<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-GB">
	<id>http://13.50.150.85/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=S123368</id>
	<title>DTU ProjectLab - User contributions [en-gb]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://13.50.150.85/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=S123368"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php/Special:Contributions/S123368"/>
	<updated>2026-07-15T08:06:59Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.3</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68890</id>
		<title>What is SWOT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68890"/>
		<updated>2019-03-01T09:32:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S123368: /* Limitations and critiques of SWOT */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article will be presenting the tool SWOT and the main points of SWOT will be covered alongside with an introduction on how to apply SWOT. Moreover, the strength and weaknesses of this tool will also be presented so it can be taken into consideration when using the tool. SWOT can be applied in many different areas in project management, whether it is business strategy or market research but is especially used within marketing.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Much of the original groundwork for what is known as SWOT today, was already established more than 50 years ago. A man name Kurt Lewin, his landmark posthumous text, called; Field Theory in Social Science, emphasized that an organization’s desires are influenced by different driving forces or enhancers and limitations and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
Many companies when facing a problem whether it is external or internal, by using SWOT they can create a quick overview of what your obstacles you need to overcome and what chances there are to take.&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is four initials standing for four different elements, where the elements are used to identify different perspectives of consequences. They each stands for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats. The first two factors, Strengths and Weaknesses are factors for the internal, typically when you are inside a company, you will look within to see what kind of Strengths you have and what kind of Weaknesses you have. Then there are Opportunities and Threats, which are external factors, so you look from internal to external. Opportunities help to identify chances there are to grow, expand and even more potential of a blue ocean and Threats are what kind of competitors are there, restrains, regulations. &lt;br /&gt;
More details about this subject will be seen down below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A brief history of SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier it was mentioned that the original groundwork was laid by Lewin, but around the same time there were two professors from Harvard, George Albert Smith Jr. and C. Roland Christensen, who also were interested in the related issue about identifying the extent of the correlation of the organization’s strategy and its competitive environment. Therefore, they instructed their students to address if a company took into account the requirements of a competitive environments. Around a decade later another professor from the same university wanted to see the already by then named SWOT, if it could be used to explore the ways in which competitive thinking influences business strategies.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Handbook of Improving Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction to SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is a strategic analytical tool, for assessing strengths and weaknesses of a business, and also for analyzing opportunities available to the business as well as threats faced by the business. SWOT can also be used for personal purposes or when managing a project. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As mentioned S.W.O.T are initials to different words, each letter stands for something different, with each one of them having their very own purpose, where they together create a very strong foundation for an analysis, whatever the purpose is for. SWOT analysis is processed by a group of stakeholders, where they: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Identify internal and external obstacles and enhancers of performance&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Analyse those factors, which are basted on estimates of their contribution to the net value and how much they are controllable&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. To decide what further or future actions to take regarding those factors &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what do they stand for?&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* S – Strengths – Refers to internal competencies, valuables resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* W - Weaknesses – Refers to internal inhibitors of the competencies, resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* O - Opportunities – Refers to external enhancer of performance, which can be pursued or used&lt;br /&gt;
* T - Threats – An external inhibitor of performance that has the potential to reduce accomplishments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now that we know what SWOT stands for, but how does one go around about them? There are some questions to get it started &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;3&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://www.professionalacademy.com/blogs-and-advice/marketing-theories---swot-analysis&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Strengths: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we best at?&lt;br /&gt;
* What intellectual property do we own that can help us with this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What specific skills does the current workforce have that can contribute to this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What financial resources do we have for reaching this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances do we have?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our bargaining power with both suppliers and intermediaries?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weaknesses: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we worst at doing?&lt;br /&gt;
* Is our intellectual property outdated?&lt;br /&gt;
* What training does our workforce lack?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our financial position?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances should we have, but don’t?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Opportunity: &lt;br /&gt;
* What changes in the external environment can we exploit?&lt;br /&gt;
* What weaknesses in our competitors can we use to our advantage?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new technology might become available to us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new markets might be opening to us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Threats:&lt;br /&gt;
* What might our competitors be able to do to hurt us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new legislation might damage our interests?&lt;br /&gt;
* What social changes might threaten us?&lt;br /&gt;
* How will the economic cycle affect us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Naturally, there are a lot more questions that can be asked, but these questions for each of the elements, are good starting points. These questions will help you get started on doing the SWOT. Remember, it is always a good idea to do SWOT in the early stages, because it gives you a detailed overview and gives you information, which you can use for your later processes in decision making and planning.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;3&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://www.professionalacademy.com/blogs-and-advice/marketing-theories---swot-analysis&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Visually the SWOT can be shown as this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SWOTKL.png‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 4x4 Matrix&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How to conduct SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
There are no doubt a couple of ways to conduct SWOT, the one which is more of a practical method, a guide on how to fill in the SWOT&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;5&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://www.smartdraw.com/swot-analysis/&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, may be a good place to start. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Determine the object: Which means to decide on a key project or a strategy, where you want to analyse. Write the name of it on the top of a page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Draw the layout: Draw a very large square box and then divide it into four smaller boxes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Put name inside each of the boxes on the top: The top left box write; Strengths, the one beside write; Weaknesses. The box under Weaknesses, write Threats and the last one Opportunity, it should look like the figure earlier (Figure). If you wish a more detailed layout, you can add a smaller box that outlines Strengths and Weaknesses as “Internal” and Opportunities and Threats as “External”, and “Helpful” for Strengths and Opportunities, where Weaknesses and Threats will have a “Harmful” outline. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Add the factors: Add the factors that affects the project in the different boxes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Draw conclusions: Decide if the project is a go or a no-go based on the negative and positive relative. Maybe you are already on a project, but want to see how the situation is, then you need to decide what to do about the information you got out of SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the Myriad guideline&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, there exist a way to conduct SWOT, in a bit of a different manner. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Recruiting stakeholders: This phase’s idea is simply to try to include your stakeholders. According to the book; Exploring Corporate Strategy by Gerry Johnson, Kevan Scholes and Richard Whittington, you can map your stakeholders according to their interest in a project. If you google “Power-interest matrix”, you can see how you should approach your stakeholders in relative to “Interest” and “Power”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Convening the focus group: This step is to call in the stakeholders, most optimal from 8-48, and explain to them what the SWOT is, and how this little workshop is going to work. The first step is to divide the stakeholders into smaller group, where the idea is to get a well-rounded SWOT, where the stakeholders also can agree on the factors. Of course, the preparations are supposed to be made beforehand, such as already made SWOT figures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Identifying and categorizing SWOTs: Now when the stakeholders are in the groups, they should start to work on the SWOT.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Analyzing SWOTs: In “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;Handbook of Improving Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://www.professionalacademy.com/blogs-and-advice/marketing-theories---swot-analysis&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, there is a figure showing, on how they are analyzing the SWOT factors within a Construction Company. Similar should be done. Hereafter, two additional questions should be asked: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor internally or externally controlled?&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor an enhancer or an inhibitor of performance? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where after you put the factors for Strengths, Weaknesses, Threats according to in “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace”&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Handbook of Improving Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, to rank with numbers from 1-5 how much it is under your control and for enhancers and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Synthesizing SWOTs: After the previous step, now the data can be collected, and the data can be shown visually, there is an example in the “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace”&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Handbook of Improving Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.	Interpreting findings and deliberating action: Now it is the time to decide upon, which and how to act upon the findings. There are a few actions to take according to what the factors are. Monitor: The factors which are neither enhancer nor inhibitors. Mitigate Threats and Exploit Opportunities: Actions are to be taken, if it is seen that there are threats that will hinder the project, likewise with opportunities, it is supposed to be exploited if it will add value. Lastly, Confront Weaknesses and Leverage Strengths: Because these factors are internal, it is easier to control them, therefore strengths should be leveraged to help achieve desired results and weaknesses should be confronted. &lt;br /&gt;
As you can see the latter option is more wholesome and no doubt more detailed, depending your situation on using SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
Remember these guidelines are only one of the many guidelines.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== When to use SWOT == &lt;br /&gt;
Here are just a few to show when it is applicable to use SWOT, and these mentioned components are also included in something called Human Performance Technology (HPT), which can deepen your understanding on SWOT, but it is not necessary&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Handbook of Improving Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	In performance analysis &lt;br /&gt;
When identifying the degree to what internal practices and external environmental influences impact how results are currently being accomplished within an organization &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	In cause analysis&lt;br /&gt;
When finding what practices should be continued or even expanded in the longer terms, as well as those that should be discontinued or replaced by other methods or tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	In strategic planning&lt;br /&gt;
When in strategic planning and needs assessment for identifying the factors that contribute to or detract from organizational effectiveness &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	In evaluation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When monitoring the internal and external environment of a program for change over time, for tracking new SWOTs as they emerge, and for documenting for previously existing SWOTs as they become less influential on a program&lt;br /&gt;
Besides these quite general categories within HPT practice, SWOT can also be a great to use within&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;: &lt;br /&gt;
* Appreciative inquiry – To clarify the organization’s strengths and opportunities &lt;br /&gt;
* Benchmarking – To identify possible opportunities and threats&lt;br /&gt;
* Industry analysis – For contextualizing opportunities existing in the market&lt;br /&gt;
* Situation analysis – For evaluating possible trends or ongoing trends in the markets, costs and competition and competitors&lt;br /&gt;
* Scenario planning – For considering possible and preferred long-term scenarios&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, these are the mentioned area where SWOT can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Critical success factors =&lt;br /&gt;
There is always some critical success factor, when using a tool and SWOT is not excluded&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Here are a couple of points to be aware of if you want a good SWOT: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Information shared by stakeholders within a SWOT analysis should never be used to play the blame game, but it should be a basis for continuous improvement&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	When conducting the weaknesses, never blame the others for faults or shortcoming, because being honest is essential&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	SWOT’s data can be collected live depending on the resources and constraints that exists&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	It may be useful to weight the experienced stakeholders’ evaluation of the SWOT’s&lt;br /&gt;
These are some points that may be good to keep in the back of the head, when going through SWOT.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Limitations and critiques of SWOT=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not doubt that SWOT is a very strong tool when carried out right, it can provide valuable knowledge about both customer preferences and competitors intents, and nevertheless where the possible opportunities to grow are. There are also some critiques of SWOT, such as: &lt;br /&gt;
* There are no prioritization of the identified factors and it seems like it was hard to meaningfully compare the importance of one SWOT to another&lt;br /&gt;
* No figuring of costs and benefits or how to use them to achieve their objectives&lt;br /&gt;
* Sometimes it can be hazy on what is external and internal &lt;br /&gt;
And, some limitations about SWOT:&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not help determine the costs and benefits of alternative performance solutions&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not rank the factors according to their criticality&lt;br /&gt;
* It provides minimal information regarding the degree to which an organization or work team possess influence over the factors that have been identified. &lt;br /&gt;
Despite all these, it is possibly to enhance SWOT to its further usability by considering 2 factors&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Approximations of the degree which an organization can control over each factor &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Estimate the costs and benefits of the factors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And turn them into questions for better decision, by asking: &lt;br /&gt;
* How much control does the organization have over each SWOT factor?&lt;br /&gt;
* How much does each SWOT factor cost or benefit the organization? &lt;br /&gt;
By using the above two questions in SWOT, it will further enhance SWOTs usability&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Conclusion =&lt;br /&gt;
This article has served its purpose, to introduce you to the tool SWOT, where the article has gone through the main points of SWOT, but have only scratched the surface. If you want to research more about SWOT, you should be more than welcome to do so, but this article has given you a good starting point. SWOT is an amazing tool to use in various areas or projects, does not matter if you want to use it for personal or professional purpose. Although, SWOT is a very widely used tool, it does have its own flaws and limitations, but it is a tool which has been used numerous times all over again worldwide, in all kinds of industries and professionals. Therefore, if you can master the tool and make up for its mentioned shortcomings with the questions that will cover its limitations to a maximum, it will be an incredible tool which is very valuable for your project or business.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Reference=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S123368</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68889</id>
		<title>What is SWOT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68889"/>
		<updated>2019-03-01T09:32:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S123368: /* Critical success factors */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article will be presenting the tool SWOT and the main points of SWOT will be covered alongside with an introduction on how to apply SWOT. Moreover, the strength and weaknesses of this tool will also be presented so it can be taken into consideration when using the tool. SWOT can be applied in many different areas in project management, whether it is business strategy or market research but is especially used within marketing.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Much of the original groundwork for what is known as SWOT today, was already established more than 50 years ago. A man name Kurt Lewin, his landmark posthumous text, called; Field Theory in Social Science, emphasized that an organization’s desires are influenced by different driving forces or enhancers and limitations and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
Many companies when facing a problem whether it is external or internal, by using SWOT they can create a quick overview of what your obstacles you need to overcome and what chances there are to take.&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is four initials standing for four different elements, where the elements are used to identify different perspectives of consequences. They each stands for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats. The first two factors, Strengths and Weaknesses are factors for the internal, typically when you are inside a company, you will look within to see what kind of Strengths you have and what kind of Weaknesses you have. Then there are Opportunities and Threats, which are external factors, so you look from internal to external. Opportunities help to identify chances there are to grow, expand and even more potential of a blue ocean and Threats are what kind of competitors are there, restrains, regulations. &lt;br /&gt;
More details about this subject will be seen down below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A brief history of SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier it was mentioned that the original groundwork was laid by Lewin, but around the same time there were two professors from Harvard, George Albert Smith Jr. and C. Roland Christensen, who also were interested in the related issue about identifying the extent of the correlation of the organization’s strategy and its competitive environment. Therefore, they instructed their students to address if a company took into account the requirements of a competitive environments. Around a decade later another professor from the same university wanted to see the already by then named SWOT, if it could be used to explore the ways in which competitive thinking influences business strategies.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Handbook of Improving Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction to SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is a strategic analytical tool, for assessing strengths and weaknesses of a business, and also for analyzing opportunities available to the business as well as threats faced by the business. SWOT can also be used for personal purposes or when managing a project. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As mentioned S.W.O.T are initials to different words, each letter stands for something different, with each one of them having their very own purpose, where they together create a very strong foundation for an analysis, whatever the purpose is for. SWOT analysis is processed by a group of stakeholders, where they: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Identify internal and external obstacles and enhancers of performance&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Analyse those factors, which are basted on estimates of their contribution to the net value and how much they are controllable&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. To decide what further or future actions to take regarding those factors &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what do they stand for?&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* S – Strengths – Refers to internal competencies, valuables resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* W - Weaknesses – Refers to internal inhibitors of the competencies, resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* O - Opportunities – Refers to external enhancer of performance, which can be pursued or used&lt;br /&gt;
* T - Threats – An external inhibitor of performance that has the potential to reduce accomplishments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now that we know what SWOT stands for, but how does one go around about them? There are some questions to get it started &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;3&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://www.professionalacademy.com/blogs-and-advice/marketing-theories---swot-analysis&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Strengths: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we best at?&lt;br /&gt;
* What intellectual property do we own that can help us with this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What specific skills does the current workforce have that can contribute to this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What financial resources do we have for reaching this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances do we have?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our bargaining power with both suppliers and intermediaries?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weaknesses: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we worst at doing?&lt;br /&gt;
* Is our intellectual property outdated?&lt;br /&gt;
* What training does our workforce lack?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our financial position?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances should we have, but don’t?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Opportunity: &lt;br /&gt;
* What changes in the external environment can we exploit?&lt;br /&gt;
* What weaknesses in our competitors can we use to our advantage?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new technology might become available to us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new markets might be opening to us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Threats:&lt;br /&gt;
* What might our competitors be able to do to hurt us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new legislation might damage our interests?&lt;br /&gt;
* What social changes might threaten us?&lt;br /&gt;
* How will the economic cycle affect us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Naturally, there are a lot more questions that can be asked, but these questions for each of the elements, are good starting points. These questions will help you get started on doing the SWOT. Remember, it is always a good idea to do SWOT in the early stages, because it gives you a detailed overview and gives you information, which you can use for your later processes in decision making and planning.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;3&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://www.professionalacademy.com/blogs-and-advice/marketing-theories---swot-analysis&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Visually the SWOT can be shown as this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SWOTKL.png‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 4x4 Matrix&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How to conduct SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
There are no doubt a couple of ways to conduct SWOT, the one which is more of a practical method, a guide on how to fill in the SWOT&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;5&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://www.smartdraw.com/swot-analysis/&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, may be a good place to start. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Determine the object: Which means to decide on a key project or a strategy, where you want to analyse. Write the name of it on the top of a page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Draw the layout: Draw a very large square box and then divide it into four smaller boxes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Put name inside each of the boxes on the top: The top left box write; Strengths, the one beside write; Weaknesses. The box under Weaknesses, write Threats and the last one Opportunity, it should look like the figure earlier (Figure). If you wish a more detailed layout, you can add a smaller box that outlines Strengths and Weaknesses as “Internal” and Opportunities and Threats as “External”, and “Helpful” for Strengths and Opportunities, where Weaknesses and Threats will have a “Harmful” outline. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Add the factors: Add the factors that affects the project in the different boxes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Draw conclusions: Decide if the project is a go or a no-go based on the negative and positive relative. Maybe you are already on a project, but want to see how the situation is, then you need to decide what to do about the information you got out of SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the Myriad guideline&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, there exist a way to conduct SWOT, in a bit of a different manner. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Recruiting stakeholders: This phase’s idea is simply to try to include your stakeholders. According to the book; Exploring Corporate Strategy by Gerry Johnson, Kevan Scholes and Richard Whittington, you can map your stakeholders according to their interest in a project. If you google “Power-interest matrix”, you can see how you should approach your stakeholders in relative to “Interest” and “Power”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Convening the focus group: This step is to call in the stakeholders, most optimal from 8-48, and explain to them what the SWOT is, and how this little workshop is going to work. The first step is to divide the stakeholders into smaller group, where the idea is to get a well-rounded SWOT, where the stakeholders also can agree on the factors. Of course, the preparations are supposed to be made beforehand, such as already made SWOT figures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Identifying and categorizing SWOTs: Now when the stakeholders are in the groups, they should start to work on the SWOT.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Analyzing SWOTs: In “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;Handbook of Improving Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://www.professionalacademy.com/blogs-and-advice/marketing-theories---swot-analysis&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, there is a figure showing, on how they are analyzing the SWOT factors within a Construction Company. Similar should be done. Hereafter, two additional questions should be asked: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor internally or externally controlled?&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor an enhancer or an inhibitor of performance? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where after you put the factors for Strengths, Weaknesses, Threats according to in “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace”&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Handbook of Improving Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, to rank with numbers from 1-5 how much it is under your control and for enhancers and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Synthesizing SWOTs: After the previous step, now the data can be collected, and the data can be shown visually, there is an example in the “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace”&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Handbook of Improving Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.	Interpreting findings and deliberating action: Now it is the time to decide upon, which and how to act upon the findings. There are a few actions to take according to what the factors are. Monitor: The factors which are neither enhancer nor inhibitors. Mitigate Threats and Exploit Opportunities: Actions are to be taken, if it is seen that there are threats that will hinder the project, likewise with opportunities, it is supposed to be exploited if it will add value. Lastly, Confront Weaknesses and Leverage Strengths: Because these factors are internal, it is easier to control them, therefore strengths should be leveraged to help achieve desired results and weaknesses should be confronted. &lt;br /&gt;
As you can see the latter option is more wholesome and no doubt more detailed, depending your situation on using SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
Remember these guidelines are only one of the many guidelines.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== When to use SWOT == &lt;br /&gt;
Here are just a few to show when it is applicable to use SWOT, and these mentioned components are also included in something called Human Performance Technology (HPT), which can deepen your understanding on SWOT, but it is not necessary&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Handbook of Improving Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	In performance analysis &lt;br /&gt;
When identifying the degree to what internal practices and external environmental influences impact how results are currently being accomplished within an organization &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	In cause analysis&lt;br /&gt;
When finding what practices should be continued or even expanded in the longer terms, as well as those that should be discontinued or replaced by other methods or tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	In strategic planning&lt;br /&gt;
When in strategic planning and needs assessment for identifying the factors that contribute to or detract from organizational effectiveness &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	In evaluation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When monitoring the internal and external environment of a program for change over time, for tracking new SWOTs as they emerge, and for documenting for previously existing SWOTs as they become less influential on a program&lt;br /&gt;
Besides these quite general categories within HPT practice, SWOT can also be a great to use within&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;: &lt;br /&gt;
* Appreciative inquiry – To clarify the organization’s strengths and opportunities &lt;br /&gt;
* Benchmarking – To identify possible opportunities and threats&lt;br /&gt;
* Industry analysis – For contextualizing opportunities existing in the market&lt;br /&gt;
* Situation analysis – For evaluating possible trends or ongoing trends in the markets, costs and competition and competitors&lt;br /&gt;
* Scenario planning – For considering possible and preferred long-term scenarios&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, these are the mentioned area where SWOT can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Critical success factors =&lt;br /&gt;
There is always some critical success factor, when using a tool and SWOT is not excluded&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Here are a couple of points to be aware of if you want a good SWOT: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Information shared by stakeholders within a SWOT analysis should never be used to play the blame game, but it should be a basis for continuous improvement&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	When conducting the weaknesses, never blame the others for faults or shortcoming, because being honest is essential&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	SWOT’s data can be collected live depending on the resources and constraints that exists&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	It may be useful to weight the experienced stakeholders’ evaluation of the SWOT’s&lt;br /&gt;
These are some points that may be good to keep in the back of the head, when going through SWOT.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Limitations and critiques of SWOT=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not doubt that SWOT is a very strong tool when carried out right, it can provide valuable knowledge about both customer preferences and competitors intents, and nevertheless where the possible opportunities to grow are. There are also some critiques of SWOT, such as: &lt;br /&gt;
* There are no prioritization of the identified factors and it seems like it was hard to meaningfully compare the importance of one SWOT to another&lt;br /&gt;
* No figuring of costs and benefits or how to use them to achieve their objectives&lt;br /&gt;
* Sometimes it can be hazy on what is external and internal &lt;br /&gt;
And, some limitations about SWOT:&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not help determine the costs and benefits of alternative performance solutions&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not rank the factors according to their criticality&lt;br /&gt;
* It provides minimal information regarding the degree to which an organization or work team possess influence over the factors that have been identified. &lt;br /&gt;
Despite all these, it is possibly to enhance SWOT to its further usability by considering 2 factors&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Approximations of the degree which an organization can control over each factor &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Estimate the costs and benefits of the factors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And turn them into questions for better decision, by asking: &lt;br /&gt;
* How much control does the organization have over each SWOT factor?&lt;br /&gt;
* How much does each SWOT factor cost or benefit the organization? &lt;br /&gt;
By using the above two questions in SWOT, it will further enhance SWOTs usability&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Conclusion =&lt;br /&gt;
This article has served its purpose, to introduce you to the tool SWOT, where the article has gone through the main points of SWOT, but have only scratched the surface. If you want to research more about SWOT, you should be more than welcome to do so, but this article has given you a good starting point. SWOT is an amazing tool to use in various areas or projects, does not matter if you want to use it for personal or professional purpose. Although, SWOT is a very widely used tool, it does have its own flaws and limitations, but it is a tool which has been used numerous times all over again worldwide, in all kinds of industries and professionals. Therefore, if you can master the tool and make up for its mentioned shortcomings with the questions that will cover its limitations to a maximum, it will be an incredible tool which is very valuable for your project or business.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Reference=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S123368</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68888</id>
		<title>What is SWOT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68888"/>
		<updated>2019-03-01T09:32:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S123368: /* How to conduct SWOT */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article will be presenting the tool SWOT and the main points of SWOT will be covered alongside with an introduction on how to apply SWOT. Moreover, the strength and weaknesses of this tool will also be presented so it can be taken into consideration when using the tool. SWOT can be applied in many different areas in project management, whether it is business strategy or market research but is especially used within marketing.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Much of the original groundwork for what is known as SWOT today, was already established more than 50 years ago. A man name Kurt Lewin, his landmark posthumous text, called; Field Theory in Social Science, emphasized that an organization’s desires are influenced by different driving forces or enhancers and limitations and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
Many companies when facing a problem whether it is external or internal, by using SWOT they can create a quick overview of what your obstacles you need to overcome and what chances there are to take.&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is four initials standing for four different elements, where the elements are used to identify different perspectives of consequences. They each stands for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats. The first two factors, Strengths and Weaknesses are factors for the internal, typically when you are inside a company, you will look within to see what kind of Strengths you have and what kind of Weaknesses you have. Then there are Opportunities and Threats, which are external factors, so you look from internal to external. Opportunities help to identify chances there are to grow, expand and even more potential of a blue ocean and Threats are what kind of competitors are there, restrains, regulations. &lt;br /&gt;
More details about this subject will be seen down below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A brief history of SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier it was mentioned that the original groundwork was laid by Lewin, but around the same time there were two professors from Harvard, George Albert Smith Jr. and C. Roland Christensen, who also were interested in the related issue about identifying the extent of the correlation of the organization’s strategy and its competitive environment. Therefore, they instructed their students to address if a company took into account the requirements of a competitive environments. Around a decade later another professor from the same university wanted to see the already by then named SWOT, if it could be used to explore the ways in which competitive thinking influences business strategies.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Handbook of Improving Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction to SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is a strategic analytical tool, for assessing strengths and weaknesses of a business, and also for analyzing opportunities available to the business as well as threats faced by the business. SWOT can also be used for personal purposes or when managing a project. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As mentioned S.W.O.T are initials to different words, each letter stands for something different, with each one of them having their very own purpose, where they together create a very strong foundation for an analysis, whatever the purpose is for. SWOT analysis is processed by a group of stakeholders, where they: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Identify internal and external obstacles and enhancers of performance&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Analyse those factors, which are basted on estimates of their contribution to the net value and how much they are controllable&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. To decide what further or future actions to take regarding those factors &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what do they stand for?&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* S – Strengths – Refers to internal competencies, valuables resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* W - Weaknesses – Refers to internal inhibitors of the competencies, resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* O - Opportunities – Refers to external enhancer of performance, which can be pursued or used&lt;br /&gt;
* T - Threats – An external inhibitor of performance that has the potential to reduce accomplishments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now that we know what SWOT stands for, but how does one go around about them? There are some questions to get it started &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;3&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://www.professionalacademy.com/blogs-and-advice/marketing-theories---swot-analysis&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Strengths: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we best at?&lt;br /&gt;
* What intellectual property do we own that can help us with this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What specific skills does the current workforce have that can contribute to this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What financial resources do we have for reaching this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances do we have?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our bargaining power with both suppliers and intermediaries?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weaknesses: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we worst at doing?&lt;br /&gt;
* Is our intellectual property outdated?&lt;br /&gt;
* What training does our workforce lack?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our financial position?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances should we have, but don’t?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Opportunity: &lt;br /&gt;
* What changes in the external environment can we exploit?&lt;br /&gt;
* What weaknesses in our competitors can we use to our advantage?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new technology might become available to us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new markets might be opening to us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Threats:&lt;br /&gt;
* What might our competitors be able to do to hurt us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new legislation might damage our interests?&lt;br /&gt;
* What social changes might threaten us?&lt;br /&gt;
* How will the economic cycle affect us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Naturally, there are a lot more questions that can be asked, but these questions for each of the elements, are good starting points. These questions will help you get started on doing the SWOT. Remember, it is always a good idea to do SWOT in the early stages, because it gives you a detailed overview and gives you information, which you can use for your later processes in decision making and planning.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;3&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://www.professionalacademy.com/blogs-and-advice/marketing-theories---swot-analysis&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Visually the SWOT can be shown as this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SWOTKL.png‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 4x4 Matrix&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How to conduct SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
There are no doubt a couple of ways to conduct SWOT, the one which is more of a practical method, a guide on how to fill in the SWOT&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;5&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://www.smartdraw.com/swot-analysis/&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, may be a good place to start. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Determine the object: Which means to decide on a key project or a strategy, where you want to analyse. Write the name of it on the top of a page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Draw the layout: Draw a very large square box and then divide it into four smaller boxes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Put name inside each of the boxes on the top: The top left box write; Strengths, the one beside write; Weaknesses. The box under Weaknesses, write Threats and the last one Opportunity, it should look like the figure earlier (Figure). If you wish a more detailed layout, you can add a smaller box that outlines Strengths and Weaknesses as “Internal” and Opportunities and Threats as “External”, and “Helpful” for Strengths and Opportunities, where Weaknesses and Threats will have a “Harmful” outline. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Add the factors: Add the factors that affects the project in the different boxes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Draw conclusions: Decide if the project is a go or a no-go based on the negative and positive relative. Maybe you are already on a project, but want to see how the situation is, then you need to decide what to do about the information you got out of SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the Myriad guideline&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, there exist a way to conduct SWOT, in a bit of a different manner. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Recruiting stakeholders: This phase’s idea is simply to try to include your stakeholders. According to the book; Exploring Corporate Strategy by Gerry Johnson, Kevan Scholes and Richard Whittington, you can map your stakeholders according to their interest in a project. If you google “Power-interest matrix”, you can see how you should approach your stakeholders in relative to “Interest” and “Power”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Convening the focus group: This step is to call in the stakeholders, most optimal from 8-48, and explain to them what the SWOT is, and how this little workshop is going to work. The first step is to divide the stakeholders into smaller group, where the idea is to get a well-rounded SWOT, where the stakeholders also can agree on the factors. Of course, the preparations are supposed to be made beforehand, such as already made SWOT figures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Identifying and categorizing SWOTs: Now when the stakeholders are in the groups, they should start to work on the SWOT.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Analyzing SWOTs: In “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;Handbook of Improving Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://www.professionalacademy.com/blogs-and-advice/marketing-theories---swot-analysis&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, there is a figure showing, on how they are analyzing the SWOT factors within a Construction Company. Similar should be done. Hereafter, two additional questions should be asked: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor internally or externally controlled?&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor an enhancer or an inhibitor of performance? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where after you put the factors for Strengths, Weaknesses, Threats according to in “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace”&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Handbook of Improving Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, to rank with numbers from 1-5 how much it is under your control and for enhancers and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Synthesizing SWOTs: After the previous step, now the data can be collected, and the data can be shown visually, there is an example in the “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace”&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Handbook of Improving Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.	Interpreting findings and deliberating action: Now it is the time to decide upon, which and how to act upon the findings. There are a few actions to take according to what the factors are. Monitor: The factors which are neither enhancer nor inhibitors. Mitigate Threats and Exploit Opportunities: Actions are to be taken, if it is seen that there are threats that will hinder the project, likewise with opportunities, it is supposed to be exploited if it will add value. Lastly, Confront Weaknesses and Leverage Strengths: Because these factors are internal, it is easier to control them, therefore strengths should be leveraged to help achieve desired results and weaknesses should be confronted. &lt;br /&gt;
As you can see the latter option is more wholesome and no doubt more detailed, depending your situation on using SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
Remember these guidelines are only one of the many guidelines.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== When to use SWOT == &lt;br /&gt;
Here are just a few to show when it is applicable to use SWOT, and these mentioned components are also included in something called Human Performance Technology (HPT), which can deepen your understanding on SWOT, but it is not necessary&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Handbook of Improving Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	In performance analysis &lt;br /&gt;
When identifying the degree to what internal practices and external environmental influences impact how results are currently being accomplished within an organization &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	In cause analysis&lt;br /&gt;
When finding what practices should be continued or even expanded in the longer terms, as well as those that should be discontinued or replaced by other methods or tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	In strategic planning&lt;br /&gt;
When in strategic planning and needs assessment for identifying the factors that contribute to or detract from organizational effectiveness &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	In evaluation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When monitoring the internal and external environment of a program for change over time, for tracking new SWOTs as they emerge, and for documenting for previously existing SWOTs as they become less influential on a program&lt;br /&gt;
Besides these quite general categories within HPT practice, SWOT can also be a great to use within&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;: &lt;br /&gt;
* Appreciative inquiry – To clarify the organization’s strengths and opportunities &lt;br /&gt;
* Benchmarking – To identify possible opportunities and threats&lt;br /&gt;
* Industry analysis – For contextualizing opportunities existing in the market&lt;br /&gt;
* Situation analysis – For evaluating possible trends or ongoing trends in the markets, costs and competition and competitors&lt;br /&gt;
* Scenario planning – For considering possible and preferred long-term scenarios&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, these are the mentioned area where SWOT can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Critical success factors =&lt;br /&gt;
There is always some critical success factor, when using a tool and SWOT is not excluded&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;. Here are a couple of points to be aware of if you want a good SWOT: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Information shared by stakeholders within a SWOT analysis should never be used to play the blame game, but it should be a basis for continuous improvement&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	When conducting the weaknesses, never blame the others for faults or shortcoming, because being honest is essential&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	SWOT’s data can be collected live depending on the resources and constraints that exists&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	It may be useful to weight the experienced stakeholders’ evaluation of the SWOT’s&lt;br /&gt;
These are some points that may be good to keep in the back of the head, when going through SWOT.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Limitations and critiques of SWOT=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not doubt that SWOT is a very strong tool when carried out right, it can provide valuable knowledge about both customer preferences and competitors intents, and nevertheless where the possible opportunities to grow are. There are also some critiques of SWOT, such as: &lt;br /&gt;
* There are no prioritization of the identified factors and it seems like it was hard to meaningfully compare the importance of one SWOT to another&lt;br /&gt;
* No figuring of costs and benefits or how to use them to achieve their objectives&lt;br /&gt;
* Sometimes it can be hazy on what is external and internal &lt;br /&gt;
And, some limitations about SWOT:&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not help determine the costs and benefits of alternative performance solutions&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not rank the factors according to their criticality&lt;br /&gt;
* It provides minimal information regarding the degree to which an organization or work team possess influence over the factors that have been identified. &lt;br /&gt;
Despite all these, it is possibly to enhance SWOT to its further usability by considering 2 factors&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Approximations of the degree which an organization can control over each factor &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Estimate the costs and benefits of the factors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And turn them into questions for better decision, by asking: &lt;br /&gt;
* How much control does the organization have over each SWOT factor?&lt;br /&gt;
* How much does each SWOT factor cost or benefit the organization? &lt;br /&gt;
By using the above two questions in SWOT, it will further enhance SWOTs usability&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Conclusion =&lt;br /&gt;
This article has served its purpose, to introduce you to the tool SWOT, where the article has gone through the main points of SWOT, but have only scratched the surface. If you want to research more about SWOT, you should be more than welcome to do so, but this article has given you a good starting point. SWOT is an amazing tool to use in various areas or projects, does not matter if you want to use it for personal or professional purpose. Although, SWOT is a very widely used tool, it does have its own flaws and limitations, but it is a tool which has been used numerous times all over again worldwide, in all kinds of industries and professionals. Therefore, if you can master the tool and make up for its mentioned shortcomings with the questions that will cover its limitations to a maximum, it will be an incredible tool which is very valuable for your project or business.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Reference=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S123368</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68887</id>
		<title>What is SWOT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68887"/>
		<updated>2019-03-01T09:29:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S123368: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article will be presenting the tool SWOT and the main points of SWOT will be covered alongside with an introduction on how to apply SWOT. Moreover, the strength and weaknesses of this tool will also be presented so it can be taken into consideration when using the tool. SWOT can be applied in many different areas in project management, whether it is business strategy or market research but is especially used within marketing.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Much of the original groundwork for what is known as SWOT today, was already established more than 50 years ago. A man name Kurt Lewin, his landmark posthumous text, called; Field Theory in Social Science, emphasized that an organization’s desires are influenced by different driving forces or enhancers and limitations and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
Many companies when facing a problem whether it is external or internal, by using SWOT they can create a quick overview of what your obstacles you need to overcome and what chances there are to take.&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is four initials standing for four different elements, where the elements are used to identify different perspectives of consequences. They each stands for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats. The first two factors, Strengths and Weaknesses are factors for the internal, typically when you are inside a company, you will look within to see what kind of Strengths you have and what kind of Weaknesses you have. Then there are Opportunities and Threats, which are external factors, so you look from internal to external. Opportunities help to identify chances there are to grow, expand and even more potential of a blue ocean and Threats are what kind of competitors are there, restrains, regulations. &lt;br /&gt;
More details about this subject will be seen down below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A brief history of SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier it was mentioned that the original groundwork was laid by Lewin, but around the same time there were two professors from Harvard, George Albert Smith Jr. and C. Roland Christensen, who also were interested in the related issue about identifying the extent of the correlation of the organization’s strategy and its competitive environment. Therefore, they instructed their students to address if a company took into account the requirements of a competitive environments. Around a decade later another professor from the same university wanted to see the already by then named SWOT, if it could be used to explore the ways in which competitive thinking influences business strategies.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Handbook of Improving Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction to SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is a strategic analytical tool, for assessing strengths and weaknesses of a business, and also for analyzing opportunities available to the business as well as threats faced by the business. SWOT can also be used for personal purposes or when managing a project. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As mentioned S.W.O.T are initials to different words, each letter stands for something different, with each one of them having their very own purpose, where they together create a very strong foundation for an analysis, whatever the purpose is for. SWOT analysis is processed by a group of stakeholders, where they: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Identify internal and external obstacles and enhancers of performance&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Analyse those factors, which are basted on estimates of their contribution to the net value and how much they are controllable&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. To decide what further or future actions to take regarding those factors &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what do they stand for?&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* S – Strengths – Refers to internal competencies, valuables resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* W - Weaknesses – Refers to internal inhibitors of the competencies, resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* O - Opportunities – Refers to external enhancer of performance, which can be pursued or used&lt;br /&gt;
* T - Threats – An external inhibitor of performance that has the potential to reduce accomplishments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now that we know what SWOT stands for, but how does one go around about them? There are some questions to get it started &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;3&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://www.professionalacademy.com/blogs-and-advice/marketing-theories---swot-analysis&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Strengths: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we best at?&lt;br /&gt;
* What intellectual property do we own that can help us with this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What specific skills does the current workforce have that can contribute to this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What financial resources do we have for reaching this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances do we have?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our bargaining power with both suppliers and intermediaries?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weaknesses: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we worst at doing?&lt;br /&gt;
* Is our intellectual property outdated?&lt;br /&gt;
* What training does our workforce lack?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our financial position?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances should we have, but don’t?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Opportunity: &lt;br /&gt;
* What changes in the external environment can we exploit?&lt;br /&gt;
* What weaknesses in our competitors can we use to our advantage?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new technology might become available to us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new markets might be opening to us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Threats:&lt;br /&gt;
* What might our competitors be able to do to hurt us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new legislation might damage our interests?&lt;br /&gt;
* What social changes might threaten us?&lt;br /&gt;
* How will the economic cycle affect us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Naturally, there are a lot more questions that can be asked, but these questions for each of the elements, are good starting points. These questions will help you get started on doing the SWOT. Remember, it is always a good idea to do SWOT in the early stages, because it gives you a detailed overview and gives you information, which you can use for your later processes in decision making and planning.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;3&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://www.professionalacademy.com/blogs-and-advice/marketing-theories---swot-analysis&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Visually the SWOT can be shown as this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SWOTKL.png‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 4x4 Matrix&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How to conduct SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
There are no doubt a couple of ways to conduct SWOT, the one which is more of a practical method, a guide on how to fill in the SWOT&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;5&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://www.smartdraw.com/swot-analysis/&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, may be a good place to start. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Determine the object: Which means to decide on a key project or a strategy, where you want to analyse. Write the name of it on the top of a page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Draw the layout: Draw a very large square box and then divide it into four smaller boxes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Put name inside each of the boxes on the top: The top left box write; Strengths, the one beside write; Weaknesses. The box under Weaknesses, write Threats and the last one Opportunity, it should look like the figure earlier (Figure). If you wish a more detailed layout, you can add a smaller box that outlines Strengths and Weaknesses as “Internal” and Opportunities and Threats as “External”, and “Helpful” for Strengths and Opportunities, where Weaknesses and Threats will have a “Harmful” outline. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Add the factors: Add the factors that affects the project in the different boxes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Draw conclusions: Decide if the project is a go or a no-go based on the negative and positive relative. Maybe you are already on a project, but want to see how the situation is, then you need to decide what to do about the information you got out of SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the Myriad guideline&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, there exist a way to conduct SWOT, in a bit of a different manner. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Recruiting stakeholders: This phase’s idea is simply to try to include your stakeholders. According to the book; Exploring Corporate Strategy by Gerry Johnson, Kevan Scholes and Richard Whittington, you can map your stakeholders according to their interest in a project. If you google “Power-interest matrix”, you can see how you should approach your stakeholders in relative to “Interest” and “Power”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Convening the focus group: This step is to call in the stakeholders, most optimal from 8-48, and explain to them what the SWOT is, and how this little workshop is going to work. The first step is to divide the stakeholders into smaller group, where the idea is to get a well-rounded SWOT, where the stakeholders also can agree on the factors. Of course, the preparations are supposed to be made beforehand, such as already made SWOT figures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Identifying and categorizing SWOTs: Now when the stakeholders are in the groups, they should start to work on the SWOT.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Analyzing SWOTs: In “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;Handbook of Improving Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://www.professionalacademy.com/blogs-and-advice/marketing-theories---swot-analysis&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, there is a figure showing, on how they are analyzing the SWOT factors within a Construction Company. Similar should be done. Hereafter, two additional questions should be asked: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor internally or externally controlled?&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor an enhancer or an inhibitor of performance? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where after you put the factors for Strengths, Weaknesses, Threats according to in “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace”&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Handbook of Improving Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, to rank with numbers from 1-5 how much it is under your control and for enhancers and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Synthesizing SWOTs: After the previous step, now the data can be collected, and the data can be shown visually, there is an example in the “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace”&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;Handbook of Improving Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.	Interpreting findings and deliberating action: Now it is the time to decide upon, which and how to act upon the findings. There are a few actions to take according to what the factors are. Monitor: The factors which are neither enhancer nor inhibitors. Mitigate Threats and Exploit Opportunities: Actions are to be taken, if it is seen that there are threats that will hinder the project, likewise with opportunities, it is supposed to be exploited if it will add value. Lastly, Confront Weaknesses and Leverage Strengths: Because these factors are internal, it is easier to control them, therefore strengths should be leveraged to help achieve desired results and weaknesses should be confronted. &lt;br /&gt;
As you can see the latter option is more wholesome and no doubt more detailed, depending your situation on using SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
Remember these guidelines are only one of the many guidelines.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== When to use SWOT == &lt;br /&gt;
Here are just a few to show when it is applicable to use SWOT, and these mentioned components are also included in something called Human Performance Technology (HPT), which can deepen your understanding on SWOT, but it is not necessary&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Handbook of Improving Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	In performance analysis &lt;br /&gt;
When identifying the degree to what internal practices and external environmental influences impact how results are currently being accomplished within an organization &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	In cause analysis&lt;br /&gt;
When finding what practices should be continued or even expanded in the longer terms, as well as those that should be discontinued or replaced by other methods or tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	In strategic planning&lt;br /&gt;
When in strategic planning and needs assessment for identifying the factors that contribute to or detract from organizational effectiveness &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	In evaluation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When monitoring the internal and external environment of a program for change over time, for tracking new SWOTs as they emerge, and for documenting for previously existing SWOTs as they become less influential on a program&lt;br /&gt;
Besides these quite general categories within HPT practice, SWOT can also be a great to use within&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;: &lt;br /&gt;
* Appreciative inquiry – To clarify the organization’s strengths and opportunities &lt;br /&gt;
* Benchmarking – To identify possible opportunities and threats&lt;br /&gt;
* Industry analysis – For contextualizing opportunities existing in the market&lt;br /&gt;
* Situation analysis – For evaluating possible trends or ongoing trends in the markets, costs and competition and competitors&lt;br /&gt;
* Scenario planning – For considering possible and preferred long-term scenarios&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, these are the mentioned area where SWOT can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Critical success factors =&lt;br /&gt;
There is always some critical success factor, when using a tool and SWOT is not excluded&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;. Here are a couple of points to be aware of if you want a good SWOT: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Information shared by stakeholders within a SWOT analysis should never be used to play the blame game, but it should be a basis for continuous improvement&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	When conducting the weaknesses, never blame the others for faults or shortcoming, because being honest is essential&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	SWOT’s data can be collected live depending on the resources and constraints that exists&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	It may be useful to weight the experienced stakeholders’ evaluation of the SWOT’s&lt;br /&gt;
These are some points that may be good to keep in the back of the head, when going through SWOT.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Limitations and critiques of SWOT=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not doubt that SWOT is a very strong tool when carried out right, it can provide valuable knowledge about both customer preferences and competitors intents, and nevertheless where the possible opportunities to grow are. There are also some critiques of SWOT, such as: &lt;br /&gt;
* There are no prioritization of the identified factors and it seems like it was hard to meaningfully compare the importance of one SWOT to another&lt;br /&gt;
* No figuring of costs and benefits or how to use them to achieve their objectives&lt;br /&gt;
* Sometimes it can be hazy on what is external and internal &lt;br /&gt;
And, some limitations about SWOT:&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not help determine the costs and benefits of alternative performance solutions&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not rank the factors according to their criticality&lt;br /&gt;
* It provides minimal information regarding the degree to which an organization or work team possess influence over the factors that have been identified. &lt;br /&gt;
Despite all these, it is possibly to enhance SWOT to its further usability by considering 2 factors&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Approximations of the degree which an organization can control over each factor &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Estimate the costs and benefits of the factors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And turn them into questions for better decision, by asking: &lt;br /&gt;
* How much control does the organization have over each SWOT factor?&lt;br /&gt;
* How much does each SWOT factor cost or benefit the organization? &lt;br /&gt;
By using the above two questions in SWOT, it will further enhance SWOTs usability&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Conclusion =&lt;br /&gt;
This article has served its purpose, to introduce you to the tool SWOT, where the article has gone through the main points of SWOT, but have only scratched the surface. If you want to research more about SWOT, you should be more than welcome to do so, but this article has given you a good starting point. SWOT is an amazing tool to use in various areas or projects, does not matter if you want to use it for personal or professional purpose. Although, SWOT is a very widely used tool, it does have its own flaws and limitations, but it is a tool which has been used numerous times all over again worldwide, in all kinds of industries and professionals. Therefore, if you can master the tool and make up for its mentioned shortcomings with the questions that will cover its limitations to a maximum, it will be an incredible tool which is very valuable for your project or business.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Reference=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S123368</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68886</id>
		<title>What is SWOT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68886"/>
		<updated>2019-03-01T09:27:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S123368: /* How to conduct SWOT */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article will be presenting the tool SWOT and the main points of SWOT will be covered alongside with an introduction on how to apply SWOT. Moreover, the strength and weaknesses of this tool will also be presented so it can be taken into consideration when using the tool. SWOT can be applied in many different areas in project management, whether it is business strategy or market research but is especially used within marketing.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Much of the original groundwork for what is known as SWOT today, was already established more than 50 years ago. A man name Kurt Lewin, his landmark posthumous text, called; Field Theory in Social Science, emphasized that an organization’s desires are influenced by different driving forces or enhancers and limitations and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
Many companies when facing a problem whether it is external or internal, by using SWOT they can create a quick overview of what your obstacles you need to overcome and what chances there are to take.&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is four initials standing for four different elements, where the elements are used to identify different perspectives of consequences. They each stands for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats. The first two factors, Strengths and Weaknesses are factors for the internal, typically when you are inside a company, you will look within to see what kind of Strengths you have and what kind of Weaknesses you have. Then there are Opportunities and Threats, which are external factors, so you look from internal to external. Opportunities help to identify chances there are to grow, expand and even more potential of a blue ocean and Threats are what kind of competitors are there, restrains, regulations. &lt;br /&gt;
More details about this subject will be seen down below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A brief history of SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier it was mentioned that the original groundwork was laid by Lewin, but around the same time there were two professors from Harvard, George Albert Smith Jr. and C. Roland Christensen, who also were interested in the related issue about identifying the extent of the correlation of the organization’s strategy and its competitive environment. Therefore, they instructed their students to address if a company took into account the requirements of a competitive environments. Around a decade later another professor from the same university wanted to see the already by then named SWOT, if it could be used to explore the ways in which competitive thinking influences business strategies.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Handbook of Improving Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction to SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is a strategic analytical tool, for assessing strengths and weaknesses of a business, and also for analyzing opportunities available to the business as well as threats faced by the business. SWOT can also be used for personal purposes or when managing a project. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As mentioned S.W.O.T are initials to different words, each letter stands for something different, with each one of them having their very own purpose, where they together create a very strong foundation for an analysis, whatever the purpose is for. SWOT analysis is processed by a group of stakeholders, where they: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Identify internal and external obstacles and enhancers of performance&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Analyse those factors, which are basted on estimates of their contribution to the net value and how much they are controllable&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. To decide what further or future actions to take regarding those factors &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what do they stand for?&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* S – Strengths – Refers to internal competencies, valuables resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* W - Weaknesses – Refers to internal inhibitors of the competencies, resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* O - Opportunities – Refers to external enhancer of performance, which can be pursued or used&lt;br /&gt;
* T - Threats – An external inhibitor of performance that has the potential to reduce accomplishments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now that we know what SWOT stands for, but how does one go around about them? There are some questions to get it started &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;3&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://www.professionalacademy.com/blogs-and-advice/marketing-theories---swot-analysis&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Strengths: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we best at?&lt;br /&gt;
* What intellectual property do we own that can help us with this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What specific skills does the current workforce have that can contribute to this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What financial resources do we have for reaching this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances do we have?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our bargaining power with both suppliers and intermediaries?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weaknesses: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we worst at doing?&lt;br /&gt;
* Is our intellectual property outdated?&lt;br /&gt;
* What training does our workforce lack?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our financial position?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances should we have, but don’t?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Opportunity: &lt;br /&gt;
* What changes in the external environment can we exploit?&lt;br /&gt;
* What weaknesses in our competitors can we use to our advantage?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new technology might become available to us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new markets might be opening to us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Threats:&lt;br /&gt;
* What might our competitors be able to do to hurt us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new legislation might damage our interests?&lt;br /&gt;
* What social changes might threaten us?&lt;br /&gt;
* How will the economic cycle affect us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Naturally, there are a lot more questions that can be asked, but these questions for each of the elements, are good starting points. These questions will help you get started on doing the SWOT. Remember, it is always a good idea to do SWOT in the early stages, because it gives you a detailed overview and gives you information, which you can use for your later processes in decision making and planning.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;3&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://www.professionalacademy.com/blogs-and-advice/marketing-theories---swot-analysis&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Visually the SWOT can be shown as this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SWOTKL.png‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 4x4 Matrix&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How to conduct SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
There are no doubt a couple of ways to conduct SWOT, the one which is more of a practical method, a guide on how to fill in the SWOT&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;5&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://www.smartdraw.com/swot-analysis/&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, may be a good place to start. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Determine the object: Which means to decide on a key project or a strategy, where you want to analyse. Write the name of it on the top of a page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Draw the layout: Draw a very large square box and then divide it into four smaller boxes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Put name inside each of the boxes on the top: The top left box write; Strengths, the one beside write; Weaknesses. The box under Weaknesses, write Threats and the last one Opportunity, it should look like the figure earlier (Figure). If you wish a more detailed layout, you can add a smaller box that outlines Strengths and Weaknesses as “Internal” and Opportunities and Threats as “External”, and “Helpful” for Strengths and Opportunities, where Weaknesses and Threats will have a “Harmful” outline. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Add the factors: Add the factors that affects the project in the different boxes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Draw conclusions: Decide if the project is a go or a no-go based on the negative and positive relative. Maybe you are already on a project, but want to see how the situation is, then you need to decide what to do about the information you got out of SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the Myriad guideline&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, there exist a way to conduct SWOT, in a bit of a different manner. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Recruiting stakeholders: This phase’s idea is simply to try to include your stakeholders. According to the book; Exploring Corporate Strategy by Gerry Johnson, Kevan Scholes and Richard Whittington, you can map your stakeholders according to their interest in a project. If you google “Power-interest matrix”, you can see how you should approach your stakeholders in relative to “Interest” and “Power”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Convening the focus group: This step is to call in the stakeholders, most optimal from 8-48, and explain to them what the SWOT is, and how this little workshop is going to work. The first step is to divide the stakeholders into smaller group, where the idea is to get a well-rounded SWOT, where the stakeholders also can agree on the factors. Of course, the preparations are supposed to be made beforehand, such as already made SWOT figures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Identifying and categorizing SWOTs: Now when the stakeholders are in the groups, they should start to work on the SWOT.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Analyzing SWOTs: In “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;Handbook of Improving Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://www.professionalacademy.com/blogs-and-advice/marketing-theories---swot-analysis&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, there is a figure showing, on how they are analyzing the SWOT factors within a Construction Company. Similar should be done. Hereafter, two additional questions should be asked: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor internally or externally controlled?&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor an enhancer or an inhibitor of performance? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where after you put the factors for Strengths, Weaknesses, Threats according to in “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace”&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;Handbook of Improving Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; , to rank with numbers from 1-5 how much it is under your control and for enhancers and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Synthesizing SWOTs: After the previous step, now the data can be collected, and the data can be shown visually, there is an example in the “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace”&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;Handbook of Improving Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.	Interpreting findings and deliberating action: Now it is the time to decide upon, which and how to act upon the findings. There are a few actions to take according to what the factors are. Monitor: The factors which are neither enhancer nor inhibitors. Mitigate Threats and Exploit Opportunities: Actions are to be taken, if it is seen that there are threats that will hinder the project, likewise with opportunities, it is supposed to be exploited if it will add value. Lastly, Confront Weaknesses and Leverage Strengths: Because these factors are internal, it is easier to control them, therefore strengths should be leveraged to help achieve desired results and weaknesses should be confronted. &lt;br /&gt;
As you can see the latter option is more wholesome and no doubt more detailed, depending your situation on using SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
Remember these guidelines are only one of the many guidelines.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== When to use SWOT == &lt;br /&gt;
Here are just a few to show when it is applicable to use SWOT, and these mentioned components are also included in something called Human Performance Technology (HPT), which can deepen your understanding on SWOT, but it is not necessary&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://www.projectsmart.co.uk/swot-analysis-in-project-management.php&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	In performance analysis &lt;br /&gt;
When identifying the degree to what internal practices and external environmental influences impact how results are currently being accomplished within an organization &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	In cause analysis&lt;br /&gt;
When finding what practices should be continued or even expanded in the longer terms, as well as those that should be discontinued or replaced by other methods or tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	In strategic planning&lt;br /&gt;
When in strategic planning and needs assessment for identifying the factors that contribute to or detract from organizational effectiveness &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	In evaluation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When monitoring the internal and external environment of a program for change over time, for tracking new SWOTs as they emerge, and for documenting for previously existing SWOTs as they become less influential on a program&lt;br /&gt;
Besides these quite general categories within HPT practice, SWOT can also be a great to use within&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;: &lt;br /&gt;
* Appreciative inquiry – To clarify the organization’s strengths and opportunities &lt;br /&gt;
* Benchmarking – To identify possible opportunities and threats&lt;br /&gt;
* Industry analysis – For contextualizing opportunities existing in the market&lt;br /&gt;
* Situation analysis – For evaluating possible trends or ongoing trends in the markets, costs and competition and competitors&lt;br /&gt;
* Scenario planning – For considering possible and preferred long-term scenarios&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, these are the mentioned area where SWOT can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Critical success factors =&lt;br /&gt;
There is always some critical success factor, when using a tool and SWOT is not excluded&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;. Here are a couple of points to be aware of if you want a good SWOT: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Information shared by stakeholders within a SWOT analysis should never be used to play the blame game, but it should be a basis for continuous improvement&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	When conducting the weaknesses, never blame the others for faults or shortcoming, because being honest is essential&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	SWOT’s data can be collected live depending on the resources and constraints that exists&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	It may be useful to weight the experienced stakeholders’ evaluation of the SWOT’s&lt;br /&gt;
These are some points that may be good to keep in the back of the head, when going through SWOT.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Limitations and critiques of SWOT=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not doubt that SWOT is a very strong tool when carried out right, it can provide valuable knowledge about both customer preferences and competitors intents, and nevertheless where the possible opportunities to grow are. There are also some critiques of SWOT, such as: &lt;br /&gt;
* There are no prioritization of the identified factors and it seems like it was hard to meaningfully compare the importance of one SWOT to another&lt;br /&gt;
* No figuring of costs and benefits or how to use them to achieve their objectives&lt;br /&gt;
* Sometimes it can be hazy on what is external and internal &lt;br /&gt;
And, some limitations about SWOT:&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not help determine the costs and benefits of alternative performance solutions&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not rank the factors according to their criticality&lt;br /&gt;
* It provides minimal information regarding the degree to which an organization or work team possess influence over the factors that have been identified. &lt;br /&gt;
Despite all these, it is possibly to enhance SWOT to its further usability by considering 2 factors&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Approximations of the degree which an organization can control over each factor &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Estimate the costs and benefits of the factors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And turn them into questions for better decision, by asking: &lt;br /&gt;
* How much control does the organization have over each SWOT factor?&lt;br /&gt;
* How much does each SWOT factor cost or benefit the organization? &lt;br /&gt;
By using the above two questions in SWOT, it will further enhance SWOTs usability&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Conclusion =&lt;br /&gt;
This article has served its purpose, to introduce you to the tool SWOT, where the article has gone through the main points of SWOT, but have only scratched the surface. If you want to research more about SWOT, you should be more than welcome to do so, but this article has given you a good starting point. SWOT is an amazing tool to use in various areas or projects, does not matter if you want to use it for personal or professional purpose. Although, SWOT is a very widely used tool, it does have its own flaws and limitations, but it is a tool which has been used numerous times all over again worldwide, in all kinds of industries and professionals. Therefore, if you can master the tool and make up for its mentioned shortcomings with the questions that will cover its limitations to a maximum, it will be an incredible tool which is very valuable for your project or business.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Reference=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S123368</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68885</id>
		<title>What is SWOT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68885"/>
		<updated>2019-03-01T09:25:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S123368: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article will be presenting the tool SWOT and the main points of SWOT will be covered alongside with an introduction on how to apply SWOT. Moreover, the strength and weaknesses of this tool will also be presented so it can be taken into consideration when using the tool. SWOT can be applied in many different areas in project management, whether it is business strategy or market research but is especially used within marketing.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Much of the original groundwork for what is known as SWOT today, was already established more than 50 years ago. A man name Kurt Lewin, his landmark posthumous text, called; Field Theory in Social Science, emphasized that an organization’s desires are influenced by different driving forces or enhancers and limitations and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
Many companies when facing a problem whether it is external or internal, by using SWOT they can create a quick overview of what your obstacles you need to overcome and what chances there are to take.&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is four initials standing for four different elements, where the elements are used to identify different perspectives of consequences. They each stands for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats. The first two factors, Strengths and Weaknesses are factors for the internal, typically when you are inside a company, you will look within to see what kind of Strengths you have and what kind of Weaknesses you have. Then there are Opportunities and Threats, which are external factors, so you look from internal to external. Opportunities help to identify chances there are to grow, expand and even more potential of a blue ocean and Threats are what kind of competitors are there, restrains, regulations. &lt;br /&gt;
More details about this subject will be seen down below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A brief history of SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier it was mentioned that the original groundwork was laid by Lewin, but around the same time there were two professors from Harvard, George Albert Smith Jr. and C. Roland Christensen, who also were interested in the related issue about identifying the extent of the correlation of the organization’s strategy and its competitive environment. Therefore, they instructed their students to address if a company took into account the requirements of a competitive environments. Around a decade later another professor from the same university wanted to see the already by then named SWOT, if it could be used to explore the ways in which competitive thinking influences business strategies.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Handbook of Improving Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction to SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is a strategic analytical tool, for assessing strengths and weaknesses of a business, and also for analyzing opportunities available to the business as well as threats faced by the business. SWOT can also be used for personal purposes or when managing a project. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As mentioned S.W.O.T are initials to different words, each letter stands for something different, with each one of them having their very own purpose, where they together create a very strong foundation for an analysis, whatever the purpose is for. SWOT analysis is processed by a group of stakeholders, where they: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Identify internal and external obstacles and enhancers of performance&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Analyse those factors, which are basted on estimates of their contribution to the net value and how much they are controllable&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. To decide what further or future actions to take regarding those factors &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what do they stand for?&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* S – Strengths – Refers to internal competencies, valuables resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* W - Weaknesses – Refers to internal inhibitors of the competencies, resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* O - Opportunities – Refers to external enhancer of performance, which can be pursued or used&lt;br /&gt;
* T - Threats – An external inhibitor of performance that has the potential to reduce accomplishments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now that we know what SWOT stands for, but how does one go around about them? There are some questions to get it started &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;3&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://www.professionalacademy.com/blogs-and-advice/marketing-theories---swot-analysis&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Strengths: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we best at?&lt;br /&gt;
* What intellectual property do we own that can help us with this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What specific skills does the current workforce have that can contribute to this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What financial resources do we have for reaching this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances do we have?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our bargaining power with both suppliers and intermediaries?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weaknesses: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we worst at doing?&lt;br /&gt;
* Is our intellectual property outdated?&lt;br /&gt;
* What training does our workforce lack?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our financial position?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances should we have, but don’t?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Opportunity: &lt;br /&gt;
* What changes in the external environment can we exploit?&lt;br /&gt;
* What weaknesses in our competitors can we use to our advantage?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new technology might become available to us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new markets might be opening to us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Threats:&lt;br /&gt;
* What might our competitors be able to do to hurt us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new legislation might damage our interests?&lt;br /&gt;
* What social changes might threaten us?&lt;br /&gt;
* How will the economic cycle affect us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Naturally, there are a lot more questions that can be asked, but these questions for each of the elements, are good starting points. These questions will help you get started on doing the SWOT. Remember, it is always a good idea to do SWOT in the early stages, because it gives you a detailed overview and gives you information, which you can use for your later processes in decision making and planning.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;3&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://www.professionalacademy.com/blogs-and-advice/marketing-theories---swot-analysis&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Visually the SWOT can be shown as this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SWOTKL.png‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 4x4 Matrix&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How to conduct SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
