencies, are also described in this standard though.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are all well known standards that are used across various fields and industries. They guide project managers to follow the best practice of management in a given project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They all describe processes, techniques, and concepts, although the level of details within each standard varies a lot. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the brief overview of what skills a project manager must possess, it might at first glance seem surprising that there is a lack of requirement of the field specific technical knowledge. There is a long list of requirement to the technical knowledge in the sense of project management techniques, but the demand of area specific technical knowledge is limited.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is noted that the organisations behind the standards all have an interest of being as broad as possible, so that as many project managers and leaders can use and apply their standards.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the PMBOK there is a slight opening of a discussion about area specific skills, but the majority of the concept is treated in an appendix in the 4th edition \cite{pmbok4}, and is referred to as &amp;quot;Application Area Extensions&amp;quot;. Noticeably this section has been removed in the 5th edition \cite{pmbok5}. This though is only an introduction to the extension material that PMI offers within each project type, e.g. software projects, construction projects, etc., and treats for example area specific practices \cite{pmboksoftware}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does not treat the subject at all, while the IPMA is the standard that goes the most in depth with the subject. The section on Contextual Competencies describe the link between the project and the organisation. In the element description &amp;quot;Permanent Organisation&amp;quot;, it is mentioned that &amp;quot;If the project manager is experienced in the respective sector and industry, he will be in a better position to understand these factors. [The planning and management principles of the operations of the permanent organisation, red.]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally raises the question: does a project manager need area specific knowledge of the projects that he manages? Does a manager need technical skills within an area to lead a team to meet predefined goals and objectives?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking into the mentioned standards, the answer seems to be no. According to PMBOK, there can be some area specific processes that would be ideal to follow \cite[appendix D]{pmbok5}, but there is not explicit requirements for concrete technical knowledge related to the working area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does only describe to subject by noting that gaps in knowledge about a project can be a risk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IPMA Competence Baseline describes area specific knowledge as being an advantage in managing the permanent organisation, but doesn&#039;t describe the subject in relation to projects in the temporary sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thinking of having a manager with very limited area-specific skills, one encounters problems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Being a successful project manager means being successful at delegating work to other people, in order to meet a set of predefined goals and objectives. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally means that the project manager needs to have some kind of respect about his person, so what he lacks in area-specific skills, he must make up for in other areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Estimating the time needed for specific sub-tasks becomes more difficult, but also a task as setting up a project team that covers a wide set of skills becomes more of a challenge. The project team as a hole is one of the key stakeholders (REFERENCE). The team need to be dynamical and have a good relation to each other, but the definition of the required skill set within the project team is of huge importance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what is the alternative then? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An obvious suggestion would be to have people working their way to a position as project managers. This is the concept of having academics that have been working a long time, and then being rewarded with responsibility. That could for example be for good work, loyalty, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One does encounter various problems with this method of employing project managers in a company. First of all, the specialized knowledge and experience gained over a long time is taken away from a project team (REFERENCE). Second of all, there are often organizational politics involved in the decision of hiring an employee in a new position within the organization. What should have been a decision based on qualifications can then easily become a political decision. (REFERENCE). Thirdly there could be a tendency of people working in the same field within the same company for years after years to be more narrow minded. This will result in project managers to be less likely to think out of the box and to have a very set way of doing things.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Judging from Richardson et al \cite{stillaccidentalprof}, it seems that academics working their way up the ranks, is actually the career path that many project managers have taken.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As suggested in literature, the profession of being a project manager is often called the accidental profession (see for example \cite{accidentalprof}). This covers the fact that there is a clear tendency of project managers being employed on behalf of their academic qualifications or the expectations for their future success as a project manager, rather than their experience as project managers \cite{stillaccidentalprof}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But as discussed in \cite{thenandnow}, time is changing. Figure (SOMETHING) shows the evolution of numbers of members of PMI worldwide, and as seen on the curve the number of memberships is increasing almost exponentially. Although it refers to the number of members of PMI (and not all other project management organisations), it can be seen as a clear sign of the significance of projects, but in particular the increasing significance as project management as a profession.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally, project managers were valued for their technological knowledge that they could apply within a certain project. Having business knowledge was an advantage, but not a requirement. Now, on the other hand, project managers are valued for the business knowledge, and technological knowledge is an advantage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This has to be seen in relation to the change of the working market. Projects are incorporated in work settings in a completely new way, and as discussed, the demand of project managers is increasing. Now the project manager&#039;s primarily job isn&#039;t necessarily to contribute with technological knowledge. According to Ranf \cite{thenandnow}, the business aspect has an increasing importance, in order for the project manager to contribute to business decisions etc. Another aspect of the project management, is political abilities. As the number of projects increases, the political environment increases, and the project manager has to move within a more complex organizational structure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So it seems that the project manager very easily can be in a situation were there is a knowledge gap. Is it too much to require from a person that he is both a highly competent manager but also a very skilled worker? And can everybody become a project manager?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Say a person has been working his way up in the company, and finally is offered a management position. He will undergo up-qualifications of his management skills, and be certified project manager within one of the numerous project management standards. Not long ago many people didn&#039;t believe in this approach. The born leader is a term that most people have encountered, but it is also a term that was highly used not long ago (REFERENCE). Today most people acknowledge that being a leader (and in particular manager), requires a set of skills that most people can learn. This being in line with all other types of knowledge that we can acquire, if there is a need and a desire hereof.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A solution used in some bigger companies, is the dual leadership model. Duos of leaders are composed, in hopes of the duo to compliment each other. If the duo is working efficiently, a wider set of leadership skills is covered within a field. That can e.g. be technological knowledge on one hand, and more management oriented abilities on the other.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Among the companies that have tried this method, is Goldman Sachs, Unilever, and Motorola \cite{jointleader}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This model brings challenges with it. There has to be a clear definition of roles, for the duo to work dynamically. There also has to be a very clear communication strategy, for information to flow efficiently within an organization. The duo needs to have a good chemistry and be able to challenge each other, but it is also suggested that a constellation like this can slow down the response to changes withing an organization or project \cite{jointleader}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But these examples are less dominant compared to the cost of a setup like this. One successful and money-making project after the other could very easily make the setup worth it, but it puts a very natural limitation of the types of companies and projects that could have use of this model. It simply has to be of a certain size in order to make sense, and have the acquired budget.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
All in all it is difficult to give one single answer to what type of leader a project or company needs. In all situations it is necessary to take a look at the project surroundings. The qualifications needed needs to be prioritize, in order to find the most suitable project manager within the framework of the company. In generally it does not seem like the dual leadership model is a solution to this problem. Both in terms of the limitations in the model itself, but also in the cost of a model like this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A clear tendency is that more and more business knowledge is required, which tends to cut down on the required area-specific technological knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If one were to judge only on behalf of what the different standards mention as necessary qualifications, then area-specific knowledge does not play an important role. But by taking this as a fact, one has to bear in mind that these standards have an agenda. At the end of the day, they make money the more people get certified within their framework. Thereby there is a natural interest in being as broad as possible, in order to approach as many future project managers as possible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lack of this can either be seen as a part of the definition of the project manager&#039;s competencies. But it can also be seen as a limitation to the standards in general. It depends on what view one has on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It does seems inevitable though, to be prepared to spend time on further education of a project manager&#039;s qualifications. That can either be the project management skills or the area-specific skills, depending on what road that has been taken to get into the present position.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No matter what perspective one must have, it seems like it is a field within which there is room for more research to be done. And until then, the conclusion must be: when in doubt, bring in an expert.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{thebibliography}{99}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\bibitem{pmbok5}&lt;br /&gt;
Project Management Institute, &lt;br /&gt;
\emph{A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge}, &lt;br /&gt;
Fifth Edition,&lt;br /&gt;
Project Management Institute, Inc.,&lt;br /&gt;
Pennsylvania, USA,&lt;br /&gt;
(2013)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\bibitem{pmbok4}&lt;br /&gt;
Project Management Institute, &lt;br /&gt;
\emph{A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge}, &lt;br /&gt;
Fourth Edition,&lt;br /&gt;
Project Management Institute, Inc.,&lt;br /&gt;
Pennsylvania, USA,&lt;br /&gt;
(2008)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\bibitem{iso}&lt;br /&gt;
Dansk Standard, &lt;br /&gt;
\emph{ISO 21500, Guidance on Project Management}, &lt;br /&gt;
First Edition,&lt;br /&gt;
Dansk Standard,&lt;br /&gt;
Copenhagen, Denmark,&lt;br /&gt;
(2012)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\bibitem{ipma}&lt;br /&gt;
International Project Management Association, &lt;br /&gt;
\emph{ICB - IPMA Competence Baseline}, &lt;br /&gt;
Third Edition,&lt;br /&gt;
International Project Management Association,&lt;br /&gt;
Nijkerk, The Netherlands,&lt;br /&gt;
(2006)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\bibitem{pmboksoftware}&lt;br /&gt;
Caupin, G., et al, &lt;br /&gt;
\emph{Software Extension to the PMBOK® Guide Fifth Edition, review}, &lt;br /&gt;
Fifth Edition,&lt;br /&gt;
http://marketplace.pmi.org/Pages/ProductDetail.aspx?GMProduct=00101457501 [visited 25/09 - 2015]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\bibitem{accidentalprof}&lt;br /&gt;
Pinto, J. K., Kharbanda, O. P., &lt;br /&gt;
\emph{Lessons for an Accidental Profession}, &lt;br /&gt;
(1995)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\bibitem{stillaccidentalprof}&lt;br /&gt;
Richardson, T. M. et al,&lt;br /&gt;
\emph{Is Project Management Still an Accidental Profession? A Qualitative Study of Career Trajectory}, &lt;br /&gt;
http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/5/1/2158244015572098&lt;br /&gt;
(1995)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\bibitem{thenandnow}&lt;br /&gt;
Ranf, D. E.,&lt;br /&gt;
\emph{Project management: Then and now},&lt;br /&gt;
Annales Universitatis Apulensis: Series Oeconomica, 13, 596-603&lt;br /&gt;
(2011)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\bibitem{jointleader}&lt;br /&gt;
Palmer, M., &lt;br /&gt;
\emph{Two chiefs not necessarily better than one}, &lt;br /&gt;
Financial Times,&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/3d509590-45d8-11e1-acc9-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3myDawPXD [visited 27/09 - 2015]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S152093</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Leadership_styles&amp;diff=16886</id>
		<title>Leadership styles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Leadership_styles&amp;diff=16886"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T17:59:59Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S152093: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;In literature, many things have been written about project management and the best practice hereof. Various standards exist with the aim of describing the field, and a long list of terms and processes are defined and described. All the standards aim to prepare a project manager to give him the highest chances of achieving success with his projects. It seems that even though each standard differ from the others, they tend to have a similar perspective on the best practice of the subject.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this article I am going to look at three standards, the PMI, ISO, and IPMA standard. I am going to look into what they suggest as good project management qualifications, but in particular what the standards suggest as necessary as area-specific knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on what the standards suggest as good project management methods, I am going to discuss two typical approaches to become a project manager. One approach is by having studied project management, and for example becoming certified project manager. The other way is by achieving a broad knowledge within a field, and then work the way into a position as a project manager. During this discussion, I will look at whether or not there typically will be a gap in knowledge of project managers. The dual leadership model is briefly being introduced, in order to see if this model could cover the gap in a project manager&#039;s knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But before we get started, let me introduce the difference between a manager and a leader. These are two terms that are being used a lot within this article, although the main focus will be on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\textbf{Manager:} A manager has a degree of power from the position that he is in. He is structured, analytical, and rational, and he creates stability within a project.&lt;br /&gt;
\textbf{Leader:} A leader, on the other hand, has power because people let him have power. He is courageous, innovative, and visionary, and initiates changes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