There are no doubt a couple of ways to conduct SWOT, the one which is more of a practical method, a guide on how to fill in the SWOT&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;5&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://www.smartdraw.com/swot-analysis/&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, may be a good place to start. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Determine the object: Which means to decide on a key project or a strategy, where you want to analyse. Write the name of it on the top of a page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Draw the layout: Draw a very large square box and then divide it into four smaller boxes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Put name inside each of the boxes on the top: The top left box write; Strengths, the one beside write; Weaknesses. The box under Weaknesses, write Threats and the last one Opportunity, it should look like the figure earlier (Figure). If you wish a more detailed layout, you can add a smaller box that outlines Strengths and Weaknesses as “Internal” and Opportunities and Threats as “External”, and “Helpful” for Strengths and Opportunities, where Weaknesses and Threats will have a “Harmful” outline. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Add the factors: Add the factors that affects the project in the different boxes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Draw conclusions: Decide if the project is a go or a no-go based on the negative and positive relative. Maybe you are already on a project, but want to see how the situation is, then you need to decide what to do about the information you got out of SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the Myriad guideline&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, there exist a way to conduct SWOT, in a bit of a different manner. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Recruiting stakeholders: This phase’s idea is simply to try to include your stakeholders. According to the book; Exploring Corporate Strategy by Gerry Johnson, Kevan Scholes and Richard Whittington, you can map your stakeholders according to their interest in a project. If you google “Power-interest matrix”, you can see how you should approach your stakeholders in relative to “Interest” and “Power”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Convening the focus group: This step is to call in the stakeholders, most optimal from 8-48, and explain to them what the SWOT is, and how this little workshop is going to work. The first step is to divide the stakeholders into smaller group, where the idea is to get a well-rounded SWOT, where the stakeholders also can agree on the factors. Of course, the preparations are supposed to be made beforehand, such as already made SWOT figures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Identifying and categorizing SWOTs: Now when the stakeholders are in the groups, they should start to work on the SWOT.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Analyzing SWOTs: In “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;Handbook of Improving Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://www.professionalacademy.com/blogs-and-advice/marketing-theories---swot-analysis&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, there is a figure showing, on how they are analyzing the SWOT factors within a Construction Company. Similar should be done. Hereafter, two additional questions should be asked: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor internally or externally controlled?&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor an enhancer or an inhibitor of performance? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where after you put the factors for Strengths, Weaknesses, Threats according to in “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace”&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;Handbook of Improving Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; , to rank with numbers from 1-5 how much it is under your control and for enhancers and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Synthesizing SWOTs: After the previous step, now the data can be collected, and the data can be shown visually, there is an example in the “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace”&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;Handbook of Improving Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.	Interpreting findings and deliberating action: Now it is the time to decide upon, which and how to act upon the findings. There are a few actions to take according to what the factors are. Monitor: The factors which are neither enhancer nor inhibitors. Mitigate Threats and Exploit Opportunities: Actions are to be taken, if it is seen that there are threats that will hinder the project, likewise with opportunities, it is supposed to be exploited if it will add value. Lastly, Confront Weaknesses and Leverage Strengths: Because these factors are internal, it is easier to control them, therefore strengths should be leveraged to help achieve desired results and weaknesses should be confronted. &lt;br /&gt;
As you can see the latter option is more wholesome and no doubt more detailed, depending your situation on using SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
Remember these guidelines are only one of the many guidelines.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== When to use SWOT == &lt;br /&gt;
Here are just a few to show when it is applicable to use SWOT, and these mentioned components are also included in something called Human Performance Technology (HPT), which can deepen your understanding on SWOT, but it is not necessary&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://www.projectsmart.co.uk/swot-analysis-in-project-management.php&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	In performance analysis &lt;br /&gt;
When identifying the degree to what internal practices and external environmental influences impact how results are currently being accomplished within an organization &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	In cause analysis&lt;br /&gt;
When finding what practices should be continued or even expanded in the longer terms, as well as those that should be discontinued or replaced by other methods or tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	In strategic planning&lt;br /&gt;
When in strategic planning and needs assessment for identifying the factors that contribute to or detract from organizational effectiveness &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	In evaluation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When monitoring the internal and external environment of a program for change over time, for tracking new SWOTs as they emerge, and for documenting for previously existing SWOTs as they become less influential on a program&lt;br /&gt;
Besides these quite general categories within HPT practice, SWOT can also be a great to use within&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;: &lt;br /&gt;
* Appreciative inquiry – To clarify the organization’s strengths and opportunities &lt;br /&gt;
* Benchmarking – To identify possible opportunities and threats&lt;br /&gt;
* Industry analysis – For contextualizing opportunities existing in the market&lt;br /&gt;
* Situation analysis – For evaluating possible trends or ongoing trends in the markets, costs and competition and competitors&lt;br /&gt;
* Scenario planning – For considering possible and preferred long-term scenarios&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, these are the mentioned area where SWOT can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Critical success factors =&lt;br /&gt;
There is always some critical success factor, when using a tool and SWOT is not excluded&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;. Here are a couple of points to be aware of if you want a good SWOT: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Information shared by stakeholders within a SWOT analysis should never be used to play the blame game, but it should be a basis for continuous improvement&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	When conducting the weaknesses, never blame the others for faults or shortcoming, because being honest is essential&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	SWOT’s data can be collected live depending on the resources and constraints that exists&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	It may be useful to weight the experienced stakeholders’ evaluation of the SWOT’s&lt;br /&gt;
These are some points that may be good to keep in the back of the head, when going through SWOT.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Limitations and critiques of SWOT=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not doubt that SWOT is a very strong tool when carried out right, it can provide valuable knowledge about both customer preferences and competitors intents, and nevertheless where the possible opportunities to grow are. There are also some critiques of SWOT, such as: &lt;br /&gt;
* There are no prioritization of the identified factors and it seems like it was hard to meaningfully compare the importance of one SWOT to another&lt;br /&gt;
* No figuring of costs and benefits or how to use them to achieve their objectives&lt;br /&gt;
* Sometimes it can be hazy on what is external and internal &lt;br /&gt;
And, some limitations about SWOT:&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not help determine the costs and benefits of alternative performance solutions&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not rank the factors according to their criticality&lt;br /&gt;
* It provides minimal information regarding the degree to which an organization or work team possess influence over the factors that have been identified. &lt;br /&gt;
Despite all these, it is possibly to enhance SWOT to its further usability by considering 2 factors&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Approximations of the degree which an organization can control over each factor &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Estimate the costs and benefits of the factors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And turn them into questions for better decision, by asking: &lt;br /&gt;
* How much control does the organization have over each SWOT factor?&lt;br /&gt;
* How much does each SWOT factor cost or benefit the organization? &lt;br /&gt;
By using the above two questions in SWOT, it will further enhance SWOTs usability&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Conclusion =&lt;br /&gt;
This article has served its purpose, to introduce you to the tool SWOT, where the article has gone through the main points of SWOT, but have only scratched the surface. If you want to research more about SWOT, you should be more than welcome to do so, but this article has given you a good starting point. SWOT is an amazing tool to use in various areas or projects, does not matter if you want to use it for personal or professional purpose. Although, SWOT is a very widely used tool, it does have its own flaws and limitations, but it is a tool which has been used numerous times all over again worldwide, in all kinds of industries and professionals. Therefore, if you can master the tool and make up for its mentioned shortcomings with the questions that will cover its limitations to a maximum, it will be an incredible tool which is very valuable for your project or business.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Reference=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S123368</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68884</id>
		<title>What is SWOT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68884"/>
		<updated>2019-03-01T09:22:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S123368: /* Introduction to SWOT */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article will be presenting the tool SWOT and the main points of SWOT will be covered alongside with an introduction on how to apply SWOT. Moreover, the strength and weaknesses of this tool will also be presented so it can be taken into consideration when using the tool. SWOT can be applied in many different areas in project management, whether it is business strategy or market research but is especially used within marketing.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Much of the original groundwork for what is known as SWOT today, was already established more than 50 years ago. A man name Kurt Lewin, his landmark posthumous text, called; Field Theory in Social Science, emphasized that an organization’s desires are influenced by different driving forces or enhancers and limitations and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
Many companies when facing a problem whether it is external or internal, by using SWOT they can create a quick overview of what your obstacles you need to overcome and what chances there are to take.&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is four initials standing for four different elements, where the elements are used to identify different perspectives of consequences. They each stands for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats. The first two factors, Strengths and Weaknesses are factors for the internal, typically when you are inside a company, you will look within to see what kind of Strengths you have and what kind of Weaknesses you have. Then there are Opportunities and Threats, which are external factors, so you look from internal to external. Opportunities help to identify chances there are to grow, expand and even more potential of a blue ocean and Threats are what kind of competitors are there, restrains, regulations. &lt;br /&gt;
More details about this subject will be seen down below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A brief history of SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier it was mentioned that the original groundwork was laid by Lewin, but around the same time there were two professors from Harvard, George Albert Smith Jr. and C. Roland Christensen, who also were interested in the related issue about identifying the extent of the correlation of the organization’s strategy and its competitive environment. Therefore, they instructed their students to address if a company took into account the requirements of a competitive environments. Around a decade later another professor from the same university wanted to see the already by then named SWOT, if it could be used to explore the ways in which competitive thinking influences business strategies.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Handbook of Improving Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction to SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is a strategic analytical tool, for assessing strengths and weaknesses of a business, and also for analyzing opportunities available to the business as well as threats faced by the business. SWOT can also be used for personal purposes or when managing a project. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As mentioned S.W.O.T are initials to different words, each letter stands for something different, with each one of them having their very own purpose, where they together create a very strong foundation for an analysis, whatever the purpose is for. SWOT analysis is processed by a group of stakeholders, where they: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Identify internal and external obstacles and enhancers of performance&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Analyse those factors, which are basted on estimates of their contribution to the net value and how much they are controllable&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. To decide what further or future actions to take regarding those factors &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what do they stand for?&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* S – Strengths – Refers to internal competencies, valuables resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* W - Weaknesses – Refers to internal inhibitors of the competencies, resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* O - Opportunities – Refers to external enhancer of performance, which can be pursued or used&lt;br /&gt;
* T - Threats – An external inhibitor of performance that has the potential to reduce accomplishments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now that we know what SWOT stands for, but how does one go around about them? There are some questions to get it started &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;3&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://www.professionalacademy.com/blogs-and-advice/marketing-theories---swot-analysis&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Strengths: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we best at?&lt;br /&gt;
* What intellectual property do we own that can help us with this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What specific skills does the current workforce have that can contribute to this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What financial resources do we have for reaching this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances do we have?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our bargaining power with both suppliers and intermediaries?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weaknesses: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we worst at doing?&lt;br /&gt;
* Is our intellectual property outdated?&lt;br /&gt;
* What training does our workforce lack?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our financial position?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances should we have, but don’t?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Opportunity: &lt;br /&gt;
* What changes in the external environment can we exploit?&lt;br /&gt;
* What weaknesses in our competitors can we use to our advantage?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new technology might become available to us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new markets might be opening to us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Threats:&lt;br /&gt;
* What might our competitors be able to do to hurt us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new legislation might damage our interests?&lt;br /&gt;
* What social changes might threaten us?&lt;br /&gt;
* How will the economic cycle affect us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Naturally, there are a lot more questions that can be asked, but these questions for each of the elements, are good starting points. These questions will help you get started on doing the SWOT. Remember, it is always a good idea to do SWOT in the early stages, because it gives you a detailed overview and gives you information, which you can use for your later processes in decision making and planning.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;3&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://www.professionalacademy.com/blogs-and-advice/marketing-theories---swot-analysis&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Visually the SWOT can be shown as this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SWOTKL.png‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 4x4 Matrix&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How to conduct SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
There are no doubt a couple of ways to conduct SWOT, the one which is more of a practical method, a guide on how to fill in the SWOT&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;5&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://www.smartdraw.com/swot-analysis/&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, may be a good place to start. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Determine the object: Which means to decide on a key project or a strategy, where you want to analyse. Write the name of it on the top of a page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Draw the layout: Draw a very large square box and then divide it into four smaller boxes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Put name inside each of the boxes on the top: The top left box write; Strengths, the one beside write; Weaknesses. The box under Weaknesses, write Threats and the last one Opportunity, it should look like the figure earlier (Figure). If you wish a more detailed layout, you can add a smaller box that outlines Strengths and Weaknesses as “Internal” and Opportunities and Threats as “External”, and “Helpful” for Strengths and Opportunities, where Weaknesses and Threats will have a “Harmful” outline. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Add the factors: Add the factors that affects the project in the different boxes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Draw conclusions: Decide if the project is a go or a no-go based on the negative and positive relative. Maybe you are already on a project, but want to see how the situation is, then you need to decide what to do about the information you got out of SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the Myriad guideline&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;, there exist a way to conduct SWOT, in a bit of a different manner. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Recruiting stakeholders: This phase’s idea is simply to try to include your stakeholders. According to the book; Exploring Corporate Strategy by Gerry Johnson, Kevan Scholes and Richard Whittington, you can map your stakeholders according to their interest in a project. If you google “Power-interest matrix”, you can see how you should approach your stakeholders in relative to “Interest” and “Power”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Convening the focus group: This step is to call in the stakeholders, most optimal from 8-48, and explain to them what the SWOT is, and how this little workshop is going to work. The first step is to divide the stakeholders into smaller group, where the idea is to get a well-rounded SWOT, where the stakeholders also can agree on the factors. Of course, the preparations are supposed to be made beforehand, such as already made SWOT figures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Identifying and categorizing SWOTs: Now when the stakeholders are in the groups, they should start to work on the SWOT.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Analyzing SWOTs: In “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;, there is a figure showing, on how they are analyzing the SWOT factors within a Construction Company. Similar should be done. Hereafter, two additional questions should be asked: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor internally or externally controlled?&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor an enhancer or an inhibitor of performance? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where after you put the factors for Strengths, Weaknesses, Threats according to in “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace”&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;, to rank with numbers from 1-5 how much it is under your control and for enhancers and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Synthesizing SWOTs: After the previous step, now the data can be collected, and the data can be shown visually, there is an example in the “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace”&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.	Interpreting findings and deliberating action: Now it is the time to decide upon, which and how to act upon the findings. There are a few actions to take according to what the factors are. Monitor: The factors which are neither enhancer nor inhibitors. Mitigate Threats and Exploit Opportunities: Actions are to be taken, if it is seen that there are threats that will hinder the project, likewise with opportunities, it is supposed to be exploited if it will add value. Lastly, Confront Weaknesses and Leverage Strengths: Because these factors are internal, it is easier to control them, therefore strengths should be leveraged to help achieve desired results and weaknesses should be confronted. &lt;br /&gt;
As you can see the latter option is more wholesome and no doubt more detailed, depending your situation on using SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
Remember these guidelines are only one of the many guidelines.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== When to use SWOT == &lt;br /&gt;
Here are just a few to show when it is applicable to use SWOT, and these mentioned components are also included in something called Human Performance Technology (HPT), which can deepen your understanding on SWOT, but it is not necessary&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://www.projectsmart.co.uk/swot-analysis-in-project-management.php&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	In performance analysis &lt;br /&gt;
When identifying the degree to what internal practices and external environmental influences impact how results are currently being accomplished within an organization &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	In cause analysis&lt;br /&gt;
When finding what practices should be continued or even expanded in the longer terms, as well as those that should be discontinued or replaced by other methods or tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	In strategic planning&lt;br /&gt;
When in strategic planning and needs assessment for identifying the factors that contribute to or detract from organizational effectiveness &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	In evaluation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When monitoring the internal and external environment of a program for change over time, for tracking new SWOTs as they emerge, and for documenting for previously existing SWOTs as they become less influential on a program&lt;br /&gt;
Besides these quite general categories within HPT practice, SWOT can also be a great to use within&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;: &lt;br /&gt;
* Appreciative inquiry – To clarify the organization’s strengths and opportunities &lt;br /&gt;
* Benchmarking – To identify possible opportunities and threats&lt;br /&gt;
* Industry analysis – For contextualizing opportunities existing in the market&lt;br /&gt;
* Situation analysis – For evaluating possible trends or ongoing trends in the markets, costs and competition and competitors&lt;br /&gt;
* Scenario planning – For considering possible and preferred long-term scenarios&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, these are the mentioned area where SWOT can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Critical success factors =&lt;br /&gt;
There is always some critical success factor, when using a tool and SWOT is not excluded&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;. Here are a couple of points to be aware of if you want a good SWOT: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Information shared by stakeholders within a SWOT analysis should never be used to play the blame game, but it should be a basis for continuous improvement&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	When conducting the weaknesses, never blame the others for faults or shortcoming, because being honest is essential&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	SWOT’s data can be collected live depending on the resources and constraints that exists&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	It may be useful to weight the experienced stakeholders’ evaluation of the SWOT’s&lt;br /&gt;
These are some points that may be good to keep in the back of the head, when going through SWOT.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Limitations and critiques of SWOT=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not doubt that SWOT is a very strong tool when carried out right, it can provide valuable knowledge about both customer preferences and competitors intents, and nevertheless where the possible opportunities to grow are. There are also some critiques of SWOT, such as: &lt;br /&gt;
* There are no prioritization of the identified factors and it seems like it was hard to meaningfully compare the importance of one SWOT to another&lt;br /&gt;
* No figuring of costs and benefits or how to use them to achieve their objectives&lt;br /&gt;
* Sometimes it can be hazy on what is external and internal &lt;br /&gt;
And, some limitations about SWOT:&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not help determine the costs and benefits of alternative performance solutions&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not rank the factors according to their criticality&lt;br /&gt;
* It provides minimal information regarding the degree to which an organization or work team possess influence over the factors that have been identified. &lt;br /&gt;
Despite all these, it is possibly to enhance SWOT to its further usability by considering 2 factors&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Approximations of the degree which an organization can control over each factor &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Estimate the costs and benefits of the factors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And turn them into questions for better decision, by asking: &lt;br /&gt;
* How much control does the organization have over each SWOT factor?&lt;br /&gt;
* How much does each SWOT factor cost or benefit the organization? &lt;br /&gt;
By using the above two questions in SWOT, it will further enhance SWOTs usability&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Conclusion =&lt;br /&gt;
This article has served its purpose, to introduce you to the tool SWOT, where the article has gone through the main points of SWOT, but have only scratched the surface. If you want to research more about SWOT, you should be more than welcome to do so, but this article has given you a good starting point. SWOT is an amazing tool to use in various areas or projects, does not matter if you want to use it for personal or professional purpose. Although, SWOT is a very widely used tool, it does have its own flaws and limitations, but it is a tool which has been used numerous times all over again worldwide, in all kinds of industries and professionals. Therefore, if you can master the tool and make up for its mentioned shortcomings with the questions that will cover its limitations to a maximum, it will be an incredible tool which is very valuable for your project or business.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Reference=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S123368</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68883</id>
		<title>What is SWOT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68883"/>
		<updated>2019-03-01T09:21:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S123368: /* Introduction to SWOT */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article will be presenting the tool SWOT and the main points of SWOT will be covered alongside with an introduction on how to apply SWOT. Moreover, the strength and weaknesses of this tool will also be presented so it can be taken into consideration when using the tool. SWOT can be applied in many different areas in project management, whether it is business strategy or market research but is especially used within marketing.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Much of the original groundwork for what is known as SWOT today, was already established more than 50 years ago. A man name Kurt Lewin, his landmark posthumous text, called; Field Theory in Social Science, emphasized that an organization’s desires are influenced by different driving forces or enhancers and limitations and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
Many companies when facing a problem whether it is external or internal, by using SWOT they can create a quick overview of what your obstacles you need to overcome and what chances there are to take.&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is four initials standing for four different elements, where the elements are used to identify different perspectives of consequences. They each stands for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats. The first two factors, Strengths and Weaknesses are factors for the internal, typically when you are inside a company, you will look within to see what kind of Strengths you have and what kind of Weaknesses you have. Then there are Opportunities and Threats, which are external factors, so you look from internal to external. Opportunities help to identify chances there are to grow, expand and even more potential of a blue ocean and Threats are what kind of competitors are there, restrains, regulations. &lt;br /&gt;
More details about this subject will be seen down below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A brief history of SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier it was mentioned that the original groundwork was laid by Lewin, but around the same time there were two professors from Harvard, George Albert Smith Jr. and C. Roland Christensen, who also were interested in the related issue about identifying the extent of the correlation of the organization’s strategy and its competitive environment. Therefore, they instructed their students to address if a company took into account the requirements of a competitive environments. Around a decade later another professor from the same university wanted to see the already by then named SWOT, if it could be used to explore the ways in which competitive thinking influences business strategies.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Handbook of Improving Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction to SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is a strategic analytical tool, for assessing strengths and weaknesses of a business, and also for analyzing opportunities available to the business as well as threats faced by the business. SWOT can also be used for personal purposes or when managing a project. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As mentioned S.W.O.T are initials to different words, each letter stands for something different, with each one of them having their very own purpose, where they together create a very strong foundation for an analysis, whatever the purpose is for. SWOT analysis is processed by a group of stakeholders, where they: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Identify internal and external obstacles and enhancers of performance&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Analyse those factors, which are basted on estimates of their contribution to the net value and how much they are controllable&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. To decide what further or future actions to take regarding those factors &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what do they stand for?&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* S – Strengths – Refers to internal competencies, valuables resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* W - Weaknesses – Refers to internal inhibitors of the competencies, resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* O - Opportunities – Refers to external enhancer of performance, which can be pursued or used&lt;br /&gt;
* T - Threats – An external inhibitor of performance that has the potential to reduce accomplishments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now that we know what SWOT stands for, but how does one go around about them? There are some questions to get it started &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;3&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://www.professionalacademy.com/blogs-and-advice/marketing-theories---swot-analysis&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Strengths: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we best at?&lt;br /&gt;
* What intellectual property do we own that can help us with this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What specific skills does the current workforce have that can contribute to this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What financial resources do we have for reaching this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances do we have?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our bargaining power with both suppliers and intermediaries?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weaknesses: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we worst at doing?&lt;br /&gt;
* Is our intellectual property outdated?&lt;br /&gt;
* What training does our workforce lack?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our financial position?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances should we have, but don’t?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Opportunity: &lt;br /&gt;
* What changes in the external environment can we exploit?&lt;br /&gt;
* What weaknesses in our competitors can we use to our advantage?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new technology might become available to us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new markets might be opening to us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Threats:&lt;br /&gt;
* What might our competitors be able to do to hurt us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new legislation might damage our interests?&lt;br /&gt;
* What social changes might threaten us?&lt;br /&gt;
* How will the economic cycle affect us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Naturally, there are a lot more questions that can be asked, but these questions for each of the elements, are good starting points. These questions will help you get started on doing the SWOT. Remember, it is always a good idea to do SWOT in the early stages, because it gives you a detailed overview and gives you information, which you can use for your later processes in decision making and planning.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;3&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://www.professionalacademy.com/blogs-and-advice/marketing-theories---swot-analysis&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Visually the SWOT can be shown as this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SWOTKL.png‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 4x4 Matrix&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How to conduct SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
There are no doubt a couple of ways to conduct SWOT, the one which is more of a practical method, a guide on how to fill in the SWOT&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;5&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://www.smartdraw.com/swot-analysis/&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, may be a good place to start. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Determine the object: Which means to decide on a key project or a strategy, where you want to analyse. Write the name of it on the top of a page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Draw the layout: Draw a very large square box and then divide it into four smaller boxes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Put name inside each of the boxes on the top: The top left box write; Strengths, the one beside write; Weaknesses. The box under Weaknesses, write Threats and the last one Opportunity, it should look like the figure earlier (Figure). If you wish a more detailed layout, you can add a smaller box that outlines Strengths and Weaknesses as “Internal” and Opportunities and Threats as “External”, and “Helpful” for Strengths and Opportunities, where Weaknesses and Threats will have a “Harmful” outline. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Add the factors: Add the factors that affects the project in the different boxes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Draw conclusions: Decide if the project is a go or a no-go based on the negative and positive relative. Maybe you are already on a project, but want to see how the situation is, then you need to decide what to do about the information you got out of SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the Myriad guideline&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;, there exist a way to conduct SWOT, in a bit of a different manner. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Recruiting stakeholders: This phase’s idea is simply to try to include your stakeholders. According to the book; Exploring Corporate Strategy by Gerry Johnson, Kevan Scholes and Richard Whittington, you can map your stakeholders according to their interest in a project. If you google “Power-interest matrix”, you can see how you should approach your stakeholders in relative to “Interest” and “Power”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Convening the focus group: This step is to call in the stakeholders, most optimal from 8-48, and explain to them what the SWOT is, and how this little workshop is going to work. The first step is to divide the stakeholders into smaller group, where the idea is to get a well-rounded SWOT, where the stakeholders also can agree on the factors. Of course, the preparations are supposed to be made beforehand, such as already made SWOT figures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Identifying and categorizing SWOTs: Now when the stakeholders are in the groups, they should start to work on the SWOT.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Analyzing SWOTs: In “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;, there is a figure showing, on how they are analyzing the SWOT factors within a Construction Company. Similar should be done. Hereafter, two additional questions should be asked: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor internally or externally controlled?&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor an enhancer or an inhibitor of performance? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where after you put the factors for Strengths, Weaknesses, Threats according to in “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace”&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;, to rank with numbers from 1-5 how much it is under your control and for enhancers and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Synthesizing SWOTs: After the previous step, now the data can be collected, and the data can be shown visually, there is an example in the “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace”&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.	Interpreting findings and deliberating action: Now it is the time to decide upon, which and how to act upon the findings. There are a few actions to take according to what the factors are. Monitor: The factors which are neither enhancer nor inhibitors. Mitigate Threats and Exploit Opportunities: Actions are to be taken, if it is seen that there are threats that will hinder the project, likewise with opportunities, it is supposed to be exploited if it will add value. Lastly, Confront Weaknesses and Leverage Strengths: Because these factors are internal, it is easier to control them, therefore strengths should be leveraged to help achieve desired results and weaknesses should be confronted. &lt;br /&gt;
As you can see the latter option is more wholesome and no doubt more detailed, depending your situation on using SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
Remember these guidelines are only one of the many guidelines.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== When to use SWOT == &lt;br /&gt;
Here are just a few to show when it is applicable to use SWOT, and these mentioned components are also included in something called Human Performance Technology (HPT), which can deepen your understanding on SWOT, but it is not necessary&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://www.projectsmart.co.uk/swot-analysis-in-project-management.php&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	In performance analysis &lt;br /&gt;
When identifying the degree to what internal practices and external environmental influences impact how results are currently being accomplished within an organization &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	In cause analysis&lt;br /&gt;
When finding what practices should be continued or even expanded in the longer terms, as well as those that should be discontinued or replaced by other methods or tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	In strategic planning&lt;br /&gt;
When in strategic planning and needs assessment for identifying the factors that contribute to or detract from organizational effectiveness &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	In evaluation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When monitoring the internal and external environment of a program for change over time, for tracking new SWOTs as they emerge, and for documenting for previously existing SWOTs as they become less influential on a program&lt;br /&gt;
Besides these quite general categories within HPT practice, SWOT can also be a great to use within&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;: &lt;br /&gt;
* Appreciative inquiry – To clarify the organization’s strengths and opportunities &lt;br /&gt;
* Benchmarking – To identify possible opportunities and threats&lt;br /&gt;
* Industry analysis – For contextualizing opportunities existing in the market&lt;br /&gt;
* Situation analysis – For evaluating possible trends or ongoing trends in the markets, costs and competition and competitors&lt;br /&gt;
* Scenario planning – For considering possible and preferred long-term scenarios&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, these are the mentioned area where SWOT can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Critical success factors =&lt;br /&gt;
There is always some critical success factor, when using a tool and SWOT is not excluded&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;. Here are a couple of points to be aware of if you want a good SWOT: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Information shared by stakeholders within a SWOT analysis should never be used to play the blame game, but it should be a basis for continuous improvement&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	When conducting the weaknesses, never blame the others for faults or shortcoming, because being honest is essential&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	SWOT’s data can be collected live depending on the resources and constraints that exists&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	It may be useful to weight the experienced stakeholders’ evaluation of the SWOT’s&lt;br /&gt;
These are some points that may be good to keep in the back of the head, when going through SWOT.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Limitations and critiques of SWOT=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not doubt that SWOT is a very strong tool when carried out right, it can provide valuable knowledge about both customer preferences and competitors intents, and nevertheless where the possible opportunities to grow are. There are also some critiques of SWOT, such as: &lt;br /&gt;
* There are no prioritization of the identified factors and it seems like it was hard to meaningfully compare the importance of one SWOT to another&lt;br /&gt;
* No figuring of costs and benefits or how to use them to achieve their objectives&lt;br /&gt;
* Sometimes it can be hazy on what is external and internal &lt;br /&gt;
And, some limitations about SWOT:&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not help determine the costs and benefits of alternative performance solutions&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not rank the factors according to their criticality&lt;br /&gt;
* It provides minimal information regarding the degree to which an organization or work team possess influence over the factors that have been identified. &lt;br /&gt;
Despite all these, it is possibly to enhance SWOT to its further usability by considering 2 factors&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Approximations of the degree which an organization can control over each factor &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Estimate the costs and benefits of the factors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And turn them into questions for better decision, by asking: &lt;br /&gt;
* How much control does the organization have over each SWOT factor?&lt;br /&gt;
* How much does each SWOT factor cost or benefit the organization? &lt;br /&gt;
By using the above two questions in SWOT, it will further enhance SWOTs usability&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Conclusion =&lt;br /&gt;
This article has served its purpose, to introduce you to the tool SWOT, where the article has gone through the main points of SWOT, but have only scratched the surface. If you want to research more about SWOT, you should be more than welcome to do so, but this article has given you a good starting point. SWOT is an amazing tool to use in various areas or projects, does not matter if you want to use it for personal or professional purpose. Although, SWOT is a very widely used tool, it does have its own flaws and limitations, but it is a tool which has been used numerous times all over again worldwide, in all kinds of industries and professionals. Therefore, if you can master the tool and make up for its mentioned shortcomings with the questions that will cover its limitations to a maximum, it will be an incredible tool which is very valuable for your project or business.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Reference=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S123368</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68882</id>
		<title>What is SWOT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68882"/>
		<updated>2019-03-01T09:18:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S123368: /* Introduction to SWOT */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article will be presenting the tool SWOT and the main points of SWOT will be covered alongside with an introduction on how to apply SWOT. Moreover, the strength and weaknesses of this tool will also be presented so it can be taken into consideration when using the tool. SWOT can be applied in many different areas in project management, whether it is business strategy or market research but is especially used within marketing.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Much of the original groundwork for what is known as SWOT today, was already established more than 50 years ago. A man name Kurt Lewin, his landmark posthumous text, called; Field Theory in Social Science, emphasized that an organization’s desires are influenced by different driving forces or enhancers and limitations and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
Many companies when facing a problem whether it is external or internal, by using SWOT they can create a quick overview of what your obstacles you need to overcome and what chances there are to take.&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is four initials standing for four different elements, where the elements are used to identify different perspectives of consequences. They each stands for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats. The first two factors, Strengths and Weaknesses are factors for the internal, typically when you are inside a company, you will look within to see what kind of Strengths you have and what kind of Weaknesses you have. Then there are Opportunities and Threats, which are external factors, so you look from internal to external. Opportunities help to identify chances there are to grow, expand and even more potential of a blue ocean and Threats are what kind of competitors are there, restrains, regulations. &lt;br /&gt;
More details about this subject will be seen down below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A brief history of SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier it was mentioned that the original groundwork was laid by Lewin, but around the same time there were two professors from Harvard, George Albert Smith Jr. and C. Roland Christensen, who also were interested in the related issue about identifying the extent of the correlation of the organization’s strategy and its competitive environment. Therefore, they instructed their students to address if a company took into account the requirements of a competitive environments. Around a decade later another professor from the same university wanted to see the already by then named SWOT, if it could be used to explore the ways in which competitive thinking influences business strategies.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Handbook of Improving Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction to SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is a strategic analytical tool, for assessing strengths and weaknesses of a business, and also for analyzing opportunities available to the business as well as threats faced by the business. SWOT can also be used for personal purposes or when managing a project. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As mentioned S.W.O.T are initials to different words, each letter stands for something different, with each one of them having their very own purpose, where they together create a very strong foundation for an analysis, whatever the purpose is for. SWOT analysis is processed by a group of stakeholders, where they: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Identify internal and external obstacles and enhancers of performance&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Analyse those factors, which are basted on estimates of their contribution to the net value and how much they are controllable&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. To decide what further or future actions to take regarding those factors &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what do they stand for?&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* S – Strengths – Refers to internal competencies, valuables resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* W - Weaknesses – Refers to internal inhibitors of the competencies, resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* O - Opportunities – Refers to external enhancer of performance, which can be pursued or used&lt;br /&gt;
* T - Threats – An external inhibitor of performance that has the potential to reduce accomplishments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now that we know what SWOT stands for, but how does one go around about them? There are some questions to get it started &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;3&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://www.professionalacademy.com/blogs-and-advice/marketing-theories---swot-analysis&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Strengths: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we best at?&lt;br /&gt;
* What intellectual property do we own that can help us with this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What specific skills does the current workforce have that can contribute to this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What financial resources do we have for reaching this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances do we have?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our bargaining power with both suppliers and intermediaries?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weaknesses: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we worst at doing?&lt;br /&gt;
* Is our intellectual property outdated?&lt;br /&gt;
* What training does our workforce lack?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our financial position?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances should we have, but don’t?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Opportunity: &lt;br /&gt;
* What changes in the external environment can we exploit?&lt;br /&gt;
* What weaknesses in our competitors can we use to our advantage?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new technology might become available to us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new markets might be opening to us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Threats:&lt;br /&gt;
* What might our competitors be able to do to hurt us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new legislation might damage our interests?&lt;br /&gt;
* What social changes might threaten us?&lt;br /&gt;
* How will the economic cycle affect us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Naturally, there are a lot more questions that can be asked, but these questions for each of the elements, are good starting points. These questions will help you get started on doing the SWOT. Remember, it is always a good idea to do SWOT in the early stages, because it gives you a detailed overview and gives you information, which you can use for your later processes in decision making and planning.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;3&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://www.professionalacademy.com/blogs-and-advice/marketing-theories---swot-analysis&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Visually the SWOT can be shown as this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SWOTKL.png‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 4x4 Matrix&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How to conduct SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
There are no doubt a couple of ways to conduct SWOT, the one which is more of a practical method, a guide on how to fill in the SWOT&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;5&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://www.smartdraw.com/swot-analysis/&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, may be a good place to start. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Determine the object: Which means to decide on a key project or a strategy, where you want to analyse. Write the name of it on the top of a page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Draw the layout: Draw a very large square box and then divide it into four smaller boxes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Put name inside each of the boxes on the top: The top left box write; Strengths, the one beside write; Weaknesses. The box under Weaknesses, write Threats and the last one Opportunity, it should look like the figure earlier (Figure). If you wish a more detailed layout, you can add a smaller box that outlines Strengths and Weaknesses as “Internal” and Opportunities and Threats as “External”, and “Helpful” for Strengths and Opportunities, where Weaknesses and Threats will have a “Harmful” outline. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Add the factors: Add the factors that affects the project in the different boxes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Draw conclusions: Decide if the project is a go or a no-go based on the negative and positive relative. Maybe you are already on a project, but want to see how the situation is, then you need to decide what to do about the information you got out of SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the Myriad guideline&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;, there exist a way to conduct SWOT, in a bit of a different manner. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Recruiting stakeholders: This phase’s idea is simply to try to include your stakeholders. According to the book; Exploring Corporate Strategy by Gerry Johnson, Kevan Scholes and Richard Whittington, you can map your stakeholders according to their interest in a project. If you google “Power-interest matrix”, you can see how you should approach your stakeholders in relative to “Interest” and “Power”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Convening the focus group: This step is to call in the stakeholders, most optimal from 8-48, and explain to them what the SWOT is, and how this little workshop is going to work. The first step is to divide the stakeholders into smaller group, where the idea is to get a well-rounded SWOT, where the stakeholders also can agree on the factors. Of course, the preparations are supposed to be made beforehand, such as already made SWOT figures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Identifying and categorizing SWOTs: Now when the stakeholders are in the groups, they should start to work on the SWOT.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Analyzing SWOTs: In “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;, there is a figure showing, on how they are analyzing the SWOT factors within a Construction Company. Similar should be done. Hereafter, two additional questions should be asked: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor internally or externally controlled?&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor an enhancer or an inhibitor of performance? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where after you put the factors for Strengths, Weaknesses, Threats according to in “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace”&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;, to rank with numbers from 1-5 how much it is under your control and for enhancers and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Synthesizing SWOTs: After the previous step, now the data can be collected, and the data can be shown visually, there is an example in the “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace”&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.	Interpreting findings and deliberating action: Now it is the time to decide upon, which and how to act upon the findings. There are a few actions to take according to what the factors are. Monitor: The factors which are neither enhancer nor inhibitors. Mitigate Threats and Exploit Opportunities: Actions are to be taken, if it is seen that there are threats that will hinder the project, likewise with opportunities, it is supposed to be exploited if it will add value. Lastly, Confront Weaknesses and Leverage Strengths: Because these factors are internal, it is easier to control them, therefore strengths should be leveraged to help achieve desired results and weaknesses should be confronted. &lt;br /&gt;
As you can see the latter option is more wholesome and no doubt more detailed, depending your situation on using SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
Remember these guidelines are only one of the many guidelines.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== When to use SWOT == &lt;br /&gt;
Here are just a few to show when it is applicable to use SWOT, and these mentioned components are also included in something called Human Performance Technology (HPT), which can deepen your understanding on SWOT, but it is not necessary&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://www.projectsmart.co.uk/swot-analysis-in-project-management.php&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	In performance analysis &lt;br /&gt;
When identifying the degree to what internal practices and external environmental influences impact how results are currently being accomplished within an organization &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	In cause analysis&lt;br /&gt;
When finding what practices should be continued or even expanded in the longer terms, as well as those that should be discontinued or replaced by other methods or tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	In strategic planning&lt;br /&gt;
When in strategic planning and needs assessment for identifying the factors that contribute to or detract from organizational effectiveness &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	In evaluation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When monitoring the internal and external environment of a program for change over time, for tracking new SWOTs as they emerge, and for documenting for previously existing SWOTs as they become less influential on a program&lt;br /&gt;
Besides these quite general categories within HPT practice, SWOT can also be a great to use within&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;: &lt;br /&gt;
* Appreciative inquiry – To clarify the organization’s strengths and opportunities &lt;br /&gt;
* Benchmarking – To identify possible opportunities and threats&lt;br /&gt;
* Industry analysis – For contextualizing opportunities existing in the market&lt;br /&gt;
* Situation analysis – For evaluating possible trends or ongoing trends in the markets, costs and competition and competitors&lt;br /&gt;
* Scenario planning – For considering possible and preferred long-term scenarios&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, these are the mentioned area where SWOT can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Critical success factors =&lt;br /&gt;
There is always some critical success factor, when using a tool and SWOT is not excluded&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;. Here are a couple of points to be aware of if you want a good SWOT: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Information shared by stakeholders within a SWOT analysis should never be used to play the blame game, but it should be a basis for continuous improvement&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	When conducting the weaknesses, never blame the others for faults or shortcoming, because being honest is essential&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	SWOT’s data can be collected live depending on the resources and constraints that exists&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	It may be useful to weight the experienced stakeholders’ evaluation of the SWOT’s&lt;br /&gt;
These are some points that may be good to keep in the back of the head, when going through SWOT.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Limitations and critiques of SWOT=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not doubt that SWOT is a very strong tool when carried out right, it can provide valuable knowledge about both customer preferences and competitors intents, and nevertheless where the possible opportunities to grow are. There are also some critiques of SWOT, such as: &lt;br /&gt;
* There are no prioritization of the identified factors and it seems like it was hard to meaningfully compare the importance of one SWOT to another&lt;br /&gt;
* No figuring of costs and benefits or how to use them to achieve their objectives&lt;br /&gt;
* Sometimes it can be hazy on what is external and internal &lt;br /&gt;
And, some limitations about SWOT:&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not help determine the costs and benefits of alternative performance solutions&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not rank the factors according to their criticality&lt;br /&gt;
* It provides minimal information regarding the degree to which an organization or work team possess influence over the factors that have been identified. &lt;br /&gt;
Despite all these, it is possibly to enhance SWOT to its further usability by considering 2 factors&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Approximations of the degree which an organization can control over each factor &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Estimate the costs and benefits of the factors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And turn them into questions for better decision, by asking: &lt;br /&gt;
* How much control does the organization have over each SWOT factor?&lt;br /&gt;
* How much does each SWOT factor cost or benefit the organization? &lt;br /&gt;
By using the above two questions in SWOT, it will further enhance SWOTs usability&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Conclusion =&lt;br /&gt;
This article has served its purpose, to introduce you to the tool SWOT, where the article has gone through the main points of SWOT, but have only scratched the surface. If you want to research more about SWOT, you should be more than welcome to do so, but this article has given you a good starting point. SWOT is an amazing tool to use in various areas or projects, does not matter if you want to use it for personal or professional purpose. Although, SWOT is a very widely used tool, it does have its own flaws and limitations, but it is a tool which has been used numerous times all over again worldwide, in all kinds of industries and professionals. Therefore, if you can master the tool and make up for its mentioned shortcomings with the questions that will cover its limitations to a maximum, it will be an incredible tool which is very valuable for your project or business.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Reference=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S123368</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68880</id>
		<title>What is SWOT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68880"/>
		<updated>2019-03-01T09:18:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S123368: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article will be presenting the tool SWOT and the main points of SWOT will be covered alongside with an introduction on how to apply SWOT. Moreover, the strength and weaknesses of this tool will also be presented so it can be taken into consideration when using the tool. SWOT can be applied in many different areas in project management, whether it is business strategy or market research but is especially used within marketing.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Much of the original groundwork for what is known as SWOT today, was already established more than 50 years ago. A man name Kurt Lewin, his landmark posthumous text, called; Field Theory in Social Science, emphasized that an organization’s desires are influenced by different driving forces or enhancers and limitations and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
Many companies when facing a problem whether it is external or internal, by using SWOT they can create a quick overview of what your obstacles you need to overcome and what chances there are to take.&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is four initials standing for four different elements, where the elements are used to identify different perspectives of consequences. They each stands for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats. The first two factors, Strengths and Weaknesses are factors for the internal, typically when you are inside a company, you will look within to see what kind of Strengths you have and what kind of Weaknesses you have. Then there are Opportunities and Threats, which are external factors, so you look from internal to external. Opportunities help to identify chances there are to grow, expand and even more potential of a blue ocean and Threats are what kind of competitors are there, restrains, regulations. &lt;br /&gt;
More details about this subject will be seen down below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A brief history of SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier it was mentioned that the original groundwork was laid by Lewin, but around the same time there were two professors from Harvard, George Albert Smith Jr. and C. Roland Christensen, who also were interested in the related issue about identifying the extent of the correlation of the organization’s strategy and its competitive environment. Therefore, they instructed their students to address if a company took into account the requirements of a competitive environments. Around a decade later another professor from the same university wanted to see the already by then named SWOT, if it could be used to explore the ways in which competitive thinking influences business strategies.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Handbook of Improving Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction to SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is a strategic analytical tool, for assessing strengths and weaknesses of a business, and also for analyzing opportunities available to the business as well as threats faced by the business. SWOT can also be used for personal purposes or when managing a project. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As mentioned S.W.O.T are initials to different words, each letter stands for something different, with each one of them having their very own purpose, where they together create a very strong foundation for an analysis, whatever the purpose is for. SWOT analysis is processed by a group of stakeholders, where they: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Identify internal and external obstacles and enhancers of performance&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Analyse those factors, which are basted on estimates of their contribution to the net value and how much they are controllable&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. To decide what further or future actions to take regarding those factors &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what do they stand for?&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* S – Strengths – Refers to internal competencies, valuables resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* W - Weaknesses – Refers to internal inhibitors of the competencies, resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* O - Opportunities – Refers to external enhancer of performance, which can be pursued or used&lt;br /&gt;
* T - Threats – An external inhibitor of performance that has the potential to reduce accomplishments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now that we know what SWOT stands for, but how does one go around about them? There are some questions to get it started &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;3&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://www.professionalacademy.com/blogs-and-advice/marketing-theories---swot-analysis&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Strengths: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we best at?&lt;br /&gt;
* What intellectual property do we own that can help us with this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What specific skills does the current workforce have that can contribute to this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What financial resources do we have for reaching this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances do we have?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our bargaining power with both suppliers and intermediaries?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weaknesses: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we worst at doing?&lt;br /&gt;
* Is our intellectual property outdated?&lt;br /&gt;
* What training does our workforce lack?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our financial position?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances should we have, but don’t?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Opportunity: &lt;br /&gt;
* What changes in the external environment can we exploit?&lt;br /&gt;
* What weaknesses in our competitors can we use to our advantage?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new technology might become available to us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new markets might be opening to us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Threats:&lt;br /&gt;
* What might our competitors be able to do to hurt us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new legislation might damage our interests?&lt;br /&gt;
* What social changes might threaten us?&lt;br /&gt;
* How will the economic cycle affect us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Naturally, there are a lot more questions that can be asked, but these questions for each of the elements, are good starting points. These questions will help you get started on doing the SWOT. Remember, it is always a good idea to do SWOT in the early stages, because it gives you a detailed overview and gives you information, which you can use for your later processes in decision making and planning.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;3&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://www.professionalacademy.com/blogs-and-advice/marketing-theories---swot-analysis&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Visually the SWOT can be shown as this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SWOTKL.png‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 4x4 Matrix&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How to conduct SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
There are no doubt a couple of ways to conduct SWOT, the one which is more of a practical method, a guide on how to fill in the SWOT&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;5&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://www.smartdraw.com/swot-analysis/&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, may be a good place to start. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Determine the object: Which means to decide on a key project or a strategy, where you want to analyse. Write the name of it on the top of a page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Draw the layout: Draw a very large square box and then divide it into four smaller boxes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Put name inside each of the boxes on the top: The top left box write; Strengths, the one beside write; Weaknesses. The box under Weaknesses, write Threats and the last one Opportunity, it should look like the figure earlier (Figure). If you wish a more detailed layout, you can add a smaller box that outlines Strengths and Weaknesses as “Internal” and Opportunities and Threats as “External”, and “Helpful” for Strengths and Opportunities, where Weaknesses and Threats will have a “Harmful” outline. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Add the factors: Add the factors that affects the project in the different boxes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Draw conclusions: Decide if the project is a go or a no-go based on the negative and positive relative. Maybe you are already on a project, but want to see how the situation is, then you need to decide what to do about the information you got out of SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the Myriad guideline&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;, there exist a way to conduct SWOT, in a bit of a different manner. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Recruiting stakeholders: This phase’s idea is simply to try to include your stakeholders. According to the book; Exploring Corporate Strategy by Gerry Johnson, Kevan Scholes and Richard Whittington, you can map your stakeholders according to their interest in a project. If you google “Power-interest matrix”, you can see how you should approach your stakeholders in relative to “Interest” and “Power”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Convening the focus group: This step is to call in the stakeholders, most optimal from 8-48, and explain to them what the SWOT is, and how this little workshop is going to work. The first step is to divide the stakeholders into smaller group, where the idea is to get a well-rounded SWOT, where the stakeholders also can agree on the factors. Of course, the preparations are supposed to be made beforehand, such as already made SWOT figures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Identifying and categorizing SWOTs: Now when the stakeholders are in the groups, they should start to work on the SWOT.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Analyzing SWOTs: In “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;, there is a figure showing, on how they are analyzing the SWOT factors within a Construction Company. Similar should be done. Hereafter, two additional questions should be asked: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor internally or externally controlled?&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor an enhancer or an inhibitor of performance? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where after you put the factors for Strengths, Weaknesses, Threats according to in “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace”&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;, to rank with numbers from 1-5 how much it is under your control and for enhancers and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Synthesizing SWOTs: After the previous step, now the data can be collected, and the data can be shown visually, there is an example in the “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace”&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.	Interpreting findings and deliberating action: Now it is the time to decide upon, which and how to act upon the findings. There are a few actions to take according to what the factors are. Monitor: The factors which are neither enhancer nor inhibitors. Mitigate Threats and Exploit Opportunities: Actions are to be taken, if it is seen that there are threats that will hinder the project, likewise with opportunities, it is supposed to be exploited if it will add value. Lastly, Confront Weaknesses and Leverage Strengths: Because these factors are internal, it is easier to control them, therefore strengths should be leveraged to help achieve desired results and weaknesses should be confronted. &lt;br /&gt;
As you can see the latter option is more wholesome and no doubt more detailed, depending your situation on using SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
Remember these guidelines are only one of the many guidelines.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== When to use SWOT == &lt;br /&gt;
Here are just a few to show when it is applicable to use SWOT, and these mentioned components are also included in something called Human Performance Technology (HPT), which can deepen your understanding on SWOT, but it is not necessary&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://www.projectsmart.co.uk/swot-analysis-in-project-management.php&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	In performance analysis &lt;br /&gt;
When identifying the degree to what internal practices and external environmental influences impact how results are currently being accomplished within an organization &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	In cause analysis&lt;br /&gt;
When finding what practices should be continued or even expanded in the longer terms, as well as those that should be discontinued or replaced by other methods or tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	In strategic planning&lt;br /&gt;
When in strategic planning and needs assessment for identifying the factors that contribute to or detract from organizational effectiveness &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	In evaluation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When monitoring the internal and external environment of a program for change over time, for tracking new SWOTs as they emerge, and for documenting for previously existing SWOTs as they become less influential on a program&lt;br /&gt;
Besides these quite general categories within HPT practice, SWOT can also be a great to use within&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;: &lt;br /&gt;
* Appreciative inquiry – To clarify the organization’s strengths and opportunities &lt;br /&gt;
* Benchmarking – To identify possible opportunities and threats&lt;br /&gt;
* Industry analysis – For contextualizing opportunities existing in the market&lt;br /&gt;
* Situation analysis – For evaluating possible trends or ongoing trends in the markets, costs and competition and competitors&lt;br /&gt;
* Scenario planning – For considering possible and preferred long-term scenarios&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, these are the mentioned area where SWOT can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Critical success factors =&lt;br /&gt;
There is always some critical success factor, when using a tool and SWOT is not excluded&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;. Here are a couple of points to be aware of if you want a good SWOT: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Information shared by stakeholders within a SWOT analysis should never be used to play the blame game, but it should be a basis for continuous improvement&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	When conducting the weaknesses, never blame the others for faults or shortcoming, because being honest is essential&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	SWOT’s data can be collected live depending on the resources and constraints that exists&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	It may be useful to weight the experienced stakeholders’ evaluation of the SWOT’s&lt;br /&gt;
These are some points that may be good to keep in the back of the head, when going through SWOT.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Limitations and critiques of SWOT=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not doubt that SWOT is a very strong tool when carried out right, it can provide valuable knowledge about both customer preferences and competitors intents, and nevertheless where the possible opportunities to grow are. There are also some critiques of SWOT, such as: &lt;br /&gt;
* There are no prioritization of the identified factors and it seems like it was hard to meaningfully compare the importance of one SWOT to another&lt;br /&gt;
* No figuring of costs and benefits or how to use them to achieve their objectives&lt;br /&gt;
* Sometimes it can be hazy on what is external and internal &lt;br /&gt;
And, some limitations about SWOT:&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not help determine the costs and benefits of alternative performance solutions&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not rank the factors according to their criticality&lt;br /&gt;
* It provides minimal information regarding the degree to which an organization or work team possess influence over the factors that have been identified. &lt;br /&gt;
Despite all these, it is possibly to enhance SWOT to its further usability by considering 2 factors&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Approximations of the degree which an organization can control over each factor &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Estimate the costs and benefits of the factors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And turn them into questions for better decision, by asking: &lt;br /&gt;
* How much control does the organization have over each SWOT factor?&lt;br /&gt;
* How much does each SWOT factor cost or benefit the organization? &lt;br /&gt;
By using the above two questions in SWOT, it will further enhance SWOTs usability&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Conclusion =&lt;br /&gt;
This article has served its purpose, to introduce you to the tool SWOT, where the article has gone through the main points of SWOT, but have only scratched the surface. If you want to research more about SWOT, you should be more than welcome to do so, but this article has given you a good starting point. SWOT is an amazing tool to use in various areas or projects, does not matter if you want to use it for personal or professional purpose. Although, SWOT is a very widely used tool, it does have its own flaws and limitations, but it is a tool which has been used numerous times all over again worldwide, in all kinds of industries and professionals. Therefore, if you can master the tool and make up for its mentioned shortcomings with the questions that will cover its limitations to a maximum, it will be an incredible tool which is very valuable for your project or business.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Reference=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S123368</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68879</id>
		<title>What is SWOT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68879"/>
		<updated>2019-03-01T09:16:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S123368: /* Reference */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article will be presenting the tool SWOT and the main points of SWOT will be covered alongside with an introduction on how to apply SWOT. Moreover, the strength and weaknesses of this tool will also be presented so it can be taken into consideration when using the tool. SWOT can be applied in many different areas in project management, whether it is business strategy or market research but is especially used within marketing.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Much of the original groundwork for what is known as SWOT today, was already established more than 50 years ago. A man name Kurt Lewin, his landmark posthumous text, called; Field Theory in Social Science, emphasized that an organization’s desires are influenced by different driving forces or enhancers and limitations and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
Many companies when facing a problem whether it is external or internal, by using SWOT they can create a quick overview of what your obstacles you need to overcome and what chances there are to take.&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is four initials standing for four different elements, where the elements are used to identify different perspectives of consequences. They each stands for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats. The first two factors, Strengths and Weaknesses are factors for the internal, typically when you are inside a company, you will look within to see what kind of Strengths you have and what kind of Weaknesses you have. Then there are Opportunities and Threats, which are external factors, so you look from internal to external. Opportunities help to identify chances there are to grow, expand and even more potential of a blue ocean and Threats are what kind of competitors are there, restrains, regulations. &lt;br /&gt;
More details about this subject will be seen down below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A brief history of SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier it was mentioned that the original groundwork was laid by Lewin, but around the same time there were two professors from Harvard, George Albert Smith Jr. and C. Roland Christensen, who also were interested in the related issue about identifying the extent of the correlation of the organization’s strategy and its competitive environment. Therefore, they instructed their students to address if a company took into account the requirements of a competitive environments. Around a decade later another professor from the same university wanted to see the already by then named SWOT, if it could be used to explore the ways in which competitive thinking influences business strategies.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Handbook of Improving Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction to SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is a strategic analytical tool, for assessing strengths and weaknesses of a business, and also for analyzing opportunities available to the business as well as threats faced by the business. SWOT can also be used for personal purposes or when managing a project. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As mentioned S.W.O.T are initials to different words, each letter stands for something different, with each one of them having their very own purpose, where they together create a very strong foundation for an analysis, whatever the purpose is for. SWOT analysis is processed by a group of stakeholders, where they: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Identify internal and external obstacles and enhancers of performance&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Analyse those factors, which are basted on estimates of their contribution to the net value and how much they are controllable&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. To decide what further or future actions to take regarding those factors &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what do they stand for?&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* S – Strengths – Refers to internal competencies, valuables resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* W - Weaknesses – Refers to internal inhibitors of the competencies, resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* O - Opportunities – Refers to external enhancer of performance, which can be pursued or used&lt;br /&gt;
* T - Threats – An external inhibitor of performance that has the potential to reduce accomplishments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now that we know what SWOT stands for, but how does one go around about them? There are some questions to get it started (3). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Strengths: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we best at?&lt;br /&gt;
* What intellectual property do we own that can help us with this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What specific skills does the current workforce have that can contribute to this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What financial resources do we have for reaching this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances do we have?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our bargaining power with both suppliers and intermediaries?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weaknesses: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we worst at doing?&lt;br /&gt;
* Is our intellectual property outdated?&lt;br /&gt;
* What training does our workforce lack?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our financial position?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances should we have, but don’t?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Opportunity: &lt;br /&gt;
* What changes in the external environment can we exploit?&lt;br /&gt;
* What weaknesses in our competitors can we use to our advantage?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new technology might become available to us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new markets might be opening to us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Threats:&lt;br /&gt;
* What might our competitors be able to do to hurt us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new legislation might damage our interests?&lt;br /&gt;
* What social changes might threaten us?&lt;br /&gt;
* How will the economic cycle affect us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Naturally, there are a lot more questions that can be asked, but these questions for each of the elements, are good starting points. These questions will help you get started on doing the SWOT. Remember, it is always a good idea to do SWOT in the early stages, because it gives you a detailed overview and gives you information, which you can use for your later processes in decision making and planning.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;3&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://www.professionalacademy.com/blogs-and-advice/marketing-theories---swot-analysis&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Visually the SWOT can be shown as this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SWOTKL.png‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 4x4 Matrix&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How to conduct SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
There are no doubt a couple of ways to conduct SWOT, the one which is more of a practical method, a guide on how to fill in the SWOT&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;5&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://www.smartdraw.com/swot-analysis/&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, may be a good place to start. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Determine the object: Which means to decide on a key project or a strategy, where you want to analyse. Write the name of it on the top of a page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Draw the layout: Draw a very large square box and then divide it into four smaller boxes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Put name inside each of the boxes on the top: The top left box write; Strengths, the one beside write; Weaknesses. The box under Weaknesses, write Threats and the last one Opportunity, it should look like the figure earlier (Figure). If you wish a more detailed layout, you can add a smaller box that outlines Strengths and Weaknesses as “Internal” and Opportunities and Threats as “External”, and “Helpful” for Strengths and Opportunities, where Weaknesses and Threats will have a “Harmful” outline. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Add the factors: Add the factors that affects the project in the different boxes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Draw conclusions: Decide if the project is a go or a no-go based on the negative and positive relative. Maybe you are already on a project, but want to see how the situation is, then you need to decide what to do about the information you got out of SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the Myriad guideline&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;, there exist a way to conduct SWOT, in a bit of a different manner. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Recruiting stakeholders: This phase’s idea is simply to try to include your stakeholders. According to the book; Exploring Corporate Strategy by Gerry Johnson, Kevan Scholes and Richard Whittington, you can map your stakeholders according to their interest in a project. If you google “Power-interest matrix”, you can see how you should approach your stakeholders in relative to “Interest” and “Power”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Convening the focus group: This step is to call in the stakeholders, most optimal from 8-48, and explain to them what the SWOT is, and how this little workshop is going to work. The first step is to divide the stakeholders into smaller group, where the idea is to get a well-rounded SWOT, where the stakeholders also can agree on the factors. Of course, the preparations are supposed to be made beforehand, such as already made SWOT figures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Identifying and categorizing SWOTs: Now when the stakeholders are in the groups, they should start to work on the SWOT.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Analyzing SWOTs: In “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;, there is a figure showing, on how they are analyzing the SWOT factors within a Construction Company. Similar should be done. Hereafter, two additional questions should be asked: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor internally or externally controlled?&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor an enhancer or an inhibitor of performance? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where after you put the factors for Strengths, Weaknesses, Threats according to in “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace”&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;, to rank with numbers from 1-5 how much it is under your control and for enhancers and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Synthesizing SWOTs: After the previous step, now the data can be collected, and the data can be shown visually, there is an example in the “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace”&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.	Interpreting findings and deliberating action: Now it is the time to decide upon, which and how to act upon the findings. There are a few actions to take according to what the factors are. Monitor: The factors which are neither enhancer nor inhibitors. Mitigate Threats and Exploit Opportunities: Actions are to be taken, if it is seen that there are threats that will hinder the project, likewise with opportunities, it is supposed to be exploited if it will add value. Lastly, Confront Weaknesses and Leverage Strengths: Because these factors are internal, it is easier to control them, therefore strengths should be leveraged to help achieve desired results and weaknesses should be confronted. &lt;br /&gt;
As you can see the latter option is more wholesome and no doubt more detailed, depending your situation on using SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
Remember these guidelines are only one of the many guidelines.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== When to use SWOT == &lt;br /&gt;
Here are just a few to show when it is applicable to use SWOT, and these mentioned components are also included in something called Human Performance Technology (HPT), which can deepen your understanding on SWOT, but it is not necessary&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://www.projectsmart.co.uk/swot-analysis-in-project-management.php&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	In performance analysis &lt;br /&gt;
When identifying the degree to what internal practices and external environmental influences impact how results are currently being accomplished within an organization &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	In cause analysis&lt;br /&gt;
When finding what practices should be continued or even expanded in the longer terms, as well as those that should be discontinued or replaced by other methods or tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	In strategic planning&lt;br /&gt;
When in strategic planning and needs assessment for identifying the factors that contribute to or detract from organizational effectiveness &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	In evaluation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When monitoring the internal and external environment of a program for change over time, for tracking new SWOTs as they emerge, and for documenting for previously existing SWOTs as they become less influential on a program&lt;br /&gt;
Besides these quite general categories within HPT practice, SWOT can also be a great to use within&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;: &lt;br /&gt;
* Appreciative inquiry – To clarify the organization’s strengths and opportunities &lt;br /&gt;
* Benchmarking – To identify possible opportunities and threats&lt;br /&gt;
* Industry analysis – For contextualizing opportunities existing in the market&lt;br /&gt;
* Situation analysis – For evaluating possible trends or ongoing trends in the markets, costs and competition and competitors&lt;br /&gt;
* Scenario planning – For considering possible and preferred long-term scenarios&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, these are the mentioned area where SWOT can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Critical success factors =&lt;br /&gt;
There is always some critical success factor, when using a tool and SWOT is not excluded&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;. Here are a couple of points to be aware of if you want a good SWOT: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Information shared by stakeholders within a SWOT analysis should never be used to play the blame game, but it should be a basis for continuous improvement&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	When conducting the weaknesses, never blame the others for faults or shortcoming, because being honest is essential&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	SWOT’s data can be collected live depending on the resources and constraints that exists&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	It may be useful to weight the experienced stakeholders’ evaluation of the SWOT’s&lt;br /&gt;
These are some points that may be good to keep in the back of the head, when going through SWOT.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Limitations and critiques of SWOT=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not doubt that SWOT is a very strong tool when carried out right, it can provide valuable knowledge about both customer preferences and competitors intents, and nevertheless where the possible opportunities to grow are. There are also some critiques of SWOT, such as: &lt;br /&gt;
* There are no prioritization of the identified factors and it seems like it was hard to meaningfully compare the importance of one SWOT to another&lt;br /&gt;
* No figuring of costs and benefits or how to use them to achieve their objectives&lt;br /&gt;
* Sometimes it can be hazy on what is external and internal &lt;br /&gt;
And, some limitations about SWOT:&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not help determine the costs and benefits of alternative performance solutions&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not rank the factors according to their criticality&lt;br /&gt;
* It provides minimal information regarding the degree to which an organization or work team possess influence over the factors that have been identified. &lt;br /&gt;
Despite all these, it is possibly to enhance SWOT to its further usability by considering 2 factors&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Approximations of the degree which an organization can control over each factor &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Estimate the costs and benefits of the factors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And turn them into questions for better decision, by asking: &lt;br /&gt;
* How much control does the organization have over each SWOT factor?&lt;br /&gt;
* How much does each SWOT factor cost or benefit the organization? &lt;br /&gt;
By using the above two questions in SWOT, it will further enhance SWOTs usability&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Conclusion =&lt;br /&gt;
This article has served its purpose, to introduce you to the tool SWOT, where the article has gone through the main points of SWOT, but have only scratched the surface. If you want to research more about SWOT, you should be more than welcome to do so, but this article has given you a good starting point. SWOT is an amazing tool to use in various areas or projects, does not matter if you want to use it for personal or professional purpose. Although, SWOT is a very widely used tool, it does have its own flaws and limitations, but it is a tool which has been used numerous times all over again worldwide, in all kinds of industries and professionals. Therefore, if you can master the tool and make up for its mentioned shortcomings with the questions that will cover its limitations to a maximum, it will be an incredible tool which is very valuable for your project or business.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Reference=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S123368</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68878</id>
		<title>What is SWOT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68878"/>
		<updated>2019-03-01T09:16:18Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S123368: /* Conclusion */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article will be presenting the tool SWOT and the main points of SWOT will be covered alongside with an introduction on how to apply SWOT. Moreover, the strength and weaknesses of this tool will also be presented so it can be taken into consideration when using the tool. SWOT can be applied in many different areas in project management, whether it is business strategy or market research but is especially used within marketing.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Much of the original groundwork for what is known as SWOT today, was already established more than 50 years ago. A man name Kurt Lewin, his landmark posthumous text, called; Field Theory in Social Science, emphasized that an organization’s desires are influenced by different driving forces or enhancers and limitations and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