For project management, there exist many standards. These standards aim to describe project management across different types of projects and across fields. They for example describe the best practise of the initiation, planning, implementation, controlling and closing of a project, and introduce a long list of tools in order to have the best chances of achieving success within a project. These standards also have a view of the best version of a project manager and the abilities that he should possess.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the following, three standards are being introduced. In particular, their view on the best version of a project manager is at interest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;PMBOK:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the PMI standard (PMBOK) \cite{pmbok5}, it is mentioned that in addition to area-specific skills, project managers possess a set of characteristics, being within the area of knowledge, performance and personal \cite[page 13]{pmbok5}. These characteristics covers the project manager&#039;s knowledge, hes ability to perform and then personal relations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;ISO standard:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the ISO standard, &amp;quot;Competencies of project personnel&amp;quot; describes the competencies a project manager should have and the competencies that the project team as a unit should have \cite{iso}. Here it is stated that the project team should have a certain skill set, and that any gap between the required and available competencies could be a risk, and should be addressed. On the other hand there are listed three categories of competencies that a project manager should possess, that being technical competencies, behavioural competencies, and contextual competencies \cite[page 7]{iso}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;technical competencies&#039;&#039; describes processes, terminology and concepts, all within project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;behavioural competencies&#039;&#039; describes personal relationships.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;contextual competencies&#039;&#039; describes the context of the project, i.e., the project within the organization and environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;IPMA:&#039;&#039;&#039; The International Project Management Association (IPMA) divides project management skills in the same three categories as the ISO standard in their &amp;quot;Competence baseline&amp;quot; \cite{ipma}. IPMA focuses on competence elements, whereof the majority of them are in the technical category. The two other categories, behavioral and contextual competencies, are also described in this standard though.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are all well known standards that are used across various fields and industries. They guide project managers to follow the best practice of management in a given project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They all describe processes, techniques, and concepts, although the level of details within each standard varies a lot. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the brief overview of what skills a project manager must possess, it might at first glance seem surprising that there is a lack of requirement of the field specific technical knowledge. There is a long list of requirement to the technical knowledge in the sense of project management techniques, but the demand of area specific technical knowledge is limited.\\&lt;br /&gt;
It is noted that the organisations behind the standards all have an interest of being as broad as possible, so that as many project managers and leaders can use and apply their standards.\\&lt;br /&gt;
In the PMBOK there is a slight opening of a discussion about area specific skills, but the majority of the concept is treated in an appendix in the 4th edition \cite{pmbok4}, and is referred to as &amp;quot;Application Area Extensions&amp;quot;. Noticeably this section has been removed in the 5th edition \cite{pmbok5}. This though is only an introduction to the extension material that PMI offers within each project type, e.g. software projects, construction projects, etc., and treats for example area specific practices \cite{pmboksoftware}.\\&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does not treat the subject at all, while the IPMA is the standard that goes the most in depth with the subject. The section on Contextual Competencies describe the link between the project and the organisation. In the element description &amp;quot;Permanent Organisation&amp;quot;, it is mentioned that &amp;quot;If the project manager is experienced in the respective sector and industry, he will be in a better position to understand these factors. [The planning and management principles of the operations of the permanent organisation, red.]&amp;quot;\\&lt;br /&gt;
\\&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally raises the question: does a project manager need area specific knowledge of the projects that he manages? Does a manager need technical skills within an area to lead a team to meet predefined goals and objectives?\\&lt;br /&gt;
Looking into the mentioned standards, the answer seems to be no. According to PMBOK, there can be some area specific processes that would be ideal to follow \cite[appendix D]{pmbok5}, but there is not explicit requirements for concrete technical knowledge related to the working area.\\&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does only describe to subject by noting that gaps in knowledge about a project can be a risk.\\&lt;br /&gt;
IPMA Competence Baseline describes area specific knowledge as being an advantage in managing the permanent organisation, but doesn&#039;t describe the subject in relation to projects in the temporary sense.\\&lt;br /&gt;
\\&lt;br /&gt;
Thinking of having a manager with very limited area-specific skills, one encounters problems.\\&lt;br /&gt;
Being a successful project manager means being successful at delegating work to other people, in order to meet a set of predefined goals and objectives. \\&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally means that the project manager needs to have some kind of respect about his person, so what he lacks in area-specific skills, he must make up for in other areas.\\&lt;br /&gt;
Estimating the time needed for specific sub-tasks becomes more difficult, but also a task as setting up a project team that covers a wide set of skills becomes more of a challenge. The project team as a hole is one of the key stakeholders (REFERENCE). The team need to be dynamical and have a good relation to each other, but the definition of the required skill set within the project team is of huge importance.\\&lt;br /&gt;
\\&lt;br /&gt;
But what is the alternative then? \\&lt;br /&gt;
An obvious suggestion would be to have people working their way to a position as project managers. This is the concept of having academics that have been working a long time, and then being rewarded with responsibility. That could for example be for good work, loyalty, etc.\\&lt;br /&gt;
One does encounter various problems with this method of employing project managers in a company. First of all, the specialized knowledge and experience gained over a long time is taken away from a project team (REFERENCE). Second of all, there are often organizational politics involved in the decision of hiring an employee in a new position within the organization. What should have been a decision based on qualifications can then easily become a political decision. (REFERENCE). Thirdly there could be a tendency of people working in the same field within the same company for years after years to be more narrow minded. This will result in project managers to be less likely to think out of the box and to have a very set way of doing things.\\&lt;br /&gt;
Judging from Richardson et al \cite{stillaccidentalprof}, it seems that academics working their way up the ranks, is actually the career path that many project managers have taken.\\&lt;br /&gt;
\\&lt;br /&gt;
As suggested in literature, the profession of being a project manager is often called the accidental profession (see for example \cite{accidentalprof}). This covers the fact that there is a clear tendency of project managers being employed on behalf of their academic qualifications or the expectations for their future success as a project manager, rather than their experience as project managers \cite{stillaccidentalprof}.\\&lt;br /&gt;
But as discussed in \cite{thenandnow}, time is changing. Figure (SOMETHING) shows the evolution of numbers of members of PMI worldwide, and as seen on the curve the number of memberships is increasing almost exponentially. Although it refers to the number of members of PMI (and not all other project management organisations), it can be seen as a clear sign of the significance of projects, but in particular the increasing significance as project management as a profession.\\&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally, project managers were valued for their technological knowledge that they could apply within a certain project. Having business knowledge was an advantage, but not a requirement. Now, on the other hand, project managers are valued for the business knowledge, and technological knowledge is an advantage. \\&lt;br /&gt;
This has to be seen in relation to the change of the working market. Projects are incorporated in work settings in a completely new way, and as discussed, the demand of project managers is increasing. Now the project manager&#039;s primarily job isn&#039;t necessarily to contribute with technological knowledge. According to Ranf \cite{thenandnow}, the business aspect has an increasing importance, in order for the project manager to contribute to business decisions etc. Another aspect of the project management, is political abilities. As the number of projects increases, the political environment increases, and the project manager has to move within a more complex organizational structure.\\&lt;br /&gt;
\\&lt;br /&gt;
So it seems that the project manager very easily can be in a situation were there is a knowledge gap. Is it too much to require from a person that he is both a highly competent manager but also a very skilled worker? And can everybody become a project manager?\\&lt;br /&gt;
Say a person has been working his way up in the company, and finally is offered a management position. He will undergo up-qualifications of his management skills, and be certified project manager within one of the numerous project management standards. Not long ago many people didn&#039;t believe in this approach. The born leader is a term that most people have encountered, but it is also a term that was highly used not long ago (REFERENCE). Today most people acknowledge that being a leader (and in particular manager), requires a set of skills that most people can learn. This being in line with all other types of knowledge that we can acquire, if there is a need and a desire hereof.\\&lt;br /&gt;
A solution used in some bigger companies, is the dual leadership model. Duos of leaders are composed, in hopes of the duo to compliment each other. If the duo is working efficiently, a wider set of leadership skills is covered within a field. That can e.g. be technological knowledge on one hand, and more management oriented abilities on the other.\\&lt;br /&gt;
Among the companies that have tried this method, is Goldman Sachs, Unilever, and Motorola \cite{jointleader}.\\&lt;br /&gt;
This model brings challenges with it. There has to be a clear definition of roles, for the duo to work dynamically. There also has to be a very clear communication strategy, for information to flow efficiently within an organization. The duo needs to have a good chemistry and be able to challenge each other, but it is also suggested that a constellation like this can slow down the response to changes withing an organization or project \cite{jointleader}.\\&lt;br /&gt;
But these examples are less dominant compared to the cost of a setup like this. One successful and money-making project after the other could very easily make the setup worth it, but it puts a very natural limitation of the types of companies and projects that could have use of this model. It simply has to be of a certain size in order to make sense, and have the acquired budget.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\section*{Conclusion}&lt;br /&gt;
All in all it is difficult to give one single answer to what type of leader a project or company needs. In all situations it is necessary to take a look at the project surroundings. The qualifications needed needs to be prioritize, in order to find the most suitable project manager within the framework of the company. In generally it does not seem like the dual leadership model is a solution to this problem. Both in terms of the limitations in the model itself, but also in the cost of a model like this.\\&lt;br /&gt;
A clear tendency is that more and more business knowledge is required, which tends to cut down on the required area-specific technological knowledge.\\&lt;br /&gt;
If one were to judge only on behalf of what the different standards mention as necessary qualifications, then area-specific knowledge does not play an important role. But by taking this as a fact, one has to bear in mind that these standards have an agenda. At the end of the day, they make money the more people get certified within their framework. Thereby there is a natural interest in being as broad as possible, in order to approach as many future project managers as possible.\\&lt;br /&gt;
The lack of this can either be seen as a part of the definition of the project manager&#039;s competencies. But it can also be seen as a limitation to the standards in general. It depends on what view one has on project management.\\&lt;br /&gt;
It does seems inevitable though, to be prepared to spend time on further education of a project manager&#039;s qualifications. That can either be the project management skills or the area-specific skills, depending on what road that has been taken to get into the present position.\\&lt;br /&gt;
No matter what perspective one must have, it seems like it is a field within which there is room for more research to be done. And until then, the conclusion must be: when in doubt, bring in an expert.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{thebibliography}{99}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\bibitem{pmbok5}&lt;br /&gt;
Project Management Institute, &lt;br /&gt;
\emph{A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge}, &lt;br /&gt;
Fifth Edition,&lt;br /&gt;
Project Management Institute, Inc.,&lt;br /&gt;
Pennsylvania, USA,&lt;br /&gt;
(2013)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\bibitem{pmbok4}&lt;br /&gt;
Project Management Institute, &lt;br /&gt;
\emph{A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge}, &lt;br /&gt;
Fourth Edition,&lt;br /&gt;
Project Management Institute, Inc.,&lt;br /&gt;
Pennsylvania, USA,&lt;br /&gt;
(2008)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\bibitem{iso}&lt;br /&gt;
Dansk Standard, &lt;br /&gt;
\emph{ISO 21500, Guidance on Project Management}, &lt;br /&gt;
First Edition,&lt;br /&gt;
Dansk Standard,&lt;br /&gt;
Copenhagen, Denmark,&lt;br /&gt;
(2012)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\bibitem{ipma}&lt;br /&gt;
International Project Management Association, &lt;br /&gt;
\emph{ICB - IPMA Competence Baseline}, &lt;br /&gt;
Third Edition,&lt;br /&gt;
International Project Management Association,&lt;br /&gt;
Nijkerk, The Netherlands,&lt;br /&gt;
(2006)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\bibitem{pmboksoftware}&lt;br /&gt;
Caupin, G., et al, &lt;br /&gt;
\emph{Software Extension to the PMBOK® Guide Fifth Edition, review}, &lt;br /&gt;
Fifth Edition,&lt;br /&gt;
http://marketplace.pmi.org/Pages/ProductDetail.aspx?GMProduct=00101457501 [visited 25/09 - 2015]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\bibitem{accidentalprof}&lt;br /&gt;
Pinto, J. K., Kharbanda, O. P., &lt;br /&gt;
\emph{Lessons for an Accidental Profession}, &lt;br /&gt;
(1995)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\bibitem{stillaccidentalprof}&lt;br /&gt;
Richardson, T. M. et al,&lt;br /&gt;
\emph{Is Project Management Still an Accidental Profession? A Qualitative Study of Career Trajectory}, &lt;br /&gt;
http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/5/1/2158244015572098&lt;br /&gt;
(1995)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\bibitem{thenandnow}&lt;br /&gt;
Ranf, D. E.,&lt;br /&gt;
\emph{Project management: Then and now},&lt;br /&gt;
Annales Universitatis Apulensis: Series Oeconomica, 13, 596-603&lt;br /&gt;
(2011)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\bibitem{jointleader}&lt;br /&gt;
Palmer, M., &lt;br /&gt;
\emph{Two chiefs not necessarily better than one}, &lt;br /&gt;
Financial Times,&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/3d509590-45d8-11e1-acc9-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3myDawPXD [visited 27/09 - 2015]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S152093</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Leadership_styles&amp;diff=16884</id>