Many companies when facing a problem whether it is external or internal, by using SWOT they can create a quick overview of what your obstacles you need to overcome and what chances there are to take.&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is four initials standing for four different elements, where the elements are used to identify different perspectives of consequences. They each stands for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats. The first two factors, Strengths and Weaknesses are factors for the internal, typically when you are inside a company, you will look within to see what kind of Strengths you have and what kind of Weaknesses you have. Then there are Opportunities and Threats, which are external factors, so you look from internal to external. Opportunities help to identify chances there are to grow, expand and even more potential of a blue ocean and Threats are what kind of competitors are there, restrains, regulations. &lt;br /&gt;
More details about this subject will be seen down below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A brief history of SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier it was mentioned that the original groundwork was laid by Lewin, but around the same time there were two professors from Harvard, George Albert Smith Jr. and C. Roland Christensen, who also were interested in the related issue about identifying the extent of the correlation of the organization’s strategy and its competitive environment. Therefore, they instructed their students to address if a company took into account the requirements of a competitive environments. Around a decade later another professor from the same university wanted to see the already by then named SWOT, if it could be used to explore the ways in which competitive thinking influences business strategies.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Handbook of Improving Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction to SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is a strategic analytical tool, for assessing strengths and weaknesses of a business, and also for analyzing opportunities available to the business as well as threats faced by the business. SWOT can also be used for personal purposes or when managing a project. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As mentioned S.W.O.T are initials to different words, each letter stands for something different, with each one of them having their very own purpose, where they together create a very strong foundation for an analysis, whatever the purpose is for. SWOT analysis is processed by a group of stakeholders, where they: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Identify internal and external obstacles and enhancers of performance&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Analyse those factors, which are basted on estimates of their contribution to the net value and how much they are controllable&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. To decide what further or future actions to take regarding those factors &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what do they stand for?&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* S – Strengths – Refers to internal competencies, valuables resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* W - Weaknesses – Refers to internal inhibitors of the competencies, resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* O - Opportunities – Refers to external enhancer of performance, which can be pursued or used&lt;br /&gt;
* T - Threats – An external inhibitor of performance that has the potential to reduce accomplishments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now that we know what SWOT stands for, but how does one go around about them? There are some questions to get it started (3). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Strengths: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we best at?&lt;br /&gt;
* What intellectual property do we own that can help us with this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What specific skills does the current workforce have that can contribute to this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What financial resources do we have for reaching this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances do we have?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our bargaining power with both suppliers and intermediaries?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weaknesses: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we worst at doing?&lt;br /&gt;
* Is our intellectual property outdated?&lt;br /&gt;
* What training does our workforce lack?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our financial position?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances should we have, but don’t?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Opportunity: &lt;br /&gt;
* What changes in the external environment can we exploit?&lt;br /&gt;
* What weaknesses in our competitors can we use to our advantage?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new technology might become available to us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new markets might be opening to us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Threats:&lt;br /&gt;
* What might our competitors be able to do to hurt us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new legislation might damage our interests?&lt;br /&gt;
* What social changes might threaten us?&lt;br /&gt;
* How will the economic cycle affect us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Naturally, there are a lot more questions that can be asked, but these questions for each of the elements, are good starting points. These questions will help you get started on doing the SWOT. Remember, it is always a good idea to do SWOT in the early stages, because it gives you a detailed overview and gives you information, which you can use for your later processes in decision making and planning.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;3&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://www.professionalacademy.com/blogs-and-advice/marketing-theories---swot-analysis&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Visually the SWOT can be shown as this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SWOTKL.png‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 4x4 Matrix&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How to conduct SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
There are no doubt a couple of ways to conduct SWOT, the one which is more of a practical method, a guide on how to fill in the SWOT&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;5&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://www.smartdraw.com/swot-analysis/&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, may be a good place to start. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Determine the object: Which means to decide on a key project or a strategy, where you want to analyse. Write the name of it on the top of a page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Draw the layout: Draw a very large square box and then divide it into four smaller boxes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Put name inside each of the boxes on the top: The top left box write; Strengths, the one beside write; Weaknesses. The box under Weaknesses, write Threats and the last one Opportunity, it should look like the figure earlier (Figure). If you wish a more detailed layout, you can add a smaller box that outlines Strengths and Weaknesses as “Internal” and Opportunities and Threats as “External”, and “Helpful” for Strengths and Opportunities, where Weaknesses and Threats will have a “Harmful” outline. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Add the factors: Add the factors that affects the project in the different boxes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Draw conclusions: Decide if the project is a go or a no-go based on the negative and positive relative. Maybe you are already on a project, but want to see how the situation is, then you need to decide what to do about the information you got out of SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the Myriad guideline&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;, there exist a way to conduct SWOT, in a bit of a different manner. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Recruiting stakeholders: This phase’s idea is simply to try to include your stakeholders. According to the book; Exploring Corporate Strategy by Gerry Johnson, Kevan Scholes and Richard Whittington, you can map your stakeholders according to their interest in a project. If you google “Power-interest matrix”, you can see how you should approach your stakeholders in relative to “Interest” and “Power”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Convening the focus group: This step is to call in the stakeholders, most optimal from 8-48, and explain to them what the SWOT is, and how this little workshop is going to work. The first step is to divide the stakeholders into smaller group, where the idea is to get a well-rounded SWOT, where the stakeholders also can agree on the factors. Of course, the preparations are supposed to be made beforehand, such as already made SWOT figures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Identifying and categorizing SWOTs: Now when the stakeholders are in the groups, they should start to work on the SWOT.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Analyzing SWOTs: In “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;, there is a figure showing, on how they are analyzing the SWOT factors within a Construction Company. Similar should be done. Hereafter, two additional questions should be asked: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor internally or externally controlled?&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor an enhancer or an inhibitor of performance? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where after you put the factors for Strengths, Weaknesses, Threats according to in “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace”&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;, to rank with numbers from 1-5 how much it is under your control and for enhancers and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Synthesizing SWOTs: After the previous step, now the data can be collected, and the data can be shown visually, there is an example in the “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace”&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.	Interpreting findings and deliberating action: Now it is the time to decide upon, which and how to act upon the findings. There are a few actions to take according to what the factors are. Monitor: The factors which are neither enhancer nor inhibitors. Mitigate Threats and Exploit Opportunities: Actions are to be taken, if it is seen that there are threats that will hinder the project, likewise with opportunities, it is supposed to be exploited if it will add value. Lastly, Confront Weaknesses and Leverage Strengths: Because these factors are internal, it is easier to control them, therefore strengths should be leveraged to help achieve desired results and weaknesses should be confronted. &lt;br /&gt;
As you can see the latter option is more wholesome and no doubt more detailed, depending your situation on using SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
Remember these guidelines are only one of the many guidelines.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== When to use SWOT == &lt;br /&gt;
Here are just a few to show when it is applicable to use SWOT, and these mentioned components are also included in something called Human Performance Technology (HPT), which can deepen your understanding on SWOT, but it is not necessary&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://www.projectsmart.co.uk/swot-analysis-in-project-management.php&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	In performance analysis &lt;br /&gt;
When identifying the degree to what internal practices and external environmental influences impact how results are currently being accomplished within an organization &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	In cause analysis&lt;br /&gt;
When finding what practices should be continued or even expanded in the longer terms, as well as those that should be discontinued or replaced by other methods or tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	In strategic planning&lt;br /&gt;
When in strategic planning and needs assessment for identifying the factors that contribute to or detract from organizational effectiveness &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	In evaluation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When monitoring the internal and external environment of a program for change over time, for tracking new SWOTs as they emerge, and for documenting for previously existing SWOTs as they become less influential on a program&lt;br /&gt;
Besides these quite general categories within HPT practice, SWOT can also be a great to use within&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;: &lt;br /&gt;
* Appreciative inquiry – To clarify the organization’s strengths and opportunities &lt;br /&gt;
* Benchmarking – To identify possible opportunities and threats&lt;br /&gt;
* Industry analysis – For contextualizing opportunities existing in the market&lt;br /&gt;
* Situation analysis – For evaluating possible trends or ongoing trends in the markets, costs and competition and competitors&lt;br /&gt;
* Scenario planning – For considering possible and preferred long-term scenarios&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, these are the mentioned area where SWOT can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Critical success factors =&lt;br /&gt;
There is always some critical success factor, when using a tool and SWOT is not excluded&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;. Here are a couple of points to be aware of if you want a good SWOT: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Information shared by stakeholders within a SWOT analysis should never be used to play the blame game, but it should be a basis for continuous improvement&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	When conducting the weaknesses, never blame the others for faults or shortcoming, because being honest is essential&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	SWOT’s data can be collected live depending on the resources and constraints that exists&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	It may be useful to weight the experienced stakeholders’ evaluation of the SWOT’s&lt;br /&gt;
These are some points that may be good to keep in the back of the head, when going through SWOT.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Limitations and critiques of SWOT=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not doubt that SWOT is a very strong tool when carried out right, it can provide valuable knowledge about both customer preferences and competitors intents, and nevertheless where the possible opportunities to grow are. There are also some critiques of SWOT, such as: &lt;br /&gt;
* There are no prioritization of the identified factors and it seems like it was hard to meaningfully compare the importance of one SWOT to another&lt;br /&gt;
* No figuring of costs and benefits or how to use them to achieve their objectives&lt;br /&gt;
* Sometimes it can be hazy on what is external and internal &lt;br /&gt;
And, some limitations about SWOT:&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not help determine the costs and benefits of alternative performance solutions&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not rank the factors according to their criticality&lt;br /&gt;
* It provides minimal information regarding the degree to which an organization or work team possess influence over the factors that have been identified. &lt;br /&gt;
Despite all these, it is possibly to enhance SWOT to its further usability by considering 2 factors&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Approximations of the degree which an organization can control over each factor &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Estimate the costs and benefits of the factors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And turn them into questions for better decision, by asking: &lt;br /&gt;
* How much control does the organization have over each SWOT factor?&lt;br /&gt;
* How much does each SWOT factor cost or benefit the organization? &lt;br /&gt;
By using the above two questions in SWOT, it will further enhance SWOTs usability&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Conclusion =&lt;br /&gt;
This article has served its purpose, to introduce you to the tool SWOT, where the article has gone through the main points of SWOT, but have only scratched the surface. If you want to research more about SWOT, you should be more than welcome to do so, but this article has given you a good starting point. SWOT is an amazing tool to use in various areas or projects, does not matter if you want to use it for personal or professional purpose. Although, SWOT is a very widely used tool, it does have its own flaws and limitations, but it is a tool which has been used numerous times all over again worldwide, in all kinds of industries and professionals. Therefore, if you can master the tool and make up for its mentioned shortcomings with the questions that will cover its limitations to a maximum, it will be an incredible tool which is very valuable for your project or business.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reference==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S123368</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68877</id>
		<title>What is SWOT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68877"/>
		<updated>2019-03-01T09:16:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S123368: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article will be presenting the tool SWOT and the main points of SWOT will be covered alongside with an introduction on how to apply SWOT. Moreover, the strength and weaknesses of this tool will also be presented so it can be taken into consideration when using the tool. SWOT can be applied in many different areas in project management, whether it is business strategy or market research but is especially used within marketing.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Much of the original groundwork for what is known as SWOT today, was already established more than 50 years ago. A man name Kurt Lewin, his landmark posthumous text, called; Field Theory in Social Science, emphasized that an organization’s desires are influenced by different driving forces or enhancers and limitations and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
Many companies when facing a problem whether it is external or internal, by using SWOT they can create a quick overview of what your obstacles you need to overcome and what chances there are to take.&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is four initials standing for four different elements, where the elements are used to identify different perspectives of consequences. They each stands for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats. The first two factors, Strengths and Weaknesses are factors for the internal, typically when you are inside a company, you will look within to see what kind of Strengths you have and what kind of Weaknesses you have. Then there are Opportunities and Threats, which are external factors, so you look from internal to external. Opportunities help to identify chances there are to grow, expand and even more potential of a blue ocean and Threats are what kind of competitors are there, restrains, regulations. &lt;br /&gt;
More details about this subject will be seen down below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A brief history of SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier it was mentioned that the original groundwork was laid by Lewin, but around the same time there were two professors from Harvard, George Albert Smith Jr. and C. Roland Christensen, who also were interested in the related issue about identifying the extent of the correlation of the organization’s strategy and its competitive environment. Therefore, they instructed their students to address if a company took into account the requirements of a competitive environments. Around a decade later another professor from the same university wanted to see the already by then named SWOT, if it could be used to explore the ways in which competitive thinking influences business strategies.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Handbook of Improving Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction to SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is a strategic analytical tool, for assessing strengths and weaknesses of a business, and also for analyzing opportunities available to the business as well as threats faced by the business. SWOT can also be used for personal purposes or when managing a project. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As mentioned S.W.O.T are initials to different words, each letter stands for something different, with each one of them having their very own purpose, where they together create a very strong foundation for an analysis, whatever the purpose is for. SWOT analysis is processed by a group of stakeholders, where they: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Identify internal and external obstacles and enhancers of performance&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Analyse those factors, which are basted on estimates of their contribution to the net value and how much they are controllable&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. To decide what further or future actions to take regarding those factors &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what do they stand for?&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* S – Strengths – Refers to internal competencies, valuables resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* W - Weaknesses – Refers to internal inhibitors of the competencies, resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* O - Opportunities – Refers to external enhancer of performance, which can be pursued or used&lt;br /&gt;
* T - Threats – An external inhibitor of performance that has the potential to reduce accomplishments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now that we know what SWOT stands for, but how does one go around about them? There are some questions to get it started (3). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Strengths: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we best at?&lt;br /&gt;
* What intellectual property do we own that can help us with this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What specific skills does the current workforce have that can contribute to this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What financial resources do we have for reaching this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances do we have?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our bargaining power with both suppliers and intermediaries?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weaknesses: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we worst at doing?&lt;br /&gt;
* Is our intellectual property outdated?&lt;br /&gt;
* What training does our workforce lack?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our financial position?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances should we have, but don’t?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Opportunity: &lt;br /&gt;
* What changes in the external environment can we exploit?&lt;br /&gt;
* What weaknesses in our competitors can we use to our advantage?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new technology might become available to us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new markets might be opening to us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Threats:&lt;br /&gt;
* What might our competitors be able to do to hurt us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new legislation might damage our interests?&lt;br /&gt;
* What social changes might threaten us?&lt;br /&gt;
* How will the economic cycle affect us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Naturally, there are a lot more questions that can be asked, but these questions for each of the elements, are good starting points. These questions will help you get started on doing the SWOT. Remember, it is always a good idea to do SWOT in the early stages, because it gives you a detailed overview and gives you information, which you can use for your later processes in decision making and planning.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;3&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://www.professionalacademy.com/blogs-and-advice/marketing-theories---swot-analysis&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Visually the SWOT can be shown as this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SWOTKL.png‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 4x4 Matrix&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How to conduct SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
There are no doubt a couple of ways to conduct SWOT, the one which is more of a practical method, a guide on how to fill in the SWOT&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;5&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://www.smartdraw.com/swot-analysis/&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, may be a good place to start. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Determine the object: Which means to decide on a key project or a strategy, where you want to analyse. Write the name of it on the top of a page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Draw the layout: Draw a very large square box and then divide it into four smaller boxes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Put name inside each of the boxes on the top: The top left box write; Strengths, the one beside write; Weaknesses. The box under Weaknesses, write Threats and the last one Opportunity, it should look like the figure earlier (Figure). If you wish a more detailed layout, you can add a smaller box that outlines Strengths and Weaknesses as “Internal” and Opportunities and Threats as “External”, and “Helpful” for Strengths and Opportunities, where Weaknesses and Threats will have a “Harmful” outline. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Add the factors: Add the factors that affects the project in the different boxes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Draw conclusions: Decide if the project is a go or a no-go based on the negative and positive relative. Maybe you are already on a project, but want to see how the situation is, then you need to decide what to do about the information you got out of SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the Myriad guideline&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;, there exist a way to conduct SWOT, in a bit of a different manner. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Recruiting stakeholders: This phase’s idea is simply to try to include your stakeholders. According to the book; Exploring Corporate Strategy by Gerry Johnson, Kevan Scholes and Richard Whittington, you can map your stakeholders according to their interest in a project. If you google “Power-interest matrix”, you can see how you should approach your stakeholders in relative to “Interest” and “Power”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Convening the focus group: This step is to call in the stakeholders, most optimal from 8-48, and explain to them what the SWOT is, and how this little workshop is going to work. The first step is to divide the stakeholders into smaller group, where the idea is to get a well-rounded SWOT, where the stakeholders also can agree on the factors. Of course, the preparations are supposed to be made beforehand, such as already made SWOT figures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Identifying and categorizing SWOTs: Now when the stakeholders are in the groups, they should start to work on the SWOT.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Analyzing SWOTs: In “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;, there is a figure showing, on how they are analyzing the SWOT factors within a Construction Company. Similar should be done. Hereafter, two additional questions should be asked: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor internally or externally controlled?&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor an enhancer or an inhibitor of performance? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where after you put the factors for Strengths, Weaknesses, Threats according to in “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace”&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;, to rank with numbers from 1-5 how much it is under your control and for enhancers and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Synthesizing SWOTs: After the previous step, now the data can be collected, and the data can be shown visually, there is an example in the “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace”&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.	Interpreting findings and deliberating action: Now it is the time to decide upon, which and how to act upon the findings. There are a few actions to take according to what the factors are. Monitor: The factors which are neither enhancer nor inhibitors. Mitigate Threats and Exploit Opportunities: Actions are to be taken, if it is seen that there are threats that will hinder the project, likewise with opportunities, it is supposed to be exploited if it will add value. Lastly, Confront Weaknesses and Leverage Strengths: Because these factors are internal, it is easier to control them, therefore strengths should be leveraged to help achieve desired results and weaknesses should be confronted. &lt;br /&gt;
As you can see the latter option is more wholesome and no doubt more detailed, depending your situation on using SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
Remember these guidelines are only one of the many guidelines.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== When to use SWOT == &lt;br /&gt;
Here are just a few to show when it is applicable to use SWOT, and these mentioned components are also included in something called Human Performance Technology (HPT), which can deepen your understanding on SWOT, but it is not necessary&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://www.projectsmart.co.uk/swot-analysis-in-project-management.php&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	In performance analysis &lt;br /&gt;
When identifying the degree to what internal practices and external environmental influences impact how results are currently being accomplished within an organization &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	In cause analysis&lt;br /&gt;
When finding what practices should be continued or even expanded in the longer terms, as well as those that should be discontinued or replaced by other methods or tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	In strategic planning&lt;br /&gt;
When in strategic planning and needs assessment for identifying the factors that contribute to or detract from organizational effectiveness &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	In evaluation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When monitoring the internal and external environment of a program for change over time, for tracking new SWOTs as they emerge, and for documenting for previously existing SWOTs as they become less influential on a program&lt;br /&gt;
Besides these quite general categories within HPT practice, SWOT can also be a great to use within&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;: &lt;br /&gt;
* Appreciative inquiry – To clarify the organization’s strengths and opportunities &lt;br /&gt;
* Benchmarking – To identify possible opportunities and threats&lt;br /&gt;
* Industry analysis – For contextualizing opportunities existing in the market&lt;br /&gt;
* Situation analysis – For evaluating possible trends or ongoing trends in the markets, costs and competition and competitors&lt;br /&gt;
* Scenario planning – For considering possible and preferred long-term scenarios&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, these are the mentioned area where SWOT can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Critical success factors =&lt;br /&gt;
There is always some critical success factor, when using a tool and SWOT is not excluded&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;. Here are a couple of points to be aware of if you want a good SWOT: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Information shared by stakeholders within a SWOT analysis should never be used to play the blame game, but it should be a basis for continuous improvement&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	When conducting the weaknesses, never blame the others for faults or shortcoming, because being honest is essential&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	SWOT’s data can be collected live depending on the resources and constraints that exists&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	It may be useful to weight the experienced stakeholders’ evaluation of the SWOT’s&lt;br /&gt;
These are some points that may be good to keep in the back of the head, when going through SWOT.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Limitations and critiques of SWOT=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not doubt that SWOT is a very strong tool when carried out right, it can provide valuable knowledge about both customer preferences and competitors intents, and nevertheless where the possible opportunities to grow are. There are also some critiques of SWOT, such as: &lt;br /&gt;
* There are no prioritization of the identified factors and it seems like it was hard to meaningfully compare the importance of one SWOT to another&lt;br /&gt;
* No figuring of costs and benefits or how to use them to achieve their objectives&lt;br /&gt;
* Sometimes it can be hazy on what is external and internal &lt;br /&gt;
And, some limitations about SWOT:&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not help determine the costs and benefits of alternative performance solutions&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not rank the factors according to their criticality&lt;br /&gt;
* It provides minimal information regarding the degree to which an organization or work team possess influence over the factors that have been identified. &lt;br /&gt;
Despite all these, it is possibly to enhance SWOT to its further usability by considering 2 factors&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Approximations of the degree which an organization can control over each factor &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Estimate the costs and benefits of the factors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And turn them into questions for better decision, by asking: &lt;br /&gt;
* How much control does the organization have over each SWOT factor?&lt;br /&gt;
* How much does each SWOT factor cost or benefit the organization? &lt;br /&gt;
By using the above two questions in SWOT, it will further enhance SWOTs usability&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article has served its purpose, to introduce you to the tool SWOT, where the article has gone through the main points of SWOT, but have only scratched the surface. If you want to research more about SWOT, you should be more than welcome to do so, but this article has given you a good starting point. SWOT is an amazing tool to use in various areas or projects, does not matter if you want to use it for personal or professional purpose. Although, SWOT is a very widely used tool, it does have its own flaws and limitations, but it is a tool which has been used numerous times all over again worldwide, in all kinds of industries and professionals. Therefore, if you can master the tool and make up for its mentioned shortcomings with the questions that will cover its limitations to a maximum, it will be an incredible tool which is very valuable for your project or business. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reference==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S123368</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68876</id>
		<title>What is SWOT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68876"/>
		<updated>2019-03-01T09:14:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S123368: /* Limitations and critiques of SWOT */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article will be presenting the tool SWOT and the main points of SWOT will be covered alongside with an introduction on how to apply SWOT. Moreover, the strength and weaknesses of this tool will also be presented so it can be taken into consideration when using the tool. SWOT can be applied in many different areas in project management, whether it is business strategy or market research but is especially used within marketing.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Much of the original groundwork for what is known as SWOT today, was already established more than 50 years ago. A man name Kurt Lewin, his landmark posthumous text, called; Field Theory in Social Science, emphasized that an organization’s desires are influenced by different driving forces or enhancers and limitations and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
Many companies when facing a problem whether it is external or internal, by using SWOT they can create a quick overview of what your obstacles you need to overcome and what chances there are to take.&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is four initials standing for four different elements, where the elements are used to identify different perspectives of consequences. They each stands for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats. The first two factors, Strengths and Weaknesses are factors for the internal, typically when you are inside a company, you will look within to see what kind of Strengths you have and what kind of Weaknesses you have. Then there are Opportunities and Threats, which are external factors, so you look from internal to external. Opportunities help to identify chances there are to grow, expand and even more potential of a blue ocean and Threats are what kind of competitors are there, restrains, regulations. &lt;br /&gt;
More details about this subject will be seen down below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A brief history of SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier it was mentioned that the original groundwork was laid by Lewin, but around the same time there were two professors from Harvard, George Albert Smith Jr. and C. Roland Christensen, who also were interested in the related issue about identifying the extent of the correlation of the organization’s strategy and its competitive environment. Therefore, they instructed their students to address if a company took into account the requirements of a competitive environments. Around a decade later another professor from the same university wanted to see the already by then named SWOT, if it could be used to explore the ways in which competitive thinking influences business strategies.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Handbook of Improving Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction to SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is a strategic analytical tool, for assessing strengths and weaknesses of a business, and also for analyzing opportunities available to the business as well as threats faced by the business. SWOT can also be used for personal purposes or when managing a project. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As mentioned S.W.O.T are initials to different words, each letter stands for something different, with each one of them having their very own purpose, where they together create a very strong foundation for an analysis, whatever the purpose is for. SWOT analysis is processed by a group of stakeholders, where they: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Identify internal and external obstacles and enhancers of performance&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Analyse those factors, which are basted on estimates of their contribution to the net value and how much they are controllable&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. To decide what further or future actions to take regarding those factors &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what do they stand for?&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* S – Strengths – Refers to internal competencies, valuables resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* W - Weaknesses – Refers to internal inhibitors of the competencies, resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* O - Opportunities – Refers to external enhancer of performance, which can be pursued or used&lt;br /&gt;
* T - Threats – An external inhibitor of performance that has the potential to reduce accomplishments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now that we know what SWOT stands for, but how does one go around about them? There are some questions to get it started (3). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Strengths: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we best at?&lt;br /&gt;
* What intellectual property do we own that can help us with this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What specific skills does the current workforce have that can contribute to this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What financial resources do we have for reaching this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances do we have?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our bargaining power with both suppliers and intermediaries?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weaknesses: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we worst at doing?&lt;br /&gt;
* Is our intellectual property outdated?&lt;br /&gt;
* What training does our workforce lack?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our financial position?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances should we have, but don’t?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Opportunity: &lt;br /&gt;
* What changes in the external environment can we exploit?&lt;br /&gt;
* What weaknesses in our competitors can we use to our advantage?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new technology might become available to us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new markets might be opening to us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Threats:&lt;br /&gt;
* What might our competitors be able to do to hurt us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new legislation might damage our interests?&lt;br /&gt;
* What social changes might threaten us?&lt;br /&gt;
* How will the economic cycle affect us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Naturally, there are a lot more questions that can be asked, but these questions for each of the elements, are good starting points. These questions will help you get started on doing the SWOT. Remember, it is always a good idea to do SWOT in the early stages, because it gives you a detailed overview and gives you information, which you can use for your later processes in decision making and planning.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;3&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://www.professionalacademy.com/blogs-and-advice/marketing-theories---swot-analysis&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Visually the SWOT can be shown as this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SWOTKL.png‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 4x4 Matrix&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How to conduct SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
There are no doubt a couple of ways to conduct SWOT, the one which is more of a practical method, a guide on how to fill in the SWOT&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;5&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://www.smartdraw.com/swot-analysis/&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, may be a good place to start. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Determine the object: Which means to decide on a key project or a strategy, where you want to analyse. Write the name of it on the top of a page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Draw the layout: Draw a very large square box and then divide it into four smaller boxes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Put name inside each of the boxes on the top: The top left box write; Strengths, the one beside write; Weaknesses. The box under Weaknesses, write Threats and the last one Opportunity, it should look like the figure earlier (Figure). If you wish a more detailed layout, you can add a smaller box that outlines Strengths and Weaknesses as “Internal” and Opportunities and Threats as “External”, and “Helpful” for Strengths and Opportunities, where Weaknesses and Threats will have a “Harmful” outline. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Add the factors: Add the factors that affects the project in the different boxes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Draw conclusions: Decide if the project is a go or a no-go based on the negative and positive relative. Maybe you are already on a project, but want to see how the situation is, then you need to decide what to do about the information you got out of SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the Myriad guideline&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;, there exist a way to conduct SWOT, in a bit of a different manner. &lt;br /&gt;
1.	Recruiting stakeholders: This phase’s idea is simply to try to include your stakeholders. According to the book; Exploring Corporate Strategy by Gerry Johnson, Kevan Scholes and Richard Whittington, you can map your stakeholders according to their interest in a project. If you google “Power-interest matrix”, you can see how you should approach your stakeholders in relative to “Interest” and “Power”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Convening the focus group: This step is to call in the stakeholders, most optimal from 8-48, and explain to them what the SWOT is, and how this little workshop is going to work. The first step is to divide the stakeholders into smaller group, where the idea is to get a well-rounded SWOT, where the stakeholders also can agree on the factors. Of course, the preparations are supposed to be made beforehand, such as already made SWOT figures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Identifying and categorizing SWOTs: Now when the stakeholders are in the groups, they should start to work on the SWOT.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Analyzing SWOTs: In “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;, there is a figure showing, on how they are analyzing the SWOT factors within a Construction Company. Similar should be done. Hereafter, two additional questions should be asked: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor internally or externally controlled?&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor an enhancer or an inhibitor of performance? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where after you put the factors for Strengths, Weaknesses, Threats according to in “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace”&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;, to rank with numbers from 1-5 how much it is under your control and for enhancers and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Synthesizing SWOTs: After the previous step, now the data can be collected, and the data can be shown visually, there is an example in the “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace”&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.	Interpreting findings and deliberating action: Now it is the time to decide upon, which and how to act upon the findings. There are a few actions to take according to what the factors are. Monitor: The factors which are neither enhancer nor inhibitors. Mitigate Threats and Exploit Opportunities: Actions are to be taken, if it is seen that there are threats that will hinder the project, likewise with opportunities, it is supposed to be exploited if it will add value. Lastly, Confront Weaknesses and Leverage Strengths: Because these factors are internal, it is easier to control them, therefore strengths should be leveraged to help achieve desired results and weaknesses should be confronted. &lt;br /&gt;
As you can see the latter option is more wholesome and no doubt more detailed, depending your situation on using SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
Remember these guidelines are only one of the many guidelines.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== When to use SWOT == &lt;br /&gt;
Here are just a few to show when it is applicable to use SWOT, and these mentioned components are also included in something called Human Performance Technology (HPT), which can deepen your understanding on SWOT, but it is not necessary&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://www.projectsmart.co.uk/swot-analysis-in-project-management.php&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
1.	In performance analysis &lt;br /&gt;
When identifying the degree to what internal practices and external environmental influences impact how results are currently being accomplished within an organization &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	In cause analysis&lt;br /&gt;
When finding what practices should be continued or even expanded in the longer terms, as well as those that should be discontinued or replaced by other methods or tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	In strategic planning&lt;br /&gt;
When in strategic planning and needs assessment for identifying the factors that contribute to or detract from organizational effectiveness &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	In evaluation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When monitoring the internal and external environment of a program for change over time, for tracking new SWOTs as they emerge, and for documenting for previously existing SWOTs as they become less influential on a program&lt;br /&gt;
Besides these quite general categories within HPT practice, SWOT can also be a great to use within&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;: &lt;br /&gt;
* Appreciative inquiry – To clarify the organization’s strengths and opportunities &lt;br /&gt;
* Benchmarking – To identify possible opportunities and threats&lt;br /&gt;
* Industry analysis – For contextualizing opportunities existing in the market&lt;br /&gt;
* Situation analysis – For evaluating possible trends or ongoing trends in the markets, costs and competition and competitors&lt;br /&gt;
* Scenario planning – For considering possible and preferred long-term scenarios&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, these are the mentioned area where SWOT can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Critical success factors =&lt;br /&gt;
There is always some critical success factor, when using a tool and SWOT is not excluded&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;. Here are a couple of points to be aware of if you want a good SWOT: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Information shared by stakeholders within a SWOT analysis should never be used to play the blame game, but it should be a basis for continuous improvement&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	When conducting the weaknesses, never blame the others for faults or shortcoming, because being honest is essential&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	SWOT’s data can be collected live depending on the resources and constraints that exists&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	It may be useful to weight the experienced stakeholders’ evaluation of the SWOT’s&lt;br /&gt;
These are some points that may be good to keep in the back of the head, when going through SWOT.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Limitations and critiques of SWOT=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not doubt that SWOT is a very strong tool when carried out right, it can provide valuable knowledge about both customer preferences and competitors intents, and nevertheless where the possible opportunities to grow are. There are also some critiques of SWOT, such as: &lt;br /&gt;
* There are no prioritization of the identified factors and it seems like it was hard to meaningfully compare the importance of one SWOT to another&lt;br /&gt;
* No figuring of costs and benefits or how to use them to achieve their objectives&lt;br /&gt;
* Sometimes it can be hazy on what is external and internal &lt;br /&gt;
And, some limitations about SWOT:&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not help determine the costs and benefits of alternative performance solutions&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not rank the factors according to their criticality&lt;br /&gt;
* It provides minimal information regarding the degree to which an organization or work team possess influence over the factors that have been identified. &lt;br /&gt;
Despite all these, it is possibly to enhance SWOT to its further usability by considering 2 factors&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Approximations of the degree which an organization can control over each factor &lt;br /&gt;
2.	Estimate the costs and benefits of the factors. &lt;br /&gt;
And turn them into questions for better decision, by asking: &lt;br /&gt;
* How much control does the organization have over each SWOT factor?&lt;br /&gt;
* How much does each SWOT factor cost or benefit the organization? &lt;br /&gt;
By using the above two questions in SWOT, it will further enhance SWOTs usability&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article has served its purpose, to introduce you to the tool SWOT, where the article has gone through the main points of SWOT, but have only scratched the surface. If you want to research more about SWOT, you should be more than welcome to do so, but this article has given you a good starting point. SWOT is an amazing tool to use in various areas or projects, does not matter if you want to use it for personal or professional purpose. Although, SWOT is a very widely used tool, it does have its own flaws and limitations, but it is a tool which has been used numerous times all over again worldwide, in all kinds of industries and professionals. Therefore, if you can master the tool and make up for its mentioned shortcomings with the questions that will cover its limitations to a maximum, it will be an incredible tool which is very valuable for your project or business. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reference==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S123368</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68875</id>
		<title>What is SWOT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68875"/>
		<updated>2019-03-01T09:14:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S123368: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article will be presenting the tool SWOT and the main points of SWOT will be covered alongside with an introduction on how to apply SWOT. Moreover, the strength and weaknesses of this tool will also be presented so it can be taken into consideration when using the tool. SWOT can be applied in many different areas in project management, whether it is business strategy or market research but is especially used within marketing.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Much of the original groundwork for what is known as SWOT today, was already established more than 50 years ago. A man name Kurt Lewin, his landmark posthumous text, called; Field Theory in Social Science, emphasized that an organization’s desires are influenced by different driving forces or enhancers and limitations and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
Many companies when facing a problem whether it is external or internal, by using SWOT they can create a quick overview of what your obstacles you need to overcome and what chances there are to take.&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is four initials standing for four different elements, where the elements are used to identify different perspectives of consequences. They each stands for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats. The first two factors, Strengths and Weaknesses are factors for the internal, typically when you are inside a company, you will look within to see what kind of Strengths you have and what kind of Weaknesses you have. Then there are Opportunities and Threats, which are external factors, so you look from internal to external. Opportunities help to identify chances there are to grow, expand and even more potential of a blue ocean and Threats are what kind of competitors are there, restrains, regulations. &lt;br /&gt;
More details about this subject will be seen down below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A brief history of SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier it was mentioned that the original groundwork was laid by Lewin, but around the same time there were two professors from Harvard, George Albert Smith Jr. and C. Roland Christensen, who also were interested in the related issue about identifying the extent of the correlation of the organization’s strategy and its competitive environment. Therefore, they instructed their students to address if a company took into account the requirements of a competitive environments. Around a decade later another professor from the same university wanted to see the already by then named SWOT, if it could be used to explore the ways in which competitive thinking influences business strategies.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Handbook of Improving Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction to SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is a strategic analytical tool, for assessing strengths and weaknesses of a business, and also for analyzing opportunities available to the business as well as threats faced by the business. SWOT can also be used for personal purposes or when managing a project. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As mentioned S.W.O.T are initials to different words, each letter stands for something different, with each one of them having their very own purpose, where they together create a very strong foundation for an analysis, whatever the purpose is for. SWOT analysis is processed by a group of stakeholders, where they: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Identify internal and external obstacles and enhancers of performance&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Analyse those factors, which are basted on estimates of their contribution to the net value and how much they are controllable&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. To decide what further or future actions to take regarding those factors &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what do they stand for?&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* S – Strengths – Refers to internal competencies, valuables resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* W - Weaknesses – Refers to internal inhibitors of the competencies, resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* O - Opportunities – Refers to external enhancer of performance, which can be pursued or used&lt;br /&gt;
* T - Threats – An external inhibitor of performance that has the potential to reduce accomplishments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now that we know what SWOT stands for, but how does one go around about them? There are some questions to get it started (3). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Strengths: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we best at?&lt;br /&gt;
* What intellectual property do we own that can help us with this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What specific skills does the current workforce have that can contribute to this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What financial resources do we have for reaching this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances do we have?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our bargaining power with both suppliers and intermediaries?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weaknesses: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we worst at doing?&lt;br /&gt;
* Is our intellectual property outdated?&lt;br /&gt;
* What training does our workforce lack?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our financial position?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances should we have, but don’t?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Opportunity: &lt;br /&gt;
* What changes in the external environment can we exploit?&lt;br /&gt;
* What weaknesses in our competitors can we use to our advantage?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new technology might become available to us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new markets might be opening to us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Threats:&lt;br /&gt;
* What might our competitors be able to do to hurt us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new legislation might damage our interests?&lt;br /&gt;
* What social changes might threaten us?&lt;br /&gt;
* How will the economic cycle affect us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Naturally, there are a lot more questions that can be asked, but these questions for each of the elements, are good starting points. These questions will help you get started on doing the SWOT. Remember, it is always a good idea to do SWOT in the early stages, because it gives you a detailed overview and gives you information, which you can use for your later processes in decision making and planning.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;3&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://www.professionalacademy.com/blogs-and-advice/marketing-theories---swot-analysis&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Visually the SWOT can be shown as this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SWOTKL.png‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 4x4 Matrix&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How to conduct SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
There are no doubt a couple of ways to conduct SWOT, the one which is more of a practical method, a guide on how to fill in the SWOT&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;5&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://www.smartdraw.com/swot-analysis/&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, may be a good place to start. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Determine the object: Which means to decide on a key project or a strategy, where you want to analyse. Write the name of it on the top of a page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Draw the layout: Draw a very large square box and then divide it into four smaller boxes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Put name inside each of the boxes on the top: The top left box write; Strengths, the one beside write; Weaknesses. The box under Weaknesses, write Threats and the last one Opportunity, it should look like the figure earlier (Figure). If you wish a more detailed layout, you can add a smaller box that outlines Strengths and Weaknesses as “Internal” and Opportunities and Threats as “External”, and “Helpful” for Strengths and Opportunities, where Weaknesses and Threats will have a “Harmful” outline. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Add the factors: Add the factors that affects the project in the different boxes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Draw conclusions: Decide if the project is a go or a no-go based on the negative and positive relative. Maybe you are already on a project, but want to see how the situation is, then you need to decide what to do about the information you got out of SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the Myriad guideline&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;, there exist a way to conduct SWOT, in a bit of a different manner. &lt;br /&gt;
1.	Recruiting stakeholders: This phase’s idea is simply to try to include your stakeholders. According to the book; Exploring Corporate Strategy by Gerry Johnson, Kevan Scholes and Richard Whittington, you can map your stakeholders according to their interest in a project. If you google “Power-interest matrix”, you can see how you should approach your stakeholders in relative to “Interest” and “Power”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Convening the focus group: This step is to call in the stakeholders, most optimal from 8-48, and explain to them what the SWOT is, and how this little workshop is going to work. The first step is to divide the stakeholders into smaller group, where the idea is to get a well-rounded SWOT, where the stakeholders also can agree on the factors. Of course, the preparations are supposed to be made beforehand, such as already made SWOT figures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Identifying and categorizing SWOTs: Now when the stakeholders are in the groups, they should start to work on the SWOT.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Analyzing SWOTs: In “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;, there is a figure showing, on how they are analyzing the SWOT factors within a Construction Company. Similar should be done. Hereafter, two additional questions should be asked: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor internally or externally controlled?&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor an enhancer or an inhibitor of performance? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where after you put the factors for Strengths, Weaknesses, Threats according to in “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace”&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;, to rank with numbers from 1-5 how much it is under your control and for enhancers and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Synthesizing SWOTs: After the previous step, now the data can be collected, and the data can be shown visually, there is an example in the “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace”&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.	Interpreting findings and deliberating action: Now it is the time to decide upon, which and how to act upon the findings. There are a few actions to take according to what the factors are. Monitor: The factors which are neither enhancer nor inhibitors. Mitigate Threats and Exploit Opportunities: Actions are to be taken, if it is seen that there are threats that will hinder the project, likewise with opportunities, it is supposed to be exploited if it will add value. Lastly, Confront Weaknesses and Leverage Strengths: Because these factors are internal, it is easier to control them, therefore strengths should be leveraged to help achieve desired results and weaknesses should be confronted. &lt;br /&gt;
As you can see the latter option is more wholesome and no doubt more detailed, depending your situation on using SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
Remember these guidelines are only one of the many guidelines.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== When to use SWOT == &lt;br /&gt;
Here are just a few to show when it is applicable to use SWOT, and these mentioned components are also included in something called Human Performance Technology (HPT), which can deepen your understanding on SWOT, but it is not necessary&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://www.projectsmart.co.uk/swot-analysis-in-project-management.php&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
1.	In performance analysis &lt;br /&gt;
When identifying the degree to what internal practices and external environmental influences impact how results are currently being accomplished within an organization &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	In cause analysis&lt;br /&gt;
When finding what practices should be continued or even expanded in the longer terms, as well as those that should be discontinued or replaced by other methods or tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	In strategic planning&lt;br /&gt;
When in strategic planning and needs assessment for identifying the factors that contribute to or detract from organizational effectiveness &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	In evaluation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When monitoring the internal and external environment of a program for change over time, for tracking new SWOTs as they emerge, and for documenting for previously existing SWOTs as they become less influential on a program&lt;br /&gt;
Besides these quite general categories within HPT practice, SWOT can also be a great to use within&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;: &lt;br /&gt;
* Appreciative inquiry – To clarify the organization’s strengths and opportunities &lt;br /&gt;
* Benchmarking – To identify possible opportunities and threats&lt;br /&gt;
* Industry analysis – For contextualizing opportunities existing in the market&lt;br /&gt;
* Situation analysis – For evaluating possible trends or ongoing trends in the markets, costs and competition and competitors&lt;br /&gt;
* Scenario planning – For considering possible and preferred long-term scenarios&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, these are the mentioned area where SWOT can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Critical success factors =&lt;br /&gt;
There is always some critical success factor, when using a tool and SWOT is not excluded&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;. Here are a couple of points to be aware of if you want a good SWOT: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Information shared by stakeholders within a SWOT analysis should never be used to play the blame game, but it should be a basis for continuous improvement&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	When conducting the weaknesses, never blame the others for faults or shortcoming, because being honest is essential&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	SWOT’s data can be collected live depending on the resources and constraints that exists&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	It may be useful to weight the experienced stakeholders’ evaluation of the SWOT’s&lt;br /&gt;
These are some points that may be good to keep in the back of the head, when going through SWOT.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Limitations and critiques of SWOT=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not doubt that SWOT is a very strong tool when carried out right, it can provide valuable knowledge about both customer preferences and competitors intents, and nevertheless where the possible opportunities to grow are. There are also some critiques of SWOT, such as: &lt;br /&gt;
* There are no prioritization of the identified factors and it seems like it was hard to meaningfully compare the importance of one SWOT to another&lt;br /&gt;
* No figuring of costs and benefits or how to use them to achieve their objectives&lt;br /&gt;
* Sometimes it can be hazy on what is external and internal &lt;br /&gt;
And, some limitations about SWOT:&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not help determine the costs and benefits of alternative performance solutions&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not rank the factors according to their criticality&lt;br /&gt;
* It provides minimal information regarding the degree to which an organization or work team possess influence over the factors that have been identified. &lt;br /&gt;
Despite all these, it is possibly to enhance SWOT to its further usability by considering 2 factors&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Approximations of the degree which an organization can control over each factor &lt;br /&gt;
2.	Estimate the costs and benefits of the factors. &lt;br /&gt;
And turn them into questions for better decision, by asking: &lt;br /&gt;
* How much control does the organization have over each SWOT factor?&lt;br /&gt;
* How much does each SWOT factor cost or benefit the organization? &lt;br /&gt;
By using the above two questions in SWOT, it will further enhance SWOTs usability&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;  &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article has served its purpose, to introduce you to the tool SWOT, where the article has gone through the main points of SWOT, but have only scratched the surface. If you want to research more about SWOT, you should be more than welcome to do so, but this article has given you a good starting point. SWOT is an amazing tool to use in various areas or projects, does not matter if you want to use it for personal or professional purpose. Although, SWOT is a very widely used tool, it does have its own flaws and limitations, but it is a tool which has been used numerous times all over again worldwide, in all kinds of industries and professionals. Therefore, if you can master the tool and make up for its mentioned shortcomings with the questions that will cover its limitations to a maximum, it will be an incredible tool which is very valuable for your project or business. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reference==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S123368</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68866</id>
		<title>What is SWOT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68866"/>
		<updated>2019-03-01T09:04:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S123368: /* Reference */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article will be presenting the tool SWOT and the main points of SWOT will be covered alongside with an introduction on how to apply SWOT. Moreover, the strength and weaknesses of this tool will also be presented so it can be taken into consideration when using the tool. SWOT can be applied in many different areas in project management, whether it is business strategy or market research but is especially used within marketing.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Much of the original groundwork for what is known as SWOT today, was already established more than 50 years ago. A man name Kurt Lewin, his landmark posthumous text, called; Field Theory in Social Science, emphasized that an organization’s desires are influenced by different driving forces or enhancers and limitations and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
Many companies when facing a problem whether it is external or internal, by using SWOT they can create a quick overview of what your obstacles you need to overcome and what chances there are to take.&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is four initials standing for four different elements, where the elements are used to identify different perspectives of consequences. They each stands for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats. The first two factors, Strengths and Weaknesses are factors for the internal, typically when you are inside a company, you will look within to see what kind of Strengths you have and what kind of Weaknesses you have. Then there are Opportunities and Threats, which are external factors, so you look from internal to external. Opportunities help to identify chances there are to grow, expand and even more potential of a blue ocean and Threats are what kind of competitors are there, restrains, regulations. &lt;br /&gt;
More details about this subject will be seen down below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A brief history of SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier it was mentioned that the original groundwork was laid by Lewin, but around the same time there were two professors from Harvard, George Albert Smith Jr. and C. Roland Christensen, who also were interested in the related issue about identifying the extent of the correlation of the organization’s strategy and its competitive environment. Therefore, they instructed their students to address if a company took into account the requirements of a competitive environments. Around a decade later another professor from the same university wanted to see the already by then named SWOT, if it could be used to explore the ways in which competitive thinking influences business strategies.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction to SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is a strategic analytical tool, for assessing strengths and weaknesses of a business, and also for analyzing opportunities available to the business as well as threats faced by the business. SWOT can also be used for personal purposes or when managing a project. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As mentioned S.W.O.T are initials to different words, each letter stands for something different, with each one of them having their very own purpose, where they together create a very strong foundation for an analysis, whatever the purpose is for. SWOT analysis is processed by a group of stakeholders, where they: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Identify internal and external obstacles and enhancers of performance&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Analyse those factors, which are basted on estimates of their contribution to the net value and how much they are controllable&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. To decide what further or future actions to take regarding those factors &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what do they stand for?&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* S – Strengths – Refers to internal competencies, valuables resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* W - Weaknesses – Refers to internal inhibitors of the competencies, resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* O - Opportunities – Refers to external enhancer of performance, which can be pursued or used&lt;br /&gt;
* T - Threats – An external inhibitor of performance that has the potential to reduce accomplishments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now that we know what SWOT stands for, but how does one go around about them? There are some questions to get it started (3). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Strengths: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we best at?&lt;br /&gt;
* What intellectual property do we own that can help us with this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What specific skills does the current workforce have that can contribute to this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What financial resources do we have for reaching this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances do we have?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our bargaining power with both suppliers and intermediaries?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weaknesses: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we worst at doing?&lt;br /&gt;
* Is our intellectual property outdated?&lt;br /&gt;
* What training does our workforce lack?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our financial position?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances should we have, but don’t?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Opportunity: &lt;br /&gt;
* What changes in the external environment can we exploit?&lt;br /&gt;
* What weaknesses in our competitors can we use to our advantage?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new technology might become available to us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new markets might be opening to us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Threats:&lt;br /&gt;
* What might our competitors be able to do to hurt us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new legislation might damage our interests?&lt;br /&gt;
* What social changes might threaten us?&lt;br /&gt;
* How will the economic cycle affect us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Naturally, there are a lot more questions that can be asked, but these questions for each of the elements, are good starting points. These questions will help you get started on doing the SWOT. Remember, it is always a good idea to do SWOT in the early stages, because it gives you a detailed overview and gives you information, which you can use for your later processes in decision making and planning.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;3&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;3&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Visually the SWOT can be shown as this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SWOTKL.png‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 4x4 Matrix&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How to conduct SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
There are no doubt a couple of ways to conduct SWOT, the one which is more of a practical method, a guide on how to fill in the SWOT&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;5&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;5&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, may be a good place to start. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Determine the object: Which means to decide on a key project or a strategy, where you want to analyse. Write the name of it on the top of a page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Draw the layout: Draw a very large square box and then divide it into four smaller boxes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Put name inside each of the boxes on the top: The top left box write; Strengths, the one beside write; Weaknesses. The box under Weaknesses, write Threats and the last one Opportunity, it should look like the figure earlier (Figure). If you wish a more detailed layout, you can add a smaller box that outlines Strengths and Weaknesses as “Internal” and Opportunities and Threats as “External”, and “Helpful” for Strengths and Opportunities, where Weaknesses and Threats will have a “Harmful” outline. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Add the factors: Add the factors that affects the project in the different boxes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Draw conclusions: Decide if the project is a go or a no-go based on the negative and positive relative. Maybe you are already on a project, but want to see how the situation is, then you need to decide what to do about the information you got out of SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the Myriad guideline&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, there exist a way to conduct SWOT, in a bit of a different manner. &lt;br /&gt;
1.	Recruiting stakeholders: This phase’s idea is simply to try to include your stakeholders. According to the book; Exploring Corporate Strategy by Gerry Johnson, Kevan Scholes and Richard Whittington, you can map your stakeholders according to their interest in a project. If you google “Power-interest matrix”, you can see how you should approach your stakeholders in relative to “Interest” and “Power”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Convening the focus group: This step is to call in the stakeholders, most optimal from 8-48, and explain to them what the SWOT is, and how this little workshop is going to work. The first step is to divide the stakeholders into smaller group, where the idea is to get a well-rounded SWOT, where the stakeholders also can agree on the factors. Of course, the preparations are supposed to be made beforehand, such as already made SWOT figures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Identifying and categorizing SWOTs: Now when the stakeholders are in the groups, they should start to work on the SWOT.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Analyzing SWOTs: In “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, there is a figure showing, on how they are analyzing the SWOT factors within a Construction Company. Similar should be done. Hereafter, two additional questions should be asked: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor internally or externally controlled?&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor an enhancer or an inhibitor of performance? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where after you put the factors for Strengths, Weaknesses, Threats according to in “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2, by Ryan Watkin and Doug Leigh (p.131), to rank with numbers from 1-5 how much it is under your control and for enhancers and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Synthesizing SWOTs: After the previous step, now the data can be collected, and the data can be shown visually, there is an example in the “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace”&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.	Interpreting findings and deliberating action: Now it is the time to decide upon, which and how to act upon the findings. There are a few actions to take according to what the factors are. Monitor: The factors which are neither enhancer nor inhibitors. Mitigate Threats and Exploit Opportunities: Actions are to be taken, if it is seen that there are threats that will hinder the project, likewise with opportunities, it is supposed to be exploited if it will add value. Lastly, Confront Weaknesses and Leverage Strengths: Because these factors are internal, it is easier to control them, therefore strengths should be leveraged to help achieve desired results and weaknesses should be confronted. &lt;br /&gt;
As you can see the latter option is more wholesome and no doubt more detailed, depending your situation on using SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
Remember these guidelines are only one of the many guidelines.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== When to use SWOT == &lt;br /&gt;
Here are just a few to show when it is applicable to use SWOT, and these mentioned components are also included in something called Human Performance Technology (HPT), which can deepen your understanding on SWOT, but it is not necessary&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
1.	In performance analysis &lt;br /&gt;
When identifying the degree to what internal practices and external environmental influences impact how results are currently being accomplished within an organization &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	In cause analysis&lt;br /&gt;
When finding what practices should be continued or even expanded in the longer terms, as well as those that should be discontinued or replaced by other methods or tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	In strategic planning&lt;br /&gt;
When in strategic planning and needs assessment for identifying the factors that contribute to or detract from organizational effectiveness &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	In evaluation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When monitoring the internal and external environment of a program for change over time, for tracking new SWOTs as they emerge, and for documenting for previously existing SWOTs as they become less influential on a program&lt;br /&gt;
Besides these quite general categories within HPT practice, SWOT can also be a great to use within&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;: &lt;br /&gt;
* Appreciative inquiry – To clarify the organization’s strengths and opportunities &lt;br /&gt;
* Benchmarking – To identify possible opportunities and threats&lt;br /&gt;
* Industry analysis – For contextualizing opportunities existing in the market&lt;br /&gt;
* Situation analysis – For evaluating possible trends or ongoing trends in the markets, costs and competition and competitors&lt;br /&gt;
* Scenario planning – For considering possible and preferred long-term scenarios&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, these are the mentioned area where SWOT can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Critical success factors =&lt;br /&gt;
There is always some critical success factor, when using a tool and SWOT is not excluded&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Here are a couple of points to be aware of if you want a good SWOT: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Information shared by stakeholders within a SWOT analysis should never be used to play the blame game, but it should be a basis for continuous improvement&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	When conducting the weaknesses, never blame the others for faults or shortcoming, because being honest is essential&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	SWOT’s data can be collected live depending on the resources and constraints that exists&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	It may be useful to weight the experienced stakeholders’ evaluation of the SWOT’s&lt;br /&gt;
These are some points that may be good to keep in the back of the head, when going through SWOT.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Limitations and critiques of SWOT=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not doubt that SWOT is a very strong tool when carried out right, it can provide valuable knowledge about both customer preferences and competitors intents, and nevertheless where the possible opportunities to grow are. There are also some critiques of SWOT, such as: &lt;br /&gt;
* There are no prioritization of the identified factors and it seems like it was hard to meaningfully compare the importance of one SWOT to another&lt;br /&gt;
* No figuring of costs and benefits or how to use them to achieve their objectives&lt;br /&gt;
* Sometimes it can be hazy on what is external and internal &lt;br /&gt;
And, some limitations about SWOT:&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not help determine the costs and benefits of alternative performance solutions&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not rank the factors according to their criticality&lt;br /&gt;
* It provides minimal information regarding the degree to which an organization or work team possess influence over the factors that have been identified. &lt;br /&gt;
Despite all these, it is possibly to enhance SWOT to its further usability by considering 2 factors&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Approximations of the degree which an organization can control over each factor &lt;br /&gt;
2.	Estimate the costs and benefits of the factors. &lt;br /&gt;
And turn them into questions for better decision, by asking: &lt;br /&gt;
* How much control does the organization have over each SWOT factor?&lt;br /&gt;
* How much does each SWOT factor cost or benefit the organization? &lt;br /&gt;
By using the above two questions in SWOT, it will further enhance SWOTs usability&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article has served its purpose, to introduce you to the tool SWOT, where the article has gone through the main points of SWOT, but have only scratched the surface. If you want to research more about SWOT, you should be more than welcome to do so, but this article has given you a good starting point. SWOT is an amazing tool to use in various areas or projects, does not matter if you want to use it for personal or professional purpose. Although, SWOT is a very widely used tool, it does have its own flaws and limitations, but it is a tool which has been used numerous times all over again worldwide, in all kinds of industries and professionals. Therefore, if you can master the tool and make up for its mentioned shortcomings with the questions that will cover its limitations to a maximum, it will be an incredible tool which is very valuable for your project or business. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reference==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;Handbook of Improving Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;Handbook of Improving Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;https://www.professionalacademy.com/blogs-and-advice/marketing-theories---swot-analysis&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;3&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;https://www.professionalacademy.com/blogs-and-advice/marketing-theories---swot-analysis&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;https://www.projectsmart.co.uk/swot-analysis-in-project-management.php&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;https://www.projectsmart.co.uk/swot-analysis-in-project-management.php&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;https://www.smartdraw.com/swot-analysis/&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;5&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.smartdraw.com/swot-analysis/&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S123368</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68860</id>
		<title>What is SWOT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68860"/>
		<updated>2019-03-01T08:57:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S123368: /* Reference */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article will be presenting the tool SWOT and the main points of SWOT will be covered alongside with an introduction on how to apply SWOT. Moreover, the strength and weaknesses of this tool will also be presented so it can be taken into consideration when using the tool. SWOT can be applied in many different areas in project management, whether it is business strategy or market research but is especially used within marketing.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Much of the original groundwork for what is known as SWOT today, was already established more than 50 years ago. A man name Kurt Lewin, his landmark posthumous text, called; Field Theory in Social Science, emphasized that an organization’s desires are influenced by different driving forces or enhancers and limitations and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
Many companies when facing a problem whether it is external or internal, by using SWOT they can create a quick overview of what your obstacles you need to overcome and what chances there are to take.&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is four initials standing for four different elements, where the elements are used to identify different perspectives of consequences. They each stands for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats. The first two factors, Strengths and Weaknesses are factors for the internal, typically when you are inside a company, you will look within to see what kind of Strengths you have and what kind of Weaknesses you have. Then there are Opportunities and Threats, which are external factors, so you look from internal to external. Opportunities help to identify chances there are to grow, expand and even more potential of a blue ocean and Threats are what kind of competitors are there, restrains, regulations. &lt;br /&gt;
More details about this subject will be seen down below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A brief history of SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier it was mentioned that the original groundwork was laid by Lewin, but around the same time there were two professors from Harvard, George Albert Smith Jr. and C. Roland Christensen, who also were interested in the related issue about identifying the extent of the correlation of the organization’s strategy and its competitive environment. Therefore, they instructed their students to address if a company took into account the requirements of a competitive environments. Around a decade later another professor from the same university wanted to see the already by then named SWOT, if it could be used to explore the ways in which competitive thinking influences business strategies.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction to SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is a strategic analytical tool, for assessing strengths and weaknesses of a business, and also for analyzing opportunities available to the business as well as threats faced by the business. SWOT can also be used for personal purposes or when managing a project. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As mentioned S.W.O.T are initials to different words, each letter stands for something different, with each one of them having their very own purpose, where they together create a very strong foundation for an analysis, whatever the purpose is for. SWOT analysis is processed by a group of stakeholders, where they: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Identify internal and external obstacles and enhancers of performance&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Analyse those factors, which are basted on estimates of their contribution to the net value and how much they are controllable&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. To decide what further or future actions to take regarding those factors &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what do they stand for?&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* S – Strengths – Refers to internal competencies, valuables resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* W - Weaknesses – Refers to internal inhibitors of the competencies, resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* O - Opportunities – Refers to external enhancer of performance, which can be pursued or used&lt;br /&gt;
* T - Threats – An external inhibitor of performance that has the potential to reduce accomplishments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now that we know what SWOT stands for, but how does one go around about them? There are some questions to get it started (3). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Strengths: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we best at?&lt;br /&gt;
* What intellectual property do we own that can help us with this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What specific skills does the current workforce have that can contribute to this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What financial resources do we have for reaching this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances do we have?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our bargaining power with both suppliers and intermediaries?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weaknesses: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we worst at doing?&lt;br /&gt;
* Is our intellectual property outdated?&lt;br /&gt;
* What training does our workforce lack?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our financial position?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances should we have, but don’t?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Opportunity: &lt;br /&gt;
* What changes in the external environment can we exploit?&lt;br /&gt;
* What weaknesses in our competitors can we use to our advantage?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new technology might become available to us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new markets might be opening to us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Threats:&lt;br /&gt;
* What might our competitors be able to do to hurt us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new legislation might damage our interests?&lt;br /&gt;
* What social changes might threaten us?&lt;br /&gt;
* How will the economic cycle affect us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Naturally, there are a lot more questions that can be asked, but these questions for each of the elements, are good starting points. These questions will help you get started on doing the SWOT. Remember, it is always a good idea to do SWOT in the early stages, because it gives you a detailed overview and gives you information, which you can use for your later processes in decision making and planning.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;3&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;3&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Visually the SWOT can be shown as this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SWOTKL.png‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 4x4 Matrix&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How to conduct SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
There are no doubt a couple of ways to conduct SWOT, the one which is more of a practical method, a guide on how to fill in the SWOT&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;5&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;5&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, may be a good place to start. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Determine the object: Which means to decide on a key project or a strategy, where you want to analyse. Write the name of it on the top of a page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Draw the layout: Draw a very large square box and then divide it into four smaller boxes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Put name inside each of the boxes on the top: The top left box write; Strengths, the one beside write; Weaknesses. The box under Weaknesses, write Threats and the last one Opportunity, it should look like the figure earlier (Figure). If you wish a more detailed layout, you can add a smaller box that outlines Strengths and Weaknesses as “Internal” and Opportunities and Threats as “External”, and “Helpful” for Strengths and Opportunities, where Weaknesses and Threats will have a “Harmful” outline. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Add the factors: Add the factors that affects the project in the different boxes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Draw conclusions: Decide if the project is a go or a no-go based on the negative and positive relative. Maybe you are already on a project, but want to see how the situation is, then you need to decide what to do about the information you got out of SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the Myriad guideline&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, there exist a way to conduct SWOT, in a bit of a different manner. &lt;br /&gt;
1.	Recruiting stakeholders: This phase’s idea is simply to try to include your stakeholders. According to the book; Exploring Corporate Strategy by Gerry Johnson, Kevan Scholes and Richard Whittington, you can map your stakeholders according to their interest in a project. If you google “Power-interest matrix”, you can see how you should approach your stakeholders in relative to “Interest” and “Power”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Convening the focus group: This step is to call in the stakeholders, most optimal from 8-48, and explain to them what the SWOT is, and how this little workshop is going to work. The first step is to divide the stakeholders into smaller group, where the idea is to get a well-rounded SWOT, where the stakeholders also can agree on the factors. Of course, the preparations are supposed to be made beforehand, such as already made SWOT figures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Identifying and categorizing SWOTs: Now when the stakeholders are in the groups, they should start to work on the SWOT.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Analyzing SWOTs: In “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, there is a figure showing, on how they are analyzing the SWOT factors within a Construction Company. Similar should be done. Hereafter, two additional questions should be asked: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor internally or externally controlled?&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor an enhancer or an inhibitor of performance? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where after you put the factors for Strengths, Weaknesses, Threats according to in “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2, by Ryan Watkin and Doug Leigh (p.131), to rank with numbers from 1-5 how much it is under your control and for enhancers and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Synthesizing SWOTs: After the previous step, now the data can be collected, and the data can be shown visually, there is an example in the “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace”&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.	Interpreting findings and deliberating action: Now it is the time to decide upon, which and how to act upon the findings. There are a few actions to take according to what the factors are. Monitor: The factors which are neither enhancer nor inhibitors. Mitigate Threats and Exploit Opportunities: Actions are to be taken, if it is seen that there are threats that will hinder the project, likewise with opportunities, it is supposed to be exploited if it will add value. Lastly, Confront Weaknesses and Leverage Strengths: Because these factors are internal, it is easier to control them, therefore strengths should be leveraged to help achieve desired results and weaknesses should be confronted. &lt;br /&gt;
As you can see the latter option is more wholesome and no doubt more detailed, depending your situation on using SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
Remember these guidelines are only one of the many guidelines.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== When to use SWOT == &lt;br /&gt;
Here are just a few to show when it is applicable to use SWOT, and these mentioned components are also included in something called Human Performance Technology (HPT), which can deepen your understanding on SWOT, but it is not necessary&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
1.	In performance analysis &lt;br /&gt;
When identifying the degree to what internal practices and external environmental influences impact how results are currently being accomplished within an organization &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	In cause analysis&lt;br /&gt;
When finding what practices should be continued or even expanded in the longer terms, as well as those that should be discontinued or replaced by other methods or tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	In strategic planning&lt;br /&gt;
When in strategic planning and needs assessment for identifying the factors that contribute to or detract from organizational effectiveness &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	In evaluation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When monitoring the internal and external environment of a program for change over time, for tracking new SWOTs as they emerge, and for documenting for previously existing SWOTs as they become less influential on a program&lt;br /&gt;