		<title>Leadership styles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Leadership_styles&amp;diff=16884"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T17:56:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S152093: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;In literature, many things have been written about project management and the best practice hereof. Various standards exist with the aim of describing the field, and a long list of terms and processes are defined and described. All the standards aim to prepare a project manager to give him the highest chances of achieving success with his projects. It seems that even though each standard differ from the others, they tend to have a similar perspective on the best practice of the subject.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this article I am going to look at three standards, the PMI, ISO, and IPMA standard. I am going to look into what they suggest as good project management qualifications, but in particular what the standards suggest as necessary as area-specific knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on what the standards suggest as good project management methods, I am going to discuss two typical approaches to become a project manager. One approach is by having studied project management, and for example becoming certified project manager. The other way is by achieving a broad knowledge within a field, and then work the way into a position as a project manager. During this discussion, I will look at whether or not there typically will be a gap in knowledge of project managers. The dual leadership model is briefly being introduced, in order to see if this model could cover the gap in a project manager&#039;s knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But before we get started, let me introduce the difference between a manager and a leader. These are two terms that are being used a lot within this article, although the main focus will be on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\textbf{Manager:} A manager has a degree of power from the position that he is in. He is structured, analytical, and rational, and he creates stability within a project.&lt;br /&gt;
\textbf{Leader:} A leader, on the other hand, has power because people let him have power. He is courageous, innovative, and visionary, and initiates changes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
For project management, there exist many standards. These standards aim to describe project management across different types of projects and across fields. They for example describe the best practise of the initiation, planning, implementation, controlling and closing of a project, and introduce a long list of tools in order to have the best chances of achieving success within a project. These standards also have a view of the best version of a project manager and the abilities that he should possess.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the following, three standards are being introduced. In particular, their view on the best version of a project manager is at interest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;PMBOK:&#039;&#039;&#039; In the PMI standard (PMBOK) \cite{pmbok5}, it is mentioned that in addition to area-specific skills, project managers possess a set of characteristics, being within the area of knowledge, performance and personal \cite[page 13]{pmbok5}. These characteristics covers the project manager&#039;s knowledge, hes ability to perform and then personal relations.&lt;br /&gt;
\textbf{ISO standard:} In the ISO standard, &amp;quot;Competencies of project personnel&amp;quot; describes the competencies a project manager should have and the competencies that the project team as a unit should have \cite{iso}. Here it is stated that the project team should have a certain skill set, and that any gap between the required and available competencies could be a risk, and should be addressed. On the other hand there are listed three categories of competencies that a project manager should possess, that being technical competencies, behavioural competencies, and contextual competencies \cite[page 7]{iso}.&lt;br /&gt;
The \textit{technical competencies} describes processes, terminology and concepts, all within project management.&lt;br /&gt;
The \textit{behavioural competencies} describes personal relationships.&lt;br /&gt;
The \textit{contextual competencies} describes the context of the project, i.e., the project within the organization and environment.&lt;br /&gt;
\textbf{IPMA:} The International Project Management Association (IPMA) divides project management skills in the same three categories as the ISO standard in their &amp;quot;Competence baseline&amp;quot; \cite{ipma}. IPMA focuses on competence elements, whereof the majority of them are in the technical category. The two other categories, behavioral and contextual competencies, are also described in this standard though.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are all well known standards that are used across various fields and industries. They guide project managers to follow the best practice of management in a given project.\\&lt;br /&gt;
They all describe processes, techniques, and concepts, although the level of details within each standard varies a lot. \\&lt;br /&gt;
\\&lt;br /&gt;
In the brief overview of what skills a project manager must possess, it might at first glance seem surprising that there is a lack of requirement of the field specific technical knowledge. There is a long list of requirement to the technical knowledge in the sense of project management techniques, but the demand of area specific technical knowledge is limited.\\&lt;br /&gt;
It is noted that the organisations behind the standards all have an interest of being as broad as possible, so that as many project managers and leaders can use and apply their standards.\\&lt;br /&gt;
In the PMBOK there is a slight opening of a discussion about area specific skills, but the majority of the concept is treated in an appendix in the 4th edition \cite{pmbok4}, and is referred to as &amp;quot;Application Area Extensions&amp;quot;. Noticeably this section has been removed in the 5th edition \cite{pmbok5}. This though is only an introduction to the extension material that PMI offers within each project type, e.g. software projects, construction projects, etc., and treats for example area specific practices \cite{pmboksoftware}.\\&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does not treat the subject at all, while the IPMA is the standard that goes the most in depth with the subject. The section on Contextual Competencies describe the link between the project and the organisation. In the element description &amp;quot;Permanent Organisation&amp;quot;, it is mentioned that &amp;quot;If the project manager is experienced in the respective sector and industry, he will be in a better position to understand these factors. [The planning and management principles of the operations of the permanent organisation, red.]&amp;quot;\\&lt;br /&gt;
\\&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally raises the question: does a project manager need area specific knowledge of the projects that he manages? Does a manager need technical skills within an area to lead a team to meet predefined goals and objectives?\\&lt;br /&gt;
Looking into the mentioned standards, the answer seems to be no. According to PMBOK, there can be some area specific processes that would be ideal to follow \cite[appendix D]{pmbok5}, but there is not explicit requirements for concrete technical knowledge related to the working area.\\&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does only describe to subject by noting that gaps in knowledge about a project can be a risk.\\&lt;br /&gt;
IPMA Competence Baseline describes area specific knowledge as being an advantage in managing the permanent organisation, but doesn&#039;t describe the subject in relation to projects in the temporary sense.\\&lt;br /&gt;
\\&lt;br /&gt;
Thinking of having a manager with very limited area-specific skills, one encounters problems.\\&lt;br /&gt;
Being a successful project manager means being successful at delegating work to other people, in order to meet a set of predefined goals and objectives. \\&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally means that the project manager needs to have some kind of respect about his person, so what he lacks in area-specific skills, he must make up for in other areas.\\&lt;br /&gt;
Estimating the time needed for specific sub-tasks becomes more difficult, but also a task as setting up a project team that covers a wide set of skills becomes more of a challenge. The project team as a hole is one of the key stakeholders (REFERENCE). The team need to be dynamical and have a good relation to each other, but the definition of the required skill set within the project team is of huge importance.\\&lt;br /&gt;
\\&lt;br /&gt;
But what is the alternative then? \\&lt;br /&gt;
An obvious suggestion would be to have people working their way to a position as project managers. This is the concept of having academics that have been working a long time, and then being rewarded with responsibility. That could for example be for good work, loyalty, etc.\\&lt;br /&gt;
One does encounter various problems with this method of employing project managers in a company. First of all, the specialized knowledge and experience gained over a long time is taken away from a project team (REFERENCE). Second of all, there are often organizational politics involved in the decision of hiring an employee in a new position within the organization. What should have been a decision based on qualifications can then easily become a political decision. (REFERENCE). Thirdly there could be a tendency of people working in the same field within the same company for years after years to be more narrow minded. This will result in project managers to be less likely to think out of the box and to have a very set way of doing things.\\&lt;br /&gt;
Judging from Richardson et al \cite{stillaccidentalprof}, it seems that academics working their way up the ranks, is actually the career path that many project managers have taken.\\&lt;br /&gt;
\\&lt;br /&gt;
As suggested in literature, the profession of being a project manager is often called the accidental profession (see for example \cite{accidentalprof}). This covers the fact that there is a clear tendency of project managers being employed on behalf of their academic qualifications or the expectations for their future success as a project manager, rather than their experience as project managers \cite{stillaccidentalprof}.\\&lt;br /&gt;
But as discussed in \cite{thenandnow}, time is changing. Figure (SOMETHING) shows the evolution of numbers of members of PMI worldwide, and as seen on the curve the number of memberships is increasing almost exponentially. Although it refers to the number of members of PMI (and not all other project management organisations), it can be seen as a clear sign of the significance of projects, but in particular the increasing significance as project management as a profession.\\&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally, project managers were valued for their technological knowledge that they could apply within a certain project. Having business knowledge was an advantage, but not a requirement. Now, on the other hand, project managers are valued for the business knowledge, and technological knowledge is an advantage. \\&lt;br /&gt;
This has to be seen in relation to the change of the working market. Projects are incorporated in work settings in a completely new way, and as discussed, the demand of project managers is increasing. Now the project manager&#039;s primarily job isn&#039;t necessarily to contribute with technological knowledge. According to Ranf \cite{thenandnow}, the business aspect has an increasing importance, in order for the project manager to contribute to business decisions etc. Another aspect of the project management, is political abilities. As the number of projects increases, the political environment increases, and the project manager has to move within a more complex organizational structure.\\&lt;br /&gt;
\\&lt;br /&gt;
So it seems that the project manager very easily can be in a situation were there is a knowledge gap. Is it too much to require from a person that he is both a highly competent manager but also a very skilled worker? And can everybody become a project manager?\\&lt;br /&gt;
Say a person has been working his way up in the company, and finally is offered a management position. He will undergo up-qualifications of his management skills, and be certified project manager within one of the numerous project management standards. Not long ago many people didn&#039;t believe in this approach. The born leader is a term that most people have encountered, but it is also a term that was highly used not long ago (REFERENCE). Today most people acknowledge that being a leader (and in particular manager), requires a set of skills that most people can learn. This being in line with all other types of knowledge that we can acquire, if there is a need and a desire hereof.\\&lt;br /&gt;
A solution used in some bigger companies, is the dual leadership model. Duos of leaders are composed, in hopes of the duo to compliment each other. If the duo is working efficiently, a wider set of leadership skills is covered within a field. That can e.g. be technological knowledge on one hand, and more management oriented abilities on the other.\\&lt;br /&gt;
Among the companies that have tried this method, is Goldman Sachs, Unilever, and Motorola \cite{jointleader}.\\&lt;br /&gt;
This model brings challenges with it. There has to be a clear definition of roles, for the duo to work dynamically. There also has to be a very clear communication strategy, for information to flow efficiently within an organization. The duo needs to have a good chemistry and be able to challenge each other, but it is also suggested that a constellation like this can slow down the response to changes withing an organization or project \cite{jointleader}.\\&lt;br /&gt;
But these examples are less dominant compared to the cost of a setup like this. One successful and money-making project after the other could very easily make the setup worth it, but it puts a very natural limitation of the types of companies and projects that could have use of this model. It simply has to be of a certain size in order to make sense, and have the acquired budget.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\section*{Conclusion}&lt;br /&gt;
All in all it is difficult to give one single answer to what type of leader a project or company needs. In all situations it is necessary to take a look at the project surroundings. The qualifications needed needs to be prioritize, in order to find the most suitable project manager within the framework of the company. In generally it does not seem like the dual leadership model is a solution to this problem. Both in terms of the limitations in the model itself, but also in the cost of a model like this.\\&lt;br /&gt;
A clear tendency is that more and more business knowledge is required, which tends to cut down on the required area-specific technological knowledge.\\&lt;br /&gt;
If one were to judge only on behalf of what the different standards mention as necessary qualifications, then area-specific knowledge does not play an important role. But by taking this as a fact, one has to bear in mind that these standards have an agenda. At the end of the day, they make money the more people get certified within their framework. Thereby there is a natural interest in being as broad as possible, in order to approach as many future project managers as possible.\\&lt;br /&gt;
The lack of this can either be seen as a part of the definition of the project manager&#039;s competencies. But it can also be seen as a limitation to the standards in general. It depends on what view one has on project management.\\&lt;br /&gt;
It does seems inevitable though, to be prepared to spend time on further education of a project manager&#039;s qualifications. That can either be the project management skills or the area-specific skills, depending on what road that has been taken to get into the present position.\\&lt;br /&gt;
No matter what perspective one must have, it seems like it is a field within which there is room for more research to be done. And until then, the conclusion must be: when in doubt, bring in an expert.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{thebibliography}{99}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\bibitem{pmbok5}&lt;br /&gt;
Project Management Institute, &lt;br /&gt;
\emph{A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge}, &lt;br /&gt;
Fifth Edition,&lt;br /&gt;
Project Management Institute, Inc.,&lt;br /&gt;
Pennsylvania, USA,&lt;br /&gt;
(2013)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\bibitem{pmbok4}&lt;br /&gt;
Project Management Institute, &lt;br /&gt;
\emph{A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge}, &lt;br /&gt;
Fourth Edition,&lt;br /&gt;
Project Management Institute, Inc.,&lt;br /&gt;
Pennsylvania, USA,&lt;br /&gt;
(2008)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\bibitem{iso}&lt;br /&gt;
Dansk Standard, &lt;br /&gt;
\emph{ISO 21500, Guidance on Project Management}, &lt;br /&gt;
First Edition,&lt;br /&gt;
Dansk Standard,&lt;br /&gt;
Copenhagen, Denmark,&lt;br /&gt;
(2012)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\bibitem{ipma}&lt;br /&gt;
International Project Management Association, &lt;br /&gt;
\emph{ICB - IPMA Competence Baseline}, &lt;br /&gt;
Third Edition,&lt;br /&gt;
International Project Management Association,&lt;br /&gt;
Nijkerk, The Netherlands,&lt;br /&gt;
(2006)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\bibitem{pmboksoftware}&lt;br /&gt;
Caupin, G., et al, &lt;br /&gt;
\emph{Software Extension to the PMBOK® Guide Fifth Edition, review}, &lt;br /&gt;
Fifth Edition,&lt;br /&gt;
http://marketplace.pmi.org/Pages/ProductDetail.aspx?GMProduct=00101457501 [visited 25/09 - 2015]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\bibitem{accidentalprof}&lt;br /&gt;