Besides these quite general categories within HPT practice, SWOT can also be a great to use within&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;: &lt;br /&gt;
* Appreciative inquiry – To clarify the organization’s strengths and opportunities &lt;br /&gt;
* Benchmarking – To identify possible opportunities and threats&lt;br /&gt;
* Industry analysis – For contextualizing opportunities existing in the market&lt;br /&gt;
* Situation analysis – For evaluating possible trends or ongoing trends in the markets, costs and competition and competitors&lt;br /&gt;
* Scenario planning – For considering possible and preferred long-term scenarios&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, these are the mentioned area where SWOT can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Critical success factors =&lt;br /&gt;
There is always some critical success factor, when using a tool and SWOT is not excluded&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Here are a couple of points to be aware of if you want a good SWOT: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Information shared by stakeholders within a SWOT analysis should never be used to play the blame game, but it should be a basis for continuous improvement&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	When conducting the weaknesses, never blame the others for faults or shortcoming, because being honest is essential&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	SWOT’s data can be collected live depending on the resources and constraints that exists&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	It may be useful to weight the experienced stakeholders’ evaluation of the SWOT’s&lt;br /&gt;
These are some points that may be good to keep in the back of the head, when going through SWOT.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Limitations and critiques of SWOT=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not doubt that SWOT is a very strong tool when carried out right, it can provide valuable knowledge about both customer preferences and competitors intents, and nevertheless where the possible opportunities to grow are. There are also some critiques of SWOT, such as: &lt;br /&gt;
* There are no prioritization of the identified factors and it seems like it was hard to meaningfully compare the importance of one SWOT to another&lt;br /&gt;
* No figuring of costs and benefits or how to use them to achieve their objectives&lt;br /&gt;
* Sometimes it can be hazy on what is external and internal &lt;br /&gt;
And, some limitations about SWOT:&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not help determine the costs and benefits of alternative performance solutions&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not rank the factors according to their criticality&lt;br /&gt;
* It provides minimal information regarding the degree to which an organization or work team possess influence over the factors that have been identified. &lt;br /&gt;
Despite all these, it is possibly to enhance SWOT to its further usability by considering 2 factors&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Approximations of the degree which an organization can control over each factor &lt;br /&gt;
2.	Estimate the costs and benefits of the factors. &lt;br /&gt;
And turn them into questions for better decision, by asking: &lt;br /&gt;
* How much control does the organization have over each SWOT factor?&lt;br /&gt;
* How much does each SWOT factor cost or benefit the organization? &lt;br /&gt;
By using the above two questions in SWOT, it will further enhance SWOTs usability&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article has served its purpose, to introduce you to the tool SWOT, where the article has gone through the main points of SWOT, but have only scratched the surface. If you want to research more about SWOT, you should be more than welcome to do so, but this article has given you a good starting point. SWOT is an amazing tool to use in various areas or projects, does not matter if you want to use it for personal or professional purpose. Although, SWOT is a very widely used tool, it does have its own flaws and limitations, but it is a tool which has been used numerous times all over again worldwide, in all kinds of industries and professionals. Therefore, if you can master the tool and make up for its mentioned shortcomings with the questions that will cover its limitations to a maximum, it will be an incredible tool which is very valuable for your project or business. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reference==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Handbook of Improving Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. https://www.professionalacademy.com/blogs-and-advice/marketing-theories---swot-analysis&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. https://www.projectsmart.co.uk/swot-analysis-in-project-management.php&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. https://www.smartdraw.com/swot-analysis/&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To create a reference link in the text like this [1], write &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;name&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;link/title&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Refer to the same reference again by writing: &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;Name&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Create a reference list like this one, by writing &amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S123368</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68856</id>
		<title>What is SWOT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68856"/>
		<updated>2019-03-01T08:55:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S123368: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article will be presenting the tool SWOT and the main points of SWOT will be covered alongside with an introduction on how to apply SWOT. Moreover, the strength and weaknesses of this tool will also be presented so it can be taken into consideration when using the tool. SWOT can be applied in many different areas in project management, whether it is business strategy or market research but is especially used within marketing.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Much of the original groundwork for what is known as SWOT today, was already established more than 50 years ago. A man name Kurt Lewin, his landmark posthumous text, called; Field Theory in Social Science, emphasized that an organization’s desires are influenced by different driving forces or enhancers and limitations and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
Many companies when facing a problem whether it is external or internal, by using SWOT they can create a quick overview of what your obstacles you need to overcome and what chances there are to take.&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is four initials standing for four different elements, where the elements are used to identify different perspectives of consequences. They each stands for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats. The first two factors, Strengths and Weaknesses are factors for the internal, typically when you are inside a company, you will look within to see what kind of Strengths you have and what kind of Weaknesses you have. Then there are Opportunities and Threats, which are external factors, so you look from internal to external. Opportunities help to identify chances there are to grow, expand and even more potential of a blue ocean and Threats are what kind of competitors are there, restrains, regulations. &lt;br /&gt;
More details about this subject will be seen down below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A brief history of SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier it was mentioned that the original groundwork was laid by Lewin, but around the same time there were two professors from Harvard, George Albert Smith Jr. and C. Roland Christensen, who also were interested in the related issue about identifying the extent of the correlation of the organization’s strategy and its competitive environment. Therefore, they instructed their students to address if a company took into account the requirements of a competitive environments. Around a decade later another professor from the same university wanted to see the already by then named SWOT, if it could be used to explore the ways in which competitive thinking influences business strategies.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction to SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is a strategic analytical tool, for assessing strengths and weaknesses of a business, and also for analyzing opportunities available to the business as well as threats faced by the business. SWOT can also be used for personal purposes or when managing a project. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As mentioned S.W.O.T are initials to different words, each letter stands for something different, with each one of them having their very own purpose, where they together create a very strong foundation for an analysis, whatever the purpose is for. SWOT analysis is processed by a group of stakeholders, where they: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Identify internal and external obstacles and enhancers of performance&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Analyse those factors, which are basted on estimates of their contribution to the net value and how much they are controllable&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. To decide what further or future actions to take regarding those factors &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what do they stand for?&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* S – Strengths – Refers to internal competencies, valuables resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* W - Weaknesses – Refers to internal inhibitors of the competencies, resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* O - Opportunities – Refers to external enhancer of performance, which can be pursued or used&lt;br /&gt;
* T - Threats – An external inhibitor of performance that has the potential to reduce accomplishments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now that we know what SWOT stands for, but how does one go around about them? There are some questions to get it started (3). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Strengths: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we best at?&lt;br /&gt;
* What intellectual property do we own that can help us with this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What specific skills does the current workforce have that can contribute to this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What financial resources do we have for reaching this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances do we have?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our bargaining power with both suppliers and intermediaries?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weaknesses: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we worst at doing?&lt;br /&gt;
* Is our intellectual property outdated?&lt;br /&gt;
* What training does our workforce lack?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our financial position?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances should we have, but don’t?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Opportunity: &lt;br /&gt;
* What changes in the external environment can we exploit?&lt;br /&gt;
* What weaknesses in our competitors can we use to our advantage?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new technology might become available to us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new markets might be opening to us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Threats:&lt;br /&gt;
* What might our competitors be able to do to hurt us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new legislation might damage our interests?&lt;br /&gt;
* What social changes might threaten us?&lt;br /&gt;
* How will the economic cycle affect us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Naturally, there are a lot more questions that can be asked, but these questions for each of the elements, are good starting points. These questions will help you get started on doing the SWOT. Remember, it is always a good idea to do SWOT in the early stages, because it gives you a detailed overview and gives you information, which you can use for your later processes in decision making and planning.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;3&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;3&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Visually the SWOT can be shown as this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SWOTKL.png‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 4x4 Matrix&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How to conduct SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
There are no doubt a couple of ways to conduct SWOT, the one which is more of a practical method, a guide on how to fill in the SWOT&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;5&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;5&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, may be a good place to start. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Determine the object: Which means to decide on a key project or a strategy, where you want to analyse. Write the name of it on the top of a page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Draw the layout: Draw a very large square box and then divide it into four smaller boxes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Put name inside each of the boxes on the top: The top left box write; Strengths, the one beside write; Weaknesses. The box under Weaknesses, write Threats and the last one Opportunity, it should look like the figure earlier (Figure). If you wish a more detailed layout, you can add a smaller box that outlines Strengths and Weaknesses as “Internal” and Opportunities and Threats as “External”, and “Helpful” for Strengths and Opportunities, where Weaknesses and Threats will have a “Harmful” outline. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Add the factors: Add the factors that affects the project in the different boxes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Draw conclusions: Decide if the project is a go or a no-go based on the negative and positive relative. Maybe you are already on a project, but want to see how the situation is, then you need to decide what to do about the information you got out of SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the Myriad guideline&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, there exist a way to conduct SWOT, in a bit of a different manner. &lt;br /&gt;
1.	Recruiting stakeholders: This phase’s idea is simply to try to include your stakeholders. According to the book; Exploring Corporate Strategy by Gerry Johnson, Kevan Scholes and Richard Whittington, you can map your stakeholders according to their interest in a project. If you google “Power-interest matrix”, you can see how you should approach your stakeholders in relative to “Interest” and “Power”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Convening the focus group: This step is to call in the stakeholders, most optimal from 8-48, and explain to them what the SWOT is, and how this little workshop is going to work. The first step is to divide the stakeholders into smaller group, where the idea is to get a well-rounded SWOT, where the stakeholders also can agree on the factors. Of course, the preparations are supposed to be made beforehand, such as already made SWOT figures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Identifying and categorizing SWOTs: Now when the stakeholders are in the groups, they should start to work on the SWOT.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Analyzing SWOTs: In “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, there is a figure showing, on how they are analyzing the SWOT factors within a Construction Company. Similar should be done. Hereafter, two additional questions should be asked: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor internally or externally controlled?&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor an enhancer or an inhibitor of performance? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where after you put the factors for Strengths, Weaknesses, Threats according to in “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2, by Ryan Watkin and Doug Leigh (p.131), to rank with numbers from 1-5 how much it is under your control and for enhancers and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Synthesizing SWOTs: After the previous step, now the data can be collected, and the data can be shown visually, there is an example in the “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace”&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.	Interpreting findings and deliberating action: Now it is the time to decide upon, which and how to act upon the findings. There are a few actions to take according to what the factors are. Monitor: The factors which are neither enhancer nor inhibitors. Mitigate Threats and Exploit Opportunities: Actions are to be taken, if it is seen that there are threats that will hinder the project, likewise with opportunities, it is supposed to be exploited if it will add value. Lastly, Confront Weaknesses and Leverage Strengths: Because these factors are internal, it is easier to control them, therefore strengths should be leveraged to help achieve desired results and weaknesses should be confronted. &lt;br /&gt;
As you can see the latter option is more wholesome and no doubt more detailed, depending your situation on using SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
Remember these guidelines are only one of the many guidelines.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== When to use SWOT == &lt;br /&gt;
Here are just a few to show when it is applicable to use SWOT, and these mentioned components are also included in something called Human Performance Technology (HPT), which can deepen your understanding on SWOT, but it is not necessary&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
1.	In performance analysis &lt;br /&gt;
When identifying the degree to what internal practices and external environmental influences impact how results are currently being accomplished within an organization &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	In cause analysis&lt;br /&gt;
When finding what practices should be continued or even expanded in the longer terms, as well as those that should be discontinued or replaced by other methods or tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	In strategic planning&lt;br /&gt;
When in strategic planning and needs assessment for identifying the factors that contribute to or detract from organizational effectiveness &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	In evaluation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When monitoring the internal and external environment of a program for change over time, for tracking new SWOTs as they emerge, and for documenting for previously existing SWOTs as they become less influential on a program&lt;br /&gt;
Besides these quite general categories within HPT practice, SWOT can also be a great to use within&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;: &lt;br /&gt;
* Appreciative inquiry – To clarify the organization’s strengths and opportunities &lt;br /&gt;
* Benchmarking – To identify possible opportunities and threats&lt;br /&gt;
* Industry analysis – For contextualizing opportunities existing in the market&lt;br /&gt;
* Situation analysis – For evaluating possible trends or ongoing trends in the markets, costs and competition and competitors&lt;br /&gt;
* Scenario planning – For considering possible and preferred long-term scenarios&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, these are the mentioned area where SWOT can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Critical success factors =&lt;br /&gt;
There is always some critical success factor, when using a tool and SWOT is not excluded&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Here are a couple of points to be aware of if you want a good SWOT: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Information shared by stakeholders within a SWOT analysis should never be used to play the blame game, but it should be a basis for continuous improvement&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	When conducting the weaknesses, never blame the others for faults or shortcoming, because being honest is essential&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	SWOT’s data can be collected live depending on the resources and constraints that exists&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	It may be useful to weight the experienced stakeholders’ evaluation of the SWOT’s&lt;br /&gt;
These are some points that may be good to keep in the back of the head, when going through SWOT.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Limitations and critiques of SWOT=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not doubt that SWOT is a very strong tool when carried out right, it can provide valuable knowledge about both customer preferences and competitors intents, and nevertheless where the possible opportunities to grow are. There are also some critiques of SWOT, such as: &lt;br /&gt;
* There are no prioritization of the identified factors and it seems like it was hard to meaningfully compare the importance of one SWOT to another&lt;br /&gt;
* No figuring of costs and benefits or how to use them to achieve their objectives&lt;br /&gt;
* Sometimes it can be hazy on what is external and internal &lt;br /&gt;
And, some limitations about SWOT:&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not help determine the costs and benefits of alternative performance solutions&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not rank the factors according to their criticality&lt;br /&gt;
* It provides minimal information regarding the degree to which an organization or work team possess influence over the factors that have been identified. &lt;br /&gt;
Despite all these, it is possibly to enhance SWOT to its further usability by considering 2 factors&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Approximations of the degree which an organization can control over each factor &lt;br /&gt;
2.	Estimate the costs and benefits of the factors. &lt;br /&gt;
And turn them into questions for better decision, by asking: &lt;br /&gt;
* How much control does the organization have over each SWOT factor?&lt;br /&gt;
* How much does each SWOT factor cost or benefit the organization? &lt;br /&gt;
By using the above two questions in SWOT, it will further enhance SWOTs usability&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article has served its purpose, to introduce you to the tool SWOT, where the article has gone through the main points of SWOT, but have only scratched the surface. If you want to research more about SWOT, you should be more than welcome to do so, but this article has given you a good starting point. SWOT is an amazing tool to use in various areas or projects, does not matter if you want to use it for personal or professional purpose. Although, SWOT is a very widely used tool, it does have its own flaws and limitations, but it is a tool which has been used numerous times all over again worldwide, in all kinds of industries and professionals. Therefore, if you can master the tool and make up for its mentioned shortcomings with the questions that will cover its limitations to a maximum, it will be an incredible tool which is very valuable for your project or business. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reference==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;1. https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Handbook of Improving Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. https://www.professionalacademy.com/blogs-and-advice/marketing-theories---swot-analysis&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. https://www.projectsmart.co.uk/swot-analysis-in-project-management.php&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. https://www.smartdraw.com/swot-analysis/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To create a reference link in the text like this [1], write &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;name&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;link/title&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Refer to the same reference again by writing: &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;Name&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Create a reference list like this one, by writing &amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S123368</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68852</id>
		<title>What is SWOT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68852"/>
		<updated>2019-03-01T08:53:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S123368: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article will be presenting the tool SWOT and the main points of SWOT will be covered alongside with an introduction on how to apply SWOT. Moreover, the strength and weaknesses of this tool will also be presented so it can be taken into consideration when using the tool. SWOT can be applied in many different areas in project management, whether it is business strategy or market research but is especially used within marketing.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Much of the original groundwork for what is known as SWOT today, was already established more than 50 years ago. A man name Kurt Lewin, his landmark posthumous text, called; Field Theory in Social Science, emphasized that an organization’s desires are influenced by different driving forces or enhancers and limitations and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
Many companies when facing a problem whether it is external or internal, by using SWOT they can create a quick overview of what your obstacles you need to overcome and what chances there are to take.&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is four initials standing for four different elements, where the elements are used to identify different perspectives of consequences. They each stands for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats. The first two factors, Strengths and Weaknesses are factors for the internal, typically when you are inside a company, you will look within to see what kind of Strengths you have and what kind of Weaknesses you have. Then there are Opportunities and Threats, which are external factors, so you look from internal to external. Opportunities help to identify chances there are to grow, expand and even more potential of a blue ocean and Threats are what kind of competitors are there, restrains, regulations. &lt;br /&gt;
More details about this subject will be seen down below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A brief history of SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier it was mentioned that the original groundwork was laid by Lewin, but around the same time there were two professors from Harvard, George Albert Smith Jr. and C. Roland Christensen, who also were interested in the related issue about identifying the extent of the correlation of the organization’s strategy and its competitive environment. Therefore, they instructed their students to address if a company took into account the requirements of a competitive environments. Around a decade later another professor from the same university wanted to see the already by then named SWOT, if it could be used to explore the ways in which competitive thinking influences business strategies.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction to SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is a strategic analytical tool, for assessing strengths and weaknesses of a business, and also for analyzing opportunities available to the business as well as threats faced by the business. SWOT can also be used for personal purposes or when managing a project. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As mentioned S.W.O.T are initials to different words, each letter stands for something different, with each one of them having their very own purpose, where they together create a very strong foundation for an analysis, whatever the purpose is for. SWOT analysis is processed by a group of stakeholders, where they: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Identify internal and external obstacles and enhancers of performance&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Analyse those factors, which are basted on estimates of their contribution to the net value and how much they are controllable&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. To decide what further or future actions to take regarding those factors &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what do they stand for?&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* S – Strengths – Refers to internal competencies, valuables resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* W - Weaknesses – Refers to internal inhibitors of the competencies, resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* O - Opportunities – Refers to external enhancer of performance, which can be pursued or used&lt;br /&gt;
* T - Threats – An external inhibitor of performance that has the potential to reduce accomplishments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now that we know what SWOT stands for, but how does one go around about them? There are some questions to get it started (3). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Strengths: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we best at?&lt;br /&gt;
* What intellectual property do we own that can help us with this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What specific skills does the current workforce have that can contribute to this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What financial resources do we have for reaching this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances do we have?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our bargaining power with both suppliers and intermediaries?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weaknesses: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we worst at doing?&lt;br /&gt;
* Is our intellectual property outdated?&lt;br /&gt;
* What training does our workforce lack?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our financial position?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances should we have, but don’t?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Opportunity: &lt;br /&gt;
* What changes in the external environment can we exploit?&lt;br /&gt;
* What weaknesses in our competitors can we use to our advantage?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new technology might become available to us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new markets might be opening to us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Threats:&lt;br /&gt;
* What might our competitors be able to do to hurt us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new legislation might damage our interests?&lt;br /&gt;
* What social changes might threaten us?&lt;br /&gt;
* How will the economic cycle affect us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Naturally, there are a lot more questions that can be asked, but these questions for each of the elements, are good starting points. These questions will help you get started on doing the SWOT. Remember, it is always a good idea to do SWOT in the early stages, because it gives you a detailed overview and gives you information, which you can use for your later processes in decision making and planning.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;3&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;3&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Visually the SWOT can be shown as this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SWOTKL.png‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 4x4 Matrix&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How to conduct SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
There are no doubt a couple of ways to conduct SWOT, the one which is more of a practical method, a guide on how to fill in the SWOT&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;5&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;5&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, may be a good place to start. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Determine the object: Which means to decide on a key project or a strategy, where you want to analyse. Write the name of it on the top of a page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Draw the layout: Draw a very large square box and then divide it into four smaller boxes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Put name inside each of the boxes on the top: The top left box write; Strengths, the one beside write; Weaknesses. The box under Weaknesses, write Threats and the last one Opportunity, it should look like the figure earlier (Figure). If you wish a more detailed layout, you can add a smaller box that outlines Strengths and Weaknesses as “Internal” and Opportunities and Threats as “External”, and “Helpful” for Strengths and Opportunities, where Weaknesses and Threats will have a “Harmful” outline. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Add the factors: Add the factors that affects the project in the different boxes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Draw conclusions: Decide if the project is a go or a no-go based on the negative and positive relative. Maybe you are already on a project, but want to see how the situation is, then you need to decide what to do about the information you got out of SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the Myriad guideline&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, there exist a way to conduct SWOT, in a bit of a different manner. &lt;br /&gt;
1.	Recruiting stakeholders: This phase’s idea is simply to try to include your stakeholders. According to the book; Exploring Corporate Strategy by Gerry Johnson, Kevan Scholes and Richard Whittington, you can map your stakeholders according to their interest in a project. If you google “Power-interest matrix”, you can see how you should approach your stakeholders in relative to “Interest” and “Power”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Convening the focus group: This step is to call in the stakeholders, most optimal from 8-48, and explain to them what the SWOT is, and how this little workshop is going to work. The first step is to divide the stakeholders into smaller group, where the idea is to get a well-rounded SWOT, where the stakeholders also can agree on the factors. Of course, the preparations are supposed to be made beforehand, such as already made SWOT figures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Identifying and categorizing SWOTs: Now when the stakeholders are in the groups, they should start to work on the SWOT.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Analyzing SWOTs: In “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, there is a figure showing, on how they are analyzing the SWOT factors within a Construction Company. Similar should be done. Hereafter, two additional questions should be asked: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor internally or externally controlled?&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor an enhancer or an inhibitor of performance? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where after you put the factors for Strengths, Weaknesses, Threats according to in “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2, by Ryan Watkin and Doug Leigh (p.131), to rank with numbers from 1-5 how much it is under your control and for enhancers and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Synthesizing SWOTs: After the previous step, now the data can be collected, and the data can be shown visually, there is an example in the “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace”&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.	Interpreting findings and deliberating action: Now it is the time to decide upon, which and how to act upon the findings. There are a few actions to take according to what the factors are. Monitor: The factors which are neither enhancer nor inhibitors. Mitigate Threats and Exploit Opportunities: Actions are to be taken, if it is seen that there are threats that will hinder the project, likewise with opportunities, it is supposed to be exploited if it will add value. Lastly, Confront Weaknesses and Leverage Strengths: Because these factors are internal, it is easier to control them, therefore strengths should be leveraged to help achieve desired results and weaknesses should be confronted. &lt;br /&gt;
As you can see the latter option is more wholesome and no doubt more detailed, depending your situation on using SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
Remember these guidelines are only one of the many guidelines.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== When to use SWOT == &lt;br /&gt;
Here are just a few to show when it is applicable to use SWOT, and these mentioned components are also included in something called Human Performance Technology (HPT), which can deepen your understanding on SWOT, but it is not necessary&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
1.	In performance analysis &lt;br /&gt;
When identifying the degree to what internal practices and external environmental influences impact how results are currently being accomplished within an organization &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	In cause analysis&lt;br /&gt;
When finding what practices should be continued or even expanded in the longer terms, as well as those that should be discontinued or replaced by other methods or tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	In strategic planning&lt;br /&gt;
When in strategic planning and needs assessment for identifying the factors that contribute to or detract from organizational effectiveness &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	In evaluation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When monitoring the internal and external environment of a program for change over time, for tracking new SWOTs as they emerge, and for documenting for previously existing SWOTs as they become less influential on a program&lt;br /&gt;
Besides these quite general categories within HPT practice, SWOT can also be a great to use within&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;: &lt;br /&gt;
* Appreciative inquiry – To clarify the organization’s strengths and opportunities &lt;br /&gt;
* Benchmarking – To identify possible opportunities and threats&lt;br /&gt;
* Industry analysis – For contextualizing opportunities existing in the market&lt;br /&gt;
* Situation analysis – For evaluating possible trends or ongoing trends in the markets, costs and competition and competitors&lt;br /&gt;
* Scenario planning – For considering possible and preferred long-term scenarios&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, these are the mentioned area where SWOT can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Critical success factors =&lt;br /&gt;
There is always some critical success factor, when using a tool and SWOT is not excluded&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Here are a couple of points to be aware of if you want a good SWOT: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Information shared by stakeholders within a SWOT analysis should never be used to play the blame game, but it should be a basis for continuous improvement&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	When conducting the weaknesses, never blame the others for faults or shortcoming, because being honest is essential&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	SWOT’s data can be collected live depending on the resources and constraints that exists&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	It may be useful to weight the experienced stakeholders’ evaluation of the SWOT’s&lt;br /&gt;
These are some points that may be good to keep in the back of the head, when going through SWOT.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Limitations and critiques of SWOT=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not doubt that SWOT is a very strong tool when carried out right, it can provide valuable knowledge about both customer preferences and competitors intents, and nevertheless where the possible opportunities to grow are. There are also some critiques of SWOT, such as: &lt;br /&gt;
* There are no prioritization of the identified factors and it seems like it was hard to meaningfully compare the importance of one SWOT to another&lt;br /&gt;
* No figuring of costs and benefits or how to use them to achieve their objectives&lt;br /&gt;
* Sometimes it can be hazy on what is external and internal &lt;br /&gt;
And, some limitations about SWOT:&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not help determine the costs and benefits of alternative performance solutions&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not rank the factors according to their criticality&lt;br /&gt;
* It provides minimal information regarding the degree to which an organization or work team possess influence over the factors that have been identified. &lt;br /&gt;
Despite all these, it is possibly to enhance SWOT to its further usability by considering 2 factors&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Approximations of the degree which an organization can control over each factor &lt;br /&gt;
2.	Estimate the costs and benefits of the factors. &lt;br /&gt;
And turn them into questions for better decision, by asking: &lt;br /&gt;
* How much control does the organization have over each SWOT factor?&lt;br /&gt;
* How much does each SWOT factor cost or benefit the organization? &lt;br /&gt;
By using the above two questions in SWOT, it will further enhance SWOTs usability&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article has served its purpose, to introduce you to the tool SWOT, where the article has gone through the main points of SWOT, but have only scratched the surface. If you want to research more about SWOT, you should be more than welcome to do so, but this article has given you a good starting point. SWOT is an amazing tool to use in various areas or projects, does not matter if you want to use it for personal or professional purpose. Although, SWOT is a very widely used tool, it does have its own flaws and limitations, but it is a tool which has been used numerous times all over again worldwide, in all kinds of industries and professionals. Therefore, if you can master the tool and make up for its mentioned shortcomings with the questions that will cover its limitations to a maximum, it will be an incredible tool which is very valuable for your project or business. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reference==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24/&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
1. https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Handbook of Improving Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. https://www.professionalacademy.com/blogs-and-advice/marketing-theories---swot-analysis&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. https://www.projectsmart.co.uk/swot-analysis-in-project-management.php&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. https://www.smartdraw.com/swot-analysis/&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S123368</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68849</id>
		<title>What is SWOT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68849"/>
		<updated>2019-03-01T08:51:59Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S123368: /* Limitations and critiques of SWOT */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article will be presenting the tool SWOT and the main points of SWOT will be covered alongside with an introduction on how to apply SWOT. Moreover, the strength and weaknesses of this tool will also be presented so it can be taken into consideration when using the tool. SWOT can be applied in many different areas in project management, whether it is business strategy or market research but is especially used within marketing.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Much of the original groundwork for what is known as SWOT today, was already established more than 50 years ago. A man name Kurt Lewin, his landmark posthumous text, called; Field Theory in Social Science, emphasized that an organization’s desires are influenced by different driving forces or enhancers and limitations and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
Many companies when facing a problem whether it is external or internal, by using SWOT they can create a quick overview of what your obstacles you need to overcome and what chances there are to take.&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is four initials standing for four different elements, where the elements are used to identify different perspectives of consequences. They each stands for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats. The first two factors, Strengths and Weaknesses are factors for the internal, typically when you are inside a company, you will look within to see what kind of Strengths you have and what kind of Weaknesses you have. Then there are Opportunities and Threats, which are external factors, so you look from internal to external. Opportunities help to identify chances there are to grow, expand and even more potential of a blue ocean and Threats are what kind of competitors are there, restrains, regulations. &lt;br /&gt;
More details about this subject will be seen down below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A brief history of SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier it was mentioned that the original groundwork was laid by Lewin, but around the same time there were two professors from Harvard, George Albert Smith Jr. and C. Roland Christensen, who also were interested in the related issue about identifying the extent of the correlation of the organization’s strategy and its competitive environment. Therefore, they instructed their students to address if a company took into account the requirements of a competitive environments. Around a decade later another professor from the same university wanted to see the already by then named SWOT, if it could be used to explore the ways in which competitive thinking influences business strategies.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction to SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is a strategic analytical tool, for assessing strengths and weaknesses of a business, and also for analyzing opportunities available to the business as well as threats faced by the business. SWOT can also be used for personal purposes or when managing a project. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As mentioned S.W.O.T are initials to different words, each letter stands for something different, with each one of them having their very own purpose, where they together create a very strong foundation for an analysis, whatever the purpose is for. SWOT analysis is processed by a group of stakeholders, where they: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Identify internal and external obstacles and enhancers of performance&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Analyse those factors, which are basted on estimates of their contribution to the net value and how much they are controllable&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. To decide what further or future actions to take regarding those factors &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what do they stand for?&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* S – Strengths – Refers to internal competencies, valuables resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* W - Weaknesses – Refers to internal inhibitors of the competencies, resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* O - Opportunities – Refers to external enhancer of performance, which can be pursued or used&lt;br /&gt;
* T - Threats – An external inhibitor of performance that has the potential to reduce accomplishments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now that we know what SWOT stands for, but how does one go around about them? There are some questions to get it started (3). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Strengths: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we best at?&lt;br /&gt;
* What intellectual property do we own that can help us with this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What specific skills does the current workforce have that can contribute to this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What financial resources do we have for reaching this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances do we have?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our bargaining power with both suppliers and intermediaries?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weaknesses: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we worst at doing?&lt;br /&gt;
* Is our intellectual property outdated?&lt;br /&gt;
* What training does our workforce lack?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our financial position?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances should we have, but don’t?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Opportunity: &lt;br /&gt;
* What changes in the external environment can we exploit?&lt;br /&gt;
* What weaknesses in our competitors can we use to our advantage?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new technology might become available to us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new markets might be opening to us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Threats:&lt;br /&gt;
* What might our competitors be able to do to hurt us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new legislation might damage our interests?&lt;br /&gt;
* What social changes might threaten us?&lt;br /&gt;
* How will the economic cycle affect us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Naturally, there are a lot more questions that can be asked, but these questions for each of the elements, are good starting points. These questions will help you get started on doing the SWOT. Remember, it is always a good idea to do SWOT in the early stages, because it gives you a detailed overview and gives you information, which you can use for your later processes in decision making and planning.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;3&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;3&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Visually the SWOT can be shown as this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SWOTKL.png‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 4x4 Matrix&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How to conduct SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
There are no doubt a couple of ways to conduct SWOT, the one which is more of a practical method, a guide on how to fill in the SWOT&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;5&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;5&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, may be a good place to start. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Determine the object: Which means to decide on a key project or a strategy, where you want to analyse. Write the name of it on the top of a page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Draw the layout: Draw a very large square box and then divide it into four smaller boxes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Put name inside each of the boxes on the top: The top left box write; Strengths, the one beside write; Weaknesses. The box under Weaknesses, write Threats and the last one Opportunity, it should look like the figure earlier (Figure). If you wish a more detailed layout, you can add a smaller box that outlines Strengths and Weaknesses as “Internal” and Opportunities and Threats as “External”, and “Helpful” for Strengths and Opportunities, where Weaknesses and Threats will have a “Harmful” outline. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Add the factors: Add the factors that affects the project in the different boxes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Draw conclusions: Decide if the project is a go or a no-go based on the negative and positive relative. Maybe you are already on a project, but want to see how the situation is, then you need to decide what to do about the information you got out of SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the Myriad guideline&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, there exist a way to conduct SWOT, in a bit of a different manner. &lt;br /&gt;
1.	Recruiting stakeholders: This phase’s idea is simply to try to include your stakeholders. According to the book; Exploring Corporate Strategy by Gerry Johnson, Kevan Scholes and Richard Whittington, you can map your stakeholders according to their interest in a project. If you google “Power-interest matrix”, you can see how you should approach your stakeholders in relative to “Interest” and “Power”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Convening the focus group: This step is to call in the stakeholders, most optimal from 8-48, and explain to them what the SWOT is, and how this little workshop is going to work. The first step is to divide the stakeholders into smaller group, where the idea is to get a well-rounded SWOT, where the stakeholders also can agree on the factors. Of course, the preparations are supposed to be made beforehand, such as already made SWOT figures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Identifying and categorizing SWOTs: Now when the stakeholders are in the groups, they should start to work on the SWOT.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Analyzing SWOTs: In “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, there is a figure showing, on how they are analyzing the SWOT factors within a Construction Company. Similar should be done. Hereafter, two additional questions should be asked: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor internally or externally controlled?&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor an enhancer or an inhibitor of performance? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where after you put the factors for Strengths, Weaknesses, Threats according to in “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2, by Ryan Watkin and Doug Leigh (p.131), to rank with numbers from 1-5 how much it is under your control and for enhancers and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Synthesizing SWOTs: After the previous step, now the data can be collected, and the data can be shown visually, there is an example in the “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace”&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.	Interpreting findings and deliberating action: Now it is the time to decide upon, which and how to act upon the findings. There are a few actions to take according to what the factors are. Monitor: The factors which are neither enhancer nor inhibitors. Mitigate Threats and Exploit Opportunities: Actions are to be taken, if it is seen that there are threats that will hinder the project, likewise with opportunities, it is supposed to be exploited if it will add value. Lastly, Confront Weaknesses and Leverage Strengths: Because these factors are internal, it is easier to control them, therefore strengths should be leveraged to help achieve desired results and weaknesses should be confronted. &lt;br /&gt;
As you can see the latter option is more wholesome and no doubt more detailed, depending your situation on using SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
Remember these guidelines are only one of the many guidelines.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== When to use SWOT == &lt;br /&gt;
Here are just a few to show when it is applicable to use SWOT, and these mentioned components are also included in something called Human Performance Technology (HPT), which can deepen your understanding on SWOT, but it is not necessary&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
1.	In performance analysis &lt;br /&gt;
When identifying the degree to what internal practices and external environmental influences impact how results are currently being accomplished within an organization &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	In cause analysis&lt;br /&gt;
When finding what practices should be continued or even expanded in the longer terms, as well as those that should be discontinued or replaced by other methods or tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	In strategic planning&lt;br /&gt;
When in strategic planning and needs assessment for identifying the factors that contribute to or detract from organizational effectiveness &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	In evaluation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When monitoring the internal and external environment of a program for change over time, for tracking new SWOTs as they emerge, and for documenting for previously existing SWOTs as they become less influential on a program&lt;br /&gt;
Besides these quite general categories within HPT practice, SWOT can also be a great to use within&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;: &lt;br /&gt;
* Appreciative inquiry – To clarify the organization’s strengths and opportunities &lt;br /&gt;
* Benchmarking – To identify possible opportunities and threats&lt;br /&gt;
* Industry analysis – For contextualizing opportunities existing in the market&lt;br /&gt;
* Situation analysis – For evaluating possible trends or ongoing trends in the markets, costs and competition and competitors&lt;br /&gt;
* Scenario planning – For considering possible and preferred long-term scenarios&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, these are the mentioned area where SWOT can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Critical success factors =&lt;br /&gt;
There is always some critical success factor, when using a tool and SWOT is not excluded&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Here are a couple of points to be aware of if you want a good SWOT: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Information shared by stakeholders within a SWOT analysis should never be used to play the blame game, but it should be a basis for continuous improvement&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	When conducting the weaknesses, never blame the others for faults or shortcoming, because being honest is essential&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	SWOT’s data can be collected live depending on the resources and constraints that exists&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	It may be useful to weight the experienced stakeholders’ evaluation of the SWOT’s&lt;br /&gt;
These are some points that may be good to keep in the back of the head, when going through SWOT.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Limitations and critiques of SWOT=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not doubt that SWOT is a very strong tool when carried out right, it can provide valuable knowledge about both customer preferences and competitors intents, and nevertheless where the possible opportunities to grow are. There are also some critiques of SWOT, such as: &lt;br /&gt;
* There are no prioritization of the identified factors and it seems like it was hard to meaningfully compare the importance of one SWOT to another&lt;br /&gt;
* No figuring of costs and benefits or how to use them to achieve their objectives&lt;br /&gt;
* Sometimes it can be hazy on what is external and internal &lt;br /&gt;
And, some limitations about SWOT:&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not help determine the costs and benefits of alternative performance solutions&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not rank the factors according to their criticality&lt;br /&gt;
* It provides minimal information regarding the degree to which an organization or work team possess influence over the factors that have been identified. &lt;br /&gt;
Despite all these, it is possibly to enhance SWOT to its further usability by considering 2 factors&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Approximations of the degree which an organization can control over each factor &lt;br /&gt;
2.	Estimate the costs and benefits of the factors. &lt;br /&gt;
And turn them into questions for better decision, by asking: &lt;br /&gt;
* How much control does the organization have over each SWOT factor?&lt;br /&gt;
* How much does each SWOT factor cost or benefit the organization? &lt;br /&gt;
By using the above two questions in SWOT, it will further enhance SWOTs usability&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article has served its purpose, to introduce you to the tool SWOT, where the article has gone through the main points of SWOT, but have only scratched the surface. If you want to research more about SWOT, you should be more than welcome to do so, but this article has given you a good starting point. SWOT is an amazing tool to use in various areas or projects, does not matter if you want to use it for personal or professional purpose. Although, SWOT is a very widely used tool, it does have its own flaws and limitations, but it is a tool which has been used numerous times all over again worldwide, in all kinds of industries and professionals. Therefore, if you can master the tool and make up for its mentioned shortcomings with the questions that will cover its limitations to a maximum, it will be an incredible tool which is very valuable for your project or business. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reference==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Handbook of Improving Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. https://www.professionalacademy.com/blogs-and-advice/marketing-theories---swot-analysis&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. https://www.projectsmart.co.uk/swot-analysis-in-project-management.php&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. https://www.smartdraw.com/swot-analysis/&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S123368</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68848</id>
		<title>What is SWOT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68848"/>
		<updated>2019-03-01T08:51:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S123368: /* Limitations and critiques of SWOT */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article will be presenting the tool SWOT and the main points of SWOT will be covered alongside with an introduction on how to apply SWOT. Moreover, the strength and weaknesses of this tool will also be presented so it can be taken into consideration when using the tool. SWOT can be applied in many different areas in project management, whether it is business strategy or market research but is especially used within marketing.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Much of the original groundwork for what is known as SWOT today, was already established more than 50 years ago. A man name Kurt Lewin, his landmark posthumous text, called; Field Theory in Social Science, emphasized that an organization’s desires are influenced by different driving forces or enhancers and limitations and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
Many companies when facing a problem whether it is external or internal, by using SWOT they can create a quick overview of what your obstacles you need to overcome and what chances there are to take.&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is four initials standing for four different elements, where the elements are used to identify different perspectives of consequences. They each stands for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats. The first two factors, Strengths and Weaknesses are factors for the internal, typically when you are inside a company, you will look within to see what kind of Strengths you have and what kind of Weaknesses you have. Then there are Opportunities and Threats, which are external factors, so you look from internal to external. Opportunities help to identify chances there are to grow, expand and even more potential of a blue ocean and Threats are what kind of competitors are there, restrains, regulations. &lt;br /&gt;
More details about this subject will be seen down below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A brief history of SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier it was mentioned that the original groundwork was laid by Lewin, but around the same time there were two professors from Harvard, George Albert Smith Jr. and C. Roland Christensen, who also were interested in the related issue about identifying the extent of the correlation of the organization’s strategy and its competitive environment. Therefore, they instructed their students to address if a company took into account the requirements of a competitive environments. Around a decade later another professor from the same university wanted to see the already by then named SWOT, if it could be used to explore the ways in which competitive thinking influences business strategies.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction to SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is a strategic analytical tool, for assessing strengths and weaknesses of a business, and also for analyzing opportunities available to the business as well as threats faced by the business. SWOT can also be used for personal purposes or when managing a project. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As mentioned S.W.O.T are initials to different words, each letter stands for something different, with each one of them having their very own purpose, where they together create a very strong foundation for an analysis, whatever the purpose is for. SWOT analysis is processed by a group of stakeholders, where they: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Identify internal and external obstacles and enhancers of performance&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Analyse those factors, which are basted on estimates of their contribution to the net value and how much they are controllable&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. To decide what further or future actions to take regarding those factors &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what do they stand for?&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* S – Strengths – Refers to internal competencies, valuables resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* W - Weaknesses – Refers to internal inhibitors of the competencies, resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* O - Opportunities – Refers to external enhancer of performance, which can be pursued or used&lt;br /&gt;
* T - Threats – An external inhibitor of performance that has the potential to reduce accomplishments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now that we know what SWOT stands for, but how does one go around about them? There are some questions to get it started (3). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Strengths: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we best at?&lt;br /&gt;
* What intellectual property do we own that can help us with this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What specific skills does the current workforce have that can contribute to this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What financial resources do we have for reaching this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances do we have?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our bargaining power with both suppliers and intermediaries?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weaknesses: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we worst at doing?&lt;br /&gt;
* Is our intellectual property outdated?&lt;br /&gt;
* What training does our workforce lack?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our financial position?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances should we have, but don’t?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Opportunity: &lt;br /&gt;
* What changes in the external environment can we exploit?&lt;br /&gt;
* What weaknesses in our competitors can we use to our advantage?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new technology might become available to us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new markets might be opening to us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Threats:&lt;br /&gt;
* What might our competitors be able to do to hurt us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new legislation might damage our interests?&lt;br /&gt;
* What social changes might threaten us?&lt;br /&gt;
* How will the economic cycle affect us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Naturally, there are a lot more questions that can be asked, but these questions for each of the elements, are good starting points. These questions will help you get started on doing the SWOT. Remember, it is always a good idea to do SWOT in the early stages, because it gives you a detailed overview and gives you information, which you can use for your later processes in decision making and planning.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;3&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;3&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Visually the SWOT can be shown as this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SWOTKL.png‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 4x4 Matrix&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How to conduct SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
There are no doubt a couple of ways to conduct SWOT, the one which is more of a practical method, a guide on how to fill in the SWOT&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;5&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;5&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, may be a good place to start. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Determine the object: Which means to decide on a key project or a strategy, where you want to analyse. Write the name of it on the top of a page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Draw the layout: Draw a very large square box and then divide it into four smaller boxes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Put name inside each of the boxes on the top: The top left box write; Strengths, the one beside write; Weaknesses. The box under Weaknesses, write Threats and the last one Opportunity, it should look like the figure earlier (Figure). If you wish a more detailed layout, you can add a smaller box that outlines Strengths and Weaknesses as “Internal” and Opportunities and Threats as “External”, and “Helpful” for Strengths and Opportunities, where Weaknesses and Threats will have a “Harmful” outline. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Add the factors: Add the factors that affects the project in the different boxes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Draw conclusions: Decide if the project is a go or a no-go based on the negative and positive relative. Maybe you are already on a project, but want to see how the situation is, then you need to decide what to do about the information you got out of SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the Myriad guideline&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, there exist a way to conduct SWOT, in a bit of a different manner. &lt;br /&gt;
1.	Recruiting stakeholders: This phase’s idea is simply to try to include your stakeholders. According to the book; Exploring Corporate Strategy by Gerry Johnson, Kevan Scholes and Richard Whittington, you can map your stakeholders according to their interest in a project. If you google “Power-interest matrix”, you can see how you should approach your stakeholders in relative to “Interest” and “Power”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Convening the focus group: This step is to call in the stakeholders, most optimal from 8-48, and explain to them what the SWOT is, and how this little workshop is going to work. The first step is to divide the stakeholders into smaller group, where the idea is to get a well-rounded SWOT, where the stakeholders also can agree on the factors. Of course, the preparations are supposed to be made beforehand, such as already made SWOT figures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Identifying and categorizing SWOTs: Now when the stakeholders are in the groups, they should start to work on the SWOT.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Analyzing SWOTs: In “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, there is a figure showing, on how they are analyzing the SWOT factors within a Construction Company. Similar should be done. Hereafter, two additional questions should be asked: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor internally or externally controlled?&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor an enhancer or an inhibitor of performance? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where after you put the factors for Strengths, Weaknesses, Threats according to in “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2, by Ryan Watkin and Doug Leigh (p.131), to rank with numbers from 1-5 how much it is under your control and for enhancers and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Synthesizing SWOTs: After the previous step, now the data can be collected, and the data can be shown visually, there is an example in the “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace”&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.	Interpreting findings and deliberating action: Now it is the time to decide upon, which and how to act upon the findings. There are a few actions to take according to what the factors are. Monitor: The factors which are neither enhancer nor inhibitors. Mitigate Threats and Exploit Opportunities: Actions are to be taken, if it is seen that there are threats that will hinder the project, likewise with opportunities, it is supposed to be exploited if it will add value. Lastly, Confront Weaknesses and Leverage Strengths: Because these factors are internal, it is easier to control them, therefore strengths should be leveraged to help achieve desired results and weaknesses should be confronted. &lt;br /&gt;
As you can see the latter option is more wholesome and no doubt more detailed, depending your situation on using SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
Remember these guidelines are only one of the many guidelines.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== When to use SWOT == &lt;br /&gt;
Here are just a few to show when it is applicable to use SWOT, and these mentioned components are also included in something called Human Performance Technology (HPT), which can deepen your understanding on SWOT, but it is not necessary&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
1.	In performance analysis &lt;br /&gt;
When identifying the degree to what internal practices and external environmental influences impact how results are currently being accomplished within an organization &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	In cause analysis&lt;br /&gt;
When finding what practices should be continued or even expanded in the longer terms, as well as those that should be discontinued or replaced by other methods or tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	In strategic planning&lt;br /&gt;
When in strategic planning and needs assessment for identifying the factors that contribute to or detract from organizational effectiveness &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	In evaluation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When monitoring the internal and external environment of a program for change over time, for tracking new SWOTs as they emerge, and for documenting for previously existing SWOTs as they become less influential on a program&lt;br /&gt;
Besides these quite general categories within HPT practice, SWOT can also be a great to use within&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;: &lt;br /&gt;
* Appreciative inquiry – To clarify the organization’s strengths and opportunities &lt;br /&gt;
* Benchmarking – To identify possible opportunities and threats&lt;br /&gt;
* Industry analysis – For contextualizing opportunities existing in the market&lt;br /&gt;
* Situation analysis – For evaluating possible trends or ongoing trends in the markets, costs and competition and competitors&lt;br /&gt;
* Scenario planning – For considering possible and preferred long-term scenarios&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, these are the mentioned area where SWOT can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Critical success factors =&lt;br /&gt;
There is always some critical success factor, when using a tool and SWOT is not excluded&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Here are a couple of points to be aware of if you want a good SWOT: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Information shared by stakeholders within a SWOT analysis should never be used to play the blame game, but it should be a basis for continuous improvement&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	When conducting the weaknesses, never blame the others for faults or shortcoming, because being honest is essential&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	SWOT’s data can be collected live depending on the resources and constraints that exists&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	It may be useful to weight the experienced stakeholders’ evaluation of the SWOT’s&lt;br /&gt;
These are some points that may be good to keep in the back of the head, when going through SWOT.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Limitations and critiques of SWOT=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not doubt that SWOT is a very strong tool when carried out right, it can provide valuable knowledge about both customer preferences and competitors intents, and nevertheless where the possible opportunities to grow are. There are also some critiques of SWOT, such as: &lt;br /&gt;
* There are no prioritization of the identified factors and it seems like it was hard to meaningfully compare the importance of one SWOT to another&lt;br /&gt;
* No figuring of costs and benefits or how to use them to achieve their objectives&lt;br /&gt;
* Sometimes it can be hazy on what is external and internal &lt;br /&gt;
And, some limitations about SWOT:&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not help determine the costs and benefits of alternative performance solutions&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not rank the factors according to their criticality&lt;br /&gt;
* It provides minimal information regarding the degree to which an organization or work team possess influence over the factors that have been identified. &lt;br /&gt;
Despite all these, it is possibly to enhance SWOT to its further usability by considering 2 factors&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Approximations of the degree which an organization can control over each factor &lt;br /&gt;
2.	Estimate the costs and benefits of the factors. &lt;br /&gt;
And turn them into questions for better decision, by asking: &lt;br /&gt;
* How much control does the organization have over each SWOT factor?&lt;br /&gt;
* How much does each SWOT factor cost or benefit the organization? &lt;br /&gt;
By using the above two questions in SWOT, it will further enhance SWOTs usability&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article has served its purpose, to introduce you to the tool SWOT, where the article has gone through the main points of SWOT, but have only scratched the surface. If you want to research more about SWOT, you should be more than welcome to do so, but this article has given you a good starting point. SWOT is an amazing tool to use in various areas or projects, does not matter if you want to use it for personal or professional purpose. Although, SWOT is a very widely used tool, it does have its own flaws and limitations, but it is a tool which has been used numerous times all over again worldwide, in all kinds of industries and professionals. Therefore, if you can master the tool and make up for its mentioned shortcomings with the questions that will cover its limitations to a maximum, it will be an incredible tool which is very valuable for your project or business. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reference==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Handbook of Improving Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. https://www.professionalacademy.com/blogs-and-advice/marketing-theories---swot-analysis&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. https://www.projectsmart.co.uk/swot-analysis-in-project-management.php&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. https://www.smartdraw.com/swot-analysis/&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S123368</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68847</id>
		<title>What is SWOT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68847"/>
		<updated>2019-03-01T08:50:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S123368: /* Limitations and critiques of SWOT */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article will be presenting the tool SWOT and the main points of SWOT will be covered alongside with an introduction on how to apply SWOT. Moreover, the strength and weaknesses of this tool will also be presented so it can be taken into consideration when using the tool. SWOT can be applied in many different areas in project management, whether it is business strategy or market research but is especially used within marketing.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Much of the original groundwork for what is known as SWOT today, was already established more than 50 years ago. A man name Kurt Lewin, his landmark posthumous text, called; Field Theory in Social Science, emphasized that an organization’s desires are influenced by different driving forces or enhancers and limitations and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
Many companies when facing a problem whether it is external or internal, by using SWOT they can create a quick overview of what your obstacles you need to overcome and what chances there are to take.&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is four initials standing for four different elements, where the elements are used to identify different perspectives of consequences. They each stands for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats. The first two factors, Strengths and Weaknesses are factors for the internal, typically when you are inside a company, you will look within to see what kind of Strengths you have and what kind of Weaknesses you have. Then there are Opportunities and Threats, which are external factors, so you look from internal to external. Opportunities help to identify chances there are to grow, expand and even more potential of a blue ocean and Threats are what kind of competitors are there, restrains, regulations. &lt;br /&gt;
More details about this subject will be seen down below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A brief history of SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier it was mentioned that the original groundwork was laid by Lewin, but around the same time there were two professors from Harvard, George Albert Smith Jr. and C. Roland Christensen, who also were interested in the related issue about identifying the extent of the correlation of the organization’s strategy and its competitive environment. Therefore, they instructed their students to address if a company took into account the requirements of a competitive environments. Around a decade later another professor from the same university wanted to see the already by then named SWOT, if it could be used to explore the ways in which competitive thinking influences business strategies.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction to SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is a strategic analytical tool, for assessing strengths and weaknesses of a business, and also for analyzing opportunities available to the business as well as threats faced by the business. SWOT can also be used for personal purposes or when managing a project. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As mentioned S.W.O.T are initials to different words, each letter stands for something different, with each one of them having their very own purpose, where they together create a very strong foundation for an analysis, whatever the purpose is for. SWOT analysis is processed by a group of stakeholders, where they: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Identify internal and external obstacles and enhancers of performance&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Analyse those factors, which are basted on estimates of their contribution to the net value and how much they are controllable&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. To decide what further or future actions to take regarding those factors &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what do they stand for?&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* S – Strengths – Refers to internal competencies, valuables resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* W - Weaknesses – Refers to internal inhibitors of the competencies, resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* O - Opportunities – Refers to external enhancer of performance, which can be pursued or used&lt;br /&gt;
* T - Threats – An external inhibitor of performance that has the potential to reduce accomplishments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now that we know what SWOT stands for, but how does one go around about them? There are some questions to get it started (3). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Strengths: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we best at?&lt;br /&gt;
* What intellectual property do we own that can help us with this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What specific skills does the current workforce have that can contribute to this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What financial resources do we have for reaching this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances do we have?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our bargaining power with both suppliers and intermediaries?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weaknesses: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we worst at doing?&lt;br /&gt;
* Is our intellectual property outdated?&lt;br /&gt;
* What training does our workforce lack?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our financial position?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances should we have, but don’t?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Opportunity: &lt;br /&gt;
* What changes in the external environment can we exploit?&lt;br /&gt;
* What weaknesses in our competitors can we use to our advantage?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new technology might become available to us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new markets might be opening to us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Threats:&lt;br /&gt;
* What might our competitors be able to do to hurt us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new legislation might damage our interests?&lt;br /&gt;
* What social changes might threaten us?&lt;br /&gt;
* How will the economic cycle affect us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Naturally, there are a lot more questions that can be asked, but these questions for each of the elements, are good starting points. These questions will help you get started on doing the SWOT. Remember, it is always a good idea to do SWOT in the early stages, because it gives you a detailed overview and gives you information, which you can use for your later processes in decision making and planning.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;3&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;3&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Visually the SWOT can be shown as this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SWOTKL.png‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 4x4 Matrix&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How to conduct SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
There are no doubt a couple of ways to conduct SWOT, the one which is more of a practical method, a guide on how to fill in the SWOT&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;5&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;5&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, may be a good place to start. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Determine the object: Which means to decide on a key project or a strategy, where you want to analyse. Write the name of it on the top of a page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Draw the layout: Draw a very large square box and then divide it into four smaller boxes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Put name inside each of the boxes on the top: The top left box write; Strengths, the one beside write; Weaknesses. The box under Weaknesses, write Threats and the last one Opportunity, it should look like the figure earlier (Figure). If you wish a more detailed layout, you can add a smaller box that outlines Strengths and Weaknesses as “Internal” and Opportunities and Threats as “External”, and “Helpful” for Strengths and Opportunities, where Weaknesses and Threats will have a “Harmful” outline. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Add the factors: Add the factors that affects the project in the different boxes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Draw conclusions: Decide if the project is a go or a no-go based on the negative and positive relative. Maybe you are already on a project, but want to see how the situation is, then you need to decide what to do about the information you got out of SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the Myriad guideline&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, there exist a way to conduct SWOT, in a bit of a different manner. &lt;br /&gt;
1.	Recruiting stakeholders: This phase’s idea is simply to try to include your stakeholders. According to the book; Exploring Corporate Strategy by Gerry Johnson, Kevan Scholes and Richard Whittington, you can map your stakeholders according to their interest in a project. If you google “Power-interest matrix”, you can see how you should approach your stakeholders in relative to “Interest” and “Power”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Convening the focus group: This step is to call in the stakeholders, most optimal from 8-48, and explain to them what the SWOT is, and how this little workshop is going to work. The first step is to divide the stakeholders into smaller group, where the idea is to get a well-rounded SWOT, where the stakeholders also can agree on the factors. Of course, the preparations are supposed to be made beforehand, such as already made SWOT figures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Identifying and categorizing SWOTs: Now when the stakeholders are in the groups, they should start to work on the SWOT.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Analyzing SWOTs: In “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, there is a figure showing, on how they are analyzing the SWOT factors within a Construction Company. Similar should be done. Hereafter, two additional questions should be asked: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor internally or externally controlled?&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor an enhancer or an inhibitor of performance? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where after you put the factors for Strengths, Weaknesses, Threats according to in “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2, by Ryan Watkin and Doug Leigh (p.131), to rank with numbers from 1-5 how much it is under your control and for enhancers and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Synthesizing SWOTs: After the previous step, now the data can be collected, and the data can be shown visually, there is an example in the “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace”&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.	Interpreting findings and deliberating action: Now it is the time to decide upon, which and how to act upon the findings. There are a few actions to take according to what the factors are. Monitor: The factors which are neither enhancer nor inhibitors. Mitigate Threats and Exploit Opportunities: Actions are to be taken, if it is seen that there are threats that will hinder the project, likewise with opportunities, it is supposed to be exploited if it will add value. Lastly, Confront Weaknesses and Leverage Strengths: Because these factors are internal, it is easier to control them, therefore strengths should be leveraged to help achieve desired results and weaknesses should be confronted. &lt;br /&gt;
As you can see the latter option is more wholesome and no doubt more detailed, depending your situation on using SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
Remember these guidelines are only one of the many guidelines.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== When to use SWOT == &lt;br /&gt;
Here are just a few to show when it is applicable to use SWOT, and these mentioned components are also included in something called Human Performance Technology (HPT), which can deepen your understanding on SWOT, but it is not necessary&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
1.	In performance analysis &lt;br /&gt;
When identifying the degree to what internal practices and external environmental influences impact how results are currently being accomplished within an organization &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	In cause analysis&lt;br /&gt;
When finding what practices should be continued or even expanded in the longer terms, as well as those that should be discontinued or replaced by other methods or tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	In strategic planning&lt;br /&gt;
When in strategic planning and needs assessment for identifying the factors that contribute to or detract from organizational effectiveness &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	In evaluation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When monitoring the internal and external environment of a program for change over time, for tracking new SWOTs as they emerge, and for documenting for previously existing SWOTs as they become less influential on a program&lt;br /&gt;
Besides these quite general categories within HPT practice, SWOT can also be a great to use within&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;: &lt;br /&gt;
* Appreciative inquiry – To clarify the organization’s strengths and opportunities &lt;br /&gt;
* Benchmarking – To identify possible opportunities and threats&lt;br /&gt;
* Industry analysis – For contextualizing opportunities existing in the market&lt;br /&gt;
* Situation analysis – For evaluating possible trends or ongoing trends in the markets, costs and competition and competitors&lt;br /&gt;
* Scenario planning – For considering possible and preferred long-term scenarios&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, these are the mentioned area where SWOT can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Critical success factors =&lt;br /&gt;
There is always some critical success factor, when using a tool and SWOT is not excluded&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Here are a couple of points to be aware of if you want a good SWOT: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Information shared by stakeholders within a SWOT analysis should never be used to play the blame game, but it should be a basis for continuous improvement&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	When conducting the weaknesses, never blame the others for faults or shortcoming, because being honest is essential&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	SWOT’s data can be collected live depending on the resources and constraints that exists&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	It may be useful to weight the experienced stakeholders’ evaluation of the SWOT’s&lt;br /&gt;
These are some points that may be good to keep in the back of the head, when going through SWOT.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Limitations and critiques of SWOT=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not doubt that SWOT is a very strong tool when carried out right, it can provide valuable knowledge about both customer preferences and competitors intents, and nevertheless where the possible opportunities to grow are. There are also some critiques of SWOT, such as: &lt;br /&gt;
* There are no prioritization of the identified factors and it seems like it was hard to meaningfully compare the importance of one SWOT to another&lt;br /&gt;
* No figuring of costs and benefits or how to use them to achieve their objectives&lt;br /&gt;
* Sometimes it can be hazy on what is external and internal &lt;br /&gt;
And, some limitations about SWOT:&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not help determine the costs and benefits of alternative performance solutions&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not rank the factors according to their criticality&lt;br /&gt;
* It provides minimal information regarding the degree to which an organization or work team possess influence over the factors that have been identified. &lt;br /&gt;
Despite all these, it is possibly to enhance SWOT to its further usability by considering 2 factors&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Approximations of the degree which an organization can control over each factor &lt;br /&gt;
2.	Estimate the costs and benefits of the factors. &lt;br /&gt;
And turn them into questions for better decision, by asking: &lt;br /&gt;
* How much control does the organization have over each SWOT factor?&lt;br /&gt;
* How much does each SWOT factor cost or benefit the organization? &lt;br /&gt;
By using the above two questions in SWOT, it will further enhance SWOTs usability&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article has served its purpose, to introduce you to the tool SWOT, where the article has gone through the main points of SWOT, but have only scratched the surface. If you want to research more about SWOT, you should be more than welcome to do so, but this article has given you a good starting point. SWOT is an amazing tool to use in various areas or projects, does not matter if you want to use it for personal or professional purpose. Although, SWOT is a very widely used tool, it does have its own flaws and limitations, but it is a tool which has been used numerous times all over again worldwide, in all kinds of industries and professionals. Therefore, if you can master the tool and make up for its mentioned shortcomings with the questions that will cover its limitations to a maximum, it will be an incredible tool which is very valuable for your project or business. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reference==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Handbook of Improving Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. https://www.professionalacademy.com/blogs-and-advice/marketing-theories---swot-analysis&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. https://www.projectsmart.co.uk/swot-analysis-in-project-management.php&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. https://www.smartdraw.com/swot-analysis/&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S123368</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68844</id>
		<title>What is SWOT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68844"/>
		<updated>2019-03-01T08:49:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S123368: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article will be presenting the tool SWOT and the main points of SWOT will be covered alongside with an introduction on how to apply SWOT. Moreover, the strength and weaknesses of this tool will also be presented so it can be taken into consideration when using the tool. SWOT can be applied in many different areas in project management, whether it is business strategy or market research but is especially used within marketing.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Much of the original groundwork for what is known as SWOT today, was already established more than 50 years ago. A man name Kurt Lewin, his landmark posthumous text, called; Field Theory in Social Science, emphasized that an organization’s desires are influenced by different driving forces or enhancers and limitations and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
Many companies when facing a problem whether it is external or internal, by using SWOT they can create a quick overview of what your obstacles you need to overcome and what chances there are to take.&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is four initials standing for four different elements, where the elements are used to identify different perspectives of consequences. They each stands for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats. The first two factors, Strengths and Weaknesses are factors for the internal, typically when you are inside a company, you will look within to see what kind of Strengths you have and what kind of Weaknesses you have. Then there are Opportunities and Threats, which are external factors, so you look from internal to external. Opportunities help to identify chances there are to grow, expand and even more potential of a blue ocean and Threats are what kind of competitors are there, restrains, regulations. &lt;br /&gt;
More details about this subject will be seen down below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A brief history of SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier it was mentioned that the original groundwork was laid by Lewin, but around the same time there were two professors from Harvard, George Albert Smith Jr. and C. Roland Christensen, who also were interested in the related issue about identifying the extent of the correlation of the organization’s strategy and its competitive environment. Therefore, they instructed their students to address if a company took into account the requirements of a competitive environments. Around a decade later another professor from the same university wanted to see the already by then named SWOT, if it could be used to explore the ways in which competitive thinking influences business strategies.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction to SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is a strategic analytical tool, for assessing strengths and weaknesses of a business, and also for analyzing opportunities available to the business as well as threats faced by the business. SWOT can also be used for personal purposes or when managing a project. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As mentioned S.W.O.T are initials to different words, each letter stands for something different, with each one of them having their very own purpose, where they together create a very strong foundation for an analysis, whatever the purpose is for. SWOT analysis is processed by a group of stakeholders, where they: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Identify internal and external obstacles and enhancers of performance&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Analyse those factors, which are basted on estimates of their contribution to the net value and how much they are controllable&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. To decide what further or future actions to take regarding those factors &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what do they stand for?&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* S – Strengths – Refers to internal competencies, valuables resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* W - Weaknesses – Refers to internal inhibitors of the competencies, resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* O - Opportunities – Refers to external enhancer of performance, which can be pursued or used&lt;br /&gt;
* T - Threats – An external inhibitor of performance that has the potential to reduce accomplishments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now that we know what SWOT stands for, but how does one go around about them? There are some questions to get it started (3). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Strengths: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we best at?&lt;br /&gt;
* What intellectual property do we own that can help us with this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What specific skills does the current workforce have that can contribute to this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What financial resources do we have for reaching this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances do we have?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our bargaining power with both suppliers and intermediaries?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weaknesses: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we worst at doing?&lt;br /&gt;
* Is our intellectual property outdated?&lt;br /&gt;
* What training does our workforce lack?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our financial position?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances should we have, but don’t?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Opportunity: &lt;br /&gt;
* What changes in the external environment can we exploit?&lt;br /&gt;