Pinto, J. K., Kharbanda, O. P., &lt;br /&gt;
\emph{Lessons for an Accidental Profession}, &lt;br /&gt;
(1995)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\bibitem{stillaccidentalprof}&lt;br /&gt;
Richardson, T. M. et al,&lt;br /&gt;
\emph{Is Project Management Still an Accidental Profession? A Qualitative Study of Career Trajectory}, &lt;br /&gt;
http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/5/1/2158244015572098&lt;br /&gt;
(1995)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\bibitem{thenandnow}&lt;br /&gt;
Ranf, D. E.,&lt;br /&gt;
\emph{Project management: Then and now},&lt;br /&gt;
Annales Universitatis Apulensis: Series Oeconomica, 13, 596-603&lt;br /&gt;
(2011)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\bibitem{jointleader}&lt;br /&gt;
Palmer, M., &lt;br /&gt;
\emph{Two chiefs not necessarily better than one}, &lt;br /&gt;
Financial Times,&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/3d509590-45d8-11e1-acc9-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3myDawPXD [visited 27/09 - 2015]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S152093</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Leadership_styles&amp;diff=16882</id>
		<title>Leadership styles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Leadership_styles&amp;diff=16882"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T17:55:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S152093: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;In literature, many things have been written about project management and the best practice hereof. Various standards exist with the aim of describing the field, and a long list of terms and processes are defined and described. All the standards aim to prepare a project manager to give him the highest chances of achieving success with his projects. It seems that even though each standard differ from the others, they tend to have a similar perspective on the best practice of the subject.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this article I am going to look at three standards, the PMI, ISO, and IPMA standard. I am going to look into what they suggest as good project management qualifications, but in particular what the standards suggest as necessary as area-specific knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on what the standards suggest as good project management methods, I am going to discuss two typical approaches to become a project manager. One approach is by having studied project management, and for example becoming certified project manager. The other way is by achieving a broad knowledge within a field, and then work the way into a position as a project manager. During this discussion, I will look at whether or not there typically will be a gap in knowledge of project managers. The dual leadership model is briefly being introduced, in order to see if this model could cover the gap in a project manager&#039;s knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But before we get started, let me introduce the difference between a manager and a leader. These are two terms that are being used a lot within this article, although the main focus will be on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\textbf{Manager:} A manager has a degree of power from the position that he is in. He is structured, analytical, and rational, and he creates stability within a project.&lt;br /&gt;
\textbf{Leader:} A leader, on the other hand, has power because people let him have power. He is courageous, innovative, and visionary, and initiates changes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\subsection*{Introduction}&lt;br /&gt;
For project management, there exist many standards. These standards aim to describe project management across different types of projects and across fields. They for example describe the best practise of the initiation, planning, implementation, controlling and closing of a project, and introduce a long list of tools in order to have the best chances of achieving success within a project. These standards also have a view of the best version of a project manager and the abilities that he should possess.&lt;br /&gt;
In the following, three standards are being introduced. In particular, their view on the best version of a project manager is at interest.&lt;br /&gt;
\textbf{PMBOK:} In the PMI standard (PMBOK) \cite{pmbok5}, it is mentioned that in addition to area-specific skills, project managers possess a set of characteristics, being within the area of knowledge, performance and personal \cite[page 13]{pmbok5}. These characteristics covers the project manager&#039;s knowledge, hes ability to perform and then personal relations.&lt;br /&gt;
\textbf{ISO standard:} In the ISO standard, &amp;quot;Competencies of project personnel&amp;quot; describes the competencies a project manager should have and the competencies that the project team as a unit should have \cite{iso}. Here it is stated that the project team should have a certain skill set, and that any gap between the required and available competencies could be a risk, and should be addressed. On the other hand there are listed three categories of competencies that a project manager should possess, that being technical competencies, behavioural competencies, and contextual competencies \cite[page 7]{iso}.&lt;br /&gt;
The \textit{technical competencies} describes processes, terminology and concepts, all within project management.&lt;br /&gt;
The \textit{behavioural competencies} describes personal relationships.&lt;br /&gt;
The \textit{contextual competencies} describes the context of the project, i.e., the project within the organization and environment.&lt;br /&gt;
\textbf{IPMA:} The International Project Management Association (IPMA) divides project management skills in the same three categories as the ISO standard in their &amp;quot;Competence baseline&amp;quot; \cite{ipma}. IPMA focuses on competence elements, whereof the majority of them are in the technical category. The two other categories, behavioral and contextual competencies, are also described in this standard though.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are all well known standards that are used across various fields and industries. They guide project managers to follow the best practice of management in a given project.\\&lt;br /&gt;
They all describe processes, techniques, and concepts, although the level of details within each standard varies a lot. \\&lt;br /&gt;
\\&lt;br /&gt;
In the brief overview of what skills a project manager must possess, it might at first glance seem surprising that there is a lack of requirement of the field specific technical knowledge. There is a long list of requirement to the technical knowledge in the sense of project management techniques, but the demand of area specific technical knowledge is limited.\\&lt;br /&gt;
It is noted that the organisations behind the standards all have an interest of being as broad as possible, so that as many project managers and leaders can use and apply their standards.\\&lt;br /&gt;
In the PMBOK there is a slight opening of a discussion about area specific skills, but the majority of the concept is treated in an appendix in the 4th edition \cite{pmbok4}, and is referred to as &amp;quot;Application Area Extensions&amp;quot;. Noticeably this section has been removed in the 5th edition \cite{pmbok5}. This though is only an introduction to the extension material that PMI offers within each project type, e.g. software projects, construction projects, etc., and treats for example area specific practices \cite{pmboksoftware}.\\&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does not treat the subject at all, while the IPMA is the standard that goes the most in depth with the subject. The section on Contextual Competencies describe the link between the project and the organisation. In the element description &amp;quot;Permanent Organisation&amp;quot;, it is mentioned that &amp;quot;If the project manager is experienced in the respective sector and industry, he will be in a better position to understand these factors. [The planning and management principles of the operations of the permanent organisation, red.]&amp;quot;\\&lt;br /&gt;
\\&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally raises the question: does a project manager need area specific knowledge of the projects that he manages? Does a manager need technical skills within an area to lead a team to meet predefined goals and objectives?\\&lt;br /&gt;
Looking into the mentioned standards, the answer seems to be no. According to PMBOK, there can be some area specific processes that would be ideal to follow \cite[appendix D]{pmbok5}, but there is not explicit requirements for concrete technical knowledge related to the working area.\\&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does only describe to subject by noting that gaps in knowledge about a project can be a risk.\\&lt;br /&gt;
IPMA Competence Baseline describes area specific knowledge as being an advantage in managing the permanent organisation, but doesn&#039;t describe the subject in relation to projects in the temporary sense.\\&lt;br /&gt;
\\&lt;br /&gt;
Thinking of having a manager with very limited area-specific skills, one encounters problems.\\&lt;br /&gt;
Being a successful project manager means being successful at delegating work to other people, in order to meet a set of predefined goals and objectives. \\&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally means that the project manager needs to have some kind of respect about his person, so what he lacks in area-specific skills, he must make up for in other areas.\\&lt;br /&gt;
Estimating the time needed for specific sub-tasks becomes more difficult, but also a task as setting up a project team that covers a wide set of skills becomes more of a challenge. The project team as a hole is one of the key stakeholders (REFERENCE). The team need to be dynamical and have a good relation to each other, but the definition of the required skill set within the project team is of huge importance.\\&lt;br /&gt;
\\&lt;br /&gt;
But what is the alternative then? \\&lt;br /&gt;
An obvious suggestion would be to have people working their way to a position as project managers. This is the concept of having academics that have been working a long time, and then being rewarded with responsibility. That could for example be for good work, loyalty, etc.\\&lt;br /&gt;
One does encounter various problems with this method of employing project managers in a company. First of all, the specialized knowledge and experience gained over a long time is taken away from a project team (REFERENCE). Second of all, there are often organizational politics involved in the decision of hiring an employee in a new position within the organization. What should have been a decision based on qualifications can then easily become a political decision. (REFERENCE). Thirdly there could be a tendency of people working in the same field within the same company for years after years to be more narrow minded. This will result in project managers to be less likely to think out of the box and to have a very set way of doing things.\\&lt;br /&gt;
Judging from Richardson et al \cite{stillaccidentalprof}, it seems that academics working their way up the ranks, is actually the career path that many project managers have taken.\\&lt;br /&gt;
\\&lt;br /&gt;
As suggested in literature, the profession of being a project manager is often called the accidental profession (see for example \cite{accidentalprof}). This covers the fact that there is a clear tendency of project managers being employed on behalf of their academic qualifications or the expectations for their future success as a project manager, rather than their experience as project managers \cite{stillaccidentalprof}.\\&lt;br /&gt;
But as discussed in \cite{thenandnow}, time is changing. Figure (SOMETHING) shows the evolution of numbers of members of PMI worldwide, and as seen on the curve the number of memberships is increasing almost exponentially. Although it refers to the number of members of PMI (and not all other project management organisations), it can be seen as a clear sign of the significance of projects, but in particular the increasing significance as project management as a profession.\\&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally, project managers were valued for their technological knowledge that they could apply within a certain project. Having business knowledge was an advantage, but not a requirement. Now, on the other hand, project managers are valued for the business knowledge, and technological knowledge is an advantage. \\&lt;br /&gt;
This has to be seen in relation to the change of the working market. Projects are incorporated in work settings in a completely new way, and as discussed, the demand of project managers is increasing. Now the project manager&#039;s primarily job isn&#039;t necessarily to contribute with technological knowledge. According to Ranf \cite{thenandnow}, the business aspect has an increasing importance, in order for the project manager to contribute to business decisions etc. Another aspect of the project management, is political abilities. As the number of projects increases, the political environment increases, and the project manager has to move within a more complex organizational structure.\\&lt;br /&gt;
\\&lt;br /&gt;
So it seems that the project manager very easily can be in a situation were there is a knowledge gap. Is it too much to require from a person that he is both a highly competent manager but also a very skilled worker? And can everybody become a project manager?\\&lt;br /&gt;
Say a person has been working his way up in the company, and finally is offered a management position. He will undergo up-qualifications of his management skills, and be certified project manager within one of the numerous project management standards. Not long ago many people didn&#039;t believe in this approach. The born leader is a term that most people have encountered, but it is also a term that was highly used not long ago (REFERENCE). Today most people acknowledge that being a leader (and in particular manager), requires a set of skills that most people can learn. This being in line with all other types of knowledge that we can acquire, if there is a need and a desire hereof.\\&lt;br /&gt;
A solution used in some bigger companies, is the dual leadership model. Duos of leaders are composed, in hopes of the duo to compliment each other. If the duo is working efficiently, a wider set of leadership skills is covered within a field. That can e.g. be technological knowledge on one hand, and more management oriented abilities on the other.\\&lt;br /&gt;
Among the companies that have tried this method, is Goldman Sachs, Unilever, and Motorola \cite{jointleader}.\\&lt;br /&gt;
This model brings challenges with it. There has to be a clear definition of roles, for the duo to work dynamically. There also has to be a very clear communication strategy, for information to flow efficiently within an organization. The duo needs to have a good chemistry and be able to challenge each other, but it is also suggested that a constellation like this can slow down the response to changes withing an organization or project \cite{jointleader}.\\&lt;br /&gt;
But these examples are less dominant compared to the cost of a setup like this. One successful and money-making project after the other could very easily make the setup worth it, but it puts a very natural limitation of the types of companies and projects that could have use of this model. It simply has to be of a certain size in order to make sense, and have the acquired budget.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\section*{Conclusion}&lt;br /&gt;
All in all it is difficult to give one single answer to what type of leader a project or company needs. In all situations it is necessary to take a look at the project surroundings. The qualifications needed needs to be prioritize, in order to find the most suitable project manager within the framework of the company. In generally it does not seem like the dual leadership model is a solution to this problem. Both in terms of the limitations in the model itself, but also in the cost of a model like this.\\&lt;br /&gt;
A clear tendency is that more and more business knowledge is required, which tends to cut down on the required area-specific technological knowledge.\\&lt;br /&gt;
If one were to judge only on behalf of what the different standards mention as necessary qualifications, then area-specific knowledge does not play an important role. But by taking this as a fact, one has to bear in mind that these standards have an agenda. At the end of the day, they make money the more people get certified within their framework. Thereby there is a natural interest in being as broad as possible, in order to approach as many future project managers as possible.\\&lt;br /&gt;
The lack of this can either be seen as a part of the definition of the project manager&#039;s competencies. But it can also be seen as a limitation to the standards in general. It depends on what view one has on project management.\\&lt;br /&gt;
It does seems inevitable though, to be prepared to spend time on further education of a project manager&#039;s qualifications. That can either be the project management skills or the area-specific skills, depending on what road that has been taken to get into the present position.\\&lt;br /&gt;
No matter what perspective one must have, it seems like it is a field within which there is room for more research to be done. And until then, the conclusion must be: when in doubt, bring in an expert.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{thebibliography}{99}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\bibitem{pmbok5}&lt;br /&gt;