* What weaknesses in our competitors can we use to our advantage?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new technology might become available to us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new markets might be opening to us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Threats:&lt;br /&gt;
* What might our competitors be able to do to hurt us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new legislation might damage our interests?&lt;br /&gt;
* What social changes might threaten us?&lt;br /&gt;
* How will the economic cycle affect us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Naturally, there are a lot more questions that can be asked, but these questions for each of the elements, are good starting points. These questions will help you get started on doing the SWOT. Remember, it is always a good idea to do SWOT in the early stages, because it gives you a detailed overview and gives you information, which you can use for your later processes in decision making and planning.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;3&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;3&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Visually the SWOT can be shown as this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SWOTKL.png‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 4x4 Matrix&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How to conduct SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
There are no doubt a couple of ways to conduct SWOT, the one which is more of a practical method, a guide on how to fill in the SWOT&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;5&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;5&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, may be a good place to start. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Determine the object: Which means to decide on a key project or a strategy, where you want to analyse. Write the name of it on the top of a page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Draw the layout: Draw a very large square box and then divide it into four smaller boxes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Put name inside each of the boxes on the top: The top left box write; Strengths, the one beside write; Weaknesses. The box under Weaknesses, write Threats and the last one Opportunity, it should look like the figure earlier (Figure). If you wish a more detailed layout, you can add a smaller box that outlines Strengths and Weaknesses as “Internal” and Opportunities and Threats as “External”, and “Helpful” for Strengths and Opportunities, where Weaknesses and Threats will have a “Harmful” outline. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Add the factors: Add the factors that affects the project in the different boxes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Draw conclusions: Decide if the project is a go or a no-go based on the negative and positive relative. Maybe you are already on a project, but want to see how the situation is, then you need to decide what to do about the information you got out of SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the Myriad guideline&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, there exist a way to conduct SWOT, in a bit of a different manner. &lt;br /&gt;
1.	Recruiting stakeholders: This phase’s idea is simply to try to include your stakeholders. According to the book; Exploring Corporate Strategy by Gerry Johnson, Kevan Scholes and Richard Whittington, you can map your stakeholders according to their interest in a project. If you google “Power-interest matrix”, you can see how you should approach your stakeholders in relative to “Interest” and “Power”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Convening the focus group: This step is to call in the stakeholders, most optimal from 8-48, and explain to them what the SWOT is, and how this little workshop is going to work. The first step is to divide the stakeholders into smaller group, where the idea is to get a well-rounded SWOT, where the stakeholders also can agree on the factors. Of course, the preparations are supposed to be made beforehand, such as already made SWOT figures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Identifying and categorizing SWOTs: Now when the stakeholders are in the groups, they should start to work on the SWOT.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Analyzing SWOTs: In “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, there is a figure showing, on how they are analyzing the SWOT factors within a Construction Company. Similar should be done. Hereafter, two additional questions should be asked: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor internally or externally controlled?&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor an enhancer or an inhibitor of performance? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where after you put the factors for Strengths, Weaknesses, Threats according to in “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2, by Ryan Watkin and Doug Leigh (p.131), to rank with numbers from 1-5 how much it is under your control and for enhancers and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Synthesizing SWOTs: After the previous step, now the data can be collected, and the data can be shown visually, there is an example in the “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace”&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.	Interpreting findings and deliberating action: Now it is the time to decide upon, which and how to act upon the findings. There are a few actions to take according to what the factors are. Monitor: The factors which are neither enhancer nor inhibitors. Mitigate Threats and Exploit Opportunities: Actions are to be taken, if it is seen that there are threats that will hinder the project, likewise with opportunities, it is supposed to be exploited if it will add value. Lastly, Confront Weaknesses and Leverage Strengths: Because these factors are internal, it is easier to control them, therefore strengths should be leveraged to help achieve desired results and weaknesses should be confronted. &lt;br /&gt;
As you can see the latter option is more wholesome and no doubt more detailed, depending your situation on using SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
Remember these guidelines are only one of the many guidelines.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== When to use SWOT == &lt;br /&gt;
Here are just a few to show when it is applicable to use SWOT, and these mentioned components are also included in something called Human Performance Technology (HPT), which can deepen your understanding on SWOT, but it is not necessary&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
1.	In performance analysis &lt;br /&gt;
When identifying the degree to what internal practices and external environmental influences impact how results are currently being accomplished within an organization &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	In cause analysis&lt;br /&gt;
When finding what practices should be continued or even expanded in the longer terms, as well as those that should be discontinued or replaced by other methods or tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	In strategic planning&lt;br /&gt;
When in strategic planning and needs assessment for identifying the factors that contribute to or detract from organizational effectiveness &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	In evaluation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When monitoring the internal and external environment of a program for change over time, for tracking new SWOTs as they emerge, and for documenting for previously existing SWOTs as they become less influential on a program&lt;br /&gt;
Besides these quite general categories within HPT practice, SWOT can also be a great to use within&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;: &lt;br /&gt;
* Appreciative inquiry – To clarify the organization’s strengths and opportunities &lt;br /&gt;
* Benchmarking – To identify possible opportunities and threats&lt;br /&gt;
* Industry analysis – For contextualizing opportunities existing in the market&lt;br /&gt;
* Situation analysis – For evaluating possible trends or ongoing trends in the markets, costs and competition and competitors&lt;br /&gt;
* Scenario planning – For considering possible and preferred long-term scenarios&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, these are the mentioned area where SWOT can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Critical success factors =&lt;br /&gt;
There is always some critical success factor, when using a tool and SWOT is not excluded&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Here are a couple of points to be aware of if you want a good SWOT: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Information shared by stakeholders within a SWOT analysis should never be used to play the blame game, but it should be a basis for continuous improvement&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	When conducting the weaknesses, never blame the others for faults or shortcoming, because being honest is essential&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	SWOT’s data can be collected live depending on the resources and constraints that exists&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	It may be useful to weight the experienced stakeholders’ evaluation of the SWOT’s&lt;br /&gt;
These are some points that may be good to keep in the back of the head, when going through SWOT.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Limitations and critiques of SWOT=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not doubt that SWOT is a very strong tool when carried out right, it can provide valuable knowledge about both customer preferences and competitors intents, and nevertheless where the possible opportunities to grow are. There are also some critiques of SWOT, such as: &lt;br /&gt;
* There are no prioritization of the identified factors and it seems like it was hard to meaningfully compare the importance of one SWOT to another&lt;br /&gt;
* No figuring of costs and benefits or how to use them to achieve their objectives&lt;br /&gt;
* Sometimes it can be hazy on what is external and internal &lt;br /&gt;
And, some limitations about SWOT:&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not help determine the costs and benefits of alternative performance solutions&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not rank the factors according to their criticality&lt;br /&gt;
* It provides minimal information regarding the degree to which an organization or work team possess influence over the factors that have been identified. &lt;br /&gt;
Despite all these, it is possibly to enhance SWOT to its further usability by considering 2 factors&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Approximations of the degree which an organization can control over each factor &lt;br /&gt;
2.	Estimate the costs and benefits of the factors. &lt;br /&gt;
And turn them into questions for better decision, by asking: &lt;br /&gt;
* How much control does the organization have over each SWOT factor?&lt;br /&gt;
* How much does each SWOT factor cost or benefit the organization? &lt;br /&gt;
By using the above two questions in SWOT, it will further enhance SWOTs usability&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article has served its purpose, to introduce you to the tool SWOT, where the article has gone through the main points of SWOT, but have only scratched the surface. If you want to research more about SWOT, you should be more than welcome to do so, but this article has given you a good starting point. SWOT is an amazing tool to use in various areas or projects, does not matter if you want to use it for personal or professional purpose. Although, SWOT is a very widely used tool, it does have its own flaws and limitations, but it is a tool which has been used numerous times all over again worldwide, in all kinds of industries and professionals. Therefore, if you can master the tool and make up for its mentioned shortcomings with the questions that will cover its limitations to a maximum, it will be an incredible tool which is very valuable for your project or business. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reference==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Handbook of Improving Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. https://www.professionalacademy.com/blogs-and-advice/marketing-theories---swot-analysis&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. https://www.projectsmart.co.uk/swot-analysis-in-project-management.php&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. https://www.smartdraw.com/swot-analysis/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To create a reference link in the text like this [1], write &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;name&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;link/title&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Refer to the same reference again by writing: &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;Name&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Create a reference list like this one, by writing &amp;lt;https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S123368</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68843</id>
		<title>What is SWOT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68843"/>
		<updated>2019-03-01T08:47:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S123368: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article will be presenting the tool SWOT and the main points of SWOT will be covered alongside with an introduction on how to apply SWOT. Moreover, the strength and weaknesses of this tool will also be presented so it can be taken into consideration when using the tool. SWOT can be applied in many different areas in project management, whether it is business strategy or market research but is especially used within marketing.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Much of the original groundwork for what is known as SWOT today, was already established more than 50 years ago. A man name Kurt Lewin, his landmark posthumous text, called; Field Theory in Social Science, emphasized that an organization’s desires are influenced by different driving forces or enhancers and limitations and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
Many companies when facing a problem whether it is external or internal, by using SWOT they can create a quick overview of what your obstacles you need to overcome and what chances there are to take.&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is four initials standing for four different elements, where the elements are used to identify different perspectives of consequences. They each stands for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats. The first two factors, Strengths and Weaknesses are factors for the internal, typically when you are inside a company, you will look within to see what kind of Strengths you have and what kind of Weaknesses you have. Then there are Opportunities and Threats, which are external factors, so you look from internal to external. Opportunities help to identify chances there are to grow, expand and even more potential of a blue ocean and Threats are what kind of competitors are there, restrains, regulations. &lt;br /&gt;
More details about this subject will be seen down below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A brief history of SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier it was mentioned that the original groundwork was laid by Lewin, but around the same time there were two professors from Harvard, George Albert Smith Jr. and C. Roland Christensen, who also were interested in the related issue about identifying the extent of the correlation of the organization’s strategy and its competitive environment. Therefore, they instructed their students to address if a company took into account the requirements of a competitive environments. Around a decade later another professor from the same university wanted to see the already by then named SWOT, if it could be used to explore the ways in which competitive thinking influences business strategies.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction to SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is a strategic analytical tool, for assessing strengths and weaknesses of a business, and also for analyzing opportunities available to the business as well as threats faced by the business. SWOT can also be used for personal purposes or when managing a project. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As mentioned S.W.O.T are initials to different words, each letter stands for something different, with each one of them having their very own purpose, where they together create a very strong foundation for an analysis, whatever the purpose is for. SWOT analysis is processed by a group of stakeholders, where they: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Identify internal and external obstacles and enhancers of performance&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Analyse those factors, which are basted on estimates of their contribution to the net value and how much they are controllable&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. To decide what further or future actions to take regarding those factors &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what do they stand for?&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* S – Strengths – Refers to internal competencies, valuables resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* W - Weaknesses – Refers to internal inhibitors of the competencies, resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* O - Opportunities – Refers to external enhancer of performance, which can be pursued or used&lt;br /&gt;
* T - Threats – An external inhibitor of performance that has the potential to reduce accomplishments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now that we know what SWOT stands for, but how does one go around about them? There are some questions to get it started (3). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Strengths: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we best at?&lt;br /&gt;
* What intellectual property do we own that can help us with this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What specific skills does the current workforce have that can contribute to this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What financial resources do we have for reaching this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances do we have?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our bargaining power with both suppliers and intermediaries?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weaknesses: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we worst at doing?&lt;br /&gt;
* Is our intellectual property outdated?&lt;br /&gt;
* What training does our workforce lack?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our financial position?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances should we have, but don’t?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Opportunity: &lt;br /&gt;
* What changes in the external environment can we exploit?&lt;br /&gt;
* What weaknesses in our competitors can we use to our advantage?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new technology might become available to us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new markets might be opening to us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Threats:&lt;br /&gt;
* What might our competitors be able to do to hurt us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new legislation might damage our interests?&lt;br /&gt;
* What social changes might threaten us?&lt;br /&gt;
* How will the economic cycle affect us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Naturally, there are a lot more questions that can be asked, but these questions for each of the elements, are good starting points. These questions will help you get started on doing the SWOT. Remember, it is always a good idea to do SWOT in the early stages, because it gives you a detailed overview and gives you information, which you can use for your later processes in decision making and planning.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;3&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;3&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Visually the SWOT can be shown as this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SWOTKL.png‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 4x4 Matrix(1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How to conduct SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
There are no doubt a couple of ways to conduct SWOT, the one which is more of a practical method, a guide on how to fill in the SWOT&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;5&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;5&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, may be a good place to start. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Determine the object: Which means to decide on a key project or a strategy, where you want to analyse. Write the name of it on the top of a page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Draw the layout: Draw a very large square box and then divide it into four smaller boxes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Put name inside each of the boxes on the top: The top left box write; Strengths, the one beside write; Weaknesses. The box under Weaknesses, write Threats and the last one Opportunity, it should look like the figure earlier (Figure). If you wish a more detailed layout, you can add a smaller box that outlines Strengths and Weaknesses as “Internal” and Opportunities and Threats as “External”, and “Helpful” for Strengths and Opportunities, where Weaknesses and Threats will have a “Harmful” outline. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Add the factors: Add the factors that affects the project in the different boxes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Draw conclusions: Decide if the project is a go or a no-go based on the negative and positive relative. Maybe you are already on a project, but want to see how the situation is, then you need to decide what to do about the information you got out of SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the Myriad guideline&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, there exist a way to conduct SWOT, in a bit of a different manner. &lt;br /&gt;
1.	Recruiting stakeholders: This phase’s idea is simply to try to include your stakeholders. According to the book; Exploring Corporate Strategy by Gerry Johnson, Kevan Scholes and Richard Whittington, you can map your stakeholders according to their interest in a project. If you google “Power-interest matrix”, you can see how you should approach your stakeholders in relative to “Interest” and “Power”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Convening the focus group: This step is to call in the stakeholders, most optimal from 8-48, and explain to them what the SWOT is, and how this little workshop is going to work. The first step is to divide the stakeholders into smaller group, where the idea is to get a well-rounded SWOT, where the stakeholders also can agree on the factors. Of course, the preparations are supposed to be made beforehand, such as already made SWOT figures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Identifying and categorizing SWOTs: Now when the stakeholders are in the groups, they should start to work on the SWOT.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Analyzing SWOTs: In “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, there is a figure showing, on how they are analyzing the SWOT factors within a Construction Company. Similar should be done. Hereafter, two additional questions should be asked: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor internally or externally controlled?&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor an enhancer or an inhibitor of performance? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where after you put the factors for Strengths, Weaknesses, Threats according to in “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2, by Ryan Watkin and Doug Leigh (p.131), to rank with numbers from 1-5 how much it is under your control and for enhancers and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Synthesizing SWOTs: After the previous step, now the data can be collected, and the data can be shown visually, there is an example in the “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2, by Ryan Watkin and Doug Leigh (p.134, 135).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.	Interpreting findings and deliberating action: Now it is the time to decide upon, which and how to act upon the findings. There are a few actions to take according to what the factors are. Monitor: The factors which are neither enhancer nor inhibitors. Mitigate Threats and Exploit Opportunities: Actions are to be taken, if it is seen that there are threats that will hinder the project, likewise with opportunities, it is supposed to be exploited if it will add value. Lastly, Confront Weaknesses and Leverage Strengths: Because these factors are internal, it is easier to control them, therefore strengths should be leveraged to help achieve desired results and weaknesses should be confronted. &lt;br /&gt;
As you can see the latter option is more wholesome and no doubt more detailed, depending your situation on using SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
Remember these guidelines are only one of the many guidelines.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== When to use SWOT == &lt;br /&gt;
Here are just a few to show when it is applicable to use SWOT, and these mentioned components are also included in something called Human Performance Technology (HPT), which can deepen your understanding on SWOT, but it is not necessary (4).&lt;br /&gt;
1.	In performance analysis &lt;br /&gt;
When identifying the degree to what internal practices and external environmental influences impact how results are currently being accomplished within an organization &lt;br /&gt;
2.	In cause analysis&lt;br /&gt;
When finding what practices should be continued or even expanded in the longer terms, as well as those that should be discontinued or replaced by other methods or tools. &lt;br /&gt;
3.	In strategic planning&lt;br /&gt;
When in strategic planning and needs assessment for identifying the factors that contribute to or detract from organizational effectiveness &lt;br /&gt;
4.	In evaluation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When monitoring the internal and external environment of a program for change over time, for tracking new SWOTs as they emerge, and for documenting for previously existing SWOTs as they become less influential on a program&lt;br /&gt;
Besides these quite general categories within HPT practice, SWOT can also be a great to use within (1): &lt;br /&gt;
* Appreciative inquiry – To clarify the organization’s strengths and opportunities &lt;br /&gt;
* Benchmarking – To identify possible opportunities and threats&lt;br /&gt;
* Industry analysis – For contextualizing opportunities existing in the market&lt;br /&gt;
* Situation analysis – For evaluating possible trends or ongoing trends in the markets, costs and competition and competitors&lt;br /&gt;
* Scenario planning – For considering possible and preferred long-term scenarios&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, these are the mentioned area where SWOT can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Critical success factors =&lt;br /&gt;
There is always some critical success factor, when using a tool and SWOT is not excluded (1). Here are a couple of points to be aware of if you want a good SWOT: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Information shared by stakeholders within a SWOT analysis should never be used to play the blame game, but it should be a basis for continuous improvement&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	When conducting the weaknesses, never blame the others for faults or shortcoming, because being honest is essential&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	SWOT’s data can be collected live depending on the resources and constraints that exists&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	It may be useful to weight the experienced stakeholders’ evaluation of the SWOT’s&lt;br /&gt;
These are some points that may be good to keep in the back of the head, when going through SWOT.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Limitations and critiques of SWOT=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not doubt that SWOT is a very strong tool when carried out right, it can provide valuable knowledge about both customer preferences and competitors intents, and nevertheless where the possible opportunities to grow are. There are also some critiques of SWOT, such as: &lt;br /&gt;
* There are no prioritization of the identified factors and it seems like it was hard to meaningfully compare the importance of one SWOT to another&lt;br /&gt;
* No figuring of costs and benefits or how to use them to achieve their objectives&lt;br /&gt;
* Sometimes it can be hazy on what is external and internal &lt;br /&gt;
And, some limitations about SWOT:&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not help determine the costs and benefits of alternative performance solutions&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not rank the factors according to their criticality&lt;br /&gt;
* It provides minimal information regarding the degree to which an organization or work team possess influence over the factors that have been identified. &lt;br /&gt;
Despite all these, it is possibly to enhance SWOT to its further usability by considering 2 factors&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Approximations of the degree which an organization can control over each factor &lt;br /&gt;
2.	Estimate the costs and benefits of the factors. &lt;br /&gt;
And turn them into questions for better decision, by asking: &lt;br /&gt;
* How much control does the organization have over each SWOT factor?&lt;br /&gt;
* How much does each SWOT factor cost or benefit the organization? &lt;br /&gt;
By using the above two questions in SWOT, it will further enhance SWOTs usability&lt;br /&gt;
(1)(2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article has served its purpose, to introduce you to the tool SWOT, where the article has gone through the main points of SWOT, but have only scratched the surface. If you want to research more about SWOT, you should be more than welcome to do so, but this article has given you a good starting point. SWOT is an amazing tool to use in various areas or projects, does not matter if you want to use it for personal or professional purpose. Although, SWOT is a very widely used tool, it does have its own flaws and limitations, but it is a tool which has been used numerous times all over again worldwide, in all kinds of industries and professionals. Therefore, if you can master the tool and make up for its mentioned shortcomings with the questions that will cover its limitations to a maximum, it will be an incredible tool which is very valuable for your project or business. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reference==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Handbook of Improving Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. https://www.professionalacademy.com/blogs-and-advice/marketing-theories---swot-analysis&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. https://www.projectsmart.co.uk/swot-analysis-in-project-management.php&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. https://www.smartdraw.com/swot-analysis/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To create a reference link in the text like this [1], write &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;name&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;link/title&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Refer to the same reference again by writing: &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;Name&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Create a reference list like this one, by writing &amp;lt;https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S123368</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68841</id>
		<title>What is SWOT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68841"/>
		<updated>2019-03-01T08:42:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S123368: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article will be presenting the tool SWOT and the main points of SWOT will be covered alongside with an introduction on how to apply SWOT. Moreover, the strength and weaknesses of this tool will also be presented so it can be taken into consideration when using the tool. SWOT can be applied in many different areas in project management, whether it is business strategy or market research but is especially used within marketing.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Much of the original groundwork for what is known as SWOT today, was already established more than 50 years ago. A man name Kurt Lewin, his landmark posthumous text, called; Field Theory in Social Science, emphasized that an organization’s desires are influenced by different driving forces or enhancers and limitations and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
Many companies when facing a problem whether it is external or internal, by using SWOT they can create a quick overview of what your obstacles you need to overcome and what chances there are to take.&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is four initials standing for four different elements, where the elements are used to identify different perspectives of consequences. They each stands for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats. The first two factors, Strengths and Weaknesses are factors for the internal, typically when you are inside a company, you will look within to see what kind of Strengths you have and what kind of Weaknesses you have. Then there are Opportunities and Threats, which are external factors, so you look from internal to external. Opportunities help to identify chances there are to grow, expand and even more potential of a blue ocean and Threats are what kind of competitors are there, restrains, regulations. &lt;br /&gt;
More details about this subject will be seen down below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A brief history of SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier it was mentioned that the original groundwork was laid by Lewin, but around the same time there were two professors from Harvard, George Albert Smith Jr. and C. Roland Christensen, who also were interested in the related issue about identifying the extent of the correlation of the organization’s strategy and its competitive environment. Therefore, they instructed their students to address if a company took into account the requirements of a competitive environments. Around a decade later another professor from the same university wanted to see the already by then named SWOT, if it could be used to explore the ways in which competitive thinking influences business strategies. (2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction to SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is a strategic analytical tool, for assessing strengths and weaknesses of a business, and also for analyzing opportunities available to the business as well as threats faced by the business. SWOT can also be used for personal purposes or when managing a project. &lt;br /&gt;
As mentioned S.W.O.T are initials to different words, each letter stands for something different, with each one of them having their very own purpose, where they together create a very strong foundation for an analysis, whatever the purpose is for. SWOT analysis is processed by a group of stakeholders, where they: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Identify internal and external obstacles and enhancers of performance&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Analyse those factors, which are basted on estimates of their contribution to the net value and how much they are controllable&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. To decide what further or future actions to take regarding those factors &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what do they stand for? (1): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* S – Strengths – Refers to internal competencies, valuables resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* W - Weaknesses – Refers to internal inhibitors of the competencies, resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* O - Opportunities – Refers to external enhancer of performance, which can be pursued or used&lt;br /&gt;
* T - Threats – An external inhibitor of performance that has the potential to reduce accomplishments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now that we know what SWOT stands for, but how does one go around about them? There are some questions to get it started (3). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Strengths: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we best at?&lt;br /&gt;
* What intellectual property do we own that can help us with this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What specific skills does the current workforce have that can contribute to this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What financial resources do we have for reaching this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances do we have?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our bargaining power with both suppliers and intermediaries?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weaknesses: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we worst at doing?&lt;br /&gt;
* Is our intellectual property outdated?&lt;br /&gt;
* What training does our workforce lack?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our financial position?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances should we have, but don’t?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Opportunity: &lt;br /&gt;
* What changes in the external environment can we exploit?&lt;br /&gt;
* What weaknesses in our competitors can we use to our advantage?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new technology might become available to us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new markets might be opening to us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Threats:&lt;br /&gt;
* What might our competitors be able to do to hurt us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new legislation might damage our interests?&lt;br /&gt;
* What social changes might threaten us?&lt;br /&gt;
* How will the economic cycle affect us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Naturally, there are a lot more questions that can be asked, but these questions for each of the elements, are good starting points. These questions will help you get started on doing the SWOT. Remember, it is always a good idea to do SWOT in the early stages, because it gives you a detailed overview and gives you information, which you can use for your later processes in decision making and planning.(3)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Visually the SWOT can be shown as this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SWOTKL.png‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 4x4 Matrix(1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How to conduct SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
There are no doubt a couple of ways to conduct SWOT, the one which is more of a practical method, a guide on how to fill in the SWOT (5), may be a good place to start. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Determine the object: Which means to decide on a key project or a strategy, where you want to analyse. Write the name of it on the top of a page.&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Draw the layout: Draw a very large square box and then divide it into four smaller boxes&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Put name inside each of the boxes on the top: The top left box write; Strengths, the one beside write; Weaknesses. The box under Weaknesses, write Threats and the last one Opportunity, it should look like the figure earlier (Figure). If you wish a more detailed layout, you can add a smaller box that outlines Strengths and Weaknesses as “Internal” and Opportunities and Threats as “External”, and “Helpful” for Strengths and Opportunities, where Weaknesses and Threats will have a “Harmful” outline. &lt;br /&gt;
4.	Add the factors: Add the factors that affects the project in the different boxes.&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Draw conclusions: Decide if the project is a go or a no-go based on the negative and positive relative. Maybe you are already on a project, but want to see how the situation is, then you need to decide what to do about the information you got out of SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the Myriad guideline (1), there exist a way to conduct SWOT, in a bit of a different manner. &lt;br /&gt;
1.	Recruiting stakeholders: This phase’s idea is simply to try to include your stakeholders. According to the book; Exploring Corporate Strategy by Gerry Johnson, Kevan Scholes and Richard Whittington, you can map your stakeholders according to their interest in a project. If you google “Power-interest matrix”, you can see how you should approach your stakeholders in relative to “Interest” and “Power”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Convening the focus group: This step is to call in the stakeholders, most optimal from 8-48, and explain to them what the SWOT is, and how this little workshop is going to work. The first step is to divide the stakeholders into smaller group, where the idea is to get a well-rounded SWOT, where the stakeholders also can agree on the factors. Of course, the preparations are supposed to be made beforehand, such as already made SWOT figures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Identifying and categorizing SWOTs: Now when the stakeholders are in the groups, they should start to work on the SWOT.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Analyzing SWOTs: (6) In “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2, by Ryan Watkin and Doug Leigh (p.129), there is a figure showing, on how they are analyzing the SWOT factors within a Construction Company. Similar should be done. Hereafter, two additional questions should be asked: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor internally or externally controlled?&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor an enhancer or an inhibitor of performance? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where after you put the factors for Strengths, Weaknesses, Threats according to in “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2, by Ryan Watkin and Doug Leigh (p.131), to rank with numbers from 1-5 how much it is under your control and for enhancers and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Synthesizing SWOTs: After the previous step, now the data can be collected, and the data can be shown visually, there is an example in the “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2, by Ryan Watkin and Doug Leigh (p.134, 135).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.	Interpreting findings and deliberating action: Now it is the time to decide upon, which and how to act upon the findings. There are a few actions to take according to what the factors are. Monitor: The factors which are neither enhancer nor inhibitors. Mitigate Threats and Exploit Opportunities: Actions are to be taken, if it is seen that there are threats that will hinder the project, likewise with opportunities, it is supposed to be exploited if it will add value. Lastly, Confront Weaknesses and Leverage Strengths: Because these factors are internal, it is easier to control them, therefore strengths should be leveraged to help achieve desired results and weaknesses should be confronted. &lt;br /&gt;
As you can see the latter option is more wholesome and no doubt more detailed, depending your situation on using SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
Remember these guidelines are only one of the many guidelines.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== When to use SWOT == &lt;br /&gt;
Here are just a few to show when it is applicable to use SWOT, and these mentioned components are also included in something called Human Performance Technology (HPT), which can deepen your understanding on SWOT, but it is not necessary (4).&lt;br /&gt;
1.	In performance analysis &lt;br /&gt;
When identifying the degree to what internal practices and external environmental influences impact how results are currently being accomplished within an organization &lt;br /&gt;
2.	In cause analysis&lt;br /&gt;
When finding what practices should be continued or even expanded in the longer terms, as well as those that should be discontinued or replaced by other methods or tools. &lt;br /&gt;
3.	In strategic planning&lt;br /&gt;
When in strategic planning and needs assessment for identifying the factors that contribute to or detract from organizational effectiveness &lt;br /&gt;
4.	In evaluation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When monitoring the internal and external environment of a program for change over time, for tracking new SWOTs as they emerge, and for documenting for previously existing SWOTs as they become less influential on a program&lt;br /&gt;
Besides these quite general categories within HPT practice, SWOT can also be a great to use within (1): &lt;br /&gt;
* Appreciative inquiry – To clarify the organization’s strengths and opportunities &lt;br /&gt;
* Benchmarking – To identify possible opportunities and threats&lt;br /&gt;
* Industry analysis – For contextualizing opportunities existing in the market&lt;br /&gt;
* Situation analysis – For evaluating possible trends or ongoing trends in the markets, costs and competition and competitors&lt;br /&gt;
* Scenario planning – For considering possible and preferred long-term scenarios&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, these are the mentioned area where SWOT can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Critical success factors =&lt;br /&gt;
There is always some critical success factor, when using a tool and SWOT is not excluded (1). Here are a couple of points to be aware of if you want a good SWOT: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Information shared by stakeholders within a SWOT analysis should never be used to play the blame game, but it should be a basis for continuous improvement&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	When conducting the weaknesses, never blame the others for faults or shortcoming, because being honest is essential&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	SWOT’s data can be collected live depending on the resources and constraints that exists&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	It may be useful to weight the experienced stakeholders’ evaluation of the SWOT’s&lt;br /&gt;
These are some points that may be good to keep in the back of the head, when going through SWOT.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Limitations and critiques of SWOT=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not doubt that SWOT is a very strong tool when carried out right, it can provide valuable knowledge about both customer preferences and competitors intents, and nevertheless where the possible opportunities to grow are. There are also some critiques of SWOT, such as: &lt;br /&gt;
* There are no prioritization of the identified factors and it seems like it was hard to meaningfully compare the importance of one SWOT to another&lt;br /&gt;
* No figuring of costs and benefits or how to use them to achieve their objectives&lt;br /&gt;
* Sometimes it can be hazy on what is external and internal &lt;br /&gt;
And, some limitations about SWOT:&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not help determine the costs and benefits of alternative performance solutions&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not rank the factors according to their criticality&lt;br /&gt;
* It provides minimal information regarding the degree to which an organization or work team possess influence over the factors that have been identified. &lt;br /&gt;
Despite all these, it is possibly to enhance SWOT to its further usability by considering 2 factors&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Approximations of the degree which an organization can control over each factor &lt;br /&gt;
2.	Estimate the costs and benefits of the factors. &lt;br /&gt;
And turn them into questions for better decision, by asking: &lt;br /&gt;
* How much control does the organization have over each SWOT factor?&lt;br /&gt;
* How much does each SWOT factor cost or benefit the organization? &lt;br /&gt;
By using the above two questions in SWOT, it will further enhance SWOTs usability&lt;br /&gt;
(1)(2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article has served its purpose, to introduce you to the tool SWOT, where the article has gone through the main points of SWOT, but have only scratched the surface. If you want to research more about SWOT, you should be more than welcome to do so, but this article has given you a good starting point. SWOT is an amazing tool to use in various areas or projects, does not matter if you want to use it for personal or professional purpose. Although, SWOT is a very widely used tool, it does have its own flaws and limitations, but it is a tool which has been used numerous times all over again worldwide, in all kinds of industries and professionals. Therefore, if you can master the tool and make up for its mentioned shortcomings with the questions that will cover its limitations to a maximum, it will be an incredible tool which is very valuable for your project or business. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reference==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Handbook of Improving Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. https://www.professionalacademy.com/blogs-and-advice/marketing-theories---swot-analysis&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. https://www.projectsmart.co.uk/swot-analysis-in-project-management.php&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. https://www.smartdraw.com/swot-analysis/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To create a reference link in the text like this [1], write &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;name&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;link/title&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Refer to the same reference again by writing: &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;Name&#039;&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Create a reference list like this one, by writing &amp;lt;https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S123368</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68840</id>
		<title>What is SWOT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68840"/>
		<updated>2019-03-01T08:40:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S123368: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article will be presenting the tool SWOT and the main points of SWOT will be covered alongside with an introduction on how to apply SWOT. Moreover, the strength and weaknesses of this tool will also be presented so it can be taken into consideration when using the tool. SWOT can be applied in many different areas in project management, whether it is business strategy or market research but is especially used within marketing.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Much of the original groundwork for what is known as SWOT today, was already established more than 50 years ago. A man name Kurt Lewin, his landmark posthumous text, called; Field Theory in Social Science, emphasized that an organization’s desires are influenced by different driving forces or enhancers and limitations and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
Many companies when facing a problem whether it is external or internal, by using SWOT they can create a quick overview of what your obstacles you need to overcome and what chances there are to take.&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is four initials standing for four different elements, where the elements are used to identify different perspectives of consequences. They each stands for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats. The first two factors, Strengths and Weaknesses are factors for the internal, typically when you are inside a company, you will look within to see what kind of Strengths you have and what kind of Weaknesses you have. Then there are Opportunities and Threats, which are external factors, so you look from internal to external. Opportunities help to identify chances there are to grow, expand and even more potential of a blue ocean and Threats are what kind of competitors are there, restrains, regulations. &lt;br /&gt;
More details about this subject will be seen down below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A brief history of SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier it was mentioned that the original groundwork was laid by Lewin, but around the same time there were two professors from Harvard, George Albert Smith Jr. and C. Roland Christensen, who also were interested in the related issue about identifying the extent of the correlation of the organization’s strategy and its competitive environment. Therefore, they instructed their students to address if a company took into account the requirements of a competitive environments. Around a decade later another professor from the same university wanted to see the already by then named SWOT, if it could be used to explore the ways in which competitive thinking influences business strategies. (2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction to SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is a strategic analytical tool, for assessing strengths and weaknesses of a business, and also for analyzing opportunities available to the business as well as threats faced by the business. SWOT can also be used for personal purposes or when managing a project. &lt;br /&gt;
As mentioned S.W.O.T are initials to different words, each letter stands for something different, with each one of them having their very own purpose, where they together create a very strong foundation for an analysis, whatever the purpose is for. SWOT analysis is processed by a group of stakeholders, where they: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Identify internal and external obstacles and enhancers of performance&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Analyse those factors, which are basted on estimates of their contribution to the net value and how much they are controllable&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. To decide what further or future actions to take regarding those factors &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what do they stand for? (1): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* S – Strengths – Refers to internal competencies, valuables resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* W - Weaknesses – Refers to internal inhibitors of the competencies, resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* O - Opportunities – Refers to external enhancer of performance, which can be pursued or used&lt;br /&gt;
* T - Threats – An external inhibitor of performance that has the potential to reduce accomplishments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now that we know what SWOT stands for, but how does one go around about them? There are some questions to get it started (3). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Strengths: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we best at?&lt;br /&gt;
* What intellectual property do we own that can help us with this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What specific skills does the current workforce have that can contribute to this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What financial resources do we have for reaching this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances do we have?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our bargaining power with both suppliers and intermediaries?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weaknesses: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we worst at doing?&lt;br /&gt;
* Is our intellectual property outdated?&lt;br /&gt;
* What training does our workforce lack?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our financial position?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances should we have, but don’t?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Opportunity: &lt;br /&gt;
* What changes in the external environment can we exploit?&lt;br /&gt;
* What weaknesses in our competitors can we use to our advantage?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new technology might become available to us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new markets might be opening to us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Threats:&lt;br /&gt;
* What might our competitors be able to do to hurt us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new legislation might damage our interests?&lt;br /&gt;
* What social changes might threaten us?&lt;br /&gt;
* How will the economic cycle affect us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Naturally, there are a lot more questions that can be asked, but these questions for each of the elements, are good starting points. These questions will help you get started on doing the SWOT. Remember, it is always a good idea to do SWOT in the early stages, because it gives you a detailed overview and gives you information, which you can use for your later processes in decision making and planning.(3)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Visually the SWOT can be shown as this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SWOTKL.png‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 4x4 Matrix(1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How to conduct SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
There are no doubt a couple of ways to conduct SWOT, the one which is more of a practical method, a guide on how to fill in the SWOT (5), may be a good place to start. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Determine the object: Which means to decide on a key project or a strategy, where you want to analyse. Write the name of it on the top of a page.&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Draw the layout: Draw a very large square box and then divide it into four smaller boxes&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Put name inside each of the boxes on the top: The top left box write; Strengths, the one beside write; Weaknesses. The box under Weaknesses, write Threats and the last one Opportunity, it should look like the figure earlier (Figure). If you wish a more detailed layout, you can add a smaller box that outlines Strengths and Weaknesses as “Internal” and Opportunities and Threats as “External”, and “Helpful” for Strengths and Opportunities, where Weaknesses and Threats will have a “Harmful” outline. &lt;br /&gt;
4.	Add the factors: Add the factors that affects the project in the different boxes.&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Draw conclusions: Decide if the project is a go or a no-go based on the negative and positive relative. Maybe you are already on a project, but want to see how the situation is, then you need to decide what to do about the information you got out of SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the Myriad guideline (1), there exist a way to conduct SWOT, in a bit of a different manner. &lt;br /&gt;
1.	Recruiting stakeholders: This phase’s idea is simply to try to include your stakeholders. According to the book; Exploring Corporate Strategy by Gerry Johnson, Kevan Scholes and Richard Whittington, you can map your stakeholders according to their interest in a project. If you google “Power-interest matrix”, you can see how you should approach your stakeholders in relative to “Interest” and “Power”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Convening the focus group: This step is to call in the stakeholders, most optimal from 8-48, and explain to them what the SWOT is, and how this little workshop is going to work. The first step is to divide the stakeholders into smaller group, where the idea is to get a well-rounded SWOT, where the stakeholders also can agree on the factors. Of course, the preparations are supposed to be made beforehand, such as already made SWOT figures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Identifying and categorizing SWOTs: Now when the stakeholders are in the groups, they should start to work on the SWOT.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Analyzing SWOTs: (6) In “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2, by Ryan Watkin and Doug Leigh (p.129), there is a figure showing, on how they are analyzing the SWOT factors within a Construction Company. Similar should be done. Hereafter, two additional questions should be asked: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor internally or externally controlled?&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor an enhancer or an inhibitor of performance? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where after you put the factors for Strengths, Weaknesses, Threats according to in “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2, by Ryan Watkin and Doug Leigh (p.131), to rank with numbers from 1-5 how much it is under your control and for enhancers and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Synthesizing SWOTs: After the previous step, now the data can be collected, and the data can be shown visually, there is an example in the “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2, by Ryan Watkin and Doug Leigh (p.134, 135).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.	Interpreting findings and deliberating action: Now it is the time to decide upon, which and how to act upon the findings. There are a few actions to take according to what the factors are. Monitor: The factors which are neither enhancer nor inhibitors. Mitigate Threats and Exploit Opportunities: Actions are to be taken, if it is seen that there are threats that will hinder the project, likewise with opportunities, it is supposed to be exploited if it will add value. Lastly, Confront Weaknesses and Leverage Strengths: Because these factors are internal, it is easier to control them, therefore strengths should be leveraged to help achieve desired results and weaknesses should be confronted. &lt;br /&gt;
As you can see the latter option is more wholesome and no doubt more detailed, depending your situation on using SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
Remember these guidelines are only one of the many guidelines.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== When to use SWOT == &lt;br /&gt;
Here are just a few to show when it is applicable to use SWOT, and these mentioned components are also included in something called Human Performance Technology (HPT), which can deepen your understanding on SWOT, but it is not necessary (4).&lt;br /&gt;
1.	In performance analysis &lt;br /&gt;
When identifying the degree to what internal practices and external environmental influences impact how results are currently being accomplished within an organization &lt;br /&gt;
2.	In cause analysis&lt;br /&gt;
When finding what practices should be continued or even expanded in the longer terms, as well as those that should be discontinued or replaced by other methods or tools. &lt;br /&gt;
3.	In strategic planning&lt;br /&gt;
When in strategic planning and needs assessment for identifying the factors that contribute to or detract from organizational effectiveness &lt;br /&gt;
4.	In evaluation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When monitoring the internal and external environment of a program for change over time, for tracking new SWOTs as they emerge, and for documenting for previously existing SWOTs as they become less influential on a program&lt;br /&gt;
Besides these quite general categories within HPT practice, SWOT can also be a great to use within (1): &lt;br /&gt;
* Appreciative inquiry – To clarify the organization’s strengths and opportunities &lt;br /&gt;
* Benchmarking – To identify possible opportunities and threats&lt;br /&gt;
* Industry analysis – For contextualizing opportunities existing in the market&lt;br /&gt;
* Situation analysis – For evaluating possible trends or ongoing trends in the markets, costs and competition and competitors&lt;br /&gt;
* Scenario planning – For considering possible and preferred long-term scenarios&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, these are the mentioned area where SWOT can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Critical success factors =&lt;br /&gt;
There is always some critical success factor, when using a tool and SWOT is not excluded (1). Here are a couple of points to be aware of if you want a good SWOT: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Information shared by stakeholders within a SWOT analysis should never be used to play the blame game, but it should be a basis for continuous improvement&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	When conducting the weaknesses, never blame the others for faults or shortcoming, because being honest is essential&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	SWOT’s data can be collected live depending on the resources and constraints that exists&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	It may be useful to weight the experienced stakeholders’ evaluation of the SWOT’s&lt;br /&gt;
These are some points that may be good to keep in the back of the head, when going through SWOT.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Limitations and critiques of SWOT=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not doubt that SWOT is a very strong tool when carried out right, it can provide valuable knowledge about both customer preferences and competitors intents, and nevertheless where the possible opportunities to grow are. There are also some critiques of SWOT, such as: &lt;br /&gt;
* There are no prioritization of the identified factors and it seems like it was hard to meaningfully compare the importance of one SWOT to another&lt;br /&gt;
* No figuring of costs and benefits or how to use them to achieve their objectives&lt;br /&gt;
* Sometimes it can be hazy on what is external and internal &lt;br /&gt;
And, some limitations about SWOT:&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not help determine the costs and benefits of alternative performance solutions&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not rank the factors according to their criticality&lt;br /&gt;
* It provides minimal information regarding the degree to which an organization or work team possess influence over the factors that have been identified. &lt;br /&gt;
Despite all these, it is possibly to enhance SWOT to its further usability by considering 2 factors&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Approximations of the degree which an organization can control over each factor &lt;br /&gt;
2.	Estimate the costs and benefits of the factors. &lt;br /&gt;
And turn them into questions for better decision, by asking: &lt;br /&gt;
* How much control does the organization have over each SWOT factor?&lt;br /&gt;
* How much does each SWOT factor cost or benefit the organization? &lt;br /&gt;
By using the above two questions in SWOT, it will further enhance SWOTs usability&lt;br /&gt;
(1)(2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article has served its purpose, to introduce you to the tool SWOT, where the article has gone through the main points of SWOT, but have only scratched the surface. If you want to research more about SWOT, you should be more than welcome to do so, but this article has given you a good starting point. SWOT is an amazing tool to use in various areas or projects, does not matter if you want to use it for personal or professional purpose. Although, SWOT is a very widely used tool, it does have its own flaws and limitations, but it is a tool which has been used numerous times all over again worldwide, in all kinds of industries and professionals. Therefore, if you can master the tool and make up for its mentioned shortcomings with the questions that will cover its limitations to a maximum, it will be an incredible tool which is very valuable for your project or business. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reference==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Handbook of Improving Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. https://www.professionalacademy.com/blogs-and-advice/marketing-theories---swot-analysis&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. https://www.projectsmart.co.uk/swot-analysis-in-project-management.php&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. https://www.smartdraw.com/swot-analysis/&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S123368</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68839</id>
		<title>What is SWOT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68839"/>
		<updated>2019-03-01T08:39:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S123368: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article will be presenting the tool SWOT and the main points of SWOT will be covered alongside with an introduction on how to apply SWOT. Moreover, the strength and weaknesses of this tool will also be presented so it can be taken into consideration when using the tool. SWOT can be applied in many different areas in project management, whether it is business strategy or market research but is especially used within marketing.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Much of the original groundwork for what is known as SWOT today, was already established more than 50 years ago. A man name Kurt Lewin, his landmark posthumous text, called; Field Theory in Social Science, emphasized that an organization’s desires are influenced by different driving forces or enhancers and limitations and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
Many companies when facing a problem whether it is external or internal, by using SWOT they can create a quick overview of what your obstacles you need to overcome and what chances there are to take.&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is four initials standing for four different elements, where the elements are used to identify different perspectives of consequences. They each stands for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats. The first two factors, Strengths and Weaknesses are factors for the internal, typically when you are inside a company, you will look within to see what kind of Strengths you have and what kind of Weaknesses you have. Then there are Opportunities and Threats, which are external factors, so you look from internal to external. Opportunities help to identify chances there are to grow, expand and even more potential of a blue ocean and Threats are what kind of competitors are there, restrains, regulations. &lt;br /&gt;
More details about this subject will be seen down below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A brief history of SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier it was mentioned that the original groundwork was laid by Lewin, but around the same time there were two professors from Harvard, George Albert Smith Jr. and C. Roland Christensen, who also were interested in the related issue about identifying the extent of the correlation of the organization’s strategy and its competitive environment. Therefore, they instructed their students to address if a company took into account the requirements of a competitive environments. Around a decade later another professor from the same university wanted to see the already by then named SWOT, if it could be used to explore the ways in which competitive thinking influences business strategies. (2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction to SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is a strategic analytical tool, for assessing strengths and weaknesses of a business, and also for analyzing opportunities available to the business as well as threats faced by the business. SWOT can also be used for personal purposes or when managing a project. &lt;br /&gt;
As mentioned S.W.O.T are initials to different words, each letter stands for something different, with each one of them having their very own purpose, where they together create a very strong foundation for an analysis, whatever the purpose is for. SWOT analysis is processed by a group of stakeholders, where they: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Identify internal and external obstacles and enhancers of performance&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Analyse those factors, which are basted on estimates of their contribution to the net value and how much they are controllable&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. To decide what further or future actions to take regarding those factors &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what do they stand for? (1): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* S – Strengths – Refers to internal competencies, valuables resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* W - Weaknesses – Refers to internal inhibitors of the competencies, resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* O - Opportunities – Refers to external enhancer of performance, which can be pursued or used&lt;br /&gt;
* T - Threats – An external inhibitor of performance that has the potential to reduce accomplishments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now that we know what SWOT stands for, but how does one go around about them? There are some questions to get it started (3). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Strengths: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we best at?&lt;br /&gt;
* What intellectual property do we own that can help us with this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What specific skills does the current workforce have that can contribute to this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What financial resources do we have for reaching this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances do we have?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our bargaining power with both suppliers and intermediaries?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weaknesses: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we worst at doing?&lt;br /&gt;
* Is our intellectual property outdated?&lt;br /&gt;
* What training does our workforce lack?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our financial position?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances should we have, but don’t?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Opportunity: &lt;br /&gt;
* What changes in the external environment can we exploit?&lt;br /&gt;
* What weaknesses in our competitors can we use to our advantage?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new technology might become available to us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new markets might be opening to us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Threats:&lt;br /&gt;
* What might our competitors be able to do to hurt us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new legislation might damage our interests?&lt;br /&gt;
* What social changes might threaten us?&lt;br /&gt;
* How will the economic cycle affect us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Naturally, there are a lot more questions that can be asked, but these questions for each of the elements, are good starting points. These questions will help you get started on doing the SWOT. Remember, it is always a good idea to do SWOT in the early stages, because it gives you a detailed overview and gives you information, which you can use for your later processes in decision making and planning.(3)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Visually the SWOT can be shown as this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SWOTKL.png‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 4x4 Matrix(1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How to conduct SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
There are no doubt a couple of ways to conduct SWOT, the one which is more of a practical method, a guide on how to fill in the SWOT (5), may be a good place to start. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Determine the object: Which means to decide on a key project or a strategy, where you want to analyse. Write the name of it on the top of a page.&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Draw the layout: Draw a very large square box and then divide it into four smaller boxes&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Put name inside each of the boxes on the top: The top left box write; Strengths, the one beside write; Weaknesses. The box under Weaknesses, write Threats and the last one Opportunity, it should look like the figure earlier (Figure). If you wish a more detailed layout, you can add a smaller box that outlines Strengths and Weaknesses as “Internal” and Opportunities and Threats as “External”, and “Helpful” for Strengths and Opportunities, where Weaknesses and Threats will have a “Harmful” outline. &lt;br /&gt;
4.	Add the factors: Add the factors that affects the project in the different boxes.&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Draw conclusions: Decide if the project is a go or a no-go based on the negative and positive relative. Maybe you are already on a project, but want to see how the situation is, then you need to decide what to do about the information you got out of SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the Myriad guideline (1), there exist a way to conduct SWOT, in a bit of a different manner. &lt;br /&gt;
1.	Recruiting stakeholders: This phase’s idea is simply to try to include your stakeholders. According to the book; Exploring Corporate Strategy by Gerry Johnson, Kevan Scholes and Richard Whittington, you can map your stakeholders according to their interest in a project. If you google “Power-interest matrix”, you can see how you should approach your stakeholders in relative to “Interest” and “Power”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Convening the focus group: This step is to call in the stakeholders, most optimal from 8-48, and explain to them what the SWOT is, and how this little workshop is going to work. The first step is to divide the stakeholders into smaller group, where the idea is to get a well-rounded SWOT, where the stakeholders also can agree on the factors. Of course, the preparations are supposed to be made beforehand, such as already made SWOT figures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Identifying and categorizing SWOTs: Now when the stakeholders are in the groups, they should start to work on the SWOT.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Analyzing SWOTs: (6) In “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2, by Ryan Watkin and Doug Leigh (p.129), there is a figure showing, on how they are analyzing the SWOT factors within a Construction Company. Similar should be done. Hereafter, two additional questions should be asked: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor internally or externally controlled?&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor an enhancer or an inhibitor of performance? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where after you put the factors for Strengths, Weaknesses, Threats according to in “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2, by Ryan Watkin and Doug Leigh (p.131), to rank with numbers from 1-5 how much it is under your control and for enhancers and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Synthesizing SWOTs: After the previous step, now the data can be collected, and the data can be shown visually, there is an example in the “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2, by Ryan Watkin and Doug Leigh (p.134, 135).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.	Interpreting findings and deliberating action: Now it is the time to decide upon, which and how to act upon the findings. There are a few actions to take according to what the factors are. Monitor: The factors which are neither enhancer nor inhibitors. Mitigate Threats and Exploit Opportunities: Actions are to be taken, if it is seen that there are threats that will hinder the project, likewise with opportunities, it is supposed to be exploited if it will add value. Lastly, Confront Weaknesses and Leverage Strengths: Because these factors are internal, it is easier to control them, therefore strengths should be leveraged to help achieve desired results and weaknesses should be confronted. &lt;br /&gt;
As you can see the latter option is more wholesome and no doubt more detailed, depending your situation on using SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
Remember these guidelines are only one of the many guidelines.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== When to use SWOT == &lt;br /&gt;
Here are just a few to show when it is applicable to use SWOT, and these mentioned components are also included in something called Human Performance Technology (HPT), which can deepen your understanding on SWOT, but it is not necessary (4).&lt;br /&gt;
1.	In performance analysis &lt;br /&gt;
When identifying the degree to what internal practices and external environmental influences impact how results are currently being accomplished within an organization &lt;br /&gt;
2.	In cause analysis&lt;br /&gt;
When finding what practices should be continued or even expanded in the longer terms, as well as those that should be discontinued or replaced by other methods or tools. &lt;br /&gt;
3.	In strategic planning&lt;br /&gt;
When in strategic planning and needs assessment for identifying the factors that contribute to or detract from organizational effectiveness &lt;br /&gt;
4.	In evaluation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When monitoring the internal and external environment of a program for change over time, for tracking new SWOTs as they emerge, and for documenting for previously existing SWOTs as they become less influential on a program&lt;br /&gt;
Besides these quite general categories within HPT practice, SWOT can also be a great to use within (1): &lt;br /&gt;
* Appreciative inquiry – To clarify the organization’s strengths and opportunities &lt;br /&gt;
* Benchmarking – To identify possible opportunities and threats&lt;br /&gt;
* Industry analysis – For contextualizing opportunities existing in the market&lt;br /&gt;
* Situation analysis – For evaluating possible trends or ongoing trends in the markets, costs and competition and competitors&lt;br /&gt;
* Scenario planning – For considering possible and preferred long-term scenarios&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, these are the mentioned area where SWOT can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Critical success factors =&lt;br /&gt;
There is always some critical success factor, when using a tool and SWOT is not excluded (1). Here are a couple of points to be aware of if you want a good SWOT: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Information shared by stakeholders within a SWOT analysis should never be used to play the blame game, but it should be a basis for continuous improvement&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	When conducting the weaknesses, never blame the others for faults or shortcoming, because being honest is essential&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	SWOT’s data can be collected live depending on the resources and constraints that exists&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	It may be useful to weight the experienced stakeholders’ evaluation of the SWOT’s&lt;br /&gt;
These are some points that may be good to keep in the back of the head, when going through SWOT.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Limitations and critiques of SWOT=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not doubt that SWOT is a very strong tool when carried out right, it can provide valuable knowledge about both customer preferences and competitors intents, and nevertheless where the possible opportunities to grow are. There are also some critiques of SWOT, such as: &lt;br /&gt;
* There are no prioritization of the identified factors and it seems like it was hard to meaningfully compare the importance of one SWOT to another&lt;br /&gt;
* No figuring of costs and benefits or how to use them to achieve their objectives&lt;br /&gt;
* Sometimes it can be hazy on what is external and internal &lt;br /&gt;
And, some limitations about SWOT:&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not help determine the costs and benefits of alternative performance solutions&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not rank the factors according to their criticality&lt;br /&gt;
* It provides minimal information regarding the degree to which an organization or work team possess influence over the factors that have been identified. &lt;br /&gt;
Despite all these, it is possibly to enhance SWOT to its further usability by considering 2 factors&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Approximations of the degree which an organization can control over each factor &lt;br /&gt;
2.	Estimate the costs and benefits of the factors. &lt;br /&gt;
And turn them into questions for better decision, by asking: &lt;br /&gt;
* How much control does the organization have over each SWOT factor?&lt;br /&gt;
* How much does each SWOT factor cost or benefit the organization? &lt;br /&gt;
By using the above two questions in SWOT, it will further enhance SWOTs usability&lt;br /&gt;
(1)(2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article has served its purpose, to introduce you to the tool SWOT, where the article has gone through the main points of SWOT, but have only scratched the surface. If you want to research more about SWOT, you should be more than welcome to do so, but this article has given you a good starting point. SWOT is an amazing tool to use in various areas or projects, does not matter if you want to use it for personal or professional purpose. Although, SWOT is a very widely used tool, it does have its own flaws and limitations, but it is a tool which has been used numerous times all over again worldwide, in all kinds of industries and professionals. Therefore, if you can master the tool and make up for its mentioned shortcomings with the questions that will cover its limitations to a maximum, it will be an incredible tool which is very valuable for your project or business. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reference==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Handbook of Improving Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. https://www.professionalacademy.com/blogs-and-advice/marketing-theories---swot-analysis&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. https://www.projectsmart.co.uk/swot-analysis-in-project-management.php&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. https://www.smartdraw.com/swot-analysis/&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S123368</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68838</id>
		<title>What is SWOT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68838"/>
		<updated>2019-03-01T08:38:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S123368: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article will be presenting the tool SWOT and the main points of SWOT will be covered alongside with an introduction on how to apply SWOT. Moreover, the strength and weaknesses of this tool will also be presented so it can be taken into consideration when using the tool. SWOT can be applied in many different areas in project management, whether it is business strategy or market research but is especially used within marketing.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;1. https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Much of the original groundwork for what is known as SWOT today, was already established more than 50 years ago. A man name Kurt Lewin, his landmark posthumous text, called; Field Theory in Social Science, emphasized that an organization’s desires are influenced by different driving forces or enhancers and limitations and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
Many companies when facing a problem whether it is external or internal, by using SWOT they can create a quick overview of what your obstacles you need to overcome and what chances there are to take.&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is four initials standing for four different elements, where the elements are used to identify different perspectives of consequences. They each stands for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats. The first two factors, Strengths and Weaknesses are factors for the internal, typically when you are inside a company, you will look within to see what kind of Strengths you have and what kind of Weaknesses you have. Then there are Opportunities and Threats, which are external factors, so you look from internal to external. Opportunities help to identify chances there are to grow, expand and even more potential of a blue ocean and Threats are what kind of competitors are there, restrains, regulations. &lt;br /&gt;
More details about this subject will be seen down below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A brief history of SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier it was mentioned that the original groundwork was laid by Lewin, but around the same time there were two professors from Harvard, George Albert Smith Jr. and C. Roland Christensen, who also were interested in the related issue about identifying the extent of the correlation of the organization’s strategy and its competitive environment. Therefore, they instructed their students to address if a company took into account the requirements of a competitive environments. Around a decade later another professor from the same university wanted to see the already by then named SWOT, if it could be used to explore the ways in which competitive thinking influences business strategies. (2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction to SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is a strategic analytical tool, for assessing strengths and weaknesses of a business, and also for analyzing opportunities available to the business as well as threats faced by the business. SWOT can also be used for personal purposes or when managing a project. &lt;br /&gt;
As mentioned S.W.O.T are initials to different words, each letter stands for something different, with each one of them having their very own purpose, where they together create a very strong foundation for an analysis, whatever the purpose is for. SWOT analysis is processed by a group of stakeholders, where they: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Identify internal and external obstacles and enhancers of performance&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Analyse those factors, which are basted on estimates of their contribution to the net value and how much they are controllable&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. To decide what further or future actions to take regarding those factors &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what do they stand for? (1): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* S – Strengths – Refers to internal competencies, valuables resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* W - Weaknesses – Refers to internal inhibitors of the competencies, resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* O - Opportunities – Refers to external enhancer of performance, which can be pursued or used&lt;br /&gt;
* T - Threats – An external inhibitor of performance that has the potential to reduce accomplishments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now that we know what SWOT stands for, but how does one go around about them? There are some questions to get it started (3). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Strengths: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we best at?&lt;br /&gt;
* What intellectual property do we own that can help us with this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What specific skills does the current workforce have that can contribute to this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What financial resources do we have for reaching this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances do we have?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our bargaining power with both suppliers and intermediaries?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weaknesses: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we worst at doing?&lt;br /&gt;
* Is our intellectual property outdated?&lt;br /&gt;
* What training does our workforce lack?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our financial position?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances should we have, but don’t?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Opportunity: &lt;br /&gt;
* What changes in the external environment can we exploit?&lt;br /&gt;
* What weaknesses in our competitors can we use to our advantage?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new technology might become available to us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new markets might be opening to us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Threats:&lt;br /&gt;
* What might our competitors be able to do to hurt us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new legislation might damage our interests?&lt;br /&gt;
* What social changes might threaten us?&lt;br /&gt;
* How will the economic cycle affect us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Naturally, there are a lot more questions that can be asked, but these questions for each of the elements, are good starting points. These questions will help you get started on doing the SWOT. Remember, it is always a good idea to do SWOT in the early stages, because it gives you a detailed overview and gives you information, which you can use for your later processes in decision making and planning.(3)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Visually the SWOT can be shown as this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SWOTKL.png‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 4x4 Matrix(1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How to conduct SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
There are no doubt a couple of ways to conduct SWOT, the one which is more of a practical method, a guide on how to fill in the SWOT (5), may be a good place to start. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Determine the object: Which means to decide on a key project or a strategy, where you want to analyse. Write the name of it on the top of a page.&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Draw the layout: Draw a very large square box and then divide it into four smaller boxes&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Put name inside each of the boxes on the top: The top left box write; Strengths, the one beside write; Weaknesses. The box under Weaknesses, write Threats and the last one Opportunity, it should look like the figure earlier (Figure). If you wish a more detailed layout, you can add a smaller box that outlines Strengths and Weaknesses as “Internal” and Opportunities and Threats as “External”, and “Helpful” for Strengths and Opportunities, where Weaknesses and Threats will have a “Harmful” outline. &lt;br /&gt;
4.	Add the factors: Add the factors that affects the project in the different boxes.&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Draw conclusions: Decide if the project is a go or a no-go based on the negative and positive relative. Maybe you are already on a project, but want to see how the situation is, then you need to decide what to do about the information you got out of SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the Myriad guideline (1), there exist a way to conduct SWOT, in a bit of a different manner. &lt;br /&gt;
1.	Recruiting stakeholders: This phase’s idea is simply to try to include your stakeholders. According to the book; Exploring Corporate Strategy by Gerry Johnson, Kevan Scholes and Richard Whittington, you can map your stakeholders according to their interest in a project. If you google “Power-interest matrix”, you can see how you should approach your stakeholders in relative to “Interest” and “Power”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Convening the focus group: This step is to call in the stakeholders, most optimal from 8-48, and explain to them what the SWOT is, and how this little workshop is going to work. The first step is to divide the stakeholders into smaller group, where the idea is to get a well-rounded SWOT, where the stakeholders also can agree on the factors. Of course, the preparations are supposed to be made beforehand, such as already made SWOT figures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Identifying and categorizing SWOTs: Now when the stakeholders are in the groups, they should start to work on the SWOT.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Analyzing SWOTs: (6) In “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2, by Ryan Watkin and Doug Leigh (p.129), there is a figure showing, on how they are analyzing the SWOT factors within a Construction Company. Similar should be done. Hereafter, two additional questions should be asked: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor internally or externally controlled?&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor an enhancer or an inhibitor of performance? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where after you put the factors for Strengths, Weaknesses, Threats according to in “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2, by Ryan Watkin and Doug Leigh (p.131), to rank with numbers from 1-5 how much it is under your control and for enhancers and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Synthesizing SWOTs: After the previous step, now the data can be collected, and the data can be shown visually, there is an example in the “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2, by Ryan Watkin and Doug Leigh (p.134, 135).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.	Interpreting findings and deliberating action: Now it is the time to decide upon, which and how to act upon the findings. There are a few actions to take according to what the factors are. Monitor: The factors which are neither enhancer nor inhibitors. Mitigate Threats and Exploit Opportunities: Actions are to be taken, if it is seen that there are threats that will hinder the project, likewise with opportunities, it is supposed to be exploited if it will add value. Lastly, Confront Weaknesses and Leverage Strengths: Because these factors are internal, it is easier to control them, therefore strengths should be leveraged to help achieve desired results and weaknesses should be confronted. &lt;br /&gt;
As you can see the latter option is more wholesome and no doubt more detailed, depending your situation on using SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
Remember these guidelines are only one of the many guidelines.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== When to use SWOT == &lt;br /&gt;
Here are just a few to show when it is applicable to use SWOT, and these mentioned components are also included in something called Human Performance Technology (HPT), which can deepen your understanding on SWOT, but it is not necessary (4).&lt;br /&gt;
1.	In performance analysis &lt;br /&gt;
When identifying the degree to what internal practices and external environmental influences impact how results are currently being accomplished within an organization &lt;br /&gt;
2.	In cause analysis&lt;br /&gt;
When finding what practices should be continued or even expanded in the longer terms, as well as those that should be discontinued or replaced by other methods or tools. &lt;br /&gt;
3.	In strategic planning&lt;br /&gt;
When in strategic planning and needs assessment for identifying the factors that contribute to or detract from organizational effectiveness &lt;br /&gt;
4.	In evaluation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When monitoring the internal and external environment of a program for change over time, for tracking new SWOTs as they emerge, and for documenting for previously existing SWOTs as they become less influential on a program&lt;br /&gt;
Besides these quite general categories within HPT practice, SWOT can also be a great to use within (1): &lt;br /&gt;
* Appreciative inquiry – To clarify the organization’s strengths and opportunities &lt;br /&gt;
* Benchmarking – To identify possible opportunities and threats&lt;br /&gt;
* Industry analysis – For contextualizing opportunities existing in the market&lt;br /&gt;
* Situation analysis – For evaluating possible trends or ongoing trends in the markets, costs and competition and competitors&lt;br /&gt;
* Scenario planning – For considering possible and preferred long-term scenarios&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, these are the mentioned area where SWOT can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Critical success factors =&lt;br /&gt;
There is always some critical success factor, when using a tool and SWOT is not excluded (1). Here are a couple of points to be aware of if you want a good SWOT: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Information shared by stakeholders within a SWOT analysis should never be used to play the blame game, but it should be a basis for continuous improvement&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	When conducting the weaknesses, never blame the others for faults or shortcoming, because being honest is essential&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	SWOT’s data can be collected live depending on the resources and constraints that exists&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	It may be useful to weight the experienced stakeholders’ evaluation of the SWOT’s&lt;br /&gt;
These are some points that may be good to keep in the back of the head, when going through SWOT.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Limitations and critiques of SWOT=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not doubt that SWOT is a very strong tool when carried out right, it can provide valuable knowledge about both customer preferences and competitors intents, and nevertheless where the possible opportunities to grow are. There are also some critiques of SWOT, such as: &lt;br /&gt;
* There are no prioritization of the identified factors and it seems like it was hard to meaningfully compare the importance of one SWOT to another&lt;br /&gt;
* No figuring of costs and benefits or how to use them to achieve their objectives&lt;br /&gt;
* Sometimes it can be hazy on what is external and internal &lt;br /&gt;
And, some limitations about SWOT:&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not help determine the costs and benefits of alternative performance solutions&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not rank the factors according to their criticality&lt;br /&gt;
* It provides minimal information regarding the degree to which an organization or work team possess influence over the factors that have been identified. &lt;br /&gt;
Despite all these, it is possibly to enhance SWOT to its further usability by considering 2 factors&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Approximations of the degree which an organization can control over each factor &lt;br /&gt;
2.	Estimate the costs and benefits of the factors. &lt;br /&gt;
And turn them into questions for better decision, by asking: &lt;br /&gt;
* How much control does the organization have over each SWOT factor?&lt;br /&gt;
* How much does each SWOT factor cost or benefit the organization? &lt;br /&gt;
By using the above two questions in SWOT, it will further enhance SWOTs usability&lt;br /&gt;
(1)(2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article has served its purpose, to introduce you to the tool SWOT, where the article has gone through the main points of SWOT, but have only scratched the surface. If you want to research more about SWOT, you should be more than welcome to do so, but this article has given you a good starting point. SWOT is an amazing tool to use in various areas or projects, does not matter if you want to use it for personal or professional purpose. Although, SWOT is a very widely used tool, it does have its own flaws and limitations, but it is a tool which has been used numerous times all over again worldwide, in all kinds of industries and professionals. Therefore, if you can master the tool and make up for its mentioned shortcomings with the questions that will cover its limitations to a maximum, it will be an incredible tool which is very valuable for your project or business. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reference==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Handbook of Improving Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. https://www.professionalacademy.com/blogs-and-advice/marketing-theories---swot-analysis&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. https://www.projectsmart.co.uk/swot-analysis-in-project-management.php&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. https://www.smartdraw.com/swot-analysis/&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S123368</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68837</id>
		<title>What is SWOT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68837"/>