Project Management Institute, &lt;br /&gt;
\emph{A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge}, &lt;br /&gt;
Fifth Edition,&lt;br /&gt;
Project Management Institute, Inc.,&lt;br /&gt;
Pennsylvania, USA,&lt;br /&gt;
(2013)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\bibitem{pmbok4}&lt;br /&gt;
Project Management Institute, &lt;br /&gt;
\emph{A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge}, &lt;br /&gt;
Fourth Edition,&lt;br /&gt;
Project Management Institute, Inc.,&lt;br /&gt;
Pennsylvania, USA,&lt;br /&gt;
(2008)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\bibitem{iso}&lt;br /&gt;
Dansk Standard, &lt;br /&gt;
\emph{ISO 21500, Guidance on Project Management}, &lt;br /&gt;
First Edition,&lt;br /&gt;
Dansk Standard,&lt;br /&gt;
Copenhagen, Denmark,&lt;br /&gt;
(2012)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\bibitem{ipma}&lt;br /&gt;
International Project Management Association, &lt;br /&gt;
\emph{ICB - IPMA Competence Baseline}, &lt;br /&gt;
Third Edition,&lt;br /&gt;
International Project Management Association,&lt;br /&gt;
Nijkerk, The Netherlands,&lt;br /&gt;
(2006)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\bibitem{pmboksoftware}&lt;br /&gt;
Caupin, G., et al, &lt;br /&gt;
\emph{Software Extension to the PMBOK® Guide Fifth Edition, review}, &lt;br /&gt;
Fifth Edition,&lt;br /&gt;
http://marketplace.pmi.org/Pages/ProductDetail.aspx?GMProduct=00101457501 [visited 25/09 - 2015]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\bibitem{accidentalprof}&lt;br /&gt;
Pinto, J. K., Kharbanda, O. P., &lt;br /&gt;
\emph{Lessons for an Accidental Profession}, &lt;br /&gt;
(1995)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\bibitem{stillaccidentalprof}&lt;br /&gt;
Richardson, T. M. et al,&lt;br /&gt;
\emph{Is Project Management Still an Accidental Profession? A Qualitative Study of Career Trajectory}, &lt;br /&gt;
http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/5/1/2158244015572098&lt;br /&gt;
(1995)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\bibitem{thenandnow}&lt;br /&gt;
Ranf, D. E.,&lt;br /&gt;
\emph{Project management: Then and now},&lt;br /&gt;
Annales Universitatis Apulensis: Series Oeconomica, 13, 596-603&lt;br /&gt;
(2011)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\bibitem{jointleader}&lt;br /&gt;
Palmer, M., &lt;br /&gt;
\emph{Two chiefs not necessarily better than one}, &lt;br /&gt;
Financial Times,&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/3d509590-45d8-11e1-acc9-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3myDawPXD [visited 27/09 - 2015]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S152093</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Leadership_styles&amp;diff=16647</id>
		<title>Leadership styles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Leadership_styles&amp;diff=16647"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T16:05:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S152093: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;In literature, many things have been written about project management and the best practice hereof. Various standards exist with the aim of describing the field, and a long list of terms and processes are defined and described. All the standards aim to prepare a project manager to give him the highest chances of achieving success with his projects. It seems that even though each standard differ from the others, they tend to have a similar perspective on the best practice of the subject.&lt;br /&gt;
In this article I am going to look at three standards, the PMI, ISO, and IPMA standard. I am going to look into what they suggest as good project management qualifications, but in particular what the standards suggest as necessary as area-specific knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
Based on what the standards suggest as good project management methods, I am going to discuss two typical approaches to become a project manager. One approach is by having studied project management, and for example becoming certified project manager. The other way is by achieving a broad knowledge within a field, and then work the way into a position as a project manager. During this discussion, I will look at whether or not there typically will be a gap in knowledge of project managers. The dual leadership model is briefly being introduced, in order to see if this model could cover the gap in a project manager&#039;s knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
But before we get started, let me introduce the difference between a manager and a leader. These are two terms that are being used a lot within this article, although the main focus will be on project management.&lt;br /&gt;
\textbf{Manager:} A manager has a degree of power from the position that he is in. He is structured, analytical, and rational, and he creates stability within a project.&lt;br /&gt;
\textbf{Leader:} A leader, on the other hand, has power because people let him have power. He is courageous, innovative, and visionary, and initiates changes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\subsection*{Introduction}&lt;br /&gt;
For project management, there exist many standards. These standards aim to describe project management across different types of projects and across fields. They for example describe the best practise of the initiation, planning, implementation, controlling and closing of a project, and introduce a long list of tools in order to have the best chances of achieving success within a project. These standards also have a view of the best version of a project manager and the abilities that he should possess.&lt;br /&gt;
In the following, three standards are being introduced. In particular, their view on the best version of a project manager is at interest.&lt;br /&gt;
\textbf{PMBOK:} In the PMI standard (PMBOK) \cite{pmbok5}, it is mentioned that in addition to area-specific skills, project managers possess a set of characteristics, being within the area of knowledge, performance and personal \cite[page 13]{pmbok5}. These characteristics covers the project manager&#039;s knowledge, hes ability to perform and then personal relations.&lt;br /&gt;
\textbf{ISO standard:} In the ISO standard, &amp;quot;Competencies of project personnel&amp;quot; describes the competencies a project manager should have and the competencies that the project team as a unit should have \cite{iso}. Here it is stated that the project team should have a certain skill set, and that any gap between the required and available competencies could be a risk, and should be addressed. On the other hand there are listed three categories of competencies that a project manager should possess, that being technical competencies, behavioural competencies, and contextual competencies \cite[page 7]{iso}.&lt;br /&gt;
The \textit{technical competencies} describes processes, terminology and concepts, all within project management.&lt;br /&gt;
The \textit{behavioural competencies} describes personal relationships.&lt;br /&gt;
The \textit{contextual competencies} describes the context of the project, i.e., the project within the organization and environment.&lt;br /&gt;
\textbf{IPMA:} The International Project Management Association (IPMA) divides project management skills in the same three categories as the ISO standard in their &amp;quot;Competence baseline&amp;quot; \cite{ipma}. IPMA focuses on competence elements, whereof the majority of them are in the technical category. The two other categories, behavioral and contextual competencies, are also described in this standard though.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are all well known standards that are used across various fields and industries. They guide project managers to follow the best practice of management in a given project.\\&lt;br /&gt;
They all describe processes, techniques, and concepts, although the level of details within each standard varies a lot. \\&lt;br /&gt;
\\&lt;br /&gt;
In the brief overview of what skills a project manager must possess, it might at first glance seem surprising that there is a lack of requirement of the field specific technical knowledge. There is a long list of requirement to the technical knowledge in the sense of project management techniques, but the demand of area specific technical knowledge is limited.\\&lt;br /&gt;
It is noted that the organisations behind the standards all have an interest of being as broad as possible, so that as many project managers and leaders can use and apply their standards.\\&lt;br /&gt;
In the PMBOK there is a slight opening of a discussion about area specific skills, but the majority of the concept is treated in an appendix in the 4th edition \cite{pmbok4}, and is referred to as &amp;quot;Application Area Extensions&amp;quot;. Noticeably this section has been removed in the 5th edition \cite{pmbok5}. This though is only an introduction to the extension material that PMI offers within each project type, e.g. software projects, construction projects, etc., and treats for example area specific practices \cite{pmboksoftware}.\\&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does not treat the subject at all, while the IPMA is the standard that goes the most in depth with the subject. The section on Contextual Competencies describe the link between the project and the organisation. In the element description &amp;quot;Permanent Organisation&amp;quot;, it is mentioned that &amp;quot;If the project manager is experienced in the respective sector and industry, he will be in a better position to understand these factors. [The planning and management principles of the operations of the permanent organisation, red.]&amp;quot;\\&lt;br /&gt;
\\&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally raises the question: does a project manager need area specific knowledge of the projects that he manages? Does a manager need technical skills within an area to lead a team to meet predefined goals and objectives?\\&lt;br /&gt;
Looking into the mentioned standards, the answer seems to be no. According to PMBOK, there can be some area specific processes that would be ideal to follow \cite[appendix D]{pmbok5}, but there is not explicit requirements for concrete technical knowledge related to the working area.\\&lt;br /&gt;
The ISO standard does only describe to subject by noting that gaps in knowledge about a project can be a risk.\\&lt;br /&gt;
IPMA Competence Baseline describes area specific knowledge as being an advantage in managing the permanent organisation, but doesn&#039;t describe the subject in relation to projects in the temporary sense.\\&lt;br /&gt;
\\&lt;br /&gt;
Thinking of having a manager with very limited area-specific skills, one encounters problems.\\&lt;br /&gt;
Being a successful project manager means being successful at delegating work to other people, in order to meet a set of predefined goals and objectives. \\&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally means that the project manager needs to have some kind of respect about his person, so what he lacks in area-specific skills, he must make up for in other areas.\\&lt;br /&gt;
Estimating the time needed for specific sub-tasks becomes more difficult, but also a task as setting up a project team that covers a wide set of skills becomes more of a challenge. The project team as a hole is one of the key stakeholders (REFERENCE). The team need to be dynamical and have a good relation to each other, but the definition of the required skill set within the project team is of huge importance.\\&lt;br /&gt;
\\&lt;br /&gt;
But what is the alternative then? \\&lt;br /&gt;
An obvious suggestion would be to have people working their way to a position as project managers. This is the concept of having academics that have been working a long time, and then being rewarded with responsibility. That could for example be for good work, loyalty, etc.\\&lt;br /&gt;
One does encounter various problems with this method of employing project managers in a company. First of all, the specialized knowledge and experience gained over a long time is taken away from a project team (REFERENCE). Second of all, there are often organizational politics involved in the decision of hiring an employee in a new position within the organization. What should have been a decision based on qualifications can then easily become a political decision. (REFERENCE). Thirdly there could be a tendency of people working in the same field within the same company for years after years to be more narrow minded. This will result in project managers to be less likely to think out of the box and to have a very set way of doing things.\\&lt;br /&gt;
Judging from Richardson et al \cite{stillaccidentalprof}, it seems that academics working their way up the ranks, is actually the career path that many project managers have taken.\\&lt;br /&gt;
\\&lt;br /&gt;
As suggested in literature, the profession of being a project manager is often called the accidental profession (see for example \cite{accidentalprof}). This covers the fact that there is a clear tendency of project managers being employed on behalf of their academic qualifications or the expectations for their future success as a project manager, rather than their experience as project managers \cite{stillaccidentalprof}.\\&lt;br /&gt;
But as discussed in \cite{thenandnow}, time is changing. Figure (SOMETHING) shows the evolution of numbers of members of PMI worldwide, and as seen on the curve the number of memberships is increasing almost exponentially. Although it refers to the number of members of PMI (and not all other project management organisations), it can be seen as a clear sign of the significance of projects, but in particular the increasing significance as project management as a profession.\\&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally, project managers were valued for their technological knowledge that they could apply within a certain project. Having business knowledge was an advantage, but not a requirement. Now, on the other hand, project managers are valued for the business knowledge, and technological knowledge is an advantage. \\&lt;br /&gt;
This has to be seen in relation to the change of the working market. Projects are incorporated in work settings in a completely new way, and as discussed, the demand of project managers is increasing. Now the project manager&#039;s primarily job isn&#039;t necessarily to contribute with technological knowledge. According to Ranf \cite{thenandnow}, the business aspect has an increasing importance, in order for the project manager to contribute to business decisions etc. Another aspect of the project management, is political abilities. As the number of projects increases, the political environment increases, and the project manager has to move within a more complex organizational structure.\\&lt;br /&gt;
\\&lt;br /&gt;
So it seems that the project manager very easily can be in a situation were there is a knowledge gap. Is it too much to require from a person that he is both a highly competent manager but also a very skilled worker? And can everybody become a project manager?\\&lt;br /&gt;
Say a person has been working his way up in the company, and finally is offered a management position. He will undergo up-qualifications of his management skills, and be certified project manager within one of the numerous project management standards. Not long ago many people didn&#039;t believe in this approach. The born leader is a term that most people have encountered, but it is also a term that was highly used not long ago (REFERENCE). Today most people acknowledge that being a leader (and in particular manager), requires a set of skills that most people can learn. This being in line with all other types of knowledge that we can acquire, if there is a need and a desire hereof.\\&lt;br /&gt;
A solution used in some bigger companies, is the dual leadership model. Duos of leaders are composed, in hopes of the duo to compliment each other. If the duo is working efficiently, a wider set of leadership skills is covered within a field. That can e.g. be technological knowledge on one hand, and more management oriented abilities on the other.\\&lt;br /&gt;
Among the companies that have tried this method, is Goldman Sachs, Unilever, and Motorola \cite{jointleader}.\\&lt;br /&gt;
This model brings challenges with it. There has to be a clear definition of roles, for the duo to work dynamically. There also has to be a very clear communication strategy, for information to flow efficiently within an organization. The duo needs to have a good chemistry and be able to challenge each other, but it is also suggested that a constellation like this can slow down the response to changes withing an organization or project \cite{jointleader}.\\&lt;br /&gt;
But these examples are less dominant compared to the cost of a setup like this. One successful and money-making project after the other could very easily make the setup worth it, but it puts a very natural limitation of the types of companies and projects that could have use of this model. It simply has to be of a certain size in order to make sense, and have the acquired budget.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\section*{Conclusion}&lt;br /&gt;
All in all it is difficult to give one single answer to what type of leader a project or company needs. In all situations it is necessary to take a look at the project surroundings. The qualifications needed needs to be prioritize, in order to find the most suitable project manager within the framework of the company. In generally it does not seem like the dual leadership model is a solution to this problem. Both in terms of the limitations in the model itself, but also in the cost of a model like this.\\&lt;br /&gt;