		<updated>2019-03-01T08:38:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S123368: /* Abstract */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article will be presenting the tool SWOT and the main points of SWOT will be covered alongside with an introduction on how to apply SWOT. Moreover, the strength and weaknesses of this tool will also be presented so it can be taken into consideration when using the tool. SWOT can be applied in many different areas in project management, whether it is business strategy or market research but is especially used within marketing.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;link/title&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Much of the original groundwork for what is known as SWOT today, was already established more than 50 years ago. A man name Kurt Lewin, his landmark posthumous text, called; Field Theory in Social Science, emphasized that an organization’s desires are influenced by different driving forces or enhancers and limitations and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
Many companies when facing a problem whether it is external or internal, by using SWOT they can create a quick overview of what your obstacles you need to overcome and what chances there are to take.&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is four initials standing for four different elements, where the elements are used to identify different perspectives of consequences. They each stands for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats. The first two factors, Strengths and Weaknesses are factors for the internal, typically when you are inside a company, you will look within to see what kind of Strengths you have and what kind of Weaknesses you have. Then there are Opportunities and Threats, which are external factors, so you look from internal to external. Opportunities help to identify chances there are to grow, expand and even more potential of a blue ocean and Threats are what kind of competitors are there, restrains, regulations. &lt;br /&gt;
More details about this subject will be seen down below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A brief history of SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier it was mentioned that the original groundwork was laid by Lewin, but around the same time there were two professors from Harvard, George Albert Smith Jr. and C. Roland Christensen, who also were interested in the related issue about identifying the extent of the correlation of the organization’s strategy and its competitive environment. Therefore, they instructed their students to address if a company took into account the requirements of a competitive environments. Around a decade later another professor from the same university wanted to see the already by then named SWOT, if it could be used to explore the ways in which competitive thinking influences business strategies. (2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction to SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is a strategic analytical tool, for assessing strengths and weaknesses of a business, and also for analyzing opportunities available to the business as well as threats faced by the business. SWOT can also be used for personal purposes or when managing a project. &lt;br /&gt;
As mentioned S.W.O.T are initials to different words, each letter stands for something different, with each one of them having their very own purpose, where they together create a very strong foundation for an analysis, whatever the purpose is for. SWOT analysis is processed by a group of stakeholders, where they: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Identify internal and external obstacles and enhancers of performance&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Analyse those factors, which are basted on estimates of their contribution to the net value and how much they are controllable&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. To decide what further or future actions to take regarding those factors &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what do they stand for? (1): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* S – Strengths – Refers to internal competencies, valuables resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* W - Weaknesses – Refers to internal inhibitors of the competencies, resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* O - Opportunities – Refers to external enhancer of performance, which can be pursued or used&lt;br /&gt;
* T - Threats – An external inhibitor of performance that has the potential to reduce accomplishments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now that we know what SWOT stands for, but how does one go around about them? There are some questions to get it started (3). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Strengths: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we best at?&lt;br /&gt;
* What intellectual property do we own that can help us with this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What specific skills does the current workforce have that can contribute to this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What financial resources do we have for reaching this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances do we have?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our bargaining power with both suppliers and intermediaries?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weaknesses: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we worst at doing?&lt;br /&gt;
* Is our intellectual property outdated?&lt;br /&gt;
* What training does our workforce lack?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our financial position?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances should we have, but don’t?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Opportunity: &lt;br /&gt;
* What changes in the external environment can we exploit?&lt;br /&gt;
* What weaknesses in our competitors can we use to our advantage?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new technology might become available to us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new markets might be opening to us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Threats:&lt;br /&gt;
* What might our competitors be able to do to hurt us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new legislation might damage our interests?&lt;br /&gt;
* What social changes might threaten us?&lt;br /&gt;
* How will the economic cycle affect us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Naturally, there are a lot more questions that can be asked, but these questions for each of the elements, are good starting points. These questions will help you get started on doing the SWOT. Remember, it is always a good idea to do SWOT in the early stages, because it gives you a detailed overview and gives you information, which you can use for your later processes in decision making and planning.(3)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Visually the SWOT can be shown as this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SWOTKL.png‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 4x4 Matrix(1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How to conduct SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
There are no doubt a couple of ways to conduct SWOT, the one which is more of a practical method, a guide on how to fill in the SWOT (5), may be a good place to start. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Determine the object: Which means to decide on a key project or a strategy, where you want to analyse. Write the name of it on the top of a page.&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Draw the layout: Draw a very large square box and then divide it into four smaller boxes&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Put name inside each of the boxes on the top: The top left box write; Strengths, the one beside write; Weaknesses. The box under Weaknesses, write Threats and the last one Opportunity, it should look like the figure earlier (Figure). If you wish a more detailed layout, you can add a smaller box that outlines Strengths and Weaknesses as “Internal” and Opportunities and Threats as “External”, and “Helpful” for Strengths and Opportunities, where Weaknesses and Threats will have a “Harmful” outline. &lt;br /&gt;
4.	Add the factors: Add the factors that affects the project in the different boxes.&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Draw conclusions: Decide if the project is a go or a no-go based on the negative and positive relative. Maybe you are already on a project, but want to see how the situation is, then you need to decide what to do about the information you got out of SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the Myriad guideline (1), there exist a way to conduct SWOT, in a bit of a different manner. &lt;br /&gt;
1.	Recruiting stakeholders: This phase’s idea is simply to try to include your stakeholders. According to the book; Exploring Corporate Strategy by Gerry Johnson, Kevan Scholes and Richard Whittington, you can map your stakeholders according to their interest in a project. If you google “Power-interest matrix”, you can see how you should approach your stakeholders in relative to “Interest” and “Power”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Convening the focus group: This step is to call in the stakeholders, most optimal from 8-48, and explain to them what the SWOT is, and how this little workshop is going to work. The first step is to divide the stakeholders into smaller group, where the idea is to get a well-rounded SWOT, where the stakeholders also can agree on the factors. Of course, the preparations are supposed to be made beforehand, such as already made SWOT figures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Identifying and categorizing SWOTs: Now when the stakeholders are in the groups, they should start to work on the SWOT.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Analyzing SWOTs: (6) In “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2, by Ryan Watkin and Doug Leigh (p.129), there is a figure showing, on how they are analyzing the SWOT factors within a Construction Company. Similar should be done. Hereafter, two additional questions should be asked: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor internally or externally controlled?&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor an enhancer or an inhibitor of performance? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where after you put the factors for Strengths, Weaknesses, Threats according to in “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2, by Ryan Watkin and Doug Leigh (p.131), to rank with numbers from 1-5 how much it is under your control and for enhancers and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Synthesizing SWOTs: After the previous step, now the data can be collected, and the data can be shown visually, there is an example in the “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2, by Ryan Watkin and Doug Leigh (p.134, 135).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.	Interpreting findings and deliberating action: Now it is the time to decide upon, which and how to act upon the findings. There are a few actions to take according to what the factors are. Monitor: The factors which are neither enhancer nor inhibitors. Mitigate Threats and Exploit Opportunities: Actions are to be taken, if it is seen that there are threats that will hinder the project, likewise with opportunities, it is supposed to be exploited if it will add value. Lastly, Confront Weaknesses and Leverage Strengths: Because these factors are internal, it is easier to control them, therefore strengths should be leveraged to help achieve desired results and weaknesses should be confronted. &lt;br /&gt;
As you can see the latter option is more wholesome and no doubt more detailed, depending your situation on using SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
Remember these guidelines are only one of the many guidelines.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== When to use SWOT == &lt;br /&gt;
Here are just a few to show when it is applicable to use SWOT, and these mentioned components are also included in something called Human Performance Technology (HPT), which can deepen your understanding on SWOT, but it is not necessary (4).&lt;br /&gt;
1.	In performance analysis &lt;br /&gt;
When identifying the degree to what internal practices and external environmental influences impact how results are currently being accomplished within an organization &lt;br /&gt;
2.	In cause analysis&lt;br /&gt;
When finding what practices should be continued or even expanded in the longer terms, as well as those that should be discontinued or replaced by other methods or tools. &lt;br /&gt;
3.	In strategic planning&lt;br /&gt;
When in strategic planning and needs assessment for identifying the factors that contribute to or detract from organizational effectiveness &lt;br /&gt;
4.	In evaluation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When monitoring the internal and external environment of a program for change over time, for tracking new SWOTs as they emerge, and for documenting for previously existing SWOTs as they become less influential on a program&lt;br /&gt;
Besides these quite general categories within HPT practice, SWOT can also be a great to use within (1): &lt;br /&gt;
* Appreciative inquiry – To clarify the organization’s strengths and opportunities &lt;br /&gt;
* Benchmarking – To identify possible opportunities and threats&lt;br /&gt;
* Industry analysis – For contextualizing opportunities existing in the market&lt;br /&gt;
* Situation analysis – For evaluating possible trends or ongoing trends in the markets, costs and competition and competitors&lt;br /&gt;
* Scenario planning – For considering possible and preferred long-term scenarios&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, these are the mentioned area where SWOT can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Critical success factors =&lt;br /&gt;
There is always some critical success factor, when using a tool and SWOT is not excluded (1). Here are a couple of points to be aware of if you want a good SWOT: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Information shared by stakeholders within a SWOT analysis should never be used to play the blame game, but it should be a basis for continuous improvement&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	When conducting the weaknesses, never blame the others for faults or shortcoming, because being honest is essential&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	SWOT’s data can be collected live depending on the resources and constraints that exists&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	It may be useful to weight the experienced stakeholders’ evaluation of the SWOT’s&lt;br /&gt;
These are some points that may be good to keep in the back of the head, when going through SWOT.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Limitations and critiques of SWOT=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not doubt that SWOT is a very strong tool when carried out right, it can provide valuable knowledge about both customer preferences and competitors intents, and nevertheless where the possible opportunities to grow are. There are also some critiques of SWOT, such as: &lt;br /&gt;
* There are no prioritization of the identified factors and it seems like it was hard to meaningfully compare the importance of one SWOT to another&lt;br /&gt;
* No figuring of costs and benefits or how to use them to achieve their objectives&lt;br /&gt;
* Sometimes it can be hazy on what is external and internal &lt;br /&gt;
And, some limitations about SWOT:&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not help determine the costs and benefits of alternative performance solutions&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not rank the factors according to their criticality&lt;br /&gt;
* It provides minimal information regarding the degree to which an organization or work team possess influence over the factors that have been identified. &lt;br /&gt;
Despite all these, it is possibly to enhance SWOT to its further usability by considering 2 factors&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Approximations of the degree which an organization can control over each factor &lt;br /&gt;
2.	Estimate the costs and benefits of the factors. &lt;br /&gt;
And turn them into questions for better decision, by asking: &lt;br /&gt;
* How much control does the organization have over each SWOT factor?&lt;br /&gt;
* How much does each SWOT factor cost or benefit the organization? &lt;br /&gt;
By using the above two questions in SWOT, it will further enhance SWOTs usability&lt;br /&gt;
(1)(2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article has served its purpose, to introduce you to the tool SWOT, where the article has gone through the main points of SWOT, but have only scratched the surface. If you want to research more about SWOT, you should be more than welcome to do so, but this article has given you a good starting point. SWOT is an amazing tool to use in various areas or projects, does not matter if you want to use it for personal or professional purpose. Although, SWOT is a very widely used tool, it does have its own flaws and limitations, but it is a tool which has been used numerous times all over again worldwide, in all kinds of industries and professionals. Therefore, if you can master the tool and make up for its mentioned shortcomings with the questions that will cover its limitations to a maximum, it will be an incredible tool which is very valuable for your project or business. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reference==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Handbook of Improving Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. https://www.professionalacademy.com/blogs-and-advice/marketing-theories---swot-analysis&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. https://www.projectsmart.co.uk/swot-analysis-in-project-management.php&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. https://www.smartdraw.com/swot-analysis/&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S123368</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68836</id>
		<title>What is SWOT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68836"/>
		<updated>2019-03-01T08:37:18Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S123368: /* Annotated bibliography */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article will be presenting the tool SWOT and the main points of SWOT will be covered alongside with an introduction on how to apply SWOT. Moreover, the strength and weaknesses of this tool will also be presented so it can be taken into consideration when using the tool. SWOT can be applied in many different areas in project management, whether it is business strategy or market research but is especially used within marketing. (1)&lt;br /&gt;
Much of the original groundwork for what is known as SWOT today, was already established more than 50 years ago. A man name Kurt Lewin, his landmark posthumous text, called; Field Theory in Social Science, emphasized that an organization’s desires are influenced by different driving forces or enhancers and limitations and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
Many companies when facing a problem whether it is external or internal, by using SWOT they can create a quick overview of what your obstacles you need to overcome and what chances there are to take.&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is four initials standing for four different elements, where the elements are used to identify different perspectives of consequences. They each stands for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats. The first two factors, Strengths and Weaknesses are factors for the internal, typically when you are inside a company, you will look within to see what kind of Strengths you have and what kind of Weaknesses you have. Then there are Opportunities and Threats, which are external factors, so you look from internal to external. Opportunities help to identify chances there are to grow, expand and even more potential of a blue ocean and Threats are what kind of competitors are there, restrains, regulations. &lt;br /&gt;
More details about this subject will be seen down below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A brief history of SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier it was mentioned that the original groundwork was laid by Lewin, but around the same time there were two professors from Harvard, George Albert Smith Jr. and C. Roland Christensen, who also were interested in the related issue about identifying the extent of the correlation of the organization’s strategy and its competitive environment. Therefore, they instructed their students to address if a company took into account the requirements of a competitive environments. Around a decade later another professor from the same university wanted to see the already by then named SWOT, if it could be used to explore the ways in which competitive thinking influences business strategies. (2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction to SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is a strategic analytical tool, for assessing strengths and weaknesses of a business, and also for analyzing opportunities available to the business as well as threats faced by the business. SWOT can also be used for personal purposes or when managing a project. &lt;br /&gt;
As mentioned S.W.O.T are initials to different words, each letter stands for something different, with each one of them having their very own purpose, where they together create a very strong foundation for an analysis, whatever the purpose is for. SWOT analysis is processed by a group of stakeholders, where they: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Identify internal and external obstacles and enhancers of performance&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Analyse those factors, which are basted on estimates of their contribution to the net value and how much they are controllable&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. To decide what further or future actions to take regarding those factors &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what do they stand for? (1): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* S – Strengths – Refers to internal competencies, valuables resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* W - Weaknesses – Refers to internal inhibitors of the competencies, resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* O - Opportunities – Refers to external enhancer of performance, which can be pursued or used&lt;br /&gt;
* T - Threats – An external inhibitor of performance that has the potential to reduce accomplishments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now that we know what SWOT stands for, but how does one go around about them? There are some questions to get it started (3). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Strengths: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we best at?&lt;br /&gt;
* What intellectual property do we own that can help us with this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What specific skills does the current workforce have that can contribute to this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What financial resources do we have for reaching this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances do we have?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our bargaining power with both suppliers and intermediaries?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weaknesses: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we worst at doing?&lt;br /&gt;
* Is our intellectual property outdated?&lt;br /&gt;
* What training does our workforce lack?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our financial position?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances should we have, but don’t?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Opportunity: &lt;br /&gt;
* What changes in the external environment can we exploit?&lt;br /&gt;
* What weaknesses in our competitors can we use to our advantage?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new technology might become available to us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new markets might be opening to us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Threats:&lt;br /&gt;
* What might our competitors be able to do to hurt us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new legislation might damage our interests?&lt;br /&gt;
* What social changes might threaten us?&lt;br /&gt;
* How will the economic cycle affect us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Naturally, there are a lot more questions that can be asked, but these questions for each of the elements, are good starting points. These questions will help you get started on doing the SWOT. Remember, it is always a good idea to do SWOT in the early stages, because it gives you a detailed overview and gives you information, which you can use for your later processes in decision making and planning.(3)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Visually the SWOT can be shown as this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SWOTKL.png‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 4x4 Matrix(1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How to conduct SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
There are no doubt a couple of ways to conduct SWOT, the one which is more of a practical method, a guide on how to fill in the SWOT (5), may be a good place to start. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Determine the object: Which means to decide on a key project or a strategy, where you want to analyse. Write the name of it on the top of a page.&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Draw the layout: Draw a very large square box and then divide it into four smaller boxes&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Put name inside each of the boxes on the top: The top left box write; Strengths, the one beside write; Weaknesses. The box under Weaknesses, write Threats and the last one Opportunity, it should look like the figure earlier (Figure). If you wish a more detailed layout, you can add a smaller box that outlines Strengths and Weaknesses as “Internal” and Opportunities and Threats as “External”, and “Helpful” for Strengths and Opportunities, where Weaknesses and Threats will have a “Harmful” outline. &lt;br /&gt;
4.	Add the factors: Add the factors that affects the project in the different boxes.&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Draw conclusions: Decide if the project is a go or a no-go based on the negative and positive relative. Maybe you are already on a project, but want to see how the situation is, then you need to decide what to do about the information you got out of SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the Myriad guideline (1), there exist a way to conduct SWOT, in a bit of a different manner. &lt;br /&gt;
1.	Recruiting stakeholders: This phase’s idea is simply to try to include your stakeholders. According to the book; Exploring Corporate Strategy by Gerry Johnson, Kevan Scholes and Richard Whittington, you can map your stakeholders according to their interest in a project. If you google “Power-interest matrix”, you can see how you should approach your stakeholders in relative to “Interest” and “Power”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Convening the focus group: This step is to call in the stakeholders, most optimal from 8-48, and explain to them what the SWOT is, and how this little workshop is going to work. The first step is to divide the stakeholders into smaller group, where the idea is to get a well-rounded SWOT, where the stakeholders also can agree on the factors. Of course, the preparations are supposed to be made beforehand, such as already made SWOT figures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Identifying and categorizing SWOTs: Now when the stakeholders are in the groups, they should start to work on the SWOT.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Analyzing SWOTs: (6) In “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2, by Ryan Watkin and Doug Leigh (p.129), there is a figure showing, on how they are analyzing the SWOT factors within a Construction Company. Similar should be done. Hereafter, two additional questions should be asked: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor internally or externally controlled?&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor an enhancer or an inhibitor of performance? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where after you put the factors for Strengths, Weaknesses, Threats according to in “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2, by Ryan Watkin and Doug Leigh (p.131), to rank with numbers from 1-5 how much it is under your control and for enhancers and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Synthesizing SWOTs: After the previous step, now the data can be collected, and the data can be shown visually, there is an example in the “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2, by Ryan Watkin and Doug Leigh (p.134, 135).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.	Interpreting findings and deliberating action: Now it is the time to decide upon, which and how to act upon the findings. There are a few actions to take according to what the factors are. Monitor: The factors which are neither enhancer nor inhibitors. Mitigate Threats and Exploit Opportunities: Actions are to be taken, if it is seen that there are threats that will hinder the project, likewise with opportunities, it is supposed to be exploited if it will add value. Lastly, Confront Weaknesses and Leverage Strengths: Because these factors are internal, it is easier to control them, therefore strengths should be leveraged to help achieve desired results and weaknesses should be confronted. &lt;br /&gt;
As you can see the latter option is more wholesome and no doubt more detailed, depending your situation on using SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
Remember these guidelines are only one of the many guidelines.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== When to use SWOT == &lt;br /&gt;
Here are just a few to show when it is applicable to use SWOT, and these mentioned components are also included in something called Human Performance Technology (HPT), which can deepen your understanding on SWOT, but it is not necessary (4).&lt;br /&gt;
1.	In performance analysis &lt;br /&gt;
When identifying the degree to what internal practices and external environmental influences impact how results are currently being accomplished within an organization &lt;br /&gt;
2.	In cause analysis&lt;br /&gt;
When finding what practices should be continued or even expanded in the longer terms, as well as those that should be discontinued or replaced by other methods or tools. &lt;br /&gt;
3.	In strategic planning&lt;br /&gt;
When in strategic planning and needs assessment for identifying the factors that contribute to or detract from organizational effectiveness &lt;br /&gt;
4.	In evaluation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When monitoring the internal and external environment of a program for change over time, for tracking new SWOTs as they emerge, and for documenting for previously existing SWOTs as they become less influential on a program&lt;br /&gt;
Besides these quite general categories within HPT practice, SWOT can also be a great to use within (1): &lt;br /&gt;
* Appreciative inquiry – To clarify the organization’s strengths and opportunities &lt;br /&gt;
* Benchmarking – To identify possible opportunities and threats&lt;br /&gt;
* Industry analysis – For contextualizing opportunities existing in the market&lt;br /&gt;
* Situation analysis – For evaluating possible trends or ongoing trends in the markets, costs and competition and competitors&lt;br /&gt;
* Scenario planning – For considering possible and preferred long-term scenarios&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, these are the mentioned area where SWOT can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Critical success factors =&lt;br /&gt;
There is always some critical success factor, when using a tool and SWOT is not excluded (1). Here are a couple of points to be aware of if you want a good SWOT: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Information shared by stakeholders within a SWOT analysis should never be used to play the blame game, but it should be a basis for continuous improvement&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	When conducting the weaknesses, never blame the others for faults or shortcoming, because being honest is essential&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	SWOT’s data can be collected live depending on the resources and constraints that exists&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	It may be useful to weight the experienced stakeholders’ evaluation of the SWOT’s&lt;br /&gt;
These are some points that may be good to keep in the back of the head, when going through SWOT.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Limitations and critiques of SWOT=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not doubt that SWOT is a very strong tool when carried out right, it can provide valuable knowledge about both customer preferences and competitors intents, and nevertheless where the possible opportunities to grow are. There are also some critiques of SWOT, such as: &lt;br /&gt;
* There are no prioritization of the identified factors and it seems like it was hard to meaningfully compare the importance of one SWOT to another&lt;br /&gt;
* No figuring of costs and benefits or how to use them to achieve their objectives&lt;br /&gt;
* Sometimes it can be hazy on what is external and internal &lt;br /&gt;
And, some limitations about SWOT:&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not help determine the costs and benefits of alternative performance solutions&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not rank the factors according to their criticality&lt;br /&gt;
* It provides minimal information regarding the degree to which an organization or work team possess influence over the factors that have been identified. &lt;br /&gt;
Despite all these, it is possibly to enhance SWOT to its further usability by considering 2 factors&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Approximations of the degree which an organization can control over each factor &lt;br /&gt;
2.	Estimate the costs and benefits of the factors. &lt;br /&gt;
And turn them into questions for better decision, by asking: &lt;br /&gt;
* How much control does the organization have over each SWOT factor?&lt;br /&gt;
* How much does each SWOT factor cost or benefit the organization? &lt;br /&gt;
By using the above two questions in SWOT, it will further enhance SWOTs usability&lt;br /&gt;
(1)(2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article has served its purpose, to introduce you to the tool SWOT, where the article has gone through the main points of SWOT, but have only scratched the surface. If you want to research more about SWOT, you should be more than welcome to do so, but this article has given you a good starting point. SWOT is an amazing tool to use in various areas or projects, does not matter if you want to use it for personal or professional purpose. Although, SWOT is a very widely used tool, it does have its own flaws and limitations, but it is a tool which has been used numerous times all over again worldwide, in all kinds of industries and professionals. Therefore, if you can master the tool and make up for its mentioned shortcomings with the questions that will cover its limitations to a maximum, it will be an incredible tool which is very valuable for your project or business. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reference==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Handbook of Improving Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. https://www.professionalacademy.com/blogs-and-advice/marketing-theories---swot-analysis&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. https://www.projectsmart.co.uk/swot-analysis-in-project-management.php&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. https://www.smartdraw.com/swot-analysis/&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S123368</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68835</id>
		<title>What is SWOT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68835"/>
		<updated>2019-03-01T08:36:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S123368: /* When to use SWOT */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article will be presenting the tool SWOT and the main points of SWOT will be covered alongside with an introduction on how to apply SWOT. Moreover, the strength and weaknesses of this tool will also be presented so it can be taken into consideration when using the tool. SWOT can be applied in many different areas in project management, whether it is business strategy or market research but is especially used within marketing. (1)&lt;br /&gt;
Much of the original groundwork for what is known as SWOT today, was already established more than 50 years ago. A man name Kurt Lewin, his landmark posthumous text, called; Field Theory in Social Science, emphasized that an organization’s desires are influenced by different driving forces or enhancers and limitations and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
Many companies when facing a problem whether it is external or internal, by using SWOT they can create a quick overview of what your obstacles you need to overcome and what chances there are to take.&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is four initials standing for four different elements, where the elements are used to identify different perspectives of consequences. They each stands for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats. The first two factors, Strengths and Weaknesses are factors for the internal, typically when you are inside a company, you will look within to see what kind of Strengths you have and what kind of Weaknesses you have. Then there are Opportunities and Threats, which are external factors, so you look from internal to external. Opportunities help to identify chances there are to grow, expand and even more potential of a blue ocean and Threats are what kind of competitors are there, restrains, regulations. &lt;br /&gt;
More details about this subject will be seen down below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A brief history of SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier it was mentioned that the original groundwork was laid by Lewin, but around the same time there were two professors from Harvard, George Albert Smith Jr. and C. Roland Christensen, who also were interested in the related issue about identifying the extent of the correlation of the organization’s strategy and its competitive environment. Therefore, they instructed their students to address if a company took into account the requirements of a competitive environments. Around a decade later another professor from the same university wanted to see the already by then named SWOT, if it could be used to explore the ways in which competitive thinking influences business strategies. (2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction to SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is a strategic analytical tool, for assessing strengths and weaknesses of a business, and also for analyzing opportunities available to the business as well as threats faced by the business. SWOT can also be used for personal purposes or when managing a project. &lt;br /&gt;
As mentioned S.W.O.T are initials to different words, each letter stands for something different, with each one of them having their very own purpose, where they together create a very strong foundation for an analysis, whatever the purpose is for. SWOT analysis is processed by a group of stakeholders, where they: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Identify internal and external obstacles and enhancers of performance&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Analyse those factors, which are basted on estimates of their contribution to the net value and how much they are controllable&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. To decide what further or future actions to take regarding those factors &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what do they stand for? (1): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* S – Strengths – Refers to internal competencies, valuables resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* W - Weaknesses – Refers to internal inhibitors of the competencies, resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* O - Opportunities – Refers to external enhancer of performance, which can be pursued or used&lt;br /&gt;
* T - Threats – An external inhibitor of performance that has the potential to reduce accomplishments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now that we know what SWOT stands for, but how does one go around about them? There are some questions to get it started (3). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Strengths: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we best at?&lt;br /&gt;
* What intellectual property do we own that can help us with this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What specific skills does the current workforce have that can contribute to this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What financial resources do we have for reaching this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances do we have?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our bargaining power with both suppliers and intermediaries?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weaknesses: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we worst at doing?&lt;br /&gt;
* Is our intellectual property outdated?&lt;br /&gt;
* What training does our workforce lack?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our financial position?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances should we have, but don’t?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Opportunity: &lt;br /&gt;
* What changes in the external environment can we exploit?&lt;br /&gt;
* What weaknesses in our competitors can we use to our advantage?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new technology might become available to us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new markets might be opening to us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Threats:&lt;br /&gt;
* What might our competitors be able to do to hurt us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new legislation might damage our interests?&lt;br /&gt;
* What social changes might threaten us?&lt;br /&gt;
* How will the economic cycle affect us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Naturally, there are a lot more questions that can be asked, but these questions for each of the elements, are good starting points. These questions will help you get started on doing the SWOT. Remember, it is always a good idea to do SWOT in the early stages, because it gives you a detailed overview and gives you information, which you can use for your later processes in decision making and planning.(3)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Visually the SWOT can be shown as this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SWOTKL.png‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 4x4 Matrix(1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How to conduct SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
There are no doubt a couple of ways to conduct SWOT, the one which is more of a practical method, a guide on how to fill in the SWOT (5), may be a good place to start. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Determine the object: Which means to decide on a key project or a strategy, where you want to analyse. Write the name of it on the top of a page.&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Draw the layout: Draw a very large square box and then divide it into four smaller boxes&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Put name inside each of the boxes on the top: The top left box write; Strengths, the one beside write; Weaknesses. The box under Weaknesses, write Threats and the last one Opportunity, it should look like the figure earlier (Figure). If you wish a more detailed layout, you can add a smaller box that outlines Strengths and Weaknesses as “Internal” and Opportunities and Threats as “External”, and “Helpful” for Strengths and Opportunities, where Weaknesses and Threats will have a “Harmful” outline. &lt;br /&gt;
4.	Add the factors: Add the factors that affects the project in the different boxes.&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Draw conclusions: Decide if the project is a go or a no-go based on the negative and positive relative. Maybe you are already on a project, but want to see how the situation is, then you need to decide what to do about the information you got out of SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the Myriad guideline (1), there exist a way to conduct SWOT, in a bit of a different manner. &lt;br /&gt;
1.	Recruiting stakeholders: This phase’s idea is simply to try to include your stakeholders. According to the book; Exploring Corporate Strategy by Gerry Johnson, Kevan Scholes and Richard Whittington, you can map your stakeholders according to their interest in a project. If you google “Power-interest matrix”, you can see how you should approach your stakeholders in relative to “Interest” and “Power”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Convening the focus group: This step is to call in the stakeholders, most optimal from 8-48, and explain to them what the SWOT is, and how this little workshop is going to work. The first step is to divide the stakeholders into smaller group, where the idea is to get a well-rounded SWOT, where the stakeholders also can agree on the factors. Of course, the preparations are supposed to be made beforehand, such as already made SWOT figures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Identifying and categorizing SWOTs: Now when the stakeholders are in the groups, they should start to work on the SWOT.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Analyzing SWOTs: (6) In “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2, by Ryan Watkin and Doug Leigh (p.129), there is a figure showing, on how they are analyzing the SWOT factors within a Construction Company. Similar should be done. Hereafter, two additional questions should be asked: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor internally or externally controlled?&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor an enhancer or an inhibitor of performance? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where after you put the factors for Strengths, Weaknesses, Threats according to in “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2, by Ryan Watkin and Doug Leigh (p.131), to rank with numbers from 1-5 how much it is under your control and for enhancers and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Synthesizing SWOTs: After the previous step, now the data can be collected, and the data can be shown visually, there is an example in the “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2, by Ryan Watkin and Doug Leigh (p.134, 135).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.	Interpreting findings and deliberating action: Now it is the time to decide upon, which and how to act upon the findings. There are a few actions to take according to what the factors are. Monitor: The factors which are neither enhancer nor inhibitors. Mitigate Threats and Exploit Opportunities: Actions are to be taken, if it is seen that there are threats that will hinder the project, likewise with opportunities, it is supposed to be exploited if it will add value. Lastly, Confront Weaknesses and Leverage Strengths: Because these factors are internal, it is easier to control them, therefore strengths should be leveraged to help achieve desired results and weaknesses should be confronted. &lt;br /&gt;
As you can see the latter option is more wholesome and no doubt more detailed, depending your situation on using SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
Remember these guidelines are only one of the many guidelines.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== When to use SWOT == &lt;br /&gt;
Here are just a few to show when it is applicable to use SWOT, and these mentioned components are also included in something called Human Performance Technology (HPT), which can deepen your understanding on SWOT, but it is not necessary (4).&lt;br /&gt;
1.	In performance analysis &lt;br /&gt;
When identifying the degree to what internal practices and external environmental influences impact how results are currently being accomplished within an organization &lt;br /&gt;
2.	In cause analysis&lt;br /&gt;
When finding what practices should be continued or even expanded in the longer terms, as well as those that should be discontinued or replaced by other methods or tools. &lt;br /&gt;
3.	In strategic planning&lt;br /&gt;
When in strategic planning and needs assessment for identifying the factors that contribute to or detract from organizational effectiveness &lt;br /&gt;
4.	In evaluation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When monitoring the internal and external environment of a program for change over time, for tracking new SWOTs as they emerge, and for documenting for previously existing SWOTs as they become less influential on a program&lt;br /&gt;
Besides these quite general categories within HPT practice, SWOT can also be a great to use within (1): &lt;br /&gt;
* Appreciative inquiry – To clarify the organization’s strengths and opportunities &lt;br /&gt;
* Benchmarking – To identify possible opportunities and threats&lt;br /&gt;
* Industry analysis – For contextualizing opportunities existing in the market&lt;br /&gt;
* Situation analysis – For evaluating possible trends or ongoing trends in the markets, costs and competition and competitors&lt;br /&gt;
* Scenario planning – For considering possible and preferred long-term scenarios&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, these are the mentioned area where SWOT can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Critical success factors =&lt;br /&gt;
There is always some critical success factor, when using a tool and SWOT is not excluded (1). Here are a couple of points to be aware of if you want a good SWOT: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Information shared by stakeholders within a SWOT analysis should never be used to play the blame game, but it should be a basis for continuous improvement&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	When conducting the weaknesses, never blame the others for faults or shortcoming, because being honest is essential&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	SWOT’s data can be collected live depending on the resources and constraints that exists&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	It may be useful to weight the experienced stakeholders’ evaluation of the SWOT’s&lt;br /&gt;
These are some points that may be good to keep in the back of the head, when going through SWOT.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Limitations and critiques of SWOT=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not doubt that SWOT is a very strong tool when carried out right, it can provide valuable knowledge about both customer preferences and competitors intents, and nevertheless where the possible opportunities to grow are. There are also some critiques of SWOT, such as: &lt;br /&gt;
* There are no prioritization of the identified factors and it seems like it was hard to meaningfully compare the importance of one SWOT to another&lt;br /&gt;
* No figuring of costs and benefits or how to use them to achieve their objectives&lt;br /&gt;
* Sometimes it can be hazy on what is external and internal &lt;br /&gt;
And, some limitations about SWOT:&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not help determine the costs and benefits of alternative performance solutions&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not rank the factors according to their criticality&lt;br /&gt;
* It provides minimal information regarding the degree to which an organization or work team possess influence over the factors that have been identified. &lt;br /&gt;
Despite all these, it is possibly to enhance SWOT to its further usability by considering 2 factors&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Approximations of the degree which an organization can control over each factor &lt;br /&gt;
2.	Estimate the costs and benefits of the factors. &lt;br /&gt;
And turn them into questions for better decision, by asking: &lt;br /&gt;
* How much control does the organization have over each SWOT factor?&lt;br /&gt;
* How much does each SWOT factor cost or benefit the organization? &lt;br /&gt;
By using the above two questions in SWOT, it will further enhance SWOTs usability&lt;br /&gt;
(1)(2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article has served its purpose, to introduce you to the tool SWOT, where the article has gone through the main points of SWOT, but have only scratched the surface. If you want to research more about SWOT, you should be more than welcome to do so, but this article has given you a good starting point. SWOT is an amazing tool to use in various areas or projects, does not matter if you want to use it for personal or professional purpose. Although, SWOT is a very widely used tool, it does have its own flaws and limitations, but it is a tool which has been used numerous times all over again worldwide, in all kinds of industries and professionals. Therefore, if you can master the tool and make up for its mentioned shortcomings with the questions that will cover its limitations to a maximum, it will be an incredible tool which is very valuable for your project or business. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Source:&lt;br /&gt;
1. https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Handbook of Improving Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. https://www.professionalacademy.com/blogs-and-advice/marketing-theories---swot-analysis&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. https://www.projectsmart.co.uk/swot-analysis-in-project-management.php&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. https://www.smartdraw.com/swot-analysis/&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S123368</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68834</id>
		<title>What is SWOT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68834"/>
		<updated>2019-03-01T08:36:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S123368: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article will be presenting the tool SWOT and the main points of SWOT will be covered alongside with an introduction on how to apply SWOT. Moreover, the strength and weaknesses of this tool will also be presented so it can be taken into consideration when using the tool. SWOT can be applied in many different areas in project management, whether it is business strategy or market research but is especially used within marketing. (1)&lt;br /&gt;
Much of the original groundwork for what is known as SWOT today, was already established more than 50 years ago. A man name Kurt Lewin, his landmark posthumous text, called; Field Theory in Social Science, emphasized that an organization’s desires are influenced by different driving forces or enhancers and limitations and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
Many companies when facing a problem whether it is external or internal, by using SWOT they can create a quick overview of what your obstacles you need to overcome and what chances there are to take.&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is four initials standing for four different elements, where the elements are used to identify different perspectives of consequences. They each stands for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats. The first two factors, Strengths and Weaknesses are factors for the internal, typically when you are inside a company, you will look within to see what kind of Strengths you have and what kind of Weaknesses you have. Then there are Opportunities and Threats, which are external factors, so you look from internal to external. Opportunities help to identify chances there are to grow, expand and even more potential of a blue ocean and Threats are what kind of competitors are there, restrains, regulations. &lt;br /&gt;
More details about this subject will be seen down below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A brief history of SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier it was mentioned that the original groundwork was laid by Lewin, but around the same time there were two professors from Harvard, George Albert Smith Jr. and C. Roland Christensen, who also were interested in the related issue about identifying the extent of the correlation of the organization’s strategy and its competitive environment. Therefore, they instructed their students to address if a company took into account the requirements of a competitive environments. Around a decade later another professor from the same university wanted to see the already by then named SWOT, if it could be used to explore the ways in which competitive thinking influences business strategies. (2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction to SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is a strategic analytical tool, for assessing strengths and weaknesses of a business, and also for analyzing opportunities available to the business as well as threats faced by the business. SWOT can also be used for personal purposes or when managing a project. &lt;br /&gt;
As mentioned S.W.O.T are initials to different words, each letter stands for something different, with each one of them having their very own purpose, where they together create a very strong foundation for an analysis, whatever the purpose is for. SWOT analysis is processed by a group of stakeholders, where they: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Identify internal and external obstacles and enhancers of performance&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Analyse those factors, which are basted on estimates of their contribution to the net value and how much they are controllable&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. To decide what further or future actions to take regarding those factors &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what do they stand for? (1): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* S – Strengths – Refers to internal competencies, valuables resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* W - Weaknesses – Refers to internal inhibitors of the competencies, resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* O - Opportunities – Refers to external enhancer of performance, which can be pursued or used&lt;br /&gt;
* T - Threats – An external inhibitor of performance that has the potential to reduce accomplishments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now that we know what SWOT stands for, but how does one go around about them? There are some questions to get it started (3). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Strengths: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we best at?&lt;br /&gt;
* What intellectual property do we own that can help us with this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What specific skills does the current workforce have that can contribute to this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What financial resources do we have for reaching this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances do we have?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our bargaining power with both suppliers and intermediaries?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weaknesses: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we worst at doing?&lt;br /&gt;
* Is our intellectual property outdated?&lt;br /&gt;
* What training does our workforce lack?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our financial position?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances should we have, but don’t?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Opportunity: &lt;br /&gt;
* What changes in the external environment can we exploit?&lt;br /&gt;
* What weaknesses in our competitors can we use to our advantage?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new technology might become available to us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new markets might be opening to us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Threats:&lt;br /&gt;
* What might our competitors be able to do to hurt us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new legislation might damage our interests?&lt;br /&gt;
* What social changes might threaten us?&lt;br /&gt;
* How will the economic cycle affect us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Naturally, there are a lot more questions that can be asked, but these questions for each of the elements, are good starting points. These questions will help you get started on doing the SWOT. Remember, it is always a good idea to do SWOT in the early stages, because it gives you a detailed overview and gives you information, which you can use for your later processes in decision making and planning.(3)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Visually the SWOT can be shown as this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SWOTKL.png‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 4x4 Matrix(1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How to conduct SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
There are no doubt a couple of ways to conduct SWOT, the one which is more of a practical method, a guide on how to fill in the SWOT (5), may be a good place to start. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Determine the object: Which means to decide on a key project or a strategy, where you want to analyse. Write the name of it on the top of a page.&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Draw the layout: Draw a very large square box and then divide it into four smaller boxes&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Put name inside each of the boxes on the top: The top left box write; Strengths, the one beside write; Weaknesses. The box under Weaknesses, write Threats and the last one Opportunity, it should look like the figure earlier (Figure). If you wish a more detailed layout, you can add a smaller box that outlines Strengths and Weaknesses as “Internal” and Opportunities and Threats as “External”, and “Helpful” for Strengths and Opportunities, where Weaknesses and Threats will have a “Harmful” outline. &lt;br /&gt;
4.	Add the factors: Add the factors that affects the project in the different boxes.&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Draw conclusions: Decide if the project is a go or a no-go based on the negative and positive relative. Maybe you are already on a project, but want to see how the situation is, then you need to decide what to do about the information you got out of SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the Myriad guideline (1), there exist a way to conduct SWOT, in a bit of a different manner. &lt;br /&gt;
1.	Recruiting stakeholders: This phase’s idea is simply to try to include your stakeholders. According to the book; Exploring Corporate Strategy by Gerry Johnson, Kevan Scholes and Richard Whittington, you can map your stakeholders according to their interest in a project. If you google “Power-interest matrix”, you can see how you should approach your stakeholders in relative to “Interest” and “Power”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Convening the focus group: This step is to call in the stakeholders, most optimal from 8-48, and explain to them what the SWOT is, and how this little workshop is going to work. The first step is to divide the stakeholders into smaller group, where the idea is to get a well-rounded SWOT, where the stakeholders also can agree on the factors. Of course, the preparations are supposed to be made beforehand, such as already made SWOT figures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Identifying and categorizing SWOTs: Now when the stakeholders are in the groups, they should start to work on the SWOT.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Analyzing SWOTs: (6) In “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2, by Ryan Watkin and Doug Leigh (p.129), there is a figure showing, on how they are analyzing the SWOT factors within a Construction Company. Similar should be done. Hereafter, two additional questions should be asked: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor internally or externally controlled?&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor an enhancer or an inhibitor of performance? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where after you put the factors for Strengths, Weaknesses, Threats according to in “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2, by Ryan Watkin and Doug Leigh (p.131), to rank with numbers from 1-5 how much it is under your control and for enhancers and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Synthesizing SWOTs: After the previous step, now the data can be collected, and the data can be shown visually, there is an example in the “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2, by Ryan Watkin and Doug Leigh (p.134, 135).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.	Interpreting findings and deliberating action: Now it is the time to decide upon, which and how to act upon the findings. There are a few actions to take according to what the factors are. Monitor: The factors which are neither enhancer nor inhibitors. Mitigate Threats and Exploit Opportunities: Actions are to be taken, if it is seen that there are threats that will hinder the project, likewise with opportunities, it is supposed to be exploited if it will add value. Lastly, Confront Weaknesses and Leverage Strengths: Because these factors are internal, it is easier to control them, therefore strengths should be leveraged to help achieve desired results and weaknesses should be confronted. &lt;br /&gt;
As you can see the latter option is more wholesome and no doubt more detailed, depending your situation on using SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
Remember these guidelines are only one of the many guidelines.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== When to use SWOT == &lt;br /&gt;
Here are just a few to show when it is applicable to use SWOT, and these mentioned components are also included in something called Human Performance Technology (HPT), which can deepen your understanding on SWOT, but it is not necessary (4).&lt;br /&gt;
1.	In performance analysis &lt;br /&gt;
When identifying the degree to what internal practices and external environmental influences impact how results are currently being accomplished within an organization &lt;br /&gt;
2.	In cause analysis&lt;br /&gt;
When finding what practices should be continued or even expanded in the longer terms, as well as those that should be discontinued or replaced by other methods or tools. &lt;br /&gt;
3.	In strategic planning&lt;br /&gt;
When in strategic planning and needs assessment for identifying the factors that contribute to or detract from organizational effectiveness &lt;br /&gt;
4.	In evaluation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When monitoring the internal and external environment of a program for change over time, for tracking new SWOTs as they emerge, and for documenting for previously existing SWOTs as they become less influential on a program&lt;br /&gt;
Besides these quite general categories within HPT practice, SWOT can also be a great to use within (1): &lt;br /&gt;
* Appreciative inquiry –To clarify the organization’s strengths and opportunities &lt;br /&gt;
* Benchmarking – To identify possible opportunities and threats&lt;br /&gt;
* Industry analysis – For contextualizing opportunities existing in the market&lt;br /&gt;
* Situation analysis – For evaluating possible trends or ongoing trends in the markets, costs and competition and competitors&lt;br /&gt;
* Scenario planning – For considering possible and preferred long-term scenarios&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, these are the mentioned area where SWOT can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Critical success factors =&lt;br /&gt;
There is always some critical success factor, when using a tool and SWOT is not excluded (1). Here are a couple of points to be aware of if you want a good SWOT: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Information shared by stakeholders within a SWOT analysis should never be used to play the blame game, but it should be a basis for continuous improvement&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	When conducting the weaknesses, never blame the others for faults or shortcoming, because being honest is essential&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	SWOT’s data can be collected live depending on the resources and constraints that exists&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	It may be useful to weight the experienced stakeholders’ evaluation of the SWOT’s&lt;br /&gt;
These are some points that may be good to keep in the back of the head, when going through SWOT.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Limitations and critiques of SWOT=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not doubt that SWOT is a very strong tool when carried out right, it can provide valuable knowledge about both customer preferences and competitors intents, and nevertheless where the possible opportunities to grow are. There are also some critiques of SWOT, such as: &lt;br /&gt;
* There are no prioritization of the identified factors and it seems like it was hard to meaningfully compare the importance of one SWOT to another&lt;br /&gt;
* No figuring of costs and benefits or how to use them to achieve their objectives&lt;br /&gt;
* Sometimes it can be hazy on what is external and internal &lt;br /&gt;
And, some limitations about SWOT:&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not help determine the costs and benefits of alternative performance solutions&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not rank the factors according to their criticality&lt;br /&gt;
* It provides minimal information regarding the degree to which an organization or work team possess influence over the factors that have been identified. &lt;br /&gt;
Despite all these, it is possibly to enhance SWOT to its further usability by considering 2 factors&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Approximations of the degree which an organization can control over each factor &lt;br /&gt;
2.	Estimate the costs and benefits of the factors. &lt;br /&gt;
And turn them into questions for better decision, by asking: &lt;br /&gt;
* How much control does the organization have over each SWOT factor?&lt;br /&gt;
* How much does each SWOT factor cost or benefit the organization? &lt;br /&gt;
By using the above two questions in SWOT, it will further enhance SWOTs usability&lt;br /&gt;
(1)(2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article has served its purpose, to introduce you to the tool SWOT, where the article has gone through the main points of SWOT, but have only scratched the surface. If you want to research more about SWOT, you should be more than welcome to do so, but this article has given you a good starting point. SWOT is an amazing tool to use in various areas or projects, does not matter if you want to use it for personal or professional purpose. Although, SWOT is a very widely used tool, it does have its own flaws and limitations, but it is a tool which has been used numerous times all over again worldwide, in all kinds of industries and professionals. Therefore, if you can master the tool and make up for its mentioned shortcomings with the questions that will cover its limitations to a maximum, it will be an incredible tool which is very valuable for your project or business. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Source:&lt;br /&gt;
1. https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Handbook of Improving Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. https://www.professionalacademy.com/blogs-and-advice/marketing-theories---swot-analysis&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. https://www.projectsmart.co.uk/swot-analysis-in-project-management.php&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. https://www.smartdraw.com/swot-analysis/&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S123368</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68833</id>
		<title>What is SWOT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68833"/>
		<updated>2019-03-01T08:35:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S123368: /* Critical success factors */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article will be presenting the tool SWOT and the main points of SWOT will be covered alongside with an introduction on how to apply SWOT. Moreover, the strength and weaknesses of this tool will also be presented so it can be taken into consideration when using the tool. SWOT can be applied in many different areas in project management, whether it is business strategy or market research but is especially used within marketing. (1)&lt;br /&gt;
Much of the original groundwork for what is known as SWOT today, was already established more than 50 years ago. A man name Kurt Lewin, his landmark posthumous text, called; Field Theory in Social Science, emphasized that an organization’s desires are influenced by different driving forces or enhancers and limitations and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
Many companies when facing a problem whether it is external or internal, by using SWOT they can create a quick overview of what your obstacles you need to overcome and what chances there are to take.&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is four initials standing for four different elements, where the elements are used to identify different perspectives of consequences. They each stands for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats. The first two factors, Strengths and Weaknesses are factors for the internal, typically when you are inside a company, you will look within to see what kind of Strengths you have and what kind of Weaknesses you have. Then there are Opportunities and Threats, which are external factors, so you look from internal to external. Opportunities help to identify chances there are to grow, expand and even more potential of a blue ocean and Threats are what kind of competitors are there, restrains, regulations. &lt;br /&gt;
More details about this subject will be seen down below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A brief history of SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier it was mentioned that the original groundwork was laid by Lewin, but around the same time there were two professors from Harvard, George Albert Smith Jr. and C. Roland Christensen, who also were interested in the related issue about identifying the extent of the correlation of the organization’s strategy and its competitive environment. Therefore, they instructed their students to address if a company took into account the requirements of a competitive environments. Around a decade later another professor from the same university wanted to see the already by then named SWOT, if it could be used to explore the ways in which competitive thinking influences business strategies. (2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction to SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is a strategic analytical tool, for assessing strengths and weaknesses of a business, and also for analyzing opportunities available to the business as well as threats faced by the business. SWOT can also be used for personal purposes or when managing a project. &lt;br /&gt;
As mentioned S.W.O.T are initials to different words, each letter stands for something different, with each one of them having their very own purpose, where they together create a very strong foundation for an analysis, whatever the purpose is for. SWOT analysis is processed by a group of stakeholders, where they: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Identify internal and external obstacles and enhancers of performance&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Analyse those factors, which are basted on estimates of their contribution to the net value and how much they are controllable&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. To decide what further or future actions to take regarding those factors &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what do they stand for? (1): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* S – Strengths – Refers to internal competencies, valuables resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* W - Weaknesses – Refers to internal inhibitors of the competencies, resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* O - Opportunities – Refers to external enhancer of performance, which can be pursued or used&lt;br /&gt;
* T - Threats – An external inhibitor of performance that has the potential to reduce accomplishments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now that we know what SWOT stands for, but how does one go around about them? There are some questions to get it started (3). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Strengths: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we best at?&lt;br /&gt;
* What intellectual property do we own that can help us with this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What specific skills does the current workforce have that can contribute to this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What financial resources do we have for reaching this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances do we have?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our bargaining power with both suppliers and intermediaries?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weaknesses: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we worst at doing?&lt;br /&gt;
* Is our intellectual property outdated?&lt;br /&gt;
* What training does our workforce lack?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our financial position?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances should we have, but don’t?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Opportunity: &lt;br /&gt;
* What changes in the external environment can we exploit?&lt;br /&gt;
* What weaknesses in our competitors can we use to our advantage?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new technology might become available to us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new markets might be opening to us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Threats:&lt;br /&gt;
* What might our competitors be able to do to hurt us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new legislation might damage our interests?&lt;br /&gt;
* What social changes might threaten us?&lt;br /&gt;
* How will the economic cycle affect us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Naturally, there are a lot more questions that can be asked, but these questions for each of the elements, are good starting points. These questions will help you get started on doing the SWOT. Remember, it is always a good idea to do SWOT in the early stages, because it gives you a detailed overview and gives you information, which you can use for your later processes in decision making and planning.(3)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Visually the SWOT can be shown as this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SWOTKL.png‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 4x4 Matrix(1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
== How to conduct SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
There are no doubt a couple of ways to conduct SWOT, the one which is more of a practical method, a guide on how to fill in the SWOT (5), may be a good place to start. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Determine the object: Which means to decide on a key project or a strategy, where you want to analyse. Write the name of it on the top of a page.&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Draw the layout: Draw a very large square box and then divide it into four smaller boxes&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Put name inside each of the boxes on the top: The top left box write; Strengths, the one beside write; Weaknesses. The box under Weaknesses, write Threats and the last one Opportunity, it should look like the figure earlier (Figure). If you wish a more detailed layout, you can add a smaller box that outlines Strengths and Weaknesses as “Internal” and Opportunities and Threats as “External”, and “Helpful” for Strengths and Opportunities, where Weaknesses and Threats will have a “Harmful” outline. &lt;br /&gt;
4.	Add the factors: Add the factors that affects the project in the different boxes.&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Draw conclusions: Decide if the project is a go or a no-go based on the negative and positive relative. Maybe you are already on a project, but want to see how the situation is, then you need to decide what to do about the information you got out of SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the Myriad guideline (1), there exist a way to conduct SWOT, in a bit of a different manner. &lt;br /&gt;
1.	Recruiting stakeholders: This phase’s idea is simply to try to include your stakeholders. According to the book; Exploring Corporate Strategy by Gerry Johnson, Kevan Scholes and Richard Whittington, you can map your stakeholders according to their interest in a project. If you google “Power-interest matrix”, you can see how you should approach your stakeholders in relative to “Interest” and “Power”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Convening the focus group: This step is to call in the stakeholders, most optimal from 8-48, and explain to them what the SWOT is, and how this little workshop is going to work. The first step is to divide the stakeholders into smaller group, where the idea is to get a well-rounded SWOT, where the stakeholders also can agree on the factors. Of course, the preparations are supposed to be made beforehand, such as already made SWOT figures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Identifying and categorizing SWOTs: Now when the stakeholders are in the groups, they should start to work on the SWOT.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Analyzing SWOTs: (6) In “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2, by Ryan Watkin and Doug Leigh (p.129), there is a figure showing, on how they are analyzing the SWOT factors within a Construction Company. Similar should be done. Hereafter, two additional questions should be asked: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor internally or externally controlled?&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor an enhancer or an inhibitor of performance? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where after you put the factors for Strengths, Weaknesses, Threats according to in “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2, by Ryan Watkin and Doug Leigh (p.131), to rank with numbers from 1-5 how much it is under your control and for enhancers and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Synthesizing SWOTs: After the previous step, now the data can be collected, and the data can be shown visually, there is an example in the “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2, by Ryan Watkin and Doug Leigh (p.134, 135).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.	Interpreting findings and deliberating action: Now it is the time to decide upon, which and how to act upon the findings. There are a few actions to take according to what the factors are. Monitor: The factors which are neither enhancer nor inhibitors. Mitigate Threats and Exploit Opportunities: Actions are to be taken, if it is seen that there are threats that will hinder the project, likewise with opportunities, it is supposed to be exploited if it will add value. Lastly, Confront Weaknesses and Leverage Strengths: Because these factors are internal, it is easier to control them, therefore strengths should be leveraged to help achieve desired results and weaknesses should be confronted. &lt;br /&gt;
As you can see the latter option is more wholesome and no doubt more detailed, depending your situation on using SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
Remember these guidelines are only one of the many guidelines.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== When to use SWOT == &lt;br /&gt;
Here are just a few to show when it is applicable to use SWOT, and these mentioned components are also included in something called Human Performance Technology (HPT), which can deepen your understanding on SWOT, but it is not necessary (4).&lt;br /&gt;
1.	In performance analysis &lt;br /&gt;
When identifying the degree to what internal practices and external environmental influences impact how results are currently being accomplished within an organization &lt;br /&gt;
2.	In cause analysis&lt;br /&gt;
When finding what practices should be continued or even expanded in the longer terms, as well as those that should be discontinued or replaced by other methods or tools. &lt;br /&gt;
3.	In strategic planning&lt;br /&gt;
When in strategic planning and needs assessment for identifying the factors that contribute to or detract from organizational effectiveness &lt;br /&gt;
4.	In evaluation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When monitoring the internal and external environment of a program for change over time, for tracking new SWOTs as they emerge, and for documenting for previously existing SWOTs as they become less influential on a program&lt;br /&gt;
Besides these quite general categories within HPT practice, SWOT can also be a great to use within (1): &lt;br /&gt;
* Appreciative inquiry –To clarify the organization’s strengths and opportunities &lt;br /&gt;
* Benchmarking – To identify possible opportunities and threats&lt;br /&gt;
* Industry analysis – For contextualizing opportunities existing in the market&lt;br /&gt;
* Situation analysis – For evaluating possible trends or ongoing trends in the markets, costs and competition and competitors&lt;br /&gt;
* Scenario planning – For considering possible and preferred long-term scenarios&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, these are the mentioned area where SWOT can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Critical success factors =&lt;br /&gt;
There is always some critical success factor, when using a tool and SWOT is not excluded (1). Here are a couple of points to be aware of if you want a good SWOT: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Information shared by stakeholders within a SWOT analysis should never be used to play the blame game, but it should be a basis for continuous improvement&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	When conducting the weaknesses, never blame the others for faults or shortcoming, because being honest is essential&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	SWOT’s data can be collected live depending on the resources and constraints that exists&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	It may be useful to weight the experienced stakeholders’ evaluation of the SWOT’s&lt;br /&gt;
These are some points that may be good to keep in the back of the head, when going through SWOT.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Limitations and critiques of SWOT=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not doubt that SWOT is a very strong tool when carried out right, it can provide valuable knowledge about both customer preferences and competitors intents, and nevertheless where the possible opportunities to grow are. There are also some critiques of SWOT, such as: &lt;br /&gt;
* There are no prioritization of the identified factors and it seems like it was hard to meaningfully compare the importance of one SWOT to another&lt;br /&gt;
* No figuring of costs and benefits or how to use them to achieve their objectives&lt;br /&gt;
* Sometimes it can be hazy on what is external and internal &lt;br /&gt;
And, some limitations about SWOT:&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not help determine the costs and benefits of alternative performance solutions&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not rank the factors according to their criticality&lt;br /&gt;
* It provides minimal information regarding the degree to which an organization or work team possess influence over the factors that have been identified. &lt;br /&gt;
Despite all these, it is possibly to enhance SWOT to its further usability by considering 2 factors&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Approximations of the degree which an organization can control over each factor &lt;br /&gt;
2.	Estimate the costs and benefits of the factors. &lt;br /&gt;
And turn them into questions for better decision, by asking: &lt;br /&gt;
* How much control does the organization have over each SWOT factor?&lt;br /&gt;
* How much does each SWOT factor cost or benefit the organization? &lt;br /&gt;
By using the above two questions in SWOT, it will further enhance SWOTs usability&lt;br /&gt;
(1)(2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article has served its purpose, to introduce you to the tool SWOT, where the article has gone through the main points of SWOT, but have only scratched the surface. If you want to research more about SWOT, you should be more than welcome to do so, but this article has given you a good starting point. SWOT is an amazing tool to use in various areas or projects, does not matter if you want to use it for personal or professional purpose. Although, SWOT is a very widely used tool, it does have its own flaws and limitations, but it is a tool which has been used numerous times all over again worldwide, in all kinds of industries and professionals. Therefore, if you can master the tool and make up for its mentioned shortcomings with the questions that will cover its limitations to a maximum, it will be an incredible tool which is very valuable for your project or business. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Source:&lt;br /&gt;
1. https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Handbook of Improving Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. https://www.professionalacademy.com/blogs-and-advice/marketing-theories---swot-analysis&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. https://www.projectsmart.co.uk/swot-analysis-in-project-management.php&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. https://www.smartdraw.com/swot-analysis/&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S123368</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68832</id>
		<title>What is SWOT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68832"/>
		<updated>2019-03-01T08:35:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S123368: /* Critical success factors */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article will be presenting the tool SWOT and the main points of SWOT will be covered alongside with an introduction on how to apply SWOT. Moreover, the strength and weaknesses of this tool will also be presented so it can be taken into consideration when using the tool. SWOT can be applied in many different areas in project management, whether it is business strategy or market research but is especially used within marketing. (1)&lt;br /&gt;
Much of the original groundwork for what is known as SWOT today, was already established more than 50 years ago. A man name Kurt Lewin, his landmark posthumous text, called; Field Theory in Social Science, emphasized that an organization’s desires are influenced by different driving forces or enhancers and limitations and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
Many companies when facing a problem whether it is external or internal, by using SWOT they can create a quick overview of what your obstacles you need to overcome and what chances there are to take.&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is four initials standing for four different elements, where the elements are used to identify different perspectives of consequences. They each stands for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats. The first two factors, Strengths and Weaknesses are factors for the internal, typically when you are inside a company, you will look within to see what kind of Strengths you have and what kind of Weaknesses you have. Then there are Opportunities and Threats, which are external factors, so you look from internal to external. Opportunities help to identify chances there are to grow, expand and even more potential of a blue ocean and Threats are what kind of competitors are there, restrains, regulations. &lt;br /&gt;
More details about this subject will be seen down below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A brief history of SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier it was mentioned that the original groundwork was laid by Lewin, but around the same time there were two professors from Harvard, George Albert Smith Jr. and C. Roland Christensen, who also were interested in the related issue about identifying the extent of the correlation of the organization’s strategy and its competitive environment. Therefore, they instructed their students to address if a company took into account the requirements of a competitive environments. Around a decade later another professor from the same university wanted to see the already by then named SWOT, if it could be used to explore the ways in which competitive thinking influences business strategies. (2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction to SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is a strategic analytical tool, for assessing strengths and weaknesses of a business, and also for analyzing opportunities available to the business as well as threats faced by the business. SWOT can also be used for personal purposes or when managing a project. &lt;br /&gt;
As mentioned S.W.O.T are initials to different words, each letter stands for something different, with each one of them having their very own purpose, where they together create a very strong foundation for an analysis, whatever the purpose is for. SWOT analysis is processed by a group of stakeholders, where they: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Identify internal and external obstacles and enhancers of performance&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Analyse those factors, which are basted on estimates of their contribution to the net value and how much they are controllable&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. To decide what further or future actions to take regarding those factors &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what do they stand for? (1): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* S – Strengths – Refers to internal competencies, valuables resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* W - Weaknesses – Refers to internal inhibitors of the competencies, resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* O - Opportunities – Refers to external enhancer of performance, which can be pursued or used&lt;br /&gt;
* T - Threats – An external inhibitor of performance that has the potential to reduce accomplishments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now that we know what SWOT stands for, but how does one go around about them? There are some questions to get it started (3). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Strengths: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we best at?&lt;br /&gt;
* What intellectual property do we own that can help us with this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What specific skills does the current workforce have that can contribute to this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What financial resources do we have for reaching this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances do we have?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our bargaining power with both suppliers and intermediaries?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weaknesses: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we worst at doing?&lt;br /&gt;
* Is our intellectual property outdated?&lt;br /&gt;
* What training does our workforce lack?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our financial position?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances should we have, but don’t?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Opportunity: &lt;br /&gt;
* What changes in the external environment can we exploit?&lt;br /&gt;
* What weaknesses in our competitors can we use to our advantage?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new technology might become available to us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new markets might be opening to us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Threats:&lt;br /&gt;
* What might our competitors be able to do to hurt us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new legislation might damage our interests?&lt;br /&gt;
* What social changes might threaten us?&lt;br /&gt;
* How will the economic cycle affect us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Naturally, there are a lot more questions that can be asked, but these questions for each of the elements, are good starting points. These questions will help you get started on doing the SWOT. Remember, it is always a good idea to do SWOT in the early stages, because it gives you a detailed overview and gives you information, which you can use for your later processes in decision making and planning.(3)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Visually the SWOT can be shown as this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SWOTKL.png‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 4x4 Matrix(1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
== How to conduct SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
There are no doubt a couple of ways to conduct SWOT, the one which is more of a practical method, a guide on how to fill in the SWOT (5), may be a good place to start. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Determine the object: Which means to decide on a key project or a strategy, where you want to analyse. Write the name of it on the top of a page.&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Draw the layout: Draw a very large square box and then divide it into four smaller boxes&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Put name inside each of the boxes on the top: The top left box write; Strengths, the one beside write; Weaknesses. The box under Weaknesses, write Threats and the last one Opportunity, it should look like the figure earlier (Figure). If you wish a more detailed layout, you can add a smaller box that outlines Strengths and Weaknesses as “Internal” and Opportunities and Threats as “External”, and “Helpful” for Strengths and Opportunities, where Weaknesses and Threats will have a “Harmful” outline. &lt;br /&gt;
4.	Add the factors: Add the factors that affects the project in the different boxes.&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Draw conclusions: Decide if the project is a go or a no-go based on the negative and positive relative. Maybe you are already on a project, but want to see how the situation is, then you need to decide what to do about the information you got out of SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the Myriad guideline (1), there exist a way to conduct SWOT, in a bit of a different manner. &lt;br /&gt;
1.	Recruiting stakeholders: This phase’s idea is simply to try to include your stakeholders. According to the book; Exploring Corporate Strategy by Gerry Johnson, Kevan Scholes and Richard Whittington, you can map your stakeholders according to their interest in a project. If you google “Power-interest matrix”, you can see how you should approach your stakeholders in relative to “Interest” and “Power”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Convening the focus group: This step is to call in the stakeholders, most optimal from 8-48, and explain to them what the SWOT is, and how this little workshop is going to work. The first step is to divide the stakeholders into smaller group, where the idea is to get a well-rounded SWOT, where the stakeholders also can agree on the factors. Of course, the preparations are supposed to be made beforehand, such as already made SWOT figures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Identifying and categorizing SWOTs: Now when the stakeholders are in the groups, they should start to work on the SWOT.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Analyzing SWOTs: (6) In “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2, by Ryan Watkin and Doug Leigh (p.129), there is a figure showing, on how they are analyzing the SWOT factors within a Construction Company. Similar should be done. Hereafter, two additional questions should be asked: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor internally or externally controlled?&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor an enhancer or an inhibitor of performance? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where after you put the factors for Strengths, Weaknesses, Threats according to in “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2, by Ryan Watkin and Doug Leigh (p.131), to rank with numbers from 1-5 how much it is under your control and for enhancers and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Synthesizing SWOTs: After the previous step, now the data can be collected, and the data can be shown visually, there is an example in the “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2, by Ryan Watkin and Doug Leigh (p.134, 135).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.	Interpreting findings and deliberating action: Now it is the time to decide upon, which and how to act upon the findings. There are a few actions to take according to what the factors are. Monitor: The factors which are neither enhancer nor inhibitors. Mitigate Threats and Exploit Opportunities: Actions are to be taken, if it is seen that there are threats that will hinder the project, likewise with opportunities, it is supposed to be exploited if it will add value. Lastly, Confront Weaknesses and Leverage Strengths: Because these factors are internal, it is easier to control them, therefore strengths should be leveraged to help achieve desired results and weaknesses should be confronted. &lt;br /&gt;
As you can see the latter option is more wholesome and no doubt more detailed, depending your situation on using SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
Remember these guidelines are only one of the many guidelines.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== When to use SWOT == &lt;br /&gt;
Here are just a few to show when it is applicable to use SWOT, and these mentioned components are also included in something called Human Performance Technology (HPT), which can deepen your understanding on SWOT, but it is not necessary (4).&lt;br /&gt;
1.	In performance analysis &lt;br /&gt;
When identifying the degree to what internal practices and external environmental influences impact how results are currently being accomplished within an organization &lt;br /&gt;
2.	In cause analysis&lt;br /&gt;
When finding what practices should be continued or even expanded in the longer terms, as well as those that should be discontinued or replaced by other methods or tools. &lt;br /&gt;
3.	In strategic planning&lt;br /&gt;
When in strategic planning and needs assessment for identifying the factors that contribute to or detract from organizational effectiveness &lt;br /&gt;
4.	In evaluation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When monitoring the internal and external environment of a program for change over time, for tracking new SWOTs as they emerge, and for documenting for previously existing SWOTs as they become less influential on a program&lt;br /&gt;
Besides these quite general categories within HPT practice, SWOT can also be a great to use within (1): &lt;br /&gt;
* Appreciative inquiry –To clarify the organization’s strengths and opportunities &lt;br /&gt;
* Benchmarking – To identify possible opportunities and threats&lt;br /&gt;
* Industry analysis – For contextualizing opportunities existing in the market&lt;br /&gt;
* Situation analysis – For evaluating possible trends or ongoing trends in the markets, costs and competition and competitors&lt;br /&gt;
* Scenario planning – For considering possible and preferred long-term scenarios&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, these are the mentioned area where SWOT can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Critical success factors =&lt;br /&gt;
There is always some critical success factor, when using a tool and SWOT is not excluded (1). Here are a couple of points to be aware of if you want a good SWOT: &lt;br /&gt;
1.	Information shared by stakeholders within a SWOT analysis should never be used to play the blame game, but it should be a basis for continuous improvement&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	When conducting the weaknesses, never blame the others for faults or shortcoming, because being honest is essential&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	SWOT’s data can be collected live depending on the resources and constraints that exists&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	It may be useful to weight the experienced stakeholders’ evaluation of the SWOT’s&lt;br /&gt;
These are some points that may be good to keep in the back of the head, when going through SWOT.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Limitations and critiques of SWOT=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not doubt that SWOT is a very strong tool when carried out right, it can provide valuable knowledge about both customer preferences and competitors intents, and nevertheless where the possible opportunities to grow are. There are also some critiques of SWOT, such as: &lt;br /&gt;
* There are no prioritization of the identified factors and it seems like it was hard to meaningfully compare the importance of one SWOT to another&lt;br /&gt;