A clear tendency is that more and more business knowledge is required, which tends to cut down on the required area-specific technological knowledge.\\&lt;br /&gt;
If one were to judge only on behalf of what the different standards mention as necessary qualifications, then area-specific knowledge does not play an important role. But by taking this as a fact, one has to bear in mind that these standards have an agenda. At the end of the day, they make money the more people get certified within their framework. Thereby there is a natural interest in being as broad as possible, in order to approach as many future project managers as possible.\\&lt;br /&gt;
The lack of this can either be seen as a part of the definition of the project manager&#039;s competencies. But it can also be seen as a limitation to the standards in general. It depends on what view one has on project management.\\&lt;br /&gt;
It does seems inevitable though, to be prepared to spend time on further education of a project manager&#039;s qualifications. That can either be the project management skills or the area-specific skills, depending on what road that has been taken to get into the present position.\\&lt;br /&gt;
No matter what perspective one must have, it seems like it is a field within which there is room for more research to be done. And until then, the conclusion must be: when in doubt, bring in an expert.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{thebibliography}{99}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\bibitem{pmbok5}&lt;br /&gt;
Project Management Institute, &lt;br /&gt;
\emph{A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge}, &lt;br /&gt;
Fifth Edition,&lt;br /&gt;
Project Management Institute, Inc.,&lt;br /&gt;
Pennsylvania, USA,&lt;br /&gt;
(2013)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\bibitem{pmbok4}&lt;br /&gt;
Project Management Institute, &lt;br /&gt;
\emph{A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge}, &lt;br /&gt;
Fourth Edition,&lt;br /&gt;
Project Management Institute, Inc.,&lt;br /&gt;
Pennsylvania, USA,&lt;br /&gt;
(2008)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\bibitem{iso}&lt;br /&gt;
Dansk Standard, &lt;br /&gt;
\emph{ISO 21500, Guidance on Project Management}, &lt;br /&gt;
First Edition,&lt;br /&gt;
Dansk Standard,&lt;br /&gt;
Copenhagen, Denmark,&lt;br /&gt;
(2012)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\bibitem{ipma}&lt;br /&gt;
International Project Management Association, &lt;br /&gt;
\emph{ICB - IPMA Competence Baseline}, &lt;br /&gt;
Third Edition,&lt;br /&gt;
International Project Management Association,&lt;br /&gt;
Nijkerk, The Netherlands,&lt;br /&gt;
(2006)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\bibitem{pmboksoftware}&lt;br /&gt;
Caupin, G., et al, &lt;br /&gt;
\emph{Software Extension to the PMBOK® Guide Fifth Edition, review}, &lt;br /&gt;
Fifth Edition,&lt;br /&gt;
http://marketplace.pmi.org/Pages/ProductDetail.aspx?GMProduct=00101457501 [visited 25/09 - 2015]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\bibitem{accidentalprof}&lt;br /&gt;
Pinto, J. K., Kharbanda, O. P., &lt;br /&gt;
\emph{Lessons for an Accidental Profession}, &lt;br /&gt;
(1995)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\bibitem{stillaccidentalprof}&lt;br /&gt;
Richardson, T. M. et al,&lt;br /&gt;
\emph{Is Project Management Still an Accidental Profession? A Qualitative Study of Career Trajectory}, &lt;br /&gt;
http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/5/1/2158244015572098&lt;br /&gt;
(1995)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\bibitem{thenandnow}&lt;br /&gt;
Ranf, D. E.,&lt;br /&gt;
\emph{Project management: Then and now},&lt;br /&gt;
Annales Universitatis Apulensis: Series Oeconomica, 13, 596-603&lt;br /&gt;
(2011)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\bibitem{jointleader}&lt;br /&gt;
Palmer, M., &lt;br /&gt;
\emph{Two chiefs not necessarily better than one}, &lt;br /&gt;
Financial Times,&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/3d509590-45d8-11e1-acc9-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3myDawPXD [visited 27/09 - 2015]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S152093</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:Organisational_resilience_with_mindfulness&amp;diff=13002</id>
		<title>Talk:Organisational resilience with mindfulness</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:Organisational_resilience_with_mindfulness&amp;diff=13002"/>
		<updated>2015-09-22T20:00:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S152093: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Josef: Hello, thank you for an interesting proposal. I really like the idea. Please make sure to go back to the original literature (e.g. Weick, see our whitepaper), and also follow the &amp;quot;Method&amp;quot; structure we propose. Also please make sure that you do not end up writing about &amp;quot;organizational resilience&amp;quot; in general, but making projects more resilient.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Review 1, s150621&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Interesting topic&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Nice that you give a description of the content of the article in the abstract&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	The table with the 5 principles is clear and straight forward, good with examples for each principle&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	The abstract should be before the contents &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Some of the sentences could be written easier, or described better, as for example this sentence: “Thorough management is crucial in resilient organisations (check ref, Geraldi et al, 2009) and mindfulness encompass the risk of the human mind.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	In the article you refer to many books, which is very good. The reference should consistently be done in wiki style, with footnotes. One example is the sentence; “Weick and Sutcliffe(2001) describe mindfulness as “a rich awareness of discrimatory detail”.”, where you don´t use the footnote reference style&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	It is nice that the article includes figures, but remember text for describing the figures, and to add the source of the figure &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	The application paragraph ends with a question, which I suggest rather to put into the discussion. Some alternatives for the answer of the question would also be nice to add to the discussion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Can see that you are not finished yet, but so far it looks interesting, and I look forward to read the rest when you are finished&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Review of Sorth90 (Rasmus Sorth-Olsen s117422), Reviewer 2==&lt;br /&gt;
* The feedback was given on Tuesday 22-09-2015 at 5 PM.&lt;br /&gt;
* The article is not finalized.&lt;br /&gt;
* Several sections are not written.&lt;br /&gt;
* It would have been an advantage if the article had described what “Organisational resilience with mindfulness” is and how the tools are applied and why. It would have made it easier for the reader to get an overview and at the same time find the information the reader is looking for.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Abstract:&lt;br /&gt;
* From the abstract, the article seems interesting.&lt;br /&gt;
* Who is seeking sociotechnical?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Big idea:&lt;br /&gt;
* Good language.&lt;br /&gt;
* Good use of sources.&lt;br /&gt;
* What section tell the reader?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5 Principles:&lt;br /&gt;
* References.&lt;br /&gt;
* Lacking a description of the figure.&lt;br /&gt;
* Good shape. The figure is not complete.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Application:&lt;br /&gt;
* Using an example. Thus the reader understand better the section.&lt;br /&gt;
* More in-depth description of Butler &amp;amp; Gray.&lt;br /&gt;
* Do you have a reference for the figure?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The rest of the article is missing, to be written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Reviewed by s152093, review 3==&lt;br /&gt;
* I know that the article isn’t done, but here are a few comments.&lt;br /&gt;
* Since you talk a lot about cognitive biases and resilience I think it would make sense to introduce the terms.&lt;br /&gt;
* The language is clear and there is a natural flow. &lt;br /&gt;
* It would be nice to see examples of fields where mindfulness would be very useful, and fields where it wouldn’t make sense to apply the techniques.&lt;br /&gt;
* Don’t forget to make the annotated bibliography where you write about each reference.&lt;br /&gt;
* The table gives a quick and clear overview. &lt;br /&gt;
* The picture is nice, but don’t forget to include it in the text. &lt;br /&gt;
* In general a really good idea. I’m looking forward to read the final version of the article :-)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S152093</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:Critical_chain_project_management_(CCPM)&amp;diff=12963</id>
		<title>Talk:Critical chain project management (CCPM)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:Critical_chain_project_management_(CCPM)&amp;diff=12963"/>
		<updated>2015-09-22T19:23:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S152093: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Anna: Good choice of topic, remember to be focused on the tool aspect and be very very concrete with the explanation so that your article can help other students understand and use this method.&lt;br /&gt;
Remember to follow the structure and include application and limitations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Review of S141926, Reviewer 3 ==&lt;br /&gt;
I think it is a good and well written article about Critical Chain Project Management, providing a good understanding of the method in a clear and well-structured way. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== General formal aspects ===&lt;br /&gt;
* I think the article is well structured, giving a good understanding of the methodological basis by providing information about the main aspects. Maybe the use of some bullet points would make this part more clear, under my point of view. &lt;br /&gt;
* The article engages the reader thanks to the fact that is easily readable, I think the use of the bullet points and subcategories help a lot to that with a logical and easy to follow work flow.&lt;br /&gt;
* Good reference notation and format. &lt;br /&gt;
* When mentioning methods/concepts that have a Wikipedia article it might be a good idea to link them. &lt;br /&gt;
* Grammatically correct with good punctuation and use of technical vocabulary. However, I could read some informal contractions that under my point of view should be avoided in this sort of writing. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===  Review of the content ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The article covers successfully the course requirements for a method article. Good description, application and limitations by giving a number of reliable references well notated throughout the whole article.&lt;br /&gt;
* Under my point of view, the history part is too long and maybe irrelevant here. I think there is too much personal information about Eliyahu M. Goldratt that might not be much relevant for the purpose of the article. Personally, I would not add his portrait :)&lt;br /&gt;
* The core principles are very well defined, using technical and precise language. Without too long and unnecessary sentences. If I had to suggest something it would be adding text formatting before starting the description of each factor (like bold titles).  &lt;br /&gt;
* Nice and useful illustrations that make more understandable the process and the article more attractive to the reader&lt;br /&gt;
* The length of the article seems appropriate and covers all the requirements of the method-article under my point of view. There is a good continuity throughout the article and under my point of view not unnecessary long sentences. &lt;br /&gt;
* Clear and well defined procedure to create a CCPM schedule, with examples to make it understandable to the reader.&lt;br /&gt;
* It provides a good understanding of the tool and real life examples (Japan section)&lt;br /&gt;
* Sometimes it is a bit difficult to differentiate between statements from literature and own opinion&lt;br /&gt;
* Good summary of advantages and disadvantages with . However, I would add some more limitations and/or how to overcome them. I would also suggest to add some bullet points or bold format to differentiate the sub-parts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Review made by s152093, reviewer 2==&lt;br /&gt;
*A really good article. I learned a lot from it, and the specific comments I have to the article are details. &lt;br /&gt;
*The language is clear, and there is a natural flow of the language. Good references. It does say in the description of the project though that we have to  “Summarize and outline the relevance of each reference to the topic”. This I can’t see anywhere. &lt;br /&gt;
*There are a few typos here and there.&lt;br /&gt;
*A little too long History section for my taste.&lt;br /&gt;
*Good introduction to the methodological basis, so that all the important tools and concepts are ready to be used for the explanation. &lt;br /&gt;
*The drawing in “Core principles” could be included in the explanation to make it even more clear. &lt;br /&gt;
*The example in “Creating a CCPM schedule” is good, but it is confusing that one example is described in text and another is shown in figure. It would be nice to have nice two aligned. &lt;br /&gt;
*Nice example with Japan, that really shows the strength of the method. &lt;br /&gt;
*Where it makes sense, it would be nice with some links to other Wiki-articles.&lt;br /&gt;
*It is a little hard to tell your opinion apart from statements from literature, even with the various references that you have.&lt;br /&gt;
*Are there really not any limitations to the theory? You point out that a critical path is needed for the CCPM to be made, and that the success is measured compared to previous very unstructured projects, and therefore its success is a little skewed. But isn’t there any more limitations to it than that?&lt;br /&gt;
*So as mentioned, all in all a very good article, and the comments I have made are almost all of them details :-)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S152093</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:Lean_as_a_project_management_tool&amp;diff=12922</id>
		<title>Talk:Lean as a project management tool</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:Lean_as_a_project_management_tool&amp;diff=12922"/>
		<updated>2015-09-22T18:27:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S152093: /* Review1 given by S152093 */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Mette: I like the idea and the topic you have chosen. As you write Lean contains many tools, so you could maybe consider if you should focus on only one tool in case of not getting your hands too full. It would still be possible to look at the questions you have presented by only looking at one tool.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Review1 given by S152093==&lt;br /&gt;
* Good article overall. I learned something from it, and it was very informative. A few typos here and there, but there is a full week to correct that :-) In my eyes it gives a very good overview, which is really good. Alternatively you could have chosen a specific area to go in depth with. A few specific comments:&lt;br /&gt;
* In “the Lean Structure” I think it would be a little easier to get an overview if the titles were included in the bullets, instead of only in the picture. The picture is really good though, as it gives a quick overview. &lt;br /&gt;
* In the next section the titles would be nice as well, but then in the section about how lean can be used as a tool it is included, and that is nice.&lt;br /&gt;
* If possible, link to other articles under Gantt chart, QCD-triangle etc. &lt;br /&gt;
* When the different parts of the Lean philosophy is described, it would be very useful for me to have the different steps compared to the “traditional” PM methods. You do it at the end of the article, but it would create an easier understanding for me, if there were some concrete examples on where it differs.&lt;br /&gt;
* You mention that other PM methods could be more useful in the conclusion. It would be really nice with an example of that, either here or somewhere else in the article. &lt;br /&gt;
* Maybe a little more talk about the limitations?&lt;br /&gt;
* The figures are good, but the aren&#039;t referred to, and that makes them unnecessary as it is right now. In my eyes, they need to be referred to and included in the text, if they are there. &lt;br /&gt;
* The three sections, “The Lean Stucture”, “What is Lean as a project management tool?”, and “How can Lean be use as a project management tool?” are a little repetitive to me.  Maybe to write it into less sections, or a little more defined outline of the sections would make it a little more clear to me. &lt;br /&gt;
* The bibliography is missing the part from the structure “Summarize and outline the relevance of each reference to the topic”.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S152093</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:Lean_as_a_project_management_tool&amp;diff=12919</id>
		<title>Talk:Lean as a project management tool</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:Lean_as_a_project_management_tool&amp;diff=12919"/>
		<updated>2015-09-22T18:25:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S152093: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Mette: I like the idea and the topic you have chosen. As you write Lean contains many tools, so you could maybe consider if you should focus on only one tool in case of not getting your hands too full. It would still be possible to look at the questions you have presented by only looking at one tool.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Review1 given by S152093==&lt;br /&gt;
* Good article overall. I learned something from it, and it was very informative. A few typos here and there, but there is a full week to correct that :-) In my eyes it gives a very good overview, which is really good. Alternatively you could have chosen a specific area to go in depth with. A few specific comments:&lt;br /&gt;
* In “the Lean Structure” I think it would be a little easier to get an overview if the titles were included in the bullets, instead of only in the picture. The picture is really good though, as it gives a quick overview. &lt;br /&gt;
* In the next section the titles would be nice as well, but then in the section about how lean can be used as a tool it is included, and that is nice.&lt;br /&gt;
* If possible, link to other articles under Gantt chart, QCD-triangle etc. &lt;br /&gt;
* When the different parts of the Lean philosophy is described, it would be very useful for me to have the different steps compared to the “traditional” PM methods. You do it at the end of the article, but it would create an easier understanding for me, if there were some concrete examples on where it differs.&lt;br /&gt;
* You mention that other PM methods could be more useful in the conclusion. It would be really nice with an example of that, either here or somewhere else in the article. &lt;br /&gt;
* Maybe a little more talk about the limitations?&lt;br /&gt;
* The three sections, “The Lean Stucture”, “What is Lean as a project management tool?”, and “How can Lean be use as a project management tool?” are a little repetitive to me.  Maybe to write it into less sections, or a little more defined outline of the sections would make it a little more clear to me. &lt;br /&gt;
* The bibliography is missing the part from the structure “Summarize and outline the relevance of each reference to the topic”.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S152093</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Leadership_styles&amp;diff=12675</id>
		<title>Leadership styles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Leadership_styles&amp;diff=12675"/>
		<updated>2015-09-22T13:46:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S152093: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
In literature, many things have been written about project management and the best practice hereof. Various standards exist with the aim of describing the field, and a long list of terms and processes are defined and described.&lt;br /&gt;
These standards aim to describe project management across different types of projects and across fields, but also the project manager and the best version of him. &lt;br /&gt;
In the ISO standard \cite{iso}, the issue is referred to as &amp;quot;Competencies of project personel&amp;quot;, and treats both the competencies a project manager should have and the competencies that the project team as a unit should have. Here it is stated that the project team should have a certain skill set, and that any gap between the required and available competencies could be a risk, and should be addressed. On the other hand there are listed three categories of competencies that a project manager should possess, that being technical competencies, behavioural competencies, and contextual competencies \cite[page 7]{iso}. Here, the technical competencies refer to the project management techniques.&lt;br /&gt;
This is the same approach as the International Project Management Association (IPMA) takes \cite{ipma}. IPMA focuses on 46 competence elements, whereof 20 of them are in the technical category. The two other categories are like in the ISO Standard behavioral and contextual competencies. Here too the technical competencies refer to the project management techniques.&lt;br /&gt;
The project managers&#039; desired technical competencies covers management of requirement and objectives, teamwork, scope and deliverables, time and project phases, etc. All competencies that can be acquired, and these are the competencies that a basic Project Management certification will confirm knowledge about.  &lt;br /&gt;
In the PMI standard (PMBOK), it is mentioned that in addition to area-specific skills, project managers possess a set of characteristics \cite[page 13]{pmbok5}, being within the area of knowledge, performance and personal. These characteristics covers many of the same areas as the ISO and IPMA standard, just using another terminology and with a different degree of details.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are all well known standards that are used across various fields and industries, and guide project managers to follow the best practice of management in a given project.&lt;br /&gt;
They all describe processes, techniques, and concepts, and aim to give the project manager a concrete and well tested set of tools to have the highest chances of obtaining success in a project surrounding. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
In the brief overview of what skills a project manager must possess, it might at first glance seem surprising that there is a lack of requirement of the field specific technical knowledge. There is a long list of requirement to the technical knowledge in the sense of project management techniques, but the demand of the area specific technical knowledge is limited.&lt;br /&gt;
Here it is noted that the organisations behind the standards all have an interest of being as broad as possible, so that as many project managers and leaders can use and apply their standards.&lt;br /&gt;
In the PMBOK there is a slight opening of a discussion about area specific skills, but the majority of the concept is treated in an appendix in the 4th edition \cite{pmbok4}, and is referred to as &amp;quot;Application Area Extensions&amp;quot;. Noticeably this section has been removed in the 5th edition \cite{pmbok5}. This though is only an introduction to the extension material that PMI offers within each project type, e.g. software projects, construction projects, etc., and treats for example area specific processes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally raises the question: does a project manager need area specific knowledge of the projects that he manages? Does a leader need technical skills within an area to lead a team to meet predefined goals and objectives?&lt;br /&gt;
Looking into the mentioned standards, the answer is no. There can be some area specific processes that would be ideal to follow \cite[appendix D]{pmbok5}, but there is not explicit requirements for concrete technical knowledge related to the working area.&lt;br /&gt;
But what is the alternative then? &lt;br /&gt;
An obvious suggestion would be to have people working their way up in the hierarchy, for example different types of engineers working themselves up to be project managers and project leaders. &lt;br /&gt;
This will also lead to problems. &lt;br /&gt;
First of all it will in general take many years to work up to a position as project manager, if it has to be learning by doing. It will also take away the good work force from the project teams, and have highly competent people doing things that they aren&#039;t necessarily good at, just because of company politics and rewarding systems. Furthermore there could also easily be a tendency of people working in the same field (and probably within the same company) for years after years to be more narrow minded, and less likely to think out of the box. After years in the field with practical experience and even more years climbing the latter, it is very easy to have a set way of doing things. &lt;br /&gt;
Is it too much to require from a person that he is both a highly competent leader but also a very skilled worker?&lt;br /&gt;
Taking a step back, and once again thinking of having a leader with very limited area-specific skills, one also encounters problems.&lt;br /&gt;
Being a successful project leader means being successful at delegate work to other people, in order to meet a set of predefined goals and objectives. &lt;br /&gt;
This naturally means that the project manager needs to have some kind of respect about his person, so what he lacks in area-specific skills, he must make up for in other areas.&lt;br /&gt;
But also a task as setting up a project team that covers a wide set of skills and estimating the time needed for specific sub-tasks becomes difficult.&lt;br /&gt;
A solution used in some bigger companies, is the dual leadership model (come with example hereof.). Here, duos of leaders are composed, where one person possesses one set of skills, and the other possesses another set of skills. In this way they can compliment each other, and cover a wider set leadership skills within a field. &lt;br /&gt;
This model brings other challenges with it. There has to be a clear definition of roles, for the duo to work dynamically. There also has to be a very clear communication strategy, for information to flow efficiently within an organization. &lt;br /&gt;
But these examples are less dominant compared to the cost of a setup like this. One successful and money-making project after the other could very easily make the setup worth it, but it puts a very natural limitation of the types of companies and projects that could have use of this model. It has to be of a certain size.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
All in all it is difficult to give one single answer to what type of leader a project or company needs. In all situations it is necessary to take a look at the project surroundings and prioritize the qualifications needed, and thereby to find the most suitable solution within the framework of the company. &lt;br /&gt;
But also being ready to spend time on further education of a leader&#039;s qualifications, that being either the project management skills or the area-specific skills, seems necessary.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S152093</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Leadership_styles&amp;diff=12351</id>
		<title>Leadership styles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Leadership_styles&amp;diff=12351"/>
		<updated>2015-09-22T07:29:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S152093: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;In literature, many things have been written about project management and the best practice hereof. Various standards exist with the aim of describing the field, and a long list of terms and processes are defined and described.&lt;br /&gt;
These standards aim to describe project management across different types of projects and across fields, but also the project manager and the best version of him. &lt;br /&gt;
In the ISO standard \cite{iso}, the issue is referred to as &amp;quot;Competencies of project personel&amp;quot;, and treats both the competencies a project manager should have and the competencies that the project team as a unit should have. Here it is stated that the project team should have a certain skill set, and that any gap between the required and available competencies could be a risk, and should be addressed. On the other hand there are listed three categories of competencies that a project manager should possess, that being technical competencies, behavioural competencies, and contextual competencies \cite[page 7]{iso}. Here, the technical competencies refer to the project management techniques.&lt;br /&gt;
This is the same approach as the International Project Management Association (IPMA) takes \cite{ipma}. IPMA focuses on 46 competence elements, whereof 20 of them are in the technical category. The two other categories are like in the ISO Standard behavioral and contextual competencies. Here too the technical competencies refer to the project management techniques.&lt;br /&gt;
The project managers&#039; desired technical competencies covers management of requirement and objectives, teamwork, scope and deliverables, time and project phases, etc. All competencies that can be acquired, and these are the competencies that a basic Project Management certification will confirm knowledge about.  &lt;br /&gt;
In the PMI standard (PMBOK), it is mentioned that in addition to area-specific skills, project managers possess a set of characteristics \cite[page 13]{pmbok5}, being within the area of knowledge, performance and personal. These characteristics covers many of the same areas as the ISO and IPMA standard, just using another terminology and with a different degree of details.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are all well known standards that are used across various fields and industries, and guide project managers to follow the best practice of management in a given project.&lt;br /&gt;
They all describe processes, techniques, and concepts, and aim to give the project manager a concrete and well tested set of tools to have the highest chances of obtaining success in a project surrounding. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the brief overview of what skills a project manager must possess, it might at first glance seem surprising that there is a lack of requirement of the field specific technical knowledge. There is a long list of requirement to the technical knowledge in the sense of project management techniques, but the demand of the area specific technical knowledge is limited.&lt;br /&gt;
Here it is noted that the organisations behind the standards all have an interest of being as broad as possible, so that as many project managers and leaders can use and apply their standards.&lt;br /&gt;
In the PMBOK there is a slight opening of a discussion about area specific skills, but the majority of the concept is treated in an appendix in the 4th edition \cite{pmbok4}, and is referred to as &amp;quot;Application Area Extensions&amp;quot;. Noticeably this section has been removed in the 5th edition \cite{pmbok5}. This though is only an introduction to the extension material that PMI offers within each project type, e.g. software projects, construction projects, etc., and treats for example area specific processes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This naturally raises the question: does a project manager need area specific knowledge of the projects that he manages? Does a leader need technical skills within an area to lead a team to meet predefined goals and objectives?&lt;br /&gt;
Looking into the mentioned standards, the answer is no. There can be some area specific processes that would be ideal to follow \cite[appendix D]{pmbok5}, but there is not explicit requirements for concrete technical knowledge related to the working area.&lt;br /&gt;
But what is the alternative then? &lt;br /&gt;
An obvious suggestion would be to have people working their way up in the hierarchy, for example different types of engineers working themselves up to be project managers and project leaders. &lt;br /&gt;
This will also lead to problems. &lt;br /&gt;
First of all it will in general take many years to work up to a position as project manager, if it has to be learning by doing. It will also take away the good work force from the project teams, and have highly competent people doing things that they aren&#039;t necessarily good at, just because of company politics and rewarding systems. Furthermore there could also easily be a tendency of people working in the same field (and probably within the same company) for years after years to be more narrow minded, and less likely to think out of the box. After years in the field with practical experience and even more years climbing the latter, it is very easy to have a set way of doing things. &lt;br /&gt;
Is it too much to require from a person that he is both a highly competent leader but also a very skilled worker?&lt;br /&gt;
Taking a step back, and once again thinking of having a leader with very limited area-specific skills, one also encounters problems.&lt;br /&gt;
Being a successful project leader means being successful at delegate work to other people, in order to meet a set of predefined goals and objectives. &lt;br /&gt;
This naturally means that the project manager needs to have some kind of respect about his person, so what he lacks in area-specific skills, he must make up for in other areas.&lt;br /&gt;
But also a task as setting up a project team that covers a wide set of skills and estimating the time needed for specific sub-tasks becomes difficult.&lt;br /&gt;
A solution used in some bigger companies, is the dual leadership model (come with example hereof.). Here, duos of leaders are composed, where one person possesses one set of skills, and the other possesses another set of skills. In this way they can compliment each other, and cover a wider set leadership skills within a field. &lt;br /&gt;
This model brings other challenges with it. There has to be a clear definition of roles, for the duo to work dynamically. There also has to be a very clear communication strategy, for information to flow efficiently within an organization. &lt;br /&gt;