* No figuring of costs and benefits or how to use them to achieve their objectives&lt;br /&gt;
* Sometimes it can be hazy on what is external and internal &lt;br /&gt;
And, some limitations about SWOT:&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not help determine the costs and benefits of alternative performance solutions&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not rank the factors according to their criticality&lt;br /&gt;
* It provides minimal information regarding the degree to which an organization or work team possess influence over the factors that have been identified. &lt;br /&gt;
Despite all these, it is possibly to enhance SWOT to its further usability by considering 2 factors&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Approximations of the degree which an organization can control over each factor &lt;br /&gt;
2.	Estimate the costs and benefits of the factors. &lt;br /&gt;
And turn them into questions for better decision, by asking: &lt;br /&gt;
* How much control does the organization have over each SWOT factor?&lt;br /&gt;
* How much does each SWOT factor cost or benefit the organization? &lt;br /&gt;
By using the above two questions in SWOT, it will further enhance SWOTs usability&lt;br /&gt;
(1)(2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article has served its purpose, to introduce you to the tool SWOT, where the article has gone through the main points of SWOT, but have only scratched the surface. If you want to research more about SWOT, you should be more than welcome to do so, but this article has given you a good starting point. SWOT is an amazing tool to use in various areas or projects, does not matter if you want to use it for personal or professional purpose. Although, SWOT is a very widely used tool, it does have its own flaws and limitations, but it is a tool which has been used numerous times all over again worldwide, in all kinds of industries and professionals. Therefore, if you can master the tool and make up for its mentioned shortcomings with the questions that will cover its limitations to a maximum, it will be an incredible tool which is very valuable for your project or business. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Source:&lt;br /&gt;
1. https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Handbook of Improving Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. https://www.professionalacademy.com/blogs-and-advice/marketing-theories---swot-analysis&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. https://www.projectsmart.co.uk/swot-analysis-in-project-management.php&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. https://www.smartdraw.com/swot-analysis/&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S123368</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68831</id>
		<title>What is SWOT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=68831"/>
		<updated>2019-03-01T08:34:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S123368: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article will be presenting the tool SWOT and the main points of SWOT will be covered alongside with an introduction on how to apply SWOT. Moreover, the strength and weaknesses of this tool will also be presented so it can be taken into consideration when using the tool. SWOT can be applied in many different areas in project management, whether it is business strategy or market research but is especially used within marketing. (1)&lt;br /&gt;
Much of the original groundwork for what is known as SWOT today, was already established more than 50 years ago. A man name Kurt Lewin, his landmark posthumous text, called; Field Theory in Social Science, emphasized that an organization’s desires are influenced by different driving forces or enhancers and limitations and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
Many companies when facing a problem whether it is external or internal, by using SWOT they can create a quick overview of what your obstacles you need to overcome and what chances there are to take.&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is four initials standing for four different elements, where the elements are used to identify different perspectives of consequences. They each stands for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats. The first two factors, Strengths and Weaknesses are factors for the internal, typically when you are inside a company, you will look within to see what kind of Strengths you have and what kind of Weaknesses you have. Then there are Opportunities and Threats, which are external factors, so you look from internal to external. Opportunities help to identify chances there are to grow, expand and even more potential of a blue ocean and Threats are what kind of competitors are there, restrains, regulations. &lt;br /&gt;
More details about this subject will be seen down below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A brief history of SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier it was mentioned that the original groundwork was laid by Lewin, but around the same time there were two professors from Harvard, George Albert Smith Jr. and C. Roland Christensen, who also were interested in the related issue about identifying the extent of the correlation of the organization’s strategy and its competitive environment. Therefore, they instructed their students to address if a company took into account the requirements of a competitive environments. Around a decade later another professor from the same university wanted to see the already by then named SWOT, if it could be used to explore the ways in which competitive thinking influences business strategies. (2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction to SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is a strategic analytical tool, for assessing strengths and weaknesses of a business, and also for analyzing opportunities available to the business as well as threats faced by the business. SWOT can also be used for personal purposes or when managing a project. &lt;br /&gt;
As mentioned S.W.O.T are initials to different words, each letter stands for something different, with each one of them having their very own purpose, where they together create a very strong foundation for an analysis, whatever the purpose is for. SWOT analysis is processed by a group of stakeholders, where they: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Identify internal and external obstacles and enhancers of performance&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Analyse those factors, which are basted on estimates of their contribution to the net value and how much they are controllable&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. To decide what further or future actions to take regarding those factors &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what do they stand for? (1): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* S – Strengths – Refers to internal competencies, valuables resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* W - Weaknesses – Refers to internal inhibitors of the competencies, resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* O - Opportunities – Refers to external enhancer of performance, which can be pursued or used&lt;br /&gt;
* T - Threats – An external inhibitor of performance that has the potential to reduce accomplishments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now that we know what SWOT stands for, but how does one go around about them? There are some questions to get it started (3). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Strengths: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we best at?&lt;br /&gt;
* What intellectual property do we own that can help us with this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What specific skills does the current workforce have that can contribute to this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What financial resources do we have for reaching this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances do we have?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our bargaining power with both suppliers and intermediaries?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weaknesses: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we worst at doing?&lt;br /&gt;
* Is our intellectual property outdated?&lt;br /&gt;
* What training does our workforce lack?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our financial position?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances should we have, but don’t?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Opportunity: &lt;br /&gt;
* What changes in the external environment can we exploit?&lt;br /&gt;
* What weaknesses in our competitors can we use to our advantage?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new technology might become available to us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new markets might be opening to us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Threats:&lt;br /&gt;
* What might our competitors be able to do to hurt us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new legislation might damage our interests?&lt;br /&gt;
* What social changes might threaten us?&lt;br /&gt;
* How will the economic cycle affect us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Naturally, there are a lot more questions that can be asked, but these questions for each of the elements, are good starting points. These questions will help you get started on doing the SWOT. Remember, it is always a good idea to do SWOT in the early stages, because it gives you a detailed overview and gives you information, which you can use for your later processes in decision making and planning.(3)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Visually the SWOT can be shown as this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SWOTKL.png‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 4x4 Matrix(1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
== How to conduct SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
There are no doubt a couple of ways to conduct SWOT, the one which is more of a practical method, a guide on how to fill in the SWOT (5), may be a good place to start. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Determine the object: Which means to decide on a key project or a strategy, where you want to analyse. Write the name of it on the top of a page.&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Draw the layout: Draw a very large square box and then divide it into four smaller boxes&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Put name inside each of the boxes on the top: The top left box write; Strengths, the one beside write; Weaknesses. The box under Weaknesses, write Threats and the last one Opportunity, it should look like the figure earlier (Figure). If you wish a more detailed layout, you can add a smaller box that outlines Strengths and Weaknesses as “Internal” and Opportunities and Threats as “External”, and “Helpful” for Strengths and Opportunities, where Weaknesses and Threats will have a “Harmful” outline. &lt;br /&gt;
4.	Add the factors: Add the factors that affects the project in the different boxes.&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Draw conclusions: Decide if the project is a go or a no-go based on the negative and positive relative. Maybe you are already on a project, but want to see how the situation is, then you need to decide what to do about the information you got out of SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the Myriad guideline (1), there exist a way to conduct SWOT, in a bit of a different manner. &lt;br /&gt;
1.	Recruiting stakeholders: This phase’s idea is simply to try to include your stakeholders. According to the book; Exploring Corporate Strategy by Gerry Johnson, Kevan Scholes and Richard Whittington, you can map your stakeholders according to their interest in a project. If you google “Power-interest matrix”, you can see how you should approach your stakeholders in relative to “Interest” and “Power”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Convening the focus group: This step is to call in the stakeholders, most optimal from 8-48, and explain to them what the SWOT is, and how this little workshop is going to work. The first step is to divide the stakeholders into smaller group, where the idea is to get a well-rounded SWOT, where the stakeholders also can agree on the factors. Of course, the preparations are supposed to be made beforehand, such as already made SWOT figures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Identifying and categorizing SWOTs: Now when the stakeholders are in the groups, they should start to work on the SWOT.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Analyzing SWOTs: (6) In “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2, by Ryan Watkin and Doug Leigh (p.129), there is a figure showing, on how they are analyzing the SWOT factors within a Construction Company. Similar should be done. Hereafter, two additional questions should be asked: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor internally or externally controlled?&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor an enhancer or an inhibitor of performance? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where after you put the factors for Strengths, Weaknesses, Threats according to in “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2, by Ryan Watkin and Doug Leigh (p.131), to rank with numbers from 1-5 how much it is under your control and for enhancers and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Synthesizing SWOTs: After the previous step, now the data can be collected, and the data can be shown visually, there is an example in the “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2, by Ryan Watkin and Doug Leigh (p.134, 135).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.	Interpreting findings and deliberating action: Now it is the time to decide upon, which and how to act upon the findings. There are a few actions to take according to what the factors are. Monitor: The factors which are neither enhancer nor inhibitors. Mitigate Threats and Exploit Opportunities: Actions are to be taken, if it is seen that there are threats that will hinder the project, likewise with opportunities, it is supposed to be exploited if it will add value. Lastly, Confront Weaknesses and Leverage Strengths: Because these factors are internal, it is easier to control them, therefore strengths should be leveraged to help achieve desired results and weaknesses should be confronted. &lt;br /&gt;
As you can see the latter option is more wholesome and no doubt more detailed, depending your situation on using SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
Remember these guidelines are only one of the many guidelines.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== When to use SWOT == &lt;br /&gt;
Here are just a few to show when it is applicable to use SWOT, and these mentioned components are also included in something called Human Performance Technology (HPT), which can deepen your understanding on SWOT, but it is not necessary (4).&lt;br /&gt;
1.	In performance analysis &lt;br /&gt;
When identifying the degree to what internal practices and external environmental influences impact how results are currently being accomplished within an organization &lt;br /&gt;
2.	In cause analysis&lt;br /&gt;
When finding what practices should be continued or even expanded in the longer terms, as well as those that should be discontinued or replaced by other methods or tools. &lt;br /&gt;
3.	In strategic planning&lt;br /&gt;
When in strategic planning and needs assessment for identifying the factors that contribute to or detract from organizational effectiveness &lt;br /&gt;
4.	In evaluation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When monitoring the internal and external environment of a program for change over time, for tracking new SWOTs as they emerge, and for documenting for previously existing SWOTs as they become less influential on a program&lt;br /&gt;
Besides these quite general categories within HPT practice, SWOT can also be a great to use within (1): &lt;br /&gt;
* Appreciative inquiry –To clarify the organization’s strengths and opportunities &lt;br /&gt;
* Benchmarking – To identify possible opportunities and threats&lt;br /&gt;
* Industry analysis – For contextualizing opportunities existing in the market&lt;br /&gt;
* Situation analysis – For evaluating possible trends or ongoing trends in the markets, costs and competition and competitors&lt;br /&gt;
* Scenario planning – For considering possible and preferred long-term scenarios&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, these are the mentioned area where SWOT can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Critical success factors =&lt;br /&gt;
There is always some critical success factor, when using a tool and SWOT is not excluded (1). Here are a couple of points to be aware of if you want a good SWOT: &lt;br /&gt;
1.	Information shared by stakeholders within a SWOT analysis should never be used to play the blame game, but it should be a basis for continuous improvement&lt;br /&gt;
2.	When conducting the weaknesses, never blame the others for faults or shortcoming, because being honest is essential&lt;br /&gt;
3.	SWOT’s data can be collected live depending on the resources and constraints that exists&lt;br /&gt;
4.	It may be useful to weight the experienced stakeholders’ evaluation of the SWOT’s&lt;br /&gt;
These are some points that may be good to keep in the back of the head, when going through SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Limitations and critiques of SWOT=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not doubt that SWOT is a very strong tool when carried out right, it can provide valuable knowledge about both customer preferences and competitors intents, and nevertheless where the possible opportunities to grow are. There are also some critiques of SWOT, such as: &lt;br /&gt;
* There are no prioritization of the identified factors and it seems like it was hard to meaningfully compare the importance of one SWOT to another&lt;br /&gt;
* No figuring of costs and benefits or how to use them to achieve their objectives&lt;br /&gt;
* Sometimes it can be hazy on what is external and internal &lt;br /&gt;
And, some limitations about SWOT:&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not help determine the costs and benefits of alternative performance solutions&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not rank the factors according to their criticality&lt;br /&gt;
* It provides minimal information regarding the degree to which an organization or work team possess influence over the factors that have been identified. &lt;br /&gt;
Despite all these, it is possibly to enhance SWOT to its further usability by considering 2 factors&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Approximations of the degree which an organization can control over each factor &lt;br /&gt;
2.	Estimate the costs and benefits of the factors. &lt;br /&gt;
And turn them into questions for better decision, by asking: &lt;br /&gt;
* How much control does the organization have over each SWOT factor?&lt;br /&gt;
* How much does each SWOT factor cost or benefit the organization? &lt;br /&gt;
By using the above two questions in SWOT, it will further enhance SWOTs usability&lt;br /&gt;
(1)(2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article has served its purpose, to introduce you to the tool SWOT, where the article has gone through the main points of SWOT, but have only scratched the surface. If you want to research more about SWOT, you should be more than welcome to do so, but this article has given you a good starting point. SWOT is an amazing tool to use in various areas or projects, does not matter if you want to use it for personal or professional purpose. Although, SWOT is a very widely used tool, it does have its own flaws and limitations, but it is a tool which has been used numerous times all over again worldwide, in all kinds of industries and professionals. Therefore, if you can master the tool and make up for its mentioned shortcomings with the questions that will cover its limitations to a maximum, it will be an incredible tool which is very valuable for your project or business. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Source:&lt;br /&gt;
1. https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Handbook of Improving Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. https://www.professionalacademy.com/blogs-and-advice/marketing-theories---swot-analysis&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. https://www.projectsmart.co.uk/swot-analysis-in-project-management.php&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. https://www.smartdraw.com/swot-analysis/&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S123368</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:Governance_of_Project_Management&amp;diff=66197</id>
		<title>Talk:Governance of Project Management</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:Governance_of_Project_Management&amp;diff=66197"/>
		<updated>2019-02-24T12:29:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S123368: /* Feedback on Abstract */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Feedback on Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{|&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Text clarity&#039;&#039;&#039;|| Good but it can be more coherent in some of the parts&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Description of the tool/theory/concept&#039;&#039;&#039;|| Good&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation of the purpose of the article&#039;&#039;&#039;|| Good&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Relevance to curriculum&#039;&#039;&#039;|| Make sure you keep it within project, program or portfolio and not about organizational management/theory.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;References&#039;&#039;&#039;|| Good&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
==Feedback 1 | Reviewer name: &#039;&#039;Kevin Lim&#039;&#039;==&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 1 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Quality of the summary:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does the summary make the key focus, insights and/or contribution of the article clear? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 1===&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, the summary gives you a good insight of what the article is about and furthermore it is going a bit into the topic itself already, giving you a taste of what you are going to read about more. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think the references needs to be placed rightly, it is probably still under the work though. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 2 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Structure and logic of the article:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the argument clear? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is there a logical flow to the article? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does one part build upon the other? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the article consistent in its argument and free of contradictions? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 2===&lt;br /&gt;
The flow of the article is fine, it is taking a topic at a time, and it is going through the relevance of the different things in order to understand the concept. The argumentation is clear and flow is fine, there are also a consistency throughout it all. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is free of contradictions too, but I think the article is not fully done, so there are parts missing. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 3 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Grammar and style:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the writing free of grammatical and spelling errors? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the language precise without unnecessary fill words? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 3===&lt;br /&gt;
Minor grammatical errors, and spelling errors are majority been avoided, but the controls whether in word or here in wiki. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As I still think, there are generally not really fill words, but again, it depends on how you are good a describing something, you can think of it as a fill words, when in reality it is not. But there are no filling as such.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the grammar and spelling, just a quick run through will be fine, to check for them again. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 4 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Figures and tables:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are figures and tables clear? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do they summarize the key points of the article in a meaningful way? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 4===&lt;br /&gt;
They are very easy to understand, but the quality is a bit bad, without clicking on them, it is a bit hard to read them, but when they are clicked it is easy to read them, no problems there. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They do summarize the key points, it gives a good overview and understanding because of the figures. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Try to fix the quality of possible and maybe a bit bigger would be nice, without having to click on them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 5 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Interest and relevance:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the article of high practical and / or academic relevance? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it made clear in the article why / how it is relevant? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 5===&lt;br /&gt;
As I said earlier there are some holes in the article, so it is a bit hard to define it one or the other, but if I absolutely must, I think it is more of a academic relevance, it is hard to actually try to implement it, based on what this article is describing the tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again, I think the relevance is also depending on the researcher, but I would definitely think it is clear how it is relevant in project management. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Try to fill out the holes, then maybe things will be more clear if it is relevant and if it is practical or academical. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 6 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Depth of treatment:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the article interesting for a practitioner or academic to read? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does it make a significant contribution beyond a cursory web search? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 6===&lt;br /&gt;
Academic, because as I mentioned at the question before. But again it is a bit hard because of the missing texts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I do not think it is a significant contribution at all, because of the missing holes. But if it is filled out, then it is no doubt a contribution, but not beyond at all.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should have finish the work by the deadline, because it is hard to give a whole feedback at this point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 7 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Annotated bibliography:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does the article properly cite and acknowledge previous work? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does it briefly summarize the key references at the end of the article? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it based on empirical data instead of opinion? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 7===&lt;br /&gt;
It is not filled out yet, so I cannot comment on this.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S123368</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:Planning_Poker_for_Improved_Project_Delivery&amp;diff=66196</id>
		<title>Talk:Planning Poker for Improved Project Delivery</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:Planning_Poker_for_Improved_Project_Delivery&amp;diff=66196"/>
		<updated>2019-02-24T12:26:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S123368: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Feedback on Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{|&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Text clarity&#039;&#039;&#039;|| Good &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Description of the tool/theory/concept&#039;&#039;&#039;|| Good&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation of the purpose of the article&#039;&#039;&#039;|| Good&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Relevance to curriculum&#039;&#039;&#039;|| Relevant&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;References&#039;&#039;&#039;|| Good&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Other&#039;&#039;&#039;|| It lacks a bit of context. Try to specify where this agile approach would more beneficial and its limitations&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Feedback 1 | Reviewer name: &#039;&#039;Kevin Lim&#039;&#039;==&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 1 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Quality of the summary:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does the summary make the key focus, insights and/or contribution of the article clear? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 1===&lt;br /&gt;
The summary gives a good introduction alongside with the key focuses the article is going to talk about. It sets you off to a good start of knowing what you will be reading, while it also gives you a short description of what a project is.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 2 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Structure and logic of the article:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the argument clear? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is there a logical flow to the article? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does one part build upon the other? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the article consistent in its argument and free of contradictions? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 2===&lt;br /&gt;
The argumentation is clear and the explanation of the concepts are fine, although it can be quite hard to read in the sea of texts, it would be much easier if there were bullet points.&lt;br /&gt;
The flow runs quite well, it describes one thing and then the other things, it does not go back and forth while trying to explain too much. It feels like you go from A to B to C etc. so it is quite good.&lt;br /&gt;
It definitely does, I do not feel confused at any point.&lt;br /&gt;
It is consistent as it has to go good with the flow, therefore I do not think it is not consistent, furthermore I do not think there are any contradictions as the article very plainly explain what the concept is, and how it is applied.&lt;br /&gt;
A suggestion would be, make bullet points, try to make some points, divide it up so it would be easier to read and try maybe make some visualization, it will help on the understanding.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 3 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Grammar and style:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the writing free of grammatical and spelling errors? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the language precise without unnecessary fill words? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 3===&lt;br /&gt;
There are some minor grammatical errors, but it is not so it is not understandable.&lt;br /&gt;
I personally think, writing such a long article without fill words, would be a challenge. I do not think though, there are fill words, just to fill the word count in this case.&lt;br /&gt;
Just a double check on the grammar, and about spelling error, there will be a underlined red line, when you write here in Wiki, so it will be avoided automatically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 4 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Figures and tables:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are figures and tables clear? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do they summarize the key points of the article in a meaningful way? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 4===&lt;br /&gt;
There are no figures, which I miss.&lt;br /&gt;
I think the conclusion is short and precise, nothing you would ask questions about or think that, you did not read about that in the article.&lt;br /&gt;
I do not think I have any suggestions for the conclusion part.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 5 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Interest and relevance:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the article of high practical and / or academic relevance? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it made clear in the article why / how it is relevant? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 5===&lt;br /&gt;
I think it has both, it tells you how it can be used in real life, but it also tells you how it works, so I think this article is one of the articles, where you can look up, and think oh I can do it like what this article is telling me and actually use it.&lt;br /&gt;
It is, but I mean, as a reader, you should also know yourself if it is relevant or not, you cannot expect the article to lead you, if you have -10 knowledge in project management, which does not make sense to me. If you google a certain topic, you are typically working about a topic, and hence researching about a topic. So you know what you are doing so to speak.&lt;br /&gt;
I think it would be very cool again if it is illustrated, but otherwise it is good.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 6 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Depth of treatment:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the article interesting for a practitioner or academic to read? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does it make a significant contribution beyond a cursory web search? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 6===&lt;br /&gt;
I would say the article is most interesting for a practitioner, because there are not deep and heavy theory about the tool itself, if you want for academic read, it definitely needs some more theory, history, background and more. Nevertheless, I think the article is a good starting point for a practice.&lt;br /&gt;
No, not a significant contribution, I guess it can be called a normal contribution. If it should be significant, then in my opinion it should be much longer, and a topic that is not really written about. So it is not because it is a bad article, it is just so much of this already exist.&lt;br /&gt;
Regarding the questions asked, there are no improvement from my side, because it depends on what your focus point is. Practice or academic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 7 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Annotated bibliography:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does the article properly cite and acknowledge previous work? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does it briefly summarize the key references at the end of the article? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it based on empirical data instead of opinion? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 7===&lt;br /&gt;
It does, but I am not sure if you need to include which page and line. Personally I did not do that, just the name and not even the date visited.&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, you can see the links, and the dates.&lt;br /&gt;
It is based on data instead of opinion yes.&lt;br /&gt;
I guess if you should REALLY be going for a 12+ then maybe page and line? (I did not even do this myself)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S123368</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:Planning_Poker_for_Improved_Project_Delivery&amp;diff=66195</id>
		<title>Talk:Planning Poker for Improved Project Delivery</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:Planning_Poker_for_Improved_Project_Delivery&amp;diff=66195"/>
		<updated>2019-02-24T12:23:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S123368: /* Feedback on Abstract */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Feedback on Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{|&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Text clarity&#039;&#039;&#039;|| Good &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Description of the tool/theory/concept&#039;&#039;&#039;|| Good&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation of the purpose of the article&#039;&#039;&#039;|| Good&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Relevance to curriculum&#039;&#039;&#039;|| Relevant&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;References&#039;&#039;&#039;|| Good&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Other&#039;&#039;&#039;|| It lacks a bit of context. Try to specify where this agile approach would more beneficial and its limitations&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| Reviewer name:Kevin Lim [edit]Question 1 · TEXT Quality of the summary:&lt;br /&gt;
Does the summary make the key focus, insights and/or contribution of the article clear?&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
[edit]Answer 1 The summary gives a good introduction alongside with the key focuses the article is going to talk about. It sets you off to a good start of knowing what you will be reading, while it also gives you a short description of what a project is.&lt;br /&gt;
[edit]Question 2 · TEXT Structure and logic of the article:&lt;br /&gt;
Is the argument clear?&lt;br /&gt;
Is there a logical flow to the article?&lt;br /&gt;
Does one part build upon the other?&lt;br /&gt;
Is the article consistent in its argument and free of contradictions?&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
[edit]Answer 2 The argumentation is clear and the explanation of the concepts are fine, although it can be quite hard to read in the sea of texts, it would be much easier if there were bullet points.&lt;br /&gt;
The flow runs quite well, it describes one thing and then the other things, it does not go back and forth while trying to explain too much. It feels like you go from A to B to C etc. so it is quite good.&lt;br /&gt;
It definitely does, I do not feel confused at any point.&lt;br /&gt;
It is consistent as it has to go good with the flow, therefore I do not think it is not consistent, furthermore I do not think there are any contradictions as the article very plainly explain what the concept is, and how it is applied.&lt;br /&gt;
A suggestion would be, make bullet points, try to make some points, divide it up so it would be easier to read and try maybe make some visualization, it will help on the understanding.&lt;br /&gt;
[edit]Question 3 · TEXT Grammar and style:&lt;br /&gt;
Is the writing free of grammatical and spelling errors?&lt;br /&gt;
Is the language precise without unnecessary fill words?&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
[edit]Answer 3 There are some minor grammatical errors, but it is not so it is not understandable.&lt;br /&gt;
I personally think, writing such a long article without fill words, would be a challenge. I do not think though, there are fill words, just to fill the word count in this case.&lt;br /&gt;
Just a double check on the grammar, and about spelling error, there will be a underlined red line, when you write here in Wiki, so it will be avoided automatically.&lt;br /&gt;
[edit]Question 4 · TEXT Figures and tables:&lt;br /&gt;
Are figures and tables clear?&lt;br /&gt;
Do they summarize the key points of the article in a meaningful way?&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
[edit]Answer 4&lt;br /&gt;
There are no figures, which I miss.&lt;br /&gt;
I think the conclusion is short and precise, nothing you would ask questions about or think that, you did not read about that in the article.&lt;br /&gt;
I do not think I have any suggestions for the conclusion part.&lt;br /&gt;
[edit]Question 5 · TEXT Interest and relevance:&lt;br /&gt;
Is the article of high practical and / or academic relevance?&lt;br /&gt;
Is it made clear in the article why / how it is relevant?&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
[edit]Answer 5 I think it has both, it tells you how it can be used in real life, but it also tells you how it works, so I think this article is one of the articles, where you can look up, and think oh I can do it like what this article is telling me and actually use it.&lt;br /&gt;
It is, but I mean, as a reader, you should also know yourself if it is relevant or not, you cannot expect the article to lead you, if you have -10 knowledge in project management, which does not make sense to me. If you google a certain topic, you are typically working about a topic, and hence researching about a topic. So you know what you are doing so to speak.&lt;br /&gt;
I think it would be very cool again if it is illustrated, but otherwise it is good.&lt;br /&gt;
[edit]Question 6 · TEXT Depth of treatment:&lt;br /&gt;
Is the article interesting for a practitioner or academic to read?&lt;br /&gt;
Does it make a significant contribution beyond a cursory web search?&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
[edit]Answer 6 I would say the article is most interesting for a practitioner, because there are not deep and heavy theory about the tool itself, if you want for academic read, it definitely needs some more theory, history, background and more. Nevertheless, I think the article is a good starting point for a practice.&lt;br /&gt;
No, not a significant contribution, I guess it can be called a normal contribution. If it should be significant, then in my opinion it should be much longer, and a topic that is not really written about. So it is not because it is a bad article, it is just so much of this already exist.&lt;br /&gt;
Regarding the questions asked, there are no improvement from my side, because it depends on what your focus point is. Practice or academic.&lt;br /&gt;
[edit]Question 7 · TEXT Annotated bibliography:&lt;br /&gt;
Does the article properly cite and acknowledge previous work?&lt;br /&gt;
Does it briefly summarize the key references at the end of the article?&lt;br /&gt;
Is it based on empirical data instead of opinion?&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
[edit]Answer 7&lt;br /&gt;
It does, but I am not sure if you need to include which page and line. Personally I did not do that, just the name and not even the date visited.&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, you can see the links, and the dates.&lt;br /&gt;
It is based on data instead of opinion yes.&lt;br /&gt;
I guess if you should REALLY be going for a 12+ then maybe page and line? (I did not even do this myself)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S123368</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:42433_APPPM_2018-Feedback_template_for_Wiki_article&amp;diff=66194</id>
		<title>Talk:42433 APPPM 2018-Feedback template for Wiki article</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:42433_APPPM_2018-Feedback_template_for_Wiki_article&amp;diff=66194"/>
		<updated>2019-02-24T12:23:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S123368: Blanked the page&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S123368</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:42433_APPPM_2018-Feedback_template_for_Wiki_article&amp;diff=66193</id>
		<title>Talk:42433 APPPM 2018-Feedback template for Wiki article</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:42433_APPPM_2018-Feedback_template_for_Wiki_article&amp;diff=66193"/>
		<updated>2019-02-24T11:58:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S123368: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Planning_Poker_for_Improved_Project_Delivery&lt;br /&gt;
http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Governance_of_Project_Management&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Feedback 1 | Reviewer name: &#039;&#039;Kevin Lim &#039;&#039;==&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 1 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Quality of the summary:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does the summary make the key focus, insights and/or contribution of the article clear? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 1===&lt;br /&gt;
The summary gives a good introduction alongside with the key focuses the article is going to talk about. It sets you off to a good start of knowing what you will be reading, while it also gives you a short description of what a project is.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No suggestions here. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 2 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Structure and logic of the article:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the argument clear? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is there a logical flow to the article? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does one part build upon the other? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the article consistent in its argument and free of contradictions? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 2===&lt;br /&gt;
The argumentation is clear and the explanation of the concepts are fine, although it can be quite hard to read in the sea of texts, it would be much easier if there were bullet points.&lt;br /&gt;
The flow runs quite well, it describes one thing and then the other things, it does not go back and forth while trying to explain too much. It feels like you go from A to B to C etc. so it is quite good.&lt;br /&gt;
It definitely does, I do not feel confused at any point.&lt;br /&gt;
It is consistent as it has to go good with the flow, therefore I do not think it is not consistent, furthermore I do not think there are any contradictions as the article very plainly explain what the concept is, and how it is applied.&lt;br /&gt;
A suggestion would be, make bullet points, try to make some points, divide it up so it would be easier to read and try maybe make some visualization, it will help on the understanding.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 3 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Grammar and style:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the writing free of grammatical and spelling errors? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the language precise without unnecessary fill words? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 3===&lt;br /&gt;
There are some minor grammatical errors, but it is not so it is not understandable.&lt;br /&gt;
I personally think, writing such a long article without fill words, would be a challenge. I do not think though, there are fill words, just to fill the word count in this case.&lt;br /&gt;
Just a double check on the grammar, and about spelling error, there will be a underlined red line, when you write here in Wiki, so it will be avoided automatically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 4 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Figures and tables:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are figures and tables clear? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do they summarize the key points of the article in a meaningful way? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 4===&lt;br /&gt;
There are no figures, which I miss.&lt;br /&gt;
I think the conclusion is short and precise, nothing you would ask questions about or think that, you did not read about that in the article.&lt;br /&gt;
I do not think I have any suggestions for the conclusion part.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 5 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Interest and relevance:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the article of high practical and / or academic relevance? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it made clear in the article why / how it is relevant? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 5===&lt;br /&gt;
I think it has both, it tells you how it can be used in real life, but it also tells you how it works, so I think this article is one of the articles, where you can look up, and think oh I can do it like what this article is telling me and actually use it.&lt;br /&gt;
It is, but I mean, as a reader, you should also know yourself if it is relevant or not, you cannot expect the article to lead you, if you have -10 knowledge in project management, which does not make sense to me. If you google a certain topic, you are typically working about a topic, and hence researching about a topic. So you know what you are doing so to speak.&lt;br /&gt;
I think it would be very cool again if it is illustrated, but otherwise it is good.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 6 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Depth of treatment:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the article interesting for a practitioner or academic to read? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does it make a significant contribution beyond a cursory web search? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 6===&lt;br /&gt;
I would say the article is most interesting for a practitioner, because there are not deep and heavy theory about the tool itself, if you want for academic read, it definitely needs some more theory, history, background and more. Nevertheless, I think the article is a good starting point for a practice.&lt;br /&gt;
No, not a significant contribution, I guess it can be called a normal contribution. If it should be significant, then in my opinion it should be much longer, and a topic that is not really written about. So it is not because it is a bad article, it is just so much of this already exist.&lt;br /&gt;
Regarding the questions asked, there are no improvement from my side, because it depends on what your focus point is. Practice or academic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 7 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Annotated bibliography:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does the article properly cite and acknowledge previous work? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does it briefly summarize the key references at the end of the article? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it based on empirical data instead of opinion? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 7===&lt;br /&gt;
It does, but I am not sure if you need to include which page and line. Personally I did not do that, just the name and not even the date visited.&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, you can see the links, and the dates.&lt;br /&gt;
It is based on data instead of opinion yes.&lt;br /&gt;
I guess if you should REALLY be going for a 12+ then maybe page and line? (I did not even do this myself)&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Feedback 2 | Reviewer name: &#039;&#039;Kevin Lim&#039;&#039;==&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 1 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Quality of the summary:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does the summary make the key focus, insights and/or contribution of the article clear? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 1===&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, the summary gives you a good insight of what the article is about and furthermore it is going a bit into the topic itself already, giving you a taste of what you are going to read about more. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think the references needs to be placed rightly, it is probably still under the work though. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 2 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Structure and logic of the article:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the argument clear? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is there a logical flow to the article? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does one part build upon the other? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the article consistent in its argument and free of contradictions? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 2===&lt;br /&gt;
The flow of the article is fine, it is taking a topic at a time, and it is going through the relevance of the different things in order to understand the concept. The argumentation is clear and flow is fine, there are also a consistency throughout it all. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is free of contradictions too, but I think the article is not fully done, so there are parts missing. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 3 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Grammar and style:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the writing free of grammatical and spelling errors? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the language precise without unnecessary fill words? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 3===&lt;br /&gt;
Minor grammatical errors, and spelling errors are majority been avoided, but the controls whether in word or here in wiki. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As I still think, there are generally not really fill words, but again, it depends on how you are good a describing something, you can think of it as a fill words, when in reality it is not. But there are no filling as such.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the grammar and spelling, just a quick run through will be fine, to check for them again. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 4 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Figures and tables:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are figures and tables clear? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do they summarize the key points of the article in a meaningful way? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 4===&lt;br /&gt;
They are very easy to understand, but the quality is a bit bad, without clicking on them, it is a bit hard to read them, but when they are clicked it is easy to read them, no problems there. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They do summarize the key points, it gives a good overview and understanding because of the figures. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Try to fix the quality of possible and maybe a bit bigger would be nice, without having to click on them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 5 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Interest and relevance:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the article of high practical and / or academic relevance? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it made clear in the article why / how it is relevant? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 5===&lt;br /&gt;
As I said earlier there are some holes in the article, so it is a bit hard to define it one or the other, but if I absolutely must, I think it is more of a academic relevance, it is hard to actually try to implement it, based on what this article is describing the tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again, I think the relevance is also depending on the researcher, but I would definitely think it is clear how it is relevant in project management. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Try to fill out the holes, then maybe things will be more clear if it is relevant and if it is practical or academical. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 6 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Depth of treatment:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the article interesting for a practitioner or academic to read? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does it make a significant contribution beyond a cursory web search? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 6===&lt;br /&gt;
Academic, because as I mentioned at the question before. But again it is a bit hard because of the missing texts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I do not think it is a significant contribution at all, because of the missing holes. But if it is filled out, then it is no doubt a contribution, but not beyond at all.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should have finish the work by the deadline, because it is hard to give a whole feedback at this point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 7 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Annotated bibliography:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does the article properly cite and acknowledge previous work? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does it briefly summarize the key references at the end of the article? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it based on empirical data instead of opinion? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 7===&lt;br /&gt;
It is not filled out yet, so I cannot comment on this.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S123368</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:42433_APPPM_2018-Feedback_template_for_Wiki_article&amp;diff=66175</id>
		<title>Talk:42433 APPPM 2018-Feedback template for Wiki article</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:42433_APPPM_2018-Feedback_template_for_Wiki_article&amp;diff=66175"/>
		<updated>2019-02-24T10:20:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S123368: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Planning_Poker_for_Improved_Project_Delivery&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Feedback 1 | Reviewer name: &#039;&#039;Kevin Lim &#039;&#039;==&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 1 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Quality of the summary:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does the summary make the key focus, insights and/or contribution of the article clear? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 1===&lt;br /&gt;
The summary gives a good introduction alongside with the key focuses the article is going to talk about. It sets you off to a good start of knowing what you will be reading, while it also gives you a short description of what a project is.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No suggestions here. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 2 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Structure and logic of the article:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the argument clear? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is there a logical flow to the article? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does one part build upon the other? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the article consistent in its argument and free of contradictions? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 2===&lt;br /&gt;
The argumentation is clear and the explanation of the concepts are fine, although it can be quite hard to read in the sea of texts, it would be much easier if there were bullet points.&lt;br /&gt;
The flow runs quite well, it describes one thing and then the other things, it does not go back and forth while trying to explain too much. It feels like you go from A to B to C etc. so it is quite good.&lt;br /&gt;
It definitely does, I do not feel confused at any point.&lt;br /&gt;
It is consistent as it has to go good with the flow, therefore I do not think it is not consistent, furthermore I do not think there are any contradictions as the article very plainly explain what the concept is, and how it is applied.&lt;br /&gt;
A suggestion would be, make bullet points, try to make some points, divide it up so it would be easier to read and try maybe make some visualization, it will help on the understanding.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 3 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Grammar and style:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the writing free of grammatical and spelling errors? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the language precise without unnecessary fill words? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 3===&lt;br /&gt;
There are some minor grammatical errors, but it is not so it is not understandable.&lt;br /&gt;
I personally think, writing such a long article without fill words, would be a challenge. I do not think though, there are fill words, just to fill the word count in this case.&lt;br /&gt;
Just a double check on the grammar, and about spelling error, there will be a underlined red line, when you write here in Wiki, so it will be avoided automatically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 4 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Figures and tables:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are figures and tables clear? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do they summarize the key points of the article in a meaningful way? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 4===&lt;br /&gt;
There are no figures, which I miss.&lt;br /&gt;
I think the conclusion is short and precise, nothing you would ask questions about or think that, you did not read about that in the article.&lt;br /&gt;
I do not think I have any suggestions for the conclusion part.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 5 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Interest and relevance:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the article of high practical and / or academic relevance? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it made clear in the article why / how it is relevant? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 5===&lt;br /&gt;
I think it has both, it tells you how it can be used in real life, but it also tells you how it works, so I think this article is one of the articles, where you can look up, and think oh I can do it like what this article is telling me and actually use it.&lt;br /&gt;
It is, but I mean, as a reader, you should also know yourself if it is relevant or not, you cannot expect the article to lead you, if you have -10 knowledge in project management, which does not make sense to me. If you google a certain topic, you are typically working about a topic, and hence researching about a topic. So you know what you are doing so to speak.&lt;br /&gt;
I think it would be very cool again if it is illustrated, but otherwise it is good.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 6 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Depth of treatment:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the article interesting for a practitioner or academic to read? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does it make a significant contribution beyond a cursory web search? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 6===&lt;br /&gt;
I would say the article is most interesting for a practitioner, because there are not deep and heavy theory about the tool itself, if you want for academic read, it definitely needs some more theory, history, background and more. Nevertheless, I think the article is a good starting point for a practice.&lt;br /&gt;
No, not a significant contribution, I guess it can be called a normal contribution. If it should be significant, then in my opinion it should be much longer, and a topic that is not really written about. So it is not because it is a bad article, it is just so much of this already exist.&lt;br /&gt;
Regarding the questions asked, there are no improvement from my side, because it depends on what your focus point is. Practice or academic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 7 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Annotated bibliography:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does the article properly cite and acknowledge previous work? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does it briefly summarize the key references at the end of the article? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it based on empirical data instead of opinion? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 7===&lt;br /&gt;
It does, but I am not sure if you need to include which page and line. Personally I did not do that, just the name and not even the date visited.&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, you can see the links, and the dates.&lt;br /&gt;
It is based on data instead of opinion yes.&lt;br /&gt;
I guess if you should REALLY be going for a 12+ then maybe page and line? (I did not even do this myself)&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Feedback 2 | Reviewer name: &#039;&#039;Kevin Lim&#039;&#039;==&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 1 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Quality of the summary:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does the summary make the key focus, insights and/or contribution of the article clear? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 1===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Answer here&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 2 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Structure and logic of the article:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the argument clear? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is there a logical flow to the article? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does one part build upon the other? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the article consistent in its argument and free of contradictions? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 2===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Answer here&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 3 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Grammar and style:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the writing free of grammatical and spelling errors? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the language precise without unnecessary fill words? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 3===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Answer here&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 4 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Figures and tables:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are figures and tables clear? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do they summarize the key points of the article in a meaningful way? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 4===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Answer here&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 5 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Interest and relevance:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the article of high practical and / or academic relevance? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it made clear in the article why / how it is relevant? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 5===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Answer here&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 6 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Depth of treatment:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the article interesting for a practitioner or academic to read? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does it make a significant contribution beyond a cursory web search? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 6===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Answer here&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 7 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Annotated bibliography:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does the article properly cite and acknowledge previous work? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does it briefly summarize the key references at the end of the article? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it based on empirical data instead of opinion? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 7===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Answer here&#039;&#039;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S123368</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:42433_APPPM_2018-Feedback_template_for_Wiki_article&amp;diff=66173</id>
		<title>Talk:42433 APPPM 2018-Feedback template for Wiki article</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:42433_APPPM_2018-Feedback_template_for_Wiki_article&amp;diff=66173"/>
		<updated>2019-02-24T10:15:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S123368: Created page with &amp;quot;http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Planning_Poker_for_Improved_Project_Delivery  | Reviewer name:Kevin Lim  [edit]Question 1 · TEXT Quality of the summary:  Does the summary m...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Planning_Poker_for_Improved_Project_Delivery&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| Reviewer name:Kevin Lim &lt;br /&gt;
[edit]Question 1 · TEXT&lt;br /&gt;
Quality of the summary:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does the summary make the key focus, insights and/or contribution of the article clear?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[edit]Answer 1&lt;br /&gt;
The summary gives a good introduction alongside with the key focuses the article is going to talk about. It sets you off to a good start of knowing what you will be reading, while it also gives you a short description of what a project is.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[edit]Question 2 · TEXT&lt;br /&gt;
Structure and logic of the article:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the argument clear?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is there a logical flow to the article?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does one part build upon the other?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the article consistent in its argument and free of contradictions?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[edit]Answer 2&lt;br /&gt;
The argumentation is clear and the explanation of the concepts are fine, although it can be quite hard to read in the sea of texts, it would be much easier if there were bullet points. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The flow runs quite well, it describes one thing and then the other things, it does not go back and forth while trying to explain too much. It feels like you go from A to B to C etc. so it is quite good. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It definitely does, I do not feel confused at any point. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is consistent as it has to go good with the flow, therefore I do not think it is not consistent, furthermore I do not think there are any contradictions as the article very plainly explain what the concept is, and how it is applied. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A suggestion would be, make bullet points, try to make some points, divide it up so it would be easier to read and try maybe make some visualization, it will help on the understanding.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[edit]Question 3 · TEXT&lt;br /&gt;
Grammar and style:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the writing free of grammatical and spelling errors?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the language precise without unnecessary fill words?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[edit]Answer 3&lt;br /&gt;
There are some minor grammatical errors, but it is not so it is not understandable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I personally think, writing such a long article without fill words, would be a challenge. I do not think though, there are fill words, just to fill the word count in this case. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just a double check on the grammar, and about spelling error, there will be a underlined red line, when you write here in Wiki, so it will be avoided automatically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[edit]Question 4 · TEXT&lt;br /&gt;
Figures and tables:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are figures and tables clear?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do they summarize the key points of the article in a meaningful way?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[edit]Answer 4&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are no figures, which I miss.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think the conclusion is short and precise, nothing you would ask questions about or think that, you did not read about that in the article. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I do not think I have any suggestions for the conclusion part. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[edit]Question 5 · TEXT&lt;br /&gt;
Interest and relevance:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the article of high practical and / or academic relevance?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it made clear in the article why / how it is relevant?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[edit]Answer 5&lt;br /&gt;
I think it has both, it tells you how it can be used in real life, but it also tells you how it works, so I think this article is one of the articles, where you can look up, and think oh I can do it like what this article is telling me and actually use it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is, but I mean, as a reader, you should also know yourself if it is relevant or not, you cannot expect the article to lead you, if you have -10 knowledge in project management, which does not make sense to me. If you google a certain topic, you are typically working about a topic, and hence researching about a topic. So you know what you are doing so to speak.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think it would be very cool again if it is illustrated, but otherwise it is good. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[edit]Question 6 · TEXT&lt;br /&gt;
Depth of treatment:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the article interesting for a practitioner or academic to read?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does it make a significant contribution beyond a cursory web search?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[edit]Answer 6&lt;br /&gt;
I would say the article is most interesting for a practitioner, because there are not deep and heavy theory about the tool itself, if you want for academic read, it definitely needs some more theory, history, background and more. Nevertheless, I think the article is a good starting point for a practice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No, not a significant contribution, I guess it can be called a normal contribution. If it should be significant, then in my opinion it should be much longer, and a topic that is not really written about. So it is not because it is a bad article, it is just so much of this already exist.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Regarding the questions asked, there are no improvement from my side, because it depends on what your focus point is. Practice or academic. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[edit]Question 7 · TEXT&lt;br /&gt;
Annotated bibliography:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does the article properly cite and acknowledge previous work?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does it briefly summarize the key references at the end of the article?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it based on empirical data instead of opinion?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[edit]Answer 7&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It does, but I am not sure if you need to include which page and line. Personally I did not do that, just the name and not even the date visited. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, you can see the links, and the dates. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is based on data instead of opinion yes. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I guess if you should REALLY be going for a 12+ then maybe page and line? (I did not even do this myself)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S123368</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=65553</id>
		<title>What is SWOT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=65553"/>
		<updated>2019-02-22T20:52:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S123368: /* Annotated bibliography */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article will be presenting the tool SWOT and the main points of SWOT will be covered alongside with an introduction on how to apply SWOT. Moreover, the strength and weaknesses of this tool will also be presented so it can be taken into consideration when using the tool. SWOT can be applied in many different areas whether it is business strategy or market research but is especially used within marketing. (1)&lt;br /&gt;
Much of the original groundwork for what is known as SWOT today, was already established more than 50 years ago. A man name Kurt Lewin, his landmark posthumous text, called; Field Theory in Social Science, emphasized that an organization’s desires are influenced by different driving forces or enhancers and limitations and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
Many companies when facing a problem whether it is external or internal, by using SWOT they can create a quick overview of what your obstacles you need to overcome and what chances there are to take.&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is four initials standing for four different elements, where the elements are used to identify different perspectives of consequences. They each stands for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats. The first two factors, Strengths and Weaknesses are factors for the internal, typically when you are inside a company, you will look within to see what kind of Strengths you have and what kind of Weaknesses you have. Then there are Opportunities and Threats, which are external factors, so you look from internal to external. Opportunities help to identify chances there are to grow, expand and even more potential of a blue ocean and Threats are what kind of competitors are there, restrains, regulations. &lt;br /&gt;
We will be talking more detailed about it in the sections further down.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A brief history of SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier it was mentioned that the original groundwork was laid by Lewin, but at around the same time there were two professors from Harvard, George Albert Smith Jr. and C. Roland Christensen, who were also interested in the related issue about identifying the extent of the correlation of the organization’s strategy and its competitive environment. Therefore, they instructed their students to address if a company took into account the requirements of a competitive environments. Around a decade later another professor from the same University wanted to see the already by then named SWOT, if it could be used to explore the ways in which competitive thinking influences business strategies. (2)&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction to SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is a strategic analytical tool, for assessing strengths and weaknesses of a business, and also analysing opportunities available to the business as well as threats faced by the business. SWOT can also be used for personal purposes or when managing a project. &lt;br /&gt;
As mentioned S.W.O.T each letter stands for something different, with each one of them having their very own purpose, where they together create a very strong foundation for an analysis, whatever the purpose is for. SWOT analysis is processed by a group of stakeholders, where they &lt;br /&gt;
1. Identify internal and external obstacles and enhancers of performance&lt;br /&gt;
2. Analyse those factors, which are basted on estimates of their contribution to the net value and how much they are controllable &lt;br /&gt;
3. To decide what further or future actions to take regarding those factors. &lt;br /&gt;
Let us look at what they stand for (1): &lt;br /&gt;
* S – Strengths – Refers to internal competencies, valuables resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* W - Weaknesses – Refers to internal inhibitors of the competencies, resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* O - Opportunities – Refers to external enhancer of performance, which can be pursued or used&lt;br /&gt;
* T - Threats – An external inhibitor of performance that has the potential to reduce accomplishments.&lt;br /&gt;
Now that we know what SWOT, stands for, but how do we go around about them? There are some questions to get you started (3). &lt;br /&gt;
Strengths: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we best at?&lt;br /&gt;
* What intellectual property do we own that can help us with this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What specific skills does the current workforce have that can contribute to this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What financial resources do we have for reaching this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances do we have?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our bargaining power with both suppliers and intermediaries?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weaknesses: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we worst at doing?&lt;br /&gt;
* Is our intellectual property outdated?&lt;br /&gt;
* What training does our workforce lack?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our financial position?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances should we have, but don’t?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Opportunity: &lt;br /&gt;
* What changes in the external environment can we exploit?&lt;br /&gt;
* What weaknesses in our competitors can we use to our advantage?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new technology might become available to us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new markets might be opening to us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Threats:&lt;br /&gt;
* What might our competitors be able to do to hurt us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new legislation might damage our interests?&lt;br /&gt;
*What social changes might threaten us?&lt;br /&gt;
*How will the economic cycle affect us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Naturally, there are a lot more questions that can be asked, but these questions for each of the elements, are good starting points. These questions will help you get started on doing the SWOT. Remember, it is always a good idea to do SWOT in the early basis, because it gives you a detailed overview and gives you information, which you can use for your later processes in decision making and planning (3)&lt;br /&gt;
Visually the SWOT can be shown as this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SWOTKL.png‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 4x4 Matrix(1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
== How to conduct SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
There are no doubt a couple of ways to conduct SWOT, the one which is more of a practical method, a guide on how to fill in the SWOT (5), may be a good point to start. &lt;br /&gt;
1.	Determine the object: Which means to decide on a key project or a strategy, where you want to analyse. Write the name of it on the top of a page.&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Draw the layout: Draw a very large square box and then divide it into four smaller boxes&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Put name inside each of the boxes on the top: The top left box write; Strengths, the one beside write; Weaknesses. The box under Weaknesses, write Threats and the last one Opportunity, it should look like the figure earlier (Figure). If you wish a more detailed layout, you can add a smaller box that outlines Strengths and Weaknesses as “Internal” and Opportunities and Threats as “External”, and “Helpful” for Strengths and Opportunities, where Weaknesses and Threats will have a “Harmful” outline. &lt;br /&gt;
4.	Add the factors: Add the factors that affects the project in the different boxes.&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Draw conclusions: Decide if the project is a go or a no-go based on the negative and positive relative. Maybe you are already on a project, but want to see how the situation is, then you need to decide what to do about the information you got out of SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the Myriad guideline (1), there exist a way to conduct SWOT, in a bit of a different manner. &lt;br /&gt;
1.	Recruiting stakeholders: This phase’s idea is simply to try to include your stakeholders. According to the book; Exploring Corporate Strategy by Gerry Johnson, Kevan Scholes and Richard Whittington, you can map your stakeholders according to their interest in a project. If you google “Power-interest matrix”, you can see how you should approach your stakeholders in relative to “Interest” and “Power”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Convening the focus group: This step is to call in the stakeholders, most optimal from 8-48, and explain to them what the SWOT is, and how this little workshop is going to work. The first step is to divide the stakeholders into smaller group, where the idea is to get a well-rounded SWOT, where the stakeholders also can agree on the factors. Of course, the preparations are supposed to be made beforehand, such as already made SWOT figures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Identifying and categorizing SWOTs: Now when the stakeholders are in the groups, they should start to work on the SWOT.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Analyzing SWOTs: (6) In “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2, by Ryan Watkin and Doug Leigh (p.129), there is a figure showing, on how they are analysing the SWOT factors within a Construction Company. Similar should be done. Hereafter, two additional questions should be asked: &lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor internally or externally controlled?&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor an enhancer or an inhibitor of performance? &lt;br /&gt;
Where after you put the factors for Strengths, Weaknesses, Threats according to in “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2, by Ryan Watkin and Doug Leigh (p.131), to rank with numbers from 1-5 how much it is under your control and for enhancers and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
5.	Synthesizing SWOTs: After the previous step, now the data can be collected, and the data can be shown visually, there is an example in the “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2, by Ryan Watkin and Doug Leigh (p.134, 135).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.	Interpreting findings and deliberating action: Now it is the time to decide upon, which and how to act upon the findings. There are a few actions to take according to what the factors are. Monitor: The factors which are neither enhancer nor inhibitors. Mitigate Threats and Exploit Opportunities: Actions are to be taken, if it is seen that there are threats that will hinder the project, likewise with opportunities, it is supposed to be exploited if it will add value. Lastly, Confront Weaknesses and Leverage Strengths: Because these factors are internal, it is easier to control them, therefore strengths should be leveraged to help achieve desired results and weaknesses should be confronted. &lt;br /&gt;
As you can see the latter option is more wholesome and no doubt more detailed, depending your situation on using SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
Remember these guidelines are only one of the many guidelines.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When to use SWOT&lt;br /&gt;
Here are just a few to show when it is applicable to use SWOT, and these mentioned components are also included in something called Human Performance Technology (HPT), which can deepen your understanding on SWOT, but it is not necessary (4).&lt;br /&gt;
1.	In performance analysis &lt;br /&gt;
When identifying the degree to what internal practices and external environmental influences impact how results are currently being accomplished within an organization &lt;br /&gt;
2.	In cause analysis&lt;br /&gt;
When finding what practices should be continued or even expanded in the longer terms, as well as those that should be discontinued or replaced by other methods or tools. &lt;br /&gt;
3.	In strategic planning&lt;br /&gt;
When in strategic planning and needs assessment for identifying the factors that contribute to or detract from organizational effectiveness &lt;br /&gt;
4.	In evaluation&lt;br /&gt;
When monitoring the internal and external environment of a program for change over time, for tracking new SWOTs as they emerge, and for documenting for previously existing SWOTs as they become less influential on a program&lt;br /&gt;
Besides these quite general categories within HPT practice, SWOT can also be a great to use within (1): &lt;br /&gt;
* Appreciative inquiry –To clarify the organization’s strengths and opportunities &lt;br /&gt;
* Benchmarking – To identify possible opportunities and threats&lt;br /&gt;
* Industry analysis – For contextualizing opportunities existing in the market&lt;br /&gt;
* Situation analysis – For evaluating possible trends or ongoing trends in the markets, costs and competition and competitors&lt;br /&gt;
* Scenario planning – For considering possible and preferred long-term scenarios&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, these are the mentioned area where SWOT can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Critical success factors =&lt;br /&gt;
There is always some critical success factor, when using a tool and SWOT is not excluded (1). Here are a couple of points to be aware of if you want a good SWOT: &lt;br /&gt;
1.	Information shared by stakeholders within a SWOT analysis should never be used to play the blame game, but it should be a basis for continuous improvement&lt;br /&gt;
2.	When conducting the weaknesses, never blame the others for faults or shortcoming, because being honest is essential&lt;br /&gt;
3.	SWOT’s data can be collected live depending on the resources and constraints that exists&lt;br /&gt;
4.	It may be useful to weight the experienced stakeholders’ evaluation of the SWOT’s&lt;br /&gt;
These are some points that may be good to keep in the back of the head, when going through SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Limitations and critiques of SWOT=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not doubt that SWOT is a very strong tool when carried out right, it can provide valuable knowledge about both customer preferences and competitors intents, and nevertheless where the possible opportunities to grow are. There are also some critiques of SWOT, such as: &lt;br /&gt;
* There are no prioritization of the identified factors and it seems like it was hard to meaningfully compare the importance of one SWOT to another&lt;br /&gt;
* No figuring of costs and benefits or how to use them to achieve their objectives&lt;br /&gt;
* Sometimes it can be hazy on what is external and internal &lt;br /&gt;
And, some limitations about SWOT:&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not help determine the costs and benefits of alternative performance solutions&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not rank the factors according to their criticality&lt;br /&gt;
* It provides minimal information regarding the degree to which an organization or work team possess influence over the factors that have been identified. &lt;br /&gt;
Despite all these, it is possibly to enhance SWOT to its further usability by considering 2 factors&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Approximations of the degree which an organization can control over each factor &lt;br /&gt;
2.	Estimate the costs and benefits of the factors. &lt;br /&gt;
And turn them into questions for better decision, by asking: &lt;br /&gt;
* How much control does the organization have over each SWOT factor?&lt;br /&gt;
* How much does each SWOT factor cost or benefit the organization? &lt;br /&gt;
By using the above two questions in SWOT, it will further enhance SWOTs usability&lt;br /&gt;
(1)(2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article has served its purpose, to introduce you to the tool SWOT, where we have gone through the main points of SWOT, but have only scratched the surface. If you want to research more about SWOT, you should be more than welcome to do so, but this article has given you a good starting point. SWOT is an amazing tool to use in various areas or projects, does not matter if you want to use it for personal or professional purpose. Although, SWOT is a very widely used tool, it does have its own flaws and limitations, but it is a tool which has been used numerous times all over again worldwide, in all kinds of industries and professionals. Therefore, if you can master the tool and make up for its mentioned shortcomings with the questions that will cover its limitations to a maximum, it will be an incredible tool which is very valuable for your project or business. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Source:&lt;br /&gt;
1. https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Handbook of Improving Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. https://www.professionalacademy.com/blogs-and-advice/marketing-theories---swot-analysis&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. https://www.projectsmart.co.uk/swot-analysis-in-project-management.php&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. https://www.smartdraw.com/swot-analysis/&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S123368</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=65549</id>
		<title>What is SWOT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=65549"/>
		<updated>2019-02-22T20:52:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S123368: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article will be presenting the tool SWOT and the main points of SWOT will be covered alongside with an introduction on how to apply SWOT. Moreover, the strength and weaknesses of this tool will also be presented so it can be taken into consideration when using the tool. SWOT can be applied in many different areas whether it is business strategy or market research but is especially used within marketing. (1)&lt;br /&gt;
Much of the original groundwork for what is known as SWOT today, was already established more than 50 years ago. A man name Kurt Lewin, his landmark posthumous text, called; Field Theory in Social Science, emphasized that an organization’s desires are influenced by different driving forces or enhancers and limitations and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
Many companies when facing a problem whether it is external or internal, by using SWOT they can create a quick overview of what your obstacles you need to overcome and what chances there are to take.&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is four initials standing for four different elements, where the elements are used to identify different perspectives of consequences. They each stands for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats. The first two factors, Strengths and Weaknesses are factors for the internal, typically when you are inside a company, you will look within to see what kind of Strengths you have and what kind of Weaknesses you have. Then there are Opportunities and Threats, which are external factors, so you look from internal to external. Opportunities help to identify chances there are to grow, expand and even more potential of a blue ocean and Threats are what kind of competitors are there, restrains, regulations. &lt;br /&gt;
We will be talking more detailed about it in the sections further down.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A brief history of SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier it was mentioned that the original groundwork was laid by Lewin, but at around the same time there were two professors from Harvard, George Albert Smith Jr. and C. Roland Christensen, who were also interested in the related issue about identifying the extent of the correlation of the organization’s strategy and its competitive environment. Therefore, they instructed their students to address if a company took into account the requirements of a competitive environments. Around a decade later another professor from the same University wanted to see the already by then named SWOT, if it could be used to explore the ways in which competitive thinking influences business strategies. (2)&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction to SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is a strategic analytical tool, for assessing strengths and weaknesses of a business, and also analysing opportunities available to the business as well as threats faced by the business. SWOT can also be used for personal purposes or when managing a project. &lt;br /&gt;
As mentioned S.W.O.T each letter stands for something different, with each one of them having their very own purpose, where they together create a very strong foundation for an analysis, whatever the purpose is for. SWOT analysis is processed by a group of stakeholders, where they &lt;br /&gt;
1. Identify internal and external obstacles and enhancers of performance&lt;br /&gt;
2. Analyse those factors, which are basted on estimates of their contribution to the net value and how much they are controllable &lt;br /&gt;
3. To decide what further or future actions to take regarding those factors. &lt;br /&gt;
Let us look at what they stand for (1): &lt;br /&gt;
* S – Strengths – Refers to internal competencies, valuables resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* W - Weaknesses – Refers to internal inhibitors of the competencies, resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* O - Opportunities – Refers to external enhancer of performance, which can be pursued or used&lt;br /&gt;
* T - Threats – An external inhibitor of performance that has the potential to reduce accomplishments.&lt;br /&gt;
Now that we know what SWOT, stands for, but how do we go around about them? There are some questions to get you started (3). &lt;br /&gt;
Strengths: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we best at?&lt;br /&gt;
* What intellectual property do we own that can help us with this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What specific skills does the current workforce have that can contribute to this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What financial resources do we have for reaching this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances do we have?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our bargaining power with both suppliers and intermediaries?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weaknesses: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we worst at doing?&lt;br /&gt;
* Is our intellectual property outdated?&lt;br /&gt;
* What training does our workforce lack?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our financial position?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances should we have, but don’t?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Opportunity: &lt;br /&gt;
* What changes in the external environment can we exploit?&lt;br /&gt;
* What weaknesses in our competitors can we use to our advantage?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new technology might become available to us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new markets might be opening to us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Threats:&lt;br /&gt;
* What might our competitors be able to do to hurt us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new legislation might damage our interests?&lt;br /&gt;
*What social changes might threaten us?&lt;br /&gt;
*How will the economic cycle affect us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Naturally, there are a lot more questions that can be asked, but these questions for each of the elements, are good starting points. These questions will help you get started on doing the SWOT. Remember, it is always a good idea to do SWOT in the early basis, because it gives you a detailed overview and gives you information, which you can use for your later processes in decision making and planning (3)&lt;br /&gt;
Visually the SWOT can be shown as this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SWOTKL.png‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 4x4 Matrix(1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
== How to conduct SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
There are no doubt a couple of ways to conduct SWOT, the one which is more of a practical method, a guide on how to fill in the SWOT (5), may be a good point to start. &lt;br /&gt;
1.	Determine the object: Which means to decide on a key project or a strategy, where you want to analyse. Write the name of it on the top of a page.&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Draw the layout: Draw a very large square box and then divide it into four smaller boxes&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Put name inside each of the boxes on the top: The top left box write; Strengths, the one beside write; Weaknesses. The box under Weaknesses, write Threats and the last one Opportunity, it should look like the figure earlier (Figure). If you wish a more detailed layout, you can add a smaller box that outlines Strengths and Weaknesses as “Internal” and Opportunities and Threats as “External”, and “Helpful” for Strengths and Opportunities, where Weaknesses and Threats will have a “Harmful” outline. &lt;br /&gt;
4.	Add the factors: Add the factors that affects the project in the different boxes.&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Draw conclusions: Decide if the project is a go or a no-go based on the negative and positive relative. Maybe you are already on a project, but want to see how the situation is, then you need to decide what to do about the information you got out of SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the Myriad guideline (1), there exist a way to conduct SWOT, in a bit of a different manner. &lt;br /&gt;
1.	Recruiting stakeholders: This phase’s idea is simply to try to include your stakeholders. According to the book; Exploring Corporate Strategy by Gerry Johnson, Kevan Scholes and Richard Whittington, you can map your stakeholders according to their interest in a project. If you google “Power-interest matrix”, you can see how you should approach your stakeholders in relative to “Interest” and “Power”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Convening the focus group: This step is to call in the stakeholders, most optimal from 8-48, and explain to them what the SWOT is, and how this little workshop is going to work. The first step is to divide the stakeholders into smaller group, where the idea is to get a well-rounded SWOT, where the stakeholders also can agree on the factors. Of course, the preparations are supposed to be made beforehand, such as already made SWOT figures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Identifying and categorizing SWOTs: Now when the stakeholders are in the groups, they should start to work on the SWOT.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Analyzing SWOTs: (6) In “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2, by Ryan Watkin and Doug Leigh (p.129), there is a figure showing, on how they are analysing the SWOT factors within a Construction Company. Similar should be done. Hereafter, two additional questions should be asked: &lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor internally or externally controlled?&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor an enhancer or an inhibitor of performance? &lt;br /&gt;
Where after you put the factors for Strengths, Weaknesses, Threats according to in “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2, by Ryan Watkin and Doug Leigh (p.131), to rank with numbers from 1-5 how much it is under your control and for enhancers and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
5.	Synthesizing SWOTs: After the previous step, now the data can be collected, and the data can be shown visually, there is an example in the “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2, by Ryan Watkin and Doug Leigh (p.134, 135).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.	Interpreting findings and deliberating action: Now it is the time to decide upon, which and how to act upon the findings. There are a few actions to take according to what the factors are. Monitor: The factors which are neither enhancer nor inhibitors. Mitigate Threats and Exploit Opportunities: Actions are to be taken, if it is seen that there are threats that will hinder the project, likewise with opportunities, it is supposed to be exploited if it will add value. Lastly, Confront Weaknesses and Leverage Strengths: Because these factors are internal, it is easier to control them, therefore strengths should be leveraged to help achieve desired results and weaknesses should be confronted. &lt;br /&gt;
As you can see the latter option is more wholesome and no doubt more detailed, depending your situation on using SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
Remember these guidelines are only one of the many guidelines.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When to use SWOT&lt;br /&gt;
Here are just a few to show when it is applicable to use SWOT, and these mentioned components are also included in something called Human Performance Technology (HPT), which can deepen your understanding on SWOT, but it is not necessary (4).&lt;br /&gt;
1.	In performance analysis &lt;br /&gt;