But these examples are less dominant compared to the cost of a setup like this. One successful and money-making project after the other could very easily make the setup worth it, but it puts a very natural limitation of the types of companies and projects that could have use of this model. It has to be of a certain size.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All in all it is difficult to give one single answer to what type of leader a project or company needs. In all situations it is necessary to take a look at the project surroundings and prioritize the qualifications needed, and thereby to find the most suitable solution within the framework of the company. &lt;br /&gt;
But also being ready to spend time on further education of a leader&#039;s qualifications, that being either the project management skills or the area-specific skills, seems necessary.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S152093</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Leadership_styles&amp;diff=8607</id>
		<title>Leadership styles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Leadership_styles&amp;diff=8607"/>
		<updated>2015-09-15T10:59:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S152093: Created page with &amp;quot;In this article I am going to examine different types of leaderships, e.g. red leader versus green leader. Furthermore, an overview of different leadership styles throughout t...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;In this article I am going to examine different types of leaderships, e.g. red leader versus green leader.&lt;br /&gt;
Furthermore, an overview of different leadership styles throughout the last century is given. At the same time, an analysis of the effect of the &amp;quot;flat&amp;quot; hierarchy structure, that usually dominates Danish corporations, is given.&lt;br /&gt;
I am also going to analyze the effect of the first follower, and discuss the effect that the group has on their leader. Most people are aware of the fact that a leader is only as successful as the peers allow him to be, and this is a reality that a leader has to exploit.&lt;br /&gt;
Ultimately an insight is given to the concept of the knowledgeable leader as opposed to the general leader, and examples of settings where this dilemma is pronounced are given, among with an analysis of its consequences in a work settings.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S152093</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Articles_Fall_Term_2015&amp;diff=8604</id>
		<title>Articles Fall Term 2015</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Articles_Fall_Term_2015&amp;diff=8604"/>
		<updated>2015-09-15T10:58:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S152093: /* Overview of 2015 Wiki Articles */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Please complete this table with your name, user name and the title of your article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To create more lines in the table click &#039;&#039;&#039;Edit&#039;&#039;&#039; and use the following code to create more lines in the table and replace the example text with your own information:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre style=&amp;quot;white-space: pre-wrap; &lt;br /&gt;
white-space: -moz-pre-wrap; &lt;br /&gt;
white-space: -pre-wrap; &lt;br /&gt;
white-space: -o-pre-wrap; &lt;br /&gt;
word-wrap: break-word;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Last Name&lt;br /&gt;
|First Name&lt;br /&gt;
|User Name&lt;br /&gt;
|Link to Article&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Create a direct link by making square brackets around the title [[The Gantt chart and the usage nowadays]] (Case sensitive)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The straight lines ( | ) create columns and the straight line with a dash ( |- ) creates a new row in the table.&lt;br /&gt;
( |} ) is only used at the very end to finish the coding for the table.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Overview of 2015 Wiki Articles=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+Fall 2015 Wiki Articles&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Last Name&lt;br /&gt;
!First Name&lt;br /&gt;
!User Name&lt;br /&gt;
!Link to article&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Gkatzalas&lt;br /&gt;
|Nikolaos&lt;br /&gt;
|s141569&lt;br /&gt;
|[[The Gantt chart and the usage nowadays]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Lymperis&lt;br /&gt;
|Konstantinos&lt;br /&gt;
|s142330&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Risk Management in Oil and Gas Industry]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Filis&lt;br /&gt;
|Charalampos&lt;br /&gt;
|Ch.filis&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Project Risk Management and Project Risk Management Processes]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Larsen&lt;br /&gt;
|Leonora&lt;br /&gt;
|s112910&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Gantt Charts as a Tool for Project Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Sala Vilar&lt;br /&gt;
|Lluís Ròmul&lt;br /&gt;
|s141586&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Portfolio Management in a Startup]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Pitsavas&lt;br /&gt;
|Konstantinos&lt;br /&gt;
|Konspits&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Modularisation: A modern process for project management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Kampianakis&lt;br /&gt;
|Andreas&lt;br /&gt;
|s150912&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Financial Portfolio Optimization Methods]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Penzes&lt;br /&gt;
|Balint&lt;br /&gt;
|s141943&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Product development and portfolio management processes at LEGO]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Hozmache&lt;br /&gt;
|Mihaela&lt;br /&gt;
|s146898&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Risk Management]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Le Corre&lt;br /&gt;
|Damien&lt;br /&gt;
|Damien&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Game theory in project management]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Bertrand&lt;br /&gt;
|Fabien&lt;br /&gt;
|150477&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Multi project management]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Cassel&lt;br /&gt;
|Sara&lt;br /&gt;
|Sarac&lt;br /&gt;
|[[The benefits of systems engineering]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Sergi&lt;br /&gt;
|Gibaja Musachs&lt;br /&gt;
|S141926&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Rapid Application Development in Extreme Project Management]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Poza&lt;br /&gt;
|María&lt;br /&gt;
|s150793&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Integrated Cost and Schedule Control]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Kulikova&lt;br /&gt;
|Nataliia&lt;br /&gt;
|s140767&lt;br /&gt;
|[[SCRUM Method]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Pekala&lt;br /&gt;
|Adam&lt;br /&gt;
|Adam.pekala&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Critical Path Method in Construction Industry]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Garnotel&lt;br /&gt;
|Gaëtan&lt;br /&gt;
|gaetangarnotel&lt;br /&gt;
|[[V-Model]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Ghanizada&lt;br /&gt;
|Naweed&lt;br /&gt;
|S103745&lt;br /&gt;
|[[PRINCE2, A Project Management Methodology]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Jacobsen&lt;br /&gt;
|Martin&lt;br /&gt;
|MistaJacob&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Mindfulness and Cognitive Biases in Project Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Ferraresi&lt;br /&gt;
|Fabrizio&lt;br /&gt;
|S150905&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Projects in Controlled Environments, a process-based approach for project management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Tanghus&lt;br /&gt;
|Bjarke&lt;br /&gt;
|S113815&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Location Based Scheduling]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Højgaard Hindhede&lt;br /&gt;
|Daniel &lt;br /&gt;
|S143352 &lt;br /&gt;
|[[ Critical path optimization in construction management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Gayot&lt;br /&gt;
|Charles-Henri&lt;br /&gt;
|s141074&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Responsibility Assignment Matrix (RACI Matrix)]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Thorp Sørensen&lt;br /&gt;
|Anders&lt;br /&gt;
|s103183&lt;br /&gt;
|[[The Gantt Chart]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Makris&lt;br /&gt;
|Dimitrios&lt;br /&gt;
|Dimak&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Benchmarking in Project Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Greiling&lt;br /&gt;
|Lea&lt;br /&gt;
|Lea&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Lean in Project Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Latorre Duque&lt;br /&gt;
|Ana&lt;br /&gt;
|Ana&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Modularity and Black-Boxing]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Almanzi&lt;br /&gt;
|Stefano&lt;br /&gt;
|S141530&lt;br /&gt;
|[[ Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Montagner&lt;br /&gt;
|Giacomo&lt;br /&gt;
|S150821&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Scrum Methodology in the Agile Project Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Ruiz Muñoz&lt;br /&gt;
|Gustavo Adolfo&lt;br /&gt;
|S121408&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Lean 6 Sigma in project management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Kalmus&lt;br /&gt;
|Thomas&lt;br /&gt;
|S141938&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Program evaluation and review technique (PERT) ]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Gudmundsson&lt;br /&gt;
|Arnar Gauti&lt;br /&gt;
|S141543&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Program management in change management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Jacobsen&lt;br /&gt;
|Ian Thobias&lt;br /&gt;
|S113735&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Story Points Estimation]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Boesgaard&lt;br /&gt;
|Katrine&lt;br /&gt;
|KB1991&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Gantt Chart]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Sorth-Olsen&lt;br /&gt;
|Rasmus&lt;br /&gt;
|Sorth90&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Lean as a project management tool]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Salling&lt;br /&gt;
|Stephanie&lt;br /&gt;
|StephSalling&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Management in E. Pihl &amp;amp; Søn A/S]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Ruina&lt;br /&gt;
|Jessica Linda&lt;br /&gt;
|Jejenji &lt;br /&gt;
|[[Scheduling techniques in Project Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Gjerstrup&lt;br /&gt;
|Jacob&lt;br /&gt;
|s113440&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Fault tree analysis]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Lynge&lt;br /&gt;
|Jane&lt;br /&gt;
|s997303&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Theory of Constraint]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Palmerini&lt;br /&gt;
|Alessandro&lt;br /&gt;
|alex161&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Project Management Communication]] &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Tvedt&lt;br /&gt;
|Ida Marie&lt;br /&gt;
|IMT&lt;br /&gt;
|[[BREEAM - project management and sustainable development]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Søndenaa&lt;br /&gt;
|Mathilde Hanssen&lt;br /&gt;
|s150621&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Critical chain project management (CCPM)]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Helassalo&lt;br /&gt;
|Antti&lt;br /&gt;
|s141506&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Development phase of idea to project]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Thorning-Schmidt&lt;br /&gt;
|Nanna&lt;br /&gt;
|Nannats&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Earned Value Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Bureika&lt;br /&gt;
|Edvinas&lt;br /&gt;
|s141931&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Communication in Project Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Rasmussen&lt;br /&gt;
|Marie-Louise&lt;br /&gt;
|DI2009&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Cross cultural teamwork]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Lara Hoces&lt;br /&gt;
|Fernando&lt;br /&gt;
|s131882&lt;br /&gt;
|[[The Oticon Case: the Spaghetti organisation]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Christos&lt;br /&gt;
|Stamatis&lt;br /&gt;
|S145170&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Olympic Games London 2012: When the client strives for innovation (The London model)]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Moe&lt;br /&gt;
|Elizabeth Lindhard&lt;br /&gt;
|113129&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Contracting as a PM]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Lessis&lt;br /&gt;
|Vasileios&lt;br /&gt;
|lessisv&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Rational Unified Process (RUP)]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Klibo Buur&lt;br /&gt;
|Christian&lt;br /&gt;
|Buurbuur&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Project Execution Model (PEM)]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Bachmann&lt;br /&gt;
|Thomas&lt;br /&gt;
|s117318&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Lean Tools in Project Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Vilar Bustos&lt;br /&gt;
|Alberto&lt;br /&gt;
|s142581&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Minimizing Risk and Uncertainties in Construction Projects]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Trap Wiegandt&lt;br /&gt;
|Sissel&lt;br /&gt;
|s112195&lt;br /&gt;
|[[The Critical Path Method (CPM)]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Christensen&lt;br /&gt;
|Britt Marie Lekven&lt;br /&gt;
|brittmch&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Lean in building and construction industry]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Vestergaard Andersen&lt;br /&gt;
|Andreas&lt;br /&gt;
|AndreasAndersen&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Management of Project Change ]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Ann-Elise&lt;br /&gt;
|Gustavsen&lt;br /&gt;
|Alise&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Stakeholder Analysis and Matrices ]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Krogh&lt;br /&gt;
|Daniel&lt;br /&gt;
|DanielKrogh&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Managing Uncertainty and Risk on the Project]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Fabio&lt;br /&gt;
|Labrini&lt;br /&gt;
|s142911&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Critical Chain Project Management to cope with uncertainty]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Viig&lt;br /&gt;
|Oliver Johannes&lt;br /&gt;
|s102935&lt;br /&gt;
|[[BIM as a project management tool on construction projects]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Federico&lt;br /&gt;
|Sbernini&lt;br /&gt;
|s141573&lt;br /&gt;
|[[The critical path method as input for quantitative schedule risk assessment]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Augustin&lt;br /&gt;
|Bouet&lt;br /&gt;
|s142823&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Metra Potential Method]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Eva Schultz&lt;br /&gt;
|Hansen&lt;br /&gt;
|s112960&lt;br /&gt;
|[[The Role of Boundary Objects in Project Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Otiv&lt;br /&gt;
|Peter&lt;br /&gt;
|s145166&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Project Financing Initiative]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Juhasz&lt;br /&gt;
|Bianka Zsuzsanna&lt;br /&gt;
|Biankajuh&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Changing conversations based on the Stacey matrix]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Rodrigues&lt;br /&gt;
|Rafael&lt;br /&gt;
|s150931&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Project Integration Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Camilla &lt;br /&gt;
|Flataukan&lt;br /&gt;
|s150801&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Mindfulness in Project Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Søren  &lt;br /&gt;
|Thomsen&lt;br /&gt;
|s140046&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Organisational resilience with mindfulness]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Schrøder  &lt;br /&gt;
|Niklas&lt;br /&gt;
|Faker&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Theory of Constraints]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Herreros&lt;br /&gt;
|Maria&lt;br /&gt;
|s142597&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Early warning signals in project management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Larsen&lt;br /&gt;
|Martin T&lt;br /&gt;
|s103128&lt;br /&gt;
|Article page not created yet&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Hoier&lt;br /&gt;
|Lasse Rasmus&lt;br /&gt;
|s117015&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Application of Antifragility in Project Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Shapel  &lt;br /&gt;
|Sarah Groot&lt;br /&gt;
|s152093&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Leadership styles]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S152093</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>