When identifying the degree to what internal practices and external environmental influences impact how results are currently being accomplished within an organization &lt;br /&gt;
2.	In cause analysis&lt;br /&gt;
When finding what practices should be continued or even expanded in the longer terms, as well as those that should be discontinued or replaced by other methods or tools. &lt;br /&gt;
3.	In strategic planning&lt;br /&gt;
When in strategic planning and needs assessment for identifying the factors that contribute to or detract from organizational effectiveness &lt;br /&gt;
4.	In evaluation&lt;br /&gt;
When monitoring the internal and external environment of a program for change over time, for tracking new SWOTs as they emerge, and for documenting for previously existing SWOTs as they become less influential on a program&lt;br /&gt;
Besides these quite general categories within HPT practice, SWOT can also be a great to use within (1): &lt;br /&gt;
* Appreciative inquiry –To clarify the organization’s strengths and opportunities &lt;br /&gt;
* Benchmarking – To identify possible opportunities and threats&lt;br /&gt;
* Industry analysis – For contextualizing opportunities existing in the market&lt;br /&gt;
* Situation analysis – For evaluating possible trends or ongoing trends in the markets, costs and competition and competitors&lt;br /&gt;
* Scenario planning – For considering possible and preferred long-term scenarios&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, these are the mentioned area where SWOT can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Critical success factors =&lt;br /&gt;
There is always some critical success factor, when using a tool and SWOT is not excluded (1). Here are a couple of points to be aware of if you want a good SWOT: &lt;br /&gt;
1.	Information shared by stakeholders within a SWOT analysis should never be used to play the blame game, but it should be a basis for continuous improvement&lt;br /&gt;
2.	When conducting the weaknesses, never blame the others for faults or shortcoming, because being honest is essential&lt;br /&gt;
3.	SWOT’s data can be collected live depending on the resources and constraints that exists&lt;br /&gt;
4.	It may be useful to weight the experienced stakeholders’ evaluation of the SWOT’s&lt;br /&gt;
These are some points that may be good to keep in the back of the head, when going through SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Limitations and critiques of SWOT=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not doubt that SWOT is a very strong tool when carried out right, it can provide valuable knowledge about both customer preferences and competitors intents, and nevertheless where the possible opportunities to grow are. There are also some critiques of SWOT, such as: &lt;br /&gt;
* There are no prioritization of the identified factors and it seems like it was hard to meaningfully compare the importance of one SWOT to another&lt;br /&gt;
* No figuring of costs and benefits or how to use them to achieve their objectives&lt;br /&gt;
* Sometimes it can be hazy on what is external and internal &lt;br /&gt;
And, some limitations about SWOT:&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not help determine the costs and benefits of alternative performance solutions&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not rank the factors according to their criticality&lt;br /&gt;
* It provides minimal information regarding the degree to which an organization or work team possess influence over the factors that have been identified. &lt;br /&gt;
Despite all these, it is possibly to enhance SWOT to its further usability by considering 2 factors&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Approximations of the degree which an organization can control over each factor &lt;br /&gt;
2.	Estimate the costs and benefits of the factors. &lt;br /&gt;
And turn them into questions for better decision, by asking: &lt;br /&gt;
* How much control does the organization have over each SWOT factor?&lt;br /&gt;
* How much does each SWOT factor cost or benefit the organization? &lt;br /&gt;
By using the above two questions in SWOT, it will further enhance SWOTs usability&lt;br /&gt;
(1)(2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article has served its purpose, to introduce you to the tool SWOT, where we have gone through the main points of SWOT, but have only scratched the surface. If you want to research more about SWOT, you should be more than welcome to do so, but this article has given you a good starting point. SWOT is an amazing tool to use in various areas or projects, does not matter if you want to use it for personal or professional purpose. Although, SWOT is a very widely used tool, it does have its own flaws and limitations, but it is a tool which has been used numerous times all over again worldwide, in all kinds of industries and professionals. Therefore, if you can master the tool and make up for its mentioned shortcomings with the questions that will cover its limitations to a maximum, it will be an incredible tool which is very valuable for your project or business. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Source:&lt;br /&gt;
1. https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&lt;br /&gt;
2. Handbook of Improving Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&lt;br /&gt;
3. https://www.professionalacademy.com/blogs-and-advice/marketing-theories---swot-analysis&lt;br /&gt;
4. https://www.projectsmart.co.uk/swot-analysis-in-project-management.php&lt;br /&gt;
5. https://www.smartdraw.com/swot-analysis/&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S123368</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=65537</id>
		<title>What is SWOT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=65537"/>
		<updated>2019-02-22T20:49:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S123368: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article will be presenting the tool SWOT and the main points of SWOT will be covered alongside with an introduction on how to apply SWOT. Moreover, the strength and weaknesses of this tool will also be presented so it can be taken into consideration when using the tool. SWOT can be applied in many different areas whether it is business strategy or market research but is especially used within marketing. (1)&lt;br /&gt;
Much of the original groundwork for what is known as SWOT today, was already established more than 50 years ago. A man name Kurt Lewin, his landmark posthumous text, called; Field Theory in Social Science, emphasized that an organization’s desires are influenced by different driving forces or enhancers and limitations and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
Many companies when facing a problem whether it is external or internal, by using SWOT they can create a quick overview of what your obstacles you need to overcome and what chances there are to take.&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is four initials standing for four different elements, where the elements are used to identify different perspectives of consequences. They each stands for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats. The first two factors, Strengths and Weaknesses are factors for the internal, typically when you are inside a company, you will look within to see what kind of Strengths you have and what kind of Weaknesses you have. Then there are Opportunities and Threats, which are external factors, so you look from internal to external. Opportunities help to identify chances there are to grow, expand and even more potential of a blue ocean and Threats are what kind of competitors are there, restrains, regulations. &lt;br /&gt;
We will be talking more detailed about it in the sections further down.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A brief history of SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier it was mentioned that the original groundwork was laid by Lewin, but at around the same time there were two professors from Harvard, George Albert Smith Jr. and C. Roland Christensen, who were also interested in the related issue about identifying the extent of the correlation of the organization’s strategy and its competitive environment. Therefore, they instructed their students to address if a company took into account the requirements of a competitive environments. Around a decade later another professor from the same University wanted to see the already by then named SWOT, if it could be used to explore the ways in which competitive thinking influences business strategies. (2)&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction to SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is a strategic analytical tool, for assessing strengths and weaknesses of a business, and also analysing opportunities available to the business as well as threats faced by the business. SWOT can also be used for personal purposes or when managing a project. &lt;br /&gt;
As mentioned S.W.O.T each letter stands for something different, with each one of them having their very own purpose, where they together create a very strong foundation for an analysis, whatever the purpose is for. SWOT analysis is processed by a group of stakeholders, where they &lt;br /&gt;
1. Identify internal and external obstacles and enhancers of performance&lt;br /&gt;
2. Analyse those factors, which are basted on estimates of their contribution to the net value and how much they are controllable &lt;br /&gt;
3. To decide what further or future actions to take regarding those factors. &lt;br /&gt;
Let us look at what they stand for (1): &lt;br /&gt;
* S – Strengths – Refers to internal competencies, valuables resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* W - Weaknesses – Refers to internal inhibitors of the competencies, resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* O - Opportunities – Refers to external enhancer of performance, which can be pursued or used&lt;br /&gt;
* T - Threats – An external inhibitor of performance that has the potential to reduce accomplishments.&lt;br /&gt;
Now that we know what SWOT, stands for, but how do we go around about them? There are some questions to get you started (3). &lt;br /&gt;
Strengths: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we best at?&lt;br /&gt;
* What intellectual property do we own that can help us with this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What specific skills does the current workforce have that can contribute to this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What financial resources do we have for reaching this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances do we have?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our bargaining power with both suppliers and intermediaries?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weaknesses: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we worst at doing?&lt;br /&gt;
* Is our intellectual property outdated?&lt;br /&gt;
* What training does our workforce lack?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our financial position?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances should we have, but don’t?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Opportunity: &lt;br /&gt;
* What changes in the external environment can we exploit?&lt;br /&gt;
* What weaknesses in our competitors can we use to our advantage?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new technology might become available to us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new markets might be opening to us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Threats:&lt;br /&gt;
* What might our competitors be able to do to hurt us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new legislation might damage our interests?&lt;br /&gt;
*What social changes might threaten us?&lt;br /&gt;
*How will the economic cycle affect us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Naturally, there are a lot more questions that can be asked, but these questions for each of the elements, are good starting points. These questions will help you get started on doing the SWOT. Remember, it is always a good idea to do SWOT in the early basis, because it gives you a detailed overview and gives you information, which you can use for your later processes in decision making and planning (3)&lt;br /&gt;
Visually the SWOT can be shown as this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SWOTKL.png‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 4x4 Matrix(1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
== How to conduct SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
There are no doubt a couple of ways to conduct SWOT, the one which is more of a practical method, a guide on how to fill in the SWOT (5), may be a good point to start. &lt;br /&gt;
1.	Determine the object: Which means to decide on a key project or a strategy, where you want to analyse. Write the name of it on the top of a page.&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Draw the layout: Draw a very large square box and then divide it into four smaller boxes&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Put name inside each of the boxes on the top: The top left box write; Strengths, the one beside write; Weaknesses. The box under Weaknesses, write Threats and the last one Opportunity, it should look like the figure earlier (Figure). If you wish a more detailed layout, you can add a smaller box that outlines Strengths and Weaknesses as “Internal” and Opportunities and Threats as “External”, and “Helpful” for Strengths and Opportunities, where Weaknesses and Threats will have a “Harmful” outline. &lt;br /&gt;
4.	Add the factors: Add the factors that affects the project in the different boxes.&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Draw conclusions: Decide if the project is a go or a no-go based on the negative and positive relative. Maybe you are already on a project, but want to see how the situation is, then you need to decide what to do about the information you got out of SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the Myriad guideline (1), there exist a way to conduct SWOT, in a bit of a different manner. &lt;br /&gt;
1.	Recruiting stakeholders: This phase’s idea is simply to try to include your stakeholders. According to the book; Exploring Corporate Strategy by Gerry Johnson, Kevan Scholes and Richard Whittington, you can map your stakeholders according to their interest in a project. If you google “Power-interest matrix”, you can see how you should approach your stakeholders in relative to “Interest” and “Power”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Convening the focus group: This step is to call in the stakeholders, most optimal from 8-48, and explain to them what the SWOT is, and how this little workshop is going to work. The first step is to divide the stakeholders into smaller group, where the idea is to get a well-rounded SWOT, where the stakeholders also can agree on the factors. Of course, the preparations are supposed to be made beforehand, such as already made SWOT figures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Identifying and categorizing SWOTs: Now when the stakeholders are in the groups, they should start to work on the SWOT.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Analyzing SWOTs: (6) In “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2, by Ryan Watkin and Doug Leigh (p.129), there is a figure showing, on how they are analysing the SWOT factors within a Construction Company. Similar should be done. Hereafter, two additional questions should be asked: &lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor internally or externally controlled?&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor an enhancer or an inhibitor of performance? &lt;br /&gt;
Where after you put the factors for Strengths, Weaknesses, Threats according to in “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2, by Ryan Watkin and Doug Leigh (p.131), to rank with numbers from 1-5 how much it is under your control and for enhancers and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
5.	Synthesizing SWOTs: After the previous step, now the data can be collected, and the data can be shown visually, there is an example in the “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2, by Ryan Watkin and Doug Leigh (p.134, 135).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.	Interpreting findings and deliberating action: Now it is the time to decide upon, which and how to act upon the findings. There are a few actions to take according to what the factors are. Monitor: The factors which are neither enhancer nor inhibitors. Mitigate Threats and Exploit Opportunities: Actions are to be taken, if it is seen that there are threats that will hinder the project, likewise with opportunities, it is supposed to be exploited if it will add value. Lastly, Confront Weaknesses and Leverage Strengths: Because these factors are internal, it is easier to control them, therefore strengths should be leveraged to help achieve desired results and weaknesses should be confronted. &lt;br /&gt;
As you can see the latter option is more wholesome and no doubt more detailed, depending your situation on using SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
Remember these guidelines are only one of the many guidelines.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When to use SWOT&lt;br /&gt;
Here are just a few to show when it is applicable to use SWOT, and these mentioned components are also included in something called Human Performance Technology (HPT), which can deepen your understanding on SWOT, but it is not necessary (4).&lt;br /&gt;
1.	In performance analysis &lt;br /&gt;
When identifying the degree to what internal practices and external environmental influences impact how results are currently being accomplished within an organization &lt;br /&gt;
2.	In cause analysis&lt;br /&gt;
When finding what practices should be continued or even expanded in the longer terms, as well as those that should be discontinued or replaced by other methods or tools. &lt;br /&gt;
3.	In strategic planning&lt;br /&gt;
When in strategic planning and needs assessment for identifying the factors that contribute to or detract from organizational effectiveness &lt;br /&gt;
4.	In evaluation&lt;br /&gt;
When monitoring the internal and external environment of a program for change over time, for tracking new SWOTs as they emerge, and for documenting for previously existing SWOTs as they become less influential on a program&lt;br /&gt;
Besides these quite general categories within HPT practice, SWOT can also be a great to use within (1): &lt;br /&gt;
* Appreciative inquiry –To clarify the organization’s strengths and opportunities &lt;br /&gt;
* Benchmarking – To identify possible opportunities and threats&lt;br /&gt;
* Industry analysis – For contextualizing opportunities existing in the market&lt;br /&gt;
* Situation analysis – For evaluating possible trends or ongoing trends in the markets, costs and competition and competitors&lt;br /&gt;
* Scenario planning – For considering possible and preferred long-term scenarios&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, these are the mentioned area where SWOT can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Critical success factors =&lt;br /&gt;
There is always some critical success factor, when using a tool and SWOT is not excluded (1). Here are a couple of points to be aware of if you want a good SWOT: &lt;br /&gt;
1.	Information shared by stakeholders within a SWOT analysis should never be used to play the blame game, but it should be a basis for continuous improvement&lt;br /&gt;
2.	When conducting the weaknesses, never blame the others for faults or shortcoming, because being honest is essential&lt;br /&gt;
3.	SWOT’s data can be collected live depending on the resources and constraints that exists&lt;br /&gt;
4.	It may be useful to weight the experienced stakeholders’ evaluation of the SWOT’s&lt;br /&gt;
These are some points that may be good to keep in the back of the head, when going through SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
== Relevance in project management =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Limitations and critiques of SWOT=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not doubt that SWOT is a very strong tool when carried out right, it can provide valuable knowledge about both customer preferences and competitors intents, and nevertheless where the possible opportunities to grow are. There are also some critiques of SWOT, such as: &lt;br /&gt;
* There are no prioritization of the identified factors and it seems like it was hard to meaningfully compare the importance of one SWOT to another&lt;br /&gt;
* No figuring of costs and benefits or how to use them to achieve their objectives&lt;br /&gt;
* Sometimes it can be hazy on what is external and internal &lt;br /&gt;
And, some limitations about SWOT:&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not help determine the costs and benefits of alternative performance solutions&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not rank the factors according to their criticality&lt;br /&gt;
* It provides minimal information regarding the degree to which an organization or work team possess influence over the factors that have been identified. &lt;br /&gt;
Despite all these, it is possibly to enhance SWOT to its further usability by considering 2 factors&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Approximations of the degree which an organization can control over each factor &lt;br /&gt;
2.	Estimate the costs and benefits of the factors. &lt;br /&gt;
And turn them into questions for better decision, by asking: &lt;br /&gt;
* How much control does the organization have over each SWOT factor?&lt;br /&gt;
* How much does each SWOT factor cost or benefit the organization? &lt;br /&gt;
By using the above two questions in SWOT, it will further enhance SWOTs usability&lt;br /&gt;
(1)(2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article has served its purpose, to introduce you to the tool SWOT, where we have gone through the main points of SWOT, but have only scratched the surface. If you want to research more about SWOT, you should be more than welcome to do so, but this article has given you a good starting point. SWOT is an amazing tool to use in various areas or projects, does not matter if you want to use it for personal or professional purpose. Although, SWOT is a very widely used tool, it does have its own flaws and limitations, but it is a tool which has been used numerous times all over again worldwide, in all kinds of industries and professionals. Therefore, if you can master the tool and make up for its mentioned shortcomings with the questions that will cover its limitations to a maximum, it will be an incredible tool which is very valuable for your project or business. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Source:&lt;br /&gt;
1. https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&lt;br /&gt;
4. https://www.projectsmart.co.uk/swot-analysis-in-project-management.php&lt;br /&gt;
2. file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/HANDBOOK%20OF%20HPT_THIRD%20EDITION.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
(2) Handbook of Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. https://www.professionalacademy.com/blogs-and-advice/marketing-theories---swot-analysis&lt;br /&gt;
(5) https://www.smartdraw.com/swot-analysis/&lt;br /&gt;
(6) https://books.google.dk/books?id=p7JY6UJuxc4C&amp;amp;pg=PA129&amp;amp;lpg=PA129&amp;amp;dq=Exhibit+5.1+SWOT+Factors+Identified+Within+a+Construction+Company&amp;amp;source=bl&amp;amp;ots=aJph0o52Du&amp;amp;sig=ACfU3U2JjxiFa1VbQuGNZd81pFHCGmZ0ww&amp;amp;hl=da&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;ved=2ahUKEwj8qv7e5cLgAhUOJlAKHZ3aAp4Q6AEwAHoECCQQAQ#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=Exhibit%205.1%20SWOT%20Factors%20Identified%20Within%20a%20Construction%20Company&amp;amp;f=false&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S123368</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=65533</id>
		<title>What is SWOT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=65533"/>
		<updated>2019-02-22T20:48:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S123368: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article will be presenting the tool SWOT and the main points of SWOT will be covered alongside with an introduction on how to apply SWOT. Moreover, the strength and weaknesses of this tool will also be presented so it can be taken into consideration when using the tool. SWOT can be applied in many different areas whether it is business strategy or market research but is especially used within marketing. (1)&lt;br /&gt;
Much of the original groundwork for what is known as SWOT today, was already established more than 50 years ago. A man name Kurt Lewin, his landmark posthumous text, called; Field Theory in Social Science, emphasized that an organization’s desires are influenced by different driving forces or enhancers and limitations and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
Many companies when facing a problem whether it is external or internal, by using SWOT they can create a quick overview of what your obstacles you need to overcome and what chances there are to take.&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is four initials standing for four different elements, where the elements are used to identify different perspectives of consequences. They each stands for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats. The first two factors, Strengths and Weaknesses are factors for the internal, typically when you are inside a company, you will look within to see what kind of Strengths you have and what kind of Weaknesses you have. Then there are Opportunities and Threats, which are external factors, so you look from internal to external. Opportunities help to identify chances there are to grow, expand and even more potential of a blue ocean and Threats are what kind of competitors are there, restrains, regulations. &lt;br /&gt;
We will be talking more detailed about it in the sections further down.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A brief history of SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier it was mentioned that the original groundwork was laid by Lewin, but at around the same time there were two professors from Harvard, George Albert Smith Jr. and C. Roland Christensen, who were also interested in the related issue about identifying the extent of the correlation of the organization’s strategy and its competitive environment. Therefore, they instructed their students to address if a company took into account the requirements of a competitive environments. Around a decade later another professor from the same University wanted to see the already by then named SWOT, if it could be used to explore the ways in which competitive thinking influences business strategies. (2)&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction to SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is a strategic analytical tool, for assessing strengths and weaknesses of a business, and also analysing opportunities available to the business as well as threats faced by the business. SWOT can also be used for personal purposes or when managing a project. &lt;br /&gt;
As mentioned S.W.O.T each letter stands for something different, with each one of them having their very own purpose, where they together create a very strong foundation for an analysis, whatever the purpose is for. SWOT analysis is processed by a group of stakeholders, where they &lt;br /&gt;
1. Identify internal and external obstacles and enhancers of performance&lt;br /&gt;
2. Analyse those factors, which are basted on estimates of their contribution to the net value and how much they are controllable &lt;br /&gt;
3. To decide what further or future actions to take regarding those factors. &lt;br /&gt;
Let us look at what they stand for (1): &lt;br /&gt;
* S – Strengths – Refers to internal competencies, valuables resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* W - Weaknesses – Refers to internal inhibitors of the competencies, resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* O - Opportunities – Refers to external enhancer of performance, which can be pursued or used&lt;br /&gt;
* T - Threats – An external inhibitor of performance that has the potential to reduce accomplishments.&lt;br /&gt;
Now that we know what SWOT, stands for, but how do we go around about them? There are some questions to get you started (3). &lt;br /&gt;
Strengths: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we best at?&lt;br /&gt;
* What intellectual property do we own that can help us with this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What specific skills does the current workforce have that can contribute to this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What financial resources do we have for reaching this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances do we have?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our bargaining power with both suppliers and intermediaries?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weaknesses: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we worst at doing?&lt;br /&gt;
* Is our intellectual property outdated?&lt;br /&gt;
* What training does our workforce lack?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our financial position?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances should we have, but don’t?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Opportunity: &lt;br /&gt;
* What changes in the external environment can we exploit?&lt;br /&gt;
* What weaknesses in our competitors can we use to our advantage?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new technology might become available to us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new markets might be opening to us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Threats:&lt;br /&gt;
* What might our competitors be able to do to hurt us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new legislation might damage our interests?&lt;br /&gt;
*What social changes might threaten us?&lt;br /&gt;
*How will the economic cycle affect us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Naturally, there are a lot more questions that can be asked, but these questions for each of the elements, are good starting points. These questions will help you get started on doing the SWOT. Remember, it is always a good idea to do SWOT in the early basis, because it gives you a detailed overview and gives you information, which you can use for your later processes in decision making and planning (3)&lt;br /&gt;
Visually the SWOT can be shown as this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SWOTKL.png‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 4x4 Matrix(1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
== How to conduct SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
There are no doubt a couple of ways to conduct SWOT, the one which is more of a practical method, a guide on how to fill in the SWOT (5), may be a good point to start. &lt;br /&gt;
1.	Determine the object: Which means to decide on a key project or a strategy, where you want to analyse. Write the name of it on the top of a page.&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Draw the layout: Draw a very large square box and then divide it into four smaller boxes&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Put name inside each of the boxes on the top: The top left box write; Strengths, the one beside write; Weaknesses. The box under Weaknesses, write Threats and the last one Opportunity, it should look like the figure earlier (Figure). If you wish a more detailed layout, you can add a smaller box that outlines Strengths and Weaknesses as “Internal” and Opportunities and Threats as “External”, and “Helpful” for Strengths and Opportunities, where Weaknesses and Threats will have a “Harmful” outline. &lt;br /&gt;
4.	Add the factors: Add the factors that affects the project in the different boxes.&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Draw conclusions: Decide if the project is a go or a no-go based on the negative and positive relative. Maybe you are already on a project, but want to see how the situation is, then you need to decide what to do about the information you got out of SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the Myriad guideline (1), there exist a way to conduct SWOT, in a bit of a different manner. &lt;br /&gt;
1.	Recruiting stakeholders: This phase’s idea is simply to try to include your stakeholders. According to the book; Exploring Corporate Strategy by Gerry Johnson, Kevan Scholes and Richard Whittington, you can map your stakeholders according to their interest in a project. If you google “Power-interest matrix”, you can see how you should approach your stakeholders in relative to “Interest” and “Power”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Convening the focus group: This step is to call in the stakeholders, most optimal from 8-48, and explain to them what the SWOT is, and how this little workshop is going to work. The first step is to divide the stakeholders into smaller group, where the idea is to get a well-rounded SWOT, where the stakeholders also can agree on the factors. Of course, the preparations are supposed to be made beforehand, such as already made SWOT figures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Identifying and categorizing SWOTs: Now when the stakeholders are in the groups, they should start to work on the SWOT.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Analyzing SWOTs: (6) In “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2, by Ryan Watkin and Doug Leigh (p.129), there is a figure showing, on how they are analysing the SWOT factors within a Construction Company. Similar should be done. Hereafter, two additional questions should be asked: &lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor internally or externally controlled?&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor an enhancer or an inhibitor of performance? &lt;br /&gt;
Where after you put the factors for Strengths, Weaknesses, Threats according to in “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2, by Ryan Watkin and Doug Leigh (p.131), to rank with numbers from 1-5 how much it is under your control and for enhancers and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
5.	Synthesizing SWOTs: After the previous step, now the data can be collected, and the data can be shown visually, there is an example in the “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2, by Ryan Watkin and Doug Leigh (p.134, 135).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.	Interpreting findings and deliberating action: Now it is the time to decide upon, which and how to act upon the findings. There are a few actions to take according to what the factors are. Monitor: The factors which are neither enhancer nor inhibitors. Mitigate Threats and Exploit Opportunities: Actions are to be taken, if it is seen that there are threats that will hinder the project, likewise with opportunities, it is supposed to be exploited if it will add value. Lastly, Confront Weaknesses and Leverage Strengths: Because these factors are internal, it is easier to control them, therefore strengths should be leveraged to help achieve desired results and weaknesses should be confronted. &lt;br /&gt;
As you can see the latter option is more wholesome and no doubt more detailed, depending your situation on using SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
Remember these guidelines are only one of the many guidelines.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When to use SWOT&lt;br /&gt;
Here are just a few to show when it is applicable to use SWOT, and these mentioned components are also included in something called Human Performance Technology (HPT), which can deepen your understanding on SWOT, but it is not necessary (4).&lt;br /&gt;
1.	In performance analysis &lt;br /&gt;
When identifying the degree to what internal practices and external environmental influences impact how results are currently being accomplished within an organization &lt;br /&gt;
2.	In cause analysis&lt;br /&gt;
When finding what practices should be continued or even expanded in the longer terms, as well as those that should be discontinued or replaced by other methods or tools. &lt;br /&gt;
3.	In strategic planning&lt;br /&gt;
When in strategic planning and needs assessment for identifying the factors that contribute to or detract from organizational effectiveness &lt;br /&gt;
4.	In evaluation&lt;br /&gt;
When monitoring the internal and external environment of a program for change over time, for tracking new SWOTs as they emerge, and for documenting for previously existing SWOTs as they become less influential on a program&lt;br /&gt;
Besides these quite general categories within HPT practice, SWOT can also be a great to use within (1): &lt;br /&gt;
* Appreciative inquiry –To clarify the organization’s strengths and opportunities &lt;br /&gt;
* Benchmarking – To identify possible opportunities and threats&lt;br /&gt;
* Industry analysis – For contextualizing opportunities existing in the market&lt;br /&gt;
* Situation analysis – For evaluating possible trends or ongoing trends in the markets, costs and competition and competitors&lt;br /&gt;
* Scenario planning – For considering possible and preferred long-term scenarios&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, these are the mentioned area where SWOT can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Critical success factors =&lt;br /&gt;
There is always some critical success factor, when using a tool and SWOT is not excluded (1). Here are a couple of points to be aware of if you want a good SWOT: &lt;br /&gt;
1.	Information shared by stakeholders within a SWOT analysis should never be used to play the blame game, but it should be a basis for continuous improvement&lt;br /&gt;
2.	When conducting the weaknesses, never blame the others for faults or shortcoming, because being honest is essential&lt;br /&gt;
3.	SWOT’s data can be collected live depending on the resources and constraints that exists&lt;br /&gt;
4.	It may be useful to weight the experienced stakeholders’ evaluation of the SWOT’s&lt;br /&gt;
These are some points that may be good to keep in the back of the head, when going through SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
== Relevance in project management =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Limitations and critiques of SWOT=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not doubt that SWOT is a very strong tool when carried out right, it can provide valuable knowledge about both customer preferences and competitors intents, and nevertheless where the possible opportunities to grow are. There are also some critiques of SWOT, such as: &lt;br /&gt;
* There are no prioritization of the identified factors and it seems like it was hard to meaningfully compare the importance of one SWOT to another&lt;br /&gt;
* No figuring of costs and benefits or how to use them to achieve their objectives&lt;br /&gt;
* Sometimes it can be hazy on what is external and internal &lt;br /&gt;
And, some limitations about SWOT:&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not help determine the costs and benefits of alternative performance solutions&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not rank the factors according to their criticality&lt;br /&gt;
* It provides minimal information regarding the degree to which an organization or work team possess influence over the factors that have been identified. &lt;br /&gt;
Despite all these, it is possibly to enhance SWOT to its further usability by considering 2 factors&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Approximations of the degree which an organization can control over each factor &lt;br /&gt;
2.	Estimate the costs and benefits of the factors. &lt;br /&gt;
And turn them into questions for better decision, by asking: &lt;br /&gt;
* How much control does the organization have over each SWOT factor?&lt;br /&gt;
* How much does each SWOT factor cost or benefit the organization? &lt;br /&gt;
By using the above two questions in SWOT, it will further enhance SWOTs usability&lt;br /&gt;
(1)(2)&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article has served its purpose, to introduce you to the tool SWOT, where we have gone through the main points of SWOT, but have only scratched the surface. If you want to research more about SWOT, you should be more than welcome to do so, but this article has given you a good starting point. SWOT is an amazing tool to use in various areas or projects, does not matter if you want to use it for personal or professional purpose. Although, SWOT is a very widely used tool, it does have its own flaws and limitations, but it is a tool which has been used numerous times all over again worldwide, in all kinds of industries and professionals. Therefore, if you can master the tool and make up for its mentioned shortcomings with the questions that will cover its limitations to a maximum, it will be an incredible tool which is very valuable for your project or business. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Source:&lt;br /&gt;
1. https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&lt;br /&gt;
4. https://www.projectsmart.co.uk/swot-analysis-in-project-management.php&lt;br /&gt;
2. file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/HANDBOOK%20OF%20HPT_THIRD%20EDITION.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
(2) Handbook of Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. https://www.professionalacademy.com/blogs-and-advice/marketing-theories---swot-analysis&lt;br /&gt;
(5) https://www.smartdraw.com/swot-analysis/&lt;br /&gt;
(6) https://books.google.dk/books?id=p7JY6UJuxc4C&amp;amp;pg=PA129&amp;amp;lpg=PA129&amp;amp;dq=Exhibit+5.1+SWOT+Factors+Identified+Within+a+Construction+Company&amp;amp;source=bl&amp;amp;ots=aJph0o52Du&amp;amp;sig=ACfU3U2JjxiFa1VbQuGNZd81pFHCGmZ0ww&amp;amp;hl=da&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;ved=2ahUKEwj8qv7e5cLgAhUOJlAKHZ3aAp4Q6AEwAHoECCQQAQ#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=Exhibit%205.1%20SWOT%20Factors%20Identified%20Within%20a%20Construction%20Company&amp;amp;f=false&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S123368</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Articles_Spring_Term_2019&amp;diff=62106</id>
		<title>Articles Spring Term 2019</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Articles_Spring_Term_2019&amp;diff=62106"/>
		<updated>2019-02-19T10:33:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S123368: /* Overview of 2019 Wiki articles */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Overview of 2019 Wiki articles=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+Spring Term 2019 Wiki Articles&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|13&lt;br /&gt;
|Evgenia&lt;br /&gt;
|Chatzivasileiou&lt;br /&gt;
|s182299&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Project Sponsorship]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|13&lt;br /&gt;
|Theodoros&lt;br /&gt;
|Seremetakis&lt;br /&gt;
|s183272&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Investment portfolio management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|5&lt;br /&gt;
|Federica&lt;br /&gt;
|Menti&lt;br /&gt;
|S182994&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Getting Things Done (David Allen)]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|Panagiotis&lt;br /&gt;
|Vounatsos&lt;br /&gt;
|PanosVoun&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Epistemic vs. Aleatory uncertainty]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|9&lt;br /&gt;
|Jack&lt;br /&gt;
|Frain&lt;br /&gt;
|Fraino12345&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Stakeholder Management Processes in Projects]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|14&lt;br /&gt;
|Alexandros&lt;br /&gt;
|Bellos&lt;br /&gt;
|AlexBellos&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Effective Brainstorming]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group Number Pending&lt;br /&gt;
|Edoardo&lt;br /&gt;
|Braccini&lt;br /&gt;
|EdoBraa&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Benefits Realisation Management (BRM)]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group Number Pending&lt;br /&gt;
|Andrea&lt;br /&gt;
|Könnecke&lt;br /&gt;
|Andrea Könnecke&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Shannon &amp;amp; Weaver Model for Communication]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 10&lt;br /&gt;
|Srdjan&lt;br /&gt;
|Gluhovic&lt;br /&gt;
|srdjangluhovic&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Project Scope Control Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|11&lt;br /&gt;
|Casper&lt;br /&gt;
|Claudinger&lt;br /&gt;
|Casper&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Managing projects in a functional organization]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|8&lt;br /&gt;
|Ronglian&lt;br /&gt;
|Wei&lt;br /&gt;
|Panda Lian&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Conceptual levels of competence]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-		&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|Jesper &lt;br /&gt;
|Wolters&lt;br /&gt;
|Wolters&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Resource allocation and crashing]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-		&lt;br /&gt;
|3&lt;br /&gt;
|Oliwia&lt;br /&gt;
|Sonia&lt;br /&gt;
|Lubiarz&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Meeting Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group Number Pending&lt;br /&gt;
|Francisco&lt;br /&gt;
|Almirudis&lt;br /&gt;
|Frank Almirudis&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Scheduling: Critical path, PERT and Gantt]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group Number Pending&lt;br /&gt;
|Bartlomiej&lt;br /&gt;
|Maciej&lt;br /&gt;
|Tyczynski&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Outcome, output, benefit]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|16&lt;br /&gt;
|Brynja&lt;br /&gt;
|Benediktsdóttir&lt;br /&gt;
|Brynja Ben.&lt;br /&gt;
|[[The Periodic Table of Project Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|16&lt;br /&gt;
|Jonina Thora&lt;br /&gt;
|Einarsdottir&lt;br /&gt;
|Jonina Thora&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Project Management Success Factors]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group Number 5&lt;br /&gt;
|Pedro&lt;br /&gt;
|Lopes da Cunha&lt;br /&gt;
|PedroLopesCunha&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Project Management: Cost vs. Price]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group Number Pending&lt;br /&gt;
|Sarantis&lt;br /&gt;
|Pavlidis&lt;br /&gt;
|Sarantis&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Types of activities]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group Number Pending&lt;br /&gt;
|Rikke&lt;br /&gt;
|Andersen&lt;br /&gt;
|RikkeA&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Cognitive Bias]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|12&lt;br /&gt;
|Johan&lt;br /&gt;
|Hilsøe&lt;br /&gt;
|s154073&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Unidentified Risks]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group Number Pending&lt;br /&gt;
|Mads&lt;br /&gt;
|Kronholm&lt;br /&gt;
|Mads Kronholm&lt;br /&gt;
|[[DMAIC]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 11&lt;br /&gt;
|Anne&lt;br /&gt;
|Dittmann&lt;br /&gt;
|Anne&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Organisational Design and Structures]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|12&lt;br /&gt;
|Thea&lt;br /&gt;
|Pedersen&lt;br /&gt;
|Thea&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Agile One Page Project Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group Number Pending&lt;br /&gt;
|Madalina&lt;br /&gt;
|Grigoras&lt;br /&gt;
|s186465&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Value to whom?]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|Martin&lt;br /&gt;
|Eberholst Carlsen&lt;br /&gt;
|Martineberholstcarlsen&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Project Initiation Management in construction]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|6&lt;br /&gt;
|Rasmine&lt;br /&gt;
|Søgren&lt;br /&gt;
|s145320&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Outcome]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|6&lt;br /&gt;
|Julie &lt;br /&gt;
|Rostgaard Andersen&lt;br /&gt;
|s123790&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Use of Business Model Canvas to Kickstart the project management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|8&lt;br /&gt;
|Dilan&lt;br /&gt;
|Casablanca&lt;br /&gt;
|Dilan Casablanca&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Prefabricated houses (industrial process)]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|5&lt;br /&gt;
|Sandro &lt;br /&gt;
|Pina&lt;br /&gt;
|SandroPina&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Create a pitch]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|11&lt;br /&gt;
|Kristoffer&lt;br /&gt;
|Glahn&lt;br /&gt;
|s133378&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Vision statement]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group Number 8&lt;br /&gt;
|Maria Christina&lt;br /&gt;
|Prokou&lt;br /&gt;
|Mprokou&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Negotiation Skills]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|3&lt;br /&gt;
|Habib (Seyed)&lt;br /&gt;
|Bahrami&lt;br /&gt;
|Habib&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Project Uniqueness]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|12&lt;br /&gt;
|Amani&lt;br /&gt;
|Alabdullah&lt;br /&gt;
|s173307&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Integrated Project Delivery (IPD)]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|12&lt;br /&gt;
|Andreas&lt;br /&gt;
|Riposati&lt;br /&gt;
|Ripo&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Basic estimation techniques]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|10&lt;br /&gt;
|Mark&lt;br /&gt;
|Christiansen&lt;br /&gt;
|s152736&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Stephen Covey&#039;s seven principles]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|6&lt;br /&gt;
|Signe &lt;br /&gt;
|Bjerrum&lt;br /&gt;
|s141886&lt;br /&gt;
|[[The Triple Constraint in Project Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|9&lt;br /&gt;
|Sebastian&lt;br /&gt;
|Walther&lt;br /&gt;
|Sebastian&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Value Canvas in Projects]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|9&lt;br /&gt;
|Keegan&lt;br /&gt;
|van Kooten&lt;br /&gt;
|Keegan&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Planning Poker for Improved Project Delivery]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8&lt;br /&gt;
|Hagos Zeru&lt;br /&gt;
|Gide&lt;br /&gt;
|Trhas&lt;br /&gt;
|[[BIM as a project management tool on construction companies]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group Number Pending&lt;br /&gt;
|William&lt;br /&gt;
|Durant &lt;br /&gt;
|Mangum&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Crisis Management when there is a Project Cost Overrun]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-		&lt;br /&gt;
|9&lt;br /&gt;
|Shri Tejas &lt;br /&gt;
|Vedula&lt;br /&gt;
|Tehass 7&lt;br /&gt;
|[[The implementation of KPIs]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|9&lt;br /&gt;
|Casper&lt;br /&gt;
|Gandil Qvortrup&lt;br /&gt;
|CasperGandil&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Application of Balanced Scorecard in Portfolio Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-		&lt;br /&gt;
|12&lt;br /&gt;
|Veronika Zsuzsanna&lt;br /&gt;
|Bankó&lt;br /&gt;
|Veronikabanko&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Determining Measurement Methods in Earned Value Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group Number Pending&lt;br /&gt;
|Mercedes&lt;br /&gt;
|Hachmann&lt;br /&gt;
|Mercedes Hachmann&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Design Thinking]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 1&lt;br /&gt;
|Rasmus&lt;br /&gt;
|Bjerg&lt;br /&gt;
|Rasmusbjerg&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Cash flow and milestone payments]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|15&lt;br /&gt;
|Moritz&lt;br /&gt;
|Gutheil&lt;br /&gt;
|MoritzGutheil&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Dan Pink on Motivation]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 5&lt;br /&gt;
|Giorgia&lt;br /&gt;
|Scartozzi&lt;br /&gt;
|GiorgiaS&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Resource-Constrained Critical Path Method]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 3&lt;br /&gt;
|Hannah&lt;br /&gt;
|Kürschner&lt;br /&gt;
|Hannah&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Projects integrating Sustainable Methods]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 17&lt;br /&gt;
|Daniel&lt;br /&gt;
|Vorting&lt;br /&gt;
|s141018&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Product family master plan]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 10&lt;br /&gt;
|André&lt;br /&gt;
|Condamine&lt;br /&gt;
|S173349&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Belbin&#039;s Team Roles]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|7&lt;br /&gt;
|Kristine&lt;br /&gt;
|Kaulberg&lt;br /&gt;
|Kristbk&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Governance of Project Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group Number 17&lt;br /&gt;
|Sai Mahesh&lt;br /&gt;
|Nadukuru&lt;br /&gt;
|Sm nadukuru&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Process Planning and Cost Estimation]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|7&lt;br /&gt;
|Gustav&lt;br /&gt;
|Josephsen&lt;br /&gt;
|Gustav Josephsen&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Potentials of Key Performance Indicators]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|11&lt;br /&gt;
|Rikke Louise Kjær&lt;br /&gt;
|Knudsen&lt;br /&gt;
|RikkeK&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Milestones in Project Planning]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|Hedin&lt;br /&gt;
|Gunnarsstein Poulsen&lt;br /&gt;
|hedinp&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Resources]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|3&lt;br /&gt;
|Isabel&lt;br /&gt;
|Wang&lt;br /&gt;
|isabel.w&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Benefits Realization Management as a key driver of Project Management Effectiveness]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|12&lt;br /&gt;
|Frederik&lt;br /&gt;
|Sørensen&lt;br /&gt;
|FTSN&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Hersey and Blanchard&#039;s Situational Leadership]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|Simon&lt;br /&gt;
|Muurholm Hansen&lt;br /&gt;
|Muurholm&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Performance-based contracting]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|6&lt;br /&gt;
|Charles&lt;br /&gt;
|Hemmingsen&lt;br /&gt;
|s122801&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Programmification of work]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|17&lt;br /&gt;
|Alberto&lt;br /&gt;
|Tognon&lt;br /&gt;
|s172420&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Project Management in pharmaceutical industry]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|17&lt;br /&gt;
|Stefano&lt;br /&gt;
|Di Lenardo&lt;br /&gt;
|s190056&lt;br /&gt;
|[[A conceptual framework of sustainability in project management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|5&lt;br /&gt;
|Arndt &lt;br /&gt;
|Oschinsky&lt;br /&gt;
|AJO&lt;br /&gt;
|[[The Project Charter]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|16&lt;br /&gt;
|Dana Rut&lt;br /&gt;
|Gunnarsdóttir&lt;br /&gt;
|s180289&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Project Management Reporting]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|8&lt;br /&gt;
|Anna&lt;br /&gt;
|Shevchenko&lt;br /&gt;
|Anutka&lt;br /&gt;
|[[SAFe]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|Thomas&lt;br /&gt;
|Boel&lt;br /&gt;
|Morning&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Cost Control]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|6&lt;br /&gt;
|Ole&lt;br /&gt;
|Moe&lt;br /&gt;
|s186359&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Prince2]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|Nikolaj&lt;br /&gt;
|Petersen&lt;br /&gt;
|s173344&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Managing habits in a project]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|15&lt;br /&gt;
|Sofie&lt;br /&gt;
|Martinussen&lt;br /&gt;
|Sofie Martinussen&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Improve communication with active listening]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|Sophia&lt;br /&gt;
|Nielsen&lt;br /&gt;
|s114901&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Adaptive Project Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|10&lt;br /&gt;
|Costanza&lt;br /&gt;
|Sesti&lt;br /&gt;
|Costanza Sesti&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Systems Theory in Project Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|7&lt;br /&gt;
|Mathias&lt;br /&gt;
|Steuch&lt;br /&gt;
|Msteuch&lt;br /&gt;
|[[SMART goals - A Project Manager Tool]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|16&lt;br /&gt;
|Marie&lt;br /&gt;
|Bukkholm&lt;br /&gt;
|s182741&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Resource breakdown structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|16&lt;br /&gt;
|Karina&lt;br /&gt;
|Kindingstad&lt;br /&gt;
|Karina&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Benefits of systems engineering]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|16&lt;br /&gt;
|Robert&lt;br /&gt;
|Kjønås&lt;br /&gt;
|RobertK&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Human behaviors in scheduling]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|8&lt;br /&gt;
|Bashir &lt;br /&gt;
|Isse&lt;br /&gt;
|BJI&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Decision-making]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|15&lt;br /&gt;
|Andreas &lt;br /&gt;
|Tuxen&lt;br /&gt;
|S153408&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Requirements management using SysML]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|3&lt;br /&gt;
|Helene &lt;br /&gt;
|Gravdal&lt;br /&gt;
|S182610&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Key performance indicator (KPI)]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|17&lt;br /&gt;
|Rajat &lt;br /&gt;
|Kumar&lt;br /&gt;
|S181289&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Risk Log]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|9&lt;br /&gt;
|Osman Furkan&lt;br /&gt;
|Simsek&lt;br /&gt;
|S182730&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Maslow&#039;s Hierarchy of Needs and Project Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|Søren&lt;br /&gt;
|Bojesen&lt;br /&gt;
|s135284&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Evolutionary purpose as motivational driver in project and programme management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|15&lt;br /&gt;
|Mads Mohr&lt;br /&gt;
|Madsen&lt;br /&gt;
|s144416&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Application of Agile]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|22&lt;br /&gt;
|Helena Brandt&lt;br /&gt;
|Rejndrup&lt;br /&gt;
|S145492&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Leadership vs. management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|13&lt;br /&gt;
|Behzad&lt;br /&gt;
|Sanie&lt;br /&gt;
|S122919&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Four types of dependency]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|Kevin &lt;br /&gt;
|Lim&lt;br /&gt;
|s123368&lt;br /&gt;
|[[What is SWOT]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|Alexander &lt;br /&gt;
|Bagge&lt;br /&gt;
|s123908&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Risk identification methods]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S123368</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Articles_Spring_Term_2019&amp;diff=62105</id>
		<title>Articles Spring Term 2019</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Articles_Spring_Term_2019&amp;diff=62105"/>
		<updated>2019-02-19T10:32:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S123368: /* Overview of 2019 Wiki articles */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Overview of 2019 Wiki articles=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+Spring Term 2019 Wiki Articles&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|13&lt;br /&gt;
|Evgenia&lt;br /&gt;
|Chatzivasileiou&lt;br /&gt;
|s182299&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Project Sponsorship]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|13&lt;br /&gt;
|Theodoros&lt;br /&gt;
|Seremetakis&lt;br /&gt;
|s183272&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Investment portfolio management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|5&lt;br /&gt;
|Federica&lt;br /&gt;
|Menti&lt;br /&gt;
|S182994&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Getting Things Done (David Allen)]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|Panagiotis&lt;br /&gt;
|Vounatsos&lt;br /&gt;
|PanosVoun&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Epistemic vs. Aleatory uncertainty]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|9&lt;br /&gt;
|Jack&lt;br /&gt;
|Frain&lt;br /&gt;
|Fraino12345&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Stakeholder Management Processes in Projects]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|14&lt;br /&gt;
|Alexandros&lt;br /&gt;
|Bellos&lt;br /&gt;
|AlexBellos&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Effective Brainstorming]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group Number Pending&lt;br /&gt;
|Edoardo&lt;br /&gt;
|Braccini&lt;br /&gt;
|EdoBraa&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Benefits Realisation Management (BRM)]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group Number Pending&lt;br /&gt;
|Andrea&lt;br /&gt;
|Könnecke&lt;br /&gt;
|Andrea Könnecke&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Shannon &amp;amp; Weaver Model for Communication]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 10&lt;br /&gt;
|Srdjan&lt;br /&gt;
|Gluhovic&lt;br /&gt;
|srdjangluhovic&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Project Scope Control Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|11&lt;br /&gt;
|Casper&lt;br /&gt;
|Claudinger&lt;br /&gt;
|Casper&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Managing projects in a functional organization]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|8&lt;br /&gt;
|Ronglian&lt;br /&gt;
|Wei&lt;br /&gt;
|Panda Lian&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Conceptual levels of competence]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-		&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|Jesper &lt;br /&gt;
|Wolters&lt;br /&gt;
|Wolters&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Resource allocation and crashing]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-		&lt;br /&gt;
|3&lt;br /&gt;
|Oliwia&lt;br /&gt;
|Sonia&lt;br /&gt;
|Lubiarz&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Meeting Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group Number Pending&lt;br /&gt;
|Francisco&lt;br /&gt;
|Almirudis&lt;br /&gt;
|Frank Almirudis&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Scheduling: Critical path, PERT and Gantt]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group Number Pending&lt;br /&gt;
|Bartlomiej&lt;br /&gt;
|Maciej&lt;br /&gt;
|Tyczynski&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Outcome, output, benefit]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|16&lt;br /&gt;
|Brynja&lt;br /&gt;
|Benediktsdóttir&lt;br /&gt;
|Brynja Ben.&lt;br /&gt;
|[[The Periodic Table of Project Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|16&lt;br /&gt;
|Jonina Thora&lt;br /&gt;
|Einarsdottir&lt;br /&gt;
|Jonina Thora&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Project Management Success Factors]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group Number 5&lt;br /&gt;
|Pedro&lt;br /&gt;
|Lopes da Cunha&lt;br /&gt;
|PedroLopesCunha&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Project Management: Cost vs. Price]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group Number Pending&lt;br /&gt;
|Sarantis&lt;br /&gt;
|Pavlidis&lt;br /&gt;
|Sarantis&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Types of activities]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group Number Pending&lt;br /&gt;
|Rikke&lt;br /&gt;
|Andersen&lt;br /&gt;
|RikkeA&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Cognitive Bias]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|12&lt;br /&gt;
|Johan&lt;br /&gt;
|Hilsøe&lt;br /&gt;
|s154073&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Unidentified Risks]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group Number Pending&lt;br /&gt;
|Mads&lt;br /&gt;
|Kronholm&lt;br /&gt;
|Mads Kronholm&lt;br /&gt;
|[[DMAIC]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 11&lt;br /&gt;
|Anne&lt;br /&gt;
|Dittmann&lt;br /&gt;
|Anne&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Organisational Design and Structures]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|12&lt;br /&gt;
|Thea&lt;br /&gt;
|Pedersen&lt;br /&gt;
|Thea&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Agile One Page Project Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group Number Pending&lt;br /&gt;
|Madalina&lt;br /&gt;
|Grigoras&lt;br /&gt;
|s186465&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Value to whom?]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|Martin&lt;br /&gt;
|Eberholst Carlsen&lt;br /&gt;
|Martineberholstcarlsen&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Project Initiation Management in construction]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|6&lt;br /&gt;
|Rasmine&lt;br /&gt;
|Søgren&lt;br /&gt;
|s145320&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Outcome]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|6&lt;br /&gt;
|Julie &lt;br /&gt;
|Rostgaard Andersen&lt;br /&gt;
|s123790&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Use of Business Model Canvas to Kickstart the project management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|8&lt;br /&gt;
|Dilan&lt;br /&gt;
|Casablanca&lt;br /&gt;
|Dilan Casablanca&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Prefabricated houses (industrial process)]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|5&lt;br /&gt;
|Sandro &lt;br /&gt;
|Pina&lt;br /&gt;
|SandroPina&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Create a pitch]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|11&lt;br /&gt;
|Kristoffer&lt;br /&gt;
|Glahn&lt;br /&gt;
|s133378&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Vision statement]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group Number 8&lt;br /&gt;
|Maria Christina&lt;br /&gt;
|Prokou&lt;br /&gt;
|Mprokou&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Negotiation Skills]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|3&lt;br /&gt;
|Habib (Seyed)&lt;br /&gt;
|Bahrami&lt;br /&gt;
|Habib&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Project Uniqueness]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|12&lt;br /&gt;
|Amani&lt;br /&gt;
|Alabdullah&lt;br /&gt;
|s173307&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Integrated Project Delivery (IPD)]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|12&lt;br /&gt;
|Andreas&lt;br /&gt;
|Riposati&lt;br /&gt;
|Ripo&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Basic estimation techniques]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|10&lt;br /&gt;
|Mark&lt;br /&gt;
|Christiansen&lt;br /&gt;
|s152736&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Stephen Covey&#039;s seven principles]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|6&lt;br /&gt;
|Signe &lt;br /&gt;
|Bjerrum&lt;br /&gt;
|s141886&lt;br /&gt;
|[[The Triple Constraint in Project Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|9&lt;br /&gt;
|Sebastian&lt;br /&gt;
|Walther&lt;br /&gt;
|Sebastian&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Value Canvas in Projects]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|9&lt;br /&gt;
|Keegan&lt;br /&gt;
|van Kooten&lt;br /&gt;
|Keegan&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Planning Poker for Improved Project Delivery]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8&lt;br /&gt;
|Hagos Zeru&lt;br /&gt;
|Gide&lt;br /&gt;
|Trhas&lt;br /&gt;
|[[BIM as a project management tool on construction companies]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group Number Pending&lt;br /&gt;
|William&lt;br /&gt;
|Durant &lt;br /&gt;
|Mangum&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Crisis Management when there is a Project Cost Overrun]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-		&lt;br /&gt;
|9&lt;br /&gt;
|Shri Tejas &lt;br /&gt;
|Vedula&lt;br /&gt;
|Tehass 7&lt;br /&gt;
|[[The implementation of KPIs]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|9&lt;br /&gt;
|Casper&lt;br /&gt;
|Gandil Qvortrup&lt;br /&gt;
|CasperGandil&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Application of Balanced Scorecard in Portfolio Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-		&lt;br /&gt;
|12&lt;br /&gt;
|Veronika Zsuzsanna&lt;br /&gt;
|Bankó&lt;br /&gt;
|Veronikabanko&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Determining Measurement Methods in Earned Value Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group Number Pending&lt;br /&gt;
|Mercedes&lt;br /&gt;
|Hachmann&lt;br /&gt;
|Mercedes Hachmann&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Design Thinking]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 1&lt;br /&gt;
|Rasmus&lt;br /&gt;
|Bjerg&lt;br /&gt;
|Rasmusbjerg&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Cash flow and milestone payments]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|15&lt;br /&gt;
|Moritz&lt;br /&gt;
|Gutheil&lt;br /&gt;
|MoritzGutheil&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Dan Pink on Motivation]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 5&lt;br /&gt;
|Giorgia&lt;br /&gt;
|Scartozzi&lt;br /&gt;
|GiorgiaS&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Resource-Constrained Critical Path Method]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 3&lt;br /&gt;
|Hannah&lt;br /&gt;
|Kürschner&lt;br /&gt;
|Hannah&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Projects integrating Sustainable Methods]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 17&lt;br /&gt;
|Daniel&lt;br /&gt;
|Vorting&lt;br /&gt;
|s141018&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Product family master plan]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 10&lt;br /&gt;
|André&lt;br /&gt;
|Condamine&lt;br /&gt;
|S173349&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Belbin&#039;s Team Roles]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|7&lt;br /&gt;
|Kristine&lt;br /&gt;
|Kaulberg&lt;br /&gt;
|Kristbk&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Governance of Project Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group Number 17&lt;br /&gt;
|Sai Mahesh&lt;br /&gt;
|Nadukuru&lt;br /&gt;
|Sm nadukuru&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Process Planning and Cost Estimation]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|7&lt;br /&gt;
|Gustav&lt;br /&gt;
|Josephsen&lt;br /&gt;
|Gustav Josephsen&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Potentials of Key Performance Indicators]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|11&lt;br /&gt;
|Rikke Louise Kjær&lt;br /&gt;
|Knudsen&lt;br /&gt;
|RikkeK&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Milestones in Project Planning]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|Hedin&lt;br /&gt;
|Gunnarsstein Poulsen&lt;br /&gt;
|hedinp&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Resources]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|3&lt;br /&gt;
|Isabel&lt;br /&gt;
|Wang&lt;br /&gt;
|isabel.w&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Benefits Realization Management as a key driver of Project Management Effectiveness]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|12&lt;br /&gt;
|Frederik&lt;br /&gt;
|Sørensen&lt;br /&gt;
|FTSN&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Hersey and Blanchard&#039;s Situational Leadership]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|Simon&lt;br /&gt;
|Muurholm Hansen&lt;br /&gt;
|Muurholm&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Performance-based contracting]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|6&lt;br /&gt;
|Charles&lt;br /&gt;
|Hemmingsen&lt;br /&gt;
|s122801&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Programmification of work]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|17&lt;br /&gt;
|Alberto&lt;br /&gt;
|Tognon&lt;br /&gt;
|s172420&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Project Management in pharmaceutical industry]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|17&lt;br /&gt;
|Stefano&lt;br /&gt;
|Di Lenardo&lt;br /&gt;
|s190056&lt;br /&gt;
|[[A conceptual framework of sustainability in project management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|5&lt;br /&gt;
|Arndt &lt;br /&gt;
|Oschinsky&lt;br /&gt;
|AJO&lt;br /&gt;
|[[The Project Charter]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|16&lt;br /&gt;
|Dana Rut&lt;br /&gt;
|Gunnarsdóttir&lt;br /&gt;
|s180289&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Project Management Reporting]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|8&lt;br /&gt;
|Anna&lt;br /&gt;
|Shevchenko&lt;br /&gt;
|Anutka&lt;br /&gt;
|[[SAFe]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|Thomas&lt;br /&gt;
|Boel&lt;br /&gt;
|Morning&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Cost Control]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|6&lt;br /&gt;
|Ole&lt;br /&gt;
|Moe&lt;br /&gt;
|s186359&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Prince2]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|Nikolaj&lt;br /&gt;
|Petersen&lt;br /&gt;
|s173344&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Managing habits in a project]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|15&lt;br /&gt;
|Sofie&lt;br /&gt;
|Martinussen&lt;br /&gt;
|Sofie Martinussen&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Improve communication with active listening]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|Sophia&lt;br /&gt;
|Nielsen&lt;br /&gt;
|s114901&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Adaptive Project Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|10&lt;br /&gt;
|Costanza&lt;br /&gt;
|Sesti&lt;br /&gt;
|Costanza Sesti&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Systems Theory in Project Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|7&lt;br /&gt;
|Mathias&lt;br /&gt;
|Steuch&lt;br /&gt;
|Msteuch&lt;br /&gt;
|[[SMART goals - A Project Manager Tool]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|16&lt;br /&gt;
|Marie&lt;br /&gt;
|Bukkholm&lt;br /&gt;
|s182741&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Resource breakdown structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|16&lt;br /&gt;
|Karina&lt;br /&gt;
|Kindingstad&lt;br /&gt;
|Karina&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Benefits of systems engineering]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|16&lt;br /&gt;
|Robert&lt;br /&gt;
|Kjønås&lt;br /&gt;
|RobertK&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Human behaviors in scheduling]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|8&lt;br /&gt;
|Bashir &lt;br /&gt;
|Isse&lt;br /&gt;
|BJI&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Decision-making]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|15&lt;br /&gt;
|Andreas &lt;br /&gt;
|Tuxen&lt;br /&gt;
|S153408&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Requirements management using SysML]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|3&lt;br /&gt;
|Helene &lt;br /&gt;
|Gravdal&lt;br /&gt;
|S182610&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Key performance indicator (KPI)]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|17&lt;br /&gt;
|Rajat &lt;br /&gt;
|Kumar&lt;br /&gt;
|S181289&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Risk Log]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|9&lt;br /&gt;
|Osman Furkan&lt;br /&gt;
|Simsek&lt;br /&gt;
|S182730&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Maslow&#039;s Hierarchy of Needs and Project Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|Søren&lt;br /&gt;
|Bojesen&lt;br /&gt;
|s135284&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Evolutionary purpose as motivational driver in project and programme management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|15&lt;br /&gt;
|Mads Mohr&lt;br /&gt;
|Madsen&lt;br /&gt;
|s144416&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Application of Agile]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|22&lt;br /&gt;
|Helena Brandt&lt;br /&gt;
|Rejndrup&lt;br /&gt;
|S145492&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Leadership vs. management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|13&lt;br /&gt;
|Behzad&lt;br /&gt;
|Sanie&lt;br /&gt;
|S122919&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Four types of dependency]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|Kevin &lt;br /&gt;
|Lim&lt;br /&gt;
|s123368&lt;br /&gt;
|[[What is SWOT]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|Alexander &lt;br /&gt;
|Bagge&lt;br /&gt;
|s123908&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Risk identification methods]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S123368</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=61424</id>
		<title>What is SWOT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=61424"/>
		<updated>2019-02-17T14:53:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S123368: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article will be presenting the tool SWOT and the main points of SWOT will be covered alongside with an introduction on how to apply SWOT. Moreover, the strength and weaknesses of this tool will also be presented so it can be taken into consideration when using the tool. SWOT can be applied in many different areas whether it is business strategy or market research but is especially used within marketing. (1)&lt;br /&gt;
Much of the original groundwork for what is known as SWOT today, was already established more than 50 years ago. A man name Kurt Lewin, his landmark posthumous text, called; Field Theory in Social Science, emphasized that an organization’s desires are influenced by different driving forces or enhancers and limitations and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
Many companies when facing a problem whether it is external or internal, by using SWOT they can create a quick overview of what your obstacles you need to overcome and what chances there are to take.&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is four initials standing for four different elements, where the elements are used to identify different perspectives of consequences. They each stands for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats. The first two factors, Strengths and Weaknesses are factors for the internal, typically when you are inside a company, you will look within to see what kind of Strengths you have and what kind of Weaknesses you have. Then there are Opportunities and Threats, which are external factors, so you look from internal to external. Opportunities help to identify chances there are to grow, expand and even more potential of a blue ocean and Threats are what kind of competitors are there, restrains, regulations. &lt;br /&gt;
We will be talking more detailed about it in the sections further down.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A brief history of SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier it was mentioned that the original groundwork was laid by Lewin, but at around the same time there were two professors from Harvard, George Albert Smith Jr. and C. Roland Christensen, who were also interested in the related issue about identifying the extent of the correlation of the organization’s strategy and its competitive environment. Therefore, they instructed their students to address if a company took into account the requirements of a competitive environments. Around a decade later another professor from the same University wanted to see the already by then named SWOT, if it could be used to explore the ways in which competitive thinking influences business strategies. (2)&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction to SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is a strategic analytical tool, for assessing strengths and weaknesses of a business, and also analysing opportunities available to the business as well as threats faced by the business. SWOT can also be used for personal purposes or when managing a project. &lt;br /&gt;
As mentioned S.W.O.T each letter stands for something different, with each one of them having their very own purpose, where they together create a very strong foundation for an analysis, whatever the purpose is for. SWOT analysis is processed by a group of stakeholders, where they &lt;br /&gt;
1. Identify internal and external obstacles and enhancers of performance&lt;br /&gt;
2. Analyse those factors, which are basted on estimates of their contribution to the net value and how much they are controllable &lt;br /&gt;
3. To decide what further or future actions to take regarding those factors. &lt;br /&gt;
Let us look at what they stand for (1): &lt;br /&gt;
* S – Strengths – Refers to internal competencies, valuables resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* W - Weaknesses – Refers to internal inhibitors of the competencies, resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* O - Opportunities – Refers to external enhancer of performance, which can be pursued or used&lt;br /&gt;
* T - Threats – An external inhibitor of performance that has the potential to reduce accomplishments.&lt;br /&gt;
Now that we know what SWOT, stands for, but how do we go around about them? There are some questions to get you started (3). &lt;br /&gt;
Strengths: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we best at?&lt;br /&gt;
* What intellectual property do we own that can help us with this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What specific skills does the current workforce have that can contribute to this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What financial resources do we have for reaching this objective?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances do we have?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our bargaining power with both suppliers and intermediaries?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weaknesses: &lt;br /&gt;
* What are we worst at doing?&lt;br /&gt;
* Is our intellectual property outdated?&lt;br /&gt;
* What training does our workforce lack?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is our financial position?&lt;br /&gt;
* What connections and alliances should we have, but don’t?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Opportunity: &lt;br /&gt;
* What changes in the external environment can we exploit?&lt;br /&gt;
* What weaknesses in our competitors can we use to our advantage?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new technology might become available to us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new markets might be opening to us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Threats:&lt;br /&gt;
* What might our competitors be able to do to hurt us?&lt;br /&gt;
* What new legislation might damage our interests?&lt;br /&gt;
*What social changes might threaten us?&lt;br /&gt;
*How will the economic cycle affect us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Naturally, there are a lot more questions that can be asked, but these questions for each of the elements, are good starting points. These questions will help you get started on doing the SWOT. Remember, it is always a good idea to do SWOT in the early basis, because it gives you a detailed overview and gives you information, which you can use for your later processes in decision making and planning (3)&lt;br /&gt;
Visually the SWOT can be shown as this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The 4x4 Matrix – Kevin Lim has copyright on the design, but the contents are all taken from (1) p. 126&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
== How to conduct SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
There are no doubt a couple of ways to conduct SWOT, the one which is more of a practical method, a guide on how to fill in the SWOT (5), may be a good point to start. &lt;br /&gt;
1.	Determine the object: Which means to decide on a key project or a strategy, where you want to analyse. Write the name of it on the top of a page.&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Draw the layout: Draw a very large square box and then divide it into four smaller boxes&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Put name inside each of the boxes on the top: The top left box write; Strengths, the one beside write; Weaknesses. The box under Weaknesses, write Threats and the last one Opportunity, it should look like the figure earlier (Figure). If you wish a more detailed layout, you can add a smaller box that outlines Strengths and Weaknesses as “Internal” and Opportunities and Threats as “External”, and “Helpful” for Strengths and Opportunities, where Weaknesses and Threats will have a “Harmful” outline. &lt;br /&gt;
4.	Add the factors: Add the factors that affects the project in the different boxes.&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Draw conclusions: Decide if the project is a go or a no-go based on the negative and positive relative. Maybe you are already on a project, but want to see how the situation is, then you need to decide what to do about the information you got out of SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the Myriad guideline (1), there exist a way to conduct SWOT, in a bit of a different manner. &lt;br /&gt;
1.	Recruiting stakeholders: This phase’s idea is simply to try to include your stakeholders. According to the book; Exploring Corporate Strategy by Gerry Johnson, Kevan Scholes and Richard Whittington, you can map your stakeholders according to their interest in a project. If you google “Power-interest matrix”, you can see how you should approach your stakeholders in relative to “Interest” and “Power”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Convening the focus group: This step is to call in the stakeholders, most optimal from 8-48, and explain to them what the SWOT is, and how this little workshop is going to work. The first step is to divide the stakeholders into smaller group, where the idea is to get a well-rounded SWOT, where the stakeholders also can agree on the factors. Of course, the preparations are supposed to be made beforehand, such as already made SWOT figures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Identifying and categorizing SWOTs: Now when the stakeholders are in the groups, they should start to work on the SWOT.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Analyzing SWOTs: (6) In “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2, by Ryan Watkin and Doug Leigh (p.129), there is a figure showing, on how they are analysing the SWOT factors within a Construction Company. Similar should be done. Hereafter, two additional questions should be asked: &lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor internally or externally controlled?&lt;br /&gt;
* To what degree is each factor an enhancer or an inhibitor of performance? &lt;br /&gt;
Where after you put the factors for Strengths, Weaknesses, Threats according to in “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2, by Ryan Watkin and Doug Leigh (p.131), to rank with numbers from 1-5 how much it is under your control and for enhancers and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
5.	Synthesizing SWOTs: After the previous step, now the data can be collected, and the data can be shown visually, there is an example in the “Handbook of Improving performance in the Workplace” Volume 2, by Ryan Watkin and Doug Leigh (p.134, 135).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.	Interpreting findings and deliberating action: Now it is the time to decide upon, which and how to act upon the findings. There are a few actions to take according to what the factors are. Monitor: The factors which are neither enhancer nor inhibitors. Mitigate Threats and Exploit Opportunities: Actions are to be taken, if it is seen that there are threats that will hinder the project, likewise with opportunities, it is supposed to be exploited if it will add value. Lastly, Confront Weaknesses and Leverage Strengths: Because these factors are internal, it is easier to control them, therefore strengths should be leveraged to help achieve desired results and weaknesses should be confronted. &lt;br /&gt;
As you can see the latter option is more wholesome and no doubt more detailed, depending your situation on using SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
Remember these guidelines are only one of the many guidelines.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When to use SWOT&lt;br /&gt;
Here are just a few to show when it is applicable to use SWOT, and these mentioned components are also included in something called Human Performance Technology (HPT), which can deepen your understanding on SWOT, but it is not necessary (4).&lt;br /&gt;
1.	In performance analysis &lt;br /&gt;
When identifying the degree to what internal practices and external environmental influences impact how results are currently being accomplished within an organization &lt;br /&gt;
2.	In cause analysis&lt;br /&gt;
When finding what practices should be continued or even expanded in the longer terms, as well as those that should be discontinued or replaced by other methods or tools. &lt;br /&gt;
3.	In strategic planning&lt;br /&gt;
When in strategic planning and needs assessment for identifying the factors that contribute to or detract from organizational effectiveness &lt;br /&gt;
4.	In evaluation&lt;br /&gt;
When monitoring the internal and external environment of a program for change over time, for tracking new SWOTs as they emerge, and for documenting for previously existing SWOTs as they become less influential on a program&lt;br /&gt;
Besides these quite general categories within HPT practice, SWOT can also be a great to use within (1): &lt;br /&gt;
* Appreciative inquiry –To clarify the organization’s strengths and opportunities &lt;br /&gt;
* Benchmarking – To identify possible opportunities and threats&lt;br /&gt;
* Industry analysis – For contextualizing opportunities existing in the market&lt;br /&gt;
* Situation analysis – For evaluating possible trends or ongoing trends in the markets, costs and competition and competitors&lt;br /&gt;
* Scenario planning – For considering possible and preferred long-term scenarios&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, these are the mentioned area where SWOT can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Critical success factors =&lt;br /&gt;
There is always some critical success factor, when using a tool and SWOT is not excluded (1). Here are a couple of points to be aware of if you want a good SWOT: &lt;br /&gt;
1.	Information shared by stakeholders within a SWOT analysis should never be used to play the blame game, but it should be a basis for continuous improvement&lt;br /&gt;
2.	When conducting the weaknesses, never blame the others for faults or shortcoming, because being honest is essential&lt;br /&gt;
3.	SWOT’s data can be collected live depending on the resources and constraints that exists&lt;br /&gt;
4.	It may be useful to weight the experienced stakeholders’ evaluation of the SWOT’s&lt;br /&gt;
These are some points that may be good to keep in the back of the head, when going through SWOT. &lt;br /&gt;
== Relevance in project management =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Limitations and critiques of SWOT=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not doubt that SWOT is a very strong tool when carried out right, it can provide valuable knowledge about both customer preferences and competitors intents, and nevertheless where the possible opportunities to grow are. There are also some critiques of SWOT, such as: &lt;br /&gt;
* There are no prioritization of the identified factors and it seems like it was hard to meaningfully compare the importance of one SWOT to another&lt;br /&gt;
* No figuring of costs and benefits or how to use them to achieve their objectives&lt;br /&gt;
* Sometimes it can be hazy on what is external and internal &lt;br /&gt;
And, some limitations about SWOT:&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not help determine the costs and benefits of alternative performance solutions&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not rank the factors according to their criticality&lt;br /&gt;
* It provides minimal information regarding the degree to which an organization or work team possess influence over the factors that have been identified. &lt;br /&gt;
Despite all these, it is possibly to enhance SWOT to its further usability by considering 2 factors&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Approximations of the degree which an organization can control over each factor &lt;br /&gt;
2.	Estimate the costs and benefits of the factors. &lt;br /&gt;
And turn them into questions for better decision, by asking: &lt;br /&gt;
* How much control does the organization have over each SWOT factor?&lt;br /&gt;
* How much does each SWOT factor cost or benefit the organization? &lt;br /&gt;
By using the above two questions in SWOT, it will further enhance SWOTs usability&lt;br /&gt;
(1)(2)&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article has served its purpose, to introduce you to the tool SWOT, where we have gone through the main points of SWOT, but have only scratched the surface. If you want to research more about SWOT, you should be more than welcome to do so, but this article has given you a good starting point. SWOT is an amazing tool to use in various areas or projects, does not matter if you want to use it for personal or professional purpose. Although, SWOT is a very widely used tool, it does have its own flaws and limitations, but it is a tool which has been used numerous times all over again worldwide, in all kinds of industries and professionals. Therefore, if you can master the tool and make up for its mentioned shortcomings with the questions that will cover its limitations to a maximum, it will be an incredible tool which is very valuable for your project or business. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Source:&lt;br /&gt;
1. https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&lt;br /&gt;
4. https://www.projectsmart.co.uk/swot-analysis-in-project-management.php&lt;br /&gt;
2. file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/HANDBOOK%20OF%20HPT_THIRD%20EDITION.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
(2) Handbook of Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. https://www.professionalacademy.com/blogs-and-advice/marketing-theories---swot-analysis&lt;br /&gt;
(5) https://www.smartdraw.com/swot-analysis/&lt;br /&gt;
(6) https://books.google.dk/books?id=p7JY6UJuxc4C&amp;amp;pg=PA129&amp;amp;lpg=PA129&amp;amp;dq=Exhibit+5.1+SWOT+Factors+Identified+Within+a+Construction+Company&amp;amp;source=bl&amp;amp;ots=aJph0o52Du&amp;amp;sig=ACfU3U2JjxiFa1VbQuGNZd81pFHCGmZ0ww&amp;amp;hl=da&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;ved=2ahUKEwj8qv7e5cLgAhUOJlAKHZ3aAp4Q6AEwAHoECCQQAQ#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=Exhibit%205.1%20SWOT%20Factors%20Identified%20Within%20a%20Construction%20Company&amp;amp;f=false&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S123368</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=61309</id>
		<title>What is SWOT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=What_is_SWOT&amp;diff=61309"/>
		<updated>2019-02-16T17:50:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S123368: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article will be presenting the tool SWOT and the main points of SWOT will be covered alongside with an introduction on how to apply SWOT. Moreover, the strength and weaknesses of this tool will also be presented so it can be taken into consideration when using the tool. SWOT can be applied in many different areas whether it is business strategy or market research but is especially used within marketing. (1)&lt;br /&gt;
Much of the original groundwork for what is known as SWOT today, was already established more than 50 years ago. A man name Kurt Lewin, his landmark posthumous text, called; Field Theory in Social Science, emphasized that an organization’s desires are influenced by different driving forces or enhancers and limitations and inhibitors. &lt;br /&gt;
Many companies when facing a problem whether it is external or internal, by using SWOT they can create a quick overview of what your obstacles you need to overcome and what chances there are to take.&lt;br /&gt;
SWOT is four initials standing for four different elements, where the elements are used to identify different perspectives of consequences. They each stands for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats. The first two factors, Strengths and Weaknesses are factors for the internal, typically when you are inside a company, you will look within to see what kind of Strengths you have and what kind of Weaknesses you have. Then there are Opportunities and Threats, which are external factors, so you look from internal to external. Opportunities help to identify chances there are to grow, expand and even more potential of a blue ocean and Threats are what kind of competitors are there, restrains, regulations. &lt;br /&gt;
We will be talking more detailed about it in the sections further down.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A brief history of SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier it was mentioned that the original groundwork was laid by Lewin, but at around the same time there were two professors from Harvard, George Albert Smith Jr. and C. Roland Christensen, who were also interested in the related issue about identifying the extent of the correlation of the organization’s strategy and its competitive environment. Therefore, they instructed their students to address if a company took into account the requirements of a competitive environments. Around a decade later another professor from the same University wanted to see the already by then named SWOT, if it could be used to explore the ways in which competitive thinking influences business strategies. (2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Theory of SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction to SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
As mentioned S.W.O.T each letter stands for something different, with each one of them having their very own purpose, where they together create a very strong foundation for an analysis, whatever the purpose is for. SWOT analysis is processed by a group of stakeholders, where they &lt;br /&gt;
1. Identify internal and external obstacles and enhancers of performance&lt;br /&gt;
2. Analyse those factors, which are basted on estimates of their contribution to the net value and how much they are controllable &lt;br /&gt;
3. To decide what further or future actions to take regarding those factors. &lt;br /&gt;
Let us look at what they stand for (1): &lt;br /&gt;
* S – Strengths – Refers to internal competencies, valuables resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* W - Weaknesses – Refers to internal inhibitors of the competencies, resources or attributes&lt;br /&gt;
* O - Opportunities – Refers to external enhancer of performance, which can be pursued or used&lt;br /&gt;
* T - Threats – An external inhibitor of performance that has the potential to reduce accomplishments.&lt;br /&gt;
Now that we know what SWOT, stands for, but how do we go around about them? There are some questions to get you started. &lt;br /&gt;
Strengths: &lt;br /&gt;
* Does the company have the necessary skills in-house?&lt;br /&gt;
* Has a budget been assigned to the project?&lt;br /&gt;
* What are the benefits of completing the project?&lt;br /&gt;
* Will the project require new technology or equipment?&lt;br /&gt;
* How experienced is the project team on similar projects?&lt;br /&gt;
Weaknesses:&lt;br /&gt;
* Is there a reliable estimate of costs available? &lt;br /&gt;
* Does the company have the budget to provide contingency funding?&lt;br /&gt;
* What are the drawbacks of the project? &lt;br /&gt;
* Will parts of the project need to be outsourced?&lt;br /&gt;
* Is the proposed schedule realistic?&lt;br /&gt;
Opportunity:&lt;br /&gt;
* Can a local project be leveraged nationally or internationally?&lt;br /&gt;
* Do the competitors have any weaknesses?&lt;br /&gt;
* What are the latest industry trends?&lt;br /&gt;
* Are there any new, or imminent, technology developments?&lt;br /&gt;
Threats:&lt;br /&gt;
* Is there well-established competition already in the marketplace?&lt;br /&gt;
* Are experienced staff difficult to replace?&lt;br /&gt;
* Has new technology been fully tested?&lt;br /&gt;
* Could national or global economic conditions affect the project?&lt;br /&gt;
Naturally, there are a lot more questions that can be asked, but these questions for each of the elements, are good starting points. These questions will help you get started on doing the SWOT. Remember, it is always a good idea to do SWOT in the early basis, because it gives you a detailed overview and gives you information, which you can use for your later processes in decision making and planning (3)&lt;br /&gt;
Visually the SWOT can be shown like this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The 4x4 Matrix – Kevin Lim has copyright on the design, but the contents are all taken from (1) p. 126&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
== How to use SWOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
PMMMM&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When to use SWOT&lt;br /&gt;
Here are just a few to show when it is applicable to use SWOT, and these mentioned components are also included in something called Human Performance Technology (HPT), which can deepen your understanding on SWOT, but it is not necessary (4).&lt;br /&gt;
1.	In performance analysis &lt;br /&gt;
When identifying the degree to what internal practices and external environmental influences impact how results are currently being accomplished within an organization &lt;br /&gt;
2.	In cause analysis&lt;br /&gt;
When finding what practices should be continued or even expanded in the longer terms, as well as those that should be discontinued or replaced by other methods or tools. &lt;br /&gt;
3.	In strategic planning&lt;br /&gt;
When in strategic planning and needs assessment for identifying the factors that contribute to or detract from organizational effectiveness &lt;br /&gt;
4.	In evaluation&lt;br /&gt;
When monitoring the internal an external environment of a program for change over time, for tracking new SWOTs as they emerge, and for documenting for previously existing SWOTs as they become less influential on a program&lt;br /&gt;
Besides these quite general categories within HPT practice, SWOT can also be a great to use within (1): &lt;br /&gt;
* Appreciative inquiry –To clarify the organization’s strengths and opportunities &lt;br /&gt;
* Benchmarking – To identify possible opportunities and threats&lt;br /&gt;
* Industry analysis – For contextualizing opportunities existing in the market&lt;br /&gt;
* Situation analysis – For evaluating possible trends or ongoing trends in the markets, costs and competition and competitors&lt;br /&gt;
* Scenario planning – For considering possible and preferred long-term scenarios&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Relevance in project management =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Limitations and critiques of SWOT=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not doubt that SWOT is a very strong tool when carried out right, it can provide valuable knowledge about both customer preferences and competitors intents, and nevertheless where the possible opportunities to grow are. There are also some critiques of SWOT, such as: &lt;br /&gt;
* There are no prioritization of the identified factors and it seems like it was hard to meaningfully compare the importance of one SWOT to another&lt;br /&gt;
* No figuring of costs and benefits or how to use them to achieve their objectives&lt;br /&gt;
* Sometimes it can be hazy on what is external and internal &lt;br /&gt;
And, some limitations about SWOT:&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not help determine the costs and benefits of alternative performance solutions&lt;br /&gt;
* It does not rank the factors according to their criticality&lt;br /&gt;
* It provides minimal information regarding the degree to which an organization or work team possess influence over the factors that have been identified. &lt;br /&gt;
Despite all these, it is possibly to enhance SWOT to its further usability by considering 2 factors&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Approximations of the degree which an organization can control over each factor &lt;br /&gt;
2.	Estimate the costs and benefits of the factors. &lt;br /&gt;
And turn them into questions for better decision, by asking: &lt;br /&gt;
* How much control does the organization have over each SWOT factor?&lt;br /&gt;
* How much does each SWOT factor cost or benefit the organization? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(1)(2)&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Source:&lt;br /&gt;
1. https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470592663.ch24&lt;br /&gt;
3. https://www.projectsmart.co.uk/swot-analysis-in-project-management.php&lt;br /&gt;
2. file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/HANDBOOK%20OF%20HPT_THIRD%20EDITION.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
(2) Handbook of Human Performance Technology Third Edition Principles, Practices, and Potential, James A. Pershing Editor Foreword by Harold D. Stolovitch and Erica J. Keeps&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S123368</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>